Not all messages are displayed:
show all messages (537 of them)
I think what's being said is that from a legal perspective it has limited reach, but it's part of a beginning trend of state Supreme Courts rebuking SCOTUS and ruling the opposite of Federal precedent, while also calling out SCOTUS's bad reasoning.
In this case, it won't do much legally because the SCOTUS interpretation still supercedes, but in cases like abortion, where Federal law states something isn't a right and state Supreme Court says "well, it is in this state", it can have more impact...even if temporary.
Really feels like mostly a protest, and one I wholeheartedly support
― never trust a big book and a simile (Neanderthal), Sunday, 11 February 2024 17:56 (three months ago) link
it's part of a beginning trend of state Supreme Courts rebuking SCOTUS and ruling the opposite of Federal precedent, while also calling out SCOTUS's bad reasoning
The entire southern tier of US states ignored Brown v Board of Education for a couple of decades. The rest of the USA didn't do remarkably better at school integration, but they didn't have state segregation laws they kept actively enforcing like the southern states did.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Sunday, 11 February 2024 18:39 (three months ago) link