it's my single favorite mcsweeney's thing (not a v rich field)
― difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 21:12 (eleven years ago) link
"Think about the strangeness of today's situation. Thirty, forty years ago, we were still debating about what the future will be: Valar, Melkor, whatever. Today, nobody even debates these issues. We all silently accept global capitalism is here to stay. On the other hand, we are obsessed with cosmic catastrophes: Sauron securing the ring of power; the departure of the elves to Valinor. So the paradox is, that it's much easier to imagine the end of all life on middle-earth than a much more modest radical change in capitalism."
― max, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 21:15 (eleven years ago) link
everything you always wanted to know about the balrog but were afraid to ask gandalf
― difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 21:20 (eleven years ago) link
the problem with saruman was that he was "not violent enough"
'it is an uncontroversial fact, a truism, if you will, that gandalf has killed more people than sauron. it isn't even worth discussing.'
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 21:24 (eleven years ago) link
ah, comedy writers working out Third Way guilt.
― saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 21:39 (eleven years ago) link
if Sauron had really been hot shit, he would have fired the Nazgul and aimed drone rockets at the Shire.
― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 21:41 (eleven years ago) link
"scoured" it, if you will
― difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 21:45 (eleven years ago) link
it was saruman chickened out of that one tbh
― bill paxman (darraghmac), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 00:19 (eleven years ago) link
4/5 in Empire.
― piscesx, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 10:19 (eleven years ago) link
Empire will never give a bad rating to a film they've had a massive feature on.
― I wish to incorporate disco into my small business (chap), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 10:40 (eleven years ago) link
very true. their positive 90s reviews for the later Batman films spring to mind.
― piscesx, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 11:20 (eleven years ago) link
I always imagine they send several critics to watch the film, and pick the one who had the most positive reaction to write it up.
― I wish to incorporate disco into my small business (chap), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 11:45 (eleven years ago) link
i always imagine they big up anything that teenage boys of all ages get a boner for
― Fortuné's Old Albion Englishness (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:01 (eleven years ago) link
That One Substitute English Teacher: 25 Things You'll Totally Believe
― before and after broscience (goole), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:24 (eleven years ago) link
Don't really GAF what ain't it cool, Empire or any nerd service sites think tbf. This thing could be a botch or a fumble but who knows, the people involved are pretty fuckin smart and they surprised me before.
― my other pug is a stillsuit (Jon Lewis), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:29 (eleven years ago) link
the Aint It Cool review of Dark Knight Rises was ridiculously over-the-top in its geekery and seemed to be out of step with everyone else on the planet's opinion give or take. is it always like that these days?
― piscesx, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 17:32 (eleven years ago) link
Haven't they always been like that? I find AICN's house style utterly insufferable.
― I wish to incorporate disco into my small business (chap), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 18:07 (eleven years ago) link
totally
― my other pug is a stillsuit (Jon Lewis), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 18:09 (eleven years ago) link
the AICN review seemed reasonable. They're not all Harry Knowles
― Number None, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 18:12 (eleven years ago) link
"Mr Beaks", who works at AICN, is excellent.The others - not.
― sean gramophone, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 18:12 (eleven years ago) link
yeah, this is a bit of an ordeal. You really feel the stretching of the source material.It seems like he sort of wanted it have a lighter feel than LOTR (Radagast and his ridiculous bunnies, Barry Humphries as comedy goblin king) but couldn't resist laying on the moody flashbacks, overwrought score and endless hordes of cgi goblins. I feel like the only reason for these movies to exist was to see Smaug realised on screen and of course you don't even get that with this one.
― Number None, Monday, 10 December 2012 23:08 (eleven years ago) link
maybe when this is eventually released on DVD, instead of doing extended editions like they did with LOTR, they will make reduced editions. I would probably watch those.
― silverfish, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 20:46 (eleven years ago) link
so... what are the second and third films going to be called? idgi
― Twerkin in a coal mine (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 21:18 (eleven years ago) link
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey
The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug
The Hobbit: There and Back Again
The Hobbit IV: Creature of Hobbit
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 21:21 (eleven years ago) link
I didn't notice the 48fps business at all btw. I think there might be something wrong with me
― Number None, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 21:23 (eleven years ago) link
it only works on special projectors/screens iirc?
― Roobarb and Custos (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 21:23 (eleven years ago) link
Yeah, only select theaters. Folks say it is akin to the atrocious "soap opera" setting of hi-def TVs.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 21:24 (eleven years ago) link
They also say the image is so sharp the flaws are massively apparent. One review mentioned seeing Sir Ian's contact lens edge, another the fact that the staffs and stuff now look like cheap resin replicas.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 21:25 (eleven years ago) link
no, my screening was in 48fps
― Number None, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 21:26 (eleven years ago) link
oh right, it's probly shit then
― Roobarb and Custos (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 21:27 (eleven years ago) link
It was basically the only reason i went so i was a tad miffed. Maybe i am visually impaired in some way though
― Number None, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 21:32 (eleven years ago) link
bought a ticket to see this in glorious 48FPS 3D at Cinerama on Friday evening. Pretty much planning on more or less hating this, but maybe it'll get the better of me.
― wongo hulkington's jade palace late night buffet (silby), Thursday, 13 December 2012 06:04 (eleven years ago) link
my mom is totally psyched for this
― i know your nuts hurt! who's laughing? (contenderizer), Thursday, 13 December 2012 06:13 (eleven years ago) link
just not excited about this in the slightest. not sure why; maybe the negative advance talk, but also, it just seems anticlimactic after LotR.
― akm, Thursday, 13 December 2012 06:43 (eleven years ago) link
^^^ this. I cared when the film was announced but it just seems like a chore now.
― That elusive North American wood-ape (Capitaine Jay Vee), Thursday, 13 December 2012 12:54 (eleven years ago) link
if you want to know what the future of the Hobbit movies will be like, imagine a big hairy foot stamping on a human face, forever
― A fat, shit, jittery fraud of a messageboard poster (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 13 December 2012 12:55 (eleven years ago) link
Eh, it will be by Jackson, it will have Hobbits and such, I will merrily watch it while my butt goes numb.
― Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 13 December 2012 12:56 (eleven years ago) link
numb yr ass and yr mind will follow
― Ward Fowler, Thursday, 13 December 2012 13:00 (eleven years ago) link
Not sure what I want to sit through less, this or Del Toro's upcoming joint.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vKz7WnU83E
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 13 December 2012 13:01 (eleven years ago) link
Ouch:
http://www.filmfreakcentral.net/ffc/2012/12/the-hobbit-an-unexpected-journey.html
― Room 227 (cryptosicko), Thursday, 13 December 2012 18:25 (eleven years ago) link
Seeing this in 48fps tomorrow morning, whee
It looks pretty bad imo but I want to see a 48fps movie on a nice screen.
― pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Thursday, 13 December 2012 18:28 (eleven years ago) link
http://www.filmfreakcentral.net/.a/6a0168ea36d6b2970c017d3ec21f9b970c-800wi
otm
I think 48fps is the only way i'd want to see this in a theater.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 13 December 2012 18:32 (eleven years ago) link
old hobbits die hard
― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 13 December 2012 18:33 (eleven years ago) link
That review is pretty terrible, but yeah hard to take anyone serious if they are going to compare something to the Star Wars Holiday Special right out the gate. All the bitching about Jackson "manufacturing" villains and plot points and stuff.... the reviewer realizes this is fiction, right?
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 13 December 2012 18:37 (eleven years ago) link
It's fiction, but it's also based on a beloved text.
― pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Thursday, 13 December 2012 18:37 (eleven years ago) link
tbh one of the things i am most anticipating is seeing what kind of invented business Jackson/Walsh et al have imported into the book's story. It's totally fine with me as long as it's awesome.
― the clown's reflection is incorrect (Jon Lewis), Thursday, 13 December 2012 18:39 (eleven years ago) link
Via a friend on FB:
According to a post on thehalloffire.net from someone who's gotten a copy of Brian Sibley's "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey Official Movie Guide", this is the quality dramaturgy we have to look forward to in Jackson's HOBBIT movies:"According to Barry Humphries [who plays the Great Goblin], the Great Goblin's throne doubles as a toilet, with a hole in the seat... 'The Goblin King is, among other things, grossly incontinent so if he hears the call of nature it doesn't need to interrupt his conversation and, from time to time, a beautifully crafted urn beneath the throne receives a compliment of matter from the Goblin King, generally speaking of ill-digested Dwarf.'"
"According to Barry Humphries [who plays the Great Goblin], the Great Goblin's throne doubles as a toilet, with a hole in the seat... 'The Goblin King is, among other things, grossly incontinent so if he hears the call of nature it doesn't need to interrupt his conversation and, from time to time, a beautifully crafted urn beneath the throne receives a compliment of matter from the Goblin King, generally speaking of ill-digested Dwarf.'"
Very Meet the Feeblesy.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 13 December 2012 19:04 (eleven years ago) link
A follow-up comment indicates this isn't actually IN the film, but perhaps...implied.
That sounds kind of great?
It was also implied in the Fellowship film that Saruman fucked mud to generate uruk-hai iirc
― the clown's reflection is incorrect (Jon Lewis), Thursday, 13 December 2012 19:20 (eleven years ago) link