Oh no! More boring computer problems! Oh no!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1739 of them)
cool, I will try that out when I get home. thanks!

kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 19:00 (nineteen years ago) link

Help! I have been getting error messages saying either a common control component is not correctly registered, or one of its dependencies is missing or invalid. It's happening when i try to complete installing a new prog.
I have an awful suspicion that some essential regsistry thing might have been taken away by my anti-virus programme when it 'repaired' a worm it found.
Any ideas on how I might be able to correct this ?

donna (donna), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 19:06 (nineteen years ago) link

My eMac, running OS 10.2.8, occasionally (twice, I think - both in the last month or so) suddenly flips to a blue screen and the login screen. I log in again and all seems fine. I supposed I would lose unsaved work if I ever did any work.

Should I be worried? Is this a bad sign of something? I repair permissions and run MacJanitor regularly.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 23:39 (nineteen years ago) link

okay, my firewire drive doesn't show up in disk management for some reason. Only my internal drives, my cd-rom, and internal zip drive show up. it does show up under disk drives in the device manager though, but I can't seem to assign drive letters there.

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 00:32 (nineteen years ago) link

That's very strange...if its not showing up in your disk management, it shouldn't be showing up on your My Computer. But: when it's not showing up in the disk management section, IS it showing up under My Computer? (and don't forget to scroll down on the disk management window wither, if there's a scroll bar there...it may be hidden at the bottom.)

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 00:36 (nineteen years ago) link

yep! could this have something to do with the removable storage part of Computer Management? The libraries directory under Removable Storage has entries for my zip and my CD/DVD drive, but nothing for this drive. Maybe I need to add a library for this drive? If so, shouldn't the driver do this or something? One thing that is odd is that if I check the properties of the drive, it says Device Type: disk drives, Manufacturer: (standard disk drives), location: LUN 0 . The (standard disk drives) thing makes me think that XP is not recognizing the correct driver or something.

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 00:43 (nineteen years ago) link

If you're using an external hard drive, it should be a pretty standard controller; Windows XP understands pretty much all of them and just says "yep, that's an external hard drive" and makes it work. I can't imagine LaCie's controller would require any special drivers to make it behave, though I have been surprised by such things before.

Just to be clear, you DON'T have the iPod plugged in at the same time while you're doing this, right? If you do, unplug dat shit, reboot and then try this all again.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 01:07 (nineteen years ago) link

no, it isn't plugged in. I'm am somewhat at a loss.

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 01:09 (nineteen years ago) link

Perhaps this is France's revenge against the English-speaking world!

Seriously, though, I don't have any clue why it would be doing that either. You could try updating the driver (both using the windows driver update using the properties of the drive, and by going to LaCie).

Also, another clarification on the Disk Management: use the bottom window, not the top window. The top window, if I remember correctly, only lists drives that are okay. If that LaCie is having difficulties, you'll have to locate it on the bottom half of the window, and it may be grey'd out.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 01:16 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah, it's not listed under there (in the bottom pane). I'm going to have to call lacie, I think; their online email support returned a mail a week later saying that my request had been received, then I never heard another word.

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 01:17 (nineteen years ago) link

haha, i rebooted and then it showed up in there. motherfucker. plugging the ipod in doesn't seem to unmount it now that I reassigned it drive letter Z. Hope this keeps working! thanks sean.

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 01:24 (nineteen years ago) link

Rebooting solves everything.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 01:26 (nineteen years ago) link

(oh i wish it was really that easy anyhow)

Glad it's working now!

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 01:26 (nineteen years ago) link

Just a thought, postfacto. What's the drive formatted as and on which machine did you format it?

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 05:44 (nineteen years ago) link

Okay, riddle me this - Hotmail wasn't working properly for ages. I'd get as far as the Inbox but then clicking on a message it would give me the "Page Cannot Be Found" bullshit. Now I have GMail and it's telling me I don't have cookies enabled.
In IE6, I go to Tools, Internet Options, Privacy, and set to Accept All Cookies.

Same story. This is very very very frustrating and I'm about to hurl my PC out the window. If someone has any ideas, they could save me hundreds of pounds worth of damage and a cold night in my bedroom. Thanks!

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:33 (nineteen years ago) link

http://www.mozilla.org/

FIREFOX

Jon Williams!!!!! (ROFFLE!@!@!@) (ex machina), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:36 (nineteen years ago) link

I WANT INSTANT RESULTS GOD DAMN IT!

This has been going on since I reloaded Windows XP. I really need to check my emails, please help! Pretty please?

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:53 (nineteen years ago) link

have you tried from another user account on the machine?

Jon Williams!!!!! (ROFFLE!@!@!@) (ex machina), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:54 (nineteen years ago) link

well, it won't let me see hotmail or gmail. the accounts work dandy on other pcs.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 16:59 (nineteen years ago) link

no no no no! i mean another log into another local user account on the same machine and then try

Jon Williams!!!!! (ROFFLE!@!@!@) (ex machina), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:01 (nineteen years ago) link

i don't think I do... what's a foolproof way to check? my friend reinstalled Windows for me.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 17:15 (nineteen years ago) link

nope. that didn't do anything.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 22:52 (nineteen years ago) link

my guess is crapware probably fucked IE over

Jon Williams!!!!! (ROFFLE!@!@!@) (ex machina), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 23:27 (nineteen years ago) link

crapware? I am running Adaware and Zonealarm but i disabled them both along with Google toolbar. When my friend reinstalled Windows, he left the old faulty version on the computer too because he was worried that deleting it might arse up the computer. I bet this is why. I am using XP Professional. The original is Home edition. It asks me which i want to use when i first switch on.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 23:57 (nineteen years ago) link

I deleted my cookies and it worked. Don't panic! Nobody panic!

dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 00:20 (nineteen years ago) link

Here's one for Linux fans,

http://www.dynebolic.org/

I've downloaded this image and it boots fine on my laptop/other PCs

If I create a mount point /mnt/net and run

mount -t smbfs -o username=,password= //192.168.0.5/sharename /mnt/net

I get an error wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on //192.168.0.5/sharename, or too many mounted file systems

The same commmand to the same share works fine on my Fedora box.

I can ping the ip address fine and web appears to work.

If I run modprobe smbfs it exits with no error, so I'm assumng the smbfs module is loaded okay.

I'm a linux newbie, any ideas?

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 11:49 (nineteen years ago) link

mount -t smbfs -o username=,password= //192.168.0.5/sharename /mnt/net

I get an error wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on //192.168.0.5/sharename, or too many mounted file systems

Just remind me why Linux is better than Windows again?

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 11:53 (nineteen years ago) link

do you have smbfs loaded in the kernel? does the command "dmesg" say anything related to this

Shake Your Halo Down! (ex machina), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 11:56 (nineteen years ago) link

It's all about the geek.

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 11:56 (nineteen years ago) link

> do you have smbfs loaded in the kernel?

use 'lsmod' to see loaded modules. (/sbin/lsmod)

> Just remind me why Linux is better than Windows again?

do you know the history of the samba project mark? it's a) interesting and b) a good example of why linux is 'better' than windows.

koogs (koogs), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 12:01 (nineteen years ago) link

smbfs: mount_data version 1919251317 is not supported

This does not sound good.

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 12:04 (nineteen years ago) link

hmm, my bet is that dynebolic is crap

Shake Your Halo Down! (ex machina), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 12:05 (nineteen years ago) link

its listed at the top of the lsmod command output

module Size Used by
smbfs 36920 0

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 12:08 (nineteen years ago) link

I know yet it sounds nice.

Freej etc preloaded all on a bootable cd.

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 12:09 (nineteen years ago) link

i had awful trouble with dynebolic, albeit an earlier version. so much so that i wrote 'shoddy' on the cdr.

anyway:
http://www.myjavaserver.com/exec/.Gdm5KtpKLwzNf2CZvwBFfNjLDwyZnxzT9vB1j3BM1JBPfwBMuwBVHwp0f2y
seems to say that more samba software is required

and this http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-support/2003-June/041463.html says that there's just a symlink missing

koogs (koogs), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 12:25 (nineteen years ago) link

Hmm mount.smbfs does not appear to be in the /sbin or usr/bin folders.

Maybe Dynebolic is shite, are there any other boot cds designed for media work like this?

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 14:03 (nineteen years ago) link

dyne:bolic is RASTA software released free under the GNU General Public License.
This software is about Digital Resistance ina babylon world which tries to control and make a business out of the way we communicate, we share our interests, informations and knowledge.
The roots of the Rastafari movement are in resistance to slavery: this software is one step in the larger struggle for Redemption and Freedom from proprietary and closed-source software.
Much blessings in Jah luv to all those who resist. Selah.

Shake Your Halo Down! (ex machina), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 14:29 (nineteen years ago) link

dude

Shake Your Halo Down! (ex machina), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 14:29 (nineteen years ago) link

Thats great and all, but the samba support seems to be borked.

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 14:31 (nineteen years ago) link

Rastas don't like to Samba

Shake Your Halo Down! (ex machina), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 14:34 (nineteen years ago) link

Okay so the lesson learned is don't get your Linux from the Rastas.

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 14:37 (nineteen years ago) link

http://dynebolic.dyne.org/index.php?show=workshop

HAHAHAHHAHA

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 14:39 (nineteen years ago) link

Speaking of Windows, is there a way to turn a folder into a CD disk image using Win98? Hmmmm?

Casuistry (Chris P), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 14:39 (nineteen years ago) link

Yes use Nero to burn but use the "image writer" rather than a CDRW.

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 14:44 (nineteen years ago) link

Hm! Cleverish!

Casuistry (Chris P), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 14:53 (nineteen years ago) link

> Maybe Dynebolic is shite, are there any other boot cds designed for media work like this?

list of distros and packages here: http://linux-sound.org/distro.html
* AGNULA a GNU/Linux audio and multimedia distribution
* APODIO is an "...audio computer on a live CD bootable distribution"
* AudioSlack audio packages for Slackware users, from Luke Yelavich, inspired by PlanetCCRMA
* Demudi the Debian Multimedia Distribution (merged with AGNULA)
* Dynebolic a GNU/Linux distribution "... shaped on the needs of media activists, artists and teachers"
* LAW is the Linux Audio Workstation distro from Jacob Robbins
* Linux Music Apps CD a great collection from John Littler
* Low-latency RPMs packages from Udo Jocher that include a 2.4.18 kernel patched for low-latency and preemptive operation
* Medialinux at OSL a Knoppix-based Linux distribution focused on multimedia
* Planet CCRMA At Home RPM packages of the Linux sound and music software used at CCRMA, thanks to Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
* Thac's RPMs For Mandrake includes a large collection of Linux music and sound packages
* Turn-Key Linux Audio a new Linux audio distro from Kevin Ernste at the Eastman Computer Music Center

but none of the ones i had a look at had freej.

(i've been reading the dynebolic pages and other people do have samba working, albeit in older versions. maybe they just forgot a couple of files. should be easy enough to copy them over from somewhere else (famous last words...). try 'locate smbfs' see if that can find it.)

koogs (koogs), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 15:24 (nineteen years ago) link

(morphix has a multimedia add-on planned which does include freej but it's a work in progress.)

koogs (koogs), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 15:29 (nineteen years ago) link

FIREFOX PROBLEM!

I tried d/ling the Google toolbar for the new version of FF (0.9) for XP, and there were some reported issues re: getting the damn thing to work - you had to close your browser after d/ling, then deactivate the extension, close AGAIN, activate it, close AGAIN, and then it would be available the next time you opened FF.

Stupid me, I inadvertently downloaded the Google toolbar extension in such a way that I ended up with TWO instances of it in my List Of Extensions, and when I shut down the browser & restarted, a little dialog box called INSTALLING DOWNLOADED EXTENSION (or something like that) popped up. And now I can't get Firefox to open! I click on the wee li'l icon, & that stupid little box shows up, and I can't do dick.

I tried uninstalling / reinstalling - no go. I can reinstall 0.8 just fine, but when I reinstally 0.9, I get the same booshit. I imagine I have to seek out whatever the hell's in my profile directory referring to the Google toolbar. I checked out where the extensions are located in the Mozilla directory, but the files / directories are named something like {9dka-doiw822-adakjj}. Help?

ALSO: where the hell can I snag a copy of Doom II? My sis wants me to burn a copy for my nephew's 6th birthday.

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 16:22 (nineteen years ago) link

i tried dynebolics 1.3 this morning and mount -t smbfs seemed to be ok (although other issues meant i couldn't actually see the shares on my win2k box). the other alternative is, of course, to share a dynebolics drive and then copy things there. there were useful looking options in the network menu.

koogs (koogs), Thursday, 24 June 2004 08:48 (nineteen years ago) link

Okay I just found LinNeighbourhood on Dynebolic and I can see the PC I want to copy files from but when I scan the machine non of the shares show up even if I scan with the Administrator account.

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Thursday, 24 June 2004 09:46 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.