The Lives of Others - (Das Leben der Anderen): Microphone? What microphone?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (229 of them)
did not LOOK very good. Gah.

The Real Dirty Vicar, Monday, 23 April 2007 22:48 (seventeen years ago) link

I took it less as "the discovery of his own humanity" than as an attempt to live like Dreyman did--to play at being an artist and not a stasi agent.

I'd agree with this.

Also DV OTM re. the play. It looked painfully dull!

kv_nol, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 08:30 (seventeen years ago) link

Its quite possible that the film itself is the film of Dreyman's book, and hence misses a few key points (and more importantly marks Dreyman out to be cluelessly heroic rather than a weaselly collaborator woth not political nouse).

Pete, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 09:44 (seventeen years ago) link

Ooh.

Alba, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 10:30 (seventeen years ago) link

I had real problems with the movie, for reasons that Alba's already mentioned. Having some secondhand experience with the effects of totalitarianism (mainly, family who've fled Cuba), you simply don't read a Brecht poem and feel your soul expand with wonder and light.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 11:20 (seventeen years ago) link

In discussion, my beloved and I felt that a film solely about Stasi agents being bad would lack dramatic tension.

The Real Dirty Vicar, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 11:38 (seventeen years ago) link

alfred otm: what the fuck, given brecht's own collusion with the east german cp, is brecht doing in this?

That one guy that quit, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 12:15 (seventeen years ago) link

Christ, everybody is being so reductive and nitpicky about this movie--as if the Brecht-reading scene was the turning point of the entire story, or as if we could tell how good the play was from the four lines of dialogue they showed. I'm not saying the internal logic was perfect but no way is there one particular element that sinks the whole ship.

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 13:08 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, I too liked it until the guy started his awakening on the road to becoming human. Has anyone thought of the idea that maybe the guy's helping/meddling actually made things [i]worse[i]?

James Redd and the Blecchs, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 13:21 (seventeen years ago) link

worse

James Redd and the Blecchs, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 13:22 (seventeen years ago) link

It's possible, although Dreyman certainly doesn't get away with publishing his article without Weisler's help.

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 13:24 (seventeen years ago) link

everybody is being so reductive and nitpicky about this movie

Because we're not saying how much we loved it?

kv_nol, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 13:35 (seventeen years ago) link

i was a little disappointed that wiesler didn't turn out to be a better writer than dreyman. there was a little window opened where he's creating scenes of his "writing sessions" on the Lenin play out of whole cloth, i really wanted his superiors to want line-by-line info on this fake play, meaning he has to be up all night writing it. that would have been great.

gff, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 13:39 (seventeen years ago) link

"his" confusion there, sorry.

gff, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 13:39 (seventeen years ago) link

x-post

No, because people are seizing on seconds-long sequences of the film and acting as if they constitute massive dramatic failures.

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 13:45 (seventeen years ago) link

I guess if Wiesler's transformation didn't feel real to them, then they naturally pick out things in the film that seem they were there to make it work.

Alba, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 14:00 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah.

I forgot the most important thing about the S&S article which is that not only did Weisler not exist but he could never have existed. Imagining that he could have betrays - according to the article - a misunderstanding of the nature of totalitarianism in general, and the Stasi specifically. No Stasi agent would have been able to keep a secret like that, because everything was rigorously cross-checked and verified. No Stasi agent would have been on control of an entire investigation, from surveillance to interrogation, the way Weisler was. But more importantly, not only would no Stasi agent be able to turn, no Stasi agent would WANT to turn, at least on the basis of the kind of events the movie depicts. People whose inner convictions can be swayed are weeded out very early in the process. I can see something insanely traumatic changing an agent - a death, an assault, an an acid trip - but - and the film hinges on this - art? (The director said his first spark of inspiration for the movie was a quote from Lenin, saying that if he kept listening to a certain piece of music he'd never finish his revolution.)

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 14:49 (seventeen years ago) link

OTM. The whole conversion was a little too E.M. Forster.

James Redd and the Blecchs, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 14:53 (seventeen years ago) link

"Only connect, through the magical world of poetry, and disconnect the surveillance microphone."

James Redd and the Blecchs, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 14:55 (seventeen years ago) link

I wanted an awesome fake play as well! I did really like this film although the change wasn't too convincing, plus Wiesler kept reminding me of the guy off Grand Designs.

Not the real Village People, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 14:56 (seventeen years ago) link

The fake play was dire. Was it supposed to be?

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 14:58 (seventeen years ago) link

I know enough not to expect things like fake plays to be good ever since being disappointed by Holly Martin's mistaken identity impromptu speech at the HQBMT on the Crisis of Faith in The Third Man

James Redd and the Blecchs, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 15:01 (seventeen years ago) link

Although I did enjoy Robert Donet's rousing impromptu stump speech for the long-named local politician in The Thirty-Nine Steps

James Redd and the Blecchs, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 15:02 (seventeen years ago) link

Donat

James Redd and the Blecchs, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 15:05 (seventeen years ago) link

a bit schmaltzy

In an Oscar-winning foreign film? Git outta town!

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 15:10 (seventeen years ago) link

One of the things I love about this thread is the way so many of the "I know all about East Germany" comments above are direct, unattributed quotes from Anna Funder's article in Sight & Sound.

The Real Dirty Vicar, Friday, 27 April 2007 17:25 (seventeen years ago) link

I forgot the most important thing about the S&S article which is that not only did Weisler not exist but he could never have existed. Imagining that he could have betrays - according to the article - a misunderstanding of the nature of totalitarianism in general, and the Stasi specifically

otm. It was a rickety conceit. Then there's also this. Please ignore that it was posted on the fucking Corner.

1. The fundamental element of the plot, the Stasi officer Wiesler helping Dreymann, is such utter nonsense that it ruins the whole movie. It would never happen that some one with over 20 years of continuous indoctrination by the Stasi would help a mortal enemy of the State (and by Stasi definition, that's what Dreymann was). Even if Wiesler could have somehow come to see Dreymann as something other than an enemy, he still would have done what the Stasi expected, because he (Wiesler) would always have been watched and his work constantly checked.

2. That Dreymann could think he was not being observed and bugged is also utter nonsense. This guy was a top playwright who associated with the highest cultural officials and he thought he was not of interest to the State !?!? My wife was continuously watched and bugged simply because she had foreign diplomats as patients. Being watched and bugged was something every East German assumed was part of their life.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 27 April 2007 17:42 (seventeen years ago) link

alfred which cornerite was that? both of those things are otm. it is a moral fantasy, i guess.

gff, Friday, 27 April 2007 17:46 (seventeen years ago) link

Not a Cornerite per se; it was an East German emigré responding to Derbyshire's review.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 27 April 2007 17:49 (seventeen years ago) link

two months pass...

Ulrich Muehe RIP

(the guy who played Wiesler)

rener, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 14:11 (sixteen years ago) link

six months pass...

"a bit schmaltzy," you bet.

If only more playwrights and actresses had introduced Stasi loners to Brecht, the Wall woulda been down in 1970.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:48 (sixteen years ago) link

I thought the movie was schmaltzy but still surprisingly effective, this mostly due to the central performance. Liked it much better than the highly-regarded domestic (American) melodramas I've seen recently: Mystic River blah blah.

I don't buy either of these absolutist, omniscient critiques, though:

the Stasi officer Wiesler helping Dreymann is such utter nonsense that it ruins the whole movie. It would never happen that some one with over 20 years of continuous indoctrination by the Stasi would help a mortal enemy of the State

-- Tracer

(Imagining that Weixler could exist) betrays ... a misunderstanding of the nature of totalitarianism in general, and the Stasi specifically. No Stasi agent would have been able to keep a secret like that, because everything was rigorously cross-checked and verified. No Stasi agent would have been on control of an entire investigation, from surveillance to interrogation, the way Weisler was.

-- Alfred

The world isn't sufficiently well-regulated to allow that kind of absolute & total certainty. Not even the world of the Stasi. It's always at least possible that human decision-making and/or fallibility could alter the program. There's always a corner here or there where something happens differently, for some unforseen reason. And it's always possible that a seemingly well-indoctrinated man might experience a change of heart even without the agency of "a death, an assault, an an acid trip."

But, yeah, the ending was kinda corny.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:16 (sixteen years ago) link

it's a total melodrama. nothing wrong with that.

s1ocki, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:17 (sixteen years ago) link

and the criticism that this could never happen is just silly. no one ever defected? no one ever passed secrets to the americans? give me 1 break. or in other words, what contenderizer said.

s1ocki, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:18 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean if you're going to deny even the remotest possibility of change in a human being i don't really see how you can buy any sort of drama.

s1ocki, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:18 (sixteen years ago) link

xp: A totally unpersuasive one. Hollywood remake coming soon! really!

If you'd like to see the lead actress in a good, offbeat thriller: Summer '04

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh yeah.

James Redd and the Blecchs, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:20 (sixteen years ago) link

how are they gonna do a h'wood remake??

s1ocki, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:20 (sixteen years ago) link

the lives of other others

gff, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:21 (sixteen years ago) link

takes place under the shadow of the wall between virginia and west virginia

gff, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:22 (sixteen years ago) link

lol at early "Spacey" posts, he can play the lead. I think Sydney Pollack bought the rights.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:22 (sixteen years ago) link

(tho may not live to make it)

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:22 (sixteen years ago) link

it's always possible that a seemingly well-indoctrinated man might experience a change of heart even without the agency of "a death, an assault, an an acid trip."

Not this particular man in this film.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:22 (sixteen years ago) link

what does that mean? is he like your BFF or something? xp

s1ocki, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:24 (sixteen years ago) link

WORKS OF DRAMA IN NOT ENTIRELY REALISTIC SHOCKER.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:24 (sixteen years ago) link

critics using generalizations to explain reactions shockah

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:25 (sixteen years ago) link

like you're not generalizing!

s1ocki, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:25 (sixteen years ago) link

The problem is it's sledgehammer-obvious. "You'll be steaming open envelopes..." CUT TO STEAMING OPEN ENVELOPES.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:26 (sixteen years ago) link

oh wait. i misread that. xp

s1ocki, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:26 (sixteen years ago) link

right, and I think it's especially cheeky to complain about the treatment of the protagonist here when like 2/3rds of the entire anglophone cinematic tradition is about those colorful rapey blood-soaked sociopaths who built our respective countries into what they are today, america esp. with all them westerns (also I finally watched gangs of ny lol)

what the fuck does this have to with the fact that the protagonist's evolution into a Rilke-loving quasi-softie is convincing?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 19 June 2008 18:24 (fifteen years ago) link

I saw it. I liked it, though I had a little more trouble with the believability of Dreyman, rather than Wiesler.

clotpoll, Thursday, 19 June 2008 19:02 (fifteen years ago) link

one month passes...

fukk all y'all i CRIED REAL TEARS at the end of this

Just got offed, Thursday, 14 August 2008 17:00 (fifteen years ago) link

one year passes...

so this is showing on the big screen here soon - worth seeing? didn't want to go through the thread for fear of spoilers. should be noted I'm not a big fan of calculated shmaltz (I did cry in theaters during A.I. though)

囧 (dyao), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 09:52 (fourteen years ago) link

it's pretty good, looks really nice, and obv the historical setting is fascinating. but maybe leave 10 mins before the end if you don't like schmaltz :)

jabba hands, Wednesday, 9 December 2009 09:57 (fourteen years ago) link

haha - not sure how the people I would be seeing it with would take it. I'll tell them I need to make some stock trades

囧 (dyao), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 09:59 (fourteen years ago) link

yes it's good. leave when they stop steaming envelopes because maybe you are allergic to envelopes.

wmlynch, Wednesday, 9 December 2009 18:46 (fourteen years ago) link

i liked this a lot, saw it in the cinema and really loved it until the end, which is pretty shit. But apart from that enjoyable.

Pedro Paramore (jim), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 18:48 (fourteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.