What Do Stupid People Talk About?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
so I was waiting on these two girls today, and, between them, i'd put their IQ somewhere around 87. (it took about three minutes for them to figure out why the CD itself wasn't exactly 16.99...i.e. there was sales tax. please keep in mind they were both in their early 20s.) and as they were walking away i wondered, "what are they going to talk about on the ride home?" not that all discussions have to be about derrida or the guantanamo bay ruling or the price of rice in cuba, but i just can't imagine. is it all prosaic and basic chit chat about their daily lives as it happens?

benito mussolinington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 20:46 (twenty-one years ago)

would watching "The Simple Life" give me some insight in this area?

benito mussolinington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 20:46 (twenty-one years ago)

I am trying so hard not to link you to threads, so very hard.

Tep (ktepi), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 20:52 (twenty-one years ago)

this is a serious sociological inquiry on my part, tep.

benito mussolinington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 20:53 (twenty-one years ago)

I was being serious, that's the problem!

I think Newlyweds will help you more than The Simple Life here, though, because of its candid slice-of-life approach to stupid.

Tep (ktepi), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 20:56 (twenty-one years ago)

"you mean buffalo don't have wings?"

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 20:57 (twenty-one years ago)

yes i like newlyweds quite a bit, but i think the we-are-also-celebrities part skews it. plus nick is pretty together in a frat guy sort of way.

benito mussolinington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 20:58 (twenty-one years ago)

in my experience: themselves and gossip about their group of friends, mostly.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 20:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Nick is your control! Look at his role in the Bratwurst Investigation, in which -- much like the Federation employing the Prime Directive -- he refuses to explain to JEssica and her mother why bratwurst is white.

Tep (ktepi), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 20:59 (twenty-one years ago)

okay that's seriously one of the funnier things i've read on ilx

benito mussolinington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Most dipshits talk about the Lottery, incessantly. Unless they're rich dipshits.

andy, Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:01 (twenty-one years ago)

i suspect there are a lot of pauses and silences

benito mussolinington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:01 (twenty-one years ago)

OTM re: Nick. I like him in a frat guy sort of way. Also in a repressed homosexuality sort of way.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:02 (twenty-one years ago)

probably about the dorky employees at the record store?

deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:02 (twenty-one years ago)

newly weds is like an advertisement for strict adherence to traditional marriage roles.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Unless they're rich dipshits.

Then they talk about how they won the Lottery.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:02 (twenty-one years ago)

They talk about how Morrissey predicted Princess Diana would die in 1985.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Concerns of the flesh.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:03 (twenty-one years ago)

perhaps i should take a recon mission to the noise dudes board and find out

benito mussolinington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:04 (twenty-one years ago)

You wont return.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:04 (twenty-one years ago)

I think you should seek out old episodes of The Newlywed Game. Apparently, anyone who gets married is stupid for some time after the wedding.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:05 (twenty-one years ago)

They attribute witty comments to pictures by some dead painter.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:05 (twenty-one years ago)

you need to assign yourself a fake login such as "#$#*)(&))" in order to infilitrate their society undetected.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:05 (twenty-one years ago)

"Most dipshits talk about the Lottery, incessantly"

that's my dad! though he's not an idiot.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:06 (twenty-one years ago)

OMG DID YOU SEE HOW BALD THAT GUY IS? HE MUST BE SMART. TEE HEE.

deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:06 (twenty-one years ago)

here i go

AFLAKCKZo 899HBV&*(^(ington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I think it's kind of like being a meat eater and asking, "What do vegetarians eat?" -- the broad categories are going to be the same, side dishes and entrees and desserts, meals at roughly the same time, occasionally vegetarian imitations of meat-eater fare.

So stupid people would talk about all the things other people do, except without ... um, the meat of smart.

Tep (ktepi), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:07 (twenty-one years ago)

ashton kutcher, the simple life, game theory

bill stevens (bscrubbins), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:07 (twenty-one years ago)

[No Name]

29/06/2004
15:19
Re:

what a pile of gob shite. I so wanna be a critic or reviewer, then I could spend my days spouting off my own particular brand of opinionated gob shite.

as I have said, time and time again, and tirelessly say once more............why listen to the opinions of others when we all have our own..................and that is not going to change by hearing somebody else's - nor is yours gonna change somebody elses either!!!!

IP: 64.236.228.41

Nick

29/06/2004
15:29
So what you're saying then...

Is that ALL communication is pointless and no one ever grows, develops or changes?

Nice.

IP: 144.173.6.74

Karim

29/06/2004
16:00
Usually

The people who learn nothing from others' opinions are those whose matter least.

IP: 81.136.229.131

edo

29/06/2004
16:12
Re:

seriously, what does that even mean.

IP: 130.159.248.44

Nick

29/06/2004
16:15
I'll use big letters...

IF YOU NEVER PAY ATTENTION TO THE OPINIONS OF OTHERS, THEN YOUR OWN OPINION IS PROBABLY WORTHLESS.

IP: 144.173.6.74

Karim

29/06/2004
16:22
Granted

I missed out the word "opinions", but you know, it wasn't too hard to work out for anyone with the ability to read.

IP: 81.136.229.131

Nick

29/06/2004
16:25
YEAH KARIM BUT...

WHY READ OTHER PEOPLE'S POSTS WHEN YOU CAN JUST READ YOUR OWN, AFTER ALL YOUR POST ISN'T GOING TO AFFECT MY POST AND NEITHER IS MINE GOING TO AFFECT YOURS, EH, WHAT WHAT, THAT MARGARET THATCHER, WONDERFUL LADY, NO SUCH THING AS SOCIETY, EH, WHAT WHAT, ONLY INDIVIDUALS, ARE YOU A SHED SEVEN FAN, EDO, ARE YOU GOOOOOOOOING FOOOOOR GOOOOOOOOOOOLD?

IP: 144.173.6.74

Nick

29/06/2004
16:31
HEY EDO...

WHY BOTHER LISTENING TO SOMEONE ELSE'S SONGS, EH, CAN'T YOU WRITE YOUR OWN, YOU'RE NEVER GOING TO ENJOY SOMEONE ELSE'S SONGS AND NO ONE ELSE IS EVER GOING TO ENJOY YOUR SONGS SO YOU MIGHT AS WELL LIVE IN A CAVE EH, WHAT WHAT, THAT NIETZSCHE, NICE BLOKE EH, WHAT WHAT.

IP: 144.173.6.74

[No Name]

29/06/2004
16:37
Re:

Ok - so if you take what i said literally to the point that you have taken it to, i admit it does sound foolish - and even in writing it, I could see how what I said could be misconstrued - but my point is, people should think for themselves and have their own opinions, and the opinions of others shouldn't be used to justify their own. Why should a particular review of embrace be used to justify your own opinions which you've formulated yourself. There's no point - the whole point is that they're your opinions, your thoughts, no one elses, and as long as that is the case they don't need to be justified by the opinions of others.

If you want to listen to other peoples thoughts, maybe even agree with them, or if you so choose, take them as your own, then that's up to you, but my point is that we can all think for ourselves and we can all formulate our own opinions without the aid or help of others.

IP: 64.236.228.41

Karim

29/06/2004
16:43
Well duh

...of course we can, but if no-one clashed or agreed or loved or hated then there'd basically be no point in anything. Ever. Interaction is healthy, you know? Discussion and debate are the breeding grounds of creativity.

IP: 81.136.229.131

Nick

29/06/2004
16:43
THAT HELEN KELLER...

FUCKING MAGIC, COULDN'T SEE OR HEAR OR SPEAK OR ANYTHING BUT SHE STILL MANAGED TO GIVE BIRTH TO A DUCK.


Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I imagine Jess strolling over to the noise board a la Apu pretending to be American. "Hello...dudes. How about that manatee over there? Ooh boy. I am so out of my head on fungus."

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:08 (twenty-one years ago)

That last one is brilliant, Nick!

Tep (ktepi), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I had a tense afternoon, Tep.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:09 (twenty-one years ago)

WHAT WHAT = stupid person mating call

martin m. (mushrush), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:10 (twenty-one years ago)

judging from overheard talk around here, it's banal shit like American Idol, celebrities, what "adorable" things their crotch-spawnlings have gotten up to, etc.

Kingfish of Burma (Kingfish), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Here's what happens when somebody finds just the comments page of a blog entry and figures out that you can enter text but doesn't figure out that it's actually part of another site. (Admittedly I probably could have handled the thing better instead of baiting them.)

In the following exchange, I appear as Martin. I've no idea who any of the other people are. (My brother, Darren, had posted earlier in the responses, tho he is not the Darren who posts here. This is just the tail end of the comments for the entry before I locked them.)

---------------------------------------

aimee is amazin

Posted by me at May 20, 2004 06:11 AM

jen n aimee run the show!!!!

Posted by the 2 of us!! at May 20, 2004 06:12 AM

HEY DARREN ITS AIMEE N JEN!! lol a showd aimee this after m/s n u can add things :-D mwuahahahah lol.
darren smells :-P

aimee n jen o.a.m!!!

Posted by aimee n jen at May 20, 2004 06:41 AM

OMGWTF!!1 U R ALL GAY K THX CYA!!!!1

Posted by martin at May 20, 2004 08:10 PM

no rely that wud jus b u

Posted by jen n aimee at May 21, 2004 12:48 PM

Apparently irony is lost on you folks. I think it's especially funny that you've been finding this comments page by doing a google search on "darren is so cool" when you probably don't even know who the Darren is who posted here. I don't even think you have any idea that this page is part of another site.

Take a hike, fuckers.

Posted by martin at May 21, 2004 01:43 PM

fuk u martin!! hey hey jen n ami!! wot yaz up 2?? soz a neva replyied a woz away wotchin a film! lol not as bad as uz :P!!!! lol ko
cya l8a
memba 2 keep ritin :P

Posted by darren at May 21, 2004 02:18 PM

fuk u u big gimp n a half!!
who cares if we found it that way. at least we'r not sad enuf 2 sit out n wurk out why ur on it. get a life n stop gettin wide 2 ppl u dont no!

anyway hey darren :-D lol nuthin much u? lol no bother :-P tok 2 u soon xxxxx

Posted by jen at May 21, 2004 02:46 PM

lol gimp n a half wot an insult jen :P u must be such a cool guy! ^o) ur prob bout 30 or summit livin wif ur maw. ya stupit prik!!!
so newayz jen.. samez reely. wb

Posted by darren at May 21, 2004 02:49 PM

"apparently irony is lost on you folks"
lol haha ur such a fukin sak!! lol a cant stop lafin at u hahaha

Posted by darren at May 21, 2004 02:52 PM

The reason I was able to work out how you got here is because it's my site... I can see it in the log file.

I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't use the comments on this site to send your friends semi-literate notes. As such, I think I'll turn off comments on this thread. Use the extra time to learn how to spell you fucktards.

Posted by martin at May 21, 2004 03:05 PM

martin m. (mushrush), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:17 (twenty-one years ago)

(I assume the big [SIC] for that whole post goes without saying.)

martin m. (mushrush), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:18 (twenty-one years ago)

... you big gimp and a half!

Tep (ktepi), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:20 (twenty-one years ago)

I love people.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:20 (twenty-one years ago)

I just imagine that being said in the same sort of tone and intent as "you big galoot."

"Hey, Charlie, you old son of a bitch, you trainwreck of a cunt, you gimp and a half, how's the wife and kids?"

Tep (ktepi), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:20 (twenty-one years ago)

somebody also please explain to me what is saved by typing "wurk" instead of "work" or "stupit" instead of "stupid." I mean, I get that "lol" is short for "laugh out loud," and though I think it's stupid, I understand the economy.

This is a serious sociological inquiry on my part as well. I really want to know how the fuck AOL-speak happened.

martin m. (mushrush), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:21 (twenty-one years ago)

it's getting far, far worse too.

benito mussolinington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:22 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm not even 100% sure how these kids are going to find jobs eventually. until the AOL-speak generation becomes management, that is.

benito mussolinington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:23 (twenty-one years ago)

It's a dialect/jargon/group-creating/culture-reaffirming thing like "Grand Poobah" and 133+ and "Klan" having a k instead of a c, but that's not an interesting answer.

Tep (ktepi), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:23 (twenty-one years ago)

how else are they going to offend their elders in this age?

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:24 (twenty-one years ago)

"Gimp and a half" made me laugh, but not nearly as much as "ur prob bout 30 or summit livin wif ur maw. ya stupit prik!!!"

I don't live wif my maw, but I'll be damned if it wasn't a dead on guess that I was bout 30 or summit. I'll be 30 in August! ya stupit prik!!!

martin m. (mushrush), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:25 (twenty-one years ago)

They make really awesome stupit prik at the Thai Shack on Vets in Metairie, man. Tons of chiles!

Tep (ktepi), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Tep is the only person on this thread, I think, for whom I have not lost considerable respect.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:28 (twenty-one years ago)

That's stupid.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:29 (twenty-one years ago)

oh please martin, it's not as if an entire generation of americans have birth defects or mental handicaps or learning disabilities...they're just FUCKING STUPID.

benito mussolinington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:33 (twenty-one years ago)

I am finding hacker-speak just as annoying as AOL-speak lately. Anyone want to meet for l0nch tommorow?

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:34 (twenty-one years ago)

I think Shalizi is awesome, but I do think he's pulling an RA Fisher / tobacco, which is to say that he's prob wrong, but is such a genius that he's capable of presenting an argument that matches his own ideology but is difficult to assail despite being false.

Dan I., Wednesday, 3 May 2017 01:37 (nine years ago)

"But" "but" "but" forgive me, I'm three drinks in the bag and posting from my phone

Dan I., Wednesday, 3 May 2017 01:39 (nine years ago)

And who can blame him, so many of the people who discuss individual differences in intelligence online are racist pieces of shit. Fuck them, but also g is real and strongly influenced by genetics . Shrug emoji

Dan I., Wednesday, 3 May 2017 01:47 (nine years ago)

thx for that CS post

flopson, Wednesday, 3 May 2017 03:19 (nine years ago)

I graduated from HS with a 3.8 GPA and scored a 1330 on the SAT, then -- because of factors having nothing to do with "intelligence" as it appears to be being discussed -- flunked out of college with a 1.8 my sophomore year. There are lots of factors standardized tests can't take into account, obvs.

1330 is a fairly mediocre score, is it not?

sarahell, Wednesday, 3 May 2017 11:25 (nine years ago)

Is it? (Or was it in 1987?) I have no idea.

(googles)

It appears the mean SAT scores in 1986-87 were 507 on the "critical reading" section and 501 on the math. (524/514 for white students.) My scores (checks) were 640 and 690. So above the mean, whether it's "mediocre" or not would I guess require knowing percentiles for that year. Which I'm not remotely interested in looking up.

Lauren Schumer Donor (Phil D.), Wednesday, 3 May 2017 11:56 (nine years ago)

1330, pssh, I did better than that when I took it in middle school :P
(for a gifted program like mh described upthread)

... but it's also worth noting that my parents bought me an SAT test prep book and made me work at it every weekend. I think the best I did on any of the graded practice tests that I took beforehand was a 12something, which shot up to a 1480 on the real thing, and then a 1600 when I took it again in high school. That was enough to earn me a full scholarship to university, which I immediately lost due to poor study habits and general slackassedness; now, ten years later, I'm still trying to finish my bachelor's degree. I spent many of those years viciously reacting againstn and tearing myself down, believing that my so-called 'intelligence' was less-than-worthless since it had failed to secure my happiness or my livelihood -- assuming said intelligence even existed at all, and wasn't just an illusory product of structural factors like class and race.

Weirdly, as I learned from recent conversations with my mom, a lot of the difficulties I ended up experiencing had been predicted in a special session my parents were invited to (after the test I scored 1480 on) about exceptionally bright children whose emotional development lags behind their cognitive abilities.

bernard snowy, Wednesday, 3 May 2017 12:07 (nine years ago)

either way, one 'counterexample' can't prove or disprove anything. at best these theories claim to explain one third of variation in outcomes (graduating from college, in Phil's case), Phil just got pwnd by the other two thirds of senseless chaotic variation

the point C Shalizi was making is specifically about drawing causal inference from principal components/factors (with a heavy dollop of the elite statistician's scorn for dirty social scientists) he says himself it doesn't disprove the existence of general intelligence (if I tell you your clock is broken and your clock reads 12, I'm not telling you it's not 12)

the best proof that we all believe in "intelligence" writ large of some form is to close this thread and open a politics thread. it's impossible to call Donald Trump an idiot without the concept of a non-idiot. you really want to give up the ability to flippantly call people idiots on a message board?

flopson, Wednesday, 3 May 2017 12:09 (nine years ago)

xp ... and I'm still not smart enough to do things like type all that out and delete it before clicking "submit post"

bernard snowy, Wednesday, 3 May 2017 12:11 (nine years ago)

xp lol I got pwnd because I am lazy and, as you said upthread, tried to coast without expending effort

Lauren Schumer Donor (Phil D.), Wednesday, 3 May 2017 12:15 (nine years ago)

same ;-)

flopson, Wednesday, 3 May 2017 12:17 (nine years ago)

but also, because i was hopelessly Internet-addicted and discovered ilx at age 17 >:(

flopson, Wednesday, 3 May 2017 12:19 (nine years ago)

"hey hey jen n ami!! wot yaz up 2?? soz a neva replyied a woz away wotchin a film! lol not as bad as uz :P!!!! lol ko"

(quoted from way upthread; do people still type like this on the internet?)

I am over a decade late to share the following startling sociological insight, but in the early 00s I was friends on IRC with someone who typed like this all the time, and I confess I thought he was not exactly stupid as he was interesting to talk to and a good & imaginative musician, but "differently smart" perhaps

then he became the editor of a respectable-ish national magazine and it turned out that all along he could in fact spell and form coherent, concise grammatical sentences better than the verbose drivel like what I am currently spattering over the internets

to answer the thread question more directly, I am way less clever than all my acquaintances and I like not talking whenever I can get away with it lest people find out (also overcompensating with archaic words like "lest")

a passing spacecadet, Wednesday, 3 May 2017 13:21 (nine years ago)

1330 is a fairly mediocre score, is it not?

7 short from being elite

^ 諷刺 (ken c), Wednesday, 3 May 2017 14:12 (nine years ago)

i did pass irish and didnt have to attend classes, got a b2

honours: physics, economics, english, french, maths, history

wrote a really good essay for the english higher in particular

is this right is this what we're doing itt

s'rong, unstable (darraghmac), Wednesday, 3 May 2017 14:20 (nine years ago)

1330, pssh, I did better than that when I took it in middle school :P
(for a gifted program like mh described upthread)

... but it's also worth noting that my parents bought me an SAT test prep book and made me work at it every weekend. I think the best I did on any of the graded practice tests that I took beforehand was a 12something, which shot up to a 1480 on the real thing, and then a 1600 when I took it again in high school. That was enough to earn me a full scholarship to university, which I immediately lost due to poor study habits and general slackassedness; now, ten years later, I'm still trying to finish my bachelor's degree. I spent many of those years viciously reacting againstn and tearing myself down, believing that my so-called 'intelligence' was less-than-worthless since it had failed to secure my happiness or my livelihood -- assuming said intelligence even existed at all, and wasn't just an illusory product of structural factors like class and race.

Weirdly, as I learned from recent conversations with my mom, a lot of the difficulties I ended up experiencing had been predicted in a special session my parents were invited to (after the test I scored 1480 on) about exceptionally bright children whose emotional development lags behind their cognitive abilities.

― bernard snowy

wanna take a break from test-score dick-measuring to say that my experience was similar (though my sat score wasn't anywhere close to 1600) and that all the self-undermining aside you _can_ do this. it took me a long time, but i did finally suck it up, do the work, and got past the hurdle where i freak out and say "fuck it" when things go wrong and sorted out the problems instead.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Wednesday, 3 May 2017 14:32 (nine years ago)

guys you are discussing your sat scores on the internet

horseshoe, Wednesday, 3 May 2017 14:57 (nine years ago)

answer to thread title

your cognitive privilege (El Tomboto), Wednesday, 3 May 2017 15:08 (nine years ago)

lol

20-lol pileup (WilliamC), Wednesday, 3 May 2017 15:15 (nine years ago)

ha! yeah, its a little too perfect.

scott seward, Wednesday, 3 May 2017 15:24 (nine years ago)

but love to all you weirdos.

scott seward, Wednesday, 3 May 2017 15:25 (nine years ago)

Every time I click on this thread, I have a flashback to freshman year of college.

Rachel Luther Queen (DJP), Wednesday, 3 May 2017 17:03 (nine years ago)

thread is an episode of Saved By the Bell

Sufjan Grafton, Wednesday, 3 May 2017 17:45 (nine years ago)

I haven't read much through this thread yet because I can only imagine that it is bad and terrible, but every time it comes up to the top of sna I think:

https://vimeo.com/6306434

how's life, Wednesday, 3 May 2017 18:03 (nine years ago)

It is hard in this world to distinguish oneself. One grasps at whatever distinctions offer themselves, even if it is as trivial as having attained a perfect SAT score amid the general wreckage of your life.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 3 May 2017 19:06 (nine years ago)

When I feel like crying I start laughing, thinking 'bout...glory days.

Jigsaw Pizzle (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 3 May 2017 19:17 (nine years ago)

Did so well on the SATs
Glory days
Now I drink to stop the DTs
Glory days
Glory days

Jigsaw Pizzle (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 3 May 2017 19:19 (nine years ago)

I failed to mention my actual weighted GPA on the four point scale

it was 50

a landlocked exclave (mh), Wednesday, 3 May 2017 19:21 (nine years ago)

A teacher told my best friend in high school that he'd never amount to anything. My AP English teacher made a big deal at some school-wide senior awards convocation that people should watch out for my name because she expected big things. My friend went on to do SFX in Hollywood and is probably the most successful person from my graduating class. My English teacher didn't even recognize me at my brother's graduation a few years later, and I lost both of my hands in a threshing accident. Nothing means anything, man.

Jigsaw Pizzle (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 3 May 2017 19:32 (nine years ago)

oh yeah that year I started to really flail in math class from not doing homework (and having what was probably the onset of my anxiety problems really starting to dig in), my mom practically cried after the instructor explained at conferences that I was doomed to life failure or something

I mean, just because I was in advanced math or whatever doesn't mean I'd automatically pick up study skills or understand why my comprehension was lagging. At the time I figured I was just a big fuck-up, but really there are a million things he could have done, from regularly collecting homework (he did it the day after the test) to actually talking to me

a landlocked exclave (mh), Wednesday, 3 May 2017 19:39 (nine years ago)

I'm gonna live forever, baby remember my name

okey-dokey, gnocchi (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 3 May 2017 19:40 (nine years ago)

Click on my post history to find out!

frogbs, Wednesday, 3 May 2017 19:40 (nine years ago)

would be a good first post. damn.

frogbs, Wednesday, 3 May 2017 19:40 (nine years ago)

the principal of my high school told me once that if i didn't watch out i might end up like my brother.

scott seward, Wednesday, 3 May 2017 19:43 (nine years ago)

did the principal murder your brother

Sufjan Grafton, Wednesday, 3 May 2017 19:59 (nine years ago)

nah, he just meant being a loser living in my parent's barn with no electricity and driving a gremlin. i mean i did kinda end up like my brother but fuck that guy and his tough love.

scott seward, Wednesday, 3 May 2017 20:06 (nine years ago)

I got ketchup on my SATs

Charles "Butt" Stanton (Neanderthal), Thursday, 4 May 2017 00:41 (nine years ago)

are you sure that wasn't blood from when you stuck two pencils up your nose and tried to commit suicide

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Thursday, 4 May 2017 00:45 (nine years ago)

no, it was ketchup

Charles "Butt" Stanton (Neanderthal), Thursday, 4 May 2017 01:32 (nine years ago)

why was there ketchup up your nose

j., Thursday, 4 May 2017 01:40 (nine years ago)

wait. the scantron, or the exam book? which part of the test got the condiments?

your cognitive privilege (El Tomboto), Thursday, 4 May 2017 02:46 (nine years ago)

scantron? cripes! when I took these tests it was always "use a number two pencil to completely fill in the circle next to the correct answer", unless, of course, it was the incorrect answer. what the hell is a scantron and can I see one in use in Tron: The Movie?

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 4 May 2017 03:13 (nine years ago)

Oh same thing. The scantron was the machine that needed you to completely fill in the bubble so it could rapidly determine your "g factor" and predict your life

your cognitive privilege (El Tomboto), Thursday, 4 May 2017 03:15 (nine years ago)

thenthe scantron was that devise which was wholly devoted to and adoring of number two pencil graphite. it had no eyes for any other substance, such as ketchup, which caused it to revulse with disgust and dock you precious "g factor" points.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 4 May 2017 03:19 (nine years ago)

have you ever used a scantron machine? it sounds like a machine gun.

Treeship, Thursday, 4 May 2017 03:20 (nine years ago)

my understanding is that machine guns are more Scranton than scantron.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 4 May 2017 03:22 (nine years ago)

why am I feeling dizzy, i think i need to lie d

Charles "Butt" Stanton (Neanderthal), Thursday, 4 May 2017 10:59 (nine years ago)

ah dizziness. smart people don't get that.

Treeship, Thursday, 4 May 2017 11:07 (nine years ago)

FAQs

s'rong, unstable (darraghmac), Thursday, 4 May 2017 11:50 (nine years ago)

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/41CulmIRDnL.jpg

^ 諷刺 (ken c), Thursday, 4 May 2017 16:20 (nine years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.