However Blair might if he goes to war without UN backing. Can anyone with a legal mind shed some light on this.
Its a great day for humanity when things like this get off the ground.
― Ed (dali), Tuesday, 11 March 2003 20:58 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Robbie Lumsden (Wallace Stevens HQ), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 13:03 (twenty years ago) link
― Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 13:09 (twenty years ago) link
Bush and Blair are counting on people being this indifferent to their war crimes.
― Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 15:12 (twenty years ago) link
It's a nice idea but if only the playing field were actually level.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 15:18 (twenty years ago) link
I pass the current ICC building in The Hague on my way to work - a military barracks. The US haven't signed + are prepared to use force if any US citizen is brought before it ('Hague Invasion Act'). IIRC Michael Mansfield + some 'radical' lawyers were trying to get Blair prosecuted but the chances must be near zero. I would imagine the ICC needs to establish itself first and inditing Blair would be suicide.
― stevo (stevo), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 15:27 (twenty years ago) link
― stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 15:29 (twenty years ago) link
I'm indifferent to yr pomposity but impressed by yr telepathic powers.
― Dadaismus (Dada), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 14:36 (twenty years ago) link
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 14:44 (twenty years ago) link
It's really the only valid choice for the modern loafer intellectual.
― Robbie Lumsden (Wallace Stevens HQ), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 14:46 (twenty years ago) link
― Dadaismus (Dada), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 14:46 (twenty years ago) link
― Tim (Tim), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 14:46 (twenty years ago) link
― Dadaismus (Dada), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 14:48 (twenty years ago) link
― Tim (Tim), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 14:48 (twenty years ago) link
― Dadaismus (Dada), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 14:50 (twenty years ago) link
― Tim (Tim), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 14:53 (twenty years ago) link
― Dadaismus (Dada), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 14:54 (twenty years ago) link
― keith m (keithmcl), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 23:55 (twenty years ago) link
I'd be perfectly up for those last two in particular being taken down a peg.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 15 April 2004 01:18 (twenty years ago) link
The council did reconvene but no authorisation for the use of force was obtained.
Any notion that the UN gave specific authorisation for the use of force is seriously deluded.
― Ed (dali), Thursday, 15 April 2004 06:24 (twenty years ago) link
― duke year, Thursday, 15 April 2004 06:37 (twenty years ago) link
― Momus (Momus), Thursday, 15 April 2004 06:55 (twenty years ago) link
― cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 15 April 2004 06:58 (twenty years ago) link
― cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 15 April 2004 07:01 (twenty years ago) link
― Momus (Momus), Thursday, 15 April 2004 07:05 (twenty years ago) link
― duke clam, Thursday, 15 April 2004 07:08 (twenty years ago) link
― cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 15 April 2004 07:12 (twenty years ago) link
― Momus (Momus), Thursday, 15 April 2004 07:13 (twenty years ago) link
anyways"(Perle has a vacation home in the South of France)"
might be the real scoop there
― duke goodnite, Thursday, 15 April 2004 07:22 (twenty years ago) link
Why 'avuncular', Dan? The Columbia professor quoted is an anti-war campaigner. Out of all the evidence in that article, you grasped at his adjective 'honest' as though it were some sort of vindication of the Bush regime. Now you're using this word 'avuncular' like the prof was offering Bush a cigar and patting him on the back.
― Momus (Momus), Thursday, 15 April 2004 07:34 (twenty years ago) link
― Momus (Momus), Thursday, 15 April 2004 07:37 (twenty years ago) link
(See dear, that's an ad hominem attack. Chiz for playing)
― suzy (suzy), Thursday, 15 April 2004 09:20 (twenty years ago) link
― duke bones, Thursday, 15 April 2004 16:37 (twenty years ago) link
― duke meat, Thursday, 15 April 2004 17:38 (twenty years ago) link
http://www.wsj.com/articles/gambia-says-it-is-leaving-international-criminal-court-1477483387
― Mordy, Wednesday, 26 October 2016 14:08 (seven years ago) link