Trolls

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Is it my imagination or are there more trolls than usual on the boards at the moment?

Tom, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I've noticed it too.

RickyT, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

There are more random people popping up...not like regular new posters, but just random.

jel --, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

There is a definite increase.

stevo, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

It's not yr imagination. I always enjoy the "fuck you assholes the Clash are great" type Trolls who pop up from nowhere and then vanish back into the ether - it's most of the 'new' 'regulars' who are making ILM an increasingly sordid and depressing experience.

There shld be more music chat on ILE, maybe.

Andrew L, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

clip clip clop over the rickety bridge...

katie, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

what's a troll?

nathalie, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I wasn't really thinking of the 'new ILM' as part of the problem, and most of the new regulars there seem fine to me - collectively a bit homogenous perhaps but that's maybe because my memory for names is reaching its limits.

Tom, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Sorry that sounded very patronising - "fine" meaning "non- destructive" not that they reach some patrician standard of posting quality.

Tom, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

It's not yr imagination. I always enjoy the "fuck you assholes the Clash are great" type Trolls who pop up from nowhere and then vanish back into the ether - it's most of the 'new' 'regulars' who are making ILM an increasingly sordid and depressing experience.
Maybe the problem is that you are more... unwilling to accept change. I don't want to sound condescending. But "Destroy the New ILM" (made by Ethan) really stinks. Which doesn't mean I dislike Ethan, on the contrary. But how do you think that feels for a newcomer who asks a question?

stevie, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Nathalie: A troll is basically somebody who comes onto a message board looking to pick fights/goad people into replying. They may or may not believe the things they're saying, it's the aggressive tone that's the giveaway. In small doses I think they're one of the things that makes Internet boards good. In larger doses they can kill boards dead.

Tom, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Sometimes assumptions are made. I also sense that sometimes people tend to not *get* it when people are tongue in cheek.

nathalie, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

there are more trolls at the moment yes, i'm not entirely sure if some of them aren't the same ones with different names (although that doesn't actually make any difference)

trolls dont kill boards. people who respond to them do (and i'm not innocent of this either)

gareth, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Maybe he or she feels more comfortable posting under an assumed name. Maybe he or she wants to start from scratch.

nathalie, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

'Sensitive' people have done far more damage to the boards than people who have had the audacity to attack some of the cosy consensii around here

dave q, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I`m a relative newcomer to these boards. What I`ve posted will never win the nobel prize - but why are you slagging off newcomers? It`s unhealthy to have a comfortable elite who all agree on everything. I found some of the lively recent debate on ILM fascinating.

sledge, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

new posters = always welcome!

jel --, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

This thread wasn't meant to slag off anybody, let alone new posters. I just noticed more trolls and wondered whether I was imagining things.

Q is right - complacency is more destructive than change - BUT there's a difference between challenging consensii and just getting into arguments where both sides are on autopilot.

Tom, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I don't think you are imagining things. There have been a number of weird posters and postings lately (go check the Camp Rock thing or the Eminem thread for ILM examples--although it was kind of clear by the end that latter fella was a bit of a joker). I have no idea if they are random googlers or actually where if anywhere these folks come from. I'm not sure how any of this destroys boards though either. At most it's a mild distraction.

Alex in SF, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm not saying there's any current risk of trolls destroying ILM/ILE - but it has happened to other boards. When the number of threads you enjoy drops below a certain level you move on - too many trolls cause the reasonable why-argue people to move quicker and without them a board becomes a lot more shrill and less affable. Mind you some people like that kind of board - I don't personally.

Tom, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Blimey - I'm not suggesting for a second that 'newcomers' shouldn't be welcomed w/ open arms and given the keys to the executive washroom, or that change is necessarily a bad thing, or that it isn't gd to have a 'cosy consensus' (which I don't think exists on ILM, anyway) shaken up or challenged. But I do find that too often these days good/intriguing threads on ILM get permanently de-railed by useless one-liners, pointless bickering, inane listmaking, or self- aggrandizing posturing. This isn't to slight anyone in particular - and I'm as guilty of all of that as the next person - just that I do think, for a while, the quality of debate on ILM was stronger and more interesting than it is as this particular moment. This isn't to slight the daily stream of thought-provoking/well-expressed opinions, useful consumer tips or funny gags that STILL make ILM the only music board worth visiting.

More likely, I just need to take a break from the net.

Andrew L, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

There have always been trolls here -- it's just in the past they (I use they in this instance because I don't want to point fingers) have been embraced as regulars and tolerated. If a board is going to accept really obnoxious behavior from some people, it stands to reason that other obnoxious twats are going to come along too and expect to be indulged.

Nicole, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

...it's most of the 'new' 'regulars' who are making ILM an increasingly sordid and depressing experience

It's your own fault for encouraging me onto these boards, Andrew!

Martin Skidmore, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

If you're thinking of the same person as I am Nicole I don't think they were ever really a troll.

Tom, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

If you're thinking of the same person as I am Nicole I don't think they were ever really a troll.

Which is the problem here: how do we define a troll?

Nicole, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

He he he he he! (in a quiet, evil, mischievous tone.)

Troll, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

there seem to be quite a lot of them on the E. Wurtzel ILE thread - people who just pop up having googled her name, spout a lot of "oh if you've never been depressed you don't underSTAND" stuff which clearly shows that they've not even bothered to read the whole thread, and then don't bother to stick around to discuss the point. that's the kind of behaviour i find annoying because after all this is meant to be a DISCUSSION board. if you don't want your opinions challenged or aren't prepared to countenance any kind of discussion or argument, why bother in the first place and why ruin it for the rest of us? it's not big OR clever.

again, this is not to put down new people! just the trolls.

katie, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Martin - I think of you of as an 'old' ILM fart already. And as far as I know you haven't got into a fite w/anyone yet (which sort of amazes me - prob. means you haven't talked a lot of shit abt jazz or Neal Adams here yet!:-))

Andrew L, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

personally i think that does constitute a troll. but it is difficult for me to blame trolls, there are abusive people both on and off the net. I think people like myself are to blame, continuing to talk with such people that have no interest in listening, therefore shifting debate onto the troll themselves (which is good for them and their ego i would presume). indulging them just seems a lot easier (but then yes you are tolerating aggressive people, maybe thats just life?)

gareth, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

ie trolls need 'norms'. a) it reinforces their idea of a 'cosy consensus', so they can be the 'individual' that rises above and punctures its 'empty ideals', although this cannot be achieved through debate it seems b) attention (if there were only trolls how would you differentiate?)

gareth, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I don't really notice it too much, but then I haven't posted to any of the major argument/discussion threads on ILE out of ignorance.

Ronan, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

"But I do find that too often these days good/intriguing threads on ILM get permanently de-railed by useless one-liners, pointless bickering, inane listmaking, or self- aggrandizing posturing."

I can't claim to have been reading thoroughly lately, I haven't had much time for ILx. But from what I've read, the majority of the above seem to come from the 'old-timers.'

Dare, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

But I do find that too often these days good/intriguing threads on ILM get permanently de-railed by useless one-liners, pointless bickering, inane listmaking, or self- aggrandizing posturing.

yeah, this is precisely why i've been taking a break from the boards (or trying to anyway...a better one than the half-assed one i did when i moved to washington)...my own behavior/stance on the boards seems to have degenerated down to this level more and more frequently and frankly it pisses me off...i don't like to be cranky (okay maybe just a little), and i don't like to be frustrated all the time, and i don't like to come off as a dullard or - even - a troll myself...i really promised myself - after i broke away from usenet - that i was never gonna join any other "online communities", but ilx really seduced me, because frankly as ramosi said before: i've never encountered a board or whatever with a higher percentage of literate, witty posters with "something to say." unfortunately ilm is shit on a shingle these days and i feel increasingly out of the ile loop. and despite what tom thinks, i really do think a lot of the new "regulars" at ilm (how do we define regular when some of these kids seem to be post twice a week and everyone seems to be posting less?) are part of the problem, not random googlers. i know what boards many of them are coming from, and frankly i didn't/don't want to see the typical indie kid message board posturing/faux- aggression/ego-masturbation be transplanted to ilx.

(*cue tom saying that's not how it is at all, even though he asked the question, and dave saying that we already had all three of those things in abundance already.)

jess, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

oh, and blah blah...i'm not saying there shouldn't be new posters...i've had contact (or they've made contact with me) with several "new" posters (post Jan. 2002?) who have been very thoughtful, interesting people.

jess, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

The qn I asked was about trolls Jess, not about the changing posting demographic of ILM. I think there are more trolls around - I didn't intend this to be soul-searching about the state of the 'community'.

Tom, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

okay, then:

eat it, ewing.

troll, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

jess, are you going to restart your blog?

gareth, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Jess, are you going to send me a tape?

Sarah, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

jess, are you going to do the washing up?

gareth, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

A spot of research confirms that almost all the trolls are the same bloke anyway.

Tom, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

gareth: no, probably not, unless popular demand just overwhelms me with love.

sarah: yes, it is in the mail already. look for it sometime next week? if you want, i shall post the track listing to ile. (i don't from transatlantic mail times.)

gareth: if the vote of the whole house is against me, yes.

tom: fnar.

jess, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

(i don't KNOW from transatlantic mail times.)

jess, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I wonder if this "same bloke" knows what an IP address is?

MarkH, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

A spot of research confirms that almost all the trolls are the same bloke anyway

now theres a surprise!!! but it does make you think doesn't it? i mean, it might be kinder just to let them continue. if they like doing it that much and it keeps them happy?

gareth, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Well there's not much I can do about it anyway Gareth so, yeah.

Tom, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yeah Jess! Tracklisting++!

Sarah, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I actually use an alter ego because I had the distinct feeling people don't tend to take me seriously (for whatever reason). Maybe with good reason of course because I do tend to make silly posts. I don't care if I make a slip and people find out who I am. But for now I feel more comfortable. If it annoys people,I would gladly say who I am though. Secondly I am extremely irked by the assumption it's a man. This actually partially caused me to use an alter ego. (BTW I only post under this one and of course my *real* name.)

cuba libre (nathalie), Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm not assuming it's a man but all the names this person has used have been male or neuter so I said "bloke" because they're posting as a bloke mostly.

Tom, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Who are you then (oh go on)

Sarah, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I came up last night with the theory that it is only me and Emma posting on here and the rest of you are a made up plan leading us further into scary stalkerism land. This was when we couldn't see the pub and thought we were being LURED to our DEATHS. Ok that is what I was musing upon anyway but then I met the rest of you and you do exist, which is good!

Sarah, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Definitely not me. I'm just here. :-)

Ned, a troll? That explains a lot;>

But seriously, Tom, I can't always post a lot either. And when I do, I occasionally enjoy goofing around (see above comment). But, from what I've seen, ILM/E thrives on the strange questions....as well as the serious ones.

I try to only post when I've got summat to say about a particular subject, but it's not easy to resist the pull when you are "surrounded" by talkers. In fact, that's what makes it fun.

Why not think of it this way: we outnumber the "trolls" 100 to 1.

Nichole Graham, Friday, 17 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

eleven years pass...

11 years pass...

1 2 3 4 i declare a FLAMEWAR!!!!!!!

___ /\ ___
,' `.`-'..`-',' `.
( |\ \ / /| )
`.`|) : __ : (|','
\_ | -- | _/
( _`.| |,'_ )
`.\ `.__,' /,'
_ __ _ `..____..' _ __ _
___(_(__)_\_____)/ \(______/_(__)_)____
|SSt `|\|`| \/)__(\/ |' |/|' |
| _ _ _ `-_--'_ _ _ _ _ |
| |_) | |_ /_\ (_ |_ |_ |_ |_ | \ |
| | |_ |_ / \ _) |_ | |_ |_ |_/ |
| _ ___ _ ___ _ _ |
| |\/| |_ | |_| |_ | |_) / \ | | |
| | | |_ | | | |_ | | \ \_/ |_ |_ |
|__________________________________________|

,/`|;V\.;
,\;`~\,;\;`\,
/;|\_|,\~/`,\/;,
`\`/;`\,`;`|;\`\'
;|V`,;'|'/'`/'/|\
`/;'|`\V'/;\,\_V/
`;|\, |;`,_|_,'
`,`\_\/;'
\;`/ _____________
\\| | | WARNING! |
_oo| | |SOME TROLLS! |
`\.| | |_____________|
---....__/ `\,____ | |
_,-' `- ""|---.|...
fsc



_.._.
/ _,/ Feed me, good man...
\ / o_ '
|__\/ _,
/ | _,/'/;
/ /_|`-, /__,/ |
`.__`\-' oo \,/
/ \ \ (/__/_
| > > ,/.-. `.
/_,/_,/ /(( . )) \
`---'--' `-'---'`-'
fsc `--'--'

Fishing for trolls
:\
: \ (..)
: \.-[]-.
________'______( )_________
____/=i=i=i=i:i=i=i==i=i=ii=i=i=\____
_____________/i=i/""""""""":"""""""""""""""""""\i=i\_____________
"""-. J c@c .-"""
`. -(_)- .`
`. _/ \_ .`
""""""""""""""""""""" MJP/LGB

Troll smacking
\
\ (..)
\.-[]-.
_______________( )_________
____/=i=i=i=i=i=i=i==i=i=ii=i=i=\____
_____________/i=i/"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""\i=i\_____________
"""-. c@c .-"""
`. -(_)- .`
`. _/ \_ .`
""""""""""""""""""""" MJP/LGB

, .
,~~~~~~~~. /| |\
(Oooooch...) {_;""\}
( *MHMPFF* )O o (* @'-,
\|||/ `~~~~~~~~" ,~ \~,""
(o o) ; , ("
,----ooO--(_)-------. | | |
| Please | /| | \
| don't feed the | ,(=~~==[])
| TROLL's ! | ( \`-' ;(
'--------------Ooo--' ) \ /\ \
|__|__| ( ) ) ) )
|| || * /_/ /_/
ooO Ooo |_\ |_\ JW

sleepingbag, Monday, 3 June 2013 22:25 (ten years ago) link

one year passes...

idk where else to put this but lol

http://www.fox.com.au/scoopla/trending-now/blog/2014/6/amazing-rainbow-tie-dye-number-surprise-cake/

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 17 June 2014 21:39 (nine years ago) link

hahahahaha

macklin' rosie (crüt), Tuesday, 17 June 2014 21:52 (nine years ago) link

let us marvel at the speed with which comments on a child's birthday cake devolve into total political ragefest shitstorm

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 17 June 2014 21:59 (nine years ago) link

That was delightful

polyphonic, Tuesday, 17 June 2014 22:05 (nine years ago) link

what's a troll?
― nathalie, Wednesday, May 15, 2002 5:00 PM (12 years ago)

Classic post

Aimless, Tuesday, 17 June 2014 22:55 (nine years ago) link

I love the internet.

Dreamland, Tuesday, 17 June 2014 23:35 (nine years ago) link

Obvious Poster I am A professional Baker • 10 hours ago

Uh, I'm pretty sure you can freeze ice cream.

LOL

polyamanita (sleeve), Tuesday, 17 June 2014 23:57 (nine years ago) link

http://onlygags.com/wp-content/uploads/How-to-troll.jpg

mirostones, Thursday, 19 June 2014 00:10 (nine years ago) link

four months pass...

adrian chen on anonymous and its mainstream water carriers

http://www.thenation.com/article/190369/truth-about-anonymouss-activism

great stuff; chen has been on fire lately

goole, Tuesday, 18 November 2014 17:01 (nine years ago) link

it's mostly a very harsh review of Gabriella Coleman, who i've heard on the radio at least once explaining the Anons. She also chimes in in the comments, looks like, on something pretty minor.

goole, Tuesday, 18 November 2014 17:07 (nine years ago) link

I thought the thread bump might be for this interview, which belongs in the canon of troll studies:

http://canadalandshow.com/podcast/interview-my-harshest-critic

forbodingly titled It's True! It's True! (Eazy), Tuesday, 18 November 2014 17:09 (nine years ago) link

Coleman is also heavily featured in the terrible hagiographical documentary We Are Legion.

Wristy Hurlington (ShariVari), Tuesday, 18 November 2014 17:22 (nine years ago) link

Tony Ortega doesn't think Chen gets the sci-ti stuff right:

http://tonyortega.org/2014/11/18/what-adrian-chen-got-wrong-about-anonymous-and-scientology/

goole, Tuesday, 18 November 2014 17:26 (nine years ago) link

that is fair enough

how did I not know someone was arrested for a hate crime for covering himself in vaseline and pubic hair? what a world

jenny holzer, ilxor (mh), Tuesday, 18 November 2014 17:31 (nine years ago) link

one month passes...

two stories about the exposure of trolls:

more adrian chen!

http://www.technologyreview.com/photoessay/533426/the-troll-hunters/

a group of volunteer researchers called Researchgruppen, or Research Group,has pioneered a form of activist journalism based on following the crumbs of data anonymous Internet trolls leave behind and unmasking them. In its largest troll hunt, Research Group scraped the comments section of the right-wing online publication Avpixlat and obtained a huge database of its comments and user information. Starting with this data, members meticulously identified many of Avpixlat’s most prolific commenters and then turned the names over to Expressen, one of Sweden’s two major tabloids. In December 2013, Expressen revealed in a series of front-page stories that dozens of prominent Swedes had posted racist, sexist, and otherwise hateful comments under pseudonyms on Avpixlat, including a number of politicians and officials from the ascendant far-right Sweden Democrats.

(meta commentary here: http://www.technologyreview.com/fromtheeditor/533561/the-cost-of-trolling/ )

...aaaand reddit:

http://www.reddit.com/r/relationships/comments/2cpgy4/update_i_32f_just_discovered_my_husband_34_of_six/

I confronted him about the issue very tamely, over breakfast. I asked him, flat out, if he was harassing and bullying people online. He said yes, and immediately withdrew. After telling him that I needed to know why -- really why, not just "I don't know", he said he needed time to think about it.

When he finally gave me his answer, I was disappointed. He said he trolled/bullied people because it was an outlet for him to relieve stress. He said he didn't view the people as real, or what he was doing as anything other than a joke, and if it hurt feelings, "those people have bigger problems and it's not my fault."

I told him that it wasn't an acceptable behavior of an adult, and that he needed to stop it and find another way to express his frustrations that didn't involve hurting strangers. He said he would think about it.

Unfortunately, he's still doing it.

goole, Monday, 22 December 2014 17:21 (nine years ago) link

one month passes...

http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/545/transcript

goole, Monday, 26 January 2015 21:24 (nine years ago) link

The irony of Ira Glass narrating the segment about vocal fry was almost too much to bear.

ledge, Friday, 30 January 2015 15:25 (nine years ago) link

well, at least they point it out

Nhex, Saturday, 31 January 2015 21:10 (nine years ago) link

five months pass...

i guess 4chan, other racists and "redpill" types, have begun to fixate on a nickelodeon show called "bella and bulldogs"

https://twitter.com/search?q=%23cancelbella&src=typd

goole, Monday, 6 July 2015 16:38 (eight years ago) link

far-right dudes are p well obsessed with cuckoldry in general at the moment

(i first heard about this on Uhh Yeah Dude a couple weeks ago)

goole, Monday, 6 July 2015 16:40 (eight years ago) link

googled this to understand what the heck it was, instantly found a super racist site complaining about this, like "jew york times" territory

Nhex, Monday, 6 July 2015 16:47 (eight years ago) link

yeah, sorry, should have put some kind of general warning

the nickel version is that there's a nick show featuring a white girl and a black boy as main characters. some enterprising trolls have found that the producer had done some work in cheesecake media. you'll never guess what happens next.

goole, Monday, 6 July 2015 16:51 (eight years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/rxMMkPJ.jpg

lil dork (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 6 July 2015 16:57 (eight years ago) link

Creators of media for kids have been filling it full references to their weird fetishes forever- cf the entire history of comic books

a silly gif of awkward larping (Sparkle Motion), Monday, 6 July 2015 17:13 (eight years ago) link

i would not suggest taking this seriously

goole, Monday, 6 July 2015 17:14 (eight years ago) link

It seems very odd that, in order to be concerned about this, one must believe that all those details, which are so subtle, attenuated, and submerged into the background of the show that they require a lengthy exposition with explanations and enlargements for adults even to see their existence, are simultaneously so powerful and irresistible that children must certainly be corrupted by them.

Exactly what is it we are supposed to think will happen to the kids watching this show? That they'll all grow up to be 'cuckold fetishists'? Seriously?

Aimless, Monday, 6 July 2015 17:35 (eight years ago) link

heh, i was thinking that's gotta be Rocko's Modern Life, and of course it is

i would love it if Nickelodeon gave an official "are you fucking kidding me?" response but what are the chances

Nhex, Monday, 6 July 2015 18:14 (eight years ago) link

cuckolding! there's a shakespearean reference i didn't think i'd see memed this year!

like a giraffe of nah (forksclovetofu), Monday, 6 July 2015 19:38 (eight years ago) link

Given what is being said about 'cuckold fetishism' in that graphic, the word is being used all wrong. By rights, a cuckold fetish ought to involve antlers, not bulls, and hasn't the slightest connection to big black men schtupping pretty white women. Especially when they are unmarried.

Aimless, Monday, 6 July 2015 20:30 (eight years ago) link

two months pass...

bizarre

Nhex, Tuesday, 15 September 2015 02:52 (eight years ago) link

Seems like a guy who felt like he could say anything to anyone and stir up any kind of turmoil, for any reason or no reason at all, and he would never suffer any consequences. This used to be called a power trip in the 60s and 70s.

Aimless, Tuesday, 15 September 2015 03:26 (eight years ago) link

creepy
isis stuff aside, wager this kind of thing (trolling political impersonations, sockpuppetry) not uncommon, in less extreme forms prob rife online

This is some weird shit: it's a conversation between a renowned internet troll and an FBI informant, neither knowing who the other really is and each working angles to try to get the other to do something, without either one ever realizing the other is playing a really different game.

surreal; there’s some black comedy to this
also some difficult legal questions
obv diff situation but a few strands of analogy to case of gf exhorting bf to suicide via texts

drash, Tuesday, 15 September 2015 14:07 (eight years ago) link

tanya headon one minute, tanya cohen the next

jordan amavero (imago), Tuesday, 15 September 2015 14:28 (eight years ago) link

from past experience in the early internet days with trolling types,

the multi-angle trolling is really an artifact of an inability to socialize with others, on or off the internet. strong "non-partisan" ideology, claiming that "free speech" trumps all and that trolling somehow pushes out the borders of free speech to ensure even the most fringe positions are ok quickly becomes a struggle to circle the drain with all the muck without falling in

there's a complete lack of empathy or understanding of world events. things in the news, like attacks and cultural battles are still seen as important (although probably the troll denies their importance) not because of lives or actual stances but due to attention. through escalation and publicity the troll feels important.

there are definitely some pathological issues to that mindset, but at its base it's a feeling that a diminished feeling of self-worth isn't a problem, it's everyone else's problem. everyone should have a low sense of self-worth, and highlighting how trivially people who are doing things in the real world are manipulated is some sort of proof.

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 15 September 2015 14:37 (eight years ago) link

short version: this dude didn't circle the drain, he fell in, and someone needs to hit the garbage disposal

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 15 September 2015 14:37 (eight years ago) link

i suppose trolls can have all sorts of motives. the ones I've seen lately are just masochistic and I never considered self-worth in that equation

The Once-ler, Tuesday, 15 September 2015 21:05 (eight years ago) link

all sorts of "don't post pictures of yourself doing things I want to do, don't talk about activities I loathe (but really want to participate in)"

μpright mammal (mh), Wednesday, 16 September 2015 01:10 (eight years ago) link

nine months pass...

this is really good
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toap7iPpTbs

thrusted pelvis-first back (ulysses), Monday, 20 June 2016 20:13 (seven years ago) link

agreed

Nhex, Tuesday, 21 June 2016 03:43 (seven years ago) link

curious if anyone else has ever noticed a pattern of one troll camping out at a site for years on end (besides me ha ha). there's a dude at 'new york' magazine who derails almost every discussion of jonathan chait's blog posts i've seen whenever i'm bored enough to venture below, and check out the comment section. however paranoid it sounds i can't help wondering how many (if any) perpetual trolls are paid moderators on big and big-ish media sites, baiting traffic?

reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 21 June 2016 17:13 (seven years ago) link

there's more than a few here of course.

thrusted pelvis-first back (ulysses), Tuesday, 21 June 2016 17:19 (seven years ago) link

def want to watch a 13 minute video on trolls

queen elseq of ærendelle (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 21 June 2016 17:53 (seven years ago) link

it's not what you think it is whiney

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 21 June 2016 17:54 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.