GMail: The Backlash?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://gmail-is-too-creepy.com/

Problem 1: Gmail is nearly immortal

Google offers 1 gig of storage, which is more than 100 times the storage offered by Yahoo or Hotmail, or any Internet service providers that we know about. The powerful searching encourages account holders to never delete anything. It takes three clicks to put a message into the trash, and more effort to delete this message. It's much easier to "archive" the message, or just leave it in the inbox and let the powerful searching keep track of it. Google admits that even deleted messages will remain on their system, and may also be accessible internally at Google, for an indefinite period of time.
After 180 days in the U.S., email messages lose their status as a protected communication under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, and become just another database record. This means that a subpoena instead of a warrant is all that's needed to force Google to produce a copy. Other countries may even lack this basic protection, and Google's databases are distributed all over the world. Since the Patriot Act was passed, it's unclear whether this ECPA protection is worth much anymore in the U.S., or whether it even applies to email that originates from non-citizens in other countries.

Google's relationships with government officials in all of the dozens of countries where they operate are a mystery, because Google never makes any statements about this. But here's a clue: Google uses the term "governmental request" three times on their terms-of-use page for Gmail and once on their privacy page. Google's language means that all Gmail account holders have consented to allow Google to show any and all email in their Gmail accounts to any official from any government whatsoever, even when the request is informal or extralegal, at Google's sole discretion. Why should we send email to Gmail accounts under such draconian conditions?


Problem 2: Google's policies do not apply

The phrasing and qualifiers in the Gmail privacy policy are creepy enough, but nothing in any of Google's policies or public statements applies to those of us who don't have Gmail accounts. Google has not even formally stated in their privacy policy that they will not keep a list of keywords scanned from incoming email, and associate these with the incoming email address in their database. They've said that their advertisers won't get personally identifiable information from email, but that doesn't mean that Google won't keep this information for possible future use. Google has never been known to delete any of the data they've collected, since day one. For example, their cookie with the unique ID in it, which expires in 2038, has been tracking all of the search terms you've ever used while searching their main index.

Problem 3: A massive potential for abuse

If Google builds a database of keywords associated with email addresses, the potential for abuse is staggering. Google could grow a database that spits out the email addresses of those who used those keywords. How about words such as "box cutters" in the same email as "airline schedules"? Can you think of anyone who might be interested in obtaining a list of email addresses for that particular combination? Or how about "mp3" with "download"? Since the RIAA has sent subpoenas to Internet service providers and universities in an effort to identify copyright abusers, why should we expect Gmail to be off-limits?
Intelligence agencies would love to play with this information. Diagrams that show social networks of people who are inclined toward certain thoughts could be generated. This is one form of "data mining," which is very lucrative now for high-tech firms, such as Google, that contract with federal agencies. Email addresses tied to keywords would be perfect for this. The fact that Google offers so much storage turns Gmail into something that is uniquely dangerous and creepy.


Problem 4: Inappropriate ad matching

We don't use Gmail, but it is safe to assume that the ad matching is no better in Gmail, than it is in news articles that use contextual ad feeds from Google. Here's a screen shot that shows an inappropriate placement of Google ads in a news article. We also read about a lawyer who is experimenting with Gmail. He sent himself a message, and discovered that the law practice footer he uses at the bottom of all of his email triggered an ad for a competing law firm.
Another example is seen in the Google ads at the bottom of this story about Brandon Mayfield. There are two ads. One mentions sexual assault charges (sex has nothing to do with the story), and the other is about anti-terrorism. The entire point of this article, as well as a New York Times piece on May 8, 2004, is that a lawyer has had his career ruined due to overreaction by the FBI, based on disputed evidence. He was arrested as a material witness and his home and office were searched. The NYT (page A12) says that "Mr. Mayfield was arrested before investigators had fully examined his phone records, before they knew if he had ever met with any of the bombing suspects, before they knew if he had ever traveled to Spain or elsewhere overseas. His relatives said he had not been out of the United States for 10 years." The only evidence is a single fingerprint on a plastic bag, and some FBI officials have raised questions about whether this print is a match. While Mr. Mayfield will get his day in court, it appears that Google's ads have already convicted him, and for good measure added some bogus sexual assault charges as well. Would Mr. Mayfield be well-advised to send email to Gmail account holders to plead his case?

Our last example shows three ads fed by Google at the bottom of a Washington Post column titled "Gmail leads way in making ads relevant." The columnist argues that Google's relevant ads improve the web, and therefore she finds nothing objectionable about Gmail. These Google-approved ads offer PageRank for sale, something which only a year ago, Google would have considered high treason. Yes, these ads are "relevant" -- the column is about Google, and the ads are about PageRank. But here's the point: A relevant ad that shows poor judgment is much worse than an irrelevant ad that shows poor judgment. The ads at the bottom of her column disprove her pro-Google arguments. She has no control over this, and is probably not even aware that it happened.

Most writers, even if they are only writing an email message instead of a column in a major newspaper, have more respect for their words than Google does. Don't expect these writers to answer their Gmail.

sounds like paranoid drivel to me.. any thoughts?

Bloodclaart Gangsta Youth Club (don), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 13:25 (nineteen years ago) link

points 1 to 3 = no different to what already goes on in email providers and direct marketing companies all over the world. do you use yahoo or hotmail? do you have a store loyalty card? do you have a credit card? then this kind of information is already being colleted about you, it is how direct marketing works.

point 4 = the adverts seem pretty unobtrusive to me and certainly less annoying than the banners and pop-ups that are plastered all over other webmail sites. the example they quote is pretty sensationalist.

i've been following the gmail hype and backlash, and as far as i can tell all the privacy concerns came about because of some ambiguous wording in google's initial press release. here is google's side of things, in nice plain english: http://gmail.google.com/gmail/help/more.html

pete b. (pete b.), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 13:39 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't ever notice Google ads. I find Gmail to be the fastest webmail service I've ever used, which means they're doing something right.

The people who put together that Gmail Is Too Creepy site are also behind other anti-Google sites which are equally absurd.

Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 14:21 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm not even getting the ads.

edward o (edwardo), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 14:32 (nineteen years ago) link

The only ads I noticed were links to sites with miso chicken recipes and instructions on how to make slippers out of feminine hygiene pads, both very useful information as far as I'm concerned.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 14:36 (nineteen years ago) link

Which reminds me - can someone explain the new ergonomically shaped sanitary towels? I tried to figure it out myself but got too disgusted at where my deductions were leading me.

Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 14:41 (nineteen years ago) link

You shove 'em up your wind tunnel.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 14:44 (nineteen years ago) link

three years pass...

Meet Vampire Females - www.GothScene.com - Date Local Vampire Females Near You View Profiles 100% Free. Join Now!

banriquit, Thursday, 17 April 2008 10:08 (sixteen years ago) link

you have to admit they've got your number

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 17 April 2008 10:23 (sixteen years ago) link

some friends and I tried sending the most offensive stuff we could to each other and learned that you can shut off ads in your gmail if you're willing to litter your emails with enough foul shit

J0hn D., Thursday, 17 April 2008 12:55 (sixteen years ago) link

You can turn off the ads by clicking on 'basic html' at the bottom of the page and then bookmarking that.

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 17 April 2008 13:02 (sixteen years ago) link

two years pass...

Or am I just too old? I hate the damn thing and the whole concept of "conversations." Which you can't turn off btw and have it treat e-mails like e-mails. Had an easier time configuring Sendmail and my own mail server than wrestling with this.

You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike. (hugo), Saturday, 7 August 2010 00:59 (thirteen years ago) link

How To Control Anyone - SecretsOfMindControl.net - Discover The Amazing Mind Control Secrets the Government Doesn't Want You To Know

CharlieS, Saturday, 7 August 2010 15:53 (thirteen years ago) link

government's gonna be PISSED

the itsytitchyschneider (s1ocki), Saturday, 7 August 2010 15:55 (thirteen years ago) link

one time I was drunk on the internet and subscribed to david icke's newsletter. doors are now open.

CharlieS, Saturday, 7 August 2010 15:57 (thirteen years ago) link

some friends and I tried sending the most offensive stuff we could to each other and learned that you can shut off ads in your gmail if you're willing to litter your emails with enough foul shit

wait, what?

also, i can't imagine doing without gmail 'conversations' these days. whenever i look at someone else's email that doesn't have that it's just. urgh.

thomp, Saturday, 7 August 2010 16:00 (thirteen years ago) link

Yeah, old-style email seems like parchment and quills to me.

All I wanted was a Pepsi and she wouldn't giveittome. (Johnny Fever), Saturday, 7 August 2010 19:14 (thirteen years ago) link

Well get off my lawn.

You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike. (hugo), Sunday, 8 August 2010 04:05 (thirteen years ago) link

nine months pass...

Have been sent over to gmail at work, and happy to experience it at last. Seems good in some ways.

One thing really puzzling me about it, though. It used to be described as infinite storage, massive storage or whatever. That was originally a big selling point for gmail, as I recall. But I have an account with 187 emails in it, mostly not with attachments, and that's already taking 2% of the space. If I import more emails from anywhere else - it's going to be full in no time.

What does anyone do about this? Buy more space? Is that worth it?

the pinefox, Tuesday, 7 June 2011 15:12 (twelve years ago) link

Hmm, I've been using it for about six years now, hardly ever delete anything and I'm only at about 9%.

the fey bloggers are onto the zagat tweets (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 7 June 2011 15:14 (twelve years ago) link

That's interesting.

The reason that this account I mention is already at 2% is that I imported the inboxes (though not the hundreds of other saved messages) from two other email accounts. Could it be that they take up more space cos they're from another system? ... Maybe, but I wouldn't have guessed it.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 7 June 2011 15:22 (twelve years ago) link

I don't know, I've never imported anything from an outside account into Gmail.

the fey bloggers are onto the zagat tweets (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 7 June 2011 15:23 (twelve years ago) link

I've been using it for seven years, sending and receiving dozens of emails a day, and I'm only at 42%. I think you'll be okay.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 7 June 2011 15:29 (twelve years ago) link

Um, 2% is nothing. You wont fill it up, trust me. Unless every single email you have has a 10mb attachment (gmail wont accept emails with files larger than that attached anyway) and even then - you wont fill it up.

Ive had my Gmail account since 2004. I am often sent mp3, pics, I get a TON of spam, I never delete anything, and I'm only at 25%.

“this dog won’t hunt” doesn’t appear in the Book of Proverbs (Trayce), Wednesday, 8 June 2011 01:33 (twelve years ago) link

i'm pretty sure they scale up and increase the storage all the time too.

akm, Wednesday, 8 June 2011 02:26 (twelve years ago) link

I use google docs too - its like 5$ for 20gb for a year - AND you can upload files up to a gig = so you know, home movies

Latham Green, Wednesday, 8 June 2011 15:51 (twelve years ago) link

my gmail has gone above a gig! i never even noticed

thomp, Wednesday, 8 June 2011 15:52 (twelve years ago) link

I am now more content about the storage issue.

I now have another, different Gmail issue.

At work my old email is being migrated to a Gmail account. There is a LOT of this mail. Too much, I admit.

OK. When the mail arrives in my Gmail account, I can Search mail by a name for instance, delete some, and and then assign what I want to a folder (label?), eg named after that person, right?

No, apparently not. Within Search Mail, the only command that appears is 'Move to Inbox'. But this mail is already in the Inbox - I'm trying to move it out of the Inbox!

Any insight welcome.

the pinefox, Thursday, 9 June 2011 18:39 (twelve years ago) link

are you using basic or enhanced version

Latham Green, Thursday, 9 June 2011 18:43 (twelve years ago) link

I assume it's Basic.

My work Gmail is a modified version for my employer.

But I have another free (basic?) Gmail account that does the same thing.

the pinefox, Thursday, 9 June 2011 18:51 (twelve years ago) link

gmail does attachments up to 25MB

conrad, Thursday, 9 June 2011 18:52 (twelve years ago) link

Conrad, would like your view on the question about Searching then moving stuff that has been found.

the pinefox, Thursday, 9 June 2011 18:55 (twelve years ago) link

I don't have cause to do any of this searching then moving stuff that has been found but will take a swatch

conrad, Thursday, 9 June 2011 18:57 (twelve years ago) link

can't you select stuff that has been found and then "label" it and "archive" it? is that not essentially the same thing as putting it in a folder?

conrad, Thursday, 9 June 2011 18:59 (twelve years ago) link

I just check mark the box by the mail message and click the move to button and move to what folder I want

Latham Green, Thursday, 9 June 2011 19:05 (twelve years ago) link

'Label' leaves it in the Inbox. What I want, is to move it.

Maybe 'Archive' would do it!? Maybe that's the answer?!

the pinefox, Thursday, 9 June 2011 19:06 (twelve years ago) link

one doesn't have that option with search results

crosspost

"archive" would do it

conrad, Thursday, 9 June 2011 19:06 (twelve years ago) link

alternately try "Filter messages like these" from the "More actions" dropdown

low-rent black gangster nicknamed Bootsy (DJP), Thursday, 9 June 2011 19:07 (twelve years ago) link

I don't think that that moves them, from the Inbox. I did try it.

I think I have found a possible way:

Search
Check (everything? or only certain things maybe - but that makes it a lot slower)
Move to Inbox
go to Inbox - you find those things ticked
Click Move to ... folder
the ticked things move.

Might work but seems a bit slower / more counter-intuitive than I expected from Google.

the pinefox, Thursday, 9 June 2011 19:17 (twelve years ago) link

... no, I don't know if that does work after all.

the pinefox, Thursday, 9 June 2011 19:19 (twelve years ago) link

Move only works for the page of mails you're on.
So if you're trying to move stuff within 100s / 1000s of mails, no good.

Will try Archive again.

the pinefox, Thursday, 9 June 2011 19:21 (twelve years ago) link

selecting the emails and labelling them and archiving them will remove them from the inbox

conrad, Thursday, 9 June 2011 19:22 (twelve years ago) link

I think, to do what you're trying to do, you need to filter so that you can apply a new label to the messages, then archive so they get taken out of the inbox. The whole point of Google mail though is that you do your partitioning via searching so you never actually need to move anything out of the inbox.

low-rent black gangster nicknamed Bootsy (DJP), Thursday, 9 June 2011 19:23 (twelve years ago) link

pinefox, there is no such thing as a folder.

http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=118708

you can label messages but they appear with those labels either in the inbox or in the archives (to be found by searching).

j., Thursday, 9 June 2011 19:26 (twelve years ago) link

xpost: ... surprised by your last claim -- you mean it's OK to have an Inbox with 1000s of mails?

Don't think I want that - though I have had it for years now!

I would have thought that 'partitioning' was via labels?

Think Conrad's statement, above, is correct, have just tried it.

the pinefox, Thursday, 9 June 2011 19:27 (twelve years ago) link

I currently have 10,000+ emails in my inbox; whenever I want a particular email, I search for a keyword. I could be more organized and label everything; then, I could filter down using label selection before doing keyword searches. I have exactly zero problems with my mail.

low-rent black gangster nicknamed Bootsy (DJP), Thursday, 9 June 2011 19:30 (twelve years ago) link

everything in my inbox

conrad, Thursday, 9 June 2011 19:31 (twelve years ago) link

i have set up filters that automatically label almost everything coming in

then i archive them; my inbox has like a dozen messages in it

/anal

mookieproof, Thursday, 9 June 2011 19:33 (twelve years ago) link

See I like to only have things in my inbox that I haven't replied to or need to do something about.

I'm happy enough with everything else just being in the Archive though.

a fucking stove just fell on my foot. (Colonel Poo), Thursday, 9 June 2011 19:34 (twelve years ago) link

The Archiving thing did work

only one drawback - it only archives 20 things at a time

so if you have 100s of that thing it takes a while

the pinefox, Thursday, 9 June 2011 19:37 (twelve years ago) link

i switched over to pale moon when the new firefox broke several extensions i found important, but it might soon be time to switch back

mookieproof, Friday, 28 September 2018 01:36 (five years ago) link

Firefox is very slow on my laptop and it makes the fan rev up like crazy. I hate it. But since I get emails at 3 different addresses all day long, I have to keep Chrome, Safari and Firefox running simultaneously.

grawlix (unperson), Friday, 28 September 2018 02:48 (five years ago) link

sounds like you woulda been a definite candidate for a standalone email client back when that was actually how everyone read their email anyway

j., Friday, 28 September 2018 03:08 (five years ago) link

you can be signed into 3 gmails at once, don't need 3 browsers open

anvil, Friday, 28 September 2018 04:23 (five years ago) link

hotmail, hot and mail

self (alomar lines), Friday, 28 September 2018 04:37 (five years ago) link

hate the new gmail look, especially since i never use hangouts and so have the right hand side of the screen filled by something useless. anyone know if there's a way to remove it?

Jibe, Friday, 28 September 2018 06:54 (five years ago) link

the idea that people would use browser email is totally bizarre to me. why??

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 28 September 2018 06:59 (five years ago) link

Cant install a client at work so browser it is

licorice oratorio (baaderonixx), Friday, 28 September 2018 07:01 (five years ago) link

lonesome hobo, cast from computer to computer with no harbor but my browser login with which to complete the tasks assigned by my employer

j., Friday, 28 September 2018 07:04 (five years ago) link

same as j.
i don't use it that often, but every time i do it annoys me tbh

Jibe, Friday, 28 September 2018 07:07 (five years ago) link

y'all are crazy, Gmail is the best

the word dog doesn't bark (anagram), Friday, 28 September 2018 08:01 (five years ago) link

Yeah - work recently moved over from Lotus Notes and GMail is sooo good.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 28 September 2018 08:50 (five years ago) link

Though people are looking to turn off conversations because there is literally no learning some people.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 28 September 2018 08:51 (five years ago) link

hate the new gmail look, especially since i never use hangouts and so have the right hand side of the screen filled by something useless. anyone know if there's a way to remove it?

I don't have anything on the right of my screen except a tiny column with some buttons - calendar, keep, and tasks.

Winner of the 2018 Great British Bae *cough* (ledge), Friday, 28 September 2018 09:20 (five years ago) link

and even that has a button at the bottom to collapse it.

Winner of the 2018 Great British Bae *cough* (ledge), Friday, 28 September 2018 09:21 (five years ago) link

yeah i have that panel too. i also realised i'm an idiot and i just needed to deactivate the chat in my settings

Jibe, Friday, 28 September 2018 09:28 (five years ago) link

I have to click on everything twice and it's slower.

And seeing that Gmail envelope animation every 35 seconds like it's the Batman logo doesn't help.

pplains, Saturday, 29 September 2018 01:08 (five years ago) link

same

mookieproof, Saturday, 29 September 2018 01:17 (five years ago) link

Remember dial up

F# A# (∞), Saturday, 29 September 2018 01:24 (five years ago) link

∞ you've been particularly helpful lately

thank's

mookieproof, Saturday, 29 September 2018 01:32 (five years ago) link

U put out luv to the world and u get it back is how i c it

mooks <3

F# A# (∞), Saturday, 29 September 2018 01:35 (five years ago) link

the idea that people would use browser email is totally bizarre to me. why??

― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 28 September 2018 4:59 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Always flummoxed by this. I feel I should be using something better than Apple mail; what’s good?

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Saturday, 29 September 2018 03:21 (five years ago) link

eudora

j., Saturday, 29 September 2018 03:25 (five years ago) link

compuserve

F# A# (∞), Saturday, 29 September 2018 03:34 (five years ago) link

Apple Mail is pretty decent tbh

Mutt if you’re nasty

I have measured out my life in coffee shop loyalty cards (silby), Saturday, 29 September 2018 04:19 (five years ago) link

🐶

F# A# (∞), Saturday, 29 September 2018 04:21 (five years ago) link

airmail's ok. that's what i use, along with spamsieve.

i'd probably use Apple Mail except there's a bug that renders all my IMAP email in black text with a black background. i even got a new hard drive, fresh install of high Sierra, did NOT restore any data, put all my info in from scratch and the bug was still there. only thing I've found online about it is something similar from like 2014 if you were running a beta or something..

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 29 September 2018 09:14 (five years ago) link

one month passes...

i used to run a decade-out-of-date machine that was pretty taxed by browser usage, merely even loading the hangouts widget was an obvious bottleneck

but now on my fast new computer it still sometimes shows the 'something's wrong' error in that widget's frame intermittently

j., Monday, 19 November 2018 19:36 (five years ago) link

yup, it's considerably slower and glitchier since the update on 2 of my older pc's.

Ludo, Monday, 19 November 2018 20:12 (five years ago) link

three years pass...

The way the official, promoted ads in my 'Promotions' tabs jump around about 2-5 seconds after I open the tab, ensuring I click on an ad instead of the actual email I want to open, is driving me bonkers. Even knowing it's coming and waiting a few extra seconds only works about half the time, they seem to have learned just how to time them.

Extra annoying that these two promoted ads are no longer consistently at the top of the page, easy to ignore.

a superficial sheeb of intelligence (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 17 November 2022 18:19 (one year ago) link

gmail is trash

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 17 November 2022 18:47 (one year ago) link

I used to like it. As I complained in another thread the search function is terrible, and Google’s core business is a search engine!

Lord Pickles (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 17 November 2022 18:59 (one year ago) link

Use Fastmail (affiliate link) (https://fastmail.com <- not an affiliate link)

G. D’Arcy Cheesewright (silby), Thursday, 17 November 2022 19:05 (one year ago) link

fastmail security supposed to be a bit shit? (full disclosure: i use fastmail for personal non spam email because i like it and don’t care)

Fizzles, Thursday, 17 November 2022 19:41 (one year ago) link

have never heard that nor do I know what you might be referring to

G. D’Arcy Cheesewright (silby), Thursday, 17 November 2022 19:43 (one year ago) link

have had no issues re gmail or search.
in fact, i have no 'promotions' tab !?

mark e, Thursday, 17 November 2022 19:55 (one year ago) link

have never heard that nor do I know what you might be referring to


the main thing is lack of e2e encryption. some people don’t like the fact the servers are oz based from a privacy pov but as my emails are mainly “hi how’s it going” type i’m not overly worried.

Fizzles, Friday, 18 November 2022 06:38 (one year ago) link

have had no issues re gmail or search.
in fact, i have no 'promotions' tab !?


also this

Fizzles, Friday, 18 November 2022 06:38 (one year ago) link

Oh I mean in practice most email you send will be TLS encrypted between servers and if you use any email provider you’re kind of trusting your provider to not read your email no matter what, nothing special about Fastmail there. Also I’m sure their infra is deployed worldwide now the internet isn’t good enough in Australia to run a service from there I’m pretty sure

G. D’Arcy Cheesewright (silby), Friday, 18 November 2022 06:58 (one year ago) link

My impression of Australia is the whole country is sharing one asymmetric DSL connection that goes to Singapore and they each pay $89 a month for it

G. D’Arcy Cheesewright (silby), Friday, 18 November 2022 06:59 (one year ago) link

xxpost - I don't know if it was something with my settings, but several years ago my Gmail started appearing pre-screened into three tabs at the top - Primary, Promotions and Social. For the most part it does a pretty good job of sorting my incoming mail into the appropriate tabs, although I have had to do a little "training" for newsletters and such. I'm sure there's some setting for this, but I'm actually okay with it and I didn't do anything intentional to set up these tabs, they just showed up. The Promotions tab is the only one that had the embedded ads.

a superficial sheeb of intelligence (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 18 November 2022 17:38 (one year ago) link

that sounds like a nightmare to me. if gmail had any advertising at all i would be gone immediately.

budo jeru, Friday, 18 November 2022 18:12 (one year ago) link

Yeah I've had the tab setup on the browser gmail for a few years, it happened automatically. Yes it has embedded ads but it also segregates useless promotional emails with a pretty high degree of accuracy (I also train it sometimes). Makes gmail an better experience overall, most days I don't even open the Promotions tab. In the app version, I use the Primary view, where Promotions is not a tab but they show up grouped together at the top of my email, which is slightly more annoying than the browser version

Vinnie, Saturday, 19 November 2022 01:10 (one year ago) link

I have several Gmail accounts and only one of them has that "promotions" tab and only one or two emails ever get sent there. Usually they're notifications from Zoom or something stupid like that.

but also fuck you (unperson), Saturday, 19 November 2022 02:26 (one year ago) link

I think they offered me the promotions 'upgrade' a couple of years ago, I declined and they haven't asked me since.

ledge, Saturday, 19 November 2022 08:09 (one year ago) link

The Promotions tab is great. Filters out all the offer emails from companies you've purchased from in the past etc

Very easy to quickly scan through the list to see if there's anything of interest and then bulk delete them.

groovypanda, Saturday, 19 November 2022 09:24 (one year ago) link

It's fine, I'm sure it could be better but it's just frickin email and I don't care enough to change, though I'm sure there are better alternatives

Blues Guitar Solo Heatmap (Free Download) (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Saturday, 19 November 2022 14:54 (one year ago) link

it's super easy to customize / remove the tabs in gmail!

The Promotions tab is great. Filters out all the offer emails from companies you've purchased from in the past etc

Very easy to quickly scan through the list to see if there's anything of interest and then bulk delete them.

exactly! Recently I had to go through a bunch of emails on an old work computer where I was using MS Outlook (ah the days of configuring POP3 settings ...) and realized that having to sort through a bunch of promotional email from like Office Depot and gig announcements for concerts in places I will never go ... that used to be a major part of "my email lyfe" and now ... promotions tab + forums tab -- not any more.

sarahell, Saturday, 19 November 2022 19:01 (one year ago) link

Also! Also! being able to have multiple gmail account inboxes show in the app ... I think that was my technology excitement of the month when I figured that out tbh

sarahell, Saturday, 19 November 2022 19:04 (one year ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.