Struck me that Schreiber's Marty sums up the movie: reserved, methodical, allergic to grandstanding, incredibly professional, doggedly focussed on getting the job done still looks otm, and, I suppose, what the naysayers on this thread dislike too -- grindingly focused on getting the job done.
― a Stalin Stale Ale for me, please (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 23 February 2019 23:51 (five years ago) link
I did appreciate how certain things were seen as axiomatic by most of the main characters, that you could sense said axioms, and that instead of being the focus or subject of something where they were either openly tested or someone had a 'change of heart,' they just continued to operate by them -- which, in my view, is pretty much how humans work. I especially appreciated how with the clues-as-such for Keaton's near-ending revelation about who buried the story earlier was neither specifically telegraphed nor made more of a thing by the movie when it did surface -- Keaton gave nothing away, keeping it totally internal until then (again, much like people are), and Schreiber just noted it and moved on.
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 23 February 2019 23:55 (five years ago) link
yep, well put
― god knows i want to fp (darraghmac), Sunday, 24 February 2019 00:05 (five years ago) link
finally got around to seeing this and thought it was really solid - the scene right at the end where ruffalo is leaving tucci's office and sees two little kids who have recently been abused waiting to tell tucci their stories was devastating
― Is it true the star Beetle Juice is going to explode in 2012 (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 3 October 2019 13:06 (four years ago) link
Popped up as I scrolled around Prime, so I watched this again--third time. I've gone from lukewarm to better, and now I'm back to lukewarm. The thing that bugs me most is Mark Ruffalo, otherwise one of my favourite actors for Zodiac, You Can Count on Me, and a couple of other roles. I find him so weird here--affectatious and almost dopy. And as I mentioned in my initial post six years ago, the procedural part of this--piecing together the story--is just so basic.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 30 November 2021 23:08 (two years ago) link
Weird, I just watched this yesterday as well and bookmarked this thread. Admittedly I'm a sucker for procedural stuff but I think the 'basic'-ness of it is... kind of the point? There wasn't really any smoking gun, everyone knew a piece of what was going on, the one priest shown didn't deny it, it's going on, all the time, and why isn't anyone stopping it when there are mechanisms to do so? (Actually this would have been a good direction to have gone stronger on in the movie - there's lots of 'don't cross the church' but I think it's kind of vague and in the end they did and presumably no-one got "fair game"-d?)
― kinder, Wednesday, 1 December 2021 00:14 (two years ago) link
I think keatons social scenes do tbh serve this function very well but plenty itt seem not to have gotten what i did from them
― fix up luke shawp (darraghmac), Wednesday, 1 December 2021 00:23 (two years ago) link
I think the 'basic'-ness of it is... kind of the point?
I know, and I feel silly complaining about it--it's kind of a banality-of-evil story, captured best by the one ex-priest who shrugs his shoulders and says "Yeah, I did, but I wasn't gratified."
Nonetheless, it just doesn't compel me the way Zodiac and All the President's Men do.
― clemenza, Wednesday, 1 December 2021 02:01 (two years ago) link
Sorry, you mentioned the priest yourself.
― clemenza, Wednesday, 1 December 2021 02:02 (two years ago) link
The most harrowing account of the same subject matter I've ever seen is the Canadian film The Boys of St. Vincent.
― clemenza, Wednesday, 1 December 2021 02:03 (two years ago) link
I didn't like how there was so much focus on the journalists uncovering the story, rather than the actual story itself. I thought it was especially jarring considering the subject matter.
― mirostones, Wednesday, 1 December 2021 07:54 (two years ago) link
I've also rewatched Zodiac and ATPM fairly recently, and they are excellent - far more engaging for sure. I think I just appreciate when, on occasion, information recounting events is relayed in a nice straightforward way without unnecessary twists or forced peril - but then again I can't really imagine rewatching it for any reason. xp Good point. i guess there were so many victims. The bit about many no longer being around stuck with me.
― kinder, Wednesday, 1 December 2021 07:56 (two years ago) link
Its a movie about the journalists and the structure within which the people in the story might actually be implicit to whatever degree in an ongoing issue of this type
And whatever about ones appetite for drama, ATPM and Zodiac are not that, they are classic flashy outsider "why isnt everyone a pure genius railing against this system like me, man!?" tales
That one wins out and one fades away frustrated in the end doesn't change that neither asks the questions spotlight does
― fix up luke shawp (darraghmac), Wednesday, 1 December 2021 10:23 (two years ago) link
Thought this was bumped because Phil Saviano, the first victim to speak up to the Globe, passed away on Sunday.
― ... (Eazy), Friday, 3 December 2021 16:29 (two years ago) link
Watching again (its a good quiet night half watch) and the supporting/incidental cast are really exceptional in this
― pandmac (darraghmac), Tuesday, 11 January 2022 22:20 (two years ago) link
This is getting the Michael Clayton revivalism.
― Max Hamburgers (Eric H.), Tuesday, 11 January 2022 22:29 (two years ago) link
Keaton in this is Keaton-acting in birdman tho, hes bad
― pandmac (darraghmac), Tuesday, 11 January 2022 22:41 (two years ago) link
wait I'm confused -- he's bad in Spotlight?
― Max Hamburgers (Eric H.),
Middlebrow approval suddenly leaks down to hip level?
― So who you gonna call? The martini police (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 11 January 2022 22:43 (two years ago) link
Yeah i think hes up and down in this, sometimes in tune and sometimes full of acting swagger
― pandmac (darraghmac), Tuesday, 11 January 2022 22:52 (two years ago) link
xp yeah, more or less
― Max Hamburgers (Eric H.), Tuesday, 11 January 2022 22:54 (two years ago) link
Keaton and the rest are fine because McCarthy largely sticks to the Bresson dictum of don't-act-behave.
Mark Ruffalo is the apostate.
― So who you gonna call? The martini police (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 11 January 2022 23:01 (two years ago) link
Id have agreed with that on previous viewings
This time ruffalo is agreeable and keaton is less so
― pandmac (darraghmac), Tuesday, 11 January 2022 23:14 (two years ago) link