i liked mirror too
otoh:
tarkovsky movies i have dozed off at least slightly at some point in their duration —
mirrorandrei rublevsolarisstalker
tarkovsky movies i remained conscious throughout their entire duration —
the sacrifice
so, you know, even i don't really trust my opinions on tarkovsky
― thomp, Sunday, 5 July 2009 19:02 (fourteen years ago) link
(i mean if i tried to think about him at all hard, i think i would be hovering around the idea that boredom is sometimes necessary and even aesthetically interesting, which is tbh what this whole sub-stratum of narrative film the thread's defining is about right? ... right?)
― thomp, Sunday, 5 July 2009 19:05 (fourteen years ago) link
to me there is a difference between interesting boredom (sounds contradictory, but i think its true) and frustrating boredom. frustrating boredom is when i'm irritated and just not going with the flow of the movie at all and i'm just like wtf is wrong with these characters and why is this even happening (e.g. synecdoche, ny). interesting boredom is when nothing is happening, but i'm in love with the place that i'm in while nothing is happening, its like being at a boring nightclub vs being at a boring beach.
― karl...arlk...rlka...lkar..., Sunday, 5 July 2009 19:12 (fourteen years ago) link
i watched a 4-hour japanese movie about upskirts and boners yesterday
I'll be watching this too, soon. Am I going to want my four hours back?
― Simon H., Sunday, 5 July 2009 19:14 (fourteen years ago) link
meditative? more like sed(it)ative!
― Garri$on Kilo (Hurting 2), Sunday, 5 July 2009 19:20 (fourteen years ago) link
otm! these kinds of movies are some of my favorites not because they're "difficult" but because they're the opposite, like people-watching somewhere just hanging out. xx-post
― Matt P, Sunday, 5 July 2009 19:20 (fourteen years ago) link
xp karl: yeah, I found Inland Empire to be an example of frustrating boredom - that didn't result in any sort of pay off. Haneke is the pro of frustrating boredom with pay off.
― incomprehensible Kool-Aid swallower (sarahel), Sunday, 5 July 2009 19:51 (fourteen years ago) link
i felt almost the exact opposite. Lynch basically always has payoff for me big time, whereas Haneke sometimes comes across as so moralizing and smug i just want to die (really thinking of seventh continent here, i liked funny games and cache)
― karl...arlk...rlka...lkar..., Sunday, 5 July 2009 20:02 (fourteen years ago) link
though i can understand why someone wouldn't like inland empire. i guess i just love lynch no matter what, idk, its not like i can really explain why anyone should like it, but i don't think its empty.
― karl...arlk...rlka...lkar..., Sunday, 5 July 2009 20:04 (fourteen years ago) link
qft, and beautifully put (though i liked synecdoche)
― mollie sugban (get bent), Sunday, 5 July 2009 20:10 (fourteen years ago) link
xp karl: I can see where you're coming from re Haneke and Lynch. I think it's just a difference in sensibility. I just don't have a lot of patience for what I see as Lynch's gratuitous surrealism, and maybe it's because I'm not a strong proponent of that style/aesthetic.
― incomprehensible Kool-Aid swallower (sarahel), Sunday, 5 July 2009 20:13 (fourteen years ago) link
I loved pretty much every movie Lynch made up to, say, 1995, but his newer stuff kinda bores me for some reason. Inland Empire was a rare example of a Lynch movie I couldn't finish watching.
― Your heartbeat soun like sasquatch feet (polyphonic), Sunday, 5 July 2009 20:18 (fourteen years ago) link
xpost: yeah, understandable. though tbh i don't really associate lynch with other surrealists. i'm not in love with surrealism as a whole, but i have infinite patience for lynch, can't say why exactly, i'd have to think about it.
― karl...arlk...rlka...lkar..., Sunday, 5 July 2009 20:19 (fourteen years ago) link
i don't think haneke ever does this.
― jed_, Sunday, 5 July 2009 21:45 (fourteen years ago) link
or lynch tbh
― Matt P, Sunday, 5 July 2009 21:50 (fourteen years ago) link
true.
― jed_, Sunday, 5 July 2009 21:51 (fourteen years ago) link
I think I love most of the movies on this thread. I like to wrassle with unwieldy cinema.
― bad crack (Eric H.), Saturday, July 4, 2009 9:50 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
me too. only thing is i HAVE to do it in the cinema. on home video i just cannot stay focused. too many distractions.
― Michael tapeworm much talent for the future (s1ocki), Sunday, 5 July 2009 21:52 (fourteen years ago) link
on the rare occasion that lynch draws out a scene to great length his intention is to draw out the dread and anxiety inherent in the scene and draw out your inner fears.
xpost
― jed_, Sunday, 5 July 2009 21:56 (fourteen years ago) link
― Michael tapeworm much talent for the future (s1ocki), Sunday, July 5, 2009 5:52 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
this is exactly my problem and why i have never gotten through andrei rublev even though i know i would love it
― harbl, Sunday, 5 July 2009 21:58 (fourteen years ago) link
I'm the reverse -- sitting through long, slow movies in the theater is too distracting -- the other people, the fact I can't smoke or eat whatever I want, etc.
― incomprehensible Kool-Aid swallower (sarahel), Sunday, 5 July 2009 22:04 (fourteen years ago) link
Jeanne Dielman video cooking contest!!!
http://www.criterion.com/current/posts/1223
― A Patch on Blazing Saddles (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 September 2009 19:28 (fourteen years ago) link
omg
i have to enter this
i make a dope meatloaf and i have watched this entire movie so
― steener HOOStinov (s1ocki), Friday, 4 September 2009 22:31 (fourteen years ago) link
just don't turn tricks. Someone will suffer.
― A Patch on Blazing Saddles (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 September 2009 22:33 (fourteen years ago) link
can i stab someone?
― steener HOOStinov (s1ocki), Friday, 4 September 2009 22:49 (fourteen years ago) link
*SPOILER*
― A Patch on Blazing Saddles (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 September 2009 22:53 (fourteen years ago) link
Oh darn it.
― Alex in SF, Friday, 4 September 2009 22:55 (fourteen years ago) link
After suffering through Liverpool, it dawned on me that my days of tolerance for this sort of movie may finally be reaching an end.
― Xiffy Pup (Eric H.), Sunday, 22 November 2009 02:50 (fourteen years ago) link
Of course, it could be the whole home video thing s1ok referred to above. Maybe in a theater I'd have found the thing as transplendent as most everyone else whose opinions I usually respect did.
http://www.slantmagazine.com/film/film_review.asp?ID=4476http://www.thehousenextdooronline.com/2009/09/liverpool.htmlhttp://www.timeout.com/film/newyork/reviews/85797/liverpool.html
― Xiffy Pup (Eric H.), Sunday, 22 November 2009 02:52 (fourteen years ago) link
The title to this thread is funny because it's this type of shit that Pauline Kael would call out for being full of hot air 9/10 times. I also wonder if she ever got lazy enough to call any movie "meditative."
― bamcquern, Sunday, 22 November 2009 03:12 (fourteen years ago) link
otm
― 311 is a joek (s1ocki), Sunday, 22 November 2009 14:34 (fourteen years ago) link
apparently for kael, "meditative" = satyajit ray
The rhythm of his films seems not slow but, rather, meditative, as if the viewer could see the present as part of the past and could already reflect on what is going on.
-- 3/17/73, on Satyajit Ray's Days and Nights in the Forest
Ray gives the action the distilled, meditative expressiveness that he alone of all directors seems able to give
-- 11/10/75, on Satyajit Ray's Distant Thunder
― hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 22 November 2009 15:29 (fourteen years ago) link
Haha. Thank you.
― bamcquern, Sunday, 22 November 2009 17:11 (fourteen years ago) link
exactly what "sort" of movie, Eric? I wasn't thrilled w/ Liverpool but thought it was OK.
btw that Kael mini-reviews site has been taken down on Geocities.
― Feingold/Kaptur 2012 (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 22 November 2009 19:06 (fourteen years ago) link
(I mean, somehow Esther Kahn didn't make you want to go comatose)
― Feingold/Kaptur 2012 (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 22 November 2009 19:08 (fourteen years ago) link
EK had a plot, of sorts.
Again, this might be in part ugly video screener getting in the way. If there's something going on in the cinematography of Liverpool, I was blinded to it.
― Xiffy Pup (Eric H.), Sunday, 22 November 2009 19:19 (fourteen years ago) link
Was just thinking of recording Old Joy, coming up on TV next week, but then I saw the word "meditative" and thought of this thread.
― Alba, Saturday, 12 January 2013 12:40 (eleven years ago) link
maybe "meditative", but hardly boring. it's good, watch it!
― circa1916, Saturday, 12 January 2013 16:46 (eleven years ago) link
This week I watched a couple of movies that fit this thread. L'avventura and Dead Man. Both had promising openings but were on the boring side tbh.
― you're going home in a crispy ambulance (cajunsunday), Friday, 17 May 2013 21:42 (eleven years ago) link
I've seen films by both those directors that were much more boring.
― ballin' from Maine to Mexico (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 18 May 2013 03:55 (eleven years ago) link
Ha.
― Beam Me Up (I Feel Like Being A) Doomsday Machine (James Redd and the Blecchs), Saturday, 18 May 2013 14:32 (eleven years ago) link
I once scared off a guy who was trying to pick me up at a National Gallery screening by saying that anyone who preferred Lizaveta Markova to Valley of the Bees was prizing quantity over quality.
If I had tried to watch Silent Light in a theater, rather than on DVD, I'm sure I would have walked out in exasperation. And I DID walk out of The Tree of Life--the cosmos-and-dinosaurs sequence was great, but YET ANOTHER sequence establishing that Brad Pitt's character was disappointed with his life, and taking it out by being an exceptionally strict father....
― Word Salad Username (j.lu), Sunday, 19 May 2013 02:36 (eleven years ago) link
Silent Light is deadly and has stopped me from checking out anything else by Reygadas to date.
― Public Brooding Closet (cryptosicko), Sunday, 19 May 2013 04:50 (eleven years ago) link
Walking out of The Tree of Life because it was too heavy handed about Brad Pitt being disappointed with his life and taking it out on his family is seriously hilarious and WTF to me.
― circa1916, Sunday, 19 May 2013 05:34 (eleven years ago) link
Search: Marguerite Duras' India Song and The Truck― Ken L (Ken L), Friday, May 20, 2005 11:32 AM (9 years ago)
Saw India Song last night. Viscerally hated it. I was in such a hurry to vacate the theatre, I forgot my sunglasses. I'm all for Jeanne Dielman and Satantango; this was brutal.
― clemenza, Thursday, 24 July 2014 03:14 (nine years ago) link
That was the most difficult movie I've ever sat through, with the possible sole exception of a Scottish documentary on healing waters
― Josefa, Thursday, 24 July 2014 03:19 (nine years ago) link
Still kind of wonder if S. Ray was just some sort of exceptional outlier in Kael's viewing history.
― You are exactly why people root for the apes (Eric H.), Thursday, 24 July 2014 03:25 (nine years ago) link
More so than RW Fassbinder?
― I Don't Zing Like Nobody (James Redd and the Blecchs), Thursday, 24 July 2014 03:35 (nine years ago) link
Was gonna say, at least there is the diva worship, but ...
― You are exactly why people root for the apes (Eric H.), Thursday, 24 July 2014 03:39 (nine years ago) link
Actually, going by India Song, I'm astounded she reviewed Le Camion so positively. I don't know, maybe they're very different. If they're not...India Song struck me as "The Come-Dressed-As-The-Sick-Soul-of-Europe Parties" turned into a movie.
The Apu films strike me as pretty close to Truffaut in tone. (Why I'm baffled that Truffaut was so condescending towards Pather Panchali.)
― clemenza, Thursday, 24 July 2014 03:42 (nine years ago) link
After re-listening to that Kael-McDonald-Simon recording from '63 again, it seems to me there were a lot of defenders of western civilization that were pretty condescending toward Ray.
― You are exactly why people root for the apes (Eric H.), Thursday, 24 July 2014 03:44 (nine years ago) link