Il Douché and His Discontents: The 2016 Primary Voting Thread, Part 4

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

keeping on keeping on...

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 29 February 2016 20:44 (eight years ago) link

glad there's a new thread, that one was wayyyyyyy too long and hard to load

creepy to get that close to the Donald / Der Fuhrer

it must look so crazy when there's no stylng gel to hold the wings back and in place- like if it was combed straight down Cousin It style it would look so fucked

anyway does anybody know if his bogus bullshit about the trade deficit has actually convinced people that Mexico has some weird jackpot of cash that can be earmarked for a US infrastructure project? do his supporters actually believe that?

the tune was space, Monday, 29 February 2016 20:49 (eight years ago) link

God, can you imagine what Trump looks like getting out of the shower? There's no aspect of that mental image that isn't vom-inducing.

Lisa Welchel's Madcap Macrame Adventure for Windows 2000 (Old Lunch), Monday, 29 February 2016 20:52 (eight years ago) link

That close and you didn't whip out the Nair?

jedi slimane (suzy), Monday, 29 February 2016 21:04 (eight years ago) link

Some food for thought here:

http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2016/02/given-that-trump-is-winning-which-views-should-we-update.html

I wonder how much blame social media should accept for the rise of Trump. Does he really have a strong social media presence? I see very little favorable about him, but that may be a result of self-selection.

o. nate, Monday, 29 February 2016 21:17 (eight years ago) link

Thanks. This thread #4 also leaves behind the unfortunate NSFW thread title of #3 that still showed up in bookmarks and My Recent Posts.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 29 February 2016 21:21 (eight years ago) link

I guess Trump has his Twitter feed, which allows him to get his insults and provocations out without any media framing or filter. But most of what I see about Trump on FB, blogs, etc. is negative. Again, could be self-selection though.

o. nate, Monday, 29 February 2016 21:23 (eight years ago) link

...though every time the old thread loaded we got a yuge NYPost Trump-as-Clown pic.

Now we're going to get to see a yuge picture of albino orangutan ass? Uh, thanks, I guess.

carry me a laser down the road that i must travel (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 29 February 2016 21:28 (eight years ago) link

how the fuck is someone going to 'blame social media' what does that even mean

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Monday, 29 February 2016 21:29 (eight years ago) link

unfortunate NSFW thread title of #3

thread lasted a whole month! Are we seriously gonna have a new thread every month

Οὖτις, Monday, 29 February 2016 21:31 (eight years ago) link

I was referring to Cowen's post I linked to above, xp:

Since most of us have been surprised by the rise of Trump, presumably other, broader views must be updated too. But which ones? I see a few options, which are not for the most part mutually exclusive:

1. Social media are more powerful than we had thought, and more powerful in politics in particular.

2. Republican voters are less conservative, less “Tea Party,” and less libertarian than many people had thought. And the “periphery Republicans” are stronger and more numerous and more easily excited than we had thought.

3. Republican primary voters are more racist than we had thought.

4. Backlash against immigration and immigrants sets in more quickly, when middle class wages are stagnant, than we had thought. And true cosmopolitans are hard to find.

5. The value of commanding and dominating media attention, in a year with no clear front-runner Republican candidate, is higher than we had thought.

6. Trump is more skillful at trolling and pulling levers of public opinion than we had thought.

7. Democracy is less stable than we had thought.

8. New Yorkers are more nationally marketable than we had thought.

Perhaps all of these are true, and yet Trump’s leading role still remains a fundamental surprise. Which other hypotheses am I missing? In any case, it is time for some updating

o. nate, Monday, 29 February 2016 21:33 (eight years ago) link

i guess it means the potential for a candidate (like trump) to bypass traditional media outlets and create his own news, using twitter in his case. he farts out a tweet, then the cable networks and online news cover his tweets and the reactions to them until it's a more traditional news story, then they invite him on to talk about the news he just created. meanwhile other candidates are just trying to get anyone to pay attention to them. not sure he could have been making his own news so easily back in 2000 or whatever.

Karl Malone, Monday, 29 February 2016 21:33 (eight years ago) link

oh, sorry, that was all very obvious and i think i completely missed the point, whoops

Karl Malone, Monday, 29 February 2016 21:33 (eight years ago) link

Are we seriously gonna have a new thread every month
hopefully

ol salt (alomar lines), Monday, 29 February 2016 21:36 (eight years ago) link

the potential for a candidate (like trump) to bypass traditional media outlets and create his own news

Yabbut how many "candidates like trump" are out there? If every election cycle is going to be dominated by a massively famous rich person who gets free media by being outrageous, might we run out of those people at some point? Or will it just be Kanye/Kim, Chelsea/Timberlake, and Bristol/Willow from now on?

Or will things slide back to a model in which professional politicians buy ads again?

carry me a laser down the road that i must travel (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 29 February 2016 21:46 (eight years ago) link

I think that depends on how badly Trump gets beaten this go-round.

Retro novelty punk (Dan Peterson), Monday, 29 February 2016 21:50 (eight years ago) link

Yabbut how many "candidates like trump" are out there?

beats me. i'd guess there might be more than you think. if i were a politically-minded rich celebrity followed by millions of people, i would strongly consider making a run for some sort of office. you'd have access to a readymade publicity machine that pretty much no one else does.

Karl Malone, Monday, 29 February 2016 21:53 (eight years ago) link

like imagine what would happen if beyonce ran for governor or something

i can almost hear the eyerolls through the internet for anyone who read it, but i don't think it's outlandish

Karl Malone, Monday, 29 February 2016 21:54 (eight years ago) link

I suspect there many innovative ways to manipulate American media

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Monday, 29 February 2016 21:54 (eight years ago) link

I remember lamenting, circa 2008, that I was no longer in advertising, because it seemed like a sweet industry to be in when people were willing to spend like half a billion dollars to not quite elect Mitterson Romney IV.

Soon the streets of the capital will be littered with panhandling ex-consultants. Their suits will grown increasingly threadbare as they hold cardboard signs reading "Will rebrand for money." Sad, really.

carry me a laser down the road that i must travel (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 29 February 2016 21:56 (eight years ago) link

Nah, those people are still ok. And besides, the Ben Carson campaign is a nice opportunity to make money on the side this election cycle

Karl Malone, Monday, 29 February 2016 21:57 (eight years ago) link

GOP accusations of Trump's fascism from are p interesting. There's a lot of them at the moment: https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2016/02/29/the-gop-will-splinter/

Οὖτις, Monday, 29 February 2016 21:57 (eight years ago) link

Yabbut how many "candidates like trump" are out there?

linda mcmahon didn't fare too well, but maybe she'd have done better in a different state than connecticut

mookieproof, Monday, 29 February 2016 21:57 (eight years ago) link

Jennifer Rubin is an imbecile though.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 29 February 2016 21:59 (eight years ago) link

so is George Will!

Οὖτις, Monday, 29 February 2016 21:59 (eight years ago) link

usually they reserve their accusations of fascism for leftists, this is just an interesting inversion of their usual rhetorical habits

Οὖτις, Monday, 29 February 2016 22:00 (eight years ago) link

I think the Trump and Bernie campaigns also suggest that a truly straight-talking politician with a some actual crossover charisma (and un-repellent views) would be tough to beat.

schwantz, Monday, 29 February 2016 22:00 (eight years ago) link

If every election cycle is going to be dominated by a massively famous rich person who gets free media by being outrageous

also, i think trump is only one version of how it could work. he's good at being an outrageous blowhard, but i know like dozens of outrageous blowhards, and none of them are currently capturing a presidential nomination by a major political party. it's the addition of his wealth and fame and his ability to manipulate the media that makes it happen for him. but imagine wealth/fame/media manipulation + charisma and occasionally saying something that is intelligent. it could be unstoppable. there's gotta be at least ONE other wealthy famous media manipulator that is also smart.

Karl Malone, Monday, 29 February 2016 22:01 (eight years ago) link

like, I *expect* uber-leftists to call the GOP frontrunner a fascist (almost regardless of who it is, but even moreso now that it's Drumpf), it's highly unusual to see the right agree.

xp

Οὖτις, Monday, 29 February 2016 22:01 (eight years ago) link

at least ONE other wealthy famous media manipulator that is also smart.

lol smart ppl generally don't become wealthy famous media manipulators

Οὖτις, Monday, 29 February 2016 22:02 (eight years ago) link

alright, i actually only know a handful of outrageous blowhards. dozens was an exaggeration. i'm on a coffee buzz, i'm bending the truth, and i'm sorry

Karl Malone, Monday, 29 February 2016 22:03 (eight years ago) link

Clooney/Affleck '20

carry me a laser down the road that i must travel (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 29 February 2016 22:05 (eight years ago) link

there's gotta be at least ONE other wealthy famous media manipulator that is also smart.

I can think of one, but he's already President.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Monday, 29 February 2016 22:08 (eight years ago) link

like imagine what would happen if beyonce ran for governor or something

i can almost hear the eyerolls through the internet for anyone who read it, but i don't think it's outlandish

― Karl Malone, Monday, February 29, 2016 4:54 PM (17 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lol Michael Rapino as shadow government

crüt, Monday, 29 February 2016 22:13 (eight years ago) link

Copied from the previous thread:

That said, it's still kind of LOLWUT that there's a bunch of people out there saying "Stick it to the snobbish Eastern one-percenter elites by voting for the billionaire Manhattanite who went to Wharton!"

― carry me a laser down the road that i must travel (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, February 29, 2016

The irony is there, but Trump doesn't fit the "snobbish Eastern one-percenter elite" profile. He's vulgar. He's gaudy (in a nouveau riche way). He turns debates into Jerry Springer episodes. Also, his gestures are stereotypically "ethnic." He talks with his hands. He makes the type of over-the-top affectionate declarations we're accustomed to hear in mobster movies or showbiz-speech ("I love you all", "you're beautiful"). He's "New York", but what people (including Ted Cruz) miss is that New York doesn't only exist in the American imagination as the least-American place in America. "New York" simultaneously exists in the culture as the most American place in America: the place where the ordinary guy with a borough-bred accent, a hustler's mentality, and a loud personality can make it big time. If Clinton was the first black president, Trump would be our first Jewish president (if by "Jewish" we mean all those traits goy culture traditionally ascribes to the big-city Jew). He's no Romney, that's for sure.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 29 February 2016 22:17 (eight years ago) link

If Clinton was the first black president, Trump would be our first Jewish president (if by "Jewish" we mean all those traits goy culture traditionally ascribes to the big-city Jew).

slow yr roll there pardner

Οὖτις, Monday, 29 February 2016 22:18 (eight years ago) link

I think the perception of Trump being a super confident alpha male in a field of nervous beta males helps him considerably.

nomar, Monday, 29 February 2016 22:21 (eight years ago) link

haha I knew someone would say that xp

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 29 February 2016 22:22 (eight years ago) link

people have such weird opinions about New York

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Monday, 29 February 2016 22:23 (eight years ago) link

Seinfeld

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 29 February 2016 22:25 (eight years ago) link

If Clinton was the first black president, Trump would be our first Jewish president (if by "Jewish" we mean all those traits goy culture traditionally ascribes to the big-city Jew).

slow yr roll there pardner

― Οὖτις, Monday, February 29, 2016 5:18 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

no way this is so otm. "yuge"

flappy bird, Monday, 29 February 2016 22:26 (eight years ago) link

no Jew would draw that much attention to themselves.

petulant dick master (silby), Monday, 29 February 2016 22:27 (eight years ago) link

tone it down a bit, Jesus

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Monday, 29 February 2016 22:29 (eight years ago) link

Jesucristo had other people hyping him up tbh

petulant dick master (silby), Monday, 29 February 2016 22:30 (eight years ago) link

Jesusbros

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Monday, 29 February 2016 22:31 (eight years ago) link

Trump tweeted a pic of himself as grand marshal of the Salute to Israel parade (from a dozen or so years ago) last week

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 29 February 2016 22:31 (eight years ago) link

Jesus also loved the poorly educated!

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 29 February 2016 22:33 (eight years ago) link

Great run of posts itt hi 5 all

Soon all logins will look like this (darraghmac), Monday, 29 February 2016 22:34 (eight years ago) link

Promised to get poor underclass into his father's housing if they followed him

Soon all logins will look like this (darraghmac), Monday, 29 February 2016 22:35 (eight years ago) link

One more prophetic Jew:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/0d/LifeStinks.jpg

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 29 February 2016 22:40 (eight years ago) link

no way this is so otm.

this election's gonna be ugly enough w/out posters using questionable racial yardsticks to measure the "actual" ethnicity of candidates/past presidents

Οὖτις, Monday, 29 February 2016 22:40 (eight years ago) link

fwiw I've yet to see any Jew claim Trump as "one of ours" the way Toni Morrison did with Bubba

Οὖτις, Monday, 29 February 2016 22:41 (eight years ago) link

toni morrison wasn't "claiming" clinton as black btw

k3vin k., Monday, 29 February 2016 22:50 (eight years ago) link

like imagine what would happen if beyonce ran for governor or something

i’m imagining beyonce running for, like, country comptroller

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 29 February 2016 22:55 (eight years ago) link

er, *county

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 29 February 2016 22:55 (eight years ago) link

was gonna say! That Morrison quote has been contorted into fascinating shapes.

xxpost

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 29 February 2016 22:55 (eight years ago) link

Drumpf has like zero jewish appeal / identification imo

ulysses, Monday, 29 February 2016 22:57 (eight years ago) link

What is he anyway, a German?

Thomas of Britain (Tom D.), Monday, 29 February 2016 22:59 (eight years ago) link

half Scottish, half German I believe

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 29 February 2016 23:00 (eight years ago) link

A while ago I saw someone say that "when Sanders speaks, bagels fall out of his mouth."

xanadude (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 29 February 2016 23:01 (eight years ago) link

all asshole iirc

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 29 February 2016 23:01 (eight years ago) link

Trump later acknowledged his German ancestry and served as grand marshal of the 1999 German-American Steuben Parade in New York City.

^ one for nakh's thread

Thomas of Britain (Tom D.), Monday, 29 February 2016 23:02 (eight years ago) link

toni morrison wasn't "claiming" clinton as black btw

I know, but she was making an equivalency based on unfair treatment + stereotype. No one's treating Trump unfairly because he projects "NY Jew". He does not project "NY Jew" imo.

Οὖτις, Monday, 29 February 2016 23:04 (eight years ago) link

was gonna say! That Morrison quote has been contorted into fascinating shapes.

xxpost

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, February 29, 2016 5:55 PM (8 minutes ago)

so few people understand what she was saying that i sometimes wonder if it partially explains the clinton's popularity with the black electorate

k3vin k., Monday, 29 February 2016 23:04 (eight years ago) link

my pt stands that Clinton:Blackness::Trump:Jewishness is not correct

Οὖτις, Monday, 29 February 2016 23:13 (eight years ago) link

In Salon, Virginia Vitzthum suggested Clinton was also the first woman president:

http://www.salon.com/1998/10/08/newsb_24/

There was a teenage-girlishness to his love-play — the hours on the phone, memorizing her phone number, wearing her ties on special days. He played hard to get; he wouldn’t go all the way. And every time he needed to turn ruthless, he nurtured instead, comforting and flattering Monica instead of sending her packing.... In his affair, Clinton played the old girl game of Technical Virginity — staying good by doing “everything but.”

xanadude (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 29 February 2016 23:17 (eight years ago) link

Weird comment at the Trump rally going on: "Someone just said 'Keep the wall going, keep the wall going'--believe me, we're going to keep the wall going.'"

He spoke in the present tense--has construction already started?

clemenza, Monday, 29 February 2016 23:25 (eight years ago) link

Love this Yogi-ism, too (talking about the media): "20% of them good, 80% of them are bad, 40% of them are disgusting." If the disgusting ones are a subset of the bad ones, I guess that works.

clemenza, Monday, 29 February 2016 23:27 (eight years ago) link

Clinton first commie president according to a stupid article, somewhere

Soon all logins will look like this (darraghmac), Monday, 29 February 2016 23:57 (eight years ago) link

More than his debate debacle, more than his earnest Jimmy Olsen-like pleading, Rubio's embarrassing himself right now. One of his handlers just explained that they have no choice, they have to draw a sharp contrast with Trump. So Rubio goes out now and becomes Donald Trump.

clemenza, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 00:28 (eight years ago) link

Big surprise: the ex-Arizona governor who had the tarmac skirmish with Obama a few years ago endorses Trump.

clemenza, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 00:47 (eight years ago) link

Scott Desjarlais, MD - pro life Christian conservative U.S. Rep for TN, who's had multiple affairs, including at least one with a patient whom he pressured to have an abortion, is endorsing Trump.

rmde bob (will), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 00:57 (eight years ago) link

Trump has the old angry desert white vote locked up

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 01:03 (eight years ago) link

there were questions about this last week

http://www.npr.org/2016/02/29/468253626/a-history-of-super-tuesday

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 01:11 (eight years ago) link

the "Drumpf" meme is so fucking stupid, the family name was changed in the 17th century

crüt, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 03:36 (eight years ago) link

“Hope and change, not so much,” said David Plouffe, who managed Mr. Obama’s 2008 campaign, referring to the slogan that defined that race. “More like hate and castrate.”

wtf

Mordy, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 03:41 (eight years ago) link

xp yeah, i was expecting something so much more devastating based on the reactions today all over the internet. Whole thing was so so stupid. John Oliver remains insufferable.

flappy bird, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 03:51 (eight years ago) link

Not surprised to see Jan Brewer endorse Trump, the AZ Republican Party is basically the harbinger of the national party. Clean election laws here in AZ disempowered the GOP establishment as gatekeepers, and as a result, all manner of noxious crazies run my state's government. Meanwhile liberals in central Phoenix, Tempe, and Tucson pray that demographic changes eventually politically transform the state into Colorado or New Mexico.

intheblanks, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 03:55 (eight years ago) link

I guess Cruz is being written off at this point, but I just saw this video and I have to say there is something impressive about it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oi5IZ9StVUI&ebc=ANyPxKpXKNnxcbJdckV-z6-uH6cg4MVLYW9IQzCZaXtP5iCip3_63vZjP0VuxuHRSCubidgl-vD2B3c321nqFSXIwf10gzZw1g

I had kind of only known him as (1) hyperconservative ideologue and (2) creepy guy, but damn he knows his shit, and you have to think if he has a range of subjects he can speak about with this depth he could win over a lot of GOP voters.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 04:03 (eight years ago) link

and yet

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 04:04 (eight years ago) link

total snake, I know

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 04:05 (eight years ago) link

I mean I guess it manages to explain why he's done as well as he has in spite of basically being disgusting

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 04:05 (eight years ago) link

Cruz: "I'd be happy to answer your question if you would stop yelling."

The man wasn't yelling. He was being emphatic, but the level of his voice was exactly as loud as Cruz's voice. This was just a way to put the guy at a disadvantage and disconcert him.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 04:21 (eight years ago) link

Cruz being this super-smart idiot who everyone hates is definitely the only fun part of the GOP campaign. I mean, this guy was a national debate champion, but when he told his Princeton teammates he planned to run for president of the debate society, they held a secret "anyone-but-Cruz" meeting. That's basically Cruz in a nutshell

intheblanks, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 04:26 (eight years ago) link

cruz was condescending af in that exchange, i mean he knows his policy he's just a huge dick even when trying to play nice guy

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 04:33 (eight years ago) link

nahh fuck cruz but he was nothing if not extremely patient and gracious there

k3vin k., Tuesday, 1 March 2016 04:39 (eight years ago) link

I think there was a subtle way that it came off like he was following a manual on how to win people over instead of being genuine, but he followed the manual very well.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 04:41 (eight years ago) link

This "earpiece" excuse for the kkk coyness is such weak bullshit. One of the most disturbing things about this race is the normality of brazen, shameless lies

Treeship, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 05:20 (eight years ago) link

One of my favourite things this whole cycle was Sanders' Sunday-morning reaction to South Carolina: "We got decimated, George, we got decimated." No creative math or anything.

clemenza, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 05:58 (eight years ago) link

Bernie's a real human being. Pulling for him tomorrow.

Treeship, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 06:24 (eight years ago) link

Watching that video I'm trying to recall a GOP nominee as policy wonkish as Cruz. Pat Buchanan? Here's one place Trump clearly benefited from such a pileup of candidates, running major interference. Cruz never had a chance to flex his knowledge. It's hard to imagine that in a protracted debate among just two or three candidates he wouldn't have scored more points for his smarts, dickface notwithstanding.

Hadrian VIII, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 13:15 (eight years ago) link

Cruz was really patient there, but he also very patiently redirecting that farmer to talk to someone else. HIs weakness as a candidate isn't related to his wonk-nerd knowledge but more from his extreme culture war views, which have no basis in fact or logic, which in turn undercuts his knowledge. He's a fundamentalist prig, and no one likes them.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 14:31 (eight years ago) link

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/84/Ned_Flanders.png
"Let me tell you, there is no one who respects farmers more than I do, neighbor."

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 14:32 (eight years ago) link

Get ready for this line to come up:

Huckabee also dismissed Trump's comments in a Monday morning interview on MSNBC's "Morning Joe." When asked about Trump refusing to distance himself from Duke on Sunday, Huckabee balked and instead brought up the late Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV).

"Look, I know it's an incredible overwhelming fascination — I've been watching this morning. But, look, let me ask you this, do you think Hillary Clinton is going to have to answer for her relationship with Sen. Robert Byrd who was an actual member of the KKK?" Huckabee asked.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 14:37 (eight years ago) link

one line is all it takes

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 14:42 (eight years ago) link

The Robert Byrd analogy came up on CNN last night, brought up by one of Trump's higher-ups (as Alfred suggests, sounds like a coordinated response). I know everyone here hates David Gergen, but the way he called the woman on that--his visible disgust--was pretty compelling.

clemenza, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 14:49 (eight years ago) link

I saw the clip this morning. I'd never known Gergen was capable of contempt.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 14:51 (eight years ago) link

It must be interesting to go through life without being able to make meaningful distinctions between anything. This seems to be a common quality among Trump defenders.

Treeship, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 15:02 (eight years ago) link

"What about Robert Byrd?" has been the favorite tu quoque comeback from the GOP re: racism for at least a decade now.

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 15:07 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, that and "southern democrats formed the KKK."

Retro novelty punk (Dan Peterson), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 15:16 (eight years ago) link

"party of lincoln"

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 15:20 (eight years ago) link

lbj on the phone a week after dallas btw: "look, yer either the party of lincoln or you ain't!"

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 15:20 (eight years ago) link

lol @ people itt last nite calling out cruz for tone policing

flopson, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 15:30 (eight years ago) link

i love the KKK = Dems claim and the inference that NOTHING has happened in the intervening 150 years that might suggest a ideological evolution/ migration. yeah jackohole everyone in the KKK voted for Obama in '08 and '12

rmde bob (will), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 15:37 (eight years ago) link

not so long of a timeline, maybe, when many of these people are still stuck on the founding fathers

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 15:41 (eight years ago) link

and i used to think it was just profoundly stupid/ ignorant people on the internet who stood by this, but it looks like it's becoming a sanctioned talking point for the right.

rmde bob (will), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 15:41 (eight years ago) link

another PA politician coming out for Trump was questioned about his refusal to denounce David Duke:

"Trump’s daughter, who converted to Judaism in 2009,” M@rin0 began. “I don’t think Trump has any feeling and concerns about the KKK, other than he doesn’t like them. He renounces them and given the fact that he supported his daughter in that move shows that.”

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 15:43 (eight years ago) link

some of my best friends are

ulysses, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 15:44 (eight years ago) link

Retaliatory deep dipping for tenuous ties between Clinton and anyone with a racist past is just fucking sad. Don't pretend that this is in any way equivalent to Trump's "KK-what now? David who?" bullshit. I knew who David Duke was and what he was about when I was ten and pretty much only interested in Garfield and the WWF.

Lisa Welchel's Madcap Macrame Adventure for Windows 2000 (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 15:45 (eight years ago) link

Black students ejected from Trump rally in Ga

Brad C., Tuesday, 1 March 2016 15:52 (eight years ago) link

the drumpf thing has an element of the mythic to it- you assert power over a thing by calling it by its True Name. see also, of course, "schicklgruber".

diana krallice (rushomancy), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:05 (eight years ago) link

xpost Huh, this might be the first time I've seen Farrakhan in the news for years. Has he totally sat out the Black Lives Matter stuff?

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:12 (eight years ago) link

too busy secretly running Obama admin

Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:14 (eight years ago) link

The notion that Trump and Sanders are pulling different ends of the same troubled American heartstring is not new, but over the disparate strains of Muse tunes and “Mustang Sally” at the Cox Convention Center in downtown Oklahoma City on Sunday, Paul and Sherelle Bowermann were living proof of this theory. They, along with over 4,000 other Oklahomans, had come to hear Sanders speak at an event that included Native American dancing and the obligatory rendition of “This Land Is Your Land” (Woody Guthrie was from Oklahoma, after all). The Bowermanns were supporting the Vermont senator, but “believe it or not, our second choice is Trump,” said Sherelle, 73. In a general election, given the choice between the Manhattan businessman and Clinton, they would vote for Trump. Paul, 68, who characterized his political outlook as “eclectic,” liked that Sanders seemed “more compassionate to people who are down and out” and that Trump seemed to be “protesting the powers that be, the billionaires that run the country.”

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/if-you-want-to-understand-whats-roiling-the-2016-election-go-to-oklahoma/

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:19 (eight years ago) link

Trump is like that SNL skit where the Broadway hypnotist hypnotizes all of his audiences into saying his show was much better than "Cats."

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:23 (eight years ago) link

He renounces them and given the fact that he supported his daughter in that move shows that.”

ban use of "that"

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:23 (eight years ago) link

OMG, I forgot all about people Trumping their cats!
http://theawesomedaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/donald-trump-funny-look-alike-201__700.jpg

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:24 (eight years ago) link

The stupidity of Peter Beinart.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:26 (eight years ago) link

To fight Mr. Trump’s ability to sway the news cycle, Mr. Clinton would not hold back on the stump, and President Obama has told allies he would gleefully portray Mr. Trump as incapable of handling the duties of the Oval Office.

looking forward to both of these tbh

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:28 (eight years ago) link

they are so going to bungle this

Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:30 (eight years ago) link

who is "they"?

WilliamC, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:31 (eight years ago) link

"they" is "we"

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:32 (eight years ago) link

we have met the enemy and they is we

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:33 (eight years ago) link

where'd he find a tangerine slice big enough to fit his head?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:35 (eight years ago) link

Holy fucking shit at the footage of the reporter being slammed.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:37 (eight years ago) link

dipshit meathead cop in recognizes no boundaries shocka

k3vin k., Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:39 (eight years ago) link

To fight Mr. Trump’s ability to sway the news cycle, Mr. Clinton would not hold back on the stump, and President Obama has told allies he would gleefully portray Mr. Trump as incapable of handling the duties of the Oval Office.

looking forward to both of these tbh

― Οὖτις, Tuesday, March 1, 2016 11:28 AM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

they are so going to bungle this

― Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Tuesday, March 1, 2016 11:30 AM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

who is "they"?

― WilliamC, Tuesday, March 1, 2016 11:31 AM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

hmm

Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:40 (eight years ago) link

Although, yes, much of the television news media upon which it's focused is inarguable garbage, Trump's ire towards the media in general is a huge red flag that cannot be waved enough. Look forward to many more chokeslams and worse under President Trump's reign.

Don't Forget To Reince Your Priebus (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:42 (eight years ago) link

I guess I shouldn't be surprised, but I was still pretty shocked that it was a secret service officer, not a Trump goon, who was doing the chokeslamming. Especially since the reporter who was nowhere near the candidate.

intheblanks, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:50 (eight years ago) link

Democrats are masters at fucking things up at the moment of victory.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:51 (eight years ago) link

it's almost as if they do it on purpose...

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:51 (eight years ago) link

eh, republicans say the same thing about their own, pretty sure both parties look upon their apparatus as ineffectual losers at all times regardless of the circumstances

intheblanks, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:52 (eight years ago) link

i know this is petty but does bernie sanders referring to himself in the third person annoy anyone else?

BURLINGTON, Vt. — Senator Bernie Sanders began “Super Tuesday” by casting a ballot at his polling station in Vermont around 7:30 a.m., saying he is “feeling great” about his prospects.

Mr. Sanders, dressed in a black winter jacket and accompanied by his wife, Jane, came to the Robert Miller Community and Recreation Center, checked in with the station’s staff members, then voted for himself.

“After a lot of deliberation I know that Bernie Sanders here in Vermont got at least one vote,” Mr. Sanders joked. “I was working on my wife. So I probably got two. So we are feeling pretty good.”

Mordy, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:52 (eight years ago) link

no...

k3vin k., Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:53 (eight years ago) link

nope

sciatica, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:53 (eight years ago) link

ugh, he does it all the time and it drives me crazy

Mordy, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:56 (eight years ago) link

It doesn't annoy Tarfumes.

Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:56 (eight years ago) link

yeah I don't see evidence there that he's crossed over to Jimmy-on-Seinfeld territory.

evol j, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:56 (eight years ago) link

i think you get a pass if you're running for president and you refer to yourself in the third person as long as you don't do it in one-on-one interviews.

ulysses, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:58 (eight years ago) link

Bob Dole doesn't like it

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:59 (eight years ago) link

Really feel like the only way to knock Trump out at this point is convince his voters he's secretly black

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 16:59 (eight years ago) link

I don't know if I can make it through this John Oliver thing

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:12 (eight years ago) link

"There's nobody that's done so much for equality as I have," Trump said, before bringing up his club. "You take a look at Palm Beach, Florida. I built the Mar-a-Lago Club, totally open to everybody. A club that, frankly, set a new standard in clubs and a new standard in Palm Beach and I've gotten great credit for it."

Treeship, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:15 (eight years ago) link

a billy club?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:16 (eight years ago) link

"There's nobody that's done so much for equality as I have," Trump said, before bringing up his club. "I'm gonna build a wall so high, Mexico will pay for it." He nodded. "It'll be so high, so equal, and you're gonna love it!"

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:18 (eight years ago) link

Lol that following discrimination laws = being an equality pioneer

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:18 (eight years ago) link

This feels like one of those early 00s Fox reality shows at this point

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:19 (eight years ago) link

I guess I shouldn't be surprised, but I was still pretty shocked that it was a secret service officer, not a Trump goon, who was doing the chokeslamming. Especially since the reporter who was nowhere near the candidate.

Is there any confirmation that it was USSS?

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:19 (eight years ago) link

it's not funny anymore. we are in kafka territory.

Treeship, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:20 (eight years ago) link

Good can't wait til he turns into a bug

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:22 (eight years ago) link

based on my voting experience this morning i can tell you that people who live on streets starting in N-Z are turning out in record numbers, A-M not so much

ciderpress, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:22 (eight years ago) link

Is there any confirmation that it was USSS?

http://time.com/4241899/donald-trump-rally-time-photographer-chris-morris/?xid=time_socialflow_twitter

intheblanks, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:31 (eight years ago) link

Clearly the GOTV operations should be focusing on that critical "streets that are earlier in the alphabet" demographic in ciderpress's area.

(In Va. they used to have lines divided that way but for last names; because there are so many more names beginning N-Z it was always a longer line. There was always some crank grumbling about how they should divide it at a different point, like S. Nowadays, the whole list is on a tablet so you can stand in any line you wish.)

xanadude (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:36 (eight years ago) link

is drumpf a wildly uncommon and weird german name? the end joke is 'haha a foreign sounding name' from a british guy on a premium cable network

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:37 (eight years ago) link

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/03/01/how-breitbart-unleashes-hate-mobs-to-threaten-dox-and-troll-trump-critics.html

funny when the legbreakers start to worry. ("funny")

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/704710156463030273

The anonymous online Trump army is racist, anti-semitic, vile, and despicable. The actual Trump supporters I've met are nothing like that.

like, are you suuuure, sean?

goole, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:39 (eight years ago) link

it's not funny anymore. we are in kafka territory.

carve his crimes into his flesh

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:42 (eight years ago) link

is drumpf a wildly uncommon and weird german name? the end joke is 'haha a foreign sounding name' from a british guy on a premium cable network

― rap is dad (it's a boy!), Tuesday, March 1, 2016 12:37 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

it's sorta that but it's also trying to undermine the power of his name, which is sort of an iconic brand in itself signalling wealth and success. also it literally means winning -- the "trump card" -- and these kinds of word associations might be influential to stupid people

Treeship, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:44 (eight years ago) link

I can't see any Drumpfs in Das Telefonbuch, but plenty of Trumpfs.

mutually aquatinted (doo dah), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:46 (eight years ago) link

fighting xenophobia with...xenophobia

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:47 (eight years ago) link

i think he was trying to make a connection to his family changing his name (hundreds of years ago?) to trump's criticism of jon stewart for changing his name, which he mentioned earlier in the segment

it wasn't one of his better segments, although it was relatively find until the drumpf part at the end. i guess at this point he feels the need to end every single episode with some sort of stupid loud thing that takes up the whole stage and causes confetti to fly down with a hashtag displayed at the bottom of the screen.

i just spent a few minutes trying to do a parody of oliver's thing where he constantly makes metaphors, but just thinking about it left me feeling ill and a bit exhausted

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:48 (eight years ago) link

the end joke is 'haha a foreign sounding name'

this is not the joke btw

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:50 (eight years ago) link

the joke is to subvert his brand

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:50 (eight years ago) link

Hey it was better than the shitty Donald Dump garbage pail kid card going around in January I'll give it that

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:51 (eight years ago) link

anonymous online

ciderpress, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:51 (eight years ago) link

Drumpf definitely a step up from the name it was before it was Drumpf, Zapf Dingbat.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:51 (eight years ago) link

In the UK, 'trump' is what small children and old people say when they mean 'fart'. Best friend's old English dad used yell WHO TRUMPED?!? whenever The Donald came on '80s TV, much to the amusement of teenage me and best friend.

jedi slimane (suzy), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:54 (eight years ago) link

I think the idea is just to annoy/provoke/ridicule him. I guess the thinking is that for someone who talks so tough, he's got a really thin skin and he can't take ridicule.

Perhaps there's also the hope that it will attract his notice and he'll lash out in some suitably trumpian fashion, which will bring equal parts publicity and lolz.

xanadude (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:57 (eight years ago) link

If someone could let me know a light hearted Trump joke I could use for my bridge class it would be appreciated, thanks. Bear in mind some of them might be Trump supporters.

badg, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:58 (eight years ago) link

"I hear if he gets to the White House he's gonna have it bronzed. It'll be classy, you won't believe how classy."

xanadude (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 17:59 (eight years ago) link

How about "In the UK, 'trump' is what small children and old people say when they mean 'fart'."

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:01 (eight years ago) link

and that's okay.

how's life, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:01 (eight years ago) link

"Ever wonder what it would look like if a geriatric shaved his pubes while standing over a half-melted dreamcicle?"

Don't Forget To Reince Your Priebus (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:03 (eight years ago) link

i had not

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:08 (eight years ago) link

trump's hair from the side really does look like a piece of salmon sushi hastily placed atop rice. the beady eyes are a couple of stray sesame seeds. you'll probably find a trump double sitting on a plate, rotating around the conveyer belt at a Kaiten-zushi place.

nomar, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:14 (eight years ago) link

Trumplings

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:15 (eight years ago) link

Thank for that horrifying piece of classical conditioning

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:16 (eight years ago) link

it's sorta that but it's also trying to undermine the power of his name, which is sort of an iconic brand in itself signalling wealth and success. also it literally means winning -- the "trump card" -- and these kinds of word associations might be influential to stupid people

i think he was trying to make a connection to his family changing his name (hundreds of years ago?) to trump's criticism of jon stewart for changing his name, which he mentioned earlier in the segment

I think the idea is just to annoy/provoke/ridicule him. I guess the thinking is that for someone who talks so tough, he's got a really thin skin and he can't take ridicule.

further, in the segment in question, he suggests the onomatopoetic images suggested by trump vs drumpf with the latter not coming across so well.
but more crucially (and this is in line with last week tonight's MO since jump), it's easily memeable
i think it's a good look

ulysses, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:18 (eight years ago) link

also please note that stewart did not change his name and trump went on (wrongly) to deny he had ever said he had

ulysses, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:18 (eight years ago) link

Anyone mocking Trump's hair clearly doesn't remember the fundamentals of Bernoulli's principle. To quote Trump himself, "In a world full of people, only some want to fly, isn't that crazy?"

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:19 (eight years ago) link

Little Donald Needs to Fly

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:21 (eight years ago) link

the john oliver thing will be so irrelevant. it exists in an echo chamber for people who already hate trump and want to feel better/smarter than other people

flappy bird, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:25 (eight years ago) link

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:26 (eight years ago) link

lol sorry everybody i didn't mean to do that

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

I feel like carefully studying any extant videos of Trump's parents could yield abundant psych warfare ammo in the general. Replicating a dressing down from his mom for telling lies might be just the thing to poke an unpatchable hole in that thin skin.

Don't Forget To Reince Your Priebus (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

she was a saint

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:28 (eight years ago) link

yeah i think some of those segments oliver and stewart and whoever else has done them exist merely so people can smugshare them on facebook

nomar, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:29 (eight years ago) link

xxxxxp so otm. I can't stand John Oliver.

p.s. a lot of European family names have changed since the 17th century, when less than 50% of people could sign their own names

crüt, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:29 (eight years ago) link

also please note that stewart did not change his name and trump went on (wrongly) to deny he had ever said he had

― ulysses, Tuesday, March 1, 2016 1:18 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

what do you mean by did not change his name?

flopson, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:30 (eight years ago) link

giving john oliver a platform is a greater embarrassment to the united states and than nominating trump

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:37 (eight years ago) link

let's keep things in perspective here

I agree Oliver's yelling into an echo chamber but eh it doesn't bother me much

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:38 (eight years ago) link

less embarrassing than Piers Morgan probably

nomar, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:39 (eight years ago) link

no john oliver is definitely worse for american discourse than trump

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:39 (eight years ago) link

aw i like John Oliver

flopson, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:41 (eight years ago) link

no john oliver is definitely worse for american discourse than trump

I can't tell if you're being serious - for one thing way more people know who Trump is/listen to Trump; just setting aside who's more obnoxious Trump is unquestionably the bigger, more impactful figure.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:44 (eight years ago) link

geez i haven't seen his show but i had no idea there was a backlash

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:45 (eight years ago) link

he's definitely being serious

iatee, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:45 (eight years ago) link

I think it's a Brit thing, Morbs. We wouldn't understand.

Don't Forget To Reince Your Priebus (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:46 (eight years ago) link

my tennessean father, who has recently discovered email, just sent me the following:

We're rooting for the Donald today. He's promising to do what the Iraq War catastrophe, the '08 financial crisis, and $4 a gallon gasoline couldn't do: send the muthafuckin' Republican party up in flames. The way things are setting, today could be a major landmark for progressivism.Who'd a thunk Drumpf could accomplished all that? What a guy. And talk about "mysterious ways!"

ulysses, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:47 (eight years ago) link

There were a couple of funny lines in that Oliver thing, but twenty fucking minutes?

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:47 (eight years ago) link

lol dads

k3vin k., Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:47 (eight years ago) link

btw we need cruz to win texas tonight so that he stays in the race

k3vin k., Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:48 (eight years ago) link

I think that's pretty likely

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:49 (eight years ago) link

https://twitter.com/anamariecox/status/704729755547865089

Trump just said he’s “never heard” the insult that he has small hands. The guy lies about the WEIRDEST things.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:51 (eight years ago) link

xp yeah he's ahead by 7 or 8 points in the RCP average

flappy bird, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:52 (eight years ago) link

xpost

That’s the first John Oliver I’ve seen but it looks like more of the same old (John Stewart) shit. I guess these people can claim that they are comedians, but their really a bunch of irresponsible newscasters just like the rest of them IMO

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:54 (eight years ago) link

i think i read something debunking the dong size/hand size thing

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:56 (eight years ago) link

i misposted this:

this is pretty good

http://www.vox.com/2016/3/1/11135756/donald-trump-nationalism

― goole, Tuesday, March 1, 2016 12:52 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

ymmv with yglesias explainer mode but the first two paras are like duuuuh of course

the anti-trump right trying to pin this all on obama or liberalism generally has been hilarious. so acrobatic, these guys

― goole, Tuesday, March 1, 2016 12:53 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

goole, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:57 (eight years ago) link

Yeah but did anyone do a dong/hand check on the author, seems suspicious

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:57 (eight years ago) link

i didn't even get that and had never heard dick size = hand size. Feet yes, hands no.
i just thought it was funny he was uptight about having pudgy hands.

ulysses, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:58 (eight years ago) link

i thought it was short fingers not small hands

micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:59 (eight years ago) link

SHORT FINGERED VULGARIAN

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 18:59 (eight years ago) link

i enjoy gawker's various descriptions of trump, i'd poll them except they're too numerous to track down

nomar, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:01 (eight years ago) link

That’s the first John Oliver I’ve seen but it looks like more of the same old (John Stewart) shit.

John Oliver has one schtick that he uses over and over again. Every bit has the exact same rhythm and uses the same "it's like (non-sequitur cultural reference)!" joke construction

micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:01 (eight years ago) link

if cruz wins tx and rubio loses fl will rubio drop out?

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:02 (eight years ago) link

oh for pete's sake

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:03 (eight years ago) link

John Oliver has one schtick that he uses over and over again. Every bit has the exact same rhythm and uses the same "it's like (non-sequitur cultural reference)!" joke construction

also stuff like "Go to bed Anthony! No one likes you and you've been crabby for 3 hours, you are ruining this evening Anthony! Go to bed!"

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:04 (eight years ago) link

if cruz wins tx and rubio loses fl will rubio drop out?

seems like a possibility, but who knows.

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:05 (eight years ago) link

FL isn't voting today

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:06 (eight years ago) link

i know

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:07 (eight years ago) link

I can't see Rubio staying in if he loses FL (which is looking likely). I look forward to his humiliation though. Hopefully it will end his career.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:09 (eight years ago) link

gonna go out on a limb and say that trying to insinuate that donald has a small dick isn't really going to work. dude has slept with a lot of hot chicks

k3vin k., Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:09 (eight years ago) link

idea: we take away florida's right to vote and replace them with Afred as a mega-super-delegate

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:09 (eight years ago) link

yeah i hope rubio gets completely jindalled

nomar, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:10 (eight years ago) link

Trump 2016: It's Not the Size of the Boat, It's the Motion of the Ocean...but Seriously Have you Seen this boat? Fantastic! It's great, the People Love this Boat! What can you say? It's beautiful...beautiful

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:11 (eight years ago) link

Read a report that Koch Brothers/other big donors have drafted a plan to stop Trump - $75 million to Rubio, $75 million to enormous campaign against Trump. Under the condition that Rubio wins FL. If he loses, they'll get behind................Mitt Romney.

flappy bird, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:11 (eight years ago) link

sure, seems like a good plan

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:13 (eight years ago) link

lmao

nomar, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:13 (eight years ago) link

and only 3 months late

anonanon, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:13 (eight years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/CSn9z85.jpg

big day for cruz!

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:14 (eight years ago) link

the john oliver thing will be so irrelevant. it exists in an echo chamber for people who already hate trump and want to feel better/smarter than other people

Like Savage's thing with Santorum?

I think Cruz and Rubio will both get just enough victory (at least in delegate terms) to stay in for a while. Both have been running around for week saying the sky is falling and Trump must be stopped By Any Means Necessary - they would look pretty foolish if tomorrow morning they were all like, "So, yeah, about that? Never mind. I'm done."

Plus Rubio at least has been putting out there the idea that his pledged delegates will give him convention leverage, even if he doesn't win any states outright. Not that it will work. (As I said earlier you can't combine the votes from two almosts and two nevers and beat one big Fuck Yeah. Clear will of the voters and whatnot.)

Rubio will stay in for the next two weeks at least, even if he's down to one staffer and he's forced to drink tap water instead of bottled. Then he can go off and be a lobbyist or lawyer or something. Cruz, I dunno. He's so loathesome I don't even want to spend mental energy on psychoanalyzing him.

word to your mother-in-law (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:15 (eight years ago) link

If he loses, they'll get behind................Mitt Romney.

god I hope this is true

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:18 (eight years ago) link

Big M.I.T.T.

micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:20 (eight years ago) link

i'm neutral on john oliver, but the civil forfeiture thing he did was legitimately good broadcasting, bringing to light to a serious issue that was otherwise basically ignored.

intheblanks, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:20 (eight years ago) link

Mitt Romney ‏@MittRomney Jan 29
RELEASE: My remarks from last night: “Happy birthday to you; happy birthday to you; happy birthday @SpeakerRyan…"
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CZ6-g1NWkAAOZVM.jpg

nomar, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:20 (eight years ago) link

Carson is seeing this through to the bitter end, right? Like, he'll hopefully still be standing awkwardly on the side of the debate stage months after the nomination is already sealed up. That's all I ask for.

Don't Forget To Reince Your Priebus (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:22 (eight years ago) link

i'm neutral on john oliver, but the civil forfeiture thing he did was legitimately good broadcasting, bringing to light to a serious issue that was otherwise basically ignored.

― intheblanks, Tuesday, March 1, 2016 1:20 PM (22 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah i think he's the best when doing things like this or the big thing regarding how lower income people often end up in jail for long periods of time for minor offenses like unpaid parking tickets, i mean get he can be a bit samey but he often does do things that the regular news media won't highligh

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:22 (eight years ago) link

http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/01/politics/paul-ryan-donald-trump-kkk/index.html

Here we have Paul Ryan playing Two Truths and a Lie:

"If a person wants to be the nominee of the Republican Party, there can be no evasion and no games. They must reject any group or cause that is built on bigotry. This party does not prey on people's prejudices," Ryan told reporters on Capitol Hill.

its subtle brume (DJP), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:23 (eight years ago) link

(I'm not sure he's clear on the rules, though)

its subtle brume (DJP), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:24 (eight years ago) link

more like 3 lies

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:25 (eight years ago) link

John Oliver has one schtick that he uses over and over again. Every bit has the exact same rhythm and uses the same "it's like (non-sequitur cultural reference)!" joke construction

― micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, March 1, 2016 2:01 PM (24 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I know what you mean. Every time I sit down to watch him I think, well, he's generally appealing; maybe this'll be a good show. But it's like biting into a chocolate-covered cherry, but instead of a cherry, there's a live bee! That's not a cherry! That's a bee! How'd that bee get in there? This isn't pleasant at all! This is very, very painful!

Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:29 (eight years ago) link

https://timethemoment.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/time_paulryan_20111205_04021.jpg

"If a person wants to be the nominee of the Republican Party, there can be no evasion and no games. They must reject any group or cause that is built on bigotry. This party does not prey on people's prejudices.

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:30 (eight years ago) link

haha

micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:32 (eight years ago) link

lol Tarfumes I see what you did there

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:34 (eight years ago) link

The Oliver 'Drumpf' piece seemed to be working on a couple of levels, one being the obvious-to-us* idea that being anti-immigrant in the US is a foolishly ahistorical idea, and another seemed to be (though I don't watch his show regularly at all) that the go big at the end is a parody of Trump and intentionally jarring with the "let's just sit and research these claims" air of the earlier stuff. And another is that Drumpf is a funny name.

*which is is the big problem, only 'us' are watching it

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:36 (eight years ago) link

i am so sorry

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:45 (eight years ago) link

[Removed Illegal Image]

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:45 (eight years ago) link

he has two belly buttons

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:46 (eight years ago) link

The Smurfs was first created and introduced as a series of comic characters by the Belgian comics artist Peyo (pen name of Pierre Culliford) in 1958, where they were known as Les Schtroumpfs.

Don't Forget To Reince Your Priebus (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:48 (eight years ago) link

Disappointed that John Oliver didn't take five seconds of the 20 minutes to point out what 'trump' means in British English.

jedi slimane (suzy), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:49 (eight years ago) link

Smurfs are anti semetic bastards

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:49 (eight years ago) link

we really can't have a SFW thread about Trump/primaries can we

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:52 (eight years ago) link

Tracer what the hell

its subtle brume (DJP), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:52 (eight years ago) link

It's a brilliant painting but it would indeed be super cool if a mod could transform it into a NSFW link.

Don't Forget To Reince Your Priebus (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:53 (eight years ago) link

it's ART!

(•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:53 (eight years ago) link

dude i am in the library

Treeship, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:56 (eight years ago) link

John Oliver has one schtick that he uses over and over again. Every bit has the exact same rhythm and uses the same "it's like (non-sequitur cultural reference)!" joke construction

― micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, March 1, 2016 2:01 PM (24 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I know what you mean. Every time I sit down to watch him I think, well, he's generally appealing; maybe this'll be a good show. But it's like biting into a chocolate-covered cherry, but instead of a cherry, there's a live bee! That's not a cherry! That's a bee! How'd that bee get in there? This isn't pleasant at all! This is very, very painful!

― Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), 1. marts 2016 20:29 (26 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I think you're confusing Last Week Tonight and Full Frontal.

BADUMTJIJ

Frederik B, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 20:00 (eight years ago) link

as a britishes it's weird and perplexing to see someone like oliver failing up from being an unsuccessful jobbing stand-up in britain to having his own tv show in the states

Cornelius Pardew (jim in glasgow), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 20:04 (eight years ago) link

NSFW, NSFAmerica

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 20:05 (eight years ago) link

I think Tracer's the one who has issues with full frontal. xxp

Sorry To Be The Bearer Of Bad Poos (Leee), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 20:05 (eight years ago) link

@nikkihaley
@realDonaldTrump, Bless your heart.

o shiii

mookieproof, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 20:06 (eight years ago) link

i hate that little exasperated "can you believe this?! uf uf!" laugh oliver does. he reminds me of rachel maddow in that he has to underline sarcasm eight times; even as they both sometimes do good work, i feel my intelligence insulted as they talk.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 20:06 (eight years ago) link

do you guys really think oliver is trying to "change" people's way of thinking about trump, or do you think he's trying to get people who are concerned about trump to laugh? he's stating he's a comedian first and foremost, and that's the way i watch the show. i don't think he's going to change anyone's mind. if you're watching it that way, you're watching it wrong

a (waterface), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 20:07 (eight years ago) link

he certainly spends some of his energy calling attention to issues he thinks his audience neglects but that's not what's happening here

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 20:09 (eight years ago) link

I think Tracer's the one who has issues with full frontal. xxp

― Sorry To Be The Bearer Of Bad Poos (Leee), 1. marts 2016 21:05 (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

BADUMBADUMTJIJ

Frederik B, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 20:11 (eight years ago) link

the john oliver trump thing was fine. it's actually not that smug, he admits there is appeal to trump and then takes the top things people say in his favour and then gives specific examples of trump being the opposite of them. it may be shouting into the void, but maybe not

ilx just doesn't like middlebrow shit that insults their intelligence as amateurist puts it

ftr i agree that some of oliver's tics are annoying

flopson, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 20:18 (eight years ago) link

his tics are annoying, sure, but he's funny as hell, funnier than Stewart was at times

a (waterface), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 20:24 (eight years ago) link

as a britishes it's weird and perplexing to see someone like oliver failing up from being an unsuccessful jobbing stand-up in britain to having his own tv show in the states

― Cornelius Pardew (jim in glasgow), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 20:04 (17 minutes ago) Permalink

any moron has a tv show on cable television in (north) america

his billboards were up in beverly hills a while ago. i guess he thinks he is "edgy"

F♯ A♯ (∞), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 20:29 (eight years ago) link

in his trump bit he used the phrase "shattering orgasm", which reminded me immediately of the 11oclock show/tvgohome ca. 2000, when men said things like that instead of being funny.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 20:36 (eight years ago) link

Anyone know which states John Oliver is projected to win today

OH

WAIT

Don't Forget To Reince Your Priebus (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 20:40 (eight years ago) link

as a britishes it's weird and perplexing to see someone like oliver failing up from being an unsuccessful jobbing stand-up in britain to having his own tv show in the states

― Cornelius Pardew (jim in glasgow), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 20:04 (17 minutes ago) Permalink

Craig Ferguson.

Thomas of Britain (Tom D.), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 20:59 (eight years ago) link

... unsuccessful as a stand up because garbage and talentless.

Thomas of Britain (Tom D.), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 20:59 (eight years ago) link

as a britishes it's weird and perplexing to see someone like oliver failing up from being an unsuccessful jobbing stand-up in britain to having his own tv show in the states

― Cornelius Pardew (jim in glasgow), Tuesday, 1 March 2016

didn't Churchill do this

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:00 (eight years ago) link

Isn't this just a thing people do? They can't seem to make their mark at home so they go to another country where they don't have to be as talented because now they have an accent? Let it goooooo.

Don't Forget To Reince Your Priebus (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:01 (eight years ago) link

I'm not surprised his standup was awful but Ferguson was by far my favorite late night host for a few years there. His interviews were actually interesting and human on a regular basis instead of canned dialogue leading to a discussion of whatever new thing the guest needed to promote.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:02 (eight years ago) link

US:rock bands::UK:comedians

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:02 (eight years ago) link

ferguso >>>>>>> the numnuts doing late night now

lute bro (brimstead), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:04 (eight years ago) link

lol "ferguson"

lute bro (brimstead), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:04 (eight years ago) link

Never saw any of that, only know him as an unfunny chancer from Cumbernauld.

Thomas of Britain (Tom D.), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:05 (eight years ago) link

truly a super tuesday on ilx

ulysses, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:09 (eight years ago) link

as a britishes it's weird and perplexing to see someone like oliver failing up from being an unsuccessful jobbing stand-up in britain to having his own tv show in the states

this from a country that feted Soul Asylum

erry red flag (f. hazel), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:12 (eight years ago) link

*obligatory MN post abt how pre-Grave Dancers Union Soul Asylum was a great band*

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:13 (eight years ago) link

this from a country that feted Soul Asylum

Don't think so.

Thomas of Britain (Tom D.), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:15 (eight years ago) link

Pirnerbro

erry red flag (f. hazel), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:15 (eight years ago) link

feel the pirn

nomar, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:17 (eight years ago) link

what about Piers Morgan? was he also a terrible stand-up in the UK before having his show in the US?

Van Horn Street, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:18 (eight years ago) link

it's a shame oliver's modest talent couldn't propel him to the heights of jimmy carr

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:19 (eight years ago) link

No, just a terrible cunt. (xp)

Thomas of Britain (Tom D.), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:20 (eight years ago) link

Piers Morgan's success baffles me, I remember seeing a hoarding advertising his return to Daybreak with the tagline "back by unpopular demand", but tbh I don't even think he's someone that people 'love to hate' à la Simon Cowell, people just hate him

soref, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:26 (eight years ago) link

i've seen his cnn show once, when he interviewed ellen barkin. he was like the most obnoxious leering dude, she was so uncomfortable.

nomar, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:28 (eight years ago) link

hey guys Hello, buglers! John Oliver has a weekly show, "Last Week Tonight"

k3vin k., Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:31 (eight years ago) link

in non-late night tv news,

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CcfVtZpUcAAzHpD.jpg

(sorry for largeness)

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:31 (eight years ago) link

he's a uniter, not a viable candidate

ulysses, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:35 (eight years ago) link

I like how he doesn't capitalize Democratic.

Sorry To Be The Bearer Of Bad Poos (Leee), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:35 (eight years ago) link

Aw, that's just so gosh darned CUTE!

He's "concerned with the lack of civility."

Don't you just want to hug the stuffing out of him?

word to your mother-in-law (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:36 (eight years ago) link

no

ciderpress, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:40 (eight years ago) link

He could probably make that even more emphatic with an image of the cherries and the bananas and the pears in a fruit salad co-existing peacefully.

clemenza, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:41 (eight years ago) link

Is this meeting also going to happen in a closet?

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:41 (eight years ago) link

Apart from the lower-case d, he apparently didn't get the memo that you're supposed to call the opponent "the democrat party."

word to your mother-in-law (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:44 (eight years ago) link

demoncrat

ciderpress, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:45 (eight years ago) link

LIEberal!

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:46 (eight years ago) link

carson is def planning to stab the remaining GOP contestants in his closet meeting

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:50 (eight years ago) link

Dude has no idea he's in a den of wolves I guess

Treeship, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:51 (eight years ago) link

they're all gonna look at each other's hands

a (waterface), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:52 (eight years ago) link

American People

mookieproof, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:53 (eight years ago) link

Upthread, Collardio G. suggested Trump was rocking something like a pseudo-jewish vibe, by virtue of being a brash new yawker:

Trump would be our first Jewish president (if by "Jewish" we mean all those traits goy culture traditionally ascribes to the big-city Jew).

Not sure about that, but please to check out Minister Farrakhan praising Trump for resisting the siren call of those filthy, scheming Jews:

http://gawker.com/louis-farrakhan-praises-trump-for-his-independence-from-1762138413?

When you're down with the Klan AND Nation of Islam, these are strange days indeed. Most peculiar, momma.

word to your mother-in-law (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:55 (eight years ago) link

They're at a Trump event on CNN right now, and "Tiny Dancer"'s playing in the hall. I remember another event where Trump came out to "Revolution." I'd be curious as to how many cease-and-desist orders they're getting on a daily basis.

clemenza, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 22:04 (eight years ago) link

When you're down with the Klan AND Nation of Islam, these are strange days indeed.

not really. they both espouse racialist, essentially separatist ideologies -- in a way they are compatible.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 22:05 (eight years ago) link

not unlike the white supremacists who supported various "back to africa" movements in the 19th and early 20th centuries

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 22:06 (eight years ago) link

A lot of times intolerant dickhead get along with one another

Treeship, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 22:06 (eight years ago) link

Buchanan in 2000 had Fulani and Duke backing him, so the weird mix is not unprecedented.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 22:07 (eight years ago) link

A lot of times intolerant dickhead get along with one another

― Treeship, Tuesday, March 1, 2016 4:06 PM (11 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this used to be the GOP motto, i think.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 22:07 (eight years ago) link

Some things transcend ideology

Treeship, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 22:08 (eight years ago) link

Tiny Dancer more like Tiny Hands Sir

micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 22:17 (eight years ago) link

Well done.

Sorry To Be The Bearer Of Bad Poos (Leee), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 22:28 (eight years ago) link

winner

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 22:28 (eight years ago) link

from the Shitlantic:

"The Republican presidential candidate (Carson) wants to convene a meeting of the candidates out of concern over a “lack of civility” in the GOP primary race, his campaign announced on Tuesday."

lol welcome to politics bitch

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 22:32 (eight years ago) link

V good

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 22:32 (eight years ago) link

i imagine the other candidates giving carson a wedgie during that "meeting"

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 22:42 (eight years ago) link

"c'mon guys, gimme back my day planner"

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 22:43 (eight years ago) link

Is this meeting also going to happen in a closet?

― i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 21:41 (1 hour ago) Permalink

i legit lolled for a full minute

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 22:50 (eight years ago) link

i thought the john oliver thing was funny. sorry britishers.

akm, Tuesday, 1 March 2016 23:49 (eight years ago) link

ISIS is endorsing Trump

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:03 (eight years ago) link

VA and GA called for Clinton. VT called for Sanders (duh)

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:08 (eight years ago) link

exit polls closer than expected for Vermont. Virginia too close to call.

I'm sure this all goes according to plan but y'know....

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:19 (eight years ago) link

for Repubs obv I'm speaking

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:19 (eight years ago) link

talking about britishers, why did the illustrator draw carson wearing a british tie here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/2016-election/primaries/super-tuesday-preview/republican/

F♯ A♯ (∞), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:22 (eight years ago) link

this "projected winner with 1% reporting" stuff is so weird

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:24 (eight years ago) link

is that a british tie? it's just red stripes

akm, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:25 (eight years ago) link

for reference, cruz is wearing an american tie

F♯ A♯ (∞), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:26 (eight years ago) link

xxpost when you lead by 50 percentage points, and the exit polls concur, it's fairly easy. such as how htey always call California in the last few elections minutes after the polls close

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:27 (eight years ago) link

https://twitter.com/NewsHour/status/704824251979726848

LOL alaska

k3vin k., Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:31 (eight years ago) link

who can blame them when they're floating way down in the middle of Mexico like that.

micro brewbio (crüt), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:33 (eight years ago) link

exit polls reportedly showing Kasich ahead in Vermont according to FiveThirtyEight

saying that 4 candidates might get delegates tonight if the cards fall right and that a lot of the races are closer than expected.

more interesting from a 'numbers geek' standpoint but hey i'm on a train this is my entertainment

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:36 (eight years ago) link

they can see putin from there u know

mookieproof, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:36 (eight years ago) link

in a shock to nobody, Georgia called for Trump.

get that Confederate vote

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:42 (eight years ago) link

Not just from a numbers perspective. The more winners the less likely ppl drop out to help consolidate the field

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:43 (eight years ago) link

We can't believe this classic troll! Putin moves "The Motherland Calls" statue to the Bering Strait, facing east!!

nomar, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:43 (eight years ago) link

Why is Trump holding a press conference tonight? That seems unusual on a big primary night. Maybe this is the big "So long, suckers" moment he's been working up to all along.

Kidding, but I am perplexed. I read something about a big endorsement, but that doesn't go along with a press conference, does it? Maybe it has something to do with KKK damage-control.

clemenza, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:46 (eight years ago) link

i don't think trump does damage control, and certainly not on a night which seems likely to be a big win for him

mookieproof, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:48 (eight years ago) link

maybe he's just gonna whip it out on live television cos why not at this point

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:49 (eight years ago) link

I have no idea, but the Trump campaign promised a major announcement.

Allen (etaeoe), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:50 (eight years ago) link

early veep announcement? i wouldn't put it past him.

nomar, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:51 (eight years ago) link

i was just thinking that

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:53 (eight years ago) link

ladies and gentlemen, Tila Tequila

nomar, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:54 (eight years ago) link

I'm sure whatever it is will be underwhelming and stupid

xpost lol

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:55 (eight years ago) link

maybe he's just gonna whip it out on live television

Thereby proving his hands really aren't that small after all.

clemenza, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:57 (eight years ago) link

oh man Virginia heating up

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 00:57 (eight years ago) link

Not that it necessarily matters, but wouldn't Sanders leading in Oklahoma be a surprise? Clinton wins all the states that vote Republican in the general.

clemenza, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:04 (eight years ago) link

is rubio going to declare victory in virginia if he comes in second by single digits? the soft bigotry of low expectations?

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:06 (eight years ago) link

xp not really, sanders has been winning white voters in most states (incl SC iirc??)

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:06 (eight years ago) link

"it just goes to show you guys that if you work hard and apply yourself, you can get beaten by an old curmudgeonly white guy"

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:07 (eight years ago) link

xpost

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:07 (eight years ago) link

please tell me the remaining 40% of Virginia is largely Beltway votes

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:08 (eight years ago) link

Vermont reporting moving at a snails pace

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:09 (eight years ago) link

538 had oklahoma as a toss-up

k3vin k., Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:09 (eight years ago) link

what else do they have to do tonight

xpost

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:09 (eight years ago) link

xpost yeah that apprently Cruz was slightly ahead in exit polls?

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:10 (eight years ago) link

i meant on the dem side

k3vin k., Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:12 (eight years ago) link

oh

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:13 (eight years ago) link

First MA results looking good for Sanders

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:15 (eight years ago) link

i promise i am not trying to spin anyone with this comment: it seems to me like bernie needs to do significantly better in ok, mass places than just like 50/50 even if he collects a few more delegates bc hillary is winning lopsidedly in all these other states and most [all?] of them are apportioned proportionately

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:15 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, tbh, I didn't know TX had almost 2.5 times as many delegates as MA.

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:17 (eight years ago) link

The first 1% of the MA results are a lot better than 50/50, though, although it probably doesn't mean much yet.

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:18 (eight years ago) link

i promise i am not trying to spin anyone with this comment: it seems to me like bernie needs to do significantly better in ok, mass places than just like 50/50 even if he collects a few more delegates bc hillary is winning lopsidedly in all these other states and most [all?] of them are apportioned proportionately

― Mordy, Tuesday, March 1, 2016 8:15 PM (3 minutes ago)

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/bernie-sanders-doesnt-need-momentum-he-needs-to-win-these-states/

k3vin k., Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:20 (eight years ago) link

btw keep in mind that the first few percentage points of precints are pretty meaningless

k3vin k., Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:20 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, the numbers are already a lot more even.

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:23 (eight years ago) link

yeah it all depends on the makeup of the earliest districts.

which sites are the best/most up to date reporting the returns? Washington Post is criminally behind CNN, but I haven't tried many others yet.

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:24 (eight years ago) link

i've tried a bunch and CNN seems to be fine, plus they show them all on the same screen

k3vin k., Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:28 (eight years ago) link

You should all know that Hills is in Miami and she didn't invite me to her party.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:29 (eight years ago) link

https://twitter.com/skoczela/status/704839420579553280

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:39 (eight years ago) link

you can "vote" "no preference" in MA?

k3vin k., Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:51 (eight years ago) link

Hope Trump runs the table except for Texas. I want to luxuriate in the full-scale Republican panic tomorrow, which will even eclipse anything thus far.

clemenza, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:51 (eight years ago) link

Kasich running behind Carson in any of these contests blows my mind

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:57 (eight years ago) link

he's just trolling at this point. he himself even predicted a Trump sweep and was like "ahh mean I'm just here for the booze and tail".

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:58 (eight years ago) link

ok maybe a little artistic license on the second half

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 01:58 (eight years ago) link

So Clinton has a slogan now--an answer song, like "Sweet Home Alabama." It's already kind of annoying.

clemenza, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:00 (eight years ago) link

Cruz officially projected for Texas now (no surprise).

Virginia loss for Rubio not horrible since they're a proportionate delegate and not winner take all (but still a blow to his widdle ego)

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:01 (eight years ago) link

sanders speech earlier sounded like they believed the race was over

clinton speech sounds like they read closely this

http://www.democracycorps.com/attachments/article/1025/Dcor_RPP_Memo_2.29.2016_FOR%20RELEASE.pdf

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:02 (eight years ago) link

which, if any, will be the first state rubio wins? hawaii?

mookieproof, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:04 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0e2jN2D7Kg

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:06 (eight years ago) link

Minnesota, maybe.

Allen (etaeoe), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:06 (eight years ago) link

Lol rubio cant win a single fucking state

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:08 (eight years ago) link

every time cnn puts up their key race alert thing i just think

MAJOR KEY ALERT

they don't want you to take this to the convention

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:09 (eight years ago) link

"ted cruz is having his victory party at the redneck country club.. that's the name of it, don't get mad at me for saying it"

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:11 (eight years ago) link

Cruz wins Oklahoma! The wave begins!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:12 (eight years ago) link

Oh Hillary, I'm really trying with you, but ... "we're all in this together" is such an obvious Sanders rip-off. Couldn't you at least have reworded a little bit? "All for one, one for all" maybe? "El pueblo unido jamas sera vencido"? "No one can stop us now, tonight we're on the loose"?

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:13 (eight years ago) link

That Jon King line was pretty funny--tomorrow he'll claim never to have heard of the Redneck Country Club.

clemenza, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:16 (eight years ago) link

Sanders getting clobbered in Alabama

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:19 (eight years ago) link

the whole south. annihilated.

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:20 (eight years ago) link

gotta say, clinton used the party machine to her advantage in texas. all the local pols were in full force as surrogates.

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:21 (eight years ago) link

that's what a party is for after all

petulant dick master (silby), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:22 (eight years ago) link

i knowwww

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:22 (eight years ago) link

"We were annihilated, George, we were annihilated."

clemenza, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:22 (eight years ago) link

xp oh no I didn't mean to be belittling D:

petulant dick master (silby), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:23 (eight years ago) link

s'okay silby

there was definitely some grassroots bernie support in san antonio, but i never got the impression that they got much done. this was a less persistent bunch than the obama campaign 8 years ago.

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:24 (eight years ago) link

it's worrisome just how conventional Hillary's rhetorical devices are. This wouldn't normally be a large concern, but this year...

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:29 (eight years ago) link

Bison, bro, who has the time. South by is in less than a fortnight homes.

nomar, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:30 (eight years ago) link

Clinton pulling away in MA now

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:31 (eight years ago) link

Keeping my fingers crossed for Bernie in Minn

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:32 (eight years ago) link

Rick Scott endorsing Trump tonight according to Fox News.

Allen (etaeoe), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:36 (eight years ago) link

"Tonight is the beginning of Donald Trump bringing the people of our nation together"--Christie.

Absolutely. We're even feeling the imminent togetherness up in Canada.

clemenza, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:39 (eight years ago) link

lol

Is there anything more nauseating than watching Chris Christie play caddy for Donald Trump?

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:40 (eight years ago) link

http://gawker.com/your-guide-to-americas-super-tuesday-national-meltdown-1762259739

"Apparently, Carson is saying he’s going to refuse to drop out of the race even if he doesn’t win any states tonight, saying “he’ll listen only to God and his supporters” since “the mainstream media is seeking to silence him.” All in all, a great prank by God."

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:41 (eight years ago) link

Keeping my fingers crossed for Bernie in Minn
― Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, March 1, 2016 8:32 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Anecdotal but friends saying Minneapolis neighborhood caucuses are packed, insane lines, running out of actual ballots & using pieces of paper

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:42 (eight years ago) link

Wow, Trump sticking the knife into Rubio tonight. That's amazing--not from Trump, but trying to imagine that before Trump.

clemenza, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:43 (eight years ago) link

which, if any, will be the first state rubio wins? hawaii?

― mookieproof, Tuesday, March 1, 2016 6:04 PM (36 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

nah i'm betting we go for trump.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:45 (eight years ago) link

I remember Huckabee staying in long after he'd been mathematically eliminated, saying "I didn't major in math, I majored in miracles."

living colour me badd english beat happening (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:53 (eight years ago) link

Rubio: "Do not give into the fear, do not give into anger. Do not give into sham artists and con artists who try to take advantage of your suffering, your hardships."
going for the old "not the robots you're looking for" ploy

ulysses, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:55 (eight years ago) link

are there Mexicans in Hawaii

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:55 (eight years ago) link

Even though Cruz is winning Texas, it looks like Rubio may win Austin. Who knew?

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 02:58 (eight years ago) link

can't wait to see who in the GOP falls in the Trump conga line and who rails against his apostasy til the very end

rmde bob (will), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:00 (eight years ago) link

God, this press conference and Christie's face in the backgrounds

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:05 (eight years ago) link

God, this press conference and Christie's face in the background

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:05 (eight years ago) link

Clinton pulling away in MA now

My sense is that, unless Sanders did really well in Worcester, the state is probably hers?

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:06 (eight years ago) link

I doubt that anyone who falls into the conga line will look more painfully diminished than Christie does right now.

clemenza, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:06 (eight years ago) link

Goo, this ass conference and Christie's face in the background

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:06 (eight years ago) link

Trump will be our next President. Listening to his press conference, it's like music. Pure poetry.

Pentenema Karten, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:06 (eight years ago) link

God, this press conference and Christie's face in the backgrounds

ulysses, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:06 (eight years ago) link

God, this press conference and Christie's face in the backgrounding

ulysses, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:06 (eight years ago) link

Trump says he'll get along with Paul Ryan, and, "if I don't, he's gonna have to pay a big price, O.K.?"

ulysses, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:07 (eight years ago) link

politics as wrestling bloodsport is amazing and weird and terrifying and hysterical

ulysses, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:08 (eight years ago) link

Christie is a Machiavellian genius. He's not going to be governor for much longer. So now he'll either be Vice President (or goebbels or whatever) if trump wins, or rewarded with some bank making business bullshit role if he loses

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:08 (eight years ago) link

trump says absolutely nothing except empty slogans and shit talk. its amazing.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:09 (eight years ago) link

God, this press conference and Christie's face in the backgrounder

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:10 (eight years ago) link

a screaming fascist manbaby is the choice for leader from a considerable percentage of the american population and that's not a good thing

ulysses, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:10 (eight years ago) link

trump is going to win the nomination. i keep wondering about who is going to fall in line behind him and who will be too principled. will nro/commentary types truly #nevertrump or will jonah goldburg dutifully support the nominee? marco rubio? the bush family or romney?

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:11 (eight years ago) link

God, this press conference and Christie's face like a moon pie in the background

ulysses, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:11 (eight years ago) link

jeez, even the usually sober Talking Points Memo has bought into the cable news/advertising twaddle that Cruz's two wins are a "major upset."

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:11 (eight years ago) link

God, this press conference and Christie's face in Trump's ass

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:12 (eight years ago) link

Clinton pulling away in MA now
My sense is that, unless Sanders did really well in Worcester, the state is probably hers?

― Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Tuesday, March 1, 2016 10:06 PM (5 minutes ago

hasn't been called by anyone yet. boston is about 83% in and there's still a lot of boonies (which should be good for bernie) at 0%

k3vin k., Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:13 (eight years ago) link

boston is about 83% in and there's still a lot of boonies

#bernies you mean

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:15 (eight years ago) link

This has to be a demoralizing nightmare for 97% of the (phantom?) Republican establishment: they now have to choose between Trump or Cruz. That's all that left.

clemenza, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:16 (eight years ago) link

are there Mexicans in Hawaii

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, March 1, 2016 6:55 PM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

more lately (~25 years), but hawaii is a dem machine state and i'm p sure its republican primary base is embattled-feeling whites and a handful of rich asians. from a political perspective the black population is zero. we also have unusually low turnout (for america!) which i guess is bad for trump if it continues, but this is a weird year.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:17 (eight years ago) link

"ted cruz is having his victory party at the redneck country club.. that's the name of it, don't get mad at me for saying it"

― arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, March 1, 2016 8:11 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Not only is it real, it's in my hometown, next to a Waffle House, an off-brand motel (used to be a LA Quinta), and a WalMart. The owner is a local Right Wing douchecanoe radio guy.

"Damn the Taquitos" (C. Grisso/McCain), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:17 (eight years ago) link

what's (# of republican primary voters)/(# of 2012 romney voters), there's still not concrete evidence that Hiterline demagoguery plays for more than somewhere less than 50% of the GOP primary electorate

I think the Republican establishment will vote for HRC

xps

petulant dick master (silby), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:18 (eight years ago) link

in other news the hawaii elections website is not accepting any combination of the inscrutable and unlabeled numbers on my driver's license

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:18 (eight years ago) link

I meant "Hitlerine" not "Hitlerline" neither of which is a word but oh well

petulant dick master (silby), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:18 (eight years ago) link

Re:Rubio in Austin--it's probably down to Young Repubs at UT and surrounding schools for whom Trump & Cruz are too mersh.

"Damn the Taquitos" (C. Grisso/McCain), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:21 (eight years ago) link

Cruz openly calling for Rubio/Kasich/Carson to throw in with him, also quoting Democratic presidents.

clemenza, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:23 (eight years ago) link

Trump and Cruz at the top, amazing

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:24 (eight years ago) link

you misspelled "horrifying"

ulysses, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:25 (eight years ago) link

well, that too

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:26 (eight years ago) link

Cruz is such a maniac

Treeship, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:31 (eight years ago) link

"Abolish the IRS"

Treeship, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:32 (eight years ago) link

I voted (in MA) with my seven yr old niece in tow. We then went to the pizzeria around the corner and ordered a large pie to bring home. After 20-25 minutes the pizza was ready and we walked out. A few seconds later, as we're crossing the street, a car crashed into the pizzeria we just left. At the time I thought a bomb had gone off. According to the news later two people were killed, three in critical condition. They haven't released the names of the victims yet, but there's a less than remote chance they're neighbors or people connected to my kids' high school. We got home, ate pizza, and I sat down to be comforted by the sight of Trump & Christie carrying on like Prez & VP. Strange evening.

Sorry, this is neither here nor there, but I needed to share. Carry on.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:32 (eight years ago) link

jesus christ dude i'm glad you guys are ok

nomar, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:34 (eight years ago) link

holy shit, man! same...

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:34 (eight years ago) link

Jesus, that's terrifying. Glad you're okay.

Don't Forget To Reince Your Priebus (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:34 (eight years ago) link

HEY GUYS TOM DELAY

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:35 (eight years ago) link

Van Jones and Trump's guy having a really heated argument on CNN. (Glad you're okay, collardio.)

clemenza, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:37 (eight years ago) link

dude i was just reading about that crash! scary shit, glad you're ok.

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:38 (eight years ago) link

thanks everyone.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:39 (eight years ago) link

Holy shit! Glad u are okay! Kinda a miracle

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:41 (eight years ago) link

goddamn, glad you're safe

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:41 (eight years ago) link

OTM

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:43 (eight years ago) link

rubio in the lead in MN! if he doesn't drop out of the race after tnite...

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:45 (eight years ago) link

Vermont otm imo

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:46 (eight years ago) link

boston is 98% in and bernie's down by about 27.5k votes

k3vin k., Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:49 (eight years ago) link

looks like fox called MA for hillary

k3vin k., Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:50 (eight years ago) link

Clinton-Trump feels as predestined as a Wrestlemania match.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:55 (eight years ago) link

clinton / hulk and trump / andre?

ulysses, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:59 (eight years ago) link

I wrote a letter to the local newspaper today, urging Sanders to continue his campaign, regardless of his chance at the nomination. It isn't as if he is bashing Hillary with a sledge hammer and hurting her chances in November. He's running a remarkably positive campaign based on his own set of issues, which I think need a good airing out.

There will be plenty of time for kissy-face and marching in step after all the votes are in.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 03:59 (eight years ago) link

Rubio had a great night, just ask him.

clemenza, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 04:04 (eight years ago) link

Bernie folks on FB talking about how Bill Clinton campaigned in front of a polling place in MA?

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 04:06 (eight years ago) link

bill clinton just needs to be locked in a room with a couple tubs of primal strips and his presidential library of erotica

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 04:10 (eight years ago) link

gabbard on msnbc

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 04:12 (eight years ago) link

so when mitch and the boys try to differentiate themselves from trump's republicans, how will they do it/what name will they use?

the american freedom party is a white supremacist group, so that's *probably* off-limits

mookieproof, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 04:15 (eight years ago) link

Colorado called for Bernie

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 04:18 (eight years ago) link

clinton v trump wrestlemania in cyberspace will be the most vaporwave presidential race ever

micro brewbio (crüt), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 04:18 (eight years ago) link

rubientum in minnesota!

mookieproof, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 04:21 (eight years ago) link

looking like bernie's gonna lose mass by about 2%

k3vin k., Wednesday, 2 March 2016 04:27 (eight years ago) link

ben carson vows to stay in the race

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 04:27 (eight years ago) link

this rly is the most fucked up scenario for the gop, trump takes the lion's share of delegates, cruz and and rubio get "wins" and feel emboldened to stick around a while longer. and ben carson doesn't give. a. fuck.

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 04:28 (eight years ago) link

And Kasich won't leave until Ohio--there was a state tonight (Vermont?) Rubio might have won absent Kasich.

clemenza, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 04:30 (eight years ago) link

it's the besssssst scenario xp

k3vin k., Wednesday, 2 March 2016 04:30 (eight years ago) link

All the more reason for dems to want sanders to stay in. If he drops out then the gop dominates the news until they all withdraw, which is how trump is winning that race in the first place.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 04:35 (eight years ago) link

looking like bernie's gonna lose mass by about 2%

― k3vin k., Tuesday, March 1, 2016 11:27 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

ilx quoted out of context

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 04:35 (eight years ago) link

shout out to the 7200 people in massachusetts who took time out of their day to go and vote for "no preference" instead of like, making a sandwich or something

k3vin k., Wednesday, 2 March 2016 04:42 (eight years ago) link

well they probably voted in other elections, too

also xps kevin, by "fucked up" i mean "the best for me and mines"

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 04:45 (eight years ago) link

I love the fact that tons of pundits were somehow convinced that MN was ever in play wrt Hillary vs Bernie.

a strawman stuffed with their collection of 12 cds (jjjusten), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 04:51 (eight years ago) link

So Ben Carson gave a 15 minute speech about the Pledge of Allegiance

JoeStork, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 04:56 (eight years ago) link

collardio, I was watching the news about that crash with escalating horror; glad you're okay

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 04:58 (eight years ago) link

i'm going to go to sleep. can you guys just alert everyone when this national nightmare is over?

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 04:58 (eight years ago) link

Def feeling a mix of deep fatigue and horror right now.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 04:59 (eight years ago) link

xpost

sorry, i posted that before i saw DJP's post. didn't mean to seem insensitive. i know where that pizzeria is. horrifying.

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 05:01 (eight years ago) link

glad you and your niece are okay collardio. please all ilxors continue safe, things are frightening enough.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 05:02 (eight years ago) link

There are rumors floating around that at least one GOP senator is planning to endorse Clinton if Trump wins the nomination.

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 05:02 (eight years ago) link

Mitch McConnell looks like an oyster

Treeship, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 05:22 (eight years ago) link

guys thanks so much for your nice words. what was hard for me was that I dearly wanted to go back into the pizza shop to help people out until ambulances etc could arrive, but i had my niece with me, and i just couldn't bring her any closer to the scene of a caved-in building with massive ovens. it was the right decision, but painful nonetheless.

but anyhow, "enough about me," as they say

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 05:43 (eight years ago) link

damn Treeship you've just killed oysters as aphrodisiacs for me

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 05:45 (eight years ago) link

Looks like Sanders will have won more states than Cruz/Rubio/Kasich/Carson combined tonight. I don't know, I think I'll lull myself to sleep with that thought tonight.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 06:05 (eight years ago) link

"There are rumors floating around that at least one GOP senator is planning to endorse Clinton if Trump wins the nomination."

lindsey graham basically already did

akm, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 06:30 (eight years ago) link

mcconnell and ryan seem to have decided to speak about against "bigotry" but also support trump should he win the nomination

a decision that will probably haunt their old age

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 06:48 (eight years ago) link

Any chance Sanders will get a Clinton cabinet appointment? Probably not, right?

viborg, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 06:57 (eight years ago) link

pretty sure he'd prefer his senate seat

Clay, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 07:50 (eight years ago) link

also

https://twitter.com/Reince/status/704864814280151040

ulysses, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 08:09 (eight years ago) link

HAPPY BIRTHDAY NED RAGGETT

Mark G, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 09:47 (eight years ago) link

HAPPY BIRTHDAY NED RAGGETT

Why thank you. If elected etc

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 11:13 (eight years ago) link

Found this pretty riveting last night:

http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/03/02/cnn-analysts-heated-exchange-trump-race-divide-sot.cnn

CNN just let them go, too.

clemenza, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 12:18 (eight years ago) link

HAPPY BIRTHDAY NED RAGGETT

Hold up there, don't you want to wait for all the votes to come in first before you jump to conclusions?

Donald Trump comports himself with the misplaced arrogance of a Waffle House manager whose branch got its seventh 4-star review in a row.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:06 (eight years ago) link

has everyone heard HRC's "America has always been great" act, and if so can she stfu

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:08 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, it's bullshit and you can practically hear her triangulating.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:10 (eight years ago) link

And we know we’ve got work to do. But, that work, that work is not to make America great again. America never stopped being great. We need …

We have to make America whole. We have to fill in what’s been hollowed out.

good lord this is stupid.

micro brewbio (crüt), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:28 (eight years ago) link

Next four and a half years are going to be super painful.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:37 (eight years ago) link

The massive support behind her likely opponent in the GE is a pretty decent argument against America's greatness.

Don't Forget To Reince Your Priebus (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:38 (eight years ago) link

The "America sucks" platform did not test well with focus groups though.

word to your mother-in-law (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:46 (eight years ago) link

Not in America anyway.

Thomas of Britain (Tom D.), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:48 (eight years ago) link

Ha

Soon all logins will look like this (darraghmac), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:50 (eight years ago) link

The massive support of war merchants and neocons behind her in the GE is a pretty decent argument against America's greatness.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:50 (eight years ago) link

any rumblings from bloomberg in the last couple of weeks?

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:51 (eight years ago) link

yes, he had some bad borscht.

is "America sucks" as the only alternative to that slop she's been spouting a corollary to "Obama's not perfect, but..."?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:57 (eight years ago) link

Is there anybody in the country outside of the tri-state area who would care one way or the other if Bloomberg dropped into the race? He'd go over about as well as Lawrence Lessig did, imo.

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:58 (eight years ago) link

Point to Oliver - "Donald Drumpf" currently a more popular search than "Ted Cruz", "Marco Rubio"

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 14:07 (eight years ago) link

the "laugh at the funny foreign name" approach might be the least funny of a generally unfunny line of attack

cher guevara (lex pretend), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 14:25 (eight years ago) link

And we know we’ve got work to do. But, that work, that work is not to make America great again. America never stopped being great. We need …

We have to make America whole. We have to fill in what’s been hollowed out.

good lord this is stupid.

― micro brewbio (crüt), Wednesday, March 2, 2016

Now, now...NPR analysts liked this response to Trump, along with that other corny one where Hillary says, 'I'm sorry, I don't want to build any walls, I want to build ladders of opportunity"

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 14:42 (eight years ago) link

If you build a 10 foot wall, someone will build an 11 foot ladder of opportunity.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 14:47 (eight years ago) link

i put the Drumpf extension on my work computer and I gotta say it hasn't stopped being entertaining yet, esp. seeing it in like 48 pt font on CNN

evol j, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 14:49 (eight years ago) link

Politico published an extensive “insider” look at the Sanders campaign on the morning of Super Tuesday that concludes with this fascinating tidbit:

They’re already prepping the fallback plan: 10 areas, including killing Obama’s trade deals and changing the super-delegate process that they’re going to organize around and try forcing into the Democratic platform.

“Worst case, we’re going to Philadelphia with 1,500 delegates. Best case, we’re going to win,” [Sanders senior advisor Larry] Cohen said. “Either way, we’re going to change things.”

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 14:58 (eight years ago) link

Miles Davis was a famous drumpfet player.

word to your mother-in-law (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 14:58 (eight years ago) link

Holy shit, that Trump weasel in that CNN link. It's just .... insane! I wish I could punch him for being a fucking asshole.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:02 (eight years ago) link

does he really believe this nonsense or is he just saying it to deflect attention?

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:06 (eight years ago) link

"The KKK were 50 years ago connected to the Democratic party - the current Democratic party talks about race a lot - Check.... mate!"

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:08 (eight years ago) link

Like, if you're going to lie and misdirect and go that big, why not just go bigger? "The moon is a racist invention of the democratic party." "Jews have killed more people than the rest of the world combined." "Poor people cause hurricanes." "The KKK was founded to make sure all Americans could safely vote."

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:12 (eight years ago) link

The last makes sense, that has been a frequent focus of leftist groups.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:14 (eight years ago) link

Holy shit, that Trump weasel in that CNN link. It's just .... insane! I wish I could punch him for being a fucking asshole.
--Josh in Chicago

No more insane than every NRO article sadly.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:15 (eight years ago) link

Man, why do they make it so hard to punch people on TV or in print?

That's the problem with the media. If someone comes on TV and just spouts bullshit, not only should you not be required to even engage with them, they should be banned from TV entirely. And yet the co-host or counterpuncher or cowpuncher or whomever even bothers to argue? You can't just leave it at "well, we'll just agree to disagree," you have to punch them in the face and tell them to get the fuck out of the studio.

Can you tell I don't have cable?

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:19 (eight years ago) link

It's marvelous how we've reached a point at which Rubio's winning one state gives him the motivation to stay in the race.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:21 (eight years ago) link

Oh man I really had a case of the punchies last night. When Tom Delay came on we were talking abt how much you would pay to have a clean shot. For charity, of course.

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:24 (eight years ago) link

Wld actually borrow to get one in.

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:25 (eight years ago) link

If donations weren't made public I'd seriously consider giving financial shots in the arm to no-hopers just to keep the popcorntastic spectacle going.

word to your mother-in-law (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:26 (eight years ago) link

i wonder if anyone responded to ben carson's letter requesting a little chat session before the thursday debate?

"Dear Dr. Carson,

lol"

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:26 (eight years ago) link

just Bernie, then xp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:26 (eight years ago) link

xpost

i think carson and rubio have plenty of money to keep going. maybe not kasich though

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:27 (eight years ago) link

last-ditch strategy seems to be 'keep trump under 50% of the delegates and prepare for a convention fight', so everyone might as well stay in

mookieproof, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:28 (eight years ago) link

"Dear Dr. Carson: I understand you're concerned with the lack of civility. I wholeheartedly concur. Accordingly, you are cordially invited to bite me, you loser shitbag."

word to your mother-in-law (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:29 (eight years ago) link

It is ridiculous, the extent to which cable news will allow anyone to blather on as if everyone has an equally legitimate and reasoned opinion. Except it isn't as if that at all because it's actually as if they need to fill airtime and as if they exist primarily for the sake of sensationalism and are arguably more entertainment consortiums than they are news organizations.

Don't Forget To Reince Your Priebus (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:30 (eight years ago) link

As the Republicans get mired deeper and deeper into this unsolvable mess, I'm going to start checking in on things like The Weekly Standard, where the we-can-still-stop-Trump contortions will be amazing for the next few months.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/five-reasons-trump-is-weaker-than-he-looks/article/2001354

clemenza, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:30 (eight years ago) link

Cynical or not, I like the fact that Clinton is making Flint a big talking point, because used properly it's the perfect symbol of the evils of privatization and "small government" conservatism. But I hope Clinton is actually going to portray it that way and not just co-opt and blunt it as some kind of vague GOP bad guy thing without an ideology behind it.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:33 (eight years ago) link

the more mainstream conservatives also have their head stuck up their ass. here's Douthat, whose voice is barely audible from within the cheeks:

But in the end, Trump’s numbers were impressive but not at all a race ender. The states in play were mostly up and down what you might call the Trump Belt — the swath of America, extending from the Deep South up through Appalachia and into New England, where his unusual coalition is strongest. Yet he won less than half the night’s delegates, with vote totals still in the 35 percent range — peaking in Massachusetts and Alabama (an amazing combination), but falling into the 20s outside the Trump Belt (in Oklahoma, Texas, Minnesota) and holding in the 30s elsewhere.

For a candidate who is not only opposed but feared as a race-baiting demagogue by almost the entire party establishment, who looks less electable than any of his rivals in the fall, who has prominent conservatives (including, this week, a sitting United States senator) lining up to swear they’ll never vote for him, who is basically in undeclared war with the last Republican president and the last two party nominees — for such a candidate, 35 percent of the vote still does not seem like it should be enough to win through to the nomination.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:34 (eight years ago) link

Hillary really needs to hammer home the potential Trump University-zation of America.

Don't Forget To Reince Your Priebus (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:38 (eight years ago) link

tbf, the night wasn't really as impressive for Trump as it was for Clinton. I think there's some validity to Cruz's argument that if the other candidates drop and the party coalesces around him, he may have a slight chance to upset Trump, although it's a long shot. At this point, Rubio, Kasich, and Carson have no real business sticking around.

xpost

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:39 (eight years ago) link

A reasonably likely scenario that I have not really seen gamed out is: how well does Trump do as a general-election candidate bearing only the half-hearted endorsement of a fractured party? At best! At worst, his nomination will have been wrung out of a contested convention, with Much Butthurt ensuing. Plus a number of reasonably prominent Republicans have already said they'd take their ball and go home rather than support Generalissimo Looneytunes.

Previous primaries have been bitterly contested. Gore and Kerry were not ideal choices, but Democrats at least pretended to come together to anoint them at convention time, and mostly stuck with them through to November. Obama v. Clinton was not a warm love-fest (as you may recall), but Democrats at least pretended to come together to anoint him at convention time.

Usually the major-party candidates go from convention to election day with support from their respective parties. Is that now irrelevant in the Age of Trump (when Everything is Different(tm))?

I'm trying to imagine a Trump general-election campaign where he obviously has allies, but much of the party apparatus is at best like, "oh yeah, and please also vote for... um... the individual at the top of the ticket. Here's an RNC-branded clothespin for you to hold your nose with, should you need it."

brotato (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:50 (eight years ago) link

yet it feels like Cruz has significantly less chance of beating Clinton than Drumpf does. there are no quasi-mystical "Reagan Democrats" out there waiting for Ted Cruz.

evol j, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:54 (eight years ago) link

eh, mythical not mystical, duh.

evol j, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:56 (eight years ago) link

Quinnipiac had Clinton's "unfavorable" polling at 56% a few months ago. Did they measure Trump's?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 15:58 (eight years ago) link

Lol the cnn video way upthread that the kkk wanted to "advance the progressive agenda." How can people believe this stuff?

Treeship, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:06 (eight years ago) link

i think an election btwn two of the most hated public figures in the country is karmic justice

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:07 (eight years ago) link

i've seen a scary number of ostensibly not-insane conservatives really going hard on this talking point lately.

xpost

rmde bob (will), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:08 (eight years ago) link

‏@pareene
Trump will be brutal for the GOP but the Democrats are going to respond by running a campaign pitched at David Brooks it's gonna be awful

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:09 (eight years ago) link

So weird. Buckley said conservatives are the people who stand athwart history and yell "stop"! The klan totally fits that definition.

Treeship, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:11 (eight years ago) link

Lol the cnn video way upthread that the kkk wanted to "advance the progressive agenda." How can people believe this stuff?

If you hate Democrats, progressivism AND black people it's a win win win.

Retro novelty punk (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:13 (eight years ago) link

true i think it's just that "liberal / progressive" = REALLY BAD and obviously the KKK is really bad, so there you go easy peasy

rmde bob (will), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:13 (eight years ago) link

"there are no quasi-mystical "Reagan Democrats" out there waiting for Ted Cruz."

Yes but the argument goes that there is a potential groundswell of TRUE CONS who would come out for the ideologically pure Cruz. His 100% ACU rating means that the die-hard, god-fearing, flag-waving base would FINALLY get Their Candidate, after having been sold out so many times by RINO squish establishmentarians. The guys who are like "I dutifully voted for Juan McLame and Mittbot, and got NOTHING. Just a bunch of RINOs who do nothing to stop the Obama juggernaut. No more. I stay home unless I can finally vote for a candidate I believe in, for the first time since Reagan." A decent proportion of those guys don't trust Trump to stay on point, no matter how much they like what' he's currently saying about immigrants and refugees.

Thing is, those people overlap enough with the "I'll crawl over broken glass to vote against Shrillery" vote that it probably doesn't matter.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:14 (eight years ago) link

hah, Juan McLame

Nhex, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:18 (eight years ago) link

I think there's some validity to Cruz's argument that if the other candidates drop and the party coalesces around him, he may have a slight chance to upset Trump, although it's a long shot.

Also a sizable section of the party don't want Cruz over Trump!

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:24 (eight years ago) link

btw:

Total votes across Super Tuesday
Clinton —— 2.7 million
Trump —— 2.2 million
Cruz —— 1.7 million
Sanders - 1.6 million
Rubio - 1.4 million

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:25 (eight years ago) link

cheering for van jones in that clip obv but i wish at some point he'd said on tv why exactly the modern democratic party is not the old one. not because of some vague "change" or "evolution" but literally because the southern racists left for the gop. i get why someone doesn't want to get sucked down the quibble hole when the issue is THE FUCKING KLAN and i get that van jones is probably using most of his psychic energy there just to maintain the appearance of unthreatening calm in the face of THE FUCKING KLAN, but this is so clear and indisputable and i have this fear that even anti-trumps across the country are thinking "yeah, get with 2016, we're much less racist now" instead of "WE KICKED OUT THE SEGREGATIONISTS AND INCIDENTALLY LOST A FEW DECADES OF EXECUTIVE POWER FOR IT AND NOW THEY'RE ALL IN YOUR FUCKING PARTY, ASSHOLE, OH AND TO THE EXTENT THAT EMBARRASSED TAX IDEOLOGUES DID MANAGE DISINGENUOUSLY TO PUT A LID ON IT IT SURE ISN'T ON THERE RIGHT NOW"

sorry. i just want to be hearing this explanation everywhere until americans actually have some kind of baseline fucking idea of where they're living and when and instead i keep hearing liars tell me how important it is to "know history"

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:26 (eight years ago) link

i guess when someone is earnestly telling you on television that the klan was the militant arm of progressivism it's hard to know where to start, or why anyone's alive

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:30 (eight years ago) link

Van Jones is a dreadful representative for Dems and liberals. I've cringed every time he's opened his mouth. His instinct around Beltway conservatives on cable shows is kumbaya.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:30 (eight years ago) link

Lol the cnn video way upthread that the kkk wanted to "advance the progressive agenda." How can people believe this stuff

Take the tack that many of these idiots use with "liberals are the real racists!" and it's not too far from there

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:30 (eight years ago) link

see also: Margaret Sanger = PROGRESSIVE BABY KILLER & HUEG RACIST

rmde bob (will), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:36 (eight years ago) link

sanders speech earlier sounded like they believed the race was over

didn't hear, but i can't believe this was intended as i've gotten 4 fundraising emails since

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:36 (eight years ago) link

Applause for every word of dlh's post, including and especially the all-caps and profanity. That is something I too want broadcast far and wide.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:37 (eight years ago) link

xxpost Morbs Trump/Hillary—Quinnipiac, national favorable/unfavorable, Feb. 18

1 Sanders 51/36 [+]

2 Kasich 35/18 [+]

3 Rubio 39/37 [+]

4 Clinton 37/58 [-]

5 Trump 37/57 [-]

6 Cruz 36/45 [-]

7 Bloomberg 21/26 [-]

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:37 (eight years ago) link

I think Van Jones is generally excellent.

clemenza, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:38 (eight years ago) link

sanders speech earlier sounded like they believed the race was over

didn't hear, but i can't believe this was intended as i've gotten 4 fundraising emails since

― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, March 2, 2016 11:36 AM (28 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yeah, they are messaging hard that they are going fifty states and will attempt to leverage platform changes if they don't win.

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:38 (eight years ago) link

for such a candidate, 35 percent of the vote still does not seem like it should be enough to win through to the nomination.

for such a pundit, the small space between the buttocks does not seem like it should be enough to admit the entire cranium through to the colon

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:39 (eight years ago) link

there was some point maybe six years ago when online progressives were all VAN JONES VAN JONES and i figured he was some Occupy guy. Then i read a little bit of his spiel and discovered a boilerplate O-bot.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:41 (eight years ago) link

xp lol

flopson, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:43 (eight years ago) link

Same reaction.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:43 (eight years ago) link

so why did Marquito win Minnesota idgi

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:51 (eight years ago) link

Lesser of the three evils, maybe? Kinda surprised we didn't go for Kasich.

Retro novelty punk (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:52 (eight years ago) link

dll otm. I thought maybe the dude was making some esoteric point about the klan's philosophy of government but i guess he literally was just rehashing the old classic republican syllogism: democrats used to have a segregationist coalition in the south, democrats are progressives, therefore progressives are racists. They are such idiots.

Treeship, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:57 (eight years ago) link

May have been mentioned before, but the robust continuation of the Sanders campaign is good for democrats. They're not tearing into each other and progressives won't feel neglected so long as sanders keeps their favorite issues in the conversation. The worst thing would be for that race to stop and hillary is just waiting around, causing democrats to lose interest

Treeship, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:03 (eight years ago) link

really enjoying the folks who are blaming Obama for Trump over the last few days.

rmde bob (will), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:03 (eight years ago) link

omg the sanders ppl i know are arguing that whole "well the black vote just went to clinton because of name recognition and the fact that bill is southern" shit gtfo

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:04 (eight years ago) link

Heather Cox Richardson, a Boston College professor and the author of a new history of the Republican Party, predicts a violent rupture that cleaves the party in two: a hard-line conservatism, as embodied by Pat Buchanan, Newt Gingrich and Mr. Trump, and an old-fashioned strain of moderate Republicanism that recalls Theodore Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower and Nelson Rockefeller. “It is going to be really ugly,” she said.

this... seems p wrong? wtf NYT

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:05 (eight years ago) link

Douthat is such a pedantic nerd

Treeship, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:05 (eight years ago) link

Sorry that was xpost to will

Treeship, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:06 (eight years ago) link

They're not tearing into each other

Bernie's not, but his internet supporters... eh

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:06 (eight years ago) link

the trump phenomenon has nothing to do with hard-line conservatism

ciderpress, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:07 (eight years ago) link

A Berniebro triumphantly sent me a link this morning that showed that Bernie's support from black voters increased with improved name recognition but when you looked at the chart he was at 80% name recognition and only 20% support so I don't know how much more support he can wring out of those last 20% who don't know him yet.

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:07 (eight years ago) link

where are all these modern-day Republicans in the mold of Eisenhower, Rockefeller and Roosevelt. Paul Ryan? Mitch McConnell? Marco Rubio?

xp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:07 (eight years ago) link

ciderpress otm, isn't that abundantly obvious given Trump's numerous heterodox statements?

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:08 (eight years ago) link

where are all these modern-day Republicans in the mold of Eisenhower, Rockefeller and Roosevelt.

They're all Democrats now.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:08 (eight years ago) link

OBAMA (in b4 morbz)

xp

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:08 (eight years ago) link

good morning guys, did i miss any enlightening posts about berniebros we personally know or have seen online?

k3vin k., Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:09 (eight years ago) link

an old-fashioned strain of moderate Republicanism that recalls Theodore Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower and Nelson Rockefeller.

yeah honestly how many ppl like this are still GOP in 2016?

looks to me like basically the pro-entitlement, isolationist racists vs the rent-seeking plutocrats and the middle-managers who carry their water (also p racist afaict)

rmde bob (will), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:09 (eight years ago) link

Liberal pundits are misinterpreting the Trump phenomenon all over the place. He doesn't fit their usual categories because in most elections the most dangerous candidate is also the most conservative one.

Treeship, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:09 (eight years ago) link

Teddy R's racism and Ike's bullying interventionism both seem alive and well if not "moderate"

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:11 (eight years ago) link

Will otm

Treeship, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:11 (eight years ago) link

i just saw a 4-1/2 hr doc about the US and the Philippines (1900 and now) and Taft and Roosevelt were p close to genocial madmen.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:12 (eight years ago) link

*genocidal

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:12 (eight years ago) link

BTW, what's up with the Oregon militia folks? I bet one of them would make a great VP candidate.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:20 (eight years ago) link

sure you've got your evangelicals, too. but at this point they more or less fall into the other two categories, partic the first.

rmde bob (will), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:21 (eight years ago) link

you guys have to be praying for a Trump-Carson ticket i imagine

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:25 (eight years ago) link

WWJD?

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:26 (eight years ago) link

I thought it was gonna be Trump-Christie

micro brewbio (crüt), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:27 (eight years ago) link

haha, another funny wavering josh marshall thing which will be 1/10th prophetic no matter what happens:

No, There Won't Be a Contested Convention

Numerous Republicans and pundits are now predicting a contested GOP convention. Everybody was noting last night that ... well, sure Trump is winning most of the primaries but delegates are distributed on a proportional basis so "not Trump" has more delegates than "Trump." So open convention, baby!

No. In this election, certainly anything - truly anything - is possible. Despite my headline, I would not even say that a contested convention is impossible. But this 'contested convention' talk is just a compressed phase of denial, bargaining and anger as GOP stakeholders rush to make sense of what's happening to them.

...There are probably many Republicans who would say that both in principle and in the long term interests of the Republican party this would still be better a better outcome. That's a strong argument. But that's a separate point. A 'stealing' contested convention could happen. But it almost certainly cedes the election to the Democrats.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:28 (eight years ago) link

The best thing to come out of the republican race is 73% of new jersey agreeing that chris christie sucks

Treeship, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:28 (eight years ago) link

otoh the ppl who would try that thinks DT's nomination cedes the election.

no, Christie for atty general xxp

arguing that whole "well the black vote just went to clinton because of name recognition and the fact that bill is southern" shit gtfo

i'm not gonna be the one to ask "what WERE the other reasons?"

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:29 (eight years ago) link

for brevity, i cut out many paragraphs of him explaining that there are also many other possibilities which he has considered, and they may be in fact be possible, but not likely, that is, if certain factors play out as expected, which, of course, can never be predicted with full certainty.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:30 (eight years ago) link

weren't Christie's NJ numbers about the same a year ago?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:30 (eight years ago) link

They dipped below 30 for the first time yesterday

Treeship, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:31 (eight years ago) link

i want to watch josh marshall conduct a groundhog day ceremony and explain to bewildered children and exasperated grandparents the 8 to 10 scenarios that could play out if (or when? no, if) the groundhog doesn't see its shadow

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:31 (eight years ago) link

kinda wish hillary would stop calling black women "dear", altho i guess maybe she calls everyone left of her that.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:32 (eight years ago) link

ie everyone she's likely to meet that she doesn't work with

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:33 (eight years ago) link

what happens if Ike sticks his head out of the burrow and sees Trump's shadow instead

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:34 (eight years ago) link

kinda wish hillary would stop calling black women "dear", altho i guess maybe she calls everyone left of her that.

― denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour),

she looks like a classic fag hag, pretty sure she called Eisenhower "dear" too

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:34 (eight years ago) link

i'm not gonna be the one to ask "what WERE the other reasons?"

they thought she'd make a better president?

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:36 (eight years ago) link

Ugh, this person:
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/dem-primaries/271327-clinton-to-voter-why-dont-you-go-run-for-something

― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, March 2, 2016 12:27 PM (5 minutes ago)

confronting a major candidate is a disaster waiting to happen like 95% of the time. you're not going to be more prepared than they are, especially hillary of all people

k3vin k., Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:37 (eight years ago) link

did she call him "dear"?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:39 (eight years ago) link

Avatar
This comment was deleted.
Avatar
Goldwater was right Guest • 21 hours ago
She has a point though. If you want change run for office.
14 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
This comment was deleted.
Avatar
This comment was deleted.
Avatar
This comment was deleted.
Avatar
This comment was deleted.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:39 (eight years ago) link

the trump phenomenon has nothing to do with hard-line conservatism

This is partly true - the standard bearers of hardline purist conservativism are Buckleyite NRO types and George Will and shit, all of whom are appalled by gauche Le Trumpisme. However they historically counted on having millions of compliantly voting footsoldiers to keep their power. Part of their current meltdown is that they're up on their gleaming stallions, sabres in the air, saying "Let us ride, my jolly men, so that we may defeat the odious Foe!" Then they look back and see that their army is gone, mostly decamped for Trumptown.

Liberal pundits are misinterpreting the Trump phenomenon all over the place. He doesn't fit their usual categories because in most elections the most dangerous candidate is also the most conservative one.

This is true too. But none of those previous conservative boogeymen - Reagan, Buchanan, Gingrich, Santorum - could have gotten anywhere without a legion of compliant followers. Many of those followers are now lining up behind Trump. In prior years they were satisfied with a cup of koolaid; now they've all been handed a pint of Everclear and they're thrilled.

Liberal pundits may be misinterpreting the phenomenon candidate, but by and large it's still the same segment of the electorate. They're just more fed up and they're being reached and motivated differently.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:40 (eight years ago) link

i just saw a 4-1/2 hr doc about the US and the Philippines (1900 and now) and Taft and Roosevelt were p close to genocial madmen.
i just saw a 4-1/2 hr doc about the US and the Philippines (1900 and now) and Taft and Roosevelt were p close to genocial madmen.

What's this documentary called? I'm interested and "1900 and now Philippines" and variations isn't leading anywhere. thanks

dsb, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:43 (eight years ago) link

the meltdown is that they thought the republican party was about X ("conservative values") but really it was about Y ("populist bigoted rage") and it turns out that those 2 things are no longer compatible. the whole thing was a balancing act to begin w/ but they can no longer keep the plates spinning.

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:43 (eight years ago) link

re Bernie, i wonder if some version of the Erica Garner ad ran throughout the South, for starters (i imagine it must've?). Have any Sanders people spoken anonymously about where their outreach to A-A voters failed, cuz it seemed 3 weeks ago they knew it was the achilles heel.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:44 (eight years ago) link

Nice Mr. Taft as governor was a fan of Western justice.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:45 (eight years ago) link

confronting a major candidate is a disaster waiting to happen like 95% of the time. you're not going to be more prepared than they are, especially hillary of all people

― k3vin k., Wednesday, March 2, 2016 5:37 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lol remember when the republican party desperately tried to win in '08 by spinning an unprepared dude/campaign plant who got gently schooled by obama as being a truthteller who zinged him hardcore

nomar, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:49 (eight years ago) link

dsb, the film (second of two by the Emerson College prof John Gianvito) is Wake (Subic).

http://www.filmcomment.com/blog/an-epic-of-understanding-john-gianvitos-wake-subic/

btw the Philippines Supreme Court just voted to let the US re-occupy its old military bases as "guests." Imperialism is a helluva drug.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:50 (eight years ago) link

the meltdown is that they thought the republican party was about X ("conservative values") but really it was about Y ("populist bigoted rage") and it turns out that those 2 things are no longer compatible. the whole thing was a balancing act to begin w/ but they can no longer keep the plates spinning.

― Mordy, Wednesday, March 2, 2016 11:43 AM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i think this is correct but i think it could very well have been papered over with a better candidate, and could be again. it might be harder now that trump has yanked the pieces apart. but politics is a short-memory business.

goole, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:54 (eight years ago) link

the meltdown is that they thought the republican party was about X ("conservative values") but really it was about Y ("populist bigoted rage")

Agreed. My point is that both appeals are drawing from the same limited pool of voters.

Closest analogy I can think of (not that it's a perfect analogy) is if the management of Playboy were making an appeal along the lines of "OUR LOYAL READERS SUBSCRIBE FOR THE ARTICLES!" while the subscriber base is all like, "where the titties at?"

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:55 (eight years ago) link

while the subscriber base is all like, "where the titties at?"

now extrapolate this to conservative politics and said in the voice of William F. Buckley, Jr.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:56 (eight years ago) link

lol @ Playboy analogy

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:57 (eight years ago) link

gonna borrow that

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:57 (eight years ago) link

did she call him "dear"?
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn),

it was a woman, video is upthread in my vine links.

worth reposting: the moment trump told christie to go get his shinebox
https://vine.co/v/i6Ei3WPMBW6

ulysses, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:57 (eight years ago) link

now extrapolate this to conservative politics and said in the voice of William F. Buckley, Jr.

eye bug on "titties"

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:57 (eight years ago) link

politics is a short-memory business.

As we'll all discover in September when Trump has successfully pivoted to being "presidential" and every single thing he said to fire up GOP primary voters is down the memory hole, at least for everyone except those voters, who will still believe that Trump is "one of them" even as he softens the message for the big stage.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:59 (eight years ago) link

every single thing he said to fire up GOP primary voters is down the memory hole, at least for everyone except those voters

this is not going to happen

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:01 (eight years ago) link

What will stop it?

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:08 (eight years ago) link

Panic.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:09 (eight years ago) link

one of the Dems key campaign strategies is going to be to constantly remind their voters how shitty Trump is - based not only on his primary shenanigans, but on his lengthy pre-campaign career

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:10 (eight years ago) link

you can credibly argue that Dems don't always run the best, most strategic campaigns, but they are well aware of this and there's no way they're going to drop that angle

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:11 (eight years ago) link

To place the magnitude of Rubio's dreadfulness in perspective, recall the outcome of recent non-incumbent Republican primary contests.

Although Mitt Romney prevailed in 2012, Rick Santorum managed to win 11 states. Four years before that, when John McCain carried 31 states to become his party's nominee, 11 states voted for Mitt Romney while eight went for Mike Huckabee.

Rubio isn’t remotely in the same league with any of these candidates. Not even Rick Santorum.

What makes Rubio such a nearly perfect loser? The fact that he only appeals to one small segment of his party: members of the conservative intellectual establishment. Don't believe me? Look at Virginia, where Rubio did (for him) fairly well today. What region went for him the strongest? Why the DC suburbs, of course, and especially the areas that lie inside the beltway — where the conservative intellectual establishment commutes home after toiling away on Capitol Hill and at the District's countless think tanks, policy shops, media outlets, and lobbying firms.

Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:14 (eight years ago) link

it's not like it would be real hard to come up with a national commercial that just replayed Trump's nastiest moments over and over again

xpost

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:14 (eight years ago) link

Rick Santorum managed to win 11 states

i somehow forgot this happened

nomar, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:15 (eight years ago) link

the republican party has been so craven my entire lifetime that i still would not be shocked if they fell in line behind nominee Trump but it really does seem like he is unacceptable to about 30% of the party and not in a way that can be resolved - his policy positions are too divergent from the things the party considers important (like small government ideology) and it seems [surprisingly to me] like a bunch of them really do mind explicit+overt bigotry.

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:16 (eight years ago) link

if he makes it that far they're going to hammer trump so hard in the general yeah. play it next to some footage of Hillary talking to kids, "smiling", writing on some pieces of paper. three things trump actually afaik has never done.

nomar, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:16 (eight years ago) link

I have no doubt that if Trump's primary-era comments get glossed over/forgotten it will only be because he starts saying even more loathsome shit during the general

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:17 (eight years ago) link

if every big name Republican comes out massively, unequivocally against Trump (like Romney did on Twitter a couple days back) does that somehow work in Trump's favour?

piscesx, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:18 (eight years ago) link

also re hillary matchup i think he's going to look terrible attacking hillary if she can keep her cool. he'll look like a bully (i think the meagan kelly spat was an early indicator that it won't play well with most ppl). and i think she is going to dance circles around him intellectually + in terms of policy. he'll come off looking like a mean, stupid snake oil salesman and dems will take house and congress, stack the supreme court, and enjoy the hillary experience for 8 years before the inauguration of elizabeth warren.

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:19 (eight years ago) link

I don't think any serious Democrat intends to just sit back and hope Trump's negatives will sink him. Plans to both actively oppose and cleverly undermine him.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2016/03/01/democrats-are-taking-the-trump-threat-very-very-seriously-theyre-right/?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-c%3Ahomepage%2Fstory

I know part of the standard dig against Hillary is that she was expecting coronation, but so far she's had to campaign everywhere and work for votes. If she is the nominee I don't think she's going to sit back and stay on cruise control till November. Ditto Sanders if he should be the nominee, he'd put up a spirited, smart, relentless campaign.

Either way, Trump has supplied his opponents with plenty of material, plus he seems unlikely to suddenly stop and become a cuddly statesmanlike figure.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:20 (eight years ago) link

it really does seem like he is unacceptable to about 30% of the party and not in a way that can be resolved

seems to me his biggest problem isn't the bigotry, it's that the money guys who have bankrolled the GOP (Kochs, Adelson, Chamber of Commerce, etc.) really don't like/trust him. He's gonna take away all their cheap undocumented labor! And raise their taxes! And make them pay for universal healthcare! etc. Trump has to win those guys over and/or convince them he can be negotiated with or otherwise tamed. Which may happen, idk.

xp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:20 (eight years ago) link

how shitty Trump is - based not only on his primary shenanigans, but on his lengthy pre-campaign career

http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--FyXPVuk---/a1e0lul3thq1zmgdlw7q.jpg

http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/BN-MF114_TrumpC_G_20160121110643.jpg

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:21 (eight years ago) link

the hat!

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:22 (eight years ago) link

lol @ Giuliani

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:24 (eight years ago) link

and is that Fred Thompson on Bubba's right?

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:25 (eight years ago) link

but seriously who among us hasn't golfed with the occasional fascist demogogue

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:25 (eight years ago) link

that's Joe Torre.

evol j, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

re Bernie, i wonder if some version of the Erica Garner ad ran throughout the South, for starters (i imagine it must've?). Have any Sanders people spoken anonymously about where their outreach to A-A voters failed, cuz it seemed 3 weeks ago they knew it was the achilles heel.

My perception is that Bernie Sanders isn't going to reach black voters in the deep Deep South just by coming to Atlanta and having Killer Mike introduce him. He could have at least brought his message to Macon and Valdosta, places where white Trump supporters have held some of their most vicious rallies. He could have gone to Hancock County, the poorest and blackest county in Georgia. He needs to offer himself to rural black voters. I'm no political strategist though. I know these places are tougher to gauge & have less political return than hitting up the big cities.

micro brewbio (crüt), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

There's also the possibility that Killer Mike isn't recognized by rural black southern voters.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:28 (eight years ago) link

how many Pitchfork writers live in northern Arkansas

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:28 (eight years ago) link

thx crut

Bloomberg is literally clenching his sphincter in that pic

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:29 (eight years ago) link

is that Billy Crystal at the, ahem, far right?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:30 (eight years ago) link

There's also the possibility that Killer Mike isn't recognized by rural black southern voters.

Well, yeah.

micro brewbio (crüt), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:30 (eight years ago) link

i would still rather golf with Trump than with Billy Crystal fwiw

xp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:30 (eight years ago) link

xpost I know at least one who used to live in Fayetteville!

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:30 (eight years ago) link

one of the best things about this primary imo is seeing how the new voting blocks obama brought in in 2008 + 2012 appear to be ongoing + permanent w/ v high levels of black voter participation. bernie supporters who are bummed about how he did in GA, NC, SC, AL should not overlook that it's a huge deal that black voters made up more than half of voters in alabama + georgia.

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:31 (eight years ago) link

i don't think it's a huge surprise that black voters -- who generally have the most to gain or lose by nominating someone seen as an electability risk, and who have maybe become a little skeptical over the years of promises made but not kept -- would coalesce around the safer, establishment pick. remember, most black voters backed hillary in '08 before it became clear that obama had a plausible path to the nomination. it's not so much that they love hillary. it's that they want a democrat in the white house

i'd again recommend this charles m blow piece - http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/11/opinion/campaign-stops/stop-bernie-splaining-to-black-voters.html

k3vin k., Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:37 (eight years ago) link

it's just the worst kind of myopia to assume that bc it's obv to you that your candidate is the best one that means it's unfathomable that someone could disagree

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:38 (eight years ago) link

http://lds.net/blog/buzz/lds-news/donald-trump-opinion-on-mormons/

Drumpf insisted that Mitt Romney lost because his faith was “alien.” But as Drumpf’s thoughts on the Church turned negative, Coppins interrupted explaining that he was Mormon. Drumpf then changed his tune saying, “People don’t understand the Mormon thing. I do. I get it.”

ulysses, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:40 (eight years ago) link

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/king-not-long-killed-trump-rally-article-1.2549868?cid=bitly

― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, March 2, 2016 10:19 AM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

well this was grim af

"I watched him for hours recruit Trump supporters with five of his buddies," said Shah. "They later attacked the group I was with. The Neo-Nazis threw punches and kicked us."

She [different she] distinctly remembered one disturbing chant, which was lead by the white supremacists, "You're scum, your time will come. You're scum, your time will come."

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:43 (eight years ago) link

latinos also broke big for hillary. re berniebro anecdotes, the same berniebro i mentioned above was making the case that hillary had exploited identity politics to unfairly beat bernie which seems pretty sour grapes to me + not relevant to reality.

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:43 (eight years ago) link

I have a friend who suspects that Sanders loses black votes every time he talks about Denmark and Norway.

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:45 (eight years ago) link

america about to be faced with the difficult question of which ideology it truly loathes more: fascism or feminism

ulysses, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:46 (eight years ago) link

/#thingsyoureadinvoxarticlesfor$200alex

ulysses, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:47 (eight years ago) link

I mean, tbc, the Blow article is pretty convincing to me. I just thought it was an interesting idea.

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:48 (eight years ago) link

berniebros also paranoid about superdelegates

flopson, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:51 (eight years ago) link

Pretty sure Killer Mike had a fairly long career in the South before El-P brought him to Pitchfork's attention via Run The Jewels.

Also:

i think he's going to look terrible attacking hillary if she can keep her cool. he'll look like a bully (i think the meagan kelly spat was an early indicator that it won't play well with most ppl). and i think she is going to dance circles around him intellectually + in terms of policy. he'll come off looking like a mean, stupid snake oil salesman and dems will take house and congress, stack the supreme court, and enjoy the hillary experience for 8 years before the inauguration of elizabeth warren.

Don't fully agree with the last part (after "and dems will...") but yeah, Google "Rick Lazio." Hillary will flatten Trump in head-to-head debates if he goes full thug. The thing is, he knows it, too - he went notably easier on Carly Fiorina than on anybody else to date.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:53 (eight years ago) link

this alternate reality where Dems replay Trump's current and very successful speeches in the future and they somehow result in a DIFFERENT outcome where they make people NOT vote for him is pretty amazing.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:53 (eight years ago) link

this is crazy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JGJVJTwLYo

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:53 (eight years ago) link

why don't they highlight how he clearly knows who david duke is since he quit the reform party because duke was in it (along with pat buchanan, etc). pretty clearly highlights his disingenuousness

global tetrahedron, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:00 (eight years ago) link

VO: What's Donald Trump's plan for unemployment in America?
Trump: It's gonna be fantastic. We're going to do amazing work.
VO: But...what's Donald Trump's actual plan for unemployment in America?
Trump: Sensational. It's gonna be sensational. We have big plans.
VO: ...Wait, no, seriously. What does he actually plan to do?
Trump: We're going to make America great again.
VO: America, do you really want a president who's basically just an unprepared and not particularly bright fourth-grader deflecting his teacher's questions because he didn't do his homework?

Don't Forget To Reince Your Priebus (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:02 (eight years ago) link

per the Clods News Network, Romney is about to give a "surprise" speech! Could it be "I will accept a draft"?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:05 (eight years ago) link

america about to be faced with the difficult question of which ideology it truly loathes more: fascism or feminism

@DennisThePerrin
Election '16: Corporate militarism vs. corporate fascism. The choice is clear.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:07 (eight years ago) link

well, it is

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:10 (eight years ago) link

another satisfied Democrat!

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:14 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, I mean, there isn't a perfect choice between the two but there's certainly one that's more preferable. Welcome to democracy. Or 'democracy' if you prefer.

Don't Forget To Reince Your Priebus (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:14 (eight years ago) link

i am usually all about "don't tell me surrender to the reagan democrats is 'mature' or the 'lesser evil'" but let's just recap rill quick

"You're scum, your time will come. You're scum, your time will come."

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:16 (eight years ago) link

this alternate reality where Dems replay Trump's current and very successful speeches in the future and they somehow result in a DIFFERENT outcome where they make people NOT vote for him is pretty amazing.

totally different voting bases. come on now.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:16 (eight years ago) link

@ggreenwald
Liberals condescendingly underestimating political skills of adversaries (Ike, Reagan, W, now Trump) is a historical, enduring problem

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:17 (eight years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CckMFa1WoAEQRvH.jpg

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:18 (eight years ago) link

dlh otm

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:18 (eight years ago) link

xp greenwald is right, but it's also right if you switch out the words "liberals" with conservatives

intheblanks, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:19 (eight years ago) link

I overestimate his ability to woo people who wouldn't vote for him and whom he's treated like garbage. Ike, Reagan, and W didn't.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:19 (eight years ago) link

xp both sides misunderestimate the strengths of the other, and from what i've seen most liberals are taking trump pretty seriously at this point, more seriously than the republicans did 8 months before crunch-time

intheblanks, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:21 (eight years ago) link

greenwald is an idiot who has done some things that even i'm impressed with

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:22 (eight years ago) link

So "corporate" is a magic word like "privilege" now?

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:22 (eight years ago) link

can't believe liberals are going to underestimate the appeal of the man currently destroying the GOP w/ his divisiveness

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:22 (eight years ago) link

this is a helluva can of worms to open but there is a considerable portion of the united states (liberal and conservative alike) that are not going to vote for a woman for president under absolutely any circumstances and that reality should be part of the conversation

ulysses, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:23 (eight years ago) link

yeah i think trump's decimation of the republican field and particularly how he annihilated two of their future (now past) stars is going to help ensure the dems don't make the same mistakes

nomar, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:23 (eight years ago) link

(Ike, Reagan, W, now Trump)

lol one of these guys is SOOOOO unlike the others, guess which one

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:23 (eight years ago) link

RIP Dr. Carson. Long may you ride on your unicorn made of jellybeans, and long may the cluster of tumors in your brain remain benign.

Don't Forget To Reince Your Priebus (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:24 (eight years ago) link

xp i feel like that's got heavy overlap with trump's base though

ciderpress, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:24 (eight years ago) link

was waiting for carson's message to conclude "to learn more about the future of our movement, please donate $50 or more to Ben Carson for America" etc etc

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:25 (eight years ago) link

this is a helluva can of worms to open but there is a considerable portion of the united states (liberal and conservative alike) that are not going to vote for a woman for president under absolutely any circumstances and that reality should be part of the conversation

― ulysses, Wednesday, March 2, 2016 2:23 PM (55 seconds ago)

a venn diagram of these people and people who aren't voting den anyway is p much a circle

k3vin k., Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:25 (eight years ago) link

Reagan was treated as a troglodyte in 1979-1980 by press though. The difference is that he was a two-term governor and didn't talk like he wanted to cut your balls off when he ran for president (as governor was another matter; it's chilling how he spoke to protestors and their supporters).

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:25 (eight years ago) link

dem* xp

k3vin k., Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:25 (eight years ago) link

brb googling troglodyte

k3vin k., Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:26 (eight years ago) link

genuinely bummed that carson is dropping out

the fruit salad of his campaign was something to witness

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:26 (eight years ago) link

yeah reagan's appeal as gov is not irrelevant to trump's at all.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:26 (eight years ago) link

kevin, i'm not positive that's the case? For a lot of southern/midwestern democrats, voting for a woman may be more difficult than voting for a black man.

ulysses, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:27 (eight years ago) link

as presidential candidates Reagan, Ike, Dubya all projected avuncular and congenial. Trump projects assholishness. Reagan, Ike, Dubya also all benefited from a united party and its attendant machinery. It's looking like Trump will not.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:27 (eight years ago) link

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-03-02/republicans-wrestle-with-trump-after-dominant-super-tuesday-wins

"Mitt Romney will lay out his case for why Donald Trump shouldn't be the nominee of the Republican Party in a speech on Thursday in Utah, according to a source with knowledge of the remarks."

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:28 (eight years ago) link

lol why are people still acting like Romney is a thing

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:28 (eight years ago) link

it's ironic that in 2012 republicans were devastated by romney's loss because they were so terrified by another 4 years of tyranny under obama, when in fact the real loss was that it created an opening for trump to blow up their party in 2016

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:29 (eight years ago) link

this is a helluva can of worms to open but there is a considerable portion of the united states (liberal and conservative alike) that are not going to vote for a woman for president under absolutely any circumstances and that reality should be part of the conversation

they said the same thing about obama and that turned out to mostly be bullshit iirc

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:29 (eight years ago) link

We are not "White Supremacist." Never have been. We are identitarians and White Nationalists.

this is some People's Front of Judea level shit

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:29 (eight years ago) link

lol one of these guys is SOOOOO unlike the others, guess which one

yeah very funny dingbat, they can have a commonality despite their overall lack of resemblance. Trump's "the Clintons came to my wedding cuz i gave em money" is still the highlight of his campaign.

So "corporate" is a magic word like "privilege" now?

or "Libya-debacle-enabling hawk".

assholish is the new avuncular
but srsly it's certainly a word that makes me reach for my revolver

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:30 (eight years ago) link

and i think i saw that hillary won white male voters in southern states too (and plenty even in strong bernie states) so it's not like she's remotely toxic to dem voters. ppl who see bernie's challenge as a repudiation of hillary are, i think unfairly, underselling the attractiveness of him as a candidate + his policies.

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:31 (eight years ago) link

For a lot of southern/midwestern democrats, voting for a woman may be more difficult than voting for a black man.

Maybe Southern, but: Tammy Baldwin, Amy Klobuchar, Heidi Heitkamp, Claire McCaskill, Debbie Stabenow etc. suggest midwestern Dems are fine with voting for women

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:32 (eight years ago) link

based on what's happening this year I will be legit surprised if Ted Nugent and a bunch of radio and tv hosts don't run for the 2020 GOP nomination

Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:33 (eight years ago) link

Not at the debate, hope still survives, announcement on Friday... please please please be that's he's announcing he's Trump's VP.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:35 (eight years ago) link

Like, not with Trump's knowledge, because he didn't realise you have to ask.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:35 (eight years ago) link

Hey history-heads: who was the last presidential candidate to win their party's nomination without any prior political experience whatsoever?

Don't Forget To Reince Your Priebus (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:38 (eight years ago) link

eisenhower?

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:41 (eight years ago) link

Eisenhower? GWB had very limited obv.

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:42 (eight years ago) link

D'oh, beat to it. Twice.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:42 (eight years ago) link

of the two major parties, yeah Eisenhower

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:42 (eight years ago) link

otoh eisenhower was governor of 1/4th of germany a while

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:43 (eight years ago) link

depends how wide your definition of party is

Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:43 (eight years ago) link

did Morbz just go archie bunker on me

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:46 (eight years ago) link

GWB was governor of Texas that's not exactly a spot on the local school board

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:47 (eight years ago) link

what about grant? (I may be missing some major pre-presidency political career but iirc he just went from army to president)

Cornelius Pardew (jim in glasgow), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:48 (eight years ago) link

question was about the last one

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:48 (eight years ago) link

george washington?

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:49 (eight years ago) link

grant, zachary taylor, and uh arguably washington all had no pre-presidential political experience

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:49 (eight years ago) link

wilson also had very little experience -- he was only governor of new jersey for two years

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:51 (eight years ago) link

Richard Nixon was a congressman and Veep when he was nominated in 1960 but the wraith-slug who took over his body in 1967 had little political experience outside of phone bank work.

Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:52 (eight years ago) link

Being the highest ranking general during a civil war is a political position.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:53 (eight years ago) link

so the CEO of a major corporation but i assume we mean "civil politics"

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:56 (eight years ago) link

Maybe it’s too early for this, but given that Trump and Clinton are most likely going to be the nominees, I'm curious about which of 2012 Obama states Trump could plausibly flip to beat Clinton.

I guess Ohio, Virginia, and Florida are the ones he’d go for, but even if he took all three of those he'd still have to win one of the three Mountain West states or Iowa, which seems challenging, given his rhetoric. With things as they stand right now, the electoral math for a presidency is pretty tough for him. Which is not to say impossible, he's obviously gotten this far.

But for all the talk of Reagan Dems, the Upper Midwest (Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin, Illinois) and Pennsylvania are diverse states with large urban centers that haven't gone Republican in a presidential campaign since 1988. They’re obviously the type of states that can and do elect Republican governors, particularly in off-year elections, but they’ve been really consistent in presidential elections. If Trump wins those states, then this would be a major realignment election or some incredible crisis or scandal will have occurred.

intheblanks, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:57 (eight years ago) link

Which, again, is totally possible! But I'm a little skeptical that consistently winning an incredibly divided GOP field with 40% of the vote is necessarily a harbinger of the type of political power that will realign some of these states.

Anyway, I hope I'm right. Not trying to downplay a serious threat, just interested in trying to realistically figure out how he actually gets to the presidency. Feel like it will take a major economic downturn or serious Clinton scandal for it to happen.

intheblanks, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:57 (eight years ago) link

i know that there are issues with using voter turnout in primaries/caucuses to predict voter turnout in the general, but this is concerning:

Last night, more than 8.5 million Republicans turned out to vote in the 11 GOP Super Tuesday states that reported results. That suggests far more enthusiasm than the last time Republicans picked a nominee. In those same 11 states in 2012, turnout only totaled around 4.7 million.

That makes this year's turnout in those 11 states 81 percent higher than four years ago.

Contrast that to the Democrat side. In the Dems' 11 states reporting results from last night, turnout only totaled around 5.9 million — that's around 2.6 million fewer people than came out in those states 2008, when Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were in the middle of what would would be a long, hard-fought race.

http://www.npr.org/2016/03/02/468918065/republican-super-tuesday-turnout

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:57 (eight years ago) link

Being the highest ranking general during a civil war is a political position.

― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, March 2, 2016 7:53 PM (2 minutes ago)

well yeah, and obv the guy who commanded allied forces in europe was better prepared to lead a country than donald fuckin' trump

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 19:58 (eight years ago) link

Last night, more than 8.5 million Republicans turned out to vote in the 11 GOP Super Tuesday states that reported results. That suggests far more enthusiasm than the last time Republicans picked a nominee. In those same 11 states in 2012, turnout only totaled around 4.7 million.

A large part of this can be attributed to "We've really got a shot this time - let's go!" vs. "OK, so who wants to run against the incredibly popular incumbent who the media thinks changed the whole country by his very presence?"

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:01 (eight years ago) link

I miss Carson already. Damn.

from what i've seen most liberals are taking trump pretty seriously at this point

Yeah see the Sargent WaPo thing posted earlier.

more seriously than the republicans did 8 months before crunch-time

I recall righties in both '08 and '12 saying a ham sandwich could beat the obviously unqualified lightweight Obama.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:03 (eight years ago) link

I'm concerned about this too, but is there evidence that primary turnout has a serious impact on general election results? Jamelle Bouie was tweeting about this last night. https://twitter.com/jbouie/status/704773596158230528

intheblanks, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:03 (eight years ago) link

disbelievingrove.gif

nomar, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:04 (eight years ago) link

A large part of this can be attributed to "We've really got a shot this time - let's go!" vs. "OK, so who wants to run against the incredibly popular incumbent who the media thinks changed the whole country by his very presence?"

i don't know, weren't republicans pretty stoked to take obama down in 2012? and didn't they believe, up until election night, even past the time when the election was called, in karl rove's case, that they were surely going to win?

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:05 (eight years ago) link

i think w/r/t the dem primaries in 1988, they were similar to the republican primary this year in that there were half a dozen candidates who were vv popular with their particular bases and were all also very big personalities in a way. was gary hart still running at that point? beyond him, you had dukakis, jesse jackson, paul simon, gephardt, gore...

nomar, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:06 (eight years ago) link

acc to 538 there's is no correlation between primary numbers and general election numbers, when i get the chance i'll try to dig up the post where they discuss it

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:08 (eight years ago) link

xpost There's a 1000+ page book about that election if you want to brush up

Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:08 (eight years ago) link

Harry Reid:

Donald Trump is the standard-bearer for the Republican Party," Reid said from the Senate floor Wednesday.
- yes

...Republicans created him by spending seven years appealing to some of the darkest forces in America.
- yesss

...Now it's up to the Republicans to try and undo what they have done by denouncing Donald Trump.
- sure, yessssss

...It's time for the Republicans to stop the Frankenstein they created.
- godDAMMIT harry reid, frankenstein was the CREATOR of the monster, you don't create frankenstein, only frankenstein's mother could create frankenstein, this is a basic fact, FUCK

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:10 (eight years ago) link

trump is frankenstein. his voters are frankenstein's monster.

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:12 (eight years ago) link

http://www.npr.org/2016/02/26/468152317/will-high-tide-of-primary-voter-turnout-float-republicans-in-november

According to Michael McDonald, a professor at the University of Florida who tracks voter turnout at his blog ElectProject.org, it's too early to tell whether Republicans will have a general election advantage just yet.

"There are some tea leaves to be read here, but I don't think there's enough information here to project into the outcome or the levels of enthusiasm in November," McDonald said.

McDonald pointed out that in 2000, Republican primary turnout was much heavier than it was for Democrats — and that election between George W. Bush and Al Gore ended up essentially deadlocked until the Supreme Court intervened.

One reason there's more perceived enthusiasm for Republicans right now is that there were simply more candidates for a long time — a field that started out with 17 has now winnowed to five. They've spent more money, commanded more media attention and had more twists and turns than the Democratic battle between Clinton and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.

"Just from sort of a logistical standpoint, there's a greater level of competition on the GOP side, coupled with all of the resources that have been spent," McDonald said. "We should expect that Republicans would be more engaged simply for that reason."

McDonald also argues that Republicans are more engaged in the primary process by their nature — they're the ones most likely to show up in drop-off elections in midterm and off-year contests and are historically more engaged.

the other article i saw that i can't easily locate right now compared a bunch of primary numbers to general election numbers and found no correlation

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:15 (eight years ago) link

I had a hard time not reading those quotes from Michael McDonald as song lyrics.

Glad to see you have the same reaction as I to Frankenstein-ing, Karl.

Don't Forget To Reince Your Priebus (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:17 (eight years ago) link

harry reid prob not making mordy's point there but mordy otm

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:19 (eight years ago) link

also haha

Republicans created him by spending seven years appealing to some of the darkest forces in America.

very diplomatic

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:20 (eight years ago) link

If all of this leads to Trump immolating himself on an ice floe in the Arctic, they can call him whatever they want.

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:21 (eight years ago) link

I would like to say definitively that people who choose to vote in a Democratic primary over a Republican primary are already repudiating the overtly racist themes that is powering Trump through the Republican primaries but I don't know people's true hearts so it would be speculation. I strongly, strongly suspect that the audience Trump is appealing to with his bluntness has a plurality of support within the Republican party and I don't think he can modulate enough to salve the people within that party who have rejected him outright so far, let alone voters who are actively choosing someone to compete against him.

The wild card in this are spiteful Bernie supporters who are convinced that Hillary Clinton is a mewling she-devil and that voting for her is directly equivalent to voting for Ted Cruz, so they will either not vote if she's the nominee or, in more puzzling logic, vote for Trump because somehow currently being an unrepentant bigot bully is better than having advocated for things that hurt minorities in the past and saying "Based on how all of that turned out, I would not advocate those positions today."

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:21 (eight years ago) link

If only Jon Stewart were around to clip together this "dark forces" talking point, with Reid and Rahm so far.

... (Eazy), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:23 (eight years ago) link

(Just so we are clear, I am emphatically NOT saying no one has anything to worry about; what I am saying is that if people actually do their jobs, Trump will not be President.)

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:24 (eight years ago) link

obv the guy who commanded allied forces in europe was better prepared to lead a country than donald fuckin' trump

"(Clemenceau) once said that war is too important to be left to the generals. When he said that, 50 years ago, he may have been right...but now, war is too important to be left to the politicians. They have neither the time, the training, nor the inclination for strategic thought...And I can no longer, sit around and allow Communist subversion, Communist corruption, and Communist infiltration of our precious bodily fluids."

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:27 (eight years ago) link

The wild card in this are spiteful Bernie supporters who are convinced that Hillary Clinton is a mewling she-devil and that voting for her is directly equivalent to voting for Ted Cruz, so they will either not vote if she's the nominee or, in more puzzling logic, vote for Trump because somehow currently being an unrepentant bigot bully is better than having advocated for things that hurt minorities in the past and saying "Based on how all of that turned out, I would not advocate those positions today."

I do not believe these people actually exist, any more than I believed the "PUMA" people who were supposedly rabidly pro-Hillary and militantly anti-Obama were real, outside the realm of Internet bullshit.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:29 (eight years ago) link

i agree - i think bernie supporters are going to fall in line. he is going to lose by a lot more delegates than hillary did in 2008 so it's not even like they'll have a legitimate narrative of "we were screwed." and i sincerely hope they aren't going to vote for trump, esp after all the strong principled stands they've associated their with their support of bernie.

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:30 (eight years ago) link

yeah i think bernie-to-trump crossover (jesus) is just the standard crisis-time wavering of the angry white working class between socialism and fascism. i'm sure these people exist; they always do.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:31 (eight years ago) link

if and i suppose WHEN more likely that Bernie drops out, I suspect there will be a lot of people who will be in touch telling him to give a strong statement in support of Hillary. probably saying to him, look we know she's not ideal but we've got to keep them out of the white house.

nomar, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:32 (eight years ago) link

there will be a lot of people who will be in touch telling him to give a strong statement in support of Hillary

Is there even the slightest doubt that he would do this anyway?

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:33 (eight years ago) link

so what would a Clinton Treasury Department look like? BlackRock.

"Fink has promoted the privatization of Social Security, while mocking the idea of retiring at 65, which is easy for a business executive who sits at a desk all day to say, rather than working on an assembly line or as a waiter."

https://theintercept.com/2016/03/02/larry-fink-and-his-blackrock-team-poised-to-take-over-hillary-clintons-treasury-department/

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:34 (eight years ago) link

yeah i think bernie-to-trump crossover (jesus) is just the standard crisis-time wavering of the angry white working class between socialism and fascism. i'm sure these people exist; they always do.

― denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, March 2, 2016 12:31 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

confusing "yeah" here, don't know who i was agreeing with. i don't think hillary should take these people's support for granted, because the handful of things that bernie and trump have in common are exactly the same handful of things hillary and bernie don't. (cf morbs' blackrock link; cf also of course dicks.) on the other hand i'm not sure she cares about those people's support in an election in which the gop seems poised to write off basically anyone with melanin.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:39 (eight years ago) link

In fact, Fink’s views on Wall Street are so similar to Clinton’s that it’s hard to see that as a coincidence. Most notably, Clinton’s financial reform plan is mute when it comes to regulating asset management firms as SIFIs.

Fink has in recent months stressed an end to “short-termism” in the financial markets. For example, he wants to limit share buybacks that pump up stock prices, and encourage investors to hold stock longer, to focus on long-term corporate performance. Clinton has mirrored this language to such a degree that the New York Times’s Andrew Ross Sorkin suggested that Clinton “could have been channeling Laurence D. Fink.”

While the call to end short-termism is in some ways laudable, in Fink’s case it certainly reflects his self-interest. Clinton’s tax plan, for example, would keep capital gains rates higher for short-term holdings and decrease the rate for investors who hold assets over five years. Because BlackRock buys and holds most of its investments, any policy favoring long-term strategies in the markets would improve the firm’s bottom line.

limiting share buybacks and encouraging investors to hold stock longer to focus on long-term corporate performance??? what a piece of shit.

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:40 (eight years ago) link

All I can say is if "BernFeelers who won't vote for Clinton ever" are the new "PUMAs", I hope they prove equally inconsequential, or equally mythical.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:41 (eight years ago) link

just fyi in case you don't read the intercept article, hillary has never said anything about fink or blackrock so this is what we might call "speculative fear-mongering," if you weren't inclined to see it as a public service warning against something that might happen (but there's no reason necessarily to believe it will)

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:42 (eight years ago) link

lol i had no idea -- weird twitter fake pundit has called most of the primaries correctly

http://www.ibtimes.com/day-diggler-medias-most-accurate-political-pundit-joke-2329043

“[Silver] just built this computer, but this election doesn’t make any sense,” he said, noting the primal feelings that seem to be fueling the Trump phenomenon. “It’s not like 1992 or 1996 anger, which was nonspecific and vague, it’s actual palpable anger.”

He was quick to burn the other, non-data, gut-based side of the spectrum as well, made up of elite talking heads who cash six-figure checks for bum predictions. “These idiots think deep anger disappears because they’ve never been that angry about anything in their lives,” Biederman said with a laugh.

Cafe.com sent both of them to New Hampshire, but usually they’re just doing the best they can in New York. Aside from one predictive stumble in Nevada, which they called for Sanders, their instincts get results.

Take Rubio’s victory in Minnesota, which Google Trends, Ballotcraft, and Predictwise erroneously called for Trump. “They’re business conservatives but they’re p***ies so they’re not gonna go for Trump. We thought about it for two minutes.”

goole, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:44 (eight years ago) link

Biden otm

this why I'm not completely opposed to the anti-political correctness stance that Trump and other republicans are taking. If it means bringing all this ugliness to the surface so that it can be properly denounced and destroyed, then great. If it means legitimizing and institutionalizing even more hatred, then not so good.

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:48 (eight years ago) link

hey everybody let's take a break and eat hair with Ted Cruz

https://youtu.be/v75wCTMZoSY

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:49 (eight years ago) link

Without caricaturing Clinton as a she-devil, I would think there would be Sanders supporters who would want to sponsor the less corporate/funded, less dynastic candidate. Especially if those voters aren't committed Democrats, but ones who feel alienated by the establishment.

... (Eazy), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:50 (eight years ago) link

They'll vote for Clinton.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:55 (eight years ago) link

http://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/takingnote/2016/03/02/the-myth-of-trump-hating-republicans/

Thought this was good, although it didn't cover any new territory

Treeship, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:55 (eight years ago) link

the Intercept piece is clearly dealing with a strong possibility, not a certainty. but keep pimping, M.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:56 (eight years ago) link

speaking of pimping maybe instead of copy/pasting every dennis perrin / fake richard nixon / intercept article that crosses yr field of vision you could set up a twitter feed to reblog them all!

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 20:58 (eight years ago) link

wow that intercept piece is garbage, that's like preying on leftist's financial illiteracy. look a Rich Finance Guy likes her policies, they must be bad right?

flopson, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:01 (eight years ago) link

Re: GOP turnout, I have no idea, but I imagine there are plenty of Republicans who went to vote for anyone but Trump. This is micro-anecdotal, but I have a friend in Arizona (a closed primary) who even changed his affiliation to Republican just to vote for someone not-Trump.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:02 (eight years ago) link

right! xp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:03 (eight years ago) link

I hated this dude's most recent book, but I won't hold it against him as long as he writes stuff like this:
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/trump-a-war-criminal-in-the-making-20160229?page=2

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:04 (eight years ago) link

Is there even the slightest doubt that he would do this anyway?

Yeah, Bernie is his own guy, but he's doesn't seem to be a baby out with the bathwater type dick like Nader.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:07 (eight years ago) link

dude, Treeship that article is garbage.

It ends with: There is no chasm in the Republican Party, which directly contradicts the division he identifies a couple sentences earlier:
It is a party of white people that protects its richest members and feeds off the anxiety of its poorest members by directing their anger at minorities, immigrants and women.

^^^that's where the division is

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:07 (eight years ago) link

Accepting the possibility that someone like Šešelj (or Trump) could advance so rapidly from bombast to mass murder requires questioning the fabric of reality before it unravels and shows itself to be fragile and disastrously dependent on an assumed ethical consensus. What I've learned is that people are addicted to the inertia of their common reality, to the desperate belief that everything shall continue as it is simply because it's been going fine up to this point.


so otm. all of history seems like it will continue the way it always has until traumatically + shockingly it suddenly doesn't.

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:08 (eight years ago) link

xps morbs- any financial regulation will benefit some members of financial community at the expense of others, so you can apply that form of criticism to literally any reform. the fact that hillary's talking about short-termism is a triumph of left finance writers like mike conczal, josh mason and doug henwood who have brought critifcism of share buybacks into the mainstream

flopson, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:08 (eight years ago) link

it's not just that it'll happen to benefit this guy by some coincidence. he is in favor of a policy (long term growth) that should be healthier for corporations like his and for the economy as a whole. it's not that he's profiting more off corporations investing long term than other corporations - they'll all benefit from this! he just has the foresight to advocate for it.

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:10 (eight years ago) link

sanders has said he would renege PNTR too, fwiw

flopson, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:19 (eight years ago) link

although it seems popular among ilxors

flopson, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:20 (eight years ago) link

For the record, I put in that comment about spiteful Sanders supporters based entirely on people in my Facebook feed, a couple of which I am on the verge of muting/unfriending. More than one of them has opined that Clinton is a worse choice than Trump, which to my mind tells me that in a competition between the two, they would not have qualms about voting for Trump.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:26 (eight years ago) link

so, totally anecdotal and probably not statistically significant, but not imaginary

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:26 (eight years ago) link

xpost That to me is just insane.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:27 (eight years ago) link

ftr I also have at least one friend who seems to fit that description

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:27 (eight years ago) link

Like, vote for fucking Clinton and then spend all your time working harder to get people to her left elected to congress! What the fuck ...

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:27 (eight years ago) link

I really want to know if all the anti Clinton absolutists really spend a minute more on politics than the presidential election every four years.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:28 (eight years ago) link

these people are not leftists.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:28 (eight years ago) link

i mean i don't know djp's facebook friends. but people willing to defect from bernie to trump are not morbs-style purists. they're angry.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:29 (eight years ago) link

flopson, where does the privatizing Soc Sec fit in with Fink, then?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:29 (eight years ago) link

As a resident of MA this Sanders supporter has the luxury of never having to vote for Hillary Clinton.

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:29 (eight years ago) link

dude, Treeship that article is garbage.

It ends with: There is no chasm in the Republican Party, which directly contradicts the division he identifies a couple sentences earlier:
It is a party of white people that protects its richest members and feeds off the anxiety of its poorest members by directing their anger at minorities, immigrants and women.

^^^that's where the division is

― Οὖτις, Wednesday, March 2, 2016 4:07 PM (18 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Also the GOP revolt against Trump is very real, it's just that it's not exactly because the GOP is an anti-racist party, it's more that (1) Trump isn't actually that much of a conservative on a lot of issues, or at least it's not clear where he stands on them, and (2) the overt racism and buffoonery is alienating to a lot of people the GOP needs to win elections in the future. Basically he manages to damage the GOP brand and not actually support the principles its richest members support, all at the same time.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:30 (eight years ago) link

As a resident of MA this Sanders supporter has the luxury of never having to vote for Hillary Clinton.

my state has about 3 republicans in it so i share this luxury, but things are getting so fucking ugly it's feeling less satisfying by the day.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:32 (eight years ago) link

i wouldn't think anyone republican or democrat would try to privatize social securit againy, the last attempt was a complete disaster

flopson, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:33 (eight years ago) link

people who voted for Sanders bcz of working-/middle-class rage who find that transferable to Trump are clearly not supporters BS would be proud of having.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:33 (eight years ago) link

of course.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:34 (eight years ago) link

Republicans without Trump on ticket would eliminate Social Security. No more chatter about privatizing

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:34 (eight years ago) link

I would like to point out that I did not call these people leftists, nor did I say anything about what Sanders thinks of their support. I only mentioned them because a) they don't fit the profile of the majority of the people I know who are participating in the Democratic primaries/caucuses, and b) they are irrational actors whose behavior I don't think anyone can reasonably predict.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:36 (eight years ago) link

I would like to point out that I did not call these people leftists

oh nah i was talking to josh re: working to get people to hillary's left in congress.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:37 (eight years ago) link

I believe my would-rather-have-Trump-than-Clinton Berniebro friend said something like "I'd rather burn this whole place down" fwiw, and I agree with DJP's profile

lol xp

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:39 (eight years ago) link

"Fight Club" nihilism. Clearly they must live such sheltered, privileged lives that they've never experienced what it's like to live in a place that's truly been fucked.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:49 (eight years ago) link

HRC just wants to see the arid distant parts of the world burn

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 21:56 (eight years ago) link

Not sure if linking this is going to work but:

https://www.facebook.com/TheOther98/videos?fref=photo

Retro novelty punk (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:13 (eight years ago) link

Dammit.

Retro novelty punk (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:13 (eight years ago) link

^^^^ SEE!!! it's starting!

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:15 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-qwM0qLjl8

Retro novelty punk (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:16 (eight years ago) link

LOL. It's this, the haunted face of Christie.

Retro novelty punk (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:17 (eight years ago) link

The wild card in this are spiteful Bernie supporters who are convinced that Hillary Clinton is a mewling she-devil and that voting for her is directly equivalent to voting for Ted Cruz, so they will either not vote if she's the nominee or, in more puzzling logic, vote for Trump because somehow currently being an unrepentant bigot bully is better than having advocated for things that hurt minorities in the past and saying "Based on how all of that turned out, I would not advocate those positions today."

If Clinton loses to Trump and it is blamed on Sanders supporters, that will be fucking classic. The entire Clinton campaign is predicated on the idea that Sanders "can't win" and that she can.

If Clinton loses, she should point her finger at the uninspiring, flip-flopping corporate, militaristic neocon in the goddamn mirror. Not at the tiny group of Clinton-hating lefties in our Facebook feeds.

Given all that, I'll still vote for her. :/

schwantz, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:30 (eight years ago) link

why would her hardcore supporters let the facts get in the way when they're the same people who've been braying the Nader bullshit for 16 years?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:31 (eight years ago) link

can't recall Mordy saying anything about Nader tbh

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:39 (eight years ago) link

If Clinton loses to Trump and it is blamed on Sanders supporters

this is not going to happen, because Sanders will not run a third-party challenge

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:39 (eight years ago) link

As far as the "establishment" is concerned, I have been involved in a civil rights / environment cause in my majority black community, and while we get frustrated with Obama, sometimes we forget how much more leverage we have with the Dems - any Dem. we're terrified right now because anyone who has far right goons policing his rallies is not someone who would pay any regard to about the civil rights community's relationship to Washington. I can't imagine that I would feel comfortable firing off a letter to the DOJ and getting a response, as I have done with Obama. Trump would be worse than Bush ever was, he has no respect for civil rights people at all, we'll have no influence whatsoever if we want something done. Someone who is outside the "establishment" is not beholden to political norms. Trump wouldn't even have to be nice to the black community or listen to them.

Fake Sam's Club (I M Losted), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:40 (eight years ago) link

Trump? Trump? Trump?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJgvzTti990

clemenza, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:43 (eight years ago) link

I want to punch Stein in his scaly reptilian face sometimes

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:45 (eight years ago) link

where ya been Losted?

xxp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:46 (eight years ago) link

lol @ Ben Stein "Economist"

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:47 (eight years ago) link

btw Trump has the Secret Service policing his rallies now

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:48 (eight years ago) link

don't all the candidates get secret service details

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:48 (eight years ago) link

they're protecting the crowd from Trump

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:50 (eight years ago) link

Shakey, you don't understand, the entitlement of the most brainwashed Democrats now extends to "deserving" the votes of nonvoters.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:50 (eight years ago) link

Bernie is helping Hillary. He has pointed out, truthfully, how she is tied to wall street because fighting entrenched interests is the centerpiece of his campaign. Other than that he is not criticizing her about the emails or doing anything else to paint her as a nefarious, untrustworthy person. Berniebros aside, he has been very careful about not damaging her in the general and I don't think he gets enough credit.

Treeship, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:50 (eight years ago) link

The extension of this primary makes the dems look good/civil, and keeps the republicans from totally stealing the stage. If hillary loses it is absolutely not due to bernie or his supporters. Quite the opposite.

Treeship, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:52 (eight years ago) link

http://i1.ytimg.com/vi/L1R5WwcOve8/hqdefault.jpg

Dan I., Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:54 (eight years ago) link

(re: Christie's face)

Dan I., Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:54 (eight years ago) link

Trump has had SecService protection since November... the legal details of ejecting BLM protestors from a DT rally by the police in GA on Monday is illuminating:

As journalist Dahlia Lithwick and First Amendment lawyer Raymond Vasvari observed in 2012, when the federal law on trespass was quietly amended by H.R. 347 — to make it a crime, punishable by up to 10 years in prison, “to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions” in locations guarded by the Secret Service, including places where individuals under Secret Service protection are temporarily located — the new statute made it “easier for the government to criminalize protest.”

What that means in practice is that campaign rallies for Donald Trump, who was granted Secret Service protection in November, and Hillary Clinton, who will be guarded for life as a former first lady, are the very opposite of free speech zones under federal law. (The restrictions also apply to all appearances by former presidents and first ladies, as well as those of two other candidates, Bernie Sanders and Ben Carson, who are currently protected by the service.)

Another problem, as Gabe Rottman, a policy adviser for the ACLU, explained in 2012, is that the amended law “could be misused as part of a larger move by the Secret Service and others to suppress lawful protest by relegating it to particular locations at a public event.”

https://theintercept.com/2016/03/01/now-hes-guarded-secret-service-federal-law-criminalizes-protesting-trump/

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:55 (eight years ago) link

One thing thats interesting about christie is that he seems like enough of a human being that you can imagine him feeling shame or disgrace. I don't think that's true of everyone in the republican field.

Treeship, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:56 (eight years ago) link

Christie is positively stuffed chockfull of shame and disgrace

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 23:00 (eight years ago) link

it's his creamy filling

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 23:00 (eight years ago) link

xpost welp I wasn't gonna finish that tuna salad anyway

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 23:01 (eight years ago) link

lol

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 23:04 (eight years ago) link

lol @ Ben Stein "Economist"

― Οὖτις, Wednesday, March 2, 2016 5:47 PM (17 minutes ago)

i was just going to post this. does having an undergraduate degree in econ really make one an "economist"?

k3vin k., Wednesday, 2 March 2016 23:05 (eight years ago) link

he had a TV show about money! must know what he's talking about

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 23:06 (eight years ago) link

DJP otm way upthread; Treeship also otm. Sanders has been pretty classy all the way and I wish more Clinton supporters would notice and say so. I certainly have.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 23:15 (eight years ago) link

this is otm:

Cruz’s strategy of activating movement conservatives, on the other hand, has failed in states across the South, where Trump peeled away evangelicals. Trump is winning on Cruz’s turf. Instead of proving that there is a wave of ideologically motivated far-right conservatives ready to wash across the country, Cruz’s campaign seems to have proven that much of the GOP base is shallow, motivated not so much by ideology as petty identity politics, rhetoric and personality.

lol @ Rubio getting absolutely zero mileage out of winning MN. I haven't seen a single piece doing more than acknowledge it in passing. Still don't get why he won there, of all places.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 23:16 (eight years ago) link

he had a TV show about money! must know what he's talking about

― Οὖτις, Wednesday, March 2, 2016 6:06 PM

Guys, Reagan had a degree in economics.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 23:17 (eight years ago) link

xpost cos his name sounds the funniest when native Sotans say it

you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 23:18 (eight years ago) link

Sotos too

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 23:18 (eight years ago) link

lol @ Rubio getting absolutely zero mileage out of winning MN. I haven't seen a single piece doing more than acknowledge it in passing. Still don't get why he won there, of all places.

― Οὖτις, Wednesday, March 2, 2016 5:16 PM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

people up here across the political spectrum are sticklers for uprightness and have a preference for calm and good order

goole, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 23:29 (eight years ago) link

rubio haters on the right are already joking about the "mondale map" which is a frustratingly wrong comparison but eh

goole, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 23:30 (eight years ago) link

people up here across the political spectrum are sticklers for uprightness and have a preference for calm and good order

Yeah I saw people baffling about Rubio winning MN on TV last night and it made perfect sense to me - in my experience northern midwestern folk have a low tolerance for loudmouth assholes and ostentatious public displays.

joygoat, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 23:38 (eight years ago) link

so why then do they turn to Rubio?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 23:38 (eight years ago) link

It was him or Carson...

nickn, Wednesday, 2 March 2016 23:40 (eight years ago) link

Look who's defending Trump: http://m.nydailynews.com/news/national/king-not-long-killed-trump-rally-article-1.2549868?cid=bitly

Whatever you do politically this year, please help keep this guy away from the White House.

Fake Sam's Club (I M Losted), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 23:41 (eight years ago) link

Christie's shame is he knows Springsteen is watching and he let him down again

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 23:46 (eight years ago) link

It was him or Carson...

― nickn, Wednesday, March 2, 2016

I mean, no way I can look at Rubio and see the sober, thoughtful, English-speaking nominee these people did.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 23:49 (eight years ago) link

Here's what the NYT wrote in their first encounter with Hitler in 1922, and it is very familiar:

https://mobile.twitter.com/jonostrower/status/705171149022433280/photo/1

jedi slimane (suzy), Wednesday, 2 March 2016 23:54 (eight years ago) link

agreed wrt Rubio. can't believe he's become the"sober" choice. he is a fucking goofball.

rmde bob (will), Thursday, 3 March 2016 00:00 (eight years ago) link

royaume des aveugles

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 3 March 2016 00:21 (eight years ago) link

chris christie has a li'l of this going on

https://nesncom.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/caldwell.jpg

nomar, Thursday, 3 March 2016 00:31 (eight years ago) link

xpost well you go with what you have - the only way for this generation of Republicans to churn out a warm, well-spoken, cordial candidate is if they turned to exhumation

Neanderthal, Thursday, 3 March 2016 00:33 (eight years ago) link

u.m.s.: I think Springsteen is a pretty forgiving dude. I predict he and Christie will hug it out when this is all over.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 3 March 2016 00:53 (eight years ago) link

Springsteen understands regret, cf. all his songs I can think of rn

Treeship, Thursday, 3 March 2016 00:56 (eight years ago) link

uh oh, looks like Rubio made dad mad:

Fox News’ top brass has given up hope on the presidential campaign of Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), according to a Wednesday New York Magazine report.

The report cites three anonymous Fox sources who said network chairman Roger Ailes told people he's lost faith in Rubio’s ability to secure the Republican nomination after disappointing returns in early primaries and caucuses.

Rubio secured his first win in Minnesota on Super Tuesday, while top rivals Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Donald Trump so far have won four and 10 contests, respectively.

“We’re finished with Rubio,” Ailes allegedly told an unnamed Fox host, according to the report. "We can't do the Rubio thing anymore."

Karl Malone, Thursday, 3 March 2016 01:00 (eight years ago) link

Lose Miley Cyrus, pick up Herman Cain--it's all good.

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/herman-cain-republicans-who-dont-back-nominee-trump-are-absolutely-insane/

clemenza, Thursday, 3 March 2016 01:04 (eight years ago) link

how long til fox turns pro-trump? just in a business sense i figure they'd follow the crowds/ratings

Karl Malone, Thursday, 3 March 2016 01:06 (eight years ago) link

Christie's shame is he knows Springsteen is watching and he let him down again

Springsteen understands regret, cf. all his songs I can think of rn

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7ky70i_VGc

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 3 March 2016 01:07 (eight years ago) link

fox news is going to go all in on trump, they know where (or how) their bread is buttered

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 02:41 (eight years ago) link

it's not as if they haven't promoted equally authoritarian and batshit people over the last few decades

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 02:41 (eight years ago) link

sorry if this has been linked already, thought it ws interesting:
http://www.vox.com/2016/3/1/11127424/trump-authoritarianism

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 02:43 (eight years ago) link

Christie is an angry, sad and damaged man, I have always seen that and I really don't get why this particular endorsement makes people think he's "selling his soul."

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Thursday, 3 March 2016 03:28 (eight years ago) link

Cant sell what you dont have!

Οὖτις, Thursday, 3 March 2016 03:42 (eight years ago) link

He's actually done his share of trump-lite demagoguing and hate-spewing over the years too.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Thursday, 3 March 2016 03:43 (eight years ago) link

maybe what's surprised folks is that while they mostly understand that he's a swollen asshole, he's not exactly in the same realm as a Palin or LePage or even a Jan Brewer? like you would be surprised if those nitwits DIDN'T support Trump

rmde bob (will), Thursday, 3 March 2016 03:52 (eight years ago) link

xposts- Mordy thanks for that article, it ties so much together.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 3 March 2016 03:54 (eight years ago) link

i think the key factor is that Christie got his best press for making a full-throated defense of Muslims' religious freedom a couple years ago.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 03:58 (eight years ago) link

Clinton's deathless thesis statement is even more trying by the way she says "AMERICA NEEDS TO BE MADE HO-ELLL"

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 04:04 (eight years ago) link

sorry if this has been linked already, thought it ws interesting:
http://www.vox.com/2016/3/1/11127424/trump-authoritarianism

that was fantastic, thank you.

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 04:13 (eight years ago) link

amazing that they predicted that people would be drawn to one of America's most famous celebrities. what will this niche group of political scientists unearth next?

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 3 March 2016 04:23 (eight years ago) link

"alternative energy"

Neanderthal, Thursday, 3 March 2016 04:29 (eight years ago) link

the gist of the article is that there are more Trumps coming, presumably with better "people skills"

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 04:31 (eight years ago) link

I've been thinking back to a discussion we had in the wake of Ferguson, in which we talked about the rise of "gear culture" (see Bass Pro Shops) and with it a certain re-scripting of American masculinity, a movement away from self-discipline, inner strength, courage, and coolness-under-pressure, and toward sheer ability to project power, and on the equipment with which one repels or destroys external threats. This culture also devalues rational thought and, in a certain sense, a realist epistemology. If you have enough gear, and you're scared (or pissed off) enough, rational inquiry is a hindrance. (The expansion of the Stand your Ground laws seem to me of a piece with all this. Fuck the duty to retreat. It's not just my home that's my castle: if I'm scared enough of you, and you so much as raise your hands, I have a right to shoot you).

In this way, Trump is the ultimate piece of gear, he's the monster truck of candidates: self-propelled, turbocharged, loud, shiny, and willing to wreak havoc left and right. The prospect of his Presidency, from this point of view, must feel irresistible.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 3 March 2016 04:32 (eight years ago) link

(you really didn't read it, did you? none of the academic work save one late-2015 study has to do with DT specifically) xp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 04:33 (eight years ago) link

xp (and I do realize lots and lots of caveats have to be placed next to my characterization of the "older" values of American masculinity, but still I think there's more than a grain of truth here)

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 3 March 2016 04:34 (eight years ago) link

similar tweet to Perrin's (by someone you guys seem to hate less)

@jeremyscahill
Trump is the candidate of bigotry and fascism. Hillary is the candidate of Empire.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 04:36 (eight years ago) link

I'll take the imperialist, thank you very much

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 3 March 2016 04:40 (eight years ago) link

is he saying Hillary is rubbing elbows with Terence Howard

Neanderthal, Thursday, 3 March 2016 04:42 (eight years ago) link

i'll take whoever is responsible for less deaths

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 3 March 2016 05:22 (eight years ago) link

You would vote for trump over hillary?

Treeship, Thursday, 3 March 2016 05:24 (eight years ago) link

it is odd that Trump is an authoritarian yet Hillary is the one who voted with W on Iraq

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 3 March 2016 05:25 (eight years ago) link

i wouldn't vote for Trump tho fuck that guy he is the worst thing to ever happen to politics just by saying the shit he says

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 3 March 2016 05:26 (eight years ago) link


amazing that they predicted that people would be drawn to one of America's most famous celebrities. what will this niche group of political scientists unearth next?
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, March 2, 2016 10:23 PM (59 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i’ll be charitable and assume you didn’t actually read the article, because if you read the article and that is what you got out of it, you’re an idiot.

and yes i keep thinking that even if trump loses there are going to be more and more trumps (big or small) to contend with in ensuing decades. people are going to take lessons from his success.

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 05:27 (eight years ago) link

it is odd that Trump is an authoritarian yet Hillary is the one who voted with W on Iraq

― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, March 2, 2016 11:25 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

precisely, she voted /with/ W.

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 05:28 (eight years ago) link

Yes, very odd. I can't even begin to think of any possible explanation why Trump didn't vote in favor of war with Iraq.

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Thursday, 3 March 2016 05:31 (eight years ago) link

what am i supposed to get from that. they took heavily biased polls and a narrowly defined version of "authoritarian" and slapped them together. wow.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 3 March 2016 05:32 (eight years ago) link

http://media.breitbart.com/media/2015/12/Donald-Trump-in-Home-Alone-2-20th-Century-Fox-640x480.jpg

this has more to do with people voting for Trump

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 3 March 2016 05:33 (eight years ago) link

i know this sounds weird, but i feel like a substantial part of trump's mystique would vanish if someone just ripped that fucking toupée off of his head and left him scrambling for it.

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 05:34 (eight years ago) link

xpost

so you just think that trump is some kind of once-in-a-lifetime leprechaun and his success says nothing about what many americans believe?

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 05:36 (eight years ago) link

I'M AN INCREDIBLE LEPRECHAUN

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 3 March 2016 06:53 (eight years ago) link

Not cool

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Thursday, 3 March 2016 07:53 (eight years ago) link

the gist of the article is that there are more Trumps coming, presumably with better "people skills"

It would be interesting to see whether isolationist, protectionist authoritarians could run successfully in the future without the race-baiting element.

In a weak field, idk whether Trump could still have won on a platform of middle-class rage / fear against the 'elite' and general disenchantment with the state of Republican politics by playing up the 'caudillo who's looking out for the average guy' element without aggressively targeting minorities.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 3 March 2016 08:39 (eight years ago) link

Alpenkinderen für Trump!

i push more weight than giles corey (Pillbox), Thursday, 3 March 2016 09:41 (eight years ago) link

Basically, Trump has to fail, and be seen to fail.

This is like last time, where the media got very excited about how close the contest was being, then Obama won by miles.

Mark G, Thursday, 3 March 2016 09:44 (eight years ago) link

i know this sounds weird, but i feel like a substantial part of trump's mystique would vanish if someone just ripped that fucking toupée off of his head and left him scrambling for it.

that's his real hair! (or at least it's hair which is surgically affixed to his scalp)

booming post from collardio

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 3 March 2016 10:30 (eight years ago) link

@jeremyscahill
Trump is the candidate of bigotry and fascism. Hillary is the candidate of Empire.

― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, March 2, 2016 10:36 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

feel like this is too pat; trump is bigotry, facism, and empire, too. i don't read trump's iraq war criticism as principled anti-interventionism. it reads more like "we didnt WIN, if I had been president we woulda won by now". this is the man who advocates killing the family members of terrorists.

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Thursday, 3 March 2016 11:43 (eight years ago) link

Basically, Trump has to fail, and be seen to fail.

Like... Barry Goldwater? The GOP won 5 of the next 6 prez elections.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 12:17 (eight years ago) link

Trump couldn't manage an Empire.

Obama actually kills the family members of terrorists.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 12:19 (eight years ago) link

whew! that'll show'em!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 3 March 2016 12:22 (eight years ago) link

'Advocates' makes a difference, albeit not to the families.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 3 March 2016 12:43 (eight years ago) link

We got a long, long email from our building management yesterday concerning the upcoming impact on the city during the RNC, which closed with this little tidbit:

• The rumor that there are “Designated Protest Sites” is not true
o Protestors may set up on “any area outside of the secured perimeter”
o [Secret Service] Agent Rowe indicated that they are not expecting any civil disobedience during the event.

Yeah, good luck with that. There are likely to be a lot of white supremacist Trump supporters coming to the city where police shot Tamir Rice in cold blood. I expect everything will be just peachy.

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Thursday, 3 March 2016 12:54 (eight years ago) link

Question: If Trump is such a horrifying nominee that a significant number of Republican voters go for Hillary, will the term "Clinton Republicans" become a thing the way "Reagan Democrats" is still a thing 35 years later?

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Thursday, 3 March 2016 13:10 (eight years ago) link

Heard a fascinating piece on the radio about the evangelical vote and how actual evangelical leaders are perplexed/frustrated that their flocks are breaking for Trump (who I could have sworn one of them actually called a degenerate). Anyway, he curses, he's rude and crass, he's been married three times and he doesn't know shit about the Bible, to they were confused. I guess according to research it turns out that, surprise, lots of people who identify as evangelical really aren't that religious, and certainly don't go to church. But they do gravitate toward authoritarianism and bigotry. The former obviously doesn't bother evangelical leaders that much, but the latter really seemed to get under their skin as un-Christian.

Well, duh, evangelicals. This seems like another case of Frankenstein's monster coming home. Also, another case where a seemingly solid voting block turns out to be a another repository convenience for racists and inchoate far-right radicals. If anything, this election cycle really underscores the inadequacy (or at least lack of clarity) of our two-part system, more than any in recent memory. Not unlike many countries in Europe, there seems to be four parties in the US: the far left, the moderate left, moderate conservatives and far-right neo-fascists.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 3 March 2016 13:10 (eight years ago) link

Mitt just doesn't seem like the evisceratin' type.

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/mitt-romney-eviscerate-donald-trump-phony-fraud-n530877

clemenza, Thursday, 3 March 2016 13:12 (eight years ago) link

I've been thinking back to a discussion we had in the wake of Ferguson, in which we talked about the rise of "gear culture" (see Bass Pro Shops) and with it a certain re-scripting of American masculinity, a movement away from self-discipline, inner strength, courage, and coolness-under-pressure, and toward sheer ability to project power, and on the equipment with which one repels or destroys external threats. This culture also devalues rational thought and, in a certain sense, a realist epistemology. If you have enough gear, and you're scared (or pissed off) enough, rational inquiry is a hindrance. (The expansion of the Stand your Ground laws seem to me of a piece with all this. Fuck the duty to retreat. It's not just my home that's my castle: if I'm scared enough of you, and you so much as raise your hands, I have a right to shoot you).

In this way, Trump is the ultimate piece of gear, he's the monster truck of candidates: self-propelled, turbocharged, loud, shiny, and willing to wreak havoc left and right. The prospect of his Presidency, from this point of view, must feel irresistible.

― never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, March 2, 2016 10:32 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Thank you for all of that. Great analysis. I'd argue that one of the central things informing this trend is a hard cultural shift from courage to cowardice and the attendant need to dress that cowardice up in masculine finery.

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Thursday, 3 March 2016 13:14 (eight years ago) link

I don't think Ferguson is ground zero for those tendencies. It goes back further to the election of a black president, which forced sociopolitical tendencies that had waxed and waned for years to coalesce. The VOX article Mordy mentioned makes it clear.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 3 March 2016 13:16 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, I think it goes back at least as long as the survivalist movement became popularized. Constructing your life around constant fear of ?????.

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Thursday, 3 March 2016 13:20 (eight years ago) link

McCarthyism is at the very least an antecedent.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 3 March 2016 13:38 (eight years ago) link

The "real American" has always needed an Other.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 13:54 (eight years ago) link

booming post from collardio

― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, March 3, 2016 10:30 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

cosign

carly rae jetson (thomp), Thursday, 3 March 2016 14:03 (eight years ago) link

http://i64.tinypic.com/16jh2c3.jpg

Neanderthal, Thursday, 3 March 2016 14:08 (eight years ago) link

collardio's posts are fantastic in this thread.

the gist of the article is that there are more Trumps coming, presumably with better "people skills"

Trump is already Pat Buchanan 2.0.

... (Eazy), Thursday, 3 March 2016 14:09 (eight years ago) link

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/mitt-romney-smash-donald-trump-115853664.html

this seems a little too late, no?

Neanderthal, Thursday, 3 March 2016 14:11 (eight years ago) link

like Trump is just gonna reply with one sentence: "yeah, well you LOST" and his fans will cheer

Neanderthal, Thursday, 3 March 2016 14:12 (eight years ago) link

lol "speech for the ages"

micro brewbio (crüt), Thursday, 3 March 2016 14:14 (eight years ago) link

you have to play his game his way

"Trump has a really, really tiny dick, and he cries during Tyler Perry movies"

xpost yeah clickbait headline

Neanderthal, Thursday, 3 March 2016 14:15 (eight years ago) link

s/tiny dick/misshapen dick

Neanderthal, Thursday, 3 March 2016 14:17 (eight years ago) link

Since that really is the level of discourse he's operating on, I just want someone to slip a diuretic in Trump's drink before a debate so that millions of eyes can witness him pissing his pants. Anything that makes him look like a total weak loser baby.

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Thursday, 3 March 2016 14:25 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHJbSvidohg

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:07 (eight years ago) link

I wish that Vox writer didn't take the weird take of presenting this as some hidden gnosis of obscure folklore or research. Stuff's been around for quite a while.

I think a better introduction is John Dean's _Conservatives without Conscience_, which came out in '06, and is still great if you can stomach the Dubya-era memories. The book is largely based onthe work of Dr Bob Altemeyer, who teaches up in the U of Manitoba and has researched this shit for decades. John Dean's book was so popular Dr Bob wrote his own, and put it online for free: http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~altemey/

It's helpful in figuring out shit like why any president's approval rating never falls below a certain percentage, no matter what happens. Nixon's was still 19% the day he quit & flew away, for example

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:14 (eight years ago) link

My in-laws told me about wealthy friends who support Trump and as far as they can surmise the only real reason is because they think he will lower their taxes, i.e. basically the same reason a lot of rich people support Republicans in general.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:32 (eight years ago) link

I know rich Republicans that think he will 'hire the right people.'

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:35 (eight years ago) link

The best people.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:37 (eight years ago) link

worked great for w

ulysses, Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:37 (eight years ago) link

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/03/secret-donald-trump-voters-speak-out

quiiiite the rogues gallery here

― lazy rascals, spending their substance, and more, in riotous living (Merdeyeux), Thursday, March 3, 2016 10:01 AM (34 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

A lot of these almost sound made up. Like I expect one to be The Transgender Undocumented Immigrant Whose Partner Was Murdered By Donald Trump

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:38 (eight years ago) link

People need to be told and told and told again: Trump isn't going to do anything as president that doesn't directly benefit Trump. You might get some of those crumbs, sure, but he doesn't give a fuck about you.

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:39 (eight years ago) link

This is the one guy from the Guardian article whose mind I really can't imagine

I’m very concerned about radical Muslims, and liked Donald’s idea to stop all Muslim immigration.

I’m also no supporter of Israel and I’m pro the BDS [boycott, divestment and sanctions] movement.

I’m concerned that some US citizens have a loyalty to their own group over and above their loyalty to America, and will lobby accordingly.

I’m a patriotic socialist, but my strong-borders patriotism wins over my socialism if I have to choose. As Donald says, we either have a country or we don’t.

I really had no idea there was a "pro-BDS keep-Muslims-out" constituency. What does this mean, that he follows Richard Dawkins on Twitter?

Guayaquil (eephus!), Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:39 (eight years ago) link

paranoia about 'jewish lobby' controlling the gov't maybe?

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:40 (eight years ago) link

that guys answer is so well-studied in its language that i'm pretty sure he's a nazi on the low

goole, Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:43 (eight years ago) link

In the off chance there were actually a Jewish president, even an anti bank president, I have no idea what the crazies will say or do. After all, Obama is only a secret Muslim Communist.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:44 (eight years ago) link

a lot of contemporary Nazis believe that Muslim (and Latin American) immigration is a Jewish plot to water down the white gene pool - they then contrast this with Israel where many Jews have a strong attachment to limiting intermarriage and so they conclude that the Jews want to keep their gene pool clean + pure while dirtying the white ppl. (obv this is insane for many reasons not least of which is that Jewishness is not racially determined and comes in many colors/ethnic groups/races but these are also ppl who believe that calling Jews Khazars is some kind of trump card.)

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:49 (eight years ago) link

I’m a patriotic socialist, but my strong-borders patriotism wins over my socialism if I have to choose.

strong borders with ... Austria? Poland?

Brad C., Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:52 (eight years ago) link

classic male science academic language and ideas there. worried i may even know him.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:52 (eight years ago) link

and yes i keep thinking that even if trump loses there are going to be more and more trumps (big or small) to contend with in ensuing decades. people are going to take lessons from his success.

― wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 05:27 (9 hours ago) Permalink

so you just think that trump is some kind of once-in-a-lifetime leprechaun and his success says nothing about what many americans believe?

― wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, March 3, 2016 12:36 AM (9 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i actually think this is more reasonable than the leprechaun rhetorical device makes it sound!

- trump looks like a success now. but when he loses the general election, and possibly loses it worse than any R in a while, will that still be success that will inspire imitation? is anyone imitating romney's 'success' right now?

- republicans in the primary play a game in two stages, where in the first stage (primaries) they need to be as hostile to black/mexican/women as possible to win the base, then need to backpedal to get the sliver of minority votes (a that gets larger and larger every 4 years) that they need to win the second stage (general). all candidates and their campaign strategists know this. pre-trump candidates were in a relatively cooperative equilibrium, where they would all temper their hostility in the first stage, even though any individual candidate could get a boost from being hostile. Trump said fuck cooperating, went full blast on racial hostility, scooped up the first stage, and will lose the second stage. Republicans are pissed because he did that while eschewing many aspects of their platform, making it an awkward choice for them to support him in the general (even though i'm sure they all will).

- i think what we did learn is that strict adherence to every aspect of the R platform is not a necessary condition to be the nominee. but i think announcements that republicans no longer care about abortion, religion, soc security and will vote for anyone who is anti-immigration, nationalist and racist enough are wrong. Trump's very good at keeping the conversation away from those things and has already pivoted on or distanced himself from the most blasphemous quotes. i don't think we've learned that R voters' policy preferences have changed, they just made decision taking into account a bunch of other things; their expectation that Trump can win (which has a self-fulfilling prophecy component, increasing in when-will-it-end momentum), the weakness of other candidates, his likeability, how strong/credible his claims are on immigration

flopson, Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:55 (eight years ago) link

i think what we did learn is that strict adherence to every aspect of the R platform is not a necessary condition to be the nominee. but i think announcements that republicans no longer care about abortion, religion, soc security and will vote for anyone who is anti-immigration, nationalist and racist enough are wrong.

Aye, but the concern is that 'republicans' is not the appropriate phrase in that sentence as much as 'a bunch of voters, many of whom don't usually vote'.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:58 (eight years ago) link

(or vote dem)

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:58 (eight years ago) link

Trump is not really a template one can copy, and if future GOP fields are just a little stronger it will be harder for a personality cult like his to dominate. Even if Marco Rubio comes back in four or eight years looking less like a joke, which I think is probable.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:08 (eight years ago) link

rubio is losing his hair, he's on the clock

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:11 (eight years ago) link

there's plenty about trump that people can copy

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:13 (eight years ago) link

a combover of that magnitude is not easily done

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:15 (eight years ago) link

especially at the state level

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:17 (eight years ago) link

Mark Cuban for Pres

Neanderthal, Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:19 (eight years ago) link

Mittens' speech should be in limerick form

Neanderthal, Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:24 (eight years ago) link

holy shit the occupy protestor in that pro-trump article O_O

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:25 (eight years ago) link

I work in a liberal arts department. I’ve read the works of Karl Marx, Herbert Marcuse, John Stuart Mill, Friedrich Nietzsche, Plato, Judith Butler, Simone de Beauvoir, Michel Foucault and so on. I am more inclined to listen to what Slavoj Žižek or Noam Chomsky have to say about current affairs than Rachel Maddow or Bill O’Reilly. If one were to take account of my demographics, the smart money would be to peg me for a Bernie Sanders supporter... His candidacy is a happy accident that is currently ripping the soul of America apart, which is something that I think we desperately need (and deserve) at this time in our history, for better or for worse. I support whatever strange gods happen to be behind his candidacy, for, as Martin Heidegger proclaimed in his famous Der Speigel interview, although for slightly different reasons, “Only a God can save us.”

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:26 (eight years ago) link

yeah every single on of those people is a mess

they each view trump as the special instrument of their revenge against some element of society that has wronged them

goole, Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:27 (eight years ago) link

they each view trump as the special instrument of their revenge against some element of society that has wronged them

this is perfect

a (waterface), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:29 (eight years ago) link

yes

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:30 (eight years ago) link

I’m particularly angry at social justice warriors and my main reason to vote Trump is to see the looks on your faces when he wins.

It’s not that I like Trump. It’s that I hate those who can’t stand him. I want them to suffer the shock of knowing all their torrents of blog posts and Tumblr bitch-fests and “I just can’t ...” and accusations of mansplaining didn’t actually matter. That they’re still losing. And that things are not getting better for them. They’re getting worse.

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:33 (eight years ago) link

support for Trump must be closely linked to the death drive

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:34 (eight years ago) link

goole otm and i am def stealing that for personal use

jason waterfalls (gbx), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:34 (eight years ago) link

If Trump really is the ascent of strong-man authoritarianism, then I can't wait for him to be defeated in the general election, utterly and humiliatingly, by a flipflopping woman supported by a coalition of single women and minorities. That's going to feel so good!

Frederik B, Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:35 (eight years ago) link

they each view trump as the special instrument of their revenge against some element of society that has wronged them

I agree that this is perfect, almost to the point of being self-evident. Like, I cannot think of a more succinct way to explain why anyone would vote for Trump over literally anyone else. Again, though: Trump is aggrieved, but his aggrievement is probably not your aggrievement.

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:38 (eight years ago) link

the weird thing to me that i kinda don't understand is that the US is not some Weimer Republic w/ out of control inflation and painful terms dictated by a recent surrender. unemployment is apparently at a two decade low, and no other country in the world has bounced back from the recession as strongly. there's obv still inequality and things that need to be fixed but these ppl are acting like this country is going down the toilet and needs some radical shakeout for its survival - it's insane. these americans must be experiencing some kind of psychotic break.

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:38 (eight years ago) link

Precisely that.

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:39 (eight years ago) link

yeah it's bizarre

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:41 (eight years ago) link

they each view trump as the special instrument of their revenge against some element of society that has wronged them

Best thing said in this long long thread

Guayaquil (eephus!), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:41 (eight years ago) link

there's a crisis everyday on 24 hour news

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:41 (eight years ago) link

xposts Or they'll feel the way the biggest loudmouth tells them they should feel absent anything like evidence or critical thought or sensory input, but what's the difference really.

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:41 (eight years ago) link

I don't think Trump is aggrieved! His voters are aggrieved. He still looks like he's doing it for fun and has watched this thing blossom since last summer until he had to take it seriously.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:41 (eight years ago) link

*still looks = looked

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:42 (eight years ago) link

we should poll ilx and see how many secret trump voters we have

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:44 (eight years ago) link

Morbs is, right?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:46 (eight years ago) link

#herewego

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:47 (eight years ago) link

my first guess xp

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:49 (eight years ago) link

Agree that goole's observation is the bee's knees.

Meanwhile I heard Jon Meacham quoted as saying that it's like an airline hijacking where the passengers are rooting for the hijackers. Funny, if not a perfect analogy.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:50 (eight years ago) link

the US is not some Weimer Republic

true, but real wages in the U.S. have been stagnant for at least 40 years, and during the same period much of the manufacturing sector has vanished ... for low-education white males of a certain age, the brutality of the economy might feel kind of Weimarish

Brad C., Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:50 (eight years ago) link

these americans must be experiencing some kind of psychotic break.

OTM. Also it's not like the Dems have been pushing the good numbers. The R's are so much better at it

a (waterface), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:51 (eight years ago) link

no way. i mean i don't want to downplay anyone's struggle [um] but life in the US in 2016, no matter how much real wage stagnation, is nothing like life in Germany in 1933

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:52 (eight years ago) link

there are “two Trumps” – the brash character he portrays himself as, and the decent man they know behind closed doors

"I'm not a bloviating megalomaniac asshole, but I play one on TV."

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:53 (eight years ago) link

of the NY Times profiles of Super Tuesday Trump supporters, this was the biggest facepalm

RICHFIELD, Minn. — When Fadumo Yusuf showed up at a Donald J. Trump rally here wearing a gold hijab, she was practically mobbed by campaign volunteers.

A Trump sticker made its way onto her hijab, and she was handed a large Trump sign and directed to the front of the group, so she could be interviewed by a local news station.

Ms. Yusuf, 34, a Muslim immigrant from Ethiopia who lives in Minneapolis, and her husband appeared to be the only nonwhites among roughly 300 people who gathered Sunday at the American Legion in this Minneapolis suburb.

One volunteer begged her to do an on-camera interview. “You are a brave, beautiful woman, and I’m proud of you,” the volunteer told Ms. Yusuf, who obliged. Chris Hupke, a Trump adviser, posed for a picture beside Ms. Yusuf, flashing a thumbs-up and then asking for her name. (Her husband was largely overlooked.)

“From the minute I came inside, everybody welcomed me,” Ms. Yusuf said. “It showed me a different thing — not hate but love.”

Ms. Yusuf is well aware that her decision to caucus tonight for Mr. Trump will surprise many people — and that the sight of a hijab-wearing Muslim holding a Trump sign can cause people to do a double take.

She does not pretend to agree with Mr. Trump’s proposal to bar Muslim immigrants from entering the country. “That was hurtful,” Ms. Yusuf said.

But she does not consider Mr. Trump a bad person, just ill-informed.

“I believe he has a heart, so I will overlook that,” she said. “He doesn’t know a lot about the Muslim community. I want to give him a chance to see who we are. We are not terrorists. We are great Muslim Americans. We are his people.”...

http://www.nytimes.com/live/super-tuesday-2016-elections/a-muslim-woman/

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:54 (eight years ago) link

“I believe he has a heart, so I will overlook that,”

^^^ how I eliminate dates

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:55 (eight years ago) link

He's such a good man, you don't understand. What, this? Oh, I just walked into a door, that's all.

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:56 (eight years ago) link

we should poll ilx and see how many secret trump voters we have

next best thing: Which secret Trump voter most closely resembles you?

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:57 (eight years ago) link

please please please

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:59 (eight years ago) link

Defections of any scale could prove lethal to Mr. Trump. He already trails Mrs. Clinton in general election polls, and polling already shows the possibility of mass desertions from the party. A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey this week found that 48 percent of Republicans who do not already back Mr. Trump said they would probably not or definitely not support him in November.

Οὖτις, Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:00 (eight years ago) link

Morbs is, right?

congrats Mordy and Sotosyn, for beating Pollitt, Steinem & Co to the lib-fascist punch

also go fuck each other

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:02 (eight years ago) link

that's not a no

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:04 (eight years ago) link

NO, shitbird. And when did you stop beating your wife?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:05 (eight years ago) link

hey man, i'm pleasantly surprised

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:05 (eight years ago) link

lol @ shitbird

Οὖτις, Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:06 (eight years ago) link

these ppl are acting like this country is going down the toilet and needs some radical shakeout for its survival - it's insane. these americans must be experiencing some kind of psychotic break.

This is something that people have been wrestling with in Poland too. Objectively Poland is in a better position than it ever has been and, despite massive inequality, quality of life has never been better. The government that has just been voted in is authoritarian, regressive and actively hostile to a lot of the Europeanisation and internationalisation that arguably brought about the positive changes.

Aside from nativism and bigotry, there seems to be a widespread lack of belief that the future is going to be anything other than stagnation followed by decline. Some of it is domestic but there is a broader fear of the decline of Europe and the west as a whole.

In an American context, I would guess that there is a widespread fear of wage stagnation and further loss of OK jobs to Asia. People might not be on the breadline but it's not easy to convince them the economy is doing well if their earnings are barely keeping pace with inflation. That is a massive shift in how the market delivers if you have been conditioned to believe in endless growth. It's not surprising that the first generation in recent history to recognise their children are probably going to be worse off than them has some weird ideas about how to fix it.

Along with that, in Poland and the US you have a huge amount of resentment about a conspiracy of elites keeping the biggest portion of the pie for themselves. The more you are told the economy is growing, the easier it is to believe a cabal is hiving off the profits if you aren't seeing direct benefits. Middle class stagnation in a growing economy is a recipe for this kind of stuff.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:06 (eight years ago) link

kind of agree that the loss of social capital for working/middle class white males in the era of increasing diversity is to them like weimar republic-equivalent systemic trauma

cf: recent articles with social scientists baffled at recent stratospheric increases in mortality among only white males as a demographic group

anonanon, Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:08 (eight years ago) link

xp

life in the US in 2016, no matter how much real wage stagnation, is nothing like life in Germany in 1933

the ready availability of cheap fast food and Walmart goods is one enormous difference, so the comparison can't be pressed too far ... but long-term decline of worker income and social stability has lasted longer here than the inter-war period in Germany

Brad C., Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:10 (eight years ago) link

next administration is def going to have to raise min wage, tax investments heavier, increase social net, but the point is that these are aren't reforms that require tearing down the entire state and starting over. these are fixes at the margins (that will nonetheless have a huge impact on ppl's lives)

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:11 (eight years ago) link

"Era of increasing diversity" is urgent and key in this I think.

Also, I read ppl are acting like this country is going down the toilet and needs some radical shakeout for its survival as "racial" shakeout, and yeah.

Retro novelty punk (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:12 (eight years ago) link

sure, but this hasn't happened and we keep getting told it is because we have a do-nothing congress and government is broken. many people just don't grasp that only one side of the congress is in fact doing nothing and utterly broken.

xopst

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:13 (eight years ago) link

a HS friend of mine recently came out on FB as a trump support, posting this:

"I've been pretty quiet about Trump over the course of the election. Here's why...

Nobody in politics likes him. Republicans or democrats. They will make sure he doesn't get elected. It's not like it would be the first time that politicians fixed an election. They've done it before. They'll do it again.

And even if he did get elected, it's not like he's going to be Dictator Trump. He won't build a boarder wall. Too many others have to be involved to help make the project happen.

There won't be enough people backing him in congress to help make it happen. He also won't be deporting 11,000 illegal immigrants. Again, same thing. Plus, he'll be chucked out of office by both parties pretty quickly. The bad reputation he will bring to this country from other nations will force the hand of the politicians to throw him out of office.

The guy people need to be afraid of being elected is Cruz. Cruz is a constitutional lawyer. He can actually fuck this country up. He'll make W look like Lyndon Johnson.

If it came down to Cruz and Hillary, I will reluctantly vote for Hillary. But if it comes down to Trump and Hillary, I'm voting for Trump because all of the reasons I stated earlier. He won't last and none of his plans will fly."

he is a textbook bernie bro, btw, and that weird species of liberal/"progressive" that will swear up and down that he's not a racist or misogynist, it's just that blacks really do more crime if you look at the numbers and women most of the time are gold digging bitches i'm just stating the facts man

jason waterfalls (gbx), Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:14 (eight years ago) link

unfriend

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:16 (eight years ago) link

also he is a failed standup comedian, a veteran, and lives in texas

just tryna give a demographic snapshot since something i hear on the left is that guys like him don't actually exist

jason waterfalls (gbx), Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:16 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmwzGMmGcJw

simpler times

k3vin k., Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:16 (eight years ago) link

Mittens being brought out as if anyone gaf what he has to say about anything is hilarious

Οὖτις, Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:18 (eight years ago) link

regarding the uniquely increasing mortality for only US middle aged white people as a demographic age group: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/you-can-t-understand-american-politics-without-reading-this-study

To put these numbers in context, this reversal is contrary to the trend in France, Germany, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia and Sweden. Indeed, it goes against the trend in every wealthy, industrialized democracy we know of.

Josh Marshall compares it to the big drop in life expectancy in post-Soviet Russia

anonanon, Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:19 (eight years ago) link

I need to read up on 1964, because Goldwater is the closest recent comparison. Not in terms of their politics, but rather a frontrunner/nominee who plainly horrified his party leadership and who inspired vigorous efforts to block him. There is also some delicious historical resonance in that one of AuH20's most prominent critics was George Romney.

Maybe this is a one-off (yeah, I know, Everything is Different Now (tm)) but I don't think there's ever been a candidate who inspired so much resistance from his own side, then went on to win.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:20 (eight years ago) link

if you don't want to read an entire book on Goldwaterism, the '64 section of Nixonland is pretty good

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:34 (eight years ago) link

I kinda agree with the FB bro upthread that anything Trump tries will be stymied by Congress or the Supreme Court. And about how much worse Cruz would be. Where we split is on the whole "...thus, I'm voting Trump!" part, obviously.

Also, I never thought Morbs would be a Trump voter. Actually voting for anyone at all would scuff up his purity, and make it (incrementally) more difficult for him to post again, and again, and again, and again about how hopelessly corrupt and evil they all are.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:37 (eight years ago) link

I need to read up on 1964, because Goldwater is the closest recent comparison. Not in terms of their politics, but rather a frontrunner/nominee who plainly horrified his party leadership and who inspired vigorous efforts to block him. There is also some delicious historical resonance in that one of AuH20's most prominent critics was George Romney.

Read Before the Storm, particularly as Election Day nears and Goldwater realizes the extent of his attracting nuts, mountebanks, and imbeciles from high and low.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:39 (eight years ago) link

what kind of profession do you work in, top man in the language department? I have it narrowed down to about four.

I'm so "pure" (neon flash of ASSHOLE everytime i encounter that word in such a context) I've cast ballots in the last ten years for Barack Obama and Clintonite Bill de Blasio.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:45 (eight years ago) link

<3 morbs

flopson, Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:46 (eight years ago) link

what kind of profession do you work in, top man in the language department?

Architecture/construction.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:50 (eight years ago) link

I get you, Morbs. You're an idealist in a fallen world. Yours is an unenviable burden.

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:52 (eight years ago) link

Kinda the exact opposite of The Fountainhead, actually. (Which I've never seen or read, 'cause the book is too long and real movies come in color.) I work for an elevator company, so we're 100% concerned with the safety and well-being of strangers.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:53 (eight years ago) link

the weird thing to me that i kinda don't understand is that the US is not some Weimer Republic w/ out of control inflation and painful terms dictated by a recent surrender. unemployment is apparently at a two decade low, and no other country in the world has bounced back from the recession as strongly. there's obv still inequality and things that need to be fixed but these ppl are acting like this country is going down the toilet and needs some radical shakeout for its survival - it's insane. these americans must be experiencing some kind of psychotic break.

― Mordy, Thursday, March 3, 2016 4:38 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

these people listen to fox news and glenn beck all day long and read breitbart in their spare time. they've been told the us is run by a despotic secret muslim socialist using isis sleeper agents to infiltrate across the border in mexico. they're not rational.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 3 March 2016 17:56 (eight years ago) link

I think it speaks to how malleable perception of whether things are "good" in "our country" or not is when immediate and basic material needs are met.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:08 (eight years ago) link

Also, any perception of things getting worse than they are/were is threatening, no matter how good the starting point.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:08 (eight years ago) link

things are getting worse in ways these empty picnic baskets cannot perceive

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:11 (eight years ago) link

all i know is every small city in the state i live in (Massachusetts) is a post-industrial wasteland/ghost town with boarded up storefronts, ruined factories, and overdose rates through the roof. if that was my daily landscape, things would look pretty dead-end and grim.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:15 (eight years ago) link

I'm so "pure" (neon flash of ASSHOLE everytime i encounter that word in such a context) I've cast ballots in the last ten years for Barack Obama and Clintonite Bill de Blasio.

he’s not an absolutist, he just plays one on the internet.

Kinda the exact opposite of The Fountainhead, actually. (Which I've never seen or read, 'cause the book is too long and real movies come in color.) I work for an elevator company, so we're 100% concerned with the safety and well-being of strangers.
― the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Thursday, March 3, 2016 11:53 AM (17 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i imagine this industry has its ups and downs, huh?

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:17 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, but sometimes they really give the customer the shaft.

Three Word Username, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:19 (eight years ago) link

I'm floored

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:22 (eight years ago) link

john mccain joining the #nevertrump campaign. if trump wins the nom, i think the dem party should try to contest every state in the country. i think adding bernie to the ticket might help as well though even without him a trump nom could equal a reagan style landslide. latinos in arizona + arizona republicans going anti-trump means arizona could flip blue imo!

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:22 (eight years ago) link

bernie would be a weird VP choice. "in case i'm incapacitated, here's this 75-year-old socialist who will take over!"

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:26 (eight years ago) link

idk if Bernie as VP is such a great idea - it depends on which demo Hillary's more concerned about losing: white college educated men or latinos

Οὖτις, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:26 (eight years ago) link

honestly clinton should add a liberal GOP to the ticket. to underline the "anybody but trump" thing. maybe mitt romney! or evan bayh.

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:26 (eight years ago) link

Nothing in this cycle has been as frightening as Bush, with a gleam in his eye during a 2000 debate, talking about a woman on death row begging for her life, and how he sent her to her final destination. In that way, a W. or a Palin are far scarier and irrational.

... (Eazy), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

the more natural vp choice for Hillary is a) somebody younger and b) from a minority demo that the Dems need to secure support from, and then c) somebody w more liberal credentials than her

Οὖτις, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

i think if the argument is that there's a strong populist anti-establishment wave in the country at the moment it would be useful to take advantage of that somehow if possible.

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

xp a friend mentioned cory booker which seemed like another way to go on VP

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

hillary's VP pick should be a liberal-republican latino from the deep south.

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:28 (eight years ago) link

honestly clinton should add a liberal GOP to the ticket

what's Michael Steele up to

Οὖτις, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:28 (eight years ago) link

haha

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:28 (eight years ago) link

hillary's VP pick should be a liberal-republican latino from the deep south.

so... Julian Castro (almost)

Οὖτις, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:28 (eight years ago) link

texas ain't the deep south, but close enough i guess

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:30 (eight years ago) link

Texas is more important electorally than any deep south state (assuming we're excluding FL)

Οὖτις, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:31 (eight years ago) link

do we actually think texas will be in play during a general election????

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:31 (eight years ago) link

xp @mordy oh man, as an az resident, i wish, but arizona is at least a decade away from going blue in a presidential election . mccain might go anti-trump, but most AZ republicans won't. my state will vote trump for sure, but i do think it will require more national GOP resources to shore up support than usual.

intheblanks, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:32 (eight years ago) link

i can see georgia and s. carolina being in play, but not texas, mississippi, louisiana, or alabama.

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:32 (eight years ago) link

hmm, let's see, Clinton-Cruz does have a certain ring to it...

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:33 (eight years ago) link

haha I was going to say "Clinton/Powell" but the "younger" part got in the way

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:33 (eight years ago) link

yeah normally I would say no re: Texas but in this election who knows

Οὖτις, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:33 (eight years ago) link

plz let's save the repulsive Cory Booker for another day

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:33 (eight years ago) link

Clinton/Ellison '16

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:34 (eight years ago) link

booker really is awful, he's on a tour now for his book, which seems banal to the point of offensiveness

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:34 (eight years ago) link

yeah fuck that guy

Οὖτις, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:35 (eight years ago) link

If only Edwards hadn't screwed the pooch...

... (Eazy), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:36 (eight years ago) link

and everything else

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:36 (eight years ago) link

if you can give me time-travel proof that Sanders would take the veep slot i will skip voting for him next month #GettingPurer

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:37 (eight years ago) link

if clinton picks booker she deserves to lose. #tongueincheekbutstill

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:37 (eight years ago) link

Would 100% rather see Clinton/Ras Baraka than Clinton/Booker.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:37 (eight years ago) link

honestly clinton should add a liberal GOP to the ticket. to underline the "anybody but trump" thing. maybe mitt romney! or evan bayh.

― wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, March 3, 2016 1:26 PM (9 minutes ago)

....

k3vin k., Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:38 (eight years ago) link

Clinton/Chafee

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:38 (eight years ago) link

too much like her xp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:39 (eight years ago) link

bernie would be a weird VP choice. "in case i'm incapacitated, here's this 75-year-old socialist who will take over!"

― wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, March 3, 2016 11:26 AM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

also, for someone as old/experienced as clinton this is an opp to pick a younger leader to be next-in-line, in addition to demographic/political position considerations.

intheblanks, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:39 (eight years ago) link

ah ok he was kidding my bad amateurist

k3vin k., Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:40 (eight years ago) link

Chris Chr—

... (Eazy), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:40 (eight years ago) link

Van Jones? Villaraigosa?

schwantz, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:41 (eight years ago) link

who was kidding? about what? i'm confused.

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:42 (eight years ago) link

honestly clinton should add a liberal GOP to the ticket. to underline the "anybody but trump" thing. maybe mitt romney! or evan bayh.

― wizzz! (amateurist), T

why would she add another liberal GOP to the ticket?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:42 (eight years ago) link

Villaraigosa is dead meat politically

Οὖτις, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:42 (eight years ago) link

Bill Clinton

you have to admit it would generate a lot of chatter

Karl Malone, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:42 (eight years ago) link

lmao @ evan bayh

marcos, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:43 (eight years ago) link

fuck that dork

marcos, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:43 (eight years ago) link

Hillary Clinton/Chelsea Clinton

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:43 (eight years ago) link

now we're talking

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:44 (eight years ago) link

WAIT

Hillary Clinton/Karenna Gore

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:44 (eight years ago) link

I'm really confused about all the Blue Dog Dems you guys want to fuck.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:44 (eight years ago) link

Bill would be great but he's Constitutionally ineligible.

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:45 (eight years ago) link

shakes otm, villaraigosa was straight fire when he was elected and had the city in the palm of his hand for a brief period, and then he just blew it.

nomar, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:45 (eight years ago) link

marred by various scandals, loathed by his constituents, continually putting his foot in his mouth, widely viewed as an opportunist, plus this:

After he left the mayor's office, Villaraigosa was involved in Campaign to Fix the Debt, a movement for entitlement reform to cut Social Security and Medicare, which Democratic strategist Nathan Ballard said is "not just touching the third rail — it’s an act of public self-immolation."

Οὖτις, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:45 (eight years ago) link

who was kidding? about what? i'm confused.

― wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, March 3, 2016 1:42 PM (2 minutes ago)

about...mitt romney...or evan bayh...as VP. that was a joke, right?

k3vin k., Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:45 (eight years ago) link

Hillary Clinton/Jerry Benghazi

(no relation to the Benghazi incident, just a coincidence)

Karl Malone, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:45 (eight years ago) link

To be clear, I'm not endorsing the guys I named, just trying to figure out who she'd pick (if she doesn't lose to Sanders)...

schwantz, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:46 (eight years ago) link

Hillary Clinton/Grover Cleveland

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:46 (eight years ago) link

While it is clear that under the Twelfth Amendment the original constitutional qualifications of age, citizenship, and residency apply to both the President and Vice President, it is unclear whether a two-term president could later serve as Vice President. Some argue that the Twenty-second Amendment and Twelfth Amendment bar any two-term president from later serving as Vice President as well as from succeeding to the presidency from any point in the United States presidential line of succession.[17] Others contend that the Twelfth Amendment concerns qualification for service, while the Twenty-second Amendment concerns qualifications for election, and thus a former two-term president is still eligible to serve as vice president.[18][19]

mookieproof, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:46 (eight years ago) link

Hillary Clinton / George Clinton

ulysses, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:46 (eight years ago) link

^^^winner

Οὖτις, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:47 (eight years ago) link

Hillary Clinton/Debbie Stabenow

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:47 (eight years ago) link

Hillary Clinton/Kal Penn

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:48 (eight years ago) link

booker would be a really dumb pick, not only because he's a piece of shit but because he'd vacate his senate seat and chris christie would appoint his successor

k3vin k., Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:48 (eight years ago) link

Clinton/Flav

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:50 (eight years ago) link

potentially a successor who was...born to run

iatee, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:51 (eight years ago) link

i'm assuming o'malley is hoping he'd get consideration? maybe not

Karl Malone, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:51 (eight years ago) link

Sadly, George Clinton can no longer make Richard Pryor minister od education

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:52 (eight years ago) link

Clinton/Geffen

... (Eazy), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:52 (eight years ago) link

Clinton/Nas

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:53 (eight years ago) link

nor Sun Ra head of NASA xxp

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:53 (eight years ago) link

Clinton/Winfrey

... (Eazy), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:56 (eight years ago) link

*drops mic*

Οὖτις, Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:57 (eight years ago) link

somewhere I swear I saw something about Trump mentioning Oprah as possible VP

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:59 (eight years ago) link

hey guys Trump is about to call Rommey a loser

Οὖτις, Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:01 (eight years ago) link

no wai

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:03 (eight years ago) link

somewhere I swear I saw something about Trump mentioning Oprah as possible VP

― the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Thursday, March 3, 2016 12:59 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yes, this was when he was first toying with the idea of running prior to the 2000 election.

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:06 (eight years ago) link

🚨 https://twitter.com/DavMicRot/status/705465869749452800 🚨

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:06 (eight years ago) link

oh man imagine Trump/Winfrey vs Clinton/DiCaprio

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:06 (eight years ago) link

Sherrod is the Hill's Veep pick

Iago Galdston, Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:14 (eight years ago) link

so this 'carson should run for rubio's senate seat' thing -- is that serious or was it just a way to get him out of the presidential race

mookieproof, Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:15 (eight years ago) link

CNN banner as i left lunch was DONALD TRUMP TO RETURN FIRE AT ROMNEY

where are these brave GOPers willing to be Aaron Burr

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:17 (eight years ago) link

The Trump crowd is shouting "we love you" at him

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:18 (eight years ago) link

CNN article from '99 mentioning the Oprah veep pick. Makes for a very interesting time capsule on a number of levels.

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:19 (eight years ago) link

I missed why everyone hates Cory Booker.

akm, Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:20 (eight years ago) link

Romney:

"We will only really know if he’s a real deal or a phony if he releases his tax returns and the tape of his interview with The New York Times. I predict that there are more bombshells in his tax returns. I predict that he doesn’t give much, if anything, to the disabled and to our veterans. I predict that he told The New York Times that his immigration talk is just that — talk."

i've been avoiding a lot of trump talk as of late as i am nearing maximum capacity for this nonsense so maybe i missed it but what is this NYT interview mittens is talking about as if it's a smoking gun?

ulysses, Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:24 (eight years ago) link

Christie has fun with "people on the internet"

http://gawker.com/chris-christie-on-obvious-hostage-video-i-wasnt-being-1762674155

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:25 (eight years ago) link

Cruz has been mentioning it but I don't know what it refers to xp

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:25 (eight years ago) link

http://www.buzzfeed.com/bensmith/trump-tape

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:26 (eight years ago) link

okay i googled my way to some clarity. what a fucking world.

ulysses, Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:26 (eight years ago) link

john cassidy theorized that they think trump, as a new york city real estate developer, has mob ties. he also theorized that if trump does, they're unlikely to appear in his tax returns

mookieproof, Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:27 (eight years ago) link

If I were the Mexican president, I would demand America build a wall to keep Americans in.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:28 (eight years ago) link

I missed why everyone hates Cory Booker.

old (2013) but still true

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/11/cory-booker-newark-neoliberal-egomaniac

not much on his

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:29 (eight years ago) link

...Senate career cuz he really hasnt done much

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:29 (eight years ago) link

Listening to trump speaking rn. It's just bragging.

Treeship, Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:32 (eight years ago) link

re: booker, there's also this: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/05/19/schooled

and this: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/12/the-cory-booker-show/266271/

Basically people think he is mainly good at getting national headlines as a rising star while doing a shitty job actually listening to and serving his constituents

intheblanks, Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:34 (eight years ago) link

TRUMP: I RUINED MY CARPET ENDORSING ROMNEY

mookieproof, Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:40 (eight years ago) link

Am I correct that there is a concerted push declaring Trumpf unfit to be president?

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:44 (eight years ago) link

I don't know if I hate Cory Booker but his schtick always made me skeptical of him.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Thursday, 3 March 2016 19:45 (eight years ago) link

he's just an empty suit full of ambition and cash from i-bankers across the river in manhattan

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:01 (eight years ago) link

as one tweeter said, man, that Obama DOJ is on a partisan witch hunt!

The Justice Department has granted immunity to the former State Department staffer who worked on Hillary Rodham Clinton’s private email server, a sign the FBI investigation into possible criminal wrongdoing is progressing.

A senior U.S. law enforcement official said the FBI had secured the cooperation of Bryan Pagliano who worked on Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign before setting up the server in her New York home in 2009.

As the FBI looks to wrap up its investigation in the coming months, agents will likely want to interview Clinton and her senior aides about the decision to use a private server, how it was set up, and whether any of the participants knew they were sending classified information in emails, current and former officials said.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/in-clinton-email-investigation-justice-department-grants-immunity-to-former-state-department-staffer/2016/03/02/e421e39e-e0a0-11e5-9c36-e1902f6b6571_story.html

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:05 (eight years ago) link

Allegedly-smart money has been on Castro for a while - younger, diverser, more charismatic.

Not sure whether his last name will be a drag on the ticket or a hilarious tweaking of Cold War-era kneejerk anti-communists (who are, one presumes, either dead or Republican - or both - by now).

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:06 (eight years ago) link

It's time for Senator Joe Hitler (D) to finally get his shot.

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:08 (eight years ago) link

hillary clinton / ha ha clinton-dix

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:08 (eight years ago) link

also this thread got off of bad elevator puns a few floors too early

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:09 (eight years ago) link

You're just trying to push our buttons.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:10 (eight years ago) link

from what i understand the emails weren't classified top secret until after they were sent so i honestly do not get what part of this scandal is actually "real," and i suspect that the answer is "none of it."

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:11 (eight years ago) link

Richard M. Nixon ‏@dick_nixon
Why in the name of God am I watching Romney now?

The mob has pitchforks and scythes and this son of a bitch says "innovation dynamic."

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:21 (eight years ago) link

mitt smacks his lips a lot

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:23 (eight years ago) link

i was on a walk through the skyway and i had headphones on but i swear the crawl on CNN on a TV i walked by in the lobby said "Trump: I Ruined My Carpet Endorsing Romney"

???

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:23 (eight years ago) link

i saw that too but i don't remember what it refers to. i do remember trump said that romney wanted his endorsement so bad that he could've told romney to get on his knees and he would've done it

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:24 (eight years ago) link

don't look at the carpet trump drew something awful on it

Karl Malone, Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:25 (eight years ago) link

lol

Οὖτις, Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:26 (eight years ago) link

He's not a wonderful person, and he's got problems.

Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:27 (eight years ago) link

The thing about the alleged hypocrisy of the Republican establishment turning on Trump the Candidate when they loved Trump the Wealthy Donor is that it is not at all hypocritical or even surprising to think that a great donor would make a terrible presidential candidate. There's certainly the argument that you should only accept money from people whose views you agree with, and I understand where a hypocrisy charge could be leveled on those grounds, but even there people should be donating to the candidates whose platforms represent the policies they want to see in action rather that buying a plank on a candidate's platform with their money (nb I am not a naive college student and I know that this happens). Every party has donors that the candidates don't want to put in front of a camera because they are embarrassing/terrifying; I don't see why having a tv show should exempt Trump from that status.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:29 (eight years ago) link

from what i understand the emails weren't classified top secret until after they were sent so i honestly do not get what part of this scandal is actually "real," and i suspect that the answer is "none of it."

― Mordy, Thursday, March 3, 2016 3:11 PM (16 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

for me, the claim that a professional lawyer with security experience would think hosting your own email was a good (or at least uncontroversial) idea is so far-fetched that i pretty much assume there is something "real" to it.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:30 (eight years ago) link

among mitt romney's bons mots: "this reckless is... recklessness... in the extreme."

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:30 (eight years ago) link

er i mean "this recklessness is recklessness... in the extreme."

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:31 (eight years ago) link

(said w/ no gravitas whatsoever)

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:31 (eight years ago) link

Am I correct that there is a concerted push declaring Trumpf unfit to be president?

― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, March 3, 2016 2:44 PM (47 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

the first 3 stories on nytimes.com/index.html right now fwiw:

Romney Leads the Charge to Stop Trump: Front-Runner Is a ‘Fraud,’ He Says
Anti-Trump Faction in G.O.P. Is Seeking Third-Party Option
G.O.P. Foreign Policy Figures Denounce Trump

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:32 (eight years ago) link

for me, the claim that a professional lawyer with security experience would think hosting your own email was a good (or at least uncontroversial) idea is so far-fetched that i pretty much assume there is something "real" to it.

i just assume (maybe wrongly) that email security doesn't mean the same thing to a 60yo in 2008 as it does to me. at this pt i need to see an actual bombshell and not just all these "implications" before i believe that there's a fire to go along w/ all the [v artificial looking] smoke.

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:34 (eight years ago) link

wondering if this election cycle is gonna put the nail in the coffin of political TV ads as major campaign expenditures - seems like they're increasingly irrelevant. Have any of those TV ads - Bernie's Erica Garner ad, or any of Jeb's anti-Trump ads, or Cruz's bizarre comedy ads - done anything at all?

Οὖτις, Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:37 (eight years ago) link

mitt seems to be getting heckled pretty hard starting at 12:30 in this video of his anti-trump speech

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iefXdC794I

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:37 (eight years ago) link

Watching the Romney speech now. Someone may have pointed this out, but I'm not sure if the "Hinckley Institute" is the best backdrop.

clemenza, Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:37 (eight years ago) link

for me, the claim that a professional lawyer with security experience would think hosting your own email was a good (or at least uncontroversial) idea is so far-fetched that i pretty much assume there is something "real" to it.

i just assume (maybe wrongly) that email security doesn't mean the same thing to a 60yo in 2008 as it does to me. at this pt i need to see an actual bombshell and not just all these "implications" before i believe that there's a fire to go along w/ all the [v artificial looking] smoke.

― Mordy, Thursday, March 3, 2016 8:34 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I assume Clinton hasn't practiced since the 80s and I dont think there was alot of email server related discovery going on when she was doing it.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:40 (eight years ago) link

has a single email even been disclosed from the investigation that would've benefited hillary by not appearing on official servers? the only emails i've seen so far are about gefilte fish and thanking sidney blumenthal for sending max's articles over.

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:41 (eight years ago) link

they locked file cabinets in the 80s iirc

xp

Οὖτις, Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:41 (eight years ago) link

she's familiar with the legal implications of a written record, not "email discovery" in particular

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:43 (eight years ago) link

Not a bad speech, but I can't see it changing anything, except maybe having the reverse effect. Heard someone unironically call Romney "the de facto leader of the Republican Party" last night. That's laughable--he pretty much vanished after the last election, and it's not like there was a lot of positive feelings within his party to begin with.

clemenza, Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:46 (eight years ago) link

also the 'yay we sold a shit-ton of bombers to the Saudis' email

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:46 (eight years ago) link

the gop's problem is that he's the de facto leader of the republican party _and_ you're right about his profile

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:47 (eight years ago) link

I'm not sure that there is one, but I just can't see it being him. Maybe Ryan at the moment, maybe still Limbaugh or someone like that. Maybe Donald Trump.

clemenza, Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:50 (eight years ago) link

Sometimes the internet truly is a gift.

http://worldmeets.us/images/donald-trump-tronald-dump-tron-caption_pic.jpg

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:51 (eight years ago) link

It's hard to tell which one is the head chicken when they're all running around headless.

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:52 (eight years ago) link

i'm not sure y'all have a handle on what "de facto" means

it doesn't mean "de wanto"

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:52 (eight years ago) link

I would have said the Koch brothers

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:54 (eight years ago) link

I agree the DIY home server is nagl, and I cringe inwardly every time I think about it. But the usual counterpoint to that is prior secretaries of state did similar things, as did many Bush admin officials. For me this is not very helpful - she should have known it would look sleazy and get used against her, the way so many things have been. Caesar's wife and all that.

That said, we've been hearing about the damn emails for many moons now, and no concrete charges have come out. If there's a smoking gun, go ahead and arrest her ass. If there isn't, do they just keep looking until they find one? Also, is there some halfway point between having her strung up for treason, and letting her and her entire staff off scot-free? Like some kind of "mistakes were made, here are some consequences, now let's move on" path?

I know this isn't CSI or L&O where you find a telltale shoeprint (DUN DUN) and call for the handcuffs. But how long is this investigation supposed to take? I honestly have no idea, but one might think it's being protracted for reasons that just may include - dare I say it - politics.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:54 (eight years ago) link

I do understand de facto, which is why I say it can't be Romney. The Koch brothers for the last couple of generals is a good pick, but I'm not sure about this one--are they good with Trump? Old Lunch might have it right.

clemenza, Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:57 (eight years ago) link

yeah that's the thing. it's not like they're still discovering emails - they had them all to begin with. they were reviewing + releasing them to the public. if there was a smoking gun we should've heard about it a long time ago. xp

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:57 (eight years ago) link

The Koch Bros are avowedly anti-Trump

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:58 (eight years ago) link

yup, they are quite clearly NOT in control

Οὖτις, Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:59 (eight years ago) link

He's such a good man, you don't understand. What, this? Oh, I just walked into a door, that's all.

― Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Thursday, March 3, 2016 11:56 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this is doubling back and i really don't wanna be an asshole, but man, this isn't cool.

shandemonium padawan (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:59 (eight years ago) link

I agree the DIY home server is nagl, and I cringe inwardly every time I think about it. But the usual counterpoint to that is prior secretaries of state did similar things, as did many Bush admin officials. For me this is not very helpful - she should have known it would look sleazy and get used against her, the way so many things have been. Caesar's wife and all that.

... I mean, you come into a new job, you ask "how should we set up things? what are the best practices?" and someone tells you "everyone set up a personal server" so you say "okay, let's do that" and then years later everyone comes down on you like a ton of bricks for following procedure with precedent that apparently didn't divulge any critical secrets to anyone who didn't already have access to them, and somehow at the originating point you are supposed to know that the best practice put in front of you is a set up for a partisan attack?

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:05 (eight years ago) link

^^^

Οὖτις, Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:06 (eight years ago) link

this whole thing is such a stupid non-scandal. People harmed = 0.

Οὖτις, Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:06 (eight years ago) link

I mean it's one thing if they were like "use this Dropbox for all of your sensitive documents, that's our standard practice" but I do think you're basically saying "Hillary Clinton should have had precognitive abilities, then none of this would be happening"

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:07 (eight years ago) link

The Koch Bros are avowedly anti-Trump

― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Thursday, March 3, 2016 3:58 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yup, they are quite clearly NOT in control

― Οὖτις, Thursday, March 3, 2016 3:59 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

don't Kock bros own the R voter database? they could withhold it from Trump

flopson, Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:08 (eight years ago) link

... I mean, you come into a new job, you ask "how should we set up things? what are the best practices?" and someone tells you "everyone set up a personal server" so you say "okay, let's do that" and then years later everyone comes down on you like a ton of bricks for following procedure with precedent that apparently didn't divulge any critical secrets to anyone who didn't already have access to them, and somehow at the originating point you are supposed to know that the best practice put in front of you is a set up for a partisan attack?

personally i don't really care at all about the email thing, BUT while i could see some people in her position being that ignorant, i can't imagine that she didn't realize there was something fishy about what she was doing. proper recordkeeping is drilled into you in the federal govt. i have a hard time believing she didn't understand it herself, but certainly one of her handlers would have known something was wrong with that approach.

Karl Malone, Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:09 (eight years ago) link

Doc Casino, apologies if that came off as insensitive. There's an obvious parallel in my mind with a Muslim defending Trump's anti-Muslim rhetoric and insisting that he ultimately has a good heart, but I wasn't intending to be flippant about domestic abuse.

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:09 (eight years ago) link

even if it is a real problem (which i'm clearly not even a little convinced about) republicans kinda blew it with all the other fake scandals they tried to make stick before this one. it's hard to believe any scandalous claims are valid at this pt, and certainly not ones so flimsily constructed.

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:11 (eight years ago) link

karl otm

mookieproof, Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:11 (eight years ago) link

i registered democratic today so if the dem primaries do make it to PA i can vote in them

Mordy, Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:13 (eight years ago) link

Anyway, given the area I covered, I received a lot of classified reports from the CIA, the State Department, etc.. They had all sorts of warnings in capital letters on their covers: SECRET NOFORN NOCONTRACT PROPIN ORCON, I think, was the standard litany. And there was a security person who came through our offices at night, scooped up any classified documents we left out, put them in a safe, and issued citations. Between the number of classified documents I received and my continuing true identity as an absent-minded professor, I got a lot of citations — second only to Marty.

But the reason I kept forgetting to lock the things up was that none of them — literally not one, during a whole year — contained anything actually sensitive. There was nothing in any of them you couldn’t have read in newspapers, or figured out for yourself given public information.

I was privy to a few bits of sensitive information, I guess — for example, I knew that Brazil was out of money a few days before it was public — but none of it was in classified documents. (And the larger secret I learned from my year — that the quality of discussion in cabinet-level meetings is lower than you can imagine — isn’t the kind of thing people put in classified documents.)

So my guess is that the only scandal here is how much anodyne stuff gets “Top secret” slapped on it.

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/01/29/my-classified-life/

flopson, Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:14 (eight years ago) link

Old Lunch, thanks, i appreciate that. Sorry for coming at you kind of abruptly and without really explaining myself.

shandemonium padawan (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:21 (eight years ago) link

oh ffs this Romney speech is hilarious, just watching his face, I really really really wish he were running again, I think a can of Diet Coke could beat him.

flappy bird, Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:31 (eight years ago) link

hell a can of diet PEPSI could

nomar, Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:32 (eight years ago) link

i'd bet on a flat Diet Rite even

flappy bird, Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:35 (eight years ago) link

President Tab

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:36 (eight years ago) link

don't look at the carpet trump drew something awful on it

― Karl Malone, Thursday, March 3, 2016 3:25 PM

still laughing

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:37 (eight years ago) link

President Tab

― i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, March 3, 2016 3:36 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

doesn't romney actually have a son named "tab"?

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:40 (eight years ago) link

Tagg!

nomar, Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:40 (eight years ago) link

Willard Romney—father of the Massachusetts healthcare reform which he disowned while running for president; once more pro-gay than Teddy Kennedy; employer of undocumented workers who had to can them because he was running for office, for pete's sake—actually deploring He, Trump for being malleable in his political opinions?

Honestly, people. If you can't see the humor in this, you're not having nearly enough fun in show business.

-- Charles Pierce

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:41 (eight years ago) link

Mitt looking pretty good for a 68 year old though, i had no idea he was that old

nomar, Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:42 (eight years ago) link

uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-brothers-grimsby-sacha-baron-cohen_us_56d8774ce4b03a405677a912?j27f1or

Donald Trump Gets AIDS In A New Movie, And That Has Studio Execs In A Panic
Afraid of Trump's reaction, they're "subtly trying to make it disappear," says an industry source.

goole, Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:44 (eight years ago) link

Holy shit SERIOUS LOL at this line at the end of Romney's speech: "He's playing the members of the American public for suckers, he gets a free ride to the White House, and all we get is a lousy hat."

flappy bird, Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:44 (eight years ago) link

missed his chance to say "lousy hat made in China"

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:44 (eight years ago) link

Editor's note: Donald Trump is a serial liar, rampant xenophobe, racist, misogynist, birther and bully who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims -- 1.6 billion members of an entire religion -- from entering the U.S.

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 3 March 2016 21:49 (eight years ago) link

We really need to find a way to convince Trump to kill himself while making hime think it was his idea

Neanderthal, Thursday, 3 March 2016 22:03 (eight years ago) link

shit Romney did at Bain Capital was graft on a level that makes the Donald look like a guy working a crooked carnival game at a county fair

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 3 March 2016 22:05 (eight years ago) link

Lol @ clemenza's Hinckley observation

Neanderthal, Thursday, 3 March 2016 22:14 (eight years ago) link

shit Romney did at Bain Capital was graft on a level that makes the Donald look like a guy working a crooked carnival game at a county fair
― robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, March 3, 2016 4:05 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah, like keeping guitar center afloat another few years

global tetrahedron, Friday, 4 March 2016 00:03 (eight years ago) link

the people need their multi-fx pedals

micro brewbio (crüt), Friday, 4 March 2016 00:05 (eight years ago) link

If we can't buy a Tube Screamer at 9 PM on a Tuesday, then the terrorists have won.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 4 March 2016 00:18 (eight years ago) link

so there is already, somehow, another GOP debate tonight. i'm not sure i can bear even tuning in and out without carson there.

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Friday, 4 March 2016 00:27 (eight years ago) link

Rubio and Cruz should just knife Trump onstage

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 00:28 (eight years ago) link

they should just dispense with the questions and do an American Gladiators-styled joust

xpost godfuckingdammit

Neanderthal, Friday, 4 March 2016 00:28 (eight years ago) link

LOL

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 00:29 (eight years ago) link

Rubio and Cruz: bringing piss to a shitfight

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 00:30 (eight years ago) link

"speak up Donald, you're hard to hear under that white sheet"

Neanderthal, Friday, 4 March 2016 00:34 (eight years ago) link

romney pulling a backstab candidacy around the GOP convention is akin to throwing the presidency, which it sounds like the party would rather do than see trump run and demolish the party for a decade. romney has nothing to lose and plenty of goodwill to gain. republican party is certainly capable of mustering the political will to push trump outta the drivers seat at their own convention, no? That's what I'd expect if he continues to cruise through the primaries.

ulysses, Friday, 4 March 2016 00:52 (eight years ago) link

somebody who understands this horseshit better than me explain how that can't happen

ulysses, Friday, 4 March 2016 00:52 (eight years ago) link

GOP wont sacrifice an energized voter base. Thats why it wont happen.

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 00:54 (eight years ago) link

They're going to resign themselves to being a rump party/try to cut their losses because the alternative is to not be a party at all.

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 00:55 (eight years ago) link

it can if theyre in denial that it's their base

xp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 March 2016 00:56 (eight years ago) link

don't they desperately WANT to sacrifice trumps energized voter base? and don't they want a figleaf so all the senate race candidates can "disavow" trump or embrace him depending on their constituency?

ulysses, Friday, 4 March 2016 00:56 (eight years ago) link

Former=no. The latter=yes. Not mutually exclusive.

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 00:58 (eight years ago) link

also if liberals have to triangulate their thoughts around voting for the same November candidate as John McCain, Bill Kristol etc CHRIST i will have an orgasm every three hours.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 March 2016 00:58 (eight years ago) link

romney as candidate doesn't make a whiff of sense to me, even if we're entertaining the idea of a counter-trump nominee getting cooked up at the convention. the argument would be: trump only has a plurality of delegates, the majority of the party voted against him. very close to that would be the thought: and they voted for these other people. not for mitt romney. the delegates they'd be trying to horse-trade into some united non-trump candidate would be ted cruz and marco rubio delegates (well maybe kasich i dunno), neither of whom likely would have the slightest interest in handing the nomination to a proven loser who's anointed himself the savior of the party for no really clear reason.

imo the backroom deal would be for a cruz/rubio ticket or cruz/kasich if rubio completes his fizzling and the latter has some late-game surge and has something to actually offer the dealmakers. this is all imagining a world where a) we actually get to the convention and trump only has a plurality and b) there are people who can present themselves as plausible brokers in the first place. i could imagine that romney is kinda putting himself forward for that role. but him slipping into the presidential nom after having done jack shit this whole time would seem weird, underhanded and/or fishy even to swaths of the party not otherwise inclined to see the entire business as a shady steal of trump's rightful crown etc. etc. i still don't think any of this is a likely scenario mind you but i am willing to say, boy does it look less utterly unlikely than it did when the subject first came up.

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Friday, 4 March 2016 01:01 (eight years ago) link

also if liberals have to triangulate their thoughts around voting for the same November candidate as John McCain, Bill Kristol etc CHRIST i will have an orgasm every three hours.

― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius)

Pictures or it's gonna happen.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 01:01 (eight years ago) link

romney as candidate doesn't make a whiff of sense to me

I'm not seeing this entertained anywhere in a serious fashion. NRO was tepid too.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 01:04 (eight years ago) link

yeah it's only popped up as being some hazy idea being considered by possibly no more than one anonymous source, as in this AP story:

Romney advisers have recently sought information on a contested convention, though there appeared to be no concrete planning for that possibility and it was unclear whether their efforts signaled Romney's own interest in becoming the GOP nominee through a floor fight, according to a Republican familiar with the efforts. That person was not authorized to discuss the plans publicly and spoke only on condition of anonymity.

Another idea rumbling through power corridors in Washington was the prospect of a late third-party candidate to represent more mainstream conservatives.

Former Texas Gov. Rick Perry has been approached by "a mixture of people" about being part of a third-party bid, said Jeff Miller, who managed Perry's failed GOP presidential campaign. But Miller said Perry found the idea "ludicrous."

i.e. never gonna happen but get ready for a million commentaries and fan-theories as to how it just... might.. happen!

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Friday, 4 March 2016 01:07 (eight years ago) link

I'm ready for bloggers wanting clicks for a bullshit opinion.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 01:08 (eight years ago) link

The contested-convention scenario actually worries me a bit because I don't want Trump's supporters even more (justifiably) angry. He gets the nomination and loses, well, they had a legit chance even if a lot of Republicans were against him. Trump gets screwed out of the nomination, and whether he runs third party or not, they'll be fuming for years that their guy could have been in the white house if it wasn't for the establishment's scheming.

JoeStork, Friday, 4 March 2016 01:09 (eight years ago) link

well it wouldn't really be justifiable if he got jilted out of a nomination if he walked in with 35% of the votes/delegates. i mean that's not a mandate. but i otherwise basically agree - the prospect of a whole trumpist "stab in the back" narrative fueling and animating his wing (and probably getting him to run again next time) is really unsettling.

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Friday, 4 March 2016 01:12 (eight years ago) link

er, i mean the anger wouldn't be justifiable

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Friday, 4 March 2016 01:12 (eight years ago) link

kasich seems to be thinking that he'll win his home state, other candidates will steal other states from trump, and when they get to the convention trump won't have enough delegates and they'll - like dr casino said - mash their delegates together to make a majority and share a ticket (and maybe promise something to the guy who doesn't get to be on the ticket). the ramifications of executing this successfully are that they lose a sizable chuck of their constituency (hard to imagine Trump not running as 3rd party but even if he didn't). but the real issue is that many of the big states are winner-take-all and not proportional delegates. the more ppl who stay in, the easier it is for trump to win all these winner-take-all states and pretty soon he has an easy majority and then it's impossible bc there is no party infrastructure really in charge he will be the nominee.

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 01:12 (eight years ago) link

man i kinda like romney for giving this speech, ulterior motives aside

carly rae jetson (thomp), Friday, 4 March 2016 01:15 (eight years ago) link

basically as i see it this new strategy is a lie the candidates are telling themselves so they don't have to make the difficult decision of consolidating the field down to trump and nevertrump and it is going to destroy the last chance they have of stopping him

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 01:15 (eight years ago) link

man i kinda like romney for giving this speech, ulterior motives aside

― carly rae jetson (thomp)

He's a charlatan and a fool and will convince no one except Beltway people on cable talk shows -- saddest thing ever

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 01:18 (eight years ago) link

well, yes, but it's nice to see this sort of thing said so prominently by someone from the GOP:

"Mr. Trump is directing our anger for less than noble purposes. He creates scapegoats of Muslims and Mexican immigrants, he calls for the use of torture and for killing the innocent children and family members of terrorists. He cheers assaults on protesters. He applauds the prospect of twisting the Constitution to limit first amendment freedom of the press. This is the very brand of anger that has led other nations into the abyss."

carly rae jetson (thomp), Friday, 4 March 2016 01:18 (eight years ago) link

Williard also took umbrage at Trump calling George W. Bush a liar so fuck that

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 01:21 (eight years ago) link

yeah, the contested thing really only happens if trump is actually losing some of those big states. which is not impossible! he hasn't swept the table so far, he has vulnerabilities, he has states that are slam-dunk trumps and states that aren't. arkansas for example was quite close - might have gone differently if carson had quit a week ago. kasich was three percentage points away from winning vermont. but those other places where has huge, HUGE leads, terrific leads, sure look like he's heading to just win the thing outright. but i haven't actually looked at any kind of big delegate chart or anything.

romney speech is interesting mainly as a halting, in certain ways still very cautious draft version of what all these other clowns should have been saying six to eight months ago. and a possible model for striking back at trump that doesn't go "i've got it --- pants-wetting jokes!" mitt's basic temperament seems unable to go there and so he's revealed another approach that would have seemed obvious to most normal grownups but which may not work coming from anybody, and certainly won't work coming from him.

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Friday, 4 March 2016 01:22 (eight years ago) link

i am happy whenever a republican disavows explicit bigotry bc even though it demonstrates that they're in total denial about the implications of their preferred policies at least they do have some unactivated sense that hate is wrong and dangerous. i half-expect them to still line up behind trump bc their dedication to the republican brand is more important than any actual principles they hold.

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 01:22 (eight years ago) link

alfred i will happily look over that for his returning to the demonizing-muslims-is-not-acceptable note four times

He said he saw thousands of Muslims in New Jersey celebrating 9/11. Wrong, he saw no such thing. He imagined it.

my mormon friend says its literally the only thing on her news feed this morning ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

carly rae jetson (thomp), Friday, 4 March 2016 01:23 (eight years ago) link

xpost yeah i agree and also having more people saying "bigotry is wrong" is just generally good for the national conversation.

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Friday, 4 March 2016 01:23 (eight years ago) link

Dubya also spoke up vs bigotry against Muslims while his administration was legally socking it to em

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 March 2016 01:25 (eight years ago) link

Every GOP statement I've heard condemning Trump's KKK demurrals -- Ryan's, the moron governor of New Mexico's a few minutes ago, Rubio's -- has been pathetic! It's always at the level of Beltway civilized discourse. It's "outrageous," "beyond the pale," "unacceptable." Yet it's OK to mention black-on-black crime and decry "race hustlers." Come on.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 01:36 (eight years ago) link

I'm halfway on Romney's speech--there's good stuff in there, but it's so transparently and desperately calculated that all of that is nullified. And going by the right-wing call-in show out of Buffalo I catch on the way home, it's backfiring spectacularly.

clemenza, Friday, 4 March 2016 01:47 (eight years ago) link

but just point that out and YOU'RE the Real Racist™

#socialmediajustice

xpost

rmde bob (will), Friday, 4 March 2016 01:48 (eight years ago) link


basically as i see it this new strategy is a lie the candidates are telling themselves so they don't have to make the difficult decision of consolidating the field down to trump and nevertrump and it is going to destroy the last chance they have of stopping him

― Mordy, Thursday, March 3, 2016 7:15 PM (38 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this.

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:04 (eight years ago) link

America, man. Maybe we are this dumb.

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:06 (eight years ago) link

has to be the first time in history that a presidential candidate bragged about his penis size in a debate

iatee, Friday, 4 March 2016 02:08 (eight years ago) link

BRAGGIN2016

Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:08 (eight years ago) link

America loves when its presidential candidates make dick jokes.

calstars, Friday, 4 March 2016 02:09 (eight years ago) link

Oh, god...Trump says everything's just fine with the hands and with everything else.

clemenza, Friday, 4 March 2016 02:09 (eight years ago) link

Cruz alternates between looking defeated and totally amazed at Trump

calstars, Friday, 4 March 2016 02:10 (eight years ago) link

lbj would have whipped it out

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:12 (eight years ago) link

this is just unbelievable

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:14 (eight years ago) link

kasich is too boring for this bloodfest

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:15 (eight years ago) link

wtf is Rubio doing flamenco?

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:16 (eight years ago) link

this republican primary season has been the slowest most excruciating trainwreck to watch and somehow again and again my shock and surprise at the state of the race is renewed

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 02:17 (eight years ago) link

cannot even

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdtKbq3Omkw

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:19 (eight years ago) link

Took Trump about 10 minutes (after pulling back on "Little Marco") to go back to Little Marco.

clemenza, Friday, 4 March 2016 02:20 (eight years ago) link

I still think it's not too late for Flavor Flav to jump into this race

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:20 (eight years ago) link

Rubio looks like he's running for class president

calstars, Friday, 4 March 2016 02:22 (eight years ago) link

you know what, I regret that quip. shame on me for besmirching Flavor's name like that.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:23 (eight years ago) link

holy shit they are challenging him with graphics is this new???

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 02:23 (eight years ago) link

fox news going in on trump

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:24 (eight years ago) link

do GOP voters care that trump knows nothing about policy

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:24 (eight years ago) link

james fallows' head is exploding

mookieproof, Friday, 4 March 2016 02:25 (eight years ago) link

who is that

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:27 (eight years ago) link

it is impossible for me to believe that there is a single human watching this and thinking they really want to vote for trump but then
https://twitter.com/ByronYork/status/705579962460413952

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 02:28 (eight years ago) link

All this "businessman" is a reminder that Republican = businessmen during the Reagan era, and Trump's kind of doing a more successful version of what Romney tried to do, with a dollop of Pat Buchanan thrown in.

... (Eazy), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:28 (eight years ago) link

when is Byron York gonna get that his long hair went out with Bennington and Bret Easton Ellis in 1987?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:29 (eight years ago) link

"chief political correspondent"

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:29 (eight years ago) link

megyn kelly looking p fierce tonight

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:34 (eight years ago) link

That defense of off-the-record conversations was more nimble than any of the other imbeciles to his left and right onstage could've managed.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:34 (eight years ago) link

just realized that rubio's cadence sounds like dirk diggler

chinavision!, Friday, 4 March 2016 02:36 (eight years ago) link

Is the booing directed at the moderators or the candidates? It's hard to tell sometimes. I think these people just enjoy booing.

clemenza, Friday, 4 March 2016 02:36 (eight years ago) link

is rubio sick or something? he looks terrible

iatee, Friday, 4 March 2016 02:36 (eight years ago) link

this crowd is fucking insane

Karl Malone, Friday, 4 March 2016 02:39 (eight years ago) link

they can't land punches on him bc they're the same sleazebags just in more dressed up language

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 02:40 (eight years ago) link

I gotta say, fox has really mastered this province of showbiz

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:40 (eight years ago) link

Yeah the gross thing (clearly with the off the record thing) is that as awful as he is, Trump is just straight up better at this stuff than these other chumps.

a strawman stuffed with their collection of 12 cds (jjjusten), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:40 (eight years ago) link

absolutely

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:41 (eight years ago) link

lol daria-g that's tight

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:43 (eight years ago) link

dab on em

maybe rubio shld try

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:44 (eight years ago) link

This feels like the end for Rubio. He's even losing his voice.

Karl Malone, Friday, 4 March 2016 02:46 (eight years ago) link

starting this fall: "The Season"

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:46 (eight years ago) link

rubio looks like he'd give anything to punch a smaller guy in the face

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:47 (eight years ago) link

lol

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:48 (eight years ago) link

during the ISIS question, i'm pretty sure that was the sound of various factions of the crowd arguing with each other

Karl Malone, Friday, 4 March 2016 02:48 (eight years ago) link

Kasich should just tack his résumé up and vacate the stage. (I realize he's stuck in a no-win situation.)

clemenza, Friday, 4 March 2016 02:50 (eight years ago) link

clearly they've got a screen somewhere in there so that ppl in the crowd can see when they're on tv, so now i'm just watching the background shots when the moderators are talking to see who's making faces

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:51 (eight years ago) link

i think he has the best hand motions

x-post

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:52 (eight years ago) link

Would be funny if the knuckleheads in the audience were actually anti-Trump, acting as over-the-top hooligans.

... (Eazy), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:52 (eight years ago) link

"if i say do it, they're gonna do it. that's what leadership is all about."

Karl Malone, Friday, 4 March 2016 02:52 (eight years ago) link

there's good middle school representation in the audience tonight

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:54 (eight years ago) link

James Fallows ‏@JamesFallows 16m16 minutes ago
I am not going to Tweet any more because I am going to cut off all my fingers, one by one, and then just drink holding bottle with my elbows

... (Eazy), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:54 (eight years ago) link

"i've given my answer, lyin' ted, i've given my answer"

we are in a saloon in tombstone, arizona in 1871.

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 4 March 2016 02:54 (eight years ago) link

Little Marco and the Lyin' Kid.

clemenza, Friday, 4 March 2016 02:55 (eight years ago) link

Opening for Trump to ridicule Jeb.

clemenza, Friday, 4 March 2016 02:56 (eight years ago) link

lol i think there are like hundreds of middle schoolers at this debate taking selfies and snapchatting etc, did you see that girl in the background by megyn kelly dab again

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:02 (eight years ago) link

yeah lol

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:03 (eight years ago) link

what is dabbing?

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:05 (eight years ago) link

all the kids are doing it grandad

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:06 (eight years ago) link

it's funny there's hardly anytime to bash democrats, just trump and then he deflects

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:06 (eight years ago) link

btw i can see how if you know nothing about anything -- politics, the world -- trump could seem convincing. too many americans don't know anything.

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:06 (eight years ago) link

All these trump attacks are funny and some of them are otm but its too little too late

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 03:09 (eight years ago) link

go megyn

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:09 (eight years ago) link

i swear there are rich republicans that think trump'll just 'hire the right people.' he's already been purchasing politicians for years or whatever

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:10 (eight years ago) link

"it was elevated to an A, it was elevated to an A"

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:10 (eight years ago) link

megyn should run

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:11 (eight years ago) link

Cruz is cracking me up

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 03:15 (eight years ago) link

Governor Kasich, the human Linkedin account.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:15 (eight years ago) link

"...and the people don't dig you"--Trump as Allen Garfield in The Candidate.

clemenza, Friday, 4 March 2016 03:17 (eight years ago) link

"it's a minor civil case!" cracked me up

JoeStork, Friday, 4 March 2016 03:18 (eight years ago) link

these dudes manage to simultaneously demonize hrc and increase her stature

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:19 (eight years ago) link

A Trump-Clinton debate will be just as ugly, although I expect it'll be a different kind of ugly (i.e., there won't be Little Marco-type stuff).

clemenza, Friday, 4 March 2016 03:22 (eight years ago) link

i keep hearing it as "little marco stands at the lectern (little marco, little marco)"

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:24 (eight years ago) link

Trump dickriders are kinda like the myopic mother who thinks her kid is adorable even he shits on the sidewalk.

Neanderthal, Friday, 4 March 2016 03:25 (eight years ago) link

And the rest of us just hope we don't get any cack on us

Neanderthal, Friday, 4 March 2016 03:25 (eight years ago) link

Kasich coming across so intelligent and adult in that school response you almost forget he's talking absolute horse shit.

Insane Prince of False Binaries (Gukbe), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:27 (eight years ago) link

hah, I'm with you, except would replace "even" with "because" xxp

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:28 (eight years ago) link

Kasich's specialty!

Xxp

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 03:28 (eight years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/dFClT83.png

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 03:28 (eight years ago) link

sorry so big (not like trump's hands)

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 03:28 (eight years ago) link

*cut to* Eminem fist-pump in audience

... (Eazy), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:29 (eight years ago) link

Next debate they should do that childhood thing of pretending Trump is not in the room with them.

Neanderthal, Friday, 4 March 2016 03:29 (eight years ago) link

are there any black people in the audience?

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:29 (eight years ago) link

GOP has banned them iirc

Neanderthal, Friday, 4 March 2016 03:30 (eight years ago) link

An impassioned plea for tolerance towards photographers.

clemenza, Friday, 4 March 2016 03:32 (eight years ago) link

lol yes

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:32 (eight years ago) link

"we must be more tolerant of intolerance"

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:32 (eight years ago) link

Cruz sounds like Ned Flanders

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:33 (eight years ago) link

Kasich doublethink

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:34 (eight years ago) link

a lone white Latin cross

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:35 (eight years ago) link

"....banning some of the most popular firearms in America"--makes it sound like such a spoilsport thing to do.

clemenza, Friday, 4 March 2016 03:38 (eight years ago) link

Rubio! Two in a row.

clemenza, Friday, 4 March 2016 03:39 (eight years ago) link

let's just take a moment to remember that even the "best" of these guys is so many degrees removed from the reality of american history and politics that i don't see any hope for us.

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:41 (eight years ago) link

shoutout 2 millenials

iatee, Friday, 4 March 2016 03:45 (eight years ago) link

Love the Rubio disclaimer: "and I'm gonna repeat it again"--this is intentional, folks, nothing's malfunctioning, promise.

clemenza, Friday, 4 March 2016 03:47 (eight years ago) link

glad to hear "et cetera et cetera" finally used to describe goals in a debate

chinavision!, Friday, 4 March 2016 03:48 (eight years ago) link

"We have breaking news, Senator Cruz. Your daughter has been kidnapped. What do you do?"

... (Eazy), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:49 (eight years ago) link

loved the "60 years of failed left-wing policies" crack when we've had 28 years (rough guess) of Republicans in that time span

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:50 (eight years ago) link

And in the midst of war, the national debt, et cetera
Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:50 (eight years ago) link

And in the midst of war, the national debt, et cetera
Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera

and that's okay

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:51 (eight years ago) link

remember that even the "best" of these guys is so many degrees removed from the reality of american history and politics that i don't see any hope for us

RIP Pataki

rmde bob (will), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:54 (eight years ago) link

Damn, why do these gop debates always coincide w/Leafs games? I missed most of it :(

kevin smith what a bro (Myonga Vön Bontee), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:55 (eight years ago) link

if you want to be a socialist country then move to a socialist country
great ok

chinavision!, Friday, 4 March 2016 03:57 (eight years ago) link

Was going to post the same thing--countries within countries.

clemenza, Friday, 4 March 2016 03:57 (eight years ago) link

kasich:

well let me just say
the little engine that...can
when you're in the arena, you're in the arena

Karl Malone, Friday, 4 March 2016 03:58 (eight years ago) link

there's always internal exile

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:58 (eight years ago) link

good luck usa

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 4 March 2016 03:59 (eight years ago) link

Rubio puts out ad that my pilot was a drug dealer- not true, not my pilot! Guy owned helicopter company- don't think I ever even used.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 4 March 2016 04:01 (eight years ago) link

You guys what the hell did I just watch

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 4 March 2016 04:02 (eight years ago) link

amazing television, truly an exceptional democracy

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 4 March 2016 04:02 (eight years ago) link

it's a great democracy, a beautiful democracy, it's huge

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 4 March 2016 04:03 (eight years ago) link

terrific

chinavision!, Friday, 4 March 2016 04:04 (eight years ago) link

trump talks so much it's crazy!

chinavision!, Friday, 4 March 2016 04:04 (eight years ago) link

"Trump Steaks is gone! You've ruined these companies!"

Treeship, Friday, 4 March 2016 04:09 (eight years ago) link

And says nothing at the same time

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 4 March 2016 04:09 (eight years ago) link

Ramesh Ponnuru Retweeted

Megan McArdle
‎@asymmetricinfo

Trump’s claiming that he’s going to win New York State in the general. In related news, I am going to play shortstop for the Yankees.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 04:10 (eight years ago) link

Why did they all pledge to support Trump? It undercuts their criticism. They called him a con artist after all.

Treeship, Friday, 4 March 2016 04:12 (eight years ago) link

This was the first debate I watched and...uh...shit

frogbs, Friday, 4 March 2016 04:14 (eight years ago) link

Yeah i know. It's a relief to know that Donald Trump doesn't have a small dick.

Treeship, Friday, 4 March 2016 04:18 (eight years ago) link

seen on the facebook

"ask Chris Christie how big Trump's dick is. it's buried in his ass"

rmde bob (will), Friday, 4 March 2016 04:19 (eight years ago) link

Flexibility

Treeship, Friday, 4 March 2016 04:21 (eight years ago) link

I don't see Christie as a bottom

Neanderthal, Friday, 4 March 2016 04:23 (eight years ago) link

aaaand no one knows what happened to the $6 million trump allegedly raised for veterans' groups

https://twitter.com/NewDay/status/705362339437158401

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Friday, 4 March 2016 04:24 (eight years ago) link

prolly bought 5 million worth of blow and let the vets go to town on it

Neanderthal, Friday, 4 March 2016 04:26 (eight years ago) link

He always seemed like a coke dude to me (no judgment) but apparently he's straight edge

Treeship, Friday, 4 March 2016 04:28 (eight years ago) link

the coke....wasn't for him

Neanderthal, Friday, 4 March 2016 04:29 (eight years ago) link

did Trump get destroyed like this in the other debates?

frogbs, Friday, 4 March 2016 04:29 (eight years ago) link

you are new

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 4 March 2016 04:30 (eight years ago) link

Trump said he thought the debate was "wonderful"

Treeship, Friday, 4 March 2016 04:33 (eight years ago) link

because he gets to treat them all like his own cable-access show

Neanderthal, Friday, 4 March 2016 04:36 (eight years ago) link

You're listening to CNN? It's amazing how he handles these post-debate interviews--he turns back into Jimmy Olsen.

clemenza, Friday, 4 March 2016 04:36 (eight years ago) link

can the Repubs choose not to nominate anybody this year

Neanderthal, Friday, 4 March 2016 04:39 (eight years ago) link

They have been talking about trump on msnbc and cnn for like a week straight nonstop

Treeship, Friday, 4 March 2016 04:46 (eight years ago) link

They have been talking about trump on msnbc and cnn everywhere on the motherfucking planet for like a week straight nonstop

fixed

Neanderthal, Friday, 4 March 2016 04:47 (eight years ago) link

nice to reaffirm that lazy liberals are into fat-shaming AND homophobia

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 March 2016 04:47 (eight years ago) link

this 3-day-old thread's about to hit 1300 posts and there ain't a lotta kasich talk in it

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 4 March 2016 04:48 (eight years ago) link

admittedly there was the interlude where we all listed generals

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 4 March 2016 04:49 (eight years ago) link

When msnbc branded themselves as "The Place for Politics," they finally threw out the misconception once and for all that they're a 24-hour news channel. They're a politics channel now, plain and simple. I guess maybe that's okay? It's basically what Fox News has been for twice as long.

Poor CNN. Nobody knows what they are.

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Friday, 4 March 2016 04:50 (eight years ago) link

iirc the joke goes if you watch msnbc you're a liberal and if you watch fox you're a conservative and if you watch cnn you're in an airport

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 4 March 2016 04:51 (eight years ago) link

I usually don't watch these channels but i've been hooked this week

Treeship, Friday, 4 March 2016 04:55 (eight years ago) link

Trump is creating compelling television

Treeship, Friday, 4 March 2016 04:55 (eight years ago) link

how are we ever going to go back?

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 4 March 2016 04:56 (eight years ago) link

True. I remember a few years ago I caught The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer one afternoon when he had Ted Turner in as a guest. Wolf asked Ted what he thought of CNN now and Ted could barely contain his contempt, though he managed to blurt out some word salad that seemed vague enough to be polite.

Americans really have no interest in an actual news network anymore. Obvs Al Jazeera had other problems besides just being named Al Jazeera, but they were the model of something I'd like to watch a lot more of and it bums me out that it could be a really long time before anyone tries that again.

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Friday, 4 March 2016 04:56 (eight years ago) link

I can't let go of cnn. I find myself liking them.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 04:57 (eight years ago) link

lobotomies are not usually reversible

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 March 2016 04:57 (eight years ago) link

i watched 2 episodes of The Americans (the good old days), i beat alla you sick, sick bastards.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 March 2016 04:58 (eight years ago) link

I never really got "news" from tv and don't think many other people my age look to these channels for news. It's sportscenter, essentially. You learn a lot about how to be a good pr rep if you pay attention.

Treeship, Friday, 4 March 2016 04:58 (eight years ago) link

Good choice xp

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Friday, 4 March 2016 04:59 (eight years ago) link

yeah my mom's clearly been planted in front of msnbc for literal weeks now and i try to scold her but of course i'm clicking on ilx every ten seconds

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 4 March 2016 05:00 (eight years ago) link

I watch CNN too, collardio. (Only basic-cable option in Canada, anyway.) They're all over the place--some good people, some bad.

clemenza, Friday, 4 March 2016 05:01 (eight years ago) link

I like watching Chris Hayes and Rachel Maddow at least a couple nights a week, but during election season there's always an increased chance I'll be exposed to Chris Matthews and that just fucking ruins my day.

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Friday, 4 March 2016 05:02 (eight years ago) link

all over the place is right.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 05:03 (eight years ago) link

I just listen to thrash metal and imagine the talking heads on CNN are saying the mean lyrics I'm hearing

Neanderthal, Friday, 4 March 2016 05:05 (eight years ago) link

I'm very racist when it comes to cnn. Give me Jones, Sellers & Brazile and I'm set.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 05:08 (eight years ago) link

ilx u are my coverage i literally lasted like 2 minutes of that shitshow

i mean, that was like a bunch of old dudes shouting each other down at a leopard lodge meeting, "presidential" "debate" my ass

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 4 March 2016 05:32 (eight years ago) link

two of the candidates are now getting post-debate spongebaths

Neanderthal, Friday, 4 March 2016 05:35 (eight years ago) link

(xposts) I like Jones, like Brazile (I realize she's a party hack, I just find her funny), and like Nia-Malika Henderson. I'm drawing a blank on Sellers. I think David Axelrod's very good.

clemenza, Friday, 4 March 2016 06:01 (eight years ago) link

Been gone most of the day. I wanted to post this earlier

http://georgelakoff.com/2016/03/02/why-trump/

Which deconstructs some of Trump's support. I particularly like the bit on how these guys use "political correctness" when they loudly complain about it.

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Friday, 4 March 2016 06:03 (eight years ago) link

I kinda realized today that we will be explaining this moment to future generations who will look at us with confusion and shock no matter how this goes down. Its a unique time in american history here folks! Take copious notes!

i believe that (s)he is sincere (forksclovetofu), Friday, 4 March 2016 07:01 (eight years ago) link

oh please we're all going to die in the Fracking Disaster of 2022

Neanderthal, Friday, 4 March 2016 07:02 (eight years ago) link

The frack u say

i believe that (s)he is sincere (forksclovetofu), Friday, 4 March 2016 07:04 (eight years ago) link

it'll be a gas

Neanderthal, Friday, 4 March 2016 07:06 (eight years ago) link

The talk above about a brokered convention / whether it will become one-on-one before that: the problem when this came up before was always Ted Cruz - the party establishment hates him and would (a month or two ago) have rathered a collapse and rebuild under Trump than the reign of Ted (if those are the only two options). And he won't back down in favour of another candidate because that would reduce rather than increase his options for being an asshole.

The nauseating thought occurs to me though that one or two months ago, they didn't have a vacancy on the Supreme Court that may not be filled until the next president.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 4 March 2016 09:18 (eight years ago) link

I kinda realized today that we will be explaining this moment to future generations who will look at us with confusion and shock no matter how this goes down. Its a unique time in american history here folks! Take copious notes!

i tell my 18-19-year-old students that they will be voting for the first time in the nuttiest presidential election in a century, and they seem confused, like this is always how it is. which of course, it is for them! but that in and of itself is crazy.

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 4 March 2016 09:30 (eight years ago) link

how are we ever going to go back?

― denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour),

nude shots of Chris Hayes

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 11:33 (eight years ago) link

speaking of MSNBC: I'm getting dressed and I hear "Mika" and Joe read a Peggy Noonan column allowed.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 11:53 (eight years ago) link

Still two more Republican debates. Maybe this happened earlier--I don't think so, I think there was still a chance that something might come up--but I felt like they officially reached the point last night where nothing they throw at Trump has any effect. Wouldn't be at all surprised if he skips the one scheduled for March 21 (don't think he'd risk March 10), or if it's cancelled altogether.

clemenza, Friday, 4 March 2016 12:46 (eight years ago) link

did this debate change anything? i'm trying to find results at large, and i'm seeing a bunch of 'rubio and ted stepped up and laid the smack down!' but i don't know if I believe that story

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Friday, 4 March 2016 12:53 (eight years ago) link

there will be maaaaybe 3 more presidential "elections"

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 March 2016 12:54 (eight years ago) link

why what's gonna happen

micro brewbio (crüt), Friday, 4 March 2016 13:16 (eight years ago) link

I will die and you will cease to exist.

Three Word Username, Friday, 4 March 2016 13:24 (eight years ago) link

That's all that future Emperor Trump will allow before he brings the whole charade to a halt.

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Friday, 4 March 2016 13:25 (eight years ago) link

the robots take over?

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Friday, 4 March 2016 13:32 (eight years ago) link

I thought Rubio's two yoga-related jokes last night were pretty great.

clemenza, Friday, 4 March 2016 13:36 (eight years ago) link

nothing they throw at Trump has any effect

See, in one sense that's true - his support will not wane - but you can't measure or detect future non-happenings.

No, I don't think the stop-Trump movement, #nevertrump, and Romney stuff will decrease his poll numbers or prevent him from accumulating a majority of delegates.

But it WILL ensure that when he takes the nomination with an asterisk. It won't make anyone get OFF the Trump train, but it will make some people more reluctant to get on. He'll get the nomination but come out of the convention sullied by the messy process that got him there. He'll be further diminished in the eyes of moderate middle voters, and most definitely women (many of whom found a full campaigning day devoted to dick-talk offputting). Most Democrats, and even some Carson-type Republicans who want more "civility" might be a bit more reluctant to jump on the bandwagon after the juvenile petty bullshit of the primary race.

The bickery middle-school food-fight stuff - especially added to highly publicized defections like McConnell, McCain, Sasse, NRO, etc. - makes all Republicans look bad and makes it very easy for Democrats to look dignified in comparison.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 4 March 2016 14:04 (eight years ago) link

fwiw the FB friend i quoted above who was going to vote for trump if it came down to trump v clinton followed up by saying that, after last night's debate, he won't be voting at all

jason waterfalls (gbx), Friday, 4 March 2016 14:16 (eight years ago) link

fivethirtyeight (i know, what is this, 2009) keeps stressing a couple things:

i. almost everyone voting for trump, pace exit polling, says they decided to vote for him months ago. nothing that has happened since january has broadened his base.

ii. a. the percentage of republican voters who actually voted for trump as their first preference, averaged over all states, is in the mid 30s. b. the percentage of republican voters, exit polled, who answered positively to 'would you be happy to vote for him if trump were the candidate' was less than 50 percent.

these are kind of reassuring things to remind yourself of, i think

carly rae jetson (thomp), Friday, 4 March 2016 14:35 (eight years ago) link

it is kind of hilarious to think that trump is actually the republicans' best shot in the general (even though trump winning is extremely unlikely), seeing romney's desperate attempt to convince people to get behind cruz or rubio is so funny because i can't imagine either of them fairing any better in the general election against clinton. cruz is even more unlikable than trump and rubio is such a lightweight

marcos, Friday, 4 March 2016 14:43 (eight years ago) link

If Rubio magically becomes the nominee, I am going to repost the water lunge video from the 2013 SOTU response everywhere I physically can until the day of the election.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 4 March 2016 14:50 (eight years ago) link

i could watch that all day

marcos, Friday, 4 March 2016 14:52 (eight years ago) link

i had to give a 45-minute presentation on wednesday and i had a tiny little plastic water bottle and it was virtually impossibly not to think of rubes whenever i took a sip

marcos, Friday, 4 March 2016 14:53 (eight years ago) link

Why did they all pledge to support Trump? It undercuts their criticism. They called him a con artist after all.

― Treeship, Friday, March 4, 2016 4:12 AM (10 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Craziest part of the whole shit show.

a (waterface), Friday, 4 March 2016 14:54 (eight years ago) link

Respect for the process is a conservative value.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 4 March 2016 14:55 (eight years ago) link

on my twitter feed someone posted "why couldn't anyone have said, 'yes i'll support the nominee, since it's not going to be trump.'?" which seems the obvious evasive answer here.

intheblanks, Friday, 4 March 2016 14:57 (eight years ago) link

Trump promising to support someone other than himself (with no conditions) also contradicted his established stance, which was that he'd support another nominee as long as he was treated "fairly"--i.e., no back-channel convention maneuvering. So if that does happen, and he runs third party, he'll now have to go back on what he said last night.

Not that it matters--doubt anyone's keeping a scorecard on Trump's veracity and consistency at this point.

clemenza, Friday, 4 March 2016 15:19 (eight years ago) link

It also might mean that he simply doesn't think that'll ever happen, that the nomination is already locked up.

clemenza, Friday, 4 March 2016 15:21 (eight years ago) link

it probably is though

art, Friday, 4 March 2016 15:26 (eight years ago) link

"rubio is such a lightweight."

in any other year this would hardly be a disqualifying characteristic, which is I guess why I had such a hard time "dispelling with" the sense that he would eventually be the nominee. I didn't watch last night but heard that Trump called him "Little Marco." now god knows this isn't outside Trump's wheelhouse, but given the relative demographic diminutiveness of Latin Americans compared to US men (and I say this as a well-shorter-than-average US man), didn't that feel...kinda racist?

evol j, Friday, 4 March 2016 15:32 (eight years ago) link

What would ever lead you to suggest such a thing about Donald Trump?

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Friday, 4 March 2016 15:36 (eight years ago) link

Agreed, the nominee will be Trump. He will be terrible for the party, but going against a plurality of voters to nominate someone else would be far worse.

Marcos is also right that Trump will probably do better than Cruz (whose extreme politics and negative charisma together spell general-election doom) or Rubio (whose relative charm and comparative moderation seem appealing until you notice how hollow he is).

I continue to believe it still won't be enough, given the hideous messiness of the Republican primaries plus the preexisting demographic / Electoral College headwind that any Republican would have.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 4 March 2016 15:36 (eight years ago) link

(whose relative charm and comparative moderation seem appealing until you notice how hollow he is).

Reminder that GWB got re-elected (or if you want, elected).

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 4 March 2016 15:49 (eight years ago) link

GWB had a down-to-earth folksiness that many people liked a lot, they felt they could relate to him in a way that i am not seeing with rubio. also his reelection in 04 resulted in large part from the political climate after 9/11, and after 8 years people finally realized that he was a terrible president

marcos, Friday, 4 March 2016 15:52 (eight years ago) link

GWB while also very hollow and superficially charming isn't really a great comparison to rubio imo

marcos, Friday, 4 March 2016 15:53 (eight years ago) link

they are very different

marcos, Friday, 4 March 2016 15:53 (eight years ago) link

gwb had a confidence that rubes clearly lacks

marcos, Friday, 4 March 2016 15:53 (eight years ago) link

I'm drawing a blank on Sellers.

Here you go clem, I present to you Bakari Sellers:

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/140910192426-hambycast-peter-hamby-lizards-thicket-bakari-sellers-orig-jm-00003610-story-top.jpg

Former rep in the SC legislature. Usually sits on Don Lemon's panels. I think he quite openly backs HRC, but he's no attack dog. Nuanced, sharp, and -let's face it- dreamy.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 15:56 (eight years ago) link

xp All after-the-fact rationalisations - the view of him through the 2000 election was "lol are you kidding me, George Bush's idiot son"? The people who felt they could relate to him came out of the woodwork afterwards, the ones who fall for Rubio's charm could do the same.

I'm not saying he's a cert, but "he's a lightweight" isn't a good reason to dismiss him - not in the general anyway.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 4 March 2016 15:57 (eight years ago) link

Missed the debate. Did I hear right that after ripping on Trump these losers said they would still support him if he's nominated? Way to undercut your leverage, morons.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 4 March 2016 16:02 (eight years ago) link

you heard right Josh.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 16:05 (eight years ago) link

am i reading correctly that hillary has better odds of being VP than bernie? that seems off.

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 16:06 (eight years ago) link

xxxp the feeling was akin to hearing Emily Litella's "Never mind"

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 16:08 (eight years ago) link

actually i don't understand those odds either

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 4 March 2016 16:09 (eight years ago) link

gwb's wkiw factor is umpteen times higher than rubios

flopson, Friday, 4 March 2016 16:10 (eight years ago) link

Would paint w/ gwb

Treeship, Friday, 4 March 2016 16:15 (eight years ago) link

Trump's nomination seems like a done deal, it's too late to dent that 40% or so of the GOP primary electorate that loves him. All of this desperate flailing on behalf of Romney, Rubio, Cruz, whoever else is alternately hilarious and pathetic and will change nothing, aside from maybe damaging Trump's chances in the general by dragging all of this primary nonsense out as long as possible - which will prevent the party from unifying behind their candidate and strategizing for the general. Dems won't have that problem (or at least, not as much).

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 16:26 (eight years ago) link

att C-Towners:

Cleveland is seeking to buy 2,000 sets of riot gear, including riot-control suits and collapsible batons, as part of the city’s latest move to spend a $50 million federal security grant for July’s Republican National Convention.

The city this week posted to its contracting website a notice seeking bidders to provide the gear. City documents refer to the “Elite Defender” riot-control suit manufactured by HWI Gear and a 26-inch baton manufactured by Monadnock, plus 2,000 bags to carry them.

The city also wants to buy 310 sets of riot-control gear — long-sleeve jackets, gloves and shin guards — that would be suitable for use by police riding bicycles.

The convention, scheduled for the week of July 18, is expected to attract 50,000 visitors to Cleveland. As part of its security plan, Cleveland is organizing a police force of 5,000 officers — the city is in the process of recruiting officers from surrounding suburbs and elsewhere to bolster its existing force of about 1,200.

http://www.cleveland.com/rnc-2016/index.ssf/2016/03/cleveland_seeking_to_buy_riot.html

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 March 2016 16:29 (eight years ago) link

I present to you Bakari Sellers

Thanks--of course, I see him almost every day. Yeah, as Hillary advocates go, he's good.

clemenza, Friday, 4 March 2016 16:31 (eight years ago) link

on my twitter feed someone posted "why couldn't anyone have said, 'yes i'll support the nominee, since it's not going to be trump.'?" which seems the obvious evasive answer here.

This is kind of what Kasich said, which made me lol

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 4 March 2016 16:35 (eight years ago) link

keep feedin' that machine

CBS Chief Les Moonves Says Trump's 'Damn Good' For Business

"Sorry. It's a terrible thing to say. But, bring it on, Donald. Keep going."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/les-moonves-donald-trump_us_56d52ce8e4b03260bf780275

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 March 2016 16:45 (eight years ago) link

att C-Towners:

Cleveland is seeking to buy 2,000 sets of riot gear, including riot-control suits and collapsible batons, as part of the city’s latest move to spend a $50 million federal security grant for July’s Republican National Convention.

The city this week posted to its contracting website a notice seeking bidders to provide the gear. City documents refer to the “Elite Defender” riot-control suit manufactured by HWI Gear and a 26-inch baton manufactured by Monadnock, plus 2,000 bags to carry them.

The city also wants to buy 310 sets of riot-control gear — long-sleeve jackets, gloves and shin guards — that would be suitable for use by police riding bicycles.

The convention, scheduled for the week of July 18, is expected to attract 50,000 visitors to Cleveland. As part of its security plan, Cleveland is organizing a police force of 5,000 officers — the city is in the process of recruiting officers from surrounding suburbs and elsewhere to bolster its existing force of about 1,200.

http://www.cleveland.com/rnc-2016/index.ssf/2016/03/cleveland_seeking_to_buy_riot.html

― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, March 4, 2016 11:29 AM (19 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i'm pretty nervous about crazy shit happening in cleveland. i was just there visting family this week and my mom is not looking forward to this at all

marcos, Friday, 4 March 2016 16:49 (eight years ago) link

also there is major major construction happening throughout the city and the airport and i know it is a few months away but shit does not look ready in cleveland at all

marcos, Friday, 4 March 2016 16:49 (eight years ago) link

All of this desperate flailing on behalf of Romney, Rubio, Cruz, whoever else is alternately hilarious and pathetic and will change nothing, aside from maybe damaging Trump's chances in the general by dragging all of this primary nonsense out as long as possible - which will prevent the party from unifying behind their candidate and strategizing for the general.

Feel like maybe that's actually the goal of the "responsible" party actors at this point, not a side-effect: Destroy Trump to save the party.

intheblanks, Friday, 4 March 2016 16:50 (eight years ago) link

i need to monetize the upcoming circus in Clevo somehow

mod (brownie), Friday, 4 March 2016 16:51 (eight years ago) link

i have heard of folks renting out their places for crazy money

marcos, Friday, 4 March 2016 16:58 (eight years ago) link

who pays for all the extra security in clevo? (i have a guess)

mookieproof, Friday, 4 March 2016 16:58 (eight years ago) link

there's a federal security grant (according to morbs article)

mod (brownie), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:00 (eight years ago) link

@AriFleischer
Trump is wrong when he says military will do whatever he tells them. They'll resign before carrying out what they think is an illegal order.

‏@ggreenwald
Reassurances from America's Moral Conscience

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:01 (eight years ago) link

unfortunately I have too much electronic gear to feel safe renting my place

will probably end up dressing as Uncle Sam and winging it

xposts

mod (brownie), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:02 (eight years ago) link

lol @ Greenwald zinger

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 17:04 (eight years ago) link

yea my sister & her husband were thinking of renting their place but don't want weirdo trump fans staying there

marcos, Friday, 4 March 2016 17:06 (eight years ago) link

daaaaaamn greenwald

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:07 (eight years ago) link

They'll resign before carrying out what they think is an illegal order.

and that's just the military -- imagine how unacceptable trump would be to america's police

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:07 (eight years ago) link

more Greenwald for my Zionist boyfriend, and whoever gave Obama & Bibi the "advocacy makes a difference" fig leaf the other day...

Then there’s the feigned horror over Trump’s proposal to kill the family members of terrorists. Though they claim they don’t do it deliberately, the fact is that this is something that both the U.S. and Israel, among others, has routinely done for years: they repeatedly bomb people’s homes or work places, killing innocent people including family members, and then justify it on the ground that a terrorist was among them. While they claim they don’t target terrorists’ family members, they certainly target their homes and other places family members are certain to be found....

https://theintercept.com/2016/03/04/trumps-policies-are-not-anathema-to-the-u-s-mainstream-but-an-uncomfortably-vivid-reflection-of-it/

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:08 (eight years ago) link

and that's just the military -- imagine how unacceptable trump would be to america's police

"Shoot an unarmed black guy? Well, if you say so I guess..."

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 17:08 (eight years ago) link

yeah i think the killing-family-members thing is instance #345235324 of trump's One Weird Trick: pry open the gulf between 21c american policy and 21c american rhetoric, in order to excite the many many people whose sympathies are with the policy. see also the difference between "torture is wrong, but waterboarding is a vital interrogation technique" and trump's "yay torture".

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:13 (eight years ago) link

sudden freedom from cognitive dissonance is almost orgasmic.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:14 (eight years ago) link

He also does it when he's asked about position changes that have doomed everyone from John Kerry to Marco Rubio: "I changed my mind, I'm a businessman, ya gotta be flexible."

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:16 (eight years ago) link

before I click you should know that the URL has the word "yogapants"

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:20 (eight years ago) link

@AriFleischer
Trump is wrong when he says military will do whatever he tells them. They'll resign before carrying out what they think is an illegal order.

its depressing but this county is not above a military coup.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:22 (eight years ago) link

i need to monetize the upcoming circus in Clevo somehow

― mod (brownie), Friday, March 4, 2016 11:51 AM (30 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Let's you and me become Uber drivers, we'll clean up. Even more if we add in dead prostitute disposal.

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:24 (eight years ago) link

oh i read the greenwald thing now and yeah it covers torture. doesn't quite go far enough tho:

He may be more gauche for saying it aloud and gleefully justifying it rather than feigning sorrow over it

gauche is french for "attractive", right

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:24 (eight years ago) link

xps this country is not above anything! Trump has been clarifying on this point

anonanon, Friday, 4 March 2016 17:25 (eight years ago) link

whoa he dropped outta cpac

a (waterface), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:26 (eight years ago) link

he=trump

a (waterface), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:26 (eight years ago) link

he doesn't need them

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 17:31 (eight years ago) link

when the mob is braying for blood making a case that actually their demagogue is just like everyone else only more honest seems very irresponsible, but greenwald has always been something of an accelerationist, right?

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 17:34 (eight years ago) link

iirc the joke goes if you watch msnbc you're a liberal and if you watch fox you're a conservative and if you watch cnn you're in an airport

― denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, March 3, 2016 10:51 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i tried to fave this like a tweet, fp'd u instead i guess

goole, Friday, 4 March 2016 17:35 (eight years ago) link

when the mob is braying for blood making a case that actually their demagogue is just like everyone else only more honest seems very irresponsible, but greenwald has always been something of an accelerationist, right?

think what's irresponsible is continuing to talk as if trump's demagoguery is self-evidently outrageous and disgusting and tapping into forces heretofore nobly spurned and limited to a small rabid fringe and does not at all have a straight-talking appeal in contrast to the incoherent politeness of his opponents

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:39 (eight years ago) link

even were president obama's administration destroying this country (which it clearly isn't) i wish that in 1932 ppl were explaining the importance of the weimar republic and the threat of unleashing germany's darkest id. someone who stood up and said that hitler's popularity is v understandable and we just need to destroy the current govt so that the communists can really take care of the ppl might think that they were being anti-fascist but tearing down the democratic establishment doesn't pave the way for communism - it paves the way for fascism. (nb Bernie support may seem counter-establishment but Bernie is ultimately running a Democratic campaign that pledges to radically alter the system but not deconstruct it - he is still working within the margins of our organized society even if his supporters think he's ultimately more radical than he is.)

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 17:40 (eight years ago) link

TRUMP: because he spouts the same bullshit as the others, only he's ruder and uses smaller words!

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:41 (eight years ago) link

look, i don't know what trump will or won't do if he's elected but his grassroots support from white supremacists (and ppl sympathetic to their narratives) is not just business as usual, even for a republican party that knowingly stoked those fires when it benefited them.

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 17:42 (eight years ago) link

many people in our media elite still think communism and democracy are a binary

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:42 (eight years ago) link

Would paint w/ gwb

― Treeship, Friday, March 4, 2016 11:15 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

About that.

how's life, Friday, 4 March 2016 17:43 (eight years ago) link

we just need to destroy the current govt

i haven't been keeping up with the intercept so maybe this is their mission statement but all that partic greenwald piece argues is that people are not seeing trump clearly. seeing him clearly will help us oppose him via the good ol Existing System. it'll help hillary.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:44 (eight years ago) link

i read the greenwald + hedges pieces in short succession so i may be conflating the two but it seemed to me like the implicit argument was that hillary is no better and maybe even emblematic of the things that are driving ppl to support trump

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 17:45 (eight years ago) link

his grassroots support from white supremacists (and ppl sympathetic to their narratives) is not just business as usual, even for a republican party that knowingly stoked those fires when it benefited them.

yeah --- maybe i'm just being alarmist (as tends to be the case in elections) but something does feel really different about the racism around his campaign. esp since i'm half-convinced that trump himself doesn't really have strong feelings about race or racism

jason waterfalls (gbx), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:48 (eight years ago) link

TRUMP: because he spouts the same bullshit as the others, only he's ruder and uses smaller words!

I think the reason Trump got so pissed off about being called "short-fingered" but not a "vulgarian" is that "vulgarian" has four syllables.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:49 (eight years ago) link

the argument that the democratic party in general and hillary specifically is indistinguishable from either the republican party or their new grassroots supported strongman seems less convincing to me this election cycle than at any other time. hillary is not the "lesser of two evils." i don't know if she'll be able to accomplish many of the things she's campaigning on (i imagine it'll depend a lot on how the congress shakes out) but i think our country is in better shape today than it was 8 years so another term of obama does not sound bad to me. it's arguably not enough, but it's not just slower decline like morbz has described it many times over the last 8 years. it's slow progress.

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 17:52 (eight years ago) link

she is most definitely an evil goddamn warmonger, that's why you fucking love her

the slow progress of 2 degrees Celsius, which will march on

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:53 (eight years ago) link

and i think ppl making the opposite case are ultimately just fueling the reactionarism that characterizes the trump campaign. remember, these trump voters were galvanized by eight years of xenophobia and bigotry targeting the president of the united states - they are imo not trustworthy observers/analysts of the state of the union.

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 17:54 (eight years ago) link

"evil goddamn warmonger" two of these three words are theologically charged language meant to exclusively appeal to reactionary impulses and the third is a hyperbolic mischaracterization that acts as a sop to flatter the speaker's belief that they aren't a disgusting human being.

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 17:55 (eight years ago) link

i know that i definitely want to be on the side of ppl who call their political opponents evil and damned by god. can't wait until we run society this way! it's gonna be great, guys. yuge.

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 17:56 (eight years ago) link

lol

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 17:57 (eight years ago) link

the argument that the democratic party in general and hillary specifically is indistinguishable from either the republican party or their new grassroots supported strongman

mordy the entire greenwald piece is about gop hypocrisy except for the "killing family members of terrorists" part, which references obama-era drone policy. do you think that part is wrong? do we not have a bipartisan consensus on the acceptability of killing family members of terrorists? do you not think that trump's "fuck yeah let's kill terrorist families" has a serious unwishywashy appeal that the democrats would be unwise to think stands in some kind of monstrous contrast to their own polices? my perspective here is that of someone who wants hillary clinton to win this election.

as for the hedges piece, saying neoliberal policies (which can be changed without destroying the government) created over bipartisan decades a huge economic and emotional opening for fascism is not saying they are the same as fascism, or even that they're not preferable to it. it's saying that if we're gonna be fighting fascists we'd prefer better armor.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:00 (eight years ago) link

Like I said, at least we have a President who has a rapport with black leadership and who isn't ignorant about civil rights. Electing Trump would be like sending an abused kid back to his abusers after being spared that situation for eight years. I'm terrified for my community, at the same time, I'm hopeful Clinton can win.

Fake Sam's Club (I M Losted), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:01 (eight years ago) link

lol well thanks morbs

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:01 (eight years ago) link

xps - Iraq and Afghanistan certainly soured the small part of the US population that voluntarily enlists in the military or national guard on the idea of small imperialist wars that slog on forever without visible progress or obvious military goals. But there is a much larger population of jingoists and chicken-hawks who think that if we'd only get a lot more violent, we'd go back to crushing all our enemies and winning all our wars in quick step time, because we've outspent the rest of the world 10 to 1 on our military for decades now, so it stands to reason that if we just "unleash" our power we can't lose. Trump appeals strongly to those assholes.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:02 (eight years ago) link

and damned by god

very cutely literal of you, please back away from the Wall.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:03 (eight years ago) link

i don't subscribe to the view that the two parties are indistinguishable but tbh hillary is a warmonger, the term suits her better than any democratic candidate we've had since the '60s

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:06 (eight years ago) link

genuinely think she's personally more of a warmonger, or to be nicer, an interventionist, than either jfk (martial rhetoric, but cautious when it counted) or lbj (totally thoughtless in this area, easily filled with the Complex's thoughts)

but of course those guys monged a whole bunch of war anyway

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:10 (eight years ago) link

cautious at some of the times that it counted rather

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:12 (eight years ago) link

jfk (martial rhetoric, but cautious when it counted

"cool and unflappable" re our beloved Schlesinger

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:12 (eight years ago) link

i don't see how she can be considered more of a warmonger than the vietnam war dems

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 18:12 (eight years ago) link

She plays Call of Duty iirc

Neanderthal, Friday, 4 March 2016 18:13 (eight years ago) link

^probably only because it's pretty unpopular now across a wider demo

xpost

rmde bob (will), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:14 (eight years ago) link

Short-fingered vulgarian sounds like a lost Smiths track.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 4 March 2016 18:16 (eight years ago) link

Or a Chitty Chitty Bang Bang henchman

Neanderthal, Friday, 4 March 2016 18:17 (eight years ago) link

"i don't see how she can be considered more of a warmonger than the vietnam war dems"

Time period matters. Either way I'd say it's close.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:18 (eight years ago) link

no way. one and a half million dead from vietnam. intervening to help topple gaddafi after he threatened a genocide in benghazi is qualitatively (as well as obviously quantitatively) different

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 18:21 (eight years ago) link

Those NYT articles published last week about her "decision making process" re Libya were chilling in revealing to what degree the impulse To Do Something for purportedly altruistic motives still motivates administrations whose leaders when campaigning claimed they didn't believe in stupid wars. Plus, the sources made her look gullible and foolish – inevitable in these campaign stories molded out or the whimpering of senior administration officials and former advisers. She's not a warmongering, which implies belligerence. She's been part of the establishment elite for so long that she's apt to believe the worst case scenarios that Pentagon/NSA types give her.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:21 (eight years ago) link

The Short-Fingered Vulgarian:

1 oz Cranberry juice
2 oz vodka
1/2 oz Bud Lite
1/2 oz chocolate syrup
1oz lime juice
shake with crushed ice for 10 seconds, serve unstrained in a rocks glass emblazoned with the words "Who Farted?"
garnish with a glow stick

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 4 March 2016 18:22 (eight years ago) link

Yes to all of that. I think Bernie is vulnerable to the same things (and in some ways even more so given his incuriosity about foreign affairs). xp

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 18:23 (eight years ago) link

In November 1961, President John F. Kennedy authorized the start of Operation Ranch Hand, the codename for the U.S. Air Force's herbicide program in Vietnam.

whitewashing JFK + LBJ's war crimes bc they make Hillary look better by comparison is nagl

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 18:25 (eight years ago) link

i was splitting a strange hair about the contents of people's heads in a way that had nothing to do with the argument we were having before

hillary really believes in the value of military intervention and feels that it has been demonstrated to her in multiple ways over her career (rwanda, bosnia, libya); she has real personal feelings and intellectual arguments about this

lbj never knew the first thing about foreign policy and just kept doing what the boys told him would let him go back to paying attention to the war on poverty; if he had been surrounded (somehow) by doves, he would have been influenced by them in a way that hillary clinton would not because she actually has her own thoughts

jfk talked a bunch of irresponsible Vigor shit about our dangerous enemies but when everyone in the room including noted peacenik bobby told him to bomb cuba and not take any of this emasculating guff about removing the turkish missiles he didn't listen, is the best thing you can say about him, and i'm not sure what hillary would do there

of course the actual effect of these people's presidencies was the vietnam war, i realize that

in typing this post i may have changed my mind about jfk, who was a warmonger (truly damning epitaph in a decades-later footnote to an early-60s vidal piece about jfk: "secretly, i think he thought war was fun") but i was trying to make a point about lbj's vacancy on this front

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

whitewashing HRC's war crimes because you think her interventions were justified is nagl either

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

There were plenty of so-called liberals who constantly pressed Bill Clinton to intervene in Bosnia, in order To Do Something for altruistic motives, and who were vocally disappointed when, for several years, he refused. Then he changed his spots regarding Kosovo, for seemingly the same reasons he'd rejected for so long. Then he was praised (except for the Chinese embassy fuck up).

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

no way. one and a half million dead from vietnam. intervening to help topple gaddafi after he threatened a genocide in benghazi is qualitatively (as well as obviously quantitatively) different

tbf Morbz seems to have something of a mental block when it comes to scale/numbers

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

justifiable != justified. i don't know if she was right to intervene in libya (syria suggests to me that there isn't a right answer). i do know that she didn't approve dropping agent orange on the libyan public to repress their revolution. she did propose a no-fly zone which gave the rebels an advantage bc gaddafi could no longer bomb them with impunity. these are very different things.

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 18:28 (eight years ago) link

The Slow Bern

2oz habenero-infused blanco tequila
1ozMescal
1/2 oz lime
1/2 oz overproof rum floater
cinnamon stick stirrer
Serve on fire, with a shot glass of ice water

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 4 March 2016 18:29 (eight years ago) link

and there are many people who blame bill for /not/ intervening in rwanda. there are no easy answers for most of these events.

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 18:29 (eight years ago) link

in typing this post i may have changed my mind about jfk, who was a warmonger (truly damning epitaph in a decades-later footnote to an early-60s vidal piece about jfk: "secretly, i think he thought war was fun") but i was trying to make a point about lbj's vacancy on this front

― denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, March 4, 2016 6:27 PM (6 seconds ago)

lol at "secretly, i think he thought"

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:30 (eight years ago) link

scoreboard morality is so beauuuuutiful, as Jimmy Breslin usta say

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:31 (eight years ago) link

i'm sure your disgust with scoreboard morality won't stop you from using it when you think it proves your argument

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 18:32 (eight years ago) link

"no way. one and a half million dead from vietnam."

The argument is not that Vietnam was a less bad military engagement than Libya, more that LBJ decision to escalate in Vietnam very much a construct of that time and mostly reflects his weakness to resist terrible advice (and a nonsensical narrative) whereas I think Hilary's decision to involve us in Libya reflect more specifically to her politics.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:33 (eight years ago) link

that's crazy hair splitting. what politics does her intervention in libya reflect? that the US should use military might to impose a no-fly zone when we think a dictator is about to murder a ton of ppl? i feel like the warmongering critique only makes sense if you don't look at any details.

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 18:36 (eight years ago) link

That the US can solve these issues with military intervention without creating a fuck ton of other issues.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:38 (eight years ago) link

is that what you actually believe she thinks? that US interventions don't come w/ unintended consequences? or is yr complaint that despite knowing that she still thinks in certain cases it is worth doing? i am not in favor of an isolationist military policy which sounds like the only alternative that you'd be okay w/.

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 18:40 (eight years ago) link

LBJ basically reversed his own policy when he escalated; in the 1964 election he'd promised he wouldn't send "american boys" to fight in asia. his tragic flaw was that he seemed to be able to bully/stand up to everyone in the universe save the ivy league foreign policy experts.

JFK otoh talked a lot of hawkish talk but seemed to flinch at actual military engagement most of the time (not just during the missile crisis but during the bay of pigs, where he infuriated pentagon hardliners by refusing to send military support to bail out the failed invasion). the vietnam intervention is the worst blot on his record but it looks fairly minor compared to what happened after him.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:42 (eight years ago) link

his tragic flaw was that he seemed to be able to bully/stand up to everyone in the universe save the ivy league foreign policy experts.

The man was a great listener and never showed contempt towards older men more experienced than he, so that's the other tragic flaw.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:43 (eight years ago) link

I think it's the number of cases she still thinks it's worth doing.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:45 (eight years ago) link

"evil goddamn warmonger" two of these three words are theologically charged language meant to exclusively appeal to reactionary impulses and the third is a hyperbolic mischaracterization that acts as a sop to flatter the speaker's belief that they aren't a disgusting human being.

― Mordy, Friday, March 4, 2016 12:55 PM (51 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

oh i see i have been looking at it all wrong. it was wrong for me to look at her public record of voting for the Iraq War and selling weapons to the Saudis and call her a warmonger bc grammar.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:52 (eight years ago) link

oh adampaws

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 18:52 (eight years ago) link

every president has sold weapons to the saudis

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 18:52 (eight years ago) link

just dropped in here to get my daily dose of Clinton condescension

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:53 (eight years ago) link

every president is a warmonger obv

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:53 (eight years ago) link

p much!

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 18:53 (eight years ago) link

which renders it m/l invalid as a criticism. better to identify specific instances/policies that you agree/disagree with, and take it for granted that whoever you vote for is going to be involved in the murder of innocents.

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 18:54 (eight years ago) link

it is possible to think that particular interventions were not smart or admirable without being an "isolationist"

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:56 (eight years ago) link

"which renders it m/l invalid as a criticism. better to identify specific instances/policies that you agree/disagree with, and take it for granted that whoever you vote for is going to be involved in the murder of innocents"

So you don't think some politicians are more or less likely than others?

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:59 (eight years ago) link

i agree. it's also possible to believe that particular interventions were not smart or admirable without believing they were motivated by belligerence and bloodthirst. xp

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 18:59 (eight years ago) link

400,000 ppl dead in syria so far (mostly casualties of SAF and Putin), 800,000 were killed in rwanda. UN airforces in Libya killed approx 1,000 ppl and NATO killed approx 1,000-5,000 civilians in Kosovo. i don't accept the argument that non-intervention in the face of genocide is the right move and i don't need to go back to ww2 to make it.

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 19:03 (eight years ago) link

So you don't think some politicians are more or less likely than others?

sure, there's a scale. Guys like Cheney obviously more genuinely bloodthirsty and prone to military adventurism than, say, Warren Christopher.

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 19:04 (eight years ago) link

I'm hardly a Clintonista but Mordy is generally otm here imo

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 19:05 (eight years ago) link

Update: Trump all "Oh, let me change my mind again."

https://twitter.com/nataliewsj/status/705824745971961856

Ned Raggett, Friday, 4 March 2016 19:06 (eight years ago) link

quel surprise

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 19:08 (eight years ago) link

ya gotta be flexible!

also incoherent

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 19:08 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6ZTdg6AzBA

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 4 March 2016 19:09 (eight years ago) link

Did you ever see Warren Christopher play backgammon? Bloodthirsty.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 19:10 (eight years ago) link

Rubio, by contrast, is just thirsty

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 19:10 (eight years ago) link

when we think a dictator is about to murder a ton of ppl

the US is entirely neutral about dictatorship as a form of guvmint in other lands.

are they our clients/ facilitators or not?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 March 2016 19:23 (eight years ago) link

Qaddaffi kind of a funny example there - he was our enemy until he wasn't and then he was again

obviously some dictators are more useful to us than others

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 19:27 (eight years ago) link

I think it depends on the administration. Obama was supportive of the Egyptian post-Mubarak elections and the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood. When Sisi conducted his coup I believe official US policy was to deny any aid or military support (though that was later rescinded, I would argue it's because Obama has an article of faith that pragmatic engagement is better than cold withdrawal).

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 19:28 (eight years ago) link

Arguably his entire relationship to the Arab Spring has been one of support for revolutionary movements with the assumption that they would result in Democratic governance (though not in the case of Iran's Green Movement which is obviously its own complicated set of facts since we clearly do not support the regime there).

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 19:29 (eight years ago) link

makes one long for the Dulles days when such gloop was unnecessary for PR

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 March 2016 19:31 (eight years ago) link

QUESTION: How do you view the presidency in Egypt, the future of the presidency in Egypt?

SECRETARY CLINTON: That’s for the people of Egypt to decide. That is a very important issue that really is up to Egyptians.

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 19:31 (eight years ago) link

yeah i knew that was comin'

you really are the Donna Wasserman-Brazile of hairy pothead Phillies fans

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 March 2016 19:32 (eight years ago) link

Just want to say Mordy making a ton of sense here, Shakey as well. The contemporary US is not likely to get a Gandhi type president with squeaky-clean hands any time soon, no matter how much we might wish it were so. The world is messy and intervening has often been wrong, disastrous, or both; so has not intervening. If, to you, HRC is best described as a bloodthirsty warmonger with the blood of children dripping from her fangs, don't vote for her I guess.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 4 March 2016 19:35 (eight years ago) link

uh oh knives out/baseball ref

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 19:36 (eight years ago) link

If, to you, HRC is best described as a bloodthirsty warmonger with the blood of children dripping from her fangs, by her actual voting record don't vote for her I guess.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 4 March 2016 19:37 (eight years ago) link

who is donna wasserman-brazile. is it an amalgamation of donna brazile and debbie wasserman schultz? i don't think i know enough about donna brazile to understand the burn sadly.

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 19:37 (eight years ago) link

Donna Brazile in the outfield.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 19:38 (eight years ago) link

makes one long for the Dulles days when such gloop was unnecessary for PR

― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, March 4, 2016 7:31 PM (8 minutes ago)

after the kissinger thing i made some sarcastic remark to my gf like "who's hillary going to be cheering for next, allen dulles?" and lo and behold literally two days later the clinton campaign was attacking bernie for criticizing the dulles-era cia

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 4 March 2016 19:44 (eight years ago) link

Next up: J.Edgar and Herbert Hoover.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 19:49 (eight years ago) link

remember, HRC did not just do photo ops and weekend hangouts with Kissinger -- she gushed over his 'realpolitik' in a book review. she is unacceptable.

this job is basically mafia chieftain, which is why ive never felt like voting for anyone who could win.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 March 2016 19:55 (eight years ago) link

Sometimes HRC seems like an updated version of Scoop Jackson. That's not who she started out to be, but she's certainly drifted there over time.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 4 March 2016 19:57 (eight years ago) link

i don't accept the argument that non-intervention in the face of genocide is the right move and i don't need to go back to ww2 to make it.

― Mordy, Friday, March 4, 2016 2:03 PM (52 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i guess the most recent case of US non-intervention is maybe the Trail of Tears?

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 4 March 2016 20:00 (eight years ago) link

a contact high from all the yuks her partner has shared with both President Bushes

xp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 March 2016 20:00 (eight years ago) link

hey there's your hook: Hillary Clinton: At Least She Isn't Andrew Jackson

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 4 March 2016 20:00 (eight years ago) link

started out as Not Tammy Wynette

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 March 2016 20:02 (eight years ago) link

Trail of Tears was interventirely at its purest.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 20:02 (eight years ago) link

*intervention

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 20:02 (eight years ago) link

lol thought that was some genius Alfredian wordplay i had yet to decode

flopson, Friday, 4 March 2016 20:07 (eight years ago) link

not intervening against Native American genocide.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 4 March 2016 20:08 (eight years ago) link

Uh non-intervention the US perpetrated the Trail of Tears.

Sorry To Be The Bearer Of Bad Poos (Leee), Friday, 4 March 2016 20:17 (eight years ago) link

There's a difference between not intervening and directly carrying out. By this logic Iraq was the US not intervening in the Bush attack.

Frederik B, Friday, 4 March 2016 20:17 (eight years ago) link

I think Syria is a pretty perfect recent example where the US could have intervened and chose not to.

Frederik B, Friday, 4 March 2016 20:21 (eight years ago) link

lol really? u think we should have trained, armed and fought alongside ISIS?

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 20:22 (eight years ago) link

ime Syria is one of those situations where there were no good options

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 20:22 (eight years ago) link

imo

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 20:22 (eight years ago) link

Also, if Adam Brunau really looks at the 20th century and can't find any examples of non-intervention, I guess that explains a lot?

Frederik B, Friday, 4 March 2016 20:23 (eight years ago) link

I'm not saying intervention is the right choice. I'm just saying it was a possibility, but didn't happen.

Frederik B, Friday, 4 March 2016 20:23 (eight years ago) link

Re: Syria.

Frederik B, Friday, 4 March 2016 20:23 (eight years ago) link

The sad thing is that at this point, the POTUS can kill thousands upon thousands of foreign civilians with nary a peep from even the Democratic base. Same goes for indefinite detention and the like. In a way, we've all, collectively, created Trump. He must figure, "why not promote torture, after all, people seem quite willing to green light all sorts of international law delinquency. Let me just push the envelope a little further."

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 20:30 (eight years ago) link

the POTUS can kill thousands upon thousands of foreign civilians with nary a peep from even the Democratic base

this is not really true. Obama has not killed "thousands upon thousands of foreign civilians" and the last time a POTUS did do that, Dem base turned out the largest anti-war protests in history

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 20:32 (eight years ago) link

Another situation with no good choices: Libya,

Frederik B, Friday, 4 March 2016 20:36 (eight years ago) link

Actually, I think most wars and bombings and interventions since the end of the cold war stemmed from situations with no good choices. Glaring example of the opposite: Iraq, of course. Looking back on it, it really boggles the mind how it happened, and why Clinton voted for it.

Frederik B, Friday, 4 March 2016 20:39 (eight years ago) link

are we counting ppl the Saudis and others kill with the shit we sold 'em?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 March 2016 20:39 (eight years ago) link

Uh non-intervention the US perpetrated the Trail of Tears.

― Sorry To Be The Bearer Of Bad Poos (Leee),

It was the policy of the American government to forcibly remove Indians or buy Indian land. I call this interventionist.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 20:39 (eight years ago) link

xxposts Under Obama, drones alone had killed 2,500 by mid-2015 iirc, and the percentage of civilians is estimated to be up to 90%. If I'm wrong about this, or my sources are, then believe me, as someone who campaigned for O, I'm glad to be corrected!

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 20:42 (eight years ago) link

that is not "thousands upon thousands", don't succumb to Morbzmath

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 20:44 (eight years ago) link

thousand upon thousand

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 4 March 2016 20:45 (eight years ago) link

technically that's just barely a thousand upon a thousand

lol dan

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 20:45 (eight years ago) link

lol

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 20:45 (eight years ago) link

I think the drone program is worse than Libya. Libya was a hard choice in a bad situation. Drones are taking easy but wrong choices over and over again.

Frederik B, Friday, 4 March 2016 20:45 (eight years ago) link

she's a very flawed candidate. the iraq war vote was very much on my mind when i voted for obama in 2008 primaries. but it looks like she's going to get the nomination and i will campaign for her bc there's only party i can trust not to turn this country into a burning heap of trash and i hope she lives up to. i think there's def upside - she seems like someone who naturally does (and did) feel a much more leftist sense of politics than her husband and i do believe that as compromised as she is she does feel like she's a servant of the ppl and she wants to help. i hope this primary experience has liberated her to govern that way tho i would be totally full of shit if i said that it seemed likely to me. actually if trump is the rep nom she's probably fine and dem party energy should be heavily invested in senatorial + congressional races to flip as much as possible. going against this republican field is a once in a lifetime opportunity (god i hope) and i hope hillary's flaws as a candidate don't waste that chance.

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 20:46 (eight years ago) link

Another situation with no good choices: Libya,

Libya presented better options than Syria! For one thing Qaddaffi wasn't being propped up by Iran.

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 20:46 (eight years ago) link

Uh non-intervention the US perpetrated the Trail of Tears.

― Sorry To Be The Bearer Of Bad Poos (Leee),

It was the policy of the American government to forcibly remove Indians or buy Indian land. I call this interventionist.

We agree, sorry for lack of punctuation, should've been an, extra comma in there.

Sorry To Be The Bearer Of Bad Poos (Leee), Friday, 4 March 2016 20:48 (eight years ago) link

all good!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 20:48 (eight years ago) link

some embarrassing typos in that post i'm sorry i hope it's still legible

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 20:49 (eight years ago) link

Fine. "A thousand and a half thousand upon a thousand"

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 20:57 (eight years ago) link

Rhetorical party poopers, y'all

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 21:00 (eight years ago) link

the pedantry of hard expectations

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 March 2016 21:00 (eight years ago) link

Rhetorical party poopers, y'all

fyi I have this on a t-shirt

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 4 March 2016 21:05 (eight years ago) link

No way

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 21:10 (eight years ago) link

Rhetorical Party Poopers is the name of my ska punk band.

Frederik B, Friday, 4 March 2016 21:11 (eight years ago) link

(give me 5 min on zazzle.com)

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 4 March 2016 21:12 (eight years ago) link

Actually '[...] is the name of my ska punk band' is the name of my ska punk band. We choice it to make a joke AND be at the start of the record shop. We did not think that through.

Frederik B, Friday, 4 March 2016 21:12 (eight years ago) link

Would buy

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 4 March 2016 21:12 (eight years ago) link

Intervenskanism is the name of mine.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 4 March 2016 21:15 (eight years ago) link

this asshole: Jim Webb: I won't vote for Clinton, but I may for Trump

Mordy, Friday, 4 March 2016 21:17 (eight years ago) link

xxposts Under Obama, drones alone had killed 2,500 by mid-2015 iirc, and the percentage of civilians is estimated to be up to 90%. If I'm wrong about this, or my sources are, then believe me, as someone who campaigned for O, I'm glad to be corrected!

― never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous)

"an average of separate counts of American drone strikes by three organizations, the New America Foundation, the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and The Long War Journal, finds that 522 strikes have killed 3,852 people, 476 of them civilians. "
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/world/asia/drone-strikes-reveal-uncomfortable-truth-us-is-often-unsure-about-who-will-die.html

That's 2004 - 2015, I believe. Estimates all over the map.

by the light of the burning Citroën, Friday, 4 March 2016 21:18 (eight years ago) link

Let's get this party pooper started.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 4 March 2016 21:25 (eight years ago) link

http://www.nevertrump.com/

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 4 March 2016 22:03 (eight years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/ZdiRpqe.png

petulant dick master (silby), Friday, 4 March 2016 22:06 (eight years ago) link

Boob Fartwrangler for President.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 4 March 2016 22:10 (eight years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/dhoO6jz.png

ulysses, Friday, 4 March 2016 22:11 (eight years ago) link

somebody's lying on the headcount

ulysses, Friday, 4 March 2016 22:11 (eight years ago) link

smh your browser doesn't do webfonts

petulant dick master (silby), Friday, 4 March 2016 22:14 (eight years ago) link

Good old race condition. xp

Sorry To Be The Bearer Of Bad Poos (Leee), Friday, 4 March 2016 22:14 (eight years ago) link

I've got the best fonts. The best!

ulysses, Friday, 4 March 2016 22:15 (eight years ago) link

Various scientific surveys of Iraqi deaths resulting from the first four years of the Iraq War estimated that between 151,000 to over one million Iraqis died as a result of conflict during this time.[1] A later study, published in 2011, estimated that approximately 500,000 Iraqis had died as a result of the conflict since the invasion.[2] Counts of deaths reported in newspapers collated by projects like the Iraq Body Count project found 174,000 Iraqis reported killed between 2003 and 2013, with between 112,000-123,000 of those killed being civilian noncombatants.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War

voting for the iraq war is the biggest sin for me. i can't get past it. i am not giving anyone who did so another chance.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 4 March 2016 22:20 (eight years ago) link

lib base vigorously protested that war

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 22:24 (eight years ago) link

feeling thankful that President Trump managed to stay pure on this topic

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Friday, 4 March 2016 22:24 (eight years ago) link

Read that as lil based

Treeship, Friday, 4 March 2016 22:28 (eight years ago) link

lib base voted for the war u mean

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 4 March 2016 22:31 (eight years ago) link

no, that isn't what I mean!

scroll upthread

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 22:32 (eight years ago) link

collardio claimed the Dem lib base has been silent when POTUS proposes to murder "thousands upon thousands of innocent civilians". The lib base vigorously protested the last time this happened - the Iraq War - resulting in the largest anti-war protests EVER. It was the Dem establishment (incl Hillary) that nonetheless voted for it. Key liberal office-holding Democrats, however, did vote against it, including my Representative and one of my Senators (Feinstein otoh can go die in a fire, I hate her).

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 22:35 (eight years ago) link

Mikulski, Boxer, Feingold, Kennedy etc. - the liberal wing of the party - were not for it.

Οὖτις, Friday, 4 March 2016 22:36 (eight years ago) link

otm, that's always made HRC's vote especially unforgivable to me

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 4 March 2016 23:03 (eight years ago) link

this is why i was making a distinction between vapid hawks and idealistic hawks

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 4 March 2016 23:07 (eight years ago) link

not quite going to let Mordy get away with characterizing American intervention in Libya as only resulting in 1K deaths therefore a relative success when there are half a million displaced people there and of course its ongoing slide into failed statedom as well as a major source of people smuggling. the question is about judgement and follow-through, not about precision of the headline operation.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 5 March 2016 00:07 (eight years ago) link

YES I USED AN 'E' AFTER THE 'G' IN JUDGEMENT, DON'T JUDGE

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 5 March 2016 00:07 (eight years ago) link

I judg thee

Οὖτις, Saturday, 5 March 2016 00:09 (eight years ago) link

the only thing i can say on libya is that i don't know what happens in the counterfactual where NATO doesn't get involved. we know sometimes you don't get involved and it leads to horrific consequences that weigh on the ppl who said no (cf samantha powers).

Mordy, Saturday, 5 March 2016 00:10 (eight years ago) link

Voting for the Iraq war is unforgivable. Voting for trump is more unforgivable imo

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Saturday, 5 March 2016 00:10 (eight years ago) link

i might've missed it in the 1500+ posts on this thread but has anyone actually proposed voting for trump?

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Saturday, 5 March 2016 00:13 (eight years ago) link

I just read some ridiculous thing from Bruce Bartlett where he said he voted for Trump precisely because he will destroy the GOP, and the GOP in its current formulation needs to suffer a humiliating electoral defeat

people's rationales are strange some times.

Οὖτις, Saturday, 5 March 2016 00:15 (eight years ago) link

i guess that's an iteration of the "it has to get worse before it gets better" argument

which is always a bad argument, because it can get so, so much worse

wizzz! (amateurist), Saturday, 5 March 2016 00:42 (eight years ago) link

Accelerationism and dark enlightenment claptrap are the retreats of people who think their material circumstances wouldn't be much worse in a collapse scenario, i.e. white men.

petulant dick master (silby), Saturday, 5 March 2016 00:49 (eight years ago) link

i might've missed it in the 1500+ posts on this thread but has anyone actually proposed voting for trump?

Jim Webb, today. Not sure if he might vote for Donald Trump.

timellison, Saturday, 5 March 2016 01:06 (eight years ago) link

tbf to Bartlett he's talking about voting for Trump in a primary to nudge the GOP to a historic defeat in the general, not trying to get him elected. TNR's Brian Beutler had a similar theory that Trump winning the nomination is necessary to reform the R's but damn if it doesn't feel too risky for comfort.

anonanon, Saturday, 5 March 2016 01:13 (eight years ago) link

Jim Webb x-post

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Saturday, 5 March 2016 01:24 (eight years ago) link

you ppl into forecasting etc might want to listen to Nate Silver gettin' grilled on On the Media this week

http://www.onthemedia.org/story/on-the-media-2016-03-04/

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 5 March 2016 01:25 (eight years ago) link

some people think forecasting is actually like looking into a christal ball

flopson, Saturday, 5 March 2016 02:11 (eight years ago) link

christal ball was one of trump's wives, right?

wizzz! (amateurist), Saturday, 5 March 2016 02:49 (eight years ago) link

Accelerationism and dark enlightenment claptrap are the retreats of people who think their material circumstances wouldn't be much worse in a collapse scenario, i.e. white men.

― petulant dick master (silby), Friday, March 4, 2016 6:49 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i say the same thing about folks who argue that there's no or little difference between the parties. -- these aren't people who are dependent on medicaid and so forth.

wizzz! (amateurist), Saturday, 5 March 2016 02:50 (eight years ago) link

that said, you're stereotyping -- plenty of white men experience precarity. in fact the fallacy that those utilizing the safety net (the one the likes of rubio and cruz would tear to shreads) are largely minorities plays into the racist fears of reactionaries...

wizzz! (amateurist), Saturday, 5 March 2016 02:51 (eight years ago) link

collardio claimed the Dem lib base has been silent when POTUS proposes to murder "thousands upon thousands of innocent civilians". The lib base vigorously protested the last time this happened - the Iraq War - resulting in the largest anti-war protests EVER.

Οὖτις I appreciate your argument and have probably been too facile and rhetorically footloose (some would say: full of shit), but you do somewhat mis-paraphrase me. I didn't claim that the Dem lib base has been silent when the POTUS proposes to kill thousands etc. (and fine, i'll back down on the "upon thousands"), but rather when he does kill thousands etc. The distinction is important because yes, when GWB proposed military intervention in Iraq, the protests were massive, no doubt about it. Once the war got underway, however, the raw numbers as well as the soccer mom: crusty activist ratio decreased quite drastically. What's more, once Obama assumed power, the protests all but evaporated... even as Obama expanded the portfolio to include Yemen, Somalia, Libya, as well as greater involvement in Pakistan and of course Afghanistan.

I think my broad point is that presidents, particularly when they are Democrats, can get away with a boatload of civilian slaughter and human rights violations (I did mention indefinite detention as well) in this age of war by remote-control and volunteer armies, without ruffling all that many Democrat feathers.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 5 March 2016 04:52 (eight years ago) link

i think it's just practically harder to sustain protest against the ongoing slog of empire than the imminent threat of an act of war

wizzz! (amateurist), Saturday, 5 March 2016 05:29 (eight years ago) link

i guess that's an iteration of the "it has to get worse before it gets better" argument

which is always a bad argument, because it can get so, so much worse

― wizzz! (amateurist)

it's more than that- the idea that making things worse makes things better is just not right. it's like trying to lose weight by eating nothing but hardees thickburgers, on the theory that eventually you'll have a heart attack and your doctor will make you start eating healthy.

diana krallice (rushomancy), Saturday, 5 March 2016 06:57 (eight years ago) link

Feels like several lifetimes ago that Ben Carson's mysterious past ("He's supposed to be very good with a knife, but only in matters of business or some sort of reasonable complaint") was a big topic of concern.

clemenza, Saturday, 5 March 2016 15:09 (eight years ago) link

Yup

Btw Trump speaking in Wichita right now, weaving Sanderisms into his speech ("By the way it's not me; we're all together") and making no pretense about identifying with the GOP ("The Republicans are eating their own")

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 5 March 2016 15:35 (eight years ago) link

witchita, kanasas

Karl Malone, Saturday, 5 March 2016 15:39 (eight years ago) link

"Trump knows best, let's just adopt this spelling ongoing"

Neanderthal, Saturday, 5 March 2016 15:40 (eight years ago) link

Have yall seen this

http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/14/politics/donald-trump-medical-bill-health/

Treeship, Saturday, 5 March 2016 15:57 (eight years ago) link

So North Korea

Treeship, Saturday, 5 March 2016 15:57 (eight years ago) link

he's gonna have arteries so clean you're not gonna believe it

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 5 March 2016 16:38 (eight years ago) link

I'm hoping low dem turnout numbers is just because most people are waiting for the main event (vs. GOP numbers, where more people may be participating because they feel they can actually evince an outcome). Hoping dems will rally when the actual campaign begins, and I hope as always that congress/senate is not overlooked.

Was talking politics with friends this morning, and we noted the irony that in the event of some sort of disaster or terrorist attack when it's Trump vs. Clinton, the script has been flipped so hard that it would probably actually benefit Clinton more.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 5 March 2016 16:47 (eight years ago) link

lol

"If elected, Mr. Trump, I can state unequivocally, will be the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency," Bornstein, an internal medicine and gastroenterology specialist who works at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York, wrote in the letter dated December 4.

Bornstein is not believed to have evaluated any past presidents.

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Saturday, 5 March 2016 17:10 (eight years ago) link

not only is high republican turnout this year not a positive indication about general turnout but it's actually a negative indication. there's such high turnout bc the party is splitting in half and both sides (really more than 2 sides, mainstream/party republicans, trump voters, evangelical voters, with some overlaps?) are energized to try to maintain control of the party. but that passion suggests that the party won't be reconciled.

Mordy, Saturday, 5 March 2016 17:10 (eight years ago) link

Looking at the dude, I do not believe the blood pressure figure this doctor cited

Treeship, Saturday, 5 March 2016 17:12 (eight years ago) link

It's normally thought that turnout = enthusiasm, but it doesn't really have to be that way. The high turnout on the GOP side seems pretty explainable as desperation - the top two candidates are HATED by a large contingent of GOP voters - and low turnout on dem side could be contentment? Both dem candidates are pretty popular amongst dem voters, so many perhaps doesn't care?

Frederik B, Saturday, 5 March 2016 17:14 (eight years ago) link

surprised the doc did not add something about how trump's fingers were among the longest he'd ever seen in his long years of practice.

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Saturday, 5 March 2016 17:15 (eight years ago) link

i find it very difficult to believe that the dem base + broader left won't turn out to keep trump or cruz out of office

Mordy, Saturday, 5 March 2016 17:19 (eight years ago) link

gastroenterology specialist means congrats Trump you don't have Chrohn's, IBS or Barrett's Esophagus, bastion of health you!

Neanderthal, Saturday, 5 March 2016 17:24 (eight years ago) link

Rubio says there's no magic number for the Supreme Court--nine, eight, seven, it's all the same. He included eight in that sequence--may need a refresher course in basic number theory.

clemenza, Saturday, 5 March 2016 17:37 (eight years ago) link

http://www.zazzle.com/rhetorical_party_poopers_yall_tee_shirt-235076862719583508

what?! I just noticed this. DJP, thank you, I'm going to have to get this, if only to help keep my hyperbole in check.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 5 March 2016 17:57 (eight years ago) link

Trump should bottle and sell his gut flora. Regardless, sure, he's probably healthier than many if not most former presidents. I mean, George Washington even had wooden teeth! Poor hygiene there, and besides, Trump would have gone gold. Much classier.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 5 March 2016 19:20 (eight years ago) link

The idea that Trump is healthier than Obama was when he became president in 2009 strains credulity.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Saturday, 5 March 2016 19:34 (eight years ago) link

Rubio says there's no magic number for the Supreme Court--nine, eight, seven, it's all the same. He included eight in that sequence--may need a refresher course in basic number theory.

― clemenza, Saturday, March 5, 2016 12:37 PM (1 hour ago)

he's not wrong tbf

k3vin k., Saturday, 5 March 2016 19:35 (eight years ago) link

um "it's all the same" may need further examination

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Saturday, 5 March 2016 19:37 (eight years ago) link

Louis CK:

P.S. Please stop it with voting for Trump. It was funny for a little while. But the guy is Hitler. And by that I mean that we are being Germany in the 30s. Do you think they saw the shit coming? Hitler was just some hilarious and refreshing dude with a weird comb over who would say anything at all.

And I'm not advocating for Hillary or Bernie. I like them both but frankly I wish the next president was a conservative only because we had Obama for eight years and we need balance. And not because I particularly enjoy the conservative agenda. I just think the government should reflect the people. And we are about 40 percent conservative and 40 percent liberal. When I was growing up and when I was a younger man, liberals and conservatives were friends with differences. They weren’t enemies. And it always made sense that everyone gets a president they like for a while and then hates the president for a while. But it only works if the conservatives put up a good candidate. A good smart conservative to face the liberal candidate so they can have a good argument and the country can decide which way to go this time.

Trump is not that. He's an insane bigot. He is dangerous.

He already said he would expand libel laws to sue anyone who "writes a negative hit piece" about him. He says "I would open up the libel laws so we can sue them and win lots of money. Not like now. These guys are totally protected." He said that. He has promised to decimate the first amendment. (If you think he’s going to keep the second amendment intact you’re delusional.) And he said that Paul Ryan, speaker of the house will "pay" for criticizing him. So I'm saying this now because if he gets in there we won't be able to criticize him anymore.
Please pick someone else. Like John Kasich. I mean that guy seems okay. I don't like any of them myself but if you're that kind of voter please go for a guy like that. It feels like between him and either democrat we'd have a decent choice. It feels like a healthier choice. We shouldn't have to vote for someone because they're not a shocking cunt billionaire liar.
We should choose based on what direction the country should go.

I get that all these people sound like bullshit soft criminal opportunists. The whole game feels rigged and it's not going anywhere but down anymore. I feel that way sometimes.
And that voting for Trump is a way of saying "fuck it. Fuck them all". I really get it. It's a version of national Suicide. Or it's like a big hit off of a crack pipe. Somehow we can't help it. Or we know that if we vote for Trump our phones will be a reliable source of dopamine for the next four years. I mean I can't wait to read about Trump every day. It's a rush. But you have to know this is not healthy.
If you are a true conservative. Don't vote for Trump. He is not one of you. He is one of him. Everything you have heard him say that you liked, if you look hard enough you will see that he one day said the exact opposite. He is playing you.

In fact, if you do vote for Trump, at least look at him very carefully first. You owe that to the rest of us. Know and understand who he is. Spend one hour on google and just read it all. I don’t mean listen to me or listen to liberals who put him down. Listen to your own people. Listen to John Mccain. Go look at what he just said about Trump. "At a time when our world has never been more complex or more in danger... I want Republican voters to pay close attention to what our party's most respected and knowledgeable leaders and national security experts are saying about Mr. Trump, and to think long and hard about who they want to be our next Commander-in-Chief and leader of the free world.”

When Trump was told what he said, Trump said "Oh, he did? Well, that's not nice," he told CBS News' chief White House correspondent Major Garrett. "He has to be very careful."
When pressed on why, Trump tacked on: "He'll find out.”
(I cut and pasted that from CBS news)

Do you really want a guy to be president who threatens John McCain? Because John McCain cautiously and intelligently asked for people to be thoughtful before voting for him? He didn’t even insult Trump. He just asked you to take a good look. And Trump told him to look out.

Remember that Trump entered this race by saying that McCain is not a war hero. A guy who was shot down, body broken and kept in a POW camp for years. Trump said “I prefer the guys who don’t get caught.” Why did he say that? Not because he meant it or because it was important to say. He said it because he’s a bully and every bully knows that when you enter a new school yard, you go to the toughest most respected guy on the yard and you punch him in the nose. If you are still standing after, you’re the new boss. If Trump is president, he’s not going to change. He’s not going to do anything for you. He’s going to do everything for himself and leave you in the dust.

So please listen to fellow conservatives. But more importantly, listen to Trump. Listen to all of it. Everything he says. If you liked when he said that “torture works” then go look at where he took it back the next day. He’s a fucking liar.

A vote for Trump is so clearly a gut-vote, and again I get it. But add a little brain to it and look the guy up. Because if you vote for him because of how you feel right now, the minute he's president, you're going to regret it. You're going to regret it even more when he gives the job to his son. Because American democracy is broken enough that a guy like that could really fuck things up. That's how Hitler got there. He was voted into power by a fatigued nation and when he got inside, he did all his Hitler things and no one could stop him.

Again, I’m not saying vote democrat or vote for anyone else. If Hilary ends up president it should be because she faced the best person you have and you and I both chose her or him or whoever. Trump is not your best. He’s the worst of all of us. He’s a symptom to a problem that is very real. But don’t vote for your own cancer. You’re better than that.

That's just my view. At least right now. I know I’m not qualified or particularly educated and I'm not right instead of you. I’m an idiot and I'm sure a bunch of you are very annoyed by this. Fucking celebrity with an opinion. I swear this isn’t really a political opinion. You don’t want to know my political opinions. (And I know that I’m only bringing myself trouble with this shit.) Trump has nothing to do with politics or ideology. He has to do with himself. And really I don't mean to insult anyone. Except Trump. I mean to insult him very much. And really I’m not saying he’s evil or a monster. In fact I don’t think Hitler was. The problem with saying that guys like that are monsters is that we don’t see them coming when they turn out to be human, which they all are. Everyone is. Trump is a messed up guy with a hole in his heart that he tries to fill with money and attention. He can never ever have enough of either and he’ll never stop trying. He’s sick. Which makes him really really interesting. And he pulls you towards him which somehow feels good or fascinatingly bad. He’s not a monster. He’s a sad man. But all this makes him horribly dangerous if he becomes president. Give him another TV show. Let him pay to put his name on buildings. But please stop voting for him. And please watch Horace and Pete.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 5 March 2016 20:55 (eight years ago) link

Rod Dreher cries.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 5 March 2016 20:59 (eight years ago) link

louis ck not too smart eh

global tetrahedron, Saturday, 5 March 2016 21:03 (eight years ago) link

Not smart like an Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 5 March 2016 21:04 (eight years ago) link

cruz just overtook rubio on the markets fwiw

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Saturday, 5 March 2016 21:07 (eight years ago) link

good for him, that's something he can yell at his daughter through her closed doors when she refuses to come to the table for dinner

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Saturday, 5 March 2016 21:09 (eight years ago) link

Cruzing to victory!

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 5 March 2016 21:13 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7XuTzIu1wc

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 5 March 2016 21:14 (eight years ago) link

I don't agree with everything in that Dreher article, but it definitely is an interesting point that both parties have done a lot to freeze out a large chunk of the country from the US economy, and now we are seeing the result.

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Saturday, 5 March 2016 21:18 (eight years ago) link

Trump's having a rally in my backyard today. They had to turn people away.

However lots of attendees were anti Trumps wanting to be a fly on the wall. 10 or more friends did this today.

One of the ladies interviewed said she was a Rubio supporter until "he got mean"

Neanderthal, Saturday, 5 March 2016 21:32 (eight years ago) link

Trump is apparently showing up here soon.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 5 March 2016 21:39 (eight years ago) link

Like Zika.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 5 March 2016 21:39 (eight years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cc0GH_sWAAA2fR2.jpg

this happened.

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Saturday, 5 March 2016 21:46 (eight years ago) link

where? When? Who?

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 5 March 2016 21:58 (eight years ago) link

Maybe he was just looking for volunteers?

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 5 March 2016 21:59 (eight years ago) link

i know theyre small states and theres a sample size of two, but cruz is winning kansas and maine today

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Saturday, 5 March 2016 22:24 (eight years ago) link

He's winning Kansas with 25%. Is the tide turning?

Frederik B, Saturday, 5 March 2016 22:35 (eight years ago) link

No

Οὖτις, Saturday, 5 March 2016 22:36 (eight years ago) link

Kansan GOP rabidly anti-abortion

Οὖτις, Saturday, 5 March 2016 22:37 (eight years ago) link

that win is certainly by more than the markets expected, cruz is up ~5% to 17% on the markets in the last hour

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Saturday, 5 March 2016 22:40 (eight years ago) link

the democrats could really have no greater gift (in the near-term) than for the GOP to nominate cruz.

even if he'd be marginally (?) less divisive for the Republican party than Trump, he'd be total death in the general election.

wizzz! (amateurist), Saturday, 5 March 2016 22:56 (eight years ago) link

but maybe the GOP at this point privileges long-term coherence (??) of their party over gaining the presidency. not that a trump loss in the primaries will necessarily undo the obvious damage that's already been done (or stave off the inevitable split of the party that some have diagnosed).

wizzz! (amateurist), Saturday, 5 March 2016 22:57 (eight years ago) link

i think i would actually prefer Cruz in the gen.

it would finally (haha j/k not really) put a final nail in the coffin of this fantasy that America will come out en masse to support a Real Conservative

rmde bob (will), Saturday, 5 March 2016 22:59 (eight years ago) link

that's the craziest thing is i start to think about who is poised to stop trump and it's the guy that i'm not even sure might not be worse

Mordy, Saturday, 5 March 2016 23:08 (eight years ago) link

right, what gives the lie to the high-mindedness of romney et al's anti-trump maneuvers is that they suggest cruz as a palatable alternative, which is nuts.

wizzz! (amateurist), Saturday, 5 March 2016 23:15 (eight years ago) link

a lot of people in the GOP would much rather put forward cruz in the general and have him lose than put forward trump, whatever the end result

wizzz! (amateurist), Saturday, 5 March 2016 23:23 (eight years ago) link

"but maybe the GOP at this point privileges long-term coherence (??) of their party over gaining the presidency."

to put it in other words, they're not trying to win, they're just trying not to die. probably smart, but anointing your killer as your savior, perhaps not so much.

diana krallice (rushomancy), Saturday, 5 March 2016 23:28 (eight years ago) link

also, for some republicans, the 20% chance that trump might win is worse than the 95% chance that cruz will lose.

wizzz! (amateurist), Saturday, 5 March 2016 23:30 (eight years ago) link

that win is certainly by more than the markets expected, cruz is up ~5% to 17% on the markets in the last hour

I think markets are failing to price in the fact that they're a bunch of people guessing, and you're embarrassing yourself as a grown adult by paying them attention.

Andrew Farrell, Saturday, 5 March 2016 23:44 (eight years ago) link

Rod Dreher cries.

i find a lot of what he writes ponderous and ill-conceived but am i wrong in finding him the most interesting right-wing writer/pundit type atm? not that it's much of a competition..

Mordy, Saturday, 5 March 2016 23:57 (eight years ago) link

I think markets are failing to price in the fact that they're a bunch of people guessing, and you're embarrassing yourself as a grown adult by paying them attention.

― Andrew Farrell, Saturday, March 5, 2016 6:44 PM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

literally anything you can read is a bunch of people guessing

flopson, Sunday, 6 March 2016 00:00 (eight years ago) link

what about the stuff you can't read

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 6 March 2016 00:05 (eight years ago) link

nate silver is currently speculating that "nice" states dislike trump and the abrasive states like him. i think it's safe to say no one knows anything about american politics in 2016.

Mordy, Sunday, 6 March 2016 00:05 (eight years ago) link

when the markets move suddenly that's a sign that a "bunch of people" were surprised by events, that's all

if that's embarrassing you should see me after 8 beers

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Sunday, 6 March 2016 00:21 (eight years ago) link

And he mocked Mr. Cruz, calling him “Lyin’ Ted.” He then went on to explain how that would be spelled: “L-Y-E-N. Lyin’. With a big apostrophe.”

Οὖτις, Sunday, 6 March 2016 00:22 (eight years ago) link

Donaldhino

Treeship, Sunday, 6 March 2016 00:50 (eight years ago) link

*Donaldinho

Treeship, Sunday, 6 March 2016 00:52 (eight years ago) link

does this mean we get more canadian birther stuff?

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Sunday, 6 March 2016 01:19 (eight years ago) link

Agreed with amateurist both that Cruz is general-election Kryptonite, and also that for some Rs, preserving party identity is a higher priority than winning the election. (One would suspect that the Supreme Court situation complicates that calculation somewhat, at least for some, but others don't see the point of pushing for conservative justices because they all turn too liberal anyway once installed, as Roberts did.)

Also dittoing will: Cruz as nominee would be pretty clarifying - yr Constitution-jizzing social-conservative deep-red Tea types could finally get a candidate of unimpeachable purity - who would then go on to lose spectacularly.

As I think I said in a prior thread, it would be even better if it were Cruz vs. Sanders: a cathartic and informative election, where we could really find out if there were more of us than there are of them, or vice versa.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Sunday, 6 March 2016 01:28 (eight years ago) link

Is there evidence of Sanders and Cruz interacting in the Senate?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 6 March 2016 01:29 (eight years ago) link

he's not wrong tbf

― k3vin k.

If the makeup were what it is now, and one case after another ended up deadlocked, what purpose would the court serve?

Cruz adds Maine. Cruzmentum--ugh.

clemenza, Sunday, 6 March 2016 01:50 (eight years ago) link

Didn't the governor of Maine endorse Trump last week?

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Sunday, 6 March 2016 02:15 (eight years ago) link

As titillating as Trump's campaign has been, atm I am thinking the best case scenario on the Republican side of things would be if Cruz arrives at the convention with roughly the same number of delegates as Trump, but neither one has it sewed up on the first ballot.

Next, Cruz takes the nomination on the third or still later ballot, after a brazenly sleazy set of parliamentary maneuvers which totally alienates Trump's supporters from the party (bcz alienating people is Cruz's biggest talent). After which Cruz goes on to the general election and alienates independent voters so badly he loses in all but a dozen states and his name becomes a byword for political sleaze and gross failure for generations to come.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 6 March 2016 02:15 (eight years ago) link

that would be p cool

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Sunday, 6 March 2016 02:19 (eight years ago) link

Trump's clearly a big nickname guy (everyone knows somebody like that), and I suspect that'd continue as president. Kim Jong-un would be L'il Kim, Putin'd be Lyin' Vlad, etc.

clemenza, Sunday, 6 March 2016 02:34 (eight years ago) link

Pooty-tang

Οὖτις, Sunday, 6 March 2016 02:37 (eight years ago) link

the trump movement getting folded into cruz' schtick seems like the worst possible scenario

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 6 March 2016 02:48 (eight years ago) link

i like the thing louie ck write

flopson, Sunday, 6 March 2016 02:54 (eight years ago) link

I suspect Cruz would be the easier to beat in a general--he's a true-believer conservative, so you know what kind of a campaign to run against him, plus he's so creepy; Trump scrambles up everything, so there's an element of uncertainty--but I want to see him denied as much pleasure in this life as possible, so I always root against him.

clemenza, Sunday, 6 March 2016 02:57 (eight years ago) link

i don't think republicans are winning this general, regardless

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 6 March 2016 03:10 (eight years ago) link

or if they did, something really will have happened to this country between now and then

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 6 March 2016 03:10 (eight years ago) link

*bad

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 6 March 2016 03:11 (eight years ago) link

Like a monster invasion

Neanderthal, Sunday, 6 March 2016 03:13 (eight years ago) link

an inasion by monsters, totally

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 6 March 2016 03:14 (eight years ago) link

Monster invasion would benefit Clinton. Now, if someone blew up a Trump building ...

Speaking of which, if you live in one of his buildings, and your building namesake not only reveals himself to be an asshole of the highest order but keeps amping it up, do you feel secure? Would you want more security? Would you want to move out?

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 6 March 2016 03:15 (eight years ago) link

you might think 'i might soon be living in a building owned by the president'

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 6 March 2016 03:18 (eight years ago) link

and then you'd probably be on a list for posing that question ha :/

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 6 March 2016 03:21 (eight years ago) link

pwned

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 6 March 2016 03:21 (eight years ago) link

this building is pwned by the president

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 6 March 2016 03:26 (eight years ago) link

from what i read cruz is thought by dems to be easier to beat in the general because he's not such a wild card and has been far, far more clear and consistent about his ideas, and his ideas are *extremely* unpopular.

currently according to ppl watching returns closely, the louisiana vote was heavily for trump from early voting, but in actual primary day votes it's trending toward cruz - that the romney speech and debate and such has actually been damaging to trump. and that there is some sign anti-trump voters are voting tactically as romney said, supporting cruz in states he can win, and i assume will support kasich in ohio/michigan and rubio in florida. i assume the goal here is to put together enough delegates to have a brokered convention?

what is hilarious is that cruz is meanwhile not exactly on board with this plan (clearly out for himself once again proving why his colleagues hate him) and opening field offices in florida to try and knock rubio out

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Sunday, 6 March 2016 03:27 (eight years ago) link

omg and if cruz succeeds at this and accumulates the 2nd number of delegates.. sorry to quote klein but

https://twitter.com/ezraklein/status/706254511661150208

The Trump-Cruz ticket is going to Make Democrats Great Again

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Sunday, 6 March 2016 03:29 (eight years ago) link

what is hilarious is that cruz is meanwhile not exactly on board with this plan (clearly out for himself once again proving why his colleagues hate him) and opening field offices in florida to try and knock rubio out

― arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g),

cruz thinks he can make trump voters believe, i bet he's just going for a kill

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 6 March 2016 03:32 (eight years ago) link

lyin ted could become flexible ted when nothing means anything anyway

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 6 March 2016 03:35 (eight years ago) link

I feel like there really is hope for an actually charismatic democratic socialist.

schwantz, Sunday, 6 March 2016 03:37 (eight years ago) link

had dinner with my parents tonight. it was weird being able to say 'socialism' without looking over our shoulders

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 6 March 2016 03:41 (eight years ago) link

if only my grandpas were around ha

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 6 March 2016 03:45 (eight years ago) link

I really wish someone had snuck a bucket of piss into UCF Arena today and doused the ole windbag w/ it, Carrie-style.

his fans seem to be the type that would view that as a 'weak moment'

Neanderthal, Sunday, 6 March 2016 03:53 (eight years ago) link

wow Cruz did way better in Louisiana than I expected (just catching up now, was out).

has to be a good sign for possible Cruz Interruptus

Neanderthal, Sunday, 6 March 2016 03:55 (eight years ago) link

Trump sounds a little shaken and subdued.

clemenza, Sunday, 6 March 2016 03:57 (eight years ago) link

good thing his GI tract is solid

Neanderthal, Sunday, 6 March 2016 03:58 (eight years ago) link

back in things that actually happened, Sanders wins Kansas and Nebraska, Clinton Louisiana

Cruz closer than expected in La., won Maine as well as KS xp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 6 March 2016 03:59 (eight years ago) link

thx morbz

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:02 (eight years ago) link

also currently up 60-46 over Trump for delegates won for the day. Trump sucks at caucusing

Neanderthal, Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:07 (eight years ago) link

Sanders pretty respectable day! my absentee ballot on the way, guessing he is who I will cast mine for.

Neanderthal, Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:07 (eight years ago) link

regretting being a registered repulbican

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:11 (eight years ago) link

lol

Donald J. Trump says Ted Cruz "should do well in Maine because it's very close to Canada, let's face it."

rmde bob (will), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:12 (eight years ago) link

the thing about these trump press conferences is just how much goddamn complaining he does the whole time. he's had to answer soooo many questions, why won't rubio just drop out, everything is so terrible, so horrible, such a disaster, blah blah blah. there's the fascism and all, but also he's such a drag

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:13 (eight years ago) link

the trump cadence is truly a thing

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:15 (eight years ago) link

that whole exchange just now was truly revolting

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:15 (eight years ago) link

In a normal world, this press conference would be considered rambling, desperate, and incoherent enough to be damaging. This year, probably not.

clemenza, Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:16 (eight years ago) link

the only time i've seen it not be funny is jimmy fallon, worst impression yet

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:17 (eight years ago) link

that salon piece's pretty otm

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:17 (eight years ago) link

trump's stem-winding complaining is part of his whole schtick though. like he's a regular common-sense guy who built a great company, facing down the bad-faith wheelers and dealers of politics. he speaks for exasperated americans, common-sense people. fantastic people. terrific people. you get into politics - lemme tell you. it's a disaster. it's a disaster. you've never seen such dishonest people. they are outta control. these people - he could straighten them right out. politicians, the press... we're gonna get rid of that, we're gonna make america great again.

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:18 (eight years ago) link

he's struggled

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:19 (eight years ago) link

like lemme tell you, who WOULDN'T be complaining dealing with these jokers? you wouldn't believe it. it's a mess. and anybody with any sense could just clean that right up, and trump, he can do it. he sees through them because he built a great company. he's come back to report on what pushovers all these fat-cats and media parasites really are.

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:19 (eight years ago) link

yeah but why again

x-post

Doctor Cashon xpost

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:20 (eight years ago) link

xxxxxpost he's not as teflon these days though. people didn't notice as much at first that people were starting to get sick of him because it only moved the needle a small amount and not enough to knock him out of victory lane, but the last two sets of primaries showed him losing a few states he had previously lead in, and thinning the gap in states he was previously supposed to win in blowout fashion.

Stuff still impacts him less negatively than other candidates, as I think Silver's theory of a 30% floor seems pretty accurate, but I think he's past the point of being able to say anything, and is going to have to be a little more careful now, something I dunno that he's very good at.

think this is the beginning of the wheels starting to come off, even though he's still obv the frontrunner. I am not sure I think the multi-headed dragon approach to beating him is the right one anymore, either. Perhaps it's too soon for Cruz to beat him one on one, but I think at least one more candidate needs to drop.

Not sure which one it needs to be though - Kasich maybe? I'm just not convinced all of Rubio's votes would go to Cruz if he was the one to leave.

Neanderthal, Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:20 (eight years ago) link

the oppressed and aggrieved billionaire

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:20 (eight years ago) link

too many words

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:21 (eight years ago) link

he's not actually a billionaire

also another interesting piece of info going around twitteronia is that he definitely can't afford to self fund a general election campaign and has not raised hardly any money

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:22 (eight years ago) link

I think he's past the point of being able to say anything, and is going to have to be a little more careful now, something I dunno that he's very good at.

my impression was that he'd already started The Pivot, cf what daria posted (way) earlier about sandersish rhetoric and the evaporation of any remaining gop loyalty

i guess that doesn't necessarily mean he's gonna stop saying, like, he's gonna dismantle the first amendment, or whatever

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:24 (eight years ago) link

god knows it's a disillusioned era but i had thought the first amendment remained popular

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:24 (eight years ago) link

if reality is an illusion then money is an illusion. i can't think of any way around it

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:25 (eight years ago) link

sorry it was collardio not daria xxp.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:26 (eight years ago) link

yeah, the salon article hit a stride halfway through, thanks for posting

Karl Malone, Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:29 (eight years ago) link

Trump calling for Rubio to drop out means either a) he sincerely despises Rubio, or b) he's actually not a very good strategist (surely Rubio splitting the vote helps him). Or both.

clemenza, Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:31 (eight years ago) link

i like the thing louie ck write

― flopson, Saturday, March 5, 2016 9:54 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

wanting a republican president "for balance" because we just had 8 years of obama is probably the dumbest mom-take I can imagine, so i stopped reading after that

k3vin k., Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:32 (eight years ago) link

that post wasn't rly pitched at ilx

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:34 (eight years ago) link

Fuck that Louis CK thing, vote for Kaisch "he seems alright" what a fucking idiot

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:37 (eight years ago) link

Yeah I love Louie but sheesh STFU.

schwantz, Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:38 (eight years ago) link

i haven't heard or read the thing but if it involves any sort of nice opinion of Kasich come the fuck on

Karl Malone, Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:39 (eight years ago) link

The First Amendment thing should have had more traction, since he was basically trying to appeal to average Janes'n'Joes by implying things would be better for them if famous people were able to get the "Media" to stop saying bad stuff about famous people by making it easier for famous people to sue and get money out of the "Media", which apparently is only slightly behind ISIS as a threat to the American Way of Life.

Now I Know How Joan of Arcadia Felt (C. Grisso/McCain), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:40 (eight years ago) link

LCK p much admits he doesnt know anything

comedians dont have to

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:44 (eight years ago) link

I am getting a little tired of the "Trump = Hitler" comparisons from the left, but then you get these moments like the raising the right arm at the rally today and you're like "dude, are you courting the comparison?"

Neanderthal, Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:44 (eight years ago) link

he was basically trying to appeal to average Janes'n'Joes by implying things would be better for them if famous people were able to get the "Media" to stop saying bad stuff about famous people

it's the rare trump position that has the ring of political passion

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:46 (eight years ago) link

i haven't considered myself a Democrat since the moment Mondale crowed that he wouldnt share anti-missile weaponry with the Soviets, but i'll have my bayonet ready for the civil war.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:46 (eight years ago) link

the moment Mondale crowed that he wouldnt share anti-missile weaponry with the Soviets

haha i never heard this, was he trying to score off reagan?

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:48 (eight years ago) link

always found reagan's batshit beatitude on that front really likable

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:48 (eight years ago) link

yes, Mondale's last tactic was TO MOVE TO REAGAN'S RIGHT on the Cold War. Genius.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 6 March 2016 04:52 (eight years ago) link

suggest that caek

a) stop with the markets already
b) have 8 beers with me

mookieproof, Sunday, 6 March 2016 05:10 (eight years ago) link

Markets moved from 56% mookieproof getting drunk this morning to 72% at poll close

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Sunday, 6 March 2016 05:15 (eight years ago) link

i've been cleaning up lately shorting will i get high derivatives

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 6 March 2016 05:18 (eight years ago) link

i will have 12 beers with mookie AND caek AND eat the markets already, i guarantee it

Karl Malone, Sunday, 6 March 2016 05:19 (eight years ago) link

the markets is all i got, i'm not allowed to vote

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Sunday, 6 March 2016 05:25 (eight years ago) link

when'd they add that to the pledge of allegiance again

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 6 March 2016 05:28 (eight years ago) link

i beat every level in SMB3 today in 250 minutes, that's all i got

boom

Karl Malone, Sunday, 6 March 2016 05:29 (eight years ago) link

Someone on CNN pointed out something I missed with Trump--by calling on Rubio to drop out, he's really just trying to goad him into staying in.

clemenza, Sunday, 6 March 2016 05:33 (eight years ago) link

Markets moved from 56% mookieproof getting drunk this morning to 72% at poll close

always a bull market

mookieproof, Sunday, 6 March 2016 07:24 (eight years ago) link

back in things that actually happened, Sanders wins Kansas and Nebraska, Clinton Louisiana

Still <200 pledged delegates separating them

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Sunday, 6 March 2016 12:34 (eight years ago) link

good morning! Has the civil war started?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 6 March 2016 12:38 (eight years ago) link

Morbz stuck me w his bayonet, leaned in and whispered "tell Mondale I'll see him in hell"

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Sunday, 6 March 2016 12:48 (eight years ago) link

I start drinking again next Saturday btw

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 6 March 2016 13:25 (eight years ago) link

that louis ck thing was stupid trash imo, of course my FB feed is already filled with "Louis CK Sends Out Epic Email Annihilating Donald Trump"

marcos, Sunday, 6 March 2016 14:32 (eight years ago) link

Michael Tracey
‏@mtracey
Trump carries Clay Co., KY -- the most economically immiserated county in America -- by 35%

https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/706276419484164096

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 6 March 2016 14:57 (eight years ago) link

Hilarious that cruz is emerging as the establishment alternate to Trump. Ideal outcome really.

Οὖτις, Sunday, 6 March 2016 15:15 (eight years ago) link

rally around the most conservative candidate since Goldwater. good night, and good luck.

Neanderthal, Sunday, 6 March 2016 15:15 (eight years ago) link

FB friend's post:

How to correctly interpret the Nebraska and Kansas Democratic primaries:

Senator Sanders won these states decisively because they were tailor made for him which means that these two states as everyone has always known are filled with very liberal, very affluent, very white, very young, very blue-collar, very rural, very caucus-y kinds of voters who usually don't turn out to vote but did this time for a democratic socialist because they are for all these reasons unrepresentative of the American people and in fact all five journalists and the hot dog vendor who attended Senator Sanders's press conference announcing his candidacy last May confidently predicted that he would win Kansas and Nebraska for all these reasons plus they are caucus states which everyone also knew from the beginning would go for the Senator because it has been predicted so often in his long career as a Democratic socialist that he would be very competitive in Red states that had caucuses which require in-state organization and familiarity and even though Senator Sanders may have never once set foot in either state in his long career until a month ago this is exactly why those voters who did vote for him are unrepresentative of the American people plus if you look at a map it is clear that Kansas and Nebraska are separated from Vermont by only 7 state boundaries which gave Senator Sanders a built-in advantage over his opponent since it has also always been known from the beginning of this campaign that the very liberal, very affluent, very white, very young, very blue-collar, very rural, very caucus-y very unrepresentative sort of voters in Kansas and Nebraska (plus Oklahoma) have always known everything about Senator Sanders and surveys have always shown that they could name him as one of the Senators from Vermont even when they could not name both Senators from their own states or the states on either side of their States which again makes them entirely unrepresentative of American voters and so the results from these states were entirely predictable especially since it snows a lot in both of these states just like Vermont

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 6 March 2016 15:29 (eight years ago) link

..and then he asked me would I yes to say yes my mountain flower and first I put my arms around him yes and drew him down to me so he could feel my breasts all perfume yes and his heart was going like mad and yes I said yes I will Yes.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 6 March 2016 15:33 (eight years ago) link

lol

Neanderthal, Sunday, 6 March 2016 15:34 (eight years ago) link

and here's why xp

Laertiades (imago), Sunday, 6 March 2016 15:36 (eight years ago) link

it's a good thing you don't need to win the most delegates to become the nominee, just outperform ppl's expectations of you

Mordy, Sunday, 6 March 2016 15:44 (eight years ago) link

Lol alfred

Οὖτις, Sunday, 6 March 2016 15:45 (eight years ago) link

well at least you won't be the nominee xp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 6 March 2016 15:46 (eight years ago) link

you guys WILL deserve what you get, richly

oops sorry i forgot you are all your own anointed pundit. carry on obnoxiously.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 6 March 2016 15:47 (eight years ago) link

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown)
Posted: March 6, 2016 at 7:48:57 AM
Morbz stuck me w his bayonet, leaned in and whispered "tell Mondale I'll see him in hell"

IRL cackled at this necessitating lengthy explanation to wife

scarcity festival (Jon not Jon), Sunday, 6 March 2016 15:52 (eight years ago) link

We are strictly in the 'delusional' phase of the Sanders' campaign. I get why they have to pretend to still have a shot; need as many delegates as possible to show how large the desire for other policies are. I get it, and it's good in the long run. And Sanders really needs more recognition for how positive his campaign has been, even though many of his supporters are insufferable on social media. But Clinton is winning most votes and most delegates, and she did so again yesterday. And at times it becomes a bit cringeworthy. There was one guy reporting home to Denmark from NY State about how Sanders actually won Super Tuesday, because Clinton was only carrying 'conservative' voters in the south. Uhm...

Frederik B, Sunday, 6 March 2016 15:55 (eight years ago) link

also hrc could die

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:01 (eight years ago) link

I don't think Sanders campaign is over and I've said before that I think he should continue it until he is mathematically eliminated. The thing that annoys me is that at this point he actually needs to be gaining on Hillary to even have a shot but I've been seeing celebrations that he didn't lose by as many delegates yesterday as they thought a week ago, or someone saying that he doesn't need to actually win Michigan, he just needs to not lose by the current polling. I don't think that's true - he really needs to start beating Hillary and not just coming really close to doing so. I guess if you think he's going to score blow outs in rust belt states but then he actually has to be winning in MI, and then in IL, OH on the 15th which is surely the last stand?

Mordy, Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:01 (eight years ago) link

lol remember when HRC's reason to continue campaigning about BHO was that he could still be assassinated?

Mordy, Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:02 (eight years ago) link

This is an area where I really don't enough about US, but I could see him doing good by keeping it going all the way to the convention, right? As people have noted on ilx before, the Dems are actually having a civilized discussion about politics, which is a pretty good contrast to what's going on on the other side. At some point the party needs to prepare the infrastructure for the general, and it would be could to have as much a lead as possible on that, but they could still do that even with Sanders campaigning for another win in Connecticut or wherever.

Frederik B, Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:07 (eight years ago) link

I wrote on facebook after Iowa that Sanders lost his shot then. He needed to change the narrative definitively to ever have a chance of gaining enough momentum to turn South Carolina, and when that didn't happen, he couldn't win. The blowout in New Hampshire didn't really change that.

Frederik B, Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:11 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, I don't think it's going to be an issue (re preparing for the general) esp in the current political environment. If there's any chance that a longer Sanders campaign will keep his voters involved and committed it might actually aid the party in GOTV efforts. From what I understand the campaign is registering new voters and bringing more ppl into the party so that can only be an advantage no matter who ultimately wins the nomination.

Mordy, Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:11 (eight years ago) link

it's not "cringeworthy" for him to stay in, and it doesn't prevent (and likely helps) the preparation of infrastructure

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:14 (eight years ago) link

meet the press - chuck todd asks lindsey graham what exactly has ted cruz accomplished in the senate besides shutting down the government? and graham says, well he made people believe that it was me and mitch mcconnell who prevented repealing obamacare. but at least he's a conservative

it is hilarious how much they clearly despise cruz and know he can't win the general and still he's not as bad as trump

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:14 (eight years ago) link

man the shift after early votes in the Louisiana race:

http://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/louisiana-kansas-kentucky-maine-primaries-presidential-election-2016/?#livepress-update-20481320

Neanderthal, Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:22 (eight years ago) link

I'm with Morbs's Facebook friend tbh, but only because (once again) I've never seen this as a campaign about winning the nomination but one about proving that campaigning on these ideas has way, way more of a shot than anyone would have expected. Nobody whatsoever last summer seriously thought left-wing ranting socialist Bernie Sanders was going to win much of anything, certainly not plains states, certainly not (so far) more states that any non-winning Democratic challenger (save Clinton '08) since 1992. So yeah, i think beating that "expectation" is very interesting, and certainly much more significant in the long term than the constantly-shifting short-term expectations one is expected to beat in an actual winning primary campaign. Clinton may win the nomination and the presidency and historians may still come to mark 2016 as the beginning of the end of the long Clinton era. Who knows?

Of course, I am disappointed with the campaign in other regards; as I said a long while back, his inability to reach minority voters in large numbers is a serious failure if the goal is to establish a meaningfully new and powerful progressive coalition that wins in America. He has not seemed to find that space or that voice, and that's a drag. I objected to people pre-emptively writing him off on this count many months ago because it hadn't played out yet. Now that we have more of a sense of it, it does seem clear that while he gained some ground with African-Americans, it has not been nearly enough to indicate that real listening and synthesis had taken place in his thinking or his approach to the problems of voters. (I am open, though, to the reading that many more voters did come around to thinking he was pretty good, but that they liked Clinton better or felt she represented more of a sure thing.)

It's not a matter of needing a younger or more charismatic Bernie - - - indeed, it seems likely that his age and the way he carries himself have all played a huge part in the success he has enjoyed. Rather, I want to see a progressive that can speak simultaneously and with equal passion about all forms of injustice and continue to strike such massive chords. The test in that case might not be whether this phantom candidate draws in minorities, but whether they alienate the white union types that are as much Sanders's base as enthusiastic students are. Put another way: can you run for president and speak the truth that police murdering minorities in the streets is one of the most serious issues facing our country, and that it's only the most violent and visible edge of massive unresolved institutionalized racism? I don't know if Sanders believes this and doesn't say it, or if his old-school economic leftism really is so ingrained that he sincerely hopes that those other things will work themselves out, or at least be a lot less bad, in a less brutally oligarchic and income-segregated America. But it would be great for the "progressive alternative" to start saying this stuff and damn the consequences.

That said, I do think his longform ads (Erica Garner, now Udelia Chautla) are remarkable gestures and a wonderful thing to do with all those campaign donations. And I've come away a bit from my original point, which is that Americans in droves are voting for a socialist this year, and that is kind of nuts!

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:26 (eight years ago) link

slate says: http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/03/05/ted_cruz_s_wins_in_maine_and_kansas_are_great_news_for_donald_trump.html bc cruz is just so gross the the GOP's heart won't be in stopping Trump if Cruz is their savior.

Mordy, Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:26 (eight years ago) link

i'm not with morb'z fb friend bc all those points are presented in a tone of frantic, nervous dismissal as if bc no one expected a strong bernie campaign when it began as we saw yesterday that means that everyone is panicked and these are just stupid excuses for his winning made up to reassure the speaker. which would imply that actually there were strong reasons to believe that he was going to continue to gain and soon take the primary. in this year's election i'm not willing to rule out anything happening but the explanations for his winning in OK and NE (primarily the favorably demographic argument) is consistent with other places he has won - and his big loss in louisiana is consistent with the the other places he has lost. so it's not a win - as strong as it was - that has pundits shocked and trying to understand what is going on. there is delusional panic but it's mostly in the bernie4prez subreddit. also i don't think the media isn't downplaying bernie bc they're trying to protect hillary. i think bernie is suffering from the fact that he's a strong dark horse in a year with the donald. (and i think he'd be doing much better in a year without trump when voters could take the time to get to know him).

Mordy, Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:32 (eight years ago) link

also i think the dem party base is just more moderate than the left-wing wishes and that's why bernie isn't taking majorities. he's making a strong case that he can persuade a lot of voters and that his ideas are mainstreamable, but the party is not there yet and if there was an opportunity for them to get there this year it's not going to happen w/ the right-wing horror flick running + freaking them all out

Mordy, Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:35 (eight years ago) link

also obama is extremely popular in the dem party (80% approval rating) so even tho it might seem to v left-wingers that he's actually a very controversial neo-liberal president it's just not true and if you're thinking the same thing about hillary you should probably consider you might not be on the same page as the rest of the party either.

Mordy, Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:36 (eight years ago) link

I took Morbs's fb friend just to be parodying all the continuous goalpost adjustment that we see in every election but which has been particularly noticeable this time around thanks to the considerable media favoritism towards Clinton which has run through the entire race (see the NYT especially) - not sure how this would be a product of Trump's campaign. But, yeah, to the extent that it's trying to offer a narrative where no really he's about to win ---- win big!!! ---- then it's silly comment-box Bernie fandom.

The only interesting thing left, arguably, is that if Sanders can maintain his current crowdfunding stream, he could actually compete in some of the late states that usually fall automatically to the front-runner because everybody else drops out by then. I look forward to voting for him in New York on April 19... which is still somewhat ahead of the point at which Clinton is expected to hit a true majority of pledged delegates. So hopefully the race is still "going" in a sense at that point, even if it's just as obvious then as it has been all along that Sanders can't actually win it.

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:41 (eight years ago) link

IIRC, a while back there was some polling and some articles that indicated a majority of Democrats liked Bernie just fine, even if they were planning to vote for Hillary... I'd love to see more stuff probing that. Because I'm sure there are many who think he's too far to the left - and absolutely many who think he's too far to the left to chance in a year when the opposing nominee is likely to be a fascist freakshow. But that's not quite the same thing as him representing a tiny leftie faction of the party. He's drawing crowds and winning votes because people think the neoliberal trickle-down economy's a scam, even if they wouldn't say "Obama is just another dangerous neoliberal" or whatever.

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:44 (eight years ago) link

i think a lot of the complaining about biased media is overblown. the NYT specifically has covered the inquiries into Hillary's emails extensively and their two part Libya piece generated from ppl i know some of the most critical comments about her record. also generally speaking:

https://espnfivethirtyeight.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/king-dem-liveblog-google-search-0301.png?w=1150

Mordy, Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:44 (eight years ago) link

er.... that graph shows rather straightforwardly that throughout the entire campaign until voting actually started, there was a much larger gap between public interest in Sanders, and media coverage of Sanders, than the equivalent for Clinton.

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:46 (eight years ago) link

it does not show a dramatic gap but more importantly it shows that the gap has closed which would demonstrate a responsive media not a biased one. if there's a case it's that the media didn't treat his candidacy seriously before the primaries started which no one can doubt. of course the media missed another really big story this election too and i don't think it was bc they were biased.

Mordy, Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:50 (eight years ago) link

(or if they were biased, it's in similar ways - to assumptions that party approved, big money candidates are sure fire things which benefits hillary but is not a sign of a conspiracy, just of outdated political wisdom)

Mordy, Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:51 (eight years ago) link

also yknow, quantity not the same thing as quality, and charts aren't really good at measuring the spin of articles, terms chosen, narrative-framing adjectives and verbs, quotes selected, yadda yadda. you know the deal. it'd be a project for a later historian of this campaign to reconstruct week by week, but ffs sanders just could not get coverage through most of the campaign. major thematic speeches with big press releases foreshadowing them would get buried. i definitely agree that part of this is, yes, them choosing consistently to make a trump story the headline news. but i really don't think it takes any crazy elaborate conspiracy thinking to say, yknow, the corporate centrist media kinda didn't give the socialist challenger a fair hearing before the public.

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:53 (eight years ago) link

(I may also be a bit biased from having, for some reason, continued to read 538 pretty regularly through the whole process, and they, especially Harry Enten, have been among the most consistent goalpost-movers, oracles of self-fulfilling prophecies, and missers of forests for the trees. Not so surprising: the racehorse is their business and it's sort of outside their whole intellectual frame that someone could be running for some reason other than 'winning.' But yeah my exasperation may partially reflect this one particular filter.)

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:56 (eight years ago) link

i feel like i've been following the sanders campaign closely and i could not tell you what major thematic speeches he gave as every time i've heard him speak it has sounded like the same thing. is this bc the media hasn't been reporting it or bc there really haven't been many? what's the last major policy idea or theme that he's released?

Mordy, Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:56 (eight years ago) link

i hate to leave it like this but like i said that really would be a job for future historians. give me a year and a grant and i'll go back and read all the ILX threads and pick some out - i swear i remember at least a couple, like, IT'S COMING! THIS FRIDAY, SANDERS WILL GIVE A MAJOR ADDRESS ON RACIAL INJUSTICE! and then he did and it got absolutely no coverage on the news, just zero. i realize this is totally vague and anecdotal but recovering individual moments like that out of months and months of a campaign is kind of burdensome to contemplate even for someone who spends way too much time scrolling through old-favorite ILX threads.

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 6 March 2016 16:58 (eight years ago) link

but really if you can look at that 538 coverage chart above and not see anything even slightly unbalanced there, i'm scratching my head. i would be more convinced by a critique of the methodology itself (are google searches really the best indicator of public interest? i guess but it still feels wrong). but if you accept the method it seems pretty plain: she was getting at least twice as much coverage as sanders even when interest in him was the same as her or much higher. i think the spikes correspond to debates, which would even give a particularly newsworthy hook for a story on sanders specifically - but no, the narrative and the stories were about clinton. idk man.

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 6 March 2016 17:01 (eight years ago) link

it looks to me in that chart that since mid-jan stories have tracked w/ bernie interest perfectly and has even overtaken hillary in early feb. it's now early march. everyone is paying attention to the race that is going to pay attention during the primaries.

Mordy, Sunday, 6 March 2016 17:05 (eight years ago) link

i said "throughout the entire campaign until voting actually started." so okay yes for a month and a half sanders has arguably gotten fairer coverage. not sure that cancels out him being basically shut out in the cold for half a year or more but i've sorta said my piece on this so i'll let others speak, hopefully someone can confirm that i'm not just a crazy person.

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 6 March 2016 17:07 (eight years ago) link

look arguably speaking bernie has had 30 years to work on getting more coverage and eyeballs on his agenda. the media didn't help him early in this race but he owns a lot of the responsibility for starting from scratch during this campaign

Mordy, Sunday, 6 March 2016 17:12 (eight years ago) link

jeez, Doc, you've written 900 words in an hour!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 6 March 2016 17:12 (eight years ago) link

and yes Sanders should stay in the race as long as he can. I don't think HRC's gonna move much farther to the left; she only started to when he was a threat, and the threat's been nullified.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 6 March 2016 17:13 (eight years ago) link

xposts yeah what an asshole, how dare he not spend the last sixteen years running for president. people who really deserve to have their ideas heard know to do that.

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 6 March 2016 17:14 (eight years ago) link

there are very high profile senators who didn't have to run for senator to become that way. when warren ends up running she will not have the issues bernie has had.

Mordy, Sunday, 6 March 2016 17:15 (eight years ago) link

who didn't have to run for president* i meant

Mordy, Sunday, 6 March 2016 17:15 (eight years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cc3rwC9VAAQnyrV.jpg

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Sunday, 6 March 2016 17:22 (eight years ago) link

he got more coverage than cruz or rubio fwiw, and much more than them as a fraction of his party

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Sunday, 6 March 2016 17:23 (eight years ago) link

well, trump can have been severely over-covered and sanders severely under-covered. also, those guys were in a field of seventeen candidates at one point; while clearly that wall of trump coverage doesn't suggest each of their ideas in turn was given a fair hearing, it's at least a little different.

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 6 March 2016 17:27 (eight years ago) link

"As people have noted on ilx before, the Dems are actually having a civilized discussion about politics, which is a pretty good contrast to what's going on on the other side."

this is perfectly good reason for him to stay in the race, IMO. The Dem process has been great so far, bringing good issues to light; the more that continues, the better they look as a whole to the general public (or so I'd hope). I really feel let down when trump does things like reverse his stance on torture (which he did, then I think he kind of didn't the next day) because I don't want those guys starting to sound reasonable to anyone.

also, you know, clinton could get indicted or some shit. I doubt it but you never know.

akm, Sunday, 6 March 2016 17:31 (eight years ago) link

https://twitter.com/mega_vac/status/706330950100131841

ulysses, Sunday, 6 March 2016 20:44 (eight years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cc3wKPYVAAA21bW.jpg

mookieproof, Sunday, 6 March 2016 21:21 (eight years ago) link

so Sanders should gang up with Kasich and Rubio. "They don't want us, screw'em, let's divide Rome."

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 6 March 2016 21:23 (eight years ago) link

the weird thing to me that i kinda don't understand is that the US is not some Weimer Republic w/ out of control inflation and painful terms dictated by a recent surrender. unemployment is apparently at a two decade low, and no other country in the world has bounced back from the recession as strongly. there's obv still inequality and things that need to be fixed but these ppl are acting like this country is going down the toilet and needs some radical shakeout for its survival - it's insane. these americans must be experiencing some kind of psychotic break.

― Mordy, Thursday, March 3, 2016 11:38 AM (3 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Precisely that.

― Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Thursday, March 3, 2016 11:39 AM (3 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah it's bizarre

― robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, March 3, 2016 11:41 AM (3 days ago) Bookmark

.....

Hungry4Ass, Sunday, 6 March 2016 22:32 (eight years ago) link

rumors were flyin that they left Sanders off of the Dem sample ballot in Illinois primary but naturally it turned out to be just a political advertisement which was obvious to anybody who bothered to read it (cos only one candidate was listed per race for all races). the Sanders Dems on my feed are so goddamn aggravating.

Neanderthal, Sunday, 6 March 2016 22:40 (eight years ago) link

are his balls brittle?

Neanderthal, Sunday, 6 March 2016 22:46 (eight years ago) link

https://i.imgur.com/9VS5kHy.jpg

really confused... why are these people angry???

Hungry4Ass, Sunday, 6 March 2016 23:05 (eight years ago) link

the weimar germany comparison should be taken seriously because if the elites keep forcing people to pick between Romneys & Clintons they will undercut their own legitimacy soon enough

Hungry4Ass, Sunday, 6 March 2016 23:07 (eight years ago) link

they're angry bc black people (and now messicans and mooslems) are getting the exact same socialism they are. the anger makes them die sooner.

rmde bob (will), Sunday, 6 March 2016 23:08 (eight years ago) link

funny spelling

karla jay vespers, Sunday, 6 March 2016 23:10 (eight years ago) link

think it's kinda problematic to attribute any one feature to Trump voters cos they span many walks of life (tho the one being focused on lately, the middle class/collapsing industries, is one for sure)

Neanderthal, Sunday, 6 March 2016 23:10 (eight years ago) link

unemployment is apparently at a two decade low, and no other country in the world has bounced back from the recession as strongly

the obliviousness of this still has my jaw on the floor... i guess it accounts for maintream dems/GOP all around the country reeling backwards clutching their chests like Redd Foxx upon discovering there's a big chunk of the electorate that responds to populism. the demo shafted by free trade (and the demo responding to trump's economic populism) aren't bouncing back from SHIT

Hungry4Ass, Sunday, 6 March 2016 23:20 (eight years ago) link

what is your conclusion from that data?

Nhex, Sunday, 6 March 2016 23:35 (eight years ago) link

isn't conventional wisdom that a large part of that is due to baby boomers retiring en masse?

Neanderthal, Sunday, 6 March 2016 23:40 (eight years ago) link

We have fewer people working than in 2006. Sure some of those non-workers are retirees, but the story is less full-time work than before as a "new normal". The generation of workers in their 20s and 30s is the first in a long long time to not have a realistic expectation of a more secure/better working life than their parents.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 6 March 2016 23:42 (eight years ago) link

unemployment is apparently at a two decade low, and no other country in the world has bounced back from the recession as strongly

A-hem

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Sunday, 6 March 2016 23:43 (eight years ago) link

here was a more in-depth analysis of that stat: http://www.usnews.com/news/the-report/articles/2015/07/16/unemployment-is-low-but-more-workers-are-leaving-the-workforce

Neanderthal, Sunday, 6 March 2016 23:43 (eight years ago) link

it isn't that jobs aren't available, a lot of it that *certain* types of jobs aren't available in either industries that have vanished or shrunk considerably

Neanderthal, Sunday, 6 March 2016 23:45 (eight years ago) link

"certain" i.e. good, full-time jobs

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 6 March 2016 23:47 (eight years ago) link

That article quotes a guy trying to explain the non-retiree side of the story with the old chestnut that our dadgum American workers just don't have the right skills. But the majority of jobs being created are low-skill service sector jobs. It doesn't compute. And in any case, there's a simple solution to finding workers with the "right skills" - you increase your wage offer. Companies aren't doing this.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 6 March 2016 23:52 (eight years ago) link

Sure some of those non-workers are retirees

approximately half of the decline was due to retiring boomers leaving the workforce. it's the other half nobody can agree on.

Neanderthal, Monday, 7 March 2016 00:05 (eight years ago) link

because really there hasn't been sufficient polling data as of yet, though there's some out there.

Neanderthal, Monday, 7 March 2016 00:05 (eight years ago) link

re: the white male death rate, their death rate really actually spiked severely between 1999 and 2005, then sharply declined again (though still hasn't quite gotten back to 1999's numbers). it's the white female death rate that's risen since 2005.

http://andrewgelman.com/2015/11/10/death-rates-have-been-increasing-for-middle-aged-white-women-decreasing-for-men/

Neanderthal, Monday, 7 March 2016 00:31 (eight years ago) link

arnold endorsed kasich lol

marcos, Monday, 7 March 2016 00:59 (eight years ago) link

i love bernie's tie tonight

Treeship, Monday, 7 March 2016 01:16 (eight years ago) link

oh shit, this is actually heating up

Treeship, Monday, 7 March 2016 01:27 (eight years ago) link

Any way to watch this in Canada?

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Monday, 7 March 2016 01:27 (eight years ago) link

Or even stream audio?

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Monday, 7 March 2016 01:27 (eight years ago) link

Signs of life, both sides...Preview of how a crowd reacts when a male snaps at Clinton to stop talking--not positively. That's something that could really blow up in Trump's face.

clemenza, Monday, 7 March 2016 01:29 (eight years ago) link

rofl

Hungry4Ass, Monday, 7 March 2016 01:38 (eight years ago) link

if we're going to argue the merits of candidates based on the recorded history of their actions,

Hungry4Ass, Monday, 7 March 2016 01:38 (eight years ago) link

yeah i just saw a few dozen tweets go by immediately with women like.. just wow, how many times has a man talked over me like that, etc. i'm certainly familiar with it.

trump looked terrible in debate vs fiorina and megyn kelly embarrassed him pretty bad

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Monday, 7 March 2016 01:39 (eight years ago) link

amazing that we actually hear candidates talking about policy rn and not just who's a loser and a liar and their poll numbers and whatever

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Monday, 7 March 2016 01:45 (eight years ago) link

alright bernie your 15 seconds is up. Senator CLinton *DING DING DING!* oh wahts that sound? Looks like Senator Clinton activated the unbiased BONUS POWERUP SUPREME just by accident which gives her unlimited time. Incredible. How does she do it. That'll be our next question. Senator Clinton: How Do You Do It?

Hungry4Ass, Monday, 7 March 2016 01:46 (eight years ago) link

Cruz, Rubio, and Democrats should go back at look at that Fiorina moment; it was the one time, I think, were Trump was completely diminished and clearly embarrassed (and dug himself an even deeper hole with his follow-up comment). It happened so early, it's been forgotten.

clemenza, Monday, 7 March 2016 01:47 (eight years ago) link

Neither candidate with much of an answer for the father whose daughter was shot in the head. "It's a hard issue."

timellison, Monday, 7 March 2016 01:58 (eight years ago) link

Sanders is great when he talks about his early-'60s experiences; very modest.

clemenza, Monday, 7 March 2016 02:08 (eight years ago) link

i don't think it's a good idea for bernie to voice his concerns about policing in quite these terms; i think too many will interpret it as anti-cop. there's a way to say the same thing in more mollifying language.

neither of them answered the 'racial blind spots' question, of course.

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:14 (eight years ago) link

Neither candidate with much of an answer for the father whose daughter was shot in the head. "It's a hard issue."

― timellison, Sunday, March 6, 2016 7:58 PM (16 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

repeal the 2nd amendment

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:14 (eight years ago) link

tbh though the fiorina thing was mostly that she was v sharp (i don't agree with her but just in terms of debate skills).. but the other part is that trump couldn't respond to fiorina with a tirade of verbal abuse like he does to rubio or cruz because bullying a woman face to face in a debate is still a bad look even for trump (he just waits until later on twitter or whatever because he has some kind of psychological issue where he can't let anything go without responding with some stupid tirade)

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:18 (eight years ago) link

wonder if in a few generations we will get to the point of banning nearly all guns, i'd be for it

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:19 (eight years ago) link

I would love to be in my 80s and tell my grandkids "let me tell ya about when guns WERE legal".

One can hope.

Neanderthal, Monday, 7 March 2016 02:22 (eight years ago) link

Bummed that I missed first hour of this and forgot to DVR it

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:24 (eight years ago) link

Any clear edge in the first hour?

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:24 (eight years ago) link

Any clear edge in the first hour?

Bernie took first half strongly; Hillary taking second half as strongly

Iago Galdston, Monday, 7 March 2016 02:38 (eight years ago) link

i have to admit that even as the outlook for the election gets bleaker and bleaker, i like sanders more and more. there's a weird mismatch between the aspects of his affect that make him look doddering and out of touch, and his obviously pretty fleet and clever mind.

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:42 (eight years ago) link

sanders just made a face like a bored five-year-old waiting for his teenage brother to stop whining

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:43 (eight years ago) link

ok i lol'ed at sanders joke re the investing in mental health after that gop debate

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:45 (eight years ago) link

Yeah that joke was delightful

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:46 (eight years ago) link

i love bernie but i thought it was sort of offensive tbh

Treeship, Monday, 7 March 2016 02:46 (eight years ago) link

hilary's taking the 2nd half by smirking evilly every time bernie brings up her taking donations from the industries that own her

Hungry4Ass, Monday, 7 March 2016 02:48 (eight years ago) link

What was Sanders going to say about Trump that he thought better of? Intrigued!

clemenza, Monday, 7 March 2016 02:52 (eight years ago) link

i think he was basically saying he would eagerly support a clinton candidacy against trump

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:53 (eight years ago) link

I think he was just about to say he would give his right arm to run against Trump

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:53 (eight years ago) link

"do you believe that god is relevant?"

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:53 (eight years ago) link

oh, i see.

xpost

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:54 (eight years ago) link

"proud to be jewish" didn't get much applause

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:55 (eight years ago) link

hilary's taking the 2nd half by smirking evilly every time bernie brings up her taking donations from the industries that own her

Trying to be nice here! Damned if I do, etc

Iago Galdston, Monday, 7 March 2016 02:55 (eight years ago) link

Half expected Sanders to snarl, "What do you care?"

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:56 (eight years ago) link

I hTe these meddling questions about faith

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:56 (eight years ago) link

"to whom and for whom do you pray?"

man, i fucking hate religion. what is this bullshit?

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:56 (eight years ago) link

xpost

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:56 (eight years ago) link

Intrusive rather

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:56 (eight years ago) link

such a hectoring question

"who? who? huh? who?"

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:56 (eight years ago) link

More than Bill Clinton -- more than Barack Obama -- Hillary Clinton strikes me as a secular candidate. I can't believe her as someone who prays.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:57 (eight years ago) link

Hate this stuff too. Humiliating.

clemenza, Monday, 7 March 2016 02:57 (eight years ago) link

also the smug piety on the countenance of the woman who asked it

ugh

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:58 (eight years ago) link

There's something really obscene about talking about your spirituality in a political context

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:58 (eight years ago) link

this is bringing out the worst of the candidates -- no wonder they believe in drone rockets

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:58 (eight years ago) link

tbf bernie didn't talk about spirituality at all, he dodges the question about as artfully as he can

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 7 March 2016 02:59 (eight years ago) link

I agree amst

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 03:01 (eight years ago) link

"I don't intend to get into the gutter with whoever they nominate."

Well, I'm going to guess that'll change.

clemenza, Monday, 7 March 2016 03:01 (eight years ago) link

You think she'll brag about her bra size?

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 03:02 (eight years ago) link

To quote a relative, depends what the meaning of gutter is.

clemenza, Monday, 7 March 2016 03:03 (eight years ago) link

i don't think she will lower herself to trump's levels, no way

Treeship, Monday, 7 March 2016 03:03 (eight years ago) link

I mean , there's gutters and then there's gutters

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 03:03 (eight years ago) link

It won't be as crude as what's going on now, but the idea that Trump and Clinton will wage a high-minded campaign is a stretch.

clemenza, Monday, 7 March 2016 03:05 (eight years ago) link

Let me it put this way--it'll be much nastier than the last two, and probably going way back before that. I know about Vince Foster and Willie Horton and Nixon and the daisy ad, but I think Clinton/Trump will take the prize.

clemenza, Monday, 7 March 2016 03:07 (eight years ago) link

Yeah it will be nasty in a different way. Not a dick measuring contest, obv

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 03:10 (eight years ago) link

why not? He'll accuse her of having small hands.q

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 7 March 2016 03:11 (eight years ago) link

It'll be guided by Trump, I imagine, and--and this is a good thing; not sure you'd want Kerry or Dukakis up against Trump--she'll be able to match him. The key word in what she says is "intends." She may not intend to, but she'll have to.

clemenza, Monday, 7 March 2016 03:14 (eight years ago) link

idk. it didn't work out for rubio

Treeship, Monday, 7 March 2016 03:14 (eight years ago) link

i think she should like, silently mock his hand gestures and puckered mouth when he is saying crazy stuff and then, when he turns his glance to her, revert to a neutral expression and act all surprised like, "what are you looking over here for?" that's the ticket

Treeship, Monday, 7 March 2016 03:15 (eight years ago) link

The timing of Rubio's attacks was transparently terrible--11th-hour desperation--and he just isn't very good at it. I've made my mixed feelings about Clinton clear, and I rooted against her in 2008, but she's tough.

clemenza, Monday, 7 March 2016 03:18 (eight years ago) link

I think she should just stare at him and say "Donald, you were always brash but you weren't a racist monster. What happened to you?"

WilliamC, Monday, 7 March 2016 03:19 (eight years ago) link

I go back and forth on that. I think she could hang back and let Trump destroy himself--Obama was very good at playing it cool in debates (except for the narcoleptic one against Romney, which wasn't actually all that bad)--but she has the politician's love of getting fired up and indignant, you saw it few times tonight, and I don't think she'd have the discipline to do that.

clemenza, Monday, 7 March 2016 03:27 (eight years ago) link

there's so much to attack hil with, bernie's been taking it so easy on her, combine that with the fact that she'll try anything to win - hil vs trump would be one of the filthiest GE's ever

Hungry4Ass, Monday, 7 March 2016 03:28 (eight years ago) link

She absolutely has to go on the offensive against Trump, otherwise she'll allow him to define her

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 03:31 (eight years ago) link

idk. i think her handling of the benghazi committee BS kind of bodes well for how she might handle crazy right-wing people yelling at her at length, and how it will come off to a national audience. i am not a clinton fan but i think she would be able to shut down trump really handily and without coming close to stooping to his level. the failure of the GOP crowd to do so this entire campaign says less about trump having unstoppable powers than it does about them being a really crappy set of politicians who were also basically hoping to win over his dedicated fans. none of them was ever in a position to take the high road, nor to look down from a position of strength and sagely shake their head at this madman.

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Monday, 7 March 2016 03:36 (eight years ago) link

Yes DC. By "going on the offensive" I didn't mean stooping to his level

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 03:40 (eight years ago) link

once again trying and failing to reconcile some of the views of hrc from these threads with what i've seen from following her career for the past eight or so years.. like i know the republicans have been working hard since the 90s to define her as duplicitous, ruthless, insincere, etc., but.. like, do you guys really believe that? because i notice you all seem to think she's pretty awful and..

it feels like it all points back to some fundamental distrust of her that is way stronger than that for many other politicians and i don't really get where it's coming from because i don't see things this way.

she made the benghazi committee look really foolish

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Monday, 7 March 2016 03:43 (eight years ago) link

Her husband's worse. She's less mellifluous.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 7 March 2016 03:47 (eight years ago) link

Most of my feelings about her come from the 2008 campaign, not from Republicans. They're far from wholly negative--as I say, I'm about halfway (and, needless to say, would want her to destroy Trump or Cruz).

clemenza, Monday, 7 March 2016 03:49 (eight years ago) link

unemployment is apparently at a two decade low, and no other country in the world has bounced back from the recession as strongly

I was laid off in 2009, got my next job a year later and still haven't made it back up to my '08-09 salary. The smart money is on me getting laid off again in a year or less (technology), and i think my prospects of getting work as a publishing pro with cancer in his mid 50s are JUST GREAT. I'm pretty angry.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 7 March 2016 04:07 (eight years ago) link

she's a blatantly insincere phony whose mere name makes one think of dozens of scandals ranging from financial impropriety to murder. she embraces really dirty/aggressive politics at any cost (see leaking the obama muslim robe photo, rev wright stuff in 08). she sadistically targeted a random country for total destruction just to buttress a foreign policy record. she's nowhere near Ted Cruz level psychotic/alienating but the fact that anyone could look at her and not feel the same chill of revulsion travel through their body as they would a Mitt Romney is bewildering to me from every angle. she might even stand for less than Mitt did

Hungry4Ass, Monday, 7 March 2016 04:27 (eight years ago) link

You don't even think she's a real phony?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93sGl1mWDlA

clemenza, Monday, 7 March 2016 04:35 (eight years ago) link

it feels like it all points back to some fundamental distrust of her that is way stronger than that for many other politicians and i don't really get where it's coming from

hm, i wonder in what obvious way hillary clinton is different from the other candidates on both sides ... *strokes beard*

carly rae jetson (thomp), Monday, 7 March 2016 04:41 (eight years ago) link

c'mon tom.

Hungry4Ass, Monday, 7 March 2016 04:44 (eight years ago) link

ade fyi the clintons did not kill vince foster

carly rae jetson (thomp), Monday, 7 March 2016 04:44 (eight years ago) link

i see they got to you too

Hungry4Ass, Monday, 7 March 2016 04:47 (eight years ago) link

lmao msnbc commentator talking about how michigan could go red this year because of the high number of militia members

marcos, Monday, 7 March 2016 04:47 (eight years ago) link

i think it is possibly time to stop talking about wisconsin, michigan, and pennsylvania as swing states?

marcos, Monday, 7 March 2016 04:48 (eight years ago) link

wonder in what obvious way hillary clinton is different from the other candidates on both sides ...

lying blatantly for 25 years?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 7 March 2016 04:50 (eight years ago) link

it's possible to be ambivalent abt hil on grounds other than duplicity or insincerity. e.g., foreign affairs.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 04:51 (eight years ago) link

at the same time I do think a lot of the animosity she attracts is fueled by sexism

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 04:54 (eight years ago) link

i'm pretty ambivalent about clinton but i certainly don't feel the level of gut revulsion h4a is talking about

i think the millions (tens of millions?) of dollars that went into investigating the backgrounds of her and her husband during his administration by the kinda sorta unconstitutional office of the independent counsel is a big factor in how people feel about her -- there's no other figure post-nixon into whose background such thorough muck-raking has taken place, surely

carly rae jetson (thomp), Monday, 7 March 2016 04:57 (eight years ago) link

dozens of scandals ranging from financial impropriety to murder

oh shit who did she murder??? dang i better rethink

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Monday, 7 March 2016 05:00 (eight years ago) link

http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.php#axzz42Bnm7V6Q
http://www.arkancide.com/

IT's pretty grisly reading... Might want to save for tomorrow.

Hungry4Ass, Monday, 7 March 2016 05:09 (eight years ago) link

Was the debate tonight actually worth watching? They held it in my hometown and I've been to many, many events in that auditorium, had high school graduation there, etc, so I'm curious how well the entire event went.

The same venue held a special episode of "Donahue" when he came to Flint after _Roger & Me_ became a thing 26 years ago, I think.

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Monday, 7 March 2016 05:13 (eight years ago) link

http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount.asp

n.b. i am no fan of hillary, and certainly not of bill. i think they both have a lot to answer for, especially wrt welfare reform, wall street deregulation, and mass incarceration. but they're not having staffers secretly killed all the time.

Treeship, Monday, 7 March 2016 05:18 (eight years ago) link

there's plenty of things to criticize her for without resorting to conspiracy theories.

Treeship, Monday, 7 March 2016 05:22 (eight years ago) link

Strongly prefer Morbs to H4A's pedestrian trolling

petulant dick master (silby), Monday, 7 March 2016 05:33 (eight years ago) link

Oh yeah? who asked you, fruit

Hungry4Ass, Monday, 7 March 2016 05:37 (eight years ago) link

"not liking hilary for being a crook and a callous monster" now a troll huh

Hungry4Ass, Monday, 7 March 2016 05:37 (eight years ago) link

Sorry but that website doesn't exactly radiate trustworthiness ("All Wars Are Bankers' Wars", "Climategate", "Obama the Love Child", etc)

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 05:42 (eight years ago) link

Lol at killing JFK Jr. That's sub-Moonie shit there.

Neanderthal, Monday, 7 March 2016 05:45 (eight years ago) link

the prank's on me for posting on a site where you cant make vince foster jokes without Treeship posting snopes links (thanks professor fucktard) but thomp i am so disappointed by these liberal banalisms ur embracing

Hungry4Ass, Monday, 7 March 2016 05:46 (eight years ago) link

"fruit"?

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 05:48 (eight years ago) link

^xp - since ILX is unlikely to change appreciably to accommodate your desires, you could always reconsider your commitment to posting to ILX

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 7 March 2016 05:49 (eight years ago) link

Was the debate tonight actually worth watching? They held it in my hometown and I've been to many, many events in that auditorium, had high school graduation there, etc, so I'm curious how well the entire event went.

Yes, I thought it was worth watching, but then again I've watched every single debate, so... tifwiw Was quite meaty on substance, with greater emphasis on infrastructure, education, and racial disparities than in other debates.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 05:53 (eight years ago) link

"Aw, please, Professor Fucktard is my _father's_ name..."

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Monday, 7 March 2016 05:56 (eight years ago) link

the prank's on me for posting on a site where you cant make vince foster jokes without Treeship posting snopes links (thanks professor fucktard) but thomp i am so disappointed by these liberal banalisms ur embracing

― Hungry4Ass, Sunday, March 6, 2016 11:46 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

you seem like a nice guy

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 7 March 2016 05:57 (eight years ago) link

http://www.fmylife.com/miscellaneous/20777932

salthigh, Monday, 7 March 2016 05:58 (eight years ago) link

xposts, continuing on the question of the debate:

Mostly what's remarkable to me, when I step back a minute, is the extent to which the center of gravity has shifted in the Dem party. For the past half-century the Dems have really pitched their flag with the middle class, and what we're seeing in 2016 is a conversation that has really foregrounded the concerns of the poor and people of color. Sure we've had from time to time candidates who operated from that axis (e.g., Jesse Jackson) but only one at a time. Here, both candidates are vying on this terrain. Yes we know The Great Pivot is a comin', post-Philly, but I still don't want to take for granted the fact that we're hearing conversations on the national stage that we just haven't heard before. Sanders deserves credit for much of this, but frankly I feel Clinton does as well, esp. in terms of bringing Afr-Am concerns to the fore. IMO however, the most credit however is owed to the activists of Occupy and Black Lives Matter.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 06:05 (eight years ago) link

For the past half-century the Dems have really pitched their flag with the middle class, and what we're seeing in 2016 is a conversation that has really foregrounded the concerns of the poor and people of color

Maybe because middle class of yesterday = poor of today?

Wimmels, Monday, 7 March 2016 06:55 (eight years ago) link

I think there's a tendency on the left to assume that the failure of the impeachment of Bill Clinton was seen as a scales-falling-from-the-eyes moment like the end of Mcarthyism, where the good folk of the US saw what was really happening, leaving all quibbling to the kind of conspiracy theorist that Hungry4Ass is for some reason cosplaying.

But apart from Ken Starr, the other figures on the Republican side have all hung around and become Senior Republican Sources, and a lot of the cyclone of muckraking that hung around the Clintons is quite likely to make a reappearance in full scale.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 7 March 2016 09:15 (eight years ago) link

I assumed the conspiracy theory stuff played some role in H4A's overarching agenda of Ass-pursuit

"Worried pimp" (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 7 March 2016 10:41 (eight years ago) link

The-Ass-Is-Out-There-poster.jpg

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 7 March 2016 10:42 (eight years ago) link

lay off the man he's just hungry 4 that ass

micro brewbio (crüt), Monday, 7 March 2016 10:47 (eight years ago) link

The cringeworthyness I was talking about upthread is when the Sanders twitter feed tweets something like this: 'Tonight proved once again that we are well on our way towards winning this Democratic primary. Thank you, Maine!'

I get it, I get why a campaign tweets something like that, but it's still embarrassing. They know it's untrue, and we know they know it's untrue, and they know we know they know it's untrue, and still.

Frederik B, Monday, 7 March 2016 11:16 (eight years ago) link

good morning!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 7 March 2016 11:32 (eight years ago) link

go back to bed

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 7 March 2016 12:00 (eight years ago) link

Tonight proved once again that we are well on our way towards winning this Democratic primary.

Except i haven't seen any subliterate use of "primary" like this by any campaign.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 7 March 2016 12:03 (eight years ago) link

It's a c/p, Morbs. https://twitter.com/BernieSanders

Frederik B, Monday, 7 March 2016 12:11 (eight years ago) link

oh boy, get the friggin' intern off the twitter, Bern

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 7 March 2016 12:16 (eight years ago) link

The nomination is only out of reach because of the superdelegates, many of whom would switch sides if Bernie were to win more pledged delegates. He is probably going to lose but I don't understand this obsession with accelerating the process. The longer he is in the race, the more pressure the Dem establishment will have to make addressing economic inequality a priority.

Treeship, Monday, 7 March 2016 12:52 (eight years ago) link

You already have free healthcare and higher education Frederik. Let Americans fight for these things for fucking once without discouraging us.

Treeship, Monday, 7 March 2016 12:53 (eight years ago) link

Just to make it clear, I don't think it's Sanders himself who is cringeworthy for continuing, I like that he does. The cringeworthy parts come from parts of the campaign such as surrogates, spin, 'interns', all that stuff. It's tragicomic.

He is almost 200 pledged delegates behind, and the map is getting less and less good to him. 538 estimates: Michigan, Clinton 99+%. Mississippi, Clinton 99+%. Florida, Clinton 99+%. Illinois, Clinton 99%. North Carolina, Clinton 95%. Ohio, Clinton 93%. It's 'poll-plus', but still. Where is Sanders going to make up his deficit?

Frederik B, Monday, 7 March 2016 12:59 (eight years ago) link

Also, why I of course am not US, and therefore worthless filth in the eyes of many in this thread (;)), let me just point out that 1) I've studied history and 2) As Treeship says I live in a country that won the fight for a welfare state. If you want tips on how to achieve it, just ask :)

Frederik B, Monday, 7 March 2016 13:03 (eight years ago) link

really not doing yourself any favors

iatee, Monday, 7 March 2016 13:13 (eight years ago) link

Suggested new sanders tweet:

we may have won a state, but the general outlook is bleak, both for our campaign and our country. give up, or don't. it barely matters.

Karl Malone, Monday, 7 March 2016 13:16 (eight years ago) link

Two things I learned today:

1) Since a rule passed in 2012, you need to have won 8 states to get the Republican presidential nomination at the convention - a rule intended to protect Mitt, now may protect against him.

2) This doesn't matter though because any rule change at the convention takes immediate effect.

Taken together the obvious conclusion is that I should sit down with some scotch, and Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail, again and mount another assault on the convention chapter.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 7 March 2016 13:32 (eight years ago) link

Lmao Frederick you were the Ice Age nazi imagery apologist iirc don't make me pull your card

Number 2 GEE I WONDER WHY it might be easier to achieve socialism in a very small, racially homogeneous country than the US, given your extensive knowledge of history what do you think?

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 7 March 2016 13:38 (eight years ago) link

this is cringeworthy

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 7 March 2016 13:39 (eight years ago) link

2) As Treeship says I live in a country that won the fight for a welfare state. If you want tips on how to achieve it, just ask :)
― Frederik B, Monday, March 7, 2016 7:03 AM (39 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Tip 1: Be born in a country that's already socialist.

The end.

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 7 March 2016 13:44 (eight years ago) link

Shitting on a guy for having opinions about your culture and history, and then shitting on him with your own wrong opinions of his culture and history: nagl.

Frederik B, Monday, 7 March 2016 13:56 (eight years ago) link

It's kinda hypocritical, don't you think?

Frederik B, Monday, 7 March 2016 13:57 (eight years ago) link

Teachable moment thanks Frederick

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 7 March 2016 13:59 (eight years ago) link

" The cringeworthy parts come from parts of the campaign such as surrogates, spin, 'interns', all that stuff. It's tragicomic."

Campaign staffers are fucking retarded on social media.

In last night's debate, Sanders said:
""We are, if elected president, going to invest a lot of money into mental health," Sanders said. "And when you watch these Republican debates, you know why we need to invest in that.""

to which one of clinton's staffers tweeted this dumb response:

"Mental health is a serious issue. Cheap shots like this are a bad look."

Fucking hell, that was a decent line from Sanders and didn't even hit your candidate. Give me a break.

akm, Monday, 7 March 2016 13:59 (eight years ago) link

nah it was a bad look, as is saying "fucking retarded"

jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, 7 March 2016 14:01 (eight years ago) link

tbh as a sanders supporter I didn't like that line either

Treeship, Monday, 7 March 2016 14:02 (eight years ago) link

With the rise of populist right-wing parties and neo-racism, rightist governments tearing down many of the post-war achievements of the social democrats, and (most recently) the EU immigration situation leading to draconian right-wing measures (such as Danish goverment's recent decision to seize the money and valuables of asylum seekers who are considered to be "too rich", or the proposed law here in Finland that citizens and immigrants with a resident permit have to earn a middle-class income in order to bring their non-EU family members to the country), the Nordic states are hardly the poster boys for socialism that they once were.

Tuomas, Monday, 7 March 2016 14:03 (eight years ago) link

Except for Sweden, the cheeky buggers! Sweden always maintains a higher moral ground than the rest of us.

Tuomas, Monday, 7 March 2016 14:08 (eight years ago) link

You guys are hilarious hitting Bernie for that joke.

Hadrian VIII, Monday, 7 March 2016 14:19 (eight years ago) link

Sweden is debatable as well, has always had a more ingrained class-system. But yeah, they're big on having the higher moral ground :)

Frederik B, Monday, 7 March 2016 14:19 (eight years ago) link

At least with immigration and racism that high ground is kinda justified, since they've been way more multicultural and have taken in more (non-Western) immigrants and asylum seekers than the other Nordic countries combined.

Tuomas, Monday, 7 March 2016 14:24 (eight years ago) link

Oh, I'm a huge fan of Sweden. Denmark is racist crap compared to it. But I don't think Sweden is really 'socialist' either.

Frederik B, Monday, 7 March 2016 14:33 (eight years ago) link

I things like this is more important: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folkhemmet

Frederik B, Monday, 7 March 2016 14:33 (eight years ago) link

thomp i am so disappointed by these liberal banalisms ur embracing

― Hungry4Ass, Monday, March 7, 2016 5:46 AM (9 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

;_; senpai ... why r u always so mean

carly rae jetson (thomp), Monday, 7 March 2016 14:51 (eight years ago) link

lol Vox link and all but did Sanders actually say this during the debate: http://www.vox.com/2016/3/6/11171092/democratic-debate-bernie-sanders-ghetto

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Monday, 7 March 2016 14:52 (eight years ago) link

tuomas didn't sweden just pass legislation limiting immigration in a way that's historically unparalleled for them

carly rae jetson (thomp), Monday, 7 March 2016 14:52 (eight years ago) link

I am biased here but I love how when you hang with folks from the northern countries they all denounce each other as authoritarian. I remember an Icelandic friend remarking that "inside every Swede's head is a cop" with a tone of disgust.

the tune was space, Monday, 7 March 2016 15:02 (eight years ago) link

Jante law

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 7 March 2016 15:03 (eight years ago) link

I think so, but still, what is historically unparalleled in Sweden is business as usual in the other Nordic countries, when it comes to immigration.

(xxpost)

Tuomas, Monday, 7 March 2016 15:07 (eight years ago) link

Sigh, stuff like this: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/king-superdelegates-corrupt-tool-party-establishments-article-1.2555210?cid=bitly I don't get if he actually believes what he's saying, and what his point is. Also, 58%-42% isn't really a close election at all...

Frederik B, Monday, 7 March 2016 15:08 (eight years ago) link

he's right on the facts that superdelegates exist to let the party keep some control over the final nominee and the republican party atm is doing a good job demonstrating why such a feature might be desirable

Mordy, Monday, 7 March 2016 15:12 (eight years ago) link

if hillary hadn't had the superdelegate lead all along, bernie might have had more momentum, and the race might be even more competitive. maybe not, but still, why does this bother you?

Treeship, Monday, 7 March 2016 15:12 (eight years ago) link

xp frederik

Treeship, Monday, 7 March 2016 15:12 (eight years ago) link

yeah I'm not understanding Frederik's agitation about everything.

akm, Monday, 7 March 2016 15:12 (eight years ago) link

The cringeworthyness I was talking about upthread is when the Sanders twitter feed tweets something like this: 'Tonight proved once again that we are well on our way towards winning this Democratic primary. Thank you, Maine!'

I get it, I get why a campaign tweets something like that, but it's still embarrassing. They know it's untrue, and we know they know it's untrue, and they know we know they know it's untrue, and still.

― Frederik B, Monday, March 7, 2016 6:16 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

clinton's camp and her propagandists do some of the exact same stuff man. it's just the way of the world. maybe just give it a fuckin rest?

k3vin k., Monday, 7 March 2016 15:14 (eight years ago) link

Oh, I just use it as an example of something 'cringeworthy'. The cherry picking of data, stuff like that. Saying Clinton does the same is true, of course, but it misses my point completely. I'm not saying Sanders is bad, that his campaign is bad. I'm saying that because he is losing the spin becomes more and more cringeworthy.

Frederik B, Monday, 7 March 2016 15:20 (eight years ago) link

I'm not entirely convinced that the superdelegates are really having such an impact on the race. Right now Clinton has a larger proportionate lead over Sanders for pledged delegates than Trump has over Cruz. That lead has increased as more states have voted. It is not too late for Sanders to come back, but so far he has only fallen further behind.

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Monday, 7 March 2016 15:22 (eight years ago) link

I guess you could say he is losing. I think he has been a wildly successful protest candidate whose run has strengthened the democratic party by pushing them to me more responsive to voter concerns. Just look at the kinds of questions that are in play now regarding campaign finance, public college tuition, free trade deals etc.

Treeship, Monday, 7 March 2016 15:23 (eight years ago) link

Yes, Treeship, you're right. But he IS losing the delegate count. Is that better?

Frederik B, Monday, 7 March 2016 15:25 (eight years ago) link

It just seems like your "cringeworthy" critique is so detached from anything that matters

Treeship, Monday, 7 March 2016 15:27 (eight years ago) link

Like, he obviously can't go out there and say "we have no shot" without tanking his campaign. Tanking his campaign will cut short his opportunity to advocate for the things he thinks are important -- things the democratic party have not prioritized for decades.

Treeship, Monday, 7 March 2016 15:29 (eight years ago) link

^^^

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Monday, 7 March 2016 15:30 (eight years ago) link

And also that at least 40% of the electorate cares about. As Hillary said, he is kind of a one issue candidate. His big issue is economic inequality, and it's so important to people that they've come out to vote for him in droves (not to mention how many people donated to the campaign!) Why fold at this point, or even gesture toward doing that?

Treeship, Monday, 7 March 2016 15:31 (eight years ago) link

also he said what DJP posted

a (waterface), Monday, 7 March 2016 15:37 (eight years ago) link

which is a pretty weird thing to say

a (waterface), Monday, 7 March 2016 15:38 (eight years ago) link

since everyone is too busy explaining how American politics works to a Scandinavian to talk about actual candidate responses to questions about racism, I looked up my own answer:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/07/bernie-sanders-says-white-people-dont-know-what-its-like-to-live-in-a-ghetto-about-that/

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Monday, 7 March 2016 15:38 (eight years ago) link

which can also be considered cringeworthy

a (waterface), Monday, 7 March 2016 15:39 (eight years ago) link

bernie should stay in at least till hillz selects professor warren as her running mate, because fuck rich people

reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 7 March 2016 16:06 (eight years ago) link

^

Treeship, Monday, 7 March 2016 16:08 (eight years ago) link

that would be a fierce ticket, and would pull along Bernie's base, but Warren would have more impact remaining in the Senate imo.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 16:13 (eight years ago) link

since everyone is too busy explaining how American politics works to a Scandinavian to talk about actual candidate responses to questions about racism, I looked up my own answer:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/07/bernie-sanders-says-white-people-dont-know-what-its-like-to-live-in-a-ghetto-about-that/

― i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Monday, March 7, 2016 10:38 AM (37 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This is good.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Monday, 7 March 2016 16:19 (eight years ago) link

"I'm not saying Sanders is bad, that his campaign is bad. I'm saying that because he is losing the spin becomes more and more cringeworthy."

I don't think you understand what a good or bad campaign is. Sanders is obv not going to win, but I don't think it's because he's campaign hasn't been run well.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Monday, 7 March 2016 16:21 (eight years ago) link

Re. Sanders answer to the question of racial blind spots, his use of the term "ghetto" was ill advised but I don't think his general point was racist or something. He was saying that unless you have lived on the other end of a nation built on inequality, you'll never fully understand what it's like. His platform for addressing inequality is at least as good as clinton's imo. It's uncomfortable for an old man to make an uncomfortable statement like that but im not sure its a cause for concern, would be interested in hearing other perspectives

Treeship, Monday, 7 March 2016 16:22 (eight years ago) link

well, among other things, it kind of reinforces the idea that Sanders has a less-than-nuanced view of the relationship between race and economic class in America

micro brewbio (crüt), Monday, 7 March 2016 16:26 (eight years ago) link

Charles Pierce, who after admitting that neither candidate answered the question well, writes:

Afterwards, and not entirely fairly, Sanders was accused of comparing getting a cab with losing a child to police violence, and for not knowing that white people live in poverty, too. (I mean, come on. The man grew up in Brooklyn and he got his start in politics doing open-housing campaigns in Chicago. Not only does he know that poverty transcends race, he also knows how easily the latter can be used as a way to make sure not much gets done about the former.)

Not sure I agree wholeheartedly.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 7 March 2016 16:29 (eight years ago) link

what I cringed at was that he continues to collapse the question about racial relations in the US to, essentially, the problems of poor, urban African-Americans. I really expected his shpiel to have evolved on this from earlier debates. This suggests that his advisors share the same blind spot.

I didn't love the use of "ghetto" but I'm not sure I prefer the euphemistic "inner city." I would have been fine with either term, however, if his fundamental approach to the matter had expanded.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 16:39 (eight years ago) link

The Sanders comment sent my mind back to where this thread was on Friday:

Accelerationism and dark enlightenment claptrap are the retreats of people who think their material circumstances wouldn't be much worse in a collapse scenario, i.e. white men.

― petulant dick master (silby), Friday, March 4, 2016 6:49 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i say the same thing about folks who argue that there's no or little difference between the parties. -- these aren't people who are dependent on medicaid and so forth.

― wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, March 4, 2016 9:50 PM (3 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

that said, you're stereotyping -- plenty of white men experience precarity. in fact the fallacy that those utilizing the safety net (the one the likes of rubio and cruz would tear to shreads) are largely minorities plays into the racist fears of reactionaries...

― wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, March 4, 2016 9:51 PM (3 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 7 March 2016 16:40 (eight years ago) link

Meanwhile Rubio announces his advisory council!. Elliott Abrams!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 7 March 2016 16:43 (eight years ago) link

A casual observer could be forgiven for experiencing some rhetorical whiplash if there is really an argument along the lines of, "Bernie Sanders does not care about [the precarity of] white people."

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 7 March 2016 16:43 (eight years ago) link

xp I wonder, at the same time, if Sanders' use of the term "ghetto" represents an attempt (perhaps unconscious) to identify with African-Americans in some way. We're talking about the child of Polish Jews, after all.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 16:48 (eight years ago) link

https://twitter.com/NRA/status/706859878703177728

Οὖτις, Monday, 7 March 2016 16:49 (eight years ago) link

oh goody

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 16:52 (eight years ago) link

his use of the term "ghetto" was ill advised

Perhaps, given how voters might perceive it, but to someone whose ancestors were both Polish and Jewish, the term "ghetto" has very clear connotations, as an urban enclave you cannot move out of because it is forbidden to live outside it, where living conditions are notoriously crowded and impoverished. With the US history of placing covenants in deeds forbidding the sale of the house to blacks or Asians, and bank redlining, and Jim Crow, and other apartheid-style racial policies, you have to admit that the European term "ghetto" has plenty of similarity to US housing practices.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 7 March 2016 18:02 (eight years ago) link

jfc

global tetrahedron, Monday, 7 March 2016 18:05 (eight years ago) link

Newt Gingrich ✔ ‎@newtgingrich
Trump's shift toward inclusiveness, team effort and unity was vitally important He has to build a Reagan like inclusiveness to win this fall

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 7 March 2016 18:10 (eight years ago) link

racism sucks. so does classism (and sexism). they're not unrelated features of a divisive unequal and inefficient system and it would be nice to talk about them all as such. and fuck rich people

reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 7 March 2016 18:11 (eight years ago) link

Re. Sanders answer to the question of racial blind spots, his use of the term "ghetto" was ill advised but I don't think his general point was racist or something. He was saying that unless you have lived on the other end of a nation built on inequality, you'll never fully understand what it's like. His platform for addressing inequality is at least as good as clinton's imo. It's uncomfortable for an old man to make an uncomfortable statement like that but im not sure its a cause for concern, would be interested in hearing other perspectives

― Treeship, Monday, March 7, 2016 10:22 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

p sure DJP is giving you another perspective

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 7 March 2016 18:11 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, that Janell Ross post is quite well-taken.

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Monday, 7 March 2016 18:15 (eight years ago) link

don't think DJP actually has offered a perspective!

i thought that pierce take was good. a somewhat clumsy answer but hardly ignorant or offensive

k3vin k., Monday, 7 March 2016 18:16 (eight years ago) link

I wish Graydon Carter were American-born so he could be the Democratic running mate

micro brewbio (crüt), Monday, 7 March 2016 18:34 (eight years ago) link

Can totally see the GOP pushing an establishment running mate, to be followed by pushing Trump to take flying lessons.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 7 March 2016 19:12 (eight years ago) link

It's uncomfortable for an old man to make an uncomfortable statement like that but im not sure its a cause for concern, would be interested in hearing other perspectives

If by "cause for concern" you mean whether Sanders is racist, then no, I'm not concerned.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 19:16 (eight years ago) link

from the transcript:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/06/the-democrats-debate-in-flint-mich-annotated/

...I was with young people active in the Black Lives Matter movement. A young lady comes up to me and she says, you don't understand what police do in certain black communities. You don't understand the degree to which we are terrorized, and I'm not just talking about the horrible shootings that we have seen, which have got to end and we've got to hold police officers accountable, I'm just talking about every day activities where police officers are bullying people.

So to answer your question, I would say, and I think it's similar to what the secretary said, when you're white, you don't know what it's like to be living in a ghetto. You don't know what it's like to be poor. You don't know what it's like to be hassled when you walk down the street or you get dragged out of a car.

And I believe that as a nation in the year 2016, we must be firm in making it clear. We will end institutional racism and reform a broken criminal justice system.

goole, Monday, 7 March 2016 19:19 (eight years ago) link

From the piece I posted upthread:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/07/bernie-sanders-says-white-people-dont-know-what-its-like-to-live-in-a-ghetto-about-that/

Additionally, more than 70 percent of black Americans are not poor, and some share of these people have never lived in a ghetto either. Yet black Americans are more likely to live in a neighborhood with lower-quality public facilities (think parks, libraries, schools, stores, etc.) than white Americans with less income. This pattern points directly to the continued existence of housing discrimination, and it's many forms, but we digress.

Also true: Black Americans up and down the income and education scale are far more likely than white Americans to experience some form of hostile, unethical, inappropriate or illegal contact with the police. So the other part of Sanders's answer, the part when he implied that some person told him that black people are mistreated by police only in certain neighborhoods; well, that's also false.

Like stories about race-related taxi pass-bys, if we wanted to, we could collect 100 such personal tales from black Americans who have been middle class or more all their lives in a single hour tonight. That's the thing about policing that differs according to the color of a person's skin. That's an immutable part of one's appearance. And it's skin color that shapes who gets stopped by the police most often and what happens once such a stop occurs. It is not one's income, not one's address or deportment and certainly not one's outfit. It is skin color and the links that some officers believe exist between race and criminality. When police stop someone, they run a warrant check. They don't ask for or try to gauge the content of anyone's resume.

Quite frankly, that's the kind of thing that someone running for president in 2016 should be able to demonstrate that they know.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Monday, 7 March 2016 19:24 (eight years ago) link

The Trump campaign has no pollster, so it is governed by public polling and what the candidate himself observes while watching cable news.

the best organization, the best, just terrific.

Οὖτις, Monday, 7 March 2016 19:33 (eight years ago) link

Putting Sanders's quote in context, as goole has, helps. If you regard the "you don't know what it's like" passage on its own, it looks like he's saying that white ppl just can't grok precarity (my new favorite word). But if you read it as an extension of the paraphrase of the Black Lives Matter voice in the previous paragraph, it makes more sense.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 7 March 2016 19:41 (eight years ago) link

@ppppolls
Marco Rubio's at 5% in the Ohio poll we'll release later today. 33/51 favorability with GOP voters

mookieproof, Monday, 7 March 2016 19:44 (eight years ago) link

From DJP's quote:

And it's skin color that shapes who gets stopped by the police most often and what happens once such a stop occurs. It is not one's income, not one's address or deportment and certainly not one's outfit. It is skin color and the links that some officers believe exist between race and criminality. When police stop someone, they run a warrant check. They don't ask for or try to gauge the content of anyone's resume.

Quite frankly, that's the kind of thing that someone running for president in 2016 should be able to demonstrate that they know.

Did the writer of that piece not hear the anecdote Sanders told immediately before the BLM one?

SANDERS: Well, let me just very briefly tell you a story. When I was in one of my first years in Congress, I went to a meeting downtown in Washington, D.C. And I went there with another congressman, an African-American congressman. And then we kind of separated during the meeting. And then I saw him out later on. And he was sitting there waiting and I said, well, let’s go out and get a cab. How come you didn’t go out and get a cab?

He said, no, I don’t get cabs in Washington, D.C. This was 20 years ago. Because he was humiliated by the fact that cabdrivers would go past him because he was black. I couldn’t believe, you know, you just sit there and you say, this man did not take a cab 20 years ago in Washington, D.C.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 19:46 (eight years ago) link

Lord Alfred, I'm getting more of an Izzard vibe from that pic

http://www.topaccountingdegrees.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/8.-Eddie-Izzard-GÇô-Comedian.jpg

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 7 March 2016 19:48 (eight years ago) link

Did the writer of that piece not hear the anecdote Sanders told immediately before the BLM one?

From the same piece, which I recommend reading:

Sanders talked about something personal. And that was what Lemon appeared to ask for. But when Sanders talked about his shock that 20 years ago a black colleague and congressman in Washington stopped trying to hail taxis to avoid what Sanders described as the humiliation of taxi drivers's refusal to pick him up, he kind of turned left. (For those unfamiliar with how this experience typically works, it's usually something like this: Taxis with their rooftop available signs turned on refuse to stop, speed up or turn off the sign as they approach a black person trying to hail a cab.)

In fairness, there probably isn't a lot of street hailing activity in Vermont. But because Sanders spends most of his time in Washington, he should probably at the very least be aware that no part of his story could not also be told by black Americans living in many other major metropolitan areas about their transportation experiences. This is an ongoing problem, not one that existed 20 years ago that has since faded away.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Monday, 7 March 2016 19:49 (eight years ago) link

So the other part of Sanders's answer, the part when he implied that some person told him that black people are mistreated by police only in certain neighborhoods; well, that's also false.

from the transcript

A young lady comes up to me and she says, you don't understand what police do in certain black communities. You don't understand the degree to which we are terrorized, and I'm not just talking about the horrible shootings that we have seen, which have got to end and we've got to hold police officers accountable, I'm just talking about every day activities where police officers are bullying people.

perhaps the writer is referring to a different answer bernie gave?

k3vin k., Monday, 7 March 2016 19:49 (eight years ago) link

a shame having the gravitas of a 12-year-old boy hasn't worked out for Marco.

why does anyone expect to learn anything from the "debates"? other than what Republicans of yore Clinton loves.

‏@DennisThePerrin
Please tell me that before she passed, Nancy Reagan endorsed Hillary.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 7 March 2016 19:51 (eight years ago) link

who is Dennis Perrin btw

micro brewbio (crüt), Monday, 7 March 2016 19:52 (eight years ago) link

'A young lady comes up to me and she says, you don't understand what police do in certain black communities.'

Frederik B, Monday, 7 March 2016 19:53 (eight years ago) link

perhaps the writer is referring to a different answer bernie gave?

― k3vin k., Monday, March 7, 2016 2:49 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i guess the key word is "certain" black communities

k3vin k., Monday, 7 March 2016 19:54 (eight years ago) link

But because Sanders spends most of his time in Washington, he should probably at the very least be aware that no part of his story could not also be told by black Americans living in many other major metropolitan areas about their transportation experiences. This is an ongoing problem, not one that existed 20 years ago that has since faded away.

I think this writer completely misreads Sanders's anecdote here. I didn't for one second read it as saying that this shit only happened up to 20 years ago within the District of Columbia.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 19:55 (eight years ago) link

Oh dear god, please stop. Just stop.

Frederik B, Monday, 7 March 2016 19:58 (eight years ago) link

He's been asked about his racial blind spots and he's answering candidly about experiences that opened up his eyes, one of them being about how even a congressman in downtown DC can't get a cab, if he's black. Where in all this is he suggesting that racism is just a neighborhood-specific thing?

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 20:00 (eight years ago) link

Sunday was the first time I've seen Matalin all year. I guess she was sent out as part of the panic-squad.

clemenza, Monday, 7 March 2016 20:00 (eight years ago) link

x-post: Check out four posts above you.

Frederik B, Monday, 7 March 2016 20:01 (eight years ago) link

I even bolded it.

Frederik B, Monday, 7 March 2016 20:01 (eight years ago) link

yeah to me that's awfully picky. but it's a good piece nonetheless, and if it clarifies things for some readers, great

k3vin k., Monday, 7 March 2016 20:02 (eight years ago) link

That's where I'm a Viking strong itt

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Monday, 7 March 2016 20:03 (eight years ago) link

I read your post Frederik, and I disagree with your interpretation.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 20:04 (eight years ago) link

I think like Morbz is Snoop & Dennis Perrin is Dr. Dre

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 7 March 2016 20:04 (eight years ago) link

Mordy = Tim Dog

JoeStork, Monday, 7 March 2016 20:06 (eight years ago) link

xp re: DJP's link

The writer of that piece makes her point very well and it was a point worth making. She used Sanders' answer in the debate as a springboard from which to propel the reader toward her point. But this is a fairly normal case of a writer shaping the discourse more to make her point than to describe exactly what Sanders said and the circumstances in which it was said.

tbf, she does start her piece recognizing the flaws in the question before moving on to the flaws in Bernie's answer, but there is little recognition that the candidates onstage must absorb the question and form their answers at once and on the fly, while the writer has the luxury of time to form many thoughts, examine them, reject some, reshape others. This gives her a superior platform from which to chide or correct what was said in haste and under pressure.

She didn't do too badly at limiting her critique to what was fair and honest, but the ILE echo chamber shouldn't be distorting her point as reflecting some important lacunae in Bernie's ideas or positions, but only the lacunae that existed in a particular answer, made on a public stage to a flawed question asked only moments earlier, and answered under a time limit. How well would any of us done in the same circumstances?

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 7 March 2016 20:09 (eight years ago) link

^v helpful formulation Aimless, thank you

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 20:12 (eight years ago) link

if you won't believe what police do in certain communities, then you'd be doubly shocked to realize black people get the same treatment or worse outside of those communities!

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 7 March 2016 20:14 (eight years ago) link

So much Bernie-splaining in this thread right now, I can't take it. Taking a break. Last thought: It's Bernie who NEEDS to be understood by minority voters, he needs to reach out, and he needs to have some fucking stump answers ready that doesn't mention the word 'ghetto'. It's HIM that needs to be understood, not black or hispanic voters who need to understand him. They're quite happy in this election without him.

Frederik B, Monday, 7 March 2016 20:18 (eight years ago) link

God dammit, parsing the response to something unlucky he said, to show that, really, the response isn't totally fair. Good job! Argh

Frederik B, Monday, 7 March 2016 20:20 (eight years ago) link

Sorry, promised to take a break. Closing my laptop now. Bye.

Frederik B, Monday, 7 March 2016 20:20 (eight years ago) link

buhbye

mookieproof, Monday, 7 March 2016 20:21 (eight years ago) link

that wasn't a slam on Sanders, just on the misperception of racism being a class issue. the anecdote about the taxi was meant to be somewhat of a generalization, but leaving in the twenty years ago framing was probably bad

unless the point was "I had a black friend, but it was 20 years ago"

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 7 March 2016 20:22 (eight years ago) link

see ya

k3vin k., Monday, 7 March 2016 20:22 (eight years ago) link

ty Fred B for that v helpful hand-wringing. it would be nice if Bernie were a superhero and able to run the perfect campaign to overcome all the natural obstacles that exist between him and his election in November. it would be very nice indeed. but I think we'll all just have to live with him as he is. we're somewhat used to imperfect candidates.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 7 March 2016 20:23 (eight years ago) link

imo something can be a partisan over-scrutinization but still make good points, no need to take it literally as a universal gotcha where this is going to be the straw that breaks the camel's back of his campaign

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 7 March 2016 20:24 (eight years ago) link

Lol left

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Monday, 7 March 2016 20:28 (eight years ago) link

So much Bernie-splaining in this thread right now, I can't take it. Taking a break. Last thought: It's Bernie who NEEDS to be understood by minority voters, he needs to reach out, and he needs to have some fucking stump answers ready that doesn't mention the word 'ghetto'. It's HIM that needs to be understood, not black or hispanic voters who need to understand him. They're quite happy in this election without him.

― Frederik B, Monday, March 7, 2016 8:18 PM (14 minutes ago)

oh dear god, please stop. just stop.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 7 March 2016 20:34 (eight years ago) link

^ the last words the creator heard before moving on to a new worldbuilding simulator

Karl Malone, Monday, 7 March 2016 20:36 (eight years ago) link

Fred B's message: he cares

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 7 March 2016 20:37 (eight years ago) link

I find most discussion of this subject exhausting tbh, both the micro-parsing of Sanders' language on race and the wheel-spinning by supporters to explain it away. Largely because I just don't think anyone has made a case that Clinton is genuinely better on any of these issues, other than perhaps being better at talking the talk.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Monday, 7 March 2016 20:37 (eight years ago) link

this thread now features:

..and then he asked me would I yes to say yes my mountain flower and first I put my arms around him yes and drew him down to me so he could feel my breasts all perfume yes and his heart was going like mad and yes I said yes I will Yes.

as well as:

oh dear god, please stop. just stop.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 20:40 (eight years ago) link

RIP Freddy B

Treeship, Monday, 7 March 2016 20:42 (eight years ago) link

imo something can be a partisan over-scrutinization but still make good points, no need to take it literally as a universal gotcha where this is going to be the straw that breaks the camel's back of his campaign

― μpright mammal (mh), Monday, March 7, 2016 3:24 PM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

otm. more analysis, more discussion, less bizarre performative outrage

Treeship, Monday, 7 March 2016 20:47 (eight years ago) link

I was the one most guilty here of getting defensive about Sanders's comments ... which is ironic, given that I was (and remain) critical of it. I was def reacting to a certain "gotcha" vibe that I was getting, that felt to me like it was ignoring context.

Anyhow, I feel like Aimless's & mh's posts upthread tied everything beautifully in a ribbon, and are beautiful formulations of how to think about these things without getting knee-jerky about it.

I'll take that as an ilx happy ending.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 20:51 (eight years ago) link

um, critical of them

losing my grammar

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 20:53 (eight years ago) link

at least 40% of this is libs with a modicum of conscience self-negotiating around "Christ, i'll have to suck it up and vote for Hillary in November"

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 7 March 2016 20:54 (eight years ago) link

brutal moral calculus of living in a swing state

Οὖτις, Monday, 7 March 2016 20:55 (eight years ago) link

I'm glad, collardio, that there were some white people around to explain the point I was making to you; now if you'll excuse me I need to take these recommendations Mr Bledsoe gave me up to Mr. Emerson's office.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Monday, 7 March 2016 21:13 (eight years ago) link

am i wrong to read morbs's mention of "libs" as dripping with contempt?

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 7 March 2016 21:26 (eight years ago) link

reminds me of the PLP* member in my high school who after a friendly argument in the student newspaper office, screamed "LIBERAL!" at me as he walked out, expecting i guess that it was the devastating coup de grace.

*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Labor_Party_%28United_States%29

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 7 March 2016 21:28 (eight years ago) link

you're the drip

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 7 March 2016 21:28 (eight years ago) link

is this where I admit my position going into the caucuses was "what can I do that would irritate Morbs the most?"

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 7 March 2016 21:31 (eight years ago) link

well i took no note tbh

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 7 March 2016 21:33 (eight years ago) link

Olympic-level handwaving itt re Bernie's ghetto comments

Yeah no it's fine he totally didnt mean it the way it was *transcribed*

rmde

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 7 March 2016 21:42 (eight years ago) link

Cruz is expected to announce the endorsement of "more than four" senators this week

Karl Malone, Monday, 7 March 2016 21:48 (eight years ago) link

Whoa

Treeship, Monday, 7 March 2016 21:49 (eight years ago) link

So he's up from less than zero

Οὖτις, Monday, 7 March 2016 21:49 (eight years ago) link

Cruz to announce endorsement of "this many!" senators this week

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Monday, 7 March 2016 21:50 (eight years ago) link

I bet Trump counts Christie as more than 4 governors

Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Monday, 7 March 2016 21:51 (eight years ago) link

well, that's just the weirdass way that the National Review reported it:

With the prospect of Donald Trump’s nomination looming over the GOP, Cruz is set to unveil endorsements from more than four senators this week, according to a source with knowledge of the situation.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/432442/ted-cruz-senate-endorsements

Karl Malone, Monday, 7 March 2016 21:51 (eight years ago) link

the more-than-fourth one is Ted Cruz

micro brewbio (crüt), Monday, 7 March 2016 21:53 (eight years ago) link

Cruz, shockingly, plans to endorse Kasich

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Monday, 7 March 2016 21:53 (eight years ago) link

there could be dozens of endorsements coming for cruz, we cannot say for sure at this time

Karl Malone, Monday, 7 March 2016 21:54 (eight years ago) link

Is handwaving the opposite of handwringing srs question

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Monday, 7 March 2016 21:54 (eight years ago) link

they always claim there are multiple endorsers but it usually turns out to be a lone one

Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Monday, 7 March 2016 21:55 (eight years ago) link

they said the same thing about the zodiac killer

micro brewbio (crüt), Monday, 7 March 2016 21:56 (eight years ago) link

the more-than-fourth one is Ted Cruz

― micro brewbio (crüt), Monday, March 7, 2016 4:53 PM (10 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lool

marcos, Monday, 7 March 2016 21:56 (eight years ago) link

would not be surprising if 4 Senators slipped Ted a note to meet them in the cloak room at 3pm for an endorsement and that he should be wear his underwear

Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Monday, 7 March 2016 21:58 (eight years ago) link

tryin to guess who in the Senate hates Trump enough/likes Cruz enough to endorse

Οὖτις, Monday, 7 March 2016 22:00 (eight years ago) link

first pics of ted cruz arriving at the meeting

https://headinavice.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/casino-cornfield.png?w=900

nomar, Monday, 7 March 2016 22:00 (eight years ago) link

yeah idgi, I thought all his colleagues hate the guy

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 7 March 2016 22:01 (eight years ago) link

you're talking about the party where the four people behind Trump who spent most of a debate talking about how wholly unfit he is to be president turned around and said they would support him as the nominee if he won

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Monday, 7 March 2016 22:02 (eight years ago) link

true, that

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 7 March 2016 22:02 (eight years ago) link

Johnny Isakson?

micro brewbio (crüt), Monday, 7 March 2016 22:06 (eight years ago) link

gonna guess Shelby, Lee, maybe Blunt, Murkowski

Οὖτις, Monday, 7 March 2016 22:07 (eight years ago) link

helluva law firm

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 7 March 2016 22:07 (eight years ago) link

Warren, Boxer, Franken, Klobuchar

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Monday, 7 March 2016 22:07 (eight years ago) link

Did he say American Senators?

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 7 March 2016 22:09 (eight years ago) link

that'd be an awfully big tent

k3vin k., Monday, 7 March 2016 22:09 (eight years ago) link

i'm not sure how much endorsements helps cruz, anyway. he's trying to take votes away from Trump, right? does it help Cruz to get the endorsement of conservative senator X who failed to follow through on promises dismantle obamacare or whatever angry old trump voters care about? (what they need is a true outsider who knows how to get things done like trump, a proven negotiator, and so on) and i thought part of cruz's appeal was precisely the fact that his colleagues don't like him. the whole town is pissed off at him because he's such a tough guy outsider, unwilling to compromise. now he's got colleagues who will say nice things about him, colleagues that failed to refused to shut down planned parenthood? who is "ted cruz"?

sorry, that's incomprehensible but i was trying to become one with the angry conservative mind

Karl Malone, Monday, 7 March 2016 22:10 (eight years ago) link

ted cruz is a guy who wants to be president very badly and like the rest of the country isn't sure what one needs to do this year to make that happen

Mordy, Monday, 7 March 2016 22:12 (eight years ago) link

it's possibly that i've overcaffeinated but suddenly it has become really fun to say Who IS 'Ted Cruz'? using the dateline mbc narrator voice

Karl Malone, Monday, 7 March 2016 22:12 (eight years ago) link

probably depends on who the endorsements are. like christie's endorsement did not lead anyone to believe trump was beloved by party apparatchiks

Mordy, Monday, 7 March 2016 22:12 (eight years ago) link

yes, but who IS 'Ted Cruz'?

hahaha, sorry

Karl Malone, Monday, 7 March 2016 22:13 (eight years ago) link

that'd be an awfully big tent

― k3vin k., Monday,

Christie's not a senator.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 7 March 2016 22:13 (eight years ago) link

has christie burned pretty much any political capital he ever had

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 7 March 2016 22:15 (eight years ago) link

not if trump is the next president of the united states

Mordy, Monday, 7 March 2016 22:15 (eight years ago) link

Karl: "i thought part of cruz's appeal was precisely the fact that his colleagues don't like him. the whole town is pissed off at him because he's such a tough guy outsider, unwilling to compromise. now he's got colleagues who will say nice things about him."

Yep that is totes part of his appeal. JUST saw on Ace of Spades about how the fact that everybody hates him is a point in his favor because if they like you in DC, that can only mean bad things about you.

Needless to say I'm enjoying TedMentum tremendously. Yes, please, throw us in that briar patch.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 7 March 2016 22:15 (eight years ago) link

has christie burned pretty much any political capital he ever had

Trenton hasn't burned down but his term isn't over yet

Karl Malone, Monday, 7 March 2016 22:16 (eight years ago) link

ba dum dum

Karl Malone, Monday, 7 March 2016 22:16 (eight years ago) link

DAMN this coffee is good! but just who IS 'Ted Cruz'?

Karl Malone, Monday, 7 March 2016 22:16 (eight years ago) link

bloomberg will not run; too many new yorkers already

mookieproof, Monday, 7 March 2016 22:18 (eight years ago) link

reminds me of the PLP* member in my high school who after a friendly argument in the student newspaper office, screamed "LIBERAL!" at me as he walked out, expecting i guess that it was the devastating coup de grace.

*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Labor_Party_%28United_States%29

― wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, March 7, 2016 4:28 PM (41 minutes ago) Bookmark

jhe was right

Hungry4Ass, Monday, 7 March 2016 22:18 (eight years ago) link

he's trying to take votes away from Trump, right?

he's trying to take votes away from Rubio and assume the role as the establishment alternative to Trump

xxp

Οὖτις, Monday, 7 March 2016 22:19 (eight years ago) link

in conversation with my mom she made the point that Christie's the type of person who would fuck over his peers or the populace out of spite or to make a point even when it'd reflect badly on him (re: the bridge thing)

that seems like a pretty good indicator of Trumpness

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 7 March 2016 22:20 (eight years ago) link

it came up in the conversation in the context of a really short-lived state governor we had who canned a bunch of people after he got elected -- people in his own party that happened to not support him in the primary

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 7 March 2016 22:21 (eight years ago) link

Bloomberg officially not running is good news for Democrats. I don't think he would have been strong enough to cause an electoral college split and hand the decision to Congress, but it seems possible he'd pull enough votes from the Democratic side to throw the election to the Republicans.

o. nate, Monday, 7 March 2016 22:24 (eight years ago) link

can't even imagine what high school would have been like if it had had intra-leftist politics in it

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 7 March 2016 22:25 (eight years ago) link

you can't strike with us!

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 7 March 2016 22:25 (eight years ago) link

top google suggestions to "Ted Cruz..."
is canadian
is a robot
is...
is hispanic

Mad Piratical (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Monday, 7 March 2016 22:25 (eight years ago) link

wtf google has modified that, up until last week the fourth result was "is the zodiac killer"

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 7 March 2016 22:27 (eight years ago) link

Bloomberg officially not running is good news for Democrats.

uh not for me -- I wanted targets after Marquito loses the Sunshine State next week.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 7 March 2016 22:31 (eight years ago) link

jhe was right

― Hungry4Ass, Monday, March 7, 2016 4:18 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

heh. i take a tiny bit of pride in attracting insults from folks like this.

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 7 March 2016 22:32 (eight years ago) link

it's a full life

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 7 March 2016 22:38 (eight years ago) link

yeah idgi, I thought all his colleagues hate the guy
― μpright mammal (mh)

The highlight of every Republican debate for me is when Trump turns to Cruz and says "Nobody likes you." It's a gentle, well-meaning reminder.

clemenza, Monday, 7 March 2016 22:40 (eight years ago) link

Voting for someone you hate vs voting for someone you hate. What a dilemma.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 7 March 2016 22:43 (eight years ago) link

With the prospect of Donald Trump’s nomination looming over the GOP, Cruz is set to unveil endorsements from more than four senators this week, according to a source with knowledge of the situation.

In Lapine, the rabbit language from Watership Down, they would call Cruz Prince-with-a-thousand-senate-endorsements.

erry red flag (f. hazel), Monday, 7 March 2016 22:45 (eight years ago) link

Frith and Inlay, what hraka these candidates are putting out. One might as well silflay with Hitler's owsla as entertain these candidates' rhetoric.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 7 March 2016 22:58 (eight years ago) link

multiple xposts-

I'm glad, collardio, that there were some white people around to explain the point I was making to you; now if you'll excuse me I need to take these recommendations Mr Bledsoe gave me up to Mr. Emerson's office.

DJP, you didn't accompany the article you shared with your own comments, so why should I make any conclusions about what point you were making? I don't presume that anybody has explained anything on your behalf. All I had to go on were the excerpts you copied, and yes, I did take issue with some of Ross's readings (e.g., re the 20 year old anecdote). I do think there's lots of instances where Sanders exhibits cluelessness w/r/t race issues (and have posted about this on these primary threads). But in this case, because I focused on those points of disagreement, it came off as "Bernsplaining", I can see that.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 7 March 2016 23:04 (eight years ago) link

(Way off-topic but apparently I'm able to store fictional-rabbit vocabulary in my head for 37 years SOLELY so that I can pull it out at just the right moment, but I still don't have any idea where my fucking car keys are most of the time.)

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 7 March 2016 23:05 (eight years ago) link

Trump is such a Bigwig.

erry red flag (f. hazel), Monday, 7 March 2016 23:11 (eight years ago) link

Which makes Barack Obama Hazel, and Robert Reich is Fiver.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 7 March 2016 23:17 (eight years ago) link

A hrududu full of millionaires

kevin smith what a bro (Myonga Vön Bontee), Monday, 7 March 2016 23:29 (eight years ago) link

Kasich is the nice-seeming rabbit who invites them into the warren full of snares.

JoeStork, Monday, 7 March 2016 23:37 (eight years ago) link

Some Rubio guy is all indignant because of a CNN story saying that Rubio's advisers are split on whether he should drop out.

In other news, Rubio's advisers are split on whether he should drop out.

clemenza, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 00:10 (eight years ago) link

I dunno at this point why quit before Florida? I guess unless yr worried about coming in 3rd your home state

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 00:16 (eight years ago) link

^gotta be it, right? so when's this dude getting kicked out of the senate?

rmde bob (will), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 00:19 (eight years ago) link

That's the reason--embarrassment. They also mentioned loss of VP credibility, which seems far-fetched--I know there have been some improbable 180s with VP picks, but Trump-Rubio seems unthinkable. (Cruz-Rubio, sure.)

clemenza, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 00:21 (eight years ago) link

the mind boggles as to who trump is going to pick as vp

Cornelius Pardew (jim in glasgow), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 00:22 (eight years ago) link

the hulkster?

Cornelius Pardew (jim in glasgow), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 00:22 (eight years ago) link

Christie is gonna feel shafted when Trump says he's going to be his own Veep

Neanderthal, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 00:22 (eight years ago) link

What better than one Trump? Two Trump.

Neanderthal, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 00:23 (eight years ago) link

otm re: Rubio's only reason to leave now is to avoid embarassment/political suicide in FL

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 00:24 (eight years ago) link

We already consider him an embarrassment

Neanderthal, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 00:25 (eight years ago) link

"when's this dude getting kicked out of the senate?"

He isn't running for reelection, so his term will be up in January. But he can choose to resign earlier. (And he might, given that he pretty much said he hates the job.)

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 00:29 (eight years ago) link

Not sure I posted this: one of our major dailies won't endorse a GOP candidate.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 00:30 (eight years ago) link

the mind boggles as to who trump is going to pick as vp

― Cornelius Pardew (jim in glasgow), Monday, March 7, 2016 7:22 PM (18 minutes ago) Bookmark

Kasich clearly angling for it already

Hungry4Ass, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 00:41 (eight years ago) link

Trump v clearly going to run "The Apprentice: VeePee" every year of his presidency guys

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 00:46 (eight years ago) link

the campaign machinery/collateral prepared here is bananas http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/08/us/politics/michael-bloomberg-not-running-for-president.html

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 00:52 (eight years ago) link

The socioeconomic forces are real, but Trump is also the beneficiary of a long process of Republican intellectual decadence. Paul Ryan denounces Trump but not the Tea Party rhetoric that propelled his own political ascent. John McCain holds Trump in contempt, but selected as his running mate Sarah Palin, the Know-Nothing of Wasilla, one of Trump’s most vivid forerunners and supporters. Mitt Romney last week righteously slammed Trump as a “phony” and a misogynist, and yet in 2012 he embraced Trump’s endorsement and praised his “extraordinary” understanding of economics.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 00:55 (eight years ago) link

who is Dennis Perrin btw

― micro brewbio (crüt), Monday, March 7, 2016 11:52 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I think he's the gawker guy

petulant dick master (silby), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 01:33 (eight years ago) link

Not to worry, everyone. They're gonna get this mess all sorted out.

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/56ddbd38e4b0ffe6f8ea125d

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 01:35 (eight years ago) link

Third google answer for "Ted Cruz is" for me: Ted Cruz is a Microdont.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 01:36 (eight years ago) link

Amazing

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 01:38 (eight years ago) link

DJP, you didn't accompany the article you shared with your own comments, so why should I make any conclusions about what point you were making? I don't presume that anybody has explained anything on your behalf. All I had to go on were the excerpts you copied, and yes, I did take issue with some of Ross's readings (e.g., re the 20 year old anecdote). I do think there's lots of instances where Sanders exhibits cluelessness w/r/t race issues (and have posted about this on these primary threads). But in this case, because I focused on those points of disagreement, it came off as "Bernsplaining", I can see that.

Part of this is my fault; I had typed out something on two separate Facebook conversations and thought I'd also typed something out here. Regarding the 20 year old anecdote, while I am certain we can all agree that the question was terrible, answering "where are your blind spots with regards to race" with "20 years ago, I learned that black people have problems getting cabs" and following it up with statements filtered through your economic justice filter that turn issues that face the entire black American population into issues that only affect poor people implies that poverty is an intrinsic part of the black experience and leads to these interactions. Which, obviously, is horseshit, and should be challenged rather than handwaved.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 02:05 (eight years ago) link

DJP, your summary brings it together really clearly, thank you. That kinda sums up why I was leaning towards the position of the article you linked even though I at first felt similarly to some of the other posters here that in some way Sanders was being misread or taken out of context.

I do still feel like some of the coverage of this has pulled parts of his response out of context, and that the "ghetto" part was way more problematic than the comment on policing, and that it's not 100% clear that Sanders is saying that this experience of the police is exclusive to poor communities, and that his ropey taxi anecdote suggests that in his mind it's definitely not that - even Congresspersons experience racism, etc. etc. He's an old guy and his thoughts don't hang together perfectly and I think he kinda drifted from one thought to another and some parts of it fit this picture of the all-economic-justice filter more than others.

But... even with all that said, this is one spot where I think it's fair to say, let's demand something better from our dream progressive radical candidate than that a discussion of racism always means a discussion of impoverished black inner-city dwellers. (I don't want them cut out of the picture either, and it's cool that he wants to talk about their problems IMO because ever since Clinton I it's kinda just been middle-class this middle-class that.) But yeah I don't want to be in the position of saying "Oh well, he's so very very right on so many things, can't we just let this one little thing that he doesn't 'get' pass by?" Cause actually this thing is kind of a big deal. Like maybe next time we can get a candidate who when they get these questions we all go, holy fuck, Candidate OTM, rather than having to carefully parse the "got sorta in the ballpark of something great" and "totally blew it" parts of the answer.

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 02:29 (eight years ago) link

and yeah i know i kinda waffled my way through the first couple paragraphs there. it's hard for me to let go of the impulse to defend him; i'm fond of this guy and his candidacy! but i do think the surer critical position is to demand better, not to make excuses.

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 02:33 (eight years ago) link

great post

k3vin k., Tuesday, 8 March 2016 02:34 (eight years ago) link

From a Facebook friend of a friend:

Okay, so I'm going to go ahead and share my experience at Donald Trump's rally in Warren, MI today. We'll start with why I went. I am a firm believer in being educated on ALL candidates, not just the one you're rooting for, so redacted and I decided to attend. If you know me, it's no surprise that I am not a fan of Trump due to his racist, misogynist, and popularity-searching "campaign". But I try to keep an open mind, understanding that people have different views and everyone is entitled to their own. I wore a shirt bashing Trump, and redacted wore a pro-Bernie Sanders baseball hat. We had no intentions of causing a scene, starting any fights, or even speaking negatively towards any Trump-supporters.

We stood in the crowd with everyone else, even made small talk with a few different people, asking back and forth about each other's views. A women supporting Trump even complimented our hat and shirt. This is not a post to bash all Trump-supporters. Most of the people we spoke to were very kind to us, as we were to them. Trump came out and started his speech. As hard as it was, we ignored the screams and chants of building walls and exporting citizens. We stood quietly and listened to the man speak. Every 15 or so minutes, a scene would happen where the crowd would yell about protestors and Trump would scream, "Get them out, send them out of here!" and the crowd would scream "USA, USA, USA" until the attendees who were asked to leave were escorted out.

So, about 45 minutes to an hour into his speech, a group of teenage boys (who had been harassing us the entire time while we ignored their comments) screamed and pointed at us, yelling for us to be kicked out. At first we laughed it off, of course we couldn't be kicked out, we were just standing here silently. Wrong. A secret service member and a police officer were there within the minute, grabbed redacted and I by our arms, and started to lead us out. One of the Trump supporters we were chatting with even stood up for us, explaining that we weren't doing anything and weren't being disruptive. By now the crowd was chanting their USA run and a large portion was also booing us out.

The walk through the crowd was very upsetting, being screamed at and filmed, even one man said "Go to China if you like communism so much!" (Communism?? Don't you mean democratic socialism??). But also, along the walk out, some attendees would high five us or shake our hands, and thank us for coming and supporting Bernie. It felt weird to be thanked, due to us not doing anything besides standing quietly. As the two men walked us out, one explained that if we returned we would be arrested. Redacted quickly asked why that was. The man replied with "They don't want you here," to which she said "Isn't it a constitutional right to silently protest?" The officer replied "Not here."

The rude remarks and yells didn't stop at the door, for Trump-supporters who didn't get in greeted us with just as much hatred. The walk back to my truck even included a man yelling from his car about how this was for Trump people and that we didn't belong here and shouldn't have come. This kind of hatred is what is ruining this country. To think that my right to protest was taken from me AT A RALLY, scares the hell out of me for if Trump actually became president and got that power. What else would he take away from us if he can't even stand two teenage girls standing silently at a FREE, PUBLIC, OPEN-TO-EVERYONE event? If you're thinking of voting Trump this year, please rethink your stance. This much hate belongs nowhere near the presidency.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 03:06 (eight years ago) link

^^
frightening.

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 03:11 (eight years ago) link

fair points -- not you, frederik -- but i guess i wonder why sanders is being quite so shit upon? as a white guy he has certainly not experienced racism like black americans have; he offered a personal anecdote that was an eye-opening moment for him. maybe he should have realized it sooner -- and reinforced that nothing has changed -- and maybe his anecdote should have encompassed the larger black experience, but compared to platitudes like

But she said that she takes seriously the struggles that nonwhite Americans face, as well as the worry this injects in their lives. She alluded to the pain and fear suffered by the parents of Trayvon Martin, a black teenager killed by a neighborhood watchman in Florida in 2012, and many others like him and said that she has tried to encourage other white Americans to give that some thought.

it doesn't seem so off. how is 'taking seriously the struggles' or 'trying to encourage white americans to give that some thought' significantly better?

mookieproof, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 03:13 (eight years ago) link

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/272153-trump-i-think-i-get-the-worst-publicity

“They make up stories, they write stuff. If you sneeze, they make a big deal out of it. I’ve been No. 1 almost from the beginning. These people are so stupid. These ads are so vicious and they’re so false,” he said. "These are the worst, most dishonest ads I have ever seen. I don’t need this folks,” Trump added of his White House run. "I had such an easy life. (I have) a wonderful family, a wonderful company (and) a wonderful everything. My whole life has been about taking, grabbing, greed. Now it’s about taking for the United States.”

this guy is messed up psychologically

like seriously why isn't this attack #1? he's unstable. he has some kind of personality disorder. all this whining and complaining about poor, poor donald over reporters doing their jobs and some ads he doesn't like.

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 03:14 (eight years ago) link

Two suburban, semi-rural communities bordering my city were in the news last week. One had an incident where people were yelling "Trump!" and making "build a wall" comments at a visiting, mostly Latino basketball team. Another had a school board meeting where it was decided high school students in the district should be saying the pledge of allegiance daily.

The high school near me in the city, however, repurposed one of the teacher-only restrooms as a non-gendered restroom any student can use.

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 03:15 (eight years ago) link

xpost maybe the next step here for those who are willing to go through with it is, turn right back around and return to the trump rally and get yourselves arrested. see how that plays once they start actually arresting people

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 03:18 (eight years ago) link

thanks for your helpful response djp.

and doctor casino.

super-otm both.

nothing to add.

now please allow me to take this fucking "bernsplainer" costume off.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 03:19 (eight years ago) link

He's yelling at a small arena near here this Friday or next Friday, and I briefly thought about taking my kids to hang at a silent protest, but it's just not worth it. It'd be like taking them to hang at a Limp Bizkit show.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 03:21 (eight years ago) link

A Limp Bizkit show would be safer and more fulfilling.

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 03:22 (eight years ago) link

I'm not sure it would be either of those things - well, maybe it would be in 2016 - but it would definitely be as stupid and loud.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 03:25 (eight years ago) link

fair points -- not you, frederik -- but i guess i wonder why sanders is being quite so shit upon?

Because a lot of Sanders fans are saying "clearly Sanders is the only rational choice black people have, I mean he marched in the Civil Rights movement; why don't black people understand that Hillary is in the Klan" and it's helpful to point out the have been multiple points where Sanders has been a tone-deaf monster whose platform doesn't actually seem like the magic panacea it's being sold as, even assuming he could present it to a Congress that would implement it?

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 03:35 (eight years ago) link

that post josh quoted -- i was picturing a coupla big tough silent guys throughout and then at then at the end the writer identifies herself and her friend as her teenage girls. that makes the scenario scarier, i think; also shows quite a level of bravery on their part.

carly rae jetson (thomp), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 03:36 (eight years ago) link

DJP &c thank you for your recent posts in this thread; i hadn't really understood about this failing of the sanders campaign and it's something most of the media i've read fails to really engage with ('sanders is not performing well amongst black voters -- why is a mystery! let's talk about bill clinton playing the saxophone.)

carly rae jetson (thomp), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 03:39 (eight years ago) link

calling sanders a "monster" seems to be overselling it a bit, to me

k3vin k., Tuesday, 8 March 2016 03:39 (eight years ago) link

it would

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 03:42 (eight years ago) link

the caucus I attended was pretty split -- a few black voters in the Sanders camp, mostly younger, about ten or so of my black neighbors in the Hillary camp

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 03:42 (eight years ago) link

anyway i appreciated the conflictedness doc casino brought with his post. that original washington post article we're all talking about, as a piece of writing, is pretty otm in its diagnosis if we're to take sanders's comments literally. (i'm a bit more inclined to cut him some slack, as this was a response to a question at a live televised debate, rather than an essay or a speech -- but maybe that's my problem to work through.) where it fails for me is when it tries to come to a tidy conclusion -- calling sanders' statement's "false" rather than, you know, poorly worded

i do think it's great that he's bringing the poor into the mainstream democratic discussion, even if it unfortunately sometimes comes at the price of overshadowing the equally-as-important factor of race. i think in the long run his campaign will be good for the democratic party. as will, of course, the people calling him out for his blind spots

k3vin k., Tuesday, 8 March 2016 03:54 (eight years ago) link

Josh Marshall wrote a piece today reassuring readers that Trump's primary appeal will have trouble after the convention as he seeks to court general election voters, but he included this:

To put this concretely, most Democrats will never support Trump for simple policy reasons, even if there are segments of the Democratic coalition that might. But what we are talking about here is a distinction between policy and political mentality, specifically a view of politics based on resentment and desire for revenge. And that operates with a large minority but not close to a majority of the electorate.

Sure. But because he -- I'm -- Muslim or black, he doesn't have to regard the “distinction between policy and political mentality” as an abhorrence; it's his privilege. Only an American citizen who doesn’t wince at the stirring of racial, ethnic, and religious resentments at Trump rallies can claim the high ground so calmly. Unless I'm reading Marshall wrong, his intelligent piece totally misses that point. I’ve said in conversation and here that the vileness Trump epitomizes should get exposed. I'm having second thoughts. Exposure is not expungement. And what price?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 04:02 (eight years ago) link

*uh because he's NOT Muslim or black

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 04:03 (eight years ago) link

that post upthread about the girls escorted out of the rally is enraging.

like....we can talk all we want about how Trump's platform isn't really all that conservative and how he wouldn't do much more than be inept if elected President and so on and so forth, but I have a much larger problem with how he has cultivated and bred an ignorant, xenophobic, hateful fanbase, and doesn't condemn the behavior, but rather encourages it. Cruz might be a much more 'insane' dude, but at least when I see his looney-toon supporters on the street, I can laugh at them and walk away.

yes, a large part of his base are misguided folks that are struggling in the new post-recession economy and foolishly think he's the answer, but a large part of his base is also just ignorant pieces of shit.

Neanderthal, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 04:04 (eight years ago) link

dueling monsters, everbuddy!

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 04:06 (eight years ago) link

anyway i appreciated the conflictedness doc casino brought with his post. that original washington post article we're all talking about, as a piece of writing, is pretty otm in its diagnosis if we're to take sanders's comments literally. (i'm a bit more inclined to cut him some slack, as this was a response to a question at a live televised debate, rather than an essay or a speech -- but maybe that's my problem to work through.)

― k3vin k., Tuesday, March 8, 2016 3:54 AM (9 minutes ago)

i'm feeling much the same -- that's why i wasn't feeling that inclined to condemn hillary for her clumsy remarks on reconstruction a few debates back (it seems like months, god this election shit lasts forever), even though taken literally they were pretty offensive.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 04:07 (eight years ago) link

Xpost Whoever those girls were, they found video of themselves being escorted out. Trump fans applauding and looks mundane enough, but even reading their post I can't imagine how it felt and sounded from their perspective, getting booed and yelled at. Tough cookies.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 04:09 (eight years ago) link

i think the media is still dominated by the voices of those who don't worry that the worst resentments were fueled by by trump will come back on them in any real way.. um.. the short version here is that if you're already on guard against being the target of a hate crime what trump is stirring up is not a joke and never was

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/donald-trump-rally-protester-crack-down-220407

Donald Trump’s rally here began with the candidate asking all attendees to raise their hands and take an oath to vote for him, while extended barriers cordoned off the press and plainclothes private intelligence officers scoured the crowd for protestors. (..) On Friday, two members of Trump’s private security team wore street clothes to a rally in New Orleans. One of them, Eddie Deck, explained to reporters that his duties were now weighted towards intelligence work researching potential protesters and assisting uniformed security personnel under the direction of Trump’s head of security.

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 04:12 (eight years ago) link

I have a hard time with schoolyard bullying of this magnitude being a staple of a guy who wants to be fucking President. I mean obviously "being a dick" has to be every candidates' M.O. at some point, but there's a difference between conventional mudslinging and actively being a snickering, frat-ish alpha-dog that enjoys intimidation tactics.

Neanderthal, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 04:17 (eight years ago) link

The thing about these Trump rallies, as scary as they might seem or be, I'm not sure they're terribly different from what we've seen at past GOP rallies in recent memory, especially since the rise of the Tea Party. The biggest difference is the degree of coverage, thanks to the high profile candidate, and also the way the candidate is flat-out saying the same looney shit as his supporters (versus merely exploiting it for votes). But this stuff has been out there for several cycles now. As the Remnick piece I posted pointed out:

The socioeconomic forces are real, but Trump is also the beneficiary of a long process of Republican intellectual decadence. Paul Ryan denounces Trump but not the Tea Party rhetoric that propelled his own political ascent. John McCain holds Trump in contempt, but selected as his running mate Sarah Palin, the Know-Nothing of Wasilla, one of Trump’s most vivid forerunners and supporters. Mitt Romney last week righteously slammed Trump as a “phony” and a misogynist, and yet in 2012 he embraced Trump’s endorsement and praised his “extraordinary” understanding of economics.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 04:18 (eight years ago) link

Yeah in some ways this is about the progress of a (bowel) movement from syndicated radio to prime-time TV.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 04:21 (eight years ago) link

But yeah, the asshole "what, me?" deflection of this CNN interview:

ACOSTA: Rallies, don't you have some responsibility to keep the peace at these rallies?

TRUMP: Well, I have nothing to do with it. When you have 25,000 people in a building -- you know, today we had to send away so many thousands of people, we couldn't get them in. If you have that many people, if you have four or five people or ten people stand up out of 22,000 that are in this building that I'm speaking to, a very great entertainer said, Donald, you're the biggest draw in the world without a guitar, which is sort of an interesting --

ACOSTA: But sir, can I ask a follow-up?

TRUMP: I won't tell you that was great Elton John. I will not tell you that. But somebody did make that statement. When you have that many people -- you understand -- in a room, and you'll have a couple of, not skirmishes, just a couple of protests. Really not skirmishes. And we treat them very gently. You know, ten years ago, they would have been treated differently, not by me, but by -- that's the way life is. We treat them very, very gently. And yeah, we had a few protesters today, but very few. I mean, if a look at it as a percentage, we had what, 0.01% of the people in the room.

ACOSTA: You don't think it's something that continues to happen at your events?

TRUMP: No, look, I watched Bernie Sanders have a protest. He was up at the microphone and two young ladies came up and took the microphone away from him. That will never happen with me. He walked meekly to the back of the room. And I said, isn't that pathetic? Isn't that sad?

This guy is just the asshole of assholes. You're weak for standing up to him, you're weak for doing nothing, everyone else is doing it wrong because he is the only one doing it right, and the best, and the greatest. He's just such a huge shit.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 04:21 (eight years ago) link

"Progress"

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 04:21 (eight years ago) link

xxxxpost idk tho - the Tea Party rallies were bad enough for being essentially just excuses to yell really loudly during townhalls and shout "nazi policy" every so often. it was a bunch of privileged white assholes on their worst behavior.

but there's a vileness to the Trump rallies that seems like an extra layer - mostly in that where most candidates would quickly (perhaps disingenuously so) distance themselves from their worst supporters, Trump is refusing to, and in many cases he's smirking at it.

even a Tea Party dude woulda quickly put as much distance between himself and the KKK - Trump didn't because he doesn't want to. he likes all of his support, even when it comes from hate groups. and he isn't being forced to walk it back because even after seeing KKK Grand Wizards championing his cause and his own reticence to tell them to fuck off, his fanbase just doesn't give a shit and still loves him.

Neanderthal, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 04:27 (eight years ago) link

http://nypost.com/2016/03/05/why-i-support-trump-and-resent-the-elites-trying-to-destroy-him/

thought this was interesting - a lot of truth + relatable sentiments along w/ obv myopia

Mordy, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 04:30 (eight years ago) link

But the Tea Party had an underbelly that, while concealed on the Hill and on the networks, was manifest elsewhere.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 04:35 (eight years ago) link

Xp

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 04:36 (eight years ago) link

Late to the party, but it would be cool if people were also hammering Clinton on casting her apology about "super-predators" as a "poor choice of words" instead of a toxic ideology. Just because the democratic slate is less tone-deaf on issues of race than the lunatic repubs doesn't mean they aren't both crazy tone-deaf on issues of race.

a strawman stuffed with their collection of 12 cds (jjjusten), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 05:14 (eight years ago) link

For reference on why that usage needs to more than a cursory apology there's this:

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/04/07/us/politics/killing-on-bus-recalls-superpredator-threat-of-90s.html?referer=&_r=0

a strawman stuffed with their collection of 12 cds (jjjusten), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 05:22 (eight years ago) link

"It certainly had consequences. It energized a movement, as one state after another enacted laws making it possible to try children as young as 13 or 14 as adults. (New York had such a law even earlier, and it is now being applied to Kahton Anderson.) Many hundreds of juveniles were sent to prison for life, though in the last few years the United States Supreme Court has ruled that such sentences must not be automatic, even in murder cases. Individual circumstances and possible mitigating factors should be weighed, the justices said.

Inescapably, superpredator dread had a racial component. What the doomsayers focused on, in the main, were young male African-Americans. For Steven A. Drizin, a law professor at Northwestern University writing for The Huffington Post last September, the deep-seated fear that any black teenager in a hoodie must be up to no good was essentially what got Trayvon Martin killed in Florida two years ago."

a strawman stuffed with their collection of 12 cds (jjjusten), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 05:27 (eight years ago) link

FYI last paragraph of that link is WILDLY IGNORABLE.

a strawman stuffed with their collection of 12 cds (jjjusten), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 05:28 (eight years ago) link

Yeah I was loathe to bring that up bc it was twenty years ago, but really the Clintons record on race is Not Good. They were not fighting against racial disparities in sentencing in the 90s. Sanders was though, even if he ultimately voted for that notorious crime bill. cf.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZJ7f-3XGB4&sns=em
I do think that he is a more compassionate and better person than Hillary fwiw, even though I understand DJP's concern that he seems to have a hard time discussing racism without subsuming it under his main concern, economic inequality

Treeship, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 05:35 (eight years ago) link

"More compassionate and better person" obv isn't the only meaningful criteria, and obv I don't know these candidates as individuals, but going off their records I trust Bernie more to listen to the concerns of people who are oppressed or marginalized

Treeship, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 05:43 (eight years ago) link

Bernie is an ideological politician looking for the support of a coalition party. It's on him to address the various components of that coalition in terms that matter to them. Bringing it all back to the organizing ideology is only appealing if you already believe that ideology will help you.

There's possibly a critique along these lines one could draw from the Sanders and Clinton campaigns' respective logos. HRC's arrow is visually uninspiring or even hackneyed on its own but its graphic simplicity allows its interior to be repurposed for any context, just give it Pride colors or put a photo of corn or children in that arrow. It's the logo of a campaign that knows it wins by being all things to all people. Bernie's first-name logotype isn't really much less embarassing than Jeb!'s. Bernie isn't running a personality campaign per se, but he's running on a singular message, trying to attract voters by staying on that message. This worked out well for my socialist city council member here in Seattle but even locally that sort of on-message consistency gets grating.

The best candidates are empty signifiers, the worst thing you could be in 2016 is too specific.

petulant dick master (silby), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 05:50 (eight years ago) link

except it's by being really specific about that message that's gotten Bernie as far as he's gotten! And the whole point of the candidacy is to re-establish that those specific concerns have very large, unaddressed constituencies. I think his ethic could be rendered richer and more synthetic and ultimately more powerful by incorporating other issues of social justice at the core rather than as add-ons, but I don't think it would have been useful in any way for him to become a vague grab-bag candidate. His answer the other night on fracking, for example, is or at least appears to be general-election suicide as of right now, but seriously how great is it for someone just to be like, fuck, that, it's a bad idea, the answer's no. I want to hear the grab-bag wind-checking politicians adopting Bernie's arguments in order to win, not the other way around.

Bernie Sanders Give You So Much Bro (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 05:56 (eight years ago) link

voters don't seem to agree that sanders' record is better

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 05:59 (eight years ago) link

voters are not voting on records, they're voting who they want to nominate for president

k3vin k., Tuesday, 8 March 2016 06:13 (eight years ago) link

many of them are making the understandable calculation that hillary is the better bet to beat whoever the republicans put up

k3vin k., Tuesday, 8 March 2016 06:14 (eight years ago) link

Voters apparently didn't like clintons record the only other time she was voted about before so

a strawman stuffed with their collection of 12 cds (jjjusten), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 06:49 (eight years ago) link

Ha whoops I mean on a national stage obv, but I assume that's clear since sanders has been sent up by Vermont for like 700 years

a strawman stuffed with their collection of 12 cds (jjjusten), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 07:06 (eight years ago) link

Clinton came as close to getting the nomination as you can, kinda, the last time she tried, did a lot better than Sanders this year, actually. And now she is beating him decisively, 58%-42%, with a lot of his best states already done. She is way more popular among democratic voters than he is. And especially among minorities, and especially among black voters. Protesting that really, both candidates seem clueless about race is stupid (and perhaps almost offensive), because, y'know, a couple of 'races' are sending a pretty strong signal that one of the candidates gets it better than the other, y'know? Try listening to them.

Any hope of reclaiming new deal politics has to grapple with why the new deal coalition eventually failed. And you know why it did? Because the civil right laws of the 60'ies caused the white democrats in the south to change sides. That is, racism wasn't just something off to the side of the new deal, it's was a fundamental part of it's appeal in large parts of the country. It was vital; in the attempt to root it out, the coalition simply fell apart. As Bernie has shown, any new new deal that isn't specifically anti-racist and anti white-supremacy in design has no hope of making it, it has too little appeal to the people who were explicitly left out of the first new deal. And what is weird about that? Why should black people trust progressive democrats? Honestly, they've been screwed harder by new deal policies than by anything Clinton ever did to them.

I really want you guys to get free healthcare and free education and all that, but until american white liberalism starts to grapple with why it's correct to call it 'white liberalism', it won't happen. You will lose, and as demographics change you will lose worse and worse. And the joke is, nobody will care. Sanders will be your last gasp of relevance, and the coalition of minorities, single women and cultural/economic elites will continue to rule.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 11:12 (eight years ago) link

Sort of picturing u cackling like skeletor with that last bit.

"Worried pimp" (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 11:25 (eight years ago) link

Very good points about the legacy of the new deal tho, just think you lost the run of yourself towards the end.

"Worried pimp" (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 11:26 (eight years ago) link

Try listening to them.

Yes, cuz the dictatorship of voters is what democracy's all about. They're always right.

Honestly, they've been screwed harder by new deal policies than by anything Clinton ever did to them.

Get fucking fucked, Frederik.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 12:19 (eight years ago) link

Lol. Damn.

Neanderthal, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 12:22 (eight years ago) link

until american white liberalism starts to grapple with why it's correct to call it 'white liberalism' nobody will care.... Sanders will be your last gasp of relevance

IT DIED 30-40 YEARS AGO, AND WHAT A GREAT COUNTRY IT'S BEEN

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 12:24 (eight years ago) link

It died pretty much precisely fifty years ago, is my point. And you need to realize why if you want to revive it.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 12:28 (eight years ago) link

I really want you guys to get free healthcare and free education and all that

You do? That's nice of you.

Thomas of Britain (Tom D.), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 12:45 (eight years ago) link

i bet Cory Booker and his hedge-fund buddies will get them for us.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 12:49 (eight years ago) link

And you need to realize why if you want to revive it.

https://authoritynutrition.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/young-woman-looking-thoughtful.jpg

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 12:49 (eight years ago) link

Are the Vikings one of the races we have to listen to you because I got beef

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 12:54 (eight years ago) link

Bernsplaining, thats where I'm a viking

Neanderthal, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 12:55 (eight years ago) link

Did you know that until his retirement in December after a contract dispute, Minnesota Vikings mascot Ragnar was the only "human" (that is, non caricature or animal) mascot in all four major professional American sports?

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 12:59 (eight years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cc9Z3TrUkAI_Rc4.jpg

Mordy, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 13:07 (eight years ago) link

Trump is bad enough but getting lectured by Frederick is an worse

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 13:56 (eight years ago) link

Did you know that until his retirement in December after a contract dispute, Minnesota Vikings mascot Ragnar was the only "human" (that is, non caricature or animal) mascot in all four major professional American sports?

it is discriminatory against hellenic people that 'spartans' and 'trojans' and the like are only 'good enough' for the collegiate ranks

reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 13:59 (eight years ago) link

Trump is bad enough but getting lectured by Frederick is an worse

― robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), 8. marts 2016 14:56 (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Spoken like a true white liberal.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 14:02 (eight years ago) link

Frederik B reaching new levels of crazy in the night I see.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 14:05 (eight years ago) link

Trump is bad enough but getting lectured by Frederick is an worse

― robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), 8. marts 2016 14:56 (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Spoken like a true white liberal.

― Frederik B, Tuesday, March 8, 2016 8:02 AM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

here's the thing about you, is you are like Trump because ultimately you don't give a shit about any of us, about our country or about any of this, you talk about a coalition of minorities and single women, then when they post on this thread you talk right past them to make your next grandiose point about american democracy -- which you've never been a part of and which you have no stake in. you treat peope on here with condescension, you know all this shit you read in books and online but when shit goes down here, you'll be happily smug in your little fucking danish hobbit hole drinking mead and listening to spotify....i might bust on morbz for his stridency but i know goddamn well what he must have dealt with in terms of oppression for year and that he's had cancer and is the belly of the fuckin beast that is the american health care system.

i bet you like this a lot more than talking about the racism, anti-immigrant policies going on in your own country because that would involve you actually getting involved, having some fucking skin in the game.

your political ideals are one: hearing your own damn self talk. just like trump.

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 14:19 (eight years ago) link

As Bernie has shown, any new new deal that isn't specifically anti-racist and anti white-supremacy in design has no hope of making it,

Bernie is anti-racist and anti-white supremacy. He's said, many times, that the danger of Trump is xenophobia, and the only way to counter right wing populism is with a robust left wing populism that emphasizes the common interests of the working class regardless of race. I think that's a good point. It doesn't address every minority concern, and he can do more, but these lacunae don't make his movement somehow racist. Bill Clinton's anti-crime, welfare busting program of the 90s was explicitly racist. It literally was designed to appeal to those white voters that didn't want black people to access the safety net. Hillary Clinton campaigned with her husband and was involved in his presidency, she never spoke out against any of this.

Black voters are sending a strong message that they prefer Hillary and there are a million reasons for that. Respecting their decision doesn't mean admitting that Bernie's campaign is somehow tinged with racism, or that minorities somehow wouldn't benefit from his plans like free public college and single payer healthcare.

Treeship, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 14:22 (eight years ago) link

*last words of first para should have been "at the time"

Treeship, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 14:23 (eight years ago) link

Also ums otm. As much as I think it's cool to get outside perspectives, it's weird to be lectured by a Scandinavian about how the only national campaign that has seriously gone after poverty in my lifetime is somehow problematic due to its supporters' white privilege. (And not just that, but that it's "doomed" by this, and we deserve it.) There's truth to this narrative -- it's not the whole truth as I explained -- but still, fuck you.

Treeship, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 14:37 (eight years ago) link

Frederik, I'm curious why you're so interested in US politics? Have you lived there, or studied there, or do you have some other personal connection to it? It makes sense that Europeans like us should have some interest in the results of US elections, because American economic and foreign policies obviously affect us too, but your level of interest seems to go way beyond of what your average politically informed EU citizen knows/cares about the subject. I don't want to judge you or anything, I'm just genuinely curious why you're fascinated by all the details of another country's elections?

Tuomas, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 14:38 (eight years ago) link

Frederik did you see this link that Morbs posted

http://fair.org/home/washington-post-ran-16-negative-stories-on-bernie-sanders-in-16-hours

micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 14:44 (eight years ago) link

that fucking great, but when I've got a stepdad dying of pancreatic cancer, the Republicans talk of privatizing my mom's remain social security scare the fuck out of me - how will she live?

when i have a daughter in an urban public school yeah i stay up nights worrying about what education "reform" under a so-call sane republican like Kaisch would look like, what will this country look like when she grows up?

so when you say "spoken like a white liberal" you can go fuck yourself pal, go. fuck. yourself.

also i'm a hillary voter dipshit you don't know shit about me. why don't you look around yourself and see what you can do to affect he people that are experiencing racism and suffering around you and fuck off.

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 14:47 (eight years ago) link

As Treeship says I live in a country that won the fight for a welfare state. If you want tips on how to achieve it, just ask :)

― Frederik B, Monday, March 7, 2016 7:03 AM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

so yeah when you drop little smug ain't i a dickens "lolz" in this thread like it's a fucking game, fuck you.

i know goddamn well since we lost our family farm when i was 13 cuz my dad died nobody's gonna catch you when you fall in america believe me. that's what we are trying to hash out. do we hope for more or worry that the alternatives are so dangerous that we should just hold on to what we have? that's a real fucking debate and who knows what's right?

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 14:49 (eight years ago) link

i bet you like this a lot more than talking about the racism, anti-immigrant policies going on in your own country because that would involve you actually getting involved, having some fucking skin in the game.

This would be bullshit even if this exact thing hadn't happened in this thread in the last 24 hours.

Bernie is anti-racist and anti-white supremacy. He's said, many times, that the danger of Trump is xenophobia, and the only way to counter right wing populism is with a robust left wing populism that emphasizes the common interests of the working class regardless of race. I think that's a good point. It doesn't address every minority concern, and he can do more, but these lacunae don't make his movement somehow racist

One of the worst things about any sort of political discussion on ILX is this dumb sliding where the defense to the idea that someone isn't explicitly anti-racist is "but you're saying they're racist!".

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 14:49 (eight years ago) link

your little fucking danish hobbit hole drinking mead

This seems harsh on those of us from hobbity lands.

Thomas of Britain (Tom D.), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 14:53 (eight years ago) link

is mead any good?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 14:54 (eight years ago) link

no offense to my ancestors
alfred - no

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 14:54 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, I've lived and studied there.

Okay, then I understand it. But I do also agree with Upper Mississippi that it's kinda condescending to lecture to people who have a stake in the game that you as a foreigner will never have. (Unless you're actually planning to move to the US?) I know that bashing American conservatives and bigging up our own lovely welfare states comes easy to Nordic leftists, god knows I've done my share own share of it in the past, but it just ain't productive in any way and it comes off as smug. I'm sure most Americans in this thread would agree we have it better here, but the politics that shaped to our (mostly) homogenous, 5 million strong nations, cannot be applied as such to a much more heterogenous and multicultural country with 60 times more people.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 14:56 (eight years ago) link

Thread needs Niels for the Good Kjopp/ Bad Kjopp routine.

Thomas of Britain (Tom D.), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 14:56 (eight years ago) link

Isn't Niels Swedish?

Tuomas, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 14:59 (eight years ago) link

not enough FPs in the world, get fucked Frederik

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:00 (eight years ago) link

(xp) Danish.

Thomas of Britain (Tom D.), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:01 (eight years ago) link

Also, if you're aiming for Dane stereotypes, you should've spelled it "Kjøpp". :)

(xpost)

Tuomas, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:02 (eight years ago) link

tuomas otm

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:04 (eight years ago) link

Not sure how to get the, er, o with a line through it on my phone tbh

Thomas of Britain (Tom D.), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:09 (eight years ago) link

hold down the o key?

micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:10 (eight years ago) link

Prøbably

Thomas of Britain (Tom D.), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:11 (eight years ago) link

Here's your handy guide for Nordic lettering stereotypes:

Danes and Norwegians have the letter "ø", which the rest of us don't have.

Swedes use the "å" more than the others.

Finns only have "ä" and "ö", not the other weird ones.

Icelanders have some letters of their own that I can't even type or pronounce, don't even try to to do this with them.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:16 (eight years ago) link

Ø

Cøøl

Œôöl

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:17 (eight years ago) link

Xpost lol @ Mötley Crüz

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:18 (eight years ago) link

is Frederick B a minority or a woman? just curious

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:18 (eight years ago) link

lol @ that correction xp

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:18 (eight years ago) link

cos if not then he needs to get in a very long line w that "Try listening to them" bs

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:19 (eight years ago) link

Prince-with-no-Senate-endorsements

erry red flag (f. hazel), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:20 (eight years ago) link

(xp) An angry Dane may well be a minority.

Thomas of Britain (Tom D.), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:20 (eight years ago) link

One of the worst things about any sort of political discussion on ILX is this dumb sliding where the defense to the idea that someone isn't explicitly anti-racist is "but you're saying they're racist!".

this is a fair point tbh. frederik's post seemed full of implication though. a better way for me to have framed this would be to say "bernie sanders is explicitly anti-racist. he could do better, and i think he'll try his best, but everything i know about him indicates he wants all americans to reap the benefits of a robust, national welfare state. i don't think his policies would disproportionally benefit whites, and tbh i haven't even seen black hillary voters claim that. they seem to like her for other reasons: her pragmatism, her experience, positive memories of the 90s when african americans had a higher employment rate."

Treeship, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:22 (eight years ago) link

i don't think his policies would disproportionally benefit whites

Then you don't understand how "colorblind" economic policy works in this country.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:26 (eight years ago) link

that's a pretty defeatist attitude. why do anything at all then?

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:27 (eight years ago) link

what the fuck enough with this danish bullshit this isn't hamlet

akm, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:28 (eight years ago) link

are people still pretending poverty has nothing to do w oppression?

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:29 (eight years ago) link

I love how tuomas has somehow become the euro voice of reason itt

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:31 (eight years ago) link

Fuck that

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:33 (eight years ago) link

Thomas Frank on Trump.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:36 (eight years ago) link

ppl still really trying to wrap their minds around trump supporters?

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:41 (eight years ago) link

interesting article, and this is going to be one of the biggest challenges for Clinton when she faces Trump. What are the chances that she's going to denounce NAFTA and similar deals? What kind of plan does she have to keep more jobs in the US?

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:43 (eight years ago) link

well it couldn't be that Americans are just voting for a massive celebrity of TV and film. /s

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:44 (eight years ago) link

article is on point

micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:46 (eight years ago) link

that's a pretty defeatist attitude. why do anything at all then?

It looks from the outside (not throwing rocks - neither my home nor my adopted country have stellar records here) that the US is inching closer to non-colourblind economic policy. With the obvious result that barricades are going up even higher in response, so suggesting that 'neutral' economic policies have historically resulted in disproportionate benefit to whites is playing the race card, don't you want fairness, why do you hate black people with this racist policy etc etc etc.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:49 (eight years ago) link

we could look at what we did in the past and take an effort to better that

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 16:05 (eight years ago) link

Clinton came as close to getting the nomination as you can, kinda, the last time she tried, did a lot better than Sanders this year, actually. And now she is beating him decisively, 58%-42%, with a lot of his best states already done. She is way more popular among democratic voters than he is. And especially among minorities, and especially among black voters. Protesting that really, both candidates seem clueless about race is stupid (and perhaps almost offensive), because, y'know, a couple of 'races' are sending a pretty strong signal that one of the candidates gets it better than the other, y'know? Try listening to them.

Any hope of reclaiming new deal politics has to grapple with why the new deal coalition eventually failed. And you know why it did? Because the civil right laws of the 60'ies caused the white democrats in the south to change sides. That is, racism wasn't just something off to the side of the new deal, it's was a fundamental part of it's appeal in large parts of the country. It was vital; in the attempt to root it out, the coalition simply fell apart. As Bernie has shown, any new new deal that isn't specifically anti-racist and anti white-supremacy in design has no hope of making it, it has too little appeal to the people who were explicitly left out of the first new deal. And what is weird about that? Why should black people trust progressive democrats? Honestly, they've been screwed harder by new deal policies than by anything Clinton ever did to them.

I really want you guys to get free healthcare and free education and all that, but until american white liberalism starts to grapple with why it's correct to call it 'white liberalism', it won't happen. You will lose, and as demographics change you will lose worse and worse. And the joke is, nobody will care. Sanders will be your last gasp of relevance, and the coalition of minorities, single women and cultural/economic elites will continue to rule.

― Frederik B, Tuesday, March 8, 2016 6:12 AM (4 hours ago)

http://static1.squarespace.com/static/54d2d94ce4b02d784c7edb4b/5514c5ece4b0ac8577a4ae35/5514c6fae4b03ac54f19867a/1427425022010/tumblr_m0bvpemaAA1qchjtmo1_500.gif

k3vin k., Tuesday, 8 March 2016 16:06 (eight years ago) link

But our left party in America – one of our two monopoly parties – chose long ago to turn its back on these people’s concerns, making itself instead into the tribune of the enlightened professional class, a “creative class” that makes innovative things like derivative securities and smartphone apps.

thomas frank otm. fuck the rich

reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 16:10 (eight years ago) link

sautee them and eat them and their fucking $480,000 apartments in QUEENS

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 16:18 (eight years ago) link

just leave DMC alone

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 16:19 (eight years ago) link

kinda lame to lump actually useful smartphone apps in w derivative securities

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 16:21 (eight years ago) link

what about candy crush

van damme death warrant (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 16:27 (eight years ago) link

more like candy crush the working class

micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 16:29 (eight years ago) link

they made that in sweden

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 16:30 (eight years ago) link

Cåndy Crøsh

van damme death warrant (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 16:31 (eight years ago) link

@Frederick

It seems like you've been pushing this idea of Sanders and the Sanders campaign being racist ever since the BLM supporters interrupted his rally and got shouted down by Sanders' supporters. That idea seemed to ossify when TNC and others wrote thinkpieces suggesting that Bernie had some work to do on reaching out to other races if he wanted to win the nomination.

Then, he actually went and did some of that work. He pointed out his long history of working for civil rights and social justice. He reached out to BLM and wrote a whole chunk of his platform around it. He started saying the names at his rallies.

In the last couple of months, he got the endorsements of TNC, Cornell West, Belafonte, and Erica Garner.

And yet, you seem to be stuck in this idea that the only reason Sanders and his campaign aren't succeeding with minorities is that they are racist. This is pretty reductive, and leaves out all kinds of other reasons for why he might not be connecting well with other races.

They may be worried about his chances in the general. They might be worried that he doesn't have the level of foreign policy experience that Hillary earned as Sec of State. They might just be turned off by Sanders' strident style and relentless focus on one issue. They might be just turned off by a Jewish septuagenarian.

But trying to tie Bernie's support for New Deal-type programs to his lack of support from minorities is trollishly ridiculous, academic hot-take nonsense.

schwantz, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 16:44 (eight years ago) link

I mean, if Clinton was out there calling for reparations and making race the central issue of her campaign, then you might have a point, but she's not, and you don't.

schwantz, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 16:46 (eight years ago) link

my grandma says the new deal was great

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 16:47 (eight years ago) link

to be blunt, the democratic party establishments in the southern states are a) very strongly black, b) not particularly left wing and c) highly dependent on the national party for their continued strength -- these are the weakest pieces of the whole party. they want a winner and they want to survive, it's not really a 'revolutionary moment' for them

goole, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 16:53 (eight years ago) link

yeah, that's my understanding. I wonder if anything will approach a revolutionary feeling before the Extinction Event kicks in.

the Great Society could've been great if LBJ didn't fuck it up with Vietnam
xp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 16:55 (eight years ago) link

And yet, you seem to be stuck in this idea that the only reason Sanders and his campaign aren't succeeding with minorities is that they are racist. This is pretty reductive

You're right, but not in the way you think you are?

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 16:55 (eight years ago) link

has anyone read Caro's LBJ bio(s)? considered it, but i'm not sure i want to bite that off right now

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:03 (eight years ago) link

Yes. They're compulsive reads – you won't stop.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:09 (eight years ago) link

x-post

Washington Post says Clinton strategy to get attention regarding local issues from local media in each state has helped her, as compared to Bernie's national-focused economic message

Hillary Clinton made the race in Michigan all about the lead in Flint’s water, her opposition to the state’s controversial emergency manager law and her opponent’s vote against a bailout for the auto industry.

The crisis in Flint had been going on for some time before the former secretary of state sent emissaries to visit, secured the endorsement of the city’s mayor and then insisted on having a debate in the city, 70 miles northwest of Detroit.

It is part of a pattern for Clinton. She’s approached every primary more like it was a Senate race than a presidential election by identifying a local issue that would play to her advantage and then championing it.

Clinton is also overwhelmingly favored to win today’s Democratic primary in Mississippi, where she’s been speaking extensively about the levels of lead in Jackson’s water. The city is predominantly African American, and Jackson’s mayor cited her attentiveness to the issue as the reason he chose to endorse her.

It’s not just infrastructure. Clinton has campaigned against voter ID laws in Alabama and Missouri, a religious freedom bill in Arkansas, as well as right to work legislation in Illinois, Missouri and West Virginia. She supported a settlement that New Orleans's Democratic mayor negotiated with FEMA and lauded a student loan refinancing program unveiled by Minnesota's Democratic governor.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/daily-202/2016/03/08/daily-202-hillary-clinton-is-winning-with-a-hyper-local-strategy/56de2040981b92a22d7612d7/

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:10 (eight years ago) link

I lol'd

http://www.buzzfeed.com/expresident/trump-tweets-the-classics#.blxROo9D1

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:14 (eight years ago) link

Clinton at non-rally appearances is even more micro-targeted. I'm sure there's a personal component but her team is very good at identifying exactly who is in the room and what their actual concerns are, or at least that was the case when I saw her speak eight years ago in a room with a few hundred people.

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:19 (eight years ago) link


interesting article, and this is going to be one of the biggest challenges for Clinton when she faces Trump. What are the chances that she's going to denounce NAFTA and similar deals? What kind of plan does she have to keep more jobs in the US?
― Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Tuesday, March 8, 2016 9:43 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i was just thinking while drivig to work that trump is gonna come at hillary from the left /and/ the right. whatever she has to do to defeat him, it won’t be drawn from the usual playbook. i imagine it will have to mostly be about credibility, and his lack of it. which will make the race instantly more personal than any we have seen in our lifetimes.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:22 (eight years ago) link

HRC and Sanders were at FOX's town hall last night! Weird watching Brett Baier interview Dems.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:26 (eight years ago) link

feel like as long as she isn't campaigning in michigan/rustbelt and against sanders hillary will revert back to free trade is good

flopson, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:27 (eight years ago) link

btw i need to change the radio station on my alarm clock (currently one of the NPR affiliates). i woke up today to a news story about mass killings in south sudan which segued into a discussion of the failures of peacekeeping forces in Africa which segued into how american muslims were fearful of donald trump's rise. i was only 15 minutes into the day and already in despair.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:28 (eight years ago) link

try bbc radio 4, it's even more despair but with a dry wit

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:30 (eight years ago) link

i stopped turning on NPR when my kids were in the car bc every time i did the first words out of the radio were "X civilians in Y were killed this morning"

Mordy, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:33 (eight years ago) link

as long as it's not those damned canadians the local NPR affiliate has on in the late evening

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:33 (eight years ago) link

caro's lbj bio is essential reading. some people worry about whether the next "game of thrones" will come out before martin dies, and i'm just worried that caro won't be able to finish his lbj bio before he dies. :(

diana krallice (rushomancy), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:33 (eight years ago) link

stay woke, am

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:35 (eight years ago) link

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/mar/07/donald-trump-why-americans-support?CMP=share_btn_fb

thomas frank is mostly OTM but... i think he fails to acknowledge the SYNERGY b/t trump's populist protectionism and racism/xenophobia. it makes total sense that people soured on "free trade" would also be suspicious of outsiders "taking their jobs" and a whole host of other bigoted canards.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:36 (eight years ago) link

i am literally woke(n up)

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:36 (eight years ago) link

i mean i like to keep up w/ the news but maybe after i've taken a shower.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:37 (eight years ago) link

they made that in sweden

― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, March 8, 2016 6:30 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Cåndy Crøsh

― van damme death warrant (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, March 8, 2016 6:31 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Kinda disappointed to see this only a few posts after I told you there's no "ø" letter in Swedish, I expected better of ILX.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:43 (eight years ago) link

ABC/WaPo poll now has It's Pat only 9 points behind Yelling Yam among Repubs nationally

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/poll-trump-decline-220415

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:44 (eight years ago) link

surprised cruz's message is resonating at all

Treeship, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:47 (eight years ago) link

Millions of ordinary Americans support Donald Trump. Here's why
Thomas Frank
When he isn’t spewing insults, the Republican frontrunner is hammering home a powerful message about free trade and its victimsTHEY SEEN HIM ON THE TV

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:51 (eight years ago) link

but yes let's continue with this "why would Americans chose a huge famous celebrity?" pose and pretend people give a crap about issues

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:52 (eight years ago) link

charting Trump's "ideology" is a fool's game. Baffled that anyone think's prognosticating about what "issues" he would attack Hillary on has any value - issues are totally beside the point with Trump, it will be all bluster and insults and totally incoherent ideologically.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:54 (eight years ago) link

Adam are you absolutely certain that Trump's supporters are all fans of The Apprentice

micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:58 (eight years ago) link

surprised cruz's message is resonating at all

― Treeship, Tuesday, March 8, 2016 11:47 AM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i think cruz's message at this point is "i'm a conservative, and i'm not trump"

we're seeing an inverse of the 2012 primary cycle when various "non-romneys" rose and fell. trump has effectively consolidated much of what had been the non-romney" vote and now we see various "establishment" candidates (or in cruz's case, marginally more establishment) rising and falling in their attempts to defeat trump.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:59 (eight years ago) link

may not all be fans of the Apprentice, but i'd guess 98% of them are big fans of his racism

rmde bob (will), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 18:02 (eight years ago) link

that must have been on the Racism Channel, i missed it

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 18:04 (eight years ago) link

i think the idea that trump's supporters are just morons drawn to a celebrity is absolutely untrue. he is playing to their resentments, providing the obvious scapegoats for their problems (minorities, immigrants), and -- as one article i read pointed out -- promising people the most taboo freedom: the freedom to hate. we ignore this at our own risk imo

Treeship, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 18:04 (eight years ago) link

Millions of ordinary Americans support Donald Trump. Here's why
Thomas Frank
When he isn’t spewing insults, the Republican frontrunner is hammering home a powerful message about free trade and its victimsTHEY SEEN HIM ON THE TV

Isn't it crazy how everyone but you is stupid and easily led?

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 18:05 (eight years ago) link

may not all be fans of the Apprentice, but i'd guess 98% of them are big fans of his racism

hey here's an article you should read http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/mar/07/donald-trump-why-americans-support

micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 18:05 (eight years ago) link

the elite meets on private island, vows to do something

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/aei-world-forum-donald-trump_us_56ddbd38e4b0ffe6f8ea125d

goole, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 18:11 (eight years ago) link

i always wanted a stucco mansion like that

Treeship, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 18:12 (eight years ago) link

but yes let's continue with this "why would Americans chose a huge famous celebrity?" pose and pretend people give a crap about issues

and the left wonders why it can't reach the disenfranchised working class

jason waterfalls (gbx), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 18:14 (eight years ago) link

Democratic Rep. John Delaney, who represents Maryland.

wtf why was this guy there

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 18:16 (eight years ago) link

the left wonders why it can't reach the disenfranchised working class

because it isn't racist enough?

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 18:17 (eight years ago) link

Karl Rove shared focus group findings that give hope to the GOP establishment.

http://i.imgur.com/3j3Bk7K.jpg

micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 18:17 (eight years ago) link

hey here's an article you should read http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/mar/07/donald-trump-why-americans-support

yeah it can be both. also, where was all this conservative white dude handwringing about free trade in 2012?

sorry to be glib, guys. i'm a wite dude from MS/ TN. i know lots of trump fans. i'm very aware of how NAFTA et al has hurt their prospects. i also know how comfortable they are with entitlements - and even handouts - themselves, as long as no one they deem Other is getting in on the action.

rmde bob (will), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 18:17 (eight years ago) link

Kinda disappointed to see this only a few posts after I told you there's no "ø" letter in Swedish, I expected better of ILX.

i know, i know. i hesitated for this reason. but it just looked so perfect there.

van damme death warrant (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 18:50 (eight years ago) link

to be blunt, the democratic party establishments in the southern states are a) very strongly black, b) not particularly left wing and c) highly dependent on the national party for their continued strength -- these are the weakest pieces of the whole party. they want a winner and they want to survive, it's not really a 'revolutionary moment' for them

― goole, Tuesday, March 8, 2016 11:53 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

OTM. there's this...problematic assumption among a lot of lefties that because african-americans vote so heavily democratic, it must follow that they are also the most liberal. this is not the case

i posted that charles m blow piece a couple of weeks ago, but jamelle bouie had explored this a little too, both on his Twitter timeline about a week ago (if you care to look) as well as in this piece he wrote a few months ago

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/01/hillary_clinton_s_ties_to_black_democrats_will_save_her_campaign_from_bernie.html

(the responses on his timeline from bernie fans was...predictably unfortunate)

k3vin k., Tuesday, 8 March 2016 18:52 (eight years ago) link

Adam are you absolutely certain that Trump's supporters are all fans of The Apprentice

― micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, March 8, 2016 12:58 PM (47 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

the American people aren't sitting home reading up on Mussolini, they are watching the Apprentice.

he is a huge star, a famous movie guy. the only other person running as world famous as him is Hillary Clinton. Trump was in Home Alone 2. he was in an episode of The Jeffersons. he was in revered 90s nostalgia films "The Little Rascals" and "Home Alone 2" and TV shows "The Nanny" and "Spin City". plus many other appearances in films and tv through the years. always as himself, always building this celebrity brand.

the polls that article refer to state that 53% of people didn't want to vote for anyone. so what do we have left: the millions of people who grew up w this guy on their TV being a big important American icon. somehow all these articles keep coming out that talk about polls and studies and theories and authoritarianism and nobody mentions a TV.

same thing for the democrats via Hillary more or less

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:17 (eight years ago) link

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0874339/

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:18 (eight years ago) link

that's a bit simplistic

I mean, why aren't we living under President Fred Thompson at the moment then

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:20 (eight years ago) link

ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. it hasn't hurt obviously. but i really don't think it makes sense at all. would his very excited supporters be just as excited if he was just as famous from his appearances in home alone 2, but gave long, dry, mumbling speeches about the tax code, or about the urgent need for the workers to seize the means of production and eliminate the military?

van damme death warrant (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:20 (eight years ago) link

like, stopping the clock right before trump actually started giving speeches and campaigning and assuming everything before that is the most important stuff for explaining his popularity seems...weird? also because part of that celebrity period overlaps with his birther icon period.

van damme death warrant (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:21 (eight years ago) link

yeah his celebrity obviously helps him but its how he's deployed it and the persona he projects that really matter

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:22 (eight years ago) link

It's definitely a mix of reasons. Not one thing or another.

Evan, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:22 (eight years ago) link

I don't think his specific policy positions matter at all, it's the larger frame of representing aggrieved white people that matters most

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:23 (eight years ago) link

it's true though that Clinton's appearance on the 2008 Ellen Page/Wilco episode of Saturday Night Live is the lynchpin (if you will) holding her campaign together

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:26 (eight years ago) link

Lotsa good bits in Jeb Lund's CPAC round-up

Hannity's role at CPAC is playing Big Man On Campus for people with stud athlete expectations radically ratcheted downward by attendance at places like Hillsdale College and Liberty University. He throws footballs out into the crowd, his small face on his Rob Liefeld body squinching with effort at huckin' the pigskin toward convention nerds. He constantly fishes for yuk-yuks with an all-time shitty Bill Clinton impression, with less of a resemblance to its inspiration than Ted Cruz's Simpsons voices.

(At one point, he tried it during a Q&A with John Kasich, saying, "Gov. Kasich, there's some really hot girls over there if you wanna go see 'em later... That's my Bill Clinton imitation, in case you didn't get it." It took Kasich a second. "I wondered," he said, looking at the audience. "I thought Hannity had lost his mind.")

[....]

This isn't the way CPAC is supposed to work. Discounts are given to college Republican activists to flood the event with 18- to 22-year-olds for the same reason that the upper limit on the draft age is usually 25: It's really easy to get hormonal dudes unaware of their own mortality rabidly amped up in peer-group settings, no matter what lethally insane shit the guy on the stage is saying. It's a lot harder to get a room of 30-year-olds to rah-rah about never having guaranteed insurance or having to kick in doors in Ramadi

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:29 (eight years ago) link

Οὖτις, really? Like, even the wall? The policy positions, as vague as some of them are, are consistent with the persona and at the very least they reinforce it.

van damme death warrant (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:30 (eight years ago) link

the American people aren't sitting home reading up on Mussolini, they are watching the Apprentice.

The highest-rated season of The Apprentice was its first season, where it averaged 20 million viewers. The highest-rated season of Celebrity Apprentice was its first, where it averaged 11 million viewers, making it the 48th-most watched show of its season. The ratings for both shows plunged steadily every season since. I don't think you know fuck-all about what "the American people" are doing.

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:31 (eight years ago) link

Whether or not Trump has any actual plans or ability to take action when in office, a lot of his rhetoric speaks to people in small towns, areas that are nearly depopulated or increasingly populated by recent immigrants who work factory jobs (non-union, tending to be more unskilled labor than machinists) that pay very little.

The racist narrative is convenient but mostly a scapegoat -- making america "great" to many of these people would be having jobs in their communities that pay a reasonable wage. They don't want to be plucking chickens, but they resent the immigrants in their community who do so.

There are a myriad of reasons smaller towns have been hit by this kind of blight. The long-term trend toward city living, NAFTA and other trade deals making it attractive for companies to relocate, unions that were slow to adapt to lean manufacturing processes, mechanization of farm labor leading to fewer jobs and more expensive equipment that small farmers wouldn't own.

It's a haughty position to brush away these concerns, to paint these people as individuals who were left behind by the new economy, people who are just unable to adapt.

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:33 (eight years ago) link

lol tho at the implication that fascism appeals to students of Italian ww2 era fascism

Mordy, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:33 (eight years ago) link

The absence of critical thinking education in American public schools + cable 'news' organizations that spoonfeed a completely skewed vision of an America going down the toilet + loudmouthed pseudo-celebrity millionaire who's like every dad and boss that people were afraid to cross all rolled up in one person = the baffling success of Trump's campaign.

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:33 (eight years ago) link

That really goes for the great manufacturing cities of the country, too. We like to paint a picture of some sort of post-industrialist rapture where small towns and defunct manufacturing cities look like the rapture hit, but there are people still there, and many people who relocated are doing worse off than they were before.

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:35 (eight years ago) link

calling that kind of stuff a policy position feels like a misapplication of the term - it's more like a hyperbolic challenge. There's no way a wall will get built. There's no way Mexico will pay for it. There's no way a police force is going to round up 11 million people and put them on the other side of that wall. And would this theoretical wall keep out whatever illegal immigrants Trump Industries feels it needs to hire? It's just so incoherent and divorced from reality it seems like a miscategorization to consider it as akin to a proposal to restructure the tax code.

xxp

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:35 (eight years ago) link

also worth mentioning the number of people who saw poor career prospects, joined the armed forces, and then came back to find poor support structures for their post-military lives

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:36 (eight years ago) link

Old Lunch otm

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:36 (eight years ago) link

that's a bit simplistic

I mean, why aren't we living under President Fred Thompson at the moment then

― Οὖτις, Tuesday, March 8, 2016 2:20 PM (15 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Donald Trump is way more famous than that. up there with President Michael Jackson or President E.T.

nostaglia is a powerful emotion and emotions are key to this election. people are overlooking this.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:38 (eight years ago) link

Trump's racism is nothing new to a party long used to demonizing minorities for political gain. i don't see the fascination in that. it's on its way out imo.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:40 (eight years ago) link

it's true, I have very fond memories of President E.T.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:40 (eight years ago) link

up there with President Michael Jackson or President E.T.

haha um no

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:40 (eight years ago) link

the peepul beleeve in teevee

it really is pro wrestling. DT catcalling "go home to mommy" to cheering as protestors are being hauled out -- well, it's just as bellicose and unfunny as all that rasslin' shit that was mystifyingly 'cool' in the '80s/90s.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:40 (eight years ago) link

fear has always been a Republican selling point

fear of Republicans has always been the Democrat selling point

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:40 (eight years ago) link

said Palpatine to Anakin

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:42 (eight years ago) link

oceania has always been at war with eurasia, i mean, eastasia

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:43 (eight years ago) link

basically this is what every Trump rally looks like to me now

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoPpw7DNzCY

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:43 (eight years ago) link

90s nostalgia. don't deny it. both sides are playing that card. even Bernie Sanders has the Seinfeld thing.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:44 (eight years ago) link

i remember Town Halls during Obamacare, when lunatics were bringing guns to it and "making a stance". he should be personally held responsible for any violence that occurs at his rallies. this goes for anyone.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:45 (eight years ago) link

even Bernie Sanders has the Seinfeld thing.

this is a very rude way to refer to Michael Richards

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:47 (eight years ago) link

some people are into trump because he's a racist, some because (as frank's piece discusses) he seems more sympathetic blue-collar workers than the other candidates, and also because he's a famous guy whose campaign truly does resemble pro wrestling/reality tv. all three of those appeal to different people. sometimes more than one appeals, and for some people it's all three. it's not just one thing. obv point but a lot of people seem to want to simplify things by saying it's entirely about racism, or it's entirely about celebrity.

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:48 (eight years ago) link

hahaha

micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:48 (eight years ago) link

xp

micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:48 (eight years ago) link

roflz

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:50 (eight years ago) link

Mike Murphy, regular GOP election/consultant type and the guy behind Jeb's Right to Rise PAC, with zero fucks and zero regrets:

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-mike-murphy-20160308-story.html

Murphy, who also writes screenplays in an office on Paramount's Hollywood lot, said he earned in the mid-six figures for his work with Right to Rise. He dismissed the criticism, saying it comes from unnamed sources and rivals.

"The truth is I don't care. There's nothing lower in my book than second-guessing," he said in an interview. "There are a lot of people in the cheap seats with a lot of opinions. What have they done?"...

A staff member at Right to Rise declined to say how much money is left but indicated that donors will get a prorated refund.

After a grueling 14-month campaign that began with great optimism and ended in dismal defeat, Murphy says he plans to spend time with his family. He and his wife, entertainment executive Tiffany Daniel — who is a Democrat — live with their 2-year-old daughter in a $2.6-million Hancock Park home.

Then, he says, he'll return to his Hollywood pursuits. His resume includes a short stint as a writer-producer for Dennis Miller and a script about politics titled "Hacks," which was bought by HBO but never greenlighted. He says he already has a deal with a cable network."

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:51 (eight years ago) link

There really is a Trump-or-Sanders contingent among people who feel left behind after the loss of steady manufacturing jobs. A lot of mixed emotions about unions, but Sanders seems like he actually cares about the working class, and Trump makes grand gestures about shutting down the things they perceive destroyed their jobs.

I know there are a number of people who became strong converts to the necessity of wind energy after a town that had appliance manufacturing lost that company after a merger/outsourcing of labor and a wind energy plant moved in.

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:53 (eight years ago) link

idk I'll drift off if I'm yelling into the wind, here

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:53 (eight years ago) link

Michelle Goldberg visits CPAC.

Yet after spending three days talking to many conservatives at CPAC, I’ve concluded that the opposition to Trump is not nearly as staunch as we might expect. Most of the Trump opponents I spoke to didn’t see him as a paradigm-shattering threat to the Republic. They simply saw him as their less-preferred presidential candidate. That’s why it’s a mistake to view the GOP as entirely polarized between the Trump and not-Trump wings. Kellyanne Conway, the conservative pollster and president of a pro-Cruz super PAC, told me that Trump is the second choice of most Cruz voters. “The one-two punch of Trump and Cruz has shown that this is a conservative populist party,” she told me.

Of Mitt Romney’s warning about the dangers of Trumpism, Conway says, “If Gov. Romney really thought his message was going to be so resonant among the conservative faithful, he would have delivered it here at CPAC. But then he would have risked being booed. And he would have risked running into a movement that’s fairly unified in its thirst to beat Hillary Clinton in the fall.” In other words, despite the protestations of aghast intellectuals and religious purists, conservatives will eventually fall in line behind Trump if that’s what it takes to win.

I thought Grover Norquist, the president of Americans for Tax Reform and a central figure in right-wing organizing, might express qualms about Trump. After all, Norquist is an advocate of immigration reform; his wife is a Palestinian Muslim, and he is loathed by Islamophobes for his efforts to bring Muslims into the Republican Party. In the course of a 45-mintue conversation, however, he was far more disdainful of the anti-Trump forces on the right than of Trump himself.

so much for principles

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:54 (eight years ago) link

maybe everyone should just look for work in the burgeoning campaign finance sector, tbh

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:55 (eight years ago) link

grover norquist should be in jail

reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 19:56 (eight years ago) link

it just me or has "thirst" became a much more commonplace term in the last year or so? And showing up where slang is traditionally slower to permeate

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 20:00 (eight years ago) link

like "thirst for knowledge"? maybe coming back into use but if it seems widespread that's prob bc it's old.

Mordy, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 20:02 (eight years ago) link

thirsty af

Cornelius Pardew (jim in glasgow), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 20:03 (eight years ago) link

Trump's appeal isn't that hard to figure out is it? A lot of people dislike or distrust all politicians. Trump does not have friends inside Washington, he can't be 'bought' or whatever, so people see him as an alternative to say, yet another Bush or Clinton.

frogbs, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 20:09 (eight years ago) link

thirsté for douché

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 20:09 (eight years ago) link

or rather thirstée

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 20:09 (eight years ago) link

*insert Rubio joke here*

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 20:13 (eight years ago) link

ok, really am shouting into the wind

Trump is speaking to what people perceive as the things that have led to negative changes in their own lives. Whether those are the real forces at work depends on the issue, and he has no ability now or ever to change some of them, but he's saying exactly what people want to hear

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 20:18 (eight years ago) link

- you did nothing wrong
- the world still should be yours
- i'm going to take back what you perceive to be yours

there's no "helping" language, just entitlement. what you had should have been yours forever, even if it's something that no longer exists. take it.

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 20:20 (eight years ago) link

as in the postwar myth of middle-class prosperity ("each generation will be somewhat better off") was implicitly promised through the culture, and that shit is gone.

Silver:

If the Republican nomination were contested under Democratic delegate rules instead, Trump would find it almost impossible to get a majority of delegates, and a floor fight in Cleveland would already be all but inevitable. If every state awarded its delegates winner-take-all, conversely, Trump would be much further ahead, although the bigger swings these rules enable would give his opponents a chance to catch up later on.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/donald-trump-would-be-easy-to-stop-under-democratic-rules/

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 20:21 (eight years ago) link

xxp not only that but he makes everything seem so easy. Mexico's gonna pay for the wall, the military will commit war crimes because I told them to, we're gonna cut taxes by restructuring bad trade agreements, bing bing bing. other candidates won't do it because they're too in bed with XYZ or they're afraid of being politically incorrect. bong, bong, bong.

frogbs, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 20:22 (eight years ago) link

it's an interest shift in terminology when "takers" used to mean people who absconded with wealth they didn't necessarily earn, and it's now some revenge fantasy of taking what you want from the abstract forces of NAFTA and immigration

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 20:24 (eight years ago) link

it's also a weird disconnect from the new economy. do you know who's buying a lot of pieces of farm equipment that cost $200k each? china, ukraine, a number of other countries that are getting on the large scale agriculture bandwagon

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 20:27 (eight years ago) link

When your life has become a dead end street...I shall build a tall gilded tower at one end, and an enormous wall at the other. From within this enclosure we shall make terrific deals. You will feel good. You already feel better, just picturing this. I know it. My hands are powerful, my tower tall.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 20:40 (eight years ago) link

hey mh, i think your posts have been super thoughtful and i'm gonna try to remember to direct ppl to them next time there's a condescending dismissal of (non-liberal) bernie/trump middle america working class whites

k3vin k., Tuesday, 8 March 2016 20:44 (eight years ago) link

see i dont trust these polls. number one the media distorts everything anyways. number two Trump is a huge celebrity and when people are polled or interviewed or otherwise engaged by the media on this they have a role to play. this is a roll enforced through Trump rallies and media analysis alike. people in general in America have a heavily distorted view of media figures and the power of the media itself (listen to me lol). any poll where they are asked a question on some big edgy topic is kind of putting them on the spot. i don't think people are this racist or this xenophobic but the media needs them to be for all their Trump articles.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 20:49 (eight years ago) link

to me he is just saying things he doesnt actually believe in just to get attention. he knows he can't do the things he says bc they are impossible, he is just saying it to get attention.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 20:51 (eight years ago) link

he is the trollwave candidate

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 20:51 (eight years ago) link

so you're a supporter?

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 20:52 (eight years ago) link

GOP Soothsayer Looks At Astronomical Charts

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 20:52 (eight years ago) link

i support Sanders that's it.

i am your feared "Bernie Bro" in the ILX nomenclature of the day

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 20:53 (eight years ago) link

Trump is speaking to what people perceive as the things that have led to negative changes in their own lives. Whether those are the real forces at work depends on the issue, and he has no ability now or ever to change some of them, but he's saying exactly what people want to hear

yes, and there's something not dissimilar in Sanders. free college tuition, single-payer healthcare. how many really expect these to come about? the feasibility is somewhat beside the point. what's more important is the fact that the demand is voiced. the voicing of the demand fulfills many functions: it is a negotiating stance, it is an expression of exasperation (despair even), it also outlines a vision. the very fact that it is outlandish and "out there" is an inherent part of its intended appeal.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 20:57 (eight years ago) link

free college tuition, single-payer healthcare. how many really expect these to come about?

it's called negotiating. it involves putting something you want on the table in the first place.

who cares if these things never materialize. people still give Obama shit for not closing guantanamo and doing a bunch of other stuff he promised. every politician promises more than they can do. do you not realize this?

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 21:07 (eight years ago) link

i think fixing tuition is something feasible whereas building a wall to keep Mexico out and having them pay for it is different. yet people are connoting the two candidates like they are alike. it's absurd.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 21:10 (eight years ago) link

those goals are in theory long-term attainable with milestones along the way -- it could be argued that we're on a long-term march toward single payer with the affordable care act, but expecting significant movement in the next four or eight years is aggressive. we're stuck trying to clean up the individual states and their efforts to privatize or legislate their way around requirements right now. college education finance needs a lot of reform and, with a few stopgaps in place, we're still trickling toward long-term irreconcilable student debt

then there are the actionable, concrete proposals like "build a wall" that are completely unfeasible but very punchy talking points

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 21:10 (eight years ago) link

to be clear: I don't mean to say that Sanders's and Trump's proposals are equally outlandish, but I do think that for supporters of both there's a feeling of, "ok, probably not going happen, but I'm glad someone is proposing that."

because, of course, I can read minds

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 21:10 (eight years ago) link

it's called negotiating. it involves putting something you want on the table in the first place.

I did mention that they fulfill a function as negotiating stances!

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 21:11 (eight years ago) link

they're different flavors of pie in the sky, but both are catering to an audience that wants easily recognizable goals

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 21:11 (eight years ago) link

I don't see it exactly as negotiating so much as changing the terms of the debate. I mean sorry, but that's not how negotiating works, you don't just say a really really big number and figure they'll meet you halfway, the other side is a sentient being that can see the lay of the land as well as you do. And you have to have a position to negotiate from.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 21:11 (eight years ago) link

that is how DT negotiates irl, which is why he mostly owns naming rights on overpriced luxury properties and veblen goods right now

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 21:13 (eight years ago) link

I mean Bernie Sanders vs a GOP congress: "I demand free college tuition" would not be an effective "negotiating" technique -- or else what? However his speaking about it can help to shift the populace into a mindset of thinking "yes, actually college SHOULD be affordable," which can in turn lead to pressure on govt in the long run.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 21:15 (eight years ago) link

who cares if these things never materialize. people still give Obama shit for not closing guantanamo and doing a bunch of other stuff he promised. every politician promises more than they can do. do you not realize this?

of course I do. I also think there's varying degrees of feasibility. When O promised he would close Guantanamo, my sense is that a lot of people thought this was doable within his term. Sanders's proposals are a little different: he acknowledges that he can't do it alone. that he needs "millions and millions" of us to help him out.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 21:15 (eight years ago) link

I mean Bernie Sanders vs a GOP congress: "I demand free college tuition" would not be an effective "negotiating" technique -- or else what? However his speaking about it can help to shift the populace into a mindset of thinking "yes, actually college SHOULD be affordable," which can in turn lead to pressure on govt in the long run.

yes exactly. it doesn't necessarily mean an outright deal negotiation. it's about shifting expectations and discourse.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 21:17 (eight years ago) link

I mean the clear distinction between Sanders and Trump in this sense is that Sanders says we'll need a political revolution if we want any of his proposals enacted, whereas Trump is more like "it'll happen because I'll say so." In either case, one is left with a yawning gap, a large question mark, between "promise" and fulfillment.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 21:23 (eight years ago) link

A Dumb Bro, No?

flopson, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 22:10 (eight years ago) link

what you had should have been yours forever, even if it's something that no longer exists. take it.

Even if it's something that *never* existed, like an America in which the women and the blacks were happy and knew their place.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 22:28 (eight years ago) link

“Sometimes we’ll do it for fun, and they’ll start screaming at me, ‘Do the swear-in! Do the swear-in!’” Trump said on “Today.” “If it’s offensive, if there’s anything wrong with it, I wouldn’t do it.”

Given the similarities to Hitler’s “Heil” salute, Trump was asked if he would stop doing the pledge.

“Well, I’ll certainly look into it,” Trump replied. “I mean, I’d like to find out that that’s true, but I’ll certainly look into it, because I don’t want to offend anybody. But I can tell you that it’s been amazingly received.”

where does Trump find all the time to look into all these things

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 23:05 (eight years ago) link

When thinking about how to get Mexico to build the wall.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 23:05 (eight years ago) link

Wait is he "looking into" the heil salute...? Like he's gonna find out what it was?

Hadrian VIII, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 23:07 (eight years ago) link

he also needed to look into the kkk

Treeship, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 23:10 (eight years ago) link

the heil thing, like everything else in his campaign, felt like a joke he was playing on his supporters

Treeship, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 23:10 (eight years ago) link

lol neil

Treeship, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 23:11 (eight years ago) link

I like how Cruz roped the slimiest Bush bro

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 23:13 (eight years ago) link

Margin supports Buchanan iirc

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 23:13 (eight years ago) link

Margin too

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 23:13 (eight years ago) link

Sanders is different from Trump because his agenda is a part of an established political philosophy and Donald Tenor Trump's platform is Donald Trump is great and will fix stuff

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 23:22 (eight years ago) link

otoh trump comes from an established political philosophy too - and one that he purportedly has studied over the years

Mordy, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 23:27 (eight years ago) link

whoah I had no idea Trump had ROY FUCKING COHN lobby Es Meese to appoint Trump's sister to her judgeship.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 23:29 (eight years ago) link

i don't think sanders is anywhere near the existential threat as trump (tho i don't really think he's much of one either but clearly they are separated by leagues)

Mordy, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 23:30 (eight years ago) link

Cohn was Trump's lawyer!

xp

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 23:30 (eight years ago) link

Roy Cohn: No. I have clout. Lots. I pick up that phone, dial 15 numbers, and guess who's on the other end of the line? In under five minutes, Henry.

Henry: The President.

Roy Cohn: Better — his wife.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 23:51 (eight years ago) link

just chatted with a local black small-business-owner here in Wisconsin who's voting Bernie

Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 23:56 (eight years ago) link

yes that post was my audition to replace thomas friedman at the new york times

Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 23:56 (eight years ago) link

where in wisconsin?

you know, i was reading about the oregon standoff folks today, and i'm surprised trump hasn't gone in on the feds over that stuff -- seems up his alley to float some conspiracy theories, gov't tyranny yadda yadda. wouldn't put it past him to glorify a bunch of militiamen.

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 00:01 (eight years ago) link

just chatted with a local black small-business-owner here in Wisconsin who's voting Bernie

― Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, March 8, 2016 6:56 PM

uh no dude this is Freddie B in disguise

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 00:07 (eight years ago) link

ratfucking the election

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 00:07 (eight years ago) link

ben carson currently w/ larger % of the vote than rubio

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 01:29 (eight years ago) link

(in MS)

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 01:30 (eight years ago) link

Clowning Rubio is one of the only true pleasures of this hideous election season

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 01:30 (eight years ago) link

Sanders appears to be doing fairly well so far in Michigan, possible upset?

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 01:30 (eight years ago) link

I'm gonna miss him. He's the sort of guy to whom you gave noogies. He's the Sam Alito of GOP candidates.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 01:31 (eight years ago) link

Sanders appears to be doing fairly well so far in Michigan, possible upset?

― Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles),

A few counties don't close until 9 p.m.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 01:31 (eight years ago) link

hillary campaign was managing expectations today

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 01:31 (eight years ago) link

not much reporting from detroit yet:

http://www.decisiondeskhq.com/results/2016/primary/dem/president/michigan/

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 01:33 (eight years ago) link

if wayne goes like macomb then she'll take the state no problem

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 01:33 (eight years ago) link

he'll?

flopson, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 01:36 (eight years ago) link

trump is over 50% in MS (early but still terrifying)

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 01:37 (eight years ago) link

he has assembled large piles of trump water, wine and beef on the stage where he's due to speak

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 01:42 (eight years ago) link

is that his rescue package for flint

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 01:50 (eight years ago) link

Oh he's got a 'rescue package' for them awrite

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 01:52 (eight years ago) link

"DON-DAY E-STA MARCO?"
MSNBC bro just now

flappy bird, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 01:53 (eight years ago) link

is that his rescue package for flint

― carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries

can they shower or drink meat

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 01:53 (eight years ago) link

they can shower in trump wine and use the meat to build shelter

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 01:54 (eight years ago) link

this has gotta be little marco's last night

k3vin k., Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:01 (eight years ago) link

trump is over 50% in MS (early but still terrifying)

― Mordy, Tuesday, March 8, 2016 7:37 PM (16 minutes ago)

Wish I could say I was surprised.

WilliamC, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:03 (eight years ago) link

He's the sort of guy to whom you gave noogies.

^word for word what I told a friend two weeks ago

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:06 (eight years ago) link

i know detroit hasn't reported in yet so that will change things pretty dramatically, but bernie's up 51-48 in MI so far. polls had hillary up by a wide margin so this is kind of surprising.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:08 (eight years ago) link

yeah who knows whether it'll hold but clearly the polls were off on the dem side

k3vin k., Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:11 (eight years ago) link

I'm curious: what sort-of candidate could the ILX collective get behind? The only person I can imagine is des Esseintes from À rebours.

larry appleton, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:12 (eight years ago) link

this has gotta be little marco's last night

― k3vin k., Tuesday, March 8, 2016 9:01 PM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

if he comes in below the threshold to get _any_ delegates in MI or MS then i guess it's not out of the question that he could go before florida

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:14 (eight years ago) link

clearly the polls were off

Or partly late campaigning payoff?

timellison, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:14 (eight years ago) link

paul o'neill endorsement for trump

k3vin k., Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:14 (eight years ago) link

clearly the polls were off

Or partly late campaigning payoff?

― timellison, Tuesday, March 8, 2016 9:14 PM (16 seconds ago)

it would be quite the late swing! 538's polls-only average was clinton 59-38

k3vin k., Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:16 (eight years ago) link

wonder who al leiter's endorsing

mookieproof, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:20 (eight years ago) link

trump is out there plugging his golf courses

k3vin k., Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:21 (eight years ago) link

Closest Sanders ever was in the last couple of months was ten points down:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/mi/michigan_democratic_presidential_primary-5224.html#polls

timellison, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:23 (eight years ago) link

why the f you lying
why you always lying

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:25 (eight years ago) link

omg trump has a merch table next to the podium

my kids are in hysterics

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:26 (eight years ago) link

does he have his latest album on vinyl?

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:29 (eight years ago) link

Quick somebody wake up Fredrick

a strawman stuffed with their collection of 12 cds (jjjusten), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:30 (eight years ago) link

being the president of the united states is a serious thing! trump is all about himself and this is embarrassing

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:31 (eight years ago) link

xxp yup, and his "little marco" ep

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:31 (eight years ago) link

bernie's up 51-47, 32% in

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:33 (eight years ago) link

if detroit votes haven't been counted yet, that count will reverse itself quickly, i would guess

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:33 (eight years ago) link

i mean he's like a drunk uncle giving a toast ffs

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:35 (eight years ago) link

LOL

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/09/us/politics/ted-cruzs-prospects-ascendant-though-perhaps-not-with-senate-peers.html

Some senators simply said they would support whoever won the nomination. Others smiled wanly, as if wishing they had superpowers that could remove them from the scene.

“It’s, uh, well, look at the alternatives,” Senator Jeff Flake of Arizona said when asked if his party could rally around Mr. Cruz at some juncture.

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:35 (eight years ago) link

http://www.cnn.com/election/primaries/polls/mi/Dem

exit polls (small sample size obv) show sanders doing really respectably among blacks (32%) and neck and neck with clinton with women

k3vin k., Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:35 (eight years ago) link

if detroit votes haven't been counted yet, that count will reverse itself quickly, i would guess

― wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, March 8, 2016 9:33 PM (2 minutes ago)

http://www.cnn.com/election/primaries/states/mi/Dem

this is the page to watch (detroit is wayne county). bernie's keeping it respectable in the counties clinton figured to blow him out in (though it's still early)

k3vin k., Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:36 (eight years ago) link

Wayne County (201 of 999 precincts reporting)
Clinton leads 52.8% to 46.3%

Oakland Cty (434 of 520 reporting)
Clinton leads 50.4-47.9

Macomb Cty (46 of 337 reporting)
Cliton leads 48.7-47.0

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:39 (eight years ago) link

538 says: "I’m looking on the Wayne County clerk’s website to try to get an idea of where the vote is being reported from in Wayne County. It seems, at least as of earlier this hour, that Detroit was at 0 percent. The nearly uniformly white areas of Grosse Pointe Shores and Plymouth were at 100 percent. In other words, the percentages coming out of Wayne County right now don’t really reflect how black areas are voting."

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:39 (eight years ago) link

not surprising that underserved areas might be taking longer to come in. v close race in MI.

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:40 (eight years ago) link

"more presidential than anybody but the great Abe Lincoln, he was very presidential"

micro brewbio (crüt), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:40 (eight years ago) link

wow. I have some hope for our FL primary next week then (if my fuckin' absentee ballot ever shows up)

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:41 (eight years ago) link

is it normal for press conferences to be packed with supporters? or is this a rally with a press conference tacked on? has anyone else done this? it's kind of brilliant because he gets to answer relatively tough questions (every once in a while, at least) and then have his supporters cheer his answers on national tv

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:42 (eight years ago) link

trump rallies, it's clear, are orgies of sycophancy

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:44 (eight years ago) link

does trump really think he's going to win NY and Illinois in the general bc he owns properties there or is he just spouting state names and the word "win" in random order

Clay, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:44 (eight years ago) link

wow. I have some hope for our FL primary next week then (if my fuckin' absentee ballot ever shows up)

― Neanderthal, Tuesday, March 8, 2016

didn't know you lived here!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:44 (eight years ago) link

has anyone tried Trump wine?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:45 (eight years ago) link

lol no. i saw it in the store the other day though. might shoplift it

Treeship, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:45 (eight years ago) link

that really rolls off the tongue doesn't it? "Trump wine"

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:46 (eight years ago) link

anyone watching trump? i think he's drunk

Treeship, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:46 (eight years ago) link

i mean he's like a drunk uncle giving a toast ffs

― arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, March 8, 2016 9:35 PM (11 minutes ago)

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:47 (eight years ago) link

can one of these supine journalists jump on stage and steal a bottle while he's talking?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:48 (eight years ago) link

i'll bet trump wine is great. the best. everyone loves it, and it brings people together.

Treeship, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:49 (eight years ago) link

he's gonna use unsold Trump wine to build his wall, it's gonna be so great, what a wall, damn

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:50 (eight years ago) link

folks, you want to know about the wine? it's got a little cocaine in it, ok? it was my brother's idea. I looked at him like this and said, what? but he was right. he's always right. my brother is the smartest guy you'll ever meet. so I said fine, let's put cocaine in the wine. and you know what? it's beautiful. it's the greatest.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:52 (eight years ago) link

didn't know you lived here!

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, March 8, 2016 9:44 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

born and raiiiiiised.

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:55 (eight years ago) link

God it's so hard not to LOL at Rubio now. only candidate gettin 0 Michigan delegates tonight

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:57 (eight years ago) link

where do you live??

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:59 (eight years ago) link

markets now have 85% for sanders winning mi

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:59 (eight years ago) link

yeah, he's definitely not going to lose big, and looking more and more like he's going to win. huge upset, i'd say

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:00 (eight years ago) link

aw yeahhh

Treeship, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:01 (eight years ago) link

yeah even if the unreported precincts break huge for her she needs to make up 32000 votes at this point, and there are still sanders counties reporting as well

JoeStork, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:02 (eight years ago) link

where do you live??

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, March 8, 2016 9:59 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Orlando - right near the damn tourists :/

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:03 (eight years ago) link

Sanders 49.8 - Clinton 48.3 in MI

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:05 (eight years ago) link

aw

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:05 (eight years ago) link

markets now have 85% for sanders winning mi

― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, March 8, 2016 9:59 PM (4 minutes ago

this doesn't seem like a good bet to me -- clinton now crushing him in wayne county with only 45% reporting

k3vin k., Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:06 (eight years ago) link

@mtaibbi
This is a hi-def preview of White House pressers in a year: incessant, inane gloating about the smoldering wreckage of Trump-foes...

(Taibbi is on record that DT is winning the election, and i'm more persuaded with each passing day, mostly bcz HRC)

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:06 (eight years ago) link

ha, a few seconds later a comeback looks a lot more plausible

JoeStork, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:06 (eight years ago) link

yeah, only 57% in.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:07 (eight years ago) link

it's my understanding that huge chunks of dearborn and detroit have not reported

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:07 (eight years ago) link

can one of these supine journalists jump on stage and steal a bottle while he's talking?

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, March 8, 2016 8:48 PM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

god i wish

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:08 (eight years ago) link

this doesn't seem like a good bet to me -- clinton now crushing him in wayne county with only 45% reporting

― k3vin k., Tuesday, March 8, 2016 10:06 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah that sounded a lot to me. it was down to 81% at 10pm, but i think that's before wayne started announcing

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:09 (eight years ago) link

NPR just played a soundbite: "Running for president isn't about providing insights... It's about getting results!"

Can someone plz interpret for Her Robotic Majesty? Is that a shot at Sanders' depth?

(don't know what to make of the weird sylLABles)

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:09 (eight years ago) link

feels like Nevada deja vu

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:09 (eight years ago) link

markets just flipped to 55% hilary when wayne announced

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:10 (eight years ago) link

*started announcing

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:10 (eight years ago) link

john king painting a nailbiter picture fwiw

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:11 (eight years ago) link

NPR just played a soundbite: "Running for president isn't about providing insights... It's about getting re]sults!"

maybe she meant to juxtapose INsults with REsults and just fucked it up?

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:13 (eight years ago) link

50.2 BS - 47.9 HRC

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:15 (eight years ago) link

did she just say, "Helping each child realize his goddamn potential!"?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:15 (eight years ago) link

if so i hope Nixon's "It's down to the nut cutting" is on the table

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:17 (eight years ago) link

you know KM, that's the only thing that makes sense, including talking past Sanders to Trump.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:18 (eight years ago) link

D Brazile suggesting that Sanders's discourse on foreclosures has helped him with the black vote in MI

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:18 (eight years ago) link

53% reporting
Votes
Bernie Sanders
50.3%
310,744
Hillary Clinton
47.9%
296,176

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:18 (eight years ago) link

I had been watching Sanders' % tick up for a while to about 51.7%, but it's dropped big time in the last 15 minutes

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:20 (eight years ago) link

@mtaibbi
This is a hi-def preview of White House pressers in a year: incessant, inane gloating about the smoldering wreckage of Trump-foes...

(Taibbi is on record that DT is winning the election, and i'm more persuaded with each passing day, mostly bcz HRC)

― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius),

With all of Taibbi's experience covering charlatans and loudmouths, you'd think he'd call the election for Hillary.

Plus; http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/08/us/trumps-rise-spurs-latino-immigrants-to-naturalize-to-vote-against-him.html

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:21 (eight years ago) link

also, even if Sanders keeps it close or just barely wins, Clinton will probably end the night with a net gain in delegates once again as she utterly blew out Mississippi

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:22 (eight years ago) link

53% reporting
Votes
Bernie Sanders
50.3%
310,744
Hillary Clinton
47.9%
296,176

― Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, March 8, 2016 10:18 PM (2 minutes ago)

wherever you're getting this from is way behind fwiw, they're at 67% reporting now

k3vin k., Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:22 (eight years ago) link

67% in
Sanders 50.6
Clinton 47.6

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:23 (eight years ago) link

bernie back in the lead at 57% on the markets

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:23 (eight years ago) link

‏@ckilpatrick
US city w/ largest ArabAmerican pop is Dearborn: 64/36 for Bernie. Arab-Americans for the socialist Jewish dude!

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:26 (eight years ago) link

interesting

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:28 (eight years ago) link

apparently Sanders spent a million more on Michigan TV than Clinton

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:29 (eight years ago) link

it's at 72% now, bernie up 50.6% to 47.5%

k3vin k., Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:29 (eight years ago) link

yeah, even Chris Matthews marveled at that stat #TipO'Neillspinningingrave

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:30 (eight years ago) link

and Van Jones echoing Brazile's remark about the efficacy of ads re foreclosures

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:31 (eight years ago) link

75% it's still 50.6/47.5

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:33 (eight years ago) link

the new mayor of flint seems like a badass. i like her.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:34 (eight years ago) link

it's crazy how these percentages are holding

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:36 (eight years ago) link

77% in
50.7
47.4

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:38 (eight years ago) link

I should probably stop this, but I'm riveted

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:39 (eight years ago) link

it's why i dislike sports

xpost

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:40 (eight years ago) link

No sleep til 90%

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:40 (eight years ago) link

this thread is like that scene where the dude is testing the purity of the coke in Blow

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:41 (eight years ago) link

markets at 79% bernie

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:41 (eight years ago) link

this is p amazing tho.....apparently HIllary's aides warned her that the 20% polled leads were a mirage and that's why she stumped there this weekend

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:42 (eight years ago) link

btw i misquoted Clinton so never mind

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:42 (eight years ago) link

this thread is like that scene where the dude is testing the purity of the coke in Blow

― Neanderthal, Tuesday, March 8, 2016 9:41 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i still need to see this

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:43 (eight years ago) link

lol Rubio outspent the other candidates in Michigan all for a measly 9%. the neo-Jeb

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:44 (eight years ago) link

david chalian reporting that young African-Americans in MI split 51% Clinton / 49% sanders

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:44 (eight years ago) link

Kasich overtaking Cruz for 2nd place in MI

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:44 (eight years ago) link

81%
50.9
47.2

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:46 (eight years ago) link

it's why i dislike sports

because the score changes? try soccer.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:47 (eight years ago) link

so whose turn is it to awaken Frederik B?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:47 (eight years ago) link

it's why i dislike sports

because the score changes? try soccer.

― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius),

Nah. I dislike the hysteria of adults over changing scores.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:47 (eight years ago) link

well i feel the same way about hysteria over bass lines

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:48 (eight years ago) link

ay no freddie, but i wish ol bern had bothered to campaign in the south. those margins are embarrassing. is his strategy to slug it out in big states and take massive blows in the south?

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:49 (eight years ago) link

Bernie at a makeshift podium in some Miami patio right now

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:51 (eight years ago) link

wearing the same tie he wore at the debate

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:52 (eight years ago) link

was gonna say, go pick up your dad at lowe's, honey

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:52 (eight years ago) link

sanders is outside applebee's

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:52 (eight years ago) link

I think he wants to go to bed. That was as perfunctory a speech as I've seen

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:53 (eight years ago) link

voting for sanders over trump just to save time watching presidential speeches

erry red flag (f. hazel), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:53 (eight years ago) link

def. would boost the economy

erry red flag (f. hazel), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:54 (eight years ago) link

He jsut finished a campaign appearance; several former students were there.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:54 (eight years ago) link

well i feel the same way about hysteria over bass lines

― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius)

invest in hysteria over tan lines

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:54 (eight years ago) link

85%
50.9
47.1

last third of the vote in Wayne County not in yet

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:55 (eight years ago) link

Gee I hope Steve Kornacki pokes men with greater accuracy than he does that County board

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:57 (eight years ago) link

heh

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:58 (eight years ago) link

just doing some back of the envelope calculating here --

bernie's currently up by 32,000 votes. wayne county has 62% reported, with hillary up 24,000 votes. if she were to keep that margin, she'd pick up an additional 15,000 votes from wayne. sanders is currently up in genessee with 45% reporting, but that will probably change. the problem is no one knows which districts of wayne have reported -- that 15,000 number assumes that hillary maintains her 16% margin in wayne. if most of the remaining precints are from detroit, she could pick up more than those 15,000

tldr hillary's only shot is if the vast majority of the remaining precints are heavily favorable for her demographically, which may be true but no one knows

k3vin k., Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:58 (eight years ago) link

thanks

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:00 (eight years ago) link

k3vin kornacki

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:03 (eight years ago) link

does this auger well from bernie in ohio and illinois?

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:04 (eight years ago) link

k3vin kornacki

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, March 8, 2016 11:03 PM (1 minute ago)

haha i just saw that he totally stole that from me

k3vin k., Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:05 (eight years ago) link

90%, lead thinning but still 50.4 to 47.6

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:06 (eight years ago) link

xxp to m bison: I suppose it could. perhaps more significantly, it's like an isotope that illuminates what could be a key hrc vulnerability (if vs trump) on trade issues

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:07 (eight years ago) link

discouraging for hrc if her strongest support is in presidential red states, but vs trump blue/purple states in industrial north go red.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:10 (eight years ago) link

you can get 12 to 1 for your money right now on predictit betting against bernie. if i didn't have a rooting interest i'd put 50 bucks on hillary for sure

k3vin k., Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:18 (eight years ago) link

or, against bernie, rather

k3vin k., Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:19 (eight years ago) link

margin down to 17,000

k3vin k., Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:20 (eight years ago) link

checking account emptied

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:20 (eight years ago) link

Just getting home from a Raptors game--amazed at Sanders, preemptively amazed at whatever rationale Rubio comes up with tomorrow for staying in.

clemenza, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:22 (eight years ago) link

wow margin thinning fast

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:23 (eight years ago) link

discouraging for hrc if her strongest support is in presidential red states, but vs trump blue/purple states in industrial north go red.

it's sort of playing out like the reverse of 08 where obama won all the 'red' state primaries and clinton won ohio/pennsylvania/michigan/new hampshire etc
turned out fine in the end tho

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:23 (eight years ago) link

detroit vote not all counted and they count absentees last so those too prob out, not sure how much though

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:24 (eight years ago) link

cruz up in the great state of idaho btw

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:26 (eight years ago) link

kent county just updated, bernie 28k in the lead again

erry red flag (f. hazel), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:28 (eight years ago) link

Cruz up about 11% in Idaho with 14% reporting. tho have no earthly clue as to what the remaining makeup of state is so it could be a mirage

probably a silly question but why didn't FiveThirtyEight have any forecasting data for Idaho/Hawaii?

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:29 (eight years ago) link

it's sort of playing out like the reverse of 08 where obama won all the 'red' state primaries and clinton won ohio/pennsylvania/michigan/new hampshire etc
turned out fine in the end tho

Latinos to the rescue!

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:30 (eight years ago) link

What's the results from Washtenaw Cty? (Ann Arbor)

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:32 (eight years ago) link

56/43 for sanders with 76% reporting, according to CNN

erry red flag (f. hazel), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:34 (eight years ago) link

i think that's a wrap

k3vin k., Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:34 (eight years ago) link

discouraging for hrc if her strongest support is in presidential red states, but vs trump blue/purple states in industrial north go red.

― never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:10 (23 minutes ago) Permalink

doubt this is meaningful -- primary voters are a much smaller pool and not necessarily representative of general election voters

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:35 (eight years ago) link

Washtenaw County
with 101 of 141 reporting (acc to NYT)
56.0% Sanders
43.2% Clinton

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:35 (eight years ago) link

Bernie wins Michigan!

schwantz, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:36 (eight years ago) link

yeaaaah bernie

Treeship, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:36 (eight years ago) link

fuck yeah!

:)

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:39 (eight years ago) link

Cruz with a little over 8% lead in Idaho, 25% in.

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:40 (eight years ago) link

A close win is v much better than a close loss, but how will this result split the MI delegates?

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:41 (eight years ago) link

CNN is estimating 41-41 but I dunno that they've updated their metrics

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:42 (eight years ago) link

actually 44-43

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:43 (eight years ago) link

doubt this is meaningful -- primary voters are a much smaller pool and not necessarily representative of general election voters

not necessarily, sure, but the hrc campaign would be remiss not to look into the "meaning" of this going forward, in terms of her potential ability to pull working class (esp white) votes from an anti-free trade candidate.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:43 (eight years ago) link


We won’t know exactly how many delegates Sanders or Clinton will take out of Michigan until the results are final, but based on the numbers so far, The Green Papers estimates that Sanders would get 72 delegates and Clinton 58. That would put Sanders five delegates above his FiveThirtyEight target for Michigan and Clinton five delegates below.

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:47 (eight years ago) link

xp i'm sure the clinton campaign is thinking about working class whites a lot, but it's worth noting that Barack Obama lost working class whites 62-36 in 2012 and still won solidly. The link below gives a pretty solid breakdown:

http://theweek.com/articles/611097/why-workingclass-whites-cant-propel-donald-trump-ultimate-victory

intheblanks, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:49 (eight years ago) link

the national media has been stuck on the narrative of "reagan democrats" as the only votes that really matter for 36 years now, but demographics have rendered that particular voting bloc far less relevant than it used to be

intheblanks, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:50 (eight years ago) link

This article posits that Trump would need to win 70% of all white men in the U.S. to win a majority, which is a staggering, unprecedented amount in the modern era:

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/donald-trump-needs-7-of-10-white-guys-213699?paginate=false

intheblanks, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:51 (eight years ago) link

that's a lot of pints to buy

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:52 (eight years ago) link

nobody here is saying Reagan Democrats are the only votes that really matter

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:53 (eight years ago) link

i know no one here is necessarily saying that, but I am seeing an increasing discussion of it in the media over the past few weeks. There's been all sorts of talk of rust belt states like PA, Michigan, and Wisconsin potentially going for Trump after not going republican for nearly 30 years.

intheblanks, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:57 (eight years ago) link

Had a feeling MI would pull through. \m/

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:58 (eight years ago) link

I did the same calculations a couple of weeks ago, trying to convince a friend that Trump couldn't win. I started from two premises, both extremely conservative: same turnout as 2012 (turnout for a Trump election will likely be massive on the left), Democrats get 85% of African-American/Hispanic vote (also unlikely--sure it will be more like 90-95%). I came up with Trump needing to win 61% of the white vote, which only happened in '64, '72, and '84, all historic landslides.

clemenza, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:58 (eight years ago) link

xp so that wasn't necessarily directed at this board, i guess i'm honestly kind of bored that the media's already breaking out the same tired stuff I've seen my whole adult life, horse race speculation from people who can't quite shake the narrative of that demographic bloc representing "real america".

intheblanks, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 04:59 (eight years ago) link

@clemenza

the 70% in the second article i linked to was for white men, not sure if that's relevant to your calculations

The 62% in the first article was specifically "white working class"

intheblanks, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 05:00 (eight years ago) link

xp got it.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 05:02 (eight years ago) link

Thanks, I haven't read the piece yet. I went by Gallup's breakdowns on this page:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/139880/election-polls-presidential-vote-groups.aspx

Just grouped all white voters together independent of gender/income/whatever.

clemenza, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 05:03 (eight years ago) link

cool, thanks clemenza

intheblanks, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 05:05 (eight years ago) link

Cruz projected to win Iowa.

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 05:15 (eight years ago) link

i imagine so

mookieproof, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 05:16 (eight years ago) link

xpost you mean ohio

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 05:17 (eight years ago) link

Idaho

Pentenema Karten, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 05:18 (eight years ago) link

Rubio has an amazing 0 delegates tonight

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 05:18 (eight years ago) link

rubiomentum

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 05:21 (eight years ago) link

took me three re-reads to realize I typed Iowa and not Idaho. too goddamn late here.

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 05:23 (eight years ago) link

he means 40(b) but....

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/707430680133763074

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 05:24 (eight years ago) link

Do you think these big data people get a raging boner when their computer finishes downloading a new set of spreadsheets?

larry appleton, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 05:26 (eight years ago) link

don't really think about nerds and their erections

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 05:27 (eight years ago) link

Nothing's hotter than a Nate Silver fantasy, and I'm sure even straight guys can agree on that one.

larry appleton, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 05:32 (eight years ago) link

Didn't see Trump's speech earlier tonight, but apparently he was claiming that Trump steaks are still around, they didn't go under, and he brandished some steaks to prove it. A panelist on CNN pointed out that the steaks were from a local butcher and not his own.

Van Jones: "He's lying about his meat again."

clemenza, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 06:24 (eight years ago) link

So seeing my name mentioned a lot in this thread since last night, do people really want to hear my thoughts on Michigan?

1) Great surprise, great victory, no doubt. At first I was dismayed, got way too caught up in the sport of it, but fuck that. However, does anyone really believe this changes anything fundamental about the primary? He still lost black voters by 35-40% (which is now considered really good...) he's still losing the pledged delegate count, and even if it turns out polling is off by 20% over the entire midwest, he won't make it up.

2) This just prolongs his defeat. Which is great! I've said repeatedly that I hope Sanders continues in the race, so this is good for that.

3) However, if he doubles down on an anti-free trade message, it could be the same. He won't win on that message, and the trade agreements weren't the cause of the decline in the rust belt, but another symptom of a wave of globalization that the west was ill suited for, due to the conservative waves in the eighties. And also, how does anti-NAFTA rhetoric track with hispanic voters?

(Also, anyone complaining about my 'smugness' in teaching US citizens about their own country, go to literally any debate on here where I try to explain what is going on in DK. Start with the Ice Age thread. This attack is massively hypocritical.)

Frederik B, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 12:16 (eight years ago) link

for the record, your name was mentioned because we think you're a clown, not because we wanted your thoughts

k3vin k., Wednesday, 9 March 2016 12:19 (eight years ago) link

One doesn't preclude the other.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:00 (eight years ago) link

Also, I don't care what you think, kevin.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:00 (eight years ago) link

"HEY I am also a smug dick about my own country's politics too! Not just on this thread!"

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:02 (eight years ago) link

@pareene
An irony of Sanders' success with whites is that he is the opposite of what Democratic Party elites said they need to be to win back whites

"Race back to the middle" they said.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:02 (eight years ago) link

I'm not gonna run away and pretend something striking and unexpexted didn't happen. But what I've been saying all along is still right.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:03 (eight years ago) link

so...you'd like to point out that you've been otm on this thread?

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:06 (eight years ago) link

@dick_nixon
I would like to reiterate at this point what a dumb son of a bitch Mitt Romney is. I think the events of the night warrant it.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:09 (eight years ago) link

morbs are dennis perrin and dick nixon the only people you follow on twitter

the uniqueness of our billionaires (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:10 (eight years ago) link

i don't follow anyone

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:12 (eight years ago) link

"This wasn't unexpected for us" -- @HillaryClinton Deputy Communications Director on @BernieSanders' Michigan win

‏@ggreenwald
Actual LOL

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:13 (eight years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/MF30iTu.gif

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:15 (eight years ago) link

so...you'd like to point out that you've been otm on this thread?

― Neanderthal, 9. marts 2016 14:06 (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yeah, surprisingly enough, I have. Luckily for me I didn't try any predictions about Michigan, other than saying he wouldn't make up his delegate deficit there. Which turned out to be technically tom (though of course not what's important)

Frederik B, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:16 (eight years ago) link

LOL Sanders has a two hundred+ delegate deficit obv he's not going to make up his deficit with one state that only has 120 something pledged delegates. That's some serious OTMing there, Fred. What wondrous and surprising predictions will you make next?

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:20 (eight years ago) link

Got dammit, you're dumb.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:22 (eight years ago) link

He needed to win Michigan by a lot more than he did to begin making up the deficit. There, is that spelled out enough for you?

Frederik B, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:23 (eight years ago) link

It's not an insightful point however you try to spin it.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:26 (eight years ago) link

Did I claim it to be?

Frederik B, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:27 (eight years ago) link

Not that you appear to have ever made an insightful point on this thread (or any US politics one) which you mostly fill with vapid and obvious political predictions and defensiveness.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:28 (eight years ago) link

You appear to be patting yourself on the back on some sort of master of US political knowledge and prognostication all the time! If that was all meant to be humor, CONGRATS your dry Dane wit appears to have snookered all of us.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:29 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, that's not true. Go back and read. But then again, who cares, you're not trustworthy. You've shown yourself over and over to be a liar, and nobody believes what you're saying.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:33 (eight years ago) link

Fantastic Donald Trump imitation! Now tells us about your hands!

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:34 (eight years ago) link

your dry Dane wit appears to have snookered all of us.

Snøkered all of us, I think you mean

A Fifth Beatle Dies (Tom D.), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:35 (eight years ago) link

dnftD

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:36 (eight years ago) link

Frederik I'm not going to subject myself to re-reading your old idiotic posts. It's bad enough that I'll have to keep reading your new ones ("Why can't I quit you election threads??!?!")

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:37 (eight years ago) link

Alex, you deserve nothing better than a Trumpian response. And if you don't get the difference between a presidential debate and an internet feud, then you're as dumb as I expect you to be.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:39 (eight years ago) link

Do stop reading my posts, why on earth would you keep on doing that? I never in a million years thought you'd be able to gain anything from them.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:41 (eight years ago) link

I don't like you, I consider you a worthless troll, I get nothing out of writing with you. Ignore me, and I'll be more than happy to ignore you. Deal?

Frederik B, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:42 (eight years ago) link

He's not smug if you read the posts in the original Danish

μpright mammal (mh), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:44 (eight years ago) link

http://denmark.dk/en/meet-the-danes

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:51 (eight years ago) link

This is like Usenet circa '96.

PS. Bob Dole has no chance.

Michael Jones, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:52 (eight years ago) link

I'm learning so much. Did you know the Danes love hot dogs? I did not!
http://denmark.dk/en//~/media/Denmark/Images/Meet%20the%20danes/Teasers/meetthekids200.jpg?h=125&iar=1&w=200

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:55 (eight years ago) link

My ex's sister and her gf who live in Copenhagen kept saying that Danes are kinda arrogant and even ruder than Finns, I guess Frederik isn't doing much in this thread to dispel that stereotype... :(

Tuomas, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:59 (eight years ago) link

Danes do love their meat, when I've been there there were hot dog ads everywhere! Not the best country for a vegetarian traveller.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:00 (eight years ago) link

all the #narrative about hillary being shaken by stunning upset is a little much considering she won 86 delegates last night while bernie won 69

mookieproof, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:01 (eight years ago) link

"I never in a million years thought you'd be able to gain anything from them."

NO ONE IS GAINING ANYTHING FROM THEM!

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:01 (eight years ago) link

Please stop. Please?

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:09 (eight years ago) link

plz guys let's just have a singalong

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEwdroXuL8A

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:10 (eight years ago) link

Well, the "Dewey Defeats Truman" polling/results gap would kinda be newsworthy no matter what; it IS a stunning upset, particularly if it's a bellwether for other states with similar polling. I dont think it reshapes the race in one stroke or anything, but I could buy mildly shaken, Clinton-wise.

agreed re: usenet 96

van damme death warrant (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:15 (eight years ago) link

BREAKING NEWS:

Report: George W. Bush Will Not Make Another Primary Endorsement

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:16 (eight years ago) link

Supposedly the worst polling in recorded primary history for MI. I think I saw that the second worst in like 88 or something (sorry id look up details but on my phone) was by +17 and this was like +24 or something?

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:19 (eight years ago) link

Might be a good time for a new thread. Anyone? I can't think of any clever titles.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:19 (eight years ago) link

I mean what happened in MI was the worst in recorded primary history period in any state. Xp

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:19 (eight years ago) link

Any theories as to why, Mordy?

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:21 (eight years ago) link

Is it the elusive young uns?

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:23 (eight years ago) link

it's possible the polls did not account for independents properly. Sanders won strongly with independents, Clinton won with democrats.

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:24 (eight years ago) link

Open primaries, black voters broke more favorable towards Bernie than the model had shown in the south, iirc it is a no cell phone state for polling, generally unfamiliar political terrain this year (which is maybe a better explanation for failings on the R side). I'm sure if he hasn't yet Nate will be explaining himself shortly. Xp

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:24 (eight years ago) link

Report: George W. Bush Will Not Make Another Primary Endorsement

I heard he likes "red."

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:25 (eight years ago) link

Grazie

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:25 (eight years ago) link

no cell phone state for polling, generally unfamiliar political terrain this year (which is maybe a better explanation for failings on the R side). I'm sure if he hasn't yet Nate will be explaining himself shortly. Xp

― Mordy, Wednesday, March 9, 2016 8:24 AM (36 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i don't even know how they are going to do polling in another 5 years

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:25 (eight years ago) link

(Xp)

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:26 (eight years ago) link

It seems like Hillary's team is better at this than conventional pollsters. They knew the polls were not representative (probably bc their internal polling was much different).

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:26 (eight years ago) link

Xxp By drone

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:27 (eight years ago) link

Future polling will be an all-darts/psychic octopus method.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:27 (eight years ago) link

also i think this is my first actual use of flag post not goofing around and saying "flag past" as a joke, feels good man

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:28 (eight years ago) link

Future polling will be an all-darts/psychic octopus method.

― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, March 9, 2016 8:27 AM (29 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i wonder about some kinda creepy tracking your facebook, google, likes all that algorithim stuff? who knows

i saw something where they can track where your eyes actually go on a webpage and make "heat maps" of pages etc

i dunno something creepy probably

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:29 (eight years ago) link

some pollsters are already doing that first part iirc?

micro brewbio (crüt), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:31 (eight years ago) link

i don't even know how they are going to do polling in another 5 years

i'm guessing analytics teams will just pay facebook/google/amazon for a subset of their user data and go from there. why bother trying to contact someone when you can just see if they liked a bernie sanders related post on facebook or googled for voter registration information

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:34 (eight years ago) link

i wonder about some kinda creepy tracking your facebook, google, likes all that algorithim stuff? who knows

i saw something where they can track where your eyes actually go on a webpage and make "heat maps" of pages etc

i dunno something creepy probably

massive whoops, i didn't see you'd already posted that. so yes, i agree!

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:34 (eight years ago) link

fivethirtyeight (but not silver):

Bernie Sanders made folks like me eat a stack of humble pie on Tuesday night. He won the Michigan primary over Hillary Clinton, 50 percent to 48 percent, when not a single poll taken over the last month had Clinton leading by less than 5 percentage points. In fact, many had her lead at 20 percentage points or higher. Sanders’s win in Michigan was one of the greatest upsets in modern political history.

Both the FiveThirtyEight polls-plus and polls-only forecast gave Clinton a greater than 99 percent chance of winning. That’s because polling averages for primaries, while inexact, are usually not 25 percentage points off. Indeed, my colleague Nate Silver went back and found that only one primary, the 1984 Democratic primary in New Hampshire, was even on the same scale as this upset. In that contest, the polling average had Walter Mondale beating Gary Hart by 17 percentage points, but it was Hart who won, with slightly more than 9 percentage points over Mondale.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 14:43 (eight years ago) link

i sort of get why a 'win' is emphasized for the purposes of having a media narrative but calling any of these a 'win' seems a bit hollow when they award proportionally

global tetrahedron, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 15:03 (eight years ago) link

Ratings.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 15:05 (eight years ago) link

That's why I think some of the media complaints that they are in the bag for Hillary are a little hard to believe (though I don't doubt there are real examples). Their primary bias is to have an exciting race to cover which means they're more likely ime to tout an underdog challenger just to make it more interesting.

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 15:18 (eight years ago) link

ultimately despite all the sometimes heightened bad feelings being engendered by the democratic race, unlike the GOP which seems to represent the total collapse of their house of cards, all the issues being brought to the surface in the democratic debate are ultimately healthy ones:

the fact that there's a large left wing in the party that's been ignored for too long, the debate of pragmatism and getting things done in the realities of washington vs. what constitutes a fundamental selling out of the party's values, the long-simmering disconnect between white progressives and progressives of color and other communities, etc etc etc, and though i mean it's a presidential race and it gets a ugly at times, i don't think either clinton or sanders has caustically attacked the other like the republican candidates have, and there's certainly times with both candidates have seemed to learn from events during the campaign and adjusting their messages.

where as the GOP just seems like some high school assholes playing the dozens

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 15:25 (eight years ago) link

That's why I think some of the media complaints that they are in the bag for Hillary are a little hard to believe (though I don't doubt there are real examples). Their primary bias is to have an exciting race to cover which means they're more likely ime to tout an underdog challenger just to make it more interesting.

― Mordy, Wednesday, March 9, 2016 10:18 AM

Never 4get 2012 when pundits said it was gonna be a nailbiter through Election Day.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 15:27 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyONt_ZH_aw&sns=em

Idk why no one has tried to torment Trump with a million steak puns yet. "Would you stake your reputation on that, Mr. Trump?" "Look, I know you are trying to stake your position as the anti-immigration candidate." "Oh, raising the stakes again I see?" A candidate could just go on and on and then play dumb when Trump complains about it. They coud also torment him by punning on his name a lot. Many possibilities

Treeship, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 15:28 (eight years ago) link

I agree with u.m.s., this dem primary has been good for the country all around

Treeship, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 15:30 (eight years ago) link

trump aside, just the concept of buying steaks at the sharper image is the funniest thing that has ever happened

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 15:32 (eight years ago) link

xp yes but has it been good for ilx?

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 15:32 (eight years ago) link

many xps - Abbasolutely agree that it's good that we're having this conversation no matter what happens.

Also otm is this from Mordy: "primary bias is to have an exciting race to cover." P much. The Story Needs To Change.

Hillinevitability was a story, which needed to change to Unexpected Surge of Populist Challenger. Which needed to change to WTF? A Socialist Has No Chance, which needed to change to OMG Can He Really Have a Chance? Which needed to change to Clinton Fights Sanders Insurgency, which needed to change to Sanders Closing The Gap, which needed to change to Clinton Roaring Back, which needed to change to ZOMG Sanders Scores Major Upset, which will change to But She Still Leads in Delegates, which will change again and again until there's no story anymore and we'll be off chasing another set of squirrels.

Of course Everything's Different Now(tm). But I recognize this rhythm, and I went to journalism school 20 years ago.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 15:42 (eight years ago) link

Curious as to how Clinton reacts to last night. She doesn't need to be rattled, but she may be--and if she's rattled she may overreact and start attacking hard, and if that happens, that could backfire. She tended to run the 2008 campaign minute to minute, Annie Oakley and all that; assume she'll be more disciplined this time.

clemenza, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 15:49 (eight years ago) link

I don't think she should panic. She has the delegate lead and she earned more delegates last night. It might be troubling for her that rust belt states are trending Bernie (though last night was a near tie in MI since it's representational delegates) but big states like PA or FL are closed primaries which should help her. March 15th might be rough for her-- I assume she'll win missouri and north carolina, and if she can keep it close in (or win some of) OH, IL and FL she'll be in good position.

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 15:56 (eight years ago) link

The Bernie case is a little harder to make since (I know I'm a broken record) at this points he needs more than momentum to overtake the earned delegate lead - the argument in his favor is that he is trending up so it's not impossible to believe that he captures such a groundswell that he starts blowing her out in some of his more favorable states.

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 15:59 (eight years ago) link

we did that one Monday, i think

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:10 (eight years ago) link

I do think it's important that Trump has yet to get a majority of support in any of his states. He's been pretty consistent in that regard.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:15 (eight years ago) link

xp whoops, thread moves fast, sorry

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:20 (eight years ago) link

Indeed, the Sanders campaign has focused on courting the Arab population in Dearborn, especially in the last week. He met with Arab-American leaders in the city, released an Arab-language radio ad in the Dearborn market, and reiterated at a Dearborn campaign rally that “we’re going to end bigotry in this country once and for all.” It’s hardly a new theme in Sanders’ campaign — he has spoken out against anti-Muslim rhetoric for months, likening such prejudice to the conditions his Jewish parents faced preceding the Holocaust.

“Arabs, both Muslim and Christian, have long been targets of discriminatory anti-terrorism policies, and Sanders’ campaign has responded to these concerns better than anyone else. He even promoted his campaign platform of equality and dignity in Arabic,” said (Hend) Amry(, a Libyan-American writer). “We are also seeing, perhaps, a response to the Sanders’ campaign’s attack of corporate America. Michigan’s blue-collar Arab Americans are suffering economic challenges too, not just white blue-collar Americans.”

http://www.ibtimes.com/bernie-sanders-wins-big-michigan-muslims-political-pundits-cant-quite-believe-it-2333030

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:24 (eight years ago) link

re: "Trump has yet to get a majority of support in any of his states." - Hence the hunger for a two-person race. All not-Trump voters have to agree to focus on one specific person (in this case, gah, apparently Cruz) or give up and stay home.

As has been noticed elsewhere, it's likely to be win-win for Democrats. The hideous Trump, the odious Cruz, or some as-yet-unknown clusterfuckular third option. The GOP will have proved either be too weak to stop the Trump train (which makes them look weak and stupid) or nefarious enough to steal the nomination from him (which makes them look evil and antidemocratic).

I know prediction is a fool's errand these days, but I can't ignore the glimmer of hope that Republicans will simultaneously lose the presidency, Senate, and Supreme Court all at once. The schismatic chaos and paroxysms of gnashing teeth and flurry of long-ass think pieces would just be the cherry on top of a magnificent sundae of woe.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:28 (eight years ago) link

and then the Democratic wing of the Democratic party can turn its attention to Clinton-Schumer leadership?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:31 (eight years ago) link

They would (will) at least be aware that they're a wing.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:36 (eight years ago) link

I thought we were an aisle?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:37 (eight years ago) link

I know prediction is a fool's errand these days, but I can't ignore the glimmer of hope that Republicans will simultaneously lose the presidency, Senate, and Supreme Court all at once. The schismatic chaos and paroxysms of gnashing teeth and flurry of long-ass think pieces would just be the cherry on top of a magnificent sundae of woe.

― brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, March 9, 2016 10:28 AM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Things would certainly improve, but I can't get over the feeling that the Dems would ultimately fumble that ball.

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:38 (eight years ago) link

Let's face it: neither party really knows what it's doing or has much in the way of internal consistency. It's just that the GOP is so much worse, oh my god.

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:39 (eight years ago) link

Jon Schwarz ‏@tinyrevolution
1996 GOP platform denounced use of terrorism to justify restriction of civil rights. Oh well http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=25848

"We denounce terrorist attacks made on American citizens at home or abroad. We must take all legitimate steps to swiftly apprehend and severely punish persons committing terrorists acts. However, we must also denounce any attempts to deprive law-abiding citizens of their God-given, constitutionally-protected rights while fighting terrorism. To take away the liberty of the American people while fighting terrorism is repugnant to the history and character of our nation. We firmly oppose any legislation that would infringe upon the rights of American citizens to freedom of religion, speech, press, and assembly; the right to keep and bear arms; and the right to judicial due process."

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:44 (eight years ago) link

How credible is the idea that Sanders getting very close to beating Clinton in the primary and it having zero effect on the way she acts as president being a recipe for causing a similar implosion in the Democratic Party? The relief of not having Trump as president being quickly be replaced by anger at Clinton doing nothing for the Sanders constituency of the Democratic Party that helped get her elected? I mean yeah blame it on obstruction from Congress but the success of Sanders in the primary might cause a bloc of the Democratic Party that was previously kind of diffuse to gain a sense of identity that is centered around betrayal of the working class by Clinton?

erry red flag (f. hazel), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:54 (eight years ago) link

it would depend how motivated and angry the "Sanders wing" would be, instead of just booting their friends down their stairs when they ask "Would you rather have Trump?"

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:57 (eight years ago) link

I did miss that! Thanks.

erry red flag (f. hazel), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:01 (eight years ago) link

i haven't read the salon piece in full, but this lines up with what i was going to say: "For the insurgents of the Sanders wing, the question now becomes how many of them are willing to turn to the more difficult and less exciting work of rebuilding democracy from the ground up"

unless Sanders/Warren supporters turn out en masse for the 2018 midterms and help to build progressive momentum around liberal candidates, they can't really throw a tizzy about HRC ignoring them while she's president

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:08 (eight years ago) link

This is what frustrates me about the notion that Sanders supporters should take solace in what could amounts to a successful protest candidacy driving issues on the left. You'd have to be an idiot or at best an amnesiac to think HRC is actually going to adopt or even sublimate his core positions.

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:09 (eight years ago) link

"could amounts," now who's the idiot

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:11 (eight years ago) link

I wonder what the response would be if Sanders somehow manages to eke out more regular delegates than Clinton, but she wins the nomination with superdelegates. It could cause a lot of contentiousness and maybe hobble her candidacy in the general?

sacral intercourse conducive to vegetal luxuriance (askance johnson), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:16 (eight years ago) link

It would be kinda nice if the american people (on both sides of the aisle) finally wake up after being dicked over and lied to for 30 years but I dont expect much

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:19 (eight years ago) link

If Sanders won more regular delegates but the super delegates flipped it for Clinton it would be catastrophic for everyone involved xp

Here, let me Danesplain that for you (jjjusten), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:20 (eight years ago) link

It would be kinda nice if the american people (on both sides of the aisle) finally wake up after being dicked over and lied to for 30 years but I dont expect much

― carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries)

that's why many Republicans are voting for Trump.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:20 (eight years ago) link

Basically you get President Trump in that scenario, also falls into the "so not going to happen" category.

Here, let me Danesplain that for you (jjjusten), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:21 (eight years ago) link

This is what frustrates me about the notion that Sanders supporters should take solace in what could amounts to a successful protest candidacy driving issues on the left. You'd have to be an idiot or at best an amnesiac to think HRC is actually going to adopt or even sublimate his core positions.

speaking seriously + specifically - she is not going to oppose free trade agreements and she isn't going to being an isolationist. that said - she has plenty of things she's campaigning on that she is likely to try and implement in office that will make a material difference in ppl's lives. so the question really becomes what constitutes "core positions."

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:33 (eight years ago) link

going to become* an isolationist. i really need to get back into the habit of reviewing posts before i hit submit.

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:33 (eight years ago) link

Richard M. Nixon ‏@dick_nixon

I'm still here.

Manu Raju @mkraju
"Every single person who has attacked me has gone down," Trump boasts

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:42 (eight years ago) link

actually Richard Nixon died in 1994

micro brewbio (crüt), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:43 (eight years ago) link

just a rumor

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:46 (eight years ago) link

Faked it.

A Fifth Beatle Dies (Tom D.), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:47 (eight years ago) link

bernie is not in any sense an "isolationist"

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:47 (eight years ago) link

I agree

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:51 (eight years ago) link

For the insurgents of the Sanders wing, the question now becomes how many of them are willing to turn to the more difficult and less exciting work of rebuilding democracy from the ground up"

just wondering what other candidates are being charged with the ludicrous task of "rebuilding democracy from the ground up"

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:54 (eight years ago) link

What other candidates are making the case that it needs to be rebuilt from the ground up?

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:55 (eight years ago) link

Like its called grassroots bc grass grows from the ground

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:56 (eight years ago) link

what if you smoke it

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:58 (eight years ago) link

From personal experience I can say you shouldn't try building anything after you smoke grass.

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:58 (eight years ago) link

maybe don't take things so literally

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:58 (eight years ago) link

You don't understand

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:59 (eight years ago) link

you don't understand

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:59 (eight years ago) link

Maybe not. Maybe you can rephrase your question? The answer to why Bernie supporters would be charged with rebuilding democracy & not, say, Hillary supporters seems obvious to me.

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:01 (eight years ago) link

*slowly reaches toward the smoking grassroots*

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:02 (eight years ago) link

What other candidates are making the case that it needs to be rebuilt from the ground up?

― Mordy, Wednesday, March 9, 2016 12:55 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

tbh i have no idea what any of the other candidates stand for, if anything, beyond enabling the same old shitshow. so yay for that.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:02 (eight years ago) link

Smells good in here...

schwantz, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:03 (eight years ago) link

what is this "rebuilding democracy" that you keep mentioning? what does that actually mean to you?

it sounds like a pretty vague term that can mean whatever you want it to.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:04 (eight years ago) link

I assume it's a vague reference to the critique made by some Bernie supporters that our democracy is fatally flawed and needs broad systemic changes?

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:06 (eight years ago) link

As opposed to maybe more mild reforms that Hillary supports (like reinstating civil rights voting protections).

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:07 (eight years ago) link

For the insurgents of the Sanders wing, the question now becomes how many of them are willing to turn to the more difficult and less exciting work of rebuilding democracy from the ground up, and taking the Democratic Party back from the lawyers and technology millionaires and Hollywood executives and foreign-policy apparatchiks who have become its principal proprietors.

oh, i see, it's simply that they want Sanders supporters to dismantle the oligarchy that has controlled society for millenia.

yeah that's a dumb expectation to have. some people say stupid things on the internet.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:11 (eight years ago) link

As opposed to maybe more mild reforms that Hillary supports (like reinstating civil rights voting protections).

ADDRESSING POLITICAL VIOLENCE

We need to re-enfranchise the more than two million African-Americans who have had their right to vote taken away by a felony conviction, paid their debt to society, and deserve to have their rights restored.
Congress must restore the “pre-clearance” formula under the Voting Rights Act, which extended protections to minority voters in states and counties where they were clearly needed.
We must expand the Act’s scope so that every American, regardless of skin color or national origin, is able to vote freely.
We need to make Election Day a federal holiday to increase voters’ ability to participate.
We must make early voting an option for voters who work or study and need the flexibility to vote on evenings or weekends.
We must make no-fault absentee ballots an option for all Americans.
We must automatically register every American to vote when they turn 18 or move to a new state. The burden of registering voters should be on the state, not the individual voter.
We must put an end to discriminatory laws and the purging of minority-community names from voting rolls.
We need to make sure that there are sufficient polling places and poll workers to prevent long lines from forming at the polls anywhere.

https://berniesanders.com/issues/racial-justice/

all seems pretty reasonable to me

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:15 (eight years ago) link

so, in the case of Chief Executive, you get to choose one of a narrow pool of candidates who are demonstrably capable of raising a billion dollars from the country's worst people. eg the First Primary

xxp

going back to some 1975 rules would be a start (more inclusive than those obviously)

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:15 (eight years ago) link

I read that Sanders outspent Hill in MI

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:26 (eight years ago) link

Adam those are things are reasonable but hopefully I'm not surprising you by mentioning that Bernie has made a "political revolution" a big part of his campaign whereas Hillary has not.

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

mordy, you just read the platform. we've had our differences but i know you're smart enough to realize that the "political revolution" stuff is largely a matter of whipping up interest and trying to differentiate himself from HRC

k3vin k., Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:31 (eight years ago) link

quit focusing on it so much

k3vin k., Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:31 (eight years ago) link

it's not that hard to understand:

our western market-driven capitalist democracy is fucked
and it needs to be dismantled
and replaced
with something else

versus

modest reforms and hopefully a return to the 90s' neoliberal prosperity!

sean gramophone, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:32 (eight years ago) link

today in the los angeles times:

"We Mexicans from the areas you report from, the latest being Boyle Heights, my old neighborhood, are not anti-Trump. We are a large group who will vote for Trump regardless of your biased views," she wrote.

"Viva Trump."

http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-0309-lopez-trump-supporters-20160309-column.html

F♯ A♯ (∞), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:36 (eight years ago) link

mordy, you just read the platform. we've had our differences but i know you're smart enough to realize that the "political revolution" stuff is largely a matter of whipping up interest and trying to differentiate himself from HRC

a. i agree w/ you that bernie's platforms are not particularly radical but inside the parameters of the democratic party and amount to a salve that will ultimately preserve the capitalist democratic nature of the USA. b. i don't think all of bernie's supporters see it that way, and c. i don't think all of bernie's rhetoric explains it that way, and d. i don't think all of bernie's opponents see it that way so that e. when AdamB asks why bernie supporters need to rebuild democracy which presumably really means f. showing up for midterms, g. i don't think bernie voters alone have an obligation to change the politics of the US by voting in better politicians i'm not surprised like Adam is that someone might think they have a unique responsibility.

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:40 (eight years ago) link

like there are ppl in this thread who think his platform is more radical than you and i think and i thought adam was one of them.

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:41 (eight years ago) link

Sanders' message has the greatest appeal to people who are suffering under the current system. Unfortunately those are to a large degree ppl who've been alienated from voting.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:42 (eight years ago) link

Lol @ polls of CA GOP, probably the weakest state GOP organization in the country

Xp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:45 (eight years ago) link

So I just learned at a social event in my left-leaning workplace that I may be alone as a Sanders supporter, although there were one or two other people who kept quiet during the "Duh we all like Hillary" chatter.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:47 (eight years ago) link

My boss is a big Clinton-supporter which made me a little circumspect about saying much.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:47 (eight years ago) link

what's with the left hostility to Nate Silver this time around? a lot of people on twitter and on my fb feed seem really pissed at him lately

i feel like last election when he was saying Romney would lose and the right were screaming that his forecasts were partisan and he's a queer and the left retort was 'you dummies, he's just feeding poll data into a forecast and showing us the results, it's not partisan it's just math.' but now that his forecast is saying hilary will win, seems like it has shifted to 'ok NOW he's a partisan hack'?

flopson, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:48 (eight years ago) link

bc he is generally giving bad news to bernie supporters and the left, like the right, shoot the messenger.

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:49 (eight years ago) link

Rubio may be out before Florida

(Link goes to a tweet w/embedded video from FOX Business Channel. You've been warned.)

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:49 (eight years ago) link

One thing I think people forget or don't realize about stats is that one big miss does not automatically call into question your entire methodology. I mean I can't actually speak to whether Silver is legit proven as a better-than-most predictor of elections, I just don't think the fact that he blew Michigan means he's worthless.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:51 (eight years ago) link

technically the polls blew MI. he can only work with the polls that are available.

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:51 (eight years ago) link

right

k3vin k., Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:51 (eight years ago) link

But I would guess that's where the hostility comes from -- calling primaries at 99% likelihood of going to the favored candidate and then being wrong upsets them because the inevitability narrative and the electability narrative are a lot of what drives Clinton campaign. Some read deliberate bias into it, but I don't.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:52 (eight years ago) link

technically the polls blew MI. he can only work with the polls that are available.

― Mordy, Wednesday, March 9, 2016 1:51 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Sort of yes, sort of no. 538 makes their own probability calculations based on polls. Giving the eventual winner a <1% chance of winning going into the primary is blowing it.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:53 (eight years ago) link

even 538 has kinda treated this election like '¯\_(ツ)_/¯ who knows anymore, let's post some slack chats and gifs'

iatee, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:53 (eight years ago) link

all silver does is average a bunch of polls and throw some fairy dust on it, the polls were massively wrong this time

iatee, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:54 (eight years ago) link

xp right, but he's supposed to be the Poll Whisperer, determining the right poll for us to listen to if there is one.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:55 (eight years ago) link

538 makes their own probability calculations but he can't call an election for Bernie when Bernie has not led in a single poll (and the best poll for him this cycle showed Hillary 10 pts up).

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:55 (eight years ago) link

ftr mordy fb messaged me the other day saying he thought bernie was gonna take michigan, maybe mordy should be the new nate silver

iatee, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:56 (eight years ago) link

even that one that came in right before the election which i don't think 538 worked into their analysis showed hillary up

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:56 (eight years ago) link

technically the polls blew MI. he can only work with the polls that are available.

― Mordy, Wednesday, March 9, 2016 1:51 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this is cop out. his job is to predict the election.

his big innovation was to formally and on an ongoing basis asses the likely accuracy of pollsters. if he's dubious about the polls then his prediction should have had big error bars. it didn't, so he clearly thought the polling was fine.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:57 (eight years ago) link

I realize this is kind of splitting hairs, but the whole point of Silver's methodology is that by mixing polls and fairy dust in the right way you can figure out, among other things, the likelihood that they would be wrong.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:57 (eight years ago) link

all silver does is average a bunch of polls and throw some fairy dust on it

eh, they do a bit more than that. this tracker is interesting, for example:

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/delegate-targets/democrats/

(click the "republican" tab at the top to see the GOP side of things)

it's kind of a nice guide to the upcoming primaries and how well the candidates need to do to stay on track for the nomination. so even in states where bernie lost or will likely lose in the future, you can still see if he made relative gains by gaining more delegates than expected.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:58 (eight years ago) link

if every poll comes in with hillary winning nate silver is limited to them no matter what the secret sauce. i can make up whatever shit i want so if you want someone's gut feeling analysis subscribe to my private messaging chat service :p

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:58 (eight years ago) link

xp caek- his forecast updates its prior by itself though, you're making it sound like he reaches in and turns a crank in favour of bernie or hilary

flopson, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:58 (eight years ago) link

if he says "lol shrug, i can only work with what the polls tell me" then his predictions should be correspondingly uncertain. "it's on them, not me" is bs.

I realize this is kind of splitting hairs, but the whole point of Silver's methodology is that by mixing polls and fairy dust in the right way you can figure out, among other things, the likelihood that they would be wrong.

― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, March 9, 2016 1:57 PM (21 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this is not splitting hairs. this is a very fundamental and correct point. it is meaningless to predict an outcome without also giving a confidence. he knows this, which is why he gives a confidence interval.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:59 (eight years ago) link

re: 538: my own backlash has little to do with their handling of the michigan thing, though i would looooove a deep stat nerdery post where silver lifts up the hood and tries to figure out what he should have factored in, or what factors he might need to add to the next contests or whatever. because yeah, the premise is exactly that just banging a lot of polls together may NOT be very predictive at all, for reasons he's always been happy to discuss as a stats nerd. i bet he finds this michigan goof fascinating more than anything.

yea, though, i do lash back. i probably sound like a broken record on this but, as i've sorta said before on these threads, the quality/in-depthitude of the analysis has gone down a lot in the ESPN era. but more importantly he's expanded his stable to include much more hackish bro sports-pundit types (especially harry enten) and these other pretending-to-be-neutral-on-a-moving-train characters (particularly the one conservadude that chimes in with the "economic" take in all their chats). these others have generally been a lot more glib and have definitely seemed to have a strong anti-sanders bias in their shifting goalposts in addition to the less objectionable bad news for sanders that just comes out of their math. also they have really really bad headline-to-article matches and the headlines have been very hacky. i think silver's own pieces are still pretty silver-ish, if less robust in their deep digging mathwise and less rich and thoughtful in their graphics.

van damme death warrant (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:59 (eight years ago) link

xp i'm not at all. i'm saying his priors about pollster reliability were demonstrably wrong. this is on him. i'm not implying bias. i'm implying that he's bad.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 19:00 (eight years ago) link

My exact sentiments: https://twitter.com/bernieorhiliary/status/706697262458507266

Fake Sam's Club (I M Losted), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 19:01 (eight years ago) link

"his forecast updates its prior by itself though"

actually i have no idea what this means

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 19:01 (eight years ago) link

if he says "lol shrug, i can only work with what the polls tell me" then his predictions should be correspondingly uncertain.

tbf he said before MI that his gut told him bernie was going to outperform the polls and he has said many times that there's a lot of uncertainty in this election so if ppl look at his figures and assume they are 100% trustworthy that is a little bit on them

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 19:02 (eight years ago) link

i think the biggest problem is that partisans want the polls to show their candidate up bc they think it has a casual affect on things like momentum, enthusiasm, participation - like some republicans during 2012 were delusional but many more knew he was going to lose but thought that admitting that would dampen turnout.

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 19:04 (eight years ago) link

causal*

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 19:04 (eight years ago) link

i'm saying his priors about pollster reliability were demonstrably wrong.?

In what sense? At this point he's been through hundreds and hundreds of elections. If he didn't get several of the 99% predictions wrong, it would mean he was miscalibrating things and expressing too little confidence in his predictions.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 19:05 (eight years ago) link

"if ppl look at his figures and assume they are 100% trustworthy that is a little bit on them"

if you're saying caveat lector that's fine. but people concluding this from a prediction that claims there is a >99% probability of a hilary win, which is what he said about MI iirc, are interpreting him completely correctly.

that is what the prediction he made _means_. it's the fundamental premise of doing things probabilistically is to do a better job of encoding your own uncertainty.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 19:05 (eight years ago) link

two polls out in the last day or two, first since super tuesday:

NBC/WSJ

Trump: 30
Cruz: 27
Kasich: 22
Rubio: 20

Clinton: 53
Sanders: 44

ABC/WashPo

Trump: 34
Cruz: 25
Rubio: 18
Kasich: 13

Clinton: 49
Sanders:42

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 19:07 (eight years ago) link

there is a >99% probability of a hilary win, which is what he said about MI iirc, are interpreting him completely correctly.

I mean, based on what we knew Sunday, what do you think is a reasonable estimate for the probability of a Sanders win in Michigan? Anything over 10% seems very, very hard for me to justify.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 19:09 (eight years ago) link

Pierce:

But, as I talked to more and more people around Flint, I got the sense that the resonance of the exchange was not what HRC and her campaign thought it would be. The UAW members I talked to clearly considered HRC's use of the auto bailout against Sanders to be at best a half-truth, and a cynical attempt to win their support, and they were offended by what they saw as a glib attempt to turn the state's economic devastation into a campaign weapon. These were people who watched the auto industry flee this city and this state, and they knew full well how close the country's remaining auto industry came to falling apart completely in 2008 and 2009. They knew this issue because they'd lived it, and they saw through what the HRC campaign was trying to do with the issue. I have no data to support how decisive this feeling was in Tuesday night's returns, but it seems to me to be one of the more interesting examples of unintended consequences that I'd heard in a while.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 19:17 (eight years ago) link

she definitely could've made that critique better. the way she made it was sleazy but she could've said something like "the first bailout bill was opposed by senator sanders despite containing respite for the auto industry because he didn't like the rest of it - we need someone willing to compromise" - i don't know if it would've been effective but it a. would've been honest and b. would've hit sanders in a somewhat weak spot - the idea that he isn't a pragmatist who can get important things done bc of his ideology.

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 19:22 (eight years ago) link

the fact that Silver blew Michigan left baseball analysis means he's worthless.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 19:25 (eight years ago) link

i enjoy gawker's various descriptions of trump, i'd poll them except they're too numerous to track down

― nomar, Tuesday, March 1, 2016 2:01 PM (1 week ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

half-empty bag of rancid tapioca

how's life, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 19:25 (eight years ago) link

A half-truth, and a cynical attempt: Hillary 2016

karla jay vespers, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 19:26 (eight years ago) link

"his forecast updates its prior by itself though"

actually i have no idea what this means

― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, March 9, 2016 2:01 PM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

some ppl are mad that his model still has HRC with 99% chance of winning FL, the implication being that it should have become more uncertain and more in favour of Bernie after last night's results. if the forecast i work on severely over- or under-forecasts something, once we feed in the new data and update it, it updates its belief about subsequent outcomes downwards or upwards accordingly (holding all else constant). for Silver in this case it would update the prob of bernie winning upwards and discount poll data relative to other inputs. (i actually haven't looked at his methodology since last year, but i'm assuming he doesn't forecast each primary independently and estimates like the joint distribution of primary votes across states?) but the updating is done completely internally within model, you just feed in the data and it calculates the new prior distribution according to bayes' rule. aside from changing the specification of his model there isn't some crank he can reach in and pull to give it a desired result, and the whole point of his enterprise is to have a hands-off forecast unmuddied by the dirty misled intuition of pundits.

flopson, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 19:32 (eight years ago) link

Oh hai guys Marquito's on campus today. What should I ask?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 19:32 (eight years ago) link

also tbc i don't think there's anything wrong with giving NS a good ribbing or saying he has a bad forecast (although idk if there are others that did better, is that princeton guy running his again?), just that reading political bias into it because we don't like the outcome is silly because that's exactly what we mocked the right for doing 4 years ago. saying well it's different because he made some bloopers this time isn't convincing to me. i get that the narrative has become much more critical of self-consciously data-driven analysis since 2012, but idk it still just seems like a dumb reaction to have. one of the best NS moments last election was after the first Romney Obama debate, when the poll swung in Romney's favour and all the right pundits were pissed at Silver because his forecast barely budged. like, are we going to do that every time now?

flopson, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 19:39 (eight years ago) link

Come back Fred all's forgiven

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 19:43 (eight years ago) link

Ask Rubio about climate change. Floridians love sea level rising.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 19:50 (eight years ago) link

got u flopson. no disagreements there.

i guess my point is "the polls were bad" does not at all absolve his or any other extremely confident prediction. it is a strength of his predictions that one of the outputs is a confidence. that confidence was very high. when that happens that's due no only to the polls having a 20 percent gap, but also him having high confidence in the polls. he was wrong in this case.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 19:50 (eight years ago) link

Let us take a break from our quibbling to focus on the real threat:

http://www.sexycongress.net/
"Who would you rather have sex with?"

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 20:18 (eight years ago) link

some of these are very very difficult to choose between

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 20:21 (eight years ago) link

they're just all so sexy!!!

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 20:21 (eight years ago) link

nsfw i'm sure

btw the daily CNN Trump speech semed to be preempted today by Nancy's burial

Bobby Jindal coulda carried that coffin by himself

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 20:22 (eight years ago) link

It isn't just "he feeds in the data" though, he ranks which polls to consider and that's his magic touch - if he thought that Bernie would beat the 20% polls then there's ways to express that - it's the 99% confidence that's the problem not that he called it for Clinton. I don't know what I would have done differently, but I'm not paid to be Nate Silver!

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 20:26 (eight years ago) link

my mistake, she's lying in state at the liberry, plenty of time for the candidates to show up and genuflect if they can't make the Friday funeral

xp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 20:28 (eight years ago) link

In April 2015 Rubio had good national name recognition and positive press coverage. It was fair enough to call him a "real contender".

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 20:46 (eight years ago) link

Marco Rubio IS base.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 20:47 (eight years ago) link

and most of us hadn't yet seen he can only muster the gravitas of a seventh grader

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 20:47 (eight years ago) link

he sure could drink water

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 20:48 (eight years ago) link

Nate Silver can be forgiven for that inasmuch as any pundit could, because it's an entire industry built on acting like you know shit you don't or can't know. There probably were people with more direct experience with Rubio who were more skeptical of him, although there were others who probably weren't. I guess the only thing with Nate/538 is that the stats-geek aspect of it gives stuff on the entire website an air of objectivity and science that it doesn't warrant.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 20:52 (eight years ago) link

rubio had a ton of endorsements and the support of the party which before this election was a strong indicator

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 20:53 (eight years ago) link

Asked by Bloomberg why they aren’t backing Cruz, senators responded with awkward chuckles, long silences, and evading the reporter by ducking into a restricted elevator. Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) responded by saying he was headed to lunch.

sick burn shelby

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 21:00 (eight years ago) link

Asked by Bloomberg why they aren’t backing Cruz, senators responded with awkward chuckles, long silences, and evading the reporter by ducking into a restricted elevator. Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) responded by saying "Bazinga".

Evan, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 21:05 (eight years ago) link

johnny damon has endorsed donald trump

mookieproof, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 21:08 (eight years ago) link

angry blue collar + dumb millionaire coalition

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 21:10 (eight years ago) link

Marco Rubio, all your possible voting base are belong to us

nomar, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 21:12 (eight years ago) link

It isn't just "he feeds in the data" though, he ranks which polls to consider and that's his magic touch - if he thought that Bernie would beat the 20% polls then there's ways to express that - it's the 99% confidence that's the problem not that he called it for Clinton. I don't know what I would have done differently, but I'm not paid to be Nate Silver!

― Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, March 9, 2016 3:26 PM (37 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this is what his website says about poll weighting/ranking:

The weights reflect the quality of each survey as determined by FiveThirtyEight’s pollster ratings, which grades polls based on their past accuracy and methodological standards. The poll weights also adjust for a poll’s sample size and how recently it was conducted. All polls are included in the weighted average unless they were internal polls released by a candidate or a candidate’s super PAC or if we have good reason to suspect that the poll faked its data or committed other gross ethical violations.

i guess he could go in and fudge the weights to make the ones that tend pro-bernie (or in the case of MI, relatively less pro-Clinton) have more weight... but i don't think this is a parameter that he has discretion over and can change at a whim

i also don't like the implication that NS the human = his forecast, and the suggestion that he should tinker with his forecast every time it makes a bad call or runs counter to intuition is exactly wrong and misunderstands why it's interesting. saying 99% confidence doesn't mean NS the human was literally feeling the human emotion of confidence, it just means the stand error was small enough, which is exactly what we would expect to happen when all the polls show hillary in the lead. people literally going "that smug neoliberal fuck is 99% confident Bernie's gonna lose! and he hasn't even updates his confidence on Florida" seem to not understand the degree to which it's largely out of his hands at this point--and that that's what makes it interesting

flopson, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 21:20 (eight years ago) link

Pierce on the Trump Steak speech:

You will never see another performance like the one he put on last night. It was more than a demonstration of the degradation of democracy. It was also a demonstration of the degradation of capitalism. I mean, Jesus, have some pride, rich folks. At least Andrew Carnegie built libraries and Jay Gould wore stylish diamond stickpins. None of them tossed slabs of dead cow to their supporters from the stage. I'm not entirely sure, but I think that, halfway through the speech, I accidentally may have bought a time-share in Florida.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 21:26 (eight years ago) link

iirc he also handed out a copy of some magazine (trump magazine?) to someone in the crowd, halfway through.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 21:28 (eight years ago) link

Rubio, packing in the hometown crowds.

https://twitter.com/ByronYork/status/707684148316610560

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 21:57 (eight years ago) link

yeah but it was a more intimate show

Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 22:10 (eight years ago) link

I just got home from the work, in the same building as the town hall. Apart from the MSNBC and NBC vans and a Jose Diaz-Balart spotting, no traffic problems today.

By the way: I'm sorry Miami inflicted Chuck Todd on the rest of you.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 22:23 (eight years ago) link

pretty sure i have never seen or heard him, but i now think of him as 'my man chuck todd'

mookieproof, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 22:27 (eight years ago) link

Chuck T

F♯ A♯ (∞), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 22:31 (eight years ago) link

Some Clinton supporters chose to vote in the Republican primary. We know 7 percent of voters in the Republican primary identified themselves as Democrats to exit pollsters, compared with just 4 percent of voters in the Democratic primary who said they were Republicans. “Those 7 percent of Dems were likely mostly Hillary voters who thought she had an easy win and they could do their part trying to stop (Donald) Trump,” said ***Bernie Porn*** of pollster EPIC-MRA. The exit-poll samples are too small, though, to check that.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-the-polls-missed-bernie-sanders-michigan-upset/ 8th paragraph down.

Bernie Porn?

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 22:34 (eight years ago) link

There are fifty states in the US (I should know, I've lived there for a year!) which means 100 primaries every cycle, which means that at least once per cycle a 99% certain outcome could be wrong. This was the biggest upset since 1984 at least. It could be completely correct to say that the probability of this happening was >99%. Silver doesn't think so, though, he said on twitter that they've been tweaking the model. Michigan only went down to 98% Clinton, though.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 22:40 (eight years ago) link

#actually there are 46 states and four commonwealths

mookieproof, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 22:42 (eight years ago) link

actually there is Texas and 49 lesser states

erry red flag (f. hazel), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 22:45 (eight years ago) link

45 states, 4 commonwealths, and a principality.

nickn, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 22:46 (eight years ago) link

Democratic debate tonight. Three days after the last one.

clemenza, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 22:48 (eight years ago) link

I'm burnt out- no more debates for me.

Mordy, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 22:52 (eight years ago) link

i also don't like the implication that NS the human = his forecast, and the suggestion that he should tinker with his forecast every time it makes a bad call or runs counter to intuition is exactly wrong and misunderstands why it's interesting. saying 99% confidence doesn't mean NS the human was literally feeling the human emotion of confidence, it just means the stand error was small enough, which is exactly what we would expect to happen when all the polls show hillary in the lead.

ok you can replace every time i said "nate silver was wrong" with "nate silver's model was wrong" if it makes you feel better about the implications. or passive voice?

anyway, his priors about pollsters are of course data-driven but the decision to apply priors at all is subjective (even if they are uninformative or flat priors), and the priors and the other uncertainties he folds into the model were obviously too confident here, to the extent that they lead him to rule out the final result with extreme confidence.

why am i saying "obviously" too confident? why is this not just "if you make 100 predictions with 99% confidence, you're going to be wrong about once"? the answer is the same reason that far more than 1 in 20 psychology papers that claim p<0.05 are wrong. the defense is true as far as it goes, but that's how you explain away random noise, i.e. statistical fluctuations. but the problems are systematic, not random. i don't think anyone is arguing unlucky random samples is what went wrong with the polls. i mean it could be what went wrong (there is a non-zero probability that 5 polls with 3 percent uncertainties could all be wrong in the same direction by 20% or so), but i think everyone is right in assuming there were _systematic_ problems. and it's concern about those systematic errors that should be in silver's priors and in the resulting confidence of the model.

people literally going "that smug neoliberal fuck is 99% confident Bernie's gonna lose! and he hasn't even updates his confidence on Florida" seem to not understand the degree to which it's largely out of his hands at this point--and that that's what makes it interesting

not trying to pull rank here, but i do know what i'm talking about re: statistics, and i can't vote in this election, so i'm not coming at this from a "neoliberal fuck" angle.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 22:58 (eight years ago) link

i wouldn't harp on about this, but silver's alleged innovations are to do a good job of handicapping the pollsters and to a lesser extent to deliver the subsequent predictions with meaningful confidence intervals. failure to do a good job of one or both of those (my money is on the first) is obviously what has gone wrong here.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 23:00 (eight years ago) link

i ike 2 party

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 23:00 (eight years ago) link

The GOP field last April was Cruz, Carson, Fiorina, Santorum, Paul, Huckabee & Pataki, let's remember.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 23:05 (eight years ago) link

I hope that this cycle has finally put an end to huckabee, santorum, and rand paul for good

akm, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 23:09 (eight years ago) link

Btw nate silver currently charges $60k for a 1 hour talk about how to build statistical models (more outside the nyc area) so "I dunno man, I just go where the statistical model tells me" seems a little generous.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 23:15 (eight years ago) link

I hope that this cycle has finally put an end to huckabee, santorum, and rand paul for good

These dorks always get out of their races before they run out of money, so they'll be back.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 23:17 (eight years ago) link

guys is trump president yet

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 23:18 (eight years ago) link

No Nate silver is :-(

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 23:19 (eight years ago) link

good post caek

k3vin k., Wednesday, 9 March 2016 23:19 (eight years ago) link

Caek, you're obviously sorta right, since they've changed the model. But I think you're wrong about the problem lying with the handicapping of the polling firms. There wasn't a single poll that gave Sanders a shot, so how would ranging them differently change the outcome? Yeah, there were structural problems, most likely mainly that Michigan haven't had a contested primary for a long time, so it was a lot harder than other states.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 23:27 (eight years ago) link

The guys whose careers are over thx to trump = jebra, rubio, christie (sorta)

Rand paul's still in the senate and chuckles can still play bass. Santorum idk what he does.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 23:28 (eight years ago) link

ILEagels

Sorry To Be The Bearer Of Bad Poos (Leee), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 23:37 (eight years ago) link

"Go" home

schwantz, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 23:48 (eight years ago) link

Related to the topic of listening to minorities: http://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/2016/03/08/spotlight-arab-american-muslim-voters-engage-issues/81486692/

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 23:58 (eight years ago) link

xps caek- i agree that his specification of the models (there are two) and any prior is subjective. but it's not clear to me that he fed in any priors to make the model extra certain of a hillary win, and the suspicion is obviously politically motivated and imo makes some people look partisan and dumb. i don't know how much tinkering goes on on a day-to-day basis but i always assumed little to none and he just kind of sets it up and lets it rip

why am i saying "obviously" too confident? why is this not just "if you make 100 predictions with 99% confidence, you're going to be wrong about once"? the answer is the same reason that far more than 1 in 20 psychology papers that claim p<0.05 are wrong. the defense is true as far as it goes, but that's how you explain away random noise, i.e. statistical fluctuations. but the problems are systematic, not random. i don't think anyone is arguing unlucky random samples is what went wrong with the polls. i mean it could be what went wrong (there is a non-zero probability that 5 polls with 3 percent uncertainties could all be wrong in the same direction by 20% or so), but i think everyone is right in assuming there were _systematic_ problems. and it's concern about those systematic errors that should be in silver's priors and in the resulting confidence of the model.

but not all systematic errors can be accounted for with the data at hand, that's the #1 problem everyone who uses non-experimental data faces. i think it's quite obvious his model is wildly underspecified with lots of omitted variables bias (they basically admit this on the first paragraph of the 538 site explaining how they set up the primary forecast) and so the interpretation of a p-value is kind of out of the window either way. i don't think other specifications with the same data would have given drastically results. like, what weighting scheme do you use to not have a confident bet that clinton would win using this data?

http://i.imgur.com/2LQVIQt.png

flopson, Thursday, 10 March 2016 00:13 (eight years ago) link

christ you guys

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 00:13 (eight years ago) link

^^^

mookieproof, Thursday, 10 March 2016 00:15 (eight years ago) link

what?

flopson, Thursday, 10 March 2016 00:16 (eight years ago) link

Pataki! I forgot about him.

Pataki got lots of undercover that's coming at me iirc

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 10 March 2016 00:17 (eight years ago) link

I can't believe we're discussing models and stats and -- leave that to Nate and the Silvers

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 00:18 (eight years ago) link

Alfred otm, separate thread pls

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Thursday, 10 March 2016 00:19 (eight years ago) link

i personally scroll past discussion on threads that don't interest me but ok

flopson, Thursday, 10 March 2016 00:22 (eight years ago) link

It's getting very technical, but it's pretty relevant. The main question is what this means for the polling in Ohio, Illinois, Pennsylvania, where Clinton is also far ahead. Was this a one-off, or is there some 'systemic' problem that means every poll in the midwest has hidden around 25% of Sanders' voters?

It's also theoretical, because afaict, he still wouldn't win the primary.

Frederik B, Thursday, 10 March 2016 00:24 (eight years ago) link

in the interest of keeping it to one-thread-per-month tho...

xp

Οὖτις, Thursday, 10 March 2016 00:25 (eight years ago) link

I can quote more old AZ lyrics if that would help foster the dialogue

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 10 March 2016 00:25 (eight years ago) link

lol

Οὖτις, Thursday, 10 March 2016 00:26 (eight years ago) link

Latest poll from Illinois has Clinton ahead 42%. I can def see that be wrong by a lot more than 25%

Frederik B, Thursday, 10 March 2016 00:28 (eight years ago) link

Obamaland

Οὖτις, Thursday, 10 March 2016 00:30 (eight years ago) link

keep the stats talk on here, it's more meaningful than (insert passive aggressive swipe of your choice here)

carly rae jetson (thomp), Thursday, 10 March 2016 00:31 (eight years ago) link

CNN reporting
Rubio on reports he's dropping out of the race: "I'm rap James Bond/my crack case gone/got cuffed in the court/had my Mack face on"

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 10 March 2016 00:31 (eight years ago) link

i can see the polling stats stuff being interesting because it does, purposefully or not, affect narrative and turnout. but on the other hand, all you really have to do is wait for the actual voting results

still think prediction markets are garb tho, despite my <3 for caek

mookieproof, Thursday, 10 March 2016 00:33 (eight years ago) link

I dig this, using a John Wayne spoken-word album to distill down a lot of the psychology of what happens when your sense of identity, belonging, and stability gets violently ruptured:

White working-class nostalgia, explained by John Wayne

In a little over a generation, right-leaning, working-class whites went from defining America — being the standard, the base model, the hard-working, self-reliant American dream made flesh, about which kitschy songs are written — to being, in their view, an embattled minority.

Their social values are mocked and rejected by mainstream pop culture, and they are condescended to and dismissed by elites. Rightly or not, they've come to view immigrants, other ethnicities, and often liberals as competitors in a zero-sum fight.

They are pissed off and panicky about it, and while we need not accept the uglier forms the backlash takes, we should still acknowledge the unique angst that results when the communities that most value order are struck by the most dislocation.

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Thursday, 10 March 2016 00:33 (eight years ago) link

'But white working-class Americans (like all Americans) should be offered some shelter from those changes, some sense that they will be okay, that they are still part of the American Us, no matter what.'

Honestly the problem seems to me more that the Trumpits don't consider the new 'American Us' to be legitimate. They've fought tooth and nail to exclude as many people as possible from the old 'American Us', and they still aren't ready to accept reality. I don't think the new 'American Us' will be particularly inclined to forgive them, btw. Sad, but true. Also, I don't particularly think they have to, pragmatically speaking.

And I think the article is pretty a-historical. It glosses over that the self-same white right-wing voters has supported the politicians that took away things they used to have, that the new deal coalition fought for. And why did they vote for this? Why did the democratic new deal coalition lose white working class voters for a generation, even though republicans did nothing for them? Because of civil rights.

Frederik B, Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:30 (eight years ago) link

Please don't use the word "us"

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:34 (eight years ago) link

Lol, that's really hard when discussing an article talking about it. Combined with the fact that I put 'us' in '''s, and that I don't particularly care what you think = nah.

Frederik B, Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:39 (eight years ago) link

Can we just autoreplace all frederik's posts on this thread w something less patronizing like idk pics of puppies

Οὖτις, Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:44 (eight years ago) link

Xxpost

You're so repellant, nothing you write is rooted in any sort of genuine empathy for other human beings just ego. Empty

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:44 (eight years ago) link

what a bitch

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:45 (eight years ago) link

ums, I have plenty of empathy, but no, not for you. Not anymore.

Frederik B, Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:47 (eight years ago) link

I also don't consider white racists a particularly good signpost for how much empathy one has.

Frederik B, Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:48 (eight years ago) link

Oh you never did you bullshit artist

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:49 (eight years ago) link

i have no skin in this beef but uhhhh ums is one of the nicest dudes to engage w/ on ILX and also one of the funniest so perhaps if you're pickin' a fight w/ him where he reacts this angrily you might want to examine yr role in it?

idk

Neanderthal, Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:50 (eight years ago) link

xxxpost

Neanderthal, Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:50 (eight years ago) link

btw I did lol at the AZ post upthread

Neanderthal, Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:51 (eight years ago) link

The most hilarious thing ums has written was some nonsense about him flagging a post for the first time. He has said that I've defended nazi imagery, was worse than trump, is 'repellent', and devoid of empathy. Yeah, really fucking nice.

Frederik B, Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:51 (eight years ago) link

tempted to start a mattress-style 'does *anyone* want frederik on this thread' poll

mookieproof, Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:52 (eight years ago) link

xpost sure seems like you "don't care what he thinks"

Neanderthal, Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:52 (eight years ago) link

xxp

you've gotta be a gabbneb sock or something

either way I sincerely hope u get temp banned soon

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:52 (eight years ago) link

xxpost yeah dude when you cherrypick 'nasty' posts a dude has made and the only overarching thing they have in common = that they're about you specifically I would say maybe that should tell you something.

Neanderthal, Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:53 (eight years ago) link

I like having varying viewpoints but this thread is at its worst when it veers into the armchair ethnic studies/sociology courtesy of frederik and gabbneb

Οὖτις, Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:53 (eight years ago) link

Alfred this is what happens when you shut down the stats talk bro

Neanderthal, Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:54 (eight years ago) link

This is his very first response to me:

'Lmao Frederick you were the Ice Age nazi imagery apologist iirc don't make me pull your card

Number 2 GEE I WONDER WHY it might be easier to achieve socialism in a very small, racially homogeneous country than the US, given your extensive knowledge of history what do you think?

― robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), 7. marts 2016 14:38 (3 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink'

Frederik B, Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:54 (eight years ago) link

Just ridiculous poorly informed generalizations about various subgroups, its gross

Xxp

Οὖτις, Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:54 (eight years ago) link

look i see you guys are pretty angry here but frederik spelled out exactly what i was trying to say re: voters not agreeing that sanders' record is better:

She is way more popular among democratic voters than he is. And especially among minorities, and especially among black voters. Protesting that really, both candidates seem clueless about race is stupid (and perhaps almost offensive), because, y'know, a couple of 'races' are sending a pretty strong signal that one of the candidates gets it better than the other, y'know? Try listening to them.

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:56 (eight years ago) link

Xpist

If that's trolling fine but I actually engaged quite sincerely about exactly why your posts bother me and you completely ignored it as you tend to do to posts that don't suit your purpose, which generally is enlightening everyone with your considerable knowledge.

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:58 (eight years ago) link

You just asked me not to use the word 'us'

Frederik B, Thursday, 10 March 2016 01:58 (eight years ago) link

fwiw, not that anyone asked my two cents: frederik or his tone have often bugged me in these threads (though i have enjoyed his posts elsewhere)... but i must have missed where he stepped it up into some super-troll territory to be getting these reactions. it seems to have really boiled over in the last day or two and it's very possible i was kinda skimming when whatever it was that went down, went down... but maybe it would be good for all involved to let it rest for a minute or something, idk.

van damme death warrant (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:02 (eight years ago) link

tbh everyone should probably just take 5 minutes and listen to that awesome MJ song, we'll all feel better afterward

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:03 (eight years ago) link

Voted today, they gave me two "I Voted" stickers and told me I could probably come back Tuesday for free coffee or a donut. If Sanders had promised free coffee and donuts for everyone he'd be way out ahead by now.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:05 (eight years ago) link

I have no problem feeling empathy, especially towards white people (it's something I'm looking at adjusting). But the constant admissions in the media that we should remember to feel sympathy for the white losers propelling Trumps campaign feels quite problematic to me, frankly. It's an idea that they deserve something they've never extended to anyone but themselves. It's kinda asking for white males to get better treatment than anyone else.

Frederik B, Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:06 (eight years ago) link

Question: if the GOP et al took a few months to really hate Obama, how will they treat Clinton, who they have hated for decades? Or will they recognize her at heart as one of them (conservative, career politician, etc)?

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:09 (eight years ago) link

it's not gonna be much prettier - we still have Benghazi, email-gate, and the fact that she's a woman.

once they're relieved that Frump isn't emperor it'll be open-season, even before inaguration

Neanderthal, Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:11 (eight years ago) link

meanwhile, on the GOP side

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/donald-trump-lobbyists-congress-220424

The message is becoming louder among the big-money set: It’s time to forget about the presidency and focus on retaining the majorities on Capitol Hill.

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:14 (eight years ago) link

shit, was hoping they forgot about that

Neanderthal, Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:15 (eight years ago) link

Wow. Ramos asked lame FOX-type questions.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:17 (eight years ago) link

A friend just explained Trump's enduring popularity as essentially the last candidate that is not Latino, female or Jewish. 2016: The Future!

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:17 (eight years ago) link

OT, gratuitous "degrees of separation" comment: my wife is friends with Jorge Ramos's brother!

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:18 (eight years ago) link

I have no problem feeling empathy, especially towards white people

ok LOL

flopson, Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:18 (eight years ago) link

i think clinton would know what to expect from the republicans due to having worked with them in the senate plus of course many years of the vast rightwing conspiracy. it seemed that obama & his team really were idealistic enough to think they could negotiate with them and work in a bipartisan way, at the start. one of the flipsides of this is that unfortunately clinton & people seem to always err on the side of being too secretive due to years of the vast rightwing conspiracy

heh.. hillary just went after trump.. i think she's used this construction a lot before - point out a whole lot of negative things about the opponent & wrap it up with "and you can draw your own conclusion"

excellent

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:19 (eight years ago) link

should just say "Trump?", then fart into the mic. get on his level.

Neanderthal, Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:20 (eight years ago) link

sorry to re-dredge this when everyone just moved on but i don't really understand what amerika is supposed to glean from frederik's reminders that the democratic party underwent schism in the 60s. we do know about that. this idea -- i may have misinterpreted this? -- that progressive policies themselves have somehow been fundamentally tainted by fdr's racist coalition-building doesn't seem to jive with the (accurate) idea that lbj-era northern democrats attempted to extend these policies to blacks and lost the south for it. do you think that sanders is some pre-lbj throwback, planning to freeze blacks out of jobs in his resurrected wpa? or that great society ambitions are foolish and worthless because racism still exists? what do you think might have happened in america had lbj not been beholden to bullshit about vietnam -- would everything have fallen apart in just the same way? (ironically, probably the best advice lbj ever got on vietnam -- irrelevant to our interests, impossible to win, our enemies are fighting for their country and will never stop, i watched them drop millions and millions and millions of pounds of bombs in korea and it was worthless, get out completely, get out now -- came from richard russell. sigh.)

hillary's larger share of the black vote is totally understandable considering we are talking here about people whose fear under a republican president, let alone a trumpian one, is of a higher probability of being murdered or seeing their children murdered instead of having to "move to canada", white liberals' perennial nightmare/fantasy. for this reason i'm not gonna tell a black person they're making a mistake by electing not to put their chips, their life, on "political revolution". (i am informed people are doing just this, on facebook, and here i have to swallow what i guess is probably somehow or other a privileged scream of GET OFF OF FACEBOOK, but okay, fair enough. condemn that.) but this doesn't mean that the political legacy sanders belongs to is inherently racist, or that it's moribund and should be sneered at and abandoned. it was abandoned, and that's why we're here. we know america is racist. we know its racism crippled the democratic party for decades. we knew it while it was happening. what do you think we should do? deport the racists? kill the racists? give up and resign ourselves to racist policy? give up and resign ourselves to plutocracy because some of the plutocrats don't actively want to destroy black people except in really extenuating circumstances, like if newt gingrich makes them uncomfortable? where is all this caustic knowingness leading?

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:26 (eight years ago) link

i see you guys are pretty angry here but frederik spelled out exactly what i was trying to say

that's fair. it's a pretty anti-hillary, or at least pro-bernie crowd here. dude's individual statements may or may not have merit, but setting himself up as 'belligerent guy who lived here for a year and knows far better than everyone else' is gabbnebery off-putting

xp also dlh otm

mookieproof, Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:28 (eight years ago) link

great post dlh

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:32 (eight years ago) link

it's not like there is a definitive subset of the american public that is "the racists" and meanwhile everybody else especially ourselves and our friends are a-ok and never racist

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:34 (eight years ago) link

I had similar thoughts a few minutes ago watching the Univision debate. I don't doubt Clinton was sincere in her 2007 support for legalizing some kinds of illegal immigration, so squabbling about who said what a decade ago looks petty. It reminds me of GOP smearing of Hugo Black because he joined the Ku Klux Klan as a young pol on the make yet whose Supreme Court career represents a rebuke to Klannery and prejudice (Robert Byrd can fuck himself though).

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:35 (eight years ago) link

All recent posts from daria dlh alfred otm

Οὖτις, Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:40 (eight years ago) link

Earlier today, I posted/wondered how Clinton would react to the Michigan loss--didn't know there was a debate. Watching tonight, she does seem to be getting much better advice than in 2008.

Jorge Ramos disclosed his conflict of interest (his daughter works for Clinton's campaign), then seemed to overcompensate with a question about dropping out if indicted. Unless it was meant to be one she could easily swat aside, which she did. He probably shouldn't be on the panel either way.

clemenza, Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:41 (eight years ago) link

this is a pretty good debate

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:41 (eight years ago) link

dlh consistently one of the best posters

jason waterfalls (gbx), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:42 (eight years ago) link

How many dick jokes have there been

Xp

Οὖτις, Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:43 (eight years ago) link

Jorge Ramos disclosed his conflict of interest (his daughter works for Clinton's campaign), then seemed to overcompensate with a question about dropping out if indicted. Unless it was meant to be one she could easily swat aside, which she did. He probably shouldn't be on the panel either way.

otm

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:44 (eight years ago) link

no dick talk yet, just bill talk xp

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:45 (eight years ago) link

nah Clinton hasn't come up yet

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:45 (eight years ago) link

Glad someone around here knows how comedy routines work lol

Οὖτις, Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:46 (eight years ago) link

Anyone interested in the history of FDR's liberalism should read: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/07/books/review/fear-itself-by-ira-katznelson.html?_r=0

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:47 (eight years ago) link

"the most beautiful tall wall, better than the Great Wall of China"

hehehehe

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:47 (eight years ago) link

it's not like there is a definitive subset of the american public that is "the racists" and meanwhile everybody else especially ourselves and our friends are a-ok and never racist

otm, my deport/kill questions were supposed to be absurd for these reasons but this was unclear

if frederik's only point is that a left-wing candidate must be equipped to attack racism explicitly+directly as necessary to the revivification of progressivism and its 60s-style redemption well of course i agree. the sanders campaign has done this, and is doing this, but we probably do await a more fluidly intersectional and confidence-inspiring candidate than ancient vermont senator bernie sanders. but this sneering like he's The White Man's Candidate, some 30s revival, instead of a guy people aren't necessarily comfortable betting everything they have on, is, idk, insulting.

anyway sry moving on! i confess i was filthily relieved this morning to learn hawaii went for trump. ilx reputation maintained.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:49 (eight years ago) link

Confronted with a Guatemalan woman trembling with fear and panic who hasn't seen her family in a decade, Sanders begins by reminding her that the NYT editorial board endorsed his immigration proposals. Bill Clinton is gross and oleaginous but he would've shown so much empathy that you'd think he was being deported.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:51 (eight years ago) link

"but"?

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:51 (eight years ago) link

'fuck'

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:51 (eight years ago) link

great posts dlh but i just don't know about the claims you're attributing to richard russell here

irrelevant to our interests, impossible to win, our enemies are fighting for their country and will never stop, i watched them drop millions and millions and millions of pounds of bombs in korea and it was worthless, get out completely, get out now

carly rae jetson (thomp), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:53 (eight years ago) link

squeamishness about immigration is a big part of the labor issues that have become dominant in this campaign as both candidates try to win working class americans who want protectionism and low immigration (and obv on the republican side too)

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:54 (eight years ago) link

hrc seems genuinely moved right now

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:54 (eight years ago) link

"I'm not a natural politician in case you haven't noticed, not like my husband and President Obama."

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:55 (eight years ago) link

Was going to make the exact same point as Alfred--the reason I like Sanders so much (no theatrics) is the same area where he shows his limitations as a politician, or at least one running for president. I also got a vision of Bill leaving the podium and walking over to hug that woman (who was clearly distraught).

clemenza, Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:55 (eight years ago) link

This won't be a very big re-dredging, because I'm off to sleep. But I want to at least say, dlh, that this part is logically wrong:

'this idea -- i may have misinterpreted this? -- that progressive policies themselves have somehow been fundamentally tainted by fdr's racist coalition-building doesn't seem to jive with the (accurate) idea that lbj-era northern democrats attempted to extend these policies to blacks and lost the south for it.'

Uhm, yes it does? It's precisely because the new deal coalition was 'fundamentally tainted' by racism that it collapsed once anti-racism was brought into it. And it's a huge problem, because what then is to be done to rekindle the new deal? It didn't die due to a mistake, it wasn't something wrong that the dems did. Rather, it was lbj trying to do something very very right for once. Which points to, that something was fundamentally wrong with the new deal to begin with. And since it's still absolutely needed to reclaim it, it makes the conundrum that much bigger.

What is to be done? I've said it before, but it has to be an explicit anti-racist new deal. You can't be radical new new deal and shy away from reparations as too divisive. Support #BLM, break the bonds of racist policing. Support Campaign Zero. How much good could those grassroots movements have done with the money that has gone to the Sanders campaign? Look to BLM, the campaign for gay marriage, the fight for a higher minimal wage, etc. Support change on a local level rather than on a national one. Resign yourself to a Clinton presidency, and that the next contested dem primary to come in 2024. And that the primary electorate will look even more diverse then.

Also, I'm actually quite optimistic, and find a lot of American politics extremely inspiring (just not the Sanders campaign). The supreme court is changing, the gop is falling apart, Trump will be defeated, and if Sanders is a last gasp of relevance, then Trump is even more so to an extreme degree. The world is getting shitty, temperatures are rising, economies all over the world are rising up and/or falling apart. But quite honestly I think the US is getting in a better and better position to adapt to it. I think there's an enormous potential in the new democratic coalition, so work with it. It's what I don't see Sanders doing enough.

Oh, and get rid of Debbie Wasserman-Schultz.

#mytwocents

Frederik B, Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:56 (eight years ago) link

maybe I'm a big softie, but I watch this debate and feel like they're both "winning"

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 10 March 2016 02:58 (eight years ago) link

great posts dlh but i just don't know about the claims you're attributing to richard russell here

irrelevant to our interests, impossible to win, our enemies are fighting for their country and will never stop, i watched them drop millions and millions and millions of pounds of bombs in korea and it was worthless, get out completely, get out now

― carly rae jetson (thomp), Wednesday, March 9, 2016 6:53 PM (31 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

taylor branch:

Russell made baleful jokes about how bad the situation looked to him. "It's a mess," he said, "and it's going to get worse." His best idea, which he outlined three times, was to engineer a new South Vietnamese government by coup [for the third or forth time--DLH], 'and get some fella in there that said they wished the hell that we would get out'... When Johnson asked about strategic loss of Vietnam, Russell scoffed, "It isn't important a damn bit... I don't know, sir, you'd better get some brains from somewhere" ... [Russell] had found [Henry Cabot] Lodge ineffective since joint service in World War II. "He thinks that he's dealing with barbarian tribes out there ... there's no doubt in my mind that he had old Diem killed out there."

...

Johnson praised McNamara as a "pretty flexible fellow ... But these politicians got to raising hell ... Lodge, Nixon, Rockefeller, Goldwater all say move." They were advocating air campaigns to stop the enemy while minimizing American casualties ... "That's just impossible," [Russell said]. He told war stories of dropping "millions and millions and millions of pounds of bombs day and night ... We never could actually interdict the lines of communication in Korea ... and you ain't gonna stop these people either."

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:00 (eight years ago) link

guys, please read Jane Dark's Dark Money, more frightening than the King oeuvre

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:01 (eight years ago) link

xpost yes this sounds like the argument ta-nehisi coates makes re: the case for reparations iirc.

i'm reading dark money right now. it is scary. i don't know how citizens united gets overturned

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:02 (eight years ago) link

good night, fred

k3vin k., Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:03 (eight years ago) link

Oh, and get rid of Debbie Wasserman-Schultz.

but then what would bring this thread together?

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:04 (eight years ago) link

Oh, shit, forgot one thing. Every new new deal policy needs to deal with racial impact. Free college, for example. Research shows that a college degree improves the lifetime wages of a white student much more than a black one. So giving free college education to everyone is giving white people a lot more money than black people. Every new new deal policy needs to figure this shit out, and correct for it.

Off to sleep. Have a good debate, everyone.

Frederik B, Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:05 (eight years ago) link

but then what would bring this thread together?

Fred, Morbs, and a scorpion.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:05 (eight years ago) link

Uli or Klaus?

Neanderthal, Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:06 (eight years ago) link

xposts I'm a third of the way into Lawrence Lessig's Republic, Lost (v good so far) and have been curious about Dark Money.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:07 (eight years ago) link

please read Jane Dark's Dark Money

Had to check that out--"Jane Dark writes about politics, too?"

clemenza, Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:09 (eight years ago) link

there's a long article mayer wrote on the kochs from 2010 after which they started investigating her! so she kept digging

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/08/30/covert-operations

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:10 (eight years ago) link

"Jane Dark writes about politics, too?"

in blank verse!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:11 (eight years ago) link

there's a long article mayer wrote on the kochs from 2010 after which they started investigating her! so she kept digging

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/08/30/covert-operations

I didn't know the extent to which they sicced private investigators on her!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:11 (eight years ago) link

What is to be done? I've said it before, but it has to be an explicit anti-racist new deal. You can't be radical new new deal and shy away from reparations as too divisive. Support #BLM, break the bonds of racist policing. Support Campaign Zero. How much good could those grassroots movements have done with the money that has gone to the Sanders campaign? Look to BLM, the campaign for gay marriage, the fight for a higher minimal wage, etc. Support change on a local level rather than on a national one. Resign yourself to a Clinton presidency, and that the next contested dem primary to come in 2024. And that the primary electorate will look even more diverse then.

- Alexis de Socqueville

salthigh, Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:13 (eight years ago) link

dlh it's not that i don't believe russell claimed that, it's that i'm not sure he was right

carly rae jetson (thomp), Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:23 (eight years ago) link

this is an old fashioned, grown up debate

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:24 (eight years ago) link

this would be a pretty good opportunity for bernie to point out that undocumented immigrants would benefit proportionately from universal health care, surprised/disappointed he hasn't gone for it

k3vin k., Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:26 (eight years ago) link

'they're fighting for their country and they will never stop' seems a strange lesson to draw from the korean war, after all

this is kind of a whole other sidetrack and i've forgotten most everything i knew about the vietnam war to argue whatever point i'm reaching for: something like, the end of the vietnam war is the outcome of a whole series of diplomatic failures (the USA's fondness for south vietnamese coups amongst them, yes)--not some kind of inevitable existential quality of the conflict

carly rae jetson (thomp), Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:27 (eight years ago) link

Interesting! Crowd reacts much better tonight to Clinton shutting Sanders up than how Michigan reacted to the reverse the other night.

clemenza, Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:32 (eight years ago) link

this crowd is pretty energetic. seems pretty balanced to me

k3vin k., Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:32 (eight years ago) link

"Senator Sanders, your name was mentioned..."

Well, yeah--there are only two people up there.

clemenza, Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:35 (eight years ago) link

this strikes me as the most educational debate so far.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:37 (eight years ago) link

I'm in the minority. I ain't getting much. Sanders and Clinton, flaunting their senatorial credentials, claim they can find a 'bipartisan consensus' on climate change when the Koch brothers make their living on energy. Sanders didn't answer the question about paying for his free college. Clinton thinks stentorian is synonymous with emphatic.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:40 (eight years ago) link

clinton i recall said she'd continue the executive actions taken by obama on climte and ended saying frankly they'd need the democrats to retake the senate and then they could start working in a bipartisan way on it

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:43 (eight years ago) link

well sure, Alfred, I mean "educational" relative to previous debates this season

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:45 (eight years ago) link

love sanders's answer on castro where he works it into an anti-war message

remove butt (abanana), Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:47 (eight years ago) link

we never invaded Cuba and it turned out just fine

petulant dick master (silby), Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:47 (eight years ago) link

I assume that was the gist I'm not watching, just posting in this thread for some reason

petulant dick master (silby), Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:47 (eight years ago) link

I liked how Sanders wouldn't pander to the audience there.

clemenza, Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:48 (eight years ago) link

vulture capitalists

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:50 (eight years ago) link

"The United States was wrong in trying to invade Cuba," trying to overthrow the Nicaraguan government in the eighties and Arbenz in Guatemala, Sanders says, responding to a clip of a frizzy-haired gruffer version of himself scowling at a cute young reporter as he explains how Cuba has educated its citizens. He still sticks with that line (I'm reminded of what the late Christopher Hitchens wrote about the wonders of Cuban education in the late nineties: most Cubans can read but there's nothing on the island worth reading). Clinton disagrees: the Castros trample human rights, disappear citizens (true). The crowd roars. Yet because she by her admission helped Obama begin negotiations with the Castros she accepts Sanders' claim that healed relations are ultimately good for Cubans and business.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:52 (eight years ago) link

btw if anyone gives a damn I've live blogged this shit.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:56 (eight years ago) link

This is right out of The Candidate: use your closing statement to list all the things that weren't mentioned tonight. Clinton wisely did not go all Crocker Jarmon.

clemenza, Thursday, 10 March 2016 03:57 (eight years ago) link

thanks Alfred

at a shelter for unaccompanied migrant kids in Miami one time, one of the Cuban workers there quoted me an entire passage out of Lope de Vega. impressive.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 10 March 2016 04:02 (eight years ago) link

he had memorized it in elementary school

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Thursday, 10 March 2016 04:04 (eight years ago) link

i don't think other specifications with the same data would have given drastically results. like, what weighting scheme do you use to not have a confident bet that clinton would win using this data?

and

But I think you're wrong about the problem lying with the handicapping of the polling firms. There wasn't a single poll that gave Sanders a shot, so how would ranging them differently change the outcome?

my point is not that pollsters should have been weighted differently, my point is that they should all have been treated with less confidence.

what should he have done instead? it's ok to say 50/50! it's ok to say i don't know.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 10 March 2016 04:11 (eight years ago) link

oh my, that is the one answer murricans do not accept

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 10 March 2016 04:15 (eight years ago) link

Amanda Marcotte
@AmandaMarcotte
@darcyjamesargue His advocacy for propping up the Sandinistas calls into question his claim to a non-interventionist history.

ffs

mookieproof, Thursday, 10 March 2016 04:36 (eight years ago) link

seems like this person might have a horse in the race

k3vin k., Thursday, 10 March 2016 04:41 (eight years ago) link

it's true, a real non-interventionist would have sold arms to iran to fund right-wing terrorists

having a horse is fine; this is absurd on every level

mookieproof, Thursday, 10 March 2016 04:50 (eight years ago) link

yeah i don't think any serious person follows marcotte for smart, objective takes

k3vin k., Thursday, 10 March 2016 04:52 (eight years ago) link

(tbf those are not terribly easy to come by)

k3vin k., Thursday, 10 March 2016 04:53 (eight years ago) link

propping up elected governments, something Henry Kissinger could seldom be accused of doing

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 10 March 2016 04:53 (eight years ago) link

dlh it's not that i don't believe russell claimed that, it's that i'm not sure he was right

oh gotcha, yeah for another thread.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 10 March 2016 04:54 (eight years ago) link

amanda marcotte is even worse than sady doyle

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 10 March 2016 05:04 (eight years ago) link

http://www.flagburning.org/halfmast.gif

am0n, Thursday, 10 March 2016 05:05 (eight years ago) link

welp, i read that 2010 article on the Kochs, that was super depressing thanks ILX

Nhex, Thursday, 10 March 2016 05:07 (eight years ago) link

sandersnistas

lettered and hapful (symsymsym), Thursday, 10 March 2016 05:10 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XXEHZsAkR0

schwantz, Thursday, 10 March 2016 05:31 (eight years ago) link

I know I know dnftt etc but

"Frederik B
Posted: March 9, 2016 at 9:05:07 PM
Oh, shit, forgot one thing. Every new new deal policy needs to deal with racial impact. Free college, for example. Research shows that a college degree improves the lifetime wages of a white student much more than a black one. So giving free college education to everyone is giving white people a lot more money than black people. Every new new deal policy needs to figure this shit out, and correct for it.

Off to sleep. Have a good debate, everyone."

Shut. The. Fuck. Up.

Here, let me Danesplain that for you (jjjusten), Thursday, 10 March 2016 07:49 (eight years ago) link

I had a bunch of specific WHAT THE FUCK reactions to that one but ugh why bother

Here, let me Danesplain that for you (jjjusten), Thursday, 10 March 2016 07:51 (eight years ago) link

Can't u ....... yknow......do something

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Thursday, 10 March 2016 08:06 (eight years ago) link

Xp in honor of long standing Ilx tradition, I have banned Frederick from The Church

Here, let me Danesplain that for you (jjjusten), Thursday, 10 March 2016 08:16 (eight years ago) link

Also I have created an autosubstitute where "new new deal" is replaced by "bag of rotting assholes"

Here, let me Danesplain that for you (jjjusten), Thursday, 10 March 2016 08:19 (eight years ago) link

The compromise of a Hilary when I needed the fire of a sanders sorry jjj I'm voting strongo in 16

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Thursday, 10 March 2016 08:25 (eight years ago) link

Remember when Howard Dean was railroaded out of the 2004 Dem primaries for acting 1000x more dignified than this? C'mon, biased liberal media, do that thing you do.

how's life, Thursday, 10 March 2016 13:24 (eight years ago) link

I've been reading (slowly) "Dark Money," and it's proven an ironic backdrop to the current campaign season, in that the GOP candidates with the most money and/or libertarian cred got knocked out early, and the Democrat with the tightest ties to money has been neck and neck with the grassroots guys. I don't know if the ongoing Koch bros. charm offensive has gotten in the way of their evil meddling, but it seems like these conservative foundations don't have a real voice in this race.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 10 March 2016 13:37 (eight years ago) link

the coda to Dark Money is that the Kochs are horrified Trump's gonna be the nominee.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 14:03 (eight years ago) link

I guess if there's one heartening takeaway from Trump's ascendancy it's learning that shadowy billionaires don't have quite as much control over the puppet show as they'd like to think they do.

Buckles On My Goulashes (Old Lunch), Thursday, 10 March 2016 14:16 (eight years ago) link

fortunately heartless millionaires have state legislatures and assemblies with which to play.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 14:17 (eight years ago) link

C'mon, biased liberal media, do that thing you do.

Bern still scariest to WaPo and the like

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 10 March 2016 14:27 (eight years ago) link

Kochs, et al. have done just fine for 7+ years without one of their guys in the White House. in fact, things like ACA and climate change have been a boon to whipping up donor-class outrage and subsequent spending.

evol j, Thursday, 10 March 2016 14:46 (eight years ago) link

Wd love to see how she'd redecorate the Senate chamber

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 10 March 2016 14:57 (eight years ago) link

http://www.salon.com/2016/03/10/i_was_wrong_about_donald_trump_camille_paglia_on_the_gop_front_runners_refreshing_candor_and_his_impetuousness_too/

― Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles)

"I read with some glee that Doanld Trump had indeed, in his words, 'taken a crap' on a Mexican immigrant. Let me say well done! I admire when our leaders keep their promises! Too often we elect empty suits uttering scripted lines. In addition, Trump's action reminds me of pagan rituals associated with Dionysian cults."

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 14:59 (eight years ago) link

If Trump wins the White House, that no-holds-barred video will go down in history as “the shot heard round the world,” Ralph Waldo Emerson’s phrase for the first salvo of the American Revolution by rural insurgents at Concord. (How many words is this yet?)

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 10 March 2016 15:00 (eight years ago) link

Paglia's quotes increasingly remind me of monkeys with typewriters

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 10 March 2016 15:01 (eight years ago) link

so i feel like maybe i missed out on some time in the past when paglia was good because i always kinda had this impression she was a really respected thinker etc etc

but in general everything i've read my her (and this is let's say mostly ILX link in the last 10 years) has been like hot garbage, did she used to be better?

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 10 March 2016 15:02 (eight years ago) link

jesus fucking chris paglia go away

akm, Thursday, 10 March 2016 15:02 (eight years ago) link

"so i feel like maybe i missed out on some time in the past when paglia was good because i always kinda had this impression she was a really respected thinker etc etc"

I think she had some respect when sexual personae first came out but she became tiresome almost immediately after that

akm, Thursday, 10 March 2016 15:02 (eight years ago) link

But Trump is a workaholic who doesn’t drink and who has an interesting penchant for sophisticated, strong-willed European women.

She's got me convinced!

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Thursday, 10 March 2016 15:03 (eight years ago) link

"His apartment has many leather-bound books and smells of mahogany."

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Thursday, 10 March 2016 15:04 (eight years ago) link

I'm pretty sure Paglia is Italian for Palin. Makes you think....

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Thursday, 10 March 2016 15:05 (eight years ago) link

Kinda shocked she can relate to a candid buffoon.

That said, I do think Trump's lack of a censor btwn brain and mouth could be a political advantage in "debates" vs HRC, who generally can't fake spontaneity in any way, flattering or not.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 10 March 2016 15:06 (eight years ago) link

I was reading the quotes excerpted here thinking "surely this is a satirical piece, why are people taking it seriously" and then I started reading the actual piece and hoo boy

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 10 March 2016 15:09 (eight years ago) link

My quote was fiction.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 15:10 (eight years ago) link

yeah but the others weren't

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 10 March 2016 15:19 (eight years ago) link

Must admit I had that book in college. She's surfin' the wave of the NINETIES! Gleefully snickering iconoclasms galore!

And every sentence is in the first person: I responded enthusiastically to this, I abhorred that, this art repels me, this art validates who I am, this thinker is insufficiently aligned with me, that thinker is excessively interested in me, me, me.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 10 March 2016 16:16 (eight years ago) link

I'm fine with first person - I absolutely hate it when cultural critics (or any other type of essayist) use "we" - as in, "Why We All Love Bruce Springsteen." My instantaneous reaction is "Fuck you, I'm not part of your 'we.'" Saying "I" is definitely preferable.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Thursday, 10 March 2016 16:18 (eight years ago) link

Yes but it can be overdone. I have read quite a lot of art criticism, and usually there are at least some sentences that discuss the work at hand. This is a painting my Berthe Morisot, here are some things about that painting. Here is a record by Magnetic Fields, and here are some things that are on the record. This movie is about some people moving about in rooms and saying things to each other.

But just as you can't spell CAMILLE PAGLIA without ME I, almost everything is "When I first saw X, I responded like Y, because clearly they had read my essays on Z."

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 10 March 2016 16:22 (eight years ago) link

The godmother of #slatepitches

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Thursday, 10 March 2016 16:37 (eight years ago) link

in other news
https://twitter.com/ShaunKing/status/707910779698216960

Οὖτις, Thursday, 10 March 2016 16:44 (eight years ago) link

xpost OMG I don't think I'd seen that McSweeney, it makes my lame-ass attempted Pagliaparodies worse than redundant. Almost impossible to top "As an Amazon with the brain of a pre-Stonewall gay man, I..."

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 10 March 2016 16:49 (eight years ago) link

pretty sure that was randy meisner who threw that sucker-punch

hunangarage, Thursday, 10 March 2016 17:03 (eight years ago) link

At this rate, it shouldn't be more than a month or so until we get to hear Trump explain that his rebranded swastika isn't a swastika at all but a 'loyalty trademark' or something.

Anus The Untouchable (Old Lunch), Thursday, 10 March 2016 17:18 (eight years ago) link

Kevin Williamson on Paglia:

She is also, unhappily, exactly right about Ted Cruz’s stage presence:

I mean that she is correct about the impression Cruz sometimes gives, not about the substance. The substance of Ted Cruz is his constitutional scholarship, his quick mind, and his deep patriotism. The substance of Donald Trump is some sort of howling psychosis playing itself out in public for ends that Sigmund Freud himself would hesitate to consider. The problem is that voters are not reliably all that good at distinguishing impressions from substance. Camille Paglia is a scholar of surfaces. Let us hope that the electorate is not entirely out of its depth.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 17:44 (eight years ago) link

I found it improbable if not impossible that Trump could survive his klutz-o-rama cascade of foot-in-mouth flubs, from carelessly categorizing Mexican immigrants as rapists to hallucinating about “thousands’ of Muslims cheering the fall of the twin towers from the mean streets of New Jersey.

whoops!

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 10 March 2016 17:47 (eight years ago) link

pretty sure paglia dresses up in a nazi uniform to get off

akm, Thursday, 10 March 2016 17:59 (eight years ago) link

so what?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 10 March 2016 18:04 (eight years ago) link

#notallnazifetishists

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 18:09 (eight years ago) link

paglia is dumb, and she always has been.

horseshoe, Thursday, 10 March 2016 18:25 (eight years ago) link

Lol mordy

Οὖτις, Thursday, 10 March 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

Paglia is so genuinely stupid it's just dazzling

tremendous crime wave and killing wave (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Thursday, 10 March 2016 18:32 (eight years ago) link

In high school, I would say I was a moderate to liberal Democrat. It was an article of faith among my set that US intervention in Central America was not only strategically unwise but also morally unsound. Still reeling from Vietnam, nauseated over the barbarity of the Contras and the Salvadoran death squads, it didn’t take much in the way of liberal sympathy or imagination to think that anything the US did in Nicaragua, Guatemala, or El Salvador—short of getting the hell out of there—would be a disaster for the peoples of those nations.

Again, this was a position that was widely shared among mainstream liberals and Democrats. I just looked up the 1982 House vote on the Boland Amendment, which prohibited all military aid to the Contras, and it was 243 in favor, 171 against. Which means that some portion of moderates also adopted this anti-interventionist position.

The only reason Clinton and her supporters on Twitter can so reflexively attack Sanders over this issue—not his support for the Sandinistas or Castro, but his opposition to US intervention—is that, thanks to two decades of liberal support for regime change and humanitarian intervention, the whole discourse of liberal anti-interventionism has practically disappeared from the scene. Today, the only solid and reliable anti-interventionists you can find are either left-wing anti-imperialists, paleo- or other brands of conservative at outlets like The American Conservative, or an ever narrowing circle of IR realists like Steve Walt.

http://coreyrobin.com/2016/03/10/liberalism-and-the-millennials/

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 10 March 2016 18:34 (eight years ago) link

Paglia is great, always a riot.

flappy bird, Thursday, 10 March 2016 18:44 (eight years ago) link

so corey robin's pt is that this version of liberalism cannot be reasoned/negotiated with, but in the past it could. of course in the past i'm pretty sure the hard left was making similar arguments. honestly i've gotten to the pt where i think reformers and revolutionaries are not allies and the latter are trying to destroy anything good and should probably be kept as far away from the levers of power as possible. nb i don't think bernie is a revolutionary or on the hard left. he's a reformer lib.

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 18:47 (eight years ago) link

When they think liberal, they think of the Clintons and their allies, who are not only terrible on the issue of US power around the world, but also terrible on the question of economic justice and equality at home. They have no memory of a generation of left liberals who fought firmly for labor unions, who pushed hard for universal health care, public housing, and the like. They have no memory of a young Arthur Schlesinger rejecting Communism but nevertheless affirming that “class conflict is essential if freedom is to be preserved, because it is the only barrier against class domination.”

That Schlesinger sentence confused me. He was a liberal who supported anti-communist activity, covert or overt.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 18:49 (eight years ago) link

he's an idiot. i mean not just based on this, but also yes based on this.

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 18:51 (eight years ago) link

his whole shtick is academic leftist. i guess he's a little more left-wing than freddie deboer but i find the 2 indistinguishable in smug tone + dogmatic self-righteousness

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 18:52 (eight years ago) link

so corey robin's pt is that this version of liberalism cannot be reasoned/negotiated with, but in the past it could

That's not how I read the last paragraph.

The gulf today between liberalism and the left is not of the millennials’ or even of the left’s making; it’s the product of a liberalism that has been moving right for decades and that, whatever feints to the left it has been making more recently, still has some way to go before there can be a useful and productive dialogue of difference.

But Robin, whom I hasten to say I like, wrote a confusing post. He doesn't immediately establish that he's going to distinguish between liberalism and leftism; it's as if last night's debate point about Cuba served as inspiration without working as an orgazational pivot point.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 18:53 (eight years ago) link

the problem is that the 2 ideas, at least in the way he's defining them, are incompatible so this idea that there was ever a time when they could have worked together but didn't (unlike today where they can't) is just a fantasy. this is how i understand his argument, but i could be wrong. the fact is that from the POV of the left, who want a complete revolution, anything short of that is always going to look like "moving right." there's a context to american liberalism as well - it's not that it's full of bad actors who disingenuously moved liberalism to the right. it's that if you're a reformer you have to be pragmatic esp if you're trying to win back a country after reagan. (important to keep in mind that the russian right-wing never got their shit together in the first place.) ignoring that is just more radical piety imo.

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 18:56 (eight years ago) link

there's been more ferment on the right about what constitutes conservatism than on the left/liberal side, which spent almost 20 years reeling from Reagan.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 18:58 (eight years ago) link

and REAGAN is a synecdoche for fifteen years worth of inevitable Democratic collapse, in part because the war and inflation and civil rights destroyed whatever semblance of a coalition existed

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:00 (eight years ago) link

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/03/10/why-the-republican-establishment-is-actually-winning/?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_wb-gopestablishment-945a%3Ahomepage%2Fstory

If this is a revolution, though, it's a funny kind of one. That's because the new boss sure does look a lot like the old boss, at least when it comes to what the Republican establishment cares about the most. And that's cutting taxes for the rich. Indeed, the two "anti-establishment" candidates are even more orthodox on this than the establishment ones. You can see that in the chart below. Trump and Cruz would both, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, cut taxes for the top 1 percent by twice as much as Rubio would. And though they all would give the top 0.1 percent a $1 million-plus tax cut, it's the putative outsiders who would give the plutocrats the most.

Populism ain't what it used to be.

curmudgeon, Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:01 (eight years ago) link

the POV of the left, who want a complete revolution

the Dems really rolled over for the last revolution in 1981-85; shouldn't be that tough

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:05 (eight years ago) link

by revolution i really mean a complete restructuring of the system. the nationalism of all industry might be a good example of a revolution. a coup in the WH and the institution of a new party (fascist, military, communist, etc), would constitute one. reagan worked within the system. it's only a revolution by rhetorical standards.

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:07 (eight years ago) link

his whole shtick is academic leftist. i guess he's a little more left-wing than freddie deboer but i find the 2 indistinguishable in smug tone + dogmatic self-righteousness

― Mordy, Thursday, March 10, 2016 6:52 PM (14 minutes ago)

i find corey useful and smart most of the time, tho arthur schlesinger (who ironically enough was good pals with kissinger) was probably not a wise name to drop in this context. can't imagine classing him w/ FDB who is a complete worthless idiot and full-time troll.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:08 (eight years ago) link

and that's really the issue i think - if you aren't willing to accept change within the system, even change that might go in the wrong direction, you don't have much in common who believes system reform is the only answer bc the alternative is worse. you have to be willing to accept that things might not turn out the way you want them for democracy to work. and the alternative, where you can guarantee that it turns out the way you want, doesn't look pretty. xp

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:09 (eight years ago) link

99% of the time i encounter corey, and i have to admit it's mostly on crooked timber, i find him intolerably smug as he lays out his radical 101 ideas. i don't even know what his field of study is.

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:10 (eight years ago) link

After following Shakey's link I wanted to apologize for goofing around. Jesus, scary.

Then on actually reading the Paglia thing I saw this:

Although the rampant Hitler and Mussolini analogies to Trump are wildly exaggerated - he has no organized fascist brigades at his beck and call...

Key word "organized."

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:11 (eight years ago) link

I read his 2012 book on conservatism; it was like a smart but attenuated college thesis.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:11 (eight years ago) link

what pct of the American populace, even the Left whatever that is, want nationalization of industry or deem it remotely possible in this society? You're talking about well less than a million, most of whom don't ever leave the amen chorus.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:12 (eight years ago) link

i agree. they are marginalized and on the fringe. america was horrified watching the communist experiment and only a pocket of ppl in the academy really believe this is a going concern.

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:13 (eight years ago) link

Schlesinger is for me the ne plus ultra of post-war establishment lib: definitive FDR and Jackson biographer, White House sycophant, Center for American Progress, loses his meal ticket, amazed by Nixon election, spends seventies in an alcoholic funk, horrified by Reagan despite voting for him, becomes Nixon's neighbor in Manhattan long enough to note in his diary that the old man would desultorily bounce a rubber ball against the wall with his grandson, parties with Mick Jagger.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:14 (eight years ago) link

I read his 2012 book on conservatism; it was like a smart but attenuated college thesis.

i haven't read it ("the reactionary mind" right?) mostly bc every time i've seen it it seems like what i expect from him - partisan politicking under the guise of scholarship

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:15 (eight years ago) link

i did quit reading him for a while after his incredibly dense attack on spielberg's lincoln (which got reposted a million places w/ the annoying implication that it was the "correct" left stance to take on the movie)

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:18 (eight years ago) link

Trumpling in clip posted above arrested and charged: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/john-mcgraw-arrest-north-carolina-trump-protester-punched

Οὖτις, Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:51 (eight years ago) link

idk who corey robin is but why are we having the "revolution is ruinous" conversation about whether or not america should have a mainstream political party willing to object to things like cia gun-running for right-wing dictators?

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:52 (eight years ago) link

Er not arrested? Idk how u get charged w out being arrested

Xp

Οὖτις, Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:52 (eight years ago) link

ticket to appear

μpright mammal (mh), Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:54 (eight years ago) link

i'm not sure we should conflate promoting the Sandinistas w/ objecting to cia gun-running for the contras. neither are ideal. nb i'm not a debayle fan or anything like that.

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:56 (eight years ago) link

i don't think there's really anything wrong w/ bernie liking castro + ortega and i don't think hillary's attack on that pt is a great one (obv considering her own record). but inevitably if we're going to talk about socialist revolutions we're going to be talking about revolutions, right? it might be that in the case of nicaragua and/or cuba a revolution was necessary. idk i have complicated feelings on this pt i should probably work out elsewhere b4 discussing it here.

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:59 (eight years ago) link

but like dlh, this is obv germane. hillary's comment in full was:

"I think in that same interview he praised what he called the revolution of values in Cuba and talked about how people were working for the common good, not for themselves. I just couldn't disagree more," Clinton said. "You know, if the values are that you oppress people, you disappear people, imprison people or even kill people for expressing their opinions, for expressing freedom of speech, that is not the kind of revolution of values that I ever want to see anywhere."

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 20:01 (eight years ago) link

the breitbart organization has acted like a house organ of the trump campaign

but after trump's campaign manager threw a breitbart reporter to the ground...

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2016/03/10/3758686/trump-campaign-accuses-assaulted-reporter-of-lying/

goole, Thursday, 10 March 2016 20:02 (eight years ago) link

If thats in the context of castro, seems legit to me.

Of course hillary has historically been fine w other regimes that do that shit so there's an element of hypocrisy there.

Xp

Οὖτις, Thursday, 10 March 2016 20:03 (eight years ago) link

neither are ideal.

That seems unnecessarily non-committal, as if to say it was a coin toss.

The Sandinistas may have been somewhat corrupt and not above jailing opponents or pocketing bribes, but they were a big improvement over the deeply corrupt Somoza regime (which we backed) and were not murderous mercenary thugs like the contras (who Reagan illegally backed by, among other things, selling arms to Iran).

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 10 March 2016 20:07 (eight years ago) link

if bernie has the dem left sewn up then at least tactically she has to get the moderates excited, and nobody likes castro! and i don't doubt that her anticommunism is sincere. i hate to speak in horserace language but it's def something sanders should have been preparted for.

arguing about whether it's ok to have been against reagan's central american fuckery in the 80s seems nuts to me in 2016, truly ugly.

goole, Thursday, 10 March 2016 20:08 (eight years ago) link

The Sandinista government implemented a policy of forced conscription for all men aged 17 to 35. The Sandinistas used this army to help guerrilla groups throughout Central America. Ortega pursued a policy of centrally planned economy and nationalization. Ortega took a very hard line against opposition to his policies: On 21 February 1981, the Sandinista army killed 7 Miskito Indians and wounded 17.[20] Forced displacement has also been documented to have occurred with the native population: 10,000 individuals had been moved by 1982.[20] Thousands of Indians took refuge in Honduras and 14,000 were imprisoned in Nicaragua. Anthropologist Gilles Bataillon termed this "politics of ethnocide" in Nicaragua.[21]

again, no one's hands are clean but i think we should be clear-sighted about what they did or didn't do

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 20:09 (eight years ago) link

The tactics used by the Sandinista government to fight the Contras have been criticized by some historians for their suppression of civil rights. On 15 March 1982, the Junta declared a state of siege, which allowed it to close independent radio stations, suspend the right of association and limit the freedom of trade unions. Nicaragua's Permanent Commission on Human Rights condemned Sandinista human rights violations, accusing them of killing and disappearing thousands in the first few years of the war.

maybe necessarily. i'm sticking tho w/ "neither are ideal."

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 20:10 (eight years ago) link

i read The Reactionary Mind, it's just a collection of book reviews from like LRB and NYRB and the Atlantic, not really even a proper book or a systematic investigation of ideas. my grad student polisci friend says his academic work is good. CR is obviously kind of a blowhard self-styled public intellectual but it was well-written, but heavy on biographical detail and character driven kinda pot-shots. my problem with it was Corey Robin doesn't seem get what's appealing about conservatism to conservatives and kinda just says the rich and powerful are motivated by fear of having their power sucked up from under them by the masses. which doesn't really explain why so many of the poor and powerless masses are conservatives. also there was a blog post of his recently where he talked about reading Ricardo with his graduate class, and it was so obvious he had never properly thought about classical economics before because he totally bungled it (even admitted so much) and it's like, dude, you're supposed to be the leftist who actually reads conservatives? classical/free-market economics is the most powerful conservative intellectual tradition, and like he didn't even seem to understand simplest intro shit so now i don't trust him at all

flopson, Thursday, 10 March 2016 20:11 (eight years ago) link

is there a good intro to ricardo text out there? not that i need to add to my reading list but i'll ask

goole, Thursday, 10 March 2016 20:15 (eight years ago) link

oh i thought we were talking about a revolution here, is why i was confused: like, complaints that the democratic party has moved far to the right are irresponsible revolutionary complaints. i was a lil shocked, sry.

there is nothing inherent in hillary's above concern for liberal values that i can argue with and perhaps sanders is rather blithe or glib about this kind of thing (leftists often are, yes) but as you of course know such concern is neither the whole story re: u.s. interventionism (especially in this hemisphere) nor a very accurate summary of clintonian values. speaking of blithe and glib.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 10 March 2016 20:18 (eight years ago) link

i think it's fair to complain that the democratic party has moved to the right! i just think that this argument that "in the past the liberals and the leftists could've gotten along but instead they fought and it was a disaster. but now you can't even work with these guys!" is disingenuous, ahistorical and dumb. again sorry if i'm misreading him but that's how i understood that post.

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 20:20 (eight years ago) link

I can't help but flinch whenever anyone, pol or not, defends some aspect of Cuba. It's a reflex.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 20:22 (eight years ago) link

trump's campaign manager citing chuck c. johnson to call the assaulted breitbart reporter a liar

https://twitter.com/CLewandowski_/status/708020305013448704

Corey Lewandowski Verified account
‏@CLewandowski_
Michelle Fields is an attention seeker who once claimed Allen West groped her but later went silent. [link]

goole, Thursday, 10 March 2016 20:29 (eight years ago) link

is there a good intro to ricardo text out there? not that i need to add to my reading list but i'll ask

― goole, Thursday, March 10, 2016 3:15 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i wouldn't bother actually reading him or any specific secondary text about him. you can understand comparative advantage, quantity theory of money and ricardian equivalence in like 3 minutes by reading wikipedia.

flopson, Thursday, 10 March 2016 20:34 (eight years ago) link

oh sweet, the marginalrevolution comment boxers aren't gonna know what hit em

goole, Thursday, 10 March 2016 20:36 (eight years ago) link

lol

flopson, Thursday, 10 March 2016 20:40 (eight years ago) link

speaking of marginalrevolution -- should this post have me reconsider the legitimate fear from outsourced jobs among trump voters? "Trump's vote share in the Republican primary is in fact significantly positively correlated with that measure, meaning that he performed most strongly in areas where manufacturing's decline has been least important. Where manufacturing's decline was most intense, Trump received about 30 percent of the Republican vote, and where it was lightest, he received about 50 percent of the Republican vote."

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 20:47 (eight years ago) link

i've been reading this btw: https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R42965.pdf - and i'd appreciate any other good reading leads about the legacy + impact of NAFTA and free trade

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 20:49 (eight years ago) link

It takes one to no one:

Richard M. Nixon
@dick_nixon

As big a bunch of charlatans, idiots, hypocrites, liars, and the criminally stupid as you can imagine.

Marco Rubio ‏@marcorubio

Proud to welcome this group of national security experts to our team: http://rub.io/qeECpw

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:08 (eight years ago) link

i don't doubt that her anticommunism is sincere

yep, proauthoritarian all the way

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:12 (eight years ago) link

(which is what bad communists are anyway. fuck isms, fuck dogmas)

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:13 (eight years ago) link

scott adams has been an unkind parody of an engineer for years

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:21 (eight years ago) link

hoo boy

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:21 (eight years ago) link

did not think i'd be posting an Inside Edition link in 2016

what kind of people support trump? well let's listen to... oh

http://www.insideedition.com/headlines/15177-trump-supporter-who-punched-protester-next-time-we-might-have-to-kill-him

goole, Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:24 (eight years ago) link

I remember distinctly the inflection point where my position went from "Scott Adams totally gets it!" to "Scott Adams is fucking insane" and it was the coda of (I think?) The Dilbert Future where he attributed his success to the fact that he had said "I will be a successful cartoonist" 10 times out loud in a row, leveraging some metaphysical Candyman-esque energy.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:25 (eight years ago) link

have a feeling adams thinks he is making a scathing satirical point with that trump thing but i've been wrong before

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:26 (eight years ago) link

xp to goole: what a charming guy in that video

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:27 (eight years ago) link

if there's one thing we know is common to all ISIS operators, it's calmly exiting a venue with security while flipping off a hostile crowd

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:28 (eight years ago) link

INSIDE EDITION tracked down the supporter, 78-year-old John McGraw, who was unrepentant.

When asked if he liked the rally, he said: “You bet I liked it. Knocking the hell out of that big mouth.”

And when asked why he punched the protester, he said: "Number one, we don’t know if he’s ISIS. We don’t know who he is, but we know he’s not acting like an American, cussing me... If he wants it laid out, I laid it out."

He added: “Yes, he deserved it. The next time we see him, we might have to kill him. We don’t know who he is. He might be with a terrorist organization.”

On Thursday, officials arrested and charged McGraw with assault and battery and disorderly conduct, according to the Cumberland County Sheriff’s Office.

goole, Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:28 (eight years ago) link

we know he’s not acting like an American, cussing me

moving the goalposts pretty far on which one of you isn't acting like an american, guy!

nomar, Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:29 (eight years ago) link

if there's one thing we know is common to all ISIS operators, it's calmly exiting a venue with security while flipping off a hostile crowd

hence their alarming youth appeal

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:30 (eight years ago) link

jesus christ someone IS gonna get killed at one of these rallies soon

also they were playing "you can't always get what you want" in the background, hmm

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:32 (eight years ago) link

it's like a real-life Eric Cartman is running for President on the Respect My Authoritaw platform

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:34 (eight years ago) link

hey that suddenly reminds me, have those guys weighed in on why all meaningful opinions about trump are stupid yet?

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:35 (eight years ago) link

man it's gonna be a really fucking ugly year isn't it

https://twitter.com/mmurraypolitics/status/707920850620649473

Longtime NBC/WSJ pollster Peter Hart on current field's unpopularity: "I've never, never seen anything like this"

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CdMKL4DXEAAnUeV.jpg

goole, Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:35 (eight years ago) link

pretty amazing how high up on that list the incumbent black president is

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:37 (eight years ago) link

kasich running with it there

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:37 (eight years ago) link

kasich has by far the biggest unlisted "dunno?" demo there

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:38 (eight years ago) link

Not shown: Zika virus; being mauled in the nuts by a rabid weasel

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:39 (eight years ago) link

lol at Romney being even less liked than Cruz

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:39 (eight years ago) link

feel like dogs and cats should be there both as a baseline and also as part of a longrunning battle to see which are more popular

Karl Malone, Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:40 (eight years ago) link

INSIDE EDITION tracked down the supporter, 78-year-old John McGraw, who was unrepentant.

When asked if he liked the rally, he said: “You bet I liked it. Knocking the hell out of that big mouth.”

And when asked why he punched the protester, he said: "Number one, we don’t know if he’s ISIS. We don’t know who he is, but we know he’s not acting like an American, cussing me... If he wants it laid out, I laid it out."

He added: “Yes, he deserved it. The next time we see him, we might have to kill him. We don’t know who he is. He might be with a terrorist organization.”

On Thursday, officials arrested and charged McGraw with assault and battery and disorderly conduct, according to the Cumberland County Sheriff’s Office.

― goole, Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:28 (10 minutes ago) Permalink

Why does America have such a disproportionate number of citizens who live their entire lives inside infantile fantasies?

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:41 (eight years ago) link

congratulations, President Kasich

now if you'll excuse me, I need to help my wife hide her reproductive system

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:41 (eight years ago) link

being German isn't a fucking race. Scott Adams can fuck right the fuck off.

akm, Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:42 (eight years ago) link

lol @ google and apple high positive ratings. If the organ grinder is popular, who cares about the monkeys?

"Worried pimp" (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:42 (eight years ago) link

Seems like the general level of violence at trump rallies is ramping up. Not a positive development.

Οὖτις, Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:44 (eight years ago) link

as a german-american myself i would like to remind everyone itt that mussolini is so far a more apt comparison; thank you for your sensitivity

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:45 (eight years ago) link

if there's one thing we know is common to all ISIS operators, it's calmly exiting a venue with security while flipping off a hostile crowd

― i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, March 10, 2016 4:28 PM (17 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

irl lol

Treeship, Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:46 (eight years ago) link

being German isn't a fucking race. Scott Adams can fuck right the fuck off.

he's wrong bc no one has called trump hitler bc of his german ancestry, however most "races" aren't races and if like some kid called another kid hitler after finding out he had german ancestry i'd have no problem calling that racism. also otm about mussolini being the better comparison (and berlusconi even better!)

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:47 (eight years ago) link

i can't believe we're talking about german-americans and nakh isn't here :(

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:47 (eight years ago) link

Trump lamenting "the good old days" when protestors would have been "carried out on a stretcher"
... this is like only a couple degrees removed from inciting a lynch mob.

Οὖτις, Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:48 (eight years ago) link

(and berlusconi even better!)
― Mordy, Thursday, March 10, 2016 3:47 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10100124825186650&set=p.10100124825186650&type=3

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:51 (eight years ago) link

Mike Lee endorses Cruz!!!!!!!

Karl Malone, Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:51 (eight years ago) link

you got one, ted! and he's ALSO a fucking asshole!

Karl Malone, Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:52 (eight years ago) link

Its hilarious that lee held out this long

Οὖτις, Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:52 (eight years ago) link

nice to see 3 of 4 non-negative leaders stand with Snowden that NSA needing corporate help unlocking a phone is "bullshit".

anticommunist Goldwater Girl not doin too good

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 10 March 2016 21:56 (eight years ago) link

Why does America have such a disproportionate number of citizens who live their entire lives inside infantile fantasies?

― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Thursday, March 10, 2016 4:41 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

individualism is kind of the american dream. it's also an infantile fantasy.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 10 March 2016 22:03 (eight years ago) link

for a while I wondered if the FBI using reverse engineering or a number of the proposed techniques to break into a phone would violate the DMCA, but there is a DMCA exemption for

a federal, state, or local law enforcement officer accesses a work in the course of a lawful investigation;

the phone thing is still a red herring, it's a work-provided cell phone and the phones the attackers used to communicate with each other were destroyed. it's just a token case law enforcement is trying to use to test Apple and other security proponents

μpright mammal (mh), Thursday, 10 March 2016 22:09 (eight years ago) link

this was posted to FB recently as well: (long, sorry):

Lauren Underwood
March 4 at 8:56am · Garden City, MI ·
Okay, so I'm going to go ahead and share my experience at Donald Trump's rally in Warren, MI today. We'll start with why I went. I am a firm believer in being educated on ALL candidates, not just the one you're rooting for, so Stephanie and I decided to attend. If you know me, it's no surprise that I am not a fan of Trump due to his racist, misogynist, and popularity-searching "campaign". But I try to keep an open mind, understanding that people have different views and everyone is entitled to their own. I wore a shirt bashing Trump, and Stephanie wore a pro-Bernie Sanders baseball hat. We had no intentions of causing a scene, starting any fights, or even speaking negatively towards any Trump-supporters. We stood in the crowd with everyone else, even made small talk with a few different people, asking back and forth about each other's views. A women supporting Trump even complimented our hat and shirt. This is not a post to bash all Trump-supporters. Most of the people we spoke to were very kind to us, as we were to them. Trump came out and started his speech. As hard as it was, we ignored the screams and chants of building walls and exporting citizens. We stood quietly and listened to the man speak. Every 15 or so minutes, a scene would happen where the crowd would yell about protestors and Trump would scream, "Get them out, send them out of here!" and the crowd would scream "USA, USA, USA" until the attendees who were asked to leave were escorted out. So, about 45 minutes to an hour into his speech, a group of teenage boys (who had been harassing us the entire time while we ignored their comments) screamed and pointed at us, yelling for us to be kicked out. At first we laughed it off, of course we couldn't be kicked out, we were just standing here silently. Wrong. A secret service member and a police officer were there within the minute, grabbed Stephanie and I by our arms, and started to lead us out. One of the Trump supporters we were chatting with even stood up for us, explaining that we weren't doing anything and weren't being disruptive. By now the crowd was chanting their USA run and a large portion was also booing us out. The walk through the crowd was very upsetting, being screamed at and filmed, even one man said "Go to China if you like communism so much!" (Communism?? Don't you mean democratic socialism??). But also, along the walk out, some attendees would high five us or shake our hands, and thank us for coming and supporting Bernie. It felt weird to be thanked, due to us not doing anything besides standing quietly. As the two men walked us out, one explained that if we returned we would be arrested. Stephanie quickly asked why that was. The man replied with "They don't want you here," to which she said "Isn't it a constitutional right to silently protest?" The officer replied "Not here." The rude remarks and yells didn't stop at the door, for Trump-supporters who didn't get in greeted us with just as much hatred. The walk back to my truck even included a man yelling from his car about how this was for Trump people and that we didn't belong here and shouldn't have come. This kind of hatred is what is ruining this country. To think that my right to protest was taken from me AT A RALLY, scares the hell out of me for if Trump actually became president and got that power. What else would he take away from us if he can't even stand two teenage girls standing silently at a FREE, PUBLIC, OPEN-TO-EVERYONE event? If you're thinking of voting Trump this year, please rethink your stance. This much hate belongs nowhere near the presidency.

akm, Thursday, 10 March 2016 22:11 (eight years ago) link

discussed upthread, I believe

μpright mammal (mh), Thursday, 10 March 2016 22:12 (eight years ago) link

bah

akm, Thursday, 10 March 2016 22:13 (eight years ago) link

edgy stance: fuck donald trump

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 10 March 2016 22:21 (eight years ago) link

http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/science/theatermove.gif

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 22:28 (eight years ago) link

https://i.imgflip.com/m7ibq.jpg

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Thursday, 10 March 2016 22:30 (eight years ago) link

thanks all

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 10 March 2016 22:31 (eight years ago) link

why would you go to a rally wearing a shirt/hat w a candidate from the other party on it?

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 10 March 2016 22:35 (eight years ago) link

to check if they're fascists?

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 10 March 2016 22:35 (eight years ago) link

idk u guys, I think donald trump is maybe g-<looks around room anxiously>-oo-bad, bad, definitely bad.

"Worried pimp" (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 10 March 2016 22:36 (eight years ago) link

yeah i guess if someone wore a Trump shirt to a Sanders rally they would just think they were being funny/ironic

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 10 March 2016 22:43 (eight years ago) link

i can't believe they're having another debate tnite

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 23:02 (eight years ago) link

haha what they are?

jason waterfalls (gbx), Thursday, 10 March 2016 23:06 (eight years ago) link

Gop is yeah

Οὖτις, Thursday, 10 March 2016 23:17 (eight years ago) link

And there's another on March 21 in Salt Lake City.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 10 March 2016 23:19 (eight years ago) link

yeah i guess if someone wore a Trump shirt to a Sanders rally they would just think they were being funny/ironic

well they might yell at you and tell you to leave, but idk if they would alert bernie sanders to your presence so that bernie sanders could dispatch private security to force you out while the crowd chanted the name of their nation

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 10 March 2016 23:20 (eight years ago) link

(maybe it's not private security; i've been a little unclear on who exactly is policing trump rallies)

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 10 March 2016 23:21 (eight years ago) link

Its a bit of both afaict

Οὖτις, Thursday, 10 March 2016 23:24 (eight years ago) link

the "trump as wrestling heel" thing just keeps holding, it's amazing. i have great memories of attending matches put on by extreme championship wrestling, the philly franchise, and the loyal crowds there launching maniacally into "ecw! ecw! ecw!" chants the moment that something really untoward happened, usually involving a wrestler getting thrown into the crowd or through a table

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 10 March 2016 23:36 (eight years ago) link

yes i chanted too, ok. it felt good

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 10 March 2016 23:36 (eight years ago) link

wrestling is kind of cool cuz it takes all that shit and channels it into a ridiculous fantasy world; it even makes meaningless postmodern hash out of "real" sports' fixation on the objective values of Competition and Dominance. too bad about the labor relations. also too bad about the kind of politics a population raised on ridiculous fantasy worlds will eventually get into i guess.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 10 March 2016 23:43 (eight years ago) link

"ecw! ecw! ecw!"

isn't that ec-dub?

larry appleton, Thursday, 10 March 2016 23:44 (eight years ago) link

funny u should say that xp

Do you watch the PGA Tour, college football, or NASCAR? Then according to a new survey, you're most likely a Republican.

But if you'd rather settle in for a Lakers-Celtics game -- or some WWE pro wrestling action -- then there's a good chance that you vote Democrat.

Mordy, Thursday, 10 March 2016 23:45 (eight years ago) link

isn't that ec-dub?

yes :)

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 10 March 2016 23:46 (eight years ago) link

xp oh that's interesting mordy and i guess not too surprising. i don't rly watch it but gf's a big fan and i've taken to challoping my parents by calling it "sports for sophisticated people"

culture of entertainment in general not partic politically healthy? or maybe it is, or maybe it doesn't matter, idk.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 10 March 2016 23:55 (eight years ago) link

lol @ "i would note"

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 11 March 2016 00:20 (eight years ago) link

Best line and highest score: Rubio's "When I'm President."

clemenza, Friday, 11 March 2016 00:40 (eight years ago) link

that line just always reminds me of this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOINdsjJsDg

Neanderthal, Friday, 11 March 2016 00:45 (eight years ago) link

https://twitter.com/lowviolet/status/707109509534076928

k3vin k., Friday, 11 March 2016 01:03 (eight years ago) link

oh look, people born to advantaged positions dominate our discourse, whether political, academic, critical, or journalistic. go "meritocracy" and "realism"

reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 11 March 2016 01:07 (eight years ago) link

cruz got endorsed by a colleague

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 01:28 (eight years ago) link

yeah, but cruz promised to pay him $100 if he'd be his friend

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 11 March 2016 01:44 (eight years ago) link

lol the moment of silence for nancy reagan and the national anthem, never change debates

k3vin k., Friday, 11 March 2016 01:57 (eight years ago) link

the transparency of cruz's hairline increases with each of these debates

reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 11 March 2016 02:00 (eight years ago) link

whenever trump gets criticized for exploitation and he responds that he's simply exploiting the existing laws and pivots to talking about what a great businessman he is, i have nightmare flash forwards to him somehow selling out the entire U.S. in exchange for $ 2 trillion to some group of rich dudes

Karl Malone, Friday, 11 March 2016 02:08 (eight years ago) link

the New Jersey Nets owner guy?

Neanderthal, Friday, 11 March 2016 02:10 (eight years ago) link

sure, and scott boras maybe.

"oh, how could we have known that he would just consider his options and then do whatever was most financially beneficial for himself? he never gave us any clues!!"

Karl Malone, Friday, 11 March 2016 02:12 (eight years ago) link

kasich defying gabbneb in facing the crucial issue of his croatian-american background head-on

van damme death warrant (Doctor Casino), Friday, 11 March 2016 02:13 (eight years ago) link

meanwhile huckabee and cruz's dad would be claiming that trump was the actual antichrist

//metalchugging

Karl Malone, Friday, 11 March 2016 02:13 (eight years ago) link

did he just say he's grown over "four hundred private-sector jobs in ohio"? wow!

van damme death warrant (Doctor Casino), Friday, 11 March 2016 02:14 (eight years ago) link

does rubio shave his hairline up to give himself a bigger forehead? the only one of these four with natural-looking hair is kasich

reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 11 March 2016 02:18 (eight years ago) link

i watched the bad lip reading version of cruz' campaign video and his little teeth and weird face freaked me out so much I can't even look at him now

akm, Friday, 11 March 2016 02:22 (eight years ago) link

this is boring :(

iatee, Friday, 11 March 2016 02:28 (eight years ago) link

(xpost) Is there still a guiding party structure? It does feel like there was a missive from above to behave tonight.

clemenza, Friday, 11 March 2016 02:31 (eight years ago) link

Trump is bored.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 11 March 2016 02:33 (eight years ago) link

maybe some kind of scheme for the convention was set up at the secret meeting rubio, cruz and kasich had with jeb bush today

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Friday, 11 March 2016 02:38 (eight years ago) link

yeah they all seem to be just going through the motions

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 11 March 2016 02:43 (eight years ago) link

china

reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 11 March 2016 02:47 (eight years ago) link

i dunno this whole section on islam is pretty fucking terrifying. it's not an "exciting" debate like the others but don't get it twisted, these are still psychos. social security segment may also have been eye-opening for some viewers.

van damme death warrant (Doctor Casino), Friday, 11 March 2016 02:55 (eight years ago) link

like, these guys being sober and dour is way more frightening because they get time to really unroll their nasty little spiels, act 'presidential' about it, and not waste time in the crosstalk.

van damme death warrant (Doctor Casino), Friday, 11 March 2016 02:56 (eight years ago) link

what i don't get is why the debate moderators don't ever ask trump point of information type questions, such as, can you tell us what the iran deal was about? because he doesn't know. he really doesn't know much of anything about policy and doesn't care to learn

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Friday, 11 March 2016 02:58 (eight years ago) link

the Palestinian people don't exist in these debates. only Palestinian terrorists.

agreed dc, this segment is blood-curdling

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 11 March 2016 03:00 (eight years ago) link

and yes the moderators are absolutely complicit

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 11 March 2016 03:02 (eight years ago) link

this is the most supine panel of moderators I can recall

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 11 March 2016 03:03 (eight years ago) link

these guys (and dana) worship wealth, and drumpf reminds them all of their bosses, whom they better not challenge too much, or else

xpost

reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 11 March 2016 03:05 (eight years ago) link

Praise for Sanders--disorienting.

clemenza, Friday, 11 March 2016 03:07 (eight years ago) link

really only half-watching but seems like rubio's having a good night

k3vin k., Friday, 11 March 2016 03:10 (eight years ago) link

i've taken to challoping my parents by calling it "sports for sophisticated people"

Surely more sport that confirms all your prejudices about sportspeople, thus making a nonsportsperson feel smug

Not an accusation, btw, i hate sport and sportspeople

like Uber, but for underpants (James Morrison), Friday, 11 March 2016 03:13 (eight years ago) link

trump doesn't know what the cuba 'deal' or iran deal are about at all, he has no clue

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Friday, 11 March 2016 03:15 (eight years ago) link

xxp yeah, I'm about a quarter watching at this point, but Rubio's easily having his best debate yet

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 11 March 2016 03:15 (eight years ago) link

audience was even starting to laugh every time trump said 'deal'

iatee, Friday, 11 March 2016 03:16 (eight years ago) link

any crotch grab in any sport is more sophisticated than this shit

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 03:18 (eight years ago) link

this is the marionette portion of tonight's entertainment

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 11 March 2016 03:21 (eight years ago) link

I still wear my Worldwide Apology Tour '08 T-shirt all the time.

clemenza, Friday, 11 March 2016 03:24 (eight years ago) link

Cruz did the Reagan and the Iran hostages thing again.

Kasich wants shock and awe.

timellison, Friday, 11 March 2016 03:31 (eight years ago) link

heh, how emo of you clem.

you know, I've listened to a lot of these GOP fuckers, but their worldview never ceases to astound me. it's such a dead-end ideology. like, no wonder "white middle America" is in a state of despair: there's no curiosity about, never mind connection with, the foreign Other in this particular stew brewed by the right.

...

:O at these answers re the sucker punch

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 11 March 2016 03:36 (eight years ago) link

Gerald Ford put America first by pardoning Nixon

timellison, Friday, 11 March 2016 03:42 (eight years ago) link

Trump always refers to 1,237 as a "random number." Huh? Isn't it half + one of the available delegates?

clemenza, Friday, 11 March 2016 03:43 (eight years ago) link

I generally liked Rubio tonight until that ridiculous story.

clemenza, Friday, 11 March 2016 03:46 (eight years ago) link

trump repeats continually that he's ahead of clinton in the polls and is going to beat her by even more.. what poll? this is the last i saw and is pretty much where we're at

PRESIDENT
Hillary Clinton (D) 51%
Donald Trump (R) 38%
(NBC/WSJ Poll, RV, 3/3-6)

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Friday, 11 March 2016 03:48 (eight years ago) link

Kasich mentioned Jack Kemp a few debates ago, tonight he mentions Pete Domenici. I think he may be out of sync with his party.

clemenza, Friday, 11 March 2016 03:53 (eight years ago) link

i didn't watch this but daria so otm about the deals

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 11 March 2016 03:58 (eight years ago) link

this morning Dylan what'shername from MSNBC casually mentioned, as if embarrassed, that Clinton and Sanders would defeat Trump 'by double digit numbers.' No one asked a followup. Horse race. We need one.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 March 2016 04:01 (eight years ago) link

i'm sure some video editors can put together a nice ad making pretty clear how clueless trump is by splicing together all the hopelessly vague "we're gonna do a deal, it's going to be a good deal, not a bad deal," soundbites + maybe some of his goofy faces.. i mean maybe you start off the whole thing with a serious question affecting people w/r/t the economy onscreen, then cut to trump being the fool he is

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Friday, 11 March 2016 04:05 (eight years ago) link

i'm sure some video editors can put together a nice ad making pretty clear how clueless trump is by splicing together all the hopelessly vague "we're gonna do a deal, it's going to be a good deal, not a bad deal," soundbites + maybe some of his goofy faces.. i mean maybe you start off the whole thing with a serious question affecting people w/r/t the economy onscreen, then cut to trump being the fool he is

they should do a "fake job interview" ad which began "would you hire this man?" and his answer to every question is something like "it's gonna be big, it's gonna be great, i don't know what it's gonna be, but we're gonna get the best people, we're gonna make a deal, it's gonna be beautiful" -- he would look utterly ridiculous.

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 11 March 2016 04:36 (eight years ago) link

also

Paglia angling for that VP spot
http://www.salon.com/2016/03/10/i_was_wrong_about_donald_trump_camille_paglia_on_the_gop_front_runners_refreshing_candor_and_his_impetuousness_too/
― Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Thursday, March 10, 2016 8:52 AM (11 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

who knew camille paglia was competing to be the american robert brasillach?

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 11 March 2016 04:36 (eight years ago) link

p sure there's no actual endorsement in there?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 04:50 (eight years ago) link

paglia supports sanders, but her contrarianism and lifelong fetishization of boorish working class men dictated she say nice things about trump

Treeship, Friday, 11 March 2016 04:54 (eight years ago) link

she and trump would be a fun team to watch though

Treeship, Friday, 11 March 2016 04:54 (eight years ago) link

CNN's in the middle of an orgy of self-congratulation over their Civil and Substantive Debate. Even if you accept the premise, I doubt they had much to do with it--if those guys had wanted to go off on each other, they'd have done so.

clemenza, Friday, 11 March 2016 04:58 (eight years ago) link

paglia is completely intellectually bankrupt

weird how she has such a hard-on for trump in that article and yet she still manages to sound like a prude when discussion bill clinton

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 11 March 2016 05:00 (eight years ago) link

"substantive" xp

Treeship, Friday, 11 March 2016 05:04 (eight years ago) link

idk why i keep watching these things

Treeship, Friday, 11 March 2016 05:04 (eight years ago) link

sayin what we all think

http://www.factmag.com/2016/03/10/mac-miller-donald-trump-racist/

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 11 March 2016 05:09 (eight years ago) link

still wonder if something's up & they plan to rewrite the rules at the convention to stop from nominating trump even if he has enough delegates

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Friday, 11 March 2016 05:25 (eight years ago) link

They (whoever "they" is) can either do that, and sacrifice the remaining shreds of legitimacy of the Republican Party, or nominate Trump, and sacrifice the remaining shreds of legitimacy of the Republican Party.

petulant dick master (silby), Friday, 11 March 2016 05:27 (eight years ago) link

xpost idk, granted a significant portion of Trump's base comes from outside the Republican party, but telling the Republicans that did vote for him "hey we're going to shit all over your right to pick our candidate" would have some pretty long-lasting damaging effects.

Maybe they would have the balls, I dunno, but I really think they're gonna go all-in with the multi-headed dragon trying to siphon away delegates so they can broker the convention.

Neanderthal, Friday, 11 March 2016 05:29 (eight years ago) link

the Repub party is basically a deformed, bleeding dick either way tho

Neanderthal, Friday, 11 March 2016 05:31 (eight years ago) link

they are totally going to be down nominating trump, watch 70% of the GOP leadership fall in line. are you kidding?

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 11 March 2016 05:37 (eight years ago) link

they might become the first party to assassinate their own candidate

Neanderthal, Friday, 11 March 2016 05:39 (eight years ago) link

the $$$ people have to be thinking about the downballot candidates esp keeping the senate.. i mean, they have no good option, it may be a question of nominating someone else who will upset a lot of their base vs nominating trump who is gonna be radioactive.. whatever oppo research the democrats & associated PACs have dug up on trump from decades of material hasn't even been used yet..

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Friday, 11 March 2016 05:51 (eight years ago) link

yeah, i am sort of mystified how no major scandals from trump's past have caught on. he seems like a sleazy person who has led a dishonest life filled with double-dealing/underhanded shennanigans at the very least

Treeship, Friday, 11 March 2016 06:11 (eight years ago) link

they should do a "fake job interview" ad which began "would you hire this man?" and his answer to every question is something like "it's gonna be big, it's gonna be great, i don't know what it's gonna be, but we're gonna get the best people, we're gonna make a deal, it's gonna be beautiful" -- he would look utterly ridiculous.

Yeah, I dunno if I'm confident on the numbers regarding "have you ever interviewed a bullshitter?" vs "have you ever tried to bullshit your way into a job?"

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 11 March 2016 10:02 (eight years ago) link

yeah, i am sort of mystified how no major scandals from trump's past have caught on. he seems like a sleazy person who has led a dishonest life filled with double-dealing/underhanded shennanigans at the very least

hi dere likely next british prime minister.

Seriously, it's amazing how much this sort of thing just isn't a problem for those with sufficient brass neck. If Nixon had been like 'yeah, I'm a crook, I illegally spy on my opponents, so what, they're bad people' he'd probably still be president now.

"Worried pimp" (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 11 March 2016 10:54 (eight years ago) link

the Repub party is basically a deformed, bleeding dick either way tho

― Neanderthal, Friday, March 11, 201

should I post a gif

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 March 2016 11:28 (eight years ago) link

the Repub party is basically a deformed, bleeding dick either way tho

..in charge of about 37 states.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 11:53 (eight years ago) link

If Nixon had been like 'yeah, I'm a crook, I illegally spy on my opponents, so what, they're bad people' he'd probably still be president now.

You really didn't hear "They all 'do it'" re Dick a lot until the late '70s; maybe that's when the US lost its cherry for the last time. So Nixon took that approach to become a Respected Elder Statesman ("When the president does it, that means it is not illegal").

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 12:02 (eight years ago) link

paglia supports sanders, but her contrarianism and lifelong fetishization of boorish working class men dictated she say nice things about trump

There's not actually anything remotely working class about Donald Trump, is there?

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Friday, 11 March 2016 13:34 (eight years ago) link

He's just a humble steak salesman made good. Sure he's got some other irons in the fire, but he's truly happiest while tending his herds, or skillfully butchering an Angus.

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 11 March 2016 13:43 (eight years ago) link

https://twitter.com/DOGSnSHAKES/status/708028576461922304

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 March 2016 13:48 (eight years ago) link

There's not actually anything remotely working class about Donald Trump, is there?

As Greenwald has pointed out, he (like Sanders) has challenged the bipartisan orthodoxy on globalist trade.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 14:43 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, I was referring to that and also his supporters, who skew older, white, male, and less educated iirc

Treeship, Friday, 11 March 2016 14:58 (eight years ago) link

NY Daily News:

Former Yankees slugger Reggie Jackson didn't endorse Trump but told The News earlier this week "he's fun and I think he's got a big heart."

Mr. October added that he believes a wall between the U.S. and Mexico is not the right decision, and he made a cringeworthy joke to explain his rationale.

"We need to control it and we need to do something about it, but we can't do it like that," Jackson said. "We need to be concerned about more jobs here and people coming in here that we really don't want, but if it's not for the Latin American community, we don't have any cooks in our Italian restaurants. We don't have any cooks at the steakhouses.

"We don't have anyone to do that kind of work, so be careful."

Reginald Martinez Jackson, ladies & gents

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 14:59 (eight years ago) link

Older, white, male, less educated, more likely to coldcock a POC and gleefully muse about killing him on-camera.

Going To Town On Aunt May's Mezze Platter (Old Lunch), Friday, 11 March 2016 15:01 (eight years ago) link

lol, that's such a perfect overfed retired sports celebrity statement: "If we don't allow in the Mexican, who will fix up my steaks?"

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Friday, 11 March 2016 15:04 (eight years ago) link

WE MUST NOT ALLOW AN ITALIAN CHEF GAP

I'm envisioning the Pasta Riots of the 2020s. Blocks-long lines to get into (even) Olive Garden, like during the gas crisis. People on street corners holding signs that read, "will work for rigatoni."

brotato chip (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 11 March 2016 15:32 (eight years ago) link

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/172404730876792832

man has a point

mookieproof, Friday, 11 March 2016 15:42 (eight years ago) link

already past anyone's interest in this breakneck news cycle but fwiw a 78yo guy cold cocking someone and then saying that 'he could be ISIS' has frontotemporal dementia written all over it

jason waterfalls (gbx), Friday, 11 March 2016 16:08 (eight years ago) link

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/172404730876792832

man has a point

― mookieproof, Friday, March 11, 2016 9:42 AM (26 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i feel like this is an issue we could build bipartisan consensus around

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 11 March 2016 16:10 (eight years ago) link

Manolia Charlotin, a Haitian journalist based in New York, said Clinton’s actions should draw questions as to how Clinton would act should she become president: “What does that mean as to her approach to foreign policy? To have a secretary of state visit a country, to make a stop, and as a result of that meeting, you have an illegal selection of leaders? How does that decision promote the American views of democracy?”

In both Honduras and Haiti, Clinton chose to shy away from letting each country’s voters choose their leaders when the going got tough. American voters, the people of Honduras, the people of Haiti and anyone who cares about democracy and human rights should know whether Clinton as president would be a promoter of such values.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2016/03/10/hillary-clinton-needs-to-answer-for-her-actions-in-honduras-and-haiti/

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 16:46 (eight years ago) link

rubio campaign: please vote for kasich in ohio to stop trump

kasich campaign: "We were going to win in OH without his help, just as he's going to lose in FL w/o ours"

mookieproof, Friday, 11 March 2016 17:07 (eight years ago) link

of everything in her customarily stupid column, this infuriated me the most:

"If Trump wins the White House, that no-holds-barred video will go down in history as “the shot heard round the world,” Ralph Waldo Emerson’s phrase for the first salvo of the American Revolution by rural insurgents at Concord."

WHY WOULD EXPLAIN THIS REFERENCE. WHY.

goole, Friday, 11 March 2016 17:14 (eight years ago) link

Oh hey Ben Carson's quest to counsel Christian voters and continue to rake in money has lead him to the conclusion that endorsing Donald Trump is the way forward.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 11 March 2016 17:22 (eight years ago) link

now envisioning Putin paying Carson to stab President Trump to death following some policy dispute

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 17:27 (eight years ago) link

goole I answered your question in my own copy-pasting of that very sentence upthread!

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 11 March 2016 17:27 (eight years ago) link

in other news:

https://twitter.com/JaredWyand/status/708120011039068160

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 17:28 (eight years ago) link

tracer this thread is for posting the same clip half a dozen times w/o reading, have you learned nothing this season

goole, Friday, 11 March 2016 17:31 (eight years ago) link

be sure to re-post it on next month's thread

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 17:32 (eight years ago) link

holy shit at that tweet video shakey just posted.
cruz's pastor is a straight up psychopathic zealot

ulysses, Friday, 11 March 2016 17:45 (eight years ago) link

I thought we'd all seen Cruz's pastor by now; footage of him has certainly circulated through the news cycle.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 11 March 2016 17:46 (eight years ago) link

this guy is literally calling for the death of homosexuals and then saying he's not afraid to die for his beliefs only moments before introducing ted cruz and ppl were worried about reverend wright???

Mordy, Friday, 11 March 2016 17:48 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pLobWHDdVw
"IT'S NOT A GAY TIME! This is, THESE ARE THE PEOPLE WITH THE SORES, THE GAPING SORES! THE SORES THAT ARE PUS-SY AND GROSS! AND PEOPLE ARE COMING IN AND CARVING HAPPY FACES ON THE SORES! That's not a nice thing to do! DON'T YOU DARE CARVE HAPPY FACES ON OPEN, PUS-SY SORES! DON'T YOU EVER DO THAT, DON'T YOU EVER DO THAT, I TELL YOU DON'T DO IT! Sackcloth and ashes, this is what America needs. America needs to hear the message... we are messed up."

ulysses, Friday, 11 March 2016 17:51 (eight years ago) link

I thought we'd all seen Cruz's pastor by now

this is a different guy from the one who converted his dad, afaict

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 17:51 (eight years ago) link

i've never seen this guy before; he's a piece of work.

ulysses, Friday, 11 March 2016 17:51 (eight years ago) link

ts: "they eat the poopoo" vs "the people with the sores that are pus-sy and gross"

ulysses, Friday, 11 March 2016 17:54 (eight years ago) link

hm, so a little reading suggests this is not "Cruz's pastor" but some fuckhead that Cruz happily cosigned and this is old news
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/16/opinion/campaign-stops/ted-cruz-and-the-anti-gay-pastor.html

ulysses, Friday, 11 March 2016 17:58 (eight years ago) link

beat me to it.

ulysses, Friday, 11 March 2016 17:58 (eight years ago) link

it bears repeating that Cruz is an amoral bastard tho, especially in the face of #anybodybuttrump

ulysses, Friday, 11 March 2016 17:59 (eight years ago) link

Anybody Butt Rump

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 11 March 2016 17:59 (eight years ago) link

a movement we can all get behind

ulysses, Friday, 11 March 2016 18:00 (eight years ago) link

Yet a quick web search will turn up Mr. Swanson’s references to the demonic power of “the homosexual Borg,” the unmitigated evil of Harry Potter and the Disney character Princess Elsa’s lesbian agenda.

wait what's this about the borg, my star trek fandom is not strong but

μpright mammal (mh), Friday, 11 March 2016 18:00 (eight years ago) link

it's a tennis diss

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 11 March 2016 18:00 (eight years ago) link

wtf is that pastor even talking about, "carving happy faces on the sores"?

Treeship, Friday, 11 March 2016 18:01 (eight years ago) link

it bears repeating that Cruz is an amoral bastard tho, especially in the face of #anybodybuttrump

― ulysses, Friday, March 11, 2016 12:59 PM (54 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

He does have a weird face, after all.

Evan, Friday, 11 March 2016 18:01 (eight years ago) link

I want to walk that joke back, I should have thought more than 5 seconds before posting it

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 11 March 2016 18:01 (eight years ago) link

lol

μpright mammal (mh), Friday, 11 March 2016 18:01 (eight years ago) link

http://barbwire.com/2015/04/02/0900-indiana-meets-the-big-gay-borg/

Update: The revised language has now been released, and it’s even worse than we thought. The new language forces Christian bakers to bake cakes in violation of their faith and conscience.

ulysses, Friday, 11 March 2016 18:02 (eight years ago) link

Baker Lives Matter

ulysses, Friday, 11 March 2016 18:02 (eight years ago) link

I may never read a sentence more glorious than "The new language forces Christian bakers to bake cakes in violation of their faith and conscience," in the rest of my lifetime.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 11 March 2016 18:02 (eight years ago) link

wtf is that pastor even talking about, "carving happy faces on the sores"?

― Treeship, Friday, March 11, 2016 1:01 PM (14 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

He's saying there's gross gay stuff happening that are sores in america/culture and people are trying to forcefully make it seem like something to be happy about?

Evan, Friday, 11 March 2016 18:03 (eight years ago) link

hey man, you bake the cakes, what we do with them once they leave your store is our own business

μpright mammal (mh), Friday, 11 March 2016 18:03 (eight years ago) link

"I'd like a cake that says, 'THIS BAKER SUPPORTS SATAN' and the law says you have to do it!"

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 11 March 2016 18:03 (eight years ago) link

oh it's a metaphor xp

Treeship, Friday, 11 March 2016 18:04 (eight years ago) link

All kidding aside, whether or not it was intended as such by the Star Trek writers, the Borg collective is a chillingly appropriate metaphor for Cultural Marxism, the driving force of the LGBT movement. What we know as “political correctness” is simply the “group-think” of the Marxist hive mind.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 March 2016 18:05 (eight years ago) link

Ulster (where else?) beat you to it.

A Fifth Beatle Dies (Tom D.), Friday, 11 March 2016 18:05 (eight years ago) link

So, America, is resistance to the LGBT Borg futile? Marxist regimes have been overthrown before. (And even Jon-Luc Picard eventually defeated his Borg opponents). I guess the outcome of this battle depends on how much we the not-yet-assimilated want to avoid becoming mindless slaves to the Collective.

This is his closing paragraph!

ulysses, Friday, 11 March 2016 18:06 (eight years ago) link

maybe they missed the episodes where there were plenty of people the borg had no interest in assimilating

μpright mammal (mh), Friday, 11 March 2016 18:07 (eight years ago) link

any body butt rump

nomar, Friday, 11 March 2016 18:07 (eight years ago) link

"in closing, i'd like to say that i really like star trek and i have no idea how much we as a nation want to avoid becoming mindless slaves. Also, thanks to Janet for bringing her famous date-nut bread; it's $1.25 a slice and all proceeds go toward fighting the Collective. It's gluten free so please buy some on your way out. See you next Woden's Day."

ulysses, Friday, 11 March 2016 18:09 (eight years ago) link

Jesus never would have given baked goods to someone he didn't like...

oh wait.....

i think there was something called The Last Supper....?

oh yeah, Jesus comes out and say "Someone here will betray me, hey Judas, you want the first piece of bread?"

so yeah Jesus himself gives bread to somebody he knows will betray him. and he still does it.

i guess no place for forgiveness in modern "Left Behind" style Christianity.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 11 March 2016 18:10 (eight years ago) link

you are bad at reading the bible

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 18:13 (eight years ago) link

cool plz point out how i am bad at it rather than just saying "you are bad at it". cos i can just throw that back at you and we'll be here all day.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 11 March 2016 18:20 (eight years ago) link

Judas received the sop in John 13. i'm curious as to how else you read that.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 11 March 2016 18:22 (eight years ago) link

I think most if not all of what I’m about to say is obvious to folks itt, so don’t take it as me trying to “reveal” anything. I just need to register a response to what I see as a deafening silence in the msm today.

So the big post-debate headline seems to be that Decorum Has Been Restored. Last night too everyone was gushing afterward about how disciplined everyone was, how restrained Trump was, and how substantive a debate the moderators orchestrated.

Meanwhile, the Great Whitewashing of racially-charged mob violence slips by unnoticed. Not a peep about the fact that nobody has dared directly confront Trump on his promotion of violence (on the same night at Fayetteville he had pined for the good old days when they used to treat protesters “very, very rough” so they wouldn’t come back so easily).

Jake Tapper did bring up the issue, but in the blandest terms. He distanced himself from it (attributing the critique to Clinton) and cast it as a matter of “tone.”

He then let Trump get away with an answer that pretty much justified the violence (the beautiful passion of my supporters; we have some protesters who are bad dudes).

Tapper then asked Cruz about whether he was concerned that “these kind of scenes” potentially hurt the GOP for the general election (again: no ethical import, it’s only a matter of electability). Cruz blurted out one quick remark about how “we need to show respect to the people” because they’re the ones “we’re working for” and (yes, Ted?...) well, we’ve had a President who for the past seven years who has acted like an Emperor above the law etc. Cruz went on to blather about how Trump asks his people to pledge their support to him but he’s got it backward, etc,

Tapper: Thank you, senator.

Now it’s Kasich’s turn: Governor Kasich, do you worry about the scenes of violence at some of these rallies affecting the Republican party's chances in November? Kasich: (I’ll paraphrase, bc running out of time): well I’m worried about violence at rallies period. But you know what Jake, I think people are worred, they’re worried about their jobs, they’re worried about trade deals. But the thing is we need to unite around these issues not divide.

Tapper: Thank you governor.

Senator Rubio? I know you want to say something.

Rubio goes on to talk about how he’s concerned about violence in general in this society and btw the first people that are facing that violence are our law enforcement officers. Of course people are angry, every institution in America has been failing us for the better part of 20 years or 30 years. Leadership is about using the anger to motivate us, not to define us. Then anecdote about his grandfather born in 1899 and the man on the moon and *bell rings* Americans can do anything and our principles etc.

Thank you senator. *applause*

Onto the next question (“The math suggests that it possible that not one of you will reach the magic number of 1,237 delegates before the Republican convention, which would mean a contested convention….”).

How restrained. How civilized. All presidential candidates on a debate stage are allowed to justify and tacitly enable assaults on (mostly black) protestors, and the next day we all congratulate them because they didn’t make dick jokes. Got it.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 11 March 2016 18:23 (eight years ago) link

otm

ulysses, Friday, 11 March 2016 18:26 (eight years ago) link

Judas received the sop in John 13. i'm curious as to how else you read that.

this isn't the thread for it but you have a penchant for removing biblical things from context (as displayed on other Xtianity-specific threads). There's loads of instances of Jesus being a forgiving sort in the NT, including his treatment of Judas, but that particular passage is mostly irrelevant to the (obviously batshit insane) pastor's point.

revive some other thread if you really want to argue about this

xp

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

in other news:

https://twitter.com/JaredWyand/status/708120011039068160

― Οὖτις, Friday, March 11, 2016 12:28 PM (59 minutes ago)

i mean...leaving aside the whole "kill the gays" thing, which is pretty bad

what the fuck is up with this dude's voice/stage presence?

k3vin k., Friday, 11 March 2016 18:28 (eight years ago) link

haha yeah he is def unhinged, all that arm-flapping, leaping about the stage. altho tbf that's not that unusual for tent-revival-style preachers

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 18:29 (eight years ago) link

i know krugman is becoming unpopular since he's not on the bernie train but i'm glad he is giving free trade v. protectionism a close look:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/11/opinion/trade-and-tribulation.html

Mordy, Friday, 11 March 2016 18:50 (eight years ago) link

between this and other reading i've done what seems to be true so far is that a. free trade has minimal benefits and minimal drawbacks, b. the link between free trade agreements and job loss are overblown (outsourcing is more impacted by other things than free trade agreements - cf china where lots of manufacturing has gone even tho we don't have an agreement with them), c. that there may be climate change + credibility repercussions for not enacting said agreements / reneging on old ones. i'm not 100% sure about any of this but it does seem a little bit like the case against free trade is a little overstated culturally?

Mordy, Friday, 11 March 2016 18:53 (eight years ago) link

collardio on fire

van damme death warrant (Doctor Casino), Friday, 11 March 2016 19:13 (eight years ago) link

yeah well we can deal with beatings and corpses discussed in mild tones, but plz no naughty bits

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 19:16 (eight years ago) link

this isn't the thread for it but you have a penchant for removing biblical things from context (as displayed on other Xtianity-specific threads)

the Bible, midrashic tradition, and Jesus Himself have a penchant for removing things from context and deploying them in new contexts. The entire New Testament is basically this, and it doesn't mean to end to tradition of seeing how a remark - however small, however wrenched from context - might apply to the needs of a given person or congregation.

imo but also ithoot (in the humble opinion of tradition.)

tremendous crime wave and killing wave (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Friday, 11 March 2016 19:17 (eight years ago) link

Krugman on trade agreements:

Why, then, did we ever pursue these agreements? A large part of the answer is foreign policy

bingo!

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 11 March 2016 19:19 (eight years ago) link

it's a more sophisticated version of the mcdonald's theory of geopolitics, right?

Mordy, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:20 (eight years ago) link

"To understand what's been happening this presidential primary season, consider Michigan, where voters turned out in huge numbers for Sanders and Trump. According to Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis data, the inflation-adjusted annual median household income in Michigan fell by about $14,000 a year — down to about $52,000 — from 1999 to 2014.

That same time period played out very differently for corporations. From 1999 to 2014, U.S. annual corporate profits after taxes shot up by about 250 percent, to nearly $1.7 trillion.

So, yes, businesses did much better, allowing Washington thought-leaders to, in effect, say: "See, we were right! We promoted the ideas that have kept America's GDP ranked No. 1 in the world, even though China has four times our population."

But outside of Washington, millions of Americans are not living in a Big Picture or a Framework. They are living in houses that have lost value, in cities where they don't trust the water pipes and where companies can suddenly announce they are moving jobs to other countries."

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/03/11/469990052/millions-of-voters-are-sending-a-message-our-economic-framework-is-rotten

salthigh, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:20 (eight years ago) link

@MSNBC
Hillary Clinton: The Reagans, particularly Nancy, helped start "a national conversation" about HIV and AIDS.

mookieproof, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:21 (eight years ago) link

xp but maybe the solution isn't making the pie smaller, it's just making sure that it's being redistributed at heavier, more equitable, levels?

Mordy, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:23 (eight years ago) link

xp: oh dear lord

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 11 March 2016 19:23 (eight years ago) link

Jesus fuckin Christ

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 19:23 (eight years ago) link

Who will say anything to be president?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 19:24 (eight years ago) link

wtf Hillary

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:25 (eight years ago) link

seriously that is gross

tremendous crime wave and killing wave (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Friday, 11 March 2016 19:26 (eight years ago) link

excerpt from the national conversation

Q: Larry, does the President have any reaction to the announcement—the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta, that AIDS is now an epidemic and have over 600 cases?
MR. SPEAKES: What’s AIDS?
Q: Over a third of them have died. It’s known as “gay plague.” (Laughter.) No, it is. I mean it’s a pretty serious thing that one in every three people that get this have died. And I wondered if the President is aware of it?
MR. SPEAKES: I don’t have it. Do you? (Laughter.)
Q: No, I don’t.
MR. SPEAKES: You didn’t answer my question.
Q: Well, I just wondered, does the President—
MR. SPEAKES: How do you know? (Laughter.)
Q: In other words, the White House looks on this as a great joke?
MR. SPEAKES: No, I don’t know anything about it, Lester.
Q: Does the President, does anybody in the White House know about this epidemic, Larry?
MR. SPEAKES: I don’t think so. I don’t think there’s been any—
Q: Nobody knows?
MR. SPEAKES: There has been no personal experience here, Lester.
Q: No, I mean, I thought you were keeping—
MR. SPEAKES: I checked thoroughly with Dr. Ruge this morning and he’s had no—(laughter)—no patients suffering from AIDS or whatever it is.
Q: The President doesn’t have gay plague, is that what you’re saying or what?
MR. SPEAKES: No, I didn’t say that.
Q: Didn’t say that?
MR. SPEAKES: I thought I heard you on the State Department over there. Why didn’t you stay there? (Laughter.)
Q: Because I love you, Larry, that’s why. (Laughter.)
MR. SPEAKES: Oh, I see. Just don’t put it in those terms, Lester. (Laughter.)
Q: Oh, I retract that.
MR. SPEAKES: I hope so.
Q: It’s too late.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 11 March 2016 19:26 (eight years ago) link

idg why she'd say something so dumb + ahistorical - like not even getting what the expected political gain is. who is the targeted constituency for whitewashing reagan's record on HIV? it's obv not conservatives. it's certainly not liberals. it's def not anyone who knows anything about the topic.

Mordy, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:29 (eight years ago) link

sounds stupidly reactive to me and myopic in the sense that she probably discussed HIV with nancy when she was the first lady and this is her personal take.

ulysses, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:31 (eight years ago) link

hope to god she's trying to stick a needle in the old woman by even bringing it up

but i really doubt it.

goole, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:31 (eight years ago) link

If there is a shred of meaningful LGBT activism left, I know a candidate who is going to have some blood thrown on her in the near future...

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 19:32 (eight years ago) link

not seeing this in her twitter feed fwiw

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:34 (eight years ago) link

quote not coming up on google searches either

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:35 (eight years ago) link

wait, i think MSNBC twitter is quoting her right now, speaking at nancy's funeral? amirong

goole, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:35 (eight years ago) link

It's still in the MSNBC feed

https://twitter.com/MSNBC/status/708363242737766401

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 11 March 2016 19:35 (eight years ago) link

ah here it is, said on live TV

https://twitter.com/MSNBC/status/708363242737766401

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:36 (eight years ago) link

xposts

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:36 (eight years ago) link

Very weird. Maybe she is just confused and has it backwards.

Treeship, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:36 (eight years ago) link

tbf she says "BECAUSE of president and particularly Mrs. Reagan" which is... well slightly different

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:37 (eight years ago) link

so good on her feet (Kissinger loves me), and her ass (Nancy was an AIDS activist)

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 19:37 (eight years ago) link

here shakey

https://twitter.com/MSNBC/status/708363242737766401

i'll wait for the reasonable liberal pundits to write about how no presidential candidate in 2016 can say something so misinformed

k3vin k., Friday, 11 March 2016 19:37 (eight years ago) link

their intransigence/silence definitely mobilized activists lol

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:37 (eight years ago) link

lol keeping up the tradition of triple-posting links itt obv xp myself

k3vin k., Friday, 11 March 2016 19:38 (eight years ago) link

Kissinger helped start a national conversation about dictatorships in Latin America.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 11 March 2016 19:38 (eight years ago) link

sad lol @ "very effective low-key advocacy" ugh

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:38 (eight years ago) link

As one of the few gay men who posts on this thread and as someone fascinated by the Reagans, I'd like a national conversation on how she can fuck off and die.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 March 2016 19:39 (eight years ago) link

the PATCO firings started a national conversation on unions

hunangarage, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:41 (eight years ago) link

my transcription:

"it may be hard for your viewers to remember how difficult it was for people to talk about HIV/AIDS back in the 1980's and because of both President and Mrs Reagan (in particular Mrs. Reagan), we started a national conversation when before, nobody would talk about it, nobody wanted to do anything about it... and you know that too is something that I really appreciate with her very effective low key advocacy but it penetrated the public conscience and people began to say, 'Hey we have to do something about this too'."

in any case patronizingly blinkered historical revisionism by the graveside imo

ulysses, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:41 (eight years ago) link

It's technically true to say that the Reagans helped start a national conversation about AIDS, in much the same way that an ex-coworker of mine helped start a conversation about race relations when he declared his affinity for the KKK.

Going To Town On Aunt May's Mezze Platter (Old Lunch), Friday, 11 March 2016 19:44 (eight years ago) link

how can anyone do "very effective low key advocacy" that "penetrates the public conscience."

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 March 2016 19:44 (eight years ago) link

if you're going to say nice bullshit tho why bring up something that no reagan fans will care about and that is false? she couldn't find anything else w/ slightly more reality than the reagans and HIV? she should've praised nancy for her excellent seance skillz.

Mordy, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:45 (eight years ago) link

if i may rephrase that reactionary closet fag Ed Koch, gays would be craaaaazy to vote for Clinton

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 19:45 (eight years ago) link

in my dream world hillary just talked for a solid 40 mins on astrology

goole, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:46 (eight years ago) link

tbf (and tbf there is no reason tbf) this sounded like an off-the-cuff remark to me rather than a prepared statement.
like she had read a piece in the paper a few days ago about how nancy doesn't deserve to be held in high esteem because of the way she helped contribute to the mass ignorance and denial around HIV in the eighties and HRC just kinda reflexively pushed back

ulysses, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:47 (eight years ago) link

if you're going to say nice bullshit tho why bring up something that no reagan fans will care about and that is false

^^^

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:47 (eight years ago) link

"now one thing people don't know about nancy is that she could summon pretty much anyone from the dead."

Mordy, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:47 (eight years ago) link

idk Maybe Nancy whispered "gays" in Ambassador Gromyko's ear instead of Ronnie's

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 March 2016 19:48 (eight years ago) link

just praise her for her fashion sense or hair or devotion to her husband or something

xp

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:48 (eight years ago) link

the degree of distrust i take inherent from anyone who says "it may be hard for your viewers to remember" on television
it's a dog whistle that says "I WILL BE VOICING MY OWN OPINIONS AS HISTORY FROM THIS POINT ON"

ulysses, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:49 (eight years ago) link

when you see the video, the part where she says "and you know that too is something that I really appreciate with her" is clearly a moment where a little voice in her head says "uh oh, i think i just said some total bullshit, i should probably wrap this up"

ulysses, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:51 (eight years ago) link

let's just throw some oxymoronic word salad about very effective low key advocacy and get back to the limo

ulysses, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:52 (eight years ago) link

in more mundane pandering, nice move, Marco:

https://twitter.com/ShaneGoldmacher/status/708328767366832128

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 19:54 (eight years ago) link

Part of me thinks that as a person who has spent most of her life in politics Hillary Clinton can say nothing without ridiculous warning lights blinking in head and can only speak in the slovenly language of non-responsibility and therefore should be cut some slack but the rest of me wants to throw her off a cliff.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 March 2016 19:55 (eight years ago) link

...the inflation-adjusted annual median household income in Michigan fell by about $14,000 a year — down to about $52,000 — from 1999 to 2014.

How could this be true? Wouldn't that mean the average family income in 1999 was $27,000 in today's dollars?

nickn, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:56 (eight years ago) link

Sorry, $277,000 per year.

nickn, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:56 (eight years ago) link

as it may be hard for our readers to remember, let's meet a few of those men who benefited from Nancy's very effective low key advocacy and continue to reap the rewards of the hard fought progress her husband made those many years ago
http://projects.sfchronicle.com/2016/living-with-aids/story/

ulysses, Friday, 11 March 2016 19:57 (eight years ago) link

It's hard to mock up a possible apology... "Alzheimers! I meant Alzheimers."

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 20:01 (eight years ago) link

Michigan's median family income in 1999 according to census data was $44,667 unadjusted ($63,519.37 adjusted to 2016)

census data: https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/state/state1.html
inflation calculator: http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 11 March 2016 20:02 (eight years ago) link

Sorry, $277,000 per year.

― nickn

no that would be per year but yes that sentence was worded terribly,she just meant to say it dropped 14,000 in total

salthigh, Friday, 11 March 2016 20:04 (eight years ago) link

or 11-12k w djp's numbers

salthigh, Friday, 11 March 2016 20:05 (eight years ago) link

yeah I assume different inflation calculators use slightly different formulae, which is why I provided a link to the one I used

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 11 March 2016 20:16 (eight years ago) link

really curious whether hillary/her surrogates will apologize, or say 'context' or lash out at sanders somehow or double down

'conversation' is certainly one of her phrases but jfc

mookieproof, Friday, 11 March 2016 20:20 (eight years ago) link

yea that was an astonishingly full-of-shit statement from hrc

marcos, Friday, 11 March 2016 20:21 (eight years ago) link

"The thing people may not remember about the Reagans, and especially Nancy, is that they were six-winged seraphim descended from Heaven and given human for to guide a troubled nation through a dark, turbulent time. May their names be magnified in The Father's light. Amen."

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 11 March 2016 20:24 (eight years ago) link

from ACT-UP's page:

I told one of my students that the most memorable Reagan AIDS moment for me was at the 1986 centenary rededication of the Statue of Liberty. The Reagans were there sitting next to French President Francois Mitterand and his wife, Danielle. Bob Hope was on stage entertaining the all-star audience. In the middle of a series of one-liners Hope quipped, "I just heard that the Statue of Liberty has AIDS but she doesn't know if she got it from the mouth of the Hudson or the Staten Island Fairy." As the television camera panned the audience, the Mitterands looked appalled. The Reagans were laughing. By the end of 1989 and the Reagan years, 115,786 women and men had been diagnosed with AIDS in the United States, and more than 70,000 of them had died.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 March 2016 20:32 (eight years ago) link

oh that bob hope, what a kidder, always helping get the word out

ulysses, Friday, 11 March 2016 20:33 (eight years ago) link

Asked about Clinton’s comments, the head of the nation’s largest LGBT rights organization — which has endorsed Clinton — avoided criticizing Clinton directly.

“While I respect her advocacy in other areas including stem cell and Parkinson’s research, Nancy Reagan was, sadly, no hero in the fight against HIV/AIDS,” Human Rights Campaign president Chad Griffin told BuzzFeed News.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/clinton-praises-reagans-for-starting-a-national-conversation#.rn2dQdqMn

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 20:48 (eight years ago) link

checked some of the pro-clinton twitter ppl, all v negative about this: michael cohen, marcotte.

i tried to look up sady doyle but i see that i am blocked! i don't think i've ever tweeted at her. i wonder if i've ended up in some 'follows too much weird left twitter' block bot

goole, Friday, 11 March 2016 20:50 (eight years ago) link

#Millennials4Hillary
‏@StillWithHer

One clumsy quote does not undo a lifetime of work to prevent HIV/AIDS #ImWithHer

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 March 2016 20:51 (eight years ago) link

wow, she has a twitter just to act as an apologist?

ulysses, Friday, 11 March 2016 20:53 (eight years ago) link

fyi, Sady has not tweeted in the last 3 hours

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 20:54 (eight years ago) link

I cant lose my shit over trying to say something nice about someone at their goddamn funeral, sorry

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 11 March 2016 20:55 (eight years ago) link

apparently, I can

COOKIES FOR EVERYONE

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 11 March 2016 20:56 (eight years ago) link

it's just dumb as hell and if the campaign has any sense she'll apologize for it (and strongly - actually condemn nancy's lack of action)

Mordy, Friday, 11 March 2016 20:58 (eight years ago) link

a funeral where the mourners should all have been fecal-sprayed by helicopter

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 20:58 (eight years ago) link

I like the sentiment but I don't think helicopters can poop

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 11 March 2016 20:58 (eight years ago) link

It's what they call an unforced error. There are a million easy nice things she could have said. She just happened to say the wrong thing.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 March 2016 20:59 (eight years ago) link

I would've supplied all the shit.

sorry jings, you don't do a historical Stalinist rewrite of a genocide to be nice. Say "she'll be missed" and fuck off.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 20:59 (eight years ago) link

I cant lose my shit over trying to say something nice about someone at their goddamn funeral, sorry

― carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, March 11, 2016

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:00 (eight years ago) link

tbf im getting exhausted defending hillary

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:03 (eight years ago) link

lol

k3vin k., Friday, 11 March 2016 21:05 (eight years ago) link

Wow what an insane statement.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:09 (eight years ago) link

the mind boggles

uncle tenderlegdrop (jim in glasgow), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:10 (eight years ago) link

AFAIC, Hillary is not much more than the least revolting of the twisted homunculi currently running for president (Bernie excluded but, y'know, so no gonna happen).

Going To Town On Aunt May's Mezze Platter (Old Lunch), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:10 (eight years ago) link

Like did the person who wrote that hate her? I can't fathom the delusional and ahistorical mind who put that sentence together and didn't think "well this is sure to cause an issue."

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:12 (eight years ago) link

It's like praising Woodrow Wilson's strong civil rights record or something.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:13 (eight years ago) link

it was extemporaneous pandering, not a speech

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:14 (eight years ago) link

and has been pointed out, w/ no political upside

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:14 (eight years ago) link

Unless it's a "Sister Souljah" type reverse psychology move, where Clinton feels like she can count on gay support already so why not take a little flak from gay activists for a news cycle or two. Who knows it might help her with social conservatives.

o. nate, Friday, 11 March 2016 21:18 (eight years ago) link

I doubt this will make any news

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 21:19 (eight years ago) link

no way it helps her with a single social conservative voter not one

Mordy, Friday, 11 March 2016 21:19 (eight years ago) link

"wow i'm so happy she praised the wife of the demigod reagan for being pro-gays i'll definitely change my vote from cruz to hill."

Mordy, Friday, 11 March 2016 21:20 (eight years ago) link

Well, praising Reagan more than strictly necessary is a card that Obama also played in 2008. Who knows if it helped him, but a lot of middle-of-the-road voters presumably still have fond memories of the Gipper.

o. nate, Friday, 11 March 2016 21:22 (eight years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CdS-YApW8AAcu06.jpg

principled conservative/reagan biographer wf buckley in 1986

mookieproof, Friday, 11 March 2016 21:22 (eight years ago) link

and any organization that criticizes Hillary for it will be dismissed as rudely attempting to piss on the memory of a recently departed "icon"

xp

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 21:22 (eight years ago) link

@dick_nixon

As First Lady, Nancy was more or less as politically powerful as Hillary. Praise her for that. Reaching for AIDS makes no sense at all.

If I were with Sanders I might encourage this or that reporter to call Larry Kramer.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:24 (eight years ago) link

that account sounds less and less like actual Nixon every day

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 21:25 (eight years ago) link

that Buckley quote is insane, huh

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:25 (eight years ago) link

I doubt this will make any news

r u serious, dude? might wanna check any ol politics site. Dan Savage is "shaking" as hge writes, and there's no more craven queer neoliberal.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:26 (eight years ago) link

Well, praising Reagan more than strictly necessary is a card that Obama also played in 2008. Who knows if it helped him, but a lot of middle-of-the-road voters presumably still have fond memories of the Gipper.

eh he didn't praise Reagan excessively. He said Reagan had changed the trajectory of the country like Clinton had not. What he said was indisputable:

"I mean, I think Ronald Reagan changed the trajectory of America in a way that, you know, Richard Nixon did not and in a way that Bill Clinton did not."

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:26 (eight years ago) link

waiting for @dick_nixon to dispute it of course

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:27 (eight years ago) link

this is gonna get buried Morbz

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 21:27 (eight years ago) link

Faggots have long memories about some things, Shakey.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:29 (eight years ago) link

lmao well that's that then. see you all monday!

good god

goole, Friday, 11 March 2016 21:29 (eight years ago) link

While the Wilsons were strong advocates for the income tax and tariff reform, I misspoke about their record on civil rights. For that, I'm sorry.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:29 (eight years ago) link

haha that was quick lmfao

xxp

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 21:30 (eight years ago) link

yeah, you misspoke, and now it's time to be misvoted back to Chappaqua.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:30 (eight years ago) link

It's hard to mock up a possible apology... "Alzheimers! I meant Alzheimers."

― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, March 11, 2016 12:01 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

respect

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:32 (eight years ago) link

i kinda believe her that she misspoke / had a brain malfunction bc it's just so hard to believe that she meant it intentionally

Mordy, Friday, 11 March 2016 21:32 (eight years ago) link

dude it's Friday, it's an issue most people won't understand/care about, she's already backpedaled, this story is dead

xp

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 21:33 (eight years ago) link

"Calm down, calm down! That was a minor interview, honestly I don't even remember what I said... I SAID WHAT?"

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:34 (eight years ago) link

ALZHEIMERS

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:34 (eight years ago) link

by midweek you'll be nothing but a vengeful berniebro for bringing it up

now that i think about it, by the end of next week it'll be an article of faith on the right that HRC did this on purpose to get everyone talking about AIDS on nancy's special day

goole, Friday, 11 March 2016 21:35 (eight years ago) link

Barack Obama was exactly right: Ronald Reagan changed the course of ILX like Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton did not.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:36 (eight years ago) link

now that i think about it, by the end of next week it'll be an article of faith on the right that HRC did this on purpose to get everyone talking about AIDS on nancy's special day

This was floated as a not-serious-but-hopeful-maybe theory on my Facebook wall

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:40 (eight years ago) link

While the Reagans were strong advocates for things that benefitted them personally, they could give less than a fuck about anyone else

pretty much sums up the 80s

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:41 (eight years ago) link

This was floated as a not-serious-but-hopeful-maybe theory on my Facebook wall

― i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, March 11, 2016 3:40 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

wow HRC really can bring left and right together

goole, Friday, 11 March 2016 21:43 (eight years ago) link

It's hard to mock up a possible apology... "Alzheimers! I meant Alzheimers."
― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, March 11, 2016 12:01 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

respect

― denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, March 11, 2016 3:32 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah for real

jason waterfalls (gbx), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:45 (eight years ago) link

ha I was skim-looking for that post so I could quote it and then ask Morbs what tonight's Powerball numbers would be

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:47 (eight years ago) link

it's an issue most people won't understand/care about,

DUDE, only a few thousand Democrats are voting in these goddamn primaries, it doesn't take much. Plus, smell of a desperate loser is pungent.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:49 (eight years ago) link

lol this is perfect Friday afternoon Morbsbait

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:49 (eight years ago) link

perspective is not your strong suit morbz

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 21:51 (eight years ago) link

btw you call "Alzheimers!" prophecy? I've been watching these masturbatory rodeos since Ted Agnew was alliterating.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:52 (eight years ago) link

me discussing Hillary Clinton on Facebook:

It's like having Chevy Chase's Ford impersonation as President, only all the pratfalls are verbal.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 11 March 2016 21:53 (eight years ago) link

hillary very obviously did not "misspeak" but it was smart of her team to apologize

k3vin k., Friday, 11 March 2016 22:06 (eight years ago) link

how is this bitch still alive
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/03/11/phyllis-schlafly-endorses-trump-in-st-louis/

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 22:19 (eight years ago) link

Down the street:https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1067739579954747&id=385729701489075

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 March 2016 22:35 (eight years ago) link

shakes my man we could probably all benefit from refraining from using that word about women we dislike

k3vin k., Friday, 11 March 2016 22:39 (eight years ago) link

i see the sinister plan to make Hillary Clinton seem untrustworthy and two-faced is working well.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 11 March 2016 22:55 (eight years ago) link

shakes my man we could probably all benefit from refraining from using that word about women we dislike

intentionally deployed in this case, I'll cop to it.

My first exposure to Schlafly was as a lad when my mom was working to get the ERA passed with the League of Women Voters and ohhhh did she have words about her.

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 22:56 (eight years ago) link

@AP: BREAKING: Ohio judge issues order to allow 17-year-olds to vote in swing state's presidential primary.

nice

k3vin k., Friday, 11 March 2016 23:32 (eight years ago) link

These are 17yo that will be 18 before Nov.?

Mordy, Friday, 11 March 2016 23:34 (eight years ago) link

Tanya Domi, a New York-based LGBT activist and staunch Clinton supporter, was relieved by the candidate's speedy apology.

"There is no doubt in my mind that Hillary Clinton is very tired and committed a gaff," Domi said on Facebook. "At the same time, keep in mind the Clinton Global Initiative's work on HIV/AIDS has saved millions of people's lives. Millions. But she made a mistake and quickly corrected herself. That is good enough for me."

Οὖτις, Friday, 11 March 2016 23:49 (eight years ago) link

she meant the other Ronald Reagan

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 11 March 2016 23:53 (eight years ago) link

Local Trump appearance tonight cancelled, fuck that guy.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 March 2016 00:40 (eight years ago) link

"Security concerns." I assume he means his diaper.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 March 2016 00:40 (eight years ago) link

WaPo had some live video of the Chicago rally descending into some rough-looking chaos. And the Breitbart reporter story continues to spiral. This is some real ugly shit.

we must not allow a mayan-chef gap (Ye Mad Puffin), Saturday, 12 March 2016 01:14 (eight years ago) link

shakes my man we could probably all benefit from refraining from using that word about women we dislike

pretty much all the solid insults/epithets are sexist/homophobic/otherwise offensive on a different level. we need new ones.

iirc french curses are more blasphemous; once knew a guy who pulled out 'by the 24 testicles of the 12 apostles . . .'

mookieproof, Saturday, 12 March 2016 01:16 (eight years ago) link

this is from earlier today:

“Part of the problem and part of the reason it takes so long [to kick them out] is nobody wants to hurt each other anymore,” Trump said during a speech at the Peabody Opera House — around 12 miles from Ferguson, Mo., the site of racially charged mass protests in 2014.
“There used to be consequences. There are none anymore,” Trump said. “These people are so bad for our country. You have no idea folks, you have no idea.”

For the better part of 10 minutes in the middle of Trump's speech, individuals shouted and interrupted.

“These people are so bad for our country, folks. You have no idea," Trump continued during a longer break in the action. "They contribute nothing. Nothing. And look at the police, they take their lives in their hands."

"We don't even win here, with protesters anymore" he complained. "The protesters end up taking over. And frankly, I mean, have to be honest: From my standpoint it makes it a little more exciting, and it gives me time to think about where I want to go next. It's beautiful. It's like intermission. And the guys that are near the event, they see some pretty good stuff."
Trump then trained his fire at the media, forecasting how "dishonest" reporters would portray the situation.

“And these people in the media, the most dishonest human beings on Earth. They are the worst. They are the worst. So what they’ll do is they’ll take 10 minutes worth of clips of that and if one policeman accidentally moves a finger and touches this wiseguy, it’s like, ‘Oh, it’s the worst thing I’ve ever seen.’ And yet the police are being abused for 10 minutes, OK? " he said.

"Give me a break. Give me a break. We better toughen up, we better smarten up, and we better stop with this political correctness because it’s driving us down the tubes.”

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Saturday, 12 March 2016 01:20 (eight years ago) link

pretty impressive how we went from the dog whistles of '08 to the relative calm of '12 to the full blown racist propaganda of '16

nomar, Saturday, 12 March 2016 01:25 (eight years ago) link

trump on tv denying all responsibility and then when confronted with his own words about punching protestors in the nose, taking them out on stretchers, he says he doesn't regret any of those words

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Saturday, 12 March 2016 02:13 (eight years ago) link

keeps repeating that there are these "rough, tough guys" "bad dudes" who are the protestors at his rallies taking swings at people

what exactly is he trying to imply

no one has any video of this happening ever because it's a lie

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Saturday, 12 March 2016 02:17 (eight years ago) link

i get that this trump was probably looking for exactly what he got in chicago, but surely things like this make the necessary pivot to the centre harder? or am i being naive in thinking he actually wants to win the general election?

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Saturday, 12 March 2016 02:18 (eight years ago) link

I theorized months ago that he did not actually want to win the election, but questioned what he might be getting out of the process otherwise. And I think we're starting to see the frightening answer to that question.

Going To Town On Aunt May's Mezze Platter (Old Lunch), Saturday, 12 March 2016 02:22 (eight years ago) link

Fuck this guy.I don't really care why, but I am happy Chicago shut him down. Plenty of friends of mine out on the street saying no.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 March 2016 02:22 (eight years ago) link

i think he's just got that much hubris and his campaign is not run by professionals.

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Saturday, 12 March 2016 02:23 (eight years ago) link

"These people are so bad for our country." Get the fuck out, you piece of shit. Never forget:

http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/wikiality/images/7/76/DescentPatriotic.jpg

Going To Town On Aunt May's Mezze Platter (Old Lunch), Saturday, 12 March 2016 02:25 (eight years ago) link

He and the GET A BRAIN! MORANS guy should get together sometime.

we must not allow a mayan-chef gap (Ye Mad Puffin), Saturday, 12 March 2016 02:34 (eight years ago) link

fuck this little shithead and his life-crisis ambition to be the american roderick spode

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Saturday, 12 March 2016 02:43 (eight years ago) link

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/3cdda4be66f74874adaaa31ba49488e1/latest-trump-says-generals-will-play-their-own-game

A spokesman for the Chicago Police Department says the agency never recommended that Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump cancel his campaign rally in the city.

Guglielmi says the university's police department also did not recommend that Trump call off the event. He says the decision was made "independently" by the campaign.

so trump on cnn earlier told don lemon that they made the decision with law enforcement and that law enforcement thought he did such a great job by making this decision etc. i don't remember exact words, but another flat out lie basically

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Saturday, 12 March 2016 02:59 (eight years ago) link

Omg a Bernie chant erupted during that cnn footage. When does this media pin this on him?

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Saturday, 12 March 2016 03:01 (eight years ago) link

@JustinRaimondo
Wow, just called our webmaster, no Trump supporter: he was literally crying at the sight of leftist fascist shutting down Trump rally.

mookieproof, Saturday, 12 March 2016 03:03 (eight years ago) link

That was quick

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Saturday, 12 March 2016 03:07 (eight years ago) link

I don't even get it.

Anyway, this guy is the closest America has ever come to an actual racist fascist in my lifetime. The fact that he is as close as he is to the presidency, however far he may be, justifies almost any response to his presence.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 March 2016 03:10 (eight years ago) link

Trump could basically be a cardboard standee with a voice chip that spouted completely random phrases at this point. Honesty doesn't matter, beliefs don't matter. The support for his campaign has nothing to do with him, nothing to do with logic or considered positions or acknowledgement of how this country actually works. "Trump" is just a rallying point for the incoherently angry and entitled. There doesn't even need to be any real agreement about what angers them or what they're entitled to. It's poisonous, infantile nihilism, full stop.

Going To Town On Aunt May's Mezze Platter (Old Lunch), Saturday, 12 March 2016 03:12 (eight years ago) link

The only material difference between Trump's supporters and a horde of cranky two-year-olds is that there's hope that the two-year-olds will grow up someday and learn that the world doesn't revolve solely around them.

Going To Town On Aunt May's Mezze Platter (Old Lunch), Saturday, 12 March 2016 03:14 (eight years ago) link

Actually, sorry, suggesting that Trump supporters function on the cognitive level of two-year-olds is really insulting to two-year-olds.

Going To Town On Aunt May's Mezze Platter (Old Lunch), Saturday, 12 March 2016 03:16 (eight years ago) link

that's not true as much as you wish it was

xpost

wizzz! (amateurist), Saturday, 12 March 2016 03:16 (eight years ago) link

https://twitter.com/Yoonginese/status/708464990022463488?s=09

Οὖτις, Saturday, 12 March 2016 03:20 (eight years ago) link

fuck Trump, but i prefer to confront odious speech rather than snuff it

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 12 March 2016 03:35 (eight years ago) link

What sphinx of cement and aluminum bashed open their skulls and ate up their brains and imagination?

Moloch! Solitude! Filth! Ugliness! Ashcans and unobtainable dollars! Children screaming under the stairways! Boys sobbing in armies! Old men weeping in the parks!

Moloch! Moloch! Nightmare of Moloch! Moloch the loveless! Mental Moloch! Moloch the heavy judger of men!

Moloch the incomprehensible prison! Moloch the crossbone soulless jailhouse and Congress of sorrows! Moloch whose buildings are judgment! Moloch the vast stone of war! Moloch the stunned governments!

Moloch whose mind is pure machinery! Moloch whose blood is running money! Moloch whose fingers are ten armies! Moloch whose breast is a cannibal dynamo! Moloch whose ear is a smoking tomb!

Moloch whose eyes are a thousand blind windows! Moloch whose skyscrapers stand in the long streets like endless Jehovahs! Moloch whose factories dream and croak in the fog! Moloch whose smoke-stacks and antennae crown the cities!

Moloch whose love is endless oil and stone! Moloch whose soul is electricity and banks! Moloch whose poverty is the specter of genius! Moloch whose fate is a cloud of sexless hydrogen! Moloch whose name is the Mind!

Moloch in whom I sit lonely! Moloch in whom I dream Angels! Crazy in Moloch! Cocksucker in Moloch! Lacklove and manless in Moloch!

Moloch who entered my soul early! Moloch in whom I am a consciousness without a body! Moloch who frightened me out of my natural ecstasy! Moloch whom I abandon! Wake up in Moloch! Light streaming out of the sky!

Moloch! Moloch! Robot apartments! invisible suburbs! skeleton treasuries! blind capitals! demonic industries! spectral nations! invincible madhouses! granite cocks! monstrous bombs!

They broke their backs lifting Moloch to Heaven! Pavements, trees, radios, tons! lifting the city to Heaven which exists and is everywhere about us!

Visions! omens! hallucinations! miracles! ecstasies! gone down the American river!

Dreams! adorations! illuminations! religions! the whole boatload of sensitive bullshit!

Breakthroughs! over the river! flips and crucifixions! gone down the flood! Highs! Epiphanies! Despairs! Ten years’ animal screams and suicides! Minds! New loves! Mad generation! down on the rocks of Time!

Real holy laughter in the river! They saw it all! the wild eyes! the holy yells! They bade farewell! They jumped off the roof! to solitude! waving! carrying flowers! Down to the river! into the street!

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 12 March 2016 03:36 (eight years ago) link

idk, i think i prefer the drumpf extension

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Saturday, 12 March 2016 03:37 (eight years ago) link

Lol did u even read that esquire link

Οὖτις, Saturday, 12 March 2016 03:56 (eight years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CdUX3SkUYAElOpw.jpg

grandma! you're alive!

mookieproof, Saturday, 12 March 2016 03:58 (eight years ago) link

i did xp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 12 March 2016 03:59 (eight years ago) link

man, if they don't pull a sting on the Donald in Cleveland, this country is going to have a helluva Oktoberfest.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 12 March 2016 04:00 (eight years ago) link

Did u notice how hillary's bit gets like one paragraph 3/4ths of the way in? Story will be gone by next week, its already getting buried by chicago shenanigans

Οὖτις, Saturday, 12 March 2016 04:03 (eight years ago) link

Christ you are a schmuck

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 12 March 2016 04:06 (eight years ago) link

soft bigotry of low expectations at its finest xp

k3vin k., Saturday, 12 March 2016 04:06 (eight years ago) link

the damage is done and will be remembered by some people on Tuesday

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 12 March 2016 04:07 (eight years ago) link

That is true.

Οὖτις, Saturday, 12 March 2016 04:33 (eight years ago) link

I'd been working up to conscientiously squashing my many misgivings to vote for Hillary but I'm so fucking dismayed by her bullshit today. I can compartmentalize and forgive an awful lot of her but despite the fact that socially people seem to have the all clear to joke about AIDS now, it is still a really horrific, painful part of very recent history and I actually do care that she did this and if I do decide not to vote for her, today will be why.

Sanders is a nice idea but I cannot picture him leading anything but a fuckin march down main street.

I know it's always been voting for the slightly shinier turd and it's why every election I try not to care or commit too much to anyone
it all just bums me the fuck out

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Saturday, 12 March 2016 04:37 (eight years ago) link

well said

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Saturday, 12 March 2016 04:43 (eight years ago) link

shinier turd? not on my watch. unshiny turd '16

Neanderthal, Saturday, 12 March 2016 04:49 (eight years ago) link

"Οὖτις
Posted: March 11, 2016 at 10:03:45 PM
Did u notice how hillary's bit gets like one paragraph 3/4ths of the way in? Story will be gone by next week, its already getting buried by chicago shenanigans"

Not if I have anything to say about it.

Here, let me Danesplain that for you (jjjusten), Saturday, 12 March 2016 04:56 (eight years ago) link

Sorry, I'm having a bad couple of days, but I know (well knew) actual dead people that might not be if it wasn't for the Reagan code of silence wrt HIV/AIDS and IV drug use, let alone their chuckling behind the hand gay plague garbage. Clinton needs to remove "misspoke" from her vocabulary, and actually retract/apologize. These aren't verbal gaffes, they are bad positions and opinions.

Here, let me Danesplain that for you (jjjusten), Saturday, 12 March 2016 05:09 (eight years ago) link

And or disingenuous triangulation of public opinion which is worse

Here, let me Danesplain that for you (jjjusten), Saturday, 12 March 2016 05:10 (eight years ago) link

^^^^

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Saturday, 12 March 2016 05:18 (eight years ago) link

"I was just trying to get more votes" is the only explanation I have any time for

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Saturday, 12 March 2016 05:19 (eight years ago) link

"Sanders is a nice idea but I cannot picture him leading anything but a fuckin march down main street."

cool analysis

hunangarage, Saturday, 12 March 2016 05:30 (eight years ago) link

https://twitter.com/aterkel/status/708526970242519041

both sides should tone it down at the trump protests, says hillary

k3vin k., Saturday, 12 March 2016 05:43 (eight years ago) link

jeez, imagine if the word "certain" was in some of these statements. hillary's fans would be SUPER mad!

k3vin k., Saturday, 12 March 2016 05:45 (eight years ago) link

That IS a very odd statement.

schwantz, Saturday, 12 March 2016 05:54 (eight years ago) link

Is that real?

Here, let me Danesplain that for you (jjjusten), Saturday, 12 March 2016 06:14 (eight years ago) link

banner day

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Saturday, 12 March 2016 06:19 (eight years ago) link

I guess it's real:

https://twitter.com/hillaryclinton/status/708526634459078656

schwantz, Saturday, 12 March 2016 06:22 (eight years ago) link

oy fucking vey.

wonder how those families in Charleston feel about the uses to which their (no doubt agonizing) act of forgiveness is being put to.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 12 March 2016 06:24 (eight years ago) link

hillary bot needs some reprogramming

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Saturday, 12 March 2016 06:42 (eight years ago) link

tbf the content of that statement is "what I mean by americans should come together is that those americans who wish to be titanic racists in public actually don't get to"

Guayaquil (eephus!), Saturday, 12 March 2016 13:04 (eight years ago) link

her attempt to placate conservatives who might want to leave the Trump train by praising a conservative icon, like, I get it as a strategy, but you could have complimented the dresses Nancy wore. instead of praising the woman who refused to help Rock Hudson multiple times.

the protest comments, jesus.

Neanderthal, Saturday, 12 March 2016 13:35 (eight years ago) link

She says ".@realDonaldTrump: condoning violence against protesters and press at your rallies is the real disgrace." I have no problem with it. You have to work really hard to think her stance is "protestors should be nicer to Donald Trump."

Guayaquil (eephus!), Saturday, 12 March 2016 13:38 (eight years ago) link

uhh, however the tweet that schwantz quoted has a *very* different message

Neanderthal, Saturday, 12 March 2016 13:42 (eight years ago) link

which paints the violence equation on roughly equal ground, saying people on all sides should reject violence in politics, which reads as an indictment of sorts of any protesters involved in the fray along with the Trump goons.

which, sorry, after seeing party after party carted off with bloodied appendages from Trump rallies due to his goon-puppeteering, I'm not going to rally behind. he's the one cultivating the violence, the protesters are usually the ones defending themselves.

Neanderthal, Saturday, 12 March 2016 13:46 (eight years ago) link

I'm calling it now: the tactics Trump used last night are the same he will use to ultimately leave the race. He'll tell some blatant and easily-disproved lie about how he's been told that to continue running would pose a threat to his supporters or some nonsense like that so he'll get to leave on his terms and put the blame on some imaginary specter in the process AND have the added bonus of getting his supporters riled the fuck up on the way out.

This is all based on my continued belief that, despite his megalomania, Trump does not actually want to be president and recognizes on some level that he's way out of his depth.

Going To Town On Aunt May's Mezze Platter (Old Lunch), Saturday, 12 March 2016 13:50 (eight years ago) link

when has realizing he's way out of his depth kept Rubio, Trump, Gerald Ford, Franklin Pierce, and James Buchanan from running for president

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 12 March 2016 13:52 (eight years ago) link

(xpost) I used to think that many months ago, that he was just bored and screwing around. But if he exits now, then what was all this for?

clemenza, Saturday, 12 March 2016 14:19 (eight years ago) link

he's dying of liver failure and this is his final fuck you to the world

Neanderthal, Saturday, 12 March 2016 14:20 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YaaZZN9VYs

clemenza, Saturday, 12 March 2016 14:25 (eight years ago) link

he's dying of liver failure and this is his final fuck you to the world

Make a Wish Foundation, maybe?

Gah, Clinton's equivalency. Sure, it's both sides that need to chill out here, the Trump supporters hitting people and threatening violence and being racist and xenophobic and KKKrazy, and the other supporters who ... don't like that!

Here (and elsewhere, with no doubt increased momentum) was a preview of what a President Trump would do to our country. It'd totally be like a strongman dictator, a gilded looney at the top and the people angry and rioting in the streets.

(FWIW, had plenty of friends there last night, afaict the protest scene outside was much more chill than the scene inside, at least early-on).
https://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/10363396_10153504850426375_1151382286616588646_n.jpg?oh=f43690ef358fe05f0f011a7f558f14a7&oe=578DE87E

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 March 2016 14:48 (eight years ago) link

Kasich courageously confronts Trump--March 12, 2016, a couple of days before his last-hope primary.

clemenza, Saturday, 12 March 2016 14:53 (eight years ago) link

Anecdotal Trump craziness. A friend posted that a guy drove by the protest in a Mazda and yelled "bring jobs back to America!" So my friend yelled back "Buy American!" And the guy responded with ... "It doesn't matter!" Then drove off. Another friend's Facebook post brought out a crazy who ranted about the protestors being immature and stifling Trump's free speech and drawing people closer to him, etc. Yeah, if you think Trump is mature and fosters free speech, sure, I can see why you'd further embrace the rules of Opposite Day and like him even more for being run out of town by the men, women, children of all races, colors, religions and ethnicity offended by his existence.

Also, xpost to Veggie, it's not picking the shiniest turd that makes this election so heartbreaking. It's that I really can't conceive of any context where Sanders could be dismissed as the shinier of turds. He's not a turd at all. And yet we will inevitably have to turn our backs on him and vote for the shinier of turds, anyway. That's what bums me the fuck out. At least theoretically. I early voted for Sanders already, a few days ago. Have no idea how he'll do, or if he'll do, but it felt good, or at least, didn't feel bad. Also got to vote locally for Tammy Duckworth and Kim Foxx, which is once again a reminder that president is just one office, and that there are plenty of shitheads who need to be held to account or held in check by fresh faces. Don't get disheartened by what we don't have or can't change. Get energized by the changes we can bring about.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 March 2016 15:00 (eight years ago) link

look i see you guys are pretty angry here but frederik spelled out exactly what i was trying to say re: voters not agreeing that sanders' record is better:

She is way more popular among democratic voters than he is. And especially among minorities, and especially among black voters. Protesting that really, both candidates seem clueless about race is stupid (and perhaps almost offensive), because, y'know, a couple of 'races' are sending a pretty strong signal that one of the candidates gets it better than the other, y'know? Try listening to them.
― arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, March 9, 2016 8:56 PM (3 days ago) Bookmark

Fuck You!!!!!!

Hungry4Ass, Saturday, 12 March 2016 15:06 (eight years ago) link

almost to the end of Flowers for Algernon here

Neanderthal, Saturday, 12 March 2016 15:14 (eight years ago) link

Making the rounds from some dude who went to a NC rally a couple of days ago, nice essay:

“So, if you know me or my friend, Seth Quackenboss, then you know that we often get ourselves into ridiculously wacky situations, especially when we're together. Yesterday was one of those days. We decided to drive down to Fayetteville in order to hear a certain orange politician speak. Yes, you guessed it. We went to a Donald Trump rally.

Now, I am not a supporter of Mr. Trump in any way, shape, or form. I'm quite inclined to a certain berning sensation that I've been experiencing for some time. But that's beside the point. The point is, we thought that we were in for a time of jokes and hilarity. And at the beginning, it was. There were a few speakers before Trump came out and they were not well organized at all. They were comical. One man, a veteran, said that he had shed blood on 7 continents. And unless I missed the great Antarctica War, I highly doubt that's true. Let it be known for the record, that I am not against veterans in any way shape or form. I just thought that particular comment was funny. Because I doubt he actually wounded someone in Antarctica. But a more plausible explanation would be that he was doing penguin research and accidentally pricked a penguin and it bled. Anyway…

One speaker also said that we needed to get rid of 911 calls and we all need to handle our problems ourselves. Well...that's highly unlikely. I can't imagine that people will start forgoing 911 calls when their house in burning down in order to try and extinguish the fire themselves. But, ya know, it's a nice thought.

So those were my laughable moments. Trump was about to come out. We had our signs ready. We were going to go all out. Yelling and screaming and whatnot. Because, why else were we there if not to join the spectacle? He comes out. People go crazy. For the first twenty to thirty minutes I sat there with high expectations of hilarity. After half an hour, my feelings turned extremely grim. I was scared and upset. Let me explain...

Trump basically said the same few things the whole time. He knows exactly what will get a cheer from the crowd and he says it. He mentioned his wall several times. About five or six if I can remember correctly. At one point he said "We're going to build a wall. And who's going to pay for it?" And the crowd yelled, "Mexico!" and then they lost their minds. Now, we all know exactly why this is stupid. So I won't elaborate. It was just very unsettling. He mentioned ISIS several times. About ten. But not exactly how to stop ISIS. Just comments like, "We're gonna get ISIS," and "ISIS is going down." Blanket statements. He did say that for America to win again (any sort of winning, not just against ISIS) we have to go outside of the law and he isn't afraid to do it. And that's unsettling for several reasons. But I'm just reporting the facts. And that was all he said on policy. Completely void of content or substance. Just statements that would get the crowd cheering.
Now, let's talk about the protesters. There were many. I think throughout the hour long rally, there were roughly 15-20 groups of protesters. Some of them were individuals and some were in groups. They popped up throughout the rally here and there. And some of them were yelling and causing a raucous but some of them were just standing there with their anti-Trump shirts or their pro-whoever else shirts. They were all removed. Peaceful or violent.
One man had a shirt that said "Love is the answer," and he was thrown out. Trump's comment on this man was, "And love is very important but I mean, who's making love to that guy?" And my stomach churned. A few minutes later, a woman stood up not far from where the other man was and starting protesting. She was removed. Trump's comment was, "She was with the other guy. They're actually a couple. A *clears throat* beautiful *gagging noises* couple." And the crowd laughed and cheered. It was horrifying.

But out of everything I saw, the crowd was the worst part. I have never seen more hateful people in my life. Everyone was just filled with so much hatred. If a protester had a sign, even the peaceful ones, they would take the sign from them, rip it up, and throw it back at the protesters. Whenever a protester would get removed, the crowd would yell horrible things. Once, after a protester was removed, Trump said, "Where are these people coming from? Who are they?" A lady, sitting not 5 feet from me, said, "Well hopefully when you're president, you'll get rid of em all!" Get rid of them? Get rid of anyone who opposes Trump? It was sickening. I felt truly nauseous. And these people loved the protesters. They loved the drama and the chaos. And Trump fed upon it. It was easily one of the strangest and uncomfortable things I've ever witnessed. I could just hear the horrible things being spoken around me and it made my skin crawl.

Needless to say, there was very little laughter on my part. I thought this was going to be joke...and it was, but for a very different reason.
I implore you, if you're thinking about voting for Trump, reconsider. You are only promoting chaos and hatred. I witnessed it firsthand. And trust me, this is not something you want to see in person. This is not what you want to happen to our country.”

Trump's consistency as a crass bully is unsettling.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 March 2016 15:24 (eight years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/mJM4qsh.jpg

pplains, Saturday, 12 March 2016 16:26 (eight years ago) link

then he unhinges his jaw and opens his infinite screaming mouth wide

Mordy, Saturday, 12 March 2016 16:27 (eight years ago) link

poor girl

akm, Saturday, 12 March 2016 16:39 (eight years ago) link

Josh, who did you vote for the Clerk of the Circuit Court? Please don't say Dorothy Brown.

Jeff, Saturday, 12 March 2016 16:46 (eight years ago) link

then he unhinges his jaw and opens his infinite screaming mouth wide

come to Teddy. come to Ted-dy.

van damme death warrant (Doctor Casino), Saturday, 12 March 2016 16:57 (eight years ago) link

xpost Hold on, let me check. Jacob Meister? By and large I used this: http://elections.chicagotribune.com/candidates/

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 March 2016 16:58 (eight years ago) link

I just finished re-reading The Stand and now that picture of Cruz is my default mental image when I picture Randall Flagg hanging out in his hotel room in Vegas

joygoat, Saturday, 12 March 2016 17:16 (eight years ago) link

OMG you are so OTM.

Going To Town On Aunt May's Mezze Platter (Old Lunch), Saturday, 12 March 2016 17:20 (eight years ago) link

^^^ hahaha yes!

Retro novelty punk (Dan Peterson), Saturday, 12 March 2016 17:41 (eight years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/MzvWZQr.png

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Saturday, 12 March 2016 18:34 (eight years ago) link

Surprised white anglo saxon protestants are negatively correlated to being Trump voters. Never pictured his supporters as Catholics

Treeship, Saturday, 12 March 2016 18:42 (eight years ago) link

Catholics who think their new pope is a bit too liberal

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Saturday, 12 March 2016 18:44 (eight years ago) link

Sooo much of this follows from 'no high school diploma'. Soooooo much.

Going To Town On Aunt May's Mezze Platter (Old Lunch), Saturday, 12 March 2016 18:50 (eight years ago) link

i am unreasonably annoyed at how they chose to sort those correlations

Karl Malone, Saturday, 12 March 2016 18:50 (eight years ago) link

by strength of correlation?

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Saturday, 12 March 2016 18:58 (eight years ago) link

I notice that in the small print Anglo-Saxon becomes European. That's not how I learned the word.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Saturday, 12 March 2016 19:08 (eight years ago) link

Josh, that is the correct answer. I appreciate your support.

Jeff, Saturday, 12 March 2016 19:15 (eight years ago) link

xpost lol, i got that part. i'm just not sure that's the clearest way to present the information to the average person with low statistics literacy. but it's no big deal (that's why i was unreasonably annoyed)

Karl Malone, Saturday, 12 March 2016 19:22 (eight years ago) link

Evangelical Christians is + 0.42

but

White Anglo-Saxon Protestants is - 0.42

Huh?

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 12 March 2016 19:23 (eight years ago) link

xpost lol, i got that part. i'm just not sure that's the clearest way to present the information to the average person with low statistics literacy. but it's no big deal (that's why i was unreasonably annoyed)

― Karl Malone, Saturday, March 12, 2016 2:22 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

right but doing it from + to - would be actively misleading imo

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Saturday, 12 March 2016 19:24 (eight years ago) link

yeah, i suppose it's not the sort that's the problem but the whole way it's laid out. it's kind of ridic but splitting it up into two columns - people connected to these variables are into Trump; people connected to these other variables are not into Trump - would make it more clear. wouldn't exactly win infographic of the year award tho

Karl Malone, Saturday, 12 March 2016 19:28 (eight years ago) link

Is this what you're saying - one column for positive correlations, one column for negative correlations. I'd be interested to see more of the negative ones, there's only 3 on there.

larry appleton, Saturday, 12 March 2016 19:30 (eight years ago) link

oh yeah, you just said that, my eye strain's getting the better of me.

larry appleton, Saturday, 12 March 2016 19:36 (eight years ago) link

The negative WASP correlation basically just means he's not really that popular overall, right? If even northern Europeans are a negative correlation, then he's not winning any broad demographic in that realm.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Saturday, 12 March 2016 19:36 (eight years ago) link

the article that's from would have been more useful
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/13/upshot/the-geography-of-trumpism.html

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Saturday, 12 March 2016 19:38 (eight years ago) link

so the WASP thing really means that he's thriving in areas where there's economic conflict between ethnicities and white fear of displacement?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Saturday, 12 March 2016 19:40 (eight years ago) link

https://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xap1/v/t1.0-9/10274020_10153457534331305_2178621901352941408_n.jpg?oh=9d2fcf2004b06e0383f6b1dc9fdcebf4&oe=57893BC0

So here's my story about this picture, and I promise you it's the god honest truth :
my friend Sean Kavanagh and I are walking out of the UIC Pavilion filled with some of the most palpable joy I've ever experienced. We did it. We fought for the truth and for a moment, a brief day, WON.
As we are leaving Trump protestors form small sections, small channels where Trump supporters can pass through to exit (a kindness which isn't quite afforded in the inverse when ya know, people get sucker punched being forced out of Trump rallies).
As people are walking out we're saying things like "Bye racists", "You lost. Please just go home now." bc many are leaving with shoves and shoulder checks, begrudgingly, but most with pent up fury.
The woman pictured with me and what looks to be her husband we're stragglers in the pack, and started responding to people's jeers. Some guy ripped a sign out of the man's hands and another man leapt out of nowhere, encouraging everyone around to respect them and let them leave (again, sometimes America is amazing).
This woman is a human being and although I don't share her views, I start yelling "I will respect my elders. Please. Leave." and a few other great folks and I start to clear the path. I walk right up to her and say "Ma'am we have listened to you. We understand this is all a little wild but we have cleared a path for you to leave *my right hand was constantly swinging in motion, showing her the path out we made for her, as shown in the photo*"
She goes, and I quote "Go? Back in my day, you know what we did-"
Bam. Hail's Hitler.
I go "Ma'am you are endagering your life doing this. LEAVE. TAKE YOUR HUSBAND AND LEAVE." (I mean, anyone who knows me knows I get loud, so you know, sorry about that.)
And she won't. She won't budge. A young woman comes up to me and says "She wants this. Leave her be." looks to her and goes "God bless you. I hope you make it home safe." and I walk away from her astounded.
I have never experienced anything like tonight. To see America rise up for a man who hates so much of it, then for him to get checked so wonderfully by a city I love so much, and then for his followers to scream and cackle to the bitter end.
So many fights were stopped. So many people protected others instead of encouraging mayhem. Don't believe the hype : protestors only stoked a fire in these people that was born long before they had Trump to personify it.
Hate is real my friends. Vicious, hurt you if you aren't watching, worse if they can get away with it indignance was in so many eyes there.
I say that bc know this : hope is real too. Hope that when we stand up against hate from time to time, and collectively, we can defeat it. Or at least silence that beast, for one damn night.
We are at a point in America where those people, Trump supporters, make me sad. But the ones who make me angry? The incredibly intelligent, brightest minds I know, who sit on their hands and do nothing, don't vote, don't volunteer, and pretend as though their knowledge abdicates them from action.
The world is broken, I learned that best from Christianity. But I don't believe even one thing on this Earth is beyond repair, and I learned that from Christianity too.
You don't have to share my belief in Christianity, but I am asking you to stand up against hate. Or this woman's slanted arm never bears a greater weight than her own ignorance. She may never get the shot to understand love, living in the world where that symbol actually rules again.
Don't let that happen. Do something. Please, for the sake of everyone, do something.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 March 2016 20:37 (eight years ago) link

Whoa

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Saturday, 12 March 2016 20:51 (eight years ago) link

Great pic. I like the bearded dude who is like what? is? going? on? here?

Jeff, Saturday, 12 March 2016 21:05 (eight years ago) link

that's good, thanks

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Saturday, 12 March 2016 21:08 (eight years ago) link

i'm getting the increasing impression that the cops are working for trump. this is a problem.

diana krallice (rushomancy), Saturday, 12 March 2016 21:10 (eight years ago) link

sounds like a reliable narrator "ma'am please leave this establishment m'lady"

am0n, Saturday, 12 March 2016 21:12 (eight years ago) link

Big hoos hotel vibes strong in this one

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Saturday, 12 March 2016 21:13 (eight years ago) link

I go "Ma'am you are endagering your life doing this. LEAVE. TAKE YOUR HUSBAND AND LEAVE." (I mean, anyone who knows me knows I get loud, so you know, sorry about that.)

...endangering her life?

jason waterfalls (gbx), Saturday, 12 March 2016 21:20 (eight years ago) link

I read it like, if you are on the losing end of a protest, and both side are pretty riled up, the last thing you want to do a strike a Nazi pose and invite/incite violence.

Xpost I've met or known so many people like that!

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 March 2016 21:21 (eight years ago) link

hmm the perspective it gives me is that her pose was a response to the counter protesters tearing her sign up, but ymmv

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Saturday, 12 March 2016 21:23 (eight years ago) link

Striking a Nazi pose is nagl ever.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 March 2016 21:24 (eight years ago) link

agreed, for sure

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Saturday, 12 March 2016 21:31 (eight years ago) link

No Illinois Nazi jokes?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Saturday, 12 March 2016 21:32 (eight years ago) link

and yet the left is really running w this Trump = Hitler thing also. to an extent i don't think Republicans even did during the health care debates. you have Sarah Silverman on TV literally dressed up like Hitler.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 12 March 2016 21:32 (eight years ago) link

Like I posted earlier, he is as close to an actual racist fascist candidate we have ever had in my lifetime, and probably since George Wallace. Trump's earned it.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 March 2016 21:39 (eight years ago) link

Lots of good pics from the trib from the protests/rally. I'm fascinated by Chicago area Trump supporters. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/politics/ct-fans-and-foes-of-donald-trump-photos-20160311-photogallery.html

Jeff, Saturday, 12 March 2016 21:53 (eight years ago) link

Not to judge anyone by their haircut, but this seems about right for a young Trump supporter:

http://www.trbimg.com/img-56e42acc/turbine/chi-ct-trump-postponed3-20160311/1300/1300x731

Jeff, Saturday, 12 March 2016 21:56 (eight years ago) link

Trump's earned it.

Trump scares me because the dog whistle he's blowing is meant to attract rabid dogs. His spin on what happened in Chicago last night is... I don't know. Makes my blood run cold.

erry red flag (f. hazel), Saturday, 12 March 2016 22:12 (eight years ago) link

Phil Anselmo has lost some weight since Dimefest

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Saturday, 12 March 2016 22:13 (eight years ago) link

No Illinois Nazi jokes?

http://40.media.tumblr.com/86e74f61009f2384607aa7480b415f9c/tumblr_mi9qch6Iat1qzymy9o1_1280.jpg

There is a resemblance...

Now I Know How Joan of Arcadia Felt (C. Grisso/McCain), Saturday, 12 March 2016 22:32 (eight years ago) link

Loser.com

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 March 2016 22:40 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, those dumb protesters had no idea who Hitler was, thanks for reminding them, Trump and his supporters. The biggest difference between Hitler and Trump is that Hitler was brought to power and allowed to enact his racist policies. This is our preemptive travel back in time shot to stop Trump from getting anywhere close(r) to that point.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 March 2016 22:44 (eight years ago) link

http://www.loser.com

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 March 2016 22:45 (eight years ago) link

There, that worked.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 March 2016 22:45 (eight years ago) link

I feel so much visceral hatred for Trump. I can't bring myself to hate Cruz as much, although I recognize he is a dangerous radical who keeps hateful company. But Trump's campaign is emboldening people who don't even want to pretend to believe in a multiethnic society where politics is about a battle of ideas rather than a battle between different ethnic groups. In his treatment of others he shows that he doesn't feel the need to respect all people, just "his people." He is such a despicable person who seems to stand against everything that is positive about our political tradition.

Treeship, Saturday, 12 March 2016 23:02 (eight years ago) link

Realize that's a pointless, redundant post. I just think the naked brutality and vulgarity of his movement is extremely dangerous, especially because it feels transgressive to people who now are going to double down on their hatred of "political correctness" by which they mean basic decency. They've got, like, the taste for blood now.

Treeship, Saturday, 12 March 2016 23:06 (eight years ago) link

he must be politic's most brazen liar and obv that has a lot of competition. the trump steaks turning out to have the other butcher's wrapping still on it was breathtaking in its lazy dishonesty.

Mordy, Saturday, 12 March 2016 23:07 (eight years ago) link

Completely. Last week some Brits were asking me what would happen if Trump won and I said something like "well I'm familiar with the history of the weimar republic, so"
They just haven't settled on what color shirt they're all going to wear

it destroys most people unacquainted with mayonnaise (El Tomboto), Saturday, 12 March 2016 23:08 (eight years ago) link

He seems to think he isn't answerable to any sort of moral standard or authority including the truth. Bc of this he seems like, barely human to me

Treeship, Saturday, 12 March 2016 23:09 (eight years ago) link

Would u shoot a baby to keep trump off the throne

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Saturday, 12 March 2016 23:10 (eight years ago) link

he is rich, tbf

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 12 March 2016 23:11 (eight years ago) link

Rich people often feel entitled but this "I should be able to lie with impunity" stuff seems extreme even for them

Treeship, Saturday, 12 March 2016 23:12 (eight years ago) link

he's also a politician

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 12 March 2016 23:13 (eight years ago) link

I get what you are saying, but this feels different. Politicians lie all the time but they usually seem to want to try to hide the fact they're lying. If they're caught they usually seem embarrassed. We've had bad people in office -- worse people than Trump -- but Trump is leading a movement where the only consistent feature is an open disdain for basic values (tolerance, honesty, etc.) The forces he has set in motion lead to a pretty dark place.

Treeship, Saturday, 12 March 2016 23:23 (eight years ago) link

To that end I think that what happened here has helped focus opposition, in the sense that people have, ironically, been very tolerant of his bullshit thus far. But no more. Like, it's not just a matter of mobilizing opposition, it's shutting him down, because bullshit like his should not even accidentally be in the serious running. Violence is terrible, but the dickhead has literally been inviting it. If it's going to happen and he wants it to happen, I'd rather it happen on someone else's terms, not his. I hope somewhere in that shame free shell of a man he's been shaken.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 12 March 2016 23:43 (eight years ago) link

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/03/12/say-who-was-that-mysterious-man-behind-hillary-clinton/?smid=tw-share&_r=0

great couple of days for hillary's PR people!

k3vin k., Saturday, 12 March 2016 23:45 (eight years ago) link

From the east coast, let me say: so proud of Chicago

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Saturday, 12 March 2016 23:45 (eight years ago) link

Hillary is basically committing a stupid error on a daily basis now. It's horrendous to watch.

it destroys most people unacquainted with mayonnaise (El Tomboto), Saturday, 12 March 2016 23:53 (eight years ago) link

yeah but #inevitability

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 12 March 2016 23:55 (eight years ago) link

A spokeswoman for Mrs. Clinton, Jennifer Palmieri, had a comeback.

“Exactly, he was standing behind her,” Ms. Palmieri said. “She was out in front.”

this is what they've got

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Saturday, 12 March 2016 23:57 (eight years ago) link

sure hope that "oppo research" i keep hearing about is great

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Saturday, 12 March 2016 23:58 (eight years ago) link

on the Trump/Hitler comparisons:

Dorothy on Adolf

erry red flag (f. hazel), Sunday, 13 March 2016 00:03 (eight years ago) link

Phil Anselmo has lost some weight since Dimefest
― robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Saturday, 12 March 2016 22:13

lol

am0n, Sunday, 13 March 2016 00:37 (eight years ago) link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=14&v=06d4t1704N8

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 13 March 2016 00:54 (eight years ago) link

(SS has to surround Trump to protect him from protester/attacker in Ohio)

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 13 March 2016 00:55 (eight years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/uHmYSqE.jpg

larry appleton, Sunday, 13 March 2016 00:58 (eight years ago) link

IDGAF what the fascist 15% thinks, bring the silencing on

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Sunday, 13 March 2016 01:01 (eight years ago) link

"(Sanders) should really get up and say to his people, 'Stop. Stop. Not me. Stop.' They said Mr. Trump should get up this morning and tell his people to be nice. My people are nice folks. They are. They're great," he said.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 13 March 2016 01:02 (eight years ago) link

who knew electing a figurehead could be so exciting

am0n, Sunday, 13 March 2016 01:16 (eight years ago) link

Obama on Trump wine:

"Has anybody bought that wine? I want to know what that wine tastes like," a laughing Obama said at a Democratic Party fundraiser Saturday. "I mean, come on. You know that's like some $5 wine. They slap a label on it. They charge you $50 and say it's the greatest wine ever."

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Sunday, 13 March 2016 01:17 (eight years ago) link

who knew electing a figurehead could be so exciting

yeah, a figurehead who commands the largest military in the world, and has a red button that can destroy the human race in one push.

larry appleton, Sunday, 13 March 2016 01:21 (eight years ago) link

Trump will make it gold.

flappy bird, Sunday, 13 March 2016 01:26 (eight years ago) link

Damn, Wyoming's got no love for Kasich.

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Sunday, 13 March 2016 01:50 (eight years ago) link

Obama on Trump wine:

"Has anybody bought that wine? I want to know what that wine tastes like," a laughing Obama said at a Democratic Party fundraiser Saturday. "I mean, come on. You know that's like some $5 wine. They slap a label on it. They charge you $50 and say it's the greatest wine ever."
― Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Saturday, March 12, 2016 7:17 PM (38 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lol

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Sunday, 13 March 2016 01:56 (eight years ago) link

Fun fact: the DC GOP nominating convention took place today.

I know exactly two DC Republicans. They're Orthodox Jews, and therefore are not able to attend the nominating convention, because it takes place on the Sabbath. I think they were able to do some kind of absentee thing, but as it's a convention (rather than a primary or caucus) I don't know whether absentees will even be in play.

we must not allow a mayan-chef gap (Ye Mad Puffin), Sunday, 13 March 2016 02:03 (eight years ago) link

wine-connoisseur zings! look out, populism

(lol tho)

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 13 March 2016 02:04 (eight years ago) link

if you catch a president by his toe he has to give you his gold

am0n, Sunday, 13 March 2016 02:04 (eight years ago) link

https://twitter.com/jaywbabcock/status/708833501810790400?s=09

Οὖτις, Sunday, 13 March 2016 02:09 (eight years ago) link

if you catch a president by his toe he has to give you his gold

You know that it wasn't always "eenie meanie mynie moe, catch a tiger by the toe" right

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Sunday, 13 March 2016 02:34 (eight years ago) link

no i confused it w/ leprechaun

am0n, Sunday, 13 March 2016 02:46 (eight years ago) link

"Don’t miss Hillary Clinton’s next story"

salthigh, Sunday, 13 March 2016 02:48 (eight years ago) link

Speaking of Hillary:

Yesterday, at Nancy Reagan’s funeral, I said something inaccurate when speaking about the Reagans’ record on HIV and AIDS. Since then, I’ve heard from countless people who were devastated by the loss of friends and loved ones, and hurt and disappointed by what I said. As someone who has also lost friends and loved ones to AIDS, I understand why. I made a mistake, plain and simple.

I want to use this opportunity to talk not only about where we’ve come from, but where we must go in the fight against HIV and AIDS.

To be clear, the Reagans did not start a national conversation about HIV and AIDS. That distinction belongs to generations of brave lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people, along with straight allies, who started not just a conversation but a movement that continues to this day.

The AIDS crisis in America began as a quiet, deadly epidemic. Because of discrimination and disregard, it remained that way for far too long. When many in positions of power turned a blind eye, it was groups like ACT UP, Gay Men’s Health Crisis and others that came forward to shatter the silence — because as they reminded us again and again, Silence = Death. They organized and marched, held die-ins on the steps of city halls and vigils in the streets. They fought alongside a few courageous voices in Washington, like U.S. Representative Henry Waxman, who spoke out from the floor of Congress....

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 13 March 2016 02:50 (eight years ago) link

...

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Sunday, 13 March 2016 02:58 (eight years ago) link

Lol

Waxman doesnt get praised often enough imo

Οὖτις, Sunday, 13 March 2016 03:01 (eight years ago) link

proud of hill in ohio today, as an awful lot of other people seem to be hedging on the side of We Must All Calm The Divisiveness:

"The ugly, divisive rhetoric from Donald Trump and the encouragement of violence and aggression is not only wrong, but dangerous," Clinton said. "If you play with matches you can start a fire you can't control. That is not leadership, that is political arson and the test - the test of leadership and citizenship is the exact opposite."

"If you see bigotry, oppose it. If you see violence, condemn it, if you see a bully, stand up to him," she added.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 13 March 2016 03:13 (eight years ago) link

The more Hillary tries to walk back the Regan comments, the angrier I get

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Sunday, 13 March 2016 03:32 (eight years ago) link

if you're gonna die on a hill

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 13 March 2016 03:32 (eight years ago) link

Has this been posted? Rubio looks exhausted

https://twitter.com/hunterschwarz/status/708813220472033281

badg, Sunday, 13 March 2016 03:42 (eight years ago) link

Wow. The mask is slipping.

Going To Town On Aunt May's Mezze Platter (Old Lunch), Sunday, 13 March 2016 03:57 (eight years ago) link

lol, have trump's racist yahoo supporters not all switched to Rubio by now like he thought? Does babby want to have a little cwy? A bloobloobloobloobloobloo notfaaaaaiiiiiiiiirrrr

"Worried pimp" (Bananaman Begins), Sunday, 13 March 2016 04:06 (eight years ago) link

If you see violence, condemn it,

OK, Mad Bomber

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 13 March 2016 07:57 (eight years ago) link

As Clinton's terrible campaigning starts to compound itself, I'm getting nervous for the first time about the GOP standing a chance in November. It's starting to feel like 2000 - no way can that alcoholic dumbass son of a one-term President win but who on Earth is truly excited to vote for Gore?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 13 March 2016 08:23 (eight years ago) link

Don't have to nominate Clinton. She's a loser.

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — The police used pepper spray twice to disperse protesters outside Donald J. Trump’s rally here Saturday night, just 24 hours after confrontations between his supporters and demonstrators led to the cancellation of a Chicago event.

Cellphone video posted on social media appeared to show as many as four cans of spray being used at one point as protesters confronted police officers on foot and on horseback.

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/03/12/police-use-pepper-spray-to-disperse-protesters-outside-trump-rally-in-kansas-city/

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 13 March 2016 09:01 (eight years ago) link

I finally saw the Clinton comment on Reagan and AIDs. (Was it just that one interview, or was it something said at the funeral itself?) I understand the outrage, but in all honesty--and I base this in large part on how calculating and 24/7 a politician she is--I think she conflated AIDs, Alzheimer's, and stem-cell research. In the interview I saw, she said it in that breezy, programmatic manner of someone who's saying what she thinks she's supposed to say. If you think it was intentional and political, you're basically saying she's angling for disaffected Republican voters (who'd have to be exceptionally disaffected to ever actually cast a vote for her) at the cost of infuriating lots and lots of Democratic voters--I can't see that she'd ever risk that trade-off.

I'm not a fan of hers. Incompetent, insulting, inexplicable. But I think it was human error.

clemenza, Sunday, 13 March 2016 14:05 (eight years ago) link

thank you HAL

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 13 March 2016 14:20 (eight years ago) link

Between this and her unprompted Kissinger praise, I definitely suspect Clinton is trying to signal to neocons and unsettled Republicans that she is relatively acceptable, if her record isn't already seen as sufficient.

Chris L, Sunday, 13 March 2016 14:31 (eight years ago) link

No way. She actually DOES like Kissinger. This... I don't know what this is about...

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Sunday, 13 March 2016 14:35 (eight years ago) link

She does like him but why else remind voters in a debate with Bernie Sanders? It won't woo any of his supporters.

Chris L, Sunday, 13 March 2016 14:37 (eight years ago) link

Hill could have made a mistake on the AIDS thing but it's hard for me to swallow, their record on AIDS is common knowledge enough that it sticks like peanut butter. The portrayal of their attitude/slow response toward AIDS is one reason Republicans campaigned to shut down "The Reagans" in 2003

Neanderthal, Sunday, 13 March 2016 14:41 (eight years ago) link

if her record isn't already seen as sufficient

That's the thing--in a whole bunch of ways that make her so distrusted by the left-wing of her own party, including her friendship with Kissinger, she's already sent those signals. I don't see how praising Nancy Reagan would add much to that. But in the middle of a much-tougher-than-expected nomination slog against Sanders, it causes all sorts of trouble for her. And it's such a colossal error--the maximum error possible--it's hard to fathom that it was premeditated.

clemenza, Sunday, 13 March 2016 14:43 (eight years ago) link

she coulda just said "the Just Say No campaign created a helluva lotta fun video games"

Neanderthal, Sunday, 13 March 2016 14:45 (eight years ago) link

And again, I totally understand why people are infuriated. I'm just trying to figure out if what she said was something more than confusion.

clemenza, Sunday, 13 March 2016 14:45 (eight years ago) link

As the established anti-establishment candidate, Sanders doesn't need to defend his positions. As a triangulating politician who has only been elected to one office but has been playing the campaign game for decades, Clinton does, but thus far defense has proved her weakest ability. She doesn't do a terribly good job defending people and things she supports, let alone her changing or evolving positions, and is seemingly so used to mainstream passive acceptance of certain keywords, beliefs and persons (like Kissinger) that when she's called out on it she kind of struggles. It's such a disconnect that the oldest guy in the room seems to have the best bead on what young people care about, and Clinton remains kind of clueless, or at least awkward, which throws off whatever game she's ever had. But then, if she'd been as consistent as Sanders, she wouldn't have to constantly juggle this jumble of contradictions and evolving positions/allegiances. You'd have to be a superhero campaigner to keep all the hypocrisy straight. My biggest fear of her vs. Trump is when he inevitably calls her out with a series of "you were there, too" or "you had dinner with the guy" or "I donated to your campaign because we believe the same things."

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 13 March 2016 14:46 (eight years ago) link

at the cost of infuriating lots and lots of Democratic voters

The fact that she was oblivious to this makes me think that it was an impromptu statement, not something she or her staff considered beforehand. But it can be off-the-cuff and still be intentional and political. She knew that voters were watching, and it would be foolish of her not to treat an interview at Nancy Reagan's funeral as a political performance. I think she got lazy and didn't think that the particular claims she made would matter that much, as long as the general tone was nice and flattering.

jmm, Sunday, 13 March 2016 14:48 (eight years ago) link

All of that I agree with--political performance, yes.

clemenza, Sunday, 13 March 2016 14:52 (eight years ago) link

at Dubya's funeral is she going to say he provoked a conversation on disaster relief

Neanderthal, Sunday, 13 March 2016 14:52 (eight years ago) link

"She does like him but why else remind voters in a debate with Bernie Sanders? It won't woo any of his supporters."

It won't woo anyone! I think she's genuinely oblivious to the effect some of these statements have.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Sunday, 13 March 2016 14:54 (eight years ago) link

(xpost) First debate against Trump, she'll thank him for opening up a national dialogue on Mexican rapists.

clemenza, Sunday, 13 March 2016 14:54 (eight years ago) link

the "I took down your license plate number" of the political season

Neanderthal, Sunday, 13 March 2016 14:56 (eight years ago) link

I never watch Chuck Todd's goon show but Alex Castellanos and Hugh Hewitt didn't deny that the Reagan administration let HIV victims die, which surprised me.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 13 March 2016 14:57 (eight years ago) link

I drove by a street of Trump supporters yesterday (it was actually just two people) and the # of supportive honks was infuriating.

I am going back that way today and am tempted to deface a few of the signs.

Neanderthal, Sunday, 13 March 2016 15:00 (eight years ago) link

@NBCNewsPR
JUST IN: Trump tells @MeetThePress' @ChuckTodd he's going to look into paying for legal fees for the man who threw the sucker punch on Sat

@ggreenwald
I wonder if any of Trump's supporters will view this as encouragement & support for that behavior?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 13 March 2016 15:02 (eight years ago) link

Trump was trying to paint the guy as an overtly passionate supporter that got caught up in the moment.

funny how that works

Neanderthal, Sunday, 13 March 2016 15:03 (eight years ago) link

let's just remember what H Rap Brown said about violence and cherry pie, and enjoy our throwback blood-in-the-gutters campaign.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 13 March 2016 15:05 (eight years ago) link

@jeremyscahill
At this rate, a brokered GOP convention could result in Hillary Clinton getting the nomination. #ShesWithReagan

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 13 March 2016 15:06 (eight years ago) link

On the other hand, going back to what I said on Clinton, the phrase "low-key advocacy" sounds like work might have gone into it.

jmm, Sunday, 13 March 2016 15:33 (eight years ago) link

"by ignoring the late Rock Hudson's pleas for help, Nancy ensured that everybody would be talking about the Reagan administration and AIDS in the same sentence for years to come"

Neanderthal, Sunday, 13 March 2016 15:36 (eight years ago) link

what political acumen!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 13 March 2016 15:40 (eight years ago) link

It may or may not be an unfair assessment, but based on her phrasing I find it plausible that she would go beyond flattery and deliberately identify a stain on the Reagans' legacy and disingenuously try to rehabilitate it. Almost like it would be worth extra credit.

Chris L, Sunday, 13 March 2016 15:41 (eight years ago) link

It finally dawned on me that Trump actually makes a lot of sense if you choose to listen to his comments about protesters as autocritique delivered in the third person.

Going To Town On Aunt May's Mezze Platter (Old Lunch), Sunday, 13 March 2016 15:51 (eight years ago) link

I was watching a Trump rally last night and getting a bit agitated until I realized it was Slap Shot

Neanderthal, Sunday, 13 March 2016 16:01 (eight years ago) link

I feel like Clinton has spent the past week attempting to back up her statement that she isn't a natural politician.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Sunday, 13 March 2016 16:02 (eight years ago) link

An attempt to reach out to disengaged angry voters.

"See look guys, I say batshit things too!"

Neanderthal, Sunday, 13 March 2016 16:05 (eight years ago) link

it's 6 AM and i'm a little bleary so i just kept scrolling that RS story and suddenly i was in the comments

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 13 March 2016 16:05 (eight years ago) link

the sad thing about being a bad politician is that the better a politician you are the less of a politician you seem (cf bill or obama) and the worse a politician you are the more of a politician you seem. it's not necessarily that hillary is a more cynical or despicable politician than many of the ppl beloved by america. she's just not as good at it.

Mordy, Sunday, 13 March 2016 16:14 (eight years ago) link

p much the only person beloved by America in the last 40 years i can stomach is Dolly Parton

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 13 March 2016 16:23 (eight years ago) link

You could do worse, Morbs.

I made it through most of the Maddow, but man, her pathos was just so thick I couldn't take it. I mean, I certainly get it, but her preamble just kept pre-ambling. "We're going to let Trump's horrible statements speak for themselves, but first ... I'm going to talk about how horrible they are ... for several minutes." Which they are, but they are so infuriating they really didn't need so much of her setting them up. That said, I also couldn't finish watching, because the more I hear his voice and see him say these things, the more infuriated I get.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 13 March 2016 16:25 (eight years ago) link

xp What about David Eckstein?

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Sunday, 13 March 2016 16:25 (eight years ago) link

Country legend Dolly Parton responded to Kenny Rogers’ comments that likened her to current Republican presidential candidate frontrunner, Donald Trump, in a new interview with Rolling Stone.

“Does (Rogers) mean my hair or my money?” the singer said.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 13 March 2016 16:27 (eight years ago) link

I made it through most of the Maddow, but man, her pathos was just so thick I couldn't take it

Why I can't watch her show. She also hasn't learned to improvise in front of the camera (Chris Hayes the only MSNBC anchor/commentator I can stand).

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 13 March 2016 16:36 (eight years ago) link

Just got in a FB debate with a dude who argued that protesters are instigating the violence to win sympathy.

Neanderthal, Sunday, 13 March 2016 16:39 (eight years ago) link

Funny how these guys always hide behind "I gots a right to an opinion maaaan"

Neanderthal, Sunday, 13 March 2016 16:40 (eight years ago) link

https://media.giphy.com/media/JtOYaMg8CKPGo/giphy.gif

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 13 March 2016 16:40 (eight years ago) link

We're going to let Trump's horrible statements speak for themselves, but first ... I'm going to talk about how horrible they are ... for several minutes." Which they are, but they are so infuriating they really didn't need so much of her setting them up

Idk, some people still don't seem to get how serious this is even after seeing the footage. There is some value in spelling things out

Treeship, Sunday, 13 March 2016 16:44 (eight years ago) link

i usually agree about maddow but a few minutes of context is pretty important in this case i think, especially as the horserace media obediently repeats Tensions Running High! euphemisms

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 13 March 2016 16:44 (eight years ago) link

for one thing showing footage of ferguson and tamir rice puts all the praise of "the good old days" in some useful perspective

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 13 March 2016 16:49 (eight years ago) link

every time i see the footage of the cosplaying old guy shoving the black girl out of the rally the guy i end up looking at is the screaming one with the nazi haircut and the cop (maybe it's fire) tshirt

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 13 March 2016 16:51 (eight years ago) link

why does trump think it was bernie supporters at his rally? is it easier to threaten a jewish guy than a woman?

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 13 March 2016 16:59 (eight years ago) link

i'm trying to get caught up on everything but have had one of the worst fevers of my life. frankly i'd rather just pass out and die at the moment

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 13 March 2016 16:59 (eight years ago) link

attacking socialists is what fascists are for

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 13 March 2016 17:00 (eight years ago) link

well lets hope socialists don't exist just to be attacekd

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 13 March 2016 17:01 (eight years ago) link

i feel pretty good about bernie kids and the potential for a long-term many-local-fronts movement to regain some of the ground lost to goldwater's children over the past few decades, assuming authoritarian nationalism can be given a humiliating electoral defeat in november; otherwise i just hope they're doing pushups

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 13 March 2016 17:07 (eight years ago) link

what the left needs right now is some leadership to run grassroots candidates in every open election this november but if it's happening anywhere i don't see it

Mordy, Sunday, 13 March 2016 17:09 (eight years ago) link

there is this guy who is running for PA Senate seat dem primary:
http://www.thenation.com/article/this-tattooed-head-shaven-straight-talking-mayor-wants-to-be-the-next-senator-from-pennsylvania/

idk maybe it's just my neighborhood but it seems like ppl are still pretty complacent about local politics. maybe it'll heat up closer to the election.

Mordy, Sunday, 13 March 2016 17:11 (eight years ago) link

there's not gonna be much of it this cycle because people are excited about bernie. you remember how it was in 2008. obama won and disappeared into the white house, taking his momentum with him; bernie will not. this is forced optimism of course haha but conditions are not unfavorable to it.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 13 March 2016 17:14 (eight years ago) link

i think you're right Mordy. here's an article about nobody wanting to run in PA: http://www.pennlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/02/public_outrage_over_budget_deb.html

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 13 March 2016 17:16 (eight years ago) link

i saw a good campaign video from fetterman not too long ago. i think he announced his candidacy from the roof his house. i didn't realize he was originally from york. it's crazy the political weight that's come from york lately: the Gov, the Auditor General, and reigning House dickhe@d Sen. W@gn3r

x-post

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Sunday, 13 March 2016 17:25 (eight years ago) link

obama won and disappeared into the white house, taking his momentum with him; bernie will not.

this is kinda what concerns me about bernie is he's been doing this for 30 years and until this election he's built nothing nationally. it's not necessarily his fault that's a lot to ask from one person but it does kinda show how impotent the left has been over the last few decades that we have an election where the republicans are possibly the weakest they've ever been and no one is like ok let's get a list of every flippable seat in the country and see what we can organize.

Mordy, Sunday, 13 March 2016 17:30 (eight years ago) link

i have to read more about fetterman, i don't think dems should run sestak again that would be a mistake xp

Mordy, Sunday, 13 March 2016 17:30 (eight years ago) link

Someone Will Die

Going To Town On Aunt May's Mezze Platter (Old Lunch), Sunday, 13 March 2016 17:46 (eight years ago) link

I'm a bit fatigued thinking about enduring several more months of this. the Romney-Obama election year was exhausting, and all we had then was a privileged Mormon idiot that occasionally acted like a dick. this is a goon-puppeteer who seems beyond reproach to his barely-ambulatory stooges. and moreso, being in a bit of a backwards state, there are a lot of these idiots here.

Do I have to be worried now that I'm going to have a la carte dental work done to me in the street if I flip off a Trump supporter? I mean it's not like it was any big secret that human garbage exists, and on one hand I am glad these people are being exposed so that otherwise unknowing people can more easily identify who they should ignore. But part of me was also happier pretending they didn't exist.

I think that's part of the reason I dread a Trump campaign so much. Not that I'm afraid he'll win. But just the exhaustion of dealing with him through November. True, his base isn't going away even if he does, but he's kind of like the mothership in that when he dies, they'll probably return to their holes for a little while. Until the next one shows up.

Neanderthal, Sunday, 13 March 2016 17:51 (eight years ago) link

the GOP taking the nom from him by any means nec could still happen, im thinking 30-40% likely

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 13 March 2016 17:53 (eight years ago) link

Were you ever guaranteed a high five from flipping someone off

I mean.

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Sunday, 13 March 2016 17:54 (eight years ago) link

no, but I've also never been made a paraplegic for doing it either.

Neanderthal, Sunday, 13 March 2016 17:55 (eight years ago) link

my point being his goons respond rabidly to often innocuous behavior from Trump protesters like a dog let off a leash.

fortunately haven't seen it in my town lately, but did have several friends report back some ugly stories from the local rally that was here last week.

Neanderthal, Sunday, 13 March 2016 17:57 (eight years ago) link

thankfully, more of the "they were harassing assholes" variety and not the Chicago/Cleveland variety.

Neanderthal, Sunday, 13 March 2016 17:57 (eight years ago) link

I watched Laura Poitras's documentary CitizenFour last night for the first time.

It throws a very horrific sidelight on what a Trump presidency could mean. As Snowden remarks near the beginning of the film, if administrative policy is the only safeguard against using the NSA against every US citizen, then the instant those policies change, the entire apparatus of the world's most oppressive totalitarianism is sitting there, ready and waiting.

If you haven't yet seen this, get a copy and watch it.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 13 March 2016 18:00 (eight years ago) link

why does trump think it was bernie supporters at his rally? is it easier to threaten a jewish guy than a woman?

― rap is dad (it's a boy!), 13. marts 2016 17:59 (36 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

A lot of the stories from protestors include them wearing Sanders clothing, and descriptions of the troubles include the protestors yelling 'feel the bern' and 'sanders sanders' etc. Also, it's largely young people. Of course, that doesn't mean that the Sanders campaign is organizing it or anything (but I'd still call it a feather in the cap for the Sanders supporters, and an indication that they care about a lot more than just their candidate)

Frederik B, Sunday, 13 March 2016 18:03 (eight years ago) link

Sanders has explicity said there's no 'revolution' possible if he's the fulcrum

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 13 March 2016 18:08 (eight years ago) link

and also people think it was Sanders' supporters because that's the narrative needed to make it their fault for getting beat up

Neanderthal, Sunday, 13 March 2016 18:10 (eight years ago) link

this is kinda what concerns me about bernie is he's been doing this for 30 years and until this election he's built nothing nationally.

i don't even really mean that bernie will continue as a national leader, just that the people he's fired up won't consider themselves satisfied at the end of this campaign.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 13 March 2016 18:10 (eight years ago) link

nothing national except this run for president of the nation

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 13 March 2016 18:17 (eight years ago) link

Yes Adam that's what I said

Mordy, Sunday, 13 March 2016 18:18 (eight years ago) link

i'm on yr side whether it comes to it or not neanderthal but yeah along deems' lines i'm not sure i've ever flipped off a stranger without preparing for violence, so the answer to your question in this climate is definitely yes

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 13 March 2016 18:19 (eight years ago) link

is that stryper

mookieproof, Sunday, 13 March 2016 18:23 (eight years ago) link

yes

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Sunday, 13 March 2016 18:28 (eight years ago) link

Anyone with drunk revanchist relatives is ready for fists at 5 at any moment.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 13 March 2016 18:31 (eight years ago) link

Xpost ok then a scenario where a simple disagreement spills over into something violent. Say someone walks by with a Bernie shirt for instance

Doesn't have to be a middle finger.

Neanderthal, Sunday, 13 March 2016 18:33 (eight years ago) link

Lol alfred

Neanderthal, Sunday, 13 March 2016 18:34 (eight years ago) link

iirc florida provides plenty of reasons to avoid flipping people off, trump or no trump

mookieproof, Sunday, 13 March 2016 18:45 (eight years ago) link

Boehner endorses Kasich

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 13 March 2016 18:55 (eight years ago) link

That should energize the base

robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Sunday, 13 March 2016 19:55 (eight years ago) link

I think that particular pic is very unfair to Michael Sweet who while he is slightly odd in appearance (esp because of an over-application of makeup) is nowhere near as freaky looking as Ted Cruz.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Sunday, 13 March 2016 20:02 (eight years ago) link

Sanders began a CNN town hall by calling Trump a pathological liar. Good for him--about time somebody did. (Will probably bail on this soon.)

clemenza, Monday, 14 March 2016 00:11 (eight years ago) link

A member of my wife's doctoral thesis committee is seated front row and just to Bernie's left on stage right now. So bizarre.

joygoat, Monday, 14 March 2016 00:43 (eight years ago) link

@ggreenwald Glenn Greenwald Retweeted David Chalian
I've never seen a photo that begs more for a caption contest. Lots of good suggestions already in the replies

https://twitter.com/DavidChalian/status/709200276226449408

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 March 2016 02:58 (eight years ago) link

Jesus. Caption contest? That could be a campaign crippler if she's not careful. And man, she's really not ...

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 14 March 2016 03:36 (eight years ago) link

Oddly enough, the Reagan funeral was directed by Dario Argento.

Sanders the comedian is getting sharper--he had this perfectly timed one-minute answer tonight linking trade pacts to Trump's wall.

clemenza, Monday, 14 March 2016 04:18 (eight years ago) link

if "fraternizing with the enemy" at a fucking FUNERAL makes a person unfit to rule in the eyes of the people these days, america is completely screwed.

diana krallice (rushomancy), Monday, 14 March 2016 10:54 (eight years ago) link

Especially a funeral she was going to as a former first lady.

Frederik B, Monday, 14 March 2016 10:58 (eight years ago) link

i keep having this v risky thought that the only chance a person like bernie sanders would ever conceivably have of accessing the power of the presidency would be in an election against an incompetent, buffoonish villain like trump

but by the same token, the only chance that an incompetent, buffoonish villain like trump would ever conceivably have of accessing the power of the presidency would be in an election against a socialist senator from vermont

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 14 March 2016 11:12 (eight years ago) link

xp Her husband survived saying nice things about Nixon at his funeral - she'll be fine.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 14 March 2016 11:12 (eight years ago) link

but there's a self-destructive part of me that wants it, like in the 9th inning of a deciding game, slugger vs fireballer, don't throw me a curve you fucker just bring the heat, power vs power, let's see who's got it

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 14 March 2016 11:14 (eight years ago) link

Tracer otm (from a safe vantage point)

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Monday, 14 March 2016 11:16 (eight years ago) link

Since when is Hil Bush's enemy? His ally vs those WMDs!

@MazMHussain
Establishment American politics is a lot like WWF, everyone just pretending to oppose each other onstage.

http://media4.s-nbcnews.com/j/streams/2014/September/140909/1D274906737364-today-bush-clinton-140909-01.today-inline-large.jpg

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 March 2016 11:24 (eight years ago) link

but shove the sanctimony, rushomancy

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 March 2016 11:27 (eight years ago) link

Xpost Not the act, just the picture. Not unlike the picture of her and Bill with Trump. Context hardly matters, just visceral impact.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 14 March 2016 11:39 (eight years ago) link

the only chance that an incompetent, buffoonish villain like trump would ever conceivably have of accessing the power of the presidency would be in an election against a socialist senator from vermont

I can conceive it if his opponent is the most hated person in the Democratic party.

But kudos on the fearful mental gymnastics, that's Chelsea Clinton's best chance for the 2040 Waterworld crown.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 March 2016 11:51 (eight years ago) link

Morbs exerting understandable defense of his sanctimony monopoly there.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 14 March 2016 11:55 (eight years ago) link

hahaha

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 March 2016 12:04 (eight years ago) link

New Chait traces Trump's love of totalitarianism back decades and calls him and his campaign full out bad for America, no matter his chances of winning or losing.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 14 March 2016 12:46 (eight years ago) link

Wow. That's like Pulitzer right there.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 14 March 2016 13:27 (eight years ago) link

New Chait traces Trump's love of totalitarianism back decades and calls him and his campaign full out bad for America, no matter his chances of winning or losing.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, March 14, 2016 7:46 AM (41 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

and yet

Why Liberals Should Support a Trump Nomination -- NYMag
nymag.com/.../why-liberals-should-support-a-trump...
New York Magazine
Feb 5, 2016 - By Jonathan Chait

global tetrahedron, Monday, 14 March 2016 13:28 (eight years ago) link

oh. well, he says he was wrong. i guess that's nice

global tetrahedron, Monday, 14 March 2016 13:29 (eight years ago) link

uh if you read the essay the first words are something like "a month ago i said a trump nomination would be best for the country...i no longer believe this to be true"

k3vin k., Monday, 14 March 2016 13:30 (eight years ago) link

Obama knows exactly what he is doing

Karl Malone, Monday, 14 March 2016 13:31 (eight years ago) link

xpost Like I noted earlier, I get a sense what happened in Chicago was some sort of grassroots we're not gonna take it tipping point. The official democratic party can be inexplicably passive or complacent about Trump, but there's no reason regular people, let alone targets of his ire, need to sit back and take his abuse.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 14 March 2016 13:32 (eight years ago) link

xp Let's dispense with that fiction, 'kay.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Monday, 14 March 2016 13:33 (eight years ago) link

Driving around the county this weekend I saw hundreds of Marco Rubio signs on lawns and doors, as I would've expected. Not a single Trump or Cruz sign too.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 March 2016 13:33 (eight years ago) link

if "fraternizing with the enemy" at a fucking FUNERAL makes a person unfit to rule in the eyes of the people these days, america is completely screwed.

― diana krallice (rushomancy), Monday, March 14, 2016 6:54 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

somehow i get the feeling that no one is changing his or her vote based on a funeral photo, but please keep up the overwrought HRC defending

k3vin k., Monday, 14 March 2016 13:33 (eight years ago) link

agitprop shop goes nuts:

so michelle fields has quit breitbart news because the management are pro-trump and haven't been supportive enough after trump's campaign mgr threw her to the ground (trump himself said she made it up)

ben shapiro, one of the worst little dudes online, quit in solidarity with her. (he hasn't said anything about this directly, but he's received a nonstop flood of antisemitism from trump fans over the past several weeks)

breitbart publishes a snotty response, saying both are betraying saint andrew's widow (?!). here's an archive:

https://web.archive.org/web/20160314115936/http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/03/14/futures-markets-wrap-dow-continues-uncertain-climb/

it was credited to "William Bigelow"; funny when i looked at it this morning it was credited just to "Breitbart News"

and now it's been deleted, with a note saying it was really Joel Pollak who wrote it. and what's with that placeholder url??

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/03/14/futures-markets-wrap-dow-continues-uncertain-climb/

goole, Monday, 14 March 2016 14:49 (eight years ago) link

lol mediaite has a further twist:

http://www.mediaite.com/online/see-breitbarts-ridiculously-sarcastic-response-to-ben-shapiros-resignation-that-was-promptly-deleted/

UPDATE — 9:41 a.m. ET: Things just got weird.

POLITICO’s Hadas Gold reports that the author name William Bigelow has been used in the past as a pseudonym for Shapiro’s father David Shapiro for pieces he wrote for the site. So for those of you keeping score at home, the sarcastic and sensitive hit piece aimed at the former editor-at-large was written under the name usually associated with his own father. The younger Shapiro clarified Monday, “Breitbart put this under his byline because they knew I’d have to out him. The fact they would use my father’s pseudonym in order to attack me just exposes how despicable they are.”

damn what a bunch of creeps

goole, Monday, 14 March 2016 14:51 (eight years ago) link

And meanwhile, the absolutely odious and despicable Christian fascist V0x D4y is blanketing his Twitter feed* with tweets calling Fields and Shapiro "cuckservatives" and "SJWs." Ben Shapiro an SJW! That's how insane this whole thing has become.

*(When he isn't busy turning his rabid dogs loose on an innocent woman.)

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Monday, 14 March 2016 14:58 (eight years ago) link

Glad to see that whole narcissism of small differences thing is no longer the sole province of the left.

Going To Town On Aunt May's Mezze Platter (Old Lunch), Monday, 14 March 2016 15:01 (eight years ago) link

"no longer"?? people deep in political media have always hated each other

goole, Monday, 14 March 2016 15:02 (eight years ago) link

Why was his father using a pseudonym anyway?

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Monday, 14 March 2016 15:04 (eight years ago) link

can imagine that perhaps the rest of the Orthodox Jewish community might not look fondly on writing for Breitbart

Neanderthal, Monday, 14 March 2016 15:10 (eight years ago) link

the only chance that an incompetent, buffoonish villain like trump would ever conceivably have of accessing the power of the presidency would be in an election against a socialist senator from vermont

i think if he has a chance at all it's better against clinton

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 14 March 2016 15:12 (eight years ago) link

xp His son wrote for them though!

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Monday, 14 March 2016 15:12 (eight years ago) link

WARNING: SUBSTANCE BELOW

new from Sanders:

The Prize Plan for HIV/AIDS

As president, Bernie will fight to reform the existing patent laws written by and for the pharmaceutical industry to boost their profits and which make medicine so expensive in the United States.

To lower costs for HIV/AIDS drugs everywhere, Bernie has a plan that would establish a multibillion-dollar prize fund to incentivize drug development. This prize fund would replace our country’s broken system that drives drug prices up through government-sanctioned monopolies.

Bernie’s plan would provide virtually universal access to lower-cost life-saving medicines for HIV/AIDS as soon as they are approved for sale.

Under Bernie’s plan, innovation would be rewarded annually from a Prize Fund for HIV/AIDS therapies. The amount of money in the Prize Fund for HIV/AIDS would be more than $3 billion per year.

The Prize Fund would reward medical researchers and developers of medicines based primarily upon the added therapeutic value a new treatment offers and the number of people it benefits. Instead of a system where the market is manipulated to keep out all competition, companies would be rewarded for their innovation with a cash prize for their medical innovations, rather than through the grant of a monopoly. Under Bernie’s plan, drugs would have generic competition immediately after FDA approval.

In other words, this plan would break the link between drug development and the rewards for medical research and development. In doing so, we will reward true innovation, eliminate the market incentive for copycat drugs and get all HIV/AIDS treatments to the people who need them at generic prices.

The Prize Fund proposal would also be much cheaper than the current system, reducing the costs of the drugs to employers, taxpayers and patients by billions of dollars per year.

Bernie would also direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to negotiate drug prices with pharmaceutical companies and reduce barriers to the importation of lower-cost drugs from Canada and other countries....

https://berniesanders.com/issues/hiv-and-aids/

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 March 2016 15:13 (eight years ago) link

xpost i know - maybe it just doesn't bother him as much?

Neanderthal, Monday, 14 March 2016 15:13 (eight years ago) link

would a prize be commensurate with the billions in profits earned from patents and monopolies? Serious question.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 March 2016 15:15 (eight years ago) link

ask Bern

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 March 2016 15:19 (eight years ago) link

i think if he has a chance at all it's better against clinton

i can't decide who i think will do better against trump. hillary has more unfavorables now but will bernie be electable once they play his pro-castro remarks (or his cancer/orgasms comments) non-stop on commercials? i do think there's a lot of truth to the idea that his popularity is partially bc no one has seriously attacked his weaknesses.

Mordy, Monday, 14 March 2016 15:20 (eight years ago) link

yeah it's hard to call, since hillary's own weaknesses are oriented w such unfortunate perfection toward trump's strengths.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 14 March 2016 15:29 (eight years ago) link

i say unfortunate but i can't imagine trump doesn't know that.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 14 March 2016 15:30 (eight years ago) link

Lately I've been reading a book about Reagan, and the author mentions an Arthur Miller speech from 2001 called "Politics and the Art of Acting". I thought it sheds some interesting light on the appeal of Trump. I guess Trump's background is technically not in acting, though I'm not sure you can draw a line between that and being a reality TV star. Miller notes that one of Reagan's strengths was his ability to not only act but act "sincerely" as evidenced by his frequent blurring of the line between reality and fiction. Like Reagan, I think Trump honestly sees himself as some kind of heroic figure. I could quote the whole thing, but here are a few parts that resonated:

No differently than with actors, the single most important characteristic a politician needs to display is relaxed sincerity. Ronald Reagan disarmed his opponents by never showing the slightest sign of inner conflict about the truth of what he was saying. Simple-minded though his critics found his ideas and remarks, cynical and manipulative as he may have been in actuality, he seemed to believe every word he said; he could tell you that atmospheric pollution came from trees or that ketchup was a vegetable in school lunches, or leave the implication that he had seen action in World War II rather than in a movie he had made or perhaps only seen, and if you didn't believe these things you were still kind of amused by how sincerely he said them... Reagan's tendency to confuse events in films with things that really happened is often seen as intellectual weakness but in reality it was -- unknowingly of course -- a Stanislavskian triumph, the very consummation of the actor's ability to incorporate reality into the fantasy of his role; in Reagan the dividing line between acting and actuality was simply melted, gone. Human beings, as the poet said, cannot bear very much reality, and the art of politics is our best proof...

The mystery of the star performer can only leave the inquiring mind confused, resentful, or blank, something that of course has the greatest political importance. Many Republicans have blamed the press for the attention Bill Clinton continued to get even out of office. Again, what they don't understand is that what a star says and even what he does is only incidental to people's interest in him. When the click of empathic association is made with a leader logic has very little to do with it and virtue even less, at least up to a certain distant point. Obviously, this is not very encouraging news for rational people trying to uplift society by reasoned argument. But then not many of us rational folk are immune to the star's power to rule.

The Presidency in acting terms is a heroic role. It is not one for comedians, sleek lover-types, or second bananas. In a word, to be credible the man who acts as President must hold in himself an element of potential dangerousness. Something similar is required in a real star...

What Clinton projects is his personal interest in the customer, which comes across as a sort of love. There can be no doubt that like all great performers he loves to act, he is most alive when he's on; his love of acting may be his most authentic emotion, the realest thing about him, and as with Reagan there is no dividing line between his performance and himself -- he is his performance...

Clinton, to me, is our Eulenspiegel, the mythical arch prankster of 13th Century Germany, who was a sort of mischievous and loveable folk spirit, half child- half man. Eulenspiegel challenged society with his enviable guile and a charm so irresistible that he could blurt out embarrassing truths about the powerful now and then, earning the gratitude of the ordinary man... Appropriately enough, the word Eulenspiegel is a sort of German joke; it means a mirror put before an owl, and since an owl is blind in daylight it cannot see its own reflection. So that as bright and happy and hilariously unpredictable as he is, Eulenspiegel cannot see himself and so among other things he is dangerous. In other words, a star. Indeed, the most perfect model of both star and political leader is that smiling and implicitly dangerous man who likes you.

http://www.neh.gov/about/awards/jefferson-lecture/arthur-miller-lecture

o. nate, Monday, 14 March 2016 15:31 (eight years ago) link

I can't imagine anyone outside Miami Dade County's dying and rebarbative Cuban American bloc, who wouldn't vote for a Dem anyway, caring about Castro and Sandinistas.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 March 2016 15:32 (eight years ago) link

The mystery of the star performer can only leave the inquiring mind confused, resentful, or blank

what's funny about reagan is how consistent the reaction was to him, all through his life: even in high school, some people think he's the nicest, kindest, most heroic person; and others are reduced to paroxysms of frustration by the mention of his name, the kind of despair that comes from years of going "but... but... but what..." to crowds that don't care

Appropriately enough, the word Eulenspiegel is a sort of German joke; it means a mirror put before an owl, and since an owl is blind in daylight it cannot see its own reflection. So that as bright and happy and hilariously unpredictable as he is, Eulenspiegel cannot see himself and so among other things he is dangerous.

i love this!

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 14 March 2016 15:35 (eight years ago) link

i'm inclined to believe Conventional Wisdom that pro-castro remarks are a bad sell in america, but i'm also inclined to look w great skepticism on Conventional Wisdom the year the gop nominates a mussolini-tweeting spode

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 14 March 2016 15:37 (eight years ago) link

it's not just the pro-castro stuff. it's the vulgar early alternative media stuff too. he's got a lot of material that is probably exploitable to demonstrate how outside the mainstream he is. hopefully it won't matter this cycle but it's def a risk.

Mordy, Monday, 14 March 2016 15:39 (eight years ago) link

Again, what they don't understand is that what a star says and even what he does is only incidental to people's interest in him.

There's this moment at 0;45 when Reagan realizes the crowd's applauding Mondale's zing and his face twists in a brief snarl: it's the resentment of an actor who thinks he's lost the love of the audience.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It0Dtm1gFFQ

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 March 2016 15:42 (eight years ago) link

mondale pre-clinches it by smiling gamely at "there you go again", even tho it is most likely a smile at the unforced, unknown error

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 14 March 2016 15:45 (eight years ago) link

@ggreenwald 1h
NPR warns its employees they're *not allowed* to condemn Trump; NPR host chides Cokie Roberts for doing so

The Rise of Trump Shows the Danger and Sham of Compelled Journalistic “Neutrality”

https://theintercept.com/2016/03/14/the-rise-of-trump-shows-the-danger-and-sham-of-compelled-journalistic-neutrality/

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 March 2016 15:46 (eight years ago) link

did we ever talk about that recording of him sitting around between segments w joe and mika?

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 14 March 2016 15:46 (eight years ago) link

it's not just the pro-castro stuff. it's the vulgar early alternative media stuff too. he's got a lot of material that is probably exploitable to demonstrate how outside the mainstream he is. hopefully it won't matter this cycle but it's def a risk.

Sure. You're right. But the GOP frontrunner is a reality show host who's going to force Mexico to pay for a wall it doesn't want.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 March 2016 15:47 (eight years ago) link

@ggreenwald 1h
NPR warns its employees they're *not allowed* to condemn Trump; NPR host chides Cokie Roberts for doing so

I'm off today, so I had a rare chance to check out how execrable the Diane Rehm show is and she came through! She and the Daily Caller guy and Kathleen Parker agreed Sanders and Trump are "exploiting" the "same phenomenon" of discontent.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 March 2016 15:48 (eight years ago) link

greenwald bizarrely does not mention that NPR is a publicly/government funded media outlet and probably has obligations to remain neutral on certain electoral topics

Mordy, Monday, 14 March 2016 15:48 (eight years ago) link

Sure. You're right. But the GOP frontrunner is a reality show host who's going to force Mexico to pay for a wall it doesn't want.

but that's part of his appeal - his outrageousness. it's already built into his base of support.

Mordy, Monday, 14 March 2016 15:49 (eight years ago) link

I think you're underestimating how Jewish self-proclaimed socialist from Vermont is part of his appeal and base of support!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 March 2016 15:51 (eight years ago) link

that bizarrely sounds like the hounding of Bill Moyers off PBS. xxp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 March 2016 15:52 (eight years ago) link

NPR's idea of neutrality is both-sides-do-it.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 March 2016 15:52 (eight years ago) link

If he were to secure the nomination and run against Trump, it would definitely be used against him. But it's an old tactic - Republicans try to smear every liberal candidate as being "dangerously to the left", so any independents who are tired of that schtick from campaign to campaign are likely to just roll their eyes.

It'll deflect some support for sure - if the nonsense that was Swift Boat Veterans took down the Kerry campaign, some truthful cringeworthy statements he made years ago can hurt too...but I also think he would run a smarter campaign than that. Likewise, even though "socialism" will be bandied about as the typical boogeyman word (and for once will have some substance to it), Trump is unpopular enough that him just being Trump should cancel that bounce out.

Trump will likely never go below a certain 'floor' of support with his constituency, but he's not even really that popular amongst his own party. 65-70% of primary voters are still voting "Not Trump" - he's just benefitting from the multi-headed dragon of shit candidates.

But even beyond the "favorability/unfavorability" numbers, there are multiple signs that Trump's reception is not going to map to the general populace. Many polls (some scientific, most non-scientific) are indicating growing discomfort with the idea of a Trump Presidency, and that's just now, when he has been able to deflect a lot of damage due to the ineptitude of most of his competition's campaigns. A one on one battle will be harder for him to win.

Nothing's a certainty but I do think Sanders carries a greater performance against Trump simply because he doesn't carry the weight of "Clinton fatigue", the (unfair) baggage of Benghazi, emailgate, etc. Undecided voters often vote based on character as opposed to platform since they often don't side with one party and Bernie's likable, like a grandpa playing catch with his nephew. Trump's the arrogant, awkward uncle that gets invited to family functions because "he's family" and usually gets thrown out before the night is over.

Neanderthal, Monday, 14 March 2016 15:53 (eight years ago) link

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxpost

Neanderthal, Monday, 14 March 2016 15:53 (eight years ago) link

i did not hear a WORD against Scalia on NPR "news" the day after his death. xxp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 March 2016 15:54 (eight years ago) link

the *real* liberal media is grossly inept because it's either trying to earn brownie points with people that those people that might be registered Democrat, but consider themselves 'moderates' and split down the middle on issues.

say what you want about the right, but one thing they've never had a problem with is saying 'fuck it' and broadcasting their shitty platforms without watering them down. our liberal talking heads will partake in the mudslinging, but they always court that audience of idiots who believe "the truth lies somewhere in the middle".

most of my Democrat friends are probably actually right of center if you were to boil down where they fell on issues.

Neanderthal, Monday, 14 March 2016 15:59 (eight years ago) link

would a prize be commensurate with the billions in profits earned from patents and monopolies? Serious question.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn)

the reform to patent laws would also presumably leave existing patents grandfathered so the plan to drag down costs of treatment (for the immediate term at least) relies on the government's ability to negotiate corporate pharma to reduce the cost to the consumer. or am i way off base?

art, Monday, 14 March 2016 16:00 (eight years ago) link

say what you want about the right, but one thing they've never had a problem with is saying 'fuck it' and broadcasting their shitty platforms without watering them down.

you know their big reactionaries say the same exact thing

Mordy, Monday, 14 March 2016 16:01 (eight years ago) link

NPR is just corporate media w a "liberal" sheen

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 14 March 2016 16:01 (eight years ago) link

NPR is just corporate media w a "liberal" sheen

wtf does that mean

Mordy, Monday, 14 March 2016 16:03 (eight years ago) link

dick_nixon goes long

"Trump and Sanders understand that winning is making others believe in the devil."

Hillary Clinton "plays a grandmother—at best, a school principal—when America wants a hangman... Tone-deaf, crippled, insensitive, overmatched, and politically stupid. And that's this week."

http://mashable.com/2016/03/13/dick-nixon-angry-america/#xiS6fLpXbPq1

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 March 2016 16:04 (eight years ago) link

what the left really needs is a Cyrano de Bergerac type campaign where some badass left-leaning comedian runs and is fed his political dialogue off-stage from like a Bernie Sanders type fellow, while he can fling zingers at the other candidate during lapses in dialogue.

Neanderthal, Monday, 14 March 2016 16:05 (eight years ago) link

so what it means is that it gets 19% of its funding from corporations as opposed to 34% from individuals? xp

Mordy, Monday, 14 March 2016 16:06 (eight years ago) link

dick_nixon goes long

Neanderthal, Monday, 14 March 2016 16:06 (eight years ago) link

per this BBC article from 2014

http://www.bbc.com/news/business-28212223

On average, only three in 10 drugs launched are profitable, with one of those going on to be a blockbuster with $1bn-plus revenues a year. Many more do not even make it to market.

art, Monday, 14 March 2016 16:07 (eight years ago) link

what the left really needs is a Cyrano de Bergerac type campaign where some badass left-leaning comedian runs and is fed his political dialogue off-stage from like a Bernie Sanders type fellow, while he can fling zingers at the other candidate during lapses in dialogue reagan

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 14 March 2016 16:09 (eight years ago) link

lol. good point

Neanderthal, Monday, 14 March 2016 16:09 (eight years ago) link

remarks on george wallace pretty familiar!

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 14 March 2016 16:15 (eight years ago) link

"Once I accept injustice, I become injustice. For example, paper mills give off a terrible stench. But the people who work there, don't smell it. Remember, Dr. King was assassinated when he went to work for garbage collectors. To help them as workers to enforce their rights. They couldn't smell the stench of the garbage all around them anymore. They were used to it. They would eat their lunch out of a brown bag sitting on the garbage truck. One day, a worker was sitting inside the back of the truck on top of the garbage, and got crushed to death because no one knew he was there."

damn - and that was from 3 years ago!

Neanderthal, Monday, 14 March 2016 16:15 (eight years ago) link

so what it means is that it gets 19% of its funding from corporations as opposed to 34% from individuals? xp

that is 53% from private sources. it means they tote the standard pro-corporate and pro-state power line. look to how in 2009 they banned the use of the word "torture". during the health care debates i recall zero stories taking a serious look at a public option. NPR is useful to the right as a boogieman and that's why people think they are leftist but in truth they are FOX News for the yoga crowd.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 14 March 2016 16:25 (eight years ago) link

so drug patents expire 20 yrs after filing and i saw some sources say it can take 8-10 years for drugs to get fda approval so that leaves 10-12 years of $1bn+ revenues before much of the drug value is eroded by generics. I

speaking in terms of present value of future payments a successful drug looks like $7.5-9bn (assuming 5% interest and $0 revenue beyond the patent period) vs $3bn for the prize. obviously lots of stuff is at play there - is having that $3bn immediately more valuable for reinvestment purposes? is the company trying to sell that 10-12 yr stable cash flow to a hedge fund?

i guess the sanders plan could work in theory but im not sure without some non-voluntary component it flies w business

art, Monday, 14 March 2016 16:26 (eight years ago) link

that is 53% from private sources. it means they tote the standard pro-corporate and pro-state power line. look to how in 2009 they banned the use of the word "torture". during the health care debates i recall zero stories taking a serious look at a public option. NPR is useful to the right as a boogieman and that's why people think they are leftist but in truth they are FOX News for the yoga crowd.

this is so dumb but i don't know what i expect

Mordy, Monday, 14 March 2016 16:26 (eight years ago) link

it means they tote the standard pro-corporate and pro-state power line. look to how in 2009 they banned the use of the word "torture". during the health care debates i recall zero stories taking a serious look at a public option. NPR is useful to the right as a boogieman and that's why people think they are leftist but in truth they are FOX News for the yoga crowd.

lol this formulation makes no sense

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 March 2016 16:27 (eight years ago) link

also - are the kind of labs that produce pharmaceuticals capable of being repulsed for a more profitable endeavor should the patent system be reformed to remove incentives for producing big dollar drugs as in the cutter the environment?

art, Monday, 14 March 2016 16:27 (eight years ago) link

I am not a fan or regular listener of NPR but to say they advance the same ideology as FOX News is bizarre, unless you meant that they are the lefty equivalent of FOX news, but that doesn't make any sense either because that would imply that NPR actually does have a lefty agenda (analogous to FOX's righty agenda)

xp

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 March 2016 16:28 (eight years ago) link

Adam, do you think tonally and editorially NPR and FOX are similar? Do you think Sanders and Trump are similar too?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 March 2016 16:29 (eight years ago) link

adam i don't remember where you live but my local NPR affiliate is always covering public interest stories - tons of original reporting about PA education, politics, environmental concerns. there have been huge attention paid to things like fracking and under-funded philly schools over the last few years. they are 100% a public service organization and if they sometimes do things you do not approve of (like not explicitly calling Trump an evil fascist on the air, or using a euphemism for torture when discussing water boarding) i imagine it has much more to do w/ their being a public institution and less to do w/ citibank demanding that they pledge fealty to the donald.

Mordy, Monday, 14 March 2016 16:29 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2M_b4w3jb-E

Neanderthal, Monday, 14 March 2016 16:32 (eight years ago) link

(By the way, that chart slightly misleads by placing the "federal government" in a different bucket from "CPB and public broadcasting entities." It's not a problem from my POV, but the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is us - technically a nonprofit, but taxpayer-funded by congressional mandate.)

In the distant past (late 80s maybe), I regarded myself as a Serious Print Journalist. Even then, I don't think anybody truly believed in objectivity or neutrality; one was expected to try for at least the appearance of decorously attempted fairness.

These days I wouldn't have the slightest idea how to be neutral, or even how to seem neutral. But I know it doesn't mean that 50% of your articles make Democrats look bad and 50% of your articles make Republicans look bad. First of all, that's just stupid. Second of all, no one on earth will ever notice this false type of "balance," let alone praise you for it.

One can always fall back on quote-based reporting: Person X Said Thing Y. And fortunately, these days no one shuts up, ever, about anything. So matter what viewpoint you want to report as being out there, you can pretty much always find someone who has said it, no matter how unhinged. The resulting stories cannot be faulted, because the people really did say the things.

we must not allow a mayan-chef gap (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 14 March 2016 16:39 (eight years ago) link

NPR will often bring two dissenting POVs which could basically be broken down to the right-wing position v. the left-wing position but I think that's a public service. As long as the neutrality means exposing listeners to a variety of opinions, I don't see the problem. Personally I appreciate hearing intelligent ppl with whom I disagree state their case (and get pushback from the interviewer or other guest).

Mordy, Monday, 14 March 2016 16:41 (eight years ago) link

There are plenty of people here who see Hillary Clinton as a right-wing politician, and if I saw Hillary Clinton as right-wing, surely I would see NPR as right-wing, too. (I don't.)

Guayaquil (eephus!), Monday, 14 March 2016 16:48 (eight years ago) link

And remember, there are only two points of view on ANY topic. That's the American Way (TM)!

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 March 2016 16:49 (eight years ago) link

(also the MacNeil / Lehrer NewsHour way inherited by most "public" media)

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 March 2016 16:50 (eight years ago) link

personally, i think that either sanders or clinton, having secured the democratic nomination, stands a strong chance to stop trump in november, though i don't consider either of them locks, and i will definitely support and vote for whichever candidate wins.

as for the two points of view on any topic, a lot of it is by design- american political parties were created in significant part to marginalize outsiders. clearly that system isn't working particularly efficiently right this second.

diana krallice (rushomancy), Monday, 14 March 2016 16:52 (eight years ago) link

I'm off today, so I had a rare chance to check out how execrable the Diane Rehm show is and she came through! She and the Daily Caller guy and Kathleen Parker agreed Sanders and Trump are "exploiting" the "same phenomenon" of discontent.

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, March 14, 2016 3:48 PM (1 hour ago)

i remember listening to this a few months back and being appalled to hear rehm's whole chorus of "experts" for the day jocularly ridicule the idea that the koch brothers have any significant say in our politics and insist that it's all about pluralism, etc etc. this show is basically only listenable if the subject isn't politics.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 14 March 2016 16:55 (eight years ago) link

i thought rehm retired. maybe she just announced it?

Mordy, Monday, 14 March 2016 16:56 (eight years ago) link

@mtaibbi Matt Taibbi
The election is about to turn into a giant Jerry Springer episode, w/different camps throwing chairs at each other.

Avi Bueno
‏@JasperAvi
@mtaibbi You have no idea how literally true that is, since @marcorubio was just accused of stealing a NH man's gf:

https://twitter.com/JasperAvi/status/709411291593576448

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 March 2016 17:01 (eight years ago) link

that's the nicest thing anyone's said about marco rubio in months

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 14 March 2016 17:02 (eight years ago) link

read that as a NH man's gif

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 March 2016 17:03 (eight years ago) link

o/u on whether the girlfriend is actually a hollowed out pumpkin

Neanderthal, Monday, 14 March 2016 17:03 (eight years ago) link

this is kind of hilariously boring
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftf-i5_qFpw

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 March 2016 17:04 (eight years ago) link

God help me, but the way Marco handled his heckler made me like him a little. Which is only the case because Trump, but still.

Going To Town On Aunt May's Mezze Platter (Old Lunch), Monday, 14 March 2016 17:06 (eight years ago) link

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/13/upshot/the-geography-of-trumpism.html

^^ interesting but mistitled i think. this is where it gets interesting:

The 10 Variables Most Closely Linked to a County’s Support for Donald Trump
A correlation of 1 means the variable is a perfect indicator of Trump support.* Negative correlations are shown in red.

goole, Monday, 14 March 2016 17:07 (eight years ago) link

(For no good reason, in my head I call it the "Ream Diane Show.")

we must not allow a mayan-chef gap (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 14 March 2016 17:08 (eight years ago) link

this is kind of hilariously boring

now eventually you do plan to have dinosaurs, on your, on your

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 14 March 2016 17:10 (eight years ago) link

wow @ christie as lickspittle interlocutor

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 14 March 2016 17:14 (eight years ago) link

wait -- a three-hour clip?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 March 2016 17:16 (eight years ago) link

it's full.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 March 2016 17:17 (eight years ago) link

xp No silly, it's only two hours long! But not a lot happens for the first hour - Trump and Christie come out past the hour mark, in the middle of Folsom Prison Blues.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 14 March 2016 17:20 (eight years ago) link

lol:

"we win with evangelicals so big-league ... we won the evangelicals. we've been winning them all over. it's been amazing, the relationship. it's been-- well, i'm a good christian, i'll tell ya." [applause] "i'll tell ya. i'm a good christian. i'm a believer." [cheering]

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 14 March 2016 17:22 (eight years ago) link

adam i don't remember where you live

Atlanta, where we are blessed with identical NPR programming on two different FM frequencies ever since GPB ripped off a bunch of college students

micro brewbio (crüt), Monday, 14 March 2016 17:24 (eight years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CdhpIWXWAAA6la9.jpg

mookieproof, Monday, 14 March 2016 17:36 (eight years ago) link

i'm not even sure the context of that, but i am laughing like a lunatic right now.

Mad Piratical (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Monday, 14 March 2016 17:56 (eight years ago) link

Adam, do you think tonally and editorially NPR and FOX are similar? Do you think Sanders and Trump are similar too?

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, March 14, 2016 12:29 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

tonally of course both are completely different. both are comfort food for their respective markets. i don't think Sanders and Trump are similar, in fact the only reason i joined that convo is bc you brought up NPR using that line. it's typical of the soft liberalism of NPR.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 14 March 2016 17:57 (eight years ago) link

i'm probably always using the wrong terminology here. my personal politics are far far left and i think the US in general is a right leaning nation and that includes NPR.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 14 March 2016 17:58 (eight years ago) link

so what you really meant was that both media sources - while being totally different in tone, content, purpose, and coverage - are equally popular with their target markets. thx for the insight.

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 March 2016 17:59 (eight years ago) link

like I never would have guessed that they had different audiences, each totally dedicated to them! incredible. where do you come up with this stuff.

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 March 2016 17:59 (eight years ago) link

hey i just do it for the privilege of getting insulted on a daily basis by strangers. it really makes life worth living.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 14 March 2016 18:01 (eight years ago) link

what are your personal politics? i get the sense of them as an amorphous discourse constantly shifting to the left in any given situation but w/ not fixed coherency. when you say NPR is right-wing, do you mean in the sense that any kind of reform or amelioration of the excesses of capitalism ultimately serve to reify its institutions and therefore only a full revolutionary agenda is sufficiently left-wing? in that sense as eephus says sanders is also right-wing since he's a reformer. or do you mean that any organization that considers right-wing positions as within the tent of legitimate speech is itself right-wing? but surely any real commitment to freedom of speech must agree that the right possesses that freedom as well.

Mordy, Monday, 14 March 2016 18:01 (eight years ago) link

i think the US in general is a right leaning nation and that includes NPR.

if we're shifting from disagreement to LOL NO DUH ADAM than okay but it's not like this is wrong, except maybe in its definition of "the US" (elite manufacturers of the_conversation vs the giant confused population that still wants single-payer)

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 14 March 2016 18:13 (eight years ago) link

*then

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 14 March 2016 18:14 (eight years ago) link

My personal politics are isolationist and socialist. i think we need to spend all the money we are investing in fighting and unwinnable war in helping the people that actually live here.

NPR can say whatever they want and it's a free country and I don't see why you brought that up. But i can call them corporate shills without having to defend against you imagining I want a complete revolution of the entire media structure.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 14 March 2016 18:15 (eight years ago) link

i think the US in general is a right leaning nation and that includes NPR.

this is compared to other Western democracies. for instance national health care. or not dropping nukes on other countries.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 14 March 2016 18:16 (eight years ago) link

you can call them whatever you want but i don't understand why you'd call them corporate shills

Mordy, Monday, 14 March 2016 18:18 (eight years ago) link

or not dropping nukes on other countries.

are you saying we shouldn't have nuked Japan in WWII

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 March 2016 18:19 (eight years ago) link

put two countries side by side.

one dropped a nuke on another country and firebombed its civilian population.

another did not.

which one is more right wing.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 14 March 2016 18:21 (eight years ago) link

i think it's safe to say that fascist-era japan was more "right-wing" than any era of the united states

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 14 March 2016 18:22 (eight years ago) link

you can call them whatever you want but i don't understand why you'd call them corporate shills

― Mordy, Monday, March 14, 2016 2:18 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

because i listened to NPR during the health care debates.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 14 March 2016 18:22 (eight years ago) link

if we're talking about civilian deaths then yeah Joseph Stalin is Ronald Reagan

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 March 2016 18:22 (eight years ago) link

Imperial Japan more right-wing than WWII-era US, no contest

xxp

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 March 2016 18:22 (eight years ago) link

we have a thread fyi Hiroshima: necessary?

van damme death warrant (Doctor Casino), Monday, 14 March 2016 18:23 (eight years ago) link

yeah that's a good thread

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 March 2016 18:24 (eight years ago) link

do we have one on nagasaki

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 14 March 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

put two countries side by side.

one dropped a nuke on another country and firebombed its civilian population.

another did not.

which one is more right wing.

the fascist one that built gas chambers for undesirables but couldn't get their hands on the bomb?

Mordy, Monday, 14 March 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

ok those are bad examples. that is a problem i have, i try to make a point and pick bad examples that then get picked at and before you know it i am arguing a point that is far removed from what i originally wanted to say. then i get called out for being inconsistent or incoherent.

but come on. the official approval of torture. the NSA spying. the drone program. the invasion of Iraq. a militarized and armed police. a higher prison population than China.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 14 March 2016 18:28 (eight years ago) link

Todd Palin in snowmobile crash

Caribou Barbie cancels Trump FL appearance

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 March 2016 18:29 (eight years ago) link

but come on. the official approval of torture. the NSA spying. the drone program. the invasion of Iraq. a militarized and armed police. a higher prison population than China.

― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau)

None of these things is explicitly right wing.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 March 2016 18:31 (eight years ago) link

there are plenty of right-wing elements to the US, and to the extent that NPR reflects a broad swath of political opinions one could say that they are participating in a right-wing discourse (though i think that's a silly simplification). but the reason you're getting picked at is because you are inconsistent/incoherent. i have yet to understand why you consider NPR right-wing except that apparently during the healthcare debates you were listening and didn't hear anyone talk about single payer (I definitely did), or bc it is a radio station in the US and the US once dropped nuclear bombs on Japan.

Mordy, Monday, 14 March 2016 18:31 (eight years ago) link

i don't think NPR is right wing lol.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 14 March 2016 18:36 (eight years ago) link

you can be a left wing corporate shill look at Hillary

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 14 March 2016 18:36 (eight years ago) link

i think "___-wing" is being bandied about a bit too freely in this discussion. but this is an idiotic discussion

k3vin k., Monday, 14 March 2016 18:37 (eight years ago) link

ok i don't think there's enough of a 'there' there to really engage on this. i understand your pov. xp

Mordy, Monday, 14 March 2016 18:38 (eight years ago) link

single-payer didn't get a lot of attention because most ppl in the legislature weren't willing to back it - it would periodically get floated and then stripped out and was something of a political football, cf. Pelosi vs. Weiner. I don't really think NPR's "right-wing coverage" or whatever you think it was had any impact on this at all tbh.

xp

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 March 2016 18:39 (eight years ago) link

the u.s. has drifted right on economic questions (thus also many social questions) at least since the 80s and probably since the crest of the civil rights movement; "left-right" dyads (in elections, on talk shows) that in other places or other times would be right-right ones have gradually redefined the center; and the Mainstream Liberal Media including npr has followed this shift, which does not make them totally worthless as news organs; i understand exhaustion with these ideas because they're all pretty well understood in this company but they're not wrong

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 14 March 2016 18:39 (eight years ago) link

but come on. the official approval of torture. the NSA spying. the drone program. the invasion of Iraq. a militarized and armed police. a higher prison population than China.

― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, March 14, 2016 6:28 PM (1 minute ago)

well obviously all of these things are bad but all of them have also been criticized for violating traditional american principles in some fashion: iraq was an unprecedented preemptive war, torture violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment, nsa spying violates the fourth amendment, etc.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 14 March 2016 18:41 (eight years ago) link

kacich:

https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/709436710564724736

fight the darkness, hug the elderly

goole, Monday, 14 March 2016 18:44 (eight years ago) link

, crush the unions

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 14 March 2016 18:44 (eight years ago) link

ok those are bad examples. that is a problem i have, i try to make a point and pick bad examples that then get picked at and before you know it i am arguing a point that is far removed from what i originally wanted to say. then i get called out for being inconsistent or incoherent.

― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 14 March 2016 18:28 (12 minutes ago) Permalink

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRJjx4E7m6W0DRwoNikqfUFlKJXxtpnStIouh1ezq9P8jgQNT4mOA

flopson, Monday, 14 March 2016 18:44 (eight years ago) link

i spelled his damn name wrong!

i'm beginning to imagine scenarios where kasich is president; every other damn thing is just as implausible, i could see it.

goole, Monday, 14 March 2016 18:46 (eight years ago) link

Fight the darkness, walk towards the light

Kasich/Kevorkian's ghost '16

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Monday, 14 March 2016 18:46 (eight years ago) link

xxxxp hot

micro brewbio (crüt), Monday, 14 March 2016 18:47 (eight years ago) link

the FEC are wet blankets.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/272904-fec-to-trump-has-tiny-hands-pac-change-your-name

Trump Has Tiny Hands PAC ordered to change its name

goole, Monday, 14 March 2016 18:59 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-9kZb9nDoE

k3vin k., Monday, 14 March 2016 19:03 (eight years ago) link

New anti-Trump ad from a conservative PAC. They aren't even recommending viewers vote *for* someone, just *against* Trump.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkSRJSUY0vs

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Monday, 14 March 2016 19:05 (eight years ago) link

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/03/breitbart-staffers-resign-jordan-schachtel-jarrett-stepman-220730

Two more staffers for Breitbart have resigned from the company, citing the website's pro-Donald Trump stance.

National security correspondent Jordan Schachtel and associate editor Jarrett Stepman sent their resignations to management on Monday afternoon.

i'm about 40% sure someone just made up the names "Jordan Schachtel" and "Jarrett Stepman" for this article but ok

goole, Monday, 14 March 2016 19:37 (eight years ago) link

Those are actually pseudonyms that Ben Shapiro's mom and uncle use for the site.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Monday, 14 March 2016 19:39 (eight years ago) link

this is compared to other Western democracies. for instance national health care. or not dropping nukes on other countries.

... having a self confessed socialist running for president.

A Fifth Beatle Dies (Tom D.), Monday, 14 March 2016 19:44 (eight years ago) link

confessed! the shame

(and he aint one)

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 March 2016 19:47 (eight years ago) link

It is considered shameful in the national healthcare paradise that is the UK in 2016.

A Fifth Beatle Dies (Tom D.), Monday, 14 March 2016 19:49 (eight years ago) link

"I believe that, in the long run, major industries in this state and nation should be publicly owned and controlled by the workers themselves."

social-ist

Mordy, Monday, 14 March 2016 19:51 (eight years ago) link

more social-ish than social-ist

we must not allow a mayan-chef gap (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 14 March 2016 19:53 (eight years ago) link

sorry for posting so many tweets lately but this is lol:
https://twitter.com/Charles_Lister/status/709449269434912768

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 March 2016 20:00 (eight years ago) link

-_-

k3vin k., Monday, 14 March 2016 20:01 (eight years ago) link

I kind of wish that anti-Trump ad didn't have to fall back on the old "our mothers, our sisters, our daughters" line, but I guess the intended audience is conservative so oh well.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Monday, 14 March 2016 20:01 (eight years ago) link

What's wrong with that line? They have to tie it up somehow. The alternative would just be hours of clips of Trump being an asshole.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 14 March 2016 20:21 (eight years ago) link

lol sorry kevin

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 March 2016 20:25 (eight years ago) link

What's wrong with that line? They have to tie it up somehow. The alternative would just be hours of clips of Trump being an asshole.

― Josh in Chicago, Monday, March 14, 2016 3:21 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Because you shouldn't really need a reason for it not to be ok to insult women? Like it shouldn't have to be tied to their relationship to someone else, just insulting women in itself is bad because they are people?

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Monday, 14 March 2016 20:27 (eight years ago) link

unfortunately some people need to be occasionally reminded that they some of their dear relatives are women

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 March 2016 20:28 (eight years ago) link

they

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 March 2016 20:29 (eight years ago) link

xpost Eh, I (obviously) didn't get that. They're just making it personal, from a rhetorical standpoint. I mean, if you even have to give someone a reason to vote against against a racist fascist asshole, then pretty much all bets are off.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 14 March 2016 20:30 (eight years ago) link

You shouldn't need a reason, but people are absolutely fucking dumb enough -especially people who may still at this point be on the fence about trump. "Oh this half of the population is someone's mother, sister, daughter" is probably the only shot you have at creating some kind of empathy

Xps

how's life, Monday, 14 March 2016 20:32 (eight years ago) link

i don't really believe in 'socialists' anymore tbh. we're all just quibbling over the details of the mixed economy and discourse would be way less annoying if everyone just admitted it instead of posturing

flopson, Monday, 14 March 2016 20:54 (eight years ago) link

Not socialist, but socialish.

Three Word Username, Monday, 14 March 2016 21:02 (eight years ago) link

please don't create another millenial movement

Neanderthal, Monday, 14 March 2016 21:09 (eight years ago) link

millennials and their social medias and isms

Evan, Monday, 14 March 2016 21:19 (eight years ago) link

and schisms

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 14 March 2016 21:22 (eight years ago) link

i don't really believe in 'socialists' anymore tbh. we're all just quibbling over the details of the mixed economy and discourse would be way less annoying if everyone just admitted it instead of posturing

yep otm

iatee, Monday, 14 March 2016 21:24 (eight years ago) link

social mediaism is a serious tip

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 March 2016 21:34 (eight years ago) link

but it has to be intersectional social mediaism, everything else is bourgois and fascist!

Frederik B, Monday, 14 March 2016 21:43 (eight years ago) link

9_9

van damme death warrant (Doctor Casino), Monday, 14 March 2016 21:49 (eight years ago) link

Fuck I don't want to get up off the couch but obv I need to get the popcorn

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Monday, 14 March 2016 21:52 (eight years ago) link

i think fredrik bot was making a joke

k3vin k., Monday, 14 March 2016 21:54 (eight years ago) link

Does he deserve a social medal?

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 14 March 2016 22:06 (eight years ago) link

Hillary:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CdijlpzUsAAoDve.jpg:large

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 March 2016 22:12 (eight years ago) link

Is that a Bible quote?

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 14 March 2016 22:14 (eight years ago) link

haha yeah idk what that is there

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 March 2016 22:14 (eight years ago) link

looks like a time marker, ie 5:30 pm and 42 seconds

Neanderthal, Monday, 14 March 2016 22:16 (eight years ago) link

"God these burritos are making me gassy" - 18:49:12

Neanderthal, Monday, 14 March 2016 22:17 (eight years ago) link

Bubba 17:30-42

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 March 2016 22:17 (eight years ago) link

And thus the Angel Gabriel came before him, and asked Bubba if he saw the ass on that one

Neanderthal, Monday, 14 March 2016 22:18 (eight years ago) link

Anyway, heard someone on the radio today, a former super delegate talking about ... super delegatry. She and the host were talking about how the Republicans probably wish they had super delegates, to stop Trump, but she basically said that would only lead to chaos, and that the time to stop Trump was months ago, or weeks ago, and that now it's probably too late for the GOP to stop him. I'd say the same goes for mainstream Democrats finally waking up and criticizing him for the same shit he's been doing for 6 months. What took her so long? What took anyone so long? Years ago it was the birther bullshit, and then the shithead basically started his campaign of terror by calling John McCain a coward for getting shot down. It's been all downhill from there.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 14 March 2016 22:19 (eight years ago) link

cos it's the primary! the arrows are usually pointed inward at that time, and when you're trying to secure your own party's nom, you might be paying less attention to the simpering, bowlegged buffoon in the other race

Neanderthal, Monday, 14 March 2016 22:21 (eight years ago) link

Trump always seems so childish and silly at these rallies, bright orange, doing that prissy circular finger-waving thing

Οὖτις, Monday, 14 March 2016 22:24 (eight years ago) link

would explain why he told protesters to shut their mouths

Neanderthal, Monday, 14 March 2016 22:28 (eight years ago) link

to be insulted etc

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 14 March 2016 22:44 (eight years ago) link

http://i67.tinypic.com/2vjpe9e.jpg

Neanderthal, Monday, 14 March 2016 22:49 (eight years ago) link

The dems probably even wanted Trump or Cruz to win the primary. The standard wisdom is to hope for the most radical and divisive candidate to win. Of course, when the moderates are Rubio and Jeb! then standard wisdom might not apply.

Frederik B, Monday, 14 March 2016 22:52 (eight years ago) link

I assume the GOP didn't want to go after Trump early because they saw him getting serious traction and wanted to co-opt his supporters.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 14 March 2016 22:57 (eight years ago) link

somehow missed this gem from sarah palin:

We don't have time for all that petty, punk-ass little thuggery stuff that's been going on with these quote unquote protesters, who are doing nothing but wasting your time and trying to take away your First Amendment rights, your rights to assemble peacefully. And the media being on the thugs' side -- what the heck are you guys thinking, media? It doesn't make sense!

i know i overuse this reference but this is really bordering on "get in the ring" material imho

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 00:08 (eight years ago) link

Trump--He's One In A Million!

Now I Know How Joan of Arcadia Felt (C. Grisso/McCain), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 00:11 (eight years ago) link

It'd be hilarious of Axl's rant was spoken in Palin's accent.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 00:11 (eight years ago) link

Gah, Trump really is "One in a Million" made manifest, isn't he? Except he probably has no problem with the police.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 00:12 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8daClN2TzJM

pplains, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 00:43 (eight years ago) link

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/on-leadership/wp/2016/03/14/robot-rubio-sounded-very-human-in-this-forceful-takedown-of-trumps-leadership-style/

dead man walking rubio comes off so much better here than he has in any debate.

they're all on 'well not entirely sure I would support trump' now that it's too late, but I think one of them shoulda taken a gamble and been willing to say "hell I'd vote for hillary clinton ahead of this guy" on stage. it mighta paid off.

iatee, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 01:15 (eight years ago) link

ha i seriously doubt it would pay off

micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 01:20 (eight years ago) link

rubio in that interview shows flashes of what everyone saw as an inevitable future president. shame about the last several months, huh?

k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 March 2016 01:22 (eight years ago) link

A bit later, he said "leadership has never been taking people’s anger and using it to get them to vote for you" -- the very definition of demagoguery, by the way. "If it is, it's a dangerous style of leadership," he said. "Leadership is about acknowledging people's anger, but as a leader, trying to address why it is they're angry instead of manipulating their anger so they become your voter, your donor, your supporter."

Leadership is about acknowledging no fly zones over Syria and rescinding the Iran deal, you sententious dirtbag.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 01:28 (eight years ago) link

Sorry, but this moron is a charlatan who's about to lose.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 01:29 (eight years ago) link

ha i seriously doubt it would pay off

maybe, but whatever else they did didn't pay off either. I think giving him enough credibility to say 'yes I would support him' was a mistake and it made them look pathetic even to the republican voters out there who hate trump.

iatee, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 01:42 (eight years ago) link

most recent polls show bernie with a lot of momentum in every state but florida tomorrow btw

k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 March 2016 01:47 (eight years ago) link

i received a very strange notice from the NYC Board of Elections today. It says "DATE CORRECTION" on the front, and on the back, this:

http://i.imgur.com/TxarrMr.jpg

"Primary Election". September 13, 2016.

It's referring to the state/local primary, but this was confusing as hell to receive. It never specified that it's referring to the state/local primary, and hmmmm i wonder what other prominent "primary election" could be taking place before that?

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 02:09 (eight years ago) link

wtf

micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 02:33 (eight years ago) link

Headline from the WaPo:

Tuesday Could Shore Up Front-Liners -- Or Give Their Challengers New Life

kthx

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 05:10 (eight years ago) link

Front-Runners rather

(tired, ok?)

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 05:11 (eight years ago) link

KM, you should share that with DailyKos, et al.

bamcquern, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 05:41 (eight years ago) link

one for morbs is this hasn't made the thread already
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dY77j6uBHI

ulysses, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 06:16 (eight years ago) link

so am i the only one miffed at clinton spouting this "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny" bullshit? or do most meme warriors not care?

diana krallice (rushomancy), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 10:39 (eight years ago) link

Re: "Tuesday Could Shore up Front-Runners - Or Give Their Challengers New Life"

Turning to weather, it might rain, or it might not.

In sports, sources say one team will win the game, but maybe the other team will win. Who the heck knows?

Of course it's a lazy-ass headline that probably sits above a lazy-ass content-free speculation story. But as the primaries drag on, with no end in sight, I am also kind of sympathetic to the reporters and copyeditors who have to come up with something fresh five or six times a day. Conventional wisdom no longer applies, and normally reliable polls have been dramatically wrong at times, so what else is there to say? Hence stories that say, effectively, "Somebody's going to win, or maybe a different person will."

In the old days, the newspaper came out once a day and you could file your story then go get drunk. Now the story line changes slightly on an hourly basis and you need a brand and you need a social media presence so you do Twitface all the goldurn time and zzzz. I know I could not hack this environment, not least because it would cut into my drinking time.

Checker/Presley '16: Make America Gyrate Again (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 11:06 (eight years ago) link

Karl send that notice to Gawker, who the hell reads DailyKos

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 11:10 (eight years ago) link

so in NY, Dems are trying... to stop white lefties from voting?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 11:15 (eight years ago) link

Real white lefties too guilty to flaunt voting privs

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 11:22 (eight years ago) link

it looks like they're trying to stop Spanish and Mandarin speakers from voting

micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 11:40 (eight years ago) link

so what could be the agenda then?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 11:45 (eight years ago) link

the simplest explanation could be it's just dumb NY weirdly timed mailings, but hmmmmmm

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 11:47 (eight years ago) link

ben carson's ringing endorsement:

"The way I look at it, even if Donald Trump turns out not to be such a great president — which I don't think is the case, I think he's going to surround himself with really good people — but even if he didn't, we're only looking at four years, as opposed to multiple generations and perhaps the loss of the American dream forever," Carson said.

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 13:43 (eight years ago) link

i didn't realize the other candidates were up for 'multiple generation' terms. that's probably going to affect my vote

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 13:44 (eight years ago) link

layers upon layers of equivocation in those 62 words

ripple-chested beefchrist (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 13:46 (eight years ago) link

Has this Yglesias piece been linked already? It seems like a very good distillation of all the negatives. http://www.vox.com/2016/3/15/11225128/donald-trump-gullible-internet

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 13:48 (eight years ago) link

Ben Carson endorsing Trump with the same argument my parents used to try to get me to consider getting braces.

Evan, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 13:49 (eight years ago) link

I thought the thrust of Rubio's speech was pretty good overall, in terms of his argument against freewheeling angry speech by candidates. He had his share of clunkers but it was about as good as I could expect from
a Republican and also the first time I've ever seen him actually connect with the words coming from his mouth.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 13:51 (eight years ago) link

He also looked genuinely, deeply concerned in a way I don't remember seeing a presidential candidate look. Maybe he was just fatigued.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 13:54 (eight years ago) link

It's as though someone found Trump's butler at the local bar, bought him drinks, and let him talk.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/03/16/us/politics/donald-trump-butler-mar-a-lago.html

... (Eazy), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 13:54 (eight years ago) link

Losing can clarify the midn.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:00 (eight years ago) link

I'm not sure I've ever seen a candidate look as worn down as Rubio.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:01 (eight years ago) link

One of my friends on FB this morning:

The scene: Independence, OH Voting Location, 8 a.m.
80-year-old gentleman: (Handing me a mini-hand sanitizer and postcard for a Republican Judge candidate) "I hope this will help secure your support for Judge so-and-so and Donald Trump."
Alexa: (walking away) "Oh, if it's for Trump I don't want it."
80-year-old: "What!? Trump wants you to have that!"
Alexa: (still walking) "No he doesn't, I'm a woman." (disappear into voting location)
80-year-old: (wagging his finger at me while I'm walking out post-vote towards him) "Young lady! Trump loves women, he has a beautiful daughter who helps him run his companies and a gorgeous wife to take care of his children!"
Alexa: (still walking) "Have you heard what he says about women?"
80-year-old: "That's all jibberish, he doesn't mean it!"
Alexa: (grumble, head shake, still walking)
80-year-old: "I see you're married, hasn't your husband ever yelled at to you? I'm sure he has said things he doesn't mean and you've forgiven him!"
Alexa: "You're not helping yourself here, sir." (slams car door)

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:02 (eight years ago) link

Y'know, that old man is right. We all should really learn to forgive the obviously contrite Trump for the awful things he's said over and over but that he clearly doesn't mean.

Going To Town On Aunt May's Mezze Platter (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:11 (eight years ago) link

Trump's hand sanitizer is amazing though. It's the best, it's the classiest hand sanitizer. He uses it in his clubs. Even the blacks and the poorly educated and the women love it.

Checker/Presley '16: Make America Gyrate Again (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:15 (eight years ago) link

80-year-old: (dies)

That exchange would make an awesome comic strip.

I gave up lobbying my wife weeks ago, but this morning on the way to the booth she told me she had changed her mind and was voting for Sanders. I asked what was different, and she said the fact that he might have a shot here made a big difference, and that she thought it was healthy to have a competitive primary.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:19 (eight years ago) link

butler story is amazing btw. the penny thing! wow. also: so mar-a-lago is the merriweather post pavilion?!

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:23 (eight years ago) link

That exchange is amazing.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:24 (eight years ago) link

xpost Was that asked of all voters, or just potential GOP?

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:25 (eight years ago) link

At this point, I think many Trump supporters would continue supporting Trump even if he murdered their own mothers in front of them. Some might waver a bit, I guess.

Going To Town On Aunt May's Mezze Platter (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:30 (eight years ago) link

What's interesting is that the "less likely" and "more likely" number add up to his more or less 30% constant. That 66%, there is no indication whether those voters were ever planning to vote for Trump.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:32 (eight years ago) link

xpost What if their mothers were ISIS? You just never know. Not a week goes by without some kind of ISIS attack in America - it's happening all the time - so better safe than sorry.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:33 (eight years ago) link

“As you may know, Donald Trump cancelled a rally in Chicago Friday night where protesters and his supporters got into confrontations,” Monmouth asked. “Does what happened there and Trump’s response to it make you more likely or less likely to support Trump, or does it have no impact on your vote for the Republican nomination?”

I'm assuming >50% of the people polled haven't even been paying attention to the news about this particular Trump rally, so based on this question, their responses seem pretty unremarkable

micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:34 (eight years ago) link

weird how my reaction to Anonymous is so much more viscerally apoplectic than my reaction to Donald Trump

micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:43 (eight years ago) link

the guy fawkes mask is 99% of it though

micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:44 (eight years ago) link

How are Anonymous's wars against ISIS, the KKK and the Zetas going? Impressive that they can fight on so many fronts at once.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:47 (eight years ago) link

At this point, I think many Trump supporters would continue supporting Trump even if he murdered their own mothers in front of them. Some might waver a bit, I guess.

― Going To Town On Aunt May's Mezze Platter (Old Lunch), Tuesday, March 15, 2016 10:30 AM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

"He must have had a good reason. I respect his confidence. He gets things done."

Evan, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:53 (eight years ago) link

xpost All of those groups dissolved this morning. Did you forget to read the news?

Going To Town On Aunt May's Mezze Platter (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:53 (eight years ago) link

"You don't get your name in lights on a tower by not murdering people's mothers"

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:54 (eight years ago) link

"My mother was a woman, after all."

Evan, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:57 (eight years ago) link

Most human part of the Rubio interview is where they ask him about whether he'll support the nominee and he said "I don't know" in weary "I thought the one constant in my life would be that I could support the Republican nominee" way.

There is some "both sides do it", but he does take care to point out that although Barack Obama has been 'divisive' (a word he consistently can't pronounce), Trump's working has been qualitatively different and dangerous. The fact that this is impressive is kind of depressing.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:59 (eight years ago) link

I've always pronounced divisive with a long I (rhymes with why live). The short I pronunciation (rhymes with missive) is less favored by dictionaries but I am hearing it more lately. Romney said it that way.

You can argue for the long I by analogy with "divide," but then you have to explain away the word "division," which gets an undisputed short I from the same root. No one says diVYzhun.

living colour me badd english beat happening (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 15:36 (eight years ago) link

hello i have the best take of the day

https://twitter.com/GeraldoRivera/status/709763287404032001

Pundits missing peril facing @BernieSanders today. It's #SpringBreak His kids are partying in farflung beaches not voting in Ohio

goole, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 15:41 (eight years ago) link

#SpriiiiiingBreeeaaaak

goole, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 15:41 (eight years ago) link

i don't know anyone who went to farflung beaches for spring break, i thought that was only something that happened in movies

ciderpress, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 15:42 (eight years ago) link

(rhymes with why live).

Of course I read this the first time as rhyming with "high give".

pplains, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 15:43 (eight years ago) link

Ohio, of course, has early voting, so college-age voters could easily have voted prior to leaving for spring break.

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 15:44 (eight years ago) link

getting things done ahead of time, a thing college students are well known for

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 15:45 (eight years ago) link

I'm off this week, so I was in and out of the house yesterday. When I was in, I was usually at the computer with CNN on in the next room. From 8:00 in the morning until midnight, with hardly any break, people argued about Donald Trump, primarily about the rallies. The people kept changing, but it was the same argument over and over.

clemenza, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:08 (eight years ago) link

Gonna be a little sad when Rubio's rushed tonight :(

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:09 (eight years ago) link

and crushed

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:10 (eight years ago) link

rushed and crushed rubio with a side of bile and sour grapes

ulysses, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:15 (eight years ago) link

and he won't be running for senator again, either. guess he'll just have to take some cushy consulting job and make a bunch of money introducing people to each other while golfing. poor guy

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:19 (eight years ago) link

http://giphy.com/gifs/3o7abkti7UphSopcl2

jamiesummerz, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:24 (eight years ago) link

make that

http://i.giphy.com/3o7abkti7UphSopcl2.gif

jamiesummerz, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:24 (eight years ago) link

Funny, but its 3rd appearance here at this point.

Evan, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:25 (eight years ago) link

4th!

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:26 (eight years ago) link

"I will be proud to announce Chris Christie as my vice presidential pick! After the teabagging, of course."

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:28 (eight years ago) link

After he fucks a goat.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:31 (eight years ago) link

so i guess ohio is the big one for tonight, on the GOP side. from 538:

The importance of this primary to the larger Republican race is difficult to overstate. According to my math (and that of Republican Benjamin Ginsberg, who basically wrote the GOP’s delegate rules), Trump is unlikely to reach a majority of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination if he loses Ohio.

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:34 (eight years ago) link

what is kasich's strategy if he wins OH?

marcos, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:39 (eight years ago) link

brokered convention

Mordy, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:43 (eight years ago) link

even then though how is his claim any more legitimate than cruz really (leaving aside trump)

marcos, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:44 (eight years ago) link

legitimacy kinda goes out the window with a brokered convention

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:45 (eight years ago) link

Trump is unlikely to reach a majority of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination if he loses Ohio.

That's oddly comforting.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:45 (eight years ago) link

fwiw the current predictwise odds

trump 85% for florida, 70% for illinois, 99% for NC

trump and cruz are 50/50 in missouri

kasich is 70/30 with trump for ohio

illinois is a dem toss-up, sanders is up 67/33 in missouri, and clinton is 90%+ in NC and FL

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:53 (eight years ago) link

what has been their record so far?

Mordy, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:54 (eight years ago) link

I really want someone else to get the nom in a brokered convention just because I posted a "Trump is not going to be the nominee and I'll bump this when I'm right" facebook status a while back.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:54 (eight years ago) link

We all should really learn to forgive the obviously contrite Trump for the awful things he's said over and over but that he clearly doesn't mean.

Obviously Trump is sort of sui generis, but ppl do this with their fave politicians all the fucking time. Most gay Dem Hilbots have already forgiven HRC for Reagan-AIDS, and would do the same if she wore an SS uniform to the next debate, as long as she apologized on Facebook.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:56 (eight years ago) link

if trump gets screwed out of the nomination at the convention there's no way you can consider that status msg valid xp

Mordy, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:56 (eight years ago) link

Cld run Clinton on the ballot in confederacy and Sanders in the north mayb? #outsidetheboxthinking

"Worried pimp" (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:56 (eight years ago) link

Most gay Dem Hilbots have already forgiven HRC for Reagan-AIDS

huh imagine that

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:57 (eight years ago) link

if trump gets screwed out of the nomination at the convention there's no way you can consider that status msg valid xp

― Mordy, Tuesday, March 15, 2016 11:56 AM (32 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Well it's a stretch, but my theory was based on GOP elites not allowing it to happen, so it sort of works.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:57 (eight years ago) link

kasich would be brokering his big ohio delegates (and perhaps those from other upcoming and demographically similar states) for the VP slot on a ted cruz ticket. honestly i've been super skeptical of brokerage talk but it is gradually coming to seem almost within the realm of things that could happen. really never imagined it'd be such a divided field for so long, with such weak anti-trump measures by the other candidates. still, though, it's more likely that even if nobody comes out of the nominating contests with a majority, some pre-convention brokering around the unpledged delegates would be enough to swing a first-ballot win against trump's 30% or whatever. maybe. that gets more likely if rubio takes the chance to bail, making it increasingly hard for trump to sneak by and grab winner-take-all states against a divided field. but who knows, rubio could basically say, okay, all my worst states are behind me, surely my big chance is coming up now!! and keep fucking it up for the others. what a wacky race.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:59 (eight years ago) link

Rubio's problem is that he hasn't even learned how to fuck himself.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:00 (eight years ago) link

mordy: i think he (predictwise) got everything except michigan democract and possibly iowa republican?

his site is terrible though and doesn't show historical data. i've met the guy and i'm happy to attribute this to lack of time/web skill rather than a desire to obscure his track record, but i can see why it would seem fishy.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:00 (eight years ago) link

rubio has to be finished after tonight, right? he looks finished

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:01 (eight years ago) link

rubio could basically say, okay, all my worst states are behind me

florida?

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:01 (eight years ago) link

huh imagine that

yes, bcz they are the worst faggots in the world.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:01 (eight years ago) link

he got zero delegates last tuesday. seems like he might get zero tonight. got to go at that point.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:03 (eight years ago) link

Rubio's done, no way does he soldier on after getting Trumpled in his backyard

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:03 (eight years ago) link

And the media being on the thugs' side -- what the heck are you guys thinking, media? It doesn't make sense!

it's amazing how we can get such a "gem" of a palin quote 8 years past her expiration date

nomar, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:03 (eight years ago) link

if trump gets screwed out of the nomination at the convention

it's only 'screwed' if you're under some sort of illusion that being a bit short of the necessary committed number of delegates means you are entitled to the nomination, in which case you are a naive taffeta-clad brony. (Dems would do the same to Sanders.)

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:05 (eight years ago) link

Palin has not expired... because she's on television, dummy.

http://d329y26hx05pom.cloudfront.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/nedbeatty.jpg

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:07 (eight years ago) link

Morbs otm (re being short of delegates)

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:07 (eight years ago) link

he's technically correct in that the party has the leeway to do what they want but he's wrong in that keeping the person w/ the most votes from winning the nomination is clearly a subversion of the base's popular will and will fracture the party.

Mordy, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:09 (eight years ago) link

1976:

Going into the convention, Ford had won more primary delegates than Reagan, as well as a plurality in popular vote. However, Ford did not have enough to secure the nomination, and as the convention opened both candidates were seen as having a chance to win. Because of this, both Ford and Reagan arrived in Kansas City before the convention opened to woo the remaining uncommitted delegates in an effort to secure the nomination. Reagan benefited from his highly committed delegates, notably "Reagan's Raiders" of the Texas delegation. They and other conservative Western and Southern delegates particularly faulted the Ford Administration's foreign policy of détente towards the Soviet Union, criticizing his signing of the Helsinki Accords and indirectly blaming him for the April 1975 Fall of Saigon. The pro-Reagan Texas delegates worked hard to persuade delegates from other states to support Reagan. Ford, meanwhile, used all of the perks and patronage of the Presidency to win over wavering delegates, including trips aboard Air Force One and personal meetings with the President himself.

Trump could take wavering delegates on his plane and if they don't yield he'll toss them out.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:10 (eight years ago) link

it's not like we're talking about a constitution here. technically speaking couldn't the party change the entire nomination process to a closed behind doors vote for all elected republican senators + congressmen and guarantee who they want? if they do it'll piss their voters off, but so will keeping trump from the nomination. xp

Mordy, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:11 (eight years ago) link

party is fractured either way; it's mutually assured destruction and the only positive thing to get outta this experience

ulysses, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:13 (eight years ago) link

This, on Rubio, comes from a blogger I disagree with about 75% of the time (less than two months ago he was saying if Rubio was the nominee, he'd crush Clinton in the general - like, he literally typed the word "landslide"):

If he never gets back into politics, he'll find himself on a lot of corporate boards, and he'll show up on a lot of political talk shows. At worst, he'll be a Republican Harold Ford, a moderately ethnic, moderately telegenic corporatist who plays a savant on TV. He'll land on his feet. So shed no tears for him after he loses today.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:14 (eight years ago) link

with friends like these

ulysses, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:15 (eight years ago) link

if they do try to deny trump the nomination i wonder how far he'd try to leverage supporter violence (and/or himself as the only nominee that could prevent violence at the convention).

Mordy, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:15 (eight years ago) link

so many delightful scenarios

p sure Trump will go peacemaker if it ever looks like he could be prosecuted

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:15 (eight years ago) link

my father puts the odds of trump in a federal prison by 2017 at roughly 1/1

ulysses, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:16 (eight years ago) link

"Harold Ford"

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:16 (eight years ago) link

i was not aware til this morning that Rubio told his Ohio supporters to vote for Kasich

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:17 (eight years ago) link

what ohio supporters

Mordy, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:18 (eight years ago) link

what ohio supporters

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:19 (eight years ago) link

Not true, as every Cuban American Republican I know is voting in droves for the cubanito to stop Trump.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:20 (eight years ago) link

i was not aware til this morning that Rubio told his Ohio supporters to vote for Kasich

Kasich just kind of smiled and shrugged when asked why he wasn't returning the favor in Florida on Meet the Press.

Darin, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:20 (eight years ago) link

it turns out that ppl who write for NRO do not constitute a sufficient base

Mordy, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:21 (eight years ago) link

@DennisThePerrin
Being a Hillary apologist these days is a form of performance art.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:38 (eight years ago) link

uhhh
https://twitter.com/BrandyLJensen/status/709710528424321024

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:39 (eight years ago) link

Ned linked to Rod Dreher's most nuanced post ever.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:41 (eight years ago) link

@ManTheAlive
Being Dennis Perrin these days is a form of performance fart.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:42 (eight years ago) link

labored over that for 4 minutes huh

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:49 (eight years ago) link

re: rubio's 'best states' - this is just going back to early-race conventional wisdom, which always sort of imagined rubio having to take some baths in the early states (though certainly not as badly as he has done) and then going on to win some of the winner-take-all stuff later in the race - the places where romney finally put santorum away. but this was back when cruz was not doing nearly so well, and it seemed like rubio could gain the mantle of the one clear 'establishment' guy. as bullshitty as that may have been, that was the logic, and if rubio still has people telling him that, then who the fuck knows. i agree that he looks like a man waiting for the moment when he can throw in the towel, much as jeb did by the end.

kasich throwing to rubio in florida would be pointless because rubio is/was doing so badly there that it wouldn't actually ensure him a win without cruz also being on board (fat chance). i still think kasich is playing for VP, but for all i know at this point he could believe that if he does well enough (and rubio gets crushed badly enough), he's actually in a position to win further states (by plurality) and present himself as the compromise brokered nominee that nobody really hates. throw in rubio's delegates, some wheeling and dealing... i dunno. that is a crazy scenario for a guy who's currently in fourth-place and super behind in delegates. he'd have to be quite the optimist but he could be thinking it: say he does win ohio's 99, and if the map is running out of really good cruz states, then with a little luck he wins pennsylvania, with a big push he wins california, while trump and cruz split the rest... it's the longest of long shots but hey he's still hanging around for some reason.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:49 (eight years ago) link

i don't know anyone who went to farflung beaches for spring break, i thought that was only something that happened in movies

yeah i think it mostly happens to people that have someone else (parents) footing all their bills. i worked part time to pay for school so my spring break was picking up extra shifts.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:53 (eight years ago) link

Katich knows that rubio is toast and that no one likes liar Cruz, so i don't think he's being totally unrealistic (though he's being extremely, extremely optimistic.)

nomar, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:54 (eight years ago) link

imo Kasich has no realistic hope of the nomination, but he could become a powerful figure in a brokered convention, esp if he could somehow pull 25% of the delegates. That would probably mean winning CA and I have no idea how he's polling there.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:03 (eight years ago) link

I haven't looked at any polls or anything but I would assume Trump is leading in CA?

micro brewbio (crüt), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:09 (eight years ago) link

The most recent Landslide Communications (wtf) poll has Trump +16.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:11 (eight years ago) link

california primary is three months away so god only knows, but 538 polling average (of, basically, two polls) has it as:

Trump 30.7
Cruz 20.6
Kasich 16.8
Rubio 13.6

a detached third-party observer might say "this is basically meaningless and it could look totally different by june" but kasich or a kasich sycophant would be saying, rubio plus kasich effectively ties with trump. you put in the legwork and boost those numbers just a bit and who knows...! better stay in this thing! (it's also winner-take-all on a district-by-district basis, so it's not actually the 172-delegate plum it may appear to be. still....)

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:16 (eight years ago) link

i don't know anyone who went to farflung beaches for spring break, i thought that was only something that happened in movies

Ha, I used to wonder if American schools were really like that.

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:19 (eight years ago) link

idk i definitely knew a lot of kids in college that booked trips to florida for spring break, varied from budget road trips to cheap motels to richer kids flying down to pricey oceanfront condos

marcos, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:21 (eight years ago) link

i went to ft lauderdale once during spring break with my brother and my dad, but i was in junior high so it didn't really count and it wasn't a spring break!! trip, just visiting some friends. i just remember driving around listening to boyz II men on my headphones and marveling at all the teal cars with purple neon under the chassis. my memory is that it was a hellish place and time.

nomar, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:22 (eight years ago) link

Student spring break trips are not a thing on the west coast ime

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:22 (eight years ago) link

i hung out w/ a bunch of activist kids though so of course we did "alternative spring breaks" to places like chiapas, mexico or cuba which were obv just as expensive

marcos, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:22 (eight years ago) link

i don't know a single person who did this in the early 90's.

akm, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:23 (eight years ago) link

(I went to berkeley). maybe kids in SoCal go to tijuana

akm, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:23 (eight years ago) link

my only college spring break trip was to Burlington VT so i went in the opposite direction. drank a lot of beer and jammed some tunes and listened to a bunch of phish and widespread with my high school homies. hempiest week of my life.

nomar, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:24 (eight years ago) link

I went to college in texas so we went to South Padre one year for spring break, wasn't super far, but there were a bazillion college kids there from all over the midwest, and it was pretty much as wild as the movies suggest. needless to say I don't remember a whole lot. was in 1994 I think?

droit au butt (Euler), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:25 (eight years ago) link

i went to Tampa/St Pete in senior year to go to spring training ballgames with my 66-year-old uncle. I haven't returned to Florida, partly bcz i saw Kissinger in the Salvador Dali Museum.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:25 (eight years ago) link

I did choir tours during spring break, which meant partying in places like scenic Wichita.

Imagine how pissed I was that the group did a SoCal tour the year before I joined and a Florida tour the year after I graduated.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:26 (eight years ago) link

Ft Lauderdale banned spring break more than 25 years ago iirc. Rich gays prefer their twinks a little quieter.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:26 (eight years ago) link

I haven't returned to Florida, partly bcz i saw Kissinger in the Salvador Dali Museum.

surrealism is dead

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

i think you just saw Dali's "face of war" painting, morbs

http://webneel.com/daily/sites/default/files/images/daily/09-2013/18-the-face-of-war-paintings-by-salvador-dali.jpg

nomar, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

that Dali museum is world class imo

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

(All of my complaints are nullified by three international summer tours, though)

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:28 (eight years ago) link

Kriston Capps
‏@kristoncapps
Cleveland prepares for possibly unprecedented violence at the Republican National Convention in July: http://bit.ly/1U21dVB

@pareene
again, given America's actual political history, it seems like they're preparing for very very precedented violence

(Cops also have been preparing for conventions exactly in this manner since 2004)

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:29 (eight years ago) link

lol that's an amazing story.

intercoastal Florida is def the kind of weird place where i would imagine randomly seeing Kissinger

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:29 (eight years ago) link

or nude wrestling with a croc in Gatorland

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:30 (eight years ago) link

a friend texted me last year to swear kissinger was in a neighboring toilet stall

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:30 (eight years ago) link

btw from a Yelp review:

What made me love the park was the surprises of the staff. Unlike many parks, where they are super reserved and concerned about getting sued, I saw a few different times when the staff would see a couple kids looking at a giant gator and they would actually let the kids inside the exhibits to feed them or take pictures. It was entertaining for everyone as well because we thought we might see a child get eaten alive.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:31 (eight years ago) link

from that convention-violence story:

A group of Trump supporters calling itself “The Lion’s Guard” aims to serve as a militia-style security force for attendees at Trump rallies.

welp

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:34 (eight years ago) link

yea i'm terrified for cleveland

marcos, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:34 (eight years ago) link

hmmm, maybe instead of Trump merely offering to pay the legal fees of the Lion's Guard after they beat the shit out of a protester, he can just go ahead and pay them all a decent salary as well, maybe even get them a uniform!

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:35 (eight years ago) link

it's going to be amazing how much Trump gets sued after all of this ends

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:36 (eight years ago) link

Henry no doubt thought it was the Salvador Allende Museum and wanted to see the corpse xxxxxxp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:37 (eight years ago) link

Karl otm, i'm thinking maybe we start with something in a brown shade for starters and move to a more classy black after awhile

nomar, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:37 (eight years ago) link

their twitter account was apparently only up for four hours but they did have a logo

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:38 (eight years ago) link

dedicated to protecting safety and security from far-left agitators

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:39 (eight years ago) link

far left alligators

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:41 (eight years ago) link

what's insane is that i think that many of the same old white men who watch endless History Channel specials on Hitler are also big Trump fans

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:41 (eight years ago) link

this is what comes of having possessions n' such

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:45 (eight years ago) link

meanwhile there are 2 kinds of 'bros' in this world...

@DougHenwood
Posh kids don't like Bernie: Sanders does well in towns hosting public universities; poorly in those with private.

https://newrepublic.com/article/131536/arent-college-towns-feeling-bern

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:53 (eight years ago) link

Gah sorry i walk away for 10 minutes...

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:55 (eight years ago) link

i don't think there's much ~~yet~~ to this "lion's guard" business. we'll find out soon enough.

goole, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:56 (eight years ago) link

Gah sorry i walk away for 10 minutes...

― Οὖτις, Tuesday, March 15, 2016 2:55 PM

and when you return to the office brownshirts await you

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:56 (eight years ago) link

They're afraid of that 50% tax rate and want to get rid of that pesky estate tax

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:56 (eight years ago) link

what's insane is that i think that many of the same old white men who watch endless History Channel specials on Hitler are also big Trump fans

― Karl Malone, Tuesday, March 15, 2016 1:41 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Somebody check the DSM V for symptoms that include 'inability to recognize patterns' and 'wall fetishization'.

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:57 (eight years ago) link

don't look now guys but i think some of these people may be young

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 19:00 (eight years ago) link

so what's winner-take-all vs proportional today?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 19:01 (eight years ago) link

He's started a Youth wing already?

A Fifth Beatle Dies (Tom D.), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 19:01 (eight years ago) link

when will primary returns/projections start to be announced, anybody have an estimate?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 19:05 (eight years ago) link

i checked the huffington post super bowl page but it didn't help

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 19:06 (eight years ago) link

6 or 7 p.m. depending on time zone

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 19:06 (eight years ago) link

I'll know while watching a Troell movie and hearing the howls of doom around my neighborhood as the results are announced.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 19:07 (eight years ago) link

dedicated to protecting safety and security from far-left agitators

― denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:39 (27 minutes ago) Permalink

far left alligators

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:41 (25 minutes ago) Permalink

My favorite Raffi song.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 19:07 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZwhNFOn4ik

ulysses, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 19:23 (eight years ago) link

538 has Bern up to a 12% shot in Illinois, so that's in the bag

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 19:29 (eight years ago) link

what's insane is that i think that many of the same old white men who watch endless History Channel specials on Hitler are also big Trump fans

― Karl Malone, Tuesday, March 15, 2016 2:41 PM (42 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Realize any memory of that programming is pushed out of their skulls in favor of hours and hours of Duck Dynasty reruns and Ancient Aliens, Ax Men, Pawn Stars, etc. for the last 10 years or so.

Evan, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 19:37 (eight years ago) link

One thing I find odd in watching election results on TV/online is the way people speak as though the election is still happening and the candidates are personally causing the votes to turn toward their favor.

8 PM: "With 7% of the vote in, Smith is holding steady with 54%. Jones is going to need to make up that deficit in the downstate counties where his support is strongest."

9 PM: "Now, with 20% counted, we're seeing Jones surging ahead! Smith is really going to have to do well in urban areas as well as in Burp County, where I'm just now being told there is a glitch with the vote-counting because the precinct captain experienced some traffic."

10 PM: "It's neck and neck between Smith and Jones, currently just separated by 11 votes, with 45% of precincts reporting. We're getting word that some of the votes still to be counted are from Smorb County, which has a big student population. That could bode well for Smith, who's been campaigning heavily to get out the youth vote. But Jones could still pull ahead, given his strong support in Glop County."

11 PM: "Smith has opened up a ten-point lead now. It's going to be very hard for Jones to make up the difference. Jones needs to do really well in these outer suburbs, like in Hupp and Reep Counties."

DUDES. Chill. It has all already HAPPENED. No one is surging ahead, falling behind, or making up the difference. Everybody's already voted and gone home. All we're doing now is just counting. Yeah I KNOW they have to say something to fill the air, and over the last 30 years of watching election returns I've sometimes fallen into that same Karl-Rovian trap - "Hey! Schmoop County hasn't come in yet; maybe there's still hope!"

These days, I prefer to go to bed early, or watch a movie and drink, then set an alarm to wake up around midnight so that I am more likely to get actual tangible results, rather than do the emotional rollercoaster of hitting refresh all evening only to see that it's still inconclusive.

Checker/Presley '16: Make America Gyrate Again (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 20:11 (eight years ago) link

It's good that Kasich's speaking up, but it's laughable watching him pretend, in an interview he just did with CNN, that he "didn't know the extent" of what Trump's been out there saying the past few months.

clemenza, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 20:12 (eight years ago) link

Have the open carry crazies ever made their presence known at a polling station, or debate, or convention, etc?

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 20:14 (eight years ago) link

538 has Bern up to a 12% shot in Illinois, so that's in the bag

― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 19:29 (48 minutes ago) Permalink

aka the CYA threshold

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 20:18 (eight years ago) link

Have the open carry crazies ever made their presence known at a polling station, or debate, or convention, etc?

― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, March 15, 2016 4:14 PM (4 minutes ago)

uh you mean, historically? or this year

k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 March 2016 20:20 (eight years ago) link

This year.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 20:24 (eight years ago) link

give trump's people a little more time

k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 March 2016 20:25 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYHLaBBs5pY

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 20:28 (eight years ago) link

Jake Tapper calls today "Survival Tuesday." Chuck Todd was trying to sell "Separation Tuesday" the other day. The Moody Blues yet to weigh in.

clemenza, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 20:31 (eight years ago) link

How about the Hold Steady?

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 20:32 (eight years ago) link

I'm on a different timeline.

clemenza, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 20:33 (eight years ago) link

Another stellar character witness for Trump (though he denies it):

http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/eye-on-baseball/25517699/pete-rose-would-like-to-clarify-that-hes-not-endorsing-donald-trump?linkId=22303550

clemenza, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 20:37 (eight years ago) link

Fwiw, I heard turnout in IL is predicted to be around 40%, which is, of course, low, but at the same time is I guess twice 2012. Which is good.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 21:40 (eight years ago) link

‏@micahuetricht
Bill Clinton, in Chicago today: "There is a blame candidate and a responsibility candidate in this race.

scumfuck

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 21:50 (eight years ago) link

I blame the responsible candidate.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 21:59 (eight years ago) link

in a post-jerry springer world, that dscc "attack ad" is underwhelming

F♯ A♯ (∞), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 22:03 (eight years ago) link

tl,dr: Trump's gotten ~$2billion in free media

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 22:04 (eight years ago) link

I'm enjoying YMP's logistical beatdowns of the constructedness of election reportage

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 22:24 (eight years ago) link

It uses the same framing as sports coverage

ciderpress, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 22:27 (eight years ago) link

Yes - and like a long season I like the wearying aspects of it that he gets at

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 22:30 (eight years ago) link

@micahuetricht
Bill Clinton, in Chicago today: "There is a blame candidate and a responsibility candidate in this race.

Yeah we learned that in 1994 with welfare reform

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 22:36 (eight years ago) link

did he say the same line when Hillary found out about Moncia?

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 22:40 (eight years ago) link

is it worse for the GOP for trump to lock it up tonight or for kasich to win and a convention battle? seems like the latter is more likely to happen

global tetrahedron, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 22:40 (eight years ago) link

*and then a convention battle

global tetrahedron, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 22:40 (eight years ago) link

In sports, they generally talk about it _when it's happening_.

It would be like if the teams each played their portion of the game alone, in an otherwise empty stadium, and then the crowd came in and listened to the sportscasters talk about what happened in the game, breathlessly but in random order.

Checker/Presley '16: Make America Gyrate Again (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 22:42 (eight years ago) link

leaning on the side that it's better the GOP (and worse for the country) to see Trump win the nom

Nhex, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 23:00 (eight years ago) link

i suppose my ultimate concern is what's best for the country. it just so happens that that's whatever happens to be worse for the GOP

global tetrahedron, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 23:01 (eight years ago) link

what a coincidence

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 23:07 (eight years ago) link

Jerry Springer - hell, Trump's campaign is more like the old Donahue show with all of the Nazis, Klan members and militiamen endorsing him.

Here is my list:
Vanguard News Network
Stormfront
David Duke
Traditionalist Workers Party
Alex Jones

...and countless internet racists.

Fake Sam's Club (I M Losted), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 23:15 (eight years ago) link

Oh, and The Daily Stormer endorsed him, too.

Fake Sam's Club (I M Losted), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 23:30 (eight years ago) link

not Donahue, Morton Downey Jr.

Hadrian VIII, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 23:40 (eight years ago) link

weird they haven't called florida for clinton yet

k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 March 2016 23:43 (eight years ago) link

weird they haven't called florida for clinton yet

People still voting in the Panhandle, I believe

Iago Galdston, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 23:47 (eight years ago) link

chris matthews just said that american politics is too "predictable, it's paint by numbers"

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:06 (eight years ago) link

Clinton's lead in Florida is commanding. She's got it.

Apparently Rubio's only won the Cuban vote lol

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:08 (eight years ago) link

NBC calling Florida for HRC.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:12 (eight years ago) link

rubio just said "we had a great team" and then corrected himself and said "we have a great team"

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:14 (eight years ago) link

heckler. rubio: "don't worry, he won't get beaten up here"

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:15 (eight years ago) link

it's rubio i'm worried for

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:17 (eight years ago) link

It's your friend you should worry about. What on earth am I to do?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:21 (eight years ago) link

and it's official he is suspending his campaign

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:24 (eight years ago) link

"suspending"

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:25 (eight years ago) link

how I wish I could enjoy this guy suffer in a context not tied to Trump becoming the republican nominee

iatee, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:27 (eight years ago) link

oh SHUT UP with your aspirational twaddle, Rubes

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:27 (eight years ago) link

aww, at least he won miami-dade

mookieproof, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:28 (eight years ago) link

he won the dying Cuban vote -- he won my abuela's vote

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:29 (eight years ago) link

Damn, Marco! Not even a CLOSE second.

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:30 (eight years ago) link

did he say the same line when Hillary found out about Moncia?

― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, March 15, 2016 6:40 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I loled

micro brewbio (crüt), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:34 (eight years ago) link

Don't give in to fear, don't give in to hysteria, said the junior senator from Florida, a supporter of torture, bombing Syrians for no reason, and the man who sprinted away from his own immigration bill.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:35 (eight years ago) link

AP called OH for Hill

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:41 (eight years ago) link

i guess harry reid's going to give some big speech tomorrow making clear that the GOP is responsible for trump
should be entertaining

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:44 (eight years ago) link

at least the good ppl of florida will have marco rubio back in the senate fighting for their freedom

mookieproof, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:47 (eight years ago) link

CNN calling Ohio for Kasich.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:47 (eight years ago) link

actually rubio isn't running for reelection in the senate either so he's out after january! prob go be a lobbyist or something idk

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:49 (eight years ago) link

xp no they won't he isn't running for senate

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:50 (eight years ago) link

It's not that hard to see what Kasich's thinking, it's basically just a) The Party Decides and b) When the Party Decides, factors they look at include being a good party republican and Carrying Your Own Fucking State.

xp and history has overtaken me - if Kasich carries Ohio, wouldn't he be in third place anyway?

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:50 (eight years ago) link

i wonder how many democrats crossed over to vote kasich (to stop trump)

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:51 (eight years ago) link

(I mean even if Rubio hadn't dropped out)

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:51 (eight years ago) link

impossible anyway for rubio to plausibly re-run for the office of launchpad

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:52 (eight years ago) link

i wonder how many democrats crossed over to vote kasich (to stop trump)

― arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g),

Many, according to MSNBC exit polls.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:53 (eight years ago) link

yeah i was joking because not only is he not running, he apparently rarely shows up in the senate

mookieproof, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:54 (eight years ago) link

i heard people were pushing carson to run for rubio's seat? lol

mookieproof, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:55 (eight years ago) link

i can't see the nominee being anyone but trump, but it really would be funny if kasich's weirdo red-meat-what-red-meat-i-don't-have-any-i-swear strategy had happened upon its first workable primary year since, what, 1956

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:55 (eight years ago) link

heh i googled and the first result was a wash post article quoting a friend of rubio's re: the senate --> 'he hates it'

i mean, he does have a point, seems like an awful place to be

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:57 (eight years ago) link

xpost and the sunny, let's all get along kasich you see in the primary is NOT the real kasich. not the friendliest guy. i mean there has to be tons of video from his old fox news tv show making that obvious

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:58 (eight years ago) link

i mean, he does have a point, seems like an awful place to be

― arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g)

don't get that at all tbh. Lots of time to read now that nothing gets done.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:00 (eight years ago) link

at least the senate has its own lil subway that won't be shut down tomorrow

mookieproof, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:00 (eight years ago) link

yeah the approach always seemed bizarre because it's the opposite of the cw "pivot": he runs as the kindly one in the primary but should he somehow get the nomination hillary attacks inevitably reveal him as the unkindly one in the general. it doesn't make any sense unless there's an attempted fascist takeover of the party. xxp

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:02 (eight years ago) link

plus the Clintons worked with Kasich when he was a Gingrich mini-me in the mid '90s -- they got an opp file on this guy

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:04 (eight years ago) link

the massive amount of time politicians from some of these big states especially spend on fundraising has to be massively depressing imo, it seems like the only person who enjoys this is terry mcauliffe maybe

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:06 (eight years ago) link

tru

mookieproof, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:11 (eight years ago) link

the predictwise guy has run some back of the envelope stuff on a contested convention

There is a 46% chance of a second ballot. There is 74% likelihood that Donald Trump wins the nomination, 13% for Ted Cruz, and 11% for John Kasich. Assume that Trump is the only person that can win nomination on the first ballot. Here is a quick and dirty estimate to consider:

54% that Trump wins on the first ballot
20% that Trump wins on the second or more ballot
13% that Cruz wins on the second or more ballot
11% that Kasich wins on the second or more ballot
1% that Paul Ryan wins on the second or more ballot

Which means Trump is about 45% to win, should the nomination be contested. And, if not, he is about 50% likely to try to run as an independent or minor party candidate.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:15 (eight years ago) link

david plouffe on fox news: "it may be coming down to trump and cruz.. which is like choosing between hemlock and cyanide, for the GOP establishment"

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:16 (eight years ago) link

i seriously think daily exposure to the sound and image of Clinton or Trump for 4 years will shorten my precarious lifespan.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:23 (eight years ago) link

Brutal day for Bernie :(

schwantz, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:24 (eight years ago) link

You can just unplug your cable Morbs

petulant dick master (silby), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:26 (eight years ago) link

Oh, Kasich. There's a difference between "being boring in comparison to Trump" and "being so boring you get on national TV and repeatedly use the phrase 'credit rating agencies.'"

A nationally known air show announcer/personality (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:27 (eight years ago) link

chris matthews just said that american politics is too "predictable, it's paint by numbers"

Could someone plz paint Matthews? Preferably in the style of that poor unfortunate girl at the beginning of Goldfinger.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:28 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KACb_Rizb8E

Thomas H. Handy (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:29 (eight years ago) link

what was that creepy thing he said about wives wearing the dress she hasn't worn in six months

ugh no

just no

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:30 (eight years ago) link

Being rent-poor and leaking cash from onerous cancer treatment copays, i haven't had cable in 4 or 5 years, silby.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:31 (eight years ago) link

Hillary's speech reminded me of Frank Drebin's address at the end of The Naked Gun 2 1/2:

I want a world where Frank Jr, and all Frank Jrs can sit under a shady tree, breathe the air, swim in the ocean, and go into a 7-Eleven without an interpreter. I want a world where I can eat a sea otter without getting sick, where the Democrats put somebody forward worth voting for.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:33 (eight years ago) link

Looks like hillary's running the table

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:34 (eight years ago) link

based on your exit polling

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:36 (eight years ago) link

lol Al

I don't even know what to say about this whole shitshow anymore, except that Trump v Hillary! is going to be a feast

Thomas H. Handy (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:38 (eight years ago) link

still think we have a major summer surprise coming

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:39 (eight years ago) link

Indictment or murder at the GOP convention or both?

Thomas H. Handy (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:40 (eight years ago) link

i decline to say what or which party

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:43 (eight years ago) link

i've seen chatter on twitteronia that there's some big story that might damage cruz and trump that the media is sitting on but it's only chatter, idk

also, still like hillary a lot you guys. go hillary

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:45 (eight years ago) link

still think we have a major summer surprise coming

― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius),

look at you aligning with Krauthammer

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:46 (eight years ago) link

Lol

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:46 (eight years ago) link

what do your FBI sources tell you? Krauthammer's been giggling and smirking about Impending Indictments since August.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:48 (eight years ago) link

i don't waste parts of my life keeping up with that insane shit, Alfred, but go vacuuming for a few months and take the Pelosi Democrat with you

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:49 (eight years ago) link

oh so it's Pelosi Democrats who are the trouble now

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:50 (eight years ago) link

we are all about to waste our time with much more insane shit thrown in our faces all summer Morbs

Thomas H. Handy (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:54 (eight years ago) link

Soon we'll be needing to worry about Hillary's supporters' well-being. Hard to picture them matching the Trumpiacs in a brawl.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:56 (eight years ago) link

trump is onstage with the guy who assaulted that reporter?

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:57 (eight years ago) link

Actually it's easy to picture them in a brawl, it's definitely going to happen. Stay away from Trumpiacs, Daria.

Thomas H. Handy (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:58 (eight years ago) link

xpost That's his main campaign adviser!

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:58 (eight years ago) link

not afraid of trumpiacs, grew up in a county full of em

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 01:59 (eight years ago) link

that is in fact trump's campaign manager who assaulted a (friendly!) journalist, denied it, attacked her character, had the candidate say she made it up, and it was all on video just as she said. and putting him onstage right now and congratulating him by name is deliberate

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:06 (eight years ago) link

Morbz hates pelosi now too?

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:08 (eight years ago) link

Trumps stump speech is basically Charlie sheen talking politics

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:08 (eight years ago) link

Yeah the campaign manager nod was gross

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:09 (eight years ago) link

So just to clear things up, Kasich win in Ohio means Trump cannot get enough delegates to win the nomination?

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:10 (eight years ago) link

look at the short guy in back who has to keep moving back and forth because he can't see over the campaign manager's shoulder

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:12 (eight years ago) link

man I'm really scared of Nice Trump

flopson, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:13 (eight years ago) link

well that group of smirking white guys certainly represented all of america there

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:13 (eight years ago) link

don't be scared, organize

trump has said and done enough already to have by far the most negative approval ratings of all the candidates (and it's not even close) and the democrats haven't even BEGUN to drop oppo research on him

all the audio of him saying hateful and degrading things about women
can't walk back the comments on mexicans, muslims, etc..

i mean i'm uncomfortable with this because he's a wild card and i don't even like the idea of him being nominated but he has the worst negatives, if there's anything that will drive overwhelming democratic turnout, it's this guy

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:17 (eight years ago) link

So just to clear things up, Kasich win in Ohio means Trump cannot get enough delegates to win the nomination?

no, he can still get enough

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:17 (eight years ago) link

Morbz hates pelosi now too?

hate would be pretty strong, she's just a good party soldier/traffic cop

i know you love her getting floor votes for progressive bills she knows will lose tho. very important.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:17 (eight years ago) link

re walls, the more you poll

https://twitter.com/kenklippenstein/status/709913295482793985

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:21 (eight years ago) link

i've been scared of Nice Trump for months just as a spectre but

don't be scared, organize

^^^

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:21 (eight years ago) link

Republicans are gonna back Trump hard imo

flopson, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:22 (eight years ago) link

yep

even though he will govern like a liberal

Thomas H. Handy (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:24 (eight years ago) link

lol yeah cops under president trump will be super liberal

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:25 (eight years ago) link

because cops will be governed by Trump?

Thomas H. Handy (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:26 (eight years ago) link

by govern I mean his positions will be way more liberal, not by the amount of people he has lined up and shot or put in the Gulag

Thomas H. Handy (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:26 (eight years ago) link

good god he's such a fucking buffoon

Thomas H. Handy (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:27 (eight years ago) link

i tend to include the gulag in my estimation of people's liberalism

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:28 (eight years ago) link

i know you love her getting floor votes for progressive bills she knows will lose tho. very important.

― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius),

I know you refuse to understand how politics works. Sometimes you vote on shit that you know won't get passed, other times you vote on shit because your constituents threaten to withhold support, still other times you do the heavy lifting for voters like you too pure to be seen supporting a cause or candidate that might embarrass them

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:29 (eight years ago) link

sry i am just very opposed to what i can easily imagine becoming a centrist-media ambience between now and november that trump is really One Of Us, he just uses plebian methods, and after all it would be nice to tamp down on some of this chaos

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:29 (eight years ago) link

and all this panic is awfully alarmist not to mention leftist and

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:30 (eight years ago) link

these people screaming fascist are maybe the real fascists and

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:31 (eight years ago) link

yknow.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:31 (eight years ago) link

i do understand it, i just have considerable contempt for it xxxxp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:31 (eight years ago) link

i'll go find a good Twitter quote you can blog about in 2 hours, now

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:32 (eight years ago) link

dlh my impression atm is that the media is more likely to err on the side of hysteria re 'the meaning of trump' than cautiousness. restraint doesn't give big ratings.

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:34 (eight years ago) link

didn't you mean 'vacuum' up

xpost

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:34 (eight years ago) link

well, this means more NRO thinkpieces about the irrelevance of poor white alkie voters

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:37 (eight years ago) link

So as we go into the halftime show Sanders is just barely clinging to his lead in Missouri and trading blows with Clinton, down one run with two on base in the bottom of the 6th, bleeding a little but still showing fight. If he can draw a foul and get the and 1, a two-point conversion attempt might keep him in the game, but Clinton has been ably parrying his thrusts and the Russian judge gives her a 9.4.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:38 (eight years ago) link

at this point i'm thinking (hoping? no, cruel) the nro staff might literally self-immolate

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:38 (eight years ago) link

Henry Olsen ‎@henryolsenEPPC

Depth of Rubio's FL defeat stunning. He only broke 30% in two counties, Orlando (Orange) and Miami-Dade. 1/2

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:40 (eight years ago) link

Who is stunned by that

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:41 (eight years ago) link

i read "defeat" as "despair"

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:41 (eight years ago) link

I basically never watch cable news except around elections, but I have to say I kind of enjoy the dgaf-ness of Brian Williams in exile.

A nationally known air show announcer/personality (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:45 (eight years ago) link

Ted Cruz is talking about Marco Rubio weaving tapestrires

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:47 (eight years ago) link

weave tapestries about his bartender mom and his Cuban dad and his open arms

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:47 (eight years ago) link

you try not to give too much weight to meme politics, but i really do remember watching the water bottle thing at the time and thinking "this man will never amount to anything"

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:50 (eight years ago) link

dlh, why are you resisting his tapestries

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 02:52 (eight years ago) link

yeah I can't believe Rubio came out of Operation Poland Spring still thinking he could be the leader of the free world

micro brewbio (crüt), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 03:01 (eight years ago) link

With the returns right now, if every Rubio vote had gone to Kasich, he still would be in third place in all the states except Ohio.

timellison, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 03:06 (eight years ago) link

The most depressing takeaways for me in this election have to do with just how much the media and the professional class on the dem side of the aisle seem to have abandoned the working class and economic issues, and how pained they seem at the thought of having to take someone like Sanders seriously, and how strong their grip still is in spite of a populist turn in politics. I don't think it's just a matter of "media conspiracy" that Sanders hasn't gotten more coverage, I think a lot of it is intuitive class sympathies and alignments among the media -- Clinton is the candidate to take seriously because she's like them, Sanders just so obviously isn't. Very much felt this in my own workplace -- highly intelligent people making actually not very sophisticated arguments for why obviously Clinton was the right choice and Sanders was clearly a joke. That depresses me, and the fact that we couldn't quite reach breakaway speed with a campaign that ran against that depresses me, although it was such an unlikely campaign to begin with that it's amazing it got this far.

Now we'll probably get four years of Clinton, during which she'll act nominally progressive but not deliver anything real on economic policies, and as a recession batters her already polarizing presidency, we'll be primed for another Republican in 2020.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 03:07 (eight years ago) link

The most depressing takeaways for me in this election have to do with just how much the media and the professional class on the dem side of the aisle seem to have abandoned the working class and economic issues, and how pained they seem at the thought of having to take someone like Sanders seriously, and how strong their grip still is in spite of a populist turn in politics. I don't think it's just a matter of "media conspiracy" that Sanders hasn't gotten more coverage, I think a lot of it is intuitive class sympathies and alignments among the media -- Clinton is the candidate to take seriously because she's like them, Sanders just so obviously isn't.

otm

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 03:11 (eight years ago) link

Omg a contested gop convention with 24 hour coverage is the height of insanity

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 03:12 (eight years ago) link

can we have hologram buckley/vidal

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 03:13 (eight years ago) link

Pay per view. Or a 24 hour lifestream, like Big Brother.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 03:14 (eight years ago) link

Hillary Clinton's lead in Illinois keeps shrinking. With 81 percent of precincts reporting, she has 51 percent to Bernie Sanders' 48 percent

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 03:16 (eight years ago) link

can we have hologram buckley/vidal

― denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour),

we'll get drunk and we'll stay plastered

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 03:17 (eight years ago) link

we've already locked in hologram george wallace

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 03:22 (eight years ago) link

The idea that HRC could throw off the constraints she internalized when her health care initiative was shot down by a well-funded fear-and-smear campaign in 1993 seems very remote to me. She cannot revitalize the democratic party. What she can do is be the first woman president, following immediately after the first African-American president and by that fact alone help to cement minorities and a majority of women more solidly into the democratic party coalition.

Now we'll probably get four years of Clinton, during which she'll act nominally progressive but not deliver anything real on economic policies, and as a recession batters her already polarizing presidency, we'll be primed for another Republican in 2020.

This seems depressingly close to describing the probable future outcome. In light of VG's comment about the shiniest turd, if HRC wins I will still find room in my heart to be glad that I shall not have to live under the biggest, smelliest, most disgusting turd of all. I've been there too often (Nixon, Reagan, Dubya) and believe me it is no fun at all.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 03:25 (eight years ago) link

lol

global tetrahedron, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 03:30 (eight years ago) link

our best hope is we get the dingleberry from that last turd

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 03:41 (eight years ago) link

what's the asshair in this metaphor? wait, nevermind, don't answer.....

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 03:42 (eight years ago) link

the invasion of Iraq and ensuing war on terror shitshow

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 03:43 (eight years ago) link

aka FREEDOM

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 03:45 (eight years ago) link

re: the media and sanders, idk, i haven't actually watched much aside from cnn on primary nights - but all the clinton people i read on blogs/social media complain quite a bit about negative coverage of clinton and that msnbc in particular is in the bag for sanders. i haven't watched a bit of msnbc (i did that in 2008 and i know better) but.. eye of the beholder, i guess?

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 03:51 (eight years ago) link

It's never going to be possible to objectively measure who media is more favorable towards, but in terms of volume of coverage the bias has been pretty clear.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 03:54 (eight years ago) link

msnbc in particular is in the bag for sanders

I don't think this is really true, and especially not in the case of Chris Fuckface Matthews who considers Bernie an agitator and a threat. But that's Chris Fuckface Matthews for you.

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 03:56 (eight years ago) link

First, as noted in the Medium piece, they changed the headline. It went from:

Bernie Sanders Scored Victories for Years Via Legislative Side Doors

to:

Via Legislative Side Doors, Bernie Sanders Won Modest Victories

Then they yanked a quote from Bernie's longtime policy adviser Warren Gunnels that read, "It has been a very successful strategy."

They then added the following two paragraphs:

"But in his presidential campaign Mr. Sanders is trying to scale up those kinds of proposals as a national agenda, and there is little to draw from his small-ball legislative approach to suggest that he could succeed.

"Mr. Sanders is suddenly promising not just a few stars here and there, but the moon and a good part of the sun, from free college tuition paid for with giant tax hikes to a huge increase in government health care, which has made even liberal Democrats skeptical."

This stuff could have been written by the Clinton campaign. It's stridently derisive, essentially saying there's no evidence Bernie's "small-ball" approach (I guess Republicans aren't the only ones not above testicular innuendo) could ever succeed on the big stage.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 03:56 (eight years ago) link

cannot get over the optics of that trump speech/presser/whatever where he's at the podium with three or four smirking white guys in suits, one of whom has just had an assault charge filed against him by a female journalist

xpost i think we are in vigorous agreement on the terribleness of chris matthews

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 03:57 (eight years ago) link

i am sad about sanders losses tonight

to be honest, though, right now i am just more concerned with trump's rise. i don't think he has a chance of winning but i am dreading eight more months of this nightmare carnival

Treeship, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 03:58 (eight years ago) link

sanders more or less performed exactly how the polls predicted he would -- outperformed them a little, maybe

k3vin k., Wednesday, 16 March 2016 03:59 (eight years ago) link

cannot get over the optics of that trump speech/presser/whatever where he's at the podium with three or four smirking white guys in suits, one of whom has just had an assault charge filed against him by a female journalist

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/03/15/donald_trump_brings_controversial_campaign_manager_onstage_with_him.html

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:01 (eight years ago) link

i guess it's like a million media cycles ago now but trump's comments about shooting muslims with bullets dripped in pigs' blood -- you know, in order to desecrate their corpses in the eyes of islamic custom -- should disqualify him from the presidency. he often says we fight in a way that is too "politically correct," like we should try to humiliate our opponents or cause gratuitous harm to them instead of just aiming to defeat them. trump is a piece of shit and as little as i thought of the republican party the fact that every republican politician isn't vigorously denouncing him right now just blows my fucking mind

Treeship, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:03 (eight years ago) link

phew! I just submitted a paper proposal for a fall conference one minute before the deadline!

was simultaneously listening to npr. overheard bits of sanders's shpiel. man how does this old dude stay so fired up!?

reminds me of my grandmother, who never stopped railing at injustice.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:03 (eight years ago) link

otm treeship

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:04 (eight years ago) link

like, what would they do if he was an actual neo-nazi or something? how far could he go?

Treeship, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:05 (eight years ago) link

trump has this whole weird relationship to disgust: he's obsessed with bodily fluids. I'm sure it's been written about somewhere.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:06 (eight years ago) link

The most depressing takeaways for me in this election have to do with just how much the media and the professional class on the dem side of the aisle seem to have abandoned the working class and economic issues, and how pained they seem at the thought of having to take someone like Sanders seriously, and how strong their grip still is in spite of a populist turn in politics. I don't think it's just a matter of "media conspiracy" that Sanders hasn't gotten more coverage, I think a lot of it is intuitive class sympathies and alignments among the media -- Clinton is the candidate to take seriously because she's like them, Sanders just so obviously isn't. Very much felt this in my own workplace -- highly intelligent people making actually not very sophisticated arguments for why obviously Clinton was the right choice and Sanders was clearly a joke. That depresses me, and the fact that we couldn't quite reach breakaway speed with a campaign that ran against that depresses me, although it was such an unlikely campaign to begin with that it's amazing it got this far.

Now we'll probably get four years of Clinton, during which she'll act nominally progressive but not deliver anything real on economic policies, and as a recession batters her already polarizing presidency, we'll be primed for another Republican in 2020.

― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Tuesday, March 15, 2016 11:07 PM (46 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Oh for god's sakes, could it just be that Bernie didn't have a broad appeal to begin with? or that his campaign failed to deliver on numerous points? I dislike HRC as much as the other guy, and I'm typing this from the warmth of a country with rather responsible banks and single payer health care, I know what he stands for is good. But if Bernie really wants to create the very much needed movement/political revolution, his supporters and himself need to stop blaming this vague 'elitism'. There was a hole bunch of problems whit his campaigns: his numbers didn't work, he couldn't get the southern vote, he never offered a precise vision of america's place in the world, and his political revolution rhetoric rang bizarre after Obama's hope campaign pretty much crashed on congress's reality. I was really quite excited about him for a while, his presence was much welcomed, and yes somehow I would still prefer him over HRC. However, the whole narrative of him being the underdog AND the victim is just too easy, too easy. This is about becoming the president, it is not about not wanting other people to become presidents. I feel like he should be above that.

Van Horn Street, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:09 (eight years ago) link

bernie supporters have a real opportunity to turn their attentions down ticket and win primaries + races throughout the country. i hope they don't decide to drop out of politics bc they're disappointed, or worse vote for trump.

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:12 (eight years ago) link

his political revolution rhetoric rang bizarre after Obama's hope campaign pretty much crashed on congress's reality.

this makes no sense. the political revolution rhetoric -- the idea that progressives need to energize new voters, re-take congress, stick to a bolder vision -- is a response to the fact that obama's message of bipartisanship "crashed and burned" due to an obstructionist congress

Treeship, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:13 (eight years ago) link

mordy otm

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:14 (eight years ago) link

Oh for god's sakes, could it just be that Bernie didn't have a broad appeal to begin with? or that his campaign failed to deliver on numerous points? I dislike HRC as much as the other guy, and I'm typing this from the warmth of a country with rather responsible banks and single payer health care, I know what he stands for is good. But if Bernie really wants to create the very much needed movement/political revolution, his supporters and himself need to stop blaming this vague 'elitism'. There was a hole bunch of problems whit his campaigns: his numbers didn't work, he couldn't get the southern vote, he never offered a precise vision of america's place in the world, and his political revolution rhetoric rang bizarre after Obama's hope campaign pretty much crashed on congress's reality. I was really quite excited about him for a while, his presence was much welcomed, and yes somehow I would still prefer him over HRC. However, the whole narrative of him being the underdog AND the victim is just too easy, too easy. This is about becoming the president, it is not about not wanting other people to become presidents. I feel like he should be above that.

― Van Horn Street, Wednesday, March 16, 2016 12:09 AM (1 minute ago)

he is "above that" in that whatever position you're somehow imputing to him you've probably gotten from a supporter on social media

now, can we get a moratorium on berniesplainers from europe, FFS?

k3vin k., Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:15 (eight years ago) link

he never offered a precise vision of america's place in the world

How about simply a country among others for once.

timellison, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:16 (eight years ago) link

like it or not the role the US plays as a defensive umbrella for countries for throughout the world has a great deal to do w/ the ongoing relative geopolitical stability. i don't think "simply a country among others" cuts it.

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:17 (eight years ago) link

Change on the scale Bernie's touting doesn't happen from the top down. It's a complete reorientation of the American political identity. For that, you need "socialists" in city and state governments. You need more than just him in congress. If you put him in the White House without a support system of any kind, socialism in America will be cooked for more generations than we'll be alive to count. It'll be "oh we tried that and it was a disaster!"

Bernie supporters don't want to put in the work and seem to have a weird view of how much one person can do (remember Obama? he actually had a congress that liked him for two years! Bernie probably wouldn't have that...ever).

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:18 (eight years ago) link

i guess it's like a million media cycles ago now but trump's comments about shooting muslims with bullets dripped in pigs' blood -- you know, in order to desecrate their corpses in the eyes of islamic custom -- should disqualify him from the presidency

yes but this is a country that is already droning and oops-droning Muslims daily for 13 years now and the democratic candidate voted to kick that whole thing off.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:18 (eight years ago) link

bernie supporters clearly have a ton of energy and passion + the ironic thing is that down ticket races are both extraordinarily important to ppl's everyday real life and much easier to impact through the actions + outreach of a small group of activists than the potus race.

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:20 (eight years ago) link

Unlike, say, Rubio, Sanders is not going anywhere, and now he has a much bigger, and much more mainstream, audience for his views, which in turn could inspire copycat candidates, or at least candidates not too chickenshit to embrace their leftist instincts. At the least, while he's going to lose the nomination, he's been very good for our democracy, and it's an important salve for the rise of Trump, knowing there is just as much passion in the opposite corner.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:21 (eight years ago) link

like it or not the role the US plays as a defensive umbrella for countries for throughout the world

And other countries have their own sets of problems. If there was a specific criticism of Sanders' foreign policy there, I didn't see it.

timellison, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:21 (eight years ago) link

eg i feel like facebooking type initiatives could make a big difference on smaller margin seats xxp

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:21 (eight years ago) link

Bernie supporters don't want to put in the work

You sure about this?

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:22 (eight years ago) link

remember Obama? he actually had a congress that liked him for two years! Bernie probably wouldn't have that...ever

lol i don't remember that i do remember them yelling "you lie!" to Obama, interrupting a presidential address.

a defeated GOP is going to give Hillary even less than any of them. pretty sure they will double down on local and national dirty tricks in response to a Hillary presidency as well.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:22 (eight years ago) link

mordy's FP beliefs are well-known, tim

mordy otm about smaller/downticket races btw. we shall see

k3vin k., Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:23 (eight years ago) link

Bernie supporters don't want to put in the work

You sure about this?

I don't see a lot of Bernie supporters rallying other people to vote in local and state elections. Just Bernie or bust.

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:24 (eight years ago) link

i guess it's like a million media cycles ago now but trump's comments about shooting muslims with bullets dripped in pigs' blood -- you know, in order to desecrate their corpses in the eyes of islamic custom -- should disqualify him from the presidency. he often says we fight in a way that is too "politically correct," like we should try to humiliate our opponents or cause gratuitous harm to them instead of just aiming to defeat them. trump is a piece of shit and as little as i thought of the republican party the fact that every republican politician isn't vigorously denouncing him right now just blows my fucking mind

― Treeship, Tuesday, March 15, 2016 11:03 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this.

all the republican hemming and hawing is meaningless until they say, tout court, that he is not qualified and they won't vote for him. as long as they hedge their bets, they are enabling his rise.

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:24 (eight years ago) link

Bernie supporters don't want to put in the work

You sure about this?

seriously, 90% of my wall = Bernie supporters and every one of them voted today, some volunteered, all of them frequently cascading the 'get out the vote' message.

a candidate with the word "socialist" affixed to him always starts with a handicap, so the fact that he's as far as he is, is pretty impressive in itself.

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:24 (eight years ago) link

mordy's FP beliefs are well-known

I was referring to VHS' assertion that Sanders "never offered a precise vision of america's place in the world."

timellison, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:25 (eight years ago) link

I don't see a lot of Bernie supporters rallying other people to vote in local and state elections. Just Bernie or bust.

― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, March 16, 2016 12:24 AM (48 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

are u serious? u don't think the people voting for Bernie support local and state issues? what about the massive local state successes for gay marriage and medical marijuana?

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:25 (eight years ago) link

Bernie supporters don't want to put in the work

You sure about this?

I don't see a lot of Bernie supporters rallying other people to vote in local and state elections. Just Bernie or bust.

― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, March 16, 2016 12:24 AM (33 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this seems like more of a general problem about political apathy, which i think is tied to people's general estrangement from their local communities, than something to do specifically with bernie supporters

Treeship, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:26 (eight years ago) link

Actually, I've noted a lot of Bernie supporters doing some rallying, albeit independent of the Sanders campaign itself, which, like Clinton, and Trump, and every single one of these assholes, really hasn't even bothered mucking around at races outside their immediate bubble, as far as I can tell.

xpost Chicago's notorious state attorney losing her job in dramatic fashion was in essence one such down ticket race, not totally unrelated to a groundswell of progressive politics. Locally, I would not be shocked if Duckworth could later take out Kirk for similar reasons. The guys at the top - here, Rahm, or Rauner - may be firmly enmeshed, but the voters seem pretty inclined and mobilized to undermine them at the voting booth the best they can. Let's hope the momentum carries forward.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:26 (eight years ago) link

note that not every county in states had local/state issues to vote on in their Primary. my county didn't. the Dem nominee was the only thing on the ballot.

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:26 (eight years ago) link

I don't see a lot of Bernie supporters rallying other people to vote in local and state elections. Just Bernie or bust.

maybe bc there's not enough progressive names to get excited over (god almighty we've had enough trouble itt coming up with less than half a dozen down ticket, Sanders-style candidates...)

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:29 (eight years ago) link

FWIW, Chicago broke its past early voter turnout record, and I've seen the general primary voter turnout in Illinois described as "historic." Like, at least twice that of 2012, maybe more.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:29 (eight years ago) link

If you guys have seen that happening with Berners, then that's awesome. Most of the ones I know are of the bandwagon variety.

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:29 (eight years ago) link

again, are we ignoring the massive recent state and local successes by the left in passing gay marriage and medical marijuana? those people are totally different from Bernie supporters? cos i don't see that.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:29 (eight years ago) link

all lazy bandwagoners too?

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:29 (eight years ago) link

xp to Van Horn: "this vague elitism" is the massively well-documented and researched shift in Democratic party politics since the Reagan years, including a gradual turn away from the economic issues of the poor and working class and toward a milder version of conservative free market ideology coupled with liberalism on social issues. My post really has very little to do with whether Sanders is a "victim," but whether populist economic politics can actually get a fair hearing on the Democratic side of the aisle anymore.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:30 (eight years ago) link

Yeah I would love if Bernie's apparatus would keep rolling through fall supporting a bunch of GOTV and downticket support for progressive/socialist candidates.

petulant dick master (silby), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:30 (eight years ago) link

Likewise.

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:31 (eight years ago) link

How many Hillary supporters are actively involved in politics beyond supporting Hillary? It'd be nice if they'd channel some of that tepid enthusiasm into pushing people to settle downticket.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:31 (eight years ago) link

adam, surely hillary voters also support both those issues? idk, maybe not weed

i do remain optimistic about four years of socialish organizing under a non-white-nationalist president

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:32 (eight years ago) link

xpost I wonder if Sanders would be on board with that. It'd be pretty magnanimous to loose his people and funds in support of Clinton. I bet he could find a way to do it without necessarily supporter her, couching it simply as a GOTV campaign and not an extension of the Clinton campaign.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:32 (eight years ago) link

a candidate with the word "socialist" affixed to him always starts with a handicap, so the fact that he's as far as he is, is pretty impressive in itself.

this is where I end up, at the end of each of these Tuesdays. I've been living under a neoliberal regime pretty much my whole politically sentient life (except, notably, for three years under Allende). Just hearing the word "socialist" uttered unapologetically on the Great American Stage is mind-boggling enough. It's not that I'm singing hallelujah over it, but neither am I going to become disillusioned because a shaggy muppet from Burlington hasn't quite made the finish line in 2016.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:35 (eight years ago) link

all the republican hemming and hawing is meaningless until they say, tout court, that he is not qualified and they won't vote for him.

Too much of the Republican base these days is made up of Palinites and Trumpsters, so that strongly repudiating either of them spells electoral suicide for the party. The Republican establishment has painted itself into a corner and can't escape it without making a huge mess.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:36 (eight years ago) link

what ppl see in their facebook/twitter feeds isn't representative of anything but their own interests

mookieproof, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:37 (eight years ago) link

xpost Seen a couple of think pieces posting that incessant anti-Obama hyperbole - he's socialist! he's a communist! - helped soften the blow a little bit and robbed the word of some of its menace.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:37 (eight years ago) link

I don't know who'll win the fight for the Republican party, but one faction will split off within the next 8-12 years and a third party will be born. How robust will it be? Who knows. But that's the point we've reached.

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:39 (eight years ago) link

xp huh, interesting Josh. didn't know that

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:40 (eight years ago) link

wow looks like hillary won missouri

k3vin k., Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:41 (eight years ago) link

yes by a few thousand votes

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:42 (eight years ago) link

The Obama thing makes sense. "Oh, is this what socialism is? Seems to not be ruining my life on a personal level."*

(*Obama is by no means a socialist, but it's cool if a huge misconception really does soften the blow.)

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:42 (eight years ago) link

pretty crazy how close mo ended up being

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:42 (eight years ago) link

yes by a few thousand votes

― Mordy, Wednesday, March 16, 2016 12:42 AM (2 minutes ago

less than 1500 it looks like!

k3vin k., Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:44 (eight years ago) link

xp to Van Horn: "this vague elitism" is the massively well-documented and researched shift in Democratic party politics since the Reagan years, including a gradual turn away from the economic issues of the poor and working class and toward a milder version of conservative free market ideology coupled with liberalism on social issues. My post really has very little to do with whether Sanders is a "victim," but whether populist economic politics can actually get a fair hearing on the Democratic side of the aisle anymore.
― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, March 16, 2016 12:30 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

sorry, i kinda took your post for a whole of shit I have been hearing about Sanders/Clinton tonight, which is super unfair on my part. I do think his rise is welcomed and everyone itt otm that the Sanders supporter type hopefully will continue the fight. To answer your post I think this vision of the left has long departed the US, even the New Deal could only be created in a time of crisis. I think the very incremental nature of US politics (presidency only 2x4 years is pretty short, compared to many countries) make those mass populist economic politics almost impossible to fight for, even more so in a climate of hatred for all things government.

Van Horn Street, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:45 (eight years ago) link

even the New Deal could only be created in a time of crisis

the wars created european socialism

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:49 (eight years ago) link

guys keep it down with the New Deal talk, you're gonna wake up Fred B.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:53 (eight years ago) link

i think a more robust liberal platform could become viable after this november if enough voters become disgusted with the republican party

Treeship, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:55 (eight years ago) link

agree obv that the imagined paradise of some aristocratic tax exiles has some pretty entrenched right-wing features but then so did the old monarchies, the left has had to fight everywhere is all. xps

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 04:55 (eight years ago) link

the left is not dependent on Bernie, it was there before him, it will be there after him, it is part of him. he is setting an incredible precedent with this run, though, even if he fails spectacularly. i think he has definitely demonstrated some new possibilities and in the future we will have more left-leaning candidates and for that i am thankful. he doesn't even have to win the presidency, he's already done the nation a massive service.

the left gets called young, foolish, lazy, and unrealistic, just as they always have. the same things they said about Occupy Wall Street, they are saying about Sanders supporters now. same old establishment song and dance.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 05:01 (eight years ago) link

Paul BegalaVerified account
‏@PaulBegala
Looks like @HillaryClinton winning city of Chicago by 10%. Big mistake for @SenSanders to attack @RahmEmanuel.

ah, wonderful

k3vin k., Wednesday, 16 March 2016 05:04 (eight years ago) link

interesting analysis paul begala

Treeship, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 05:12 (eight years ago) link

wonder what the next Patriot Act is going to look like

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 05:12 (eight years ago) link

Begala is a toad.

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 05:18 (eight years ago) link

Xp building on Adam's post:

One of the most remarkable thing to me about Sanders's run is he flat-out doesn't even bother to, or pretend to, triangulate.

We have become so resigned to that as the default mode of dem prez candidates that it had acquired the character of a natural law.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 05:20 (eight years ago) link

s

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 05:21 (eight years ago) link

adam, surely hillary voters also support both those issues? idk, maybe not weed

fwiw Vermont was the first state to grant full marriage rights to same sex couples in 2000.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 05:41 (eight years ago) link

So just to clear things up, Kasich win in Ohio means Trump cannot get enough delegates to win the nomination?

Oh god no, he cleared up on the per-district delegates for Missouri and Illinois - I think he's further ahead of his projected path than before.

Also worth pointing out that Kasich staying in as the "Not Trump or Cruz" candidate means Trump's far more likely to clear up the winner-take-all states to come.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 09:29 (eight years ago) link

How many Hillary supporters are actively involved in politics beyond supporting Hillary? It'd be nice if they'd channel some of that tepid enthusiasm into pushing people to settle downticket.

unfair, sure, but, lol

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 09:44 (eight years ago) link

lol so the Halperin crew thinks Paul Ryan will be the establishment's last choice should a convention need brokering

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 11:16 (eight years ago) link

Van Horn Street pretty much otm imo, but who is surprised by that...

Also, the wars didn't create european socialism, stop talking about countries you know nothing about dlh, oh my god you're so arrogant, you're repellant, worse than hrc, etc, etc, etc. Denmark had it's first soc dem prime minister in 1924. And we weren't in ww1. Succesful labor union politics created danish socialism. And I don't think it's any fault of the american unions that the same didn't happen in the us, Danish right wing politicians didn't sic militias on strikers in dk.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 11:18 (eight years ago) link

xp Even my mom is talking about Paul Ryan coming in on some kind of parachute.

Apparently the thing that makes some people go for Trump is this idea that he 'can't be bought' but anyone with his money might be in the business of buying people up, right?

jedi slimane (suzy), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 11:23 (eight years ago) link

last i checked paul ryan was out-shermaning sherman and actually threatening to sue anybody who tried to get him to run for president.

in other news:

"FWIW, Chicago broke its past early voter turnout record, and I've seen the general primary voter turnout in Illinois described as "historic." Like, at least twice that of 2012, maybe more.

― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, March 16, 2016"

dead chicagoans turning out in droves for this one, eh?

diana krallice (rushomancy), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 11:30 (eight years ago) link

Threadb fredb pls

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 11:47 (eight years ago) link

Any truth to this Sanders-friendly forecasting?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-alan-grayson/democratic-presidential-primary-2_b_9459766.html

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 11:49 (eight years ago) link

Hillary just won a ton of states outside the "Old South" last night

There was a hole bunch of problems whit his campaigns (crüt), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 11:50 (eight years ago) link

the race is over

iatee, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 11:50 (eight years ago) link

love Grayson so much, he could potentially make for the kind of straight-talkin charismatic leftie that could win a general election, when the time is right

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 11:58 (eight years ago) link

even if he fails spectacularly.

Isn't this already impossible? I mean, short of some sort of spectacular personal breakdown which is I suppose not impossible, he's fought a strong campaign, if that doesn't sound too patronizing, doing far better than would have been thought possible for an openly left-socialist candidate.

"Worried pimp" (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 11:58 (eight years ago) link

love Grayson so much, he could potentially make for the kind of straight-talkin charismatic leftie that could win a general election, when the time is right

― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, March 16, 2016

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/02/12/us/politics/alan-graysons-double-life-congressman-and-hedge-fund-manager.html?referer=https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2FjFp15qqKE6&_r=2

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 12:00 (eight years ago) link

hmm

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 12:02 (eight years ago) link

I liked him too.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 12:14 (eight years ago) link

he's a world class asshole

Thomas H. Handy (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 12:35 (eight years ago) link

So despite an extremely aggressive bunch Sanders of election staff and volunteers here in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, Clinton won the county 62-38. Ouch.

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 12:49 (eight years ago) link

fun nightmare scenario I cooked up yesterday over dinner: in response to threats of violence & other acts of intimidation by organized militiae of Trump supporters (* possibly including false-flag operations, planted by the Republican party's terrified mainstream in its death throes? "to the last I grapple with thee, from Hell's heart," etc), President Obama goes on TV to announce that the election will be postponed in the interest of 'national security,' leading to open rioting, lots of bluster, & at least one attempted coup before Hillary Clinton is able to take the reins of power as O's handpicked successor

bernard snowy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 13:14 (eight years ago) link

nobody is going to postpone the election

There was a hole bunch of problems whit his campaigns (crüt), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 13:15 (eight years ago) link

I know dude it was a goofy nightmare scenario jeeze lay off

bernard snowy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 13:16 (eight years ago) link

... basically what I'm saying is, our window of time to find a producer for this screenplay is extremely limited

bernard snowy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 13:18 (eight years ago) link

Oh god no, he cleared up on the per-district delegates for Missouri and Illinois - I think he's further ahead of his projected path than before.

no, he's now just behind: http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/delegate-targets/

the fact that everyone is behind their targets is why they is a non-negligible chance of a contested convention. but that depends on the other two candidates not dropping out and remaining viable at the polls.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 13:28 (eight years ago) link

grayson is fucking irritating

akm, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 13:36 (eight years ago) link

Don't think I've ever seen cruz without him mouth open before.

how's life, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 13:37 (eight years ago) link

yes he's irritating and jerky but he's OUR irritating jerk
xpost

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 13:38 (eight years ago) link

The CNN anchor, going over demographics from last night, described the upcoming Trump-Clinton election as "Angry white voters against...pretty much everyone else." The ellipsis represents a discernible pause.

clemenza, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 13:39 (eight years ago) link

xpost Ha, this season is totally like a band struggling in the studio with the tour dates already booked, or a movie scrambling with rewrites and reshoots with opening day locked in.

Whoever ends up president, they'll be lots of lore for years. "Oh, you should have seen the first draft." "I heard the demos, they were great, they just got overproduced." "The director's cut was awesome before the studio took it away from them and recut it."

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 13:42 (eight years ago) link

"There'll be," sorry.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 13:43 (eight years ago) link

We'll all be sorry.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 13:43 (eight years ago) link

Cruz looks like LBJ and Pat Buchanan melted together in that illustration (and perhaps irl?).

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 13:43 (eight years ago) link

Hillary just won a ton of states outside the "Old South" last night

The Grayson piece seems optimistic to me too but Ohio is the only non-Southern state that she won decisively last night. IL and MO were virtually tied in delegate count. I would think that Sanders definitely needs to do better than tie states, though, considering that NY is very likely to go to HRC.

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 14:46 (eight years ago) link

FL + OH are the two biggest swing states in a general election, so the "she only succeeds in republican states" is a misrepresentation

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 14:49 (eight years ago) link

she has a substantial delegate lead at this point, and since democrats don't have winner-take-all primaries, sanders would have to score a series of big victories - not just surprisingly squeaking by to a victory like in Michigan - in order to make it up before the convention.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 14:54 (eight years ago) link

Marco Rubio ends bid for president: 'It was not God's plan for me to win’

Cruel God! - why didn't he tell Marco months ago?... think of the money he would have saved...
- Jon Langford on Facebook.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 14:57 (eight years ago) link

Getting faced by god like that gotta make a man question his faith.

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 15:03 (eight years ago) link

"It wasn't God's plan for me to win" sounds like a country song.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 15:04 (eight years ago) link

I've never understood this tack of "Hillary can't win because her strength is in Republican states where Dems won't win anyway." You could say the same thing about Sanders winning in states where Democrats ARE going to win anyway. The relevant question is who's going to win the swing states: Florida, Ohio, Virginia, Colorado, New Mexico, Iowa,.... I think Clinton looks strong in those states, especially the biggest ones.

There's a more nuanced version of the argument that's more compellling -- that Clinton is doing better in closed-primary states, where independents (who favor Sanders, and who matter in the general) are excluded. But not as many people are making that argument.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 15:09 (eight years ago) link

I'm really mad at a friend who just had to renew their drivers license recently and switched their voter registration to Independent while doing so. "I wanted to be more honest about my political beliefs. I
m a little bummed I won't get to vote for Bernie." That's understandable, but couldn't you have waited until after the primaries? Or just carried on as a Dem for another 8 years and no one would even give a shit?

how's life, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 15:20 (eight years ago) link

Pardon me, I'm having a private message Facebook brawl with a good friend who called Sanders a Jacobin and a crazy man yelling in the streets and has posted reams of link showing how trade deals have actually been good for forcing Columbia and Mexico to care about the environment.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 15:25 (eight years ago) link

eephus, people certainly made that argument in 2008, i.e., that Clinton won more Democrats (and Dem-stronghold states) than Obama.

Checker/Presley '16: Make America Gyrate Again (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 15:31 (eight years ago) link

I've never understood this tack of "Hillary can't win because her strength is in Republican states where Dems won't win anyway." You could say the same thing about Sanders winning in states where Democrats ARE going to win anyway. The relevant question is who's going to win the swing states: Florida, Ohio, Virginia, Colorado, New Mexico, Iowa,.... I think Clinton looks strong in those states, especially the biggest ones.

There's a more nuanced version of the argument that's more compellling -- that Clinton is doing better in closed-primary states, where independents (who favor Sanders, and who matter in the general) are excluded. But not as many people are making that argument.

― Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:09 AM (24 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Almost no argument trying to extrapolate general election results from primary results means anything, and a lot of these arguments are especially bad.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 15:35 (eight years ago) link

wd love to see more republicans coming out against trump, but at the same time, nobody really wants a repeat of 1824's "corrupt bargain" debacle

diana krallice (rushomancy), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 16:25 (eight years ago) link

Rick Scott announces that he endorses Trump. Happy?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 16:26 (eight years ago) link

hey, 1824 was a p good year for me

joie de visa (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 16:32 (eight years ago) link

oh no, not 1824! All the STDs.

54% that Trump wins on the first ballot
20% that Trump wins on the second or more ballot
13% that Cruz wins on the second or more ballot
11% that Kasich wins on the second or more ballot
1% that Paul Ryan wins on the second or more ballot

I think the predictwise guy putting numbers on 1) something that hasn't happened in a century (?) and 2) involves a wide spectrum of loony flailers suggests that this is on a par with astrology.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 16:34 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IrE6FMpai8

Evan, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 16:45 (eight years ago) link

time for a new thread? this one is becoming impossible to load.

flappy bird, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 16:46 (eight years ago) link

Impossible to believe too.

A Fifth Beatle Dies (Tom D.), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 16:47 (eight years ago) link

impossible to keep my food down too

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 16:48 (eight years ago) link

If you're trying to load the entire thread every time you click on it, you're ILXing wrong.

defibrillate after opening (WilliamC), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 16:49 (eight years ago) link

post less

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 16:51 (eight years ago) link

flappy bird just use bookmarks

marcos, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 16:52 (eight years ago) link

[Grayson]'s a world class asshole

This matches what I've heard about him.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 16:52 (eight years ago) link

It moves so fast that if you slumber just a little bit, it's hard to see the posts immediately prior to the current convo without loading all 5,000+.

joie de visa (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 16:53 (eight years ago) link

Somehow I wound up on Grayson's email list, and I know this isn't the best measure but he comes off as the opportunistic douchebag.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 16:54 (eight years ago) link

*an

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 16:54 (eight years ago) link

It moves so fast that if you slumber just a little bit, it's hard to see the posts immediately prior to the current convo without loading all 5,000+.

No really - bookmark is for this.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 16:56 (eight years ago) link

I think the predictwise guy putting numbers on 1) something that hasn't happened in a century (?) and 2) involves a wide spectrum of loony flailers suggests that this is on a par with astrology.

― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, March 16, 2016 12:34 PM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

well yeah, but when your predictions are 50/50 which is what he's saying the chance of a contested convention is, and what he's saying the chance of trump winning in the second or later round, he's not actually making very strong claims. so i guess in that sense you're right, it is like astrology.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 16:57 (eight years ago) link

loved bernie but relieved the dem contest is effectively over

flopson, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:01 (eight years ago) link

extra time to get used to the worst election ever

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:03 (eight years ago) link

2000 is a high standard but i think we can do it

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:04 (eight years ago) link

relieved the dem contest is effectively over

Now is the part where everybody comes together for a group hug and sings kumbayah, right?

joie de visa (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:05 (eight years ago) link

NYT page 1 feature today: the most disliked in-party nominees-in-waiting ever

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:06 (eight years ago) link

when even the Times has a clue, look out

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:07 (eight years ago) link

xp
The evil of two lessers.

nickn, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:07 (eight years ago) link

i grant that bernie supporters need a few more days to mourn but [as per my fb feed] if they continue threatening to vote for trump, or making up new mathematical models to demonstrate that bernie is sure to be the nominee, or swearing to sit out the election bc of their disappointment, as opposed to actually finding candidates that can still win and putting all their energy behind them, i'm giving up on the american left as ever amounting to anything but a bunch of babies.

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:08 (eight years ago) link

dems shouldn't have run Bush 3.0

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:08 (eight years ago) link

Please don't go Mordy

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:09 (eight years ago) link

leave Obama out of this

there is no American Left; fuck voting for a fascist or a militarist, piss on em hard

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:10 (eight years ago) link

state and local seems to be successful. the left has made a lot of progress on social issues. look at gay marriage and medical marijuana. in 2000 Vermont was the first state to grant those rights. we've all heard the argument that Vermont is crazy liberal town and nothing coming from there could play on the national stage yet here we are 16 years later and all 50 states have it, with a majority opinion written by a SC justice appointed by Ronald Reagan no less.

if your definition of left success depends wholly on the election of a single person on the national stage you are setting yourself up for disappointment.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:15 (eight years ago) link

those rights i meant same sex marriage in particular there

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:15 (eight years ago) link

The left is winning the culture wars but not the economic wars.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:17 (eight years ago) link

i grant that bernie supporters need a few more days to mourn but [as per my fb feed] if they continue threatening to vote for trump, or making up new mathematical models to demonstrate that bernie is sure to be the nominee, or swearing to sit out the election bc of their disappointment, as opposed to actually finding candidates that can still win and putting all their energy behind them, i'm giving up on the american left as ever amounting to anything but a bunch of babies.

― Mordy, Wednesday, March 16, 2016 12:08 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

The problem is that the people you describe are not the American left but are indeed still a bunch of babies.

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:22 (eight years ago) link

I know I'm preaching to the choir, but anyone actually saying 'well, if not Bernie then Trump' is functioning on roughly a third-grade level and should be, I dunno...chemically castrated, maybe? Is that going too far?

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:25 (eight years ago) link

also fuck the unanimous "it's over" shit. This is why ppl won't fucking vote in the remaining primaries.

Looking fwd to casting my 'meaningless' Sanders vote on April 19. It will become extra meaningless the second he endorses HRH; hoping he doesn't.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:26 (eight years ago) link

"Well, if I don't get that job I wanted, maybe I'll just feed my left arm to a dog. Same difference."

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:27 (eight years ago) link

seeing a lot of people post this today.... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-alan-grayson/democratic-presidential-primary-2_b_9459766.html
not realistic but i hope bernie stays in until it's mathematically impossible for him to win...

flappy bird, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:27 (eight years ago) link

alan grayson is a dipshit and (as noted upthread) an asshole

There was a hole bunch of problems whit his campaigns (crüt), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:28 (eight years ago) link

i'm pro-legal-weed but it's hard for me to see it as a left issue when it means potentially gargantuan new private profits from a new and lucrative industry, and when the ban and cultural stigma it's chipping away at doesn't really make any 2016 political sense at all (unless trump starts talking tomorrow about mariowhanna-crazed mexican rapists/axe-murderers, which i guess is within possibility) (and unless you frame legalization as a blow against big pharma, which i think big pharma will recover from) -- i mean, was the repeal of prohibition a leftist victory? prohibition itself was arguably closer.

trump's gonna pick up a bunch of conveniently angry, conveniently unblack bernie voters but i'd hardly call those people the american left. (i bet they're pro-legal-weed tho.)

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:31 (eight years ago) link

Trump said Wednesday that a contested GOP convention could be a disaster if he goes to Cleveland a few delegates shy of 1,237 — and doesn’t leave as the party’s nominee.

“I think you’d have riots,” Trump said on CNN.

Noting that he’s “representing many millions of people,” he told Chris Cuomo: “If you disenfranchise those people, and you say, ‘I’m sorry, you’re 100 votes short’…I think you’d have problems like you’ve never seen before. I think bad things would happen.”

O RLY

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:32 (eight years ago) link

Mordy just being an idiot

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:33 (eight years ago) link

weed one of those issues that gets confusing through a left-right lens because of the american right's weird sensual race-haunted exceptions to their ideas of Freedom

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:34 (eight years ago) link

"as opposed to actually finding candidates that can still win and putting all their energy behind them"

This is spectactular horseshit, of course.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:34 (eight years ago) link

how so? bc it seems like you can continue to phonebank and send money to bernie or you can pivot to other races that you can still win but there's zero sum in terms of dollars + focus here.

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:35 (eight years ago) link

umm... weed should first and foremost be treated as an issue of social justice, both on the racial disparity/criminal justice reform side and affordable use medicinally vs opioid painkillers/etc.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:37 (eight years ago) link

the reasoning to keep campaigning for bernie if he can't win doesn't make a ton of sense. i've heard this idea that the longer he campaigns the more it keeps hillary from pivoting to the center but if you think she's just waiting for bernie to dropout before she sells out the left then what difference does it make if she starts selling them out now or in july.

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:38 (eight years ago) link

otoh Bernie was never going to win so why campaign for him at all by that token?

uncle tenderlegdrop (jim in glasgow), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:39 (eight years ago) link

Naturally, this "I think you'd have riots" bullshit is Trump yet again giving his barely-retrained hordes his tacit approval to do just that when the time comes.

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:40 (eight years ago) link

'restrained'

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:40 (eight years ago) link

https://www.instagram.com/p/BDBS8bYGhWr/

global tetrahedron, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:40 (eight years ago) link

otoh Bernie was never going to win so why campaign for him at all by that token?

only in hindsight was he never going to win - there were a few times during the campaign that i felt he had a shot, even a longshot.

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:41 (eight years ago) link

That's a strawman, that Bernie supporters aren't already involved in those other races, nor is it a universal that "other races you can still win" even exist.

Bernie dropping out would mean "pivoting" to Hillary and you can't get people excited to vote, much less volunteer, playing purely on fear. That's the horseshit I'm referring to, just like it was in 2000. That's been the point of the entire primary campaign - Hillary represents a holding action against the crazies on the right, which is a fine reason for her to be President instead of Trump or Cruz, but not something that all that many people find inspirational.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:42 (eight years ago) link

xxxxxp there

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:43 (eight years ago) link

your premise is dumb. pivoting to down ticket races doesn't necessitate campaigning for hillary.

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:43 (eight years ago) link

As an upper middle-class black man, it's pretty fucking inspirational to me.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:44 (eight years ago) link

let's not even get into what supporters are saying about constituencies that broke big for hill

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:45 (eight years ago) link

it's a special kind of hindsight where you know what happens in the future (DNC) and forecast that hindsight to the past (the present).

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:45 (eight years ago) link

your premise is dumb. pivoting to down ticket races doesn't necessitate campaigning for hillary.

you missed the first sentence about that being a strawman - who's to say Bernie supporters aren't doing that, or even that they can? Or even that the ones you're referring to ARE actually working for Bernie rather than just posting some shit on Facebook about how they like him?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:45 (eight years ago) link

ugh @ that anti-hillary trumpstagram. this'll be unpleasant.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:46 (eight years ago) link

it's a special kind of hindsight where you know what happens in the future (DNC) and forecast that hindsight to the past (the present).

just keep unskewing those polls, adam

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:47 (eight years ago) link

polls are for failed astrologers

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:48 (eight years ago) link

Pardon me, I'm having a private message Facebook brawl with a good friend who called Sanders a Jacobin and a crazy man yelling in the streets and has posted reams of link showing how trade deals have actually been good for forcing Columbia and Mexico to care about the environment.

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, March 16, 2016 11:25 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

You are facebook friends with Paul Krugman?

Van Horn Street, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:50 (eight years ago) link

My bright side takeaway from Bernie's candicacy is that a professed socialist was able to get as far as he did on his platform. I'm sure we will see future candidates for all different offices picking up that torch now that they see that there's a demand.

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:51 (eight years ago) link

there was a WaPo piece awhile back about the poor coordination/prospects of Bernie-associated candidates in downticket races, but yeah it would be good if the energy behind his campaign was directed there.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 17:55 (eight years ago) link

I'm 100% okay with losing Bernie staying in it as long as possible. JiG otm. Bernie's campaign is performative, it does things. He gets people registered, he gets people stoked up about socialist policy state by state, he gets words into the conversation, and afaict a donation to his campaign has a good chance of either paying an intern for a few hours' work, or producing really really nice ads about issues/constituencies that deserve an airing. The benefits of those will not vanish instantly and imho they feed directly into the kind of medium-turn Left-building some folks are worried about (or in some cases, not necessariily on this board, concern-trolling about).

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 18:05 (eight years ago) link

hillary from pivoting to the center

you mean from the 'left'? haha, tell me another dad.

pivoting = telling different lies

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 18:05 (eight years ago) link

do you ever smile?

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 18:06 (eight years ago) link

just wondering

even when i agree with you, which is actually quite often, you come across as a horrible scold

maybe ILX is cathartic for you and when you're offline you're working on expanding your collection of vintage chinoiserie

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 18:07 (eight years ago) link

I would think it takes a tremendous amount of energy to be that hysterically angry all the time, but maybe it's just the flipside of slurping down all that gloopy Spielberg chum

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 18:09 (eight years ago) link

also chemo and a shitty employer-mandated healthcare plan

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 18:09 (eight years ago) link

Chemo makes a man mean. It's poison in the veins.

pplains, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 18:10 (eight years ago) link

I don't recall you being all sunshine and lollipops pre-chemo

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 18:11 (eight years ago) link

ignore these trolls Morbz. keep fighting the good fight

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 18:15 (eight years ago) link

i don't really mind the misanthropy, just wish it came packaged w/ more ideas than a bitter junior high anarchist

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 18:16 (eight years ago) link

Speaking of junior high, I posted a video of Trump motor-boating Giuliani. I hope everyone enjoyed it.

Evan, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 18:18 (eight years ago) link

No not that one, it's a different youtube link.

Evan, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 18:22 (eight years ago) link

what this thread needs now is Jerry (not his senile praise of Trump either, but hey a 90-year-old bootstrappy millionaire whaddya expect)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erLJdTPa2i4

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 18:23 (eight years ago) link

hope that's junior-high-anarchist enuf for Mordecai

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 18:23 (eight years ago) link

he praised Trump?! I missed that

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 18:24 (eight years ago) link

he said in his birthday interview he's blind and almost deaf, so who knows what he's getting

concentrate on the work

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 18:25 (eight years ago) link

he just feels the good vibes

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

maybe he just appreciates Trump's deluded manchild schtick

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 18:29 (eight years ago) link

damn i've been school on grayson. thank you based ilx

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 18:48 (eight years ago) link

I would remind (Trump and Cruz) that John Kasich is the governor of Ohio and, as such, he's the commander-in-chief of the Ohio National Guard of long historical memory. If he wants to get to the floor, he'll get to the floor. Seriously, though, if they think they can ram Paul Ryan through in the face of what's coming, then obvious anagram Reince Priebus has departed for the Land of Nod, never to return.

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a43073/republican-convention-civil-war/

http://www.newsweek.com/my-god-theyre-killing-us-our-1970-coverage-kent-state-328108

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 18:56 (eight years ago) link

Next scheduled debate cancelled by fox

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 19:04 (eight years ago) link

Kasich’s win in Ohio, with Rubio quitting, puts him in play for California, Maryland, and Wisconsin, among others. California,
with 172 delegates, may be Trump’s last chance to win outright; Kasich will be strong on the coast, and Cruz will go after Palm Springs, the desert cities, and parts of Orange County.

Don’t count Trump out. But Republicans are in a clear three-way split, and I doubt it will change before Cleveland.

Prepare for war—-physical, political, and otherwise. And if you have doubts, go with the one who attracts the quiet man.

Because to confuse silence for weakness is a terrible mistake.

http://mashable.com/2016/03/15/kasich-is-the-man-of-the-silent-majority-says-dick-nixon/

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 19:06 (eight years ago) link

I was about to say, is someone imitating Dick's prose

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 19:09 (eight years ago) link

[Grayson]'s a world class asshole

This matches what I've heard about him.

― i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Wednesday, March 16, 2016 12:52 PM (2 hours ago)

for a politician, give me an asshole with good policy positions over a guy you'd want to have a beer with with worse opinions any day

k3vin k., Wednesday, 16 March 2016 19:10 (eight years ago) link

from today's Bernie fundraising email:

What you will not hear from the political and media establishment is that, based on the primary and caucus schedule for the rest of the race, this is the high water mark for the Clinton campaign. Starting today, the map now shifts dramatically in our favor.

Arizona, Idaho, and Utah are up next Tuesday. Alaska, Hawaii, and Washington State caucus the Saturday after. Then it's Wisconsin's turn to vote.

That means we have an extremely good chance to win nearly every state that votes in the next month.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 19:17 (eight years ago) link

doesn't matter unless he wins 99% to 1%, which he won't

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 19:19 (eight years ago) link

bernie's only chance to win is if hillary gets indicted or something. which is possible!

i agree bernie supporters ideally should be (co-)focussing their energies on down ballot and local races. fail to see the necessity of speculating on whether our nationally representative sample of facebook friends are doing so

k3vin k., Wednesday, 16 March 2016 19:20 (eight years ago) link

is there a recent poll that shows Sanders doing particularly well in Arizona?

There was a hole bunch of problems whit his campaigns (crüt), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 19:24 (eight years ago) link

That piece is barely written in English.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 19:33 (eight years ago) link

This Year’s Biggest Superhero Movies Are All About America’s Descent into Fascism
http://io9.gizmodo.com/this-year-s-biggest-superhero-movies-are-all-about-amer-1765086280

flappy bird, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 19:39 (eight years ago) link

if any bernie fans wanna help contribute to a quixotic house race against one of the leading climate change denialists in congress (lamar smith), this is your mans

http://www.wakely2016.com/contribute

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 19:42 (eight years ago) link

lol "Here's what I surmise about some movies I didn't see" xp

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 19:43 (eight years ago) link

nice to see Shakes getting his arguments out to a wider audience though

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 19:43 (eight years ago) link

is there a recent poll that shows Sanders doing particularly well in Arizona?

― There was a hole bunch of problems whit his campaigns (crüt), Wednesday, March 16, 2016 3:24 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

basically no polling at all. 538 doesn't even have pages for arizona, idaho, alaska, hawaii or washington, all having dem contests in the next two weeks. they do have utah, but the polling there is extremely scanty - last two included cover jan 6-13 and feb 10-15. i have no expertise here but i suspect people usually don't plan to do a lot of polling of later states since the assumption is the race will be sewn up. if people are polling them now (which i imagine they are, though maybe not aggressively since the race does not look competitive) there will eventually be some info, but it won't be very robust and reading momentum/trends will be basically impossible. i suppose it could turn out that bernie wins all of them by 80% landslides but uh i would not hold my breath on that one.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 19:43 (eight years ago) link

xp: (nb: I know that is not actually Shakey)

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 19:44 (eight years ago) link

like I'm the only guy around here that complains about movies I haven't/will not see

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 19:46 (eight years ago) link

not that anyone has ever cared, but i'm assuming hawaii goes hillary out of dnc loyalty, tulsi gabbard or no -- i see way more bernie signs where i live but i doubt it's the same on oahu. still looking forward to voting bernie tho.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 19:51 (eight years ago) link

rising sea tides lift all gloats

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 19:53 (eight years ago) link

by now someone must have written about how the tea partiers were so successful at primarying establishment republicans, right? i remember seeing some profile once that they all used forums + email lists to coordinate. what would a national organization that tried to push "bernie"-style candidates this election (and in the midterms) look like? something like this must already exist, right?

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 19:55 (eight years ago) link

I've never heard of one

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:07 (eight years ago) link

not that anyone has ever cared, but i'm assuming hawaii goes hillary out of dnc loyalty, tulsi gabbard or no -- i see way more bernie signs where i live but i doubt it's the same on oahu. still looking forward to voting bernie tho.

― denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, March 16, 2016 3:51 PM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

had no idea ilx had a new hawaii correspondent since gr80 moved to chicago!

flopson, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:07 (eight years ago) link

the "tea party" had party apparatchiks like Dick Armey coordinating shit, I don't think Bernie has those kinds of allies.

xp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:08 (eight years ago) link

maybe the one Koch Brother that got blackmailed out of his inheritance from his siblings wants to switch sides.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:09 (eight years ago) link

this is one of the things that annoys me about Bernie, he's more of a cult of personality than a "movement" - he's run a good campaign but he's not a party tactician like Dean turned out to be, he doesn't seem to really know how to engineer this "revolution" that he claims is necessary. tbh I suspect his campaign's success has been something of a surprise, I doubt he ever really thought he would get this far.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:13 (eight years ago) link

he doesn't have to run it, tho.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:14 (eight years ago) link

who beyond the youngest and most naive expected him to?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:15 (eight years ago) link

Sarah Silverman?

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:16 (eight years ago) link

paul begala was shat upon earlier today but I saw something yesterday that made me lol

on cnn after rubio drops out begala basically accuses rubio of being the john edwards of 2016 and the panel reacted like he farted in church. is it really that bad of a comparison? seems apt to me.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:16 (eight years ago) link

he doesn't seem to really know how to engineer this "revolution" that he claims is necessary

he's not engineering it, he is one of the voices of it. it's part of his success.

it's not like all the leftists in the country are going to vanish when he doesn't get to be president.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:19 (eight years ago) link

the dude from Grizzly Bear

Van Horn Street, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:19 (eight years ago) link

xxxposts

Van Horn Street, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:19 (eight years ago) link

it's not like all the leftists in the country are going to vanish when he doesn't get to be president.

they sure seem to mysteriously vanish during mid-terms

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:20 (eight years ago) link

I hate to break it to you guys that revolutions require infrastructures, resources, coordination, funding, goals ie all the things the American left has been shitty at for like 40 years now. if you see Bernie as little more than a figurehead that's all well and good but who's taking care of this other stuff?

the best organized/most effective leftist political organization in recent years is quite clearly Black Lives Matter, and Bernie obviously hasn't done too great a job at reaching their base.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:24 (eight years ago) link

lol they reached him first.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:24 (eight years ago) link

thanks for telling us what a revolution requires. Bernie should put those on his revolution checklist.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:26 (eight years ago) link

"he's not a party tactician like Dean turned out to be"

was Dean effective as DNC head when he took over? I think so, but I'm not sure. I honestly can't remember anymore.

akm, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:27 (eight years ago) link

they definitely confronted him and I think he did an okay job at absorbing their criticism (and spokespeople) but it's pretty obvious the black votes are not going to Bernie. I wouldn't put that all down to BLM or anything but black communities are not rallying around Bernie, as has been discussed here at great length (hi Frederik, no need to chime in here btw)

xp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:28 (eight years ago) link

kind of amazing Bernie was a successful 2-term mayor of Burlington while completely ignoring infrastructure, resources, coordination, funding, and goals

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:28 (eight years ago) link

Dean's 50-state strategy was absolutely successful in 2006 and 2008.

xp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:29 (eight years ago) link

I'm sorry was there some sort of revolution that took place in Burlington, I missed it

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:29 (eight years ago) link

Remove Bookmark from this Thread

k3vin k., Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:30 (eight years ago) link

fundamentally changing national political power structures is sort of different from being a mayor, idg where you're going there (as usual)

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:30 (eight years ago) link

adam r u 4 real

Mordy, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:30 (eight years ago) link

lol sorry k3vin

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:30 (eight years ago) link

fundamentally changing national political power structures

lol are u guys for real. it's all-or-nothing with you isn't it?

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:31 (eight years ago) link

ok Shakey is an Occupy-denier aqs well

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:32 (eight years ago) link

anything so they get to handwave

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:32 (eight years ago) link

kind of amazing Bernie was a successful 2-term mayor of Burlington while completely ignoring infrastructure, resources, coordination, funding, and goals

― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, March 16, 2016 4:28 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lmao have u been to burlington dude

marcos, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:34 (eight years ago) link

there are 42,000 people in burlington

marcos, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:35 (eight years ago) link

i have been to burlington. pretty awesome place. if my city had air that fresh i would love it.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:35 (eight years ago) link

a busy lefty like Big HOOS will save us bcz he stays off these idiotic threads?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:38 (eight years ago) link

Occupy was a promising but ultimately disappointing exercise

xp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:38 (eight years ago) link

I will happily review a list of Occupy's accomplishments if anyone has one

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:39 (eight years ago) link

"on cnn after rubio drops out begala basically accuses rubio of being the john edwards of 2016 and the panel reacted like he farted in church. is it really that bad of a comparison? seems apt to me."

Unless there is a Rubio sex scandal I'm not aware of I'd say that comparison is kinda strange.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:40 (eight years ago) link

brought inequality into the national discussion

xp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:40 (eight years ago) link

I don't know if BLM would have been as organized and successful as it has been without Occupy reigniting people's interest in wide-scale grassroots activism.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:41 (eight years ago) link

nearly made Wall Street scumfucks shit their pants for a year

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:41 (eight years ago) link

yes Occupy helped built up some of that left infrastructure

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:41 (eight years ago) link

I will happily review a list of Occupy's accomplishments if anyone has one

― Οὖτις, Wednesday, March 16, 2016 4:39 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this is just off the top of my head but a recent presidential primary has been driven to a substantial degree by young, engaged voters fired up about the issue of income inequality, the wall street bailout, and policies that revolve around taxing wall street to redress economic-justice issues. others may be able to add to this list though.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:42 (eight years ago) link

basically what y'all said

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:42 (eight years ago) link

helped Greater NYC significantly post-Sandy when FEMA was paralyzed

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:42 (eight years ago) link

I haven't read about any connections between BLM and Occupy, would be interested to see more on that. I think BLM benefits from v clear goals and v specific incidents to rally around, which Occupy lacked.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:43 (eight years ago) link

2008 Bailout yo

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:43 (eight years ago) link

v clear goals ... which Occupy lacked

sudden wave of nostalgia

flopson we have another hawaii correspondent but she only posts in the wwe thread

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:45 (eight years ago) link

not reallly sure the wall street scumfucks really shit their pants over anything

akm, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:45 (eight years ago) link

It seems kinda weird to count a failed primary challenge as a success for Occupy. To me, anyway. I know issues have to be raised in a national dialogue before they can be addressed in a concrete way, but it's really the latter that matters most, and frankly income inequality is not being addressed legislatively and I'm not convinced that all this increased dialogue is going to amount to much without, y'know, winning elections. Which goes back to my point about the necessity of infrastructures etc. to achieve down-ballot election victories, mount successful primary challenges, get bills introduced and passed. The actual mechanics of politics.

xp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:46 (eight years ago) link

not reallly sure the wall street scumfucks really shit their pants over anything

I saw the fear in those pricks' eyes at their windows as we were marching.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:48 (eight years ago) link

like if you guys think Occupy, and by extension Bernie's candidacy, is going to push Hillary's legislative priorities to the left to address income inequality... man, idk. I wouldn't bet on it. It's possible.

xp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:48 (eight years ago) link

not reallly sure the wall street scumfucks really shit their pants over anything

there's a prostitution joke lurking here but it feels really dickish to make it

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:48 (eight years ago) link

her rhetoric will probably tack that way in the general, but I wouldn't be super-confident that that will be backed up by action

xxp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:49 (eight years ago) link

Again, I do agree it's all going nowhere and things will only change, and for the worse, when the Extinction Event comes full-bore.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:49 (eight years ago) link

was deblasio a product of occupy?

k3vin k., Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:49 (eight years ago) link

oh nothing is going to push Hillary to the left. she already voted for the Iraq War, The Patriot Act, and the bailout, she's pretty much a lost cause.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:50 (eight years ago) link

but the lost causes are the vital ones, as Mr Smith said to Claude Rains xxp

the perception that he was an extreme lefty, maybe. xp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:50 (eight years ago) link

oh nothing is going to push Hillary to the left.

so... a real success for Occupy and Bernie then

I feel bad having to handhold you guys through these conclusions here I mean come on

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:54 (eight years ago) link

you are defining success by how it affects Hillary's campaign

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:55 (eight years ago) link

my overarching point is that at some point the left has to move past the goal of getting people talking about stuff and get their hands dirty getting people to actually vote for stuff.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:56 (eight years ago) link

lol that is the exact thing HRC told BLM when she met them.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:57 (eight years ago) link

uh the system is broken and the kleptocracy has drones

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:57 (eight years ago) link

oh nothing is going to push Hillary to the left. she already voted for the Iraq War, The Patriot Act, and the bailout, she's pretty much a lost cause.

― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, March 16, 2016 4:50 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

iirc her voting record in the senate was to left of most democrats

marcos, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:58 (eight years ago) link

lol that is the exact thing HRC told BLM when she met them.

BLM has a great candidate for mayor in Baltimore and most likely played a key role in removing two DA's who failed to appropriately prosecute cases, among other things. afaik Bernie doesn't have any allies slated to win anything, and Occupy never focused on legislative or electoral goals.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:59 (eight years ago) link

"was deblasio a product of occupy?"

does anyone like him?

akm, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:00 (eight years ago) link

iirc her voting record in the senate was to left of most democrats

― marcos, Wednesday, March 16, 2016 4:58 PM (40 seconds ago)

i'm getting a little tired of the is-hillary-a-progressive-or-not arguments -- at this point people should probably have their minds made up -- but being the 11th most liberal senator is not really that impressive if you're representing new york

k3vin k., Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:03 (eight years ago) link

yeah sure but nobody here is actually mounting the "move hillary to the left" argument, right? so why linger on it?

i think the party/country spending six to nine months arguing around terms of income inequality, wealth inequality, "the 1%", big-money influence on electoral politics, and the pros and cons of redistributive measures is a good thing. sorry. i don't need to wait to see the end-result legislation getting signed to say "this is a positive development," just as i don't need to see President Trump in office building his wall to look at his campaign of vitriol, violence and bigotry to say "this is a negative development."

i for one look forward to the conventional-wisdom "safe" positions of cowardly middle-of-the-road positions running for minor office becoming "well you gotta say you're for taxing wall street, i mean come on" instead of that being taken as basically the position of a dead-in-the-water fringe communist student radical. america's parents at america's dinner tables can talk about something other than dinky tax credits for "the middle class." this is not a failure.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:04 (eight years ago) link

yeah OWS very clearly brought economic inequality into the mainstream conversation in a meaningful way. that's an accomplishment in itself. i'm very pro-BLM but you could make the same arguments about how it hasn't gotten anything "done". you're cherry-picking

k3vin k., Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:07 (eight years ago) link

iirc her voting record in the senate was to left of most democrats

― marcos, Wednesday, March 16, 2016 4:58 PM (40 seconds ago)

i'm getting a little tired of the is-hillary-a-progressive-or-not arguments -- at this point people should probably have their minds made up -- but being the 11th most liberal senator is not really that impressive if you're representing new york

― k3vin k., Wednesday, March 16, 2016 5:03 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

im not saying it is particularly impressive, i just think the hyperbole around her is kind of absurd

like some bernie dude i know literally adds a #hilaryiscorporatepersonhood hashtag to every FB post he makes on politics

marcos, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:07 (eight years ago) link

(i admit though than bringing up every FB post made by idiot friends to support arguments isn't great)

marcos, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:09 (eight years ago) link

yeah OWS very clearly brought economic inequality into the mainstream conversation in a meaningful way. that's an accomplishment in itself. i'm very pro-BLM but you could make the same arguments about how it hasn't gotten anything "done". you're cherry-picking

my point is that BLM is mobilized around v specific goals, and it's showing signs of success already. Electoral gains, actions from the justice dept., convictions, etc. OWS and Bernie have not, because they were/are shitty at organizing and achieving goals.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:09 (eight years ago) link

i think the party/country spending six to nine months arguing around terms of income inequality, wealth inequality, "the 1%", big-money influence on electoral politics, and the pros and cons of redistributive measures is a good thing. sorry.

i do, too. and if her opponent was anyone other than trump, the chances of those topics dominating the conversation would be higher. but trump obviously has a way of bending all media coverage to whatever he wants to talk about, so most of those topics (except for "big-money influence on electoral politics", which he sometimes brings up as a way to deflect criticism that he donated to causes deemed heretical to conservatives) don't seem likely to gain much traction

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:10 (eight years ago) link

re "liberal senator" scoreboards: statistics, damned lies, etc

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:11 (eight years ago) link

had some long post about BLM being associated with a threat of violence/riots (which OWS and Bernie never have been) being tied to political effectiveness but my thoughts about it are a bit muddled... there's something there though, I think. Maybe about how it has framed the political calculus of BLM's goals as political accommodation vs. urban destruction, with institutions and voters siding for the former.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:16 (eight years ago) link

yeah what an awesome liberal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_Protection_Act_of_2005

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:17 (eight years ago) link

if her opponent was anyone other than trump, the chances of those topics dominating the conversation would be higher.

i was counting backwards! the conversation has been going on!

i dunno i'm very much in the camp of, my entire life as far back as i was aware of politics, the discourse has been totally dominated by reagan/clinton attitudes about the role of government and the role of corporations. everyone here is used to it by now maybe, but: i think it is kind of blindingly huge news that a cranky old socialist, talking about jacking up taxes on the rich to pay for enormous new entitlements, has held possibly the most 'inevitable' candidate in years and years down to 57.8% of the democratic primary vote so far (a number which might plausibly go down further). (this particular silver chart is kinda helpful to put that in perspective. the next one down is sitting president ford staving off reagan in 1976 and look where the party went after that.) so far, counting primaries and not caucuses, nearly six million people have walked into a voting booth and chosen the income-redistributing big-government socialist. history books may well record that as the most important political development of 2015-2016 depending what ultimately happens with trumpism.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:24 (eight years ago) link

and again: how many of those are first-time voters? how different will the range of allowable choices look to you throughout the rest of adulthood when the first vote you cast is Socialist 4 Prez?

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:26 (eight years ago) link

if ows posed no threat of violence you certainly wouldn't have known it from watching tv

obv there are certain factors that make blm a whole lot scarier to some people

agree w djp that there is a lot more occupy-->blm continuity than the These Are The White Leftists; These Are The Black Leftists categories allow for; i also think that bernie really did respond well to blm's criticisms, and black people not switching from hillary by the millions in six months is not some kind of damning referendum on his hopeless whiteness. certainly blm activists are not hostile to economic-justice ideas; its not as if their success comes at the expense of socialism. i think what we've seen over the past few years is a flourishing of leftist activism + a slow and heavily resisted reintroduction of leftist ideas into the Serious sphere, and which bernie's surprisingly good run is an example of this trend, not a culmination of it, regardless of how everybody's facebook friends are acting.

the next one down is sitting president ford staving off reagan in 1976 and look where the party went after that.

i've thought cautiously of this parallel too.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:27 (eight years ago) link

Whether it's Trump or Hills, this is the fist time we can say Reagan's dead.

Then we all diem

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:27 (eight years ago) link

um i wrote that paragraph about three different ways and decided to use them all i guess

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:28 (eight years ago) link

hopefully bernie will bring everyone to tears at the convention, then lie for years about having last-second improvised it

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:29 (eight years ago) link

have we discussed Trumps anti-Hilary ad where she goes "arf! arf! arf! arf!" like she's in the freakin' dog police

frogbs, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:31 (eight years ago) link

i said "this is going to be really unpleasant" and then we all comforted ourselves with some good ol intra-left bickering

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:33 (eight years ago) link

heh

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:42 (eight years ago) link

dog police?

Evan, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:43 (eight years ago) link

Dog police https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0359hSerDeE

reggae mike love (polyphonic), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:47 (eight years ago) link

Wait, there's a serious call for Paul Ryan to run for ... president? As a third party? As what? How would that work? I mean, it'd be good, right, because he would split the vote? And also because it would be extra funny, because http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/intel/2012/10/11/11-paul-ryan-time-p90x.w245.h368.jpg

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 22:54 (eight years ago) link

Wait, there's a serious call for Paul Ryan to run for ... president? As a third party? As what? How would that work? I mean, it'd be good, right, because he would split the vote? And also because it would be extra funny, because 🗻

Here come the RyanBros

Iago Galdston, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 22:58 (eight years ago) link

paul ryan is a douche but he's not fucking stupid, he's not going to do that

akm, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 23:00 (eight years ago) link

paul ryan wouldn't waste his presidential bid this year. he is too ambitious. he is going to try to run in 2024 or something like that.

Treeship, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 23:04 (eight years ago) link

it is kinda funny that the muppet-faced doofus Ryan is actually the soothing potential candidate everybody wants now

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 23:04 (eight years ago) link

but yea, not gonna happen

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 23:04 (eight years ago) link

they're going to go with trump. good for them, they deserve it

Treeship, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 23:06 (eight years ago) link

maybe they'll change the rules to where in a contested convention, whomever can win a round robin 1-on-1 basketball tourney is the nominee

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 23:09 (eight years ago) link

or maybe they will arrange for trump to be killed and then, at the convention, newt gingrich will come onstage and do one of these

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQ7RvRPCSWM

Treeship, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 23:10 (eight years ago) link

what do people think will happen to trump when he loses the general? is he going to go back to his previously annoying ways or is he going to linger around stenching up the US with political forays?

akm, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 23:11 (eight years ago) link

he is going to die because he is 70 years old, doesn't exercise, and subsists on a diet of grease, sugar, and bile

Treeship, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 23:12 (eight years ago) link

will return to Castle Greyskull

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 23:12 (eight years ago) link

i seriously can't remember hating someone as much as i hate this guy. now i know something of the white hot rage some people get when they hear the names nixon and reagan. bush could never inspire this much revulsion in me, even though of course i was appalled by his presidency

Treeship, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 23:18 (eight years ago) link

i can but they were all 12-14 years old and classmates of mine

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 23:20 (eight years ago) link

I didn't know about the "Ron Paul Rule" until today--something they concocted in 2012. If they honor it at the convention, Trump wins; they have to change it for anyone else to win.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eoin-higgins/rnc-rules-to-stifle-ron-p_b_8941816.html

clemenza, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 23:20 (eight years ago) link

are there any legal ramifications to RNC changing the rules at the convention and saying something like "and since the rule is anybody with RUMP in their name can't run, you're out"?

like if Trump was somehow led to believe he'd be the nominee through current procedure, would he have any recourse, or would it just be unethical but not something he could sue over?

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 23:24 (eight years ago) link

clemenza - they may have to change that for anybody to get voted on at all, though, since winning majorities of delegates hasn't really been happening. but i can't imagine anyone was seriously thinking "aha, we'll use this one weird trick to keep trump's delegates from even getting to vote. he's done way way too well for that and you really would be looking at a riot situation. that's not to say no rules-based trickery will come into play, but this one seems undercooked. of course the article is from january and things probably looked a little different then.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 23:26 (eight years ago) link

(xpost) It sounds like the existing rules become void the minute the convention starts, and while they're usually renewed as a matter of formality, they can basically change whatever they want. (I'm sure your reductio ad absurdum example would present problems...)

Yeah, the article points out that even Trump might fall short of the Paul rule.

clemenza, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 23:29 (eight years ago) link

he is going to die because he is 70 years old, doesn't exercise, and subsists on a diet of grease, sugar, and bile

no way. i can state unequivocally, if elected, he would be the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency.

http://i.imgur.com/6fPYIzR.png

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 23:32 (eight years ago) link

http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834515c5469e201b7c81b3d03970b-pi

this is dr. harold n. bornstein btw

Treeship, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 23:35 (eight years ago) link

but yeah, if trump doesn't walk in the door with a >50% majority, the first thing on the agenda for the RNC will be to set very expansive rules for delegate seating ("we want all voices to be heard in our big tent party") so that every single non-trump delegate - even Jeb!'s sad foursome - can be mobilized.

one shenanigan they might more plausibly consider would be releasing the three-per-state RNC-representative delegates from the requirement that they vote for whoever won their state. these, together with a very small number of miscellaneous unbound delegates, are the GOP equivalent of superdelegates, and were previously considered something of a non-issue (by me, for one) since there are so few of them. but in the contested convention scenario, those 150 extra delegates would be a huge bloc. mind you i'm not sure if this is a rule they actually could change at this date.... but suppose it were slipped in that they were only bound to vote for the winner of a state if it had a true majority winner? i'm definitely not an inside expert on these matters, just kinda imagining, which i admit is silly at this point, but the part of me that double-majored in political science can't help but find this kind of rulesy what-if shit fascinating.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 23:40 (eight years ago) link

That rule was always going to be changed (they all are every time afaict) but that one has to be changed this time: even trump hasn't won a majority in any state except lol Northern Mariana

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 23:41 (eight years ago) link

Rubio's delegates, most of them are going to wind up being reallocated somewhere, too (except for the 20 or so that by state law have to remain bound to Rubio, fuckin stupid as hell)

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 23:42 (eight years ago) link

and then we all comforted ourselves with some good ol intra-left bickering

i'm def not in the same SF prosecco-sippin' "left" as Shakey

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 23:48 (eight years ago) link

xpost well, yeah. i mean first round they have to vote for their candidate and then the interesting thing is, what kind of deals get cut to move those people around and assemble a majority for somebody. again we're in what-if territory. rubio managed to soak up 172 delegates, a decent-sized piece of the pie right now though it'll be less of one by june.

deep pointless broker speculation territory ahead: so, the big question is, does trump make up the gap in the remaining contests and push himself over 50%? it's possible but it does depend on him doing better than he's ever done so far, even though the field has narrowed again. for the sake of fun, assume for a minute that he fails to do so and we are headed to a contested convention (or pre-convention deal-making). then, the most important sub-variable becomes how well kasich does in the time between now and then. cruz currently appears to be the second-place guy, but the assumption has long been that he's already passed his best states and is thus much further behind than he seems. rubio was hoping to do wait this period out and then beat cruz in those later states. but clearly ran the numbers and found it would never be enough, with trump doing as well as he's turned out to do - and certainly not in a four-man field.

IF kasich gets most of the dwindling rubio support in those later states, AND they really are ill-suited to cruz, AND trump's numbers slip just a little (not a "flame-out," just one of his periodic wobbles, facing slightly less trump-friendly states), THEN it's possible that kasich wins some of the remaining winner-take-all states, cruz wins few or none of them, and trump is held just shy of 50% with kasich as the second-place guy. the RNC and company, i think, would find it much easier to broker a deal for the rubio-and-assorted-delegates around a Kasich/Cruz ticket than Cruz/Kasich. for one, they may hope that cruz's extremism is less serious ballot-box poison if he's #2 (a la paul ryan) though in reality the dems will have a field day portraying such a candidate as a double-whammy of right-wing ideologues.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:00 (eight years ago) link

I dont even know what prosecco is

Xp

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:02 (eight years ago) link

but yes its been well established that you are a party of one morbz

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:04 (eight years ago) link

it's wine, much like what Morbs has done throughout this thread

Neanderthal, Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:04 (eight years ago) link

if one wanted to start playing the betting markets, would this be a good buy-in time for Cruz, or did that ship sail?

Neanderthal, Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:05 (eight years ago) link

does it seem deeply odd to anybody else that Kasich, of all 16 of the original candidates, is the establishment "alternative" guy that's lasted this long? I never predicted that.

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:05 (eight years ago) link

well I guarantee that had everything to do with the importance of Ohio and his success in polls in that state. if he'd have dropped prior to now, this race would be effectively over after last night.

course now he's not going to drop due to the win and wanting to be a viable brokered opportunity as well.

Neanderthal, Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:07 (eight years ago) link

well gosh darn it he wasn't going to quit before the fine people of ohio got to vote

iatee, Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:07 (eight years ago) link

I understand why Kasich's hanging around--the scenario Casino outlines above (plus maybe a VP pick)--but I just can't see him as the nominee under any circumstances. I think the party (by which I mean, in this case, the people who draw up the rules) would just as soon lose with Trump or Cruz than run a bland, born-again (or fake, whatever) moderate who was drawing 10% of the vote until his home state.

clemenza, Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:08 (eight years ago) link

they could always reprogram him

Neanderthal, Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:09 (eight years ago) link

does it seem deeply odd to anybody else that Kasich, of all 16 of the original candidates, is the establishment "alternative" guy that's lasted this long? I never predicted that.

:

http://i.imgur.com/TXWB5pl.jpg

pplains, Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:09 (eight years ago) link

he told people he was gonna win ohio

nobody believed in him. they said no john, you can't do it, you can't win ohio. but he won ohio. and it's a whole new ballgame.

iatee, Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:09 (eight years ago) link

Nixon knew

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:12 (eight years ago) link

gop convention - that's really just another election in cleveland. there's only one politician left who is undefeated in ohio.

I don't want to say it's a sure thing, but the writing's on the wall.

iatee, Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:13 (eight years ago) link

typical smh @ Florida.

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/03/florida-poll-workers-find-democratic-ballots-in-closet-after-telling-voter-primary-for-republicans-only/

probably nothing sinister as much as gross incompetence, and wouldn't have impacted the race, but lord....

Neanderthal, Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:13 (eight years ago) link

guess i don't understand why anyone would be angling for vice president -- warm piss and that -- but particularly in a trump or cruz administration. what would be the point, apart from hoping your boss died?

mookieproof, Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:16 (eight years ago) link

I'm sure they'll all watched HoC

Neanderthal, Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:17 (eight years ago) link

Doc Casino, you care about that shit more than I do.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:19 (eight years ago) link

guess i don't understand why anyone would be angling for GOP [s]vice[s] president -- warm piss and that

Paul Ryan does not want to lose to HRC.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:19 (eight years ago) link

(S@rge broke the story for Gawker too!)

xxxpost

Neanderthal, Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:21 (eight years ago) link

kasich to me always had the right look-and-feel for an "establishment" candidate (though "moderate" has been an interesting sell). on paper, in a 'typical' year, he's got it all - oldish white guy, been in the party forever, can talk about working with reagan, governor of a swing state that is not utterly sick of him. balanced budget, blah blah, business as usual, and just count on the base getting out to vote against hillary being enough to cancel out your really really unappealing swing-state positions on abortion, etc. hindsight's 20/20 but he just seems more obviously a 'real' candidate than most of the clown car.

frankly he might have been a passable establishment front-runner in a world without jeb! getting much of the big big donor class to buy into him before he was road-tested (or before anyone thought through the general appeal of another bush running), and hanging on to them for so, so long. and rubio convincing another swath of that crowd that he was the fresh-faced GOP Obama they'd been looking for. who knows, without either of those factors and the larger clown car problem, this might have looked like a pretty conventional race. (in other words, assuming that trump's dominance wasn't just due to his fame, free press, or anti-establishment anger, but specifically due to jeb and rubio actually being terrible candidates that didn't excite anybody and couldn't think on their feet.) imagine if you will, folksy establishment midwestern conservative kasich as front-runner, trump as a pat buchanan channeling right-wing anger but crushed once the winner-take-all states kick in. kasich was probably thinking of something like that (and considering his own age) when he first considered running; by the time he was actually in, the car was full and he suddenly appeared to be playing for VP or to be considered the heir apparent in 2020. it's swung back around where there's a very faint glimmer of a chance he could actually be the nominee. weird.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:22 (eight years ago) link

@ alfred ha, yeah, i can get going. time to walk away from the computer and think about frank lloyd wright for a while.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:22 (eight years ago) link

Kasich would have been a perfect GOP nominee in 2000.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:28 (eight years ago) link

he's abhorrent and gross but is polite and won't call for a stoning if gays on Medicaid make out in front of him

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:28 (eight years ago) link

Meanwhile, in an interview on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” program, Mr. Drumpf described himself as the person he listens to most on foreign policy.

“I’m speaking with myself, number one, because I have a very good brain and I’ve said a lot of things,” Mr. Drumpf said.

He went on, “My primary consultant is myself and I have — you know, I have a good instinct for this stuff.”


he says shit like this ALL THE TIME
this is such a weird year so far

ulysses, Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:29 (eight years ago) link

"I have a very good brain and I've said a lot of things"!

ulysses, Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:29 (eight years ago) link

"I just wanted to say that I have been otm in this election"

Neanderthal, Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:31 (eight years ago) link

Basically, Jeb! cockblocked everyone and let Trump sneak in. Between Jeb's name and money, other hopefuls seemed hopeless, but he was so terrible the losers stayed at the party hoping to get lucky.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:32 (eight years ago) link

"i have a very good brain and i've said a lot of things" instantly on the shortlist for part 5 thread title

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:35 (eight years ago) link

and Reagan could've said it

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:39 (eight years ago) link

will you and Reagan's corpse get a room already

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:40 (eight years ago) link

ugh, stop with the drumpf shit

mookieproof, Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:45 (eight years ago) link

Drumpf was one of the many phrases input into FB purity this morning

Neanderthal, Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:46 (eight years ago) link

will you and Reagan's corpse get a room already

― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius),

you mean you and Bill Clinton

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 March 2016 00:50 (eight years ago) link

so who still thinks inherited privilege doesn't dominate every facet of contemporary society?

reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 17 March 2016 01:26 (eight years ago) link

lol "Here's what I surmise about some movies I didn't see" xp

― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, March 16, 2016 2:43 PM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

LOL indeed. who said internet criticism wasn't rigorous?

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 17 March 2016 01:33 (eight years ago) link

i wonder if any of these conservative PACs currently running broadsides against trump on the TV will keep it up after he becomes the nominee. are there some wealthy/influential conservatives who believe that trump will be more damaging (to the GOP and the nation) than Clinton? and will they put their money (and mouths) where their principles are?

i'm pretty cynical about the GOP establishment failing to get in line behind a trump candidacy. they've essentially enabled the fascist so far, I don't think they have enough principles and good sense to really stop now even if they'll whine about it until kingdom come. history will not judge them kindly, of course.

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 17 March 2016 01:36 (eight years ago) link

Ugh imagining a post-trump history curriculum

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Thursday, 17 March 2016 01:38 (eight years ago) link

those brave GOP paladins.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 March 2016 01:41 (eight years ago) link

Republicans being honest about drawing conclusions irrespective of facts. Sad!

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 March 2016 01:50 (eight years ago) link

love "unstuffy"

there's no way the gop doesn't nominate trump. he deserves the nomination! the gop deserves it too. as for the rest of us, when did any of these people ever care about that. also, the bourgeois parties always fall in line eventually.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 17 March 2016 02:03 (eight years ago) link

If it weren’t for all the idiotic and racist comments, he would be kind of a breath of fresh air ... I don’t think he is George Wallace in his heart of hearts ... He’s just a buffoon and a political opportunist

The bourgeoisie does not like the 'plebeian' method of resolving its tasks. It was always hostile to Jacobinism, which cleared the road for the development of bourgeois society with its blood ... The sober bourgeoisie does not look very favorably even upon the Fascist mode of resolving its tasks, for the concussions, although they are brought forth in the interests of bourgeois society, are linked up with dangers to it ... The big bourgeoisie likes Fascism as little as a man with aching molars likes to have his teeth pulled ... but in the last analysis they have become reconciled to the inevitable, though with threats, with horse-trades and all sorts of bargaining. Thus the petty bourgeoisie's idol of yesterday becomes transformed into the gendarme of capital.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 17 March 2016 02:08 (eight years ago) link

i had a guinness

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 17 March 2016 02:10 (eight years ago) link

i can see a few establishment GOP pols with little to lose coming out against trump decisively (like mccain, who trump has personally insulted). but most will fall in line, which in some ways will be helpful b/c we'll know their true colors.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPn0KFlbqX8

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 17 March 2016 02:15 (eight years ago) link

i had a guinness

― denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour),

I don't believe you

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 March 2016 02:18 (eight years ago) link

“In the end, whoever the nominee is, the party will, to one degree or another, rally around him,” predicted Ron Kaufman, the longtime lobbyist and Republican National Committee stalwart.

...

Kaufman waved off concerns that Trump’s rhetoric has reached a dangerous and unprecedented level. “Lots of folks say lots of things that probably they don’t mean,” he said. “I’m not in any way, shape or form defending things these candidates have said, including Donald Trump, but in the end, this is about governing.”

well "lots of folks say lots of things that probably they don't mean" just jumped the whole aforementioned shortlist

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 17 March 2016 02:18 (eight years ago) link

play fuckin loud xp

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 17 March 2016 02:18 (eight years ago) link

When Trump started in on Cruz's citizenship, McCain made it clear he (improbably, after the POW stuff) loathes Cruz even more than Trump--he publically sided with Trump.

clemenza, Thursday, 17 March 2016 02:19 (eight years ago) link

i could also see one or two elected officials changing their party affiliation to "Independent" although obviously there are very, very few if any Jim Jeffordses still hanging around this party.

there's two separate questions though really, which is: will 'the establishment' take available measures to try and keep trump from getting the nomination, and will it back trump as nominee if he gets it. the latter seems like, yeah, most of them probably will for a variety of reasons. technocratic and business types (your jebs and bloombergs) will sit it out or vote for hillary but probably not campaign for her.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 17 March 2016 02:22 (eight years ago) link

WAIT. I seriously thought this was a joke at first, but these are legitimate Trump quotes?!?

“I’m speaking with myself, number one, because I have a very good brain and I’ve said a lot of things."

“My primary consultant is myself and I have — you know, I have a good instinct for this stuff.”

It's not shocking that he says these things because there are a lot of stupid people in the world and he's most definitely one of them. What's shocking is he says these things and no one laughs in his face and tells him to just shut the fuck up already. What a ludicrous garbage person who is completely unworthy of respect or being taken at all seriously.

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Thursday, 17 March 2016 02:23 (eight years ago) link

yes, if this election cycle has proven anything it's that there are far more idiots in america than i had previously imagined. even the intelligent glosses of trump's appeal by the likes of matt taibbi and thomas frank can't gloss over this fact.

left-wing folks like me have said that the GOP was essentially an authoritarian party for a while, they're just proving us right these days. not that i get any satisfaction out of it.

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 17 March 2016 02:25 (eight years ago) link

haha I don't think Taibbi has once glossed over that fact

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 March 2016 02:26 (eight years ago) link

right, but he's explained the various reasons why people support him under than "dur, dur, dur"

but "dur, dur, dur" is a big part of it; it's not as if people have come to a rational decision that electing trump will improve their lot in life

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 17 March 2016 02:28 (eight years ago) link

(well, i guess it might improve their self-image, if rejecting the "other" has that effect)

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 17 March 2016 02:29 (eight years ago) link

will 'the establishment' take available measures to try and keep trump from getting the nomination

They might, but I agree with the one CNN guy tonight: there is no conceivable scenario under which the Republicans get a two-person election with Clinton against a not-Trump. It's either Trump or Trump runs independently.

clemenza, Thursday, 17 March 2016 02:31 (eight years ago) link

also:

in college, i took a seminar on right-wing movements in american history (starting post-civil war but largely focusing on 20th century).

one day we did a thought experiment: if somehow a fascist gov't or fascist puppet gov't were to have come to power in the 1930s/early 1940s, which folks would fall in line support it, and which would speak out against it? father coughlin? charles lindbergh? herbert hoover? etc.

i feel like this is that thought experiment come true. we're witnessing how seriously that various "mainstream" "conservative" politicians take their stated (or presumed) commitment to deliberative democracy and civil discourse. the results are pretty grim.

i always expected that the likes of sarah palin would be fifth columnists. wasn't so sure about newt gingrich, paul ryan, and so forth.

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 17 March 2016 02:33 (eight years ago) link

xpost well, maybe, but the counterargument would be: lose with trump or lose with a republican that doesn't just totally trash (what's left of) the brand name?

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 17 March 2016 02:34 (eight years ago) link

Its too late for trump to run third party in a bunch of states, isnt it?

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 March 2016 02:34 (eight years ago) link

Hadn't thought about that, you might be right. One thing I don't think will matter a bit is all these pledges of support the two sides have taken at various points. Anyone will turn on anyone at a moment's notice, and rationalizing it will be easy. Trump can go right back to his initial pledge, that he'll support a nominee other than himself provided he's not "treated unfairly"--lots of wiggle room there.

clemenza, Thursday, 17 March 2016 02:39 (eight years ago) link

why is kasich not attending the debate after trump cancelled? it would just be him and cruz. surely that would be good for him?

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 17 March 2016 02:59 (eight years ago) link

I like this photo from the New Republic:

http://i1059.photobucket.com/albums/t427/sayhey1/cruz_zpsnayqcluz.jpeg

clemenza, Thursday, 17 March 2016 03:02 (eight years ago) link

Lots of folks say lots of things that probably they don’t mean

I keep hearing this again and again re: Trump, from supporters, from GOP folks, from commentators. Like, why wouldn't he say what he means? He's not promising some incremental shit he can sweep under the rug. And like Chait noted in one of those columns, Trump's been praising totalitarian action since Tiananmen Square. He's been pretty consistent. Which, of course, is why all the pollsters say he's getting a lot of his support. Evangelicals, rich people, poor people, dumbasses - the one trait his people apparently all have in common is a love of authoritarianism.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 March 2016 04:44 (eight years ago) link

it's that probably that's sublime

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 17 March 2016 05:08 (eight years ago) link

@mtaibbi
Trump will name himself to all cabinet posts. He'll jump back and forth between chairs a la Woody Allen in "Bananas"

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 March 2016 11:29 (eight years ago) link

Donald Trump winning the US presidency is considered one of the top 10 risks facing the world, according to the Economist Intelligence Unit.

He is rated as riskier than Britain leaving the European Union or an armed clash in the South China Sea.

mookieproof, Thursday, 17 March 2016 13:04 (eight years ago) link

It's a start, but he won't stop until he's number one. Number one!
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2016/02/09/us/09live-trumpfoam/09live-trumpfoam-tmagArticle.jpg

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 March 2016 13:15 (eight years ago) link

One for the history books: the exact moment Trump's presidential run was conceived.
http://media.gq.com/photos/56e981824b58804e5e741151/master/w_800/Trump-Friends-Andy-Warhol.jpg

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 March 2016 13:16 (eight years ago) link

By the way, some of the comments on the PBS site with the white power woman phone banking are great, including the woman's defense and PBS's added disclaimer:

Editor’s Note: At several times during this campaign the NewsHour has featured video packages of voices of voters, profiling different families and their views on the candidates and how they have arrived at them. These reports have been presented without reporters’ narration. It is true that this storytelling style requires the audience to draw its own conclusions about what they see and hear, but we believe the audience is able to do so.

In this case, a debate about Grace Tilly’s tattoos has started online. As you can see in the comments section posted with this story, Ms. Tilly argues that these tattoos are not representative of neo-Nazi positions but are connected to her family’s Celtic religious beliefs. That is what she told our producers as well. Others among our online commenters vehemently disagree.

First comment:

Well, let’s see here…

Wife Grace Tilly has the “Odin’s Cross” tattoo on the back of one hand, which is one of, if not, THE most common symbol used by white supremacists / white nationalists, Aryans, etc. (it’s used as the logo for “Stormfront.org, incorporating the slogan “white pride world wide”) … but she insists there is no racist implication…

Grace has the “88” tattoo (in that familiar Germanic lettering style) on the back of the other hand, which is commonly used by white supremacists / white nationalists / Aryans, etc. to signify “HH – Heil Hitler” … but she insists there is no racist implication…

Grace has a fascination / devotion to Odinism / Asatru which has been heavily co-opted within white supremacist / white nationalist / Aryan, etc. organizations … but she insists there is no racist implication…

Husband Farron Tilly has a tattoo on his left arm incorporating a German “Iron Cross” and an eagle’s head, common symbols used by white supremacist / white nationalist / Aryan, etc. organizations … but she insists there is no racist implication…

Just coincidences … or something?

Well, how ‘bout this one:

Husband Farron Tilly’s facebook page lists “White Nationalism” under “Interests”

Perhaps we can get another Trump-style denial on that point, too…?

Second comment:

The photo of the two of them (Grace & Farron) on her FB page shows him in a confederate flag hat. What a pair of "winners" - bet the want their country back too. Just ask them! Oh, and BTW: there's a photo of an American Flag on Farron's Facebook page, except the stars are swatikas. This whole family is lying confederate trash.

Third comment:

She has another FB. Apparently she's likes David Lane (renowned white supremacist):
https://www.facebook.com/grace...

Later:

Additionally, on his YouTube profile, Farron Tilly created a playlist titled "WhitePrideIsAllright." It consists of 23 hours of audio of the book Nature's Eternal Religion, the scripture of the white supremacist Creativity church.

And another:

Google + shows a video entitled "Dixie Rockin' this place' https://plus.google.com/107541...

They named their kid...DIXIE. But no worries, they're just the nicest people with no ties to white supremacist groups. At all.

If it looks like a white supremacist, and it walks like a white supremacist, quacks like a white supremacist...

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/all-in-for-trump-inside-a-north-carolina-military-familys-gop-politics/

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 March 2016 13:22 (eight years ago) link

xp George Harrison's looked happier.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 17 March 2016 13:22 (eight years ago) link

What's Celtic about Odin?

A Fifth Beatle Dies (Tom D.), Thursday, 17 March 2016 13:37 (eight years ago) link

and i have the mumps

ulysses, Thursday, 17 March 2016 13:43 (eight years ago) link

If it looks like a white supremacist, and it walks like a white supremacist, quacks like a white supremacist...

...it probably doesn't actually mean what it's quacking?

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Thursday, 17 March 2016 13:46 (eight years ago) link

wow someone named Dixie AND they have Celtic tattoos? hopefully they don't own any incriminating Lynyrd Skynyrd albums.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 17 March 2016 13:50 (eight years ago) link

Hopefully nobody does.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:02 (eight years ago) link

weird, I'm seeing all sorts of pagan Celtic symbols popping up everywhere today.

There was a hole bunch of problems whit his campaigns (crüt), Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:08 (eight years ago) link

ha, Happy White Pride Day everyone. Jump around! Jump around!

pplains, Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:09 (eight years ago) link

I like Skynyrd. Hopefully my lack of white power tattoos will help be avoid getting confusing for a white supremacist!

This was her defense in the comments:
http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--0DkIywuB--/tjpruyrx4xoqt6pigeyx.png

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:09 (eight years ago) link

She doesn't defend, as far as I can tell, the 88 on her other hand. Or all those other direct connections to white power groups/beliefs.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:10 (eight years ago) link

Maybe she's a pianist!

pplains, Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:12 (eight years ago) link

keeps to the white keys..

Mark G, Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:13 (eight years ago) link

Big fan of Hubert Humphrey?

pplains, Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:14 (eight years ago) link

“I’m speaking with myself, number one, because I have a very good brain and I’ve said a lot of things."

There's a reason why Tim Heidecker sites Trump as his direct inspiration for the mannerisms, expressions, and speech of his character Decker.

Evan, Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:32 (eight years ago) link

point taken btw that given the outlandish depths that Trump is willing to plumb, citations to show quotes are true and not hyperbole are likely appropriate from here on out.
"I have a good brain and I've said lots of things"! On live television! He's the front-runner! And it's already forgotten!

ulysses, Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:36 (eight years ago) link

Clearly a big fan of NASCAR driver Dale Earnhardt Junior:

http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3172/2337700430_99040abf20_z.jpg

joie de visa (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:37 (eight years ago) link

Charles Blow:

Clinton’s coverage on television has dwarfed Sanders’s. As a New York Times Upshot report this week pointed out, Clinton has received more than twice the “news and commentary” about her campaign “on television, in newspapers and magazines, and on social media” as Sanders has....

There appear to be two parallel universes of Democratic voters this season — one disproportionately older, the other disproportionately younger — whose habits make them almost invisible to each other.

Clinton’s voters may be less likely to show up to rallies, or post on social media or be serial commenters who commandeer comments sections, but they do show up to vote. But these are the same voters who are less likely to hear much news about Sanders.

In a February Pew Research Center survey, a plurality of people 18 to 29 years old said that the social media was their most helpful source for learning about the 2016 presidential election. A plurality of those 30 and over cited cable news as the primary source. Network news was the second most popular source for those 65 and older.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/17/opinion/campaign-stops/a-bernie-blackout.html

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:46 (eight years ago) link

apparently last night none of the networks showed his speech but instead focused on an empty shot of Donald Trump's stage

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:51 (eight years ago) link

There's a reason why Tim Heidecker sites Trump as his direct inspiration for the mannerisms, expressions, and speech of his character Decker.

holy shit, now I have to watch every episode of Decker again

frogbs, Thursday, 17 March 2016 15:06 (eight years ago) link

wow someone named Dixie AND they have Celtic tattoos? hopefully they don't own any incriminating Lynyrd Skynyrd albums.

― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau)

FP feels so good

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Thursday, 17 March 2016 16:02 (eight years ago) link

i saw someone w a Chinese symbol earlier today, do you think he could secretly be a communist?

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 17 March 2016 16:31 (eight years ago) link

Are you joking?

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Thursday, 17 March 2016 16:33 (eight years ago) link

reading through first thread, doctor casino with the first otm prognostication. although not sure if 'hilarious' ended up being the right word

trump beating j.e. bush maybe the most interesting thing long term. would be hilarious if he became the horse to beat and the whole primary process becomes an "anyone but trump" saga.
― a chamillionaire full of mallomars (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, July 1, 2015 3:41 PM (8 months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 17 March 2016 16:46 (eight years ago) link

so glad Adam is here to defend the good names of white nationalist Trumplers

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 March 2016 16:48 (eight years ago) link

a simpler time

Surprised to see Trump implode so quickly--so immediately. I was looking forward to him gumming up all the debates, but--and maybe I'm completely wrong here--I don't think he'll get anywhere near them after the last few days. In any event, enjoying his ordeal thoroughly.
― clemenza, Wednesday, July 1, 2015 5:57 PM (8 months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 17 March 2016 16:48 (eight years ago) link

a board of Bill Kristols

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 March 2016 16:49 (eight years ago) link

btw i offered a bet to rim anyone in the Apple Store if either Trump or Sanders was nominated, and no one ... bit

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 March 2016 16:50 (eight years ago) link

I'm not sure I'd read into that anything about Trump or Sanders.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Thursday, 17 March 2016 16:51 (eight years ago) link

btw i offered a bet to rim anyone in the Apple Store if either Trump or Sanders was nominated, and no one ... bit

― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius),

you might try a cornhole at NRO

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 March 2016 16:54 (eight years ago) link

global tetrahedron: Glad you dug that up--I was completely, spectacularly wrong about Trump's chances. I actually don't mind, though (notwithstanding Trump himself); I generally hate smug proclamations of certainty when it comes to politics, and was dumb enough to fall into that trap with Trump.

clemenza, Thursday, 17 March 2016 16:59 (eight years ago) link

not trying to call anyone out here either, it's just jarring to see a lot of these comments and reflect a bit on what a shit show this has been

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:00 (eight years ago) link

Hell, I was predicting he'd walk away rather than release his finances. I never imagined he'd just give out the equivalent of a piece of paper with "I AM REALLY REALLY RICH FUCK YOU" written on it in crayon, and the press and everyone else would basically chuckle, "Oh, that Donald!"

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:01 (eight years ago) link

(xpost) Keep going! I might even go back and round up all the times I said Trump couldn't possibly win.

clemenza, Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:02 (eight years ago) link

i won't have time for awhile but there was also a prediction that trump would either end up broke or in jail by the end. there's still hope for that i guess

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:03 (eight years ago) link

kudos to Casino for that prophecy; please let me know if you have any thoughts on powerball

joie de visa (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:05 (eight years ago) link

global tetrahedron: Glad you dug that up--I was completely, spectacularly wrong about Trump's chances. I actually don't mind, though (notwithstanding Trump himself); I generally hate smug proclamations of certainty when it comes to politics, and was dumb enough to fall into that trap with Trump.

don't feel too bad, iirc almost everyone in the world was totally and spectacularly wrong about trump and expressed certainty about it. s

Karl Malone, Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:07 (eight years ago) link

the first incident where I thought conventional wisdom re: Trump's chances were wrong was when he suffered zero fallout from dissing McCain. After that I viewed his campaign differently.

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:09 (eight years ago) link

Three things I like about Trump (no need for a lecture Treeship, I'm mostly horrified by him too):

1) A few of his insults at the debates were perfect (telling Cruz no one in the Senate liked him, telling Bush his mother should have ran instead).

2) When he openly mocks the media for playing along (thinking of the time Chuck Todd was excoriating him over something and Trump calmly said "It got you to pay attention, didn't it?").

3) That he made everybody who said he couldn't win the nomination (me included)--who knowingly pointed to the establishment and the fact it's a rigged game--look stupid.*

*(Seeing as he hasn't actually won yet, I'll attach an asterisk to that one.)

clemenza, Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:25 (eight years ago) link

calling dibs on the dn btw

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:32 (eight years ago) link

wtf

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:33 (eight years ago) link

Human Life Won't Become a Cat

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:34 (eight years ago) link

can you bold a dn?

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:34 (eight years ago) link

I'm honestly not understanding what that means. Is it against stem cell research or something? I'm sensing it's about abortion but

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:34 (eight years ago) link

notably, that tweet seems confused not only about biology, but about what petitions are for

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:35 (eight years ago) link

yeah. like you know how people think nothing of getting abortions for their cats and do it all the time. he's saying with people it's not like that.

Treeship, Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:36 (eight years ago) link

xp yeah the *argument* is that "Human life begins at conception because you know it's a human once it's conceived." P sure human sperm won't become a cat either though.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:36 (eight years ago) link

rip xp

Treeship, Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:36 (eight years ago) link

Just about a quarter notch above "Evolution isn't real because I've never opened a jar of peanut butter and found a spontaneously generated organism" in sophistication.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:37 (eight years ago) link

Human Life Won't Become a Cat

i would swear i read this on clickhole

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:37 (eight years ago) link

ghoul game i can't help playing: my only success iirc besides staying unconfidently quiet early on has been jumping wholeheartedly aboard the this-is-fascism, it's-not-about-trump's-motives-it's-about-the-movement train back when people (ilx people -- the larger world of course is notoriously trigger-happy w hitler comparisons) were still arguing that this was ahistorical teenage hysteria, not that i haven't indulged in teenage hysteria since. (but ahistorical's a fighting word.) also i correctly predicted the outcome of the hawaii republican primary, which i could have done w even more certainty by polling the eight people planning to vote in it.

no ilx evidence of this but my personal oh-fuck moment was when trump started bragging about everyone else onstage (+ hrc) being bought and paid for and none of them had any idea how to respond, not just because it was true but because they had thought that was just how it worked. i'm sure that e.g. ross perot said that kind of thing too (idk?) but this was the year for it.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:38 (eight years ago) link

Watch this video and sign this petiton if you know that a human life won’t become a fly or a pod:

http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMTQ4MDY0MDk0N15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMTYwNDg0Mw@@._V1_CR0,25,266,150_AL_UX477_CR0,0,477,268_AL_.jpg

Human Life WON’T Become a FLY

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:39 (eight years ago) link

Human Life Won't Become a Cat

i would swear i read this on clickhole

― wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, March 17, 2016 12:37 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I thought it was clickhole or something similar when I first saw it.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:42 (eight years ago) link

global tet, thank you. for the record though the very first thread was this one Your 2016 Presidential Candidate Speculation Thread

where KM was the first to mention trump as a candidate, then rule him out: "although it would be hilarious"

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:42 (eight years ago) link

**delivers petition to publisher of Animorphs series** WE NEED TO HAVE WORDS, MISTER

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:43 (eight years ago) link

http://2fast2die.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/peter-criss-1.jpg

schwantz, Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:44 (eight years ago) link

xpost we have to admit that it has been hilarious at times

Karl Malone, Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:45 (eight years ago) link

Found this in that first thread:

I thought (Cruz) was ineligible, destined, after a triumphant homecoming, to be our Prime Minister one day, but I see he became a naturalized citizen in 2005.
― clemenza, Sunday, 22 March 2015 15:26 (11 months ago) Permalink

It will be an issue at some point. Maybe just for a single news cycle, but someone will make a stink about it.
― Johnny Fever, Sunday, 22 March 2015 15:32 (11 months ago) Permalink

Someone did.

clemenza, Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:52 (eight years ago) link

lmao fox is gonna hold a second tier debate for the candidates who dont fit in the first one!
― lag∞n, Monday, 15 June 2015 14:42 (9 months ago) Permalink

glad to see that trump will be debating somewhere, then
― legendary wireless executive (Karl Malone), Monday, 15 June 2015 14:57 (9 months ago) Permalink

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:52 (eight years ago) link

Should've been done years ago. tick.jpg

Saw highlights only - Bingham was excellent. Ronnie looked totally under the cosh.

Anyone but Trump. Would've fancied Robertson to beat him but he's out after a tight match last night.

― xyzzzz__, Thursday, April 30, 2015

nomar, Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:57 (eight years ago) link

Meanwhile check out these dead enders

A secretive group of Republican operatives and conservative leaders convened Thursday morning for more than three hours to discuss ways to unite the right against Donald Trump, with a presentation about the feasibility of mounting a third-party challenge as well as extensive deliberations about whether a coalition of anti-Trump forces could prevent the billionaire mogul from securing the party's presidential nomination at the July convention in Cleveland.

"It's certainly not too late," Rep. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.) said as he left the session. "You could get another party on the ballot. If you did that, you'd need a movement conservative to be the candidate."

"I was just here to listen," Franks, a supporter of Trump rival Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), added. "I am worried about the kind of damage that Trump could cause to our party. You can't trust him and we've got to stop him."

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:58 (eight years ago) link

republican convention is gonna be like the end of the wild bunch

nomar, Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:59 (eight years ago) link

who will be Robert Ryan?

Trump, a triumph of democracy

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a43055/trump-hillary-general-election/

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 March 2016 18:00 (eight years ago) link

I still remember watching him come down that escalator, and the person standing up top drop their sign in the process. It was such a a ridiculous materialization of a lost Tom Goes To The Mayor episode that it was completely not threatening at all.

Evan, Thursday, 17 March 2016 18:01 (eight years ago) link

Just saw an interview where Harry Reid praised Cruz over his Obamacare filibuster: "At least he stands for something" (that's all I caught--I assume he meant as opposed to Trump).

Does this mean Reid wants Cruz or Trump to win?

clemenza, Thursday, 17 March 2016 18:04 (eight years ago) link

mitt romney feels like the robert ryan here, he just needs the mustache.

nomar, Thursday, 17 March 2016 18:04 (eight years ago) link

Does this mean Reid wants Cruz or Trump to win?

― clemenza

heh – sounds like what I call the Harriet Miers Strategy, which worked well for Reid.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 March 2016 18:10 (eight years ago) link

first time I've heard this "Grover Norquist is a jihadist" theory:
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/03/cruz-names-anti-muslim-paranoic-as-top-adviser.html#

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 March 2016 18:25 (eight years ago) link

Forgot all about Norquist--haven't heard him mentioned once this cycle.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2015/08/13/nearly-all-the-gop-candidates-bow-down-to-grover-norquist/

That dates back to last August, when Trump was one of three people who hadn't signed the "pledge."

clemenza, Thursday, 17 March 2016 18:29 (eight years ago) link

cruz named gaffney to his national security advisory team? loooool

Karl Malone, Thursday, 17 March 2016 18:33 (eight years ago) link

that "fetuses don't become cats" tweet is a good reminder that while Trump is an a+fascist schlemiel, the rest of the party's nominees aren't much better except at hiding the crazy

ulysses, Thursday, 17 March 2016 18:52 (eight years ago) link

Is this like that thing where GWB was asked what was the worst judicial decision, and he said Dred Scott?

Lots of people were laughing about, oh, okay, W is being very brave in coming out against chattel slavery. But where does he stand on Teapot Dome, Smoot Hawley, etc.? Har de har har, until it was pointed out that it was a pro-life dogwhistle.

leprechaundriac (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 17 March 2016 19:01 (eight years ago) link

Kasich has unleashed the heavy artillery: he's got some mildly critical Tweets directed at Trump today (March 17, 2016).

clemenza, Thursday, 17 March 2016 19:02 (eight years ago) link

holy christ – Frank Gaffney AND Michael Ledeen AND Elliott Abrams in Ted Cruz's national security posse?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 March 2016 19:25 (eight years ago) link

I had totally forgotten about Ledeen what a shitbag

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 March 2016 19:28 (eight years ago) link

Trump died yet?

Neanderthal, Thursday, 17 March 2016 19:48 (eight years ago) link

Not yet, check back later.

Evan, Thursday, 17 March 2016 19:59 (eight years ago) link

Mr. Obama acknowledged that Mrs. Clinton is perceived to have weaknesses as a candidate, and that some Democrats did not view her as authentic.

But he played down the importance of authenticity, noting that President George W. Bush — whose record he ran aggressively against in 2008 — was once praised for his authenticity.

...

Karl Malone, Thursday, 17 March 2016 20:17 (eight years ago) link

Our president seems to have confused authenticity and honesty

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 March 2016 20:19 (eight years ago) link

But, while he stressed that he was not endorsing either candidate, and that both would make good presidents, Mr. Obama went on to lavish praise on Mrs. Clinton, describing her as smart, tough and experienced, and said that she would continue the work of his administration.

Mordy, Thursday, 17 March 2016 20:20 (eight years ago) link

breaking news

k3vin k., Thursday, 17 March 2016 20:21 (eight years ago) link

bad news for MSF hospitals

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 March 2016 20:21 (eight years ago) link

Our president seems to have confused authenticity and honesty

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, March 17, 2016 3:19 PM (16 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

you seem to have confused politics and honesty

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Thursday, 17 March 2016 20:35 (eight years ago) link

I don't know what he means by "authenticity" -- Sanders and Bush like roots rock?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 March 2016 20:40 (eight years ago) link

Hil's cash is Goldman Good

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 March 2016 20:42 (eight years ago) link

I don't know what he means by "authenticity" -- Sanders and Bush like roots rock?

It means they use vintage gear and record on reel-to-reel. Old school, man.

leprechaundriac (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 17 March 2016 20:44 (eight years ago) link

ability to connect w/ voters on an intimate personal level that conveys that the politician is a real person just like me who i like and who understands my problems

Mordy, Thursday, 17 March 2016 20:44 (eight years ago) link

That's what I thought the writer meant. Whatever my reservations about HRC, she does connect with lots of voters. That criticism of hers has always made the least sense to me (I don't imagine Romney, Dole, or Kerry connecting w/anyone).

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 March 2016 20:46 (eight years ago) link

Bob Dole connects with Bob Dole!

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 March 2016 20:47 (eight years ago) link

sometimes it feels like anyone other than kerry would have been a winner that year, even if they'd run gore out there one more time.

nomar, Thursday, 17 March 2016 20:47 (eight years ago) link

HRC connects with voters but i think she's right that she's not a natural politician like bill + obama - they were able to, despite being moderates, spark the hopes and dreams of an awful lot of ppl (who probably should've known better). she doesn't have that transcendent element - she seems more like your run-of-the-mill politician. nb i like her a lot but even there i don't get the infamous leg shivers

Mordy, Thursday, 17 March 2016 20:51 (eight years ago) link

she hasn't had a "i feel your pain" or "a more perfect union" moment

Mordy, Thursday, 17 March 2016 20:52 (eight years ago) link

sometimes it feels like anyone other than kerry would have been a winner that year, even if they'd run gore out there one more time.

― nomar, Thursday, March 17, 2016 4:47 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

any candidate that lets the Swift Boat nonsense actually cripple their campaign rather than getting out in front of it and turning it on its head stood no chance. it was kinda like he'd decided by then he didn't really want the job.

Neanderthal, Thursday, 17 March 2016 20:54 (eight years ago) link

I don't think that's what sunk Kerry

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 March 2016 20:57 (eight years ago) link

Dem base wasn't gonna get excited about a candidate who was just gonna "do better" at Dubya's stupid war, the guy had to inspire turnout, and his basic positioning was flawed and stupid.

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 March 2016 20:58 (eight years ago) link

stupid, I say! Dems should've run an antiwar candidate, but they were too cowardly.

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 March 2016 20:58 (eight years ago) link

what's weird is that kerry is an obvious antiwar candidate w/ his vietnam protest background. considering that lord knows why he voted for the iraq war.

Mordy, Thursday, 17 March 2016 21:02 (eight years ago) link

that Kerry died awhile ago, now he advocates for lobbing some soft cruise missiles

HRC connects as one of several unfortunate symbols, pick one

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 March 2016 21:03 (eight years ago) link

I don't think that's what sunk Kerry

― Οὖτις, Thursday, March 17, 2016

he was on a Swift Boat.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 March 2016 21:04 (eight years ago) link

what's weird is that kerry is an obvious antiwar candidate w/ his vietnam protest background. considering that lord knows why he voted for the iraq war.

― Mordy, Thursday, March 17, 2016 5:02 PM (3 minutes ago)

yeah i think that iraq war vote may have had something to do with it

k3vin k., Thursday, 17 March 2016 21:06 (eight years ago) link

idk what to think of Kerry as secretary of state -- less blood on his hands than Clinton for sure, and I'm impressed with the smoothness of the Cuba-U.S. reopening.

As senator he had a mostly honorable career (one of the few interested in impeaching Reagan; investigating Contra-drug ties; BCCI). He would've made a good president had he he run twenty years earlier.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 March 2016 21:06 (eight years ago) link

otoh we never bombed an MSF facility while hill was SOS (iirc!).

Mordy, Thursday, 17 March 2016 21:08 (eight years ago) link

just a citizen or three

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 March 2016 21:13 (eight years ago) link

and some 'militant' children

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 March 2016 21:13 (eight years ago) link

gosh look at you always moving the goal posts. first you don't want us to bomb hospitals, then you don't want us to kill innocent civilians and american citizens, next you'll want what? no more coups of democratic countries???

Mordy, Thursday, 17 March 2016 21:14 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxjM1yCcqTQ

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 March 2016 21:25 (eight years ago) link

Referencing America recovering from President Trump.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 March 2016 21:26 (eight years ago) link

I think Kerry's badness is overstated he was a okay candidate and Bush was just not as unpopular as most people think he was in 2004

iatee, Thursday, 17 March 2016 22:35 (eight years ago) link

swift boat stuff probably had zero effect on anything, that was just meat for the republican base

iatee, Thursday, 17 March 2016 22:37 (eight years ago) link

sanders not asking for a missouri recount which leads me to believe he's rethinking how long he's going to stay in the race at this point

akm, Thursday, 17 March 2016 22:38 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, I'm sure he knows he's not going to win, but also he gets basically the same amount of delegates from Missouri no matter who is the official winner

intheblanks, Thursday, 17 March 2016 22:52 (eight years ago) link

delegates are awarded proportionally so it doesn't really matter

k3vin k., Thursday, 17 March 2016 22:53 (eight years ago) link

I think Kerry's badness is overstated he was a okay candidate and Bush was just not as unpopular as most people think he was in 2004

― iatee, Thursday, March 17, 2016

otm -- and Bush barely won. Remember when Ohio results were unknown for about twelve hours?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 March 2016 23:03 (eight years ago) link

The surge worked!

Οὖτις, Thursday, 17 March 2016 23:10 (eight years ago) link

Stuart Stevens, Romney's guy in 2012, is actually funny--just got off two great lines on CNN. 1) "I take back what I said about Donald Trump not bringing people together: with Graham supporting Cruz, the Rapture must be at hand." 2) (After a couple of minutes of the usual arguments over Trump) "I've been in a lot of delegate-hunting meetings, and that's the first time I've ever heard the word 'moral' come up."

clemenza, Friday, 18 March 2016 00:22 (eight years ago) link

Greta Van Susteren Verified account
‏@greta
Senator Rubio says he won't be anyone's VP, not running for Gov in Florida..and will be private citizen in January

i'm picturing rubio just sitting in a recliner staring at a wall for hours on end

lute bro (brimstead), Friday, 18 March 2016 03:41 (eight years ago) link

they'll take his batteries out and put him in a closet, to be found years later on Storage Wars

akm, Friday, 18 March 2016 04:05 (eight years ago) link

i know he's young but is rubio basically saying "fuck politics" right here?

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Friday, 18 March 2016 04:09 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ya1GWB2AMnY

lute bro (brimstead), Friday, 18 March 2016 04:11 (eight years ago) link

impossible to unsee http://gawker.com/after-this-video-you-will-never-be-able-to-watch-ted-cr-1765312656

flopson, Friday, 18 March 2016 04:19 (eight years ago) link

http://lionsoftrump.net/2016/03/15/lion-guard-is-born/

Evan, Friday, 18 March 2016 04:20 (eight years ago) link

lots of people design lots of websites that probably they don't mean

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 18 March 2016 04:22 (eight years ago) link

g1ennster20I3
MARCH 17, 2016 AT 8:57 PM
I’m forming a chapter of Lion Guard in Riverside county. Visit my web site ca1iforniaf0rtrump.com. We are having a rally Saturday, March 26, 12:00 noon in Temecula at the duck pond. Trump must win in California!

Lion Guard
MARCH 17, 2016 AT 10:09 PM
YES! Thank you! Together we can Make America Great Again!

nomar, Friday, 18 March 2016 04:25 (eight years ago) link

I have a hard time believing that's not parody? Though perhaps the the commenters.

chinavision!, Friday, 18 March 2016 04:30 (eight years ago) link

The writing style seems wrong.

chinavision!, Friday, 18 March 2016 04:31 (eight years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/X1rJXE4.jpg?1

larry appleton, Friday, 18 March 2016 04:31 (eight years ago) link

Perhaps "not" the commenters xpost

chinavision!, Friday, 18 March 2016 04:31 (eight years ago) link

lions guard logo/branding looks weirdly well developed

micah, Friday, 18 March 2016 04:34 (eight years ago) link

fasces gratia fascis

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 18 March 2016 04:37 (eight years ago) link

Kinda bizarre statements by Bernie on Rachel Maddow tonight about how he could conceivably be making his case to superdelegates at the convention even if behind on pledged delegates.

"There are other factors, and the other factors will be the strength of each of us in taking on the Republican candidate. What I think is most important to all of the delegates, including the superdelegates, is that we have a candidate who will win."

Only scenario where that has any integrity I can see would be if he was ahead in total popular vote but through delegate proportioning was behind in pledged delegates. I think that's possible in the same way a similar thing is possible with the electoral college.

timellison, Friday, 18 March 2016 04:45 (eight years ago) link

didn't watch that segment but he's probably also referring to polls showing him beating trump and cruz head-to-head by a larger margin than hillary is. i doubt the meaningfulness of those polls, but if you're in his position you're certainly going to play them up

k3vin k., Friday, 18 March 2016 04:49 (eight years ago) link

Amazing the stuff you forget. CNN was just playing 2008 debate clips, and Clinton was going after Obama over Tony Rezko. Don't think I heard that name even once in 2012.

clemenza, Friday, 18 March 2016 04:58 (eight years ago) link

But that would be a weaselly reason for why you should be the nominee when you didn't actually win.

xp

timellison, Friday, 18 March 2016 04:59 (eight years ago) link

It all sounds vaguely familiar.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVHq-SLrah4

clemenza, Friday, 18 March 2016 05:08 (eight years ago) link

so what do we think about this wild scenario? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/adam-nicholas-phillips/doomsday-savior-how-paul-ryan_b_9474788.html

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 18 March 2016 05:08 (eight years ago) link

Flopson - that Cruz video was nauseating!

schwantz, Friday, 18 March 2016 07:01 (eight years ago) link

amateurist: well, y'all laughed at me last time i brought up the corrupt bargain of 1824...

that said paul ryan is no henry clay.

diana krallice (rushomancy), Friday, 18 March 2016 10:35 (eight years ago) link

Wasn't that the premise of the Veep season 4 finale?

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 18 March 2016 11:38 (eight years ago) link

This harebrained theory was co-conceived and written with Chris LaTondresse, VP of Communications and Strategy at The Expectations Project and former advisor at USAID’s Center for Faith Based and Community Initiatives.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Friday, 18 March 2016 12:41 (eight years ago) link

re Rubio "he's young" - I guess. It pains me to say that he and I were born four days apart (May '71). Cruz is only slightly older (December '70).

This year we may elect the last insufferable Boomer, for good or for ill. The president after next could well be younger than everyone here, and that will be a strange cultural moment. Figuring out how to mock them will be an interesting process.

leprechaundriac (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 18 March 2016 13:22 (eight years ago) link

I'm older than one of my current U.S. Senators. I look forward to boxing his big jug ears one day.

pplains, Friday, 18 March 2016 13:25 (eight years ago) link

Glad i'll be dead for the first insufferable millennial prez, if things go that long

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 18 March 2016 13:50 (eight years ago) link

"The president after next could well be younger than everyone here, "

Lol speak for yrself gramps

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Friday, 18 March 2016 13:52 (eight years ago) link

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/18/us/politics/as-hillary-clinton-sweeps-states-one-group-resists-white-men.html

it's amazing how many of these pro-Hillary pieces i have read that include zero reference to her voting for the Iraq War and Patriot Act, hiding them instead in the adviser-approved language of "national security experience". as much as the Times would like us to forget it's important to remember she voted for The Iraq War, The Patriot Act, and the bank bailout which were three of the biggest biggest reasons why W was the worst president of all time. everyone hated W, even his own party. yet none of those get brought up in your standard NYTimes think-piece about why people don't like her. instead we get identity politic and easy cherry-picked targets like Bengazi. what do you expect coming from a paper that was also one of "Dubya's war" biggest cheerleaders. you can't have a large chunk of the population spend more than a decade hating W for his injust war, surveillance state, normalizing of torture, etc. and then just have them ignore all that now and be cool with The Patriot Act now that someone has a D by their name.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 18 March 2016 13:52 (eight years ago) link

that's never the perspective of such stories tho; it's about how white men like those in the Times story see Obama-Clinton as the standard bearers of "pro-minority" liberalism.

The yutzes interviewed in that piece are OK with Endless War, i'd wager

xp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 18 March 2016 13:56 (eight years ago) link

the headline "One Group Resists Clinton: White Men" is misleading cos it focuses on a very specific and easily ignorable group that "resists" her.

btw, "resists" her? that is kind of gross language imo. shame on me for resisting something.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 18 March 2016 14:02 (eight years ago) link

Resistance is futile!

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Friday, 18 March 2016 14:03 (eight years ago) link

everyone hated W, even his own party.

this is not how I remember 2001-2009

There was a hole bunch of problems whit his campaigns (crüt), Friday, 18 March 2016 14:06 (eight years ago) link

yeah, that's bs

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 18 March 2016 14:10 (eight years ago) link

they had Clint Eastwood talk to an empty chair rather than invite him to the last RNC

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 18 March 2016 14:11 (eight years ago) link

Bush was unpopular from January 2009 to February 2009.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 18 March 2016 14:13 (eight years ago) link

he transferred it to his brother Jeb after taking up painting / ironic lolz

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 18 March 2016 14:14 (eight years ago) link

the Dems sure rubberstamped a lot of W's shit, imagine if he'd been popular!

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 18 March 2016 14:15 (eight years ago) link

My barber went into a massive RAGE yesterday about how much he hates Clinton and Obama, and Trump is the only one he can stand. Among other things, he said something like "There is no way in hell I would give that lying snake the pleasure of being the first woman president," and "Obama is a fucking asshole who thinks he's smarter than everyone else." Sanders, meanwhile is just "out there," which is relatively kind. He's basically the perfect trump voter -- an angry, white, probably not college-educated, moderately conservative guy from non-gentrified Brooklyn who feels like elites are shitting on him. He cuts the hair of smug midtown professionals like myself all day, and I think on top of that his business is slow and he's stressed about it. I didn't really argue with him about it except to say that I didn't like Clinton but would take her over Trump, which is true, and that Trump changed his story every time he spoke, which is also true. I wasn't about to go further -- the guy was visibly enraged and was holding a razor.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Friday, 18 March 2016 14:15 (eight years ago) link

bush was pretty popular in his first term. it seemed to some of us that the wars had been going a long time by 2004, but haha

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 18 March 2016 14:18 (eight years ago) link

I wonder if native NYC-metro area people respond to Trump differently than most other Americans. I still identify Trump as a sort of 80's tabloid clown on par with Geraldo Rivera, Cutis Sliwa, George Steinbrenner etc. Clearly a dick but also an obviously pretend ideologue, posing no threat except in his own sphere, played for laffs.

The David Duke analogy wld work if maybe Ted Cruz or somebody was hosting.

― Hadrian VIII, Tuesday, October 20, 2015 10:28 AM (4 months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Hadrian VIII, Friday, 18 March 2016 14:56 (eight years ago) link

From SNL thread. Maybe a good idea w/ these to have a dedicated shaming/mea culpa thread.

Hadrian VIII, Friday, 18 March 2016 14:57 (eight years ago) link

I definitely think there is a shock-jock, Howard Stern-esque appeal of Trump for some NYers though. Actually maybe no moreso than for anyone else in the country who listens to conservative talk radio. That's actually what Trump sounds like more than anything else imo, a shock jock.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Friday, 18 March 2016 15:00 (eight years ago) link

Lots of manly bluster about how much it sucks to be oversocialized and have to live in civilization.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Friday, 18 March 2016 15:01 (eight years ago) link

You need a new barber dude. There are so many chill young barbers in NY.

Treeship, Friday, 18 March 2016 15:10 (eight years ago) link

I agree though about trump and "shock jock" culture. That's part of why I am so repulsed by him, in a pre-rational sort of way.

Treeship, Friday, 18 March 2016 15:11 (eight years ago) link

"King of All Media" schtick aside, though, Howard didn't trade in self-aggrandizement. He openly gushed over and envied his guest's lives, and when it came to dick talk he only lamented his poor endowment etc.

Hadrian VIII, Friday, 18 March 2016 15:16 (eight years ago) link

He also resembles the rude and rambling weirdos that come into stores that employees are told to ignore until they go away, or at least he probably appeals to that demo.

Evan, Friday, 18 March 2016 15:18 (eight years ago) link

You need a new barber dude. There are so many chill young barbers in NY.

― Treeship, Friday, March 18, 2016 10:10 AM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

He's a great barber though.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Friday, 18 March 2016 15:20 (eight years ago) link

Although TBQH this visit made me question whether I want to keep going back - he also seemed upset about the fact that I cancelled last minute the other day.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Friday, 18 March 2016 15:21 (eight years ago) link

He was pretending not to be but I could see he was. He's an angry and frustrated man.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Friday, 18 March 2016 15:21 (eight years ago) link

How can a barber of all people possibly stand trump?

Evan, Friday, 18 March 2016 15:24 (eight years ago) link

professional curiosity?

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 18 March 2016 15:26 (eight years ago) link

the 2nd post in this thread is more or less Trump barber POV

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 18 March 2016 15:26 (eight years ago) link

lol

"Worried pimp" (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 18 March 2016 15:37 (eight years ago) link

he also seemed upset about the fact that I cancelled last minute the other day.

tbf every business gets upset about this

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 18 March 2016 15:39 (eight years ago) link

so it seems like bernie actually believes he can win this thing by convincing superdelegates that he's more electable. i guess he can't just say "i know our campaign can't win but i'm going to continue anyway to put pressure on hillary" but it seems like maybe his campaign team is lying to him about his chances.

Mordy, Friday, 18 March 2016 15:39 (eight years ago) link

appointments for haircuts lol

all Sanders cares about is *a* chance, fine with me

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 18 March 2016 15:42 (eight years ago) link

it is kinda funny that after months of calling superdelegates undemocratic he is staying in out of the home that he can convince enough superdelegates to overturn the pledged delegate majority

Mordy, Friday, 18 March 2016 15:42 (eight years ago) link

out of the hope*

Mordy, Friday, 18 March 2016 15:42 (eight years ago) link

as i've said my personal preference is that he uses all that money + activist energy to focus on winnable down ticket races. the longer he runs without actually making an effort to spearhead the revolution he says is necessary taking donations for a quixotic campaign, the less i respect him tbh. he seems like an honest guy who talks a lot but doesn't really have the will or energy to do anything that could make a difference (except for the hard to measure "changing the discourse" part)

Mordy, Friday, 18 March 2016 15:44 (eight years ago) link

It's good that he gets out of the home ever so often. It's good to keep stimulated and feel part of society at that age.

xp

Evan, Friday, 18 March 2016 15:45 (eight years ago) link

I have been going to the same two or three barbershops since childhood (and mostly gotten the same haircut), but have never once made an appointment, fwiw.

leprechaundriac (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 18 March 2016 15:55 (eight years ago) link

he also seemed upset about the fact that I cancelled last minute the other day.

tbf every business gets upset about this

― i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, March 18, 2016 10:39 AM (17 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

It's not my fault he's not getting enough walk-in traffic!

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Friday, 18 March 2016 15:58 (eight years ago) link

It's not like he lost business because of me.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Friday, 18 March 2016 15:59 (eight years ago) link

I walked out of my barber shop of ten years a few months ago, never to return. I just couldn't take the hot ignorant political takes anymore.

So now I'm looking for a new barber. Dammit.

pplains, Friday, 18 March 2016 16:00 (eight years ago) link

i'm just growing out a natural. fuck the barbers and fuck the system mannnnnnnnnn
#feelthesidebern

ulysses, Friday, 18 March 2016 16:05 (eight years ago) link

I may be looking for one, the dude's rage as much as the political content was hard to take

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Friday, 18 March 2016 16:12 (eight years ago) link

lol @ #feelthesidebern

leprechaundriac (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 18 March 2016 16:12 (eight years ago) link

http://imgur.com/ofgVtDz

leprechaundriac (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 18 March 2016 16:23 (eight years ago) link

it is kinda funny that after months of calling superdelegates undemocratic he is staying in out of the home that he can convince enough superdelegates to overturn the pledged delegate majority

― Mordy, Friday, March 18, 2016 11:42 AM (43 minutes ago)

i don't recall sanders calling super delegates undemocratic

k3vin k., Friday, 18 March 2016 16:27 (eight years ago) link

i mean they are, everyone both for and against them realizes this, but i don't remember bernie himself complaining about them

k3vin k., Friday, 18 March 2016 16:28 (eight years ago) link

i really have to go round up these mordy disingenuous concern troll posts about bernie and his supporters that begin with "so it seems" or "i guess" and poll them at the end of the season, one of my favorite things

k3vin k., Friday, 18 March 2016 16:29 (eight years ago) link

it seemed like that argument was coming out of his campaign but i'll admit that it might've just been omnipresent among his supporters

Mordy, Friday, 18 March 2016 16:29 (eight years ago) link

gee whiz, i really hope bernie supporters will divert their energies to other races once bernie's out...but i bet they won't, *wink-wink*

k3vin k., Friday, 18 March 2016 16:30 (eight years ago) link

yeah i'm a huge concern troll you got me. there are no legitimate critiques of bernie's campaign, just secret hillary supporters trying to sow discontent.

Mordy, Friday, 18 March 2016 16:30 (eight years ago) link

it seemed like that argument was coming out of his campaign but i'll admit that it might've just been omnipresent among his supporters

― Mordy,

should've started that sentence with "I guess" imo

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 18 March 2016 16:30 (eight years ago) link

i bet he won't even get out. he has displayed very little skill to building a voting base outside of college students and very little savvy about what is required to have a democratic revolution (hint: it involves getting other ppl besides himself elected). i actually registered Dem so i could vote for him in PA but i've since switched back to Hill.

Mordy, Friday, 18 March 2016 16:31 (eight years ago) link

i feel like you're expecting a bit much of a presidential candidate, honestly

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 18 March 2016 16:33 (eight years ago) link

he said that changing this country is going to require a political revolution to flip congress. i don't think it's asking too much for him to lead the revolution he's running on.

Mordy, Friday, 18 March 2016 16:34 (eight years ago) link

Mordy and his Troupe of Strawmen, Sunday night on The Ed Sullivan Show

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 18 March 2016 16:34 (eight years ago) link

say revolution one more time and Berniejuice appears

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 18 March 2016 16:35 (eight years ago) link

bernie has no reason to get out. generally when people fall behind in primary races they need to drop out because they start to run out of money. bernie doesn't have that problem

k3vin k., Friday, 18 March 2016 16:35 (eight years ago) link

Riotously stupid article in the NY Times about how Hillary may be in trouble because she's 'losing white men':

She also performed poorly on Tuesday with independents, who have never been her core supporters. But white men were, at least when Mrs. Clinton was running against a black opponent

THIS IS COMPLETELY INEXPLICABLE.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 18 March 2016 16:36 (eight years ago) link

Say "revolution" one more time. I dare you--I double dare you.

http://www2.pictures.zimbio.com/mp/P1bFv6KVp0tl.jpg

clemenza, Friday, 18 March 2016 16:37 (eight years ago) link

Although TBQH this visit made me question whether I want to keep going back - he also seemed upset about the fact that I cancelled last minute the other day.

― human life won't become a cat (man alive), Friday, March 18, 2016 11:21 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

May i suggest tomcats barber shop. Once they gave me free metal tickets. Just chill times with chill guys.

Treeship, Friday, 18 March 2016 16:38 (eight years ago) link

"She's talking to minorities now, not really to white people, and that's a mistake," said Dennis Bertko, 66, a construction project manager in Youngstown, Ohio, as he sipped a draft beer at the Golden Dawn Restaurant in a downtrodden part of town. "She could have a broader message. We would have listened."

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 18 March 2016 16:40 (eight years ago) link

But white men were, at least when Mrs. Clinton was running against a black opponent

THIS IS COMPLETELY INEXPLICABLE.

― Andrew Farrell, Friday, March 18, 2016 12:36 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lol

marcos, Friday, 18 March 2016 16:41 (eight years ago) link

Are nyt trolling hil supporters, white men, internet lefties, all of the above with that?

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Friday, 18 March 2016 16:43 (eight years ago) link

"She's talking to minorities now, not really to white people, and that's a mistake," said Dennis Bertko, 66, a construction project manager in Youngstown, Ohio, as he sipped a draft beer at the Golden Dawn Restaurant in a downtrodden part of town. "She could have a broader message. We would have listened."

I can imagine Chris Matthews masturbating in the corner as this conversation took place.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Friday, 18 March 2016 16:44 (eight years ago) link

trolling the idea of an informed populace more like

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 18 March 2016 16:44 (eight years ago) link

"She's talking to minorities now, not really to white people, and that's a mistake," said Dennis Bertko, 66, a construction project manager in Youngstown, Ohio, as he sipped a draft beer at the Golden Dawn Restaurant in a downtrodden part of town. "She could have a broader message. We would have listened."

I can imagine Chris Matthews masturbating in the corner as this conversation took place.

― the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Friday, March 18, 2016

beside portraits of Ronnie 'n' Tip

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 18 March 2016 16:47 (eight years ago) link

meanwhile former McCain lickspittle and Jeb! super PAC guy Mike Murphy has a few things to get off his chest:

Trump, if you haven't gathered, irritates Murphy. And no matter how much Trump surges, Murphy's in no danger of "learning German" and pulling a Chris "von Papen" Christie: "I'd rather cut my arm off than vote for that jerk." But what especially irks him are critics ("the bumper sticker glue" crowd he calls them, as in outsiders who second-guess your campaign right down to the kind of glue used on the bumper stickers) acting as though it were Right to Rise's duty to take out Trump.

Cruz:

"I think he's cynical, totally cynical. .  .  . I don't think he could win a general election, so he'll be wiped out. It's a choice between Trump, who is terrible for the country, and Cruz, who is terrible for the party. He's too smart for his act .  .  . and he's probably pissed that a bigger con man showed up."

Rubio:

It especially enrages Murphy that the Beltway crowd has been so protective of Rubio, "having a breakdown as their precious helicopter-mom dreams are evaporating."

sad man thinkin about things on Super Tuesday at a hotel bar:

Murphy himself isn't much of a drinker anymore, but when he orders a Blue Moon, DJ looks as though Murphy had just tried on a pair of lady-boots. "Marco beer," DJ grimaces. "Lots of f

http://www.weeklystandard.com/debriefing-mike-murphy/article/2001632#.Vuu5YFzn0bJ.twitter

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 18 March 2016 16:55 (eight years ago) link

lots of foam

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 18 March 2016 16:55 (eight years ago) link

helicopter-mom dreams

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 18 March 2016 16:57 (eight years ago) link

i don't remember bernie himself complaining about (superdelegates)

And I don't remember Hillary herself claiming her nomination was "inevitable" or that she expected/deserved a "coronation," but nevertheless one hears those accusations leveled against her all the goldurn time.

leprechaundriac (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 18 March 2016 16:59 (eight years ago) link

you must have missed yesterday's NYT lovefest where Obama levels those accusations "against her"

big difference between random people on Facebook hyping themselves up vs. the New York Times

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 18 March 2016 17:04 (eight years ago) link

what the hell are you even talking about

k3vin k., Friday, 18 March 2016 17:09 (eight years ago) link

must have missed when Dailykos was a respected institution that led the nation to invade Iraq under false pretenses

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 18 March 2016 17:10 (eight years ago) link

champagne wishes and helicopter mom dreams

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 18 March 2016 17:24 (eight years ago) link

he has displayed very little skill to building a voting base outside of college students

mordy, this just isn't true and i think you can do better. sanders may not have built a winning coalition, and he may have dramatically failed to win over some super-major, important groups as much as he needed to... as i'd be the first to acknowledge! but he has not won nine states just on college kids, c'mon.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Friday, 18 March 2016 17:26 (eight years ago) link

just took a business call with a client who, when I used the phrase "trump card" in reference to a late addition to our deliverable, said "DON'T SAY THAT NAME!"

people be nervous

ulysses, Friday, 18 March 2016 17:28 (eight years ago) link

just took a business call with a client who, when I used the phrase "trump card" in reference to a late addition to our deliverable, said "DON'T SAY THAT NAME!"

Time for a freedom fries style name change.

A Fifth Beatle Dies (Tom D.), Friday, 18 March 2016 17:30 (eight years ago) link

well that's the drumpf thing isn't it?

ulysses, Friday, 18 March 2016 17:31 (eight years ago) link

freedom card

There was a hole bunch of problems whit his campaigns (crüt), Friday, 18 March 2016 17:32 (eight years ago) link

i involuntarily flinched the other day when a co-worker said that something "trumps" something else, i think that word is poisoned now

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 18 March 2016 17:32 (eight years ago) link

From now on, I'll be blowing my own drumpfet.

A Fifth Beatle Dies (Tom D.), Friday, 18 March 2016 17:33 (eight years ago) link

I did that last week when I opened my mailbox and saw my electricity "bill"

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 18 March 2016 17:33 (eight years ago) link

you blew bill?

taking 90's nostalgia a bit too far there imo

ulysses, Friday, 18 March 2016 17:35 (eight years ago) link

Burning myself is totally ruined too.

Evan, Friday, 18 March 2016 17:36 (eight years ago) link

Fortunately the thread has moved on but, argh, sorry, just to explain my impressions / thoughts in order:

1. The charge is made that Bernie (or rather Bernie's supporters) claimed that superdelegates are undemocratic.

2. The countercharge is made, hey, Bernie HIMSELF didn't say that, despite what some Bernie supporters may have said (or what some non-Bern-feelers perceive Bernie supporters to have said).

3. I think, hey, Hillary has gotten plentiful flak itt (and in its predecessors) for things she hasn't said, but that Hillary opponents believe she thinks, or believe her supporters think. For EXAMPLE the inevitability/coronation narrative - which I am not aware of her or any campaign person saying like ever. But which people are happy to accuse her and her supporters of thinking (here and elsewhere).

4. Abandoning this line of argument because what is the point anyways (not gonna change any minds), I thought "OK whatevs," and for entertainment's sake linked in a parody/satire that I thought was actually kinda funny, despite a mean-ish edge if one were to take it too seriously.

I don't know if that helps but that is what I was talking about. Absolutely have no trouble conceding that Facebook randos, NYT, and the sitting president speak with differing levels of authority if that makes things any better.

BUT I think it's worth saying that if pro-Sanders folks can ask us to distinguish the thoughts of Joe Sanders Supporter from the thoughts of the candidate himself, then surely Clinton deserves at least some of the same courtesy? No?

leprechaundriac (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 18 March 2016 17:36 (eight years ago) link

Joe Plumber Sanders

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 18 March 2016 17:38 (eight years ago) link

Joe the Sander, surely.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Friday, 18 March 2016 17:59 (eight years ago) link

I wonder if anybody will be ever able to write accurately about the sociological effects & sampling bias of FB sorting algorithms affect political campaigns, American presidential ones or otherwise.

It kinda exacerbates the "well everybody _I_ know is talking about this" thing only instead of just a single Beltway, you have near-infinite Beltways, each constructed by each participant.

Plenty of shit has been typed about the perceived online behavior of a candidate's fans(or supporters of any range of zealotry) having a non-zero effect on voting patterns. Algorithm-sorting results in a positive feedback loop more annoying than jamming a Shure 57 into a speaker cone; you see all this shit on a topic because the stuff you post about is also posted about by all the contacts you've voluntarily networked with.

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Friday, 18 March 2016 18:19 (eight years ago) link

Hillary has gotten plentiful flak itt (and in its predecessors) for things she hasn't said, but that Hillary opponents believe she thinks, or believe her supporters think

i don't understand why you are concerning yourself with mind-reading the thoughts of potential voters of any of these people when there are millions of them. it just seems like an exercise in self-confirmation bias.

i could really care less what she says or thinks or what other people thinks she says or thinks. the way she votes is all that matters.

politicians will say anything to get elected. let's look at the hard evidence of actual votes. this shouldn't be controversial.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 18 March 2016 19:25 (eight years ago) link

Patriot Act she voted for.
Iraq War she voted for.
Bank Bailout she voted for.

this is in the public record you don't need a crystal ball or a crystal poll.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 18 March 2016 19:27 (eight years ago) link

I wonder if anybody will be ever able to write accurately about the sociological effects & sampling bias of FB sorting algorithms affect political campaigns, American presidential ones or otherwise.

It kinda exacerbates the "well everybody _I_ know is talking about this" thing only instead of just a single Beltway, you have near-infinite Beltways, each constructed by each participant.

I think it started with talk radio and cable news (esp the split in cable news resulting from Fox News). But it's interesting to think about how relatively short the span of time was when national television network news (and maybe to an extent syndicated print news and newspapers) created this probably largely false sense of The Nation.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Friday, 18 March 2016 19:34 (eight years ago) link

Hillary's votes aren't in dispute.

Look, all I'm talking about here is the idea (expressed upthread) that we shouldn't confuse Bernie's supporters with Bernie himself. I agree, fwiw, and am just asking whether Hillary gets the same benefit of the doubt or not.

leprechaundriac (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 18 March 2016 19:38 (eight years ago) link

The Nation = the monoculture

we don't have one anymore

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 March 2016 20:02 (eight years ago) link

we don't have one anymore

Yeah, that's I mean. It's not just an insular community only talking to it(e.g. RW talk radio), it's _millions_ of insular communities, where the epistemology, as it were, of each participant is fed by a sorting algorithm.

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Friday, 18 March 2016 20:09 (eight years ago) link

Only talking to itself, rather

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Friday, 18 March 2016 20:09 (eight years ago) link

Bank Bailout she voted for.

I'm tired of people acting like the bank bailouts were some tremendous failure. They were not a failure. They weren't even really bailouts in the end. TARP booked a 15.3 billion dollar profit for the US Treasury. The effectiveness of TARP can certainly be debated, but what exactly was the alternative? Letting some of the largest banks in the country go into liquidation? Anyone who seriously thinks inaction was a superior alternative can't be taken seriously.

But facts never get in the way of a convenient talking point, even for people on the left.

Gatemouth, Friday, 18 March 2016 20:23 (eight years ago) link

otm

I can't abide by Patriot/Iraq War votes myself but I don't really hold the bank bailout vote against her.

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 March 2016 20:27 (eight years ago) link

people hate the banks

Van Horn Street, Friday, 18 March 2016 20:33 (eight years ago) link

lol. I for one am a (relatively) liberal Democrat who works in the banking sector and I could never bring myself to support Sanders just because of his blanket condemnations of the "banks." The one thing Clinton has in her favor is her nuanced approach (i.e. engaging with stakeholders). Sanders' one-man bank wrecking machine approach isn't going to get anywhere. I mean, New York and Delaware are each represented by two Senators from his own party.

Gatemouth, Friday, 18 March 2016 20:38 (eight years ago) link

cool

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Friday, 18 March 2016 20:42 (eight years ago) link

oh it made a profit. nevermind then. what a great success for America.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 18 March 2016 20:43 (eight years ago) link

thank god we didn't wait until there were, you know, real and substantial reforms written into the bailout, and just handed over a check. wouldn't want to not be taken seriously by someone who counts money for a living.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 18 March 2016 20:44 (eight years ago) link

first suggestion I've seen of the House actually being in play in 2016, thx to GOP meltdown:
http://cookpolitical.com/story/9382

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 March 2016 20:52 (eight years ago) link

filing deadlines still haven't passed in a majority of districts

get on it Berniebros

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 March 2016 20:55 (eight years ago) link

Bank Bailout she voted for.
I'm tired of people acting like the bank bailouts were some tremendous failure. They were not a failure. They weren't even really bailouts in the end. TARP booked a 15.3 billion dollar profit for the US Treasury. The effectiveness of TARP can certainly be debated, but what exactly was the alternative? Letting some of the largest banks in the country go into liquidation? Anyone who seriously thinks inaction was a superior alternative can't be taken seriously.

But facts never get in the way of a convenient talking point, even for people on the left.

― Gatemouth, Friday, March 18, 2016 1:23 PM (29 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

So otm, I'm glad she voted for TARP. Problem isn't TARP, but lack of accountability (hearings, regulatory crackdown, etc.) post-bailout, Dodd-Frank not having stronger teeth, inability to close carried-interest loophole, etc.

intheblanks, Friday, 18 March 2016 20:57 (eight years ago) link

Which of those do we have any reason to believe she supports or would have supported?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 18 March 2016 20:59 (eight years ago) link

Barney seems p confident about her support of Dodd-Frank

xp

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 March 2016 21:01 (eight years ago) link

Also..."but I would also fight for tough new rules, stronger enforcement and more accountability that go well beyond Dodd-Frank."

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/07/opinion/hillary-clinton-how-id-rein-in-wall-street.html

Obviously ymmv as to whether these are sincere and believable statements, but she's on the record with them.

intheblanks, Friday, 18 March 2016 21:04 (eight years ago) link

lol:
https://twitter.com/timothypmurphy/status/710932875256991744

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 March 2016 21:20 (eight years ago) link

Problem isn't TARP, but lack of accountability (hearings, regulatory crackdown, etc.) post-bailout, Dodd-Frank not having stronger teeth, inability to close carried-interest loophole, etc.

couldn't these have been, i dunno, written into the terms of the bailout? i'm no legislator mind you but.... isn't this the reason why people who dislike the bailout, dislike the bailout? the vague promise that congress would someday come back around to this and prevent another disaster of the deregulated financial market doesn't really cut it in 2016 ("I would also fight for...") any more than it did in 2009, right?

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Friday, 18 March 2016 21:30 (eight years ago) link

Bernie skippin' AIPAC

my man

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 18 March 2016 21:33 (eight years ago) link

perhaps relevant to consider how fast TARP was written and passed, iirc there was not a lot of time for tinkering. maybe there were amendments ready to go that were voted down, I don't remember.

xp

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 March 2016 21:33 (eight years ago) link

AIPAC is an abomination

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 March 2016 21:34 (eight years ago) link

BUT I think it's worth saying that if pro-Sanders folks can ask us to distinguish the thoughts of Joe Sanders Supporter from the thoughts of the candidate himself, then surely Clinton deserves at least some of the same courtesy? No?

NO HOW DARE YOU COMPARE THE SAINT TO THE DEVIL

tremendous crime wave and killing wave (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Friday, 18 March 2016 21:38 (eight years ago) link


Problem isn't TARP, but lack of accountability (hearings, regulatory crackdown, etc.) post-bailout, Dodd-Frank not having stronger teeth, inability to close carried-interest loophole, etc.

couldn't these have been, i dunno, written into the terms of the bailout? i'm no legislator mind you but.... isn't this the reason why people who dislike the bailout, dislike the bailout? the vague promise that congress would someday come back around to this and prevent another disaster of the deregulated financial market doesn't really cut it in 2016 ("I would also fight for...") any more than it did in 2009, right?

― never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Friday, March 18, 2016 2:30 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I actually agree, but I think it's relevant that TARP didn't pass in 2009, it passed in 2008 when GWB was president. It's far enough away now that I don't know what the then-sitting president would have supported, but I think that's a relevant limiting factor.

intheblanks, Friday, 18 March 2016 21:43 (eight years ago) link

yet another Rubio obit, this one well-sourced.

Rubio's handling of the Gang of Eight negotiations might offer a window into his executive style. "He was the guy who would show up late, leave early and leave the dirty work to his staff," recalls one aide who worked behind the scenes on the bill. "You'd have a situation where all the members would be in the room and a couple of senators would be arguing, and then Rubio's staffer would be arguing, while Rubio would be sitting back with a Cheshire-cat grin on his face, watching."

To the shock of many people who were involved with the bill, Rubio outsourced the bulk of the negotiations to a close friend and hired gun, Miami attorney Enrique Gonzalez. While hiring experts is far from unusual, Gonzalez is an attorney at one of the most prominent corporate immigration law firms in the country, and Rubio made him the head of his team. "Enrique's role was to make sure the business community loved this bill and knew who it was who took care of them," says the aide. "From a political standpoint, that was a smart play. But it was also incredibly irresponsible, a case study in the donor class controlling our politics. And what it says about what kind of president Rubio would be is quite frightening." This is why Trump's attacks on Rubio have resonated – "He's right," the staffer continues. "The establishment looks at him and says, 'He'll play ball.' And the immigration bill is evidence of that."

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 18 March 2016 21:49 (eight years ago) link

guy has graft all over him, good riddence. however I still liked him more than cruz or trump

akm, Friday, 18 March 2016 21:55 (eight years ago) link

how do you feel about bucket of vomit vs. pile of shit

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 March 2016 21:58 (eight years ago) link

at least with bucket of vomit, you get a bucket

akm, Friday, 18 March 2016 21:58 (eight years ago) link

ok lol

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 March 2016 22:00 (eight years ago) link

“I would very much have enjoyed speaking at the AIPAC conference,” Sanders said in a letter Friday to Robert Cohen, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee president.

“Obviously, issues impacting Israel and the Middle East are of the utmost importance to me, to our country and to the world,” he said. “Unfortunately, I am going to be traveling throughout the West and the campaign schedule that we have prevents me from attending. Since AIPAC has chosen not to permit candidates to address the conference remotely, the best that I can do is to send you a copy of the remarks that I would have given if I was able to attend.”

however i would not be surprised if his remarks were pointed + critical

Mordy, Friday, 18 March 2016 22:01 (eight years ago) link

You can grow stuff with a pile of shit.

xp

Michael Jones, Friday, 18 March 2016 22:02 (eight years ago) link

couldn't these have been, i dunno, written into the terms of the bailout? i'm no legislator mind you but.... isn't this the reason why people who dislike the bailout, dislike the bailout? the vague promise that congress would someday come back around to this and prevent another disaster of the deregulated financial market doesn't really cut it in 2016 ("I would also fight for...") any more than it did in 2009, right?

― never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Friday, March 18, 2016 5:30 PM (35 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

there are good criticisms of TARP but brink of financial apocalypse is not exactly when you want to initiate a considered debate on financial reform. people barely understood what was going on at the time. if anything dodd-frank is a better target as a missed opportunity. Bernanke & Geithner knew they had to do some fast and dirty shit to keep it from turning into the Great Depression #2 and they succeeded. blame lies more on them for what they wrote than the politicians who voted for it.

flopson, Friday, 18 March 2016 22:09 (eight years ago) link

JCLC going all Good Democrat on us has definitely been one of the more personally disappointing election season trends

k3vin k., Friday, 18 March 2016 22:12 (eight years ago) link

brink of financial apocalypse is not exactly when you want to initiate a considered debate on financial reform

right, and after a mass shooting is not when you want to initiate a considered debate on gun law reform

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 18 March 2016 22:16 (eight years ago) link

i guess we can all have this discussion during the next collapse in, oh, 4 years or so

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 18 March 2016 22:18 (eight years ago) link

i get the brink-of-apocalypse thing. it just seems, i dunno... like, you're handing over that much money to basically some private companies. even if you, Senator X, don't blame those companies in particular for the enormous fucking disaster happening all around, it seems like the other side of the argument would be, brink of financial collapse is exactly when you could demand something in return. congress held all the cards, though the sky-is-falling narrative certainly worked to the banks' advantage. waiting until the banks were stable to initiate a reasoned discussion of how the market might be returned to pre-reagan regulatory limitation has not exactly panned out.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Friday, 18 March 2016 22:19 (eight years ago) link

more quality analogies from Adam

in other news, from Alfred's link this is the 2nd time I've seen Bartlett quoted to this effect:
Bartlett is supporting Trump – not because he likes him, but because he is convinced he will lose by a landslide, which, he thinks, is just the medicine the GOP needs. "Republicans have to be brought back to reality and at least make electability the prime criteria for getting the party nomination," he says. "That alone will put pragmatists back in control."

I have to wonder if that latter part about electability becoming central again will play out. Trump's loss v easily slots into a "we didn't elect a REAL conservative, and that's why we lost!" narrative that conservatives love. (I can hear Cruz mansplaining this already)

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 March 2016 22:30 (eight years ago) link

right, and after a mass shooting is not when you want to initiate a considered debate on gun law reform

― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, March 18, 2016 6:16 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

you're dumb

i get the brink-of-apocalypse thing. it just seems, i dunno... like, you're handing over that much money to basically some private companies. even if you, Senator X, don't blame those companies in particular for the enormous fucking disaster happening all around, it seems like the other side of the argument would be, brink of financial collapse is exactly when you could demand something in return. congress held all the cards, though the sky-is-falling narrative certainly worked to the banks' advantage. waiting until the banks were stable to initiate a reasoned discussion of how the market might be returned to pre-reagan regulatory limitation has not exactly panned out.

― never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Friday, March 18, 2016 6:19 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

there was a reform that succeeded the crisis that attempted to address the specific weaknesses of the financial sector, called Dodd-Frank. it's 850 pages long. do you think they should have sat down and drafted that document when the Dow Jones was dropping 7% a day?

flopson, Friday, 18 March 2016 22:34 (eight years ago) link

The "real conservative" line is pretty much a true Scotsman gambit, imo. xp

Sorry To Be The Bearer Of Bad Poos (Leee), Friday, 18 March 2016 22:36 (eight years ago) link

yeah I think critics are overlooking the time frame here. It's not like Congress needs a crisis in order to extract concessions from the banking sector, they can pass laws whenever the hell they want to. If cracking down didn't happen after the bailout had already passed, it's because there were other factors at work (hmm I wonder what those could be)

xp

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 March 2016 22:39 (eight years ago) link

TARP booked a 15.3 billion dollar profit for the US Treasury.

cool we should do this every week, pay for the military

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 18 March 2016 22:39 (eight years ago) link

standard anti-TARP argument is that the banks should have been nationalized, no? Not sure how that would have played out.

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 March 2016 22:40 (eight years ago) link

not on the same absolute scale, big details different, but a similar fraction of the banking sector

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 18 March 2016 22:43 (eight years ago) link

The "real conservative" line is pretty much a true Scotsman gambit, imo

it totally is, which is why it's so handily resilient!

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 March 2016 22:43 (eight years ago) link

to be clear I was happy to entertain the prospect of nationalization, but I don't really have any idea how it would have played out on such a huge scale. The votes definitely weren't there for it, and there wasn't a lot of time for arm-twisting - I assume Adam's position is that lefties should've withheld their votes and risked total financial catastrophe in the interests of getting their way with a risky scheme hmm wait where have I heard that before

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 March 2016 22:47 (eight years ago) link

i don't think the "real conservative" argument is going to work this time bc normally the way it operates is the party picks a compromise electable candidate to try to appeal to the moderate center and the hard right says "well of course they rejected you you ran democratic lite, if you ran a conservative you would've turned out the base and won." but you can't say that if the base is coming out in droves and it's not for the electable guy.

Mordy, Friday, 18 March 2016 22:49 (eight years ago) link

tons of paleoconservative guys are against Trump - Erick Erickson, NRO, Cruz, etc. there is def room for that argument.

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 March 2016 22:55 (eight years ago) link

The argument would also be easily ripe for co-opting by the establishment, which rightly fears the election losses Trump is going to engender

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 March 2016 22:55 (eight years ago) link

establishment types could argue "see why did you foolish plebes abandon core conservative principles for this con-man?! Return to the sweet bosom of trickle down economics and dog-whistling"

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 March 2016 22:56 (eight years ago) link

the worst aspects of tarp is that nobody wanted to take a hair cut on what they were owed. it was 100% privatize profits, socialize losses, which is some anti capitalist bullshit, imo.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 18 March 2016 23:07 (eight years ago) link

taking the risk out of risk management amirite

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 18 March 2016 23:07 (eight years ago) link

seems pretty pro-capitalist to me

capitalism has always relied on gov'ts to prop it up

Οὖτις, Friday, 18 March 2016 23:09 (eight years ago) link

Difference between pure capitalism and monied interests asking for government bailouts shocker.

Sorry To Be The Bearer Of Bad Poos (Leee), Friday, 18 March 2016 23:58 (eight years ago) link

rent seekers gonna seek

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Saturday, 19 March 2016 00:40 (eight years ago) link

he is staying in out of the home that he can convince enough superdelegates to overturn the pledged delegate majority

I'm not sure that the content of the interview adds up to this, although he is a bit vague.

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Saturday, 19 March 2016 02:16 (eight years ago) link

http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/what-bernie-sanders-has-achieved?mbid=nl_160318_daily&CNDID=26735857&spMailingID=8684571&spUserID=MTA5MjQwNDkyNzc5S0&spJobID=882044232&spReportId=ODgyMDQ0MjMyS0

john cassidy (who was pretty harsh toward bernie earlier in the race) on what his run has accomplished

k3vin k., Saturday, 19 March 2016 02:16 (eight years ago) link

ehh, i guess i really shouldn't try and argue about the bailout - i genuinely don't know enough about it, though i still feel like my gut is pointing me in the right direction. obviously many dopey and ill-informed beliefs are maintained by similar methods.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Saturday, 19 March 2016 02:36 (eight years ago) link

all US help for big banks can be summarized, Raging Bull style, as SUCKING BIG FAT ELEPHANT DICKS

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 19 March 2016 03:13 (eight years ago) link

wow homophobic

mookieproof, Saturday, 19 March 2016 03:18 (eight years ago) link

pachydermphobic

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 19 March 2016 03:20 (eight years ago) link

Eat dumbos dick

Neanderthal, Saturday, 19 March 2016 03:25 (eight years ago) link

@dick_nixon
One of NBC's main political reporters -- not Todd or Russert -- just suggested on the air that Clinton put Rubio or Kasich on the ticket.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 19 March 2016 13:58 (eight years ago) link

It happens every cycle. "Unity ticket" blah blah. (Also, I think that was Chris Matthews, because OF COURSE it was.)

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Saturday, 19 March 2016 14:46 (eight years ago) link

How about Jim Webb!

I think President Trump, in the name of unity, should just appoint all the former GOP nominees to whatever positions open in his administration, as they come along. Secretary of State! Um, Carson. Attorney General! Um, Christie. Post Master General? Rubio. Etc. He's a uniter, not a divider.

Been a couple of days since he said or did something stupid out loud, right? I really hope it's just a coincidence and he's not making a concerted effort to tone things down. Gotta keep the outrage going for several more months, for the sake of the world.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 19 March 2016 14:48 (eight years ago) link

Trump's veep pick is such an exciting concept I honestly can't wait, but I know I'm going to be disappointed when he does something boring with it

El Tomboto, Saturday, 19 March 2016 14:51 (eight years ago) link

Postmaster General needs to be Kasich.

living colour me badd english beat happening (Ye Mad Puffin), Saturday, 19 March 2016 15:00 (eight years ago) link

all the former GOP nominees

thought for sure this would mean GHWB, Dole, GWB, McCain, and Romney. And maybe Quayle, Cheney, Palin and Ryan. It's gonna be the biggest administration, we're gonna get the best people. Amazing people. You've never seen an administration like this.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Saturday, 19 March 2016 15:16 (eight years ago) link

Palin = Secretary of Puzzling Syntax.

clemenza, Saturday, 19 March 2016 15:26 (eight years ago) link

Trump's veep pick is such an exciting concept I honestly can't wait

Maybe he can turn it in into a reality TV show?

A Fifth Beatle Dies (Tom D.), Saturday, 19 March 2016 15:29 (eight years ago) link

Trump / Nugent '16

kevin smith what a bro (Myonga Vön Bontee), Saturday, 19 March 2016 15:33 (eight years ago) link

there's always Rudy G

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 19 March 2016 15:43 (eight years ago) link

it'll be Palin

tremendous crime wave and killing wave (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Saturday, 19 March 2016 16:06 (eight years ago) link

Ah, what a gift that would be.

Yoshimi P-We's Playhouse (WilliamC), Saturday, 19 March 2016 16:15 (eight years ago) link

Trump should choose a pro wrestler as his Veep

Neanderthal, Saturday, 19 March 2016 16:46 (eight years ago) link

No idea who, but I can't see Palin for a whole bunch of reasons (above and beyond her innate ridiculousness): has already lost, only room for one egomaniac, Trump's obvious embarrassment at her endorsement announcement, no electoral value (not that I envision Trump studying the map carefully), etc.

clemenza, Saturday, 19 March 2016 16:53 (eight years ago) link

yeah given trump's "loser" rhetoric for romney (and mccain!), i can't see him choosing palin

k3vin k., Saturday, 19 March 2016 16:53 (eight years ago) link

christie seems like the obvious choice

k3vin k., Saturday, 19 March 2016 16:54 (eight years ago) link

Omarosa would really help his demographics.

clemenza, Saturday, 19 March 2016 16:56 (eight years ago) link

Until Christie gets indicted

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Saturday, 19 March 2016 17:04 (eight years ago) link

i keep thinking christie must have been promised something more substantial for his high-risk toadying than an outside chance at the most frustrating job in the country, but on the other hand maybe his motives at this point have regressed entirely into the primal

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Saturday, 19 March 2016 17:12 (eight years ago) link

chances of a president trump getting impeached, whacked or having a stroke seem pretty high compared to most, veep slot has a decent chance of paying off

hunangarage, Saturday, 19 March 2016 17:48 (eight years ago) link

Trump Christie is the lamest possible choice but also provides a lot of opportunities for their unfavorability ratings to actually multiply each other - literally EVERYONE has had a boss like at least of those assholes, and EVERYONE hated that fucking job

El Tomboto, Saturday, 19 March 2016 17:50 (eight years ago) link

chances of a president trump getting impeached, whacked or having a stroke seem pretty high compared to most, veep slot has a decent chance of paying off

who woulda thought chris christie had an lbj long game in him, but i guess he's probably worried about his heart

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Saturday, 19 March 2016 17:54 (eight years ago) link

Watching some of this Trump protest in New York. Part of me thinks that anything like this only guarantees him the nomination, generates push-back in any wavering Republicans (why they'd still be wavering, I don't know). But, if you grant Trump even a sliver of a chance in general, anything that previews how exhausting his presidency would be can only be good. You'd have four years of this every day, I would think.

clemenza, Saturday, 19 March 2016 18:04 (eight years ago) link

kasich is angling for it no?

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Saturday, 19 March 2016 18:06 (eight years ago) link

he's doing trump a favour by staying in, for a start

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Saturday, 19 March 2016 18:07 (eight years ago) link

Kasich is probably getting strong signals to stay in the race from elements in the party who hate both Trump and Cruz. There is still much confusion among them about how best to play their unexpectedly weak hand.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Saturday, 19 March 2016 18:30 (eight years ago) link

On Friday night, after Mr. Trump called for a boycott of Ms. Kelly’s show, the network responded through a spokeswoman.

“Donald Trump’s vitriolic attacks against Megyn Kelly and his extreme, sick obsession with her is beneath the dignity of a presidential candidate who wants to occupy the highest office in the land,” said Irena Briganti, a spokeswoman for the network. “Megyn is an exemplary journalist and one of the leading anchors in America — we’re extremely proud of her phenomenal work and continue to fully support her throughout every day of Trump’s endless barrage of crude and sexist verbal assaults. As the mother of three young children, with a successful law career and the second highest rated show in cable news, it’s especially deplorable for her to be repeatedly abused just for doing her job.”

Ms. Kelly, as she had in the past, has stayed out of the crossfire, opting not to respond personally to Mr. Trump’s provocations.

Later Friday night, the Trump campaign responded in a statement from its spokeswoman, Hope Hicks:

“Megyn Kelly is a highly overrated reporter and anchor that constantly disparages Mr. Trump with negative and inaccurate reports. Despite the fact he wants nothing to do with her and will not appear on her show due to her extremely biased reporting, much of the program is about him anyway on a nightly basis.”

“Unlike Megyn Kelly, who resorts to putting out statements via FOX News, Mr. Trump will continue to defend himself against the inordinate amount of unfair and inaccurate coverage he receives on her second-rate show each night.”

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 19 March 2016 19:20 (eight years ago) link

ok I did laugh at "second-rate" in response to "second highest rated"

There was a hole bunch of problems whit his campaigns (crüt), Saturday, 19 March 2016 19:59 (eight years ago) link

i like when trump obviously writes his own press releases in the third person

Treeship, Saturday, 19 March 2016 20:03 (eight years ago) link

"Hope Hicks" is an amazing name

kevin smith what a bro (Myonga Vön Bontee), Saturday, 19 March 2016 20:04 (eight years ago) link

'Despite the fact he wants nothing to do with her and will not appear on her show due to her extremely biased reporting, much of the program is about him anyway on a nightly basis.'

This is such an insane thing for a presidential frontrunner to say.

Frederik B, Saturday, 19 March 2016 20:20 (eight years ago) link

Republican Leaders Map a Strategy to Derail Donald Trump

Republican leaders adamantly opposed to Donald J. Trump’s candidacy are preparing a 100-day campaign to deny him the presidential nomination, starting with an aggressive battle in Wisconsin’s April 5 primary and extending into the summer, with a delegate-by-delegate lobbying effort that would cast Mr. Trump as a calamitous choice for the general election.

Recognizing that Mr. Trump has seized a formidable advantage in the race, they say that an effort to block him would rely on an array of desperation measures, the political equivalent of guerrilla fighting.

...The names of a few well-known conservatives have been offered up in recent days as potential third-party standard-bearers, and William Kristol, editor of The Weekly Standard, has circulated a memo to a small number of conservative allies detailing the process by which an independent candidate could get on general-election ballots across the country.

Among the recruits under discussion are Tom Coburn, a former Oklahoma senator who has told associates that he would be open to running, and Rick Perry, the former Texas governor who was suggested as a possible third-party candidate at a meeting of conservative activists on Thursday in Washington.

aaaaahahahahahahah

Karl Malone, Saturday, 19 March 2016 20:23 (eight years ago) link

This is such an insane thing for a presidential frontrunner to say.

― Frederik B, Saturday, March 19, 2016 4:20 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah dude, trump's off the wall

Treeship, Saturday, 19 March 2016 20:27 (eight years ago) link

lol. actually i've been thinking about perry's dropping out of the race so early. surely he must be kicking himself after seeing so many other people get their turn in the sun. he's also a complete doofus and probably very susceptible to flattering advice. if these clowns are dedicated enough to actually try to field a third-party "but really, he's the real republican" ticket, perry really might be their man.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Saturday, 19 March 2016 20:28 (eight years ago) link

will someone rid me of this meddlesome Texan

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 19 March 2016 20:31 (eight years ago) link

he dropped out early i forgot he was ever in it, tbh. but didn't he drop out early, in part, because he was totally out of money and his own campaign workers hadn't been paid in weeks? doesn't seem like he had the financial base to stay in for the long haul, even if he might have eventually had a moment in the sun (i kinda doubt he would have, though. other than wearing glasses he was essentially 2012 ver 1.2)

Karl Malone, Saturday, 19 March 2016 20:31 (eight years ago) link

what would they call their new ticket? just "independent" or will they make a catchy name

Treeship, Saturday, 19 March 2016 20:32 (eight years ago) link

shd just be the conservative party like most parliamentary systems, ppl will know what theyre getting

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Saturday, 19 March 2016 20:33 (eight years ago) link

i like n.o.p., the new old party

Treeship, Saturday, 19 March 2016 20:34 (eight years ago) link

I only skimmed it, but the third-party idea might link to a Huffington Post piece that someone linked to the other day--that the objective would be to make sure neither Trump nor Clinton gets half the electoral votes, after which the election gets thrown into the House of Representatives. I don't know, I'll have to go back and read the full piece. For that to happen, the third-party candidate would have to actually win a handful of states, no?

clemenza, Saturday, 19 March 2016 20:34 (eight years ago) link

or really any state, which would not happen

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Saturday, 19 March 2016 20:37 (eight years ago) link

what would they call their new ticket? just "independent" or will they make a catchy name

― Treeship

"functionally illiterate"

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 19 March 2016 20:41 (eight years ago) link

Here's the piece again:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/adam-nicholas-phillips/doomsday-savior-how-paul-ryan_b_9474788.html

It just bulldozes its way over the part about winning states.

clemenza, Saturday, 19 March 2016 20:44 (eight years ago) link

Maybe, without ever saying so publically, they'd be happy enough ensuring even more so that Trump loses. (Curious as to what the Kristols and Eriksons of the world would honestly prefer: Trump or Clinton?)

clemenza, Saturday, 19 March 2016 20:49 (eight years ago) link

perry dropping out so early seems strange in hindsight i guess in part because, okay, he ran out of money, but like, all these other clowns were able to keep that same kind of money pouring in. just weird... i mean clearly he's not very competent at these things but you'd have to figure there would still be some subset of donors either fooled by the glasses or still huffing the fumes of that brief moment in 2011 when democrats quivered at the image of this craggy, plain-spoken texan. like what did jindal have that this guy didn't? in some alternate universe he would be in the kasich seat right now, possibly. the independent goofus conservative party should just be a perry/walker ticket.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Saturday, 19 March 2016 20:50 (eight years ago) link

perry has plenty of wealthy texans donating, he probably just couldnt take all the mean criticism of ppl calling him dim bc everyone in texas treats him much nicer

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Saturday, 19 March 2016 20:54 (eight years ago) link

I wonder if maybe he discovered belatedly that Jeb!, through GWB, already had most of the wealthy Texans, and Cruz had grabbed the fringier hardcore conservative ones?

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Saturday, 19 March 2016 20:59 (eight years ago) link

good pt, also rick perry is incredibly stupid

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Saturday, 19 March 2016 21:03 (eight years ago) link

#neverforget

Perry’s roof-raising speech Friday, which was festooned with ten-dollar words and an emphasis on state governance as a mechanism for crowd-sourcing solutions, broke through in part because it came in a new package: Perry the collected-but-not-cool thinking man, wearing a muted tie, a bespectacled elder statesman whose long tenure as chief executive of the Lone Star state bestowed wisdom on him while showering prosperity on Texans.

Here’s the visual package in a blowup of the above picture, from Perry’s appearance with National Review’s Jim Geraghty. You can’t see Perry’s sensible shoes, but he’s working a subdued, knees-together posture, modestly leaning in to his interlocutor, fully committed to the pursuit of better solutions.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/372882/rick-perry-intellectual-tim-cavanaugh#comments

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 19 March 2016 21:04 (eight years ago) link

Check out @pjbreenphotohttps://twitter.com/pjbreenphoto/status/711253419281911808?s=09" class="noborder">

Οὖτις, Saturday, 19 March 2016 21:09 (eight years ago) link

Oops sorry

Οὖτις, Saturday, 19 March 2016 21:11 (eight years ago) link

I wonder where Trump will come to in CA. Kinda looking forward to it.

Οὖτις, Saturday, 19 March 2016 21:12 (eight years ago) link

central park today

https://twitter.com/GideonResnick/status/711234839509377024

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Saturday, 19 March 2016 21:14 (eight years ago) link

I wonder where Trump will come to in CA. Kinda looking forward to it.

― Οὖτις, Saturday, March 19, 2016 5

he'll be a big hit in Berkeley and San Francisco

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 19 March 2016 21:25 (eight years ago) link

I cant see him hitting any of the major metro areas w out huge problems. Sooo ... Bakersfield? Fresno? Central valley is so heavily latino he's probably screwed there too...

Οὖτις, Saturday, 19 March 2016 21:47 (eight years ago) link

I can't recall a time when a party's presumptive nominee garnered such big protests prior to the general election even starting

Οὖτις, Saturday, 19 March 2016 21:49 (eight years ago) link

Gilroy

El Tomboto, Saturday, 19 March 2016 22:00 (eight years ago) link

CNN is becoming the Ghosts of Republican Campaigns Past network, as they assemble en masse to denounce Trump.

clemenza, Saturday, 19 March 2016 22:06 (eight years ago) link

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/03/gop-must-answer-for-what-it-did-to-kansas.html

The rise of Trump has forced many conservatives to reckon with the moral odiousness of Nixon’s Southern Strategy — a blueprint for GOP electoral success that relied on coded appeals to white racial animus. Unfortunately, the fall of Kansas has failed to inspire a similar reckoning with the policies that those ugly advertisements were designed to sell. The GOP front-runner’s praise of mob violence and religious discrimination has spurred much righteous outrage from the National Review. Kansas’s shortened school-years have spurred none.

El Tomboto, Sunday, 20 March 2016 00:11 (eight years ago) link

http://www.vocativ.com/news/296340/donald-trump-handprints/

Henry Kraemer, founder of the Trump Has Tiny Hands PAC (which has since been ordered to change its name) said he is not surprised that the Trump Organization is not forthcoming with proof of the size of Trump’s hands. “This is textbook tiny-handed trickery from Donald Trump,” Kraemer told Vocativ. “Of course he never actually made cement handprints because the weight of the wet cement would have certainly crushed his weak, pathetic mouse fingers. The truly sad thing is that he thought any of us would be deceived by his miniature-ham-fisted pantomime.”

El Tomboto, Sunday, 20 March 2016 00:38 (eight years ago) link

Loooooool

Οὖτις, Sunday, 20 March 2016 00:50 (eight years ago) link

kids u gotta get outta the house on Saturday

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 20 March 2016 01:34 (eight years ago) link

wonderful mouse hands

tremendous crime wave and killing wave (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Sunday, 20 March 2016 02:31 (eight years ago) link

Was marveling earlier tonight at the weirdly in-sync/out-of-sync "Up Like Trump" -- how Rae Sremmurd unintentionally made the political song of 2015 -- and when I watched the video for the first time in ages, this shot in particular got me.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v335/gypsyfrocksbedlam/Screen%20Shot%202016-03-19%20at%207.36.53%20PM_zpsduaawucm.png

A nationally known air show announcer/personality (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 20 March 2016 03:00 (eight years ago) link

I met Kraemer thru a local Bus Project thing some years back here in Portland. I'm quite amused his joke has had this amount of impact

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Sunday, 20 March 2016 06:38 (eight years ago) link

I hear that sleepy eyes @chucktodd will be fired like a dog from ratings starved Meet The Press? I can't imagine what is taking so long!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 13, 2015

"like a dog!" sleepy eyes chuck todd thought; it was as though the shame of it must outlive him

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 20 March 2016 09:01 (eight years ago) link

Kasich on Meet the Press: vision, consensus, etc., etc., then he gets asked a direct question about Merrick Garland and the Senate, declines to answer, mumbles something about considering him when he gets elected president. After the interview, a clarification from the host: Kasich wants to be clear that he would not consider Garland.

I would think at this point, with about a 0.1% chance of winning, Kashich might just answer the question.

clemenza, Sunday, 20 March 2016 13:29 (eight years ago) link

yeah he's pretty pathetic. otoh i was thrilled yesterday to learn that my dad, who when i last talked politics with him circa ~october (?) was leaning trump, has now thoroughly rejected him in favor of kasich. i also think kasich is a fraud and a right-wing monster but at least he's been trying to pass himself on as a get-things-done regular joe politician and i am way more comfortable with my dad being taken in by that one.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 20 March 2016 13:39 (eight years ago) link

Weird

Just saying "vote on Garland" would have been an opportunity to separate himself from Trump and Cruz and solidify his establishment credentials without any downside (e.g. a vote on Garland). If this comes down to a convention fight, you need to distance yourself from your competitors to win. Especially when delegates are likely to be handpicked mainstream establishment folks.

Allen (etaeoe), Sunday, 20 March 2016 13:44 (eight years ago) link

i.e. loudly endorse any position that helps down ticket republicans

Allen (etaeoe), Sunday, 20 March 2016 13:45 (eight years ago) link

This is the most gifted class of republican nominees in generations

Karl Malone, Sunday, 20 March 2016 13:46 (eight years ago) link

really interested to see what the Rubio-drop does for Cruz's numbers on Tuesday. doubtful that it's going to have any meaningful effect in Arizona (and no polls have been released that were taken post-drop), but he's supposed to win significantly in Utah caucus.

Neanderthal, Sunday, 20 March 2016 13:49 (eight years ago) link

Hollywood Reporter
‏@THR
Scott Baio Endorses Donald Trump: "He Speaks Like I Speak" http://thr.cm/ZQayN2

‏@dick_nixon
Failure and little girls.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 20 March 2016 13:50 (eight years ago) link

hahahahhaahahaha

Neanderthal, Sunday, 20 March 2016 13:51 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mo-ddYhXAZc

Neanderthal, Sunday, 20 March 2016 13:52 (eight years ago) link

Allen: Yeah, that's what I mean--it's no longer enough to just separate himself from Trump, he now has to separate himself from Cruz. And it doesn't matter if he "alienates the base," since his minuscule chance of winning has nothing to do with the base anymore. That question's a gift.

clemenza, Sunday, 20 March 2016 13:54 (eight years ago) link

Trump pronouncements very much in character: "The Mormons are very smart people--I know many Mormons."

clemenza, Sunday, 20 March 2016 14:14 (eight years ago) link

https://twitter.com/owillis/status/711405869850894336?s=09

Οὖτις, Sunday, 20 March 2016 14:37 (eight years ago) link

Love how these protests are being pegged as "far left." By what standard? Or is it simply that everyone is "far left" compared to Trump?

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 20 March 2016 14:41 (eight years ago) link

thode are conservative outlets calling them that

k3vin k., Sunday, 20 March 2016 14:46 (eight years ago) link

"Far left" distinguishes them from "Clinton left"

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 20 March 2016 14:50 (eight years ago) link

yeah c'mon that's nothin new.

even middle of the road Kerry got called "Dictator material" by one Repub voter I knew back in 04

Neanderthal, Sunday, 20 March 2016 14:55 (eight years ago) link

guys prepare for a time of miracles

https://youtu.be/kbWWvHsEiy0

Hadrian VIII, Sunday, 20 March 2016 16:33 (eight years ago) link

no, this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbWWvHsEiy0

Hadrian VIII, Sunday, 20 March 2016 16:36 (eight years ago) link

argh fuggit, @ 21:15

Hadrian VIII, Sunday, 20 March 2016 16:37 (eight years ago) link

stared at this for a while yesterday and then brought out the cheeks more this morning

http://49.media.tumblr.com/c0962fd8902e21970a758615044767d8/tumblr_o4clswVEGB1qdmmiqo1_400.gif

Karl Malone, Sunday, 20 March 2016 17:27 (eight years ago) link

Nice work with that 3D effect.

pplains, Sunday, 20 March 2016 18:15 (eight years ago) link

That picture of Trump...If I had him in a TV studio for an interview, I'd point him in the direction of a chair, snap my fingers, and say "You, Flock of Seagulls."

clemenza, Sunday, 20 March 2016 20:20 (eight years ago) link

that fasting child is gonna fix everything
i wonder what the party in hell will be like when glenn beck dies; it's gonna be a high time

ulysses, Sunday, 20 March 2016 22:36 (eight years ago) link

Looking at New York, California, and Pennsylvania alone, I get the feeling stop-Trump is just a mirage. Real Clear Politics' poll averages:

New York (95 delegates, winner take most):
Trump 54.5
Cruz 11.5
Kasich 9.5

California (172 delegates, winner take all):
Trump 31.5
Cruz 21.0
Kasich 17.5

Pennsylvania (71 delegates, winner take all):
Trump 28.5
Cruz 16.5
Kasich 13.0

If he gets 320 out of those 340, that'd put him over 1,000. Arizona's the next biggest, and he's winning there by ~10 points.

clemenza, Sunday, 20 March 2016 23:52 (eight years ago) link

They arent gonna stop him

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 March 2016 00:04 (eight years ago) link

Are any of those polls post 3/15 tho? NYC I'm not sure it matters but the closer ones sure.

Neanderthal, Monday, 21 March 2016 00:18 (eight years ago) link

here's a thought: donald j. trump is going to be the republican candidate for president of the united states of america

There was a hole bunch of problems whit his campaigns (crüt), Monday, 21 March 2016 00:23 (eight years ago) link

the 'j' sounds so made up

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 21 March 2016 00:46 (eight years ago) link

sounds like a cartoon character: homer j simpson, rocket j squirrel, bullwinkle j moose

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 21 March 2016 00:51 (eight years ago) link

Trump T. Firefly

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 March 2016 00:55 (eight years ago) link

none of the states cited above has percentages totaling anywhere close to 100. rubio wasn't necessarily a polling powerhouse, but his voters do have to go somewhere. granted the stop-trump people have not given me the impression of being super coordinated or having a great plan, but rubio throwing ohio to kasich did work. i think it's possible california won't happen for trump, and that is a lot of delegates to miss out on.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 21 March 2016 01:06 (eight years ago) link

we also have basically no idea though. those RCP averages are based on a couple of polls each, and not up-to-date-ones. same deal as i was saying above about the upcoming dem states - i don't think anyone budgets for a real density of polling this late in the race because it's assumed it'll be pretty clear what's gonna happen.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 21 March 2016 01:09 (eight years ago) link

elmer j fudd

mookieproof, Monday, 21 March 2016 01:37 (eight years ago) link

http://bbsimg.ngfiles.com/10/25040000/ngbbs534b44612db4e.jpg

"i am donald j. trump, millionaire. i own a mansion and a yacht."

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 21 March 2016 02:14 (eight years ago) link

none of the states cited above has percentages totaling anywhere close to 100. rubio wasn't necessarily a polling powerhouse, but his voters do have to go somewhere. granted the stop-trump people have not given me the impression of being super coordinated or having a great plan, but rubio throwing ohio to kasich did work. i think it's possible california won't happen for trump, and that is a lot of delegates to miss out on.

― never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Sunday, March 20, 2016 9:06 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

we also have basically no idea though. those RCP averages are based on a couple of polls each, and not up-to-date-ones. same deal as i was saying above about the upcoming dem states - i don't think anyone budgets for a real density of polling this late in the race because it's assumed it'll be pretty clear what's gonna happen.

― never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Sunday, March 20, 2016 9:09 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yes, but have you considered this: donald j. trump is going to be the republican candidate for president of the united states of america

There was a hole bunch of problems whit his campaigns (crüt), Monday, 21 March 2016 02:23 (eight years ago) link

It's Trump vs. Clinton at this point. I think we can all take a break and make our peace about it.

larry appleton, Monday, 21 March 2016 02:30 (eight years ago) link

What if she runs him over with her bus?

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 March 2016 03:08 (eight years ago) link

Maybe this means something, I don't know--only 40 delegates.

http://www.sltrib.com/news/3683983-155/new-poll-shows-ted-cruz-with

clemenza, Monday, 21 March 2016 03:29 (eight years ago) link

might mean trump's tiff with romney hurt him w/ mormons

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 03:31 (eight years ago) link

Hell hath no fury like a Mormon scorned.

clemenza, Monday, 21 March 2016 03:32 (eight years ago) link

am i damaged if i say i'd rather see trump run than cruz? cruz is so unpleasant. trump is more plainly and honestly a sociopath.

ulysses, Monday, 21 March 2016 03:49 (eight years ago) link

they would both get owned in unique ways

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Monday, 21 March 2016 03:52 (eight years ago) link

i honestly don't know who would terrify me more in a position of power of those two little homunculi
they both look as if they've been crafted from dough and have made a deal with a demon that if they win the presidency they will become real boys

ulysses, Monday, 21 March 2016 03:54 (eight years ago) link

both would be bad obv but seems like cruz with his knowledge of the law and ultraconservative ideology would be much more effective in passing some terrible shit

k3vin k., Monday, 21 March 2016 03:57 (eight years ago) link

but he doesnt understand ppl v well, so he will be bad at getting ppl to do shit for him

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Monday, 21 March 2016 04:00 (eight years ago) link

This is a pseudonym for someone legitimately close to sources who would know:

https://twitter.com/jzokun/status/711665561814446081

... (Eazy), Monday, 21 March 2016 04:00 (eight years ago) link

if this is about her cooties, i got some fucking news for you bruh...

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Monday, 21 March 2016 04:04 (eight years ago) link

i honestly don't know who would terrify me more in a position of power of those two little homunculi

I'd suspect those would be about the only two people in American politics who could unite a fractured congress in complete opposition.

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Monday, 21 March 2016 04:18 (eight years ago) link

This is a pseudonym for someone legitimately close to sources who would know:

https://twitter.com/jzokun/status/711665561814446081

― ... (Eazy), Monday, March 21, 2016 12:00 AM (18 minutes ago)

I've also heard that the DNC has an Everest-sized mountain of oppo research against Trump that they haven't even begun using yet, and why would they when he keeps poisoning his own general election profile.

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Monday, 21 March 2016 04:21 (eight years ago) link

I feel like it would be hard for either party to keep a scandal under wraps for long

Treeship, Monday, 21 March 2016 04:24 (eight years ago) link

especially as it's hard to believe any of these ppl are professionals

but not sure either party has a standard of scandalous behavior anymore

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 March 2016 05:14 (eight years ago) link

Medical diagnosis, Edwards-type situations, Spitzer-type situations, who knows...

... (Eazy), Monday, 21 March 2016 05:22 (eight years ago) link

Trigger warning for this article, but I feel like this will probably become more of an issue in the general. This story is not just in Ivana's authorized biography but she repeated it during a deposition as well. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/07/27/ex-wife-donald-trump-made-feel-violated-during-sex.html

Treeship, Monday, 21 March 2016 05:27 (eight years ago) link

Trump’s lawyer then changed tactics, lobbing insults and threatening a lawsuit if a story was published.
“I will make sure that you and I meet one day while we’re in the courthouse. And I will take you for every penny you still don’t have. And I will come after your Daily Beast and everybody else that you possibly know,” Cohen said. “So I’m warning you, tread very fucking lightly, because what I’m going to do to you is going to be fucking disgusting. You understand me?”

Treeship, Monday, 21 March 2016 05:40 (eight years ago) link

here's a thought: donald j. trump is going to be the republican candidate for president of the united states of america

― There was a hole bunch of problems whit his campaigns (crüt), Monday, March 21, 2016 12:23 AM (10 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

the 'j' sounds so made up

― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, March 21, 2016 12:46 AM (10 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

sounds like a cartoon character: homer j simpson, rocket j squirrel, bullwinkle j moose

Shall I part my hair behind? Do I dare to eat a peach? Fuck yeah!

"Worried pimp" (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 21 March 2016 11:06 (eight years ago) link

He did not like the sound of "Michael A. Fox" during a time when "fox" was coming to mean "attractive" and because his middle initial sounded too much like the Canadian "eh?" He also didn't like the sound of "Andrew" or "Andy," so he decided to adopt a new middle initial and settled on "J", as a homage to actor Michael J. Pollard.[8]

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 21 March 2016 11:27 (eight years ago) link

that's great

michael, a fox

soref, Monday, 21 March 2016 11:35 (eight years ago) link

RCP polling averages show Clinton ahead of Sanders in AZ 53–23.

There was a hole bunch of problems whit his campaigns (crüt), Monday, 21 March 2016 13:53 (eight years ago) link

but no polls since the 11th

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 13:55 (eight years ago) link

i'll put this here since no one will read the cap punishment thread

@the_intercept
Clinton's vow to feel relieved when others finally win the fight against the death penalty isn't exactly courageous. http://interc.pt/1pBLjEN

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 March 2016 14:21 (eight years ago) link

Man, that Trump lawyer sounds like an even more evil and vindictive Trump, the brains behind the bully.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 March 2016 14:55 (eight years ago) link

"brains"

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Monday, 21 March 2016 14:59 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, it's all relative. I just meant that Trump's bluster is backed up by bullshit, but I have a feeling his lawyer has the wherewithal to follow up on threats to really mess with people in more than a WWF way.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 March 2016 15:02 (eight years ago) link

There really can't be enough said about Trump's mealy-mouthed derision of his detractors. The protestors are sick people, professional troublemakers who make signs with just the worst profanity, the worst words you've ever seen. Whereas Trump is standing up for his first amendment rights, and his violent supporters are just spirited folks who want their country to be great again, and I guess his own use of profanity and bigoted language is...whatever. They're sick, these protestors.

Reality is just whatever he says it is, I guess.

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Monday, 21 March 2016 15:04 (eight years ago) link

i heard that Vivia A Fox insisted on the "a" for just that reason

akm, Monday, 21 March 2016 15:06 (eight years ago) link

vivica, that is

akm, Monday, 21 March 2016 15:06 (eight years ago) link

signs with just the worst profanity, the worst words you've ever seen.

Yeah my wife and I had a good lol at this on the news this morning.

Retro novelty punk (Dan Peterson), Monday, 21 March 2016 15:15 (eight years ago) link

“The way that Trump interacts with other people is very violent, he seems like a physical bully … He seeks out conflicts in which he is going to be gratuitously brutal to other people,” says says Liza Featherstone, editor of False Choices: The Faux Feminism of Hillary Rodham Clinton. “I think women instinctively pick up on that. And it has nothing to do with policy.”...

“If men dislike Clinton more [than other Democrats], it’s partly sexist,” says Featherstone. “If you hate Hillary because she reminds you of your ex-wife, that is sexist. If you dislike Hillary because she has dedicated her life to the neoliberal polices that have screwed you, as a working person, that’s not sexist.”

https://theintercept.com/2016/03/21/women-hate-donald-trump-even-more-than-men-hate-hillary-clinton/

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 March 2016 15:17 (eight years ago) link

“If men dislike Clinton more [than other Democrats], it’s partly sexist,” -- seems pretty logical. outside general gender preferences per party i see no reason to believe that male voters have unique reasons to dislike hillary more than female voters so i've got to assume that the huge discrepancy between the two groups has a lot to do with sexism - probably both actual sexism coming from men and solidarity against sexism on some level coming from women.

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 15:21 (eight years ago) link

female voters have more unique reason(s) to like hillary than male voters ie Making History

tho younger female voters seem markedly less invested in this as a prime reason for support

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 March 2016 15:27 (eight years ago) link

"We need steady hands and not a president who says he's neutral on Monday, pro-Israel on Tuesday, and who knows what on Wednesday," Clinton said.

She added that Israel's security is "non-negotiable," contrasting herself with Trump's business-like approach to politics.

http://theweek.com/speedreads/613956/hillary-clinton-slams-donald-trump-aipac

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 March 2016 15:45 (eight years ago) link

Quality!

https://twitter.com/aterkel/status/711919433200082944

Ned Raggett, Monday, 21 March 2016 15:55 (eight years ago) link

How is making history a female-specific reason?

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 21 March 2016 15:56 (eight years ago) link

i was going to say that it's as much history making for me to vote for a woman POTUS as it is for any woman but i do understand why someone who shares your gender identity might give that an extra imperative.

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 16:00 (eight years ago) link

i listened to the speech and found it pretty predictable. much more interested in what the donald has to say (and how many ppl walk out). morbz, i do often wonder why you're so interested in this particular topic but i guess probably best not to know.

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 16:07 (eight years ago) link

well bcz i am a secret Jew killer as well as a Trumpist, obviously.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 March 2016 16:09 (eight years ago) link

I knew it!

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 March 2016 16:12 (eight years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/l6APHEM.jpg

pplains, Monday, 21 March 2016 16:20 (eight years ago) link

oh wait, you said "trumpist".

pplains, Monday, 21 March 2016 16:20 (eight years ago) link

Secret trumpets!
http://www.albrechtdurerblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Slide2.jpg

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 March 2016 16:33 (eight years ago) link

for all the time we spend worrying about their opinions, are white males even the biggest race/gender voting bloc nationally in terms of turnout?

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 21 March 2016 16:39 (eight years ago) link

women vote more than men, but yes NH whites compose by far the greatest share of the electorate

k3vin k., Monday, 21 March 2016 16:44 (eight years ago) link

New Hampshire whites?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 March 2016 16:47 (eight years ago) link

i know that whites are like 4/5 of likely voters but women are like 6/10 of white voters?

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 21 March 2016 16:49 (eight years ago) link

why does male people never want to vote?

trickle-down ergonomics (jim in glasgow), Monday, 21 March 2016 16:50 (eight years ago) link

they die younger and old people vote at a higher rate

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 21 March 2016 16:51 (eight years ago) link

ah of course

trickle-down ergonomics (jim in glasgow), Monday, 21 March 2016 16:52 (eight years ago) link

Who even cares about truth anymore, amirite.

How do you even attack or shame a candidate whose every public appearance is the spoken equivalent of rolling around in fetid shit? You can't tarnish Trump because he presents himself as soiled goods at every turn.

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Monday, 21 March 2016 16:52 (eight years ago) link

we prefer arguing on message boards xp

k3vin k., Monday, 21 March 2016 16:52 (eight years ago) link

totally making this up but i always thought it was because men fetishized individualism more and women were generally leant more communal. writing this i realize it's a pretty broad stereotype.

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 16:53 (eight years ago) link

chart also confirms that while r. edward "lyin' ted" cruz is indeed a huge liar, one of the hugest liars, he is not a demonstrably worse liar than donald trump. i wonder if that counts as one of trump's lies.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 21 March 2016 16:56 (eight years ago) link

"broad" stereotype? you sexist son of a bitch

jk

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 21 March 2016 16:56 (eight years ago) link

also i would propose we start calling him "r. edward cruz," much as i was hoping "j. e. bush" or "j. ellis bush" would catch on, but i worry it would come off the wrong way.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 21 March 2016 16:57 (eight years ago) link

I'm inclined to think that anything out of Trump's mouth aside from "my name is Donald Trump" and "I'm running for president" and "I'm going to make America great again" is a lie.

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Monday, 21 March 2016 16:58 (eight years ago) link

a "pretty broad" stereotype! xxp

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 16:58 (eight years ago) link

"I'm going to make America great again"

think we can count this one as a lie too

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 March 2016 16:59 (eight years ago) link

kinda surprising to me that hillary gets a higher 'true' score than bernie

Upset by racist left wingers calling me an egg (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 21 March 2016 16:59 (eight years ago) link

i thought men fetishized leather.

diana krallice (rushomancy), Monday, 21 March 2016 16:59 (eight years ago) link

as we've said before, no idea what that methodology is, not taking at face value

it's p easy to tell the truth accidentally at least 10% of the time

(in Trump's case, there was "the Clintons came to my wedding cuz i gave em cash, and that's how the game is played")

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 March 2016 17:02 (eight years ago) link

the proportion of female voters has actually been closer to 53/47 the last three elections. that said, they've voted for

Whites comprised 72% of voters in the 2012 election but the white vote generally doesn't decide elections, because Republicans have won the White vote by double digit margins the last 4 elections. and, in fact, I went back to 1976 and I couldn't find one election where a Democrat won the white vote. Democrats have always won with minority votes.

Romney beat Obama by 20% amongst White voters (59 to 39), which was a much larger deficit than he worked from in 2008, but that was completely undone by losing 93% to 6% in the African American vote, 71% - 27% Hispanic, 73% - 26% Asian, etc. The Hispanic and Asian vote actually grew from the 2008 to 2012 elections for Obama - they were still predominately Obama in 2008, but it was closer to 3/4ths than 2/3rds in 2012.

Essentially the only way the Repubs can win the White House = maximizing their share of the white vote, while minimizing the damage of the minority vote (ie, losing 58%-42% isntead of say, 70%-30%). Democrats already know they're going to lose the white vote, but if they garner 2/3rds - 3/4ths of the minority vote, they can make up most deficits. More than likely, had minorities not increased their support for Obama in 2012, he might have lost, but Democrats only need to minimize, not erase their deficits amongst white voters.

Which is why I really feel like, as clemenza suggested above, Trump is doomed as a candidate. Granted, we don't allocate electoral votes by race and different demographics exist for different states, but no Republican candidate ever wins by alienating minorities, and Trump has done that moreso than Romney, which is a feat since minorities overwhelmingly hated him.

Neanderthal, Monday, 21 March 2016 17:12 (eight years ago) link

That's some fucked up definition of 'decide elections' - if the white vote stayed home, do you think things would look the same?

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 21 March 2016 17:14 (eight years ago) link

we're talking about voters who vote.

Neanderthal, Monday, 21 March 2016 17:15 (eight years ago) link

turnout obviously matters as well, but the white proportion of the vote has decreased in six consecutive elections - from 87% in 1992 to 72%. that is based in part in minority turnout but I can't imagine that a bigoted man threatening to be the most powerful man in the free world* wouldn't inspire similar turnout among

Neanderthal, Monday, 21 March 2016 17:19 (eight years ago) link

minorities

Neanderthal, Monday, 21 March 2016 17:19 (eight years ago) link

No, I get that - if the white vote switched to double-digit margins for Democrats, would things look the same? Or am I missing what you mean by "doesn't decide elections"?

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 21 March 2016 17:20 (eight years ago) link

they don't decide elections in that it's a given that the majority will go for the GOP. I guess it's less of a given that minorities will break for Democrats

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 March 2016 17:21 (eight years ago) link

xpost what I mean is, losing the white vote doesn't mean a loss in the elections. Obviously if Democrats won the lion share of the white vote, they'd win in a landslide. but they haven't done this in 30+ years. the closest they've come is losing by 4 percent.

Neanderthal, Monday, 21 March 2016 17:22 (eight years ago) link

xpost yes that's what I meant Outis. for instance, when Dubya won re-election, he managed to win 40%+ of the vote from several minority groups.

Neanderthal, Monday, 21 March 2016 17:22 (eight years ago) link

so risking wrath again, may i ask what pct of liberal/Dem US Jews shares Hil's opinion, offered to AIPAC, that the entire divestment movement is antisemitic?

I’m not going to wade into the debate over BDS, but it was striking that Clinton took what is essentially the position of maximal opposition to BDS: not that it has legitimate arguments to make even if it often takes them too far, or that the movement tolerates anti-Semites within its ranks, or that people within it are starting from liberal values and thus might be persuaded to agree with someone like her, but that the entire thing is anti-Semitic and therefore must simply be fought:

“Many of the young people here today are on the front lines of the battle to oppose the alarming boycott, divestment and sanctions movement known as BDS.

“Particularly at a time when anti-Semitism is on the rise across the world, especially in Europe, we must repudiate all efforts to malign, isolate and undermine Israel and the Jewish people.

“I’ve been sounding the alarm for a while now. As I wrote last year in a letter to the heads of major American Jewish organizations, we have to be united in fighting back against BDS.”

And she took on Trump for saying in February that when it comes to negotiations between the two sides, he would attempt to be “neutral.” His opponents in the Republican primaries have gotten a lot of mileage out of that one word, and Clinton used it against him as well: “Yes, we need steady hands, not a president who says he’s neutral on Monday, pro-Israel on Tuesday, and who knows what on Wednesday, because everything’s negotiable.”

In Trump’s defense (yes, I just wrote those words), when this subject comes up he’ll say as loudly as anyone else how “pro-Israel” he is, but when he used that term he was talking about being an arbiter in negotiations. And he’s forthright in saying it’s basically a ruse. “I would like to at least have the other side think I’m somewhat neutral as to them, so that we can maybe get a deal done,” he said at the last debate. “I think it’s probably the toughest negotiation of all time. But maybe we can get a deal done.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2016/03/21/hillary-clinton-gets-to-donald-trumps-right-on-israel/

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 March 2016 17:28 (eight years ago) link

i haven't seen any polling but i saw a poll this weekend that said that ninety-four percent of Jewish Americans said that if Israel “no longer existed tomorrow,” they would feel that was a tragedy, with nearly one in four saying they would consider such an event to be the “biggest tragedy of my lifetime.” Eighty-five percent said that Israel is “right to take threats to its existence seriously,” and that Israel’s concerns are not irrational or overstated.

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 17:33 (eight years ago) link

so the % who think that BDS is intrinsically antisemitic is probably a bit lower than those figures, but i'd guess not much

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 17:33 (eight years ago) link

The chances that a large percentage of the white vote won't vote Republican (either staying home or third-party) seem a fairly crucial factor at the moment - how is that not deciding the election?

xp xpost what I mean is, losing the white vote doesn't mean a loss in the elections. Obviously if Democrats won the lion share of the white vote, they'd win in a landslide. but they haven't done this in 30+ years. the closest they've come is losing by 4 percent. - these two sentences contradict each other! How would Democrats win the lion share without Republicans losing it?

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 21 March 2016 17:36 (eight years ago) link

here's a bunch of data from the somewhat recent big Pew study you can comb through on the issue:
http://www.pewforum.org/2013/10/01/chapter-5-connection-with-and-attitudes-towards-israel/

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 17:37 (eight years ago) link

No part of BDS is about the destruction of the state of Israel, FFS!

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 21 March 2016 17:37 (eight years ago) link

idk, the founder of BDS has openly called for the destruction of Israel, the plank about the right of return for descendants of 1948 refugees implies as much, it is often comorbid w/ other more obviously destructive ideologies, and norman finkelstein believes it is but reasonable ppl can disagree. not sure this is the best thread to rehash this argument tho.

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 17:40 (eight years ago) link

these two sentences contradict each other! How would Democrats win the lion share without Republicans losing it?

first sentence is clearly referring to the Democrats...?

xxp

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 March 2016 17:40 (eight years ago) link

That's still the same thing though - if losing the white vote doesn't matter (because obviously Democrats win presidential elections) but gaining it would, that's still 'decides elections'.

Oh good right of return is anti-semitic, glad we cleared that up.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 21 March 2016 17:51 (eight years ago) link

xxxpost what I'm saying (and Outis clarified) is that Democrats *never* win the white vote. I could only find stats that go back to 1976, and in every single election, whites predominately voted for the Republican candidate, with margins ranging from slim (4%) to large (20%). Obviously, Republican white males either staying home, voting third party, or actually voting Democrat for the first times in their lives could give the white vote to the Democrats. That would result in an overwhelming Democratic landslide, yes, but it wouldn't be the principal reason for the victory since Democrats have proven even 20% deficits amongst white voters can be erased with the minority vote. A

s Clemenza I believe noted upthread, for the Republican party to win this election without winning additional minority support from the previous election, he'd have to win a ridiculous percent of the white vote, one that is unusual and unlikely. Meaning, the Republicans know they have to reach out to and convert minorities to win the election. They'd probably need to get at least 40% in a few of the communities - having a hard time imagining Asians, Hispanics, or African-Americans thinking a guy that has said racist shit and doesn't openly criticize the KKK is a guy that deserves their vote. Where Dems could lose is if minority turnout decreases proportionately in this election, but even then it'd have to decrease significantly.

Romney lost the minority vote something like 80/20 in 2012, and that is one reason he lost the election. Minorities hated him. Obviously *every* vote is important, I'm just saying hey, if on election date, Trump was to command the white vote, even by 10% or more, it won't necessarily translate into a victory because it hasn't in the past. It's a vote they always win - they have to win where they haven't won recently.

The proportion of the voters that were white has precipitously declined from 87% to 72%, which means minorities carry a much larger influence on the election than they did in previous decades.

Neanderthal, Monday, 21 March 2016 17:52 (eight years ago) link

http://www.junkiesfan.com/images/cover_woen.jpg

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Monday, 21 March 2016 17:54 (eight years ago) link

hat's still the same thing though - if losing the white vote doesn't matter (because obviously Democrats win presidential elections) but gaining it would, that's still 'decides elections'.

what I'm saying is Democrats probably don't have to do well or even win amongst white voters to win in 2016, despite them being the majority of voters. obviously it would benefit them to do so but it isn't *necessary*

Neanderthal, Monday, 21 March 2016 17:55 (eight years ago) link

good posts neanderthal

i've been trying to explain this to various family members terrified of trump winning the general, and while it scares the shit out of me too, it is not likely to happen bc while i can imagine him possibly outperforming romney w/ white males, i certainly can't imagine him outperforming romney w/ minorities

marcos, Monday, 21 March 2016 17:58 (eight years ago) link

he just doesn't have the numbers

marcos, Monday, 21 March 2016 17:58 (eight years ago) link

I get what you're saying, and I agree with what you're saying - I'm just pointing out that phrase you used isn't what I think you meant.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 21 March 2016 17:59 (eight years ago) link

These have been around for awhile (well, for at least three and a half years or so.)

But here's what the 2012 electoral map between Obama and Romney would've looked like if only white men were allowed to vote:

http://i.imgur.com/nV8Rjz9.jpg

pplains, Monday, 21 March 2016 18:07 (eight years ago) link

Hooray for Oregon and Washington State!

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 21 March 2016 18:11 (eight years ago) link

Maine and Vermont?!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 March 2016 18:13 (eight years ago) link

Quite surprised by Oregon, considering how polarised that state is (VERY conservative east), but then it's not very diverse either, so I guess the Portland metropolitan area has lots of white, male Obama supporters.

Michael Jones, Monday, 21 March 2016 18:16 (eight years ago) link

alfred have you been to vermont

jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, 21 March 2016 18:24 (eight years ago) link

even the rednecks have progressive politics and drive subarus

jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, 21 March 2016 18:25 (eight years ago) link

If Donald Trump becomes the Republican Party's nominee, Utahns would vote for a Democrat for president in November for the first time in more than 50 years, according to a new Deseret News/KSL poll.

"I believe Donald Trump could lose Utah. If you lose Utah as a Republican, there is no hope," said former Utah Gov. Mike Leavitt, a top campaign adviser to the GOP's 2012 nominee, Mitt Romney.

The poll found that may well be true. Utah voters said they would reject Trump, the GOP frontrunner, whether former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton or Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders is the Democratic candidate on the general election ballot.

While Clinton was only slightly ahead of Trump — 38 percent to 36 percent — Sanders, a self-declared Democratic socialist, holds a substantial lead — 48 percent to 37 percent over the billionaire businessman and reality TV star among likely Utah voters.

"Wow. Wow. That's surprising," said Chris Karpowitz, co-director of Brigham Young University's Center for the Study of Elections and Democracy. "Any matchup in which Democrats are competitive in the state of Utah is shocking."

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865650513/Poll-Utah-would-vote-for-a-Democrat-for-president-over-Trump.html?pg=all

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 March 2016 18:26 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, the GOP figured out too late that winning entails more than slapping an 'R-' on a plate of pig offal.

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Monday, 21 March 2016 18:32 (eight years ago) link

my sense is, a result that weird -- mormons are one group in the conservative coalition with a really dim view of trump -- would indicate other weirdness all over the map, NOT a uniformly bad map for trump-as-nominee. he's also been mouthing off about romney's faith personally over the past few weeks.

i feel like his irreligious bullying anti-trade anti-immigrant nationalism is especially bad for sunny industrious deseret, but is (i fear) pretty great for a lot of angrier and down-at-the-mouth constituencies.

we have no idea what this election is going to look like, basically

goole, Monday, 21 March 2016 18:33 (eight years ago) link

holy shit @ Utah

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 March 2016 18:34 (eight years ago) link

he's also been mouthing off about romney's faith personally over the past few weeks.

I wouldn't be surprised if this has a lot to do w it

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 March 2016 18:38 (eight years ago) link

that and romney's speech against trump.

new noise, Monday, 21 March 2016 19:07 (eight years ago) link

yeah i can imagine trump losing a lot of votes in western/mountain states but gaining nearly as many in the rust belt. and places like ohio and michigan carry more electoral votes than those mountain states....

in other words, yeah, who knows.

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 21 March 2016 19:09 (eight years ago) link

Frank rich correctly pointed out the bullshit duplicity of romney's speech but yeah probably

Xp

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 March 2016 19:12 (eight years ago) link

Warren going in on Trump on twitter fwiw

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 March 2016 19:18 (eight years ago) link

that's awesome, but i can't help but lament how successfully trump has dragged everybody down with him. not that politics hadn't been about scoring quick and nasty points before, but that seems to be just about everything this cycle.

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 21 March 2016 19:22 (eight years ago) link

also, kids these days.

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 21 March 2016 19:23 (eight years ago) link

damn it's good tho

goole, Monday, 21 March 2016 19:57 (eight years ago) link

alfred have you been to vermont

― jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, March 21, 2016 2:24 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

even the rednecks have progressive politics and drive subarus

― jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, March 21, 2016 2:25 PM (1 hour ago)

lol as someone who lived in burlington for 2 years until recently, and traveled all over the state for work, this is so otm

k3vin k., Monday, 21 March 2016 19:57 (eight years ago) link

is that actually her account? because her official account didn't tweet anything (warren)

akm, Monday, 21 March 2016 20:01 (eight years ago) link

https://twitter.com/elizabethforma

goole, Monday, 21 March 2016 20:02 (eight years ago) link

yeah i can imagine trump losing a lot of votes in western/mountain states but gaining nearly as many in the rust belt. and places like ohio and michigan carry more electoral votes than those mountain states....

in other words, yeah, who knows.

There's a recent NBC/WSJ poll that has Clinton winning 12% of Republicans and Trump winning 5% of Democrats. Assuming this was nationwide.

timellison, Monday, 21 March 2016 20:03 (eight years ago) link

alfred have you been to vermont

― jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, March 21, 2016

failed joek on my part

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 March 2016 20:17 (eight years ago) link

I'd like to thank lots of you, particularly Neanderthal, for throwing out some vital history and stats I can relate to hand-wringing friends. The very notion of Trump makes me angry, but having numbers to back up my hope that the math really doesn't work in his favor makes me feel a little better, even if his name alone makes me oscillate between rage and depression.

On the other hand, I find it hilarious that Trump is garnering a historically diverse plurality of people who hate him. Women, minorities, immigrants, and now apparently Mormons.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 March 2016 20:28 (eight years ago) link

all you have to say is "There aren't enough white people in Vermont to vote for Trump"

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 March 2016 20:30 (eight years ago) link

I wouldn't vote for that asshole for all the white people in Vermont.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 March 2016 20:31 (eight years ago) link

lol Trump not so into NATO apparently

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 March 2016 20:32 (eight years ago) link

nate-toe as Bush I said

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 March 2016 20:34 (eight years ago) link

as usual there's like this tiny kernel of a legit point buried in with a bunch of poorly thought out (or not thought out at all) nonsense

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 March 2016 20:35 (eight years ago) link

can u c+p the list, i've been paywalled

goole, Monday, 21 March 2016 20:35 (eight years ago) link

xpost I understand why, but how annoying is it that all papers are going paywall? So much for the internet as great collector and collator of information. But screw paying for several papers, especially given how much they seem to be sharing stories these days.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 March 2016 20:37 (eight years ago) link

For the first time, Trump also listed members of a team chaired by Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) that is counseling him on foreign affairs and helping to shape his policies: Keith Kellogg, Carter Page, George Papadopoulos, Walid Phares and Joseph E. Schmitz.

Trump praised George P. Shultz, who served as President Ronald Reagan's top diplomat, and was harshly critical of current secretary of state John F. Kerry. He questioned the United States’ continued involvement in NATO and, on the subject of Russia’s aggression in Ukraine, said America’s allies are "not doing anything."

Trump said that U.S. involvement in NATO may need to be significantly diminished in the coming years, breaking with nearly seven decades of consensus in Washington. "We certainly can’t afford to do this anymore," Trump said, adding later, "NATO is costing us a fortune, and yes, we’re protecting Europe with NATO, but we’re spending a lot of money."

Trump sounded a similar note in discussing the U.S. presence in the Pacific. He questioned the value of massive military investments in Asia and wondered aloud whether the United States still was capable of being an effective peacekeeping force there.

ooo i guess under prez trump we'll get to find out whether the US has been keeping the peace or not

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 20:39 (eight years ago) link

SCHULTZ?!

The guy must need a bib

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 March 2016 20:41 (eight years ago) link

Trump should have gone all in and name checked Kissinger.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 March 2016 20:42 (eight years ago) link

"China has got unbelievable ambitions," Trump said. "China feels very invincible. We have rebuilt China. They have drained so much money out of our country that they’ve rebuilt China. Without us, you wouldn’t see the airports and the roadways and the bridges. The George Washington Bridge [in New York], that’s like a trinket compared to the bridges that they build in China. We don’t build anymore. We had our day."

my neighbor's Pomeranian is sharper

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 March 2016 20:42 (eight years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/AuNdw2H.png

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 20:43 (eight years ago) link

But ... but ... China has a wall! A great, big, beautiful wall!

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 March 2016 20:43 (eight years ago) link

that wall should've been built in America!

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 March 2016 20:44 (eight years ago) link

pretty depressing day, given Hil's Likudnik raving as well.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 March 2016 20:45 (eight years ago) link

xxxxpost the women's vote can also swing this, as they have in recent history voted more liberal - the margins have ranged from thin (a few percentage points) to comfortable (11%), but the last Republican to win the women's vote was George H.W. Bush in 1988.

although it's obv possible to win without the women's vote (Dubya - twice!), a candidate that significantly loses the women's vote could find himself in a hole.

Recall in the last election, Romney (who is by all means a dick and socially awkward, but nowhere near the creep Trump is re: women), lost the women's vote 55% - 44% (a sharp contrast to the 52% - 45% advantage he had among men). In an opinion poll taken right before the 2012 election, Romney's net favorability rating among women was -2%.

Trump's, currently? -33% (source: https://theintercept.com/2016/03/21/women-hate-donald-trump-even-more-than-men-hate-hillary-clinton/).

It's very difficult to translate that into numbers (and we're also a ways away from the Gen Election, which gives ample time for him to improve his stature among women), but if he stays that unpopular among women, he could lose their vote 60-40, which would be hard to overcome.

Neanderthal, Monday, 21 March 2016 20:48 (eight years ago) link

morbz that must've been a real heartbreaker finding out that a personal hero of yours is pro-israel

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 20:49 (eight years ago) link

Likudnik raving

picturing her waving glowsticks on a beach in Haifa

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 March 2016 20:57 (eight years ago) link

more like her idolators and voter-flunkies do not give a flying shit what she says for 7-1/2 coming months, nor can they fake it

xp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 March 2016 20:58 (eight years ago) link

"pro-israel"

i saw what ya did there

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 March 2016 20:59 (eight years ago) link

don't worry, Morbs: the ice caps are melting

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 March 2016 20:59 (eight years ago) link

i can't use that alone for security

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 March 2016 21:00 (eight years ago) link

i thought about saying pro-likud but i don't really believe that she is and i'm not sure you actually know what the likud is

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 21:03 (eight years ago) link

I likud like that

Neanderthal, Monday, 21 March 2016 21:04 (eight years ago) link

but lol @ voter-flunkies 👍

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 21:04 (eight years ago) link

ooooh I likud
I get chills down my spine every time I take likud at you

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 March 2016 21:05 (eight years ago) link

I thought that was Webster's dad

xpost

erry red flag (f. hazel), Monday, 21 March 2016 21:06 (eight years ago) link

Going to see Bernie tomorrow in San Diego!

timellison, Monday, 21 March 2016 21:06 (eight years ago) link

Sanders or Billingham

Neanderthal, Monday, 21 March 2016 21:08 (eight years ago) link

kevin drum on the dream team:

http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/03/oh-wait%E2%80%94donald-trump-decides-he-has-foreign-policy-team-after-all

So....this is a helluva C-list crew Trump has assembled. A guy who worked for Paul Bremer; the son of John Schmitz; a former Ben Carson advisor; a Fox News talking head; and a guy who specializes in torts.

As for Trump's actual foreign policy, apparently it's the same as always: he's super militaristic, but he doesn't want to actually use the American military for much of anything. He'd like other countries to start taking care of Ukraine and NATO and the South China Sea—or, if they insist on America doing it, he'd like them to pay us for it. Apparently Trump's ambition is to sit at the head of a vast American tribute empire.

goole, Monday, 21 March 2016 21:17 (eight years ago) link

Donald Trump as a real-life President Snow makes some sick amount of sense

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Monday, 21 March 2016 21:20 (eight years ago) link

i'm not sure you actually know what the likud is

yes just as i know A. Sharon is their Lincoln

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 March 2016 21:26 (eight years ago) link

David Ben-Washington

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 March 2016 21:28 (eight years ago) link

sharon left likud in 2005 to form kadima

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 21:28 (eight years ago) link

and i'm pretty sure likud considers the gaza withdrawal a disaster so

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 21:29 (eight years ago) link

Phares, who is probably the objectively worst human being on that list, was also part of Romney's team iirc.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 21 March 2016 21:30 (eight years ago) link

kasich pronounces natan as nay-ton

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 21:38 (eight years ago) link

funky cold kadima

Neanderthal, Monday, 21 March 2016 21:41 (eight years ago) link

bernie posted his speech:
https://berniesanders.com/sanders-outlines-middle-east-policy/

ppl burnt out on one-sidedness of other candidates will appreciate the even-handedness but it would've been more courageous to actually deliver it in person i think

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 22:06 (eight years ago) link

what, is trump about to go on

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 March 2016 22:14 (eight years ago) link

paul ryan on now. idk when trump is coming.

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 22:14 (eight years ago) link

lol @

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CeGrRwGWwAAjWG9.jpg

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 22:17 (eight years ago) link

Aw man, no Ted Cruz

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Monday, 21 March 2016 22:19 (eight years ago) link

I kind of want a Sanders yarmulke.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Monday, 21 March 2016 22:24 (eight years ago) link

those look like cheapo bar mitzvah kippot tho. someone was making these on etsy tho much nicer imo

https://img0.etsystatic.com/102/0/9237869/il_570xN.909246962_is7q.jpg

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 22:26 (eight years ago) link

trump speaking now

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 22:31 (eight years ago) link

Maybe this is more significant than I realize, but when Trump always brings up grand-marshalling a parade, it reminds me of Palin talking about her PTA experience as a qualification.

clemenza, Monday, 21 March 2016 22:34 (eight years ago) link

"i've studied this deal more than anyone else" <dismissive laughter from the crowd> "believe me. beeeelieve me."

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 22:34 (eight years ago) link

Maybe this is more significant than I realize, but when Trump always brings up grand-marshalling a parade, it reminds me of Palin talking about her PTA experience as a qualification.

superficially on a different scale but romney's saving-the-olympics bullet point always felt in this class to me.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 21 March 2016 22:37 (eight years ago) link

positing the Palestinian-Israeli conflict as akin to a real estate deal is p gross imo

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 March 2016 22:38 (eight years ago) link

he's v scripted and in behaving himself / trying to act like an adult mode

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 22:39 (eight years ago) link

"Believe me, believe me, believe me...I get the feeling no one believes me."

clemenza, Monday, 21 March 2016 22:40 (eight years ago) link

calling I/P a real estate deal is a kinda super cynical realpolitik take on the situation but it's not v complete. i remember seeing a few years ago polling that showed that israeli + palestinian support for a final deal shot up when provisions like "israel will apologize for the nakba" or "palestine will acknowledge israel is a jewish state" were added, which suggests that the land piece - as serious as it is - is not enough.

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 22:41 (eight years ago) link

yeah I think the non-land-related issues are p essential

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 March 2016 22:51 (eight years ago) link

I keep thinking that he's not as stupid as he sounds -- that when we wins the nomination he'll study. Bush sounded relatively legible by 2003, and Trump was a better businessman.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 March 2016 22:54 (eight years ago) link

dropped a "ivanka is, maybe as we speak, about to have a jewish baby." i don't understand how david duke could possibly watch this and feel like he made the right endorsement.

Mordy, Monday, 21 March 2016 22:55 (eight years ago) link

"ivanka is, maybe as we speak, about to have a jewish baby."

*gag*

A Fifth Beatle Dies (Tom D.), Monday, 21 March 2016 22:57 (eight years ago) link

Duke takes what he can get

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 March 2016 22:58 (eight years ago) link

"My colleague Lindsay Graham...I know, I know--we worked some stuff out."

clemenza, Monday, 21 March 2016 23:07 (eight years ago) link

"colleague"?!

Οὖτις, Monday, 21 March 2016 23:09 (eight years ago) link

disgusting that the wapo insists on colluding w trump in obvious fiction "hope hicks"

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Monday, 21 March 2016 23:51 (eight years ago) link

sad lol when the first thing Sanders mentions about Palestinian suffering is their employment rate. can't say he's not consistent.

ejemplo (crüt), Monday, 21 March 2016 23:59 (eight years ago) link

I’d work on spirit because the spirit is so low, it’s incredible, the unemployment, you look at unemployment for black youth in this country, African American youth, is 58-59 percent. It’s unthinkable. Unemployment for African Americans – not youth, but African Americans – is very high. And I would create in the inner cities, which is what I really do best, that’s why when I open a building and I show you it’s way ahead of schedule, under budget and everything else—I think it was the Rite Aid store, the store in Baltimore it took them 20 years to get it built, one store, and then it burned down in one night—we have to create incentives for people to love what they are doing, and to make money.

dog trumpet

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 00:03 (eight years ago) link

sad lol when the first thing Sanders mentions about Palestinian suffering is their employment rate. can't say he's not consistent.

That was striking to me too!

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 00:22 (eight years ago) link

And I would create in the inner cities, which is what I really do best, that’s why when I open a building and I show you it’s way ahead of schedule, under budget and everything else—I think it was the Rite Aid store

amazing sentence

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 00:43 (eight years ago) link

http://www.disneyclips.com/imagesnewb/images/cliptiggerhappy.gif

"Buildin' inner thitiez ith what Tiggers do betht! WOOHOOHOO!"

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 00:44 (eight years ago) link

CNN's got one-on-one interviews with all five candidates airing right now. They just cut to a commercial, and as they glided past Trump standing waiting for his turn, I don't think I've ever seen a politician look more Napoleonesque in the way he was standing. I suppose it should have been an unsettling image, but I just burst out laughing.

clemenza, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 00:59 (eight years ago) link

the online nazis in the usual places are in deep mourning about trump's speech today

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 01:34 (eight years ago) link

the whole libel laws/protesters section in that wapo transcript is surreal reading but associate editorial page editor jo-ann armao is my hero today

HIATT: But your answer is you condone violence when the guy is really egregious and terrible?

TRUMP: No, I condone strong law and order. I’ll tell you what they —

HIATT: Rip him out of his seat, punch him in the face, isn’t that violent?

TRUMP: Well he punched other people.

HIATT: No, I understand that.

TRUMP: Fred, he punched other people. He was punching people. He was — one guy was, you know, I’d like to say —

JO-ANN ARMAO, ASSOCIATE EDITORIAL PAGE EDITOR: The Fayetteville protester who was sucker punched — he didn’t punch anyone —

TRUMP: No.

ARMAO: He was being escorted from police, and he was sucker punched.

TRUMP: No. When are you talking about? When?

ARMAO: In Fayetteville.

COREY LEWANDOWSKI, TRUMP 2016 CAMPAIGN MANAGER [to Trump]: North Carolina.

TRUMP: I don’t know. I don’t know which one.

ARMAO: Yes you do.

TRUMP: I don’t know. Because we’ve had so many —

ARMAO: That’s the gentleman you said you were going to look into to see whether or not to pay his legal fees.

TRUMP: Oh well that’s a different — that’s different from the one I’m talking about.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 01:54 (eight years ago) link

TRUMP: Well he punched other people.

HIATT: No, I understand that.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 01:58 (eight years ago) link

TRUMP: ...I always say we have to be unpredictable. We’re totally predictable. And predictable is bad. Sitting at a meeting like this and explaining my views and if I do become president, I have these views that are down for the other side to look at, you know. I hate being so open. I hate when they say — like I said get rid of the oil, keep the oil, different things over the years, when people are saying what would you do with regard to the Middle East, when we left — We should have never been in Iraq. It was a horr- it was one of the worst decisions ever made in the history of our country. We then got out badly, then after we got out, I said, “Keep the oil. If we don’t keep it Iran’s going to get it.” And it turns out Iran and ISIS basically—

HIATT: How do you keep it without troops, how do you defend the oil?

TRUMP: You would… You would, well for that– for that, I would circle it. I would defend those areas.

HIATT: With U.S. troops?

TRUMP: Yeah, I would defend the areas with the oil.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 02:00 (eight years ago) link

just fire oil at the enemy, that'll show'em

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 02:01 (eight years ago) link

I always say we have to be unpredictable. We’re totally predictable. And predictable is bad.

shades of nixon playing chicken w sac

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 02:03 (eight years ago) link

HIATT: I’d like to come back to the campaign. You said a few weeks ago after a family in Chicago gave some money to a PAC opposing you, you said, “They better watch out. They have a lot to hide.” What should they watch out for?

...

TRUMP: Well, it means that I’ll start spending on them. I’ll start taking ads telling them all what a rotten job they’re doing with the Chicago Cubs. I mean, they are spending on me. I mean, so am I allowed to say that? I’ll start doing ads about their baseball team. That it’s not properly run or that they haven’t done a good job in the brokerage business lately.

RYAN: Would you do that while you are president?

TRUMP: No, not while I am president. No, not while I’m president. That is two phases.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 02:15 (eight years ago) link

Right now, look, you know, I went to a great school, I was a good student and all. I am an intelligent person. My uncle, I would say my uncle was one of the brilliant people. He was at MIT for 35 years. As a great scientist and engineer, actually more than anything else. Dr. John Trump, a great guy. I’m an intelligent person. I understand what is going on.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 02:15 (eight years ago) link

Is it just me or does that WaPo transcript seem like the first time he's actually been confronted on his views by someone other than a TV news hack too chickenshit to follow up?

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 02:16 (eight years ago) link

tough hardball questioners like Ruth Marcus

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 02:17 (eight years ago) link

TRUMP: I don’t want people to go around thinking that I have a problem. I’m telling you, Ruth, I had so many people. I would say 25, 30 people would tell me … every time I’d shake people’s hand, “Oh, you have nice hands.” Why shouldn’t I? And, by the way, by saying that I solved the problem. Nobody questions … I even held up my hands, and said, “Look, take a look at that hand.”

MARCUS: You told us in the debate ….

TRUMP: And by saying that, I solved the problem. Nobody questions. Everyone held my hand. I said look. Take a look at that hand.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 02:17 (eight years ago) link

and i'm pretty sure likud considers the gaza withdrawal a disaster so

talkin' bout Ariel's greatest hits of Sabra and Shatila

could you plz call the next one of these the Trump thread? just to avoid confusion.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 02:18 (eight years ago) link

HIATT: How do you keep it without troops, how do you defend the oil?

TRUMP: You would… You would, well for that– for that, I would circle it. I would draw a circle around it and say, hey, this is our oil. Leave it alone.

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 02:18 (eight years ago) link

TAKE A LOOK AT THIS HAND
IT'S PASSING IN BETWEEN US

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 02:19 (eight years ago) link

again

TRUMP: Well he punched other people.

HIATT: No, I understand that.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 02:21 (eight years ago) link

cool of Hillary to run to the right of Trump on Israel.

salthigh, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 02:24 (eight years ago) link

it's how you prove you're "serious"

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 02:25 (eight years ago) link

AIPAC: Well Palestine punched other people

CLINTON: No, I understand that

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 02:28 (eight years ago) link

I was just thinking earlier that, if faced with the Sophie's choice, I would (god help me) take a third term of W. over Trump. And now I'm reading that transcript and thinking, as much as W. often came across like he'd abused a few too many substances during his lost years, Trump often sounds as if he's in the midst of a severe brain event. Trump is so good at elevating regard for other turds just by perpetually being the smelliest one in the room.

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 02:32 (eight years ago) link

if Trump managed to be elected, his entrance interview would be "The permanent govt is making the decisions; go along, or three killshots to the hair."

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 02:42 (eight years ago) link

As a general rule, anytime someone tries to hammer home a self-description ad infinitum, I'm deeply inclined to believe the polar opposite. Yes, please tell us more about how intelligent you are, Donald. And more about this intelligent uncle, because apparently that shit works by way of familial osmosis now? I'd previously thought I was wildly unqualified for any kind of political office but I'm descended from a former Secretary of State so maybe all I need to do is just start telling people what a sensational politician I am and it will become so. People tell me my hands are amazing, too, all the time. Such amazing hands.

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 02:46 (eight years ago) link

my uncle is so amazing, he's going to be so intelligent

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 02:46 (eight years ago) link

The guy basically comports himself like a cross between the kleptocrat King of some nowhere nation, some cartoonishly vain mob boss and the drunk guy holding court at the party who does nothing but boast about dumb shit. "How big is your yacht? Really, that's pretty big. I mean, not as big as my yacht. It's a tremendous yacht. Just tremendous. It gets me all the women, all the power. What's that? Did you say I - did you say something about my yacht? What's that? Nothing? Yeah, that's fucking right, you said nothing. Vito, get this asshole out of here. Get him out!!! And where are the dancers? Where are the fucking dancers!!! I want the fucking dancers to start fucking dancing right fucking now!!! You know, fuck the dancers. Fuck 'em. No, I - you heard me! No fucking dancers! I'm getting the fuck out of here. Vito, get my car. What's th - where are we going? What do you mean, where are we going. Don't fucking ask me where I'm going, I'll fucking tell you when we get there, you fucking ape! Where would you all be without me? Huh? Fucking working the checkout at the fucking supermarket with all the rest of the morons. You should be thanking me for giving me a job. Thanking me! Wait, what? What are you doing? Stop fucking thanking me, you fucking morons! Get off the floor! Jesus fucking Christ, I've got a headache. A huge fucking headache. Vito, run me a bath! Jesus, my head, it hurts to think for all you idiots at once. Vito! Don't just stand there, get the fucking bath ready! Fucking morons ..."

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 03:10 (eight years ago) link

I actually really noticed the mob-boss angle in the CNN interview tonight. He was expressing a kind of theatrical exasperation over something at one point--maybe withdrawing NATO support--and he threw his arms out and gave what-for like he was in Goodfellas: "They wouldn't be happy about it? So they wouldn't be happy about it--what do you want me to do? Now go fuck your mother."

clemenza, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 03:39 (eight years ago) link

Go get your shinebox

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 03:44 (eight years ago) link

Anderson Cooper asked Bernie if he thought the Cuban revolution was a good thing and Bernie accused him of red-baiting. Nice.

timellison, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 03:55 (eight years ago) link

i like bernie sanders

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 03:57 (eight years ago) link

listening to part of the cnn interview with blitzer that trump did and once again.. like the washington post editorial board interview.. you see where with every question he has to jump immediately to the one or two points he has & then either change the subject or attack someone because he's so uninformed on policy

drunk guy holding court at the party who does nothing but boast about dumb shit

yeah drunk guy who knows it all and you're embarrassed for listening to him

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 04:16 (eight years ago) link

he reminds me of kids when they brag about this one thing they did and they tell every single person the same story about that one thing they did

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 04:16 (eight years ago) link

this thing today was super weird (who is this lady, is her biography accurate, how did she get a media credential for a media outlet that doesn't exist)

http://money.cnn.com/2016/03/21/media/donald-trump-alicia-watkins/index.html

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 04:17 (eight years ago) link

i went down the slide backwards? did you see? i went so fast, i was going backwards, i had no idea where i was going. i'm a really good slider.

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 04:18 (eight years ago) link

hrc should do political commercials where she accuses trump of being ineligible to be president because kids cannot be president

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 04:18 (eight years ago) link

agree on the childishness as well.. everything is so unfair to him, the media, the questions, the other candidates. it's just so unfair. it's so horrible, so awful. he just wants to be president. why can't he just be president already waaaaah :`( sad!

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 04:19 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, she laughed and said (maybe after he's mentioned another woman, think it was fiancee Megan)something like, "Having sex is *not* the way to get close to you." So if they do, it's just something that happens occasionally, no biggie. The kitchen scene is another reminder of how superfluous he's getting to be. (A woman who knew Roger in Paris before the War recalled, "You seemed like a minor character in your own life.")
Another good Fresh Air interview with Weiner, and Gross plays some very early excerpts that connect with recent scenes in ways I didn't expect (stream, dl, transcript)
http://www.npr.org/2015/05/07/404904172/mad-men-creator-on-don-drapers-losses-and-the-end-of-the-road🔗🔗
Kinda wished they'd waited a few more weeks, but he'll be back at some point.
i mean i guess a modicum of self-delusion is necessary to maintain any kind of optimism or desire to keep struggling, or just to inoculate against despair. but the whole cherry-picking of polls and focus groups and election results reminds me of the excesses of literary interpretation where if /x/ doesn't mean /x/ then it can just as easily mean /y/ if your interpretation is willful and clever enough.
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/on-the-road-with-bob-dylan-joan-baez-and-the-rolling-thunder-revue-19760115?page=3🔗

Plinythewelder, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 05:27 (eight years ago) link

Wut?

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 06:46 (eight years ago) link

some cartoonishly vain mob boss

http://www4.pictures.zimbio.com/mp/7adSesLmtr4l.jpg

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 06:56 (eight years ago) link

The meeting at The Washington Post was hardly successful: The paper’s opinion deputy digital director, Karen Attiah, took to Twitter to say that Mr. Trump had “hit on” her there

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 10:42 (eight years ago) link

see Ned's previous post in this thread for the article she wrote about it

ejemplo (crüt), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 11:22 (eight years ago) link

i didn't see any note here of It's Pat's full-throated 'Palestine hasn't existed since 1948!' yesterday.

Truly a golden age of Israel-coddling ahead from the next prez. Put up some condo towers in those settlements.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 11:38 (eight years ago) link

Oh look, Phyllis Schlafly and the Eagle Forum(chaired by her daughter) are in a bit of a disagreement over which fleshy bag of resentment to endorse more:

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/eagle-forums-not-so-polite-split-over-donald-trump

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 16:08 (eight years ago) link

lol, perfect.

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 16:19 (eight years ago) link

AIPAC rebukes Trump for anti-Obama comments

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 16:24 (eight years ago) link

Die-hard Cruz supporter and media icon Glenn Beck, who the website LDS Living calls "one of the most influential Mormons in the media today," invoked a Mormon end times prophecy at a rally in the city of Provo.

"Like many Mormons, I believe in a prophecy that the Constitution will one day hang by a thread in the last days. I believe that time is now, and I believe people like (Utah Sen.) Mike Lee and Ted Cruz will save it," Beck said.

The Christian website Charisma News, where Cruz and his campaign leadership have published articles, wrote that Beck's comments were a reference to the Mormon "White Horse" prophecy, suggesting that Cruz could be the horse.

In 1902, Mormon Elder John Roberts wrote in his journal that the prophet Joseph Smith had said, "You must continue to petition Congress all the time, but they will treat you like strangers and aliens and they will not give you your rights, but will govern you with strangers and commissioners. You will see the Constitution of the United States almost destroyed. It will hang like a thread as fine as a silk fiber."

"It will be preserved and saved by the efforts of the White Horse," wrote Roberts, who went on to predict that "a terrible revolution will take place in the land of America" in which "the most terrible scenes of bloodshed, murder and rape that have ever been imagined or looked upon will take place."

cool story Mormons

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 16:43 (eight years ago) link

lmao

marcos, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 16:44 (eight years ago) link

They tried that one when Romney ran, IIRC.

jedi slimane (suzy), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 16:46 (eight years ago) link

put the white horse in the white house

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 16:46 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwATF5dnfq4

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 16:49 (eight years ago) link

If you want to ride, don't ride that White Horse.

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 16:50 (eight years ago) link

Not over yet: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/bernie-sanders-fundraising-hillary-clinton-221024

schwantz, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 17:01 (eight years ago) link

Additionally, the filing showed that the Sanders campaign spent $620 on Chick-Fil-A.

lol

ejemplo (crüt), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 17:03 (eight years ago) link

bernie won democrats abroad today

k3vin k., Tuesday, 22 March 2016 17:11 (eight years ago) link

bernie supporting anti-LGBT chicken

akm, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 17:20 (eight years ago) link

My daughter's school is in the bluest of areas, like mega liberal territory. For some reason the PTA keeps catering events with Chik-Fil-A. I don't know whether it's political cluelessness, a deliberate sabotage operation from a closet social conservative on the board, or just a preference for a certain type of chicken sandwich that is strong enough to overrule all principles.

Knowing that Sanders's campaign is also impure in its social justice-oriented spending is actually kind of a relief.

Though I should say that SANDERS does suggest another chicken provider, iykwimaityd.

leprechaundriac (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 17:30 (eight years ago) link

when youre on the road, sometimes shit is all there is.

from Bern email:

"Here’s why this result is important: we netted more delegates from the Democrats Abroad voting than Hillary Clinton netted with her narrow victories in Illinois, Massachusetts, and Missouri combined."

true?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 17:31 (eight years ago) link

probably; those 3 were virtual ties

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 17:33 (eight years ago) link

A friend is circulating an apparently real fundraising effort from Camp Clinton dangling dinner and champaign with Hillary at George Clooney's house to the top bidder.

Barf.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 17:36 (eight years ago) link

Delegates Abroad:

Sanders - 9
Clinton - 4

+5 Sanders

IL, MA, MO combined:

Sanders - 76 + 45 + 35 = 156
Clinton - 78 + 46 + 36 = 160

+4 Clinton

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 17:38 (eight years ago) link

In 1902, Mormon Elder John Roberts wrote in his journal that the prophet Joseph Smith had said, "You must continue to petition Congress all the time, but they will treat you like strangers and aliens and they will not give you your rights, but will govern you with strangers and commissioners. You will see the Constitution of the United States almost destroyed. It will hang like a thread as fine as a silk fiber."

"It will be preserved and saved by the efforts of the White Horse," wrote Roberts, who went on to predict that "a terrible revolution will take place in the land of America" in which "the most terrible scenes of bloodshed, murder and rape that have ever been imagined or looked upon will take place."

Joseph Smith ran for president in 1844

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 17:38 (eight years ago) link

"Wow! So, if I'm the highest bidder I'll get to have dinner with George Clooney!"

"No, dinner with Hillary at George Clooney's house."

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 17:40 (eight years ago) link

Currently pledged delegates (without superdelegates, since that makes people angry):

Sanders - 850
Clinton - 1174

2383 delegates are needed to win.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 17:41 (eight years ago) link

She had some really crushing victories in the south.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 17:43 (eight years ago) link

I don't understand what "delegates abroad" is, because I was sent an absentee ballot for the last state I lived in, and I thought it was to be counted for that state, not for some other category.

(actually I neglected to vote because I don't care who wins the primary but I'll vote in the general)

droit au butt (Euler), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 17:43 (eight years ago) link

hm I wonder who the superdelegates are gonna break for

xp

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 17:43 (eight years ago) link

Sanders: 27
Clinton : 482

(because sometimes I like making people angry)

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 17:44 (eight years ago) link

tbh I don't see why it makes a difference which animal-slaughtering company they get a catered meal from

ejemplo (crüt), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 17:44 (eight years ago) link

some people like their animal cruelty with less homophobia

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 17:47 (eight years ago) link

Sanders: 27
Clinton : 482

(because sometimes I like making people angry)

― i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, March 22, 2016 1:44 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

superdelegate count kind of meaningless at this point since they're not bound. though obviously the only reason they'd start to switch for Bernie is if he somehow runs up huge margins from here on out, which is unlikely

k3vin k., Tuesday, 22 March 2016 17:50 (eight years ago) link

when clinton gets up to around 1700 pledged delegates, though, you'll probably start seeing stories about how she's essentially secured the nomination which take the superdelegates into account

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:03 (eight years ago) link

bernie supporting anti-LGBT chicken

― akm, Tuesday, March 22, 2016 1:20 PM (47 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i kind of wish it was clinton instead w/ the chik-fil-a bill bc my FB feed would've ripped her apart on this

marcos, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:09 (eight years ago) link

Ted Cruz: "“We need to immediately halt the flow of refugees from countries with a significant al Qaida or ISIS presence. We need to empower law enforcement to patrol and secure Muslim neighborhoods before they become radicalized.
"

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/us-candidates-responses-brussels-terrorism-speak-volumes?cid=sm_fb_maddow

akm, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:12 (eight years ago) link

praying for God Almighty to come down and give Ted Cruz the biggest baddest swirlie this world has ever known

ejemplo (crüt), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:16 (eight years ago) link

shoutout to the radicalized Christian communities that support Ted Cruz

ejemplo (crüt), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:20 (eight years ago) link

this has probably been posted but

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FrNyTvOZDY

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:22 (eight years ago) link

apparently 3 LDS missionaries from utah were injured in the brussels attack. 538 claims that concern/anxiety re terrorism tends to favor trump - i wonder if this'll help him close the gap a little in utah.

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:26 (eight years ago) link

i would guess that any major act of terrorism, in the US or abroad, benefits trump, at least among republican voters.

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

why would anyone anywhere think trump would be a good counter to terrorism

akm, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:28 (eight years ago) link

the guy is not fucking jack bauer or james bond

akm, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:28 (eight years ago) link

because he's doubling down on his calls to torture people and the republican base loves that

k3vin k., Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:29 (eight years ago) link

Remember when we were torturing people and terrorism ended? People want a return to those halcyon days.

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:29 (eight years ago) link

i don't think most people understand the motivations behind terrorism, which means they have weird notions about what can be done to fight against it. enter trump

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:30 (eight years ago) link

i think that when faced with complex upsetting problems ppl often want simple, decisive answers. even if those answers are dumb (register all muslims, ban all muslims from coming to the US, torture suspects for information, kill terrorist families, wipe out isis) they satisfy the need to /do something/. by contrast the answer that there's nothing really we can do and these things will probably continue to happen is v unsatisfying.

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:34 (eight years ago) link

there's also a great contrast between the simplicity of trump's response to terrorism - close the borders, torture people - compared to what people on the left advise - see this from john judis, for example, which ends like this:

Not doing anything – withdrawing collectively from the Middle East and waiting for these conflicts to play out won’t work. That would mean decades of continued strife and continued acts of terror. Half-measures like the Obama administration has attempted in Syria won’t work. What’s needed is the most comprehensive plan for the Middle East – one that tries to undo the past.

After 9/11, I put this in terms of waging war and peace at the same time – war against al Qaeda and peace in the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians – but since then, the problem has vastly deepened and broadened. Borders created by the Europeans after World War I are being destroyed. Age-old religious and tribal conflicts have revived. Nothing less that the kind of concerted plan – on the model of Bush I’s coalition in the first Gulf War – would suffice to tamp down and began to resolve the conflicts in that region.

But I can’t see anything like that in sight. The EU is divided, and the American and European public understandably has no appetite for a more concerted intervention – one that would not only have to shake up older alliances, but also involve the military. And it’s a plan that even if fully implemented still might fail miserably. Think of the West in Afghanistan. Al Qaeda’s original strategy, which ISIS has carried forward, may have actually succeeded. I am pessimistic that any resolution will come out of this terrorist attack, except perhaps for a continued movement to the populist right in northern Europe and a boost for Donald Trump.

i think a lot of people crave the simplicity of closing border and bombing and winning. that's why trump gets a boost, as Judis says

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:36 (eight years ago) link

oops, xpost, but yeah, mordy and i making the same point

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:37 (eight years ago) link

when action is ambiguous or counterproductive, bellowing will do.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:39 (eight years ago) link

Fred Hiatt sounded as much of a dingbat as Trump did in that WaPo interview.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:40 (eight years ago) link

Sanders' speech vid here

In a speech from Salt Lake City, which had been offered to telecast to AIPAC — an offer that was denied — the Vermont senator reiterated his support for Israel’s security. He also insisted that “peace also means security for every Palestinian. It means achieving self-determination, civil rights, and economic well-being for the Palestinian people.”

Sanders called it “absurd” for Israel to pursue more settlements in response to violence. “Peace will also mean ending the economic blockade of Gaza,” he said. “And it will mean a sustainable and equitable distribution of precious water resources so that Israel and Palestine can both thrive as neighbors.”

While objecting to rocket attacks by Hamas, he also reiterated that he “condemned the [Israeli] bombing of hospitals, schools and refugee camps.” He insisted that while Israel is a friend to the United States, “as friends, we are obligated to speak the truth as we see it. This is what real friendship demands, especially in difficult times.”

https://theintercept.com/2016/03/22/bernie-sanders-spoke-up-for-suffering-palestinians-but-few-in-broadcast-media-covered-it/

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:46 (eight years ago) link

what's interesting about trump pronouncements are that he appears to be unwilling or unable to speak in formal english or even in semi-educated language. Like, try reading this in trumpvoice

The EU is divided, and the American and European public understandably has no appetite for a more concerted intervention

you can't do it!
i am almost willing to put up with the confinement camps and yearly purges just to hear this guy's State of the Union. It would be the best State of the Union from the best president and the best country, what a state of the union that would be

ulysses, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:49 (eight years ago) link

The EU is divided, and the American and European public understandably has no appetite for a more concerted intervention. Sad!

there I did it

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:50 (eight years ago) link

i'm good until i get to "concerted intervention" and i can't pretend anymore

ulysses, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:51 (eight years ago) link

yeah that is a few too many syllables

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:53 (eight years ago) link

The EU is divided, and the American and European public, look, they're totally, they understand there's no appetite. Sad!

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:54 (eight years ago) link

"has no appetite" is also antithetical to Trumpspeak

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:54 (eight years ago) link

Europe, anger, America, me, you, anger. Sad! Torture, close border, America, great!

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:56 (eight years ago) link

"And Europe doesn't get it! And the people don't wanna get involved! They don't wanna get involved."

ulysses, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:58 (eight years ago) link

just a few more generations and we can finally arrive at the much simpler Two Minutes Hate instead of bothering with arguing about what to do about things

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 18:59 (eight years ago) link

what's interesting about trump pronouncements are that he appears to be unwilling or unable to speak in formal english or even in semi-educated language.

this is precisely the sort of thing that makes him strongly appeal to a certain person, and strongly anathema to even more people.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:02 (eight years ago) link

he never sounds rehearsed, because he isn't, really. he never pieces together a sentence that would sound out of place if you were making small talk with your mechanic while waiting for your brakes to be fixed.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:03 (eight years ago) link

I have never had small talk with a mechanic about the size of my hands.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:04 (eight years ago) link

live a little, DJP

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:04 (eight years ago) link

My daughter's school is in the bluest of areas, like mega liberal territory. For some reason the PTA keeps catering events with Chik-Fil-A. I don't know whether it's political cluelessness, a deliberate sabotage operation from a closet social conservative on the board, or just a preference for a certain type of chicken sandwich that is strong enough to overrule all principles.

This is mainly owed to CFA having a serious community service interest--probably more so than any other fast food chain. Their franchisees are instructed as part of their corporate commitment to make a big presence in their communities by working with schools, charities, and community organisations by providing discount catering, food prizes, gift certificates, special nights at their restaurants etc.

Now I Know How Joan of Arcadia Felt (C. Grisso/McCain), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:05 (eight years ago) link

funny you mention that. i went to Burger King yesterday for some onion rings and they had a big poster advertising how they will cater charitable events at a big discount.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:06 (eight years ago) link

xpost

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:06 (eight years ago) link

plz book them for a PETA event and then film it

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:09 (eight years ago) link

too soon

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:10 (eight years ago) link

http://chronicle.com/article/On-One-Campus-a-Trump-Rally/235789

"It was very scary. A lot of racial slurs, a lot of vitriol, very, very, very angry, animated people," said Mr. Custer, who added that he had to create a human chain with other protest leaders to keep the groups separated. "There is not an exchange of ideas. There is violence, screaming, and shouting."

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:13 (eight years ago) link

for some ppl violence screaming and shouting is the most idea exchanging they'll ever do

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:16 (eight years ago) link

"Europe is a mess, and the people in America and the people in Europe are sick of trying to help people who treat them very, very badly. It's true."

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:16 (eight years ago) link

he says that a lot. "it's very, very true." it's a rhetorical figure that seems to suggest he's worried about quite the opposite.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:17 (eight years ago) link

I think it was Tom Scharpling who pointed out a particular aspect of Trump's stupidity some time ago, the thing where he's clearly reading something representing his own opinion off a teleprompter or cue cards and punctuates it with, "That's true."

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:19 (eight years ago) link

I think he's just a dumb idiot who barely understands English.

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:19 (eight years ago) link

well it does often sound as if he literally just made up what he just said out of thin air (or it was whispered to him two minutes ago) so he seeks to reassure himself with phrases like, "that's very true," "that's true," "you wouldn't believe this," etc.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:20 (eight years ago) link

Oh god, I just realized that Trump is a bellowing Chauncey Gardner.

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:21 (eight years ago) link

"people keep telling me"

"i hear this all the time"

he has a common rhetorical trick where he kind of outsources his authority to unnamed other folks, experts, just folks, whatever. same reason he re-tweets bullshit from dubious people.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:21 (eight years ago) link

Fifty or more people have complimented his strong, beautiful, completely normal (maybe even bigger than normal) hands.

Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:23 (eight years ago) link

http://www.davidbordwell.net/blog/2016/03/22/our-daily-barbarisms-leo-hurwitzs-strange-victory-1948/

Strange Victory is, it seems to me, the essential documentary of our moment. A nearly seventy-year-old film can remind us that, as the narration puts it, “hopelessness is next door to hysteria.” The frustrations, despair, and hatreds that surfaced during Obama’s tenure have crystallized in an American fascist movement of unprecedented breadth. The film reminds us that scapegoating is eternal, sometimes summoned quietly (they’re not like us, she’s a traitor, he knows exactly what he’s doing), sometimes conjured up in full fury. At a moment when America is one ISIS attack away from a Trump or Cruz presidency, it’s good to be reminded how the well-funded Hitler exploited Us vs. Them. Temporizing pundits give every sufficiently funded lunatic the benefit of straight-faced interviews, or even tongue-baths. Right-wing politicians and agitators, keen on power and uncommitted to principle, are ready to fall in line behind a leader if he might win. Forget Godwin’s Law. Facing today’s assault on peace and justice, Strange Victory can rekindle our energies, without a moment to lose.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:44 (eight years ago) link

Temporizing pundits give every sufficiently funded lunatic the benefit of straight-faced interviews

this is the most appalling thing to me; the media treats trump's demagoguery as if it's just another form of democratic deliberation.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:47 (eight years ago) link

is it true tho? fox news went after trump in that one debate more than i've ever seen a news org go after a candidate ever. what should they be doing? refusing to talk to him? badmouthing him to his face? why does anyone think that would turn off his supporters?

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:51 (eight years ago) link

He thrives on people treating him very, very badly. It's true.

I Can Say I Know We're Risin' Underneath The Blazin' Sky (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:53 (eight years ago) link

at what point will we see "gotcha" informational questions to the Yam, ie name the heads of state of these countries? The simpler the better.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:56 (eight years ago) link

is it true tho? fox news went after trump in that one debate more than i've ever seen a news org go after a candidate ever. what should they be doing? refusing to talk to him? badmouthing him to his face? why does anyone think that would turn off his supporters?

― Mordy, Tuesday, March 22, 2016 7:51 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

maybe they could ask follow up questions asking for specifics for the vague nonsense and bullshit he constantly spews

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:57 (eight years ago) link

they do! did you see that wapost interview? but the question is still why you think his supporters would care that the NYT or CNN held trump's feet to the fire.

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:58 (eight years ago) link

i feel like blaming the media for not doing enough to stop Trump, or for not letting enough people know about Bernie, is a cop-out that gives way too much power to a very decentralized industry in steep decline.

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 19:59 (eight years ago) link

the point wdn't be to expose him to his committed supporters, but everyone else.

hell i wd only read an interview with him for money! time is precious.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:01 (eight years ago) link

one can understand the structural roots of the problem (="decentralized industry in steep decline") and still lament its effects on discourse and politics!

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:01 (eight years ago) link

i think he exposes himself plenty the moment he opens his mouth but i love the idea of asking him easy trivia questions and trying to stump him

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:02 (eight years ago) link

ok but isn't the consequence of a decentralized industry in steep decline that more ppl are getting their information from alternative and online sources and closing themselves off in echo chambers? whether network news is aggressive or not just seems like a total non-sequitar.

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:03 (eight years ago) link

i was thinking of that too. i bet he couldn't specify any amendments beyond the first two. obviously this would play well to the anti-intellectualism of his "base," but it would repel everyone else.

i hope.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:04 (eight years ago) link

ok but isn't the consequence of a decentralized industry in steep decline that more ppl are getting their information from alternative and online sources and closing themselves off in echo chambers? whether network news is aggressive or not just seems like a total non-sequitar.

― Mordy, Tuesday, March 22, 2016 3:03 PM (25 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

mainstream media produces all kinds of "moments" that resonate through other, more niche platforms

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:04 (eight years ago) link

I am pretty sure that everyone who has been exposed to the Trump phenomenon has already decided whether they find him repellent or attractive and that the calculus going on for people who are undecided have little to nothing to do with him and everything to do with what they think of his Republican/Democratic rivals.

Like, maybe I'm wrong in thinking that running your rallies like fascist othering parties is going to engender a strong reaction in people who see it but I don't think the problem here is that people don't know what Trump's all about; the problem is that people are so distrustful of those who represent The Establishment that they're willing to put up with all kinds of Trump-fueled nonsense for a shot at something different. IMO you're looking at a bunch of people who have decided that the devil they know is unacceptable and are evaluating whether the horrifying carnival act down the road will really be that bad or if it will shake things up enough that a few good things fall out of it. I think this is an insane, nonsensical component when applied to Trump but when you remember that this country is also made up of venal racists, it makes more sense (even as it becomes more depressing).

THAT BEING SAID, I don't think everyone in this country has forgotten the lessons of World War II and I don't think a majority of voters are willing to vote for for a fascist, so I don't think there's any serious chance of Trump becoming President. If they manage to back-door Ryan into the nomination, I will be more concerned about the Democrats losing the election and losing ground in the Senate/House.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:23 (eight years ago) link

if they go with anyone other than trump at the convention, they're already sacrificing the presidency in a feeble attempt to save the downticket senate/house races.

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:26 (eight years ago) link

what's bugging me is that i couldn't imagine a world in which this moron would be a major party nominee. and that appears to be happening! so i'm necessarily questioning other things that i believed wholeheartedly... like that a plurality of morons could overturn the apple cart entirely.

ulysses, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:28 (eight years ago) link

If they manage to back-door Ryan into the nomination, I will be more concerned about the Democrats losing the election and losing ground in the Senate/House.

You mean Paul "Mitt Romney's VP pick"/"almost a real boy" Ryan? Yeah, there's no universe in which he beats Clinton.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:31 (eight years ago) link

whatever happens, the GOP will have to change in order to resolve its establishment vs freedom caucus vs trump dilemma, or be rendered fractured and irrelevant. and when one major party changes to such a degree, the other tends to adapt and change as well, correct?

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:32 (eight years ago) link

just a preference for a certain type of chicken sandwich that is strong enough to overrule all principles.

i've noticed this one a lot among people my age

ciderpress, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:32 (eight years ago) link

most likely scenario imo is trump becomes the nominee and the rest of the GOP falls in line. i don't expect convention dealing and paul ryan is definitely not going to the nominee

marcos, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:34 (eight years ago) link

i am as reluctant to evaluate Yam as a dope any more than It's Pat as brilliant. Or Clinton as astute, or Kasich as reasonable.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:34 (eight years ago) link

You mean Paul "Mitt Romney's VP pick"/"almost a real boy" Ryan? Yeah, there's no universe in which he beats Clinton.

it's not even about paul ryan (although i agree, he's certainly no ideal). if the convention ends with the GOP denying trump the nomination (this is assuming he continues to dramatically outpace cruz and kasich in delegates), it wouldn't matter if ronald reagan descended from the heavens riding a flying golden lion, they'd be doomed in the presidential race

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:34 (eight years ago) link

GOP establishment's gonna get behind Trump for the most part, and then the party's gonna get crushed in the election, and the war between the rank and file and the "establishment" will revert to prior status - the establishment saying "see? we told you he was a loser!" and the base saying "you sold us out!" Rinse and repeat.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:37 (eight years ago) link

You mean Paul "Mitt Romney's VP pick"/"almost a real boy" Ryan? Yeah, there's no universe in which he beats Clinton.

"more concerned" does not necessarily mean I am actually concerned; more that if the Republican party manages to finagle someone like Ryan into being their nominee, I can see a scenario where voters reward them for not being stupid enough to continue backing Trump. This doesn't mean that I think that scenario will actually happen.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:37 (eight years ago) link

GOP establishment's gonna get behind Trump for the most part, and then the party's gonna get crushed in the election, and the war between the rank and file and the "establishment" will revert to prior status - the establishment saying "see? we told you he was a loser!" and the base saying "you sold us out!" Rinse and repeat.

― Οὖτις, Tuesday, March 22, 2016 4:37 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yup

marcos, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:46 (eight years ago) link

The "get behind Trump" phase during and after the convention is gonna be hilarious.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:50 (eight years ago) link

"THAT BEING SAID, I don't think everyone in this country has forgotten the lessons of World War II and I don't think a majority of voters are willing to vote for for a fascist, so I don't think there's any serious chance of Trump becoming President."

I imagine Trump supporters think this is a melodramatic exaggeration and aren't actually processing the real similarities, same way they dismiss when Trump is called an asshole as just a name rather than looking at the striking similarities of him to a literal anus that spews actual shit.

Evan, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:50 (eight years ago) link

DERP in the VIRP

More turmoil in the Virgin Island Republican Party erupted Tuesday as the GOP chair there announced the disqualification of six delegates that had been selected to represent the territory at the Republican convention and the elevation of new delegates in their place.

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:50 (eight years ago) link

since HRC has not rarely acted like a political nitwit in the last 3 months, you Bring Yam On pundits are walking the line here.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:52 (eight years ago) link

maybe they could ask follow up questions asking for specifics for the vague nonsense and bullshit he constantly spews

Trump's been on my TV constantly for the last six months, so I'll second mordy's point above: he gets asked follow-ups all the time, which he responds to with more "believe me, believe me"s and "it's gonna be great"s. It's pointless. You're better to ask for details once, move on, and leave it anyone listening to figure out that nothing was actually said.

clemenza, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:52 (eight years ago) link

everyone in this country who personally remembers the lessons of World War II is over 75

book larnin' and the History Channel aint quite the same

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:54 (eight years ago) link

No, you have to spoon feed that point to the audience listening "So you're saying you don't actually have a detailed plan to achieve ______?"

xpost

Evan, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:55 (eight years ago) link

I imagine Trump supporters think this is a melodramatic exaggeration and aren't actually processing the real similarities, same way they dismiss when Trump is called an asshole as just a name rather than looking at the striking similarities of him to a literal anus that spews actual shit.

I imagine that Trump supporters are not a majority of voters. I don't think he's going to win more than 60% of the Republican vote, let alone a majority of independents and Democrats, and if he does it will be due to suppressed Republican voter turnout due to their party nominating a blatantly obvious walking talking bag of shit as their nominee rather than someone who can play the part of a reasonable human being that can spin their loathsome positions into reasonable-sounding sound bites.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:55 (eight years ago) link

I don't think he's going to win more than 60% of the Republican vote,

from NYT, yesterday:

http://i.imgur.com/SdN731J.jpg

looks more like 82%, and that's before republican voters are told over and over for months that bernie sanders/hillary clinton is the devil and the world will explode if they don't vote for trump

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 21:01 (eight years ago) link

Trump's been on my TV constantly for the last six months, so I'll second mordy's point above: he gets asked follow-ups all the time, which he responds to with more "believe me, believe me"s and "it's gonna be great"s. It's pointless. You're better to ask for details once, move on, and leave it anyone listening to figure out that nothing was actually said.

― clemenza, Tuesday, March 22, 2016 1:52 PM (7 minutes ago)

I don't agree at all. I think Trump or whoever it is gets the upper hand. Why not stand for something? Why not say our news organization doesn't tolerate evasive answers, contradictions, and lies? Why not spell it out right explicitly and vehemently right when it happens?

timellison, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 21:06 (eight years ago) link

support /= vote though, i think on the enthusiasm scale trump won't really bring them running to the polls

nomar, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 21:08 (eight years ago) link

yeah, i can't prove you wrong on that, because i can't find a similar poll from 2012 or 2008 that measured "enthusiastic support / support with reservations / support only because nominee" among mccain/romney/obama voters to see how that translated to actual turnout

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 21:12 (eight years ago) link

but my guess is that the vast majority of people fall in line with whichever person has the D or the R by their name, even the people who aren't enthusiastic

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 21:13 (eight years ago) link

moreso on the R side I think, their tribal affiliations are a bit stronger

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 21:13 (eight years ago) link

they're also on drugs or killing themselves

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 21:15 (eight years ago) link

(xpost) They do. You're talking to a brick wall.

Why not say our news organization doesn't tolerate evasive answers, contradictions, and lies?

If you actually said this, I think you'd look self-righteous and silly. Ask the question, ask a follow-up definitely, but a certain point, you have to trust that people can see through nonsense. It's not like Trump's fooling the whole country or anything--maybe 40% of his party ("of his party" not exactly accurate) believes everything he says, the other 60% doesn't, a large part of that 60% is scrambling around to prevent him from getting the nomination, and most of the rest of the country sees him as the buffoon he is. I don't think asking the same question six times instead of two is going to move those numbers much.

clemenza, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 21:18 (eight years ago) link

I agree with Dr. Morbius about the inadvisability of taking Trump's loss to Hillary (or to Bernie, who imo has less than a 10% chance of being nominated) as a foregone to conclusion. Yes, Donald has made himself odious to anyone with a recent family history of immigration from Latin America and he will not be getting many minority votes of any kind, but his reduction of every issue to terms so simple they are pure fantasies is a powerful weapon.

Think how often you indulge in a fantasy life and how strong that tug is. Trump is creating a mass shared fantasy and giving millions of people permission to join in. It isn't enough to point out that one must be fairly weak-minded to enter that dream world. Given a choice between a reality you already know feels like crap and a golden dream where solving your problems is as easy as pie, a hell of a lot of people will choose to toss reality aside and buy a fistful of lottery tickets.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 21:41 (eight years ago) link

math is a bitch and it's not on Trump's side

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 21:46 (eight years ago) link

Dems already start w an electoral college advantage, and no way can Trump swing enough states to overcome it. it will never happen.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 21:47 (eight years ago) link

Very happy to hear it. Glad it's guaranteed. I'd feel uneasy otherwise.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 21:49 (eight years ago) link

believe me, believe me, it's very true

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 21:53 (eight years ago) link

This will get ridiculed, but something Greil Marcus wrote a couple of weeks ago: "In a presidential election, Nate Silver will prepare careful and accurate guides to what should happen, what is most likely to happen, but not what will happen: anything can happen. Add to this the disbelief on both sides that Trump could actually win, which energizes his followers and confirms his claims to outsider status, and add to that the fact that in many circles, particularly among better educated and better-off people, and particularly on the coasts, there are plenty of people who are attracted to Trump, who are secretly thrilled by the current of nihilism he is riding and the specter of destruction he embodies, but are keeping their mouths shut.

I understand how awful the demographics look for Trump, I've made the same argument myself, and I think in the end, that indeed will result in a possible landslide. But I'm with Aimless--anything can happen. I'm reluctant to express anything with certainty with regards to Trump at this point, other than he'll continue to say and do outrageous stuff. I especially get wary when something like Brussels happens, that irrationality and fear will take over.

clemenza, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 22:00 (eight years ago) link

I agree with Dr. Morbius about the inadvisability of taking Trump's loss to Hillary (or to Bernie, who imo has less than a 10% chance of being nominated) as a foregone to conclusion.

not sure where you got that -- all i saw was stuff about yams and pats

mookieproof, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 22:03 (eight years ago) link

it's coded language

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 22:03 (eight years ago) link

when I read that response, especially the last sentence, I thought, "Name names, Greil."

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 22:03 (eight years ago) link

noted political social scientist greil marcus

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 22:04 (eight years ago) link

This will get ridiculed

this man knows ilx

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 22:07 (eight years ago) link

a vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton as nominee is a vote for irrationality and fear, by the way.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 22:07 (eight years ago) link

greil marcus' record speaks for itself

For weeks, all of the indicators, measurements, polls and calculations have pointed to an Obama victory, even an overwhelming rout. But while I read the polls many times a day and half believe them — believe them all, the poll that has Obama leading by 15 as much as I believe the poll on the same day that has him leading by 2 — I also believe absolutely none of it. My whole life, my upbringing, education, travel and talk, from working in Congress as an intern at the height of the civil rights movement in the mid-1960s to every election in which I’ve ever voted, makes it all but impossible for me to believe that, on Tuesday, a single state will turn its face toward the face of a black man and name him president of the United States.

nomar, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 22:09 (eight years ago) link

lol

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 22:10 (eight years ago) link

For personal reasons, I promised myself I wasn't going to defend Marcus anymore, so I think I'll sit this one out.

Curious, Οὖτις--what was your own prognosis early on for Trump's chances of winning the nomination?

clemenza, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 22:12 (eight years ago) link

that reminds me of the guy who told me with absolute confidence in 2007 that giuliani would be our next president.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 22:13 (eight years ago) link

xpost

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 22:13 (eight years ago) link

In re: Obama, I think Marcus' point was that he was in a state of disbelief, not that the polls were wrong.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 22:16 (eight years ago) link

Curious, Οὖτις--what was your own prognosis early on for Trump's chances of winning the nomination?

as is well documented on these threads, I thought he would flame out for any number of reasons - saying something beyond the pale, refusing to reveal his finances, some other kind of scandal/criminal charges. Will happily admit I was totally wrong and underestimated how much free media time + weak/uncoordinated establishment response + popularity of demagoguery would work in his favor. In retrospect greater credence should have been given to how well Trump polled w primary audience, right from the day he announced.

Primaries, however, are not the general election where a lot of other factors are in play, and none of them favor Trump.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 22:18 (eight years ago) link

not a lot of minority voters in GOP primaries, for one thing

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 22:19 (eight years ago) link

Don't disagree with any of that, and don't disagree that Trump's chances of winning a general are miniscule, barring unforeseen events. But miniscule and impossible aren't the same thing, and unforeseen events do happen.

clemenza, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 22:27 (eight years ago) link

Okay, I'll break my rule--I don't think it's fair to remove that 2008 Marcus quote from its context (starting right with the headline, which in this case may have been Marcus's suggestion) and treat it like a Real Clear Politics prediction.

http://www.salon.com/2008/11/03/obama_71/

clemenza, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 22:39 (eight years ago) link

even ignoring his extreme politics, most people just really don't like Donald Trump and the Americans who loathe the guy aren't gonna suddenly stop loathing him. we're kinda lucky he *is* Donald Trump and not a more affable extremist politician.

iatee, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 22:41 (eight years ago) link

guess Palin's out as potential VP: https://www.yahoo.com/tv/sarah-palin-daytime-court-tv-show-development-200702957.html

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 22:43 (eight years ago) link

Unlike other court television personalities, Palin does not hold a law degree...she has a “telegenic personality, wide appeal and common sense wisdom make her a natural for this kind of format.”

You don't need to reword that much to imagine an identical conversation among McCain people in 2008--the format was VP there.

clemenza, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 22:48 (eight years ago) link

I feel like I'm in an episode of Curb Your Enthusiasm here

MARCUS: You told us in the debate that you guaranteed there was not another problem. Was that presidential? And why did you decide to do that?
TRUMP: I don’t know if it was presidential, honestly, whether it is or not. He said, ‘Donald Trump has small hands and therefore he has small something else.’ I didn’t say that. And all I did is when he failed, when he was failing, when he was, when Christie made him look bad, I gave him the– a little recap and I said, and I said, and I had this big strong powerful hand ready to grab him, because I thought he was going to faint. And everybody took it fine. Whether it was presidential or not I can’t tell you. I can just say that what he said was a lie. And everybody, they wanted to do stories on my hands; after I said that, they never did. And then I held up the hand, I showed people the hand. You know, when I’ve got a big audience.

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 23:08 (eight years ago) link

imagine if Ruth Marcus had asked those questions.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 23:11 (eight years ago) link

I feel like Trump will probably be annihilated in the general but the media will try SO FUCKING HARD to make it look as close as possible for $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ purposes

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 23:16 (eight years ago) link

His will be a campaign that never ends, even after it's ended.

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 23:19 (eight years ago) link

i read marcus's state-of-disbelief article at the time and got what he meant but i can't help reading it a little differently since he said on his website a while back that he was a clinton supporter that year

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 23:39 (eight years ago) link

why are people reading greil marcus on the presidential election anyway? i wouldn't read charlies pierce on the latest postpunk throwback girl band from the pacific northwest.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 23:43 (eight years ago) link

if i recall the last time charles pierce wrote about music it was to complain that country music just ain't what it used to be

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 22 March 2016 23:46 (eight years ago) link

Maybe someone else would be kind enough to field that very strange question.

clemenza, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 23:47 (eight years ago) link

GOP establishment's gonna get behind Trump for the most part, and then the party's gonna get crushed in the election, and the war between the rank and file and the "establishment" will revert to prior status - the establishment saying "see? we told you he was a loser!" and the base saying "you sold us out!" Rinse and repeat

Way late, but fwiw I think this is right. Tru-con Cruzophiles are going to say "you should have gone with the real deal conservative, not the ersatz latecomer with the ridiculous hair, who only speaks conservatism as a second language." Trumpers are going to say, "Trump would have won if you tru-cons hadn't thrown a snit fit and sabotaged him because he was insufficiently establishment-friendly." Rinse and repeat for basically ever as the grecian entity says.

One might have have preferred the Cruz v. Sanders election, both for its clarifying fire, and to put at least some woulda-coulda arguments out of business, but it's doubtful that will happen at this point.

It's not like Trump's fooling the whole country or anything--maybe 40% of his party ("of his party" not exactly accurate) believes everything he says, the other 60% doesn't, a large part of that 60% is scrambling around to prevent him from getting the nomination, and most of the rest of the country sees him as the buffoon he is.

Ah but rather it is not so much people believing what he says. Rather, they don't care - I mean literally you can see people saying "he may not mean it, but it's a better lie than I've heard from any other politician. And if it turns out that he was full of shit, well, then, I'm no worse off than I was with the last several GOP nominees." This is a real position and you can see it on display here http://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=362284. Another form of this is "He's crude but he's what we need. He may not mean what he says, but if he's a catalyst for destroying the country-club Republican set, great. If he gets lucky and also destroys the media and Democrats (but I repeat myself), so much the better."

No, they don't think he's genuine, but they also don't care, because he has the right enemies. And he's doing god's good work by destroying the establishment GOP - which is hated only SLIGHTLY less than the MSM and liberal democrats (which are assumed to be the same thing).

leprechaundriac (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 01:30 (eight years ago) link

believe me, believe me, it's very true

i'm relieved too, except whatshername will be the most goddamn right-wing Democratic prez of your lifetime

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 01:38 (eight years ago) link

an antiphonal chant addressed to University administration, led by College sophomore Jonathan Peraza, resounded “You are not listening! Come speak to us, we are in pain!” throughout the Quad.

ah, college

k3vin k., Wednesday, 23 March 2016 01:41 (eight years ago) link

YMP: After I posted that, I was thinking the same thing--that even a lot of the 40% who support Trump probably don't believe a lot of what he says, they instead like him for some of the reasons you cite. Which is in keeping with my main point: after months of watching Trump being interviewed, I think that trying to pin him down, or get him to explain anything, or (the idea's laughable) catch him in a contradiction, is utterly pointless. People react to him, pro and con, on a whole other plane.

clemenza, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:05 (eight years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CeMpdcsW8AAXbeT.jpg

mookieproof, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:07 (eight years ago) link

um

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:08 (eight years ago) link

^_^

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:10 (eight years ago) link

he hasn't done nearly as much actual damage as plenty of actual presidents but I hate him like you'd hate somebody who directly did you wrong

tremendous crime wave and killing wave (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:12 (eight years ago) link

we should have stopped him back when he was just a charismatically awful real-estate tycoon making cameos in mainstream comedies

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:14 (eight years ago) link

http://www.gallup.com/poll/15370/party-affiliation.aspx

so.. trump gets 80 or so percent of republicans but republicans are only 26% of registered voters.. add in the registered independents who are basically republicans and you only have 40% of voters

so far i'm still trusting those who are looking at the math and finding the path for trump in the general is almost impossible. was reading some GOP strategists (who are against trump and not involved in this race and pontificating on tv and twitter mostly).. there aren't enough angry white guys/hidden reagan democrats for trump to win. romney got a higher share of that vote than reagan did, it's not enough

i guess i do worry about some wild card prior to the election like the fall 2008 market crash but.. well, who was going to trust mccain in a crisis once he picked palin to be second in line to the presidency.. and who's going to trust trump in a crisis? not enough people for him to benefit

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:16 (eight years ago) link

wow that's a seriously low down threat from trump there

poor lady is married to ted cruz, leave her alone

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:18 (eight years ago) link

i don't think a trump presidency is impossible. i can think of numerous scenarios where he beats hillary in the general. but i think it's really improbable and being as how there are probable things to feel anxiety over i'm not going to budget for the chance that a bigger than 9/11 attack propels trump to the wh. (on that note - i was thinking today that hillary's hawk-ish rhetoric may actually soften that. it's reasonable to vote for hillary and believe she would rigorously defend the nation in whatever reptilian portion of the brain americans use to evaluate threats.)

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:20 (eight years ago) link

Wow--it's gotta be something Goldman-Sachs related with Cruz's wife. Maybe he can tie her to Hillary and wrap it all up in one neat bundle, addressed to oblivion. (I don't really mean that, I just like to quote Sweet Smell of Success.)

clemenza, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:22 (eight years ago) link

yeah trying to run to hillary's right on foreign policy is probably not the most efficient way to exploit a weakness in her xp

k3vin k., Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:22 (eight years ago) link

esp when it's not easy to do convincingly

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:23 (eight years ago) link

let's say there's a huge domestic incident next feb and americans are just insanely demanding whoever is in the wh respond with a significant show of military force (no opinion about whether such a response would be wise or not). i'd feel safer with hillary in the wh than trump - not just in terms of not being as hawkish, but just in terms of picking intelligent responses, developing strategies, leading the armed forces with some sense of discipline + insight.

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:23 (eight years ago) link

omg i was thinking about posting that in the creepy liberal free speech thread. administration is reviewing tape and going to discipline the students who did it.

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:24 (eight years ago) link

trump on chalk so scary it causes pain to kids paying $63k a year for four years of overnight camp

Thomas H. Handy (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:25 (eight years ago) link

have we talked about how disgusting cruz + trump's responses to brussels has been or do we already feel they're so repulsive it's not worth mentioning

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:26 (eight years ago) link

he hasn't done nearly as much actual damage as plenty of actual presidents but I hate him like you'd hate somebody who directly did you wrong

― tremendous crime wave and killing wave (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Tuesday, March 22, 2016 9:12 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

So supremely OTM. There are garbage people, sure, but then there are garbage people who inspire other garbage people to be more garbagey and who aspire to spread their garbage as far as their garbage minds can conceive and to make everything just a little more garbagey and who then whine about being treated very, very badly by the sick people who deign to call them out for being pretty much the living embodiment of garbage and for not giving a shit about anything or anyone that isn't similarly garbagey.

I Can Say I Know We're Risin' Underneath The Blazin' Sky (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:27 (eight years ago) link

omg please let this turn out to be true

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/trackers/2016-03-23/rolling-stone-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:30 (eight years ago) link

lol jann wenner, i could believe it

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:32 (eight years ago) link

guy who claimed to be thisclose to voting for bernie now ecstatic about rolling stone endorsing his opponent, i'll take "never really bought it" for 400, alex

k3vin k., Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:34 (eight years ago) link

lol you misread my tone

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:34 (eight years ago) link

i don't think rs' endorsement matters for anyone or anything but the lolz i'll have reading a jann wenner endorsement of hillary in its pages

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:35 (eight years ago) link

why not believe me? i like them both of them. i could still easily vote for sanders. i change my mind every few days.

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:36 (eight years ago) link

why wdn't Hil be right in RS's wheelhouse? Didn't they love Bill?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:37 (eight years ago) link

oh i guess i don't really know enough about wenner to get why that's weird. mea culpa

k3vin k., Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:38 (eight years ago) link

idk weird just like aging uncool boomer out of touch with his own magazine + writers. i love the bit where he defends millionaires.

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:39 (eight years ago) link

the only politician i've given money to this election cycle endorsed bernie so this idea that being okay voting for hillary means that you are hostile to bernie's agenda and must have never given him a fair chance or whatever is just a fantasy. polling shows that a huge % of democrats would be satisfied if he were the candidate. most democrats are not voting for him tho.

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:40 (eight years ago) link

most Dems haven't voted for anybody, and after the early primaries i think what the MSM calls momentum is more like metooism.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:43 (eight years ago) link

the ppl who are most devoted to voting decide elections it's true

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:44 (eight years ago) link

Wenner's late 2000 Bill Clinton interview amounted to a 6000-word begging for Bill to stain Jann's dress.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:44 (eight years ago) link

A v bizarre thing about trumps fucking of the teaparty-rocked Republican apparatus is how jumpy ilx is about it as opposed to viewing the process as a good and probably inevitable thing and just enjoying it.

It's the Liverpool title-run of presidency bids. Not only is it not gonna happen but it was never gonna happen in any timeline viewed from any direction.

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:45 (eight years ago) link

Get fucked CNN

Voters in 3 Western states are having their say today as candidates react to terror attacks in Belgium. Watch CNN

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:46 (eight years ago) link

trump on chalk so scary it causes pain to kids paying $63k a year for four years of overnight camp

yeah.. i definitely support some changes demanded by campus activists ie situation at mizzou.. but instances like this (assuming the chalk was just 'vote trump' and such? not racist?), the rhetoric about being in pain and afraid in response feels pretty overwrought.

also i've been noticing how the 'safe space' type rhetoric is one of those hook-y things that gets a lot of play on fox news/conservative media because, well, though i believe there was a need for it sometimes it really does devolve into absurdity

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:46 (eight years ago) link

you know, i forgot Taibbi is RS? cuz the only time i go to their site is to read him.

the ppl who are most devoted to voting for POTUS gen don't do jackshit else.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:48 (eight years ago) link

trump response and cruz response were both despicable. just like with paris, trump decided to go on about what a horrible place it was and certain quarters the police wouldn't go, which he totally makes up of course.. and cruz, well, stating & reiterating that the response should be police patrols in us muslim neighborhoods is disqualifying.

i mean these guys are doing real damage to the country, saying this

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:48 (eight years ago) link

the ppl who are most devoted to voting for POTUS gen don't do jackshit else.

potus gen numbers inflate but the ppl who vote every year obv vote for potus too

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:50 (eight years ago) link

A v bizarre thing about trumps fucking of the teaparty-rocked Republican apparatus is how jumpy ilx is about it as opposed to viewing the process as a good and probably inevitable thing and just enjoying it.

It's the Liverpool title-run of presidency bids. Not only is it not gonna happen but it was never gonna happen in any timeline viewed from any direction.

― Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Tuesday, March 22, 2016 9:45 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

blacks, latinxs, and muslims are being beaten and killed by white supremacists emboldened by trump. it doesn't matter that he won't win. it matters that he's inspiring violence against already marginalized people. it's not enjoyable when you're the target of that violence or if you love the people who are targets of that violence.

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:51 (eight years ago) link

like idk every v civically involved person i've ever known felt very strongly about presidential elections. i don't buy that midterm voters are like "ugh please voting for president? so passé. newbs." xp

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 02:51 (eight years ago) link

M bison otm

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 03:19 (eight years ago) link

realizing the trump "spill the beans" thing, is once again trump deciding to make a big dumb spectacle to get attention on primary night

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 03:20 (eight years ago) link

New York Times has called AZ for Hillary & Trump.

ejemplo (crüt), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 03:54 (eight years ago) link

sorry, that was improper of me. Clinton and Trump.

ejemplo (crüt), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 03:55 (eight years ago) link

http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/03/22/straight-talk-from-bernie-sanders-on-the-israeli-palestinian-conflict

sanders is the only adult running for president, frankly.

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 04:00 (eight years ago) link

^^^^

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 04:04 (eight years ago) link

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/delegate-targets/democrats/

i like 538's delegate tracker because it compares the results against what each candidate "needs" to be "on track" for the nomination, and thus allows you to put these election nights into context. (for example, coming in hillary had 111% of the delegates she needed so far to be on track for the nomination, while bernie was at 88%. starting this week, the territory becomes more favorable for bernie for a while, and so according to 538 his target for tonight's 137 delegates is to win 74. assuming he stays at 37% in AZ, bernie would need to win 66% of the vote in idaho and utah to get 74 for the night

k3vin k., Wednesday, 23 March 2016 04:13 (eight years ago) link

btw only a little over half of arizona has reported yet

http://apps.azsos.gov/election/2016/PPE/Results/PPE2016Results.htm

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 04:19 (eight years ago) link

Why not say our news organization doesn't tolerate evasive answers, contradictions, and lies?

If you actually said this, I think you'd look self-righteous and silly. Ask the question, ask a follow-up definitely, but a certain point, you have to trust that people can see through nonsense. It's not like Trump's fooling the whole country or anything--maybe 40% of his party ("of his party" not exactly accurate) believes everything he says, the other 60% doesn't, a large part of that 60% is scrambling around to prevent him from getting the nomination, and most of the rest of the country sees him as the buffoon he is. I don't think asking the same question six times instead of two is going to move those numbers much.

― clemenza, Tuesday, March 22, 2016 2:18 PM (8 hours ago)

I'm not advocating asking a question six times. I'm advocating news organizations not being used by politicians as free space to say whatever the hell they want. I think politicians routinely walk all over journalists and I think they show little to no guts in confronting them about it.

timellison, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 06:05 (eight years ago) link

assuming he stays at 37% in AZ, bernie would need to win 66% of the vote in idaho and utah to get 74 for the night

― k3vin k., Wednesday, March 23, 2016 12:13 AM (1 hour ago)

(btw if anyone cares i re-did the math because it didn't seem right and assuming a 60/40 AZ loss, he needs 78%, not 66%)

k3vin k., Wednesday, 23 March 2016 06:07 (eight years ago) link

he got 74% in utah (w/ 15% reporting)

j., Wednesday, 23 March 2016 06:25 (eight years ago) link

78% on the nose in Idaho.

timellison, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 06:47 (eight years ago) link

timellison otm

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 09:56 (eight years ago) link

Sanders needs more than blowouts in the favorable states upcoming, he needs a Clinton error makes Nancy/AIDS look miniscule (can it, Shakey).

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 11:34 (eight years ago) link

I'm advocating news organizations not being used by politicians as free space to say whatever the hell they want. I think politicians routinely walk all over journalists and I think they show little to no guts in confronting them about it.
― timellison

As a general proposition applying to both parties and all politicians, I don't disagree with that at all, Tim. But if you trace this detour back, it began with the specific idea that if only Trump were questioned more vigorously, people would start to see through him. I disagree with that because a) he is asked follow-up questions, all the time, to no avail--he just repeats the same generalities over and over, and b) I think most people already realize he's saying nothing--people who hate him, obviously, but, as Mad Puffin points out, I'm not even sure what percentage of the people who support him actually take his blather literally. You can ask him for exact details on how he plans to get Mexico to play for his wall twice or five times or ten times, and you just go around in circles.

Interviewer: How will you get them to pay? Mexico is a sovereign country.
Trump: Oh, they'll pay, believe me.
Interviewer: But how?
Trump: They'll pay, and it'll be an amazing wall.
Interviewer: You're still not being specific--how will you make this happen?
Trump: Read my book, The Art of the Deal. It'll happen, believe me. And because you're making me mad right now, the wall just got three feet higher.

On and on and on. We've been hearing that for the last eight months.

clemenza, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 11:49 (eight years ago) link

AZ: hourslong lines to vote, no polls open AT ALL in at least one Latino district, evacuations for bomb threats at peak voting times, etc.

http://usuncut.com/politics/5-examples-voter-suppression-arizona-primary/

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 11:51 (eight years ago) link

Next time Trump tells someone "believe me" the proper response should be "see, I don't believe you, because you're not answering the question." And then the interviewer should kick him in the balls and say "believe that, motherfucker." Then take off his hat, put it on, and walk out of the room in slow motion while Trump rolls around on the floor moaning.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 13:51 (eight years ago) link

xpost -- or the more concise version, "you've given the country a lot of reasons not to believe you," and leave that hanging there.

Yoshimi P-We's Playhouse (WilliamC), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 13:55 (eight years ago) link

had to look up rumors about cruz' wife to sate my curiosity, apparently she suffered from depression. massive low blow from trump if that's what he's planning on throwing around but it's not like that's surprising

akm, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 13:57 (eight years ago) link

"Little Teddy's wife is a crybaby. It's true."

I Can Say I Know We're Risin' Underneath The Blazin' Sky (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 14:00 (eight years ago) link

'Person who lives in the same home as Ted Cruz suffers from depression' doesn't exactly seem like a lid-blower.

I Can Say I Know We're Risin' Underneath The Blazin' Sky (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 14:03 (eight years ago) link

Hey, I know we hate these cats but mental illness isn't funny, and if we follow that line we're basically just accepting Trump's bait imho.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 14:09 (eight years ago) link

Who said it was funny? I'm saying a) it's totally the kind of thing that Trump would latch onto as crassly as possible, and b) being married to Ted Cruz is certainly a factor that might contribute to someone's depression.

I Can Say I Know We're Risin' Underneath The Blazin' Sky (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 14:15 (eight years ago) link

Allegations of depression aside, it's pretty much the grossest thing ever anytime a political candidate starts going after a rival's family.

I Can Say I Know We're Risin' Underneath The Blazin' Sky (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 14:17 (eight years ago) link

c) it would indeed be a lame thing to threaten to expose, if that's what he meant

Evan, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 14:18 (eight years ago) link

Jeb! endorsing It's Pat today

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 14:33 (eight years ago) link

I guess it's hard for me not to read a 'being married to that guy would make anyone depressed' kinda comment and not feel like it's a cheap zing. But if you didn't mean it that way, my apologies.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 14:43 (eight years ago) link

fortune has some cool analysis for you

http://fortune.com/donald-trump-white-supremacist-genocide/

Countless numbers of people mention #WhiteGenocide each day on Twitter, but Fortune used social media analytics software from Little Bird to find those who are considered to be the most prominent. In the world of social media marketing, such people are called “influencers.”

“Our technology builds a big network of hundreds or thousands of specialists in a particular field or people who used a particular hashtag, and then analyzes the connections between the people in that network,” explains Little Bird co-founder and chairman Marshall Kirkpatrick. “We then find the person or people in that group that are most followed by others in the same group. It’s kind of like a ‘9-out-of-10 dentists recommend’ model rather than measuring people by the absolute popularity. We view it as earned influence within a specific context.”

The Little Bird software analyzed Twitter content to generate a ranked list of just under 2,000 #WhiteGenocide “influencers” as of February 8. The more impactful, the higher up on the list (which, understandably, ebbs and flows a bit over time).

Since the start of his campaign, Donald Trump has retweeted at least 75 users who follow at least three of the top 50 #WhiteGenocide influencers. Moreover, a majority of these retweeted accounts are themselves followed by more than 100 #WhiteGenocide influencers.

goole, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 14:55 (eight years ago) link

Said this last night--because Cruz's wife works for Goldman-Sachs, and because that's Trump's world, my guess is his threat resides there.

clemenza, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 15:22 (eight years ago) link

huh Sanders' biggest margins of victory yet

too bad it doesn't matter

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 15:33 (eight years ago) link

yeah, hardly anyone is reporting on it. even with the huge margin, sanders picked up 67, clinton 51, so only a 16 net increase.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 15:42 (eight years ago) link

I thought it was dumb that CNN's story was "Clinton wins big in AZ" and not "Sanders wins more delegates than Clinton overall"

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 15:43 (eight years ago) link

that's the problem w/ doing v well in small delegate states and poorly in large delegate states. he should do well in wisconsin, washington, guessing wyoming too? no idea about hawaii or alaska, and then the next one is NY where latest polls has hill up +48. hard to imagine he can feasibly catch up. xp

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 15:44 (eight years ago) link

would love to be pleasantly surprised tho and have the party roll on to PA

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 15:45 (eight years ago) link

so AZ's voting was supremely fucked up enough that the GOP governor had to comment on it

goole, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 15:48 (eight years ago) link

'Vader scores direct hit on X-Wings; Rebels also gain'

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 15:48 (eight years ago) link

WA is, idiotically, caucuses, which I'd have to guess favors the Clinton demos.

petulant dick master (silby), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 15:48 (eight years ago) link

caucuses + white people favors Sanders

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 15:49 (eight years ago) link

closed Dem primaries favor Clinton

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 15:49 (eight years ago) link

caucuses are really the stupidest thing

k3vin k., Wednesday, 23 March 2016 15:50 (eight years ago) link

"what a great resume" yutzes favor Clinton

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 15:50 (eight years ago) link

caucuses really are archaic in terms of their rules, it's just bizarre. crowds of people shuffling from one area of a room to another.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 15:52 (eight years ago) link

have you ever been to a Shoney's buffet?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 15:53 (eight years ago) link

nice

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 15:54 (eight years ago) link

idk what a Shoney's is

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 16:02 (eight years ago) link

that's a no then

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 16:04 (eight years ago) link

Huckabee already dropped out though.

http://i.imgur.com/tHOPIHl.jpg

pplains, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 16:13 (eight years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/GmB21cc.jpg

pplains, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 16:45 (eight years ago) link

had not realized but there is a definite cruz / shoney's big boy resemblance

ulysses, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 16:45 (eight years ago) link

Pssh, 'resemblance' my foot. J'ACCUSE, 'BIG BOY' CRUZ.

I Can Say I Know We're Risin' Underneath The Blazin' Sky (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 17:00 (eight years ago) link

ah. we have (had? I haven't seen one in decades) Bob's Big Boy out here. Dunno why they went for the regional branding/different name thing.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 17:02 (eight years ago) link

Had a business meeting today to which one of the attendees showed up wearing a Trump hat.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 17:10 (eight years ago) link

if you trace this detour back, it began with the specific idea that if only Trump were questioned more vigorously, people would start to see through him. I disagree with that because a) he is asked follow-up questions, all the time, to no avail--he just repeats the same generalities over and over, and b) I think most people already realize he's saying nothing--people who hate him, obviously, but, as Mad Puffin points out, I'm not even sure what percentage of the people who support him actually take his blather literally. You can ask him for exact details on how he plans to get Mexico to play for his wall twice or five times or ten times, and you just go around in circles.

So, at least call him on it. I do think it would have an effect! His whole shtick is that he's a "winner" who gets away with whatever he wants and, if I was interviewing him, I would feel used. This is a decent example of someone sticking up for the integrity of their program:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psgl0M0wD3A

timellison, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 17:13 (eight years ago) link

Or just use his own rhetorical tricks on him. "Many, many people I've talked to think you're a sad little turd. It's true."

I Can Say I Know We're Risin' Underneath The Blazin' Sky (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 17:15 (eight years ago) link

az resident here, and I can verify maricopa county (which has 60% of the state's population) was a total disaster last night. it's probably already been mentioned in this thread, but there were only 60 voting locations, compared to 200 in the far less contested 2012 primaries. This is for a county with 4 million people in it.

When it first became clear what a disaster it was, the county recorder tried to blame independent voters for not realizing it was a closed primary. A number of people who were registered with a party have said that the voting locations had their information wrong.

I waited in a giant line for 20 minutes before I realized I could drop off my early ballot, which I hadn't mailed. Someone came by counting and told me I was 720th in line, and that actually seemed accurate.

intheblanks, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 17:16 (eight years ago) link

I think people are just too polite or deferential or something. People don't do enough to undercut his bullshit. Feel like some people on this board could grind him up if given the chance to go toe-to-toe with Lil' Donnie Pee-Pee Pants.

I Can Say I Know We're Risin' Underneath The Blazin' Sky (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 17:18 (eight years ago) link

p sure Sanders might be yr best hope of tough cross-questioning

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 17:19 (eight years ago) link

GOP voter suppression efforts paying off big time, eh?

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 17:25 (eight years ago) link

yeah, some stuff i read indicated that it's directly related to the SCOTUS Shelby case that gutted the voting rights act. arizona was one of the states that previously needed DOJ clearance, and now the counties basically can set up their own rules. It's really horrible; az republicans are pretty dominant and, I can imagine, scared that the state starts voting like NV, CO, or NM

intheblanks, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 17:41 (eight years ago) link

i.e. allows latinxs to vote

intheblanks, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 17:53 (eight years ago) link

I think people are just too polite or deferential or something. People don't do enough to undercut his bullshit.

Imagine being deferential to that clown, wtf? I'd love to have seen Paxman in his prime unleashed on this fool.

A Fifth Beatle Dies (Tom D.), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 17:54 (eight years ago) link

Had a business meeting today to which one of the attendees showed up wearing a Trump hat.

white or red?

mookieproof, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 17:58 (eight years ago) link

Red.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 18:02 (eight years ago) link

someone asked "dick_nixon" a couple weeks ago what Christie's role in a Trump Admin would be and he said "Billy Carter."

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 18:43 (eight years ago) link

man do they love that chart. feel like it kinda sums up a lot of the gaps between what they're good at and what they think they're good at, without marking the moment when they slip into punditry, or interrogating the assumptions behind the model, the variables, the connotations of words... like the numerous unspoken things implied by organizing the field in such a chart, which just get accepted as truths in between the lines.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 18:45 (eight years ago) link

The author admits that placement of candidates on that chart is based on nothing but guesswork and whim.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 18:46 (eight years ago) link

yeah but that still assumes that there could be a correct placement, that these are the right circles to draw... the same-sizeness of the circles, which ones are imagined as overlapping vs. utterly distant, the fuzziness of "establishment" vs "moderate" (where the latter in the real world describes none of these people), trump just being "outside" in the same spot the entire time (wouldn't his success suggest that there's some big overlap he's riding?) (what if he's "moved? did anybody else move?). it's probably a useful illustration of SOMETHING but they trot it out for like every debate as if it has a general explanatory power, when the chart itself is what needs explaining. I dunno.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 19:00 (eight years ago) link

Let us agree that it is a deeply stupid chart in every regard.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 19:02 (eight years ago) link

sorry guys

i saw colors and shapes and lines and lost control!

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 19:03 (eight years ago) link

hahaha, nothin against you KM, just suddenly struck me.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 19:09 (eight years ago) link

i think behind that chart is an interesting idea: a shitshow is not amenable to that kind of analysis. but they don't seem to agree with that idea so...

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 19:15 (eight years ago) link

i'm just happy that DT has his own whitespace anteroom

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 19:25 (eight years ago) link

I like how Christie had to go *around* Kasich in that graph

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 19:26 (eight years ago) link

waddling all the way

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 19:26 (eight years ago) link

might as well post this here:

josh marshall's twitter account has been hacked by some nobody esports website. "enjoy" it while it lasts.

goole, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 20:59 (eight years ago) link

@DennisThePerrin Mar 19
Okay, okay. If I absolutely *had* to, I'd vote for Hubert Humphrey over Hillary Clinton. http://bit.ly/1Rbfola #noseheld #nosebleed

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5EbEDvjyvI

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 24 March 2016 11:19 (eight years ago) link

you don't say!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 24 March 2016 11:22 (eight years ago) link

Hunter Thompson, you may remember, voted for Dick Gregory... and wrote that if the Dems nominated Humphrey again in '72, he'd vote for Nixon.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 24 March 2016 11:35 (eight years ago) link

I think that chart up there works if you imagine the circles as bath-bombs and the candidates as little bits of polystyrene, and the whole thing immersed in water.

Michael Jones, Thursday, 24 March 2016 11:57 (eight years ago) link

Obama, leaving Cuba yesterday:

"As far as the notion of having surveillance of neighborhoods where Muslims are present, I just left a country that engages in that kind of neighborhood surveillance, which, by the way, the father of Sen. Cruz escaped for America, the land of the free," he said.

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Thursday, 24 March 2016 12:29 (eight years ago) link

sorry to revisit old news, but remember the GOP debate that was supposed to happen recently, but then trump refused to participate? why did kasich also refuse to participate? i remember it was confusing at the time, since it seemed like a cruz/kasich debate would be good exposure for both of them. did anyone ever figure that out?

Karl Malone, Thursday, 24 March 2016 13:24 (eight years ago) link

Kasich seems to be hanging on for dear life to this incredibly remote possibility that an open convention turns to a guy who finished a distant third, all because there are polls that show he beats Clinton. Which doesn't answer your question--no idea what he was thinking. But he's such a vulture right now, he makes me side with Trump and Cruz.

clemenza, Thursday, 24 March 2016 13:27 (eight years ago) link

I think it's bc they don't want to get in each other's way.

Treeship, Thursday, 24 March 2016 13:27 (eight years ago) link

#tagteam #dynamicduo etc

Treeship, Thursday, 24 March 2016 13:28 (eight years ago) link

That would be the logical answer, but Kasich hasn't given any indication that he's willing to anything not-selfish to help Cruz.

clemenza, Thursday, 24 March 2016 13:28 (eight years ago) link

treeship that's the only thing i can think of, but given how trump completely dominates the coverage, you'd think cruz/kasich could have a relatively civil 2 hour debate and offer republican voters a vision of leadership that isn't completely embarrassing. or not trump-level embarrassing, i mean. they're both assholes but i think they could avoid screaming at each other for a single evening and it would be beneficial to both of them. and maybe that was kasich's problem - he just couldn't bear to help cruz, even if he could improve the GOP's chances of taking down Trump and help himself along the way.

Karl Malone, Thursday, 24 March 2016 13:40 (eight years ago) link

i wish i had a young child because then i could record myself saying that to them in soft parental tones, a la the end of a full house episode

Karl Malone, Thursday, 24 March 2016 13:41 (eight years ago) link

Was this posted already?

http://www.wnd.com/2016/03/obama-enjoys-cuba-while-civilization-burns/

She ran four years too early.

clemenza, Thursday, 24 March 2016 13:41 (eight years ago) link

But he's such a vulture right now, he makes me side with Trump and Cruz.

― clemenza, Thursday, March 24, 2016 9:27 AM (19 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

You must really really fucking hate vultures.

Evan, Thursday, 24 March 2016 13:52 (eight years ago) link

best Obama line of the year:

"As far as the notion of having surveillance of neighborhoods where Muslims are present, I just left a country that engages in that kind of neighborhood surveillance, which, by the way, the father of Sen. Cruz escaped for America, the land of the free," he said.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 24 March 2016 14:19 (eight years ago) link

I've never met a vulture. They look kind of scary.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ditjNRJNcbM

clemenza, Thursday, 24 March 2016 14:23 (eight years ago) link

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/712850174838771712

i'm not sure what this guy could do that would surprise me now. maybe kick over a podium and start a brawl?

ulysses, Thursday, 24 March 2016 14:28 (eight years ago) link

I am not convinced anyone is signing this non-sarcastically (but I'm probably wrong)

https://www.change.org/p/quicken-loans-arena-allow-open-carry-of-firearms-at-the-quicken-loans-arena-during-the-rnc-convention-in-july-2

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 24 March 2016 14:33 (eight years ago) link

xpost God, what a vile piece of shit. I hope he gets curbstomped by Cruz next time they see each other.

I Can Say I Know We're Risin' Underneath The Blazin' Sky (Old Lunch), Thursday, 24 March 2016 14:41 (eight years ago) link

He is like, an unabashed misogynist

Treeship, Thursday, 24 March 2016 14:45 (eight years ago) link

Nate Silver
‏@NateSilver538
Exclusive @FiveThirtyEight projection on what the Electoral College would look like if women refuse to vote Trump.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CeSbXNiWsAA4lhK.jpg:large

petulant dick master (silby), Thursday, 24 March 2016 14:58 (eight years ago) link

lol

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 24 March 2016 15:29 (eight years ago) link

i'm told that ben carson is saying crazy things on 'the view'

mookieproof, Thursday, 24 March 2016 15:29 (eight years ago) link

latest Wisconsin poll has Cruz ahead

Neanderthal, Thursday, 24 March 2016 15:30 (eight years ago) link

"By endorsing Cruz, Romney, Lindsey Graham and now Bush are giving definition to the “anyone” in “Anyone But Trump” movement"

(Not entirely clear this was intended as a sick burn?)

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/ted-cruz-republican-establishment-elites-221174

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 24 March 2016 15:40 (eight years ago) link

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/03/24/bernie_sanders_supporters_in_la_say_they_ll_back_clinton.html

The one Sanders supporter who adamantly said she would not support Clinton was 23-year-old Evergreen State College student Hallie Sills, who traveled from Washington to attend the Los Angeles event. Sills, who described herself as “neo-Marxist,” was carrying a sign that read “I DIDNT BEAT UP A TRUMP SUPPORTER 4 BERNIE,” and spoke of Sanders’ other “tour” dates as if they were rock shows. (“I tried to go see him in Seattle. I tried to see him in Vancouver this weekend. I tried to see him in San Diego yesterday, and then my friend sent me tickets for this today last night. I live in Olympia, Washington, so the day I left to come down here was the day of his tour of Washington, and I missed it, and I was really, really mad yesterday about missing the San Diego one because I couldn’t find a ride.”)

“This is a tough question,” she said when asked what she would do if Sanders lost. “I think I would—I’ve said in a few different conversations and out of a little bit of rage and excitement that I would honestly vote for Trump so that I could witness a presidential assassination. But that’s a little intense, so I would rather look into an independent party.”

Mordy, Thursday, 24 March 2016 15:55 (eight years ago) link

yep sounds like a 23 year old Evergreen State College student, nothing wrong with that.

petulant dick master (silby), Thursday, 24 March 2016 15:58 (eight years ago) link

She seems chill idk what the problem is

Treeship, Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:01 (eight years ago) link

bernie supporters have gotten me paranoid enough that i considered the slate article was just secret oppo cynical writing to convince bernie supporters to vote for hillary and make the one refusal look like an irresponsible phishhead but i love her touring description too much.

last night at the purim party i went to there were a few trump supporter costumes. a russian couple friend were dressed in like american flag + fatigues w/ trump signs that was obv meant to be satirical but there was a guy at the party just wearing the red trump hat and when i asked him he said that he also supported trump so it wasn't really a costume at all. luckily he's canadian tho and does not get a vote. i asked him why he'd vote for trump since he has a wife and child and job and his life is pretty good and he said bc he finds chaos exciting so i guess trump has sewn up the chaotic evil vote.

Mordy, Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:02 (eight years ago) link

bernie = chaotic good?
cruz = lawful evil, obvs
hilary = true neutral?

ulysses, Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:05 (eight years ago) link

I think this election is revealing that there is at least a small contingent of people -- enough to be a notable voting bloc -- who don't think the world is real or something, that it's all just a game.

Treeship, Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:05 (eight years ago) link

Hillary voted for the Iraq War and Patriot Act, that's a hell of a neutral

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:06 (eight years ago) link

Speaking to trump supporters the atlantic also found a good amount of folks who said they liked him bc they wanted to watch the world burn or whatever

Treeship, Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:06 (eight years ago) link

bernie's not chaotic, i mean he's very predictable in terms of his message.

Karl Malone, Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:06 (eight years ago) link

Oh yeah i dont think he is chaotic at all, but i think that evergreen state student has a different perspective. Trump is authentically a wild card though

Treeship, Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:08 (eight years ago) link

Sorry thought u were talking to me km

Treeship, Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:08 (eight years ago) link

latest Wisconsin poll has Cruz ahead

The numbers on this are kinda fascinating actually. In the Republican stronghold of the state, the rich white-flight suburbs of Milwaukee (aka Scott Walker country) Trump's negatives are basically as bad as they are among Democrats. But Trump is well-liked in the rural parts of the state (which can be GOP-leaning or Dem leaning, loosely depending on how close you are to Minnesota.) I have no idea whether the movement Republicans in Waukesha will vote Trump in a general election or stay home (hard to imagine them pulling the lever for either HRC or Sanders under any circumstance.)

Guayaquil (eephus!), Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:12 (eight years ago) link

I said a while back that a vote for Trump is the electoral equivalent of suicide by cop. I just wish, if people hate themselves/the world that much, that they could avoid dragging the rest of the world into whatever it is they need to do to find peace.

I Can Say I Know We're Risin' Underneath The Blazin' Sky (Old Lunch), Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:15 (eight years ago) link

i asked him why he'd vote for trump since he has a wife and child and job and his life is pretty good and he said bc he finds chaos exciting so i guess trump has sewn up the chaotic evil vote. ― Mordy

Speaking to trump supporters the atlantic also found a good amount of folks who said they liked him bc they wanted to watch the world burn or whatever ― Treeship

There are plenty of people who are attracted to Trump, who are secretly thrilled by the current of nihilism he is riding and the specter of destruction he embodies, but are keeping their mouths shut. ― Greil Marcus

clemenza, Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:17 (eight years ago) link

Yeah i am more disgusted with those people than i am in the xenophobes who support him because they think expelling immigrants will "make america great again"

Treeship, Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:18 (eight years ago) link

Hillary voted for the Iraq War and Patriot Act

This is mindblowing new information that you definitely haven't previously written multiple times on this thread

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:19 (eight years ago) link

Yeah i am more disgusted with those people than i am in the xenophobes who support him because they think expelling immigrants will "make america great again"

You can find enough disgust in your heart for both, treesh, I believe in you

Guayaquil (eephus!), Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:20 (eight years ago) link

What's wrong with being a patriot?

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:21 (eight years ago) link

Their tight ends murder

Neanderthal, Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:22 (eight years ago) link

http://www.monmouth.edu/assets/0/32212254770/32212254991/32212254992/32212254994/32212254995/30064771087/7714a05b-515f-4ad3-bdaa-e72a6e5f8e61.pdf

Looking at these results by candidate support in the ongoing nomination process shows that not all partisan voters are ready to get behind the current frontrunners, although this is more pronounced on the Republican side. Among Democrats who support Bernie Sanders for their party’s nomination, 78% say they would vote for Clinton over Trump in November, while 12% would actually vote for Trump and 7% would not vote at all. In the Republican contest, two-thirds (68%) of voters who back Ted Cruz for the GOP nomination say they would vote for Trump in November, while 13% would vote for Clinton and 10% would not vote. Among Republicans who back John Kasich, just 50% would vote for Trump and 19% would vote for Clinton, with 22% saying they would sit out the general election.

k3vin k., Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:24 (eight years ago) link

Can't believe, btw, that Trump is actually internet bullying Cruz's (fragile?) wife like a vindictive tween girl. What a fucker he is. I hope he gets hit by a bus.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:25 (eight years ago) link

"As far as the notion of having surveillance of neighborhoods where Muslims are present, I just left a country that engages in that kind of neighborhood surveillance, which, by the way, the father of Sen. Cruz escaped for America, the land of the free," he said.

he means Canada amirite?

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:38 (eight years ago) link

I hope he gets hit by a bus.

What a terrible thing to wish on a bus driver.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:40 (eight years ago) link

wonder how man of those sanders voters who claim they'd vote for trump are neo-chaos campus dadaists and how many are aggravated white union types to whom trump has been appealing all along. and of course how many would actually pull the lever (see: moving to canada).

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:40 (eight years ago) link

The phrase "no-go zones" back in everyday vernacular despite them not bring a thing

Neanderthal, Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:41 (eight years ago) link

Heartened and amused by the petition making the rounds calling for open carry at the Republican convention in Cleveland.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:46 (eight years ago) link

Voting is a battle of attrition

Neanderthal, Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:50 (eight years ago) link

Yes, let's all make the area a few blocks from my office into a free-fire zone, ha ha ha ha ha, hilarious.

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Thursday, 24 March 2016 17:00 (eight years ago) link

I think this is a real photo:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CeR8-IMWsAEV9Wm.jpg

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Thursday, 24 March 2016 17:03 (eight years ago) link

LOL

xpost

reading trump's tweets just makes me think about my 95-year-old great-aunt who told me, in a phone call during the 2008 presidential election season, that "every time i see that palin woman on the TV, i want to slit her throat"

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 24 March 2016 17:08 (eight years ago) link

xpost I really don't think it's a serious call for guns there, just underscoring GOP hypocrisy by hosting their convention in a place that forbids guns.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 24 March 2016 17:36 (eight years ago) link

I have a cartoon angel on one shoulder decrying gun-fetishism, and a cartoon devil on the other shoulder, slyly asking whether adding actual firearms into the "GOP civil war" might potentially be a good thing for the country and for humankind after all.

Not so much "lol they'll shoot each other and there will be fewer of them ha ha," but rather that of a bunch of faux-macho cowboys walking around ostentatiously open-carrying will look sublimely ridiculous. I mean, you're inside a heavily secured convention hall that is overwhelmingly full of like-minded old white guys. They pretty much all love them some sweet sweet firearms. There are TV cameras everywhere. What the actual fuck are you afraid of, if you think you need an assault rifle propped next to the chair in which you're eating bad catered food and talking about which candidate does a better job of loving guns and hating brown people?

leprechaundriac (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 24 March 2016 17:59 (eight years ago) link

By the time Ryan had entered Congress in 1999 at the age of 28 and filed his first disclosure statement, he reported assets between $167,000 and $1.3 million, owned a home and had three rental units.

1) just another regular twentysomething, hoping to make a difference
2) between 167k and 1.3 mill is a helluva range

ulysses, Thursday, 24 March 2016 18:39 (eight years ago) link

hey when you're a maker it's hard to keep track

Οὖτις, Thursday, 24 March 2016 18:41 (eight years ago) link

He hides money in his copy of The Fountainhead iirc.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 24 March 2016 18:46 (eight years ago) link

https://i.imgur.com/JS7I5e6.png

F♯ A♯ (∞), Thursday, 24 March 2016 18:47 (eight years ago) link

Tay is TAYking over ILX

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 24 March 2016 18:52 (eight years ago) link

godwins law personified

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 24 March 2016 18:53 (eight years ago) link

well that was a totally gross post caek thx
xp

Οὖτις, Thursday, 24 March 2016 19:04 (eight years ago) link

er wait that was meant for the NRO thread

Οὖτις, Thursday, 24 March 2016 19:04 (eight years ago) link

no you should post that everywhere

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 24 March 2016 19:07 (eight years ago) link

let it be known

goole, Thursday, 24 March 2016 19:08 (eight years ago) link

i didn't realize caek had such strong opinions about slovenia

Karl Malone, Thursday, 24 March 2016 19:10 (eight years ago) link

Panic:

Even without a controversial presidential candidate to contend with, Senate Republicans face a challenging map. Fresh off reclaiming the majority for the first time in eight years, the GOP now faces the daunting prospect of defending 24 of the 34 Senate seats that are up for grabs this November, largely because the six-year terms for the many Republicans who swept into office in the 2010 elections have come due.

The party can afford to lose only three seats to stay in the majority, and at least two incumbents are already facing difficulties: Sens. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), whose state is seen as a prime pickup opportunity for Democrats, and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), who is struggling in the polls. Five more GOP seats are up for grabs in states that President Obama won twice, including some, like Pennsylvania, by comfortable margins.

Loud foot­steps up­stairs in the pres­id­en­tial race could eas­ily shake the Sen­ate races be­low,” veteran analyst Charlie Cook wrote this week, adding that if the GOP loses the White House by a larger margin than it did in 2008 or 2012, “hanging onto the Sen­ate would be a long shot at best.”

If Trump is the nominee, Democrats have already signaled that they plan to try to link him to every Republican running this fall. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee has rolled out a “Party of Trump” campaign dubbing GOP candidates as “Retrumplicans.

if the Dems aren't outspent

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 24 March 2016 19:56 (eight years ago) link

lol @ Retrumplicans

Οὖτις, Thursday, 24 March 2016 20:00 (eight years ago) link

It's catchy

Evan, Thursday, 24 March 2016 20:01 (eight years ago) link

also sounds kinda like Replicant

Οὖτις, Thursday, 24 March 2016 20:02 (eight years ago) link

has there been any more reports on trumps fundraising?

I know PACs are a thing, but if you dont have establishment support how can you draw down the 1-2 billion its gonna take to run nationwide?

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 24 March 2016 20:26 (eight years ago) link

"Donald, you're a sniveling coward, and leave Heidi alone."

I hate these moments where you have to agree with someone you despise--although it's worth noting it took Cruz a couple of days to get there, and no doubt a few consultants whispering in his ear: "Get outraged! People love that stuff."

clemenza, Thursday, 24 March 2016 20:40 (eight years ago) link

200 million of his own money plus 800 million in free coverage that he gets by tweeting dumb things that are then covered by most media outlets, plus every show begging him to be a guest?

i'm being sort of facetious but he gets exposure from the media in ways that other candidates can't

Karl Malone, Thursday, 24 March 2016 20:41 (eight years ago) link

but that doesnt fund GOTV operations anywhere

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 24 March 2016 20:43 (eight years ago) link

200 million doesn't pay for GOTV? (honestly i have no idea what portion of campaign $ goes directly to GOTV as opposed to advertising and pizza)

Karl Malone, Thursday, 24 March 2016 20:47 (eight years ago) link

isn't this basically what the convention's gonna be about, whether the GOP $$$ org is willing to get behind him (they will, imo)

Οὖτις, Thursday, 24 March 2016 20:48 (eight years ago) link

was listening to a news story about donald trump's having repeatedly sued journalists who criticized him (all of the suits were tossed out of court). what a fucking baby. why are authoritarians always such whiners?

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 24 March 2016 21:07 (eight years ago) link

it's what makes them want to be authoritarians!

Οὖτις, Thursday, 24 March 2016 21:08 (eight years ago) link

one day they'll show all those jerks, they'll all be begging for mercy...

Οὖτις, Thursday, 24 March 2016 21:08 (eight years ago) link

you know, trump really combines every venal trait a human being can have, it's almost impressive.

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 24 March 2016 21:26 (eight years ago) link

Gotta ask once more: is this a tipping point for Trump? Almost a year of evidence says not a chance. But you never know.

clemenza, Thursday, 24 March 2016 21:46 (eight years ago) link

at this point if he made obscene gestures when bringing up cruz's wife at a debate, i don't think it would harm his appeal to the 15% (?) of the electorate that has latched onto him.

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 24 March 2016 21:51 (eight years ago) link

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/01/donald-trump-is-shocking-vulgar-and-right-213572

About 15 years ago, I said something nasty on CNN about Donald Drumpf’s hair. I can’t now remember the context, assuming there was one. In any case, Drumpf saw it and left a message the next day.
“It’s true you have better hair than I do,” Drumpf said matter-of-factly. “But I get more pussy than you do.” Click.

dude you are making me take the side of tucker carlson. cut it the fuck out.

ulysses, Thursday, 24 March 2016 21:53 (eight years ago) link

so slate runs an article (rightly) talking about how trump's horrendous misogynist bullshit is the worst sort of poison

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/03/donald_trump_has_one_core_philosophy_misogyny.html

Drumpf wants us to know all about his sex life. He doesn’t regard sex as a private activity. It’s something he broadcasts to demonstrate his dominance, of both women and men. In his view, treating women like meat is a necessary precondition for winning, and winning is all that matters in his world. By winning, Drumpf means asserting superiority. And since life is a zero-sum game, superiority can only be achieved at someone else’s expense.

and then, slate being slate, they follow it up with reductionist "let's beat him with sex" pseudo lysistrata clickbait.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2016/03/23/vote_trump_get_dumped_campaign_asks_women_to_stage_a_sex_strike_against.html

ulysses, Thursday, 24 March 2016 21:57 (eight years ago) link

Going after Cruz's wife seems some Nixon-attacking-Muskie shit

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Thursday, 24 March 2016 23:08 (eight years ago) link

American presidential elections usually amount to a series of overcorrections: Clinton begat Bush, who produced Obama, whose lax border policies fueled the rise of Trump.

riiiight

nomar, Thursday, 24 March 2016 23:12 (eight years ago) link

is it too much to hope for an actual trump/cruz duel

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 24 March 2016 23:15 (eight years ago) link

With pistols or rapiers?

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Thursday, 24 March 2016 23:19 (eight years ago) link

Or, given their level of decorum, matching pairs of BBQ tongs?

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Thursday, 24 March 2016 23:19 (eight years ago) link


dude you are making me take the side of tucker carlson.

did you actually read the article? he's a horrible asshole who supports trump.

wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 24 March 2016 23:23 (eight years ago) link

Poor old USA, this campaign is one of the most repulsive and embarrassing spectacles I've ever witnessed (at a safe distance, thank God).

A Fifth Beatle Dies (Tom D.), Thursday, 24 March 2016 23:32 (eight years ago) link

is it too much to hope for an actual trump/cruz duel

a sword fight, if you know what i mean

mookieproof, Thursday, 24 March 2016 23:50 (eight years ago) link

Drumpf wants us to know all about his sex life. He doesn’t regard sex as a private activity. It’s something he broadcasts to demonstrate his dominance, of both women and men. In his view, treating women like meat is a necessary precondition for winning, and winning is all that matters in his world. By winning, Drumpf means asserting superiority. And since life is a zero-sum game, superiority can only be achieved at someone else’s expense.

otm

Treeship, Thursday, 24 March 2016 23:59 (eight years ago) link

lol cruz's "call out" of trump complete with pointing, what a nerd

Treeship, Friday, 25 March 2016 00:04 (eight years ago) link

God damn it Cruz, tell the public that you will never support that yammering asswipe's presidential campaign in a million years. Don't let the GOP do you like that.

ejemplo (crüt), Friday, 25 March 2016 00:11 (eight years ago) link

keep in mind that most of the GOP is going to support nominating a guy who has publicly mocked his opponent's wife's mental illness on social media.

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 25 March 2016 00:53 (eight years ago) link

truly the expression "i can't even" has never been more apt

Treeship, Friday, 25 March 2016 01:17 (eight years ago) link

so can someone explain the Polls-Plus method on 538 for me? cos it's now updated Cruz has a 45% chance to win Cali, and yet the only new poll that came out was one that ended before Rubio dropped out and still shows Trump ahead. I realize it's meant to show a range of possibilities, but it seems weird that this model forecasts him as a slight frontrunner when not a single CA poll from 2016 has him closer than a 5 point deficit. are they possibly doing the math of Rubio-transfer?

Neanderthal, Friday, 25 March 2016 01:35 (eight years ago) link

"polls plus" attempts to model the effect of endorsements as well as polls, and cruz has had a ton of these.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 25 March 2016 01:40 (eight years ago) link

presumably the modeling is based on data from 2012, etc., when an endorsement was a good thing for a GOP candidate

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 25 March 2016 01:40 (eight years ago) link

got it - thanks!

Neanderthal, Friday, 25 March 2016 01:41 (eight years ago) link

I have a feeling the Convention is going to be one of the most hilarious spectacles that I nonetheless have no desire to be within a 50 mile radius of

Neanderthal, Friday, 25 March 2016 01:42 (eight years ago) link

i think "polls plus" uses state demographics too, in the sense that it incorporates results from demographically similar primaries earlier in the cycle?

but endorsements are probably the big effect in CA. they'll dominate the polls plus in states with very little polling like CA.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 25 March 2016 01:45 (eight years ago) link

i feel really bad for cleveland right now. can they back out of the convention and give to, i dunno, the bahamas?

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 25 March 2016 02:17 (eight years ago) link

move it to guantanamo bay

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 25 March 2016 02:25 (eight years ago) link

is this a tipping point for Trump?

the latest polling showing him at like a 70% unfavorable rating among women voters might be. i am becoming more and more doubtful of trump being nominated. i think they'll find a way to push him out at the convention, assuming they can keep him short of the 1237 delegates on the first ballot. been reading a lot of stories indicating that trump's people aren't organized w/r/t who is selected as a delegate and procedures at the convention

http://www.wsj.com/articles/ted-cruz-gains-in-louisiana-after-loss-there-to-donald-trump-1458861959

While Mr. Trump leads in winning primary and caucus elections, and has won more delegates, the Cruz campaign is proving superior at the arcane game of picking the people who will be the actual delegates to the convention, where they will help write the rules and ultimately choose the nominee.

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Friday, 25 March 2016 02:38 (eight years ago) link

i agree, not nominating Trump is the lesser disaster. if they can keep him short and don't fuck it up...

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 25 March 2016 02:43 (eight years ago) link

The republican front runner too busy chasing tail and defending his hands and throwing mentally ill women under the bus to waste time figuring out how this whole 'delegate' thing works.

Eckrich® Pickled Pig Doin's (Old Lunch), Friday, 25 March 2016 02:47 (eight years ago) link

Trump always reminds me of the Onion article about the alternate universe James Hetfield being named Taco Bell employee of the month. Without his daddy's cash, dude would probably be some anonymous slob throwing back Natty Lights in his dank basement apartment right now.

Eckrich® Pickled Pig Doin's (Old Lunch), Friday, 25 March 2016 02:49 (eight years ago) link

One of the front-pagers at LGM:

Donald Trump is that kid who shows up in your basement and wants to play your electric guitar even though he doesn’t know a single chord. He insists that he’s awesome and can totally rock out better than anyone ever, “better than Jimmy Hendrix, even” — and when he says the name you know he’s thinking “Jimmy” and not “Jimi,” because that’s how goddamn dumb he is. But he won’t shut up about your guitar — seriously, he goes on about it for, like, two hours.

Finally, you roll your eyes and placate the mulleted intruder, because he’s eating all your cereal right out of the box with his gross little hands, and you have no idea where they’ve been (but really you do, you just can’t think about it anymore), and you realize it’s only a matter of time before he gets bored and tries to fuck your sister again or your mom or something worse. So you give him the guitar, show him a couple of power chords, and tell him to “take it easy” as you plug him into the amp.

He ignores you, of course, and attacks the guitar like it owes him $20 and a handjob. The breakfast sausages that pass for fingers bend the strings unreasonably, and he’s got that white guy Blues Face going on, and his hair is bobbing like a worn 7-11 mop, and you can’t even look because you’re suddenly embarrassed for the entire human race. Meanwhile, your amp is spitting out black clots of noise that sound like what self-loathing would sound like, or like the audio track to a crush fetish video. You don’t know it yet, but upstairs, your dog is shitting on the kitchen floor.

Trump, the stupid dicknose, actually does a windmill and totally misses the strings, and the pick goes flying across the room, but he’s like, “Nah, fuck it, I meant to do that,” so he drops down to his knees and shoves his fist in the air and screams “Yeah!” like he’s that guy from Metallica and not the absolute worst person in the world at that moment and most moments bracketing either end of that moment. The feedback scrapes the basement walls for another ten seconds or so, and upstairs, another dog turd drops.

Trump stands up as you’re reaching for the bleach bottle, swoops his pig knuckles through his hair, and grunts, “Heh. Fucking awesome, I’ve gotta get one of these,” as you drop the cap and take your first swig.

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Friday, 25 March 2016 02:51 (eight years ago) link

Trump would be a PUA men's rights neckbeard

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 25 March 2016 02:57 (eight years ago) link

did you actually read the article? he's a horrible asshole who supports trump.

yeah, there was no way i was gonna read that article tbh

ulysses, Friday, 25 March 2016 03:46 (eight years ago) link

“If I can’t make it — and we’re going to try as hard as we can until the last vote is cast — we want to completely revitalize the Democratic Party and make it a party of the people rather than one of large campaign contributors,” Sanders said in an interview on the progressive Web show “The Young Turks.”

Sanders also listed policy demands he would make of Clinton, including a single-payer health care system, a $15 an hour minimum wage, tougher regulation of the finance industry, closing corporate tax loopholes and “a vigorous effort to address climate change.”

“I am very worried. I mean, I talk to these scientists. This planet is in serious danger. You can’t cuddle up to the fossil fuel industry — you’ve got to take them on,” Sanders said, alluding to Clinton’s ties to oil and gas companies.

He also expressed concern about Clinton’s consistency on policy issues.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-endorsement_us_56f45bf0e4b014d3fe22b4a7

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 25 March 2016 03:48 (eight years ago) link

i think "polls plus" uses state demographics too, in the sense that it incorporates results from demographically similar primaries earlier in the cycle?

i think this is actually a totally separate gizmo they have somewhere else, the demographic-based model.

trump and cruz and cruz's wife is so... i mean, if cruz's responses weren't so disorganized and unconvincing i'd really be convinced at this point that this was the real conspiracy all along: trump and cruz making a pact, where trump thins the field out and then at the end plays heel to cruz's face, just piling on the over-the-top shenanigans to give cruz chances to put his hand on his heart, shed a tear for the bald eagle, and defend the honor of his wife and decent old american values. but cruz isn't really so good at that part.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Friday, 25 March 2016 04:38 (eight years ago) link

they're such weird guys

Treeship, Friday, 25 March 2016 05:06 (eight years ago) link

cruz is like something from a david lynch movie and trump is like something from a david cronenberg movie.

Treeship, Friday, 25 March 2016 05:09 (eight years ago) link

Nah Cruz's face is more "body horror" than Trump

Neanderthal, Friday, 25 March 2016 05:13 (eight years ago) link

If they can somehow keep the nomination from Trump, how will that dude go out? Because he will not go quietly.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 25 March 2016 05:23 (eight years ago) link

something roughly sort of like this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Z-LXnDGgek

Treeship, Friday, 25 March 2016 05:29 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQJ8WrKnLUs

ejemplo (crüt), Friday, 25 March 2016 12:09 (eight years ago) link

Trump's been going on the last couple of months about how badly Romney "choked" in 2012. I think there's some truth to that--that election could have been won--but if, hypothetically, Trump loses this nomination because of something like last-minute backlash from women, that would have to go down as one of the most spectacular political choke-jobs ever. He had the nomination pretty much locked up, all he had to do was tone it down a little bit, and he just couldn't.

clemenza, Friday, 25 March 2016 12:25 (eight years ago) link

#TedCruzSexScandal

mookieproof, Friday, 25 March 2016 12:37 (eight years ago) link

I know! A Cruz sex scandal will be a big problem, less because of the blatant hypocrisy and more because it forces people to think about Ted Cruz having sex.

Worth it to go back to Nate Silver's checklist for assessing damage:

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/electric-minor-political-scandal-acid/

If true, #1, 2, and 3 are serious problems (#3: "Lyin' Ted"); they're okay on #4, because Trump obviously can't be beat here; #5, would depend on the timing if confirmed.

clemenza, Friday, 25 March 2016 12:45 (eight years ago) link

If Ted Cruz were brought down by a sex scandal, I'd be okay with that.

http://www.theroot.com/content/dam/theroot/articles/politics/2014/02/katrina_pierson_challenges_gop_incumbent_pete_sessions/katrina_pierson_far.jpg.CROP.rtstoryvar-large.jpg

Reportedly one of the five women, Katrina Pierson. She's on CNN all the time--she's with Trump right now. That intuitively makes me think it's not true with regards to her. Why wouldn't she have spoken up by now? Maybe that was something Trump was keeping in reserve.

clemenza, Friday, 25 March 2016 13:04 (eight years ago) link

The "beans" Trump thinks he has to spill is the rumor that Heidi was a call girl...

Iago Galdston, Friday, 25 March 2016 13:36 (eight years ago) link

that woman is too pretty for me to imagine cruz touching her

akm, Friday, 25 March 2016 13:45 (eight years ago) link

She is also batshit crazy, so don't count anything out just yet: http://gawker.com/search?q=katrina+pierson

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Friday, 25 March 2016 13:47 (eight years ago) link

Maybe he found skidmarked undies

Neanderthal, Friday, 25 March 2016 13:50 (eight years ago) link

ugh, this is going to be very ugly for everyone on both sides, isn't it

Karl Malone, Friday, 25 March 2016 13:50 (eight years ago) link

Why wouldn't she have spoken up by now?

You had sex with Ted Cruz. Would YOU want anyone to find out?

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Friday, 25 March 2016 13:52 (eight years ago) link

We hadn’t been airborne long when Trump decided to watch a movie. He’d brought along “Michael,” a recent release, but twenty minutes after popping it into the VCR he got bored and switched to an old favorite, a Jean Claude Van Damme slugfest called “Bloodsport,” which he pronounced “an incredible, fantastic movie.”

mookieproof, Friday, 25 March 2016 13:54 (eight years ago) link

a Jean Claude Van Damme slugfest called “Bloodsport,” which he pronounced “an incredible, fantastic movie.”

Fuck it, he's got my vote.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Friday, 25 March 2016 14:09 (eight years ago) link

Wonder if some people will hear "Katrina Pierson" and think of the B-52's.

clemenza, Friday, 25 March 2016 14:55 (eight years ago) link

OTM about Bloodsport.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Friday, 25 March 2016 15:07 (eight years ago) link

ted doesn't seem particularly loyal to the republican party, certainly not when it conflicts with his own goals. so presumably he thinks refusing to back trump-as-nominee would be a political misstep

what does he have to lose by saying 'fuck that guy, he insulted my wife, i will never support him'?

mookieproof, Friday, 25 March 2016 15:38 (eight years ago) link

it's hard to understand. i thought maybe it's bc he wants trump to agree to endorse ted if ted wins but a) ted is not going to win outside of hijacking the convention in which case there's no way trump will endorse him and b) why does he think trump will keep to his word?

Mordy, Friday, 25 March 2016 15:39 (eight years ago) link

Cruz wants establishment backing ergo he needs to demonstrate party loyalty, that's all there is to it

Οὖτις, Friday, 25 March 2016 15:42 (eight years ago) link

Cruz isn't Mitt Romney. I think there's a population of rich establishment people who are fundamentally comfortable with HRC being president even if it's not their choice. But I feel like Cruz much more comes from the group of people who think of people like Clinton and Obama as literally actively trying to destroy the country. The people who think Clinton had Vince Foster murdered (or at least: well, probably not, but it's plausible) and who think Obama is enthusiastically trying to hasten the caliphate. My guess is that Cruz probably authentically would rather have Trump as president than Clinton.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 25 March 2016 15:44 (eight years ago) link

I can't help thinking of the old Franken & Davis political-ad sketch on SNL where they shoot each other.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 25 March 2016 15:58 (eight years ago) link

Wow. CNN has two women on right now, one from Cruz's side and one from Trump's, and the Trump woman says "We have to move on," and then proceeds to say to the other woman (paraphrase), "For instance, you've been named as one of the five women who've had an affair with Mr. Cruz--if you deny it, we can move on." The CNN moderator has to intervene.

clemenza, Friday, 25 March 2016 15:59 (eight years ago) link

I am having a hard time picturing Cruz having extramarital dalliances. I mean how many women could there possibly be that are into banging Gramdpa Munster.

Οὖτις, Friday, 25 March 2016 16:02 (eight years ago) link

the rumor i heard was escorts?

Mordy, Friday, 25 March 2016 16:03 (eight years ago) link

"Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac" -- Hillary Clinton's friend.

clemenza, Friday, 25 March 2016 16:04 (eight years ago) link

please god let there be a ted cruz sex scandal

k3vin k., Friday, 25 March 2016 16:05 (eight years ago) link

good to know donald trump is around if we need someone to stand up for marital fidelity and respect for the women in one's life

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Friday, 25 March 2016 16:06 (eight years ago) link

instead of terrifying and depressing this election is going to be terrifying and nauseating

goole, Friday, 25 March 2016 16:08 (eight years ago) link

is this being reported anywhere other than national enquirer and conservative blogs?

Karl Malone, Friday, 25 March 2016 16:11 (eight years ago) link

man what else do you need??!?!

goole, Friday, 25 March 2016 16:12 (eight years ago) link

same national enquirer writer who broke tiger woods + john edwards i think?

Mordy, Friday, 25 March 2016 16:14 (eight years ago) link

Starts with the Enquirer, I believe. Dicey, obviously, but the John Edwards' story was theirs.

clemenza, Friday, 25 March 2016 16:14 (eight years ago) link

lewinski scandal was broken by the enquirer too iirc

i can remember a weird week of limbo where cable news had to gingerly say "well, a lot of people are talking about this enquirer story..."

weirdly i just looked at drudge's twitter for nostalgia's sake and he has... only 3 tweets? did he start deleting them in solidarity with whatever rightwinger said he was getting censored?

goole, Friday, 25 March 2016 16:15 (eight years ago) link

yeah, i know they've broken legit sex scandals before, and i wouldn't be shocked if it were true, i just expected to see more about it the usual internet places, and there's nary a mention of it, although now i guess i'm seeing little snippets that mention it, , , , , , ,

Karl Malone, Friday, 25 March 2016 16:16 (eight years ago) link

editors are trying to keep their breakfast down maybe?

goole, Friday, 25 March 2016 16:17 (eight years ago) link

In the CNN exchange I posted above, the moderator was momentarily aghast: "Wait a minute, we haven't reported anything about this..."

Not today, anyway--I'm sure they'll be all over it tomorrow.

clemenza, Friday, 25 March 2016 16:18 (eight years ago) link

nothing on NRO

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 25 March 2016 16:19 (eight years ago) link

happy Good Friday y'all!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 25 March 2016 16:19 (eight years ago) link

nothing on NRO

well no shit

goole, Friday, 25 March 2016 16:23 (eight years ago) link

anyway i guess i'm interested in ted cruz' sex life to the extent that it stands in contrast to his standing as the candidate that was anointed by god (who is of course monogamous, having maintained its sexual relationship with its godlover for eternity while commanding followers to stay faithful, which is a bit hypocritical since an omniscient and eternal god has experienced the most intense sex and infinite amount of times, from all possible subjects and perspectives, but that's not weird at all), and so might lead to a fall from whatever grace he managed to achieve with his bible friends, then his dropping out of the campaign.

Karl Malone, Friday, 25 March 2016 16:24 (eight years ago) link

aside from voting for Bernie in 25 days, i think i shall withdraw from this event. carefully and without slippage.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 25 March 2016 16:26 (eight years ago) link

new superpac name idea: guardians of the seed

Karl Malone, Friday, 25 March 2016 16:27 (eight years ago) link

aside from voting for Bernie in 25 days, i think i shall withdraw from this event. carefully and without slippage.

― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, March 25, 2016 12:26 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0kAf8wwKX0

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 25 March 2016 16:28 (eight years ago) link

new cybermetal band name idea: betrayers of the seed

Karl Malone, Friday, 25 March 2016 16:28 (eight years ago) link

Pretty clearly, Cruz has had sex on the brain for a long time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vt-vG_TdOT4

clemenza, Friday, 25 March 2016 16:29 (eight years ago) link

xpost AD&D-based "gold box" computer game, surely

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Friday, 25 March 2016 16:29 (eight years ago) link

i wonder how his dad will react

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 25 March 2016 16:30 (eight years ago) link

are politicians actually more prone to adultery or is it just that they're more likely to be both hypocritical and found out

mookieproof, Friday, 25 March 2016 16:35 (eight years ago) link

Power swells them.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 25 March 2016 16:37 (eight years ago) link

hehehe

ejemplo (crüt), Friday, 25 March 2016 16:38 (eight years ago) link

aside from voting for Bernie in 25 days, i think i shall withdraw from this event. carefully and without slippage.

― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, March 25, 2016 4:26 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

When I read this, I couldn't help thinking about the clip you posted in the "Hail Caesar!" thread featuring excerpts of Jerry Lewis's "Errand Boy" - for God's sake be careful!

TOO DEEP FOR ME, but thx

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 25 March 2016 16:50 (eight years ago) link

https://twitter.com/johnfund/status/713396047188475904

Trump surrogate Adriana Cohen on CNN debating ex-Cruz aide Amanda Carpenter Suddenly accuses her of being
Cruz mistress. Stop this MADNESS!

goole, Friday, 25 March 2016 16:50 (eight years ago) link

@daveweigel
Cruz also navigates around the term ratf**ker: "Donald may be a rodent but I have no desire to copulate with him."

mookieproof, Friday, 25 March 2016 16:51 (eight years ago) link

Let the MADNESS get MADDER!

clemenza, Friday, 25 March 2016 16:55 (eight years ago) link

Bolduan expressions are pretty hilarious in those clips.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Friday, 25 March 2016 17:16 (eight years ago) link

Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out.

nickn, Friday, 25 March 2016 17:20 (eight years ago) link

daria's comment upthread about the delegate wooing process (and trump's weakness at it) is interesting

there is this tho:

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/trump-aides-plot-two-phase-strategy-win-potential-contested-convention-n545231

goole, Friday, 25 March 2016 18:37 (eight years ago) link

Man, things are getting metaphysical. How can you prove you did not sleep with Ted Cruz?

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 25 March 2016 18:41 (eight years ago) link

you still have skin?

goole, Friday, 25 March 2016 18:42 (eight years ago) link

"my genitals are not screaming 'WHY FOR THE LOVE OF GOD WHY' at me 24/7, ergo I could not have slept with Ted Cruz"

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 25 March 2016 18:42 (eight years ago) link

(xposts) On Monday, (Trump) called the majority delegate requirement "unfair" seven times, arguing that it's too hard for the front-runner to win 50 percent in a race with over 5 candidates.

He's been complaining about this "arbitrary" number of 1,237 for a while, and always brings up how hard that is with so many candidates. The joke being, of course, that if there hadn't been so many candidates, he very likely wouldn't be leading.

clemenza, Friday, 25 March 2016 18:44 (eight years ago) link

Wait, I thought the tabloid story included no names?

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 25 March 2016 18:44 (eight years ago) link

internet sleuths have pushed some names out there

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 25 March 2016 18:49 (eight years ago) link

I did not sleep with Ted Cruz.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 25 March 2016 18:51 (eight years ago) link

(xpost) That, plus live face-to-face CNN leaks.

clemenza, Friday, 25 March 2016 18:52 (eight years ago) link

Prove it, you lot!

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 25 March 2016 18:56 (eight years ago) link

I have in my hand a list of hundreds who have slept with Ted Cruz. And unlike my competition, I have pictures, too!
http://www.cheerfulgivers.org/wp16/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Beanies.jpg

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 25 March 2016 18:57 (eight years ago) link

ew

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 25 March 2016 18:58 (eight years ago) link

1) True or not, this has all the earmarks of a ratfck by a career ratfcker, and I would be willing to hazard a guess that the "Washington insider" quoted by the National Enquirer is an old Nixon hand whose name rhymes with "Dodger Drone."

2) The Enquirer itself is run by the aptly monickered David Pecker, who is a longtime Friend Of The Donald.

3) Not enough people remember Jimmy Swaggart.

4) Not enough people have seen Elmer Gantry.

5) This campaign is nowhere near as nauseating as it's going to get.

Man, to hell with this story. Even schadenfreude has some limits.

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a43321/ted-cruz-sex-scandal/

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 25 March 2016 18:59 (eight years ago) link

@jonathanjbarnes
Scott Walker predicts open GOP convention would nominate someone not currently running http://host.madison.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/election-matters/scott-walker-predicts-open-gop-convention-would-nominate-someone-not/article_e3eea03d-8f97-57ed-90bc-e5f737001d52.html … via @CapTimes

@dick_nixon Richard M. Nixon Retweeted Jonathan Barnes
Johnny thinks the Yankees will come calling if he can just get the bat off his shoulder.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 25 March 2016 19:03 (eight years ago) link

lol at all of this

Treeship, Friday, 25 March 2016 19:04 (eight years ago) link

cruz you rascal. the only way for him to survive this is to channel his inner bill clinton, play it off as something that makes him more likable if anything.

Treeship, Friday, 25 March 2016 19:07 (eight years ago) link

@dick_nixon
The women who can be recognized jibe with certain specific rumors about Cruz that have circulated for some time.

This is not to say I'm privy to any alleged evidence on Cruz, but politically the thing to do is not leak all at once.

That is to say you leak, let the fellow rebut it, then hit him again. Watch him wave his arms, then reveal everything.

this guy's a pretty good Nixon

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 25 March 2016 19:08 (eight years ago) link

nixon sez two of the women are 'recognizable'

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 25 March 2016 19:10 (eight years ago) link

an old Nixon hand whose name rhymes with "Dodger Drone."

I can't work out who this is

Οὖτις, Friday, 25 March 2016 19:14 (eight years ago) link

ted rouéz

Treeship, Friday, 25 March 2016 19:15 (eight years ago) link

cruz you rascal. the only way for him to survive this is to channel his inner bill clinton, play it off as something that makes him more likable if anything.

I'm sorry, his what

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 25 March 2016 19:15 (eight years ago) link

yr kiddin or...?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Stone

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 25 March 2016 19:16 (eight years ago) link

i had to do several google searches to figure that out

ejemplo (crüt), Friday, 25 March 2016 19:16 (eight years ago) link

http://gawker.com/ted-cruz-implies-hed-fuck-a-rat-as-long-as-it-wasnt-don-1767113389

have to admit this headline made me lol

Treeship, Friday, 25 March 2016 19:18 (eight years ago) link

Stone's fourth book Jeb! and the Bush Crime Family was released by Skyhorse Publishing on February 16, 2016

i'm waitin for the movie

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 25 March 2016 19:20 (eight years ago) link

not kidding! not sure I've come across that name before

xp

Οὖτις, Friday, 25 March 2016 19:22 (eight years ago) link

man, dailykos has removed at least two stories on the cruz affairs. wtf?

akm, Friday, 25 March 2016 19:24 (eight years ago) link

Woman #5 is... The Daily Kos

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 25 March 2016 19:25 (eight years ago) link

#thething

Treeship, Friday, 25 March 2016 19:27 (eight years ago) link

it's roger stone shakey

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 25 March 2016 19:28 (eight years ago) link

More than you wanted to know about Roger Stone:

Others have noted that he wears a diamond pinkie ring in the shape of a horseshoe, in 2007 he had Richard Nixon's face tattooed on his back,[3] he owned five Jaguars as of 2007, and he also owns five Yorkshire Terriers.

Retro novelty punk (Dan Peterson), Friday, 25 March 2016 19:29 (eight years ago) link

http://gawker.com/people-have-been-talking-about-the-thing-with-ted-cru-1767029781

seems like there might be some kind of sex tape.

Rick Wilson ‎@TheRickWilson
Dear media outlets in possession of The Thing; I know you're scared about legal. Have an intern post it on YouTube and then "discover" it.
5:15 PM - 11 Mar 2016
197 197 Retweets 238 238 likes

Treeship, Friday, 25 March 2016 19:29 (eight years ago) link

I'd have sex with Ted Cruz if it would resurrect Nixon as a prisoner of Monica Crowley's so he can prognosticate on the election and nothing more.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 25 March 2016 19:30 (eight years ago) link

in 2007 he had Richard Nixon's face tattooed

this is next level

Οὖτις, Friday, 25 March 2016 19:32 (eight years ago) link

yeah like no one in the current GOP has Reagan tats

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 25 March 2016 19:35 (eight years ago) link

Priceless: "Ted Cruz's problem with the National Enquirer is his and his alone, and while they were right about O.J. Simpson, John Edwards, and many others, I certainly hope they are not right about Lyin' Ted Cruz."

clemenza, Friday, 25 March 2016 19:36 (eight years ago) link

cruz you rascal. the only way for him to survive this is to channel his inner bill clinton, play it off as something that makes him more likable if anything.

― Treeship, Friday, March 25, 2016 2:07 PM (25 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This campaign is on its way all the way to the bottom. "Who's getting more pussy now, Donald?"

Eckrich® Pickled Pig Doin's (Old Lunch), Friday, 25 March 2016 19:36 (eight years ago) link

yeah RS is kinda like an SCTV ratfucker character

In January 2008, Stone founded Citizens United Not Timid, an anti-Hillary Clinton 527 group with an intentionally obscene acronym.

In February 2010, Stone became campaign manager for Kristin Davis, a madam linked with the Eliot Spitzer prostitution scandal, in her bid for the Libertarian Party nomination for Governor of New York in the 2010 election.

also may be deeply closeted

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 25 March 2016 19:38 (eight years ago) link

or not so deep

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 25 March 2016 19:39 (eight years ago) link

just when you thought things couldn't get any wackier

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/a4/d8/6a/a4d86aeb108e88e67c8020b9f90055b0.jpg

god bless murica

F♯ A♯ (∞), Friday, 25 March 2016 19:39 (eight years ago) link

Maybe it'll be revealed it's his wife who has had five affairs. Def. jibes with the "anyone but Cruz" vibes.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 25 March 2016 19:43 (eight years ago) link

This election season is so fucked up I can equally imagine Cruz and Trump being felled for sex tapes, the former for having something he shouldn't and the latter for boasting of something he lacks. Though god knows Trump has tapes. All kinds of tapes. What is that weird fetish with people stepping on small mammals? He probably has some of those.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 25 March 2016 19:47 (eight years ago) link

that's a terrible thing to say about marco rubio

Οὖτις, Friday, 25 March 2016 19:48 (eight years ago) link

feel like trump has vorarephilia

Mordy, Friday, 25 March 2016 19:48 (eight years ago) link

I have no idea whether or not the cover story about Ted Cruz in this week’s issue of the National Enquirer is true or not, but I had absolutely nothing to do with it, did not know about it, and have not, as yet, read it.
Likewise, I have nothing to do with the National Enquirer and unlike Lyin’ Ted Cruz I do not surround myself with political hacks and henchman and then pretend total innocence. Ted Cruz’s problem with the National Enquirer is his and his alone, and while they were right about O.J. Simpson, John Edwards, and many others, I certainly hope they are not right about Lyin’ Ted Cruz.
I look forward to spending the week in Wisconsin, winning the Republican nomination and ultimately the Presidency in order to Make America Great Again.
- Donald J. Trump

Treeship, Friday, 25 March 2016 20:04 (eight years ago) link

Drudge broke Monica Lewinsky after Newsweek scuttled David Itzkoff's story. Surprised to see nothing on his site about the Cruz sex scandal.

flappy bird, Friday, 25 March 2016 20:36 (eight years ago) link

despite evidence to the contrary (his children) i refuse to believe ted cruz ever had sex w/ anyone, so this scandal doesn't rly track

art, Friday, 25 March 2016 21:08 (eight years ago) link

Lol shakey

kevin smith what a bro (Myonga Vön Bontee), Friday, 25 March 2016 21:14 (eight years ago) link

What was that thing we talked about in an earlier thread, the very particular mindset of late 80s debate/forensics club types at Princeton getting all hawt & wett from the prospect of Young Ted, and his ability to just crush massive p because of it?

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Friday, 25 March 2016 21:30 (eight years ago) link

https://www.princeton.edu/paw/archive_old/PAW99-00/10-0223/4768-cnfcruz.jpg

His clenched, grunting face right as he finishes off in your roommate when you get back from practice

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Friday, 25 March 2016 21:33 (eight years ago) link

well that was unpleasant

Οὖτις, Friday, 25 March 2016 21:34 (eight years ago) link

This story suggests Rubio's campaign is behind everything:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/03/25/ted-cruz-affair-rumors-peddled-by-marco-rubio-s-allies.html

Trump's "tiny fingerprints" made me laugh. Trump will now set his sights on The Daily Beast: "I assure you there's nothing small about my fingerprints. I have very large fingerprints, terrific fingerprints."

clemenza, Friday, 25 March 2016 21:40 (eight years ago) link

lol yeah the "tiny fingerprints" aside is great

Οὖτις, Friday, 25 March 2016 21:43 (eight years ago) link

https://twitter.com/politico/status/713474676765417477

k3vin k., Friday, 25 March 2016 21:53 (eight years ago) link

trying to figure out what the kid over his right shoulder is doing at the end lol

k3vin k., Friday, 25 March 2016 21:54 (eight years ago) link

well that was unpleasant

― Οὖτις, Friday, 25 March 2016 21:34 (14 minutes ago) Permalink

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Friday, 25 March 2016 21:55 (eight years ago) link

looooooooooool
https://twitter.com/RichardDawklns/status/672302448535564288

Οὖτις, Friday, 25 March 2016 21:58 (eight years ago) link

I know I'm gay and I think everyone is gay but Cruz has the mien and attitude of a guy whom you'd find fucking your male roommate and afterwards threatening to report you to the RA on a minor infraction as a way of keeping you both quiet.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 25 March 2016 21:58 (eight years ago) link

Well, in the cigar photo, look at the word he's putting a check mark next to.

Clearly he was pro-Bush at the time.

leprechaundriac (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 25 March 2016 22:00 (eight years ago) link

yeah well I don't think he likes bush very much

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 25 March 2016 22:01 (eight years ago) link

Sundquist is the one

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 25 March 2016 22:01 (eight years ago) link

that's a fake account shakey

k3vin k., Friday, 25 March 2016 22:04 (eight years ago) link

my bad

Οὖτις, Friday, 25 March 2016 22:10 (eight years ago) link

i've seen chatter on twitteronia that there's some big story that might damage cruz and trump that the media is sitting on but it's only chatter, idk
― arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, March 15, 2016 9:45 PM (1 week ago)

i guess this might be it? last week i was going through twitter conversation w/hashtag #thething (ok also because it was full of gifs/references to best horror film of all time) and trying to figure out what exactly they were talking about

what doesn't make sense to me yet is that the *reason* supporters of rubio were talking about it was principally about damaging trump and cruz was more like collateral damage if they were lucky. i take it all with a big grain of salt because most of it was regular people's wishful thinking that a big scandal would destroy the other candidates since their guy was losing. and even the few comments coming from those who were professional operatives were.. they've heard about whatever-it-is but did not personally have evidence. so why did trump hire the spokesperson he did, who used to work for cruz? odd.

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Friday, 25 March 2016 22:40 (eight years ago) link

greatest horror movie of all time: TS cruz sex-tape vs. the thing

Οὖτις, Friday, 25 March 2016 22:46 (eight years ago) link

Talking about today's news on the weekly NPR roundup, David Brooks sounded like he wanted to cry. EJ Dionne called him out as one of many Republicans who didn't loudly decry Trump years ago for being a jackass. Granted, Brooks is a pussy, but why would any person even pretending to be sensible want to identify as Republican? I get it, in theory, in a vacuum, but what does the party offer at this point? Is it just a cynical matter of "and from the right .... " employment? Because all of the principles these so-called principled Republicans stand for have long been flushed.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 25 March 2016 23:22 (eight years ago) link

If david brooks didn't identify as a republican he wouldn't have a job

iatee, Friday, 25 March 2016 23:40 (eight years ago) link

Josh, did you read Brooks' column today

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 25 March 2016 23:48 (eight years ago) link

ime (i live in the area where he went to high school) there are a lot of these coastal [often jewish like brooks] republican types whose families signed onto a kind of entrepreneurial genteel aspirational conservatism that has its entire own world of magazines + journals (commentary and post-buckley NR) and has basically been able to insulate itself from the ongoing disintegration of the GOP into madness. a close friend was one of these types and already in 2008 we were having conversations about what palin meant for his kind of republicanism and he really didn't want to hear or think too much about it and then by 2012 he was independent but i think still voted for romney and now i assume he'll be voting for hillary bc the candidates on offer are really repellant to this type. this election it has really come to a head and i've been hearing a lot of "i don't know what i'm going to do" just sad head shaking and like "i can't vote for clinton can i" from at least a few ppl.

Mordy, Friday, 25 March 2016 23:56 (eight years ago) link

@dick_nixon
Johnny thinks the Yankees will come calling if he can just get the bat off his shoulder.

dick_nixon's first good line itt

mookieproof, Saturday, 26 March 2016 00:13 (eight years ago) link

last week i was going through twitter conversation w/hashtag #thething (ok also because it was full of gifs/references to best horror film of all time)

lol

mookieproof, Saturday, 26 March 2016 00:14 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FV2wCXKgG1E

Iago Galdston, Saturday, 26 March 2016 00:16 (eight years ago) link

I read this at the time. It's extraordinary.

n 1976, Stone was named national youth director for Reagan’s first, failed run for the Republican nomination. Four years later, after serving on various young-Republican task forces, Stone asked the leaders of Reagan’s next campaign for the toughest assignment they had. They made Stone, who was in his late twenties, political director of New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut. The region hardly looked like Reagan country, but Stone found a new mentor to help him. “I was invited to a party by a socialite named Sheila Mosler, and Roy Cohn was there,” Stone said, as the captain delivered an order of “21” ’s steak tartare. “Roy was a Democrat, but he was an anti-Communist and a master of public relations, and he wanted to help me with Reagan. He told me to come see him at his town house.

“When I got there, Roy was in his bathrobe, eating three strips of bacon burned to a crisp and both halves of a devilled egg,” Stone went on. “He started telling me how he was going to help me set up the Reagan campaign—everything from union endorsements to office space. He told me to ride down to the courthouse with him. He had a young lawyer with him, and it was clear that Roy knew nothing about the case he was going to argue. But he knew it didn’t matter. He used to say, ‘Don’t tell me the law. Tell me the judge.’ Roy knew how the world worked.” Following Cohn’s lead, Stone played hardball for Reagan, challenging George H. W. Bush’s New York primary delegates on a variety of technical grounds, getting many of them disqualified. A couple of years later, Cohn threw Stone a thirtieth-birthday party in a private room at “21.”

Like Stone, Cohn combined conservative politics with an outré personal life. “Roy was not gay,” Stone told me. “He was a man who liked having sex with men. Gays were weak, effeminate. He always seemed to have these young blond boys around. It just wasn’t discussed. He was interested in power and access. He told me his absolute goal was to die completely broke and owing millions to the I.R.S. He succeeded in that.”

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 26 March 2016 01:00 (eight years ago) link

o man devilled eggs

mookieproof, Saturday, 26 March 2016 01:20 (eight years ago) link

"He told me his absolute goal was to die completely broke and owing millions to the I.R.S. He succeeded in that."

lmao

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Saturday, 26 March 2016 01:22 (eight years ago) link

i like that cnn is getting around to talking about this story only by talking about the reactions to it

akm, Saturday, 26 March 2016 01:27 (eight years ago) link

fucking Reagan everywhere

bowl of grapes to his right

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 26 March 2016 01:32 (eight years ago) link

When I was in 4th grade we had some assignment to write a letter to the president. I must have been goofing around, because I was sent to the hallway to work on mine, so I figured, whatever, I will write the best letter ever to the president. I think it had to do with trash pickup. Weeks later, I got an envelope from the White House with a letter, some other swag and a picture of Ronnie riding a horse. I figured, cool, wtf. I still have it somewhere in my mom's house. Maybe I sent him jellybeans.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 26 March 2016 02:09 (eight years ago) link

"i can't vote for clinton can i"

do it, genteel Repugs, she promises endless war and absolutely nothing that will impede coastal flood inundation.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 26 March 2016 02:28 (eight years ago) link

ok also because it was full of gifs/references to best horror film of all time

wait, when did Michael Powell's Peeping Tom enter the fray?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 26 March 2016 02:32 (eight years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/PgZtz0j.gif

pplains, Saturday, 26 March 2016 02:47 (eight years ago) link

the conventions are a week apart in July, what madness

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 26 March 2016 03:00 (eight years ago) link

https://twitter.com/PeteBlackburn/status/713546359287230464

j., Saturday, 26 March 2016 03:43 (eight years ago) link

:-(

Treeship, Saturday, 26 March 2016 03:45 (eight years ago) link

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/20/2016_Republican_National_Convention_Logo.png

A left-handed guitar, just like what Obama would play.

pplains, Saturday, 26 March 2016 03:46 (eight years ago) link

why is the elephant trampling over an electric guitar, symbol of joy and freedom?

Treeship, Saturday, 26 March 2016 03:48 (eight years ago) link

that elephant is shredding, b

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Saturday, 26 March 2016 03:52 (eight years ago) link

I believe that is a reference to Cleveland's undisputed status as the birthplace of rock and roll.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Saturday, 26 March 2016 03:54 (eight years ago) link

birth AND deathplace

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Saturday, 26 March 2016 03:55 (eight years ago) link

I would say that it's strutting rather than trampling. I read 'RNC' as 'PRINCE' for a moment when I opened the thread

soref, Saturday, 26 March 2016 03:55 (eight years ago) link

DNC playing up castration anxiety by prominently featuring the Liberty Bell.

pplains, Saturday, 26 March 2016 03:58 (eight years ago) link

Will have to read that New Yorker piece on Roger Stone.

"Everybody talks about the Reagan Democrats who helped put the Republican Party over the top, but they were really the Nixon Democrats. The exodus of working-class people from the Democratic Party was started by Nixon. The realignment was delayed by Watergate, but it was really Nixon who figured out how to win," Stone said.

Rather astute, I'd say.

clemenza, Saturday, 26 March 2016 03:59 (eight years ago) link

He wrote recently on his Web site, an erratically updated collection of observations called Stonezone.com

... (Eazy), Saturday, 26 March 2016 05:31 (eight years ago) link

I hope they make all the conventioneers sit thru the interminal docu vids at the R&R Hall of Fame

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Saturday, 26 March 2016 05:37 (eight years ago) link

I'm starting to get pulled into the Stone zone...

This is one of the last sites I would think to link to but the guy knows what he's talking about.

Though these “Trump” delegates will be bound by national and state rules to support Trump through the first ballot at the convention, they are free to vote against Trump’s interests on the adoption of Rules and the seating of delegates. It’s entirely plausible that a state could seat delegates pledged to support Donald Trump who have open affiliations with other candidates. In California, Cruz and Paulistas are signing up online via CA’s GOP website as Trump delegates.

... (Eazy), Saturday, 26 March 2016 06:26 (eight years ago) link

Re: that logo - evidently someone at the RNC heard that the heart of rock and roll is still beating... in Cleveland.

Man, that convention is going to be amazeballs.

a state could seat delegates pledged to support Donald Trump who have open affiliations with other candidates. In California, Cruz and Paulistas are signing up online via CA’s GOP website as Trump delegates

Oh, the idea of a bunch of Cruz men elaborately plotting a dramatic second-ballot Trojan horse switcheroo is packed with dramatic potential.

They stay up the night before drinking Jack and Coke in their hotel rooms, pledging their loyalty to the cause, planning to save the Republic in a swift stroke like Brutus and Cassius of yore, congratulating themselves for their courage. They all go in to the convention in matching blazers. They have, like, secret hand signals or something. Then, due to a tragic miscalculation, Trump accidentally wins on the first ballot.

The confetti falls, the place goes insane, and all yr Cruzers are standing there looking like jackasses and wondering what went wrong. Later, five of them are found dead in their hotel rooms, clutching bottles of Jack and souvenir inflatable American-flag Stratocasters.

leprechaundriac (Ye Mad Puffin), Saturday, 26 March 2016 10:55 (eight years ago) link

rolling stone, or at least its editor, endorses hillary: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/hillary-clinton-for-president-20160323

k3vin k., Saturday, 26 March 2016 16:19 (eight years ago) link

k3vin you are sooo last thursday with that link

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 26 March 2016 16:37 (eight years ago) link

meanwhile:

Mr. Kasich’s colleagues in Ohio and Washington do not share that worry. In interviews, they recall a three-decade career in government punctuated by scolding confrontations, intemperate critiques and undiplomatic remarks.

Today, as Mr. Kasich makes comity a centerpiece of his long-shot bid for the Republican nomination, they describe his candidacy as an exercise in remarkable self-restraint that has managed to keep his crankier instincts mostly out of sight.

The John Kasich of 2016 is a much mellower politician than the hard-charging congressman of the 1990s, who could be so difficult that House Speaker Newt Gingrich, never known for his diplomacy, offered Mr. Kasich firm advice about his tendency to bulldoze colleagues.

“I talked to him a lot about unlocking people rather than running them over,” Mr. Gingrich recalled, adding of his counsel, “I think some of that actually stuck.”

But not all of it. In Ohio, Mr. Kasich is known for flashes of impatience, anger and disdain. A police officer who pulled him over? An “idiot,” Mr. Kasich said (though he later apologized). Lobbyists? Farm animals with “their snouts in that trough,” in his words. Out-of-state rivals? “Wackadoodles.”

“We see a completely different side of him,” said Lou Gentile, a Democratic state senator. Mr. Gentile recalled Mr. Kasich pulling him aside after a news conference and unspooling a vigorous grievance about how Democrats had not supported a proposal he had championed.

“I literally said, ‘Governor, governor, can I please get a word in here?’ ” Mr. Gentile said.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 26 March 2016 16:47 (eight years ago) link

Pennsylvania's primary is April 28th and the chatter is starting. The usual suspects are talking up Kasich, and doubling down on the Clinton hate.

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Saturday, 26 March 2016 18:28 (eight years ago) link

I think Clinton will do well here. Closed primary and conservative Democratic Party.

Mordy, Saturday, 26 March 2016 18:34 (eight years ago) link

I've never really encountered a berniebro. The biggest berniebro I know is some dorky dad on my facebook feed.

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Saturday, 26 March 2016 18:44 (eight years ago) link

Clinton should do fine.

rap is dad (it's a boy!), Saturday, 26 March 2016 18:45 (eight years ago) link

FiveThirtyEight demographic projection gives it 96/93 to Sanders. So she should be ok.

Frederik B, Saturday, 26 March 2016 18:52 (eight years ago) link

Alaska called for Sanders.

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Saturday, 26 March 2016 21:33 (eight years ago) link

elementary school i'm in right now indistinguishable from (modestly attended) bernie rally

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Saturday, 26 March 2016 22:31 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbePWVrEzqs

compilation of creepy trump comments on women's skin (via buzzfeed andrew)

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Sunday, 27 March 2016 00:17 (eight years ago) link

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/27/us/politics/donald-trump-transcript.html

i tried to read the entire transcript of his nyt foreign policy interview but it's quite a slog

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Sunday, 27 March 2016 00:29 (eight years ago) link


TRUMP: First off, we’re so obsolete in cyber. We’re the ones that sort of were very much involved with the creation, but we’re so obsolete, we just seem to be toyed with by so many different countries, already. And we don’t know who’s doing what. We don’t know who’s got the power, who’s got that capability, some people say it’s China, some people say it’s Russia. But certainly cyber has to be a, you know, certainly cyber has to be in our thought process, very strongly in our thought process. Inconceivable that, inconceivable the power of cyber. But as you say, you can take out, you can take out, you can make countries nonfunctioning with a strong use of cyber. I don’t think we’re there. I don’t think we’re as advanced as other countries are, and I think you probably would agree with that. I don’t think we’re advanced, I think we’re going backwards in so many different ways.

mick signals, Sunday, 27 March 2016 00:34 (eight years ago) link

I think what he doesn't get about cyber warfare is that you don't paint a flag on the side of your malware
he'll fix that, of course

El Tomboto, Sunday, 27 March 2016 00:36 (eight years ago) link

There was a time, when I used IRC more frequently, when I too believed as fervently in the power of cyber.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 27 March 2016 00:40 (eight years ago) link

This is pretty funny--watch the bottom of the screen.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2016/mar/26/live-results-alaska-hawaii-washington-caucuses

clemenza, Sunday, 27 March 2016 00:44 (eight years ago) link

That's wonderful

El Tomboto, Sunday, 27 March 2016 00:45 (eight years ago) link

🎥

compilation of creepy trump comments on women's skin (via buzzfeed andrew)


The way he delivers that first line about Lawrence, never heard anything so skin crawling

Iago Galdston, Sunday, 27 March 2016 00:52 (eight years ago) link

I like how Taibbi comes right up on the edge of saying people should stay home if Hillary gets the nomination but then chickens out and says "listen to the young people!" instead.

El Tomboto, Sunday, 27 March 2016 01:57 (eight years ago) link

i dont get the "stay home" argument unless thats a euphemism for "vote jill stein"

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Sunday, 27 March 2016 02:24 (eight years ago) link

taibbi has nothing new to say there. really generic and not interesting.

hillary clinton is not the same person as bill clinton and was not president in the 90s. sanders v trump general election polling is not a good indicator given that there really haven't been many attacks on sanders thus far. not the kind of stuff you'd get from the GOP, which would probably start off with scaring the hell out of people about socialism, nothing about whatever weird stuff he's said in interviews back in the day, etc.

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Sunday, 27 March 2016 02:27 (eight years ago) link

this is a sincere question (and not a rhetorical or snarky one) because i have not followed hrc's campaign as closely as i have sanders', but what are some of the ways that she has indicated her administration will be different than bill's?

also, i don't doubt that attacks on sanders could be brutal, but would they be effective? i think any democrat running against trump wins. in terms of margin, i'm not confident which candidate would have an easier time (what states does sanders put into play that hrc doesn't, and vice versa?)

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Sunday, 27 March 2016 02:40 (eight years ago) link

i think it's worthwhile to count bernie's ability to generate enthusiasm among the disaffected left and working class on economic issues. that is something hrc will have some difficulty replicating. but she'll do well to collect some nervous middle-right voters who can't stomach trump.

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Sunday, 27 March 2016 02:46 (eight years ago) link

there isn't going to be like, an evidence-based answer for why hillary would be a stronger general election candidate than bernie -- just the usual conventional wisdom you can surmise. NB, i'm not necessarily saying the CW is wrong -- what daria says makes sense to me. all of the smart people say the polling -- the few percentage points bernie has over hillary in a potential matchup with trump or cruz -- means little this far out, which i can accept. i do think bernie could beat trump in a general, though, just that hillary would probably be more of a sure thing

of course, none of this matters as bernie is not winning the nomination

i guess the age-old question to all of our centrist friends, including many on this board, is that if this is "not the time" to be nominating a real lefty -- when s/he is going to likely be matched up against a republican nominee who no one likes, when, exactly, is the time? (the answer few will give, but the actual answer from their POV, is "never" -- fair enough.)

i don't think it's much of a stretch, or particularly unfair, to suggest there isn't much daylight between HRC's views and bill's. of course, those views are subject to the prevailing moods of the day, and since the democratic base seems a bit more energized and reliably liberal than it was in the 90s, maybe that's cause for some cautious optimism. still, only her most hardcore supporters -- the kind of weirdos you find on twitter -- would deny that she'll be quick to sell out anything the left cares about for the quickest buck. but so it goes

k3vin k., Sunday, 27 March 2016 02:52 (eight years ago) link

i guess the age-old question to all of our centrist friends, including many on this board, is that if this is "not the time" to be nominating a real lefty -- when s/he is going to likely be matched up against a republican nominee who no one likes, when, exactly, is the time? (the answer few will give, but the actual answer from their POV, is "never" -- fair enough.)

otm

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Sunday, 27 March 2016 03:05 (eight years ago) link

Nancy knows whom to look at.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 27 March 2016 03:07 (eight years ago) link

HRC won't try to squeeze herself through any cracks of daylight on issues that concern the left. She's the sort who will want a nice large opening she can walk through without much chance of political discomfort.

On issues of war and 'national security', her instinct will always favor the conservative position, for the same reasons LBJ escalated Vietnam -- fear of being painted as "soft on our enemies". Any politician who looked at GHWB's poll numbers at the close of the Persian Gulf War (roughly 90% favorable) would have the same instinct, I'm sure.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 27 March 2016 03:20 (eight years ago) link

Is there supposed to be something incriminating about those pics? That the clintons smiled and shook the reagans' hands at what appear to be formal events? What should they have done? Spit in Ronnie's eye?

Dan I., Sunday, 27 March 2016 03:32 (eight years ago) link

that dude is lookin at HRC like she's a meal in that last pic

Neanderthal, Sunday, 27 March 2016 03:36 (eight years ago) link

Bill's hair looks like it came off of a raccoon

Neanderthal, Sunday, 27 March 2016 03:37 (eight years ago) link

haha i actually like that last picture of hillary, she's like "im sorry ron but my more interesting and cool friend just walked in and i want to talk to them now"

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Sunday, 27 March 2016 04:04 (eight years ago) link

i put 200 in house money on bernie , jeez i hope i win . what were the odds back then like , i could make a sweet grand or something

Sébastien, Sunday, 27 March 2016 04:09 (eight years ago) link

i think it's worthwhile to count bernie's ability to generate enthusiasm among the disaffected left and working class on economic issues. that is something hrc will have some difficulty replicating. but she'll do well to collect some nervous middle-right voters who can't stomach trump.

― get a long, little doggy (m bison), Saturday, March 26, 2016 7:46 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

True, but I also think it's worthwhile to count clinton's ability to generate enthusiasm in areas where bernie is weak--African-American communities, moderates, Latinos (to a lesser extent). You could just as easily argue that's something Bernie will have some difficulty replicating. I like Bernie and the enthusiasm he's generated, but both candidates have constituencies where they're stronger than the other. It's not like clinton is winning due to the support of moderate republicans who can't stomach trump.

intheblanks, Sunday, 27 March 2016 05:16 (eight years ago) link

i guess the age-old question to all of our centrist friends, including many on this board, is that if this is "not the time" to be nominating a real lefty

1972

intheblanks, Sunday, 27 March 2016 05:18 (eight years ago) link

sorry, i cut off your whole question, 1972 was the year to nominate a real lefty. obviously this is a facetious answer, but i feel like this "real lefty" thing is a dumb litmus test that holds that there's literally no such thing as incremental change. I don't love Clinton, particularly on foreign policy. But I think it's dangerous to assume that obviously trump is going to lose, and that dems should nominate a candidate a far-left candidate.

anyway, i wish warren would have run, this was obviously her year in retrospect.

intheblanks, Sunday, 27 March 2016 05:23 (eight years ago) link

True, but I also think it's worthwhile to count clinton's ability to generate enthusiasm in areas where bernie is weak--African-American communities, moderates, Latinos (to a lesser extent). You could just as easily argue that's something Bernie will have some difficulty replicating. I like Bernie and the enthusiasm he's generated, but both candidates have constituencies where they're stronger than the other. It's not like clinton is winning due to the support of moderate republicans who can't stomach trump.

― intheblanks, Sunday, March 27, 2016 12:16 AM (24 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

hm, to me the constituencies where hrc is strong are those in which the democratic party has already done well with (namely the rank and file party members). sanders' ability to garner support from self-styled "independents" is intriguing.

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Sunday, 27 March 2016 05:42 (eight years ago) link

haha i actually like that last picture of hillary, she's like "im sorry ron but my more interesting and cool friend just walked in and i want to talk to them now"

― get a long, little doggy (m bison), Sunday, March 27, 2016 12:04 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i think there is something really endearing about pictures of young hillary. i'm a bernie supporter, but i like hrc OK as a personality and political figure. my main issue with her is her hawkishness. bill always struck me as a creep/borderline sociopath, but i don't feel that way about her at all.

Treeship, Sunday, 27 March 2016 05:55 (eight years ago) link

the word on her seems to be she is a cynic who will do whatever it takes for power. i don't think that's true. even her interventionist tendencies -- like her pushing to back up the rebels in libya -- seem to be borne of idealism if anything. she may claim kissinger as a friend but i don't think she is machiavellian and ruthless the way he was. she seems like someone who essentially believes in government as an instrument for positive change. she's spent her whole life learning the rules of the game to be able to play it effectively. her issue this election is that tons and tons of voters think the game is rigged and that her ability to win the support of elites makes her a pawn. i agree with bernie and the others who think she is too compromised to be effective, but i can understand why she doesn't feel that way. she thinks these are just the way things are done: this is the game, these are the rules

Treeship, Sunday, 27 March 2016 06:07 (eight years ago) link

no the pic with Kissinger is the incriminating one.

If one identifies as a leftist who is only a registered Democrat to paticipate in meaningful elections (in my case NY primaries at the city and state level), obviously the Clintons and their entire epochal shift of their party to primarily serve the pro-conglomerate warmaking right makes one's skin crawl, and while my electoral role in November is utterly meaningless, I haven't and wouldn't vote for either cretin ever for anything, not in Ohio or Florida either. This sophistry about "a vote for/not for _____ is REALLY a vote for _____" is the worst cable-carnival garbage, go peddle it there.

but i can understand why she doesn't feel that way

You and I have no idea what she "feels" other than wanting to win an election, and it's 100% irrelevant.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 27 March 2016 08:20 (eight years ago) link

armchair psychoanalysis of a person whose life has borne absolutely no resemblance to ours for 40 years, always a winner

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 27 March 2016 08:22 (eight years ago) link

i guess the age-old question to all of our centrist friends, including many on this board, is that if this is "not the time" to be nominating a real lefty

1972

yeah bcz Trump, Cruz or God knows who is in the same political catbird seat as a popular incumbent president

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 27 March 2016 08:30 (eight years ago) link

Every time I see Bernie and the bird--so perfect in the way it reinforces the idea of Sanders as kindly and wise--I get a vision of Clinton excoriating her staff behind closed doors: "Where's our bird? What the fuck am I paying you people for?"

clemenza, Sunday, 27 March 2016 13:11 (eight years ago) link

Bill's hair looks like it came off of a raccoon

― Neanderthal, Saturday, March 26, 2016

John Updike: clinton's hair "closely modeled on the opossum fur of his beloved Arkansas" and appears to be "composed of an unidentifiable salt-and-pepper substance, like spill-proof carpeting."

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 27 March 2016 13:20 (eight years ago) link

omg

Neanderthal, Sunday, 27 March 2016 13:22 (eight years ago) link

I've a vague memory of Greil Marcus citing Updike's passage as an example of Beltway hate of the Clintons.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 27 March 2016 13:40 (eight years ago) link

and then someone told Greil that Updike didn't dwell in the Beltway

what a ass

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 27 March 2016 13:44 (eight years ago) link

read the essay, toots

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 27 March 2016 13:53 (eight years ago) link

This was at the height of impeachment fever. As Didion hinted in her "Vichy Washington," Clinton was getting impeached for the wrong reasons.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 27 March 2016 13:55 (eight years ago) link

Every day above ground not reading Greil Marcus is a good day.

Ralph Nader:

Democrats falsely accused my campaign of fraud in state after state. In Pennsylvania, they forced us off the ballot after challenging more than 30,000 signatures on spurious technical grounds. My running mate, Peter Camejo, and I were ordered to pay more than $81,000 in litigation costs the plaintiffs, a group of Democratic voters, said they incurred. In an effort to collect, their law firm, Reed Smith ,which the DNC also hired in that cycle, froze my personal accounts at several banks for eight years. A criminal prosecution by the state attorney general later revealed that Pennsylvania House Democrats had, illegally at taxpayer expense, prepared the complaints against our campaign, and several people were convicted of related felonies....

By running as a Democrat, Sanders declined to become a complete political masochist, and he avoided exposing his campaign to immediate annihilation by partisan hacks. Because if he had run as an independent, he would have faced only one question daily in the media, as I did: “Do you see yourself as a spoiler?” The implication being, of course, that he had no chance of winning. His popular agenda would have been totally ignored by a horse-race-obsessed mass media, which would have latched on instead to a narrative in which Sanders was unfairly hurting Hillary Clinton’s chances against whichever Republican wound up with the other major-party nomination, as if any Democrat is automatically entitled to the votes of progressives.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/03/25/ralph-nader-why-bernie-sanders-was-right-to-run-as-a-democrat/

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 27 March 2016 13:59 (eight years ago) link

If one identifies as a leftist who is only a registered Democrat to paticipate in meaningful elections (in my case NY primaries at the city and state level), obviously the Clintons and their entire epochal shift of their party to primarily serve the pro-conglomerate warmaking right makes one's skin crawl, and while my electoral role in November is utterly meaningless, I haven't and wouldn't vote for either cretin ever for anything, not in Ohio or Florida either.

Cuz you have the privilege -- as usual in your case -- of living in a state that hasn't gone red since 1984. Because as usual you read nothing that contradicts or adds nuance to your adolescent conception of American politics, a vote for a GOP candidate means installing hacks into our regulatory and administrative agencies that don't believe in federal responsibility for the environment, clean water, or safe reproductive care. It would mean deciding not to enforce laws you pretend to care about. It would mean bringing the lovely experiments taking place at the state level to the federal government and inflicting them on the rest of us. I know you claim you won't get fooled again, but you're pretending that the kind of conservative crackpot you saw in 1980 and 1994 is no different than what we see in 2016. It isn't that these neo-nihilists weren't detectable in those years; it's that in 2016 the nihilism is perfected.

As for me, I couldn't vote in Florida's closed primaries. Miami Dade County tends to go blue, but if statewide polls look grim then I'll vote for the repugnant Clinton because I expect her not to nominate or appoint functionaries whose mission is to eviscerate the regulatory state under which we've lived since the Teddy Roosevelt administration.

See? And I didn't once mention the Supreme Court.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 27 March 2016 14:07 (eight years ago) link

I like this photo of two possible future presidents. I know which one I'd do vodka shots with.

http://i.imgur.com/A1qLu8Q.jpg

pplains, Sunday, 27 March 2016 14:13 (eight years ago) link

Because as usual you read nothing that contradicts or adds nuance to your adolescent conception of American politics, a vote for a GOP candidate means installing hacks into our regulatory and administrative agencies that don't believe in federal responsibility for the environment, clean water, or safe reproductive care.

The first half of this sentence has nothing to do with the second.

I'm not voting GOP. Go piss on someone who deserves it.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 27 March 2016 14:21 (eight years ago) link

I'm not voting GOP.

Congratulations; here's your fuckin' robe and halo.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Sunday, 27 March 2016 14:21 (eight years ago) link

everyone should vote how they want to btw

adolescent conception

This counts as the "be an ADULT" argument, i collect $200

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 27 March 2016 14:23 (eight years ago) link

誤訳侮辱, you're definitely a music critic

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 27 March 2016 14:24 (eight years ago) link

i don't see how hillary can possibly win this thing without the bitter shitty film-critic vote. morbz, if i promise i don't give a fuck who you vote for or what you think about anything ever will you promise to stop making the same post over and over again as though there were still posters on ilx who weren't tired of your self-righteous broken record ignoramus shtick?

Mordy, Sunday, 27 March 2016 14:26 (eight years ago) link

誤訳侮辱, you're definitely a music critic

20 years in the game this November. What's your point?

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Sunday, 27 March 2016 14:26 (eight years ago) link

i'm not a film critic

xp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 27 March 2016 14:27 (eight years ago) link

"hey guys, i'm an old dude who lives in NY with real important opinions about how bad politicians are. watch me state them repeatedly interspersed w/ brief unfulfilled threats to stop posting."

Mordy, Sunday, 27 March 2016 14:27 (eight years ago) link

is this the part of the thread where we state plain facts as if they are inherently insults

Neanderthal, Sunday, 27 March 2016 14:31 (eight years ago) link

xxxxxpost

Neanderthal, Sunday, 27 March 2016 14:32 (eight years ago) link

As much as I don't agree with Morbz on various things, I always enjoy his contributions to these conversations, just as alternate POVs. Keeps life interesting. Given the history of conflict on this forum - back circa 2001 shit got so vicious that I suspect fistfights would've erupted had some posters been in the same physical space - it's fascinating that so many of y'all (and I love all of you, don't get anything twisted) get so bent outta shape by the Dr.

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Sunday, 27 March 2016 14:32 (eight years ago) link

aw c'mon he enjoys the tug of war too, he creates the needed equilibrium to remind everybody else we're all (mostly) on the same side.

Neanderthal, Sunday, 27 March 2016 14:35 (eight years ago) link

nope

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 27 March 2016 14:36 (eight years ago) link

I'm not voting GOP.

Didn't say you were. But you mentioned nothing about turnout.

Keeps life interesting. Given the history of conflict on this forum - back circa 2001 shit got so vicious that I suspect fistfights would've erupted had some posters been in the same physical space - it's fascinating that so many of y'all (and I love all of you, don't get anything twisted) get so bent outta shape by the Dr.

I still do! I'd tell him the same thing should we ever meet. He's the one telling me whom to piss on.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 27 March 2016 14:44 (eight years ago) link

I haven't and wouldn't vote for either cretin ever for anything, not in Ohio or Florida either. This sophistry about "a vote for/not for _____ is REALLY a vote for _____" is the worst cable-carnival garbage

This is otmfm (as is Morbs itt).

Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Sunday, 27 March 2016 14:50 (eight years ago) link

i've been waiting for Nader to chime in. i remember him getting refused entry into Democratic debates even though he had a ticket. like the police showed up and told him he would be arrested and all.

Morbs otm as usual.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 27 March 2016 14:53 (eight years ago) link

back circa 2001 shit got so vicious that I suspect fistfights would've erupted had some posters been in the same physical space

link plz

Mr. Snrub, Sunday, 27 March 2016 14:55 (eight years ago) link

I voted for Nader in 2004, no regrets.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 27 March 2016 14:58 (eight years ago) link

"i've been waiting for Nader to chime in. i remember him getting refused entry into Democratic debates even though he had a ticket."

Was the National debates he was refused entry from.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Sunday, 27 March 2016 15:05 (eight years ago) link

ok then he was refused entry to the Democratic-Republican debates

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 27 March 2016 15:08 (eight years ago) link

As much as I don't agree with Morbz on various things, I always enjoy his contributions to these conversations, just as alternate POVs. Keeps life interestin

Morbz is classic, he should run for President next time round.

A Fifth Beatle Dies (Tom D.), Sunday, 27 March 2016 15:19 (eight years ago) link

With gabbnebb as veep

Neanderthal, Sunday, 27 March 2016 15:22 (eight years ago) link

... though if a bird landed on his podium during a speech he'd probably bite its head off. (xp)

A Fifth Beatle Dies (Tom D.), Sunday, 27 March 2016 15:22 (eight years ago) link

adolescent conception

This counts as the "be an ADULT" argument, i collect $200

LOL, from the fucko who told people to "put on their pajamas" in the fucking Batman movie thread, don't you even ever get bored with yourself?

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Sunday, 27 March 2016 15:37 (eight years ago) link

adult in the cinema, child at the ballot box - this is what democracy looks like

Mordy, Sunday, 27 March 2016 15:46 (eight years ago) link

Hey guys I'm just returning from eight months of mission work in Angola and trying to get caught up. Figured I'd start here but this page takes sooooooo long to load now, using my bookmark.

So what's happening? I mean I'm sure Jeb is way out in front w/ delegates...just please please please just tell me there's no chance (nightmare scenario) Scott Walker gets nominated. On the other hand that would p spell the end of the Republican party.

Hadrian VIII, Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:00 (eight years ago) link

It's pretty much down to Heidi Cruz and Melania Trump at this point.

clemenza, Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:09 (eight years ago) link

Walker was fatally stabbed by some goons later linked to the Perry campaign (though I'm not sure we ever got real confirmation of that) which took him out too; there were some kinda crazy and chaotic debates which is why the threads are so long but the short version is that Jim Gilmore, barring some really unlikely developments, is sailing to the nom. I can't remember though, who was Jeb?

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:12 (eight years ago) link

Hmm Gilmore, interesting. A year for dark horses then.

Heidi Cruz, Melanoma Trump....these are rank-and-file house members I guess? Politics is so unpredictable.

Hadrian VIII, Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:15 (eight years ago) link

Btw though: kinda big night for Sanders right? I mean he was projected to win those states (though I remember rumblings about how the HI dem machine would work in Clinton's favor), but I don't have a sense of by how much he was expected to win. Only WA is really delegate-rich but I'd be interested to see thoughtful writing on those contests, their demographics, etc.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:16 (eight years ago) link

BERNIE Sanders?

Also—last question— caught a few minutes of Gwen Ifill on PBS News Hour... the little box above her shoulder said "Election 2016" but she was talking about, like, Guy Fieri's penis or something?

Hadrian VIII, Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:21 (eight years ago) link

xp It was a big night, Sanders definitely overperformed.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:22 (eight years ago) link

Washington, the largest prize Saturday with 101 delegates in play, was a vital state for Mr. Sanders, whose prospects of capturing the nomination dimmed after double-digit losses to Mrs. Clinton across the South and weak showings in delegate-rich Ohio, Florida and North Carolina this month. As of Saturday evening, Mrs. Clinton had roughly 280 more pledged delegates, who are awarded based on voting, and 440 more superdelegates — party leaders and elected officials — than Mr. Sanders.

WI comes next which I think he'll win, but behind still over 200 delegates Sanders needs wins in upcoming states like NY (4/19, Hill +48 in latest Emerson poll), PA + MD (4/26, Hill +25 and +33) and CA + NJ (6/7). California looks winnable but none of the other ones do and while there are other more Bernie favorable states during this time period they're all tiny and these states are all huge. Unless my heart is right and the bird event means that his presidency is divinely ordained, I still don't see it happening. I was thinking before yesterday that if he made her non-viable in one or more of yesterday's states I might've felt that indicated a more dramatic reversal but just overperforming his polls in these places isn't sufficient. imho.

Mordy, Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:24 (eight years ago) link

538's delegate tracker has him at 91% of his "target" now, and hillary at 107%. those should both rise a little, as not all of the delegates from last night have been awarded yet

k3vin k., Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:24 (eight years ago) link

what makes one non-viable? and how would one distinguish being "non-viable" from losing by 40-50 points?

i don't think either candidate is going to be shown to be "non-viable". polls have consistently shown that most democrats would be fine with either candidate as their nominee

k3vin k., Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:27 (eight years ago) link

if you go below 15% you get no delegates

Mordy, Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:28 (eight years ago) link

Maybe I'm wrong, but the way I remember 2008 is that the pledged-delegate count was the one that was always front-and-center, and the superdelegates were an afterthought (because the feeling, which turned out to be exactly the case, was that they would drift over to Obama eventually). This year, on CNN and elsewhere, their delegate tracking always includes superdelegates. Seems unfair to Sanders.

clemenza, Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:29 (eight years ago) link

if you go below 15% you get no delegates

― Mordy, Sunday, March 27, 2016 12:28 PM (2 minutes ago

oh i see what you mean

k3vin k., Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:31 (eight years ago) link

Unless the Democratic Party wants to tear itself in half in the same year the GOP is doing so just to even the playing field, I doubt that the superdelegates would want to thwart the apparent will of the people at the convention, if it came to that

petulant dick master (silby), Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:34 (eight years ago) link

xp in my calculation above i only counted pledged delegates which is really the insurmountable part to my eyes. now if bernie can win in most/all of NY, NJ, PA, CA i'd feel more optimistic about his campaign.

Mordy, Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:35 (eight years ago) link

I got Bernie going from needing something 58.3% of the remaining pledged delegates before yesterday to now needing about 56.7%.

timellison, Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:35 (eight years ago) link

*something like

timellison, Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:36 (eight years ago) link

xp in my calculation above i only counted pledged delegates

You did, which is good. The most prominent delegate trackers don't.

CNN: http://www.cnn.com/election/primaries/parties/democrat
NBC: http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/
CBS: http://www.cbsnews.com/elections/2016/primaries/

ABC's is a little better:

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Election

clemenza, Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:45 (eight years ago) link

fwiw the democratic nomination odds didn't shift at all in response to yesterday's results, which suggest they didn't exceed expectations to those people

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:50 (eight years ago) link

I think Sanders supporters actually have a reasonable case for Sanders's strength in a general election. But I find it frustrating that when HRC racks up huge margins in, I dunno, Tennessee or Alabama, those states are dismissed by Sanders supporters as "the old South" and irrelevant in the general, whereas Sanders getting big wins in WA, AK, HI reads as an important indicator of Sanders's strength. I think when Sanders massively outperformed polls in Michigan there was a real question: have things moved decisively in his favor? Is he more popular than HRC in Florida, in Ohio, in Pennsylvania, the states where general elections are actually decided? I think he's been A LOT STRONGER in FL and OH, and will be stronger in PA, than anybody would have expected three months ago. But I don't see how to get around the fact that more Democrats in those states are voting for Clinton.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:52 (eight years ago) link

To me, the superdelegates are just placeholders, and shouldn't be reported at all. Unless the feeling this time is that they're a solid bulwark against Sanders winning, even if he started pulling (improbable) upsets in New York and Pennsylvania. And then you'd run into the problem silby mentions.

clemenza, Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:55 (eight years ago) link

I think if Sanders makes another huge leap in popularity and wins big in places like NY, PA, MD -- seems unlikely to me but so does a lot of stuff that's actually happened -- HRC concedes graciously and campaigns hard for him in the general. She's a Democrat, she's a creature of the party, I think she cares a lot more about there being a Democrat in the White House than she cares whether it's her.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:58 (eight years ago) link

Yeah I don't understand why they are being reported as if they are already counted, exaggerating Clinton's lead.

Treeship, Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:59 (eight years ago) link

Is there any chance Clinton gets indicted for the email server nonsense before she locks up enough delegates for the Democratic nomination? I have no idea how seriously to take that investigation since the online commentary about it is totally wackadoo.

erry red flag (f. hazel), Sunday, 27 March 2016 17:01 (eight years ago) link

I only read 538 on this stuff so I didn't even know other places were reporting superdelegate counts, agree there's no reason to

Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, 27 March 2016 17:01 (eight years ago) link

we've discussed it before and i still see no reason to consider it a serious possibility. xp

Mordy, Sunday, 27 March 2016 17:07 (eight years ago) link

Thanks. My only line of reasoning for it being unlikely was how few Sanders supporters bring it up as a reason for him not to bow out until the convention.

erry red flag (f. hazel), Sunday, 27 March 2016 17:15 (eight years ago) link

adolescent conception

This counts as the "be an ADULT" argument, i collect $200

LOL, from the fucko who told people to "put on their pajamas" in the fucking Batman movie thread

i guess i'll just conclude my li'l victory dance/horselaugh over what Phil D considers coequal adolescent material and go watch The Straight Story in 35mm

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 27 March 2016 17:20 (eight years ago) link

Really trying to figure out whether the subtext of this entire thread is that Dr. Morbius is Armond White

Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, 27 March 2016 17:22 (eight years ago) link

That flowchart, widely shared on my feed, is awesome for people who think being undecided between Sanders and Trump is a reasonable political stance, not so much for everybody else.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, 27 March 2016 17:27 (eight years ago) link

I think if Sanders makes another huge leap in popularity and wins big in places like NY, PA, MD -- seems unlikely to me but so does a lot of stuff that's actually happened -- HRC concedes graciously and campaigns hard for him in the general. She's a Democrat, she's a creature of the party, I think she cares a lot more about there being a Democrat in the White House than she cares whether it's her.

― Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, March 27, 2016 12:58 PM (28 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i would bet my entire bank account against HRC doing this if i could -- she stayed in through june against obama, remember. besides, even if she started losing big states, she could still clinch the nomination with a sting showing in CA to close it out

k3vin k., Sunday, 27 March 2016 17:34 (eight years ago) link

HOF Freudian slip: "with a sting showing"--entraps Bernie in a heroin ring.

clemenza, Sunday, 27 March 2016 17:37 (eight years ago) link

I think she cares a lot more about there being a Democrat in the White House than she cares whether it's her.

nah

i mean yeah i'm sure she'd prefer sanders over a republican but there's no way she'd back off 'for the good of the party'. to her, the good of the party means her winning

mookieproof, Sunday, 27 March 2016 17:41 (eight years ago) link

i would bet my entire bank account against HRC doing this if i could

Sorry, I made it sound like I thought HRC would drop out in April -- I agree that's hard to imagine. I think she'd concede before the convention and campaign hard for him afterwards.

But again, I don't actually think any of this is actually going to happen; I think Clinton is going to win in New York and Maryland and Pennsylvania and go into the convention with a majority of delegates.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, 27 March 2016 17:42 (eight years ago) link

to her, the good of the party means her winning

We'll have to agree to disagree, I guess. To my eye her entire public life is that of a loyal soldier for the Democratic party. She didn't try to undercut Obama once it was clear he'd be the nominee, even though a President McCain would have given her an opening in 2012.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, 27 March 2016 17:45 (eight years ago) link

There is no way she would ever, ever, ever, do that. Are we talking about the same HRC?

Hadrian VIII, Sunday, 27 March 2016 17:47 (eight years ago) link

Yeah she only managed to impugn his professed religion ("as far as I know") and run a soft smear on him the whole time until she realized it was over and they agreed to make her the candidate next time.

Hadrian VIII, Sunday, 27 March 2016 17:48 (eight years ago) link

Her team also indirectly originated the Birther movement

Neanderthal, Sunday, 27 March 2016 17:52 (eight years ago) link

I am actually fascinated by this now, do you guys seriously think that if Sanders were the nominee Clinton would do anything other than go to the mat to get him elected President?

Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, 27 March 2016 17:55 (eight years ago) link

If he gets the nomination, obviously. But her standards of "once it's clear" would be very different from yours and mine.

Hadrian VIII, Sunday, 27 March 2016 17:58 (eight years ago) link

i.e. after the convention. This is their last chance, remember—at least until Chelsea is launched.

Hadrian VIII, Sunday, 27 March 2016 18:00 (eight years ago) link

yeah the only way hillary would drop out is if she's mathematically eliminated. which, with superdelegates, is probably not possible

k3vin k., Sunday, 27 March 2016 18:03 (eight years ago) link

So I guess this is where we differ. If Sanders somehow surges so strongly that he leads in pledged delegates, I see Clinton conceding at the convention.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, 27 March 2016 18:05 (eight years ago) link

until she realized it was over and they agreed to make her the candidate next time.

o rly

tremendous crime wave and killing wave (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Sunday, 27 March 2016 18:05 (eight years ago) link

Um you don't need to be a conspiracy theorist to understand this.

Hadrian VIII, Sunday, 27 March 2016 18:06 (eight years ago) link

But yeah yr probably right, that's why the field was also open to....Jim Webb. And why Wasserman-Schultz got the DNC chair post.

Hadrian VIII, Sunday, 27 March 2016 18:08 (eight years ago) link

She probably didn't leverage the PUMA vote in that meeting, either. Why do that? I mean, it's a merit-based system, right?

Hadrian VIII, Sunday, 27 March 2016 18:12 (eight years ago) link

you don't need to be a conspiracy theorist to understand this conspiracy i am alleging

Mordy, Sunday, 27 March 2016 18:15 (eight years ago) link

why would they need to explicitly promise her anything? she has been a part of the party, raising funds for the party, representing the party, her entire political career. that's why almost all the superdelegates are pledged to her - not bc they crudely promised her at the convention that if she supports obama they pinky-swear they'll vote for her eight years from now.

Mordy, Sunday, 27 March 2016 18:16 (eight years ago) link

You guys are shockingly naive about party politics.

Hadrian VIII, Sunday, 27 March 2016 18:20 (eight years ago) link

Well he insisted he's right again, don't you all feel foolish

Neanderthal, Sunday, 27 March 2016 18:21 (eight years ago) link

I guess that's one way to argue your point.

Hadrian VIII, Sunday, 27 March 2016 18:26 (eight years ago) link

no i believe you it's just amazing that they got 719 superdelegates to agree to keep this agreement quiet including the delegates who are voting for bernie

Mordy, Sunday, 27 March 2016 18:32 (eight years ago) link

if i were a superdelegate going for bernie i would tell cameras "the party promised hillary she would be the candidate next election and that's the only reason hillary has the majority of superdelegates right now"

Mordy, Sunday, 27 March 2016 18:33 (eight years ago) link

there are still backdoor greasejobs in politics but they're much more difficult to pull off in this day and age due to the omnipresence of insta-media and recording technology, so I tend to feel like Mordy's otm here.

Neanderthal, Sunday, 27 March 2016 18:39 (eight years ago) link

That flowchart, widely shared on my feed, is awesome for people who think being undecided between Sanders and Trump is a reasonable political stance, not so much for everybody else.

thread humorlessness reaching Park Slope Food Co-op levels

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 27 March 2016 18:40 (eight years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/NZNRiXR.gif

pplains, Sunday, 27 March 2016 18:43 (eight years ago) link

xpost Mordy ok you are being disingenuous now. Nobody said anything about a pinkie-promise or animal sacrifice or whatever it is you imagine I'm contending. The President is the de facto leader of the party. He holds sway over party rules and appointments. He had the power to readily advance a number of political allies, Daley people, Axelrod people, etc. (Don't forget HRC coming after him for Bill Ayers, btw.) But they felt they needed Hillary's endorsement, and were probably right. The terms are tacit, for fuck's sake it's been going on for hundreds of years—getting people jobs and in general discouraging—when the time comes—other potential candidates from raising too much money in the expectation he will back them.

Hadrian VIII, Sunday, 27 March 2016 18:51 (eight years ago) link

i don't really understand why all this matters

k3vin k., Sunday, 27 March 2016 18:52 (eight years ago) link

Some of us (me) responding (too strongly?) to notion upthread that HRC is all about putting the Party first. Carry on....

Hadrian VIII, Sunday, 27 March 2016 18:55 (eight years ago) link

first paragraph of today's NYT story is wow

Donald J. Trump and Senator Ted Cruz of Texas traded insults on Easter Sunday morning over recent smears against their wives, while Mr. Trump ruled out creating internment camps for American Muslims and said he would study a proposal to allow delegates to bring guns to the Republican National Convention.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Sunday, 27 March 2016 19:29 (eight years ago) link

packs a lot in

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Sunday, 27 March 2016 19:29 (eight years ago) link

imagine reading that sentence context-free about five or six years ago

global tetrahedron, Sunday, 27 March 2016 19:40 (eight years ago) link

some kind of left-wing nightmare fanfic

Nhex, Sunday, 27 March 2016 19:41 (eight years ago) link

shit that looks like an onion article but isn't

new noise, Sunday, 27 March 2016 19:45 (eight years ago) link

Mr. Trump said he had not seen the petition, which is aimed at candidates like himself, and that he would have to review it before commenting, although he noted he was a “very, very strong person for the Second Amendment.”

indistinguishable from Onion

mick signals, Sunday, 27 March 2016 20:12 (eight years ago) link

Right, he's going to "study the proposal."

timellison, Sunday, 27 March 2016 20:33 (eight years ago) link

He had the power to readily advance a number of political allies, Daley people, Axelrod people, etc.

I can't believe a sitting President advanced the person who served as his secretary of state instead of a Senator from Vermont with whom he'd had no meaningful dealings at all

must be a huge internal conspiracy

stoked that you can peel the scales from everybody's eyes on this, I have a question about jet fuel & steel beams when you get a minute

tremendous crime wave and killing wave (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Sunday, 27 March 2016 22:12 (eight years ago) link

we're also thinking that the president is as powerful as he was in FDR's time, i.e. patronage and 'leader of his party'

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 27 March 2016 22:17 (eight years ago) link

though I remember rumblings about how the HI dem machine would work in Clinton's favor

i said something like this. various retired titans including akaka were praising her to the skies at the time but i should have given more weight to the tulsi endorsement/commercials (which barely work the Billionaires angle at all; they're about iraq) and to what is probably an unusually intense anti-adventurism sentiment here that i used to think was mutually exclusive as a policy- or even tone-driver w the state's economically fundamental coziness w the u.s. military, but isn't. the place is a forward outpost and a testing ground; what would they want to attack anyone for.

sanders and hrc each opened two offices here -- one each in honolulu of course; sanders one in hilo; clinton one in wailuku on maui; this is so on-the-nose people laugh when they hear it. i suspect that setting up shop in what is roughly analogous to a rich suburb is a worse strategy when what separates you from both the state's second-largest pop center (hilo) and the majority of the state's "rural" pop (the island hilo's on) is not a medium-length drive but a chunk of pacific. by a week or so before the primary i'd realized (i am in hilo) that i'd basically never seen an hrc sign, or sticker, or supporter. like i posted upthread, the poll itself (i joined the dems and everything, sigh) looked like a bernie rally. when i dropped in on the office i actually laughed cuz i opened the door (to what until late last year was a failing sex shop called "private moments") and there was the earnest, organized young left again, all on laptops just like they'd never gone away -- but in general i think the sanders victory was cross-generational here and that the parts that weren't about all-the-other-politicians-are-liars were mostly about war. just thought yall would enjoy some anecdotal hindsight pundit exegesis on the lowest-stake race of the week

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 27 March 2016 22:50 (eight years ago) link

Mr. Clooney slips on a pair of boat shoes and runs, like an angry, flightless bird, to a neighbor’s house.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 27 March 2016 23:09 (eight years ago) link

that's why the field was also open to....Jim Webb.

Three weeks ago, I saw Webb (who I'd forgotten was actually in this early on) mentioned as a possible VP for Clinton. A few days ago, he said on TV he wouldn't vote for Clinton (but may vote for Trump). So I guess that brings that to a close.

clemenza, Sunday, 27 March 2016 23:58 (eight years ago) link

Feel like the discussion about Clinton as heir apparent misses the point if it becomes about whether Obama and the party specifically tried to sabotage Sanders or cut deals with superdelegates or something, which no one has actually asserted; the point is that Clinton walked in the door as the party's choice, with a bajillion endorsements locked in before anybody else even declared a candidacy. It looked and felt like a race with a sitting President, where people just do not run against them. Now, whether that was a quid pro quo worked out in June 2008, I dunno and kinda doubt... but it certainly seems like party actors had decided on a nominee very, very early.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 28 March 2016 00:05 (eight years ago) link

like after watching the Seinfeld finale

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 28 March 2016 00:17 (eight years ago) link

Hillary was the runner-up last time, and then the secretary of state. Of course she was the pre-emptive nominee.

Frederik B, Monday, 28 March 2016 00:36 (eight years ago) link

Brace yourself for some grief over "pre-emptive," Frederik.

clemenza, Monday, 28 March 2016 00:38 (eight years ago) link

she was also widely popular among democratic voters and her candidacy will be a historic event

iatee, Monday, 28 March 2016 00:45 (eight years ago) link

yeah i think any party is going to feel pretty good about having a candidate as ready-made as clinton waiting her turn.

doc casino otm tho -- maybe there was a deal, maybe there wasn't; i'm not sure what that changes, since she was gonna be the strongest candidate anyway

k3vin k., Monday, 28 March 2016 00:50 (eight years ago) link

eh there were no backroom meetings just a bunch of cuomo types doing the math and deciding not to waste a year of their life. this has been a huge contributor to sanders' success - he's never had to split the not-clinton votes or spotlight. if there were one more candidate that had *any* support, the math woulda never worked out for sanders.

iatee, Monday, 28 March 2016 00:54 (eight years ago) link

There was O'Malley. I suppose a more previously high profile person with a similar platform might have gotten more traction.

timellison, Monday, 28 March 2016 00:58 (eight years ago) link

Might have.

timellison, Monday, 28 March 2016 00:59 (eight years ago) link

yeah idk i think lumping all the "not clintons" in the same category might be a mistake, bernie sort of had his own lane and brand of followers

k3vin k., Monday, 28 March 2016 01:00 (eight years ago) link

sure I think that's true, he just also got every "I don't really like clinton" voter too

iatee, Monday, 28 March 2016 01:02 (eight years ago) link

I'm surprised O'Malley didn't get more traction! He's been, for years, that guy in Democratic politics about whom you hear "this is the guy you haven't heard of who's gonna be big."

Guayaquil (eephus!), Monday, 28 March 2016 01:02 (eight years ago) link

tbh we don't really know and probably never will, about deals made or inquiries rebuffed or whatever. not like it's some big secret, i just mean that it's the kind of thing that history won't necessarily give us access to. the cuomos of the world deciding not to run - which i agree has been very crucial for bernie, but not sufficient in any way to his success (see: gore/bradley) - gets us to a question of causality. okay, they decided not to run. why? because it was obvious they had no chance. why did they have no chance? some of them may have simply run the same factors iatee refers to and concluded it was no chance.

but another such factor would be knowing that all the doors are already going to be closed to you and that People Who Matter have already chosen to get on board this ship. it's not the 19th century anymore but it seems pretty obvious that you don't want to be on the wrong side in terms of endorsements, aiding and abetting, when it turns out Clinton wins the thing and it comes time to see who gets rewarded and who doesn't. or there could have been conversations like "hey mr. president/other party leader, i'm thinking about running" and they say "look, i like you a lot, that would be great, but you need to know that we're all pretty much ready to root for hillary here." i think part of clinton's inevitability was self-reinforcing, and you can imagine another universe where other passable democratic candidates not named o'malley would have thought, hey, this person's been beaten once before, she's associated with very unpopular foreign policies, she has some scandals going that might peter out but might weaken her, voters are ready for a fresh face, i'll be too old in 4/8 years.... or whatever. like, without that factor of her being ensconced as the obvious candidate, and having spent years laying the groundwork to maintain that spot, it's not really so obvious.

o'malley really struggled to offer any particular reason you should vote for him, there was no message or movement or (sorry) unique selling point there. and while there may have been some clinton non-fans out there (see also the hazy poll numbers Hypothetical Biden was showing for a while) it's also pretty clear that most clinton voters have a positive opinion of sanders (they just like clinton much more) and believe it or not vice versa, so there aren't THAT many votes up for grabs in the "i just really dislike clinton and want to vote for someone else" pool. it is a non-zero number obviously! but it doesn't seem to be enough to make a campaign on, or at least nobody really tried it; even sanders has not gone nearly as far as his supporters in articulating everything that is wrong with the clinton/clintonite worldview, even if he's provoked that conversation. (so, so much more has been written about the troubling aspects of clintonism, the compromises of the 90s, the iraq war and patriot act votes, than would ever have been written had sanders not been running - but he has not gotten up and said "this party was hijacked to an ideologically bankrupt but politically expedient center-right calculus twenty-five years ago and it's time to take it back" or whatever.)

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 28 March 2016 01:12 (eight years ago) link

the word on her seems to be she is a cynic who will do whatever it takes for power. i don't think that's true. even her interventionist tendencies -- like her pushing to back up the rebels in libya -- seem to be borne of idealism if anything. she may claim kissinger as a friend but i don't think she is machiavellian and ruthless the way he was.

― Treeship, Sunday, March 27, 2016 6:07 AM (Yesterday)

eh, it's pretty hard to put an "idealistic" spin on her role in the coup in honduras.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 28 March 2016 01:31 (eight years ago) link

she was also widely popular among democratic voters and her candidacy will be a historic event

She also sucks up cash like a SuperMop, AND considers the Mubaraks personal friends.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 28 March 2016 02:10 (eight years ago) link

sick freestyle

Neanderthal, Monday, 28 March 2016 02:11 (eight years ago) link

thats cool that theres a beer that predicts what job u will have

i guess that means i will be a fat tire soon

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Monday, 28 March 2016 02:54 (eight years ago) link

well then I'm a fuckin founding father bitches

Neanderthal, Monday, 28 March 2016 02:57 (eight years ago) link

which founding father will you be a-fuckin

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Monday, 28 March 2016 02:59 (eight years ago) link

damn it feels good to be a yuengling

Guayaquil (eephus!), Monday, 28 March 2016 02:59 (eight years ago) link

i bet she was very excited to open that case: "WHEW presidente, glad i didnt get "bartender", what a shitty...oh im sorry youre still here arent u? here, have a campaign button."

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Monday, 28 March 2016 03:04 (eight years ago) link

which founding father will you be a-fuckin

not really my favorite Roseanne Cash tune but a good'un

Neanderthal, Monday, 28 March 2016 03:04 (eight years ago) link

She also sucks up cash like a SuperMop, AND considers the Mubaraks personal friends.

― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, March 27, 2016 10:10 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

sick freestyle

― Neanderthal, Sunday, March 27, 2016 10:11 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lol

Heez, Monday, 28 March 2016 04:25 (eight years ago) link

Haven't read this yet, but when it showed up on my FB wall and I saw the headline, my first reaction wasn't "That's so ridiculous." It actually made sense at least a couple of ways right away.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/the-case-for-vice-president-al-franken-213756

clemenza, Monday, 28 March 2016 04:58 (eight years ago) link

i read that this morning. it's...actually kind of otm??????

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Monday, 28 March 2016 05:01 (eight years ago) link

the logic is basically: hrc needs the energized progressive vote and someone who can effectively manage the trump media circus. lots of other choices have too may downsides (sherrod brown leaving the senate means kasich picks his successor; julian castro too green and too pro-TPP; other women too womeny; not that many dem govs)

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Monday, 28 March 2016 05:03 (eight years ago) link

That's what I thought, beyond the obvious cover he provides from the left: that if you're going to face Trump, instead of the normal "attack dog," having someone with a sense of humour is your best way to highlight his ridiculousness.

clemenza, Monday, 28 March 2016 05:08 (eight years ago) link

thats basically it.

i was gonna share that article but then the author at the end was like "plus if its franken thatll make this more entertaining and thats what rly matters 4 me" and i was getting some morbsian apoplexy

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Monday, 28 March 2016 05:10 (eight years ago) link

It comes down in the end to how you view the prospect of facing Trump. If you see it as an unlosable election, you probably go for the safest pick possible--a familiar senator or someone. But if you instead see something incomparably strange and unpredictable ahead, where you can't just sit back and end up getting blindsided by something, you pick someone less obvious.

clemenza, Monday, 28 March 2016 05:57 (eight years ago) link

eh, it's pretty hard to put an "idealistic" spin on her role in the coup in honduras.― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), 28. marts 2016 03:31 (5 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This is really vague, and yet I'm 100% sure it's untrue.

Frederik B, Monday, 28 March 2016 07:08 (eight years ago) link

If she is genuinely naive enough to think that democracy and freedom would flourish under a brutal military dictatorship that's arguably more worrying than a cynical calculation to shore up American interests.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 28 March 2016 07:33 (eight years ago) link

Also, I've seen no evidence she had anything to do with the coup. And I checked for it the last time this kind of vague insinuations bubbled up in this thread. Although that time it was only her behaviour after the coup that was misconstrued.

Frederik B, Monday, 28 March 2016 10:24 (eight years ago) link

Misconstrued how?

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 28 March 2016 10:28 (eight years ago) link

it's a coup, they're misconstrued, c'mon

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 28 March 2016 10:30 (eight years ago) link

The political version of the croque monsieur

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Monday, 28 March 2016 10:48 (eight years ago) link

should probably go in the quiddities thread too:

It was about 9 p.m. on a recent Saturday, the first I had off in two months, and I was sipping an organic vodka and rosemary cocktail at a restaurant in Fort Greene, Brooklyn.

My cellphone rang. Bernie Sanders wanted to talk. He was worried that reporters were starting to conclude that he had no chance of winning the Democratic presidential nomination.

“I don’t want to disturb the media narrative too much,” he said wryly, with his unmistakable Brooklyn inflection. “But don’t write us off.”

The Sanders campaign is unlike any other this election cycle. The packed rallies of liberals, young people and union workers; the anger at Wall Street; the indie rock anthems; and the kiwi slices consumed aboard his campaign plane characterize a movement that feels both unexpected and yet perfectly aligned with this cultural moment.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/29/us/politics/bernie-sanders-campaign.html?ribbon-ad-idx=4&rref=homepage&module=Ribbon&version=origin®ion=Header&action=click&contentCollection=Home%20Page&pgtype=article

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 28 March 2016 10:52 (eight years ago) link

x-posts: It was insinuated that the Americans supported the coup because they insisted on new elections instead of reinstating the overthrown president. Without bringing the constitutional crisis into the equation (and also leaving out the fact that he would have had to step down in november 2009 anyway, as the constitution doesn't allow for re-election)

Frederik B, Monday, 28 March 2016 10:54 (eight years ago) link

Clinton admits to having strategised with other LATAM leaders to work on a transition of power, rather than allowing Zelaya back - which went against the EU, UN and OAS line on the legitimacy of his removal and contradicted Obama's own statement that he was the proper president of Honduras. Even if you want to read some kind of noble intent into the statement that she was working towards ensuring free and fair elections in continuing to provide political and material support for the interim government, it clearly didn't work. The elections were rigged and the country has seen a horrific, ongoing wave of political murders ever since.

Propping up dictatorships is part of the job description but if she's an idealist, she's an incredibly naive and inept one.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 28 March 2016 11:11 (eight years ago) link

Ah I was wondering about the ilx favouritism shown but that'd be it

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Monday, 28 March 2016 11:23 (eight years ago) link

x-post: Link? There was a transition of power at the exact time that it was supposed to be, according to the constitution. Which is a pretty significant detail, imo.

Frederik B, Monday, 28 March 2016 11:30 (eight years ago) link

Wait, do you want me to provide a link to the effect that the 2009 Honduran election was not free and fair or a link to prove that there has been a horrific wave of political murder? Are you disputing the idea that there was a coup?

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 28 March 2016 11:33 (eight years ago) link

No. I'd like a link to Hillary discussing her own role.

Frederik B, Monday, 28 March 2016 11:39 (eight years ago) link

It's in her autobiography, Hard Choices, though the key quote is this:

“In the subsequent days I spoke with my counterparts around the hemisphere, including Secretary Espinosa in Mexico,” Clinton writes. “We strategized on a plan to restore order in Honduras and ensure that free and fair elections could be held quickly and legitimately, which would render the question of Zelaya moot.”

None of this is really disputed, even by Clinton supporters.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 28 March 2016 11:43 (eight years ago) link

I'm sure Fred can step up to the plate though.

A Fifth Beatle Dies (Tom D.), Monday, 28 March 2016 11:58 (eight years ago) link

well she said "free and fair" so that checks out

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 28 March 2016 13:36 (eight years ago) link

@ShariVari: No, I'm not disputing any of that either. But I don't find that quote supports a lot of the insinuations out there about her role in the time after the coup, not to say anything about any alleged 'role in the coup' as said by JD upthread.

Also, just out of curiosity, where is that quote from? The fact that it includes 'Clinton writes' makes me think it's not taken directly from the book ;)

Frederik B, Monday, 28 March 2016 14:00 (eight years ago) link

but maybe that was THE GHOSTWRITER protecting her??!!!!

Neanderthal, Monday, 28 March 2016 14:06 (eight years ago) link

crut, that's not how ShariVari quoted it. I wasn't disputing the quote at all, I was just interested in knowing where he took it from, and reading the context. ShariVari often has interesting links.

Frederik B, Monday, 28 March 2016 14:32 (eight years ago) link

The quote was copied from an Al Jazeera article but reported in the same way by Huff Post, Slate, the Guardian and others.

The whole segment of the book is instructive, though - rolling back the idea that a coup even took place and implying that everything more or less worked out well in the transition back to civilian rule. There is no mention of death squads, the suspension of habeas corpus, the removal of the right to free speech and freedom of association during the election period, the overwhelming condemnation of Zelaya's removal by the international community, etc.

Whether the U.S. had a role in planning the coup is a grey area and it's perfectly possible they didn't (state department people on the ground appear to have condemned it in internal memos) but whitewashing what happened isn't accidental.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Monday, 28 March 2016 14:58 (eight years ago) link

How Clinton’s email scandal took root

The FBI is now trying to determine whether a crime was committed in the handling of that classified material. It is also examining whether the server was hacked.

One hundred forty-seven FBI agents have been deployed to run down leads, according to a lawmaker briefed by FBI Director James B. Comey. The FBI has accelerated the investigation because officials want to avoid the possibility of announcing any action too close to the election.

Karl Malone, Monday, 28 March 2016 15:06 (eight years ago) link

Well there's not a whole lot else for them to do

El Tomboto, Monday, 28 March 2016 15:26 (eight years ago) link

this ought to be "self-recommending" but idk if i have the energy for it -- patricia lockwood goes to a trump rally

https://newrepublic.com/article/131936/lost-trumplandia

goole, Monday, 28 March 2016 15:51 (eight years ago) link

thanks for posting that, i'm enjoying it immensely

Karl Malone, Monday, 28 March 2016 16:16 (eight years ago) link

Can anyone explain clearly to me the current delegate "math" situation? What I really want is to see what the dem primary looks like without superdelegates, i.e., assuming the superdelegates will switch to whoever has the majority of vote/caucus-based delegates, what percent of the remaining vote/caucus-based delegates does Bernie need to get a majority of them?

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Monday, 28 March 2016 16:17 (eight years ago) link

I know that it's 1243 to 975 in non-super delegates right now. I'm unclear on how many non-super delegates remain.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Monday, 28 March 2016 16:18 (eight years ago) link

iirc, he needs to win ~58% of remaining pledged delegates

Karl Malone, Monday, 28 March 2016 16:19 (eight years ago) link

ignore the dumb title/url: http://www.npr.org/2016/03/27/472056754/despite-the-math-bernie-sanders-has-already-won

Going into the day, he would have needed 58 percent of all remaining delegates for a pledged majority. Coming out, he would need 57 percent. With superdelegates factored in, he needs a whopping 67 percent of all remaining delegates. (The Sanders campaign is focused on winning a pledged majority, because superdelegates can switch their allegiances. The Sanders team believes they will do that if he wins a pledged majority.)

Karl Malone, Monday, 28 March 2016 16:19 (eight years ago) link

be sure to read the article, though, especially the latter half where it details how well he would need to do in key upcoming primaries

Karl Malone, Monday, 28 March 2016 16:21 (eight years ago) link

Truly, use the Fivethirtyeight delegate tracker - it's really good:
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/delegate-targets/democrats/

The only thing that's confusing is 538 "targets". These "targets" are based on candidates' past demographic results. Most of Bernie Sanders' wins will come from certain demographics; ditto for Clinton. In states with tons of young people and progressives, for instance, he is expected to do well. He will have a high "target" there. In states with lots of POC, olds and moderates, Clinton will do well. Her target will be higher there. If a candidate is trailing their target, they are falling short of what they need to (eventually) clinch the nomination, given state-by-state demographics.

The targets are relevant/interesting because they factor in future races. Demographically, Sanders is expected to do well in many of the races yet to come; he is still behind where he ought to be if he hopes to clinch.

sean gramophone, Monday, 28 March 2016 16:37 (eight years ago) link

the problem with those "targets" is i don't think they've updated them since the beginning of the race. so bernie actually needs to outperform those targets by quite a bit to get to a majority

k3vin k., Monday, 28 March 2016 16:39 (eight years ago) link

x-post to article about 147 FBI agents under its Republican head, Comey investigating the email thing

http://nypost.com/2016/03/20/will-hillary-get-charged-or-what/

unnamed "career agents" say...

curmudgeon, Monday, 28 March 2016 16:44 (eight years ago) link

<i>the problem with those "targets" is i don't think they've updated them since the beginning of the race. so bernie actually needs to outperform those targets by quite a bit to get to a majority</i>

Yes - because he is at a deficit he needs to outperform the target in each state.

But the targets are v helpful because they put the candidates' delegate counts into perspective after a given state primary/caucus. "Bernie wins!" is irrelevant. But seeing how well Clinton/Sanders did vs their target lets you understand how momentum or expectatons are shifting.

sean gramophone, Monday, 28 March 2016 17:03 (eight years ago) link

yeah

k3vin k., Monday, 28 March 2016 17:12 (eight years ago) link

58% - 57%, by the way, is rounded. I think he made up closer to a percentage point and a half on Saturday and I have the remaining pledged delegates needed at 56.7%.

timellison, Monday, 28 March 2016 17:24 (eight years ago) link

(The Sanders campaign is focused on winning a pledged majority, because superdelegates can switch their allegiances. The Sanders team believes they will do that if he wins a pledged majority.)

This is OK for public consumption, because it places a burden of expectations on the party, but it does not describe the Democratic Party as I know it or the designated role of superdelegates to save the party from the enthusiasm of its progressive voters.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 28 March 2016 17:37 (eight years ago) link

did this already get covered here? http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/donald-trump-republican-convention-213770
this is going to be so much fun

other people systems as applicable (El Tomboto), Monday, 28 March 2016 17:41 (eight years ago) link

(xpost) Isn't that more or less what happened in 2008 (leaving aside the word "progressive"; it's fair to say that the enthusiasm was on Obama's side).

https://espnfivethirtyeight.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/silver-superdelegates-1.png?w=575&h=465

clemenza, Monday, 28 March 2016 17:56 (eight years ago) link

Obviously, Clinton's superdelegate lead is much larger this time.

clemenza, Monday, 28 March 2016 17:57 (eight years ago) link

The Patricia Lockwood article is v good

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 28 March 2016 18:09 (eight years ago) link

That Politico piece is ridiculous. A whole lot of contorting to avoid the fact that way more actual individual primary voters have voted for Trump than for any other individual candidate. The author should have just extended his dumb "95 yards of a hundred-yard dash" analogy by saying the "not-Trumps" won the race because Ted ran 65 yards, Marco ran 45 and Kasich ran 30 or some such foolishness.

evol j, Monday, 28 March 2016 18:40 (eight years ago) link

i think he makes a few valid points though. the degree to which non-trump republican voters seem to actually hate trump seems unusual. and they make up a majority of the republican electorate.

Treeship, Monday, 28 March 2016 18:42 (eight years ago) link

for sure, and the party is well within its rights to deny him the nomination according to the agreed-upon rules, I just think it's disingenuous to so blatantly evade the fact that he's gotten significantly more votes so far than anyone else.

evol j, Monday, 28 March 2016 18:47 (eight years ago) link

berniebro on fb breathlessly pinging me w/ every update on this hillary email case. he claims he doesn't actually want her to be indicted but it seems pretty transparent. i told him to msg me again when they actually indict her but he couldn't help himself :(

Mordy, Monday, 28 March 2016 18:48 (eight years ago) link

i wish she hadn't set up the server in her bathroom. that detail makes the whole thing way better fodder for the conspiracy-minded aka republicans

Treeship, Monday, 28 March 2016 18:49 (eight years ago) link

That Politico piece is ridiculous.

If you say so. But the American political system has never been a direct democracy. It always interposes representatives and procedural rules between the mass of citizens and the power to make decisions. Trump is basing his argument on principles of direct democracy, but even then it is a weak argument, if he does not command the votes of either a majority of voters or a majority of delegates.

In a parliamentary system, someone in Trump's position would have to make a coalition and share power, which is what he'll effectively be expected to do at the convention: seek coalition partners who will allow him to control an actual majority, not just a plurality. If he can't put together a majority coalition, but Cruz or someone else can, then fuck him, he has lost the nomination and it is fair and square.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 28 March 2016 19:10 (eight years ago) link

"fair and square" are not legal principles - they're in the eye of the beholder. and when your system is built on legitimacy what matters is perception not the arcane bylaws of a political party (esp when part of what is under threat is said party's authority as a representative of its voting base)

Mordy, Monday, 28 March 2016 19:23 (eight years ago) link

I just like that they're in an unresolvable bind. They won't be breaking any rules by denying Trump, but they will have a mutiny. And if they give it to him, they'll have Trump. Good luck.

clemenza, Monday, 28 March 2016 19:29 (eight years ago) link

remember they can make any laws they want. they can say first day in cleveland: "electors have been reduced to 1: mitt romney." the problem isn't the breaking the rules, the problem is not picking trump without alienating his supporters. afaict there's no way to do it unless someone else comes into the convention w/ more delegates.

Mordy, Monday, 28 March 2016 19:34 (eight years ago) link

prevailing wisdom is that hillary would never pick bernie or that he would never take it because he'd have more power in the senate. but nothing is getting passed in the senate anyway, and vermont is a safe seat to defend... VP slot is where you make speeches, which Bernie is good at, and it'd allow Hillary to grab a few economic populists from trump, sate the young, etc. why wouldn't hillary offer him?

global tetrahedron, Monday, 28 March 2016 19:39 (eight years ago) link

Nobody cares how they do whatever. clemenza otm. this disastrous shit show couldn't happen to a nicer bunch.

other people systems as applicable (El Tomboto), Monday, 28 March 2016 19:41 (eight years ago) link

xp - they're both elderly. Someone on the ticket needs to not qualify for Early Bird Senior Specials.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 28 March 2016 19:45 (eight years ago) link

sherrod brown maybe? if she was asked i think warren would say yes. there are options in the party who are younger + target similar audiences that bernie does.

Mordy, Monday, 28 March 2016 19:46 (eight years ago) link

clinton/bernie would seem like a one term plan to me, not a plan for another 12-16 years of Democratic control

akm, Monday, 28 March 2016 19:47 (eight years ago) link

oh, milo said basically the same thing

akm, Monday, 28 March 2016 19:47 (eight years ago) link

Assuming Trump doesn't have an outright majority and none of the other candidates with delegates are anywhere near to being aligned with Trump's positions, then it means the results of the election process were inconclusive. Any conclusion arrived at will be a kludge, one that yokes together pieces that don't fit and don't agree. This falling apart is a natural outcome of the Republican party's internal divisions. The only process that works in such a case is horse-trading, bargaining and compromise, which the Republican base has been taught to revile and will cause many of them to turn away from the result, whatever it is.

So, it's just as many people have pointed out, a case of sowing the wind and reaping the whirlwind. The convention will award the nomination to someone, and whoever they choose will not represent the party, because a party so divided cannot be represented by any one.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 28 March 2016 19:50 (eight years ago) link

Sherrod Brown would be great, if only because it would put his wife, former Cleveland Plain Dealer writer Connie Schultz, at the White House on a regular basis; thereby causing early death via heart attack for thousands of moronic Ohioans whose letters I've seen in the PD over the years and who comment on her Facebook page.

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Monday, 28 March 2016 19:50 (eight years ago) link

please tell me you guys understand why sherrod brown would be an awful pick for VP

k3vin k., Monday, 28 March 2016 20:02 (eight years ago) link

from whose perspective? i can imagine his constituents would prefer him in the senate but i only see upside for hillary's campaign in putting a young white male populist reformer type from a major swing state on the ticket.

Mordy, Monday, 28 March 2016 20:08 (eight years ago) link

prevailing wisdom is that hillary would never pick bernie or that he would never take it because he'd have more power in the senate. but nothing is getting passed in the senate anyway, and vermont is a safe seat to defend... VP slot is where you make speeches, which Bernie is good at, and it'd allow Hillary to grab a few economic populists from trump, sate the young, etc. why wouldn't hillary offer him?

Bernie is just fine in the Senate, thanks. Why would he be veep when he'd be reliant on the generosity of the president for any power or influencee?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 28 March 2016 20:10 (eight years ago) link

that seems to be the CW but i think when you're asked to be VP it's very hard to say no

Mordy, Monday, 28 March 2016 20:12 (eight years ago) link

assume k3vin means that kasich would get to appoint his replacement, in a year when retaking the senate is more precarious than winning the presidency

sciatica, Monday, 28 March 2016 20:12 (eight years ago) link

when a senator vacates his seat to work in the executive branch, his replacement is picked by that state's governor. sherrod brown represents ohio. ohio's governor is john kasich

k3vin k., Monday, 28 March 2016 20:12 (eight years ago) link

bernie has said any endorsement of hillary would come with a 'so what are you going to do for me/my supporters' sort of leveraging. i feel like he could add a lot to the ticket and he might do it if given certain concessions/leeway. i dunno.

global tetrahedron, Monday, 28 March 2016 20:15 (eight years ago) link

he loses any ability to continue exerting that leverage in the future when he agrees to be her subordinate

sciatica, Monday, 28 March 2016 20:19 (eight years ago) link

whatever movement Sanders leads dies when he enters the White House. I don't get it. It's like libs who wanted Warren to run for president.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 28 March 2016 20:21 (eight years ago) link

how marvelous to have some fiction of a liberal firebrand cohort in the Senate. Ted Kennedy was the last of'em.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 28 March 2016 20:22 (eight years ago) link

Hillary Clinton is not going to pick a 70+ y.o. socialist from the northeast to be on her ticket you guys cmon

Clay, Monday, 28 March 2016 20:23 (eight years ago) link

It's like some of you guys post on this thread without having read all of the article links that other people have posted to this thread.
I thought this was for serious people.

other people systems as applicable (El Tomboto), Monday, 28 March 2016 20:23 (eight years ago) link

Sanders needs to pass on his recently-acquired mantle of leadership of the progressives to someone else as soon as he is able. Warren would prob be a fine choice for this. Then Sanders can become the elder statesman of the 'movement', such as it is.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 28 March 2016 20:25 (eight years ago) link

I think Bernie accepting VP is even less likely than Clinton offering it -- it gives him nothing.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Monday, 28 March 2016 20:28 (eight years ago) link

how marvelous to have some fiction of a liberal firebrand cohort in the Senate. Ted Kennedy was the last of'em.

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, March 28, 2016 4:22 PM (3 minutes ago)

you've made this point about 100 times but i've never really been on board with it. senators have a lot of power, but ultimately they're one of 100 people making up one half of the legislative branch. the president runs the executive branch. i'd rather warren be president. (why does anyone run for president, then? ego?)

k3vin k., Monday, 28 March 2016 20:28 (eight years ago) link

Senators don't have term limits.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 28 March 2016 20:31 (eight years ago) link

she's 66!

k3vin k., Monday, 28 March 2016 20:32 (eight years ago) link

Should Warren ever for prez and lose, she becomes a losing prez candidate who may have also lost her seat for the sake of running for the presidency. Perfect way to destroy her.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 28 March 2016 20:33 (eight years ago) link

*ever run for prez

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 28 March 2016 20:33 (eight years ago) link

in a hypothetical nomination process where warren replaced bernie, running against hillary clinton, i think warren would be winning. bernie has surprised a lot of people and has been a better campaigner than i think most people expected. but (this is anecdotal, yeah) before this election cycle started (or wait...they don't end or start anymore, do they?), most of my friends were way more fired up about warren than any other national politician, and it wasn't even close. the fact that bernie sanders has done this well suggests to me that warren would be doing even better.

Karl Malone, Monday, 28 March 2016 20:37 (eight years ago) link

and i also don't get the thinking where she has more influence as a senator than she does as the president of the united states. i also don't understand why she'd lose her senate seat if she ran for president. she's senator until 2018, right?

BASICALLY WE DISAGREE ALFRED

Karl Malone, Monday, 28 March 2016 20:40 (eight years ago) link

the mailman...delivers

Neanderthal, Monday, 28 March 2016 20:41 (eight years ago) link

the mailman always relies on anecdotal information to make a point

Karl Malone, Monday, 28 March 2016 20:41 (eight years ago) link

xposts agreed there's no way Hillary picks Bernie Sanders for that slot. There's no value-added, it gives oppo the add'l "Commie" target, and anyway as Alfred says upthread why would he ever accept? It's asking to be marginalized. Same for Warren. Unfortunately, balancing the ticket will not mean appeasing disgruntled progressives. Esp. for HRC.

Hadrian VIII, Monday, 28 March 2016 20:42 (eight years ago) link

and i also don't get the thinking where she has more influence as a senator than she does as the president of the united states. i also don't understand why she'd lose her senate seat if she ran for president. she's senator until 2018, right?

BASICALLY WE DISAGREE ALFRED

― Karl Malone,

Not if we swap Warren for k3vin

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 28 March 2016 20:44 (eight years ago) link

xpost anyway not trying to be confrontational or anything, i just don't think warren running for president is/was a ridiculously bad idea. my gut is that she would do well. i'm biased because i personally think she's fantastic, i think she's a great public speaker, and a great communicator. also i really really really want to help elect the first female president, and i would be sooooo much more into that if it were warren instead of clinton.

Karl Malone, Monday, 28 March 2016 20:44 (eight years ago) link

ultimately they're one of 100 people making up one half of the legislative branch. the president runs the executive branch.

This is reductive in the extreme. The president "runs" the executive branch - by adhering to laws, made by the legislature - for up to 8 years. A single Senator, even one who only wins two terms, can powerfully influence the direction of the executive branch for 12 years, and can, with sufficient committee influence, subpoena any member of the executive branch to hold them accountable and hence the entire President's administration.

An influential Senator decides to run for President entirely because of ego and perhaps for a change of pace (i.e. recesses are boring for them)

other people systems as applicable (El Tomboto), Monday, 28 March 2016 20:47 (eight years ago) link

Not if we swap Warren for k3vin

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, March 28, 2016 4:44 PM (3 minutes ago)

i would bring the people togethuh

k3vin k., Monday, 28 March 2016 20:48 (eight years ago) link

you just get a bunch of birds to follow you around and fly all over you, people love that

Karl Malone, Monday, 28 March 2016 20:48 (eight years ago) link

xpost the Captain and Tenille platform

Neanderthal, Monday, 28 March 2016 20:49 (eight years ago) link

EW still biding time w/ endorsement. If she ever did sign onto Sanders (I don't believe she will) and they made the highly unusual move of announcing her as running mate in the next few weeks, I don't see how they wouldn't sweep past HRC. If in such a scenario Bernie, at 74, announced his intention to serve a single term making EW presumptive 2020 nominee/pseudo-incumbent they would probably get a double-digit bounce.....

Hadrian VIII, Monday, 28 March 2016 20:50 (eight years ago) link

the president "runs" the executive branch by appointing all of the people who run its divisions (departments), who answer either directly or indirectly to the president; appointing the members of the federal judiciary, including the supreme court, when vacancies arise; and by signing into law or vetoing bills voted on by the legislative branch. among other things. no one is gonna slatepitch me that a senator *well actually* has more power than a president

k3vin k., Monday, 28 March 2016 20:51 (eight years ago) link

look, guys, we all love Elizabeth Warren -- we're fighting about where she'd do the most good.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 28 March 2016 20:52 (eight years ago) link

no I'm actually fighting about the fact that civics 101 is not sufficient to explain all the complexities of power and influence in DC, especially when comparing an 8 year term to a career that might easily span 30+ years

other people systems as applicable (El Tomboto), Monday, 28 March 2016 21:04 (eight years ago) link

in addition to the idea that elected officials are real people with their own agency and career choices to make instead of comic book characters who should take up excalibur and fight for us because it would be awesome, that's why

other people systems as applicable (El Tomboto), Monday, 28 March 2016 21:06 (eight years ago) link

but k3vin knows how the executive branch works so stick a fork in me folks I'm donezo

other people systems as applicable (El Tomboto), Monday, 28 March 2016 21:07 (eight years ago) link

artist's conception of warren at the end of her 30+ year senate career

http://i.imgur.com/M6vIvHq.jpg

Karl Malone, Monday, 28 March 2016 21:07 (eight years ago) link

no I'm actually fighting about the fact that civics 101 is not sufficient to explain all the complexities of power and influence in DC, especially when comparing an 8 year term to a career that might easily span 30+ years

― other people systems as applicable (El Tomboto), Monday, March 28, 2016 5:04 PM (3 minutes ago)

we're talking about this in the context of warren, who's in her late 60s. but anyway i'd still disagree, a president's legacy lives on long after they've left office, through their judicial appointments especially

k3vin k., Monday, 28 March 2016 21:10 (eight years ago) link

in addition to the idea that elected officials are real people with their own agency and career choices to make instead of comic book characters who should take up excalibur and fight for us because it would be awesome, that's why

― other people systems as applicable (El Tomboto), Monday, March 28, 2016 5:06 PM (4 minutes ago)

no one is blaming warren for not running, take a deep breath

k3vin k., Monday, 28 March 2016 21:10 (eight years ago) link

it seems like there would be a ton variables making one position more "powerful" or effective than another, e.g. who controls congress and by what margin, the number and import of the preceding admin's executive orders needing to be reversed, whether or not as an executive you are capable of still wielding influence in congress, etc.

Hadrian VIII, Monday, 28 March 2016 21:12 (eight years ago) link

FWIW I think a lot of Presidents' legacies lives on because most popular history is still stuck on biographies of "great men" instead of how shit actually works

other people systems as applicable (El Tomboto), Monday, 28 March 2016 21:14 (eight years ago) link

Personally I think she'd be more valuable in the white house. For one, progressive replacement would ride her coattails into the senate here in MA, she would demonstrate combativeness and put a bright face on progressivism nationally.

Hadrian VIII, Monday, 28 March 2016 21:17 (eight years ago) link

in know senators still have to spend most of their time on the phone begging for money, presidents don't have that duty anymore, do they?

i understand that's the reason people jump from the senate to a cabinet post, which always seems like a huge step down and a political death sentence from the outside, to me. but it's probably cushier!

goole, Monday, 28 March 2016 21:18 (eight years ago) link

Senators confirm judicial and cabinet appointments - Senators write the laws the President gets to sign - Senators (as above) get to hold the executive branch "accountable" at their whimsy if they accrue sufficient influence, and they can do all of this for decades. They also get to try all impeachments. Senators are the most atavistic and undemocratic aspect of our entire enterprise, and I include the judiciary in that (which has extensive processes of appeal and review etc - the Senate just does shit and if you don't like it well elect a new one, three elections at a time)

other people systems as applicable (El Tomboto), Monday, 28 March 2016 21:18 (eight years ago) link

senate to a cabinet post, which always seems like a huge step down and a political death sentence from the outside, to me. but it's probably cushier!

Retirement lap. And sets you up for a much more lucrative private sector post-retirement lap lap.

other people systems as applicable (El Tomboto), Monday, 28 March 2016 21:19 (eight years ago) link

Best way to rid the Republic of a nuisance legislator is to kick'em to the executive branch

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 28 March 2016 21:30 (eight years ago) link

The reason it's unusual to announce your running mate before you have clinched the nomination is the same it's unusual to name your cabinet picks before you have clinched the nomination. Ditto promising to serve only one term.

Not many people do these things because (A) they are rightly perceived as gun-jumping and gimmicky, (B) they are as grounded in reality as fantasy baseball is, and (C) because few voters make their decisions based on these kinds of tissue-paper promises.

Also they've basically never worked, but I know that 2016 is not he year in which one is permitted to cite history as precedent.

leprechaundriac (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 28 March 2016 21:34 (eight years ago) link

gah, The reason it's unusual to announce your running mate before you have clinched the nomination is the same reason why it's unusual to name your cabinet picks before you have clinched the nomination.

leprechaundriac (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 28 March 2016 21:37 (eight years ago) link

i half expected Trump to name his and then to attempt to enter the White HOuse to start working last week

Neanderthal, Monday, 28 March 2016 21:43 (eight years ago) link

I like Warren but I actually think she's an annoying public speaker, she sound patronizing all the time. Plus I still think the Indian this is a ding on her, regardless of whether or not she used it to her 'advantage' (I don'tt hink she did, but I also don't like people claiming heritage based on family lore of cherokee princesses, she should know better). She's fine in the Senate.

akm, Monday, 28 March 2016 21:48 (eight years ago) link

remember when trump called her "the indian"? cool guy

Treeship, Monday, 28 March 2016 21:51 (eight years ago) link

the main thing I didn't like about that was the insinuation that being indian was somehow less.

akm, Monday, 28 March 2016 21:52 (eight years ago) link

yeah, i interpreted it as totally racist.

Treeship, Monday, 28 March 2016 21:54 (eight years ago) link

ed kilgore on the logistical mess of planning the RNC convention:

...News-media interest in a contested convention so far has focused almost entirely on byzantine scenarios for the presidential balloting and what they might produce. But a better and more immediate question is whether chaos will break out long before the balloting begins, in the full view of cameras and with no one in particular in charge.

As I’ve confirmed by conversations with veterans of conventions in both parties (and from my own experience as a script and speech staffer at six Democratic conventions), the modern national party conclave is designed to be celebratory, not deliberative. Many internal convention decisions normally made by the putative nominee’s operatives will have to be made some other way, and the number of conflicts could massively proliferate if the nomination contest spills over into every corner of the event, making every routine decision part of the struggle for power. Is the chairman of the host committee who typically greets delegates after the opening gavel a Trump person or a Cruz person? Maybe the convention needs two greeters! Is there boilerplate language in the draft platform carried over from the last five conventions that could serve as a point of departure for undermining a candidate’s support (e.g., vague support for trade agreements condemned as job losers by Trump or for infrastructure investments condemned by Cruz as wasteful)? They won’t be boilerplate anymore; they could become the meat and potatoes of minority reports and platform fights. Normally noncontroversial proceedings such as credentials and rules could and probably will become exceptionally controversial, making “neutral” decision-making by the event’s nomenklatura impossible.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/03/this-problem-might-cause-chaos-at-gop-convention.html#

Karl Malone, Monday, 28 March 2016 21:54 (eight years ago) link

Paul Ryan should invite Rage Against the Machine to play. Iirc that worked out last time, and besides, he's a fan.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 28 March 2016 21:58 (eight years ago) link

i bet someone in the RNC invites springsteen to play born in the usa EVERY YEAR

Karl Malone, Monday, 28 March 2016 22:00 (eight years ago) link

Pink Floyd might be more apt

Neanderthal, Monday, 28 March 2016 22:01 (eight years ago) link

"Ooh babe, of course mama's gonna help build the wall" would be a neat, gender bending slogan for Trump he should think about it

Treeship, Monday, 28 March 2016 22:03 (eight years ago) link

Maybe we hypothesized this already when I asked rhetorically so many posts back, but when Trump doesn't lose, how will he go out? Swinging and starting shit? I expect he'd go out like Ice T at the end of the "OG" album:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1YH6u6jHzY

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 28 March 2016 22:03 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38_MwcGDNhQ

Neanderthal, Monday, 28 March 2016 22:07 (eight years ago) link

I like the way CNN described Trump's threatened lawsuit over Louisiana delegates: "Donald Trump and Ted Cruz now have something to fight about other than their wives."

clemenza, Monday, 28 March 2016 22:09 (eight years ago) link

and over who the most hated man in america is

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 28 March 2016 22:40 (eight years ago) link

Cruz's face looks like a croissant

Neanderthal, Monday, 28 March 2016 22:46 (eight years ago) link

one that hasn't been baked yet, maybe, like a pillsbury crescent straight out the fridge

Treeship, Monday, 28 March 2016 22:48 (eight years ago) link

"Ted Cruz has the face of an unbaked croissant" is solid gold, thanking you both

other people systems as applicable (El Tomboto), Monday, 28 March 2016 23:01 (eight years ago) link

so does il douche though tbf, or maybe it's more like an unbaked hungryman

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 28 March 2016 23:05 (eight years ago) link

his is more like playdough that got left out in the sun

Neanderthal, Monday, 28 March 2016 23:05 (eight years ago) link

sorry, hungry jack xpost

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 28 March 2016 23:07 (eight years ago) link

iirc Warren got added to a school register through no action of her own and spoke speculatively about her heritage (ie she spoke of stories she had heard) rather than saying definitively that she has Indian roots.

bamcquern, Monday, 28 March 2016 23:08 (eight years ago) link

lotta movement towards Trump in the Wisconsin race today in the Pollsplus and BETTING MARKETs today.

gonna be a close one, though not winner-take-all, one I think Cruz needs to win for narrative.

really feel like it's a shame that Pennsylvania has both Kasich and Cruz doing decently, if one of them was in single digits he could just do the "vote for my enemy" Ohio strategy again.

xpost yeah that whole thing got twisted around badly

Neanderthal, Monday, 28 March 2016 23:09 (eight years ago) link

Someone needs to compile the list of things that Ted Cruz's face has been compared to. I like Taibbi's: "It looks like someone sewed pieces of a waterlogged Reagan mask together at gunpoint."

schwantz, Monday, 28 March 2016 23:11 (eight years ago) link

be a good coffee table book

Neanderthal, Monday, 28 March 2016 23:13 (eight years ago) link

re: Warren

she's 66!

Life expectancy for women, especially women with money and good health care, is pretty high.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 28 March 2016 23:36 (eight years ago) link

remember they can make any laws they want. they can say first day in cleveland: "electors have been reduced to 1: mitt romney." the problem isn't the breaking the rules, the problem is not picking trump without alienating his supporters. afaict there's no way to do it unless someone else comes into the convention w/ more delegates.

Well, they would also like to look like grow ups, but they could presumably just post a resolution saying "this guy is a fascist, fuck this guy" (not without a sense of irony, but). The problem with not alienating his supporters is that a lot of them are his supporters rather than Republicans (or necessarily conservatives) - even with a plurality in Cruz's hands, Trump has e.g. previously talked about how Cruz stole Iowa from him: it wouldn't take much for him to convince them that a screw job was occurring, leaving them feeling disenfranchised (and possibly riotous).

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 28 March 2016 23:46 (eight years ago) link

Neil deGrasse Tyson has opinions about stuff:

https://twitter.com/neiltyson/status/708817118150537216

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 00:04 (eight years ago) link

EW still biding time w/ endorsement. If she ever did sign onto Sanders (I don't believe she will) and they made the highly unusual move of announcing her as running mate in the next few weeks, I don't see how they wouldn't sweep past HRC. If in such a scenario Bernie, at 74, announced his intention to serve a single term making EW presumptive 2020 nominee/pseudo-incumbent they would probably get a double-digit bounce.....

o rly

mookieproof, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 00:09 (eight years ago) link

wow that guy has some bad tweets

xp

JoeStork, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 00:09 (eight years ago) link

I don't see how they wouldn't sweep past HRC.

Maybe that is because the future is so hard to see.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 01:12 (eight years ago) link

we didn't really talk about Trump's NYT interview on international policy.
it's horrifying and fascinating. he's a moron.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/27/us/politics/donald-trump-transcript.html
i don't even know where to start quoting.

i believe that (s)he is sincere (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 01:17 (eight years ago) link

SANGER: So we talked a little this morning about Japan and South Korea, whether or not they would move to an independent nuclear capability. Just last week the United States removed from Japan, after a long negotiation, many bombs worth, probably 40 or more bombs worth of plutonium or highly enriched uranium that we provided them over the years. And that’s part of a very bipartisan effort to keep them from going nuclear. So I was a little surprised this morning when you said you would be open to them having their own nuclear deterrent. Certainly if you pull back one of the risks is that they would go nuclear.

DRUMPF: You know you’re more right except for the fact that you have North Korea which is acting extremely aggressively, very close to Japan. And had you not had that, I would have felt much, I would have felt differently. You have North Korea, and we are very far away and we are protecting a lot of different people and I don’t know that we are necessarily equipped to protect them. And if we didn’t have the North Korea threat, I think I’d feel a lot differently, David.

SANGER: But with the North Korea threat you think maybe Japan does need its own nuclear…

DRUMPF: Well I think maybe it’s not so bad to have Japan — if Japan had that nuclear threat, I’m not sure that would be a bad thing for us.

SANGER: You mean if Japan had a nuclear weapon it wouldn’t be so bad for us?

DRUMPF: Well, because of North Korea. Because of North Korea. Because we don’t know what he’s going to do. We don’t know if he’s all bluster or is he a serious maniac that would be willing to use it. I was talking about before, the deterrent in some people’s minds was that the consequence is so great that nobody would ever use it. Well that may have been true at one point but you have many people that would use it right now in this world.

SANGER: For that reason, they may well need their own and not be able to just depend on us…

DRUMPF: I really believe that’s true. Especially because of the threat of North Korea. And they are very aggressive toward Japan. Well I mean look, he’s aggressive toward everybody. Except for China and Iran.

See we should use our economic power to have them disarm — now then it becomes different, then it becomes purely economic, but then it becomes different. China has great power over North Korea even though they don’t necessarily say that. Now, Iran, we had a great opportunity during this negotiation when we gave them the 150 billion and many other things. Iran is the No. 1 trading partner of North Korea. Now we could have put something in our agreement that they would have led the charge if we had people with substance and with brainpower and with some negotiating ability. But the No. 1 trading partner with North Korea is Iran. And we did a deal with them, and we just did a deal with them, and we don’t even mention North Korea in the deal. That was a great opportunity to put another five pages in the deal, or less, and they do have a great influence over North Korea. Same thing with China, China has great influence over North Korea but they don’t say they do because they’re tweaking us. I have this from Chinese. I have many Chinese friends, I have people of vast wealth, some of the most important people in China have purchased apartments from me for tens of millions of dollars and frankly I know them very well. And I ask them about their relationship to North Korea, these are top people. And they say we have tremendous power over North Korea. I know they do. I think you know they do.

SANGER: They signed on to the most recent sanctions, more aggressive sanctions than we thought the Chinese would agree to.

DRUMPF: Well that’s good, but, I mean I know they did, but I think that they have power beyond the sanctions.

SANGER: So you would advocate that they have to turn off the oil to North Korea basically.

DRUMPF: So much of their lifeblood comes through China, that’s the way it comes through. They have tremendous power over North Korea, but China doesn’t say that. China says well we’ll try. I can see them saying, “We’ll try, we’ll try.” And I can see them laughing in the room next door when they’re together. So China should be talking to North Korea. But China’s tweaking us. China’s toying with us. They are when they’re building in the South China Sea. They should not be doing that but they have no respect for our country and they have no respect for our president. So, and the other one, and this is an opportunity passed because why would Iran go back and renegotiate it having to do with North Korea?But Iran is the No. 1 trading partner, but we should have had something in that document that was signed having to do with North Korea as the No. 1 trading partner and as somebody with a certain power because of that. A very substantial power over North Korea.

SANGER: Mr. Drumpf with all due respect, I think it’s China that’s the No. 1 trading partner with North Korea.

DRUMPF: I’ve heard that certainly, but I’ve also heard from other sources that it’s Iran.

SANGER: Iran is a major arms exchanger with...

DRUMPF: Well that is true but I’ve heard it both ways. They are certainly major arms exchangers, which in itself is terrible that we would make a deal with somebody that’s a major arms exchanger with North Korea. But had that deal not been done and they were desperate to do it, and they wanted to do it much more so than we know in my opinion, meaning Iran wanted to make the deal much more than we know. We should have backed off that deal, doubled the sanctions and made a real deal. And part of that deal should have been that Iran would help us with North Korea. So, the bottom line is, I think that frankly, as long as North Korea’s there, I think that Japan having a capability is something that maybe is going to happen whether we like it or not.

i believe that (s)he is sincere (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 01:26 (eight years ago) link

SANGER: Mr. Drumpf with all due respect, I think it’s China that’s the No. 1 trading partner with North Korea.

DRUMPF: I’ve heard that certainly, but I’ve also heard from other sources that it’s Iran.

He's pulled this before, right? Citing his unnamed and unverified secret sources?

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 01:33 (eight years ago) link

http://d.gr-assets.com/books/1330545377l/13505602.jpg

Treeship, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 01:35 (eight years ago) link

forks your Drumpf filter is driving me crazy

ejemplo (crüt), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 02:00 (eight years ago) link

^^^

mookieproof, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 02:11 (eight years ago) link

^^^

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 02:25 (eight years ago) link

___,,,^._.^,,,___

Treeship, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 02:29 (eight years ago) link

shit a bear, everybody run

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 02:31 (eight years ago) link

"Ooh babe, of course mama's gonna help build the wall"

HA.

And I randomly heard this album again at a house party on Saturday. Which reminds me, I need to listen to the Final Cut.

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 02:32 (eight years ago) link

forks your Drumpf filter is driving me crazy

hadn't even noticed it and certainly wasn't aware it was transferring over from cut and paste. sorry?

i believe that (s)he is sincere (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 02:41 (eight years ago) link

you know, i've also never listened to the final cut. xp

the wall is one of the best albums of all time though for sure. PINK FLOYD

Treeship, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 02:43 (eight years ago) link

but more to the point: in flagrant disregard of 75 years of foreign policy, this guy is strongly suggesting Japan get nukes because "it'll be good for America"!
that whole interview reads like it's with a first year poli-sci major from a safety school who has yet to crack a book

i believe that (s)he is sincere (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 02:43 (eight years ago) link

it's all good man xp

ejemplo (crüt), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 02:45 (eight years ago) link

de-drumpf'd for your reading horror:

DRUMPF: Well I was a fan as you probably know, I was a fan of Douglas MacArthur. I was a fan of George Patton. If we had Douglas MacArthur today or if we had George Patton today and if we had a president that would let them do their thing you wouldn’t have ISIS, O.K.? You wouldn’t be talking about ISIS right now, we’d be talking about something else, but you wouldn’t be talking about ISIS right now. So I was a fan of Douglas MacArthur, I was a fan of — as generals — I was a fan of George Patton. We don’t have, we don’t have seemingly those people today, now I know they exist, I know we have some very, I know the Air Force Academy and West Point and Annapolis, I know that great people come out of those schools. A lot of times the people that get to the top aren’t necessarily those people anymore because they’re politically correct. George Patton was not a politically correct person.

SANGER: Yeah I think we can all agree on that.

DRUMPF: He was a great general and his soldiers would do anything for him.

SANGER: But the other day, I’m sorry, this morning, you suggested to us you would only use nuclear weapons as a last resort.

DRUMPF: Totally last resort.

SANGER: And what did Douglas MacArthur advocate?

DRUMPF: I would hate, I would hate —

SANGER: General MacArthur wanted to go use them against the Chinese and the North Koreans, not as a last resort.

DRUMPF: That’s right. He did. Yes, well you don’t know if he wanted to use them but he certainly said that at least.

SANGER: He certainly asked Harry Truman if he could.

DRUMPF: Yeah, well, O.K.. He certainly talked it and was he doing that to negotiate, was he doing that to win? Perhaps. Perhaps. Was he doing that for what reason? I mean, I think he played, he did play the nuclear card but he didn’t use it, he played the nuclear card. He talked the nuclear card, did he do that to win? Maybe, maybe, you know, maybe that’s what got him victory. But in the meantime he didn’t use them. So, you know. So, we need a different mind set. So you talked about torture before, well what did it say — well I guess you had enough and I hope you’re going to treat me fairly and if you’re not it’ll be forgotten in three or four days and that’ll be the story. It is a crazy world out there, I’ve never seen anything like it, the volume of press that I’m getting is just crazy. It’s just absolutely crazy, but hopefully you’ll treat me fairly, I do know my subject and I do know that our country cannot continue to do what it’s doing. See, I know many people from China, I know many people from other countries, I deal at a very high level with people from various countries because I’ve become very international. I’m all over the world with deals and people and they can’t believe what their countries get away with. I can tell you people from China cannot believe what their country’s, what their country’s getting away with. At let’s say free trade, where, you know, it’s free there but it’s not free here. In other words, we try sell — it’s very hard for us to do business in China, it’s very easy for China to do business with us. Plus with us there’s a tremendous tax that we pay when we go into China, where’s when China sells to us there’s no tax. I mean, it’s a whole double standard, it’s so crazy, and they cannot believe they get away with it, David. They cannot believe they get away with it. They are shocked, and I’m talking about people at the highest level, people at — the richest people, people with great influence over, you know, together with the leaders and they cannot believe it. Mexico can’t believe what they get away with. When I talked about Mexico and I talked about they will build a wall, when you look at the trade deficit we have with Mexico it’s very easy, it’s a tiny fraction of what the cost of the wall is. The wall is a tiny fraction of what the cost of the deficit is. When people hear that they say “Oh now I get it.” They don’t get it. But Mexico will pay for the wall. But they can’t believe what they get away with. There’s such a double standard. With many countries. It’s almost, we do well with almost nobody anymore and a lot of that is because of politics as we know it, political hacks get appointed to negotiate with the smartest people in China, when we negotiate deals with China, China is putting the smartest people in all of China on that negotiation, we’re not doing that. So anyway, I hope you guys are happy.

SANGER: Thank you, you’ve been very generous with your time.

i believe that (s)he is sincere (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 02:48 (eight years ago) link

"see, MacArthur was just trying to scare the North Koreans so he was talking to Truman about nuking them to scare them"
"how would they know he was doing that"
"let's talk about that wall"

i believe that (s)he is sincere (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 02:49 (eight years ago) link

MacArthur & Patton? Surprise surprise, Trump reads Dad books.

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 02:50 (eight years ago) link

trump doesn't read books dude

"Hold that book up," Trump told the man. "That's my second favorite book of all time. You know what my favorite is?" he asked. "The Bible!" he said, giving a thumbs-up. "Nothing beats the Bible, not even The Art of the Deal. Not even close."

these are the words of a non-book reading person

Treeship, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 02:54 (eight years ago) link

the author at the end was like "plus if its franken thatll make this more entertaining and thats what rly matters 4 me" and i was getting some morbsian apoplexy

The fact that this neverending parade of fuckos is being openly presented (once you get past the True Believers) as Entertainment and Nothing Else is the only charming thing about it. You'd all love a Franken-Christie debate.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 02:55 (eight years ago) link

who all?

Treeship, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 02:56 (eight years ago) link

The rabble.

Given that there's an American Psycho revival at full steam (there's an imminent Broadway musical), i'd forgotten that Trump is Patrick Bateman's idol.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 02:57 (eight years ago) link

the final cut is bad, don't bother

mookieproof, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 03:11 (eight years ago) link

usually don't feel like i need vox to explain this to me but in this case it was v helpful

http://www.vox.com/2016/3/28/11318722/trump-foreign-policy

4) Trump sees himself as applying business savvy to foreign policy, but shows profound ignorance of even basic business concepts
5) Trump just does not understand how foreign policy works

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 03:17 (eight years ago) link

also apologies if this was linked earlier on the thread but today trump actually got challenged on his answers by.. some conservative radio guy in wisconsin
the end of the interview is especially bad where trump just gets more and more petulant about 'well, he started it' re cruz and finally the host says, donald, we're not on a playground, we're running for president

how is it that wolf blitzer and anderson cooper and others get the same kind of answers from trump and just let him keep talking unchallenged?

http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-gop-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/03/trump-charlie-sykes-interview-221289

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 03:21 (eight years ago) link

Anybody see the anti-trump thing his former communications lead posted?

It's blowing up I guess, despite the fact that she seems like a fucking terrible person as well

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 03:21 (eight years ago) link

yeah i read it - i didn't know how seriously to take it given the source (not her, i mean xojane)

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 03:28 (eight years ago) link

xojane is like the adult version of tumblr or something, i don't think they exert any sort of editorial control

k3vin k., Tuesday, 29 March 2016 03:32 (eight years ago) link

how is it that wolf blitzer and anderson cooper and others get the same kind of answers from trump and just let him keep talking unchallenged?

If you lived in Wisconsin you'd know: Charlie Sykes's job is being a dick and he is really good at his job

Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 03:33 (eight years ago) link

i read the xojane piece. it was sort of odd. she is saying that trump is a "fraud," that "the presidential candidate" is just a "character" the same way he claims the misogynistic reality show host was. this is basically what ben carson says, except he uses this argument to justify his endorsement of trump

Treeship, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 04:24 (eight years ago) link

it's also hard not to hate the writer, who seems to have been trump's publicist or whatever. she keeps saying "i wanted to believe." belive in fucking what?

Treeship, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 04:25 (eight years ago) link

like, the issue is not that he is a fraud. the issue is that he is a lying, irresponsible, racist, piece of shit

Treeship, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 04:29 (eight years ago) link

Is there any line to be drawn btwn complaints at all the free press ye complain about trump getting and the observable fact that left to yere own devices he's 80% of yere chosen topic, I wonder

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 04:36 (eight years ago) link

he's like that kid in ubik who absorbs people's life energy. he just keeps expanding, dominating our thoughts and conversations, edging out everything else until, one day, there will be nothing else left

Treeship, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 04:38 (eight years ago) link

we can't do anything about it. this is a metaphysical situation.

Treeship, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 04:38 (eight years ago) link

It's just called 'UK' fyi, they leave out British & Irish these days at our request, and that guy might tbf be injured for the euros

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 04:40 (eight years ago) link

Trump talks as if he believed MacArthur had the power to order DEFCON 1. At any rate it fascinates me how Trump cites approvingly a general whose defiance of President Harry Truman is legend as if Trump’s leadership style as perceived by his followers wouldn’t demand the drawing and quartering of Douglas MacArthur.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 10:31 (eight years ago) link

some Senate Dems wanted to publish an 'open letter' calling on Sanders to quit; Schumer and Mikulski reportedly nayed it

@dick_nixon
Meaning Schumer wants something from Clinton and she isn't playing ball.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 11:52 (eight years ago) link

(or S and M don't want to alienate Sanders supporters in their states who haven't voted in primaries yet)

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 12:00 (eight years ago) link

I don't like giving this guy more pixels than he's already gotten but still, the point buried in here is crucial:

SANGER: General MacArthur wanted to go use them against the Chinese and the North Koreans, not as a last resort.

TRUMP: That’s right. He did. Yes, well you don’t know if he wanted to use them but he certainly said that at least.

SANGER: He certainly asked Harry Truman if he could.

TRUMP: Yeah, well, O.K.. He certainly talked it and was he doing that to negotiate, was he doing that to win? Perhaps. Perhaps. Was he doing that for what reason? I mean, I think he played, he did play the nuclear card but he didn’t use it, he played the nuclear card. He talked the nuclear card, did he do that to win? Maybe, maybe, you know, maybe that’s what got him victory. But in the meantime he didn’t use them. So, you know.

This is like the ninetieth time this has come up in discussion of the Donaldigensian philosophy: part of his vaunted mad dealmaking skillz is to stake out an extreme position, then negotiate down to where you actually want to be.

"45-percent tariffs [or whatever] on Chinese goods" could be seen as an initial position on the way to a slightly altered trade deficit. "Deport 'em all," then, may just be an initial position on the way to strengthened use of e-Verify and, I guess, streamlined deportation of violent offenders. "Mexico's gonna pay to build a 25-foot goldplated wall" is an initial position on the way to, I dunno, slightly more areas with an eight-foot chain-link fence. "I'm gonna nuke your cities into glowing rubble" is an initial position on the way to "stop shooting at people I like." "Your face is ugly and you suck hobo cock in urine-soaked alleyways" is an initial position on the way to "You're not the right choice for the country, and anyways I'm leading in the polls ha ha! Sad."

On one level, this stuff makes a certain kind of twisted self-consistent sense. Trump's willingness to nudge and wink while giving away the game might even be appealing if he weren't such a horrible human being.

What makes it mind-fuckingly strange is that many of his supporters have heard all this, and they like it: yeah, that's what we need, a dealmaker! That's what we need, someone who fights and fights dirty and is devious with our enemies (both foreign and domestic).

But they have weirdly failed to internalize the lesson. They're somehow mystically certain that he's only bluffing OTHER people, not THEM. When his spew involves stuff they like, they assume THAT is the bit that is sincere; he's only bullshitting the people we don't like. This odd blind spot is, dare I say, yuge.

leprechaundriac (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 13:35 (eight years ago) link

At any rate it fascinates me how Trump cites approvingly a general whose defiance of President Harry Truman is legend as if Trump’s leadership style as perceived by his followers wouldn’t demand the drawing and quartering of Douglas MacArthur.

trump's leadership style would demand the forcible retirement of harry truman to some missouri dacha

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 14:12 (eight years ago) link

that's all?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 14:18 (eight years ago) link

looks like paul ryan is getting primary'd.

he is a traitor to the right

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 14:19 (eight years ago) link

well he'll have to be drafted at the convention, then

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 14:24 (eight years ago) link

part of his vaunted mad dealmaking skillz is to stake out an extreme position, then negotiate down to where you actually want to be.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azZr1cSu9-4&sns=em

Treeship, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 14:38 (eight years ago) link

So I spent Easter with some Republican Trump-hating relatives (4 Kasich, 1 Cruz) and gleaned some things. One, Trump is drawing heavily from the "Patriot" population. These people are xenophobic, but how "patriotic" is someone so reckless. He doesn't strike me as particularly patriotic. Makes me wonder what the future is for the right in terms of claiming "America hate" by anyone who doesn't think like them. It's not convincing coming from Trump. So that may be one good thing coming out of this - he's poisoning the jingoism these people engage in. This could be the beginning of the end for that stuff.

Fake Sam's Club (I M Losted), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 14:40 (eight years ago) link

read that as "Trump hunting relatives" at first and then my contact lens slid back in place :(

Neanderthal, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 14:43 (eight years ago) link

I spent Easter with a League of Shadows

Treeship, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 14:44 (eight years ago) link

I spent Easter watching my kids on an Easter egg hunt, which was awesome.

Later that evening I had a horrifying neverending gastrointestinal incident so it feels like I spent the day talking about Trump.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 15:09 (eight years ago) link

huffington post has a fun chart

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-rallies-arrests-and-violence_us_56f17b5ce4b09bf44a9ea5f1

goole, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 15:19 (eight years ago) link

Later that evening I had a horrifying neverending gastrointestinal incident

they're called Cadbury Creme Eggs iirc

ejemplo (crüt), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 15:24 (eight years ago) link

vat a cantry

goole, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 15:33 (eight years ago) link

they're called Cadbury Creme Eggs iirc

Oh man I wish, those things are delicious

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 15:40 (eight years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CeuX_ouWwAMDXnK.jpg:large

Frederik B, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 15:45 (eight years ago) link

What am i looking at fred?

Treeship, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 15:46 (eight years ago) link

I think that's a still shot of Lewandowski grabbing Fields

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 15:49 (eight years ago) link

btw the comments on that article are a sewer

you should all read them and consider that this may be more than just "trolling" and what that actually means about the country we live in

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 15:50 (eight years ago) link

Robert >>>>>>>> Corey

Terry Micawber (Tom D.), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 15:51 (eight years ago) link

@ggreenwald
Add George W. Bush's former NSA & CIA Chief - a true pro-torture extremist - to the "Clinton over Trump" club

Alexandra Jaffe
‏@ajjaffe
On @Morning_Joe Gen. Hayden asked to choose btw Trump & Clinton, says "Secretary Clinton is better prepared to handle" national security.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 15:52 (eight years ago) link

I saw Fran Lebowitz on a Bill Maher clip a few weeks ago talking about she's never liked the Clintons from the get-go ("I knew 'that guy' in high school and didn't like him then") but is voting for Hil anyway, but i couldn't watch more because Gen. Hayden was hogging the panel and i didn't have my Winky Dink crayons to draw [redacted] on his fucking asshole forehead.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 15:55 (eight years ago) link

Is Greenwald implying that he supports Trump over Clinton there?

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:03 (eight years ago) link

no

k3vin k., Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:05 (eight years ago) link

I wonder what the bigger factor in his support is - that he thinks Hillary is more pro torture than Trump (clearly not) or not wanting Japan to start building nukes.

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:10 (eight years ago) link

Is he implying that people who support Clinton over Trump are terrible people by association?

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:10 (eight years ago) link

I wonder if Greenwald writes this kind of dumb shit bc he himself is a moron or he thinks his Twitter followers are morons.

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:11 (eight years ago) link

i read that as him just noting how evil the lesser of the two evils is

nomar, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:12 (eight years ago) link

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

by just tryin' to make you people feel extra good about voting for the same candidate that stellar human beings like Michael Hayden (and likely Henry Kissinger) will

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:14 (eight years ago) link

There's always Jill Stein.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:16 (eight years ago) link

I already feel fine about voting for Clinton in a general election; this bullshit is making me want to campaign for her.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:19 (eight years ago) link

Feel free, but don't do it bcz Morbs got under your skin.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:20 (eight years ago) link

it's such a dumb statement from glenn. if the most salient fact about hayden is that he's pro-torture, then surely the surprise should be that he's not backing the explicitly pro-torture candidate. one could easily conclude it's bc trump is such a loose handle that even pro-torturers are scared of him, but instead glenn seems to be insinuating it's bc hayden likes hillary [non-existent] position on torture, or just smearing her w/ the implication that if hayden prefers her to trump that must mean she's terribly compromised.

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:20 (eight years ago) link

will you donate every time i tear into her, a la Obama 2012? xxp

There's always Jill Stein

Been there, not feelin' it. A truly empty gesture.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:21 (eight years ago) link

one of many reasons I didn't caucus on Saturday was that I realized I don't have an actual informed preference between the two dems! They're fine. Just entirely adequate, under the circumstances.

petulant dick master (silby), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:21 (eight years ago) link

will you donate every time i tear into her, a la Obama 2012?

Not until the general; you've still got a few free months before you start fundraising by proxy.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:22 (eight years ago) link

you guys done yet

k3vin k., Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:27 (eight years ago) link

Oh, i won't have much to say after April 19. But in America, your cash is the best political currency.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:28 (eight years ago) link

I'm not crazy about Clinton, but if she's the nominee, she's got my vote. It's like Dr Morbius always says: "I don't care whom I have to vote for, as long as we get a Democrat in the White House."

ejemplo (crüt), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:28 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxSfQeCoFUM

can imagine Morbs in these clothes

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:29 (eight years ago) link

Oh, i won't have much to say after April 19

lololol plz no teasing

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:29 (eight years ago) link

Cash is what votes first.

"I don't care whom I have to vote for, as long as we get a Democrat in the White House."

I generally give Southerners a pass on this.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:29 (eight years ago) link

No, once Bern is off the scene, vote for the monster you like best.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:30 (eight years ago) link

One interesting thing about that Fields/Lewandowski video is that it's apparently from a security camera at Trump's own club. A more practiced movie villain would have directed his staff to "accidentally" delete that footage.

Not that it will change the way anybody votes, but Camp Trump would have done better to say something along the lines of "whoops, it was a few chaotic seconds, sorry IF you got jostled in the scrum." But they went straight to "she's lying and she's a hysterical nut and fame-seeker and oh by the way probably a whore as well." It could have been a bruise sustained in a confused moment; it's been allowed to become a story that conveniently fits larger narratives of misogyny and violence.

leprechaundriac (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:30 (eight years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ceuo6ZaWIAArr2G.jpg

sorry

mookieproof, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:37 (eight years ago) link

Sarandon is kind of a phony, no kiddin'

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:39 (eight years ago) link

Yeah can we stop attributing this perspective to youth or immaturity? There's an intelligent argument to be made against zero-sum politics but the constant "oh you don't yet understand what it's like in the real world" is a fucking copout.

Hadrian VIII, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:45 (eight years ago) link

Like is there ANY set of circumstances in which the notion that the status quo is no longer tenable, full stop, would be legitimate to you guys?

Hadrian VIII, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:47 (eight years ago) link

Yes, but we are nowhere near that point.

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:48 (eight years ago) link

At the moment the dangers of instability in our country and throughout the world are much greater than the dangers of the status quo - this is even if we didn't have a reasonable expectation of reforms being put into place to make the status quo better.

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:49 (eight years ago) link

any dramatic/violent end to the political & economic status quo would rapidly degrade the material circumstances of millions of already-vulnerable Americans, likely for the rest of their lives.

petulant dick master (silby), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:51 (eight years ago) link

I watched Sarandon on Hayes' show last night; she's smarter than the average actor until she says dumb shit

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:54 (eight years ago) link

Also not sure that Hollywood actors are the best ppl to tell us "what it's like in the real world."

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:55 (eight years ago) link

any dramatic/violent end to the political & economic status quo would rapidly degrade the material circumstances of millions of already-vulnerable Americans, likely for the rest of their lives.

― petulant dick master (silby), Tuesday, March 29, 2016 12:51 PM (3 minutes ago)

this is just vague enough to be not even wrong

k3vin k., Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:56 (eight years ago) link

I mean I'm no economist but I figure if the US gov't under the constitution were to violently cease operations, the repudiation of USD-denominated national debt would cause widespread misery

petulant dick master (silby), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:57 (eight years ago) link

I will apologize in advance if I am wrong that neither of you are seeking treatment for PTSD or phantom limb, have lost your pensions, have had your homes taken by eminent domain to Big Frack. I guess it all depends where you're sitting.

Hadrian VIII, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 16:59 (eight years ago) link

Does anyone think that the US has gone in a better direction because GWB beat Gore in 2000? Why would anyone believe that electing the worse choice would lead to better results down the road? It's just magical thinking + fantasizing.

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:00 (eight years ago) link

who the hell are you even responding to now

k3vin k., Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:01 (eight years ago) link

Where I'm sitting President Donald Trump is not going to make life better for people seeking treatment for PTSD, who have lost their pension, or lost their home to eminent domain. Where you're sitting does it look differently?

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:01 (eight years ago) link

how do you guys do this every day

k3vin k., Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:01 (eight years ago) link

I thought we're talking about Sarandon's comments? Am I wrong?

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:01 (eight years ago) link

I'll be honest I'm not sure what I'm responding to.

petulant dick master (silby), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:02 (eight years ago) link

can we talk about how her acting has sucked since 1995

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:02 (eight years ago) link

i assume 'let's stick with the status quo' ilxors don't click on the climate change thread too often

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:03 (eight years ago) link

Donald Trump denies human caused global warming so wtf are you talking about.

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:04 (eight years ago) link

I avoid learning about climate change because I have an extreme need to maintain affective homeostasis

petulant dick master (silby), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:05 (eight years ago) link

Trump & Hil will do zip to stop climate change

also Trump will not be president

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:06 (eight years ago) link

Clinton will do nothing to stop climate change or the things Clinton is proposing to do will not stop climate change? The former implies that she does not care and is not including it in her platform; the latter implies that she's focusing on the wrong things in her platform. Which is the problem you're identifying here?

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:11 (eight years ago) link

Where I'm sitting President Donald Trump is not going to make life better for people seeking treatment for PTSD, who have lost their pension, or lost their home to eminent domain. Where you're sitting does it look differently?

The question for me is not will Donald Trump make those things better. In the short term your point is well taken. In the meantime the private interests benefiting from endless war and usury are increasingly entrenched and our institutions are calcifying to the extent that one day they will beyond rehabilitation.

I guess we differ as to how long from now that is, and what the signs are.

Hadrian VIII, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:15 (eight years ago) link

Clinton, iirc xp

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:16 (eight years ago) link

She does not care enough to piss off her funders in the "energy" fields, and i see her keeping the Arctic open for drilling a la the Obama-Trudeau agreement.

http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2015/10/hillary-clinton-climate-change-debate-copenhagen

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:16 (eight years ago) link

In the meantime the private interests benefiting from endless war and usury are increasingly entrenched...

Waaaaaait for itttttt

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:17 (eight years ago) link

Wwwwwwwwaaaaaaiiiitttttt fffffooorrrrrr iiiiiittttttttt

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:17 (eight years ago) link

(that last post was to DJP)

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:17 (eight years ago) link

She does not care enough to piss off her funders in the "energy" fields, and i see her keeping the Arctic open for drilling a la the Obama-Trudeau agreement.

From her platform:

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/climate/

Ensure safe and responsible energy production. As we transition to a clean energy economy, we must ensure that the fossil fuel production taking place today is safe and responsible and that areas too sensitive for energy production are taken off the table. Hillary knows there are some places where we should keep fossil fuels in the ground or under the ocean.

https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/633629814713397249?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

So again, are you basing this on research that shows her campaign goals will not go far enough to make a difference or are you making up shit because you don't like her?

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:21 (eight years ago) link

The former implies that she does not care and is not including it in her platform

I think this really hits on something. IMO she doesn't have to "not care" about global warming to do nothing about it. I will never in a zillion years vote for HRC (I'm in MA) but not because I don't think she doesn't care or that her heart is in the wrong place. I think she is generally sincere, well-intentioned, and on some issues even righteous. But as someone who has been reared in and profited by a system of legislation-for-profit, I think she is fundamentally incapable of identifying the actual underlying problem. Name your issue: guns? bridges? health care? prison reform? The ob$tacle is the same.

Hadrian VIII, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:26 (eight years ago) link

So, the people I had Easter dinner with vote Republican because of abortion. My brother married the daughter of a Marine and her family are really conservative. Talking about the "unborn" while passing plates of slaughtered pig = fuck these people. How could they not see how their racist party is responsible for Trump?

Fake Sam's Club (I M Losted), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:27 (eight years ago) link

Electing Trump this year is not going to give the WH to the far left four years from now. If you believe it might - like you're thinking Trump might be good from a strategic perspective because maybe it'll help the left succeed more later down the line, I think you need to strongly interrogate whether that's a reasonable assumption.

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:29 (eight years ago) link

Fetuses, the other white meat

Hadrian VIII, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:29 (eight years ago) link

xpost yeah I'm not voting for Trump so

Hadrian VIII, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:31 (eight years ago) link

or maybe you are asking Susan Sarandon that

Hadrian VIII, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:33 (eight years ago) link

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2016/03/29/susan_sarandon_is_perfect_spokeswoman_for_neverhillary.html

What Sarandon is voicing is the old Leninist idea of “heightening the contradictions,” which holds that social conditions need to get worse in order to inspire the revolution that will make them better. In this way of thinking, the real enemy of progress is incremental reform that would render the status quo tolerable. That was the position of the German Communists in the early 1930s, who refused to ally with the Social Democrats, proclaiming: “After Hitler, our turn!” A similar—if less deadly—assumption underlay Ralph Nader’s 2000 presidential campaign, for which Sarandon served as co-chair of the national steering committee. George W. Bush, Nader argued then, could serve as a “provocateur,” awakening the power of the left. “If it were a choice between a provocateur and an 'anesthetizer,' I'd rather have a provocateur,” said Nader. “It would mobilize us.”

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:34 (eight years ago) link

Electing Trump this year is not going to give the WH to the far left four years from now. If you believe it might - like you're thinking Trump might be good from a strategic perspective because maybe it'll help the left succeed more later down the line, I think you need to strongly interrogate whether that's a reasonable assumption.

― Mordy, Tuesday, March 29, 2016 1:29 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yea the "things need to get really bad before they get better" fantasy has been around for a long time

marcos, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:34 (eight years ago) link

But as someone who has been reared in and profited by a system of legislation-for-profit, I think she is fundamentally incapable of identifying the actual underlying problem. Name your issue: guns? bridges? health care? prison reform? The ob$tacle is the same.

Do you believe this is reflected in the platform she has put forward? The link to her take on climate change is upthread.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:35 (eight years ago) link

i love susan sarandon but she is wrong here

akm, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:39 (eight years ago) link

xpost But that's the thing—I don't believe her professed positions have any real value. This isn't cynicism on my part. The post-election prioritization of corporate interest above principles-on-record basically IS neoliberalism.

Hadrian VIII, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:43 (eight years ago) link

HVIII you are in a room full of people that think the bailout was a good idea

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:44 (eight years ago) link

worst case scenario for her is a big fat tax cut so she's cool with trump

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:44 (eight years ago) link

As we transition to a clean energy economy, we must ensure that the fossil fuel production taking place today is safe and responsible and that areas too sensitive for energy production are taken off the table. Hillary knows there are some places where we should keep fossil fuels in the ground or under the ocean.

tbf this on its own does not sound like it is going to reverse climate change

ejemplo (crüt), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:44 (eight years ago) link

sarandon may think trump would be better than hillary because it would force people to have a revolution; but in reality, her personal life will be impacted exactly ZERO by trump in the white house, she is wealthy and white.

akm, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:44 (eight years ago) link

like, i'd like to see more language about energy sources other than fossil fuels

ejemplo (crüt), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:45 (eight years ago) link

her campaign goals will not go far enough to make a difference or are you making up shit because you don't like her?

ok i'll cut to the chase: she's a congenital liar and politically inept very often.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:45 (eight years ago) link

(lol i didn't actually click the link obv)

ejemplo (crüt), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:47 (eight years ago) link

ha I was gonna ask

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:52 (eight years ago) link

I am not an accelerationist but the fact that Susan Sarandon is makes me like her more. The left can afford a few high profile eccentrics to put pressure on the democrats from the left this year, as Hillary losing the election to Trump seems basically impossible.

Treeship, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:54 (eight years ago) link

xposts guys I don't think anyone is arguing that the "strategy" Sarandon mentioned is anything but stupid. I was responding to this characterization by HRC team of those who believe there is a critical difference btw HRC and Sanders as "young" or "immature."

I don't really believe she means it anyway, nor do I believe most people who say this. It always sounds more like concern trolling in the hopes of swaying votes, and fair enough.

Hadrian VIII, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:55 (eight years ago) link

S. Sarandon can heighten my contradictions any time she wants, hubba hubba

Hadrian VIII, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 17:57 (eight years ago) link

if trump's campaign manager was running anyone but trump's campaign this assault charge would be a massive scandal, no?

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:00 (eight years ago) link

Of course. Trump hires literal thugs and everyone knows it. Cf. his lawyer:

I will make sure that you and I meet one day while we’re in the courthouse. And I will take you for every penny you still don’t have. And I will come after your Daily Beast and everybody else that you possibly know,” Cohen said. “So I’m warning you, tread very fucking lightly, because what I’m going to do to you is going to be fucking disgusting. You understand me?”

Treeship, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:02 (eight years ago) link

People thought the Republican Party was toast after Nixon fucked up. I remember my Democrat relatives being excited in 1976 - "people will never vote Republican again!" We can see how well that worked, with the Worst Republican Ever in the wings.

Fake Sam's Club (I M Losted), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:02 (eight years ago) link

yeah the bush-as-worst-president-ever backlash lasted all of two fucking years when the worst congress in history was elected in 2010

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:04 (eight years ago) link

This is a completely different situation.

Treeship, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:04 (eight years ago) link

http://gui.afsc.org/birddog/bernie-sanders-lockheed-martin-f-35-jets-vermont

Josh: "...You work on limiting the influence of money in politics, yet at the same time you continue to support wasteful contracts from companies such as Lockheed Martin with the F-35 for instance. So what steps are you willing to take to limit the influence of companies in politics, not only on campaigns, but in policy making as well?”

Senator Sanders: "What part of the F-35? What are my options as a Senator? …if I said no to the F-35 coming to Burlington, for Vermont National Guard where would it go?... South Carolina?

My choice as a Senator, this is not a debate 20 years ago when we saw the F-35, which was very, very costly and is a huge cost overall. It’s the debate that the F-35 is here, it goes to South Carolina, or Florida, or in the state of Vermont. And I wanted it to come to the state of Vermont. Now in terms of the military spending in general, that’s another broader issue. Are we spending too much? Yes, we are. Have there been, more…well back up for a minute…we are spending too much, we should cut it.

The F-35, you have to in politics, it’s not and people do this I don’t mean to be critical, but you gotta look at where somebody is at the moment. If the debate is if somebody comes to you and says “Look, I’m thinking about building this super plane deal, it’s gonna cost huge sums of money, what do you think?” That’s, and maybe say no, no I think that’s a good idea, maybe we’ll go with the F-16. So then I responded. Are you about to say something?”

Josh: "No."

Sen. Sanders continues: “That’s where, in the real world, if the plan is built, and it is the plan that the U.S. Navy and the U.S. Air Force and of NATO, and if the choice is if that goes to Vermont, North Carolina-not North Carolina, South Carolina, or Florida, what is your choice as a United States Senator? Do you want it to go to South Carolina? You’re not saving anybody any money. So you have to look at these things in a, and it becomes complicated, and good friends can disagree on that. But my view is that given the reality of the damn plane, I’d rather it come to Vermont than to South Carolina. And that’s what the Vermont National Guard wants, and that means hundreds of jobs in my city. That’s it.”

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:05 (eight years ago) link

The party base is divided here. It's not just that democrats and independents hate republicans to an exceptional degree.

Treeship, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:05 (eight years ago) link

i don't blame him tbh but if you don't know anything about the F-35 this is a very amusing breakdown:
https://pando.com/2014/12/18/the-war-nerd-more-proof-the-us-defense-industry-has-nothing-to-do-with-defending-america/

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:05 (eight years ago) link

tread very fucking lightly, because what I’m going to do to you is going to be fucking disgusting. You understand me?”

umm I think maybe we have a general election thread title here

Hadrian VIII, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:06 (eight years ago) link

Sanders does right by his constituents I don't see that as a problem.

Treeship, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:07 (eight years ago) link

I don't either but I think it might not fit the image some of his supporters might have of him.

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:07 (eight years ago) link

Maybe, although his decision there wasn't about doing what was best for Lockheed Martin, it was about what was best for the people of Vermont.

Treeship, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:10 (eight years ago) link

tread very fucking lightly, because you tread on my fucking dreams

k3vin k., Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:10 (eight years ago) link

The claim regarding Clinton is that money influences her in ways that lead her to value the interests of capital over labor

Treeship, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:11 (eight years ago) link

Sanders is a goddamn '70s liberal pro-pork egomaniacal Democrat, and light-years better than his opponent.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:11 (eight years ago) link

I find it interesting that the Democratic campaigns want to generate every possible fake-controversy about each other that they can possibly imagine except for "which one is likely to lose their faculties first and would it be while they were in office a la Reagan"

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:11 (eight years ago) link

Lol that is like my favorite quote from the campaign. What type of lawyer talks like that on the record to the fucking media.

Treeship, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:12 (eight years ago) link

it fits the image i have of him bc he's not bsing his way out of it and pretend to be something he isn't.

it doesn't fit the image his naysayers have of him tho, which is of an out of touch idealist who shuns pragmatism.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:12 (eight years ago) link

xp over yonder to k3v

Treeship, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:12 (eight years ago) link

What type of lawyer talks like that on the record to the fucking media.

a mob lawyer.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:17 (eight years ago) link

i don't turn to susan sarandon for political advice; only posted it because a feminist telling her to 'act her age' was kinda gross

mookieproof, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:33 (eight years ago) link

marcotte is a clown

k3vin k., Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:33 (eight years ago) link

KeV <3√√√

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:33 (eight years ago) link

/long post alert, sorry

As we transition to a clean energy economy, we must ensure that the fossil fuel production taking place today is safe and responsible and that areas too sensitive for energy production are taken off the table. Hillary knows there are some places where we should keep fossil fuels in the ground or under the ocean.

tbf this on its own does not sound like it is going to reverse climate change

correct - it's written in a way so that people on all sides of the issue can hear what they want to hear. when i read that excerpt, i don't think about climate change specifically, but instead about the short-term dangers that can arise from off-shore drilling (ie., another Deepwater Horizon) and fracking. if you're a gung ho hillary fan that cares about climate change, you read that section as advocacy for reducing GHG emissions as quickly as possible ("transition to a clean energy economy"! "Keep fossil fuels in the ground"!). if you're on the coast, you read it as moving toward denying off-shore drilling permits (unlike obama). if you live above the marcellus formation, you read it as opposing fracking. if you're a republican fan of oil and gas and/or a climate change denier, you read it as a continuation of obama's "all of the above" approach, which is in itself a continuation of bush's "all of the above" approach (only areas that are "too sensitive" for energy production will be taken off the table); "there are some places where we should keep fossil fuels in the ground or under the ocean." that excerpt is everything to everyone, which is why to a lot of environmentalists it's meaningless, and an indication that she's just going to be Obama II on the environment.

yes, i've read the rest of her climate plan. there are things in there that sound good:


Set national goals to have 500 million solar panels installed; generate enough renewable energy to power every home in America; cut energy waste in homes, schools, and hospitals by a third; and reduce American oil consumption by a third.

Lead the world in the fight against climate change by bringing greenhouse gas emissions to 30 percent below what they were in 2005 within the next decade—and keep going.

but there's no way the solar panels thing will happen without republican support in the house, and that's not happening (unless trump brings everyone down with him). and i know it annoys everyone to hear, but the 30% below 2005 goal is likely not enough to mitigate millions and millions of people dying from climate change. those goals are set under heavy political pressure and are consensus driven - they represent the most conservative estimates from climate scientists. and hillary's record on environmental issues is mixed. it's not just her waddling on keystone (a textbook example of her refusing to take a position on principle, and instead holding a finger to the political winds). she sort of gets it, she sort of doesn't at all. again, she's obama II.

and that's why a lot of people who care about the environment, and climate change in particular, express deep skepticism that hillary clinton's positions add up to what it would take to produce a response that's commensurate to the scale of the problem. climate change isn't the kind of problem that can be solved in hedged, incremental steps.

anyway, my point is that the excerpt above is egregiously vague and could never be used as evidence of clinton's belief in the urgency of addressing climate change, one way or another, and that plenty of people who care passionately about climate change are not optimistic about her candidacy because it likely represents a continuation of incremental improvements (in the face of stonewalling by republicans, i know, i get that) which will not add up to the changes that are necessary. that's not a fringe position. that is a very common position among people who care about this.

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:38 (eight years ago) link

thx KM

even when Clinton puts in an anti-fossil fuel applause line -- her recent vow "We're going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business" -- it's something not at all necessary for broadening her appeal, indeed will harden votes against her. Yeah, those damn unemployed miners....

i assumed this Marcotte is just some nitwit blogger xxxp

Sarandon went from appearing at Nader rallies with Tim Robbins in 2000 to calling him "your guy" on Bill Maher's show in 2004

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:43 (eight years ago) link

even when Clinton puts in an anti-fossil fuel applause line -- her recent vow "We're going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business" -- it's something not at all necessary for broadening her appeal, indeed will harden votes against her. Yeah, those damn unemployed miners....

on top of that, it's about as bold of a claim as "i will make the sun go down tonight", because the coal mines have been going out of business anyway for a few years now, for a variety of reasons that have nothing to do with hillary clinton.

http://grist.org/climate-energy/good-news-theres-bad-news-for-coal/

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:54 (eight years ago) link

zackly, even CNNMoney made the same point. The more safer the topic, the more HRC wants to boldly stake claim to it. Then she flubs the presentation (ie, say sumthin nice at Nancy Reagan's funeral).

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:57 (eight years ago) link

so my takeaway here is that if I actually want to have a conversation about this with someone, I should just talk to Karl as he seems to be the only one willing to engage beyond a surface level

thank you very much for your response Karl; I want to talk more but can't at the moment due to an impending presentation

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 19:04 (eight years ago) link

(I do plan to come back to it, just later)

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 19:06 (eight years ago) link

well he's maybe the only one here who knows a lot about said issue, so yeah

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 19:06 (eight years ago) link

when you feel your life's too hard
just go have a talk with Karl

ejemplo (crüt), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 19:10 (eight years ago) link

oh, no prob. and i realize there are inconsistencies in what i said, too - chiefly that sanders would run into the same republican roadblock as clinton. but i do appreciate that his platform places an emphasis on policies that would be truly meaningful but aren't politically attractive - like a carbon tax - while clinton would probably run out of the room screaming if tried to force her to have an opinion on that. o'malley was vocal in his support of a carbon tax, too, for what it's worth.

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 19:11 (eight years ago) link

xpost nah, no that's not true. there are lots of great posters in the climate change thread, i'd be kinda curious to see if they have an opinion on sanders/clinton/climate/the futility of it all

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 19:12 (eight years ago) link

Not that I'm a good poster on climate change, but I figure that human civilization is irrevocably fubared, so just withdraw into your own insular world and enjoy it while it lasts.

Jenny Ondioleeene (Leee), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 19:17 (eight years ago) link

those of us in Miami would like to thank all y'all's concern.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 19:19 (eight years ago) link

/vanity

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 19:20 (eight years ago) link

great post, karl.

the sad thing is that anything short of a bill pullman independence day attitude, that fighting climate change is basically the existential threat of our age and needs to be treated like the biggest most important 'war' ever, damn the consequences and damn whoever disagrees, will likely leave the planet wrecked. sanders too falls short of this but i do think he gets it. at this point in a sane world we would basically be nationalizing all energy companies and forcing them to do what's necessary. i mean in world war ii we could basically take over detroit and even the walt disney company in order to see to it that hitler was defeated and soldiers had helpful cartoons explaining VD or whatever. we need that spirit here.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 19:49 (eight years ago) link

i'm becoming resigned to the idea that if most Americans can't see the enemy in human form, or it doesn't threaten them RIGHT NOW, it doesn't exist.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 19:56 (eight years ago) link

amanda marcotte is the same idiot who was attacking sanders for "propping up the sandinistas" in the 80s

i guess total ignorance of foreign policy is an asset if you want to feel good about supporting clinton

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 20:01 (eight years ago) link

I don't usually catch up on the day's news till I get home. "Bruises," "lawyers," "incident"--thought maybe Trump and Cruz finally went at it, but I see it's something else.

clemenza, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 20:52 (eight years ago) link

gouge away

"It doesn’t matter who Susan Sarandon or Rosario Dawson or Killer Mike vote for, unless any of them also own homes in Miami and decide to register there (they have until 29 days before the election to do so).

"The most aggravating part of the entire aggravating conversation is that nearly every professional commentator pillorying Sarandon today is in the same boat as she—their votes in November will be purely performative. For a New Yorker or Washingtonian to march into the voting booth and pull the lever for the Democratic nominee is to engage in a symbolic gesture of political self-identification, not to participate in any meaningful way in the political process. Staying home is equally valid and equally consequential."

http://gawker.com/it-couldnt-possibly-matter-less-if-susan-sarandon-doesn-1767810152

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 21:17 (eight years ago) link

sarandon: doesn't matter
lewandowski: really should matter but probably won't

goole, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 21:17 (eight years ago) link

the gross thing about Lewandowski is we'll be treated to him making it about *his* struggle and persecution and the ex-Breitbart reporter will probably get 3x the misogyny tossed her way.

Neanderthal, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 21:20 (eight years ago) link

trump has already said, out loud, if it was a big deal she would have screamed

if you want to know how the day is going in the life the republic

goole, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 21:22 (eight years ago) link

anyway, chew on this y'all:

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/mar/28/hillary-clinton-honest-transparency-jill-abramson

I would be “dead rich”, to adapt an infamous Clinton phrase, if I could bill for all the hours I’ve spent covering just about every “scandal” that has enveloped the Clintons. As an editor I’ve launched investigations into her business dealings, her fundraising, her foundation and her marriage. As a reporter my stories stretch back to Whitewater. I’m not a favorite in Hillaryland. That makes what I want to say next surprising.

Hillary Clinton is fundamentally honest and trustworthy.

goole, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 21:23 (eight years ago) link

Jill Abramson? LOL

Iago Galdston, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 21:28 (eight years ago) link

"honesty" is not the problem i have with HRC, personally...

goole, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 21:38 (eight years ago) link

Live press conference on Air Force Trump rn

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b340UaWj_Bw

flappy bird, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 22:06 (eight years ago) link

The guy is such an asshole it's almost impossible to put into words. It's like he's operating on an entirely new level of asshole. Just one thing after another.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 22:21 (eight years ago) link

Like every single day.

clemenza, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 22:25 (eight years ago) link

If you've somehow combed those 26 minutes already, please share any highlights...

Evan, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 22:29 (eight years ago) link

At 26:12 the video ends

reggae mike love (polyphonic), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 22:29 (eight years ago) link

He's campaigning hard for the MRA vote

Mordy, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 22:31 (eight years ago) link

he coulda done that by just walking on stage and going "Bitches, man...", then dropping the mic

Neanderthal, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 22:33 (eight years ago) link

congenital heart failure gods, please do your bidding

Neanderthal, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 22:33 (eight years ago) link

Just looking at a 538 discussion on Trump and women. Excellent analogy:

harry: Again, I call on the Simpsons for discussing Trump’s strategy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmBj8r1-fDo

clemenza, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 22:37 (eight years ago) link

lol i just read that.

Neanderthal, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 22:40 (eight years ago) link

xpost High/lowlight includes doubling down on his defense of his campaign guy, claiming the reporter, had she been hurt, would have screamed, that she grabbed at him (Trump) first, that her bruises may have been there before, that his campaign guy is a good guy, a family man with four kids, and his life should not be destroyed because of this nothing ... just keeps going on and on. The constant threats of revealing secret information, on Cruz, on Walker, on whomever, like Trump is privy to all this shit that no one else has. Like in the Times piece, where he says North Korea's number one trading partner is Iran, and they correct him and tell him it's China, and he's all "well, that's not what my sources tell me." Fuck you, Trump. You're like some idiot relative who forwards crazy urban legends but refuses to read Snopes or whatever. "Well, you say that bigfoot doesn't exist, and I say he does, we'll just have to agree to disagree on that."

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 29 March 2016 22:42 (eight years ago) link

iirc it is because Bigfoot devalued the currency, that's why Trump clothing isn't made in America and why he doesn't hire American workers. Would if he could, of course, but he's a businessman and therefore must cut costs to the bone in order to survive in the rough-and-tumble business of making yet more ties (ties that are interchangeable with other ties).

scott beowulf (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 29 March 2016 23:28 (eight years ago) link

CNN's got Town Hall #67 & 68 just coming on...Trump will be addressing, among other topics, bruises, Bigfoot, and Lyin' Pope Francis.

clemenza, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 00:03 (eight years ago) link

"What's your greatest weakness, and what have you learned from it?"

Cruz begins by, correctly, making fun of how silly such questions are, at least in terms of generating an honest answer--he cites the guy who says in a job interview that his biggest weakness is that he works too hard. He then goes on to basically give the exact same answer: his biggest weakness is that he's too driven.

clemenza, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 00:29 (eight years ago) link

better than what Trump would say, which is "my dick's too big"

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 00:30 (eight years ago) link

Great!

clemenza, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 00:31 (eight years ago) link

be interesting to see what Trump's handling of the assault sitch does to his polling in Wisconsin. not a major mover, probably, but given that Cruz's odds are rising there and he's the favorite in 538's eyes, and that women hate him, it probably won't help.

granted though I'm sure he's more focused on the fact that he's so far ahead in NYC, but Cali is gonna be a big play too.

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 00:35 (eight years ago) link

Cruz the first candidate I've ever seen quote Sonny Bono, politician. Weird, but, um, I think I like it.

clemenza, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 00:40 (eight years ago) link

Trump seems coked up tonight, more than normal.

Treeship, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 01:41 (eight years ago) link

Love the old man behind trump staring daggers at him.

Treeship, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 01:44 (eight years ago) link

That last answer was some kind of legerdemain, and he actually (or at least I thought) managed to make it sound credible: he no longer promises to support the nominee, and neither does he want Cruz's support if he wins, because he saw how agonizing it was for Cruz to have to say that, and he doesn't want Cruz to feel compelled to do something that he doesn't feel in his heart of hearts.

clemenza, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 01:50 (eight years ago) link

(He didn't actually say "heart of hearts," that was my flourish.)

clemenza, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 01:51 (eight years ago) link

Very very
Many many

Treeship, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 01:52 (eight years ago) link

It's funny how obvious it is that Ivanka's his favorite kid

Treeship, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 01:58 (eight years ago) link

"Hey, Don. Put it on a t-shirt and then shut the fuck up. Ok?"

"Put it on a t-shirt? Saayyyyy....."

http://i.imgur.com/ZTdHoJc.jpg

pplains, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 03:07 (eight years ago) link

Totally a guy named Don

other people systems as applicable (El Tomboto), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 03:26 (eight years ago) link

so glad he was immediately able to partake in the festivities after his 30 year cryofreeze

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 04:14 (eight years ago) link

wow this townhall w/trump is a 100% complete trainwreck

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CexAfu2WsAALz5B.jpg

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 05:13 (eight years ago) link

Wait is that real (the transcript) am I dumb did that happen

other people systems as applicable (El Tomboto), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 05:25 (eight years ago) link

I don't put anything past or below Drumpf but how did I miss this

other people systems as applicable (El Tomboto), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 05:27 (eight years ago) link

amazed that this seems to be real

Nhex, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 05:51 (eight years ago) link

Rience Priebus in empty suit shocker.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/30/donald-trump-revokes-pledge-to-support-republican-nominee

The headline's a little inaccurate, it's closer to "everyone revokes pledge...."

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 06:01 (eight years ago) link

Do you people who say Drumpf genuinely think it's amusing?

like Uber, but for underpants (James Morrison), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 06:56 (eight years ago) link

They have robo-butlers to say Drumpf for them.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 07:27 (eight years ago) link

i'm stickin' with Hillary Walmart Clinton

clearly Trump's withdrawal of his support-the-nominee vow is the End

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 11:21 (eight years ago) link

Wait is that real (the transcript) am I dumb did that happen

Verbatim. Last night was a good idea of what it looks like when you press Trump with follow-ups. His big thing now is to cut you off with "Excuse me, excuse me," which translates as "Fucking shut up--I'm talking." Cooper did make some headway. There was the exchange above, and then later he laughingly pointed out that according to Trump, retweets and repeating something somebody else said don't count as agitating; Trump conceded that maybe he should stop doing these things. Even though he won't, obviously.

clemenza, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 12:11 (eight years ago) link

He's being treated very unfairly. Very unfairly. If we're not careful, he may just take his ball and go home.

You will notice a small sink where your sofa once was. (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 12:21 (eight years ago) link

TS: Drumpf vs Zodiac Killer thing

pplains, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 13:51 (eight years ago) link

“I don’t know if they were bruises from that. Why? Who said they were bruises from that? How do you know those bruises weren’t there before? I don’t know what the police said. How do you know those bruises weren’t there before? I’m not a lawyer. She said she had a bruise on her arm, to me, if you’re going to get squeezed, wouldn’t you think you would’ve yelled out a scream or something, if she has bruises on her arm? Take a look at her facial expression. It doesn’t even change. So you say bruises on her arm, how did they get there? Who put them there? I don’t know that he put them there?”

http://www.nbc.com/sites/nbcunbc/files/files/images/2015/4/23/140207_2722843_Saturday_Night_News_Segment___Nathan_Thurm_anvver_2.jpg

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 14:17 (eight years ago) link

the problem with those "targets" is i don't think they've updated them since the beginning of the race. so bernie actually needs to outperform those targets by quite a bit to get to a majority

― k3vin k., Monday, 28 March 2016 17:39 (2 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

It's a fair point - they've redrawn them for the current situation

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/its-really-hard-to-get-bernie-sanders-988-more-delegates/

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 14:20 (eight years ago) link

Singularity (of the day!): Wolf Blitzer one on one with political strategist Omarosa.

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 14:25 (eight years ago) link

Trenchant!

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 14:31 (eight years ago) link

Only thing I don't get in that article: references to "recent polling" in those states, when their own poll-tracking prediction widget suggests that there's almost none to go on, with some states not even getting entries. Not saying that surprise Sanders blowouts lurk everywhere, just that it seems an odd lapse for Silver.

Bernie making this even *look* like a plausible fight to the finish is a bigger victory than I'd have ever predicted for him. It's going to look more like 2008, in terms of states/delegates won, than any other race. Given that he arrived poised to do somewhere between Kucinich and Bradley, I think that bodes extremely well for the progressive left.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 14:32 (eight years ago) link

xpost Hmmm yeah I wasn't going for that...but happy to provide you insight?

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 14:35 (eight years ago) link

It sure has gotten a lot more dickish here over the years.

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 14:36 (eight years ago) link

Only thing I don't get in that article: references to "recent polling" in those states, when their own poll-tracking prediction widget suggests that there's almost none to go on, with some states not even getting entries

The states he's talking about with the larger quantities of delegates do have recent polling. The states without any polling tend to be the ones with almost no delegates. I'd be very surprised if this turned out to be anywhere near as close as 2008.

Mordy, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 14:40 (eight years ago) link

I think his campaign bodes well for the progressive left but if you came away from that article thinking that he's manipulating the numbers to make it look bad for Sanders and actually it's super close I think you may be misleading yourself thru wishful thinking.

Mordy, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 14:41 (eight years ago) link

I think his campaign bodes well for the progressive left until Clinton and Schumer "fix things."

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 14:43 (eight years ago) link

Go read a book ya dumbass

Mordy, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 14:45 (eight years ago) link

Mordy, please point to anything I said that made you think I interpreted the article that way? I am not stupid and I think I have generally made clear in these threads that I am not under any illusions re: Bernie's chances. Please also indicate which other Dem nominating contest you think is a closer analogue to 2008. I never suggested it would be as close as a 47%/48% split, just that it is dramatically different from the typical outcome of such races. The socialist no-chance guy has won fifteen contests so far, and will probably take a couple more. Though he'll likely fall short of Clinton 08's 23, I find this newsworthy.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 14:55 (eight years ago) link

It's going to look more like 2008, in terms of states/delegates won, than any other race.

I guess I don't understand what this means. That race seemed extremely close at the time and iirc Hillary ended up winning the popular vote and losing pledged delegates by only like 100. By contrast Bernie is more than 200 down at the moment in pledged and it's looking like Hillary is going to increase her lead by the end of the race. This is without discussing superdelegates at all. They seem fundamentally different in levels of competitiveness to me.

Mordy, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 15:04 (eight years ago) link

I just looked through the historical primary record and I guess you're right! It does look from a casual glance that it's the closest since 2008, but I'm still not sure they're comparable. I remembered in 2008 that when the primary came to PA the result still seemed unsettled.

Mordy, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 15:09 (eight years ago) link

and this time, the anointed winner of the Three-Year Money Primary will be first

maybe

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 15:10 (eight years ago) link

Wasserman-Schultz also endorses Diaz-Balart and Ros-Lehtinen in the battle for which hyphenate can be more dangerous to South Florida.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 15:19 (eight years ago) link

HRC has deigned to debate Bernie on her "home" state, Brooklyn to be exact, before the primary on 4/19. I guess he has met her conditions about his "tone"

Iago Galdston, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 15:46 (eight years ago) link

I understand why he wants the debate - he's way behind in NY and needs to win to have a chance at the nomination so any kind of event that could change the polling is worth fighting for. But I'm skeptical that another debate is going to change the numbers much.

Mordy, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 15:50 (eight years ago) link

i'm guessing it won't be in Prospect Park, to keep Birdie away

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 15:52 (eight years ago) link

The thing is, Mordy, he bailed her out with a NH debate (and she still lost, gives credence to what you are saying) and iirc also the Flint one? So this is really her holding up her end of the bargain. But you're right, probably neglible impact

Iago Galdston, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 15:55 (eight years ago) link

I have a conservative libertarian friend who has been opining that both parties have moving towards their logical extremes for several years now; I've always discounted this as conservative nonsense but the realization that Sanders running on a platform that likely would have been political anathema 12 years ago is making this a competitive race against Hillary Clinton is making me rethink my position slightly; I still don't think that polarization on the Democratic side is as strong as polarization on the Republican side but I suspect that some of that is because I think progressive positions SHOULD be the default. (I also think Democrats are invested in the idea of a functioning government and Republicans are not, which makes the Democratic side more amenable to compromise and constrains how far to the left the mainstream Democratic position can be.)

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 16:25 (eight years ago) link

That's roughly how I feel as well with the caveat that Republicans are very much into the idea of a functioning government as long as those functions directly enrich themselves and/or their lunch buddies

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 16:29 (eight years ago) link

(I also think Democrats are invested in the idea of a functioning government and Republicans are not, which makes the Democratic side more amenable to compromise and constrains how far to the left the mainstream Democratic position can be.)

Yep. It also means that the party that believes in functioning government gets the blame when the bailout, Obamacare, IRS, oversight in Flint, etc go badly. Reminds me of that memo written by a GOP aide several years ago admitting that this was the GOP's long term goal.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 16:34 (eight years ago) link

I wonder what the political affiliation is of this lawmaker briefed by Comey? Also nice of the wapo to fact check their sources a couple days later after running the story.

"One hundred forty-seven FBI agents have been deployed to run down leads, according to a lawmaker briefed by FBI Director James B. Comey," read the original report, which was published on Sunday.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/wapo-corrects-number-fbi-agents-clinton-email-probe

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 16:45 (eight years ago) link

this is the "he started it" video btw
https://twitter.com/zbyronwolf/status/714986877858619393

ulysses, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 17:41 (eight years ago) link

Great pitch

https://twitter.com/hillaryclinton/status/715217490368827396

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 18:15 (eight years ago) link

@HillaryClinton
Some folks may have the luxury to hold out for “the perfect.” But a lot of Americans are hurting right now and they can’t wait for that.

thanks obama

mookieproof, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 18:16 (eight years ago) link

Obama sucks and my opponent is better than me in 140 chars

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 18:17 (eight years ago) link

"the perfect"

how's life, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 18:19 (eight years ago) link

HRC imitating her worst supporters -- brava and pass the fucking sock o' manure

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 18:19 (eight years ago) link

the transferable nickname for any Dems left of the Wall St Journal

xp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 18:20 (eight years ago) link

lol that is just fucking pathetic

ejemplo (crüt), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 18:21 (eight years ago) link

"find someone less perfect than me, i dare ya"

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 18:23 (eight years ago) link

unbelievable

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 18:33 (eight years ago) link

Only 224 days until the next president begins campaigning for their second term.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 18:34 (eight years ago) link

I wonder if GOP strategists screen footage of Hillary as evidence for success of Overton window

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 18:37 (eight years ago) link

I just looked through the historical primary record and I guess you're right! It does look from a casual glance that it's the closest since 2008, but I'm still not sure they're comparable. I remembered in 2008 that when the primary came to PA the result still seemed unsettled.

― Mordy, Wednesday, March 30, 2016 11:09 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yes; again, I don't expect it to be remotely as close as 2008. My point was not that this was the "closest since 2008" however (that would be, er, not a very wide field of comparison), but that it was historically out of the norm and a serious shift from the model of "left challenger who won't win anything because the party and Americans at large generally prefer the centrist." Let's look at the runner-ups in the Dem races since 1972 and see how Bernie stacks up historically in terms of contests won (this includes D.C., Puerto Rico, etc.). Wikipedia actually doesn't format these consistently and I've probably overlooked some or made some counting errors, but basically:

1972 - McGovern (11), Wallace (6), Humphrey (4)
1976 - Carter (30), Church (5), Scoop Jackson (4), Udall, Wallace, Brown (3 each)
1980 - Carter (37), Kennedy (12)
1984 - Mondale (19), Hart (26), Jesse Jackson (3)
1988 - Dukakis (31), Jackson (14), Gore (7), Gephardt (3), Simon (1)
1992 - Clinton (35), Tsongas (7), Brown (6), Kerrey and Harkin (1 each)
1996 - no contest
2000 - Gore (50+), Bradley (0)
2004 - Kerry (51), Edwards and Dean (2 each), Clark (1)
2008 - Obama (33), Clinton (23)
N/A 2012 - no contest
2016 - Clinton (20), Sanders (15) - so far!

Obviously, contests won isn't everything. Such a metric overstates the importance of winning, say, the US Virgin Islands, and of smaller, less populous states. Gary Hart won a majority of the contests but lost the popular vote by ~2.5%. I submit, however, that it is not a meaningless measure, particularly if we are interested in the electoral viability of ideas, issues, and postures taken by a candidate. A platform that can win a majority in a state, or a lot of them, cannot be written off as a trivial, diffuse leftie fringe. So I think it is at least Interesting that if the race were called for Clinton as of today, Sanders would have won a bigger share of contests (as a percentage of those counted) than Clinton at the end of the 2008 race, and indeed of any modern runner-up save Gary Hart. Of course, calling it now would make it a silly comparison for various reasons but this is something to which it would be interesting to return in June.

Regarding 538:

Me: Only thing I don't get in that article: references to "recent polling" in those states, when their own poll-tracking prediction widget suggests that there's almost none to go on, with some states not even getting entries. Not saying that surprise Sanders blowouts lurk everywhere, just that it seems an odd lapse for Silver.

Mordy: The states he's talking about with the larger quantities of delegates do have recent polling.

Well, let's see.

April
Wisconsin (96): two polls in March: Clinton +6, Sanders +4
Wyoming (18): no page in 538's primary forecast/poll-tracker widget
New York (291): one poll in mid-March: Clinton +48
Connecticut (70): no page
Delaware (31): no page
Maryland (118): one poll in early March, Clinton +33
Pennsylvania (210): two polls in March: Clinton +30, Clinton +25
Rhode Island (33): no page

May
Indiana (92): no page
Guam (12): no page
West Virginia (37): no page
Kentucky (61): no page
Oregon (74): no page

June
U.S. Virgin Islands (12): no page
Puerto Rico (67): no page
California (546): two polls in March: Clinton +7, Clinton +11
Montana (27): no page
New Jersey (142): no polls in March (and only one in 2016).
New Mexico (43): no page
North Dakota (23): no page
South Dakota (25): no page
D.C. (45): no page

Now, to be clear, it's not surprising that there aren't robust poll results in these places! Some of the contests are ages away, and surely pollsters were not planning or budgeting for polling all these contests since usually the race is totally sewn up by now. And my claim was not that Silver cooked the books or something, just that it seems a bit of a logical lapse for Mr. Data Guy, who has previously tweeted frustration when there seems to be a shortage of polling in interesting upcoming races, to put his chips on, "recent polls" in states like New York, where his own system counts only two polls, one from March 14-16, weighted .37, and one from Feb. 28-Mar 3 (weighted .10). Similar numbers crop up in the other upcoming big-ticket states like Maryland and PA. I think he's right about Sanders's chances, but if you're going to be a "numbers" site, use the numbers when you've got them, and acknowledge when you don't got 'em, especially if earlier in the same nomination process you've repeatedly reminded readers that primaries are notorious for big last-minute shifts in voting and that the polls therefore have comparatively low predictive value, especially when you have limited polling data and it's all basically from 1-2 polling houses.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 18:45 (eight years ago) link

POLITICS MAR 30 2016, 2:18 PM ET
Trump Advocates Abortion Ban, 'Some Form of Punishment' for Women

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/trump-lewandowski-they-re-destroying-very-good-person-n548036

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 19:09 (eight years ago) link

@alivitali: NEW Trump to @msnbc: "there has to be some form of punishment" for women who have abortions but he has yet to determine what that should be.

this is getting less funny

k3vin k., Wednesday, 30 March 2016 19:14 (eight years ago) link

this guy is thriving on treating wasp's nests like piñatas
would love it if abortion is the hill he dies on

ulysses, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 19:16 (eight years ago) link

def looking to get a couple hundred Democratic votes

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 19:17 (eight years ago) link

is there anyone that respects women more than trump does?

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 19:18 (eight years ago) link

barbers

Evan, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 19:28 (eight years ago) link

oh wait I misread your post

Evan, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 19:29 (eight years ago) link

welp I'm done

this is blatant attention-pandering, daring people to get outraged and share his comments with other outraged people, thereby spreading his poisonous message. I'm not doing it anymore.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 19:35 (eight years ago) link

i think i'm up to 40% now on his not being nominated

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 19:37 (eight years ago) link

i'm not sure that he meant to bring it up, though - it almost seems like he just never thought through the implications of his position that abortion should be banned (imagine that!).

In an exclusive interview with MSNBC's Chris Matthews, the GOP front-runner described himself multiple times as "pro-life" but struggled to define what the legal ramifications of that position should be. When continually pressed for what the answer is regarding punishing women who would break any theoretical ban, Trump said the "answer is that there has to be some form of punishment, yeah."

When asked what kind of punishment he had in mind, Trump lacked specifics and said he has "not determined what the punishment would be." Trump noted that he does "take positions on everything else but this is a very complicated position."

"If you say abortion is a crime or abortion is murder, you have to deal with it under the law," Matthews stated, making the pivot from the moral position of being pro-life to the practical implications of implementing that position in the law.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 19:42 (eight years ago) link

Wow.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 19:45 (eight years ago) link

Just when you think he can't say something even more insane, he says something even more insane.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 19:46 (eight years ago) link

his numbers are starting to slip both in the polls and the betting markets. he still might be the 'most likely' candidate but the odds of a brokered convention aren't so long shot anymore and he's in a double digit deficit in the latest Wisconsin poll.

no way he's losing NYC, but chances of Cruz stealing CA are fairly high, Maryland is def winnable by Cruz, and PA is only Trump-led because Kasich is getting an absurd amount of votes. Given that he can't get a majority prior to convention time, if he were to tell his voters to vote for Cruz similar to the whole Ohio campaign he benefitted from, that could flip PA.

I don't see how Trump is gonna get the majority of delegates needed by convention time. Perhaps his numbers aren't hurting like they should be (or anywhere near), but he's definitely sinking and the states coming up aren't going to be easy for him. I really think this is going to be a contested convention, even if he does win on first or second ballot.

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 19:49 (eight years ago) link

part of me does worry about the latter only because of the long shot Paul Ryan drafted at convention theories, because he could fare way better than his partners in a GE

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 19:49 (eight years ago) link

but would Cruz say anything different? xxp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 19:49 (eight years ago) link

i'm not sure if it's intentional or not, but his pattern of consistently upping the ante helps him in some ways because it makes people forget about all the other stupid stuff he believes in. it's difficult to try to remember his most recent 10 terrible things he's done, and that's just the tip of the iceberg for him.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 19:50 (eight years ago) link

xxpost Cruz is much more horrible on a policy side but almost equally unelectable, and moreso, doesn't carry the gross goon tactics that Trump's campaign does.

if he had a chance at winning, I might rethink my wishes

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 19:51 (eight years ago) link

meanwhile...

Matt Karp
‏@karpmj
A little bit of data for Michael Tomasky and others who say Bernie Sanders voters are in a "privileged" position

https://twitter.com/karpmj/status/714800486617055232

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 19:52 (eight years ago) link

also, when he raises the bar for terribleness, it helps to mask other things he says that previously would have caused headlines around the world. for example, in the town hall last night, anderson asked him if he trusted Muslims. he answered "...most of them." a few months ago that would have been big news, now it wasn't even mentioned, at least nowhere that i saw.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 19:52 (eight years ago) link

Paul Ryan would not won a general election. There aren't 100 million Joe Scarboroughs in the country.

Xxxpost

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 19:54 (eight years ago) link

http://www.thenation.com/article/the-bernie-inspired-candidate-for-senate-in-pennsylvania/

love the juxtaposition of this guy's look and his political beliefs

k3vin k., Wednesday, 30 March 2016 20:05 (eight years ago) link

i love him. i'm probably hosting a debate party for him next tuesday (which i've never done before but i don't know what else to do and i'm hoping they'll give me a street sign to put up)

Mordy, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 20:08 (eight years ago) link

his campaign ad is worth watching imo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i85rJR99FJc

Mordy, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 20:09 (eight years ago) link

I just have to wonder, where's the tipping point where Trump starts to seriously lose supporters? I feel like he could say "I think parents should murder all of their children" and a lot of people would still be onboard.

I am very inteligent and dicipline boy (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 20:11 (eight years ago) link

He could probably say anything he wants as long as it doesn't sound wimpy.

Evan, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 20:15 (eight years ago) link

He kinda already has? I mean I don't think there's anything he can say that will cause him to lose every remaining state, but there are states he arguably lost in recently like Ohio that earlier in the race, he was doing well in, and he may lose some states in coming weeks that he previously was on target to win.

I think we've also overestimated his actual popularity. We've barely had any primaries since Rubio dropped out, and it already seems to have made some significant shifts in polls (including Wisconsin).

problem is, it could be too little, too late, but the idea of a brokered convention seemed remote not that long ago and now is becoming more and more likely.

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 20:20 (eight years ago) link

He could probably say anything he wants as long as it doesn't sound wimpy.

Every time you think this fucking moron couldn't sink any lower he just keeps plummeting to new depths.

Terry Micawber (Tom D.), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 20:32 (eight years ago) link

I just have to wonder, where's the tipping point

I'm convinced there isn't one. He's already insulted Mexicans, Muslims, McCain, Megyn (maybe he just hates the letter M), and it makes no difference. Callers on CSPAN I've heard who support him do so because they think he's a successful businessman, not a career politician, just a plain-spoken guy who loves America. THat "plain-spoken" thing comes up a bunch, they actually love that he has no filter.

Retro novelty punk (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 20:38 (eight years ago) link

What he's expressing here is of course the logical consequence of asserting personhood of foetuses. Cruz etc are too canny to say it but I'm sure they agree.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 20:41 (eight years ago) link

Is there an anti-abortion/pro-life position that does not involve punishing women who have abortions? Or is the shocking part that he doesn't seem to have thought through what the punishment would be?

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 20:45 (eight years ago) link

>i'm not sure if it's intentional or not, but his pattern of consistently upping the ante helps him in some ways because it makes people forget about all the other stupid stuff he believes in. it's difficult to try to remember his most recent 10 terrible things he's done, and that's just the tip of the iceberg for him.

this was the exact same pattern as the previous, notorious, crack-smoking mayor of my hometown.

Mad Piratical (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 20:49 (eight years ago) link

There are quite a few countries that make providing abortions illegal but don't have functional criminal sanctions against the woman but punishment is fairly common too. Xp

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 20:51 (eight years ago) link

He's already insulted Mexicans, Muslims, McCain, Megyn (maybe he just hates the letter M), and it makes no difference.

Just wait'll he goes after Morbius...

Now I Know How Joan of Arcadia Felt (C. Grisso/McCain), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 21:16 (eight years ago) link

@Bencjacobs
Donald Trump fully retreats on punishing women who get abortions

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ce0wtFkW8AASIAw.jpg

mookieproof, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 21:20 (eight years ago) link

also!

@nbcwashington
JUST IN: Bernie Sanders not on D.C. ballot after Dem. party error, sources say nbc4dc.com/UIdwA69

mookieproof, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 21:21 (eight years ago) link

jesus

goole, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 21:21 (eight years ago) link

lotta write-ins

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 21:23 (eight years ago) link

Wouldn't normally post something like this, but I think it's a much better version of that flow chart from a few days ago. (Can't tell if the person who created is a friend of a friend on FB, or if it was picked up somewhere else--anyway, she does say she's made it public.)

http://i1059.photobucket.com/albums/t427/sayhey1/flow_zpscpggzjd4.jpg

Sorry if it was posted earlier. Need a new thread--this one's too large to check back.

clemenza, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 21:24 (eight years ago) link

Believe me. No one posted that.

pplains, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 21:31 (eight years ago) link

lol

ejemplo (crüt), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 21:36 (eight years ago) link

"My position hasn't changed"

timellison, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 21:42 (eight years ago) link

I think the one I posted is a response to that one.

clemenza, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 21:46 (eight years ago) link

oh good, our conversion into Facebook is complete

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 21:47 (eight years ago) link

lolworthy cat vids coming soon

scott beowulf (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 21:54 (eight years ago) link

"Candidate Clarifies Statements on Punishment for Abortions"

...when did "clarify" become a synonym for "revises"?

"let me clarify my statement that I like hitler. i do not like hitler."

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 21:56 (eight years ago) link

Trump doing any kind of a clarification must be a first, though. The backlash must have been immediate and fierce.

clemenza, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 21:58 (eight years ago) link

he's "clarified" plenty of times, just not quite this fast or thoroughly

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 21:59 (eight years ago) link

lolworthy cat vids coming soon

I rarely post anything from Facebook here, but I did think that flowchart was good. I know ILX isn't like that.

You demanded it: a thread with pictures of cats in it
This one's for ENBB
Infinite Cats... (cats cats cats cats cats cats...)

clemenza, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 22:03 (eight years ago) link

don't forget The different kinds of tea that cats like

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 22:04 (eight years ago) link

http://www.xojane.com/issues/stephanie-cegielski-donald-trump-campaign-defector

If this is real, I think his behaviour makes a lot more sense.

it's hard for me to swallow that whole story but it would be funny if he was literally trying to get out by self-sabotaging and then just had to go "jesus you idiots, what else do I have to do to lose this thing?"

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 22:12 (eight years ago) link

Even more than the specifics of what Trump is clarifying/contradicting/making up, or the degree of backlash, this might signal an atypical instance of him second-guessing himself--a slight loss of nerve, like an athlete who hesitates a split-second too long.

clemenza, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 22:21 (eight years ago) link

People writing / saying things like "adorable belief in the magic political revolution fairy" drive me up the fucking wall. I'd like to put them each into a closet-sized paper bag and leave them there to die.

Adorable belief in paper bags that kill ppl

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 22:28 (eight years ago) link

It's not the paper bags that kill people, it's the lack of imagination.

~magic~

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 22:34 (eight years ago) link

fake penthouse letters magorium

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 22:34 (eight years ago) link

nb I'm just riffing I strongly support voting for whoever you are so angry about not being taken seriously as a future president

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 22:36 (eight years ago) link

don't forget The different kinds of tea that cats like

― wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, March 30, 2016 3:04 PM (17 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

<3 <3 <3 this thread

lute bro (brimstead), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 23:18 (eight years ago) link

Cruz's alleged mistress is talking to Erin Burnett on CNN

Treeship, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 23:23 (eight years ago) link

Classic teeth sucking, eye rolling, reality denying conservative pundit.

Treeship, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 23:24 (eight years ago) link

guilty lols @ right wing sites calling this the "cuban mistress crisis"

ejemplo (crüt), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 23:25 (eight years ago) link

Her face looks kind of like a skull but only because she has done too much contouring with her makeup.

Treeship, Wednesday, 30 March 2016 23:26 (eight years ago) link

also, she is a Horcrux

ejemplo (crüt), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 23:34 (eight years ago) link

http://www.xojane.com/issues/stephanie-cegielski-donald-trump-campaign-defector

If this is real, I think his behaviour makes a lot more sense.

― A long little doggy like a dachshund? I already g (fake penthouse letters mcgee), Wednesday, March 30, 2016 11:11 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lost all credibility by calling seth rogen an extraordinary improvisor

F♯ A♯ (∞), Wednesday, 30 March 2016 23:45 (eight years ago) link

Don't know if anyone's posted this yet.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/interrogation/2016/03/barney_frank_is_not_impressed_by_bernie_sanders.html

I find myself agreeing with lots of this.

o. nate, Thursday, 31 March 2016 01:45 (eight years ago) link

i like barney, but he seems like a prick

k3vin k., Thursday, 31 March 2016 02:00 (eight years ago) link

Bernie Sanders has been in Congress for 25 years with little to show for it in terms of his accomplishments and that’s because of the role he stakes out.

that is true, but not really an argument against his past role or hoped-for role

mookieproof, Thursday, 31 March 2016 02:05 (eight years ago) link

if you accept that major, well-known results are the most important factor in deciding who should be president, then hillary is your gal. many of hers are awful

k3vin k., Thursday, 31 March 2016 02:09 (eight years ago) link

i like barney, but he seems like a prick

― k3vin k., Wednesday, March 30, 2016

I recommend his memoir, one of the best of its kind: well-written (no ghost writer as far as I can tell) narrative about how purity's the enemy if you're in the minority. I wrote this at the time:

That excrescence, to which Frank devotes an entire chapter, might never have made it out of committee had opponents done the boring work of calling and writing congressmen. This chapter contains the book’s second leitmotif: Liberals protest. Conservatives vote. Liberals chant. Conservatives organize. The National Rifle Association, the most successful voting bloc in the country’s history, does it right. The NRA, writes Frank, urges “urge all of their adherents to get on the voting rolls. They are diligent to the point of obsession in making sure that elected officials hear from everyone in their constituencies who opposes any limits on guns…” A denizen of a safe district who spent half his political life in the minority, Frank has no patience for purity. Activists who reject partial victories get the full force of his contempt

The excrescence is DADT.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 31 March 2016 02:12 (eight years ago) link

i hate the fucker.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 31 March 2016 02:18 (eight years ago) link

More Stone!

http://www.gq.com/story/roger-stone-donald-trump-interview

He called me a henchman, and I don't really object to that, but henchmen get paid, and I have been paid nothing by Trump.

... (Eazy), Thursday, 31 March 2016 02:22 (eight years ago) link

so he's Trump's Barney Frank

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 31 March 2016 02:24 (eight years ago) link

tbh i lost a lot of respect for frank after reading that interview, his opinions come off as lazy and misinformed at best, and defensive of the worst aspects of modern u.s. politics at worst.

Well if that’s the case it’s even dumber than I thought. The financial system is people lending money to other people so they can do things. I do think that he overstates it when he says, “they’re all corrupt.” It’s simply not true.

i don't think bernie has ever said that every single person in america's financial system is "corrupt," he's said that america's campaign financing system is corrupt and harmful to democratic politics. which is, in and of itself, a completely normal opinion that countless ppl across the political spectrum, including obama, have expressed over the last decade. the primary difference between sanders and other liberal politicians is that he's put that opinion front and center in his platform in a way that makes politicians who are basically comfortable with the system and proud of their accomplishments within it (like frank) uncomfortable.

also calling sanders a "mccarthyite" for calling on clinton to release her wall street speeches is pretty gross, jeez.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 31 March 2016 05:07 (eight years ago) link

The remarks on caucuses are pretty otm, though.

Frederik B, Thursday, 31 March 2016 08:04 (eight years ago) link

oh good, our conversion into Facebook is complete

a few more flowcharts drained of jokes and we can call it "clemenzaland"

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 31 March 2016 10:53 (eight years ago) link

this is fun

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-fact-check_us_56fc375fe4b0daf53aee9175

goole, Thursday, 31 March 2016 13:59 (eight years ago) link

not even going to read the Politico piece beyond its assertion of what Hillary "needs" to beat Trump when the answer is anything beyond "continue existing through November."

evol j, Thursday, 31 March 2016 14:13 (eight years ago) link

I raised an eyebrow at "the Democrats don't need to recruit a Latino anymore" and stopped reading once I got to "the Democrats don't need to include another woman"

If your takeaway from all of this is "the Republicans are so toxic that we can, no MUST go back to selecting an older white man to be VP", you should probably stop writing

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 31 March 2016 14:17 (eight years ago) link

like, there are multiple reasons why Franken would at least be an interesting pick to discuss and the article touches on some of them, but including "plus we don't have to worry about minorities or women anymore" is immediate middle-finger rhetoric

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 31 March 2016 14:18 (eight years ago) link

oh i didn't read the article

goole, Thursday, 31 March 2016 14:20 (eight years ago) link

hp;dr

goole, Thursday, 31 March 2016 14:20 (eight years ago) link

oh that was politico lol

still

goole, Thursday, 31 March 2016 14:21 (eight years ago) link

oh politicopaws

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 31 March 2016 14:35 (eight years ago) link

Are Jews not a minority group anymore? I haven't read the article either, but if its POV is "no need to pick a minority - we can go with this Jewish guy" that's kind of interesting, no?

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Thursday, 31 March 2016 14:44 (eight years ago) link

the argument is that hillary needs to shore up her left flank, keep the rust belt happy and have someone who can trade shittalk with trump. franken sort of superficially looks like he could do all 3.

BUT, i don't know if that's what hillary would need to look for in a running mate AND there's a lot to quibble about in terms of franken's ability to those 3 things anyway

i like him ok as a senator but come on

goole, Thursday, 31 March 2016 14:49 (eight years ago) link

TS Gremlins 2 vs Trading Places

Chicamaw (Ward Fowler), Thursday, 31 March 2016 14:51 (eight years ago) link

i'd shore up her left flank if you know what i mean

Neanderthal, Thursday, 31 March 2016 14:54 (eight years ago) link

somewhat reduces the daylight between "bozo" and "the serious people"

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 31 March 2016 15:04 (eight years ago) link

i don't think bernie has ever said that every single person in america's financial system is "corrupt," he's said that america's campaign financing system is corrupt and harmful to democratic politics.

Then blame the interviewer not Frank, because he certainly gave the impression that Bernie had said that.

o. nate, Thursday, 31 March 2016 15:18 (eight years ago) link

Man, that Matthews-Trump interview from yesterday: outside of Palin, I don't remember a clearer case of a politician with a "What I am supposed to say here?" thought bubble over his head as he tries to answer a question. They argued and yelled and interrupted each other for four hours on CNN last night--thought Trump's surrogate was going to break down crying at one point--and then, just before midnight, they brought Betty White in for 10 minutes.

clemenza, Thursday, 31 March 2016 15:25 (eight years ago) link

I think the main issue that Frank has with Sanders and his supporters is their seeming belief that a model of ideological and fundraising purity that can work for one quixotic Senator from a small liberal state can be a model for a national party, and their willingness to attack Clinton for making the deals and accepting the fundraising that are necessary to actually make things happen in the political world that exists.

o. nate, Thursday, 31 March 2016 15:45 (eight years ago) link

does any of this hurt Trump, even if he loses WI, Real Clear Politics shows him with sizeable leads in California, New York and Pennsylvania...

rockpalast '82 (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 31 March 2016 15:50 (eight years ago) link

that politico franken article was already posted, and some of y'all liked it!

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 31 March 2016 15:53 (eight years ago) link

RCP is using old polls for California in their average. the latest poll in CA had Trump's lead at 1, and 538's polls-plus model now gives the odds of a Cruz victory in CA at around 55%. There hasn't been an actual poll to show him in the lead yet, but there's ample time before that primary to swing in either direction.

He's largely winning by a lot in PA because of vote splitting - Kasich and Cruz both polling in the 20%s there. The only way for Kasich or Cruz to win there is if one asks his followers to vote for his competitor, and who knows how well that will go.

Neanderthal, Thursday, 31 March 2016 15:54 (eight years ago) link

3 of those polls used in RCP's average for CA, for instance, were taken before Rubio even dropped out. the one with Trump's lead to 1 is the only post-Rubio poll there.

Neanderthal, Thursday, 31 March 2016 15:55 (eight years ago) link

technically also, Pennsylvania's most recent poll (which showed Kasisch within 3 points of Trump) spanned two days in which Rubio was still in the race. so who knows what's going on there.

Neanderthal, Thursday, 31 March 2016 15:56 (eight years ago) link

puritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypuritypurity

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 31 March 2016 15:58 (eight years ago) link

well you sure just typed "purity" a buncha times congrats

Neanderthal, Thursday, 31 March 2016 15:59 (eight years ago) link

o. nate OTM.

In that Frank interview, the statement regarding individuals who sat out the 2010 and 2014 midterm elections being angry at Democrats for not being able to produce policies they like struck a chord with me. Applies to so many enthusiastic Bernie supporters I know.

Gatemouth, Thursday, 31 March 2016 16:00 (eight years ago) link

that's the part of Frank's thinking that's always resonated. Unlike the candidate of his choice, he has worked and was in the minority for half his public life using amendment. That's the part of his criticism of Sanders that sounds bat shit .

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 31 March 2016 16:01 (eight years ago) link

*amendments

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 31 March 2016 16:02 (eight years ago) link

Krugman especially sharp today with his analysis of the deer-in-the-headlights reaction of the Republican establishment to the rise of Trump:

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/03/30/the-pathos-of-republican-reformers

o. nate, Thursday, 31 March 2016 16:07 (eight years ago) link

that politico franken article was already posted, and some of y'all liked it!

― global tetrahedron, Thursday, March 31, 2016 10:53 AM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

oh sorry, i know that's a bad habit on these threads

goole, Thursday, 31 March 2016 16:08 (eight years ago) link

ftr I didn't open it the first time

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 31 March 2016 16:27 (eight years ago) link

The initial Franken post gave me big LOLs just because I imagined the snit my mother would have if it happened.

jedi slimane (suzy), Thursday, 31 March 2016 16:39 (eight years ago) link

Facebook is summarizing that Barney Frank interview as "Barney Frank: Former Congressman Expresses Disinterest in Seeing 'The Big Short' in Interview" for me.

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Thursday, 31 March 2016 16:42 (eight years ago) link

E.J. Dionne is not a statistician, not does he have a perfect track record as an astute observer of the political moment. However I thought this piece was worth some eyeball time:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-great-trump-distortion/2016/03/30/3f93792a-f6a6-11e5-8b23-538270a1ca31_story.html?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-f%3Ahomepage%2Fstory

Basically, Trump is currently eating up the airwaves not because he's popular, but because cameras like to follow whatever's in motion. It doesn't mean that Trump or Trumpian ideas are popular. In fact, Obama's popularity eclipses Donald's, yet Obama is widely thought to be an unpopular and failed President.

Obama’s approval rating is at 89 percent with Democrats and 50 percent among independents. But it stands at only 12 percent with Republicans and 9 percent among conservative Republicans. Yet the voices of conservative Republicans are being amplified beyond all reason by the obsession with Trump and the GOP’s struggles.

So the people speaking loudest say Obama sucks, so that attitude gets more headlines. No one is interviewing the people who think he's more or less okay. Got it.

Back to the Hateful Yam:

A March 16-21 Quinnipiac poll found that Trump was viewed favorably by 62 percent of Republicans but only 34 percent of independents and 6 percent of Democrats. His overall favorability rating: 33 percent. In the case of Trump, affection is mostly a Republican phenomenon.... Trumpism is not sweeping the nation. It has a strong foothold only in the Republican Party, and not even all of it.

I don't mean "Democrats, relax because it's in the bag," but rather "Democrats, relax (a little) because this ridiculousness is still a niche phenomenon." The people with the loudest voices still only get one vote each.

scott beowulf (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 31 March 2016 16:43 (eight years ago) link

The remarks on caucuses are pretty otm, though.

― Frederik B, Thursday, March 31, 2016 1:04 AM (8 hours ago)

The part where he accused participants of having a lot of time on their hands?

timellison, Thursday, 31 March 2016 16:45 (eight years ago) link

yet Obama is widely thought to be an unpopular and failed President.

by GOP rabble maybe

Οὖτις, Thursday, 31 March 2016 16:47 (eight years ago) link

frank is being his usual Good Dem and basically trotting out all of the usual pro-HRC anti-bernie talking points, but his point that caucuses are dumb and less democratic than primaries is definitely right. that said i do think bernie's success in caucuses is heavily confounded by the demographics of states that happen to hold caucuses, something i haven't seen enough people point out

k3vin k., Thursday, 31 March 2016 16:51 (eight years ago) link

Οὖτις, precisely, see above. To borrow a bit from George Saunders, if you're in a room with ten people and one guy has a megaphone, you're going to remember his opinions more than those of the people quietly speaking in the corner.

scott beowulf (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 31 March 2016 16:53 (eight years ago) link

these "'Silent' 'Majority' Stands With Trump" signs are just the best. these idiots are certainly NOT a majority, and for the love of fuck they are not silent - irl or online. i've never seen a group of people so loud and incapable of shutting tfu.

rmde bob (will), Thursday, 31 March 2016 16:59 (eight years ago) link

barney frank, barty frack, party hack

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 31 March 2016 17:01 (eight years ago) link

though the Bernie superfans certainly give them a run for their money ;)

xpost

rmde bob (will), Thursday, 31 March 2016 17:01 (eight years ago) link

trump is only on top because the rest of the GOP field is historically weak and terrible at being politicians/standing strong on their own bonafides/not allowing themselves to be drawn into a knife fight in a voting booth with yam.

nomar, Thursday, 31 March 2016 17:02 (eight years ago) link

From Krugman:

After all, what is the modern GOP? A simple model that accounts for just about everything you see is that it’s an engine designed to harness white resentment on behalf of higher incomes for the donor class.

Of course, ilx says roughly the same thing on a near-daily basis, but this formulation is exceptionally pithy. A bit of paring down and it's a tweet.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 31 March 2016 17:03 (eight years ago) link

nomar - but Huckabee told me this was the A Team!

will - yes, but let's not tell them just yet. This is juvenile and spiteful but perhaps it's okay to have them think they are an uncounted legion until circumstances force them to realize they are not so.

scott beowulf (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 31 March 2016 17:03 (eight years ago) link

he's usually not that memorable a writer so I'm especially impressed

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 31 March 2016 17:04 (eight years ago) link

the A Team with nothing but murdocks

nomar, Thursday, 31 March 2016 17:04 (eight years ago) link

i know you all love the markets so...

trump down from 81 to 66 for the gop nom this week

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 31 March 2016 17:05 (eight years ago) link

Terrific read

will dig into this and looks like good reportage at first glance but ugh that headline

Οὖτις, Thursday, 31 March 2016 17:05 (eight years ago) link

A good read.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 31 March 2016 17:08 (eight years ago) link

http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/the-only-thing-that-matters/

The new map, as you will see, does not show a close and competitive general election. The Republicans now find themselves in a deep hole.

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Thursday, 31 March 2016 17:10 (eight years ago) link

... and >1 vote at the convention has gone from 40% to 70% in the same time

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 31 March 2016 17:11 (eight years ago) link

are the rapid polling shifts mostly based on his poor wisconsin numbers?

Mordy, Thursday, 31 March 2016 17:12 (eight years ago) link

are the polling shifts based on polling shifts?

or do you mean the betting markets? if so, who knows what they are based on, but they do not usually move this quickly absent an actual election reporting a result

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 31 March 2016 17:16 (eight years ago) link

i meant the betting markets. it's hard to imagine it moving bc of something he said - you'd think if all the other things he said didn't sink him the latest thing wouldn't either.

Mordy, Thursday, 31 March 2016 17:18 (eight years ago) link

Punishing women for abortions does seem to have had an impact that the other enormities didn't, coming in the same week as the lewandowski thing and the cruz's wife stuff.

Ps I think this is the first time in my life I used the word "enormity" correctly and I realise this post is valueless punditry but I didn't want to pass up the opportunity.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 31 March 2016 17:28 (eight years ago) link

Potential Trump supporters have quite possibly never interacted with members of the other groups that Trump has slagged off but chances are pretty good that they've been acquainted with a woman or two. And, yeah, he's always been a misogynist but the past week has been an impressively-sustained assault on that front.

I am very inteligent and dicipline boy (Old Lunch), Thursday, 31 March 2016 17:32 (eight years ago) link

People just need to keep calling him on it so that, unlike most other human beings who would eventually back down and possibly even apologize, he'll keep doubling down with his mealy mouthed "who knows, that pen could've been a bayonet" bullshit and dig the hole deeper.

I am very inteligent and dicipline boy (Old Lunch), Thursday, 31 March 2016 17:34 (eight years ago) link

(I just found within myself a deep desire to stage a faux production of Waiting For Godot with all of Beckett's dialogue replaced with Trump quotes.)

I am very inteligent and dicipline boy (Old Lunch), Thursday, 31 March 2016 17:36 (eight years ago) link

The amazing thing about his abortion comments is that he managed to piss off both pro- and anti-choice people in equal measure.

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Thursday, 31 March 2016 18:20 (eight years ago) link

(I just found within myself a deep desire to stage a faux production of Waiting For Godot with all of Beckett's dialogue replaced with Trump quotes.)

it would be amazing if you got the script off your shelf and realized that trump had been exclusively quoting beckett's dialogue all along

Guayaquil (eephus!), Thursday, 31 March 2016 18:28 (eight years ago) link

He's like soft porn. People who don't like porn find him offensive and people who do like porn can tell he doesn't really mean what he's saying.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 31 March 2016 18:37 (eight years ago) link

@HillaryClinton
Some folks may have the luxury to hold out for “the perfect.” But a lot of Americans are hurting right now and they can’t wait for that.

@dick_nixon
"What the hell else are you going to do?" At least they came out and said it.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 31 March 2016 18:45 (eight years ago) link

He's like soft porn. People who don't like porn find him offensive and people who do like porn can tell he doesn't really mean what he's saying.

― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, March 31, 2016 2:37 PM (46 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

However, watching shit emerge from a orifice surrounded by weird looking skin is more hardcore porn.

Evan, Thursday, 31 March 2016 19:28 (eight years ago) link

The amazing thing about his abortion comments is that he managed to piss off both pro- and anti-choice people in equal measure.

― Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Thursday, March 31, 2016 1:20 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

he's just punctured their bullshit smokescreen that they are interested in protecting the "wellbeing of women" like those fake ass "pregnancy health counceling" centers they put in vacant corner store locations in the city.

cruz will be much worse on women's right to choose because unlike trump he actually gives a fuck about his horrific "principles" where as trump might see a shiny quarter on the ground get distracted and forget he ever said that, then deny he ever did if it comes up again

rockpalast '82 (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 31 March 2016 19:46 (eight years ago) link

that last point is why Cruz is scarier/more dangerous across the board

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 31 March 2016 19:48 (eight years ago) link

yep

k3vin k., Thursday, 31 March 2016 19:49 (eight years ago) link

and why in no way in fucking hell he can be elected, along with being disliked by his party and being physically repellent

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 31 March 2016 19:50 (eight years ago) link

also yep

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 31 March 2016 19:50 (eight years ago) link

barring some catastrophe or people being so relieved that the Republicans bait/switched at the convention to a candidate less blatantly crazy that the reward their strongarming with votes, the Democratic primary is the actual election this time

obv IMO and I make no guesses about congressional races but unless the country is a lot more shameless than I think it is, whoever wins the Democratic nomination will be the next President

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 31 March 2016 19:52 (eight years ago) link

would cruz or trump yield a bigger democratic win? who would have the bigger down-ticket effect?

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:01 (eight years ago) link

i instinctively thought Trump, a lot of people don't know/care about Cruz and he wouldn't inspire as much anti-turnout
but then how many Republicans/"independents" will just stay home if Trump isn't the nominee, either...

Nhex, Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:04 (eight years ago) link

I have no idea tbh. I never thought DT would make it this far in the first place so I can't feel comfortable making bold predictions about anything other than "he has already secured 90% of the votes he would get in a general election"; Cruz is, as has been noted, the most despised person in the running who could still be thought of as an establishment figure so I can't imagine that his name at the top of the ballot would reflect well on other Republicans downticket unless the person voting has only seen the DT clown show and has never paid attention to a single thing Cruz has ever said or done.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:05 (eight years ago) link

my hunch now is trump, so i'm hoping he noisily clings on

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:08 (eight years ago) link

p.s. if you make an incorrect prediction about this election you're not allowed to post in the 2020 thread

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:09 (eight years ago) link

GOP better off just renominating Mitt

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:09 (eight years ago) link

lolololololololol

https://twitter.com/katie_mburns/status/694021085952548864

goole, Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:11 (eight years ago) link

isn't that his normal face tho

k3vin k., Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:13 (eight years ago) link

GOP better off just renominating Mitt

― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, March 31, 2016 4:09 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

kind of hoping cruz gets the nom so we can see what happens to the "if only we nominated a real conservative" whining when he loses miserably

marcos, Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:15 (eight years ago) link

like trump, despite base support among repubs, is still too much of a mixed bag, the wishing for a "real conservative" would persist w/ a trump candidacy

marcos, Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:17 (eight years ago) link

have a trump candidacy then a 'real' conservative, then they can lose this time *and* next time

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:20 (eight years ago) link

the sanest republican opts for kasich. s/he who is feeling adventurous favours trump

F♯ A♯ (∞), Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:25 (eight years ago) link

Absolute best odds for a Republican presidency: Kasich vs. Sanders. Any other combination adds up to a D win IMO.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:27 (eight years ago) link

the next post is the 6,666th one

Iago Galdston, Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:28 (eight years ago) link

fartz

Karl Malone, Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:29 (eight years ago) link

haha sorry

Karl Malone, Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:29 (eight years ago) link

actual lol

goole, Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:30 (eight years ago) link

same

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:30 (eight years ago) link

rumour has it if you shave trump's head the number of the beast is revealed

what do you think he's hiding under that combover

F♯ A♯ (∞), Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:31 (eight years ago) link

that's where he keeps Chris Christie's soul

Οὖτις, Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:33 (eight years ago) link

from Jon Schwarz at The Intercept

...Citizens United didn’t change the law that forbids political spending by “foreign nationals” (which covers foreign governments, corporations, and individuals). Federal contractors also may not engage in such spending.

But what Citizens United did do was make it possible for U.S. corporations to spend unlimited amounts directly from their corporate treasuries on electioneering — and the money in corporate treasuries belongs to the company’s shareholders.

“Arguably, then,” wrote Ellen Weintraub, one of the six members of the FEC, in a New York Times op-ed, “for a corporation to make political contributions or expenditures legally, it may not have any shareholders who are foreigners or federal contractors.”

Since essentially all significant publicly traded “American” corporations are owned to some degree by foreign nationals (and certainly some have shareholders who are federal contractors), that means that any electoral spending by such corporations is potentially illegal.

That would presumably be even more the case for subsidiaries of foreign companies that are wholly owned by their parent company but incorporated in the U.S.

Weintraub says that at the next FEC meeting, she “will move to direct the commission’s lawyers to provide us with options on how best to instruct corporate political spenders of their obligations under both Citizens United and statutory law.”

https://theintercept.com/2016/03/31/foreign-money-is-flowing-into-u-s-elections-alitos-lying-lips-notwithstanding/

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:34 (eight years ago) link

shoulda gone in gen politics thread i guess

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:34 (eight years ago) link

i instinctively thought Trump, a lot of people don't know/care about Cruz and he wouldn't inspire as much anti-turnout
but then how many Republicans/"independents" will just stay home if Trump isn't the nominee, either...

― Nhex, Thursday, March 31, 2016 9:04 PM (37 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

if cruz was the nominee people are going to know all about him by the time the election rolls around, i mean i doubt most people had even heard of sarah palin when she was picked for the VP slot and well before the election she was the defining reason for anti-turnout.

nomar, Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:45 (eight years ago) link

I sure hope we're not all underestimating the ability of Repubs to hold their collective nose and pull the lever, especially if it's Cruz.

nickn, Thursday, 31 March 2016 20:57 (eight years ago) link

i think most of them would be capable of doing it, but can't see cruz doing any better than mccain or romney did, at best.

Karl Malone, Thursday, 31 March 2016 21:00 (eight years ago) link

Cruz's outreach to Latinos is really gonna pay off, just wait!

Οὖτις, Thursday, 31 March 2016 21:01 (eight years ago) link

DJP otm with this

he has already secured 90% of the votes he would get in a general election

At the same time, I agree with marcos that it would bring a nice, long-overdue clarity to the conversation if Cruz were the nominee (assuming, of course, he loses badly). I know that dead-ender types are gonna be dead-enders, but still. Having a real-world counterargument to the "if only we nominated a REAL conservative" line would have been nice.

Ah, well. Those dudes will be if-onlying their way to the grave either way. Upside is that having them loudly blame Trump for the disastrous loss to the weakest Dem in decades may forestall another Trump run (or Trump-style run) in future.

scott beowulf (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 31 March 2016 21:13 (eight years ago) link

Having a real-world counterargument to the "if only we nominated a REAL conservative" line would have been nice.

What effect do you think that'll have? I mean, suppose Sanders is nominated and loses. Do you think the left flank of the Democratic party is going to say "ok, we're satisfied, now we see it's not just a matter of nominating a real liberal?" No, they (or should I say we) would say "he was undercut by the media and the establishment of the party, really getting behind a left-wing nominee still hasn't been tried." And that's exactly what the movement conservatives would say / will say if / when Cruz runs and loses; the RINOs and the immigrant-loving business interests in the RNC didn't really get behind him, they intentionally let Cruz lose so they could run Romney II next time, but when a conservative candidacy is REALLY tried, then you'll see the silent majority rise up, etc etc etc.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Thursday, 31 March 2016 21:22 (eight years ago) link

otm

Mordy, Thursday, 31 March 2016 21:23 (eight years ago) link

if only we nominated a real Cuban!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 31 March 2016 21:26 (eight years ago) link

we've been over this No True Scotsman fallacy thing

Οὖτις, Thursday, 31 March 2016 21:27 (eight years ago) link

yea u r right eephus

marcos, Thursday, 31 March 2016 21:32 (eight years ago) link

Okay, conceded.

doo-wop unto others (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 31 March 2016 21:35 (eight years ago) link

Buffalo "conservatarian" talk-radio guy says, categorically, Trump's finished. Overreacting, probably, but I will say this is the first time he's said that.

clemenza, Thursday, 31 March 2016 22:01 (eight years ago) link

:)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1L_UKv19P9E

schwantz, Thursday, 31 March 2016 22:18 (eight years ago) link

didn't nytimes write that trump is leading over there

*googles*

uh

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/03/31/donald-trump-and-hillary-clinton-hold-strong-leads-in-new-york-poll-shows/

F♯ A♯ (∞), Thursday, 31 March 2016 22:19 (eight years ago) link

few metaphors are lower hanging fruit than the fate of a young black man with a "FREE HUGS :)" sign at a trump rally vs. a sanders rally

ulysses, Thursday, 31 March 2016 22:28 (eight years ago) link

oof

nomar, Thursday, 31 March 2016 22:31 (eight years ago) link

NYC is definitely his by a long shot. but the market's grown bearish on Donut Pump.

even 66% odds that it goes to more than two ballots at the convention now. and I don't know if we've bore the full weight of his dunderheaded statements from yesterday yet.

Neanderthal, Thursday, 31 March 2016 22:32 (eight years ago) link

I hugged that guy!

timellison, Thursday, 31 March 2016 23:37 (eight years ago) link

wow, on PredictIt, you can buy a Trump Wins Repub Nom for fuckin' 46 cents a share.

I hate that I discovered this shit cos I used to have a gambling problem but it's better than betting on sports cos you don't have to bank on a result necessarily

Neanderthal, Friday, 1 April 2016 00:27 (eight years ago) link

Because Trump is despised from all directions, he also moves the bar on insane-pariah status. Suddenly anti-Trump guy Glenn Beck is showing up on CNN again.

clemenza, Friday, 1 April 2016 00:44 (eight years ago) link

we're gonna be very bored when this is all over

Neanderthal, Friday, 1 April 2016 00:47 (eight years ago) link

wonder if rubio is wishing he'd stuck around

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 1 April 2016 00:48 (eight years ago) link

he's apparently trying to hold onto his delegates despite dropping out to preserve #nevertrump

Neanderthal, Friday, 1 April 2016 00:51 (eight years ago) link

(not a joek - though I have no idea if that will be allowed)

Neanderthal, Friday, 1 April 2016 00:51 (eight years ago) link

Love what they did with Perot's nose there...What a circus that was, Perot's exit + return. If Trump ever bows out, maybe he can come up with a Perot-like story about the RNC planting CIA agents at the hospital where his daughter had her baby.

clemenza, Friday, 1 April 2016 00:54 (eight years ago) link

People have forgotten how batshit Perot exit/reentry were. He accused former CIA director Poppy Bush of putting a hit out on his family!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 1 April 2016 00:56 (eight years ago) link

.....could....

Could Chelsea enter GOP race

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Friday, 1 April 2016 00:58 (eight years ago) link

I might be wrong, but I get the feeling some of the younger posters here don't know how crazy Perot was period. He seems to get a measure of respect for his anti-NAFTA stance (overlap with Trump). He was nuts.

clemenza, Friday, 1 April 2016 01:01 (eight years ago) link

I remember the ears and that he was, for some reason, really popular amongst my 8th grade classmates (we had a mock election and he came in 2nd. Clinton came in dead last. I think we were all just perves.)

Neanderthal, Friday, 1 April 2016 01:04 (eight years ago) link

I have no idea if that will be allowed

To the best of my knowledge, pledged delegates from primaries or caucuses remain pledged for at least the first ballot, unless they are released by the candidate before the first ballot. Their votes can't be officially transferred by one candidate to another and after the first ballot they are freed to vote as they desire. That's a big reason why the slate of delegates is chosen for their proved loyalty to the candidate, so they will follow directions even if they don't have to.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 1 April 2016 01:06 (eight years ago) link

lol did Perot actually say "you people" during an NAACP address?

Neanderthal, Friday, 1 April 2016 01:09 (eight years ago) link

Yes...From memory, he was talking about the economy and said something like "And who gets hit hardest? You people."

clemenza, Friday, 1 April 2016 01:15 (eight years ago) link

I do remember Stocksdale tho...that shit was hilarious

Neanderthal, Friday, 1 April 2016 01:16 (eight years ago) link

(- extra s)

Neanderthal, Friday, 1 April 2016 01:17 (eight years ago) link

He could still surprise us!
http://springfieldfiles.com/albums/clothing/0084.JPG

Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Friday, 1 April 2016 02:11 (eight years ago) link

if yer that much into war why not play Amon Amarth songs

Neanderthal, Friday, 1 April 2016 02:18 (eight years ago) link

we're gonna be very bored when this is all over

That long, huh?

Bern rallying in the Bronx with Spike Lee and Rosario Dawson right now.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 1 April 2016 03:04 (eight years ago) link

http://youtu.be/dC4Pvm6Oj4A

Ugh please stop fucking up and being terrible

Here, let me Danesplain that for you (jjjusten), Friday, 1 April 2016 04:28 (eight years ago) link

Like obv I'm going to vote for you under duress but jamming your finger in the face of a climate change activist because any challenge on your donations is an attack from the sanders camp is so fucking shitty.

Here, let me Danesplain that for you (jjjusten), Friday, 1 April 2016 04:33 (eight years ago) link

She really should be better at this after an entire life in politics. This isn't even her first presidential run!

Like, I only even know one person who is a full on enthusiastic Hillary supporter (just like she was in 2008), and good for her, but most people who aren't bonkers for Bernie are just like "yeah, she's the worst, but what else is there?" That's how I feel, anyway. I just wish she'd stop making me hate myself more every day.

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Friday, 1 April 2016 04:38 (eight years ago) link

most people who aren't bonkers for Bernie are just like "yeah, she's the worst, but what else is there?"

I think it depends who you hang out with? I would say just about every woman my age I know (I'm mid 40s) is legitimately psyched about Clinton. I have more Clinton-supporting friends than Sanders-supporting friends. That's just anecdotal but polling shows Clinton voters self-report just as much enthusiasm as Sanders supporters

http://www.gallup.com/poll/190343/trump-clinton-supporters-lead-enthusiasm.aspx

and of course there's the fact that millions and millions of people, given the choice between Clinton and Sanders, are voting for her. I just can't see any way to read this other than "lots and lots of people are sincerely excited about Hillary Clinton being president."

Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 1 April 2016 04:46 (eight years ago) link

yeah eephus otm, true of liberal voters maybe but certainly not the majority of democrats

k3vin k., Friday, 1 April 2016 04:49 (eight years ago) link

That's interesting and actually new news to me. Even though I'm already a dedicated Clinton voter, I have no enthusiasm at all and no one else I know (with the exception of one person) has any either. I'm aware I live in a bubble of angry lefties, though, so it's hardly a realistic view of the campaign.

Obama, for all he's accomplished, likely ruined me forever about big expectations. All I really want now is someone who won't make the lives of my LGBTQ friends worse and won't make the lives of my women friends worse and won't make the lives of my black friends worse and hopefully won't make the rest of the world hate us more than they already do and won't wreck the supreme court for decades to come. Maybe that guy is Bernie, but after 7 years of centrist Obama getting the kind of pushback he gets from congress, I can't see Bernie accomplishing one single thing. At least Clinton has a chance.

(Though, if Trump torches the GOP so badly that they lose the senate AND the house, it could be good timez!)

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Friday, 1 April 2016 04:59 (eight years ago) link

http://youtu.be/dC4Pvm6Oj4A

Ugh please stop fucking up and being terrible

― Here, let me Danesplain that for you (jjjusten), Friday, April 1, 2016 4:28 AM (39 minutes ago)

yeah she is the fucking worst, not looking fwd to months and months of hearing ppl pretend she's anything other than a shitty person and candidate

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 1 April 2016 05:11 (eight years ago) link

if only she had a bird to sit on her podium for a few seconds.

Van Horn Street, Friday, 1 April 2016 05:14 (eight years ago) link

Vampire bat, more like.

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Friday, 1 April 2016 05:16 (eight years ago) link

Hillary isn't much older than I am (68 vs. 61). I've seen a hell of a lot of politicians in my lifetime and believe me, when it comes to the worst I've seen she doesn't even crack the top 100. It makes no sense to me for people to talk about her as if she were some horrific bag of turds.

Realistically considered, she's a careerist whose career spans some ugly decades in US politics, so the compromises she's made have also been pretty damn ugly. But, like any careerist, she was just following public opinion, not leading it, and so what you hate about her is nothing but an accurate reflection of that public.

When she voted for the Iraq War and USA PATRIOT Act those votes were approved by a lopsided majority of Americans. Yes, they were gross votes, but the Iraq War Authorization passed 77 - 26 in the Senate, with 29 democrats in favor. The USA PATRIOT Act passed (get ready for it...) 98 -1. She may be no paragon of principle, but maybe about 5% of US Senators ever come close to that standard and none of them get elected President.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 1 April 2016 05:49 (eight years ago) link

that's pretty otm imo

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 1 April 2016 10:05 (eight years ago) link

yeah everyone else was voting for those horrible things so it makes it okay. /s

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 1 April 2016 10:48 (eight years ago) link

i wonder why those votes were approved by a lopsided majority of Americans, it's not like there was a multi-media coordinated top-down propaganda effort to make people existentially afraid

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 1 April 2016 10:51 (eight years ago) link

also otm

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 1 April 2016 10:54 (eight years ago) link

i'm actually starting to go through the rabbit-hole on clinton where i like her precisely _because_ she's so unlikable and untrustworthy. people keep criticizing her by saying she's a "typical politician", but typical politicians don't inspire gut revulsion on the level clinton does. now, her husband, he's a typical politician- he'll shake your hand, look into your eyes, and you get this belief that he actually cares about you and your problems. hillary doesn't have that. and for those of us who don't have this instinctive likability, who don't come equipped with reality distortion fields... well, i personally find it inspiring, in a weird way. she's got this kind of "grandma hermione" thing going for her.

anyway i'm probably just telling an elaborate series of lies to myself because that's what people do by this point in the campaign, but i wanted to share.

diana krallice (rushomancy), Friday, 1 April 2016 11:17 (eight years ago) link

That's great, though. Whatever it takes so long as she wins.

typical politicians don't inspire gut revulsion on the level clinton does

except they do? politicians like bill come along once in a generation

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 1 April 2016 11:39 (eight years ago) link

I find that most politicians inspire gut revulsion, tbh.

I am very inteligent and dicipline boy (Old Lunch), Friday, 1 April 2016 12:22 (eight years ago) link

like any careerist, she was just following public opinion, not leading

well i hate most Americans too

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 1 April 2016 12:27 (eight years ago) link

also, she is sposed to know what the fuck she is talking about.

is it possible for you to have a more cynical view of a statesperson's job?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 1 April 2016 12:28 (eight years ago) link

now, her husband, he's a typical politician- he'll shake your hand, look into your eyes, and you get this belief that he actually cares about you and your problems.

...which made his policies and public mien all the more repulsive

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 1 April 2016 12:30 (eight years ago) link

Anyone who seeks public office is an egomaniacal psychopath. If they weren't, they'd keep their fucking head down and mind their own fucking business like the rest of us. That's why electoral politics should be abandoned entirely and replaced with a lottery system - people get randomly chosen for one year of unpaid service to the government. You open your mailbox one day and, "Aw, fuck - I'm a Senator!"

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Friday, 1 April 2016 13:01 (eight years ago) link

that's how the Tea Party does it iirc

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 1 April 2016 13:07 (eight years ago) link

over mimosas

Neanderthal, Friday, 1 April 2016 13:08 (eight years ago) link

That video sort of makes me like her more in a weird way (although I'll still volunteer with the Sanders campaign). It at least feels genuine.

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Friday, 1 April 2016 13:08 (eight years ago) link

That's why electoral politics should be abandoned entirely and replaced with a lottery system - people get randomly chosen for one year of unpaid service to the government. You open your mailbox one day and, "Aw, fuck - I'm a Senator!"

Didn't the Tea Party recruit a pizza store owner to run for Congress a few years ago?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 1 April 2016 13:20 (eight years ago) link

and I just read the other day he's still trying to hold onto his delegates

nomar, Friday, 1 April 2016 14:20 (eight years ago) link

ayooooooooooooo

Neanderthal, Friday, 1 April 2016 14:22 (eight years ago) link

i'm actually starting to go through the rabbit-hole on clinton where i like her precisely _because_ she's so unlikable and untrustworthy. people keep criticizing her by saying she's a "typical politician", but typical politicians don't inspire gut revulsion on the level clinton does. now, her husband, he's a typical politician- he'll shake your hand, look into your eyes, and you get this belief that he actually cares about you and your problems. hillary doesn't have that. and for those of us who don't have this instinctive likability, who don't come equipped with reality distortion fields... well, i personally find it inspiring, in a weird way. she's got this kind of "grandma hermione" thing going for her.

anyway i'm probably just telling an elaborate series of lies to myself because that's what people do by this point in the campaign, but i wanted to share.

― diana krallice (rushomancy), Friday, April 1, 2016 7:17 AM (3 hours ago)

this is what happens when you post to ilm for too long

k3vin k., Friday, 1 April 2016 14:26 (eight years ago) link

"i like this record precisely because it's so flawed. humans are flawed, y'know!

k3vin k., Friday, 1 April 2016 14:27 (eight years ago) link

i was surprised to see this: http://www.gallup.com/poll/190343/trump-clinton-supporters-lead-enthusiasm.aspx

Mordy, Friday, 1 April 2016 14:33 (eight years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/RnbdaYn.png

guess it's not so surprising since it's just a poll of democratic voters and not independents but it does contradict the idea that hillary's supporters are not enthusiastic. more likely that internet comments are not indicative of broader population.

Mordy, Friday, 1 April 2016 14:36 (eight years ago) link

"i like this record precisely because it's so flawed. humans are flawed, y'know!

― k3vin k., Friday, April 1, 2016 10:27 AM

aka the Drake Defense

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 1 April 2016 14:41 (eight years ago) link

aka the Drake Defense

See also Kanye West. "No, the fact that he totally bungled the rollout and is now frantically retooling the album hour by hour is a profound artistic statement, deconstructing the idea of the album as fixed object!"

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Friday, 1 April 2016 14:44 (eight years ago) link

i think it makes sense that bernie supporters aren't 'very' or 'extremely' enthusiastic, they would tend to be people more skeptical of a presidential candidate in the first place

global tetrahedron, Friday, 1 April 2016 14:45 (eight years ago) link

That video sort of makes me like her more in a weird way (although I'll still volunteer with the Sanders campaign). It at least feels genuine.

As someone who lives in an area where I'm stopped on the sidewalk seemingly every other day by a Greenpeace volunteer with a clipboard, I have to admit I felt a little thrill seeing her stick her finger in that person's face.

o. nate, Friday, 1 April 2016 14:55 (eight years ago) link

if we're just talking political aesthetics i kind of agree w/ rushomancy in the sense that at this point i much prefer clintonism as flinty lecture spiked w awkward performative friendliness to clintonism as cloying serial-seducer goo about feeling for me

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 1 April 2016 15:00 (eight years ago) link

oh like you wouldn't want Clinton feeling you.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 1 April 2016 15:13 (eight years ago) link

if yer that much into war why not play Amon Amarth songs

― Neanderthal, Thursday, March 31, 2016 9:18 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Boyd Rice's politics are more in line with Trump

rockpalast '82 (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 1 April 2016 15:17 (eight years ago) link

(unless amon amarth is one of "those" metal bands, but i didn't think so)

rockpalast '82 (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 1 April 2016 15:17 (eight years ago) link

lol @ "grandma hermione" btw

many xposts

Οὖτις, Friday, 1 April 2016 15:21 (eight years ago) link

Greenpeace recently released a report showing that Clinton had also received more than $1.2 million in donations bundled — or fundraised — by lobbyists for the fossil fuel industry on her behalf, the Washington Post reported.

"I'm sick of taking their money, sick of it!"

karla jay vespers, Friday, 1 April 2016 15:48 (eight years ago) link

http://www.npr.org/2016/04/01/472615778/fact-check-hillary-clinton-and-donations-from-fossil-fuel-companies

so it appears some people have done their research and while clinton has received some individual donations from people who work in the fossil fuel industry, it's not a lot of money and it seems like it's from ordinary people, not the industry itself. if true, i sort of love clinton's response. (because, tbh, fuck greenpeace *ducks*)

k3vin k., Friday, 1 April 2016 15:51 (eight years ago) link

bernie raised $44 million in march alone - $1.2 million is peanuts. i understand why ppl would prefer that she not take any amount of money from any lobbying industries but i also accept what frank said in that interview posted above - it's insane to unilaterally disarm while republicans are taking in millions and millions more from the same industries.

Mordy, Friday, 1 April 2016 15:51 (eight years ago) link

renewing my Greenpeace membership this weekend, thx guys

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 1 April 2016 15:53 (eight years ago) link

lol sure you are

Mordy, Friday, 1 April 2016 15:53 (eight years ago) link

wd you like a copy of the check?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 1 April 2016 15:57 (eight years ago) link

"ordinary people"
just concerned citizens participating in our democracy

salthigh, Friday, 1 April 2016 15:58 (eight years ago) link

there are no ordinary people in the fossil fuel industry. just bad people.

Mordy, Friday, 1 April 2016 16:00 (eight years ago) link

lobbyists for the fossil fuel industry need to step up their game if they want to compete with wall street bundlers for her attention

bernie raised $44 million in march alone - $1.2 million is peanuts.

You are comparing all of the donations Bernie received for one month with the specific donations she received from one group of people working in one industry

curmudgeon, Friday, 1 April 2016 16:06 (eight years ago) link

yes, correct that is the comparison. good work!

Mordy, Friday, 1 April 2016 16:07 (eight years ago) link

You are responding to curmudgeon in a sarcastic matter.

Frederik B, Friday, 1 April 2016 16:10 (eight years ago) link

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and how they make the sausage

http://ronbryn.blogspot.com/2015/05/canadian-bank-us-probed-multiple-times.html

Hadrian VIII, Friday, 1 April 2016 16:14 (eight years ago) link

I've decided to parse that URL as "Canadian bank: 'Us probed multiple times'"

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 1 April 2016 16:18 (eight years ago) link

i did that too

Hadrian VIII, Friday, 1 April 2016 16:22 (eight years ago) link

me probe bank one day

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 1 April 2016 16:24 (eight years ago) link

lol

marcos, Friday, 1 April 2016 16:34 (eight years ago) link

i don't agree with sanders' assessment of the right half of the american people:

http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2016/03/bernie-sanders-interesting-theory-on-gops-existence

I think if we had a media in this country that was really prepared to look at what the Republicans actually stood for rather than quoting every absurd remark of Donald Trump, talking about Republican Party, talking about hundreds of billions of dollars in tax breaks for the top two tenths of 1 percent, cuts to Social Security and Medicare, Medicaid, a party which with few exceptions doesn't even acknowledge the reality of climate change, let alone do anything about it, a party which is not prepared to stand with women in the fight for pay equity, a party that is not prepared to do anything about a broken criminal justice system or a corrupt campaign finance system, I think, to be honest with you—and I just don't, you know, say this rhetorically, this is a fringe party. It is a fringe party. Maybe they get 5, 10 percent of the vote.

goole, Friday, 1 April 2016 16:44 (eight years ago) link

bizarre theory imo

Mordy, Friday, 1 April 2016 16:45 (eight years ago) link

Maybe they get 5, 10 percent of the vote.

hahahahahahahahahahaaaaa

Οὖτις, Friday, 1 April 2016 16:49 (eight years ago) link

I believe that was meant to be in his alternate universe where the media adopts the strategy he mentions, not like an actual real-world prediction.

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Friday, 1 April 2016 16:50 (eight years ago) link

that is also ridiculous

Οὖτις, Friday, 1 April 2016 16:51 (eight years ago) link

I mean maybe a little less ridiculous given it's a hypothetical but still totally divorced from reality

Οὖτις, Friday, 1 April 2016 16:51 (eight years ago) link

it's almost as if he missed the last couple decades where the right-wing decided our current corporate owned media was populated by a bunch of radical leftists and retreated to the safe seas of talk radio and fox news.

Mordy, Friday, 1 April 2016 16:53 (eight years ago) link

The scintilla of a point I'l rescue is that he's right about corporate media leading with can-you-believe-what-Trump-said-now? twaddle...but it was ever thus.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 1 April 2016 16:54 (eight years ago) link

meanwhile:

Newt Gingrich, the former House speaker who has frequently praised Mr. Trump’s insurgent campaign, said the front-runner had made a series of bewildering and irrational mistakes. Mr. Trump’s campaign, he said, had failed to evolve beyond the “personal gunslinger, random-behavior model” characterized by the candidate.

“None of the mistakes have been forced and nobody forced him to react negatively,” Mr. Gingrich said. “It’s almost as though he is so full of himself that he can’t slow down and recognize that being president of the United States is a team sport that requires a stable personality, that allows other people to help him.”

Newtie obviously totally loathsome both on a personal and political level, but I admit I do find him entertaining as a public figure, just this little mercurial nutjob with a penchant for marrying completely insane positions with the occasionally legitimately insightful pithy witticism

Οὖτις, Friday, 1 April 2016 16:58 (eight years ago) link

That quote is just Sanders selling the Fundamental Decency of the American People, you nitwit literalists.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 1 April 2016 17:00 (eight years ago) link

i can't help but have affection for his space nerd mode xp

Mordy, Friday, 1 April 2016 17:00 (eight years ago) link

ha yeah me too

Οὖτις, Friday, 1 April 2016 17:01 (eight years ago) link

Sanders selling the Fundamental Decency of the American People

fake bill of goods imo

Οὖτις, Friday, 1 April 2016 17:01 (eight years ago) link

space nerd canceled out by the black hole absorbing his brain and all notions of civility

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 1 April 2016 17:03 (eight years ago) link

Eh, there really is a lot of basic decency in the American people, but it is so thoroughly mixed in with racism, self-interest and ignorance that it's hard to believe all these traits can co-exist -- until you come to understand that this is How Humans Are Built. It's like the cartoon cliché of a little angel and a little devil riding on each of our shoulders, whispering contrary advice into each ear.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 1 April 2016 17:17 (eight years ago) link

i.e. like every other people

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 1 April 2016 17:19 (eight years ago) link

yup

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 1 April 2016 17:20 (eight years ago) link

^^^

Οὖτις, Friday, 1 April 2016 17:20 (eight years ago) link

This is actually the least favorite thing I've ever heard from Sanders. Republicanism is popular. It's not like people who vote for it don't know what it is. They know what it is and they're voting for that, and it's not 10% of the population, it's a big chunk of the population. The reason those policies are to be fought isn't because they're unpopular, it's because they're bad.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 1 April 2016 17:20 (eight years ago) link

but if only they were better educated/informed, then they would all agree with Sanders!

Οὖτις, Friday, 1 April 2016 17:21 (eight years ago) link

or me!

nyt headline:

POLITICAL MEMO
G.O.P. Fears Trump as Zombie: Damaged but Unstoppable

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 1 April 2016 17:30 (eight years ago) link

G.O.P. Fears Trump as Zombie: Damaged but Unstoppable

This is very unfamiliar territory for the so-called "G.O.P." Conventional wisdom among Republican bigwigs has long been that you try like hell to avoid a prolonged battle for the nomination, because your eventual nominee will have the mud from that fight still attached after the nomination. In the past few decades there has usually been an heir presumptive before the campaign even begins. This helps explain their timidity in attacking their frontrunner with sufficient gusto.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 1 April 2016 17:39 (eight years ago) link

This is actually the least favorite thing I've ever heard from Sanders. Republicanism is popular. It's not like people who vote for it don't know what it is. They know what it is and they're voting for that, and it's not 10% of the population, it's a big chunk of the population. The reason those policies are to be fought isn't because they're unpopular, it's because they're bad.

At the same time, though, hasn't it been said many times, including here, that Trump has jettisoned many core Republican principles and is now the leading Republican candidate? That does suggest that 'Republicanism' per se might not be as popular as thought. (What it says about what is popular might be even darker, though, in contrast to what Sanders is saying.)

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Friday, 1 April 2016 17:43 (eight years ago) link

yeah, i don't think trump's popularity jibes w/ bernie's assertion. the republican party has married evangelical principles to pro-corporate / capital principles to bigotry and hate. not everyone in the tent agreed with everything and so trump has demonstrated that there's an appetite for bigotry divorced from evangelicalism (to some extent) and establishment conservative ideology. but that's doesn't mean that his voters are ready to return to the democratic party - their priority remains pro-bigotry before class interests.

Mordy, Friday, 1 April 2016 17:47 (eight years ago) link

Yes, I agree.

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Friday, 1 April 2016 17:53 (eight years ago) link

Sanders' problem there is that he implicitly accepts that people's political opinions are based on informed, rational decision-making, as opposed to tribalism. The latter is a far stronger force in determining voting patterns, and it's particularly strong in the GOP, Trump's campaign fits right into that pattern.

Οὖτις, Friday, 1 April 2016 18:12 (eight years ago) link

this is a common trap with lefties, who like to frame issues as a simple matter of determining what policies produce the greatest common good based on the facts available - but that is actually pretty divorced from the reality of how people make decisions about who to vote for. It's not simply a matter of the opposing side not being exposed to the correct sources of information, and it never has been.

Οὖτις, Friday, 1 April 2016 18:15 (eight years ago) link

"A THIRD OF THE COUNTRY ARE ALWAYS MORONS" not considered smart political rhetoric

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 1 April 2016 18:23 (eight years ago) link

especially since it's more like 2/3rds

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 1 April 2016 18:54 (eight years ago) link

Still maybe a pretty conservative percentage there.

I am very inteligent and dicipline boy (Old Lunch), Friday, 1 April 2016 18:55 (eight years ago) link

It is always good to remember that the peak of the IQ bell curve is presumed to be 100. The average person is somewhat mediocre at sorting out all the complexities and nuances of language and logic. Put them under a lot of emotional stress and they tend to respond to it on a very basic level. Doesn't help to call them morons.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 1 April 2016 19:09 (eight years ago) link

no need to get defensive

Οὖτις, Friday, 1 April 2016 19:14 (eight years ago) link

it's not like geniuses have been shown to be immune to emotional appeals and pre-existing biases. often they're better at coming up w/ post-hoc justifications tho.

Mordy, Friday, 1 April 2016 19:15 (eight years ago) link

it's shorthand, dawg; we mean "politically"

and i include a lot of 'educated' Democrats in my sample so i'm more optimistic than most

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 1 April 2016 19:16 (eight years ago) link

outic otm, maybe sanders' estimate at 5-10% would look better if a similar (or not too far-off) exercise estimated the figure of core dem voters who were fully invested in each and every stated aim of "the left" as defined by its opponents.

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Friday, 1 April 2016 19:17 (eight years ago) link

I hadn't heard this before (from Krugman):

it’s time for Sanders to engage in some citizenship. The presidency isn’t the only office on the line; down-ballot races for the Senate and even the House are going to be crucial. Clinton has been raising money for other races; Sanders hasn’t, and is still being evasive on whether he will ever do so. Not acceptable.

this seems like a dumb thing for Sanders not to do, don't really get what his motive is there

Οὖτις, Friday, 1 April 2016 20:03 (eight years ago) link

Priestess Maddow asked him about it.

"We'll see," Sanders said. "Right now, our focus is on winning the nomination."

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/bernie-sanders-fundraise-down-ballot-democrats-maddow

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 1 April 2016 20:17 (eight years ago) link

why dont you ask goldman sachs for some cash to help flesh out your campaign staff, homey

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 1 April 2016 20:21 (eight years ago) link

odd that he wouldn't consider that a key part of his "revolution"

xp

Οὖτις, Friday, 1 April 2016 20:22 (eight years ago) link

yeah, the political system is rigged because none of the young democrats showed up for the 2010 and 2014 house elections, not the opposite he claims all the time.

Van Horn Street, Friday, 1 April 2016 20:23 (eight years ago) link

the problem is that right now is when the primaries are happening so if leftists want to primary moderate dem representatives they need to be doing it now. once bernie wins he can campaign alongside candidates that won their primaries (assuming he isn't too busy trying to win the general election) but they won't necessarily be the ppl he will need to have a political revolution. it's like bad enough that the kids don't show up to the midterm elections but they're barely showing up to this election.

Mordy, Friday, 1 April 2016 20:29 (eight years ago) link

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/04/01/feel-the-math/?module=BlogPost-Title&version=Blog%20Main&contentCollection=Opinion&action=Click&pgtype=Blogs®ion=Body&_r=0

i love krugman (this election season aside), but i'm not gonna be too shocked if the sanders campaign decides not to take the advice of a guy who hasn't missed a chance to shit on them at every opportunity

k3vin k., Friday, 1 April 2016 21:32 (eight years ago) link

That's why electoral politics should be abandoned entirely and replaced with a lottery system - people get randomly chosen for one year of unpaid service to the government. You open your mailbox one day and, "Aw, fuck - I'm a Senator!"

i love this idea. we should do the same for police too imo.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 1 April 2016 21:36 (eight years ago) link

i smell a plan to funnel Sanders money to Planet Debbie.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 1 April 2016 21:38 (eight years ago) link

i love this idea. we should do the same for police too imo.

I know this idea isn't entirely serious but the problem is that you would just end up with an extra-government professional class/apparatus running things - lobbying firms, ie the institutions that would persist from one term to the next, would basically be in charge, because every newbie thrown into a position would be reliant on them to understand their new job and the processes involved. (This is also one of the many problems with term limits ime)

Οὖτις, Friday, 1 April 2016 21:45 (eight years ago) link

This is such a beautiful Trump story. "I'm going to sue the RNC because I'm an ill-prepared, ignorant, and intellectually-incurious motherfucker who's totally out of his depth, which is apparently someone else's fault. They're treating me very unfairly, it's true.""

I am very inteligent and dicipline boy (Old Lunch), Friday, 1 April 2016 22:00 (eight years ago) link

For such a tuff guy, he sure is a little pisspants baby about everything that doesn't go exactly his way.

I am very inteligent and dicipline boy (Old Lunch), Friday, 1 April 2016 22:02 (eight years ago) link

Interestingly, ancient Athens filled many government positions by lottery, but even they elected the most crucial ones. Plus it had only 30,000 or so eligible citizens instead of hundreds of millions. Socially speaking, everyone was so closely linked by clan and patronage that pressure could be applied in very direct ways. For example, they used ostracism as a formal component of government.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 1 April 2016 22:24 (eight years ago) link

haven't checked this thread in three days, but are we all agreed that trump has jumped the shark with this abortion stuff? or is this just a blip?

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 1 April 2016 22:53 (eight years ago) link

Trump is the shark

Οὖτις, Friday, 1 April 2016 22:54 (eight years ago) link

this is around the 20th shark he's jumped

last night i tried to find a list of the most prominent trump controversies since he announced his candidacy, expecting that there'd be a few dozen terrible things he's done, any single one of which would sink a traditional candidate, but i couldn't find one. anyone know of one?

Karl Malone, Friday, 1 April 2016 22:56 (eight years ago) link

Thread

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Friday, 1 April 2016 23:01 (eight years ago) link

there's basically one every couple of days, would be a p long list

Οὖτις, Friday, 1 April 2016 23:01 (eight years ago) link

something about the abortion one feels different

maybe we'll find out that evangelicals don't even care about abortion

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 1 April 2016 23:04 (eight years ago) link

even tho they quickly denounced it i'd be shocked if their opposition to punishing the woman for the abortion came more from fear of the optics than an intrinsic belief

Mordy, Friday, 1 April 2016 23:04 (eight years ago) link

i mean i'd be shocked if it wasn't more about the optics

Mordy, Friday, 1 April 2016 23:05 (eight years ago) link

Trump is all optics. He himself is created with mirrors iirc

Οὖτις, Friday, 1 April 2016 23:05 (eight years ago) link

right i guess i just don't buy that evangelicals are horrified by the notion that the woman should be punished for having an illegal abortion performed. they think abortion is murder - why is only one the parties to murder culpable?

Mordy, Friday, 1 April 2016 23:10 (eight years ago) link

it seems to me that the issue is more that it's obvious that trump is a big faker on abortion

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 1 April 2016 23:12 (eight years ago) link

today he wouldn't even say that abortion is murder, he had to be prodded to do it

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 1 April 2016 23:13 (eight years ago) link

Some evangelicals see the woman as being the victim of manipulation, ie the evil doctors who perform them, the guys who don't "man up" to take care of a child, forcing the woman into it...

All this condescending "we care about YOU too!" bullshit. It's like those billboards that say "every abortion has two victims"

Neanderthal, Friday, 1 April 2016 23:14 (eight years ago) link

The most stupid thing my youth group pastor ever played for us was a sad ballad sung from the perspective of a recently aborted fetus

Neanderthal, Friday, 1 April 2016 23:16 (eight years ago) link

i think evangelicals were taken aback because their agenda is that actually punishing women should sound like what's best for women, sort of like "enslaved black people were happier," and trump is not part of that idealogical club, his misogyny is a bit too depraved-european or something.

map, Friday, 1 April 2016 23:19 (eight years ago) link

it's mostly that it was obvious that the town hall meeting was literally the 1st time trump ever had to think (or speak) about what abortion being illegal actually means

wizzz! (amateurist), Friday, 1 April 2016 23:20 (eight years ago) link

i just don't buy that evangelicals are horrified by the notion that the woman should be punished for having an illegal abortion performed

you underestimate the extent of their eagerness to rob women of any and all sexual agency, and be totally patronizing about it in the process:

“No pro-lifer would ever want to punish a woman who has chosen abortion,” responded Jeanne Mancini , president of the March for Life. “This is against the very nature of what we are about. We invite a woman who has gone down this route to consider paths to healing, not punishment.”

Οὖτις, Friday, 1 April 2016 23:29 (eight years ago) link

The most stupid thing my youth group pastor ever played for us was a sad ballad sung from the perspective of a recently aborted fetus

― Neanderthal, Saturday, April 2, 2016 12:16 AM (12 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

You probably won't thank me for this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rj1XVUsXnvI

Pheeel, Saturday, 2 April 2016 11:29 (eight years ago) link

i think evangelicals were taken aback because their agenda is that actually punishing women should sound like what's best for women, sort of like "enslaved black people were happier," and trump is not part of that idealogical club, his misogyny is a bit too depraved-european or something.

depraved-european? Is this the Drumpf thing again?

Terry Micawber (Tom D.), Saturday, 2 April 2016 11:46 (eight years ago) link

Not optimistic about Trump making it through this minefield:

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/its-probably-first-ballot-or-bust-for-donald-trump-at-the-gop-convention/

Delegates are people!

clemenza, Saturday, 2 April 2016 16:07 (eight years ago) link

Michael Cohen
‏@speechboy71
As Sanders has ramped up his attacks on Clinton, I've seen many more personal attacks from Clinton backers on Sanders ..

Michael Cohen ‏@speechboy71 1h1 hour ago
Something similar happened in 2008 between Obama & Clinton supporters ... but this year feels nastier and more personal than then

is this guy serious? 2008 was much more brutal iirc

k3vin k., Saturday, 2 April 2016 17:40 (eight years ago) link

NYT has an article about just how brutal the general election would be for trump. it's hopeless and then some. (barring some catastrophe of course.)

buried in the article is the observation that in polls sanders fares even better against trump (and cruz) than clinton. i assume this is partly simply because low name recognition equals low negatives. i wonder how good of a predictor those polls are in re. sanders. i'd like to think they are sound....

wizzz! (amateurist), Saturday, 2 April 2016 18:06 (eight years ago) link

the NYT notes among other things that if trump amps up his politics-of-resentment stuff to consolidate his white, blue-collar male votes he'll probably lose as many votes (among better-educated suburbanites) as he would gain. and at this point there's pretty much no chance he'll make inroads among minorities and (probably) women. so he's fucked.

wizzz! (amateurist), Saturday, 2 April 2016 18:08 (eight years ago) link

which to my mind means we have a once-in-a-lifetime chance to elect a real progressive to the white house; we don't have to worry as much about that elusive and often dubious quality "electability". but i understand that other folks don't see it that way.

(the little devil in my head is telling me that should sanders become president, it would galvanize the Right like nothing else and not only would he be a one-term president, but the house/senate elections in 2018 would swing way to the GOP's favor. sort of like 2010 in overdrive. but who knows. i'm not good at playing chess, either.)

wizzz! (amateurist), Saturday, 2 April 2016 18:09 (eight years ago) link

buried in the article is the observation that in polls sanders fares even better against trump (and cruz) than clinton.

This isn't really a secret, it's been that way for a while. The normal counterargument is that Clinton is at her floor, so can only go up; Sanders - and Trump - are at their ceilings, so can only go down.

which to my mind means we have a once-in-a-lifetime chance to elect a real progressive to the white house; we don't have to worry as much about that elusive and often dubious quality "electability". but i understand that other folks don't see it that way.

Yes, it's "Look, the GOP is going to nominate a complete maniac! Time to capitalize on that and get who we really want" vs. "Look, the GOP is going to nominate a complete maniac! Now is not the time for a utopian experiment! The stakes are too high!"

doo-wop unto others (Ye Mad Puffin), Saturday, 2 April 2016 18:17 (eight years ago) link

The most stupid thing my youth group pastor ever played for us was a sad ballad sung from the perspective of a recently aborted fetus

That song is linked on an ILM thread somewhere, I should look for it because it was super lolsy and horrifying

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Saturday, 2 April 2016 21:36 (eight years ago) link

Lol I should have just kept reading the thread

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Saturday, 2 April 2016 21:37 (eight years ago) link

Also unless a whole bunch of people to the left of the current makeup of Congress are also elected this year, electing Sanders is going to give us about the same as what we will get from electing Clinton, so I hope everyone putting forward the "here's the chance to get what we want!" are pushing the down-ticket candidates who will make Sanders' platform achievable.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Saturday, 2 April 2016 21:40 (eight years ago) link

otm, though the not starting wars thing would be a nice consolation prize too

k3vin k., Saturday, 2 April 2016 21:41 (eight years ago) link

which to my mind means we have a once-in-a-lifetime chance to elect a real progressive to the white house; we don't have to worry as much about that elusive and often dubious quality "electability". but i understand that other folks don't see it that way.

(the little devil in my head is telling me that should sanders become president, it would galvanize the Right like nothing else and not only would he be a one-term president, but the house/senate elections in 2018 would swing way to the GOP's favor. sort of like 2010 in overdrive. but who knows. i'm not good at playing chess, either.)

I think there's also good reason to believe that sanders might achieve fewer progressive goals as president than clinton would, even (or maybe especially) with a democratic congress

iatee, Saturday, 2 April 2016 21:54 (eight years ago) link

yeah, i think a sanders executive branch would function a little differently than a clinton executive branch.

i can't do much about downticket races save for the senate one (feingold vs. johnson)--i'll be going door to door for feingold in a few weeks (after the primary). my congressional district is essentially uncontested, as are the others near here. i'll put in some time and money to support some dem candidates in the few state senate districts that are for grabs, in the hopes that someday they can redistrict in a way that doesn't nearly guarantee uncontested congressional districts. but that day is probably a decade or more off.

anyway.

wizzz! (amateurist), Saturday, 2 April 2016 21:56 (eight years ago) link

sanders has a pretty clear record of voting for major democratic bills, even after a bit of needling and threats, does he not? not sure i buy the theory that he'll be some purist who is gonna be free tuition or bust or something xp

k3vin k., Saturday, 2 April 2016 21:56 (eight years ago) link

xpost

say more iatee. why do you think that?

wizzz! (amateurist), Saturday, 2 April 2016 21:56 (eight years ago) link

i mean, xxpost!

wizzz! (amateurist), Saturday, 2 April 2016 21:56 (eight years ago) link

The most stupid thing my youth group pastor ever played for us was a sad ballad sung from the perspective of a recently aborted fetus

this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aiYg0BOsOs

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 2 April 2016 22:08 (eight years ago) link

xpost

say more iatee. why do you think that?

I think he'd be bad at making the types of compromises you need to make to get major legislation passed. he's shown little evidence he understands why much of the country disagrees with any part of his platform. and I don't think his administration would deal with failure well.

iatee, Saturday, 2 April 2016 22:11 (eight years ago) link

I think there's also good reason to believe that sanders might achieve fewer progressive goals as president than clinton would, even (or maybe especially) with a democratic congress

she seems like she might be better at convincing more moderate recalcitrant reps to sign onto legislation like obama had to end up doing passing ACA or give more cover to dems in moderate districts just by virtue of not seeming like the furthest left wing of the party. idk obv just speculating. presumably she has better working relationships with a lot of these legislators in the party having raised funds for them, been involved on some level in their careers, and maybe even republicans - i remember stories during her time in the senate about how she had better than usual working relationships w/ republicans. otoh like obama she'll likely be quicker to dilute progressive legislation in the hope of facilitating compromise.

Mordy, Saturday, 2 April 2016 22:15 (eight years ago) link

Her Senate tenure looks like Henry Clay's tenure at this point though.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 2 April 2016 22:19 (eight years ago) link

i love krugman [...]

― k3vin k., Friday, April 1, 2016 5:32 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

Rofl

Hungry4Ass, Saturday, 2 April 2016 23:11 (eight years ago) link

i love krugman -- man unrelated to paul krugman, who also somehow does not have a gun pointed at his head by paul krugman

Hungry4Ass, Saturday, 2 April 2016 23:12 (eight years ago) link

That latest Krug column is vile btw, even by his bootlicking standards

Hungry4Ass, Saturday, 2 April 2016 23:28 (eight years ago) link

she seems like she might be better at convincing more moderate recalcitrant reps to sign onto legislation like obama had to end up doing passing ACA

wait wait wait wait. what?

On December 23, the Senate voted 60–39 to end debate on the bill: a cloture vote to end the filibuster. The bill then passed, also 60–39, on December 24, 2009, with all Democrats and two independents voting for it, and all Republicans against (except Jim Bunning, who did not vote).[119] (...) The House passed the Senate bill with a 219–212 vote on March 21, 2010, with 34 Democrats and all 178 Republicans voting against it.[135] The next day, Republicans introduced legislation to repeal the bill.[136] Obama signed the ACA into law on March 23, 2010.[137]

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 3 April 2016 00:11 (eight years ago) link

oh wait okay. you meant "reps" as in "representatives" so that could mean curmudgeonly conservative dems. okay, that makes mor sense.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 3 April 2016 00:16 (eight years ago) link

yes sorry for easily avoidable ambiguity

Mordy, Sunday, 3 April 2016 00:23 (eight years ago) link

Trying to clean up the mess everywhere.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/02/politics/donald-trump-heidi-cruz-tweet/index.html

Feels like everything's just come to a complete stop. The timing of all this stuff, during a long break between primaries, probably hurts as much as anything else.

clemenza, Sunday, 3 April 2016 02:59 (eight years ago) link

i think that may be the first time i (or anyone) has heard him apologize.

wizzz! (amateurist), Sunday, 3 April 2016 04:02 (eight years ago) link

daaaamn

http://predictwise.com/politics/2016-president-republican-nomination

I mean this doesn't really mean shit since we ain't had a primary in over a week and his supporters aren't likely to throw in the towel between now and the convention as he's still likely to be leading but am really interested in seeing how Wisconsin goes on Tuesday. if he gets 6 or less delegates as speculated, that will be huge because it will cement the likelihood of a contested convention given that even him winning 20 delegates there wouldn't have him on track. Trump's staff already minimizing expectations ("we knew we'd lose in Wisconsin").

tbh I'm hoping for pure circus spectacle at the RNC.

Neanderthal, Sunday, 3 April 2016 04:18 (eight years ago) link

I don't think his administration would deal with failure well.

HRC would define success as "whatever happens"

also "i came, i saw, they died"
she is going to be the biggest Dem militarist since LBJ

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 3 April 2016 04:57 (eight years ago) link

Lol, Sanders apparently just stole the election in Nevada.

Frederik B, Sunday, 3 April 2016 11:25 (eight years ago) link

If Trump can get Dowd to stop shit-talking Hillary Clinton for even two sentences, he's in real trouble.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Sunday, 3 April 2016 12:50 (eight years ago) link

Chris Wallace just had Trump on. He's really digging in on his nonsensical explanation for the abortion comments: "It was a hypothetical, I was answering a hypothetical." What exactly is the difference between answering a hypothetical and expressing your actual thoughts?

I'm glad about one thing. I thought he might finally have been forced into coming across vaguely contrite and human. Nope, still the same. He's released Ted Cruz from his pledge to support Trump because he realizes it causes Cruz all sorts of stress, and (paraphrase) "Ted doesn't handle stress well. Have you seen him? He's a basket case."

clemenza, Sunday, 3 April 2016 13:24 (eight years ago) link

Lol, Sanders apparently just stole the election in Nevada.

― Frederik B,

what's your problem, man?

Treeship, Sunday, 3 April 2016 15:22 (eight years ago) link

yea stop harshing our mellow

Neanderthal, Sunday, 3 April 2016 15:28 (eight years ago) link

yeah "stole" seems like not the right verb...? nevada awards its delegates in several phases and it seems sanders's people turned out more for this one, which was never obligated to match the popular-vote results in the state. no delegates were taken away from clinton. you could argue that nevada awards its delegates in a dumb and loopy way, but the thing is playing out according to the rules as far as i can tell?

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 3 April 2016 15:30 (eight years ago) link

relax guys, i'm sure he wasn't trying to insinuate bernie did anything underhanded. sheesh.

Mordy, Sunday, 3 April 2016 15:33 (eight years ago) link

wait is freddy b. a mordy sock

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 3 April 2016 15:37 (eight years ago) link

Hilarious watching Kasich try to answer basically the same questions about abortion from Stephanopoulos this morning. He simply wouldn't answer them: "Send it back to the states, send it back to the states, send it back to the states." Okay, but if you think abortion is murder, shouldn't there be punishment for the woman or the doctor? "Send it back to the states--that's all I'm going to say." Okay, you're a governor--if it gets send back to Ohio, what will you do? "Huggleglumpf--and that's all I'm going to say right now."

clemenza, Sunday, 3 April 2016 15:45 (eight years ago) link

i think clarifying positions on abortion is a good thing since like 65% of people believe it should be legal, no?

wizzz! (amateurist), Sunday, 3 April 2016 15:54 (eight years ago) link

("of people" in this context = of americans)

wizzz! (amateurist), Sunday, 3 April 2016 15:55 (eight years ago) link

kasich probably believes doctors who perform abortions illegally should be punished, which is a different thing imo than saying the woman should be punished. still a bad position, but he is a pro-life republican

Treeship, Sunday, 3 April 2016 15:56 (eight years ago) link

lots of Repubs like Kasich probably moved more towards pro-choice positions eons ago but have to maintain the pro-life stance for their idiot constituents. tho I do think people like Cruz are genuinely (and creepily) pro-life. "send it back to the states" the popular way to avoid responsibility for a terrible fuckin' opinion.

the fuckin' states-rights bullshit is always bullshit. what's the point of being a country if everything is left up to the states and the rights afforded to you change drastically the moment your car goes over an imaginary line? obv some things should be left to states like whether to have income tax, or whether certain counties are dry/whether you can get a haircut after 9 pm....abortion? nah. I don't care if Roe v Wade was a 'bad legal decision' as many, including Ginsberg, have opined (and is not an invalid position). regardless, abortion is legal now, federally, and sending it back to the states or making it federally illegal again would be an immense disaster. though not sure if I prefer the new method of states coming up with barriers that make it effectively impossible to get one. :/

Neanderthal, Sunday, 3 April 2016 15:58 (eight years ago) link

(I don't know what Kasich personally believes, to be clear, just that I think far less Republican politicians are vehemently pro-life than claim to be these days)

Neanderthal, Sunday, 3 April 2016 15:59 (eight years ago) link

no way, kasich is pro-life

Treeship, Sunday, 3 April 2016 15:59 (eight years ago) link

(xposts) I imagine that is what he thinks--or what he thinks is politically viable, anyway--but he wouldn't even make that much clear. There's a landmine there, he just saw what happened to Trump, so he won't go anywhere near the question. Really can't stand Kasich.

clemenza, Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:00 (eight years ago) link

xpost I don't know what Kasich personally believes, to be clear,

Neanderthal, Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:00 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zk532lLn5zw&feature=youtu.be

Treeship, Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:00 (eight years ago) link

"send it back to the states" is actually an appeasing answer for Libertarians tho so in some ways it's not even dodging

Neanderthal, Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:01 (eight years ago) link

I agree with Neanderthal: I imagine Kasich and many Republicans are pro-choice but can't say so. And I realize Obama and Clinton and many Democrats had the same hypocrisy for many years re gay marriage--what they believed and what they felt they could say.

clemenza, Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:02 (eight years ago) link

Obama went from pro-gay marriage in the 90s to anti-gay marriage/pro-civil union in 2008 pres campaign, then back to pro-gay marriage again iirc (I may have left out a few waffles though)

Neanderthal, Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:07 (eight years ago) link

what's the point of being a country if everything is left up to the states and the rights afforded to you change drastically the moment your car goes over an imaginary line?

there were a few arguments about this among men in knee highs, powdered wigs, and beaver skin tricorne hats back in the day. those men were my fathers, and everything is normal

Karl Malone, Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:10 (eight years ago) link

lol. kasich is either a true-blue anti-choice republican or doing a darn good impression of one. see: his whole track record as governor of ohio. if he secretly has pro-choice views what difference would it make?

neanderthal, not sure i follow how income tax should be up to the states...? that would kinda radically change our whole government; are you advocating the repeal of the 16th amendment or am i misreading you?

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:11 (eight years ago) link

I meant state income tax, not fed (didn't specify so that's on me)

Neanderthal, Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:13 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, there is literally zero evidence that John Kasich's views on abortion are even a half inch to the left of Randall Terry's.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:14 (eight years ago) link

(I don't know what Kasich personally believes, to be clear, just that I think far less Republican politicians are vehemently pro-life than claim to be these days)

Neanderthal, Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:15 (eight years ago) link

re: income tax: gotcha gotcha.

re: Kasich etc: sure, sure, I see that - I'm just not sure why it matters! I mean it's sorta like saying Clinton might secretly be in favor of a 90% marginal tax rate and amnesty for most of the prison population, but if she's never going to act even remotely like that's her position, aren't we just writing fanfic?

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:18 (eight years ago) link

pro choice is much more mainstream an opinion than 90% marginal tax rate and amnesty for most of the prison population. it's more like saying she's secretly pro-legaliziing recreational marijuana (something with a lot of mainstream approval) which i would not be surprised if she were.

Mordy, Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:20 (eight years ago) link

Guys, John Kasich is an active and effective vanguard in the fight to obliterate women's reproductive rights. He's done a lot of evil work in Ohio. He's just smart enough to know that doing so contradicts his "I'm the middle of the road adult" image so he's spectacularly tight-lipped about it.

ENERGY FOOD (en i see kay), Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:22 (eight years ago) link

^^^^

please watch the video i posted. he pushed forward a provision in ohio that prevents rape crisis centers from sharing information about where women could obtain an abortion.

Treeship, Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:23 (eight years ago) link

ENERGY FOOD otm. and i'm not sure why it matters how mainstream the opinion is. the point is it's an opinion that runs contradictory to everything they actually advocate for and work on so it's totally irrelevant to hypothesize that secretly they like the idea. i guess it would matter if they saw public opinion changing and followed the winds to their 'true belief,' but then a) their track record as an opponent of these things would presumably be a problem with this same public and b) if they're inclined to just turn with the wind, then them having inner beliefs doesn't enter into it anyway.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:26 (eight years ago) link

I'm just pointing out how amusing it is to see him ducking the very same questions Trump got nailed for. You would think, whatever his personal belief, that by now, after 30 or 40 years of doing this, he'd have an answer formulated (with regards to the punishment question) that he could trot out in his sleep. But he didn't.

clemenza, Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:26 (eight years ago) link

not only that, he/they slipped it into a really crucial budget bill iirc xp to treesh

Clay, Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:28 (eight years ago) link

It jibes with why I can't stand him. He's trying to thread the needle beyond reason and beyond fairness--he's won virtually nothing to this point, he's been gingerly stepping around everything for months, and his only rationale for hanging around are the polls he keeps citing that he runs ahead of Clinton. I compared him to a vulture, and someone pointed out I must really hate vultures.

clemenza, Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:31 (eight years ago) link

i guess you could argue that a politician who "secretly" is pro-choice would eagerly adopt that position if the tides were to turn politically, like obama did with gay marriage. also, perhaps it wouldn't be as big a priority to him as others when it came to appointing supreme court justices or whatever. all of this is irrelevant with kasich of course because he is a dyed in the wool anti-choicer

Treeship, Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:31 (eight years ago) link

xp to doctor casino

Treeship, Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:31 (eight years ago) link

I don't get why anyone would think Kasich was secretly soft on abortion unless it was because the narrative requires that there be a "moderate" in the race. There used to be a moderate in the race -- Chris Christie, and nobody liked him. Now there isn't. Kasich is basically the same guy as Scott Walker -- equally hostile to unions, probably slightly MORE sincerely devoted to keeping women from getting abortions, seemingly smarter and more politically skilled.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:40 (eight years ago) link

the fuckin' states-rights bullshit is always bullshit. what's the point of being a country if everything is left up to the states and the rights afforded to you change drastically the moment your car goes over an imaginary line?

Patrick Henry to thread

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:43 (eight years ago) link

I think his problem with actually answering the question stems from the gap between his right-wing track record, and the friendly MOR Republican he's running as - and more generally, between the answers and rationalizations favored by the right-wing constituents, and those adopted by the "don't like abortions as such but don't want them to be illegal" crowd. The stuff about abortion being murder - but that the real criminals are the conspiracy of sadistic murder-loving abortion-providers who are the ones who have to be stopped cause we LOVE the mothers - plays on the right-wing because it papers over the anti-choice position's misogyny and basic untenability... but this isn't how most Americans actually see the situation I think, and the same rhetoric won't work there.

I think it's also the case that frankly this question doesn't get asked as much as it should. Roe v. Wade has been the law for decades, so really getting into the hypothetical of "wait, so how would this work if abortions were outlawed?" doesn't happen as much as it should. I like the question being asked though; it exposes a lot of uncomfortable lapses in anti-choice agitation. These are pertinent in the present-day world since these assholes have been so effective, at the state level, at implementing draconian schemes to chip away at Roe, or remove abortion as an option, in ways that to less boneheaded Supreme Courts would be flagrantly underhanded schemes to circumvent the law. They're creating huge sectors of the country where illegal abortion has to be coming back in a big way, so they need to have answers.

Kasich does have a unique selling point in the race though: not that he's a "moderate" (though I think he's happy to coast on this impression), but that he's a generic Republican. That comes with some perception of "electability" which dovetails with the "moderate" thing, but the main point is that if you still would like to cast your vote for someone who is not Donald Fucking Trump or Ted Fucking Cruz, you can do that.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 3 April 2016 16:54 (eight years ago) link

That's absolutely how he's framing it, I just hate the idea of "You've resoundingly rejected me in every primary except a couple"--he even finished behind Rubio in one of them, after Rubio had dropped out--"but you should hand the nomination to me because I poll really well in a hypothetical match-up." I mean, if what he wants to happen actually were to happen, there'd be so much outrage within his party that his hypothetical poll numbers would plummet, even if he were able to draw well from independents who don't like Clinton.

clemenza, Sunday, 3 April 2016 17:23 (eight years ago) link

there's no way he thinks he could be elected president. he is still in there bc the gop wants to salvage some of its hemorrhaging legitimacy.

Treeship, Sunday, 3 April 2016 18:14 (eight years ago) link

Doesn't think he can win the nomination, or doesn't think he can win again Clinton? I don't believe at all that he's hanging around out of selfless loyalty to the party, and that this has been arranged with the RNC or whoever behind closed doors. In the first place, I'm not sure how his presence helps the party when the one candidate who superficially seems moderate and reasonable (forget for a second the question of whether he actually is) is getting killed by the two guys who don't.

clemenza, Sunday, 3 April 2016 18:24 (eight years ago) link

i think he thinks he can win the nomination through brokered convention shenanigans, but not the presidency

Treeship, Sunday, 3 April 2016 18:25 (eight years ago) link

i think his presence has some advantages for the party. he reminds voters who are thinking of defecting that "they all aren't really like this" or whatever.

pretty sure elements within the gop are planning to lay low and rebuild over the next few election cycles. i cannot see a scenario this fall that doesn't have them losing the presidency and at least the senate.

Treeship, Sunday, 3 April 2016 18:26 (eight years ago) link

The gop def dont want him in the race anymore - voters arent voting for him and party apparatchiks are complaining about his refusal to drop out

Οὖτις, Sunday, 3 April 2016 18:26 (eight years ago) link

do they actually want cruz?

Treeship, Sunday, 3 April 2016 18:28 (eight years ago) link

in any case, even if the party doesn't want him, in his mind he thinks that he could be selected as the nominee by making the argument that the gop should salvage some legitimacy. he has to know that he wouldn't win the general. the trump and cruz voters would be soooo mad

Treeship, Sunday, 3 April 2016 18:30 (eight years ago) link

There's no way to know for sure how ego-blinded Kasich is, but a national campaign is such a grind that a truly discouraged candidate won't keep going for long once they've lost heart. It was amazing the Jeb! stayed in as long as he did. By contrast, Kasich still looks to me like a man with hope.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 3 April 2016 18:30 (eight years ago) link

I was thinking today that I wonder if Rubio has had second thoughts, now that it seems very likely there'll be an open convention (think he dropped out when it looked very likely Trump would reach 1,237). It's a bit of a catch-22. If it were an open convention, I think the party would much rather go with him than Trump or Cruz. But if he hadn't dropped out--and I'd have check this against states that voted after he left--maybe Trump would have continued winning with 35%.

clemenza, Sunday, 3 April 2016 18:31 (eight years ago) link

I'm not even so sure how Kasich helps #neverTrump anymore. It made sense initially but if he were to drop now, Maryland and Pennsylvania both might go Cruz...he's siphoning away votes in Penn.

So he must really be banking on somehow being the brokered candidate but at this point the RNC is less likely to look at how well he's polling against Cruz now vs how well he isn't doing in the primary. It'd be a much bigger effort to galvanize support around a guy nobody's cared about for months than to build support around a guy who kind of has a base that they could hopefully mold into a less extreme platform.

IMO they should run a smear campaign saying Kasich freed Willie Hortons nephew or something and just peel away his votes

Neanderthal, Sunday, 3 April 2016 18:36 (eight years ago) link

Xpost I think for sure Trump isn't free falling as bad if he stayed in. Not just the vote-splitting....not surprisingly Trump's performance has been much worse since he doesn't have an easy bully target to pick on and can't benefit as much from every candidate fighting amongst each other anymore

Neanderthal, Sunday, 3 April 2016 18:39 (eight years ago) link

i've given my kasich theories way upthread somewhere but basically i think he thinks there is a non-zero (if pretty pathetic) chance of getting the nom at the convention as the one guy nobody really hates. this requires him to do better than he's currently doing, actually win a few more races, look credible - - - and it also requires cruz playing ball as VP despite coming in with way more delegates which seems like a VERY slim chance knowing how cruz rolls. kasich's chances here would be better if delegates really were tied together as blocs and there were a limited number of people you had to sway to win over these big batches of people. in kasich's favor here is that probably most of the "establishment" wheeler-dealers and persuaders will be on his side in this effort. they're obviously not in full control of the party but they probably have more sway over delegates and elected state politicians as people who can make or break your later career etc. the kind of people that are in jeb's rolodex, for whatever that's worth.

plan B for kasich is losing, but coming away as the obvious heir apparent in 2020 after a crash-and-burn 2016, here on the non-zero chance that the party kinda gets its shit together and goes "man we fucked up by nominating a crazy guy, we better change the rules this time or whatever to keep the trumps and cruzes of the world out." if he ran a "principled" campaign as an "electable" "moderate" republican, a "compassionate conservative," whatever, he'd be pretty well-positioned in four years. it's a long shot but a lot less long than it was when he started the race.

i don't think he's doing a particularly good job at building up to either of these things, and they're both kinda making lemonade out of some serious lemons, but they're not horrible master plans. rubio's problem was that he and kasich were effectively competing for that same slot, and kasich had it in him to at least win one big winner-take-all state and rubio didn't even have that. after a string of underperformances the entire time, rubio just looked like a loser and wasn't about to turn that around. if he were still in the race it'd look even worse for both of them.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 3 April 2016 18:39 (eight years ago) link

I think there's a good chance trump causes some sort of disaster if he's ahead on delegates and the party doesn't give him the nomination. but I think that becomes a sure thing if it goes to kasich, it wouldn't be hard to get a lot of voters stirred up if the party handed it to the guy with the least support. the end result could possibly hurt the party as much as a trump ticket would.

iatee, Sunday, 3 April 2016 18:42 (eight years ago) link

these are people who already hate the gop brand

iatee, Sunday, 3 April 2016 18:43 (eight years ago) link

My own theory: once Kasich pocketed the Ohio delegation, he realized he could be a real force in a contested convention, but he'd have to stay in the race to use that muscle - not to win the nomination outright, but to win valuable concessions and maybe the VP spot. He's going to let his chips ride and see what the roulette wheel brings him.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 3 April 2016 18:50 (eight years ago) link

Xpost Yea Kasich's sole bargaining chips are "you guys don't HATE me" (meh) and "CURRENTLY I'M THE ONLY ONE BEATING HILLARY IN NATIONAL POLLS" which would be banking the Super Bowl on a QB in Week 5 appears to match up well with the other contender's defense. Neither are compelling except to people who already like Kasich or people that are really desperate

Neanderthal, Sunday, 3 April 2016 18:53 (eight years ago) link

*who in Week 5

Neanderthal, Sunday, 3 April 2016 18:53 (eight years ago) link

the GOP might be really desperate, is the thing. and you do have to go back to some of those states where both rubio and kasich were polling kinda okay, and combined looked competitive with trump (esp. california). kasich actually winning those seems like a slim chance to me, especially if he's not campaigning his ass off (and there's not been much sign of that, that i've seen)... but it would really help him out a lot. there's almost no polling information on most of the races since rubio dropped out; maybe kasich has internal polls suggesting places where he could be more of a contender than we think. remember that the CW was that cruz was more or less running out of really good cruz states - it could be that the spread of delegates in june doesn't look so lopsided with kasich way at the bottom.

i guess there is the chance that he's playing to be ted cruz's VP slot but does anybody want that gig given cruz's chances in the fall? talk about a career-killer.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 3 April 2016 19:03 (eight years ago) link

it's true that there's very little polling in most states (one of the more frustrating things about the post-Rubio dropout is we barely know what it's done to the race yet outside of the Wisconsin poll)

Neanderthal, Sunday, 3 April 2016 19:22 (eight years ago) link

The only way I see Kasich being a possibility in 2020 would be if Clinton beats Trump or Cruz handily, goes on to have a more or less successful first term, and the Republicans feel 2020 is more or less a write-off. I could see Kasich winning a hollowed-out field, where the best candidates (and who would that be? no idea) decide not to run. But if they lose this time and have a winnable election in 2020, I can't see them ever turning back to Kasich. I think Santorum had delusions that he was next in line this year, and what a colossal miscalculation that was.

clemenza, Sunday, 3 April 2016 20:11 (eight years ago) link

Santorum had delusions that his infamous 'website' might finally come down

Neanderthal, Sunday, 3 April 2016 20:14 (eight years ago) link

i guess there is the chance that he's playing to be ted cruz's VP slot but does anybody want that gig given cruz's chances in the fall? talk about a career-killer.

being vp on a losing ticket isn't the worst, you cement your place as a nationally recognized politician and get granted front runner status for the next election.

iatee, Sunday, 3 April 2016 20:29 (eight years ago) link

cf the establishment guys publicly thirsting for paul ryan as speaker / "consensus pick" nominee at the convention or whatever

Clay, Sunday, 3 April 2016 20:37 (eight years ago) link

That's only actually worked once though since the war, where the losing VP got the nomination next time: Mondale in 1980, which is a special case, really, seeing as he'd already served a term as VP in '76. I can't see any instance of it happening otherwise--they either run and lose, or don't run at all.

clemenza, Sunday, 3 April 2016 20:41 (eight years ago) link

Winning VPs, yes.

clemenza, Sunday, 3 April 2016 20:41 (eight years ago) link

xxpost some betting markets have his odds as better than Kasich (albeit the ones more manipulated by pump 'n dump but w/e)

Neanderthal, Sunday, 3 April 2016 20:41 (eight years ago) link

NBC News
April 1 at 10:20pm ·
"At this moment the laws are set. And I think we have to leave it that way," Donald J. Trump said 2 days after telling MSNBC he thinks abortion should be illegal.

Treeship, Sunday, 3 April 2016 21:51 (eight years ago) link

lol cos that's what Republicans treasure in their candidate, a guy who says "welp law's the law, caint do nothin bout it"

Neanderthal, Sunday, 3 April 2016 21:52 (eight years ago) link

-James Hetfield, Creeping Death Party

Neanderthal, Sunday, 3 April 2016 21:54 (eight years ago) link

sorry, "Part-ehh-ehhhhh-oh-whoooa!"

Neanderthal, Sunday, 3 April 2016 21:54 (eight years ago) link

that's what trump's hats should say instead of "make america great again"

Treeship, Sunday, 3 April 2016 21:54 (eight years ago) link

if he thought anything mattered he wouldn't change his positions so dramatically and recklessly

Treeship, Sunday, 3 April 2016 21:55 (eight years ago) link

abortion is so bad, we need to punish people who get abortions, except maybe it's not so bad so they should just be allowed. i don't know. it's up to me.

Treeship, Sunday, 3 April 2016 21:55 (eight years ago) link

^ some weird ass Mac Miller lyrics

Neanderthal, Sunday, 3 April 2016 21:56 (eight years ago) link

Anderson Cooper made a salient point about Trump the other night: how suggestible he is in interviews. Chris Matthews mentions punishing the woman, Trump says yeah, there should be some punishment. Chris Wallace says, this morning, so you're not ruling out a third-party run, Trump hints that yes, maybe that's something he'll still do (after not speaking about that for months). There have been other examples.

This could present a problem when sitting down with other countries.

clemenza, Sunday, 3 April 2016 22:00 (eight years ago) link

"yeah we'll lift the ban on nuclear weapons, just play nice k?"

Neanderthal, Sunday, 3 April 2016 22:14 (eight years ago) link

he seems like he has a severe case of ADD and can't keep his thoughts straight for more than one minute at a time. i say this as someone who has ADD and frequently feels similarly "jumbled." this is a thing that people can deal with, but they need to first realize that it's a problem, that their random whims don't pass for deep insight.

Treeship, Sunday, 3 April 2016 22:14 (eight years ago) link

Makes me think of Kevin, Elaine's Bizarro-Jerry friend on Seinfeld. "You know, maybe I don't like children after all--maybe I will get a vasectomy!"

clemenza, Sunday, 3 April 2016 22:17 (eight years ago) link

kasich to me has a little bit of that stuart symington thing going on, if you've read "the making of the president 1960" (which is an informative read for anyone wanting to know how brokered conventions worked in practice).

diana krallice (rushomancy), Sunday, 3 April 2016 22:31 (eight years ago) link

I mentioned Stuart Symington in 2012, how much something written about Symington in 1960: LBJ vs. JFK vs. Nixon (The Epic Campaign That Forged Three Presidencies) reminded me of Romney: "the most possible of all nominees, but he was also a man lacking any deep and abiding political philosophy...his appeal is largely to the older-line professional politicians, and their hope is that the convention will find objections with each of the other candidates and agree on Symington." Applies to Kasich too: he'd be the perfect nominee except for the fact that no one actually wants him to be the nominee.

clemenza, Sunday, 3 April 2016 22:54 (eight years ago) link

the GOP equivalent then was Harold Stassen.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 3 April 2016 23:00 (eight years ago) link

That's only actually worked once though since the war, where the losing VP got the nomination next time: Mondale in 1980, which is a special case, really, seeing as he'd already served a term as VP in '76. I can't see any instance of it happening otherwise--they either run and lose, or don't run at all.

the question is whether people are treated as if they have loser's stench after being on a failed ticket. only one person is gonna get the nomination, everyone's chances are always low. lots of those vp candidates never were gonna get further in national politics regardless - it's not like sarah palin tossed away her chance at a presidential run by being on mccain's ticket. but for the ones w/ presidential aspirations (edwards, paul ryan) I don't think they found themselves in a worse position after the election.

iatee, Sunday, 3 April 2016 23:29 (eight years ago) link

might depend how spectacularly they lose by? i mean it's a small sample set so who knows. just feel like if there's a decisive rejection of the cruz/kasich ticket, say, they lose everywhere, it's gonna be hard to shake that off even if in the abstract you might be like "oh well it wasn't his fault" etc.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 4 April 2016 00:10 (eight years ago) link

I don't think they found themselves in a worse position after the election.

Probably, but you initially framed it as a clear advantage: "you cement your place as a nationally recognized politician and get granted front runner status for the next election." Was there actually a moment when Edwards was considered the front-runner for 2008 once Clinton announced? I can't remember. Ryan's VP loss clearly paved the way for him to become the speaker, but I'd ask the same question: how far back do you have to go find him as the front-runner for 2016?

If a losing bid were a clear advantage, I would think there'd be at least one instance of someone moving on to the nomination. There isn't, unless you count Dole getting the nomination 20 years after his loss in '76.

clemenza, Monday, 4 April 2016 00:25 (eight years ago) link

I'll put it this way: I think there are the perceived advantages you mention, but they're outweighed, or at least neutralized, by a reluctance to go with someone who's already lost one national election.

clemenza, Monday, 4 April 2016 00:29 (eight years ago) link

I don't know how it happened but my FB feed is now full of Hillary supporters strategizing on ways to attack Bernie's wife.

Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Monday, 4 April 2016 01:41 (eight years ago) link

classy! as ever

so Clinton is up 12 in NY, sez Quinnipiac... lolclaims a few weeks ago that she had a 48-pt lead.

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/274935-clinton-seeks-to-avoid-loss-in-home-state-ny

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 4 April 2016 02:10 (eight years ago) link

Kasich's VP play doesn't have to come down to a second-ballot Cruz coalition - he could join a Trump ticket before before the first ballot. Could be bingo: insta-win.

sean gramophone, Monday, 4 April 2016 04:04 (eight years ago) link

i feel like we're overdue for a candidate in one of the two parties dropping dead during the primaries

Neanderthal, Monday, 4 April 2016 04:19 (eight years ago) link

perhaps someone could bring a live bear into the RNC

Neanderthal, Monday, 4 April 2016 04:20 (eight years ago) link

Trump's arrogance in saying Kasich is "taking" HIS votes suggests he would've made a fine Gore Democrat in 2000.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 4 April 2016 10:23 (eight years ago) link

What I take away is that Sanders himself is awesome and that the people running his campaign are kinda assholes.

Frederik B, Monday, 4 April 2016 11:16 (eight years ago) link

Will read the article when I get a moment. It does seem like an odd way to frame things--for most casual observers, I think Sanders has wildly exceeded expectations. If he had jumped in very aggressively from the start, like Kerrey suggests (skimmed a bit), I'm not sure that that would have helped him.

clemenza, Monday, 4 April 2016 12:16 (eight years ago) link

Where did it all go wrong for the little-known challenger to the Democratic heir apparent? I can't believe how badly he botched it.

I am very inteligent and dicipline boy (Old Lunch), Monday, 4 April 2016 12:26 (eight years ago) link

"Making the transcripts of the Goldman speeches public would have been devastating"

does anyone actually think there's anything interesting in these speeches? my guess is they're boring as hell. even in a private forum her speech writers aren't gonna be handing her anything that could haunt her. the reason not to release them is that doing so makes people talk about it more.

iatee, Monday, 4 April 2016 12:45 (eight years ago) link

yeah the 'devastating' version is where she's systematically listing all the bills she's planning to support per their requests, which, come on, that's not what's in there. i think the likelihood is that they're banal, full of effusive praise for wall street people and vague statements about how they need to be given the freedom to use their wonderful creative power or whatever. there's also the possibility that they're really short. i mean the 'scandal' would not be what's in the speeches, but in the bigger point: what the fuck can a politician possibly say to a niche of well-funded and organized constituents in under an hour, for hundreds of thousands of dollars? i'm not sure the sanders campaign is going about this the best possible way, but kinda good to shine a light on how this system is transparently a way of conveying a bribe by another name. the mafia are more subtle when securing a favor.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 4 April 2016 13:01 (eight years ago) link

My impression and I could be wrong is that she got something like the going rate for a super high profile speaker? Like I bet Mark Zuckerburg commands a large speaking fee and I doubt it functions as a bribe.

Mordy, Monday, 4 April 2016 13:08 (eight years ago) link

what the fuck can a politician possibly say to a niche of well-funded and organized constituents in under an hour, for hundreds of thousands of dollars?

recommend that they read Marilynne Robinson.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 4 April 2016 13:14 (eight years ago) link

Don't you think there's a difference when the high-profile speaker commanding that fee could also be responsible for legislation that governs the person paying the fee?
xp

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Monday, 4 April 2016 13:14 (eight years ago) link

no doubt and even if it wasn't explicitly intended as a bribe i think it's impossible to not have a conflict of interest when dealing w/ someone who has paid you a lot of money. but that's different from insinuating that the payment was intended to be a bribe and that's why it's so large.

Mordy, Monday, 4 April 2016 13:17 (eight years ago) link

like i'm sure after obama leaves the WH he will get lots of offers to speak to a variety of groups for lots + lots of money. does that mean they think he'll be returning to politics and will owe them a favor? maybe it means that they want to ask him to introduce them to someone he's met during his years in office, but also maybe it just means they want the prestige associated w/ their institution of having a former POTUS address them.

Mordy, Monday, 4 April 2016 13:20 (eight years ago) link

I said it a few months ago: I don't give a damn about what Clinton might have said; it won't make her less – or more – attractive as a candidate. Call it confirmation bias.

As political strategy, though, maybe saying "speeches for Wall Street" a dozen times a day might have worked even if it would've sullied Sanders' hands. I don't care about his purported purity anyway.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 4 April 2016 13:20 (eight years ago) link

Oh, I see what you're saying, Mordy. I think we're on the same page. The conflict of interest would be the key point for me.

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Monday, 4 April 2016 13:24 (eight years ago) link

still don't understand why she couldn't just release the transcripts the following day, as soon as she was asked. it's not an unreasonable request to ask for transcripts of the speeches, and it wouldn't have been a controversy if she just would have addressed them and moved on.

Karl Malone, Monday, 4 April 2016 13:27 (eight years ago) link

i feel like we're overdue for a candidate in one of the two parties dropping dead during the primaries

― Neanderthal, Monday, April 4, 2016 4:19 AM (9 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I've wondered about the odds of one the candidates not making it to Election Day.

... (Eazy), Monday, 4 April 2016 13:50 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, you figure that orange clown makeup has to be carcinogenic.

I am very inteligent and dicipline boy (Old Lunch), Monday, 4 April 2016 13:58 (eight years ago) link

- "This way, Mr. Trump."

- "What, through the kitchen?"

pplains, Monday, 4 April 2016 14:08 (eight years ago) link

still don't understand why she couldn't just release the transcripts the following day, as soon as she was asked.
--Karl Malone

She's a shitty candidate that's why

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Monday, 4 April 2016 14:38 (eight years ago) link

here's some more on clinton's climate change plan and why many activists remain skeptical:

ince the start of the campaign, Mrs. Clinton has moved strikingly to the left on climate issues, including opposing the Keystone XL pipeline, offshore drilling and, indeed, most forms of fracking, a drilling technique also known as hydraulic fracturing.

In a debate last month in Flint, Mich., she said she would severely regulate fracking.

“By the time we get through all of my conditions,” she said, “I do not think there will be many places in America where fracking will continue to take place.”

But Mr. Sanders, a self-described democratic socialist, had a snappy retort: “My answer is a lot shorter. No, I do not support fracking.”

The absolutism of Mr. Sanders’s position on this and other climate issues — as well as the fact that Mrs. Clinton arrived at her views under pressure from the left — has made many activists mistrustful of her and supportive of Mr. Sanders.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/05/us/politics/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-climate-change.html

Karl Malone, Monday, 4 April 2016 14:42 (eight years ago) link

like i'm sure after obama leaves the WH he will get lots of offers to speak to a variety of groups for lots + lots of money. does that mean they think he'll be returning to politics and will owe them a favor?

well, as you allow, it could be that basically he's still in politics in a meaningful sense and can offer them a favor (connections, introductions, etc.) - - - but setting that aside, i'm not sure how relevant it is. i mean, if the beatles were all alive and reunited they could also command huge fees for short engagements. lots of people get paid lots of money to do lots of things. that doesn't mean that when someone is an active politician and receives enormous sums, for basically no work, from groups that have very active interests in keeping certain legislative avenues closed, we shouldn't raise our eyebrows.

i mean, there are rules forbidding large individual gifts for a reason, right? and "speaking fees" are just a kind of blatant end run around that, where supposedly you are being paid for a service but you don't have to prove that it really happened. suppose we rolled back all the restrictions, and wall street people just like, bought hillary a mansion directly ("what do you prefer, gothic? classical? or something more contemporary? just see my architect on your way out, he's fantastic, we'll take care of everything"), or handed her garbage bags stuffed with hundred dollar bills and were like "we do appreciate your stopping by for a visit and gracing us with your presence - here's a little something to remember our conversation by. oh, don't leave yet, i've ordered dessert and you simply must try maria's ganache" .... would we be like "oh sure but they would do that for lots of people, doesn't mean there's any expectation behind it"...?

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 4 April 2016 15:04 (eight years ago) link

Wait a second, what were the dates of the speeches under consideration? Was she actually in office at the time?

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Monday, 4 April 2016 15:10 (eight years ago) link

(Because the date I'm seeing is October 2013, several months after she was Secretary of State while she was a private citizen; unless the argument you're making is that anyone who goes on the lecture circuit is ineligible to run for office, I don't think you have a supportable position here.)

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Monday, 4 April 2016 15:12 (eight years ago) link

I mean, at what date was Hillary Clinton neither in office nor effectively running for something? "Wait, you mean the very same Hillary Clinton that we had over for that speech is now running for - for President? Gosh, goes to show you never know where people's lives will take them. I wonder if she remembers the two hundred grand. Nah, probably not, she's a busy lady."

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 4 April 2016 15:13 (eight years ago) link

So your position is that you should not be eligible to run for elected office once you've gone on the lecture circuit.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Monday, 4 April 2016 15:15 (eight years ago) link

at what date was Hillary Clinton neither in office nor effectively running for something?

looks like the answer is October 2013, for starters

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 4 April 2016 15:22 (eight years ago) link

I didn't say anything about ineligibility for office fwiw? My point is only that the "lecture circuit" is manifestly a different thing when we're talking about enormous, set-you-up-for-life sums dispensed to politicians by interest groups, as opposed to elder rock stars giving inspirational commencement speeches or whatever. I think this difference is worth recognizing, and that these things should be regulated and made transparent, so that their bribe-like qualities might be more visible. And Sanders shining light on the speeches hints at some of the troubling aspects of this entire business. I wish he'd make these points more explicitly but so it goes. I'm glad it's a thing people are talking about.

I dunno maybe I'm in some crazy minority but imho it should be troubling when people running for office can thank interest groups for their massive fortunes. Would we not notice if a Republican candidate, during a two-year interregnum between leaving a Cabinet position and running for President, racked up half a million for two speeches to the NRA and the tobacco lobby? The only defenses I can imagine start to sound like Trumpisms. "Sure, I take lots of fees, I speak to people, terrific people. That doesn't mean I owe them anything." I mean, come on. I know I would remember getting a couple hundred grand for a couple hours' work.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 4 April 2016 15:23 (eight years ago) link

BTW, this is something I hadn't really thought about before because it was very in keeping with his core platform but Sanders' crowing about how little he's made off of speaking fees is an incredibly empty boast seeing as he's been an elected official since 1981 and constrained by bribery rules as to what he could reasonably accept as a result; he couldn't get paid massive amounts to give a speech even if he wanted to.

I don't think this is a big GOTCHA against him or anything as nothing in his platform makes me think he has any interest in making $$$$$ off of the lecture route but it seems like something worth footnoting.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Monday, 4 April 2016 15:26 (eight years ago) link

and lol at the idea that hillary clinton was not effectively running for president in october 2013. are we talking about the same person?

but basically i think who needs to be scrutinized and regulated are the people handing out the bribes. again, this is not controversial when we're talking about mysterious fur coats and lincoln continentals showing up at the house wrapped in a giant bow. we have laws on the maximum gifts you can give politicians. why is it so weird to bring up the same concepts when the gift is changed to a 'speaking fee'?

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 4 April 2016 15:27 (eight years ago) link

making speeches for $200K a pop to wall street people doesn't make someone ineligible to run for president, but it's definitely a salient point to consider, especially when "the high-profile speaker commanding that fee could also be responsible for legislation that governs the person paying the fee", as sund4r succinctly put it upthread.

it's impossible to prove, and i'm not saying it deserves an fbi investigation or anything, but is there any reason that an investment bank should pay someone like hillary clinton a few hundred thousand dollars for an hourlong speech OTHER than doing it to gain influence? is she so phenomenal of a public speaker and financial guru that her thoughts are worth $55.55 per second?

Karl Malone, Monday, 4 April 2016 15:50 (eight years ago) link

why can't hillary just take their money & then stab them in the back

ejemplo (crüt), Monday, 4 April 2016 15:53 (eight years ago) link

they paid her to speak & she's not legally obligated to do anything beyond that for them

ejemplo (crüt), Monday, 4 April 2016 15:54 (eight years ago) link

(nearly) everyone in the position to make bank off of those kinds of speeches does it, but it's still not a good look. and it still doesn't make any sense to not release the transcripts when requested to do so by numerous outlets, whether it's from a PR or transparency perspective. as others have said, it's not like anyone expects that she said "trust me ya big money wall street boyz, i will pay you BACK when i am president, and by that i mean i will deregulate your sector to the greatest extent possible in a relatively low-key way that preserves my chances of re-election!" so just release the damn transcripts already

Karl Malone, Monday, 4 April 2016 15:54 (eight years ago) link

i was looking around and it seems like her fees were comparable to other blockbuster speakers. whether her observations + thoughts are worth that much is a different question but i do assume that a former first lady, senator + secretary of state would have insight + experiences that normal ppl would not. it's not necessarily specific financial recommendations that they would be seeking but maybe information about stability in various international markets, information about who key decision makers are, etc. plus obv the prestige of having this kind of speaker. i'm not sure it makes sense that in 2013 they were giving her this money to speak bc they assumed she'd be the next POTUS instead of bc of her previous job experience. in hindsight it seems obv that she'd run again but i remember in 2013 seeing lots of stories about how she hadn't decided.

Mordy, Monday, 4 April 2016 15:56 (eight years ago) link

it's not just hillary clinton. i think anyone running for president should feel obligated to disclose transcripts of paid speeches they've given in the recent past. if bernie sanders refused to release a transcript of a speech a lof people would be like O_o

Karl Malone, Monday, 4 April 2016 15:57 (eight years ago) link

in hindsight it seems obv that she'd run again but i remember in 2013 seeing lots of stories about how she hadn't decided.

iirc the instant she stepped down as secretary of state it was clear that she was running for president. i think it was common wisdom that she was preparing to run for president and it would have been shocking if she did not.

Karl Malone, Monday, 4 April 2016 15:59 (eight years ago) link

TBF, we don't know that these speeches weren't just hour-long, expletive-filled excoriations of the banking industry, now do we.

I am very inteligent and dicipline boy (Old Lunch), Monday, 4 April 2016 16:00 (eight years ago) link

Hillary Clinton has been running for president since at least '91, iirc.

I am very inteligent and dicipline boy (Old Lunch), Monday, 4 April 2016 16:00 (eight years ago) link

that's true, she could be holding them back because she dropped the f-bomb too much while suplexing a commodity derivative market specialists

Karl Malone, Monday, 4 April 2016 16:01 (eight years ago) link

again, see my beatles comment. i don't disagree that non-politcians can also get big big fees for telling wealthy people/groups/companies that everybody's free to wear sunscreen, or paraphrasing 'oh the places youll go' or whatever. but when it is a politcian, there are obvious conflicts of interests which is why they're not supposed to be able to take huge gifts and bribes. there are loopholes: you can do it while you're not currently in office or officially running, and if you accept the money under this comforting label of 'speaking fee' it's less likely that people will complain about it two years later than if you just take the mansion and the yacht directly.

sanders is basically calling that bluff and seeing if people DO find it suspicious once attention's brought to it. i dunno whether or how it could be regulated exactly, but at the very least, the court of public opinion might shift us to a point where people who take these sackfuls of cash are seen as 'bought' and consequently can't get votes.

as to why not release them: i suspect that at first she probably just figured it was a non-scandal that would blow over and sanders would either look bad for sticking to it, or just give it up after gaining no traction with it. it doesn't seem to have hurt him, and maybe now backing off would look bad in itself. could also be that the speeched are so empty and vaporous that, now that there is attention on them, they become campaign ad fodder. ''Hillary Clinton's Wall Street friends paid her x dollars a word for her insight. What did she have to tell them? (Quote most empty section.) Very insightful. Is that really all Goldman Sachs expected for their money? When the chips are down, whose side do you think Hillary Clinton will be on?'' That needs a lot of polish obv but I think the contents of the texts might be mobilizable in a way that the idea of 'the speeches' isn't, by itself. idk.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 4 April 2016 16:07 (eight years ago) link

we'll have the last laugh, just wait! stupid lamestream media.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 4 April 2016 16:29 (eight years ago) link

Did that say..."no more oreos - Donald trump" or have I finally just lost my mind completely.

Here, let me Danesplain that for you (jjjusten), Monday, 4 April 2016 16:30 (eight years ago) link

I too am wondering if I have actually gone insane.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 4 April 2016 16:30 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5zjVUZA7rY

ulysses, Monday, 4 April 2016 16:34 (eight years ago) link

^from back in september

ulysses, Monday, 4 April 2016 16:34 (eight years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CfHwqbCUIAEbhB6.jpg

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 4 April 2016 16:35 (eight years ago) link

oh thank god this all is referring to the actual cookies

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Monday, 4 April 2016 16:37 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZK9vrBNRys

global tetrahedron, Monday, 4 April 2016 16:37 (eight years ago) link

The NYT with one of its where-did-it-go-wrong stories about Sanders.

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, April 4, 2016 6:39 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

What I take away is that Sanders himself is awesome and that the people running his campaign are kinda assholes.

― Frederik B, Monday, April 4, 2016 7:16 AM (5 hours ago)

once this is all over, i really hope this is going to be the takeaway certain people have -- people who for whatever reason have devoted a lot of their time to attacking sanders and his message and tactics. he genuinely seems to be a fundamentally decent human being, something that can't be said of a lot of politicians, let alone national ones

(tbh i don't think anything in that article painted sanders' team in a particularly unfavorable light either. tbh i find the recoil at what are perceived to be the "attacks" coming out of the sanders camp pretty funny -- it's like people have completely forgotten about 2008, or maybe arent paying attention to the current GOP race. (sanders' supporters, esp those on social media, are another story otoh))

from that story btw:

Several prominent Democrats say that a different candidate — one with more history in the South and more experience with black voters — might have been able to beat Mrs. Clinton. Some singled out Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., who considered seeking the nomination.

“Biden could have competed among African-Americans far better than Sanders and possibly stopped Clinton from getting the delegate lead she has,” said Joseph P. Riley Jr., a former mayor of Charleston, S.C., who is a Biden ally and supports Mrs. Clinton’s candidacy.

it's amazing to me how clueless some apparent dem insiders can be. someone, i think jamelle bouie, pointed this out on twitter last night, but basically anything bad you can say about hillary from the 90s -- and there is plenty bad to say -- biden was just as bad or worse. HRC supported (and made some pretty awful comments about) the crime bill -- biden wrote it. biden was as cozy with the financial and credit card industries as anyone in congress in the 80s and 90s. biden voted for the iraq war too. (though, to his credit, he's certainly more dovish than clinton these days.) the list goes on

why can't hillary just take their money & then stab them in the back

― ejemplo (crüt), Monday, April 4, 2016 11:53 AM (34 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

they paid her to speak & she's not legally obligated to do anything beyond that for them

― ejemplo (crüt), Monday, April 4, 2016 11:54 AM (33 minutes ago)

can't tell if you're being facetious but if not you may not understand the idea of conflict of interest

btw to sort of synthesize a few points about this upthread: as a private citizen HRC is perfectly entitled to give speeches to whomever she wants. doesn't mean it's not fair game on the campaign trail, tho

k3vin k., Monday, 4 April 2016 16:42 (eight years ago) link

Kind of curious what the effect would be on the market for the supposed insights if it was clear that they'd be in the papers a month later.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 4 April 2016 16:47 (eight years ago) link

Now that "No more oreos!" makes more sense, the shot with that quote still offers us

"Donald Trump is simply awe-inspiring" - all who gaze upon him

"I wrote the Art of the Deal" - Donald Trump

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 4 April 2016 16:52 (eight years ago) link

lol djp: hey, it's still only april give him a minute

ulysses, Monday, 4 April 2016 17:00 (eight years ago) link

I think policing black identity is one of the places that Trump has left to go once he needs to really unfurl his sails in the general.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 4 April 2016 17:03 (eight years ago) link

the entire reason Trump had momentum to begin with is that he policed the identity of America's most powerful black person

ejemplo (crüt), Monday, 4 April 2016 17:06 (eight years ago) link

^^^

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Monday, 4 April 2016 17:07 (eight years ago) link

We really need more intrepid reporters setting rhetorical traps for Trump. He's proven so suggestible and adept at taking the bait thus far, exposing the void where a system of values would lie in a functioning human being. Ask him questions in such a way that it steers him towards voicing a hugely-unpopular and perhaps even broadly offensive position that is in no way reflective of his having given any real thought to the issue. Lather, rinse, repeat.

I am very inteligent and dicipline boy (Old Lunch), Monday, 4 April 2016 17:10 (eight years ago) link

Jay Leno's "Jaywalking" as political tool. I like it! Can we get this on the air by Tuesday?

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Monday, 4 April 2016 17:21 (eight years ago) link

Old Lunch otm. In the abortion conversation, Matthews deserves some credit for continuing to press Trump, but he (Matthews) also comes off as somewhat rambly and disorganized. He gives some cover to Trumpoids who say it was a baiting question and that it needs to be heard in context. Even so T. needed to release several flailing and contradictory clarifications, and he is still on the defensive. Which is great.

Slightly better planning and a more laserlike focus might get some truly un-walk-backable stuff out of Trump. Ask him about affirmative action. Ask him about voter ID. Ask him about pay equity. Let the fun commence.

All this said, it's not primarily the media's job to torpedo Trump's candidacy. I continue to believe that Trump is his own worst enemy, and that if permitted enough rope he will destroy his own chances just by being himself.

up jump the bougie (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 4 April 2016 17:37 (eight years ago) link

x-post re Clinton and Sanders on Wall Street and possible influence or not of her speeches

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2016/01/05/3736113/bernie-sanders-wall-street-plan/

How Sanders and Clinton differ with their Wall Street related plans (as of January)

Some agreement, but differences on Glass-Steagall, what a financial transaction tax should cover, and other things

curmudgeon, Monday, 4 April 2016 17:41 (eight years ago) link

video game fascism, who could have predicted...

goole, Monday, 4 April 2016 17:42 (eight years ago) link

Just to sidestep for a moment the vitally important conversation about Hillary Clinton's speeches - do you Sanders supporters really not see that your belief that he'd do better nationally than Clinton is the exact mirror image of right-wing nutjobs' belief that "if we just nominate a True Conservative, the country will be ours!" Sanders is fucking doomed, and it's not the word "socialist" that kills him, it's the word "revolution." People don't want a revolution. They want to be left the fuck alone. That's why voter turnout is what it is. Clinton's presidency promises to be low-impact for the average person, and she's the only candidate of whom that's true. Trump, Cruz, and Sanders all promise to make people's lives more complex, and bring trouble, if they win. Only maniacs vote for politicians who are going to require them, the voters, to actually do something or change their own lives in a significant way. And the vast majority of Americans are not maniacs - they're people with other shit on their minds, who want to think seriously about politics for about a month, once every four years.

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Monday, 4 April 2016 17:46 (eight years ago) link

tbf current polling does suggest that he'd be competitive nationally tho who knows how that looks when we get to october

Mordy, Monday, 4 April 2016 17:48 (eight years ago) link

on, eh, clinton's speeches (sorry), just ftr, for me they represent a massive problem in where she's coming from - even if there's no formal quid pro quo it tells you tons about where she feels comfortable and who she thinks is important. but there was nothing actually illegal about them as far as anybody can tell.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 4 April 2016 17:49 (eight years ago) link

it's similar to how carrying a heavy jug of your own excrement and putting it up the lectern next to the microphone as you give a speech is not illegal. "No, Victoria, I will not move this jug of excrement down from the lectern, and I do not care if it is blocking your vision. That is YOUR problem, Victoria, that is YOUR problem, not mine!"

- John Oliver

Karl Malone, Monday, 4 April 2016 17:55 (eight years ago) link

top man - which of ''you sanders supporters'' are you politely addressing? we try to all keep on the same page, you know, but differences of opinion slip through which is why our hive mind has resolved that we should continue to post under separate screen names, at least through the current phase of the campaign. but it does make it tricky to answer blanket responses to what may in fact be phantom strawmen. i for one am comfortable with the idea that sanders's current hypothetical general numbers would crash hard once he's subjected to a full-bore GOP smear campaign. the only caveats are that some of that loss might be canceled out by clinton's preexisting high negatives, and the enormous disadvantages that any of the toxic GOP candidates has going in re: electoral map, etc. etc.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 4 April 2016 18:00 (eight years ago) link

"Clinton's presidency promises to be low-impact for the average person, and she's the only candidate of whom that's true."

I think there may be are more "average" people who are looking for more significant changes than you think, Phil (congratulations on speaking for all the normals though).

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Monday, 4 April 2016 18:09 (eight years ago) link

yeah, i mean the whole basis of sanders's campaign, and in a different way trump's, is that lots of 'regular people' feel like the status quo is actively screwing them over and they are seeking restitution. not saying that that by itself is an election-winning coalition but it's an odd year to lean hard on people's fundamental complacency and preference for business-as-usual.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 4 April 2016 18:11 (eight years ago) link

do you Sanders supporters really not see that your belief that he'd do better nationally than Clinton is the exact mirror image of right-wing nutjobs' belief that "if we just nominate a True Conservative, the country will be ours!"

― the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Monday, April 4, 2016 1:46 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

if you say so

Hadrian VIII, Monday, 4 April 2016 18:13 (eight years ago) link

xp also an odd century.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 4 April 2016 18:14 (eight years ago) link

Sanders v. Trump
RCP Average 3/16-4/2 53.4 37.4 Sanders +16.0

Clinton v. Trump
RCP Average 3/16-4/2 49.4 38.6 Clinton + 10.8

(it's been holding steady like this for a long time now)

Hadrian VIII, Monday, 4 April 2016 18:17 (eight years ago) link

vs. Kasich, currently

Sanders: +1.3
Clinton: -6.3

Hadrian VIII, Monday, 4 April 2016 18:19 (eight years ago) link

And vs. Cruz

Sanders +9.8
Clinton +3.1

Hadrian VIII, Monday, 4 April 2016 18:21 (eight years ago) link

i think he's vulnerable on the soviet / communism / bread lines stuff

Mordy, Monday, 4 April 2016 18:24 (eight years ago) link

like i've never seen this clip before today and i've been following the election closely. there's likely a lot of usable stuff out there like this that hillary has not made a part of her campaign in any way:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJBjjP8WSbc

Mordy, Monday, 4 April 2016 18:25 (eight years ago) link

A fair point.

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Monday, 4 April 2016 18:29 (eight years ago) link

Bernie Sanders praising bread lines and food rationing... as preferable to widespread starvation.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 4 April 2016 18:32 (eight years ago) link

and he only went on his honeymoon to the USSR bc they had a sister-city program. if you think americans respond well to context + nuance then you'll disagree that these things could have an effect. i'm not as optimistic about polity.

Mordy, Monday, 4 April 2016 18:33 (eight years ago) link

(it's been holding steady like this for a long time now)

― Hadrian VIII, Monday, April 4, 2016 2:17 PM (17 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

head to head polls are meaningless this far out

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 4 April 2016 18:37 (eight years ago) link

on the subject of someone dying before november

One explanation for all this raggedness is that the Trump team is simply burned out. People who know Trump say they’ve never seen him so tired. Several months ago, he began wearing a bulletproof vest, two sources close to the campaign told me, which has added to his discomfort on the stump, leaving him sweaty and spent after events. And given that his unfavorables among women already are at ruinous levels (a CNN poll last month found that 73 percent of registered female voters held a negative view of Trump), his ill-advised comments about punishing abortion-seekers seem like they might have been a function of sheer exhaustion as well.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 4 April 2016 18:39 (eight years ago) link

sweaty and spent

Gah, erotic Trump campaign fic should not be permitted into the national conversation, even under Rule 34.

up jump the bougie (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 4 April 2016 18:44 (eight years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/cGX1Spn.jpg

ejemplo (crüt), Monday, 4 April 2016 19:03 (eight years ago) link

it's similar to how carrying a heavy jug of your own excrement and putting it up the lectern next to the microphone as you give a speech is not illegal. "No, Victoria, I will not move this jug of excrement down from the lectern, and I do not care if it is blocking your vision. That is YOUR problem, Victoria, that is YOUR problem, not mine!"

I legit can't tell if this is real Oliver or parody, and I say that as someone who generally likes him (though now I'm starting to reconsider).

evol j, Monday, 4 April 2016 19:03 (eight years ago) link

Bernie Sanders praising bread lines and food rationing... as preferable to widespread starvation.

― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), 4. april 2016 20:32 (30 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

That's... A pretty bad excuse... I don't think he's talking about Ethiopia or whereever.

Frederik B, Monday, 4 April 2016 19:07 (eight years ago) link

uh are you at all familiar with how many people died of famine in the Soviet Union? more than Ethiopia, for sure.

the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Monday, 4 April 2016 19:08 (eight years ago) link

Well, yeah, but that makes his statement worse.

Frederik B, Monday, 4 April 2016 19:10 (eight years ago) link

What's the full context though?

Evan, Monday, 4 April 2016 19:12 (eight years ago) link

i don't really agree w/ any of top man's "you sanders supporters" post. most successful candidates run on a platform of challenging the status quo to at least some degree, and obama won in 2008 by promising the exact opposite of what you're talking about. voter turnout isn't low because ppl don't want stuff from their government -- weed out the tea partiers, and most americans want a lot of stuff from their government! i also think that the majority of ppl who don't vote are probably never going to vote, and the outcome of the election doesn't depend on them.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 4 April 2016 19:13 (eight years ago) link

Well, yeah, but that makes his statement worse.
--Frederik B

Yeah why didn't Bernie save all the people.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Monday, 4 April 2016 19:13 (eight years ago) link

Arguably the famine and the bread lines were both symptomatic of the same forced collectivization of agriculture. Breadlines are obviously preferable to starving to death but I wasn't trying to gotcha Bernie. I was more pointing out that most of the material the right wing will use to smear him haven't even shown up in the discourse yet (partially bc I think the right would prefer him to Hillary and are saving their material for later).

Mordy, Monday, 4 April 2016 19:14 (eight years ago) link

I legit can't tell if this is real Oliver or parody, and I say that as someone who generally likes him (though now I'm starting to reconsider).

lol, it's parody. i still tune in occasionally but once you start noticing his metaphor + short conversation with a fake person thing, it's incredibly annoying

Karl Malone, Monday, 4 April 2016 19:28 (eight years ago) link

The parody could have been more accurate if you had John yelling at Victoria a little longer. It ended too comfortably.

Evan, Monday, 4 April 2016 19:40 (eight years ago) link

WATCH: John Oliver absolutely destroys Victoria in an epic rant that originally had something to do with the idea of holding leaders to a higher standard

Karl Malone, Monday, 4 April 2016 19:42 (eight years ago) link

yeah Oliver's one note schtick gets pretty grating

There's a big Bernie Sanders billboard in my neighborhood now. Such a waste of money and resources.

Οὖτις, Monday, 4 April 2016 19:42 (eight years ago) link

tbf, john oliver doesn't dig it either
http://www.vulture.com/2016/02/john-oliver-last-week-tonight-c-v-r.html

It’s a comedy show. We can’t really control how people receive it. Just like you can’t control the ludicrous packaging placed on the pieces the next day online, when people write things like “John Oliver takes a sword to the very heart of chicken farming.” “He throws a hand grenade at Congress.” That response never ceases to slightly depress me. “He takes a baseball bat and pounds to death the concept of chicken farming.” Wow, you just oversold what that piece was! It’s really annoying.

ulysses, Monday, 4 April 2016 19:43 (eight years ago) link

Trump's campaign surely never recovered from his insightful takedown!

(Though to be honest, I found his breakdown of the costs and logistics of the border wall refreshing... why won't people press Trump further to go into any detail about how his plans will actually work?)

Evan, Monday, 4 April 2016 19:45 (eight years ago) link

bc the wall is just a metaphor

Mordy, Monday, 4 April 2016 19:46 (eight years ago) link

The wall is you and me, and we're fabulous.

I am very inteligent and dicipline boy (Old Lunch), Monday, 4 April 2016 19:49 (eight years ago) link

that reminds me that i was having a bad dream last night where sea levels were overtaking miami and other major cities but we had a giant 40 foot wall between the u.s. and mexico

Karl Malone, Monday, 4 April 2016 19:49 (eight years ago) link

that reminds me that i was having a bad dream last night where sea levels were overtaking miami and other major cities but we had a giant 40 foot wall between the u.s. and mexico

― Karl Malone, Monday, April 4, 2016 3:49 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Sounds like a good dream to me #TRUMP2016

Evan, Monday, 4 April 2016 20:00 (eight years ago) link

this exists
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bERtaqXtBpI

ulysses, Monday, 4 April 2016 20:36 (eight years ago) link

If Trump is the most fit person ever, says his GI specialist or derm or whomever, imagine how hard police and soldiers have it with their bulletproof vests.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 4 April 2016 21:11 (eight years ago) link

not the most fit person ever, just "the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency."

so, you know, not completely exaggerated or anything

Karl Malone, Monday, 4 April 2016 21:15 (eight years ago) link

i miss those silly early days of his campaign was the insane aspects of his candidacy were related to things like his personal doctor saying idiotic shit rather than barely veiled threats against adherents of particular religions

Karl Malone, Monday, 4 April 2016 21:17 (eight years ago) link

i dunno the latter has been the coin of his candidacy from nearly day one. wasn't the "temporary shut down of all muslims enterting the US" pretty early in the campaign?

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 4 April 2016 21:18 (eight years ago) link

There's a big Bernie Sanders billboard in my neighborhood now. Such a waste of money and resources.

― Οὖτις, Monday, April 4, 2016 3:42 PM (54 minutes ago)

because your neighborhood is likely to vote for him already?

k3vin k., Monday, 4 April 2016 21:19 (eight years ago) link

p much. also he isn't going to win California or the primary so maybe he should spend that money on better shit.

Οὖτις, Monday, 4 April 2016 21:20 (eight years ago) link

I never saw an Obama billboard in SF in '08 fwiw

Οὖτις, Monday, 4 April 2016 21:21 (eight years ago) link

xpost
yeah, guess you're right - he did his "They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people." thing during the announcement of his candidacy on June 16

Karl Malone, Monday, 4 April 2016 21:21 (eight years ago) link

the muslims thing was months later though, after the San Bernardino shooting

Οὖτις, Monday, 4 April 2016 21:24 (eight years ago) link

ARG poll comes out showing Trump up 10 in Wisconsin. fans go nuts, ignoring how terrible ARG's track record has been

Neanderthal, Monday, 4 April 2016 21:28 (eight years ago) link

p much. also he isn't going to win California or the primary so maybe he should spend that money on better shit.

― Οὖτις, Monday, April 4, 2016 5:20 PM (11 minutes ago)

oh i forgot you were doing the bernie-should-drop-out thing, carry on

k3vin k., Monday, 4 April 2016 21:33 (eight years ago) link

That's... A pretty bad excuse... I don't think he's talking about Ethiopia or whereever.

Well, what "other countries" was he talking about?

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Monday, 4 April 2016 21:37 (eight years ago) link

The NY Mag article caek quoted above (about Trump's exhaustion) is pretty good, if you need a look under the hood.

It was also thanks to some information he had gathered that Trump was able to do something that no other Republican has done before: take on Fox News. An odd bit of coincidence had given him a card to play against Fox founder Roger Ailes. In 2014, I published a biography of Ailes, which upset the famously paranoid executive. Several months before it landed in stores, Ailes fired his longtime PR adviser Brian Lewis, accusing him of being a source. During Lewis’s severance negotiations, Lewis hired Judd Burstein, a powerhouse litigator, and claimed he had “bombs” that would destroy Ailes and Fox News. That’s when Trump got involved.

“When Roger was having problems, he didn’t call 97 people, he called me,” Trump said. Burstein, it turned out, had worked for Trump briefly in the ’90s, and Ailes asked Trump to mediate. Trump ran the negotiations out of his office at Trump Tower. “Roger had lawyers, very expensive lawyers, and they couldn’t do anything. I solved the problem.” Fox paid Lewis millions to go away quietly, and Trump, I’m told, learned everything Lewis had planned to leak. If Ailes ever truly went to war against Trump, Trump would have the arsenal to launch a retaliatory strike.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/04/inside-the-donald-trump-presidential-campaign.html#

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 4 April 2016 21:46 (eight years ago) link

Bernie staying in past this point, I just don't know what to attribute it to. He's already earned himself a seat at the table for the convention, and he's pushed Hillary's rhetoric to the left and (at least on the Dem side) brought his signature issues into the mainstream of the party. But there's no way he's going to get the nomination now, staying in at this point seems like an exercise in willful contrarianism, egomania, etc. And at this point when it looks like Dem congressional chances are better than previously thought possible, it's weird/sad to see all this money and energy from his supporters being channeled into a pointless charade rather than something actually productive.

(just started Barney Frank's "A Life in Politics", maybe some of his cantankerous pragmatism is rubbing off on me today)

xp

Οὖτις, Monday, 4 April 2016 21:48 (eight years ago) link

That's... A pretty bad excuse... I don't think he's talking about Ethiopia or whereever.
Well, what "other countries" was he talking about?

― Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), 4. april 2016 23:37 (15 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Well, it's probably not a third-world country, since that would indirectly indict the second world for falling way far behind. And it's obviously not a second-world country. So go figure.

Frederik B, Monday, 4 April 2016 21:58 (eight years ago) link

Hm, many Communist countries were Third World countries previously. I had interpreted the comment as saying that, under socialism, there was at least this basic improvement. (Indian Communists made arguments like this all the time.) If he was comparing Communist countries favourably to wealthy First World countries, then I agree that it's pretty ridiculous.

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Monday, 4 April 2016 22:06 (eight years ago) link

But there's no way he's going to get the nomination now, staying in at this point seems like an exercise in willful contrarianism, egomania, etc.

You're right - it's important for the party to know how many people in New Hampshire and Washington support a more progressive approach to the party, but totally unimportant to suss this out for New York and California. Really, Bernie had made his point after he cracked 20% in national polling - everything since then has been a total waste of everybody's time. And if you really think about it, running at all in the first place was willfully contrarian and egomaniacal, since Hillary was always going to win. For shame.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 4 April 2016 22:14 (eight years ago) link

i really don't think it's a question of egomania

wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 4 April 2016 22:20 (eight years ago) link

idgi Doc, you think Bernie's running a demographics study?

Οὖτις, Monday, 4 April 2016 22:21 (eight years ago) link

And if he was, then what to make of his campaign admitting they gave up on the south, to get more 'wins' on super tuesday?

Frederik B, Monday, 4 April 2016 22:25 (eight years ago) link

i really don't think it's a question of egomania

I was hesitant to make this accusation, but Bernie really seems to enjoy his newfound cult of personality - much moreso than he, say, wants to support other candidates or build networks of like-minded candidates or actually get legislation passed. I tend to judge these kinds of misalignments of priorities in public figures p harshly.

Οὖτις, Monday, 4 April 2016 22:25 (eight years ago) link

we've already discussed this a bunch but it bears repeating that it's odd for a candidate to call for a revolution and then not actually show any interest in the organizing required to accomplish that revolution

Οὖτις, Monday, 4 April 2016 22:27 (eight years ago) link

I have more respect for Dean, who successfully pivoted from his failed primary bid and capitalized on his support within the party to reshape the party's strategy and actually win elections - which had a direct impact on getting Obama his Dem majority, and resulted in decent legislation.

Οὖτις, Monday, 4 April 2016 22:29 (eight years ago) link

idgi Doc, you think Bernie's running a demographics study?

I think, as I've said many many times, that his campaign is about proving a point: that there is an audience for progressivism and a platform based fundamentally on the issues of income inequality, political reform, and all the rest of it. "Moving Hillary to the left" is not the project and never has been since we all know how that'll end; the value of it is in revealing the base's progressive leanings to those who might run for other races, not to mention ginning up a lot of enthusiasm among people as the Bernie tour visits your state, gets you pumped, gives you the experience of voting for a socialist as something not totally alien, something you've now done and might do again. (Now I'm really really repeating myself, but: I think this matters! Especially for first-time voters! Wouldn't the range of political possibilities look different to you, maybe for the rest of your life, if your first choice is between center-right Democrat and 'democratic socialist,' with both actually doing pretty darn good in the race?)

Him bailing on the race because it's profoundly unlikely (to the point of impossibility) that he'll actually win is silly: that was true from the moment he started! Him winning has only gotten more likely (as in, going from a .001 chance to a .005 or something), but anyway if he quits, that means tons and tons of people don't get to pull the lever for the candidate they support and don't get to go through with this whole thing. I wonder what's really at stake in urging him out of the race. Why's it so important to deny him those votes and those delegates, or the full referendum on his ideas? I want the history books to get it right and I want him to compete right to the end.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 4 April 2016 22:30 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, good point - I, too, am really disappointed that Future Bernie Sanders has not done any of that organizing stuff. I mean it's already mid 2019 where he is. Pretty disappointing that he's just been sitting on his hands since losing the nomination - I thought he was made of better stuff than that.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 4 April 2016 22:31 (eight years ago) link

It's just, like - - - I see so many of these "advice to Bernie Sanders: if you really want to succeed, what you should do is quit! Trust me, I know about success - I've been supporting Clinton since day one!" kinda pieces and opinions floating around and it's such weak concern-trolling.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 4 April 2016 22:33 (eight years ago) link

i seem to remember shakey having some pretty harsh words for the blue dogs the dean/rahm DNCC whipped up during those first couple of obama years -- the ones who got wiped out in the midterms and gave the GOP their huge majorities, btw

k3vin k., Monday, 4 April 2016 22:36 (eight years ago) link

the base's progressive leanings to those who might run for other races

this is an admirable goal, but it's only the smallest of first steps in actually getting those people into office. Once the demand is there, then you have to identify which races are in play, find candidates to run in those races, give them money and party backing to fight what is likely to be hard-fought campaign (in the case of primary challenges, or swing seats), then you have to make sure those voters who were excited by Bernie know about this other person and actually show up to vote when Bernie is *not* on the ballot. That is all a shitload of work that requires coordination and exploitation of the party apparatus and Bernie has p clearly demonstrated by this point that he is *not* interested in doing it. He hasn't supported downballot candidates who claim his mantle, his campaign isn't coordinating with them, it isn't helping them raise money, etc. And at this point we have less than 7 months to go! Or do you think Berniemania is going to somehow sustain itself into the 2018 midterms cuz if so I have some unpleasant news for you...

xp

Οὖτις, Monday, 4 April 2016 22:36 (eight years ago) link

Can't wait for Οὖτι to blame Sanders for Clinton's centrist policies in a year. He'll have gotten a lot of practice by then.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 4 April 2016 22:37 (eight years ago) link

i seem to remember shakey having some pretty harsh words for the blue dogs the dean/rahm DNCC whipped up during those first couple of obama years

true, and a lot of those individual members sucked and what I didn't like about them was when they didn't toe the party line. otoh (most of them) helped get ARRA and Obamacare passed.

Οὖτις, Monday, 4 April 2016 22:38 (eight years ago) link

Can't wait for Οὖτι to blame Sanders for Clinton's centrist policies in a year. He'll have gotten a lot of practice by then.

Unless Clinton gets a majority in congress it's barely going to matter what any of her policies are

Οὖτις, Monday, 4 April 2016 22:39 (eight years ago) link

that there is an audience for progressivism and a platform based fundamentally on the issues of income inequality, political reform, and all the rest of it

also hasn't this goal already been accomplished? it sure seems like it to me. what's the point of staying in all the way up to the convention, just burning up all that donor money?

Οὖτις, Monday, 4 April 2016 22:40 (eight years ago) link

Can't wait for Οὖτι to blame Sanders for Clinton's centrist policies in a year.

hey maybe if Bernie had a bloc of votes in Congress they could pressure President Hillary from the left, wouldn't that be nice? eh too much work...

Οὖτις, Monday, 4 April 2016 22:41 (eight years ago) link

so much more fun to continue this silly purist liberal savior grandpa routine

Οὖτις, Monday, 4 April 2016 22:43 (eight years ago) link

This is a lot of responsibility to be laying on one guy's head tbh! Why are all of those things his job? Why does it all have to happen this one election cycle? And your whole list starts with "once the demand is there..." and yet you want Bernie to quit before he finishes confirming this. It's strange. We're talking about putting the brakes on, and hopefully reversing, the general tendency this entire party has had for more than two decades. Sanders's campaign can do a lot and I'm really glad it's happening; I acknowledge it can't do everything, but why does that then mean "well then he may as well just pack it in"? I don't necessarily think "Berniemania" will sustain itself until the 2018 midterms but I don't think the interest in progressive policies to address income inequality is just this year's fad.

The only development that would actually seriously shock me is if, in 2018, Bernie is not all over the fucking place making speeches with Candidate X in cities where Bernie did well this year, working the crowd, doing some of his 'greatest hits' and speaking about how excited he is that Young People like Candidate X here are the real future of the Political Revolution In This Country. I mean, that shit writes itself.

Also in case my labored joke about transmissions from Future Bernie Sanders wasn't clear: Howard Dean was not elected DNC chair until February 2005, so holding whatever he accomplished in that post over what Sanders should supposedly be doing right this second is, uh, odd.

what's the point of staying in all the way up to the convention,

I already answered this, but the point of staying in until the convention is that people in New York and California and a bunch of other places have not fucking voted yet, thank you, and we would like our voices to also be registered in this grand tallying-up of opinion, thank you very much for your concern.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 4 April 2016 22:45 (eight years ago) link

xp I take it you won't be voting for the silly purist liberal savior grandpa then.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 4 April 2016 22:46 (eight years ago) link

Tim Robbins at a Sanders rally, really hitting the point that it matters what all the primary voters think:

"After the Southern primaries, you had called the election. And who's fooling who? Winning South Carolina in the Democratic primary is about as significant as winning Guam. No Democrat is going to win in the general election. Why do these victories have so much significance?"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/04/04/tim-robbins-figures-that-clintons-south-carolina-win-is-about-as-important-as-winning-guam/

Frederik B, Monday, 4 April 2016 22:49 (eight years ago) link

Yeah that's a dumb argument, and I would like to take the opportunity to formally disassociate myself from Tim Robbins, though I may still finish watching that tape of The Player sometime.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 4 April 2016 22:50 (eight years ago) link

Howard Dean was not elected DNC chair until February 2005, so holding whatever he accomplished in that post over what Sanders should supposedly be doing right this second is, uh, odd.

Dean also withdrew way earlier and made it clear he was willing and eager to work with the party apparatus. Bernie's not going to replace Debbie Wasserman-Schulz (lolzy as that would be, and I would welcome such a development) precisely because he demonstrates no interest in the party machinery - and when he does express an interest it's usually one of contempt. After decades in congress he has few allies, very little congressional support, etc. This guy is not a team player, he never has been and he doesn't want to be. But you need a team to make legislative gains.

if, in 2018, Bernie is not all over the fucking place making speeches with Candidate X in cities where Bernie did well this year, working the crowd, doing some of his 'greatest hits' and speaking about how excited he is that Young People like Candidate X here are the real future of the Political Revolution In This Country.

yeah this isn't going to happen. setting this aside for future reference fwiw

xp

Οὖτις, Monday, 4 April 2016 22:54 (eight years ago) link

oh good, well, since we both already know exactly what sanders is going to do with his time in the future, it's probably safe to hold whatever it is against him

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 4 April 2016 22:59 (eight years ago) link

I'm holding what he's doing right now against him - all those primary donations, pissed away

Οὖτις, Monday, 4 April 2016 23:00 (eight years ago) link

on things like billboards in the most liberal distict in the country

Οὖτις, Monday, 4 April 2016 23:00 (eight years ago) link

i consider my donation money pretty well spent tbh. you've probably given him a lot more though.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 4 April 2016 23:02 (eight years ago) link

Doctor Casino, what do you think of the Sanders' campaign's election strategy in the south? From the nyt story upthread:

The morning after the Nevada vote, Mr. Sanders pulled Mr. Devine away from church and Mr. Weaver from breakfast to talk about strategy. They agreed that Mr. Sanders would still compete for the South Carolina primary on Feb. 27, but he would shift his plans for the March 1 “Super Tuesday” contests. Instead of spending money on ads and ground operations to compete across the South, Mr. Sanders would all but give up on those states and would focus on winning states where he was more popular, like Colorado and Minnesota, which would at least give him some victories to claim.

The reason: Mr. Sanders and his advisers and allies knew that black voters would be decisive in those Southern contests, but he had been unable to make significant inroads with them. He had hoped to. At one meeting with advisers in December, he suggested campaigning hard in Alabama in January, but his team insisted that he focus on winning Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada. Mrs. Clinton went on to rout him in Alabama, as well as in South Carolina and other Southern states, running up huge margins in African-American areas.

These victories allowed her to compile a significant delegate lead, given that Democrats award delegates based on the candidates’ vote totals.

[...]

Mr. Weaver, the Sanders campaign manager, called South Carolina “a disappointment” but said the senator had had no choice but to focus on winning states on Super Tuesday rather than competing everywhere for delegates. Had Mr. Sanders not, he might have carried only his home state, Vermont, on March 1.

“What would the media narrative have been after that day? I can tell you: It would have been devastating,” Mr. Weaver said.

Instead, he won there, as well as in Minnesota, Colorado and Oklahoma.

Frederik B, Monday, 4 April 2016 23:02 (eight years ago) link

I'm holding what he's doing right now against him - all those primary donations, pissed away
--Οὖτις

I think continuing to focus attention from Hillary's left is pretty valuable actually.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Monday, 4 April 2016 23:05 (eight years ago) link

I'm making a point to avoid all Bernie v Hillary stuff at this point, just had enough of it. Regardless of whose campaign is doing what I kinda don't wanna know.

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Monday, 4 April 2016 23:06 (eight years ago) link

i think it's pretty ridiculous to play armchair quarterback on bernie's campaign considering how much of a longshot he was at the outset. i'd ay whatever they decided to do it worked pretty well.

as far as punting the south -- delegates are awarded proportionally. if he had committed more time and resources to the south at the expense of some of his stronger states, maybe he only loses by 20 points in states like alabama and FL, but then maybe some of the states he won landslides in clinton gets closer to him too. in the end it's probably a wash

k3vin k., Monday, 4 April 2016 23:07 (eight years ago) link

yeah he's run a good, smart campaign imo, albeit a quixotic one

Οὖτις, Monday, 4 April 2016 23:08 (eight years ago) link

Doctor Casino, what do you think of the Sanders' campaign's election strategy in the south?

I think we talked about his Southern performance for weeks on this board. I file the 'strategy' part under areas where I wish he'd done more to live up to the kind of candidate I'd like him to be. Since we Sanders supporters are famously idealists unable to reckon with the real world, it has been a real strain to repeatedly note on this thread my disappointments in his shortcomings, but there it is. I don't like the idea of a candidate who's trying to build a progressive base seemingly writing off whole swaths of the country and whole groups of people. I also don't like the idea of Bernie being driven out of the race months ago, and his ideas relegated to the dustbin as discredited losers with no traction outside of New Hampshire. I dunno what exactly I would have wanted him to do there. Maybe pick a couple of Southern states and try really hard in them, like a clearer "I haven't given up on wanting to hear what African-American voters are thinking, and try to win them over" approach.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 4 April 2016 23:10 (eight years ago) link

I don't like the idea of a candidate who's trying to build a progressive base seemingly writing off whole swaths of the country and whole groups of people.

rich tradition of this with the left, sadly

Οὖτις, Monday, 4 April 2016 23:13 (eight years ago) link

hey maybe if Bernie had a bloc of votes in Congress they could pressure President Hillary from the left, wouldn't that be nice? eh too much work...

― Οὖτις, Monday, April 4, 2016 5:41 PM (30 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

http://www.wakely2016.com/

hey if yall hate climate change deniers, this guy is running against lamar smith who is on a the space, tech,etc cmte and also i am volunteering in this campaign. wakely worked with cesar chavez and did labor organizing, was unitarian minister, and was recruited by the green party, ultimately ran as a dem.

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Monday, 4 April 2016 23:16 (eight years ago) link

sure. complicated in this case by the limited resources of any campaign etc. etc. basically it hinges on, how crucial to the bigger 'cause' is it that he rack up some 'wins' even though the delegates are awarded proportionally? i think pretty darned important, given a) the way these things play out narratively, in the media etc., and b) the value of showing that you can WIN a statewide election (of democrats, obv) campaigning on this stuff against a mega-politician with a million advantages. but then, i'm not among the groups being potentially written out of the picture that way.

that said, i'm in the difficult position of defending bernie against two contradictory charges: that he should pragmatically quit races he can't win (which i don't agree with), and that he should for the good of his base-building project, compete enthusiastically in places he can't possibly win (which i endorse, but which, if followed consistently, might have deep-sixed the campaign). i can, with my disappointments and mixed feelings acknowledged, have a reasoned conversation about the latter, but not if i'm simultaneously having to talk the talk of the former. this is further complicated by the fact that the pragmatist charge is being leveled by shakey, who i'd rather argue with, and the shoot-the-moon national referendum is being strongly implied by freddy b, who drives me up a wall pretty consistently.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 4 April 2016 23:22 (eight years ago) link

guy looks great. I hate Lamar Smith. I will be in San Antonio in a few weeks, will tell everyone to vote for him

Οὖτις, Monday, 4 April 2016 23:29 (eight years ago) link

actually wait, i managed to already forget that freddy was outed as a mordy sock, so please ignore most of the above

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 4 April 2016 23:30 (eight years ago) link

I expect to learn more about open conventions the next few months that any Canadian need ever know. (I know about them to an extent already, insofar as all our conventions work that way. A few years ago the Liberal leadership was won by Stéphane Dion, who was nobody's first choice but had the least resistance and came up through the middle, from third or fourth on the first ballot to winning it in three or four.)

I didn't realize till a few minutes ago that a few states, at least on the Republican side, send delegates who are completely unbound. They mentioned North Dakota: 28 delegates, they can all do whatever they want right from the first ballot, and they don't even have to declare before the convention. Truly, what's the point of even having a primary there?

Most states seem to have delegates committed to reflecting the primary/caucus results for the first ballot or two.

clemenza, Monday, 4 April 2016 23:31 (eight years ago) link

guy looks great. I hate Lamar Smith. I will be in San Antonio in a few weeks, will tell everyone to vote for him

― Οὖτις, Monday, April 4, 2016 6:29 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

thx, plz send money

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Monday, 4 April 2016 23:35 (eight years ago) link

A few years ago the Liberal leadership was won by Stéphane Dion, who was nobody's first choice but had the least resistance and came up through the middle, from third or fourth on the first ballot to winning it in three or four.)

I'm pretty sure that when I voted in the 2011 NDP leadership race, there was just one vote held of all party members in the country. We voted with a ranked ballot, using instant runoff voting, basically. I don't remember any business with delegates or voting on multiple ballots.

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Monday, 4 April 2016 23:43 (eight years ago) link

OK, Wikipedia makes a slight correction: it was one-member-one-vote but you only submitted a ranked IRV ballot if you voted early. If you voted on the day of the convention, you submitted a ballot for each round.

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Monday, 4 April 2016 23:48 (eight years ago) link

actually wait, i managed to already forget that freddy was outed as a mordy sock, so please ignore most of the above
--never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino)

Really?

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Monday, 4 April 2016 23:51 (eight years ago) link

actually i'm really sad to report that i double checked and i think this pet theory of mine was based on day-drunkenly misreading a mordy post. i was really stoked about it though, felt it would explain a lot. "morderik b."

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Monday, 4 April 2016 23:54 (eight years ago) link

(xposts) I realize "nobody's first choice" was an exaggeration with regards to Dion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_Party_of_Canada_leadership_election,_2006#Results

He had about 900 delegates support him on the first ballot, good for third; it took four ballots in all. (For anybody who checks the link, yes, that Ken Dryden.) Anyway, the upcoming Republican convention does seem to have the potential for something similar, with delegates drifting in Cruz's direction (or, god forbid, Kasich's) over the course of three ballots.

clemenza, Monday, 4 April 2016 23:57 (eight years ago) link

I thought Dean a terrible candidate but his 50-state strategy was a marvelous and impressive thing that at least suggested the possibility of another motley New Deal type coalition. To date it's the only Dem strategy that sought to flip local races .

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 00:38 (eight years ago) link

idk if it's a joke or not, but frederik b. is not a mordy sock xp

Treeship, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 00:48 (eight years ago) link

Clemenza: OK, this is interesting. Apparently, both the CPC and NDP use a simple one-member-one-vote system with ranked ballots but the Liberals have this whole deal with delegates.

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 00:50 (eight years ago) link

Anyway, back to US politics, socks, etc.

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 00:50 (eight years ago) link

in case anyone else was curious who wrote trump's AIPAC speech for him:
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/04/04/paper-whose-editor-helped-donald-trump-with-speech-vows-no-more-such-input/

Mordy, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 01:30 (eight years ago) link

thread filled with Hillary socks

so where's the Brooklyn debate to be held?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 02:26 (eight years ago) link

barclay center, they're going to suit up for the nets first

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 02:28 (eight years ago) link

I suppose the poetic ending to this saga is this election is going to make Trump die much younger after he loses.

Neanderthal, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 02:30 (eight years ago) link

ffs the reason it makes sense for a candidate like Sanders to campaign in the South or other states he "can't win" is that "winning states" doesn't matter; most Dem delegates are awarded proportionately, and improving your results by 10% in a given state by 10% means 10% more delegates.

sean gramophone, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 02:51 (eight years ago) link

however "winning" states drives the media narrative, which drives a sense of possibility, which drives donations. i can see both sides of this argument.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 03:01 (eight years ago) link

there is no necessity for votes in different states to be uniformly winnable, say in proportion to spending and trail time.

j., Tuesday, 5 April 2016 03:13 (eight years ago) link

ffs the reason it makes sense for a candidate like Sanders to campaign in the South or other states he "can't win" is that "winning states" doesn't matter; most Dem delegates are awarded proportionately, and improving your results by 10% in a given state by 10% means 10% more delegates.

― sean gramophone, Monday, April 4, 2016 10:51 PM (41 minutes ago

this is true, but it is also true that resources + actual physical presence spent here are resources not spent elsewhere. so maybe he does a little better in the south (but still doesn't win any of the states) but a bit worse in the whiter/more liberal states. maybe it's a wash in terms of delegates, maybe it would have netted him another...40 delegates, who knows. but he could have lost a couple of the states he did end up winning. as amateurish points out, the effect of "winning" states (which was never going to happen in the south) might matter vis a vis perception of the campaign/momentum.

anyway as i mentioned before i think second-guessing the tactics of this campaign, considering where it started from, is pretty silly

k3vin k., Tuesday, 5 April 2016 03:37 (eight years ago) link

j. otm

these days the internet aggregators know about as much about us in abstract as ward heelers used to know concretely, and analyzing that knowledge at the national level is easier than ever before. a very savvy campaign should be able to allocate resources very efficiently on a resource-per-vote basis.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 03:42 (eight years ago) link

I agree with this idea but don't see how it's particularly relevant as a critique of the Sanders campaign: his southern numbers saw a huge boost thanks to his campaigning in many of those states. This was very effective as a strategy, I thought, rather than fighting to increase his lead on home ground, where his target audience already knew about him.

sean gramophone, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 03:54 (eight years ago) link

**BREAKING NEWS**

the new kasich TV ads (about his "hardscrabble" upbringing) feature a looped slide-guitar riff that sounds a lot like the one in beck's "loser" -- which is kind of beautiful.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDn3zA-YtOY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgSPaXgAdzE

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 04:00 (eight years ago) link

thats the kind of generic drop d blues slide thats in truck commercials and whatever the fuck my father in law watches on tnt or netflix

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 04:06 (eight years ago) link

yeah but i like hearing "loser" looping in back of the kasich ad

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 04:08 (eight years ago) link

you can play both of those youtubes at the same time

get a long, little doggy (m bison), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 04:09 (eight years ago) link

generic drop d blues slide

it's sort of the audio equivalent of beef jerky

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 04:13 (eight years ago) link

that's a good ad

ejemplo (crüt), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 04:42 (eight years ago) link

it's sort of the audio equivalent of beef jerky

― wizzz! (amateurist),

http://www.adweek.com/files/imagecache/node-blog/blogs/jack-links-beef-jerky.jpg

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 10:34 (eight years ago) link

Trump seems to have the emotional range of a Power Rangers villain and the social skills of a teenage Minotaur. He looks like a pumpkin having a nervous breakdown, talks like the words are being fired out of his mouth by a tennis ball launcher and has the general manner of an arrogant televangelist suspected of murder by Columbo.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/apr/04/donald-trump-arrogant-televangelist-clinton-sanders-frankie-boyle

a lad of balls (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 11:17 (eight years ago) link

have to say, i'm really tired of the stupid "electability" narrative that keeps getting stuck to clinton- and i'm a clinton supporter. you poll clinton and sanders against any republican candidate you can think of and sanders does better, but people invested in the narrative that clinton is more "electable" will then tell you that polls don't matter this far out. oh, ok. so if empirical data doesn't matter as far as electability, what does? your personal gut instincts? we went through this shit for a year with everybody assuring me that the polls were wrong and trump would never get anywhere in the republican race, and now "pragmatic" clinton supporters are feeding people the same line.

if your only reason for supporting clinton is the idea that she's more "electable", go ahead and switch your vote to bernie now. your fake realpolitik does neither clinton nor america any favors.

diana krallice (rushomancy), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 11:23 (eight years ago) link

I think people are basing Clinton's electability on the fact that she is currently beating Sanders decisively in the dem primary, plus 'conventional wisdom' about what kind of candidate normally has an easier time winning.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 11:32 (eight years ago) link

those Nov matchup polls all show Bernie beating Trump/Cruz more decisively, however.

these Sanders camp (and wife!) quotes in the NYT were... strategically mystifying. (probably posted yesterday, but i sure as fuck am not reloading)

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/04/04/why-did-bernie-sanders-help-the-new-york-times-bury-him.html

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 11:35 (eight years ago) link

We discussed it a bit upthread. And I said I thought the Sanders campaign were assholes. Not Sanders himself, but the guys running the campaign.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 11:42 (eight years ago) link

'moderate candidates are more electable' is based on evidence from elections not gut instinct. sanders has less baggage than clinton but most of the country hasn't been fully introduced to his platform, which contains tons of things that the majority of Americans don't actually want.

iatee, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 11:44 (eight years ago) link

right, but conflating the nomination process and the general election is a really basic error. being the most likely candidate to be nominated by your party doesn't make you the most electable candidate- in fact, in the republican party those two qualities are basically mutually exclusive at this point. it's true that clinton's "inevitability narrative" in terms of the nomination is by this point not just a narrative, but a statistical likelihood, but i can see why sanders supporters are frustrated- a lot of those votes were obtained under basically false pretenses, and if sanders had a do-over he'd win. that's not how politics works, mind you, but sanders supporters tend not to be completely political creatures and are more motivated by an arbitrary and idealistic sense of "fairness" than by the actual rules by which political campaigns are conducted. they feel like the game was rigged, which it was! and there's little point in explaining that the sorts of rigging that goes on in the campaign exists largely to prevent the sort of rules lawyering that mcgovern pulled on them in '72.

diana krallice (rushomancy), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 12:04 (eight years ago) link

Um, no. That's hilariously wrong.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 12:08 (eight years ago) link

Clinton is winning because she has the broadest support - while Sanders definitely has the deepest.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 12:17 (eight years ago) link

And the whole idea that the typical Clinton voter was scammed by the media, simply wasn't smart enough to look through the lies of the MSM, is close to offensive. Harry Enten pointed out recently a new theory, that Clinton won black areas because that coincided with low internet use.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 12:19 (eight years ago) link

I'm confused what the false pretenses were... that Hilary was more well known and had more money (initially anyway)?

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 12:21 (eight years ago) link

xp Krugman made the argument that non-white votes were so savvy that they saw right past the horrible MSM lies about Hillary.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 12:23 (eight years ago) link

Clinton is winning because she has the broadest support - while Sanders definitely has the deepest.

about that deep support

http://i.imgur.com/RnbdaYn.png

bernie definitely has the most enthusiastic internet posters tho.

Mordy, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 12:29 (eight years ago) link

Democratic supporters only in that poll though.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 12:30 (eight years ago) link

"definitely" followed by meaningless statement

love election season

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 12:30 (eight years ago) link

democratic/democatic leaners xp

Mordy, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 12:30 (eight years ago) link

That's a weird question. Is that enthusiasm for voting for their candidate or enthusiasm for voting in general?

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 12:31 (eight years ago) link

here's the link to the poll:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/190343/trump-clinton-supporters-lead-enthusiasm.aspx

Mordy, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 12:33 (eight years ago) link

i got up to the part of the 538 podcast last night where they said they got more questions about this poll than any other thing this election (guess why) but i was done walking my dog before they started to really discuss it. if they have any interesting insight i'll report back.

Mordy, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 12:35 (eight years ago) link

They don't, I don't think so.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 12:36 (eight years ago) link

So excitement for race in general... given that their preferred candidate is likely going to lose it makes sense that Sanders supporters would be less enthusiastic at this point.

There is something to what Fred is saying because the level of Sanders' support under the $200 level is pretty impressive. Is that broad or deep or just okay that's pretty cool I'm not sure but it is a little different than Hillary's support

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 12:37 (eight years ago) link

I'm less sure about the numbers. Perhaps Sanders supporters are less enthusiastic about the election because at this points it seems more likely than not that he will lose + a lot of them hate Hillary, much more than Hillary supporters hate Sanders (I think. Hillary still has more favorability amongst dems, iirc)

Frederik B, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 12:39 (eight years ago) link

the "How much thought have you given to the upcoming election for president -- quite a lot, or only a little?" question is also interesting vis-a-vis the claim that hillary supporters are low information voters

Mordy, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 12:42 (eight years ago) link

people's enthusiasm for voting in the election

If they were polling people's enthusiasm for voting in the general election, and not people's enthusiasm for their preferred candidate, then it is not surprising that supporters of the most likely nominees are most 'enthusiastic'.

non-white votes were so savvy that they saw right past the horrible MSM lies about Hillary

the whiter/more liberal states

Sanders has done well with a number of non-white regions/communities, e.g. Asian-dominated Hawaii, Alaska with its large Native population, Arab-Americans in Michigan, etc. Non-black != white.

3xp

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 12:43 (eight years ago) link

That question is dumb though. Having thought about something doesn't mean you have a lot of information or even good information about it.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 12:44 (eight years ago) link

I'm less sure about the numbers. Perhaps Sanders supporters are less enthusiastic about the election because at this points it seems more likely than not that he will lose + a lot of them hate Hillary, much more than Hillary supporters hate Sanders (I think. Hillary still has more favorability amongst dems, iirc)

― Frederik B, Tuesday, April 5, 2016 8:39 AM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

"definitely"

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 12:45 (eight years ago) link

"Perhaps"
"I think"
"iirc"
"less sure"
"supporters"
"amongst"
"numbers"
"caek"

Frederik B, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 12:47 (eight years ago) link

Clinton is winning because she has the broadest support - while Sanders definitely has the deepest.

― Frederik B, Tuesday, April 5, 2016 8:17 AM (35 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this is baseless (and meaningless) and you act like someone reading their horoscope when shown a poll

you are very bad at this thread imo

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 12:54 (eight years ago) link

Ok, I give. Sanders has nothing.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 13:00 (eight years ago) link

Is that better?

Frederik B, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 13:00 (eight years ago) link

There's no support for Sanders in the US, and the future for progressivism in the country is nonexistent.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 13:00 (eight years ago) link

I don't think you understand my point but if you stop posting then we can call it even

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 13:02 (eight years ago) link

Oh, too bad. Then you lose :(

Frederik B, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 13:03 (eight years ago) link

Humanity lost.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 13:44 (eight years ago) link

On Monday, Mr. Cruz amplified calls for Mr. Kasich to step aside and predicted that “the people would quite rightly revolt” if party leaders tried to elevate anyone other than Mr. Cruz or Mr. Trump at a contested convention in July.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/05/us/politics/wisconsin-primary-republican-race.html

i had assumed that open support for violence was trump's territory alone, but i guess cruz wanted to get in the game too.

i'm not sure if trump will make it to 1,237 delegates. but i do think that if it ends up being a contested convention he's not going to walk out of it as the republican nominee. does anyone think that trump supporters are going to go down quietly? i admit that i'm fascinated by the whole prospect because it would be like nothing i've witnessed in my lifetime but things are going to get frightening pretty quickly if violence breaks out. all of the GOP's courting of the "take our country back" crowd, both tacitly and openly, could really come back to bite them.

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 14:20 (eight years ago) link

tbf if saying the people will revolt is a call for violence...

Mordy, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 14:28 (eight years ago) link

Trump and Cruz + their support are proving to be two versions of the result of years of over the top rhetoric that's been somehow out looneying itself to reach ridiculous degrees... I've wondered whether its the kind of thing that can reach a climactic point and implode... maybe this will be it?

Evan, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 14:37 (eight years ago) link

xpost
then bernie sanders' army of facebook likers is going to march down the street with bazookas if his call for a political revolution goes unheeded?

i think it's a little bit different in the GOP context. would anyone be surprised if trump supporters turned their violence outward and beyond beating the shit out of protesters at his rallies?

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 14:41 (eight years ago) link

Are they going to go with pitchforks to Rinse Pubis' house?

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 14:47 (eight years ago) link

I was reading a comma after beyond, but you mean further than beating up protesters? He has been talking about sending his supporters to Bernie rallies - but at the point which Trump/Cruz are talking about, it'd be other Republicans that would be the target of their wrath.

(But I think I remember Phil D pointing out that he would be one of many people who would be target-adjacent?)

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 14:49 (eight years ago) link

I was reading a comma after beyond, but you mean further than beating up protesters?

to this point their violence has been contained within his own rallies in closed door events. but i'm imagining there are gonna be juuuuuust a few people outside of the republican convention this year, both progressive and conservative protesters of all stripes. that will already be a biiiit on the tense side, and then imagine in the midst of that chaos, an announcement that trump didn't win the first or second votes, and that some typical establishment guy is gonna end up getting the nomination somehow.

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 14:57 (eight years ago) link

i guess i'm on the paranoid side of the spectrum, but i tend to read a bit of nixonland before i go to bed most nights, and 1968 doesn't seem that far away from me. we've changed as a country in many ways, but in some ways not at all

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 14:58 (eight years ago) link

would anyone be surprised if trump supporters turned their violence outward and beyond beating the shit out of protesters at his rallies?

this is already happening!

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:03 (eight years ago) link

i am very worried about violence at the rnc this year karl, i don't think we're being paranoid

marcos, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:03 (eight years ago) link

i think it's going to be really ugly

marcos, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:04 (eight years ago) link

if the nomination is "taken" from trump though i think the outrage will be milder if cruz is chosen as opposed to kasich

marcos, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:05 (eight years ago) link

but i'm imagining there are gonna be juuuuuust a few people outside of the republican convention this year, both progressive and conservative protesters of all stripes.

I imagine there won't, from the progressive side at least - you'd have to be insane?

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:06 (eight years ago) link

this is already happening!

ugh, i don't know want to know. i mean, i want to know, but i don't want to know.

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:06 (eight years ago) link

I imagine there won't, from the progressive side at least - you'd have to be insane?

― Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, April 5, 2016 11:06 AM (46 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

there will most definitely be progressive protestors at the rnc this year, there always is

marcos, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:07 (eight years ago) link

also, remember a few weeks ago when protesters shut down the trump rally in chicago? i don't think you have to be insane, just very brave.

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:09 (eight years ago) link

Bloomberg threw a few hundred protestors at the NYC RNC in jail for just standing outside the protest pen etc

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:12 (eight years ago) link

Can you imagine Cleveland, months after dealing with a police officer who shot a child for carrying a toy pistol, dealing with hundreds of angry Tea Baggers flaunting their live ammo in the streets.

pplains, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:14 (eight years ago) link

This year is not really like previous years? I don't know, maybe I'm wrong.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:16 (eight years ago) link

v wrong afaict

k3vin k., Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:18 (eight years ago) link

Absolutely not blaming anyone who goes down to protest and get fucked up, of course! It just seems an odd hill to possibly literally die on.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:18 (eight years ago) link

the scene outside the trump rally in chicago that was shut down by protesters:

http://i.imgur.com/Mfk54ee.jpg

(those are not trump fans in the photo)

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:19 (eight years ago) link

Yes, I am aware of that, thank you.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:19 (eight years ago) link

sorry, not trying to antagonize you. but if tons of protesters showed up in chicago a few weeks ago, why does it seem impossible that the same exact thing would happen at a much more prominent event, at an intensely heated moment in the political cycle, a few hours down the highway?

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:21 (eight years ago) link

i don't think it's a weird thing to do, either. people tend to get really worked up when a leading presidential candidate is also a white supremacist

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:21 (eight years ago) link

Well, a Trump Rally is by definition a show of force for this white supremacist, and the convention is not going to be*? The damage done will largely be by the GOP to the GOP, it doesn't seem like good tactics to hand around wearing "hey you can blame us if you like" t-shirts on.

*unless he gets to 1278 delegates beforehand, in which case they have my (entirely meaningless, I'm aware) blessing to protest the shit out of it.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:28 (eight years ago) link

*hang around

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:29 (eight years ago) link

Karl, how can you possibly have missed ALL of these stories:

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/03/02/a_list_of_violent_incidents_at_donald_trump_rallies_and_events.html

And this doesn't include the incident where Trump's capaign manager manhandled a Breitbart reporter or the incident in Janesville, WI, rally where a teenage girl was groped and then peppersprayed and called a nigger lover when she reacted to the groping.

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:38 (eight years ago) link

I think you were directing that at Andrew, right. I think Karl seems pretty aware of these incidents.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:39 (eight years ago) link

oh I misread, sorry

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:41 (eight years ago) link

But I will link this, which happened BEFORE the rally violence started:

http://www.politicususa.com/2015/08/20/boston-men-inspired-trump-brutally-beat-homeless-hispanic-man.html

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:42 (eight years ago) link

xpost
yeah, i'm all too aware of them! i must have used a vague phrasing upthread (imagine that!) but i was trying to say that there has already been a ton of violence at trump rallies, and i'm concerned that the violence will begin spreading beyond that, meaning, beyond trump-specific rallies.

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:43 (eight years ago) link

I really have no idea what/who Trump/Cruz supporters will direct their violence against but I wouldn't recommend travelling to Cleveland during that period of time.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:44 (eight years ago) link

no, I missed "and beyond" in your post, which greatly changes the meaning of what you wrote into something insane

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:46 (eight years ago) link

eww at the idea coming into Nixon

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:51 (eight years ago) link

*the idea of coming into Nixon

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:51 (eight years ago) link

bhahahaha

https://www.washingtonpost.com/apps/g/page/politics/memo-explains-how-donald-trump-plans-to-pay-for-border-wall/2007/?tid=a_inl

y'know, it's about time we had another war with Mexico

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:54 (eight years ago) link

xpost
djp, do you mean that you think the idea of trump-related violence spreading beyond his rallies is insane (hope you're right if that's the case), or that the increasing violence itself is insane (that i agree with)?

or that the idea of coming into nixon is insane. i suppose there are multiple correct answers here

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:54 (eight years ago) link

omg at trump's wall plan

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:56 (eight years ago) link

Interesting bit on Trump's criminalizing abortion, that he inadvertently voiced the action aims of all this shit that gave the lie to what's called the Standard Answer whenever a pro-lifer is pointedly asked about going after the women

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:56 (eight years ago) link

bhahahaha

https://www.washingtonpost.com/apps/g/page/politics/memo-explains-how-donald-trump-plans-to-pay-for-border-wall/2007/?tid=a_inl

y'know, it's about time we had another war with Mexico

― Οὖτις, Tuesday, April 5, 2016 1

lol it looks like an intern punched a few ideas into Notepad.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:56 (eight years ago) link

it's like a gamergate comments thread turned its collective brainpower and expert realpolitik to the matter of international diplomacy. really unbelievable.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 15:59 (eight years ago) link

I have to love the "Conclusion: and another thing.."

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 16:03 (eight years ago) link

djp, do you mean that you think the idea of trump-related violence spreading beyond his rallies is insane (hope you're right if that's the case), or that the increasing violence itself is insane (that i agree with)?

Not knowing that protesters were being beaten up regularly at Trump rallies is insane. (The violence in and of itself is also insane. I also expect that it will spread like wildfire regardless of who the Republican nominee is.)

i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 16:04 (eight years ago) link

I love the implication that the US has borne far more of the costs of the drug war, both in terms of money spent and lives lost, than Mexico, so viciously ignorant.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 16:05 (eight years ago) link

xp

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 16:05 (eight years ago) link

this whole election has been bonkers. i'm rooting for the fantasy scenario of dozens of a contested convention where no candidate can manage to get the majority of delegate votes, and as a result the GOP decides to peacefully disband.

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 16:08 (eight years ago) link

obama's really relishing his first opportunity to play above the fray

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/02/world/middleeast/obama-nuclear-security-summit-iran.html

"The person who made the statements doesn't know much about foreign policy or nuclear policy or the Korean Peninsula or the world generally," Obama told a news conference Friday.

ulysses, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 16:11 (eight years ago) link

I'm looking forward to Obama interjecting himself into the campaign tbh, should be interesting

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 16:17 (eight years ago) link

lol economic models

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 16:23 (eight years ago) link

lol thehill.com

Mordy, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 16:24 (eight years ago) link

y'know, it's about time we had another war with Mexico

sad that sam peckinpah didn’t live to see this day

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 16:31 (eight years ago) link

I find pretty much everything Trump says mindboggling and/or exasperating, and I feel like a low-level anger at his existence and popularity, but something about his explanation about funding the wall is making me fucking livid. We're going to extort another country into paying for something ridiculous that "benefits" us by threatening the livelihood of its citizenry? It's fucking ludicrous and unfeasible and so base-level "I don't give a fuck about anybody". Fuck this guy. May he pass peacefully in his sleep as soon as possible.

I am very inteligent and dicipline boy (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 16:36 (eight years ago) link

my college-freshman students are working on persuasive policy speeches and if one of them handed in that trump 'policy paper' i'd give them a C at best.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 16:38 (eight years ago) link

was that trump's actual policy proposal or was that the zimmermann telegram? i can't tell.

diana krallice (rushomancy), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 16:48 (eight years ago) link

anyway, if there is a screwjob of trump in cleveland, i think it'll have to be cruz. i mean, really, is there anybody else you'd trust to pull off a screwjob like that?

diana krallice (rushomancy), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 16:51 (eight years ago) link

Bernie hasn't lived here in 50 years, i'll give him a pass on the subway moxie

A friend ran into Bob Dole in NC about ten years ago, who asked him about the trolleys in Brooklyn

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 16:55 (eight years ago) link

i too wish for cruz to give trump the ol screwjob in cleveland

ejemplo (crüt), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 16:55 (eight years ago) link

i did not know that jon polito was involved in that incident.

diana krallice (rushomancy), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 16:57 (eight years ago) link

anyway, if there is a screwjob of trump in cleveland

Something something "_Trump_ screwed Trump"

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 17:01 (eight years ago) link

Love Poppy's glasses.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 17:04 (eight years ago) link

http://thehill.com/policy/finance/275084-models-predict-gop-white-house-even-with-trump

― goole, Tuesday, April 5, 2016 12:21 PM (56 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i was hoping this would be fashion models giving their perspective. i have one friend who is a model. he vastly underestimates the dangers of trump, in my view.

Treeship, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 17:20 (eight years ago) link

one of those folks who's like, "he's just trying to get the people going. if he were president he would be awful, but no more awful than an ordinary republican."

Treeship, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 17:21 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, he's just trying to get the people going like a gallon of gasoline is just trying to get the fire going.

I am very inteligent and dicipline boy (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 17:27 (eight years ago) link

charming!

Roger Stone, an informal adviser to Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump, said Monday that in the event of a contested GOP convention he planned to disclose where delegates are staying in Cleveland so that Trump supporters could give them a piece of their mind.

Stone issued a scathing condemnation of the GOP nomination process in an interview on Freedomain Radio, and urged Trump's supporters to "march on Cleveland" if delegates were to "steal" the nomination from the real estate mogul.

"Join us in the Forest City. We're going to have protests, demonstrations," Stone said. "We will disclose the hotels and the room numbers of those delegates who are directly involved in the steal. If you're from Pennsylvania, we'll tell you who the culprits are. We urge you to visit their hotel and find them."

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/roger-stone-steal-trump-nomination

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 17:46 (eight years ago) link

murder delegates in their sleep, classic

Treeship, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 17:50 (eight years ago) link

one of those folks who's like, "he's just trying to get the people going. if he were president he would be awful, but no more awful than an ordinary republican."

― Treeship, Tuesday, April 5, 2016 1:21 PM (29 minutes ago)

i still believe this btw *shrug*

k3vin k., Tuesday, 5 April 2016 17:51 (eight years ago) link

i think it's possible, but i also think the election of trump has repercussions beyond what trump would actually do in office.

Treeship, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 17:53 (eight years ago) link

as the gop frontrunner his xenophobic remarks regarding Mexicans and Muslims and his "policy" "ideas" of creating a wall along the border and barring Muslims from entering the U.S. will already be having a real world effect on people belonging to or perceived to be belonging to those groups. If he were POTUS this would no doubt be exacerbated. He legitimizes bigotry.

trickle-down ergonomics (jim in glasgow), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 17:55 (eight years ago) link

one of those folks who's like, "he's just trying to get the people going. if he were president he would be awful, but no more awful than an ordinary republican."

― Treeship, Tuesday, April 5, 2016

which is pretty awful

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 17:56 (eight years ago) link

btw Dem debate on 4/14 will be held at the Duggal Greenhouse in the Brooklyn Navy Yard

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 17:59 (eight years ago) link

no argument here. but i think there is something uniquely dangerous about the type of storm trump is brewing among his supporters.

Treeship, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 18:00 (eight years ago) link

oh sick brooklyn navy yard

Treeship, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 18:00 (eight years ago) link

Linked From Southern Poverty Law Center's email newsletter---he can't even make up his own shit (or refrains from it, when he wants to push just the right buttons, wired to Truest Believers):
https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2016/04/04/numbers-donald-trump-continues-mainstream-white-nationalist-memes

dow, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 18:52 (eight years ago) link

OMG @ that Roger Stone quote. That's practically an incitement of physical violence against specific individuals.

I am very inteligent and dicipline boy (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 18:58 (eight years ago) link

Love that he refers to Cleveland as "the Forest City".

through a charles barkley (brownie), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 19:40 (eight years ago) link

OMG @ that Roger Stone quote. That's practically an incitement of physical violence against specific individuals.

― I am very inteligent and dicipline boy (Old Lunch), Tuesday, April 5, 2016 1:58 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

he's taking a page from the militant "pro-life" folks. "we're publishing the names and addresses of these abortionists. not that you should do anything about that. it's just, you know, information. hint hint."

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 20:02 (eight years ago) link

Love that he refers to Cleveland as "the Forest City".

― through a charles barkley (brownie), Tuesday, April 5, 2016 3:40 PM (23 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

haha i grew up there and i have never heard that term

marcos, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 20:03 (eight years ago) link

when i think of cleveland, my mind conjures images of dense bodies of tall, tall trees.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 20:04 (eight years ago) link

ten-cent-beer-night-went-horribly-wrong

kind of hard to imagine any other outcome...

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 20:10 (eight years ago) link

on first glance i assumed bill veeck had something to do with that

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 20:11 (eight years ago) link

no that was Disco Demolition Night in Chi, five (?) years later

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 20:14 (eight years ago) link

"The Forest City" is an antiquated enough nickname for Cleveland that by the time I was in junior high school most people just knew "Forest City" as a furniture store.

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 20:18 (eight years ago) link

How did Morbs get a pic of the GOP convention when it hasn't even started yet?

pplains, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 20:18 (eight years ago) link

Trumpist Night at the Ballgame

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 20:19 (eight years ago) link

hey remember when rick perry put glasses on?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/04/05/trump-plans-a-series-of-policy-speeches/


State of the 2016 race
By Karen Tumulty and Robert Costa April 5 at 4:08 PM


Donald Trump speaks during a news conference at the at the Old Post Office Pavilion, soon to be a Trump International Hotel, in Washington on March 21. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)
GOP front-runner Donald Trump, facing a likely setback in Tuesday's Wisconsin primary, plans to shift gears in the coming weeks, and give a series of policy speeches in settings more formal than the freewheeling rallies that have become his political signature.

Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski said in an interview Tuesday that a memo published by The Washington Post detailing how Trump plans to get Mexico to pay for his proposed border wall is a prelude to a series of moves that flesh out the policies that Trump has been speaking about in general terms in his rallies and in interviews.

goole, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 20:28 (eight years ago) link

oh fucking shit i'm sorry about that

MODS HELP

goole, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 20:28 (eight years ago) link

wonder how many of those policy speeches his son-in-law is gonna write

Mordy, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 20:30 (eight years ago) link

i was like "jeez finally a candidate ready to talk about crosswords"

nomar, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 20:31 (eight years ago) link

his mexico plan is nuts. of course it would be, but, it's nuts.

goole, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 20:31 (eight years ago) link

April 9
Wyoming holds it Democratic caucuses.

April 19
New York holds it primaries.

that's copy/pasted from washpo? that actually makes me feel better about my own neverending series of typos and missing words

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 20:32 (eight years ago) link

wait can we go back to the news that Trump's buying Mexico

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 20:34 (eight years ago) link

how ready for a take are you guys right now?

https://twitter.com/aantonop/status/717341020250370048

goole, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 20:38 (eight years ago) link

that NY Daily News interview with Bernie isn't that bad i thought. it's always been obviously he's not the sharpest dude but i don't think the interviewer got him to say anything too awful?

de l'asshole (flopson), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 20:57 (eight years ago) link

yeah, i don't think ppl like him bc of his incisive detailed plans. they're probably ok with "this is the general goal and we'll figure it out once we get there" as an answer. if he was running as a technocrat it would be a disaster, but he's not.

Mordy, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 20:59 (eight years ago) link

"it's always been obviously he's not the sharpest dude"

I would like to thank you for this amazing thumbnail of the general ILX level of self-estimation

Here, let me Danesplain that for you (jjjusten), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 21:07 (eight years ago) link

Neither Braynard nor Lewandowski commented when asked whether Braynard left of his own accord or was fired. Sources say his top lieutenant in the campaign’s data shop, a former RNC data engineer named Witold Chrabaszcz, was elevated at least temporarily to run the team. Chrabaszcz, who goes by “Vito,” declined to comment. While he is regarded as a savvy manipulator of data, he’s largely unknown in the tight-knit world of GOP data strategists. He seldom worked on political strategy at the RNC and mostly interacted with the party’s other data engineers, a group known as the “basement dwellers.”

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 21:08 (eight years ago) link

I mean obv we don't have a lockdown on the general Internet "get a brain morans" tendency but

Here, let me Danesplain that for you (jjjusten), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 21:08 (eight years ago) link

it's the best basement though, really, the best, just yuge.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 21:09 (eight years ago) link

1) lol at putting a *data engineer* in a political strategy position

2) lol at taking a job where you are abused by polisci interns when you could be earning $200k

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 21:10 (eight years ago) link

My point is not Sanders specific, btw, I'm just saying that if you spend large portions of your day on here, odds are you are not smarter than people who have ascended to the point of running for president of the United States. Ok maybe Webb, Santorum, and Rick Perry.

Here, let me Danesplain that for you (jjjusten), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 21:28 (eight years ago) link

anyone seen the best man (1964)? gore vidal film about a brokered convention, with henry fonda, etc. alfred do you recommend?

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 21:34 (eight years ago) link

My point is not Sanders specific, btw, I'm just saying that if you spend large portions of your day on here, odds are you are not smarter than people who have ascended to the point of running for president of the United States.

― Here, let me Danesplain that for you (jjjusten), Tuesday, April 5, 2016 5:28 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

why?

de l'asshole (flopson), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 21:36 (eight years ago) link

i'm not alfred, but i do like that movie!

xpost

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 21:36 (eight years ago) link

anyone seen the best man (1964)? gore vidal film about a brokered convention, with henry fonda, etc. alfred do you recommend?

― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, April 5, 2016

I'd recommend, yes, and would watch with you and goole

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 21:37 (eight years ago) link

the sequel isn't very good, though

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d6/The_Best_Man_Holiday.jpg

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 21:39 (eight years ago) link

Times change.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 21:45 (eight years ago) link

"de l'asshole (flopson)
Posted: April 5, 2016 at 4:36:09 PM
My point is not Sanders specific, btw, I'm just saying that if you spend large portions of your day on here, odds are you are not smarter than people who have ascended to the point of running for president of the United States.

― Here, let me Danesplain that for you (jjjusten), Tuesday, April 5, 2016 5:28 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

why?"

Just as a first clarification, it's not you specific either, and I don't want it to come off that way, but come on, Ilx/the Internet in general is full of the archetypical "the smartest guy in the room" dudes. (And yeah, I'm def using specific male terms there). The truth is we...probably aren't? Add the political rhetoric of "people I disagree with are clearly stupid/flawed, and not rationally opposed" and you've got a heady breeding ground for special snowflake moments.

Here, let me Danesplain that for you (jjjusten), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 21:49 (eight years ago) link

"smarter" is a contentious term + if it includes things like social savvy, ambition, cleverness, common sense, etc then i'm sure jjj is right that anyone getting that close to the WH is smarter than me. i assumed flopson meant more like bernie isn't an "intellectual" which smarter is like often shorthand for and i'd agree that he isn't really (but how many presidents are actually intellectuals? obama. hillary seems a little wonkish. cruz seems frighteningly intelligent. otherwise...)

Mordy, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 21:51 (eight years ago) link

does cruz seem really intelligent in a broad sense? he strikes me as someone who has a very finely honed skill at certain narrow things (pulling out facts and figures, identifying counterarguments and weaknesses) who doesn't seem to grasp some larger concepts. he also seems to lack considerable social intelligence.

it is indeed rare to have a genuine intellectual in the white house, though as morbius would probably be quick to point out, it's not as if that means a ton, in terms of practical political ramifications.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 21:54 (eight years ago) link

My point is not Sanders specific, btw, I'm just saying that if you spend large portions of your day on here, odds are you are not smarter than people who have ascended to the point of running for president of the United States.

I would kinda say the opposite, given most of these fuckers! Not Rick Perry, though. He wears glasses. Granted, there are very few ilxors I would actually want to have as President, and I suspect Ned is the only nominee we could all agree upon, but idk a lot of people here are pretty smart.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 21:55 (eight years ago) link

dershowitz called cruz "off the charts brilliant" and while you may be inclined to dismiss that bc u don't like the dersh he has seen a ton of students so he probably has some good examples to measure him against. imo from what i've seen + read cruz does seem legitimately brilliant in addition to being evil + disgusting.

Mordy, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 21:55 (eight years ago) link

wonkish /= intelligence

I don't know if that's what Mordy meant. If not, I apologize.

(I also despise the word "wonkish"; it's Beltway contempt for someone who actually reads)

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 21:56 (eight years ago) link

there are very few ilxors I would actually want to have as President, and I suspect Ned is the only nominee we could all agree upon,

nah I'd primary him

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 21:57 (eight years ago) link

i meant wonkish as "someone who actually reads" lol - but that's getting pretty close to what i mean by an 'intellectual'

Mordy, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 21:57 (eight years ago) link

re: the '76 convention:

Back-to-back-eruptions greeted the candidates’ wives. One of the Ford children allegedly dumped trash on the delegates from Texas. A Ford delegate who broke her leg in the chaos was kept from the hospital for fear that her replacement would vote for Reagan; she suffered in a brace made from convention programs until the voting was over. Meanwhile, in a back room, Henry Kissinger was “raising hell” over a change to the platform, threatening to resign and demanding a roll call of delegates who were drunk as they deliberated.

man this is gonna be a hoot

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 21:58 (eight years ago) link

yes that was an amazing read thanks for sharing -- esp kissinger as the too moderate secretary the conservatives hated!

Mordy, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 21:59 (eight years ago) link

I think someone being "off the charts brilliant" as a law student might very well line up with what amateurist is saying though - like the things that would register to a professor as brilliance in this context might totally leave out social intelligence, grasping larger concepts, etc. Like the equivalent of a chess prodigy, or lots of other fields where a certain kind of brilliance is absolutely a thing (I always think of things like music, computer programming, and architecture, which I've tried my hand at and know enough to recognize that I don't have the x factor that gives other people the ability to produce really elegant, well-formed solutions to problems). I've certainly had students that I've thought of as brilliant, even as I would not for a second vouch for their 'intelligence' in any situation beyond the participation in, and production of work for, the classes I was teaching. Or I'll have students that are kinda underperforming in my classes (architectural history) but I know from other instructors or from seeing their work pinned up that they are absolute gangbusters as designers. Etc. etc.

Basically, everything about Cruz radiates the sense of a guy who indeed would be very, very good at a certain world of formal debate, lawyering, beating you down with supporting facts that he has at the ready. Dunno if that means he's a smart guy though.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 22:02 (eight years ago) link

nah I'd primary him

career-ending move imo. this is the season of "hill you choose to die on" as a construction i'm seeing everywhere all of a sudden, and alfred, this is a curious hill indeed. i mean it's probably good for the party to have an open debate and air the issues and so on but come on. it's ned's turn.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 22:03 (eight years ago) link

ok well i don't think we're in disagreement. i was trying to disentangle the term "smart" from the term "intellectual" or calling someone an "intellect" which i think is more aligned with some of the quick grasp / deep memory / innovative thinking you're talking about. but which we're all in agreement does not qualify anyone to be head of state (tho it sure is nice to have along w/ other more important things). xp

Mordy, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 22:04 (eight years ago) link

"intellectual" is a tricky one too cause I basically think of it meaning what you describe, but there's a side of it also that indicates maybe a lifestyle, set of interests, etc., which one could have without actually having the kind of mental acuity under discussion. But that type seems really unlikely to succeed in politics - "I have no talent for debates, policy, or winning people over to my point of view, but as a matter of principle I favor jazz and the theater over the tastes of the common sheeple."

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 22:07 (eight years ago) link

yeah but can Cruz does read Montesquieu

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 22:09 (eight years ago) link

would alfred run to ned's left or right? or would he run below him?

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 22:38 (eight years ago) link

or maybe it'd be more like speed-walking

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 22:38 (eight years ago) link

take the opportunity to be strong - run over him! (politically speaking of course)

maureen dowd would devote every other column to you

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 22:44 (eight years ago) link

I'll just chime in that I think Ted Cruz could probably make seven figures as a scumbag corporate lawyer none of us have ever heard of, but he seems to find being a scumbag Senator from Texas who has alienated ALL of his colleagues to be a much more exciting career. If that equates to "off the charts brilliance", then he certainly qualifies.

For comparison, Nixon was reputed to be extremely brilliant when talking foreign policy and Nixon was clearly a more talented politician than Cruz. At this early point in Cruz's career, it is hard to say which is the greater scumbag though. Nixon is pretty lofty competition.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 22:54 (eight years ago) link

how many innocent civilians has Cruz murdered by giving orders in a drunken rage

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 22:56 (eight years ago) link

Nixon's foreign policy chops vastly overrated imo

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 22:57 (eight years ago) link

I've never seen Nixon's foreign policy bonafides. Cambodians and Chileans sure are grateful though!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 22:58 (eight years ago) link

he was even wrong about Yeltsin!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 22:58 (eight years ago) link

xps How many? None, afaik. Why else do you think Cruz chafes at the limitations of the Senate and longs for executive power?

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 22:58 (eight years ago) link

I've never seen Nixon's foreign policy bonafides. Cambodians and Chileans sure are grateful though!

^^^ every time some talking head starts prattling on as if Nixon's foreign policy skills are beyond dispute it's rmde time. Vietnam was a disaster, his China visit was 0 for 3 of its stated goals, etc.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 23:02 (eight years ago) link

straining to think of a single foreign policy crisis that he successfully resolved

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 23:02 (eight years ago) link

i think people just like delivering some kind of counter-conventional wisdom when it comes to nixon, makes them feel wonkish, as it were.

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 23:03 (eight years ago) link

kind of like rock critics rehabilitating the osmonds

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 23:04 (eight years ago) link

they would be better served by citing his successful domestic policies

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 23:04 (eight years ago) link

If cruz is so brilliant, why does he believe so many stupid things?

SALT?

Frederik B, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 23:06 (eight years ago) link

(Nixon was horrible)

Frederik B, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 23:06 (eight years ago) link

If cruz is so brilliant, why does he believe so many stupid things?

= zen koan least likely to result in enlightenment

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 23:07 (eight years ago) link

why smart people believe stupid things is the second most important theological query after why bad things happen to good ppl

Mordy, Tuesday, 5 April 2016 23:08 (eight years ago) link

with the possible exception of johnson, nixon was prob the single worst foreign policy prez of the cold war era

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 23:09 (eight years ago) link

Bad things happen everybody. It's only worth further thought when they happen to good ppl.

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 23:15 (eight years ago) link

not even then. but then again, i'm not much for theology!

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 23:17 (eight years ago) link

Smart ppl believe stupid things because u gotta have a mental comfort blanket in a crul world where bad things happen to good ppl (and to bad ppl but as covered wgaf)

What's the third big one I got two mins

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 23:17 (eight years ago) link

And yet, both Cruz and Nixon have/had reputations for brilliance. This probably says quite a bit about the general quality of judgment among very powerful people. I expect there is a presumption that acquiring great power and wielding great power automatically impresses those who value power.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 23:19 (eight years ago) link

they would be better served by citing his successful domestic policies

― Οὖτις, Tuesday, April 5, 2016

"Soldier of Love" was a big American hit.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 23:22 (eight years ago) link

(I also despise the word "wonkish"; it's Beltway contempt for someone who actually reads)

Since 'wonk' is 'know' backwards, I've always assumed the term started as a compliment.

jedi slimane (suzy), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 23:25 (eight years ago) link

The nature of brilliance is worthy of a big thread, gut feeling is that you prob need to be very brilliant indeed to perform even reasonably well at even reasonably low levels of political complexity, which is why predictability, ability to navigate the structures and tendency to avoid landmines trump brilliance ten times out of ten

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 23:28 (eight years ago) link

what does trump have to do with it?

wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 23:31 (eight years ago) link

have to do with it

F♯ A♯ (∞), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 23:36 (eight years ago) link

Ted Turner

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 23:37 (eight years ago) link

The nature of brilliance is worthy of a big thread, gut feeling is that you prob need to be very brilliant indeed to perform even reasonably well at even reasonably low levels of political complexity,

i.e. Reagan was Metternich?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 23:41 (eight years ago) link

Can never manage to remember Reagan's position on the Napoleonic exile, remind me again

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Tuesday, 5 April 2016 23:44 (eight years ago) link

7,300+ posts. Post-Wisconsin would be a good time for Part 5.

clemenza, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 00:04 (eight years ago) link

It is a new month after all

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 00:15 (eight years ago) link

frederick was right that the podcast had no really brilliant take on the enthusiasm numbers. however harry entin (i think) had a really interesting point - he said that some studies are showing that trump is doing really poorly in places w/ strong social cohesion / sense of community and really well in places where ppl feel alienated / alone. i'd like to find what he was referring to but that tracks w/ my gut about trump's appeal and also would literally make him the divisive candidate.

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 00:24 (eight years ago) link

new thread could just be called "feel the nedmentum"

up jump the bougie (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 00:56 (eight years ago) link

trump below 50% for the nom on predictwise for the first time since iowa

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 01:07 (eight years ago) link

would watch the best man with goole and alfred

have had empire in my amazon shopping cart for ~3 years. maybe now is a good time finally buy it.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 01:09 (eight years ago) link

you can buy shares that bernie won't be the dem nominee at predictit for 80c, which is insane, but with their $850 cap and 5% fee for withdrawals it's not really worth it. maybe if it goes down to 75c

k3vin k., Wednesday, 6 April 2016 01:11 (eight years ago) link

unexpected post!

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 01:15 (eight years ago) link

ha i thought i've been pretty clear that while i'm rooting for bernie i don't think it's likely he's gonna win. certainly his odds are worse than 4:1, however you feel about hm

k3vin k., Wednesday, 6 April 2016 01:17 (eight years ago) link

wonkish doesn't mean "intellectual" it means obsessive about the details of policy. It is associated with a type of intelligence but not necessarily grand strategy, long view or vision.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 01:17 (eight years ago) link

i can buy that cruz is brilliant even though i've never been sadistic enough to seek out any evidence

i didn't just mean wonkish when i said bernie doesn't seem smart (although i find the 'don't ask for specifics, we're gonna figure out how to do it once we get elected' attitude arrogant and also weirdly lazy of the campaign? like there's tonnes of progressive/socdem policy people who could write him up some stuff, it's not like he's the first person to have thought of how to make college free or break up banks), to me he seems like an incurious old hippie. not an idiot, but just, you know, someone with a smug bumper sticker. like he believes in alternative medicine and shit. or like, despite being the guy who brings up the 1% at every opportunity i read somewhere some close friend of his saying he never read a page of Capital in the 21st Century and never would (ok granted it's a punchline how long and boring the book is but like, you could probably read the one book ever written that exists about the one topic you talk about, you know?)

it's awesome that an old hippie dude like that became senator and was on the right side of history while america was doing some dark shit, and he's a strangely enchanting orator who can bring a tear to my eye at his best. i don't think 'smart' is a necessary condition to be a politician, but it's definitely a quality i want leftist candidates to have. people already think all leftists are dumb idealists, i think it helps to have some public figures who can offset the image deficit. plus, like, we may just have one shot to bring social democracy to america, you don't wanna fuck it up

de l'asshole (flopson), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 01:22 (eight years ago) link

Admittedly this is one thing I do find frustrating about Sanders -- I think he IS smart enough to just suck it up and memorize a little more detail fed to him by policy people the way most candidates do it. The Daily News interview was frustrating, because it wasn't like his answers were really that bad if you dissected them but he sounded so unprepared on things that he actually DOES have opinions about. I don't actually care if he read Capital in the 21st Century (a lot of people who claim to have done so have only read small excerpts), but he could easily read a few articles about it and have some talking points.

I took what he said about too big to fail institutions, for example -- if you take out some confusion that was actually caused by the questioner moving the ball (he kept switching from the executive to the fed in a way that made no sense and did not respond to what Bernie was saying), his answer was perfectly right. But he does need to be able to do better on the spot answering -- I don't need him to be an expert on the details, many presidents and governors are not, but I kind of want to feel that he cares about knowing the details a little more.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 01:30 (eight years ago) link

Lol Trump

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 01:33 (eight years ago) link

More and more thinking my comment way upthread about him being slightly W-like in his simplicity was right. And I don't think that's per se a bad thing -- W was, unfortunately, a very effective president in a lot of ways. I think Sanders has good instincts and common sense and the right beliefs, so I'm ok with him not knowing every detail of what a post-breakup JPMorgan Chase would look like, I just want him to try a little harder, at very least to quiet the doubters, since this is so obviously a weakness for his campaign.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 01:33 (eight years ago) link

ap call wisconsin for cruz

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 01:35 (eight years ago) link

The Republican side is so uninteresting when Cruz does well.

clemenza, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 01:36 (eight years ago) link

AP calls Wisconsin for Sanders

Iago Galdston, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 01:53 (eight years ago) link

That was painful. "This election is about God, freedom, and security." Give me Trump's bluster and complete lack of conviction about anything any day.

clemenza, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 02:08 (eight years ago) link

not an idiot, but just, you know, someone with a smug bumper sticker. like he believes in alternative medicine and shit.

tbh i think that he kind of does? seems irrelevant but i think there's some stuff he said and wrote about it back in the day that the republicans would happily circulate if they had a reason to

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 02:29 (eight years ago) link

he's said some dumb shit about medicine but nothing that would ever hurt him in an election

k3vin k., Wednesday, 6 April 2016 02:39 (eight years ago) link

not an idiot, but just, you know, someone with a smug bumper sticker. like he believes in alternative medicine and shit.

tbh i think that he kind of does? seems irrelevant but i think there's some stuff he said and wrote about it back in the day that the republicans would happily circulate if they had a reason to

― arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g)

the GOP believes in alternative medicine too: if you're poor and have no insurance, you die.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 02:41 (eight years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CfU0WeJWwAACw8z.jpg

oh man. where to start? way to assume the nomination belongs to your campaign and thus the voters who voted against you are helping to "steal" it.. accusations of illegal coordination with a super PAC like it's no big deal.. also is "whomever" the correct usage here, I don't think it is?

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 02:41 (eight years ago) link

a neurosurgeon running for the GOP's nomination for president couldn't even bring himself to defend the childhood vaccine schedule, these people arent drawing those kinds of lines in the sand xxp

k3vin k., Wednesday, 6 April 2016 02:42 (eight years ago) link

As someone who rode the Obama Birther movement to political prominence, Trump understands how to speak to conspiracy theorists. This just shows his allegiance to his roots.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 02:47 (eight years ago) link

'You Might Very Well Be the Cause of Cancer': Read Bernie Sanders' 1970s-Era Essays

i'm sure there's plenty more where this came from and nobody has really done anything with it in the primaries because tbh who cares, but i do think it would hurt him in a general election

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 02:47 (eight years ago) link

Every time things don't go Trump's way, his reactions force me picture him in short pants and a beanie, his face turning red, a lolly in his hand, as he stamps his foot and squeals "Not fair! Not fair!" over and over, a thin trickle of urine running down the inside of his right leg and collecting in his shoe.

I am very inteligent and dicipline boy (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 02:50 (eight years ago) link

is not having read capital in the 21st century really such a big deal for bernie? and is piketty really the whole field of 'economic stuff bernie talks about'? can't immediately find it now but i recall reading something about how his financial policies had been influenced by certain heterodox economists

also is "whomever" the correct usage here, I don't think it is?

it isn't, because it's the subject of the clause "whoever is the Democratic nominee"

ejemplo (crüt), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 02:53 (eight years ago) link

seriously. "steal the nomination" which he hasn't won yet
and every team who pulls off a 4th quarter comeback steals the game right

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 02:53 (eight years ago) link

i'll admit say that a lot of that shit is pretty embarrassing -- especially the water fluoridation crap, yeesh -- but i don't really buy that it'd be a big deal in an election. it would be a part of a larger narrative of him being a crazy lefty, sure, but i don't think this kind of stuff would really move the needle much by itself

k3vin k., Wednesday, 6 April 2016 02:55 (eight years ago) link

except for the new jersey generals xp

mookieproof, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 02:55 (eight years ago) link

As I mentioned elsewhere in one of these threads, the 30 For 30 documentary about the USFL and Trump buying the Generals and ultimately destroying the league should be required viewing for anyone considering voting for him.

I am very inteligent and dicipline boy (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 02:57 (eight years ago) link

I really can't imagine 40-year-old essays (or 20-year old essays, or...essays in general) being a thing anyone cares about but who knows

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 02:58 (eight years ago) link

bernie wrote all that stuff so long ago that i think he could plausibly dismiss it as silly stuff he thought when he was younger -- and most of it probably is.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 02:58 (eight years ago) link

kind of wondering why trump is so pleased with himself for calling ted cruz "lyin' ted".. okay stopped wondering a few seconds later when i realized the answer is that trump isn't very bright..
cruz doesn't strike me as particularly a liar? his creepiness and horrendous policy ideas are right there out in the open?

xpost the other stuff is way weirder than the water fluoridation! maybe since i've been exposed to a fair amount of new age garbage (i go to a lot of yoga classes), i find it v maddening when people don't believe in science

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 02:59 (eight years ago) link

man i hate to say it, but if hillary wrote even one of those the internet would go completely batshit

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:02 (eight years ago) link

having worked in the health care field in VT for a couple of years i definitely know bernie (like most vermonters) to be generally sympathetic to alternative medicine. and as someone relatively hostile to that field it's not something i'm particularly happy about, but the policy effects are relatively minor

k3vin k., Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:03 (eight years ago) link

Trump's "Lyin' Ted" thing comes from Cruz's campaign calls during the Iowa caucuses claiming that Ben Carson was dropping out of the race.

ejemplo (crüt), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:03 (eight years ago) link

bernie's quackery from 40 years ago >> hillary's super-predator rhetoric from 20 years ago

karla jay vespers, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:06 (eight years ago) link

tbh i was chill about alternative medicine nonsense too until i heard from totally well-educated, upper middle class friends that some of their totally well-educated, upper middle class friends were not vaccinating their children.

well that and yoga teachers saying stuff like recovering from postpartum depression and similar maladies was about choosing to be happy, and other yoga teachers advocating for homeopathic remedies for actual injuries, and such.

basically sometimes i think it can be dangerous

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:07 (eight years ago) link

yeah i just rolled my eyes at the fluoridation thing in particular because it's such a typical lefty science denier thing, and such a dumb thing to be against. tho given bernie's good-government views i'd be shocked if he still held those views xxp

k3vin k., Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:08 (eight years ago) link

"super-predator rhetoric" ie one comment she made one time, back when the crime bill in question had near universal support?
or did she give a speaking tour about super predators that i missed, i'm open to new info

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:09 (eight years ago) link

http://www.oregonlive.com/today/index.ssf/2016/04/wisconsin_primary_live_updates_1.html

"We will disclose the hotels and the room numbers of those delegates who are directly involved in the steal," he told a radio interviewer on Monday. And he will send Trump supporters to those rooms.

motherfucker it isn't a steal it's the goddamn rules the Republicans agreed on during the 2012 RNC (that will likely change again), ffs you don't own shit. you don't like it, form your own damn party.

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:10 (eight years ago) link

cruz doesn't strike me as particularly a liar?

he is a horrible, well-practiced liar and prevaricator.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/01/ted_cruz_may_be_the_most_gifted_liar_ever_to_run_for_president.html

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:10 (eight years ago) link

having worked in the health care field in VT for a couple of years i definitely know bernie (like most vermonters) to be generally sympathetic to alternative medicine. and as someone relatively hostile to that field it's not something i'm particularly happy about, but the policy effects are relatively minor

― k3vin k., Tuesday, April 5, 2016 11:03 PM (5 minutes ago)

i should clarify that i mean that policy effects visavis alternative medicine BERNIE has been involved with are relatively minor -- things like expanding access to acupuncture at the VA and stuff. not that anti-science policies in general are harmless

k3vin k., Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:11 (eight years ago) link

when a girl pushes aside all that her mother has 'taught' her and accepts her boyfriend's love

28-year old Bernie comes across as a tad bit sad here

Sharkie, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:11 (eight years ago) link

kind of wondering why trump is so pleased with himself for calling ted cruz "lyin' ted".. okay stopped wondering a few seconds later when i realized the answer is that trump isn't very bright..

I think it's partly because when he flings shit it often sticks. He could just as easily have said "Oily Ted" or "Loser Ted" or "Flip-Floppin' Ted," "Small-Dicked Ted," "Canadian Ted," or whatever. Whether it fits Cruz particularly doesn't matter. The point is that it gets remembered and repeated.

Someone arbitrarily gave me a nickname in high school - it wasn't insulting or demeaning, just an arbitrary bit of goofiness - and the ONE person from my high school who went to my college happened to be one of the people who knew about it. Hence it lived for years longer than it should have, just because sometimes nicknames are viral like that.

up jump the bougie (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:12 (eight years ago) link

looks like bernie is gonna rack up a 13ish point win tonight

k3vin k., Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:12 (eight years ago) link

xxxpost there are moments where I hear Trumpers rattling on about Cruz's infidelities and I have to remind them of their own candidate's fling with Marla Maples when I realize "Goddammit you cumstains, you're actually making me defend Ted Cruz right now" (insofar as "ad hominem tu quoque counts as a 'defense' I guess)

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:13 (eight years ago) link

xpost acupuncture is cool though. some of the stuff i support, don't get me wrong. would totally try acupuncture if i had a need, i've heard good things.

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:13 (eight years ago) link

do a lot of people have a knee-jerk tendency to defend cruz against accusations of infidelity because it's way more upsetting to believe them. i don't mean politically i mean like ew gross no way

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:15 (eight years ago) link

"super-predator rhetoric" ie one comment she made one time, back when the crime bill in question had near universal support?
or did she give a speaking tour about super predators that i missed, i'm open to new info

― arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, April 6, 2016 3:09 AM (4 minutes ago)

did bernie sanders give a speaking tour about alternative medicine and water fluoridation? as opposed to making some questionable statements back in the late 60s/early 70s when that nonsense was everywhere

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:16 (eight years ago) link

Sanders’s indulging of the anti-science/anti-GMO crowd (or the extent to which he’s part of that crowd) is the principal thing that gives me pause about his candidacy. franklym it’s a rank embarrassment.

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:17 (eight years ago) link

oh no another DISASTROUS WIN for Bernie

lol you guys always throwin the dirt on

btw W is smarter than most of us

also i think i made it to p 150 of Piketty (the graphs helped)

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:18 (eight years ago) link

"you guys" - this phrase does a /lot/ of work in your posts

i voted for bernie btw

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:20 (eight years ago) link

tbh i was chill about alternative medicine nonsense too until i heard from totally well-educated, upper middle class friends that some of their totally well-educated, upper middle class friends were not vaccinating their children.

well that and yoga teachers saying stuff like recovering from postpartum depression and similar maladies was about choosing to be happy, and other yoga teachers advocating for homeopathic remedies for actual injuries, and such.

basically sometimes i think it can be dangerous

― arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, April 5, 2016 10:07 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Bernie's talking point about GMO-labeling is probably the biggest disappointment for me on a policy level, but it's really not a big deal to me (especially since I don't ultimately give a fuck if my corn has a meaningless GMO label). I haven't seen any evidence that he's currently deeper into the shit than that (anti-vax, anti-fluoridation, etc.). He was a hippie when he was young, Clinton wasn't. There's not really an analogous thing in Clinton's past. But I don't quite think you can compare views she expressed while first lady to views he expressed as a young radical.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:20 (eight years ago) link

bernie is def not in the anti-vaccine crowd

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:22 (eight years ago) link

oh shit all these "trump campaign losing momentum, in disarray" stories are just preparation for the "trump campaign amazing comeback, genius" stories to come when the primaries move to new york and new jersey and etc and he wins the states he's expected to win

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:23 (eight years ago) link

no, he's definitely not an anti-vaxxer!

the problem with the "GMO labeling" movement is that it lends pointless credibility to a bunch of anti-science paranoia, which in turn lends credibility-by-association to a bunch of other crackpot ideas shared by many of the same folks. (which my partner and i refer to as "stuff that people write about in the local grocery co-up newsletter.")

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:24 (eight years ago) link

xpost

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:24 (eight years ago) link

Jeez. Try to imagine the worst possible outcome from a can of garbanzos having the phrase "Contains genetically modified ingredients" written on it. It boggles the imagination. Civilization might crumble. Or perhaps people would just largely choose to eat the same sort of food they ate before genetic modification was possible on an industrial scale. Or maybe they'd choose to eat the GMO garbanzos. Hard to say which outcome is scarier because frankly, neither one scares me at all.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:25 (eight years ago) link

i'll have you know that one of the most respected political minds in this country, Bill Maher, is an anti-vaxxer!

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:26 (eight years ago) link

(btw that same co-op newsletter once published a "vaccines might cause autism" piece which got a round of angry letters from doctors who are co-op members. sadly the co-op responded with a bullshit "we are an open forum, we present all sides of issues of concern to our members" hand-waving motion. if i had my druthers i'd have given up my membership then and there. but they have a really tasty hot bar.)

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:27 (eight years ago) link

I voted against the GMO labeling initiative in WA a couple years ago because of its origin in anti-science hippieism, can't abide that shit.

eyecrud (silby), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:28 (eight years ago) link

(the anti-science stuff is a good reminder that political identification is largely a matter of tribalism and that "liberals" are just as dumb as anyone else)

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:30 (eight years ago) link

do a lot of people have a knee-jerk tendency to defend cruz against accusations of infidelity because it's way more upsetting to believe them. i don't mean politically i mean like ew gross no way

srsly I have no desire to imagine Cruz thrusting his filibuster-stick inside anybody

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:31 (eight years ago) link

I have a lot of the anti-GMO crew as friends. they also say things like 'BEWARE ASPARTAME POISONING' like it's a real thing

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:32 (eight years ago) link

"i'm ted cruz, and i endorsed this quickie"

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:32 (eight years ago) link

lol

k3vin k., Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:32 (eight years ago) link

toxins you guys, don't forget you need to detox to get rid of toxins

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:37 (eight years ago) link

"GMO" I'm most cases means that the food was covered in RoundUp, which is something that I'd like to know about. Plus, making it illegal for companies to VOLUNTARILY label their food smacks of big brother to me.

schwantz, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:37 (eight years ago) link

er, the pro-labeling crowd wants to make it /mandatory/ to label GMO food as such (with the obvious implication that we should be concerned about it)

i'm not opposed to companies voluntarily labeling it! and neither are most of us, i assume.

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:39 (eight years ago) link

just like companies are free to label their off-brand pickles as "gluten-free" (LOL)

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:39 (eight years ago) link

The idea that somehow the entire nation would start reading the fine print on every bit of packaged or processed food they buy, become hysterical at the idea of eating GMO food, then destroy several decades of scientific research in a sort of 'village mob destroys Frankenstein's castle' moment is in itself verging on hysteria.

I would estimate that maybe 15% of US consumers at most give a shit about GMO one way or the other. Including those in favor. The anti-labeling position seems as emotion-laden as the anti-GMO position to me. It will not make any appreciable difference if labeling is required. Not enough people would reject GMO products to do more than shave some profits off the balance sheets of some food conglomerates. Boo fucking hoo.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:40 (eight years ago) link

the vote in Washington didn't make it illegal for voluntarily labeling, it made it illegal to mandate it:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/06/washington-state-voters-reject-gmo-labeing/3450705/

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:41 (eight years ago) link

xpost and amateurist just said that oops

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:41 (eight years ago) link

(the anti-science stuff is a good reminder that political identification is largely a matter of tribalism and that "liberals" are just as dumb as anyone else)

Yeah, that's the real trick. People start going against what we shorthandedly call science when shit starts going against very closely held beliefs that tie into identity. Hell, Mike McRae wrote great book about it.

Also, intelligence is no complete defense against believing dumb shit, due to how we form beliefs(hint: it ain't rationally).

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:42 (eight years ago) link

there are also plenty of librulls that are all like "burger flippers don't *really* deserve 15/hour, man" too

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:44 (eight years ago) link

My bad. In any case, the super-condescending "just trust us" attitude around GMOs I get from my scientist friends seems ignorant of the rich history of unintended consequences that have accompanied virtually every scientific advancement.

schwantz, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:45 (eight years ago) link

Every social group has bete noires and touchey subjects; its just that the subject area for how these touchey areas form is different due to differing worldviews/narratives. Lefties get more easily het up about corporate shit, rightwingers freak about about gov't shit.

And certain things cross tribal lines to cause fear and moral panics for all sortsa reasons(e.g. flouridation, anti-vax, etc).

Darkest Cosmologist junk (kingfish), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:45 (eight years ago) link

Cuck panic

eyecrud (silby), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:47 (eight years ago) link

My bad. In any case, the super-condescending "just trust us" attitude around GMOs I get from my scientist friends seems ignorant of the rich history of unintended consequences that have accompanied virtually every scientific advancement.

― schwantz, Tuesday, April 5, 2016 11:45 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah but I don't really think "did we really do enough testing? what if WE'VE CREATED A MONSTER WE CAN'T SEE" is really justification for the stances the anti-GMO crew take.

some of them are out there blaming GMOs for things like cancer based on dubious and/or discredited studies.

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:47 (eight years ago) link

like the anti-GMO movement doesn't really ask questions except in the rhetorical sense, and they usually adopt the most Chicken Little stance on the matter that they can find

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:49 (eight years ago) link

Just cuz hippies are lame doesn't mean that we should trust Monsanto, is all I'm saying.

schwantz, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:51 (eight years ago) link

The internal combustion gasoline engine has delivered us from endless drudgery without any bad consequences apart from maybe a bit of particulate pollution, and a smidgeon of greenhouse gases from the exhaust. Hardly enough to bother about.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:51 (eight years ago) link

i wonder how you'd study the effects of some of this labeling - gluten-free, no GMOs, all natural, organic, etc.. some of which is regulated some not.. troubling if consumers mistakenly believe foods are healthy simply because they're "natural" and no GMO and whatever. i see this with people at work, family members with the "natural" juice/sparkling drinks which are hardly better than just drinking soda.

i pay fairly close attention to food labels myself but i settle for 'good enough' ie i eat a lot of frozen organic vegetables from whole foods and don't really eat processed food most of the time, but if there are doughnuts at the office sure i have one

**anyway** speaking of anti-science, i mean, in a rational world all the GOP candidates would be at sub-30% in the polls since they don't believe climate change is real and caused by humans. it's really depressing to me that climate change has hardly been mentioned in the debates thus far

arts and crafts THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:52 (eight years ago) link

Just cuz hippies are lame doesn't mean that we should trust Monsanto, is all I'm saying.

― schwantz, Tuesday, April 5, 2016 11:51 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I think one can have distrust for Monsanto the corporation while also acknowledging that thus far, there's been no proven negative health effects from GMOs.

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:52 (eight years ago) link

My bad. In any case, the super-condescending "just trust us" attitude around GMOs I get from my scientist friends seems ignorant of the rich history of unintended consequences that have accompanied virtually every scientific advancement.

― schwantz, Tuesday, April 5, 2016 11:45 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

But the anti-GMO stance is analogous rougly to Trump's "let's not let in any more muslims until we can figure out what's going on." You never "figure out what's going on" to a satisfactory degree for people who take that stance.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:53 (eight years ago) link

the anti-GMO, pro-labeling movement engages in pretty much the exact same tactics as the anti-vaxxers do

another consequence of requiring labels on GM products, other than what amateurist mentioned, is that it quite understandably increases demand for "organic" or non-GMO products, which despite having comparable nutritional value tend to be more expensive. for the (white, middle class) people who actually care about the issue, this is no big deal. for everyone else, it might be

but we digress. and we've had this exact discussion on a couple of other threads before

k3vin k., Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:55 (eight years ago) link

xpost
And it took about 25 years to figure out how bad DDT really was.

Sorry for the derail. I'll shut up now.

schwantz, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 03:56 (eight years ago) link

lotsa Trump investors wailing about the money they lost tonight going all-in on a Trump win based on that shitty ARG poll. I should be going to sleep but reading it is hilarious.

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 04:05 (eight years ago) link

on PredictIt forums

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 04:06 (eight years ago) link

As schwantz pointed out and I have also said on other threads, the only GMO agricultural products to have entered the distribution chain in any appreciable quantities have ALL been varieties of Round-Up resistant plants. Their ONLY benefit is to allow the producer to spray herbicides on them more often and in greater quantities than similar conventional plants.

I personally would avoid GMO products atm simply because dumping ever larger quantities of herbicides on fields seems like a questionable practice for the health of the workers in those fields and the health of the soil, not to mention the greater chance of my ingesting herbicide residues.

I could give a shit about eating the actual genetic material in those plants. I know it won't harm me because chemically speaking it is made out of the same stuff as any other DNA. It's the fucking herbicides I'm against and atm "GMO" is an excellent proxy for their increased use in food production.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 04:07 (eight years ago) link

there are also plenty of librulls that are all like "burger flippers don't *really* deserve 15/hour, man" too

no problem votin' for H Walmart-Clinton then

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 04:10 (eight years ago) link

YES WE GET IT

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 04:12 (eight years ago) link

"Neanderthal
Posted: April 5, 2016 at 10:44:40 PM
there are also plenty of librulls that are all like "burger flippers don't *really* deserve 15/hour, man" too"

Huh. You know some shitty liberals I guess

Here, let me Danesplain that for you (jjjusten), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 04:26 (eight years ago) link

really should have said "Democrats" and not liberals there

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 04:27 (eight years ago) link

librulls is funny and i might use it in the future

Van Horn Street, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 04:28 (eight years ago) link

actually i think that's really one of morbz' better nickname-insults

j., Wednesday, 6 April 2016 04:28 (eight years ago) link

he does do a good job wif the nicks

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 04:29 (eight years ago) link

morbz fan here.

Van Horn Street, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 04:31 (eight years ago) link

awwww :)

btw i am really really sorry Sanders is boring some of you with the wholesale theft of everything by the richies who own our government!

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 04:34 (eight years ago) link

I voted for the dude. not my fault the rest of my state didn't follow suit.

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 04:35 (eight years ago) link

no matter who wins the democratic nomination, if the democrats win the presidency, citizens united is sure to be gutted by SCOTUS anyway, no? that's in the case Obama can't ever nominate his last judge.

Van Horn Street, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 04:37 (eight years ago) link

I remember this being good on the anti anti-science stuff

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/08/the-new-scientism/

If it's actually bad then I apologise

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 04:37 (eight years ago) link

Sanders in Wash Sq Park next Wednesday night

doing sk8board tricks

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 04:59 (eight years ago) link

poppin wheelies, eatin vegan food, gettin arm tats

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 05:00 (eight years ago) link

cool new york jokes dudes

6 god none the richer (m bison), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 05:03 (eight years ago) link

yeah sorry i regretted that instantly

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 05:05 (eight years ago) link

it's okay i would blame the last 2 years of New Yorker covers.

Van Horn Street, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 05:06 (eight years ago) link

Trump is fucked

Treeship, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 05:21 (eight years ago) link

Maybe i'll go see sanders. I wonder if the pigeon guy will be there. What does he do when the park gets massively crowded?

Treeship, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 05:22 (eight years ago) link

Some nerdy beardo explaining convention rules to lawrence o'donnell brian williams and rachel maddow, all of whom are acting intrigued, like they are improbably just learning about this now. maybe thats true of brian williams

Treeship, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 05:25 (eight years ago) link

Some nerdy beardo

Sage Francis?

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 05:34 (eight years ago) link

Chris matthews has the same odd blonde old man hair trump has. What is this about? Is it dyed?

Treeship, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 05:34 (eight years ago) link

Ben Ginsberg. They should do an hour on this stuff. The rules are what the delegates decide they are after the delegates vote on the rules base upon the rules committee's official rules, barring a minority statement on alternate rules based upon 25% of the rules committee delegates agreeing to create one, based upon the rules, and the Louisiana delegate meeting where Trump's invitations got lost in the mail. Plus hookers slipping mickeys to delegates in Cleveland hotels to prevent signing off on the nominees (that discussion was implied in my living room).

xpost

Zachary Taylor, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 05:44 (eight years ago) link

https://twitter.com/speechboy71/status/717175557096673280

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 05:51 (eight years ago) link

i like the picture of sanders there, he looks like a total dumbass. go back to the retirement home, you kooky old piece of shit. amiright, daily news?

larry appleton, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 05:53 (eight years ago) link

xpost

https://twitter.com/tcote/status/717382056481800193

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 05:54 (eight years ago) link

if they want people to take the article seriously, they should pick better photos.

larry appleton, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 05:56 (eight years ago) link

this just reminds me that /all/ of our choices for president are essentially terrible, although naturally by no means /equally/ terrible

good night everybody!

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 05:58 (eight years ago) link

Wow what an irritating twat this Michael Cohen is - his tweets reveal that he too has no idea what he's talking about. Who is he?

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 06:08 (eight years ago) link

yeah i don't give a shit about michael cohen but the bernie interview /was/ pretty embarrassing and cohen's takeaways from it were mostly pretty valid

anyway back to the humor section:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/716222480738869248

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 06:13 (eight years ago) link

i mean i don't think you can successfully explain away bernie's answers in that interview by reference to how irritating/lame michael cohen is

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 06:14 (eight years ago) link

I'm a bernie supporter but I think his insistence on the moral culpability of the corporations and banks is misguided. The issue is coporations and private banks are existentially required to maximize profit by any legal means necessary. It's bleak but it's what they do, otherwise we wouldn't call them corporations. Politicians who don't reign them in, or are compromised by their lobbyist money or whatever, are far more culpable, because they are supposed to work in the public interest.

Basically you can't expect capital to work for the interests of labor-- that's why labor needed to get organized to improve their circumstances. That's why so many people in history have wanted to abolish capitalism.

Treeship, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 06:15 (eight years ago) link

cool shit twitter account speechboy71, one to watch in 2016

hunangarage, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 06:16 (eight years ago) link

do you mean moral culpability of individual actors? or the institutions?

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 06:17 (eight years ago) link

cool shit twitter account speechboy71, one to watch in 2016

― hunangarage, Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:16 AM (42 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

man, every other post on ILX is such garbage these days

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 06:18 (eight years ago) link

much like... a twitter feed, i suppose

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 06:18 (eight years ago) link

As a rhetorical tactic the talk if jailing bankers is I guess effective, but that kind of thing wouldn't strike at the root of the global forces that are dispossessing and angering the working class. And I am skeptical that there is a lot that could be done on the trade agreement front without causing unexpected consequences.

Treeship, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 06:18 (eight years ago) link

is "moral culpability" really the center of sanders's attack on "big banks"? if it was, wouldn't he be aiming primarily and punishing the individuals responsible? (which is part of his "plan," such as it is, but not the one he insists upon most vocally)

i feel like sanders does diagnose the problems as structural ones to the extent that someone making a serious run for national political office in the USA can

a problem is that the diagnosis isn't very sophisticated

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 06:21 (eight years ago) link

do you mean moral culpability of individual actors? or the institutions?

― wizzz! (amateurist),

Both. Capitalism is amoral. It's hard to reign in. It wreaks havoc. I don't know if things would be so different if it was only good people leading these profit maximizing organizations, who need to maintain their edge however they can or else become unprofitable and die.

Treeship, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 06:22 (eight years ago) link

right, of course -- i just can't imagine that line of argument getting a politician anywhere

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 06:23 (eight years ago) link

it's just too dispassionate

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 06:23 (eight years ago) link

rein, treezy!

k3vin k., Wednesday, 6 April 2016 06:23 (eight years ago) link

(btw just to return to an earlier theme, i think many of michael cohen's critiques of sanders and his campaign are whiny and silly. i happen to think his pointing out how dumb sanders sounded in the NYDN interview was completely valid.)

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 06:24 (eight years ago) link

Sanders sometimes offers a structural critique but then also sometimes sesms to point to "greed" as a problem, which seems sort of like it misses the point.

Treeship, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 06:24 (eight years ago) link

Lol sorry k3v

Treeship, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 06:25 (eight years ago) link

Both. Capitalism is amoral. It's hard to reign in. It wreaks havoc. I don't know if things would be so different if it was only good people leading these profit maximizing organizations, who need to maintain their edge however they can or else become unprofitable and die.

but don't both clinton and bernie's plans at least propose to resolve the structural problems that enable banks to engage in bad behaviors? doesn't that acknowledge that the problems aren't primarily about individual bad actors but about the about of leeway that we allow the financial sector?

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 06:25 (eight years ago) link

xposts!

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 06:25 (eight years ago) link

i mean they are basically making arguments for structural reforms but draping them in the language of moral culpability, which is basically a technique to win elections

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 06:26 (eight years ago) link

The politician <---> lobbyist profession makes diagnosing capitalism/govt as two separate problems silly. (in our time and place.)

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 11:27 (eight years ago) link

yeah i don't give a shit about michael cohen but the bernie interview /was/ pretty embarrassing and cohen's takeaways from it were mostly pretty valid

It was pretty disappointing to me, too, as a non-citizen who had felt excited enough by him to volunteer a bit. I think I still prefer him to the other options but that says as much about how I feel about the other options.

Also, I haven't seen much about this: has anyone talked or written about whether/how the welfare state Sanders is proposing would be affordable without drastic reductions in US military spending (or, if not, how much he'd be willing to cut the military)? This seems like the most obvious difference between the US and most other First World countries. I'm no economist but Canada is just managing to maintain a single-payer health care system that covers less than what he's suggesting while spending about 27% as much on the military relative to GDP (by Wikipedia numbers). Even our leftist parties don't talk about free tuition.

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 12:10 (eight years ago) link

Even our leftist parties don't talk about free tuition.

(Actually, I think the Green Party does, tbf.)

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 12:13 (eight years ago) link

That's one of the things I have with Bernie. He's very vague about his plans, like he goes from 1 to 5 and skips 2, 3, 4. Like, "well, we just need a revolution among the people!" and that's great and everything, but has he seen what things are like here lately? I like the spirit of what he talks about, but his moments of magical thinking make me cringe whenever I hear them.

larry appleton, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 12:15 (eight years ago) link

OK, looking at World Bank numbers, Canadian health care spending relative to GDP is about 64% of the US's so maybe there's a case that health care expenditures could fall more generally under single-payer? Is that the expectation?

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 12:18 (eight years ago) link

i'm fine with voting for virtue moving in the right direction that will never happen

bcz the Clintons have shit in their veins

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 12:44 (eight years ago) link

the expectation is yes, that spending falls under single payer. but you know, if anyone can fuck that up, it's the US

akm, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 12:53 (eight years ago) link

daria-g:

all these "trump campaign losing momentum, in disarray" stories are just preparation for the "trump campaign amazing comeback, genius"

The Story Has To Change. Just as Clintonian inevitability was a story, which needed to change to Unexpected Surge of Populist Challenger. Which needed to change to WTF? A Socialist Has No Chance, which needed to change to OMG Can He Really Have a Chance? Which needed to change to Clinton Fights Sanders Insurgency, which needed to change to Sanders Closing The Gap, which needed to change to Clinton Roaring Back, which needed to change to ZOMG Sanders Scores Major Upset, which will change to But Clinton Still Leads in Delegates, and so on.

up jump the bougie (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 13:10 (eight years ago) link

“There is a persistent, organized effort to misrepresent my record, and I don’t appreciate that, and I feel sorry for a lot of the young people who are fed this list of misrepresentations,” Clinton said, a few minutes after talking herself hoarse at a rally here. “I know that Senator Sanders spends a lot of time attacking my husband, attacking President Obama. I rarely hear him say anything negative about George W. Bush, who I think wrecked our economy.”

the fuck outta here with this shit

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 13:43 (eight years ago) link

"That ought'll hold the little SOBs"

larry appleton, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 13:46 (eight years ago) link

* oughta

larry appleton, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 13:46 (eight years ago) link

“Anybody help me out here, because I don’t remember the figures, but my recollection is over 10,000 innocent people were killed in Gaza. Does that sound right?” he said first.

Told that the number was “probably high,” Sanders responded: “I don’t have it in my number… but I think it’s over 10,000. My understanding is that a whole lot of apartment houses were leveled,” he went on. “Hospitals, I think, were bombed. So yeah, I do believe and I don’t think I’m alone in believing that Israel’s force was more indiscriminate than it should have been.”

(according to hamas the figure was 1,462 civilians)

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 13:55 (eight years ago) link

Clinton going negative is like a shotgun blasting in a million directions at once and hitting everyone. And Sanders on virtually anything but domestic policy is like watching him turn the shotgun on himself. I must admit, I've not heard him talk much about the world at large. He seems almost as incurious as Trump to the point of disinterest. "The rest of the world? Yes, there is a rest of the world but we'll deal with that later. First: the banks!"

Has he or anyone talked about the Panama Papers, or are they all waiting to see if/when their friends are revealed as complicit?

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 14:01 (eight years ago) link

i havent finished the nydn transscript, but i havent found anything that is that damning compared to previous statements. he has very broad ideas about policy that he wants but he's not really good with specifics. am i missing anything?

6 god none the richer (m bison), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 14:02 (eight years ago) link

there is a rest of the world but we'll deal with that later

if climate change is addressed meaningfully, rest of the world should take that.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 14:05 (eight years ago) link

clinton didn't "go negative" in that politico thing, at least not according to the write-up. (obv didn't listen to the 45 minute interview.) the media desperately wants a "negative campaign" narrative but it just aint happening (at least not from the candidates)

k3vin k., Wednesday, 6 April 2016 14:08 (eight years ago) link

hey morbz you seem very concerned about climate change. how do you think the potus should best address it keeping in mind the growth of industry in non-first world countries that is generating huge amounts of carbon while bringing their ppl out of poverty? xp

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 14:10 (eight years ago) link

Josh, yes, he addressed the Panama Papers from the stump last night in Wyoming. Obv. right up his alley and fortuitous timing....

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 14:11 (eight years ago) link

he looks like my grandmother

ulysses, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 14:57 (eight years ago) link

i havent finished the nydn transscript, but i havent found anything that is that damning compared to previous statements. he has very broad ideas about policy that he wants but he's not really good with specifics. am i missing anything?

That's basically it, just a lot of it in one place. I think I was sort of hoping he was keeping the message simple but had thought all of these things through.

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 15:02 (eight years ago) link

I saw a pre-primary video of Trump yesterday and, true to the stories circulating, he did look and seem tired. To the extent that, for a change, he looked and sounded like a halfway reasonable person (except for that thing where he looked like he'd just gone face first into a bowl of butterscotch pudding).

I am very inteligent and dicipline boy (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 15:12 (eight years ago) link

I have a feeling the Republicans are headed for the point of maximum awkwardness re the delegate count. Somewhere over, I don't know, 1,100 for Trump make it very difficult for them to deny him (without incredible anger), and anywhere under 1,000 renders complaints from Trump less and less valid. I think Trump might end up somewhere in the middle.

clemenza, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 15:23 (eight years ago) link

xpost Are Bernie's policy ideas in fact so broad, or is he instead savvy about messaging? I say this as a supporter who is sometimes frustrated w/ his tendency to gloss over details. After all this is a ranking member of the Budget committee who also sits on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, etc. High Wonk stuff. I wonder if instead he knows how precious media attention is (esp. for a marginal candidate w/ an unconventional platform), and that a certain amount of cynicism from decades of witnessing the ascent of so many idiot colleagues—has him deliberately going big and simple and repetitive.

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 15:25 (eight years ago) link

how do you think the potus should best address it keeping in mind the growth of industry in non-first world countries

how about sizable assistance to implement eonc growth via greenest possible methods? after we cut DoD budget in half.

(i know this won't happen and i recognize yr attempt at gotcha question)

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 15:32 (eight years ago) link

it's not a "gotcha" question. you said that the foreign affairs stuff will work itself out once we handle climate change but from what i can tell the route to addressing climate change runs directly through foreign affairs.

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 15:33 (eight years ago) link

re cutting the DoD budget, which parts do you recommend we cut? are you in favor of Trump's plan of shedding any countries under our defense umbrella? aka, pacific nations, europe / NATO, middle eastern countries? do you think there might be consequences to withdrawing from these agreements in terms of Russian or Chinese or Iranian reactions + potential aggression? i don't think these are side questions - these are v important questions and i don't know if Bernie has given them a ton of thought. nb i believe DoD can be cut too but i think some of this is what ppl are balking at - these broadsides that don't seem to address the specific conditions that are essential to work out.

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 15:35 (eight years ago) link

i'm not running for office; i don't need a motherfucking plan.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 15:36 (eight years ago) link

i agree that politically apathetic ppl not running for office probably don't need to think about these things

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 15:37 (eight years ago) link

Cutting defense spending as I understand his position has less to do with any radical realignment or policies of engagement (although not being in war all the time wld help) as it does curbing the influence of lobbyists and gaming defense contracts so that we're not paying exponentially more than fair-market value.

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 15:40 (eight years ago) link

bernie's been in congress for decades -- i'm pretty sure he's given the topic some thought

k3vin k., Wednesday, 6 April 2016 15:42 (eight years ago) link

and i'm sure HRC will cut Waste, Fraud and Abuse in the defense contracting/procurement system.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 15:43 (eight years ago) link

i havent finished the nydn transscript, but i havent found anything that is that damning compared to previous statements. he has very broad ideas about policy that he wants but he's not really good with specifics. am i missing anything?

nah it's really not as bad as people are making it out to be. it's also pretty unforgivingly edited/transcribed and the interviewer is a dick

de l'asshole (flopson), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 15:44 (eight years ago) link

If you're not sufficiently upset about this, here are the defense omnibus earmarks:

http://www.protectingtaxpayers.org/assets/files/2014-Defense-Earmarks-Omnibus-Bill.pdf

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 15:45 (eight years ago) link

Incidentally, those earmarks alone nearly equal the amount projected to close gap btw public and private govt. higher-ed spending that could make public colleges and universities tuition-free

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 15:55 (eight years ago) link

voter id laws in wisconsin are "working"

http://www.thenation.com/article/wisconsins-voter-id-law-caused-major-problems-at-the-polls-last-night/

goole, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 15:56 (eight years ago) link

xpost* "public and private higher-ed spending"

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 15:57 (eight years ago) link

Wonder how much this helped Sanders' numbers

Xpost

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 15:58 (eight years ago) link

The Nation always sez i have read all my free articles (for life i guess)... So why did it help Sanders?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:05 (eight years ago) link

Just wondering out loud if voter suppression ends up working in his favor, the article did not get into that

Check Yr Scrobbles (Moodles), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:09 (eight years ago) link

looks like they are working hard to keep both blacks and students home come November, so maybe a wash in the primary

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:16 (eight years ago) link

my big takeaway from these primaries is that if the left wants to stand a chance at changing anything they are going to need to [prioritize?] taking over their state governance or the voter suppression alone is going to marginalize them for years to come.

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:18 (eight years ago) link

which they are not doing, cuz protest voting for Bernie is easier/more exciting

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:22 (eight years ago) link

Right, yes, successful characterization of millions and millions of voters

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:23 (eight years ago) link

xpost agreed and also revisiting Voting Rights Act w/ new appointment to court, if/when

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:24 (eight years ago) link

Do you guys really think Sanders' down-ticket efforts or lack thereof have more to do with him not caring or acting selfishly than with plain fact that he is not a member of the Dem party, until recently has had zero national profile, not to mention anything even remotely close to the political resources and infrastructure/connections of his opponent, who has been running for President for thirty years?

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:30 (eight years ago) link

there's a ton of little things he could be doing that would make a huge difference - his campaign could be sharing its donor lists with allied congressional candidates, for ex.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:31 (eight years ago) link

No - I think you're right. It has to do with his not being a member of the Dem party and having zero national profile, few political resources, infrastructure, lack of experience running a national movement, etc. I don't want to speculate about why he has those disadvantages - maybe it just never occurred to him until recently that building a national movement might be an important thing to do - his attention was locally focused. xp

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:32 (eight years ago) link

this was Sunday's NYT op by 2 poli-scientists: the Republicans losing prez elections has become their base of power for everything else:

The electorate is changing in ways that will weaken the Republican advantage in the future — in particular, it’s becoming much more diverse. But Republicans have managed to hold back this tide to some extent by making voting harder (with voter ID laws and the like) and by mobilizing their core voters even more aggressively. And they’ve mobilized them not in spite of their presidential disadvantage, but often by virtue of it.

It is not simply that the G.O.P. enjoys these structural advantages. More and more, it feeds on the failure of its presidential standard-bearers. Party leaders sincerely lament these repeated losses (and may come to lament them more with the Supreme Court’s balance now on the line). They are not trying to win by losing. But they are doing just that, and this tells us a lot about how the contemporary Republican Party works.

Republicans excel at generating and then exploiting hostility to government, and thrive on being in opposition, especially to presidents. Almost without fail, recent presidential losses were followed by a “backlash” election — in 1994, 2010 and 2014 — in which the G.O.P. swept to victories in Congress and statehouses.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/03/opinion/campaign-stops/why-trump-cant-break-the-gop.html?_r=0

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:33 (eight years ago) link

"which they are not doing, cuz protest voting for Bernie is easier/more exciting"

I thought they were posting on message boards.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:35 (eight years ago) link

there's a ton of little things he could be doing that would make a huge difference - his campaign could be sharing its donor lists with allied congressional candidates, for ex.

― Οὖτις, Wednesday, April 6, 2016 12:31 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This is hilarious considering the lengths the Democratic party has gone to to prevent him from having the same

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:35 (eight years ago) link

his lack of support for down-ticket races is concerning to me. there's still a small chance he could get the nomination (i feel like the NY primary in a couple weeks could be the make or break point), so when i think of him as a candidate i still think of how he would actually function as a president, rather than just how he's affecting the left on a macro level by merit of how well he's done so far. i think it would be difficult for him to consolidate democratic support in the house and senate if he didn't make an early and strong effort to support down-ticket races. even more difficult than it would already be, i mean.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:35 (eight years ago) link

I don't want to speculate about why he has those disadvantages

why not?

I agree w you that those things limit his effectiveness re: this revolution that he says is required

xp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:36 (eight years ago) link

This is hilarious considering the lengths the Democratic party has gone to to prevent him from having the same

these things are not related

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:36 (eight years ago) link

Bernie wouldn't have to go through the DNC, he could respond to requests for coordination from individual candidates, which his campaign has refused/ignored

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:37 (eight years ago) link

Candidates who have endorsed him? Is there some story here which details this?

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:40 (eight years ago) link

ive been getting emails from Democracy for America (which supports him) asking for $ for candidates. Proxies will have to do?

are there all that many candidates sympathetic to him running?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:41 (eight years ago) link

It's also not like there's no risk, in a tight race, to calling in the elderly Socialist for a photo-op. There are more sensible plays. I mean I doubt he's turning down invitations for reasons other than scheduling. Can you enumerate these?

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:43 (eight years ago) link

There is one running for PA senate who has endorsed him and his campaign desperately needs funding. I'm sure there are others but I don't think the Bernie campaign has the resources or wherewithal. They have their hands full just making sure they're opening enough campaign offices in primary states.

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:43 (eight years ago) link

They have their hands full just making sure they're opening enough campaign offices in primary states.

yup, and this is precisely what makes me angry about his campaign - ass-backwards priorities

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:46 (eight years ago) link

so easy when you're running against the Machine, dawg

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:47 (eight years ago) link

his campaign is prioritizing his bid for the presidency (a non-achievable goal) over actual "revolution" that would produce electoral and legislative victories for the left

xp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:47 (eight years ago) link

xpost Mordy I think that is a fair take

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:48 (eight years ago) link

his campaign is prioritizing his bid for the presidency (a non-achievable goal)

yes, that should be the campaign's #1 bead right now, tacitly acknowledging he's lost. Go work for Pelosi.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:49 (eight years ago) link

his campaign is prioritizing his bid for the presidency (a non-achievable goal) over actual "revolution" that would produce electoral and legislative victories for the left

so, his campaign for the presidency is foolishly prioritizing his campaign for the presidency?

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:49 (eight years ago) link

p much!

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:49 (eight years ago) link

This nerve of this Sanders guy

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:50 (eight years ago) link

he should stop pretending that his fairytale dream of being president = revolution

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:50 (eight years ago) link

he has said the OPPOSITE of that, clown

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:51 (eight years ago) link

Nan's not up for reelection this year Morbz

xp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:51 (eight years ago) link

are you Rob Reiner?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:51 (eight years ago) link

it's extremely unlikely sanders would continue to bring in the kind of money he's been receiving if his campaign (if you could even call it that at that point, maybe more like a PAC) decided to start punting the presidential election and support candidates his donors haven't heard of. which is a problem, insofar as one accepts that this is a problem, with the sanders supporters, not sanders himself

but shakey knows this and is just being a douche

k3vin k., Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:53 (eight years ago) link

he has said the OPPOSITE of that, clown

This is even more nonsensical! "First I get elected President, then a revolution happens that retakes local, state and federal legislatures - somehow by magic!" it's so delusional.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:53 (eight years ago) link

peronally I find it outrageous that some of these budding down-ticket "revolutionaries" aren't instead devoting their efforts to children in pre-schools across this great nation, spending time to shape the minds of tomorrow's leaders, our future

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:53 (eight years ago) link

personally argh

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:54 (eight years ago) link

which is a problem, insofar as one accepts that this is a problem, with the sanders supporters, not sanders himself

yes this IS the problem, but idk why we should give Sanders a pass and blame his supporters exclusively, one wouldn't exist without the other

xp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:55 (eight years ago) link

in the meantime Sanders can keep spending his hard-earned $20 donations on billboards in San Francisco - why doesn't he just set his donor money on fire if he's going to be this stupid with it, feel the burn!

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:56 (eight years ago) link

this whole line of thinking pr much sums up the Dem party's decades of capitulation

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:57 (eight years ago) link

lol right

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:58 (eight years ago) link

The billboard does sound like a misstep possibly based on what I think is a misconception that what Bernie lacks is still name recognition. Hard to imagine this is still true at this late date in the campaign but I still hear it from supporters as an explanation for why he's behind in polling in key states.

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 16:59 (eight years ago) link

I'm sure that right now the opposition has really got its panties in a twist that Ted Cruz isn't in Indiana right now shooting hoops with Dan Coats

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:00 (eight years ago) link

revolution comes with the 2018 midterms, shakey

you know, when the Republicans get supermajorities bcz of all the ClintonHate.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:00 (eight years ago) link

that billboard probably cost bernie 20 minutes worth of donations, get out of here

i do like this idea that bernie decides to start punting elections and spending money on local races and the money just keeps on flowing in. who's the delusional one?

k3vin k., Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:02 (eight years ago) link

yes but Morbs you are predicating that on Clinton victory, if indeed she gets the nom it may be the Dems w/ midterm bounce courtesy of President Cruz

/going to take a shower now/

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:03 (eight years ago) link

@thehill
Clinton: "I'm not even sure" Sanders is a Democrat http://hill.cm/i2yIAZQ

‏@ggreenwald
So often in US politics, campaigns try to turn a candidate's best attributes into liabilities

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:08 (eight years ago) link

if indeed she gets the nom it may be the Dems w/ midterm bounce courtesy of President Cruz

lol

marcos, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:08 (eight years ago) link

"If he says so" deja vu

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:09 (eight years ago) link

his campaign is prioritizing his bid for the presidency (a non-achievable goal) over actual "revolution" that would produce electoral and legislative victories for the left

which would be preferable at this moment:

a) bernie quits right now, in the middle of a campaign that is still attracting energetic supporters and introducing a bunch of young people to progressive ideas, before millions of those people get a chance to cast a vote for him and attend rallies with tens of thousands of other supporters, in order to fully devote his time to supporting down-ticket/state/local progressive politics, i.e., the "political revolution"

b) bernie keeps the campaign going for another 2 months, continues to give the progressive movement someone to unite around, and then he devotes his time to supporting down-ticket/state/local progressive politics, i.e., the "political revolution"

i think b) is better. but there's an assumption built into it, which is that keeping his campaign alive helps to build support for progressive ideas. by inspiring a lot of people who weren't previously engaged in politics or aren't satisfied with going with someone like hillary clinton for president, he's helping to inspire a lot of young people to get involved in local/state elections. no, not many - most will just vote in the primary or in november, and then completely forget about everything until 2020, again. but some people nonetheless will get inspired and become active that would not have been otherwise. for example, most people here have known all about single payer healthcare for decades or more, but you should remember that there are tons of college kids who were either too young or too politically disengaged to really pay attention to that short-lived debate during its most recent turn in the spotlight in 2009/2010. so having a democratic socialist in the news everyday to popularize these ideas (and trounce hillary in some states, on top of that) is inherently valuable to the future of progressive politics.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:09 (eight years ago) link

revolution comes with the 2018 midterms, shakey

you know, when the Republicans get supermajorities bcz of all the ClintonHate.

this is entirely likely, and if anyone (like, say, committed leftists) had any foresight this is what they would really be worried about

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:10 (eight years ago) link

‏@thehill
Clinton: "I'm not even sure" Sanders is a Democrat http://hill.cm/i2yIAZQ

How is this even possible? Just a terrible, terrible candidate with a frighteningly short-memory

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:12 (eight years ago) link

Can she just not manage to step in it, even once? Run-up to the general election is going to be v scary IMO

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:13 (eight years ago) link

i think the point that the time to be supporting bernie-style candidates is now -- when the primaries are occurring -- is fair. but i don't see how the sanders campaign does this and manages to sustain its funding. people are donating to him to run for president. if it were the case that people from all over the country were interested enough in the kind of local races necessary to effect a "political revolution", there would be a PAC for this and it would be hugely successful. but there's not. people care about the presidency

k3vin k., Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:14 (eight years ago) link

I thought he wasn't a Democrat before this run? xp

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:14 (eight years ago) link

re: Karl's post - the difference between options a) and b) is two months - and when there are things like filing deadlines and fundraising goals to worry about, idg what the additional two months of "building support for progressive ideas" actually accomplishes. The former is an actual thing that needs to be done to win elections - it's a clear goal that can be achieved. the latter is vague and poorly defined, and its benefits can't be clearlyt quantified.

xp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:14 (eight years ago) link

xpost he wasn't

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:16 (eight years ago) link

KM otm

re trouncing (explain it's all a mirage, we've heard that-- the OPTICS are good)

‏@ggreenwald
Last 7 states:

ID- Sanders 78%
UT- Sanders 79.3%
AZ- HRC 56.5%
AK- Sanders 81.6%
HI- Sanders 68.8%
WA- Sanders 72.7%
WI- Sanders 56.5%

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:17 (eight years ago) link

if I'm Bernie I see those numbers and know it's time to fold up shop, draft concession speech etc. because REALISTICALLY etc.

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:20 (eight years ago) link

the difference between options a) and b) is two months

in order to support him dropping him out right now, you have to believe that he is single-handedly capable (and responsible) of doing all the gruntwork (like the filing deadlines, fundraising you mentioned), and that the reason down-ticket races aren't looking good for progressives is due to his lack of time and attention. given the kind of person he is - as discussed upthread it seems like he's more of a big picture guy than detail-oriented, which i think is totally fine - he seems like a more galvanizing force as a figurehead of the movement.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:20 (eight years ago) link

also it's kind of cheesy, but there's a rally in brooklyn in a couple weeks, and there are going to be a bunch of families and young people and children and formerly disengaged people who hate all the typical establishment candidates, standing together and cheering for sanders and listening to his ideas. that means something, and it's going to inspire a bunch of people. i don't see how abruptly quitting and canceling those kind of rallies is a good move for progressives.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:22 (eight years ago) link

i'm sorry everyone, go home! bernie has a conference call about filing deadlines in rural indiana for a key state representative battle that he needs to attend.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:23 (eight years ago) link

he's more of a big picture guy than detail-oriented ... a more galvanizing force as a figurehead of the movement.

see, Shakey? Reagan.

as you've already elected Clinton, howzbout she fires Wasserman-Stain? does that get your concern as much as Sanders financing a generation of lefty Dem congressppl this year?

where is this Brooklyn rally, km?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:24 (eight years ago) link

er, not in BK - in washington square. but hey, maybe he'll walk over here and say hello!

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:25 (eight years ago) link

let's say theoretically bernie loses in NY and he's looking ahead to PA, NJ, MD and the numbers are you know, he's making progress but it seems like he's probably not going to turn it around sufficiently. does it make more sense for him to keep going to the convention knowing that his narrow path to victory has essentially vanished - basically lying to supporters that there's still a chance (at the moment there is enough of a chance that i think his call for support is genuine) - or does it make more sense to tell supporters: "the math doesn't make sense but that does not mean the revolution is over. now announcing: Bernie candidates! we still need to put ppl who agree w/ us in office to change this country and now that will be the focus of this campaign." i mean i think the latter - i don't see virtue in dragging supporters to a convention IF the math really does become impossible. i think it's not so at the moment - i mean he could win in NY, close the gap and win in PA, NJ, not lose too badly in MD, and then get a huge blowout in CA and have a spectacular come from behind victory. but if the numbers actually become impossible does it make sense to keep going just to keep the kids involved? or does it make sense to transition the kids to something new?

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:26 (eight years ago) link

the debate (4/14) is at the Navy Yard xxp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:28 (eight years ago) link

or does it make more sense to tell supporters: "the math doesn't make sense but that does not mean the revolution is over. now announcing: Bernie candidates! we still need to put ppl who agree w/ us in office to change this country and now that will be the focus of this campaign."

in the event of a NY loss, that would be sweet, although i don't think he'd do it. i mean, i take issue with his lack of support for down-ticket races, as i mentioned above. i don't think he has a plan for how to actually build a progressive revolution. i don't see a plan for maintaining the energy and support from his campaign and using using it as a base to build upon. not that it's easy - obama's Organizing for Action seems to have been a total failure - but it would be cool if he would even give it a shot.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:32 (eight years ago) link

so given my lack of confidence in his ability to deliver on the grassroots nuts and bolts movement kind of stuff, i think he's most valuable doing what he's doing - running a very prominent campaign for president and getting his ideas out there.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:34 (eight years ago) link

and that he should keep doing it as long as he has a viable chance, which he certainly does right now, even if it's small. sorry, i'll stop now.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:34 (eight years ago) link

same. ive linked to my local race a couple of times here, but i dont think that guy runs or wins as a democrat without bernie. and i sure as fuck dont volunteer if that guy doesnt win either. i cant be the only one.

6 god none the richer (m bison), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:35 (eight years ago) link

@HillaryClinton
We need a president who doesn’t just rail against trade. We need a president who knows how to compete against the rest of the world and win.

Trumpishhhhh....

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:44 (eight years ago) link

Where are the specifics?

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:46 (eight years ago) link

Hey hey! Ho ho! Uncompetitive marginal tax rates have got to go!

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:50 (eight years ago) link

if it were the case that people from all over the country were interested enough in the kind of local races necessary to effect a "political revolution", there would be a PAC for this and it would be hugely successful. but there's not. people care about the presidency

yes this is a real problem. voting for a president is "sexy" and "exciting", rallies w 1000s of people etc. but it is not really the most effective political activity. the right has figured this out. the left has not.

many many xps

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:52 (eight years ago) link

speaking of trade, does Hillary support TTIP?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:52 (eight years ago) link

howzbout she fires Wasserman-Stain? does that get your concern as much as Sanders financing a generation of lefty Dem congressppl this year?

my hatred of Wasserman-Schulz is well-established on these threads.

has Sanders called for her firing? that would be cool.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:54 (eight years ago) link

have we mentioned today's daily news cover? (admitted bernie-fan bait)

http://www.thewrap.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Bernie-New-York-Daily-News-.jpg

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:55 (eight years ago) link

guess the daily news really does not like him

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:56 (eight years ago) link

to the claims that Bernie's firing up and engaging progressives and how that (hopefully) will have a lasting impact - isn't it just as likely that people will disengage/become cynical when he inevitably loses? "I was so excited and donated money and went to rallies and voted in the primary and it STILL wasn't enough! Fuck this shit!" seems like just as likely a reaction.

xp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:57 (eight years ago) link

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2016/04/06/clinton-attacks-sanders-on-guns-but-the-truth-is-complicated/

not a great couple of days for the NYDN in terms of journalistic integrity/honesty, though it seems to be working

k3vin k., Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:59 (eight years ago) link

true, but that depends on how bernie (and hillary) manage and communicate his loss

xp

goole, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 17:59 (eight years ago) link

ok answered my own question - she finally came out AGAINST ttip after weeks of hemming and hawing. but notably she raised no objections against ISDS (as far as i can tell) which is by far the most objectionably anti-democratic provision in it (which is saying something)

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:01 (eight years ago) link

why did he even talk to the daily news? that newspaper is like one step above the post which is one step below the gutter.

Treeship, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:01 (eight years ago) link

isn't it just as likely that people will disengage/become cynical when he inevitably loses?

some people definitely will, just like almost everyone disengages when it's time for midterms. but, again, how would those same people react if he quit right now, at the end of a series of strong primary victories, when he still had a legitimate chance to win?

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:01 (eight years ago) link

The Daily News slammed Clinton a couple days ago for the perceived min wage opportunism, and I think also hit her on caginess around a debate, but I do get the sense that they're ultimately more anti-Sanders than anti-Clinton. And I'd be surprised if they weren't.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:02 (eight years ago) link

what is the trick to getting the left to vote during midterms? they claim to be angry + that things are dire + that radical change is needed. how does that become "oops was yesterday election day?"

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:03 (eight years ago) link

The Daily News is an institution in NYC whether good or not, and at least it's Dem-leaning, unlike the Post. Although such things are increasingly becoming dinosaurs, it's one of the two papers that "ordinary New Yorkers" have read for years.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:04 (eight years ago) link

xpost because the candidates on offer are basically moderate republicans?

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:04 (eight years ago) link

also, let's dispel with this fiction that his loss is inevitable. in terms of delegates, it's unlikely, but not impossible, and he certainly has the momentum. putting all that aside, it seems foolish to categorize anything as "inevitable" this year. remember a few months ago when anyone that talked about the possibility of a contested convention was tossed aside like a fool because it was impossible that GOP would let things reach that point?

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:04 (eight years ago) link

what is the trick to getting the left to vote during midterms? they claim to be angry + that things are dire + that radical change is needed. how does that become "oops was yesterday election day?"

― Mordy, Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:03 PM (43 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This is the $10k question. How did the tea party do it? I remember reading that, contrary to popular stereotype, its supporters tend to be affluent and educated. That's probably the base for people who are most likely to be politically active. I guess you need a way to make involvement engaging, social, exciting, etc., like dressing up in revolutionary era garb and yelling is for right-wing dorks. Do that and channel it into midterm voting somehow (???).

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:06 (eight years ago) link

You don't actually need a huge number of people to get involved, relatively speaking, because turnout is so low.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:06 (eight years ago) link

treesh the daily news is a staple of new york life, like the post. yes it's a tabloid but it's fairly high qual as tabs go (and it's not owned by rupert murdoch)

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:07 (eight years ago) link

i know no one likes to talk about hillary's email thing, but if the FBI has 147 a few dozen people working on it and they intend to do whatever they do before the convention, there's at least a chance that she has to deal with a ton of bad publicity in the final weeks of the primary season. i don't know how much something like that would affect the race, but it definitely doesn't help her

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:07 (eight years ago) link

let's dispel with this fiction

let's dispel this malapropism shall we

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:08 (eight years ago) link

let's dispel with dis dick

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:14 (eight years ago) link

what is the trick to getting the left to vote during midterms?

As I always ask, what left?

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:15 (eight years ago) link

dude everything you post is dumb

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:17 (eight years ago) link

this revved up left that's voting for Bernie, obviously

xp

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:17 (eight years ago) link

i know no one likes to talk about hillary's email thing, but if the FBI has 147 a few dozen people working on it and they intend to do whatever they do before the convention, there's at least a chance that she has to deal with a ton of bad publicity in the final weeks of the primary season. i don't know how much something like that would affect the race, but it definitely doesn't help her

― Karl Malone, Wednesday, April 6, 2016 2:07 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

idk i haven't been keeping up w/ it a ton but the email thing seems like such a non-scandal, nobody really gives a shit except for right-wingers and some really hardcore bernie fans, though i guess the reaction would change a little if clinton is actually indicted, which seems like a longshot though

marcos, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:23 (eight years ago) link

M, i think you're stupid too. let's move on.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:24 (eight years ago) link

please just think 10 seconds before you post something and ask yourself "is this a really dumb comment that adds nothing to the conversation"?

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:24 (eight years ago) link

like we're in the midst of a bernie campaign where you apparently believe he has a more than non-zero chance of winning and you even cited a greenwald post to demonstrate all his momentum and how the narrative that he can't win is bogus -- and then you ask "what left." like what the fuck are you even talking about?

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:26 (eight years ago) link

don't bother Mordy

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

er don't bother, Mordy

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:27 (eight years ago) link

Say, now, wasn't there talk of starting a Part 5 thread, now that this one is well past 7500 posts? With Wisconsin results the season is entering a new phase of Trump slippage and Sanders fighting for leverage in NY, PENN and NJ. Seems like a good moment to start anew.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:29 (eight years ago) link

it would be cool if the new thread had a title that didn't result in the word Douché at the top of my phone as i catch up on this thread on crowded trains

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:33 (eight years ago) link

like what the fuck are you even talking about?

i'm talking about our "left" party that is going to ask these disaffected Bernie supporters to turn out to reward two years of a Schmuck Schumer-led Senate in '18.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:33 (eight years ago) link

Also Trumps' scalp flashing on screen for a second as the thread loads (for me). Cue next thread's 2nd post being a close up of his word hole...

xp

Evan, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:35 (eight years ago) link

newsflash: the democratic party is a coalition party, not an ideological one. if you don't like who they run, get involved and promote your cause. otherwise someone else will and you won't like it. not that i think you will - the extent of your political participation appears to be half-assed self-aggrandizing comments on an internet message board. xp

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:35 (eight years ago) link

it would be cool if the new thread had a title that didn't result in the word Douché at the top of my phone as i catch up on this thread on crowded trains

― Karl Malone, Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:33 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Bern After Reading

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:36 (eight years ago) link

Mor vs. Mor 7500 posts long

Evan, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:36 (eight years ago) link

you even cited a greenwald post to demonstrate all his momentum and how the narrative that he can't win is bogus

Tbf that wasn't the point of the Greenwald citation (as I read it anyway) - Morbs explicitly was backing up KM, who was making what I thought was a pretty fair assessment of the value of Sanders staying in the race against the no-doubt totally sincere and well-intentioned advice from Clinton die-hards that he leave the race for the good of the progressive causes that their candidate does not champion:

he's helping to inspire a lot of young people to get involved in local/state elections. no, not many - most will just vote in the primary or in november, and then completely forget about everything until 2020, again. but some people nonetheless will get inspired and become active that would not have been otherwise. for example, most people here have known all about single payer healthcare for decades or more, but you should remember that there are tons of college kids who were either too young or too politically disengaged to really pay attention to that short-lived debate during its most recent turn in the spotlight in 2009/2010. so having a democratic socialist in the news everyday to popularize these ideas (and trounce hillary in some states, on top of that) is inherently valuable to the future of progressive politics.

in which context the list of recent trouncings really doesn't seem like it's being offered as proof that sanders can win the nomination. i dunno.

as to the midterms point i think morbs is being typically cantankerous but basically otm against the notion that there's some big disappointing mystery about progressives' failure to show the same love to tepid centrists in midterms (which they tend to spend running away from anything really exciting going on, see so many dems after obamacare passed!) that they do to a big bold socialist yelling himself hoarse about income inequality and taxing the rich to pay for social services. there are certainly arguments offered, often, why they "should" get out and vote for those people anyway, and i'm sympathetic to some of them, but if the question is why they're not inspired to do so, i do think morbs may offer a piece of the puzzle.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:38 (eight years ago) link

xpost to marcos

yeah, what i'm talking about is the indictment side of it, and the affect it would have on the democratic primaries. i have no idea if an indictment is likely or not. it seems pretty clear that she knowingly set up a private server and unwittingly exposed classified material for at least a month because they didn't think to encrypt it properly. i don't think it was nefarious, it's just part and parcel with the disregard and lack of understanding of information security that's common throughout the government. but i don't know how the FBI would react to it - i don't know if it amounts to something that she MUST be indicted for. and i don't know what kind of influence the obama administration would play in that decision. the whole reason i raised it is just that it's an example of something unexpected that could happen in the next month or two that would significantly impact the race, as another reason that bernie shouldn't quit until it actually IS impossible for him to win.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:39 (eight years ago) link

With Wisconsin results the season is entering a new phase of Trump slippage

Do not want to vicualize Trump slippage, thanks.

My Whole Existence Is Flan (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:39 (eight years ago) link

it would be cool if the new thread had a title that didn't result in the word Douché at the top of my phone as i catch up on this thread on crowded trains

― Karl Malone, Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:33 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Bern After Reading

― human life won't become a cat (man alive), Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:36 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

No takers? Ok how about "J'accuse Ted Cruz"

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:41 (eight years ago) link

the notion that there's some big disappointing mystery about progressives' failure to show the same love to tepid centrists in midterms

i think you've misread the glenn greenwald comment but i don't feel like scrolling up to revisit it. i think this is dumb as hell tho. besides the fact that political participation is strategic and not a demonstration of personal values, the system is set up so that you can run and vote for whomever you want. if there's a real leftist movement in this country, let them find candidates they love and support them and change the system. the whining that the democratic party is not appealing enough is dumbshit nonsense.

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:41 (eight years ago) link

this idea that leftists don't show up to vote at midterms because they aren't inspired enough is just lazy leftists letting themselves off the hook.

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:43 (eight years ago) link

Doctor Casino and Morbs otm re: midterms.

Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:44 (eight years ago) link

Mordy, that discontent with the part that you call "whining" is exactly what has propelled the most successful leftish presdiential candidate in modern memory, whereas what you're advocating is essentially Clinton's line throughout her career.

Whether the system is really "set up so that you can run and vote for whomever you want" is a whole other ball of wax.

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:45 (eight years ago) link

yeah, really otm. "i won't vote until the democratic party spontaneously starts running candidates i like more" is definitely the way to change politics. it's a good thing the republican side feels the same way otherwise i might be worried that they'll capture legislative bodies and governorships throughout the country. xp

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:46 (eight years ago) link

my political participation ended with OWS as i have slowly going broke from illness to deal with, but thx M.

and it's all over btw, nothing to be done

i am a Beckettian.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:46 (eight years ago) link

and yes, the 'sexiness' of presidential races certainly factors into it. as must voter suppression efforts and the comparative ease of voting for the affluent etc. like, all the factors that obtain in every election which favor republicans, which we hashed out with some charts and stuff a little while back, apply in midterm elections but without the enthusiasm push that comes from the sense of a major event, a manichean choice of direction, a contest between a couple of symbolic individuals. yeah that stuff is dumb but it probably HELPS progressive turnout in the presidential years more than it can be said to hurt it in the non-presidential years.

people are meeting at bernie rallies, they're adding each other on facebook. a minority are volunteering, forming groups, canvassing neighborhoods, exhorting friends to come to events. some number of those are likely to continue in those efforts after this election. they will form other groups, start other campaigns - or when they hear about other campaigns, they will have many more people at their fingertips that they can try to draw to come along with them. this will obviously not be most of the subset of sanders supporters who got 'involved' in the first place, but it will not be zero and this will matter. but this too is a non-sexy, low-level kind of process. so basically, sanders-as-presidential-candidate is enabling the boring low-level stuff that some complain the focus on sanders-as-presidential-candidate somehow prevents or blocks. so now who's putting too much emphasis on the symbolism of the quadrennial contest versus the "day to day" stuff? "boy, i sure wish sanders would do more to help the diffusion of progressivism! like for example, he could stop appearing on TV or at giant rallies promoting progressivism! if only they'd put me in charge!"

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:46 (eight years ago) link

for whoever said that people aren't energized by downticket races b/c moderates: there are plenty of genuine progressives in downticket races! in wisconsin there are a whole bunch!

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:47 (eight years ago) link

except no one said he should stop appearing on TV or promoting progressivism so you're just arguing with yourself xp

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:48 (eight years ago) link

political participation is strategic and not a demonstration of personal values

too bad average ordinary folk who vote tend not to think so. Most ppl who do have stopped voting.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:48 (eight years ago) link

what we need is a sexy bernie sanders

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:48 (eight years ago) link

I'm already planning to capitalize on the excitement with my Feel the BERN Xtreme Skate, Punk, Circus Sideshow and Midterm Voter Registration Festival Tour

human life won't become a cat (man alive), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:49 (eight years ago) link

yes correct - Americans have the lowest participation numbers of iirc pretty much every other Western democracy? probably bc we're so exceptionally infatuated with individualism that americans believe "well my vote doesn't make the difference" is a good reason not to go to the polls. xxp

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:49 (eight years ago) link

i think you've misread the glenn greenwald comment but i don't feel like scrolling up to revisit it.

here's the relevant posts again since yeah it was almost two hours ago. i have many differences with morbz but i don't think his posts need to be totally mischaracterized in order to disagree with him every time.

i think b) is better. but there's an assumption built into it, which is that keeping his campaign alive helps to build support for progressive ideas. by inspiring a lot of people who weren't previously engaged in politics or aren't satisfied with going with someone like hillary clinton for president, he's helping to inspire a lot of young people to get involved in local/state elections. no, not many - most will just vote in the primary or in november, and then completely forget about everything until 2020, again. but some people nonetheless will get inspired and become active that would not have been otherwise. for example, most people here have known all about single payer healthcare for decades or more, but you should remember that there are tons of college kids who were either too young or too politically disengaged to really pay attention to that short-lived debate during its most recent turn in the spotlight in 2009/2010. so having a democratic socialist in the news everyday to popularize these ideas (and trounce hillary in some states, on top of that) is inherently valuable to the future of progressive politics.

― Karl Malone, Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:09 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

KM otm

re trouncing (explain it's all a mirage, we've heard that-- the OPTICS are good)

‏@ggreenwald
Last 7 states:

ID- Sanders 78%
UT- Sanders 79.3%
AZ- HRC 56.5%
AK- Sanders 81.6%
HI- Sanders 68.8%
WA- Sanders 72.7%
WI- Sanders 56.5%

― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, April 6, 2016 1:17 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:49 (eight years ago) link

what we need is a sexy bernie sanders

oh yeah....

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1586639544/Screen_Shot_2011-10-13_at_11.43.30_AM_400x400.png

wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:50 (eight years ago) link

oooooh yeaaah

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:51 (eight years ago) link

Karl, make us a new thread, plz. ty.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:51 (eight years ago) link

DC - either way, he quoted approvingly of a post that showed that the left is resurgent + "trouncing" in the last batch of states only like an hour before asking what left. now he has clarified that what that means is the democratic party has not stirred his loins enough to make it worth the trouble voting during off-years.

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:52 (eight years ago) link

These long paragraphs are breaking my monitors.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:52 (eight years ago) link

i vote, fucker, and ive always lived in ultrasafe Dem districts

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:53 (eight years ago) link

also DC: "boy, i sure wish sanders would do more to help the diffusion of progressivism! like for example, he could stop appearing on TV or at giant rallies promoting progressivism! start endorsing down ticket candidates and making public calls for his supporters to get involved with their local politics." you don't need to strawman your opponents and doing so gives me the impression that you actually are sensitive to this critique.

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:54 (eight years ago) link

yes correct - Americans have the lowest participation numbers of iirc pretty much every other Western democracy? probably bc we're so exceptionally infatuated with individualism that americans believe "well my vote doesn't make the difference" is a good reason not to go to the polls. xxp

― Mordy, Wednesday, April 6, 2016 2:49 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

it also seems super hard to vote. what with some state laws that make it difficult for some people to participate in the electoral process (Florida iirc). also i had friends waiting 2 hours at poll stations in pennsylvania, here in the second metropolis of Canada it rarely takes me more than 10 minutes. in France, the electoral day is a national holiday. Australia has a mandatory voting system, etc. I just think the problem happens to do more with infrastructure than the culture of the american people.

Van Horn Street, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:55 (eight years ago) link

i think infrastructure is a problem too! but the only way to fix that is to vote!

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:56 (eight years ago) link

man spoke for a lotta ppl

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIraCchPDhk

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:57 (eight years ago) link

oh my god listen to what george carlin says. he doesn't complain about politicians. TAKE A NOTE.

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:58 (eight years ago) link

(great carlin clip tho. if only you were even a tenth as insightful)

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 18:59 (eight years ago) link

what value are you adding through repeatedly telling morbs your opinion of him, mordy?

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:03 (eight years ago) link

i'm not sure venting is a value but it sure it fun

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:04 (eight years ago) link

yes Americans are morons, i wonder if youve ever heard me echo that

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:05 (eight years ago) link

no worries i def think you've echoed the idea that Americans are morons

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:05 (eight years ago) link

Karl, make us a new thread, plz. ty.

i would like to, but cannot. my pun game is very, very weak.

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:06 (eight years ago) link

mordy i have no idea what you're arguing really, unless you just want to repeat the canard that progressives like "whining" (and not "organizing" or whatever the fuck you want them to be doing while you're out supporting center-right democrats like clinton). "it's a free country, you should nominate some people you like" is a fine enough point, i guess, but the subject under discussion is narrower: is "the candidates on the ballot in november don't look much like leftists" possibly a factor? i also brought up the various economic and practical obstacles to voting but you don't seem very interested in that explanation either. it's all just whiny, lazy leftists to you.

all of this of course is argument about a future that hasn't happened yet. we can make some pretty good guesses about how the 2018 midterms might go, but in the context of arguing about what the effects of sanders's candidacy, the organizing it spawns, and his own future activity will be, it becomes a bit circular. i could say, perhaps sanders's campaign will lay groundwork for a better progressive performance in 2018 than we've seen in the past, as candidates see how well bernie did and model themselves on him, crowdfund themselves hardcore, press his message, get bernie to show up for the rallies, promise to throw the bums out and fight stridently for income equality etc. "oh no, progressives won't show up for midterms, because progressives don't show up for midterms."

re: people wanting sanders to drop out - it's not a strawman! that has been explicitly advocated in this thread by shakey, two days ago, and followed up with in his post today to the effect that, in aimless's gloss (endorsed by shakey) "his campaign for the presidency is foolishly prioritizing his campaign for the presidency." you're trying to substitute in a milder business of endorsing downticket candidates and so on (which we should acknowledge is at least something of a mine-field, assuming they even want the endorsement given the unsettled race) for the much stronger claim - sanders would do more good by either quitting or giving up the pretense of running to win - that actually provoked the discussion.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:07 (eight years ago) link

You guys do realize that it is exactly because Americans are morons that I have to danesplain everything?

(sorry)

Frederik B, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:08 (eight years ago) link

the other day i thought of the thread name "Brokered Asshole Convention; National LOLfest" but it's kinda more for the period after the last primaries maybe, also people don't like swears in the thread titles and maybe dislike circa 2000 indie rock even more

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:09 (eight years ago) link

Shakey/Mordy: Let's Gabbneb-leap to 2018

Could we just have Karl & Doc C co-anchor prez threads? they're among the few sane civil smart posters in 'em.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:10 (eight years ago) link

DC I understand your optimism. I even remember you saying that you anticipate Bernie in 2 years heading a kind of national movement (which I'm very skeptical about). And you're right - we have no idea what his campaign will augur until it does. I'm just saying that right here right now I see a lot of enthusiasm for Bernie and not a lot of enthusiasm for the movement at large and I am concerned that this will have real consequences this year and the idea that "oh, we don't know, maybe it'll be better 2 years from now," strikes me as a lot of wishful thinking. maybe you're right and bernie is running everything perfectly and it's all going to turn out great. or maybe there are things he could that he isn't that would be productive + valuable. but i don't think you're in a space to hear the latter, and it's telling that anyone who makes that case you write-off as a hillary supporter. like you have no fucking idea. it's just coasting on a good feeling.

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:10 (eight years ago) link

maybe you're right and bernie is running everything perfectly

Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the bern.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:12 (eight years ago) link

i guess it's pretty pertinent to point out (as i think karl did earlier) that obama failed miserably at organizing the kind of long-term progressive coalition that some of his biggest fans on this board are demanding bernie create

k3vin k., Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:18 (eight years ago) link

And Obama won the presidency.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:21 (eight years ago) link

You guys do realize that it is exactly because Americans are morons that I have to danesplain everything?

(sorry)

that's probably going to get lost in the thread, esp since a new one will show up in a minute anyway, but for the record stfu man

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:21 (eight years ago) link

well it helps to have a leader who isn't risible when he claims to be progressive

xxp

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:22 (eight years ago) link

It is the Dems' fault they never took Dean seriously as candidate and DC chair. The disappointment's even made him a Clinton supporter.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:24 (eight years ago) link

there are absolutely things he could do differently that i think would be productive and valuable. i have made a number of critical remarks about sanders on these threads! i just think, as i've said repeatedly, that clinton supporters advocating for sanders to do this or that in order to supposedly better serve his progressive agenda, is classic concern-trolling. i would accept it, maybe, with heavy caveats like "i am actually a hardcore leftist and my heart is with sanders but i am supporting clinton only for narrow tactical reasons about which we might politely disagree." the proliferation of "sanders should do X" stuff online, from people who have never wanted sanders or his message to get anywhere in the first place, is dumb and irritating. i should be clearer about not lumping all posters here into that group, yes.

as to the enthusiasm/midterm point - yeah it's an uncertain future. i still don't know what's so implausible about a progressive congressional candidate in 2018 getting sanders to show up for a rally to boost turnout/enthusiasm, but that's only one possible way he could make a difference. shakey brought up the things howard dean did within the party (after the primaries were over) that may have made a difference in the long term. perhaps sanders will follow such a path (if the party lets him). or some other one. who knows? i guess more generally i don't really get how you disentangle "enthusiasm for Bernie" from "enthusiasm for the movement at large" to the point where you can say confidently that the latter is not to be found. the enthusiasm for bernie is there because people are fucking stoked to hear somebody saying this shit, and they agree with him! that's... good for the movement, right? or maybe there's a conflation here between enthusiasm and nuts-and-bolts organizing and downticket fundraising, where when you say enthusiasm for bernie i think of people showing up for rallies, sharing shit on facebook, winning over skittish friends and family members who agree in principle but are worried about x y and z.... but where you say enthusiasm for the movement at large i think you're talking about all the downticket organizing stuff. i don't think one excludes the other and while yeah sanders might do more to push that stuff, is he really doing it any harm by providing a powerful national symbol that progressivism is not a 4% fringe idea but a huge, potentially election-winning bloc?

tbh i also haven't followed his activities close enough to say that he HASN'T been doing any downticket stuff. don't local figures (candidates, activist leaders) appear at his rallies and get to speak (in front of gigantic crowds)? i honestly am not sure. i do know that he's spent a lot of donation money giving huge props and national attention to erica garner's activism, and that of exploited farmers, in those two really beautiful (imho) short-film advertisements. i am going to go out on a limb and say they probably spent more on those than on billboards in san francisco (though i dunno, it's an expensive city). this and the fact that he pays his interns are my basic justification for giving the guy donations - isn't that a pretty direct channeling of "bernie enthusiasm" (donor money, people's likelihood to click 'share' because the video came from their hero bernie) to other progressive movements and organizing activities?

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:25 (eight years ago) link

also re: co-anchoring, i endorse karl malone but i am not ready for prime-time, unless i can be that weather guy who speaks only in tribe called quest lyrics.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:28 (eight years ago) link

just have a blazer on.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:28 (eight years ago) link

And write shorter paragraphs.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:29 (eight years ago) link

yeah, i guess i don't see the sharing and big reddit threads as indicative of any kind of enthusiasm that translates into real political change. it seems more like feel good stuff to me where what i would like to see is what you call the nuts-and-bolts organizational and downticket fundraising stuff. my state has suffered under republican leadership, and i know that other states have had it much worse. so when you ask me what's more important - the good feelings + enthusiasm of the bernie campaign (which admittedly i am less optimistic about their chances of winning than other ppl) or getting toomey thrown out of office - for me it's the latter every time. if it looked like bernie was directing his young supporters into these other races it would honestly make me feel a lot better. i don't want us to get to november and toomey is winning bc well we had our focus on a campaign that ended up not coming through and then we have what? literally nothing to show for all that enthusiasm and all those facebook shares. nb i am an undecided voter who sees strong arguments for both dem candidates. i am not concern trolling - i am concerned.

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:33 (eight years ago) link

okay, so fair enough. i think it comes off as concern trolling because in general you're much more supportive of clinton than most posters here (which, you're right, i should not assume makes you a clinton supporter as such), and because you seem so down on sanders even having the capacity to do any of the things it's hypothesized that he might do, so the 'advice' seems somehow less sincere. but i can relate to being concerned and worried about the prospects of things. if it comes around to november and sanders is not doing anything with his massive support base to help then maybe we can reopen this conversation.

it's a tricky one too for all the reasons that someone skeptical of sanders in the first place might point out: is it better to back a fetterman, whose politics are right on, but risk losing by a hair or more against this total asshole incumbent who will otherwise become a permanent fixture? or back a middle-of-the-road democrat that has less in common with the sanders movement (and thus inspires less roaring enthusiasm) for the sake of just getting toomey gone? (then there are lots of x factors: what if fetterman sucks as a candidate? what if his look and feel end up turning off a lot of people that agree with his message?) this is stuff that's really easy for me to say in the abstract - go left, be bold, don't look back - but not so easy for me to impose on people living in pennyslvania. also part of what i mean about it being a minefield for sanders to get into the habit of endorsing every progressive candidate for everything, or in general for people who haven't secured their own nominations to go around hitching their wagons together with unknowns - - - some of them might turn out to be raving uninformed campus liberals, some might have horrible skeletons in their closet ("BREAKING: SANDERS PAL IS PORNO KING"), god knows. i know this sounds like me arguing for the 'safe' and personally/visually normative centrist. but we're having a conversation about strategy/tactics (what's the most useful thing for sanders to do with limited money and limited hours in a day), and these things probably do enter into it.

(in the interest of reassuring you, separate from sanders: i think people will be pretty motivated by the presence of a trump/cruz at the top of the ticket to come out and vote blue all the way down. impossible to predict this far out but if the unappealingness of the republican nominee makes this even a baby-sized 'wave' election, then toomey - who didn't win by a huge margin in 2010 and has horrible approval ratings - would need a heck of an incumbency effect to keep his seat imo.)

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:45 (eight years ago) link

welp, i can't think of anything, so here we go:

Conventional Mealy Mouths: The 2016 Primary Voting Thread, Part 5

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:47 (eight years ago) link

no it's not funny and it's a terrible name but fuck man, i'm at work

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:48 (eight years ago) link

as for 'feel good stuff' and facebook - well, i dunno. i refer to facebook, not reddit, because i am thinking of a very person-to-person kind of thing (also i have never used reddit and don't really understand it) so my model are things like my best friend going to sanders's campaign-video shoot last week in brooklyn, and sharing stuff and then catching her sisters at dinner and having a long long conversation about sanders (re: their agreement with his policies vs. their pre-existing desire to support clinton for 'historic'/female president reasons) and maybe winning one or two of them over. that's anecdotal, and it's tiny by itself, but those are real effects. given that they are her sisters it's likely this conversation would have happened without facebook (actually i may even be screwing up the order of events), but i'm just saying, it's that kind of communication that leads me to invoke facebook - - - not talking about hiveminds of bernie die-hards unknown to each other, echo-chambering their tiny world and excorciating their perceived enemies/conspiracies/whatever. though i'm sure that goes on, based on my sweaty and ill-smelling stereotype of reddit.

anyway my point is that where you're seeing "good feelings" i'm seeing a commitment to spread the word, to persuade, to fight on. it's hard for me to entirely grasp tbh because i'm still kinda cynical and inactive and old and sure, lazy i guess. this friend though, she seems really lit up, like she's been waiting without realizing it forever to hear candidates talk about stuff like this, and she's getting in touch with people doing multi-lingual voter organizing and shit. i can't assume right this second that she's going to pack all of that in once bernie quits, or that the voter organizing and registration and stuff won't end up mattering in november even if she does. i would also refer you to my post above concerning possible knock-on effects of just people staying involved and organized and getting their friends to turn up when there's a rally for the minimum wage next march or whenever. it mighta got buried in a longer post; sorry for paragraph rockin'.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:54 (eight years ago) link

oh oops. well, farewell old thread. we still have il douché and we certainly still have discontent. but it's been a good one.

never ending bath infusion (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:54 (eight years ago) link

Thread sucked

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 20:15 (eight years ago) link

the new thread has close-ups of mouths, you should check it out d

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 6 April 2016 20:21 (eight years ago) link

I've been in and I like the look of it already, good work imo I've not felt this optimistic about a change in US politics since Bernie sanders ran for the Dems in 2016

Ecomigrant gnomics (darraghmac), Wednesday, 6 April 2016 20:24 (eight years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.