Astonishing X-Men C/D

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
OH MY, THE COSTUMES.

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:09 (twenty years ago) link

The rationale seems sound, at least.

Oh, and the art is stunning.

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:10 (twenty years ago) link

Cassaday is unstoppable. Not convinced about the writer.

Josh Davis (josh_anomaly), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:30 (twenty years ago) link

I found it amusing, the Buffyhumor is there. It's automatically going to be a let-down after Morrison, but I'm really going to try to take it for what it is.

Looks like we're in for plenty of Scott coming to terms with his boring-ass self and Logan playing surly comic relief though, *sigh*.

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:41 (twenty years ago) link

read first five pages online and cringed

tom west (thomp), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:35 (twenty years ago) link

also: GODAWFUL COVERS

tom west (thomp), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:35 (twenty years ago) link

I haven't seen the "special" cover (I hate that shit anyway), but I have no problems with the look-Wolverine's-claws-are-iconic one.

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:52 (twenty years ago) link

Is that the OLD SCHOOL Wolverine uni (circa Hulk #180!) I spy on Logan's face?

I'm geeked simply for more Cassaday goodness - as long as Whedon doesn't have the same issues w/ coherence and plausability other X-franchise writers seem to have nowadays, I'm in (once I get some cash money, that is).

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 27 May 2004 16:08 (twenty years ago) link

does anyone have pictures of these costumes? i want to see these costumes

tom west (thomp), Thursday, 27 May 2004 18:01 (twenty years ago) link

The script is same old same old but Cassaday is a beautiful artist. X-men doesn't deserve him...

David Nolan (David N.), Thursday, 27 May 2004 20:59 (twenty years ago) link

I'm a huge Whedon fan, but I'm not convinced.

J (Jay), Wednesday, 2 June 2004 01:00 (twenty years ago) link

I can't get past the fact that Cyclops is wearing a giant black condom.

Vic Fluro, Wednesday, 2 June 2004 09:24 (twenty years ago) link

I MUST SEE PICTURES OF THESE COSTUMES

tom west (thomp), Wednesday, 2 June 2004 18:52 (twenty years ago) link

and there's not a comic book in miles so don't even say it

tom west (thomp), Wednesday, 2 June 2004 18:52 (twenty years ago) link

comic book SHOP, oops. as you were

tom west (thomp), Wednesday, 2 June 2004 18:52 (twenty years ago) link

Who is the team, anyway? (I suppose I should check marvel.com). I won't make it to the comic shop for at least another week, probably two; I bought friends a subscription since they're on a waiting-to-hear-about-a-job-might-have-to-move-on-short-notice budget, but they don't live here, so I can't borrow it from them.

I would've been happy never seeing Cyclops again, honestly.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 3 June 2004 21:39 (twenty years ago) link

Team = White Queen, Cyclops, Wolverine, Kitty Pryde (Code Name To Be Chosen?), Beast.

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 3 June 2004 21:58 (twenty years ago) link

When will Beast turn it Breast? Or at the very least into Beats?

Lazer Guided Mellow Leee (Leee), Thursday, 3 June 2004 22:01 (twenty years ago) link

Hm. Okay, that's a pretty cool mix, even with Cyclops in there (maybe having the White Queen and Wolverine in the mix justifies Cyclops being around, I can live with that; I just picture a Whedon-written Cyclops being played by Riley, which makes me unhappy until I picture Riclops being eaten by Wolverlorne, and then it's all gravy. By "all," I mean "Scott Summers.")

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 3 June 2004 22:47 (twenty years ago) link

Tep, did you read any of Morrison's New X-Men run? He totally validated Cyclops' existance!

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 3 June 2004 23:36 (twenty years ago) link

A couple of em, but not many, I admit. Can you validate him without changing him completely? I actually liked him best during INFERNO, of all things.

Still, Morrison is good at pulling that kind of rabbit out of the hat. I'm going to pick up the TPBs at some point soon.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 3 June 2004 23:37 (twenty years ago) link

Actually, the entire "I love Jean now" thing is really making Scott interesting again (plus it finally ties together the disparate threads of his comic book portrayal from as far back as the introduction of Maddie Pryor vis a vis his "I love you when you are right in front of my face as long as your name isn't Jean Grey" tendencies).

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 4 June 2004 00:40 (twenty years ago) link

Morrison really handled the fact that Scott is basically a complete mental case well. Without compromising his heroism.

didn't he list Cyclops as one of his ten favourite superheroes in the Face last year? I think - somebody correct me if I'm wrong - that the Flash was No.1.

David Nolan (David N.), Friday, 4 June 2004 23:23 (twenty years ago) link

(Er, I meant "Emma" but everyone knew that.)

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 5 June 2004 11:45 (twenty years ago) link

Wait, I didn't! Where did you mean Emma?

Tep (ktepi), Saturday, 5 June 2004 12:10 (twenty years ago) link

"I love Emma now"

Jordan (Jordan), Saturday, 5 June 2004 14:27 (twenty years ago) link

I was about to say, Dan!

David R. (popshots75`), Saturday, 5 June 2004 16:01 (twenty years ago) link

That is a classic Whedon design on the villain. (Is it anyone we've seen before?)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 5 June 2004 23:04 (twenty years ago) link

Finally picked this up, although I still haven't had a chance to get to the comic store (we haven't been home on weekends, and The Girl is in intensive language classes all summer). CCCCCClassic. Y'all are right; Cyclops actually has a lot of potential to be interesting now.

I'm a little befuddled by him and Emma being a couple, and don't know when Jean died this time, but let me guess, that's another reason for me to get the Morrison trades?

Kitty looks a little weird, but the quasi-flashback touches with her were nice. And all in all, this is a well-chosen team.

Tep (ktepi), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 21:42 (twenty years ago) link

(Oh: also picked up #1 of Claremont's new Excalibur, which -- despite liking the original, and liking his FF, and having given his post-Twelve run on X-Men a shot even though it sucked that elephant thing hardcore -- I hated instantly. He has Xavier talking like Wolverine, sans "bub." Has the man completely lost his ability to differentiate dialogue?)

Tep (ktepi), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 21:43 (twenty years ago) link

This really was surprisingly good. My main gripe is that I'm not at all interested in the relationships between these characters aside from Scott and Emma. (Kitty should be made to interact with the former New Mutants.)

John Cassaday is a god.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 22:18 (twenty years ago) link

GET THE MORRISON TRADES YESTERDAY ALREADY, TEP! ALL OF THEM! TWICE! (Don't mind the lack of consistent art when Frank Quitely's not drawring.)

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 22:20 (twenty years ago) link

I was just sick of mutants when Morrison came on, I figured they'd be good -- but Marvel'd just started putting EVERYTHING in trades, so I knew I could catch up.

Which I'll do soon, then.

Dan, you aren't interested in seeing what Kitty and Wolverine are like now that she's not a kid? I figure that's potentially cool in a Faith-and-Wesley-if-they-were-the-other-way-around way.

Tep (ktepi), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 22:46 (twenty years ago) link

I am completely uninterested in the Kitty/Logan relationship. We've already seen that go through about as many interesting permutations as I can think of over the past what, 25 years? Surely we can give it a rest, particularly since there about 8,000,000,000 other mutants in the X-Universe to read about.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 16 June 2004 01:57 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, but it's Joss! We've seen it referenced/rehashed, but rarely when both (or either) character was well-written. (Granted, I don't know yet how good a job he'll do with Logan, who's pretty far outside his writing comfort zone. But I trust him to do well with Kitty.)

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 16 June 2004 02:11 (twenty years ago) link

FYI, here are all the titles (ongoing or limited) currently on the Marvel slate (or upcoming) that involve X-related characters in the regular continuity stream:

- Astonishing X-Men
- New X-Men
- Uncanny X-Men
- X-Men
- Excalibur
- District X
- Weapon X
- Mystique
- Cable / Deadpool
- Wolverine
- Emma Frost
- Rogue
- Nightcrawler
- MadroX
- Jubilee(!!!)

...and I know I missed a mini or 12.

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 16 June 2004 02:56 (twenty years ago) link

District X is surprisingly good, if you like cops and mutant ghettos. I especially like that it focuses on the mutants whose mutations don't happen to be fabulous superpowers, just weird shit that makes their lives tougher in more than a "oh, the boys at school are afraid of me because I have super strength" way.

I'm still reading Rucka's Wolverine but it's really pretty boring. Is there really going to be a Rogue book? I know there's a Gambit one coming up, but I hadn't heard about that.

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 16 June 2004 03:44 (twenty years ago) link

Oh! And I forgot:

- NYX
- Starjammers
- X-Force
- and, yeah, Gambit

WE WANT LOCKHEED DAMMIT! (Also, I feel for Paul O'Brien, unless Marvel continues their spotty release schedule.)

Here's a rundown from Wizard World Philadelphia.

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 16 June 2004 11:23 (twenty years ago) link

MADROX?????

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 16 June 2004 11:24 (twenty years ago) link

(Also Tep, remember that I'm not really into Buffy, ergo Joss himself is not automatically a huge draw for me.)

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 16 June 2004 11:25 (twenty years ago) link

YES MADROX

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 16 June 2004 11:28 (twenty years ago) link

Damn, that actually sounds interesting (particularly since I skipped PAD-Factor and therefore missed the Jamie/Guide/Rahne show the first time around).

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 16 June 2004 13:56 (twenty years ago) link

PAD-Factor is choice stuff; of course, it's not collected.

One reason I kinda frown on Fabian Nicienza - for whatever reason, a scene from PAD's X-Factor (involving a jar of mayo and a bunch of dialogue) was redone in a Gus Van Sant-does-Psycho type way for an X-Factor annual FN wrote. There might've been some significance for that move/homage (aside from editors getting distracted by boobies), but I dunno what.

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 16 June 2004 14:00 (twenty years ago) link

I remember that mayonnaise! What ever happened to the "big guy" character?

I seem to remember PAD leaving X-Factor without warning, and I was a little miffed. Great artist, tho'. Who was that?

Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Thursday, 17 June 2004 00:51 (twenty years ago) link

Larry Stroman

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 17 June 2004 01:05 (twenty years ago) link

Also, Joe Quesada penciled the last few issues of PAD's run (as well as that Annual I alluded to in my last post). Jae Lee drew a few issues as well. I think he (PAD) jumped ship right after the X-Cution Agenda (circa X-Factor #90).

Strong Guy (AKA Guido, or Guide, if you're Venga) is gonna be part of the MadroX series, I think!

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 17 June 2004 01:30 (twenty years ago) link

Man, I might actually pick up Madrox. I only vaguely remember PAD's X-Factor (although I remember Guido -- Lila Cheney's bouncer/roadie/something, right?), but I dug the character way back in Fallen Angels.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 17 June 2004 03:09 (twenty years ago) link

Rucka's Wolverine is pretty boring, though what I've read of the Naturalist Native storyline is a lot better.

Leeefuse 73 (Leee), Thursday, 17 June 2004 20:23 (twenty years ago) link

Am I right in thinking that the current lineup is five of the most experienced X-Men?

I couldn't find the thread where someone said tht Beast was getting dumber again, but I thought that was just a part of the nano-mite nonsense/Cassandra Nova messing with his mind. The last few pages of #2 seem to show him still pretty smart.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 1 July 2004 08:39 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, you're right Andrew re: the nanomite / Nova thing. My bad.

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 1 July 2004 11:29 (twenty years ago) link

The one-page fight vs the soldiers was one of the best examples of "we = a team of experienced fighters, you = fucked" I've seen in a long time. It also matches Whedon's patterns from Buffy: they are ridiculously strong, but there's always someone who's ridiculously stronger.

I did wonder about the panel where Kitty seemed to be halfway through the floor and also knocking someone over - I thought it was one or the other. NB: I know next to nothing about her.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 1 July 2004 12:06 (twenty years ago) link

She can definitely phase parts of her body. She rocks.

I'm actually somewhat conflicted because I've REALLY enjoyed the first two issues, yet I still have "WAAAH WAAAH I've seen all of these stories/dynamics except for Emma/Scott and Emma/Kitty" issues. I wish they'd thrown in some more characters to conflict directly with Emma (like Iceman or any of the New Mutants).

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 1 July 2004 12:26 (twenty years ago) link

Man, if they bring in the New Mutants to interact w/ Emma, then I'm gonna go "WAAAH WAAAH I've already seen the Emma / Hellions // Emma / Stepford Cuckoos dynamic", and then no one's gonna be happy.

Has anyone been reading the new Claremont issues? I've heard good / semi-decent things about them (from the X-Axis, no less!), but I'm skeptical (esp. w/ what's happening in _Excalibur_).

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 1 July 2004 12:37 (twenty years ago) link

Excalibur I hate, and I'm a fan of Claremont when he's good -- the first issue was one of the most poorly written comics I've read in a few years; Uncanny, though, my comic shop guy tells me is good, and he's going to put the next issue of it in my pull list. I'll let you know what I think, I'm picking up comics on Saturday before Spidey 2.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 1 July 2004 12:46 (twenty years ago) link

I was actually going to make an (ill-advised) trip to my non-local store for some recent back issue luv and perhaps a li'l FCBD luv, so I might splurge on the UnXM.

BTW, speaking of the 139 X-books Marvel offers, District X (AKA Bishop in NYPD Blue) is is on the happy side of Pretty Damn Good.

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 1 July 2004 12:52 (twenty years ago) link

I think there's some mileage to be run out of "how do interact with you as an equal and an ally after you spent most of my adolescence trying to control my brane?" but I do acknowledge that it's mostly the Kitty/Emma interaction cranked up to 11. I'd also like to see some "you were the wunderkind when we were kids but now we're equals and WOW isn't this tense?" interaction between, say, Dani or Roberto and Kitty (I think she always got along with the others, more or less).

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 1 July 2004 12:58 (twenty years ago) link

one month passes...
Given that I never liked Buffy and have issues wrt the X-Men I am stunned by how enjoyable this is. God bless you .cbr formats.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 31 August 2004 22:45 (twenty years ago) link

five months pass...
Whedon/Casadady run extended to 36 issues.

"Astonishing X-Men" writer Joss Whedon and the stars of the upcoming film "Serenity" assembled at WonderCon in San Francisco earlier today. In addition to a lot of "Serentity" news, a full write-up of which will be included a bit later today, Whedon announced that he and artist John Cassaday would be continuing their run on Marvel's premiere mutant title for an additional 24 issues. The duo would produce twelve issues, followed by a short break, and then get back to the title with an additional twelve issues. No word on whether the title would simply take a break or if fill-in creative teams would participate.

Tep (ktepi), Sunday, 20 February 2005 00:04 (nineteen years ago) link

Actually, it looks like the "additional" there isn't right -- it'll be 24 total, not 36, according to everywhere else.

Tep (ktepi), Sunday, 20 February 2005 21:29 (nineteen years ago) link

six months pass...
So, someone explain me the Hellfire Club, as apparently I'm supposed to care about them.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 5 September 2005 06:20 (nineteen years ago) link

One of them has really bushy side-burns, and there are these chicks who wear bodices.

jel -- (jel), Monday, 5 September 2005 15:43 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm more than a little annoyed that Whedon's making Emma into a villain again, if he is. Or even if he's doing something when she's only pretending to be a villain. It's so... dull.

The Hellfire Club should brought back, because they're all sideburns, bodices and victorian porn. But there's much more mileage in an all-new White Queen who's younger than Emma and can squeeze into a tighter corset, because that would be Emma's WORST NIGHTMARE.

Vic Fluro, Monday, 5 September 2005 16:11 (nineteen years ago) link

If the idea is that first appearance = best appearance then I look forward to Wolverine becoming some doofus in a yellow hat and a painted-on tache who fights the Hulk occasionally.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 5 September 2005 16:14 (nineteen years ago) link

When you were a kid = best appearance, so it's Claremont all the way. I'm assuming Whedon thought Evil Emma was so good that dialing her back makes more sense than keeping the crossover-tastic New Good Emma. Still, benefit of the doubt - it's more likely to be "YOU are the traitor as well Cyclops YOU????" "HA HA, yes!!! Except no!! Nobody is a traitor except a traitor TO EVIL for we are all good!" "PHEW now the FITE."

Vic Fluro, Monday, 5 September 2005 16:58 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh, she's not going to be a villain. It's totally obvious where this is going - she was put in the X-Men to infiltrate/destroy from within, but she realizes that she really loves being an X-Man, the secret gets out, and she has to prove herself and earn the X-Men's trust all over again even though she is the HEADMISTRESS OF THE SCHOOL.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 5 September 2005 17:10 (nineteen years ago) link

Please remember that this is Joss Whedon and his favorite character arc is clearly "villain who reforms but is haunted by their dark past."

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 5 September 2005 17:13 (nineteen years ago) link

I liked the Hellfire Club circa the time of Nimrod! What happened to Nimrod?

jel -- (jel), Monday, 5 September 2005 17:38 (nineteen years ago) link

He fused with Master Mold and became...BASTION!, who was responsible for the awful Operation Zero Tolerance and got his ass handed to him by Iceman.
Don't know where he is these days.

Amadeo (Amadeo G.), Monday, 5 September 2005 17:51 (nineteen years ago) link

Bastion is so silly, cos you had suspend a huge amount of disbelief to buy that a pink-skinned guy with flashing eyes could become the leader of a prominent anti-mutant movement.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 5 September 2005 18:14 (nineteen years ago) link

Maybe Emma is consumed by her own power but rescued by WUV.

Vic Fluro, Monday, 5 September 2005 18:24 (nineteen years ago) link

I think he's doing the Lilah Morgan thing with Emma, but Emma probably won't end up getting chopped up by Scott Summers in the end.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 5 September 2005 19:03 (nineteen years ago) link

This thing of which you speak is beyond me. You'll have to break it down for non-Buffy watchers.

Vic Fluro, Monday, 5 September 2005 19:46 (nineteen years ago) link

That's from Angel. Which is the better of the two shows, if you ask me. Lilah Morgan is pretty much the Buffyverse's answer to Emma Frost.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 5 September 2005 20:54 (nineteen years ago) link

What he did to Lilah still pisses me off, which is silly because it's only a show. And if he is going the same route with Emma (who is my favorite character), I will be very disappointed.


O'so Krispie (Ex Leon), Monday, 5 September 2005 23:50 (nineteen years ago) link

What do you mean? The fact that she was killed off? The fact that she was totally denied redemption?

I'm a huge fan of the Wesley/Lilah arc, so I'm very curious.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 02:13 (nineteen years ago) link

Just that she was killed off in the way she was, when she was the most interesting female character on the show. I resented the fact that the twee and drippy Kitty Fred got to live when there really was not that much going on with her character.

O'so Krispie (Ex Leon), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 10:04 (nineteen years ago) link

But Fred was killed off too! And it was just as horrifying. All of those Angel characters were doomed; that's part of what made it such a great show.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 11:32 (nineteen years ago) link

And Fred died for the same reason Lilah did, in terms of plot - to make Wesley that much more miserable.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 11:34 (nineteen years ago) link

No, Fred was supposed to be Wesley's twu wuv so it was supposed to be much more tragic when she died -- Lilah's death was almost shrugged off.

O'so Krispie (Ex Leon), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 12:14 (nineteen years ago) link

None of this is answering the question about why Joss Whedon feels my bowels should quake at the sight of another Hellfire Club. Things I have gathered:

1) They are Evil.
2) The White Queen was there, and evil. Now she isn't. Or is she, etc.
3) Er...
4) That's it.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 12:19 (nineteen years ago) link

Andrew: the fact that it's the Hellfire Club shd be 2ndary to the fact that Emma's consorting with Skulking Shadowy People that look real mean.

The Hellfire Club were involved in the now-canonical Dark Phoenix Saga boggins (back during the halcyon Claremont / Byrne days). I think I tried to explain what was going on in another thread, but I'll offer a "short" version (assuming, of course, you have no idea what's going on). Emma was the White Queen in the Hellfire Club, a group of elitist mutant-types bent on world domination and fine brandy. The only guy I recognized in that splash page was the head of the Hellfire Club, Sebastian Shaw. He (along w/ Ms. Frost, & a few other mutants) conspired to drag the Phoenix'd Jean Grey into their clutches. These machinations only served to accelerate Jean's gradual transformation from Happy-Go-Lucky Phoenix to Evil Phoenix, tho.

So, for the continuity phreaks, the significance is: Sebastian Shaw & the Hellfire Club is (supposedly) once again plotting to take Cyclops' one true love away. That his one true love was once a member of the Hellfire Club adds a little spice to the broth.

I'm all for bringing the HFC back as well (see Vic's assessment), and I also don't think it's as cut & dry as other folks on this thread are making it. But, hey, we have a year+ to think on this, so wahey!

The news about Nimrod makes me weep for humanity.

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 13:09 (nineteen years ago) link

I read a theory on Newsarama that it is all happening in Emma's BRANE, which would explain the ridiculousness of them all being in Genosha in the first place, mind you this theory seems to rest on the dark-haired hellfire girl being Negasonic Teenage Warhead. Which she probably isn't.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 13:22 (nineteen years ago) link

Andrew: the fact that it's the Hellfire Club shd be 2ndary to the fact that Emma's consorting with Skulking Shadowy People that look real mean.

Yeah fair enough, but she's been doing that for aaages. The letter column bobbins seemed to imply that the reveal of their identity on the last page was earth-shattering. So I was confused.

The only guy I recognized in that splash page was the head of the Hellfire Club, Sebastian Shaw

I recognized him from Morrison's XMen run, when the Hellfire Club seemed to have been converted into a mutant tittie bar. The lady in the hat is Cassandra Nova, though.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 13:52 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, you're right, Andrew - the specifics of who those folks are SHOULD be secondary (for those not in the know), but it's not gonna be.

Given the luv of bodices & such, it was only time before SS made the club into a Victorian-era gentlemen's club. Unless it was already, and Claremont's been holding out on us (you sneak).

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:08 (nineteen years ago) link

The lady in the hat is Cassandra Nova, though.

Really?!

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:10 (nineteen years ago) link

No, Fred was supposed to be Wesley's twu wuv so it was supposed to be much more tragic when she died -- Lilah's death was almost shrugged off.

I would argue that Wesley wanted to believe that Fred was his true love, but the reality was that his "soul mate" was Lilah, and if the show kept going, Illyria. It's the difference between what he wanted to be vs. who he actually was. He had a real relationship (even if it was a little fucked up) with Lilah - he only ever had a fantasy with Fred.

That's definitely Cassandra on that page, and she's the real reason why that last page is exciting. Sebastian Shaw is a chump and always will be a chump. Whedon is clearly trying to make some sense out of Grant's run in terms of the relationship between its events - Cassandra and the Genoshan massacre, Emma joining the group, Sebastian Shaw's odd appearance in the Weapon Plus arc, etc. And that's Negasonic Teenage Warhead, which makes it soooooooooo odd.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:20 (nineteen years ago) link

http://www.tuffcity.com/html/hhImages/FredWesley.jpg

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 14:23 (nineteen years ago) link

My friend Shawn's review of the book, with which I agree, yo.

http://www.silverbulletcomics.com/news/story.php?a=699


p.s. Cassandra Nova in the Hellfire Club? I didn't catch that! I'll have to read it again NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

J (Jay), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 15:53 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm just going to say that I hated the Wesley/Lilah stuff, but then I hated pretty much everything in Angel post-Season 2. (With the exceptions of Jasmine and the puppet episode.)

The Yellow Kid, Tuesday, 6 September 2005 17:45 (nineteen years ago) link

We don't seem to be linking this in to the Emma/Mastermind stuff going on in the New Avengers. Possibly there is no link, in which case it's just unfortunate, but it is surely likely that they at least checked with Whedon first.

I know Grant tried to add some extra stuff, but Emma is primarily a powerful psychic. I might easily feel, were I writing a superhero book, that two such, not distinguished in major ways, is one too many. And if I were thinking of bringing Jean back, as every writer must at least consider when they aren't killing her, the problem is exacerbated. This may be a way of removing Emma from the team.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 10 September 2005 11:06 (nineteen years ago) link

The flaw in that argument Martin is that there are about 17 different teams of X-Men. All of whom could use a powerful psychic. :)

Tom (Groke), Saturday, 10 September 2005 12:51 (nineteen years ago) link

Emma isn't going anywhere, Martin. She's one of the most popular X-Men characters right now and the writers love her.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Saturday, 10 September 2005 13:15 (nineteen years ago) link

Surely all of them have a powerful psychic or two already, Tom? And Bendis might nonetheless be keener on turning her once more (if you want precedent for him taking a widely loved character who'd been on the good guys' side for ages and switching her back to dramatic effect, see the Avengers) than on passing her on to X-Squad or X-Gang or whatever.

But Matthew's logic is of a kind to which I have no access these days, and is probably more compelling than any of mine.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 10 September 2005 14:21 (nineteen years ago) link

Reversing Emma's membership would be problematic for the other books, where she is used as a sexier, sassier surrogate for Charles Xavier.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Saturday, 10 September 2005 21:11 (nineteen years ago) link

ah, okay - I've only been reading the one X-book for a long time (the Morrison before the Whedon).

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 10 September 2005 21:48 (nineteen years ago) link

five months pass...
So I just finished the first two trades, and for the most part I'm really digging this. Uncanny was the first big canonical book from my youth that I gave up on, in like 1990 or something, and I've never looked back. Whedon, though, does a good job writing these characters, at least the five I know. It's also good to see an X-team that's mostly characters from before everything got kind of shitty. Throw in Nightcrawler and you'd pretty much have all my favorite X-dudes on one squad.

But so, that one character I'm not too familiar with, at least not as a hero, is Emma Frost. I've read somewhere (maybe here?) that she's currently superpopular with the fanbase. Other than her two most obvious attributes, why the hell is that so? She serves the dynamic of this current team well, but as a character she's pretty damn uninteresting. She's good for an occasional witty line, but as a conflation of both the vain witch stereotype and the "reformed villain who may not be entirely reformed" cliche she doesn't seem to have much depth. It's like Cordelia and Spike in the person of a Frederic's model, or something. Do reasonable people find her interesting, or is it just 12-year-old boys too stupid to use the internet properly? Of course my complete ignorance of the last 16 years of X-history might have something to do with my lack of understanding.

ample parking (Garrett Martin), Thursday, 23 February 2006 16:35 (eighteen years ago) link

Oh, for the day when folx stop mentioning Buffy when they talk about Whedon.

As for Ms. Frost, GM, your caveat - "Of course my complete ignorance of the last 16 years of X-history might have something to do with my lack of understanding." - is so OTM when it comes to Ms. Frost it's stoopid, as most of the heavy lifting re: making Ms. Frost teh hottness, has happened since 1990, if not the past 5 years. See: any thread where ILC praises Grant Morrison's X-run.

David R. (for Reasonable) (popshots75`), Thursday, 23 February 2006 16:41 (eighteen years ago) link

(xpost) That last sentence might have some weight to it.

Dan (Several Orders Of Magnitude, In Fact) Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 23 February 2006 16:42 (eighteen years ago) link

I agree that Scott Lobdell should get a lot of the credit for making Emma a great character, but the characterization and events of Grant's run are what made the character become the first major new member of the X-Men since the end of Claremont's original run.

I was thinking last night that maybe the X-Man who is fated to destroy the Breakworld is Kitty via the huge mega-Sentinel/Danger combo.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 23 February 2006 17:06 (eighteen years ago) link

Unfortunately Emma Frost as built up by Morrison makes perfect sense in the context of a universe with lots of Mutants, which we don't have any more. I don't think Whedon writes her well or badly.

Did anyone else read the new issue? The right amount of plot movement, but I'd forgotten how po-faced Astonishing is.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 23 February 2006 17:10 (eighteen years ago) link

What struck you as being po-faced, Tom?

This was definitely my favorite issue of the series thus far. It's the one where it most felt like Joss Whedon felt like he was entirely at home writing the characters rather than taking a holiday in mutantville.

I was very concerned about him retconning stuff from Grant's run, but I think this is going to turn out well.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 23 February 2006 17:21 (eighteen years ago) link

Hard to put my finger on it, and I don't think "po-faced" is always a bad thing either - actually now I try and analyse it it's the same feeling I used to get when Claremont would do his character bits in his heyday, it wasn't 'mere' characterisation, it was all Important Scenes That Will Move The Characters Along. Whedon seems to like his plots to emerge partly from the characterisation, so this is probably no bad thing.

I think maybe my feeling sprang from coming to it having read some of Milligan's run, where the characterisation is entirely tongue-in-cheek, and also some early-90s Superman books, which are nothing but light - and effective - soap characterisation with almost no sense of portent.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 23 February 2006 17:30 (eighteen years ago) link

also I think Cassidy's art doesn't help me enjoy it - it's very beautiful in a way but his figures generally look quite static unless they're in an actual combat scene

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 23 February 2006 17:32 (eighteen years ago) link

I suppose it's off to buy the Morrison trades, now.

ample parking (Garrett Martin), Thursday, 23 February 2006 17:48 (eighteen years ago) link

I had to pick it up to remember what happens, which is a bad sign considering that I read it about 90 minutes ago.

(SPOILER)Nothing fucking happens.(/SPOILER)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 23 February 2006 17:56 (eighteen years ago) link

I wouldn't call that big reveal about Emma and Cassandra in Genosha "nothing."

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 23 February 2006 18:07 (eighteen years ago) link

Yeah, John Cassady's art is pretty and all, but it's a bit self-consciously "quality", a bit Yes-album-cover. I'd almost prefer a throwaway Howard Porter type.

And his Emma Frost is starting to remind of Jodie Marsh.

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Thursday, 23 February 2006 18:29 (eighteen years ago) link

i like cassady's art a lot! and the colouring is great.

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 23 February 2006 18:40 (eighteen years ago) link

Oh dear God, please never let Howard Porter draw a core X-Men book.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 23 February 2006 20:01 (eighteen years ago) link

I enjoy the way Cassaday draws Scott, Logan, and Kitty. I think he has a really good handle on those characters.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 23 February 2006 20:02 (eighteen years ago) link

the only annoying part of the newest ish was when cassandra asked emma if she liked diamonds. CHEEZY-O.

but, i've always liked the hellfire club! so i am into this.

Special Agent Gene Krupa (orion), Thursday, 23 February 2006 20:19 (eighteen years ago) link

yeah, matthew otm about those dudes especially

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 23 February 2006 20:50 (eighteen years ago) link

I really liked the "do you like diamonds?" line!

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 23 February 2006 21:26 (eighteen years ago) link

I mean, you kinda left out the "I don't think I need to ask, but..." part, which is definitely what made it a good line to me.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 23 February 2006 21:27 (eighteen years ago) link

Okay, so maybe not Howard Porter, but I do find Cassady distractingly overblown... he's sort of the Alex Ross it's okay to like.

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Thursday, 23 February 2006 21:55 (eighteen years ago) link

Which places it right at the start of Morrison's run, rather than Genosha?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 23 February 2006 22:05 (eighteen years ago) link

I think if you want to talk about Alex Ross types, you're thinking more of Greg Land.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 23 February 2006 22:06 (eighteen years ago) link

The scene at the start of this issue would have to take place someplace between X-Men #113 and #114, Andrew.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 23 February 2006 22:11 (eighteen years ago) link

Ah okay, so literally the start, cool.

Did Tep ever pick up the Morrison trades?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 23 February 2006 23:57 (eighteen years ago) link

Haha I'd forgotten that Magneto died in both 113 and 114! Is this a record?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 24 February 2006 00:00 (eighteen years ago) link

I did! I dig the Morrison. There are some things I wasn't crazy about, and I think I would have been less patient had I been reading it monthly -- but I could be wrong about that latter bit, it's not like New Avengers has been pissing me off.

Tep (ktepi), Friday, 24 February 2006 02:35 (eighteen years ago) link

two months pass...
Does anyone know why Joss Whedon is pissing all over this title?

J (Jay), Saturday, 6 May 2006 19:29 (eighteen years ago) link

What do you mean? The last two issues were the best thus far!

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Saturday, 6 May 2006 20:11 (eighteen years ago) link

The only thing really good about the last issue was when Kitty and Peter come down to the kitchen while Wolverine's eating his wheaties. I have a major hate-on for the rest of it.

J (Jay), Saturday, 6 May 2006 22:29 (eighteen years ago) link

Whedon REALLY needs to make up for his lost momentum, and spending pages & pages on set-up had better pay off or I am gonna be pissed.

electro-acoustic lycanthrope (orion), Sunday, 7 May 2006 04:51 (eighteen years ago) link

You know, I don't even care about that so much. I hate the fact that he's taking his Claremont tributes so far as to be recycling actual plots and destroying Emma Frost.

And can somebody explain to me how Cassandra Nova is up and walking around? I don't get that. Did I miss something?

J (Jay), Sunday, 7 May 2006 11:19 (eighteen years ago) link

I imagine she escaped from being Ernst, and all the stuff in the last arc of Grant Morrison's run won't happen now, because "fuck Grant Morrison in the ear" is the official X-Books motto now.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 7 May 2006 12:51 (eighteen years ago) link

Well, those Austen issues after Grant left are canon, and involved some lame subplot about Beast and Cyclops realizing that Cassandra Nova was "missing" from the basement of the school. Editorial decided that they didn't like the Ernst thing and preferred to keep Cassandra as a supervillain who could return whenever they needed her.

It's lame, but I don't blame them - Cassandra is the only really memorable new Marvel or DC villain of the past ten years or so.

I think there would have been a much better story with Ernst gradually turning back into Cassandra, but whatever.

PS: All of the stuff in the final arc wouldn't happen anyway because Cyclops didn't abandon the X-Men. Didn't you read the last issue?

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Sunday, 7 May 2006 14:46 (eighteen years ago) link

Another memorable recent villain from last 10 yrs: Solaris, the Tyrant Sun. Also created by Grant Morrison, though stuck in super-limbo sadly.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 7 May 2006 15:53 (eighteen years ago) link

Oops, I'd forgot that of course.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 7 May 2006 16:43 (eighteen years ago) link

Though I say this tentatively - not everything has been revealed as of yet - I do think that in the long run, Joss Whedon's attempt to ellucidate some of the unexplained motivations of key characters and events in Grant Morrison's run will ultimately make those stories better in retrospect. Astonishing X-Men is nothing if not seasons 4 and 5 of New X-Men, so it makes sense to me.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Sunday, 7 May 2006 19:17 (eighteen years ago) link

Solaris is coming back in ASS, I believe.

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Sunday, 7 May 2006 20:13 (eighteen years ago) link

where did solaris first appear? dc 1,000,000?

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 8 May 2006 03:57 (eighteen years ago) link

Oh, she's not going to be a villain. It's totally obvious where this is going - she was put in the X-Men to infiltrate/destroy from within, but she realizes that she really loves being an X-Man, the secret gets out, and she has to prove herself and earn the X-Men's trust all over again even though she is the HEADMISTRESS OF THE SCHOOL.

-- Matthew C Perpetua (perpetu...), September 5th, 2005 2:10 PM. (inca)

PWNED

electro-acoustic lycanthrope (orion), Monday, 8 May 2006 04:24 (eighteen years ago) link

"Does anyone know why Joss Whedon is pissing all over this title?"

Well, he pissed all over the 'Alien' movies, so it's in character.

James Morrison (JRSM), Monday, 8 May 2006 06:53 (eighteen years ago) link

slock1: yes. The Superman issue of the DC1000000 was actually Solaris' best story, and wasn't written by Morrison (tho I reckon it probably was).

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 8 May 2006 08:03 (eighteen years ago) link

yeah, Morrison plotted all four 1,000,000 Super-issues

kit brash (kit brash), Monday, 8 May 2006 08:44 (eighteen years ago) link

Actually, I don't think he's responsible for pissing on the Alien movies. He has loudly and frequently bemoaned what was done to his original script for that film.

J (Jay), Monday, 8 May 2006 13:41 (eighteen years ago) link

six months pass...
Revive. So, am I now to understand that this whole last story arc *wasn't* Whedon giving Morrison the kiss-off, but instead giving him a big wet kiss? I'm growing increasingly impatient with this title.

J (Jay), Friday, 17 November 2006 02:16 (eighteen years ago) link

Dude, this entire run has been nothing but sloppy kisses to Morrison, or more specifically "E Is For Extinction." I get the sense that Joss kinda skimmed over the rest of the run.

Matthew Perpetua! (Matthew Perpetua!), Friday, 17 November 2006 03:29 (eighteen years ago) link

The issue felt really anticlimactic to me, but I don't know, maybe that's cos the issues come far apart and the "gotcha" thing was figured out by fans a few issues ago. I really could've done without the whole Psycho ending with Scott spelling out his psychological interpretation of what Emma was doing, but I guess if he didn't make it fairly clear a lot of people would've been all "huh, wha?"

Matthew Perpetua! (Matthew Perpetua!), Friday, 17 November 2006 03:33 (eighteen years ago) link

Dude, this entire run has been nothing but sloppy kisses to Morrison, or more specifically "E Is For Extinction." I get the sense that Joss kinda skimmed over the rest of the run.

Apparently, I have missed the point entirely. BACK TO SCHOOL WITH ME!

J (Jay), Friday, 17 November 2006 20:01 (eighteen years ago) link

Actually, I don't think he's responsible for pissing on the Alien movies. He has loudly and frequently bemoaned what was done to his original script for that film.

You can read the script here. Scanning it for a minute, seems like the main change is that the movie scaled down the climactic fight to keep it in space. The Newborn's still in it, though the concept's a bit different. Character bits are in it ("Father's dead, asshole.", etc.) Hm.

lumberingwoodsman (Chris Hill), Friday, 17 November 2006 21:24 (eighteen years ago) link

WHY WOLVERINE NOT FLOAT TO CEILING?

Richard Baez (Johnny Logic), Friday, 17 November 2006 22:00 (eighteen years ago) link

Screenwriter Joss Whedon was extremely unhappy with the final product. In a 2005 interview, when asked how the film differed from the script he'd written, Whedon responded, "It wasn’t a question of doing everything differently, although they changed the ending; it was mostly a matter of doing everything wrong. They said the lines...mostly...but they said them all wrong. And they cast it wrong. And they designed it wrong. And they scored it wrong. They did everything wrong that they could possibly do. There’s actually a fascinating lesson in filmmaking, because everything that they did reflects back to the script or looks like something from the script, and people assume that, if I hated it, then they’d changed the script...but it wasn’t so much that they’d changed the script; it’s that they just executed it in such a ghastly fashion as to render it almost unwatchable."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien:_Resurrection

J (Jay), Friday, 17 November 2006 22:12 (eighteen years ago) link

Just now sat down and got caught up on the last year or so of Astonishing, and I have to say I'm kind of impressed. I trailed off somewhere during "Danger," which was as sucky and draggy as the CW says, but this Hellfire arc actually did a number of things right, and I think kind of escapes the tag I had on this series of being nothing but a constant Claremont 1982 nostalgia trip. What Whedon's discovered here is that you can do a rewrite of the Dark Phoenix story that actually does something new - that you can fuse the tropes and associations of the canonical X-Men stories with the mind-trip gotcha widescreen of the Morrison X-Men and get something that's genuinely new. It may fail in places (certainly the storytelling is a little too rushed and jumpy), but it manages to simultaneously "feel" like Morrison and Claremont, in a way that makes both exciting again.

Of course, by going into outerspace he can obviously fuck it all up again, but I have some sliver of hope.

Doctor Casino (Doctor Casino), Saturday, 18 November 2006 02:10 (eighteen years ago) link

It's important to remember that he doesn't like the X-Men movie either, so perhaps he is a little too precious about his lovely lovely words.

Is he actually writing Astonishing any more, I though that was his time up?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 18 November 2006 13:32 (eighteen years ago) link

He is writing one more year of Astonishing, though that really means six more issues. He's also going to be writing Runaways in a few months.

Matthew Perpetua! (Matthew Perpetua!), Saturday, 18 November 2006 16:39 (eighteen years ago) link

Well, from what Whedon's said, only 2 lines in the X-Men movie were his, so it's more understandable if he didn't like the movie. But he does get kinda precious about his words - I remember he was very upset by the Buffy movie too.

The Yellow Kid (The Yellow Kid), Sunday, 19 November 2006 07:36 (eighteen years ago) link

Well, would you want people to think that you wrote something really awful when you actually didn't?

Matthew Perpetua! (Matthew Perpetua!), Sunday, 19 November 2006 14:09 (eighteen years ago) link

If I'd written the script for Alien Resurrection (and I'm talking about the original one online as well as the filmed thing), I'd know that people were saying I'd written something really awful when I actually really HAD!

Oh, and Buffy sucks too, so there! Yah! Boo!

James Morrison (JRSM), Monday, 20 November 2006 02:24 (eighteen years ago) link

I really liked "Alien Resurrection"

808 the Bassking (Andrew Thames), Monday, 20 November 2006 06:59 (eighteen years ago) link

So yeah I finally got around to reading this last issue, and it's way better than its immediate predecessor. I suspect upon re-reading, the entire arc will seem a lot more sensibly paced though.

CROWS don't FLY in STRAIGHT LINES (orion), Monday, 20 November 2006 07:41 (eighteen years ago) link

(I don't care about Alien Resurrection one way or the other, since I've never seen it or any of the other Alien movies! I was just reporting yknow)

J (Jay), Monday, 20 November 2006 19:56 (eighteen years ago) link

MAGIC ADAMANTIUM

hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 20:29 (eighteen years ago) link

three months pass...
Okay, i'm right in thinking that Astonishing X-Men has nothing to do with the rest of X-books continuity?

It's kinda wishy-washy really.

jel --, Monday, 26 February 2007 20:19 (seventeen years ago) link

Well, it's clearly written to be read out of continuity, which is fine by me. I was really really impressed by the way Joss dodged the "Decimation" thing -- he acknowledges that there are very few students now, but never says why. If you're only reading Astonishing X-Men, you can just assume it's because of what happened with the students in the Dangerous storyline.

Mr. Perpetua, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 01:11 (seventeen years ago) link

Do you mean out of continuity as in "not tightly crossing over with the other books" or as in "non-canonical"? The former seems plausible enough, and probably AXM will work best if it's cancelled after Whedon and Cassaday are done with it, collected as an omnibus, and sold as one fairly continuous X-Men story from 2005.

Even in that format there's a lot of stuff that I expect won't work. Joss's decision to have the series largely revolve around this Breakworld plot is commendable in a certain sense - the X-Men are in need of new villains and plot points, which is why "E is For Extinction" and killing off Jean Grey were the best parts of the Morrison run...and if you're going to bring back a dead character, I like the angle of having it gradually emerge that the resurrection isn't just a clean reset but brings in all sorts of larger things. Unfortunately, the larger things here basically means the Breakworld, which has been painfully generic even by the standards of Marvel. Really couldn't care less, and if it was being drawn by hacks (like Uncanny's space story is right now) it would fall off my reading list very very quickly. The little character touches continue to be great, and I still think his fusion of Morrison's story arcs and Claremont's characters is something new (rather than just "the formula done well") but POB is right to say that at this pace, ship-wise and story-wise, it's hard for it to be a flagship book.

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 1 March 2007 21:23 (seventeen years ago) link

FWIW, Joey Q has an EXCITING NEW ANNOUNCEMENT re: the future of AXM post-Whedon COMING SOON TRUE BELIEVERS. Which I'm assuming means a) it ain't getting cancelled, and b) "disappointment" is bound to be the word of the day when the new creative team's announced. When the word's not "kumquat," that is.

David R., Thursday, 1 March 2007 21:30 (seventeen years ago) link

The sad thing is, it's hard for me to really imagine what an exciting lineup for this tittle would be...

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 1 March 2007 21:41 (seventeen years ago) link

CHOOSE ONE:

a) Dinesh D'Souza & Jim Woodring
b) Tom Wolfe & Gary Panter
c) John Byrne, using Eno's Oblique Strategies cards as "co-plotter"

David R., Thursday, 1 March 2007 21:51 (seventeen years ago) link

I think they are giving the book to Millar.

Mr. Perpetua, Thursday, 1 March 2007 21:53 (seventeen years ago) link

WRONG MOVE MAR-VELL

David R., Thursday, 1 March 2007 21:53 (seventeen years ago) link

Unless:

a) Millar draws
b) Liefeld draws
c) Liefeld writes & Millar draws

David R., Thursday, 1 March 2007 21:54 (seventeen years ago) link

Also, wasn't New X-Men a "fusion of Morrison's story arcs and Claremont's characters"? That seemed to be the appeal. All Whedon is doing, and he is the first to admit this, is do New X-Men season 4 and 5. They changed the name to Astonishing X-Men for commercial reasons -- he's said several times that he didn't really ask for that, that it was supposed to just be New X-Men still.

They would be insane to break up the core cast of NXM/AXM (Cyclops/Emma/Wolverine/Beast) or toss off the core book, and so of course it's going to carry on with a new creative team. Would you rather have Ed Brubaker inherit them? Dude is great on some things, but he's godawful on the X-Men.

Mr. Perpetua, Thursday, 1 March 2007 21:57 (seventeen years ago) link

Right now, I'd be totally happy if MM just disappeared for about 15 years after getting the last issue of Ultimates 2 to his editors / Hitch, & limited himself during that time to just posting about his greatness and the greatness of his half-ass theories and the purported greatness he's inflicting on Hollywood on his MW board.

David R., Thursday, 1 March 2007 21:58 (seventeen years ago) link

(hi dere I want to go home now)

David R., Thursday, 1 March 2007 21:59 (seventeen years ago) link

Also, wasn't New X-Men a "fusion of Morrison's story arcs and Claremont's characters"? That seemed to be the appeal.

You're right; I mistyped - change "Claremont's characters" to something more like "Claremontian soap opera." That first scene in the first issue with Kitty stepping into the mansion is as explicit as you could get of a "Hi, I grew up on Uncanny X-Men from 1982" statement - but he's continuing forth with Morrison's plots, especially re: Cyclops and Emma, as you very correctly point out. The reintroduction of Kitty and Peter to the core cast, the teasing use of the Hellfire Club, the costumes - it's a rather nice (and I think deft) rejiggering of twenty-five-year-old X-Men stuff into the status quo from the moment Morrison left the book, whereas Morrison's run was very much about keeping the status quo up for grabs - kill off millions of mutants in one issue, out the school, skip months of time, establish "mutant culture," Xorn, Magneto, two major characters dying in one issue. Whedon has been relatively sedate IMO, because he'd rather just get the characters into a room and enjoy watching them talking to each other. That's the flavor of the Claremont X-Men (and especially New Mutants) that people really got attached to.

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 1 March 2007 22:26 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah. I kinda like that Astonishing X-Men is more about playing with the characters, getting in their heads. I think the problem a lot of people have is they don't get too into that, and try right away to mess about with continuity or make big changes. There's been so much of that in the X-Men over the past several years that it's nice to have some stability, even if the book comes out sporadically. When Grant came in, things really needed to change, and he had amazing ideas and executed most of them quite well. Chuck Austen, latter day Claremont, Ed Brubaker -- much less so! Much, much, much, much less so.

Mr. Perpetua, Thursday, 1 March 2007 23:08 (seventeen years ago) link

I never thought I'd say this but I'm kind of hoping Kitty dies at the end of the Breakworld story.

Also I kind of hope the book gets taken over by Ennis (for no good reason).

HI DERE, Friday, 2 March 2007 15:23 (seventeen years ago) link

I think Brubaker's stuff is OK - the miniseries with its monster retcon was a bit feeble but the space stuff is a decent passes-the-time superhero romp. It's not X-Greatness at all but it's comofrtably better than late Claremont and Chuck Austen! Better than Milligan too. :(

Astonishing is fine as a "Legends Of The X-Men" type showcase series - superior solidity.

Carey's book seems to have the most plot drive of any of them but some spark is lacking.

Groke, Friday, 2 March 2007 15:46 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh c'mon, Milligan's stuff even when it wasn't very inspired trounces Brubaker's X-stuff! At least Milligan was funny. Brubaker just seems like he's totally out of his depth and perversely trying to make it harder on himself.

I like Carey's X-Men, but he has really bad taste in villains, which is also the case for his Ultimate Fantastic Four. He's definitely got some plot momentum, and I appreciate that quite a bit, and I think his cast is really good too. I wish he'd spend more time developing the relationships between the characters rather than throw the X-Men into these really inconsequential battles that take up most of the time. I mean, what the hell does he really need villains for when Mystique, Sabretooth, and Mastermind are part of the regular cast?

Mr. Perpetua, Friday, 2 March 2007 20:20 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh c'mon, Milligan's stuff even when it wasn't very inspired trounces Brubaker's X-stuff! At least Milligan was funny. Brubaker just seems like he's totally out of his depth and perversely trying to make it harder on himself.

Two minutes for TOTALLY WRONG / YMMV, Mr P. Unless you go for "oh, he's having a laugh / oh, he's not; why don't U DECIDE" shenanigans coupled w/ interpretive characterizations and crap adventures. The Rogue / Gambit / whatever the hell Mystique was calling herself triangle was klutzy (to be kind), and the dude only seemed to find his sealegs right before he left (w/ his Apocalypse arc), and that's only in comparison to the 20+ issues of spotty floundering that preceded.

Like Tom says, Bru's just telling a straight adventure story - it's nothing spectacular, and it's nowhere near his best work, but it's totally fine for what it is. Gimme that - a writer w/ a plan, and the sticktoitiveness to, um, stick to it, & pump out serviceable, enjoyable stories - over someone that's just flouncing around, trying all sorts of crap, and falling short in nearly every respect. & it's not like PM was seemingly going for anything spectacular (unless you think he actually was trying to poke fun @ the inherent soap-operatics of the X-Verse - from my POV, that's a stretch).

David R., Friday, 2 March 2007 20:38 (seventeen years ago) link

Hey, I think both Brubaker and Milligan are being hacks on the X-Men. It's just that I could deal with Milligan cos he was funny, at the very least. Brubaker is just being a snooze, and I know he can do far better.

Mr. Perpetua, Friday, 2 March 2007 22:36 (seventeen years ago) link

He wasn't funny enough! Nothing Milligan wrote was as amusing as the guy with the enormous sword in Brubaker's run, for a start. There was one point in the Milligan run where it looked like he was going to make everything that happened be some kind of mental plot of Doop's, which would have been enjoyable, but he didn't. :(

I do agree that Brubaker has managed to somehow pick the five most boring possible X-Men for his TWELVE-PART saga (how did they allow it!) but given that he's doing an OK job.

Groke, Saturday, 3 March 2007 03:08 (seventeen years ago) link

Well, the thing is, Brubaker and Carey were basically hired to do a year of filler before the X-books could enter whatever crossover is coming this summer. A twelve-issue space epic is just as good as any other plan, really. It's not like any of the core X-books are actually going to deal with the Decimation plot! X-Factor got saddled with that whole thing.

Mr. Perpetua, Saturday, 3 March 2007 03:19 (seventeen years ago) link

Really, you'd think if they had to crank out a year of filler (kind of ridiculous way to go about things obv) they could have cranked out some vaguely Decimation-themed filler, right? Tracking down isolated mutants, something? Even if Decimation isn't going anywhere it'd be nice to maintain the illusion that it made some sort of difference, rather than having Professor X run off into space right when you'd expect mutantkind would need him the most. At least the last Unadjectived annual did something with the whole idea, but that was long long long overdue.

As for Milligan, I read his run and can't tell you a thing about it except that Gambit turns evil, which I found sort of harmless and irrelevant. There was an awful lot of Havok and Polaris, who both annoy the shit out of me pretty much any time they're ever in a comic. And there was a sorta okay Red Ghost story that got completely scuttled by confusing crossover stuff IIRC. Definitely a disappointing run though.

Doctor Casino, Saturday, 3 March 2007 03:28 (seventeen years ago) link

Even if Decimation isn't going anywhere it'd be nice to maintain the illusion that it made some sort of difference

This sounds like wrongthink to me - a demand that the universe respect your pain. If they can't think of a good way to face a situation, I'd rather they didn't face it.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 8 March 2007 11:37 (seventeen years ago) link

I'd rather they get rid of it rather than pretending it didn't exist.

HI DERE, Thursday, 8 March 2007 15:55 (seventeen years ago) link

I dunno about wrongthink - isn't serialized comic storytelling in large part the art of making stuff that isn't going anywhere feel like it is? I don't mind being strung along in circles for that type of thing. I guess what I'm getting at is, rather than write mediocre generic space epics for filler, why not write mediocre specific post-Decimation stories for filler? Those would at least have the illusory cachet of novelty, no? Plus, so long as it stands as a plot point (and the xbooks certainly ACKNOWLEDGE that it does) it just seems bizarre for it not to drive more of the stories.

Doctor Casino, Friday, 9 March 2007 00:35 (seventeen years ago) link

one month passes...
oh he didn't.

thomp, Friday, 4 May 2007 04:06 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, you're probably right.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 4 May 2007 06:07 (seventeen years ago) link

my call is that "one of them isn't coming back" means that one of them, uh, decides not to come back, actually.

thomp, Friday, 4 May 2007 12:02 (seventeen years ago) link

four years pass...

so the cartoon version of this is on watch instantly and it's the ugliest thing i've ever seen. i guess they spent basically nothing to make it?

Mordy, Saturday, 7 May 2011 00:55 (thirteen years ago) link

You mean this thing?

http://www.blogcdn.com/www.comicsalliance.com/media/2010/08/wolvielovespizza.gif

Never seen, but it sounds just ridiculous. See this review. Anyone else remember this kind of thing being sold for like $20 a pop as "CD-ROMix" back in the early 90s?

Doctor Casino, Saturday, 7 May 2011 03:01 (thirteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.