Trailer:
http://vimeo.com/4062746
Charlotte Gainsbourg and William Dafoe, late Summer 2009.
Wiki
― StanM, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 15:50 (fifteen years ago) link
it's "Willem"
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 15:52 (fifteen years ago) link
Sorry, Lars Von Trier makes me cranky
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 15:53 (fifteen years ago) link
fantastic
― ogmor, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 15:55 (fifteen years ago) link
I don't know, premise and actors are great, but LVT makes me skeptical
― Dr. Johnson (askance johnson), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 15:57 (fifteen years ago) link
Sorry, Lars Von Trier makes me cranky^^^me too
― jed_, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 15:58 (fifteen years ago) link
sounds promising, but I haven't really paid too much attention to him since that ridiculously shitty Bjork movie
― This Board is a Prison on Planet Bullshit (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 15:58 (fifteen years ago) link
All LVT haters need to watch Riget, it fully redeems him of all shitty things he has done since.
Also, I am very excited for Anti-Christ.
― Viceroy, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:00 (fifteen years ago) link
I do apologize, that's the first time ever I noticed he's not called William. :-(
― StanM, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:01 (fifteen years ago) link
xp Shakey: too bad. The last one - Boss of it All was pretty great - more in the vein of The Idiots. I like almost everything else he did, except for that Bjork movie which made me fall asleep.
― photoshop your disgusting ass partner into passive-aggressive notes (sarahel), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:01 (fifteen years ago) link
lars von trier fucking sucks guys.
― FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:02 (fifteen years ago) link
Actually I've only really ever seen Breaking the Waves, which was really good. I may have seen the bjork movie too, and hated it, I can't remember.
Willem Defoe was born with the name "William" but he changed it because he is crazy.
― Dr. Johnson (askance johnson), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:03 (fifteen years ago) link
Von Trier does not suck, and this looks very interesting. I love Dafoe.
― Gerard (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:05 (fifteen years ago) link
I don't understand his whole hatred-for-women thing but I will kind of always give him a pass because of the Kingdom and because of the loopy Dogme 95 manifesto. I am always amused by artists with manifestos.
― This Board is a Prison on Planet Bullshit (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:12 (fifteen years ago) link
The same with me. He may be technically talented, but after Idiots and DITD I decided his brand of emotional torture porn isn't for me.
― Tuomas, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:12 (fifteen years ago) link
any doubts i had about von trier--and he has certainly done some bad shit--were erased by the five obstructions, totally amazing movie. i liked dogville too.
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:13 (fifteen years ago) link
i think his larger-than-life tuxedo-clad train-jumping manifesto-spouting media personality is pretty awesome too
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:14 (fifteen years ago) link
Really excited for this - The Kingdom proved he can do horror, so it's nice to see him returning to it.
― Simon H., Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:18 (fifteen years ago) link
yeah five obstructions ws rad, hi5 slocki
― stimulus package (cozwn), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:20 (fifteen years ago) link
xp Shakey: yeah, the Bjork movie struck me as part of a misogyny trilogy that began with Breaking the Waves and also included Dogville. Though his brutality/humiliation of his lead characters isn't restricted to women - cf Zentropa/Europa and Five Obstructions. The Idiots didn't imply a hatred of women - to me - more a dislike for poseurs or a certain category of artists.
― photoshop your disgusting ass partner into passive-aggressive notes (sarahel), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:31 (fifteen years ago) link
Dancer as misogyny? No.
― Simon H., Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:37 (fifteen years ago) link
because he is crazy
more likely it was a SAG Name conflict, but that also qualifies as crazy
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:40 (fifteen years ago) link
oh absolutely. how else to explain a series of movies that all hinge on the abject abuse and degradation of their central female characters...? This is a pretty common criticism of Von Trier ("torture porn" isn't far off the mark, even though that attribution is usually reserved for more trad 00s horror fare)
Haven't seen the 5 Obstructions, will look into it...
― This Board is a Prison on Planet Bullshit (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:46 (fifteen years ago) link
Really appreciated what he was up to after watching Five Obstructions, don't think his films are direct expressions of any of his beliefs, misogyny or anything, more like sort of patronising aggressive therapy for his audience. Looks like this is pretty astute and funny.
― ogmor, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:50 (fifteen years ago) link
The thing is - a lot of his films hinge on the abject abuse and degradation of their central characters - whether they're male or female. The first Von Trier film I saw was Breaking the Waves and I almost wrote him off as a director for that one because of the misogyny, but then I watched other films where the central character was male, and they got the same treatment. Dude's just misanthropic - with degradation and abuse of central character used to get at his real target - the audience.
― photoshop your disgusting ass partner into passive-aggressive notes (sarahel), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:53 (fifteen years ago) link
i dont see how that really follows.
and 5 obstructions is so not like that, it's a really compassionate movie, not to give away the ending, but i don't see how you could watch that film and come away with the idea that lvt is trying to degrade the main character.
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:54 (fifteen years ago) link
I don't think he's nec. misanthropic, but he is suspicious of the way people empathise with characters. I think he's using a different model of catharsis. Five Obstructions was so good because he was so honest.
― ogmor, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 17:08 (fifteen years ago) link
― FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:02 PM
no wai i loved 'the idiots'
― Dr. Phil, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 17:08 (fifteen years ago) link
i really like the idiots, and riget is often very funny
― zurück zum Traphaus (donna rouge), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 17:11 (fifteen years ago) link
and i like the pranksterism of the dogme manifesto (they wrote it in 30 minutes while getting drunk). i don't really "agree" with it but i don't really agree with most manifestos either
― zurück zum Traphaus (donna rouge), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 17:13 (fifteen years ago) link
Five Obstructions is good, but kinda zzzz in the middle stretch.
― Nurse Detrius (Eric H.), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 17:15 (fifteen years ago) link
His female characters often turn out to be pretty strong through everything though, or sometimes they snap and get revenge on their tormentors. Either way I think we're meant to think of them as inspiring survivors instead of victims, moreso than a lot of his male characters anyway.
― ‽, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 17:15 (fifteen years ago) link
In retrospect, DitD probably was a pile of crap, but I still think highly of Breaking the Waves and Dogville.
― Nurse Detrius (Eric H.), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 17:16 (fifteen years ago) link
― s1ocki, Tuesday, April 14, 2009 11:54 AM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
i need to reesreeen this; funny i think i agree with you but my conclusion was basically the opposite. it's clear LVT loves Leth dearly but still has basically no self-recognition. he's totally invested in the idea of himself as some kind of torturer-therapist and that never comes in to question. like, who the fuck are YOU maaaan!?
― goole, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 17:16 (fifteen years ago) link
I really loved Dogville, like it depressed the shit out of me for days.
― Plaxico (I know, right?), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 17:18 (fifteen years ago) link
Actually, I tend to like his movies incrementally more than I think I'm going to, but appreciate them retroactively not that much.
Brian Fantana: I think I was in love once.Ron Burgundy: Really? What was her name?Brian Fantana: I don't remember.Ron Burgundy: That's not a good start, but keep going.Brian Fantana: She was Brazilian, or Chinese, or something weird. I met her in the bathroom of a K-Mart and we made out for hours. Then we parted ways, never to see each other again.Ron Burgundy: I'm pretty sure that's not love.Brian Fantana: Damn it.
― FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 17:19 (fifteen years ago) link
Von Trier is currently working on a film entitled Dimension which is a project that spans 30 years. Every year the cast and crew (including Udo) meet to shoot footage. The film will show the actors age 30 years without make-up or special effects. Approximately seen years of footage has already been shot. The premiere will take place in 2024!
(source: Udo Kier's bio @ imdb.com) (Should have started the "Anticipating Lars Von Trier's Dimension (2024)" thread?)
― StanM, Thursday, 16 April 2009 19:55 (fifteen years ago) link
http://www.reuters.com/article/entertainmentNews/idUSTRE54G2JF20090517
― StanM, Monday, 18 May 2009 16:19 (fourteen years ago) link
(can't wait)
― StanM, Monday, 18 May 2009 16:20 (fourteen years ago) link
Von Trier film that shocks critics non-shocker :)
(we neither!)
― Gerard (Le Bateau Ivre), Monday, 18 May 2009 16:27 (fourteen years ago) link
(wme neither!)
* Xan Brooks The horror! The horror! Scene from Lars von Trier's Antichrist
"Chaos reigns," declares a mangy fox about midway through Lars von Trier's Antichrist. The audience guffaws and then – whoops – we are pitched headlong into the abyss. Until then I'd been standing toe-to-toe with the film, which casts Charlotte Gainsbourg and Willem Dafoe as a bereaved couple going off the rails at their shack in the woods. But after that I'm senseless; my thoughts in tatters. There are squawking crows and pitch-black holes and an abattoir's worth of mutilation that I could only peer at through splayed fingers.
Chaos reigns. I stumble out in a daze, momentarily unsure whether I loved it or loathed it. Abruptly I realise that I love it. Von Trier has slapped Cannes with an astonishing, extraordinary picture – shocking and comical; a funhouse of terrors (of primal nature, of female sexuality) that rattles the bones and fizzes the blood before bowing out with a presumptuous dedication to Andrei Tarkovsky that had sections of the crowd hooting in fury.
― jed_, Monday, 18 May 2009 16:37 (fourteen years ago) link
screendaily makes it sound like the same old same old, which i can easily believe.
"Antichrist is Lars Von Trier at his most provocative. There doesn’t seem to be a genuinely-felt sentiment in it, apart from the conviction that women are the root of all evil - not something he hints at subtly, but clubs the viewer around the head with. Cannes gives Von Trier the oxygen of publicity and Antichrist will draw thousands of irate rants, and, later, a rehabilitation when some declare they love it after all.
Preposterous, but probably destined to become a cult horror ticket - it is well made and, at times, genuinely horrific - Antichrist stars a oft-naked, sexually rapacious Charlotte Gainsbourg and Willem Dafoe as a couple whose toddler child falls to his death from an open window in the prologue. They’re having sex as the accident happens, and Von Trier cuts from the child’s face mid-fall to Gainsbourg’s mid-orgasm, which pretty much sets the tone for the picture. Dafoe, a controlling psychologist, decides to treat Gainsboug’s “a-typical grief” himself.
This leads the couple to a forest retreat called Eden, an evil place where Gainsbourg starts to really lose the plot. Much will be made of a female circumcision sequence and there is beaucoup de female masturbation. Gainsbourg seems to mislay her pants at a certain point and spends the rest of the movie rampaging around the forest naked from the waist down while Dafoe is mutilated a la Misery- and that’s after she charges his erect penis with something akin to a battering ram. Other highlights include a talking fox."
― jed_, Monday, 18 May 2009 16:43 (fourteen years ago) link
sounds great!
― marty flipman (jeff), Monday, 18 May 2009 16:51 (fourteen years ago) link
This makes it sound like the worst thing in the history of bad things, ever:
http://hollywood-elsewhere.com/2009/05/antichrist_fart.php
― StanM, Monday, 18 May 2009 19:12 (fourteen years ago) link
Ebert's seen it too (maybe a little too many spoilers in there, don't know)
http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/05/for_even_now_already_is_it_in.html
― StanM, Monday, 18 May 2009 19:15 (fourteen years ago) link
I just wanted to add that I really loved The Five Obstructions, the only LVT-associated thing I've ever enjoyed.
― Your heartbeat soun like sasquatch feet (polyphonic), Monday, 18 May 2009 19:16 (fourteen years ago) link
Director's Confession http://www.antichristthemovie.com/?p=277&language=en
― StanM, Monday, 18 May 2009 19:54 (fourteen years ago) link
He also told the media, “I am the best film director in the world, and all the others are overrated”, though he later downplayed it a little bit by saying that “all filmmakers think so about themselves but say it out, but I do”.
― Zeno, Monday, 18 May 2009 19:55 (fourteen years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Y2qrXMUWGA
― am0n, Friday, 18 September 2009 15:40 (fourteen years ago) link
wau @ this movie
― huh (latebloomer), Sunday, 20 September 2009 11:13 (fourteen years ago) link
it has really stayed in my mind over the past few days. i think i wanna see it again (and on a big screen).
― flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 20 September 2009 15:18 (fourteen years ago) link
yeah, i DEFINITELY want to see this in a theater. i'm not even sure how much i liked it, but i still want to drink it in.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Sunday, 20 September 2009 16:11 (fourteen years ago) link
yeah u really should
― fountain bleaut (s1ocki), Sunday, 20 September 2009 16:45 (fourteen years ago) link
on ifc on demand starting tomorrow (10/21), apparently
― johnny crunch, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 15:04 (fourteen years ago) link
orly?
― am0n, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 15:13 (fourteen years ago) link
anthony lane is befuddled. i think he's right to ignore the three-beggars symbology as a red herring -- or at best a personal directorial idiosyncrasy -- but i don't think the central allegory is really as hard to parse as he's making it out to be.
― flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 20 October 2009 15:43 (fourteen years ago) link
Watching this movie was like an endurance trial. I got physically ill at one point and nearly had to stop to go lie down to stop my head from spinning. While I watched it on my computer I felt simultaneously attracted to and horrified by the idea of viewing it in a theater. This may be the only film I have ever seen that I liked and yet would never ever recommend to anyone.
I liked the bit about the shoes.
― chocolatepiekid, Sunday, 25 October 2009 06:22 (fourteen years ago) link
the shoes was the detail that i had most trouble working into the broader scheme/theme of the movie. i kept puzzling over what it signified and finally gave up. it was creepy, maybe that was its only purpose.
― STRATE IN2 DAKRNESS (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 25 October 2009 13:34 (fourteen years ago) link
have never before liked anything by Von Trier, but this is probably the best film i've seen this year - the dedication to Tarkovsky apart, it reminded me most of some of Bergman's more gothic semi-horror movies, HOUR OF THE WOLF especially, but also VIRGIN SPRING (the template for LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT), PERSONA (also dominated by, and dependent on, two excellent performers), CRIES AND WHISPERS (w/ which it shares a horrible scene of genital mutilation) etc.
― Ward Fowler, Sunday, 30 August 2009 16:37 (1 month ago) Bookmark
def owes as much to bergman as it does to tarkovski
― warmsherry, Sunday, 25 October 2009 15:21 (fourteen years ago) link
it's finally actually ON on demand. i feel like my mouth was hanging open for the last 40 minutes. im glad to have seen it but i really dont think i need to see it in a theatre, or ever again
it is really beautifully shot, though. lots of the images in nature, esp the mind-picture ones She imagines on the train are nearly painterly, reminded me of Apichatpong Weerasethakul stuff. agree the opening is fantastic, jeez. i immediately watched the prologue again as soon as it ended
can barely conceive of like the mechanics of shooting some of those scenes
― johnny crunch, Saturday, 31 October 2009 17:47 (fourteen years ago) link
He's such a hard to parse filmmaker, sort of like Neil LaBute, both of whom consistently provide lots of red meat to critics of their misogyny/misanthropy even as they deny offering it. At least Von Trier had a handful of genre films he made (Kingdom, Europa, Element of Crime) before he went all Dogme and off the deep end. I find LaBute a lot easier to dismiss, though, even if "In the Company of Men" is better and less intellectually facile/offensive than Von Trier's films. I've seen no evidence that LaBute is a good filmmaker. Von Trier, on the other hand, is formidable, if erratic.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 31 October 2009 18:05 (fourteen years ago) link
yea labute is easier to dismiss, as is haneke imo; von trier is intriguing enough where hes earned [some] endulgances in my book
― johnny crunch, Saturday, 31 October 2009 18:13 (fourteen years ago) link
Yeah, Haneke is way too smug about his bad vibes.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 31 October 2009 18:15 (fourteen years ago) link
is it just me, or did the prologue with the kid falling out the window look/feel kinda like an advertisement for some luxury product?
― sarahel, Saturday, 31 October 2009 18:42 (fourteen years ago) link
"perfume commercial" was what entered my mind
― i ain't no daggum son of a gun (latebloomer), Sunday, 1 November 2009 03:32 (fourteen years ago) link
i forgot 2 say, u can see the kid's shoes in that first scene ~ i took that detail as some hint at an underlying mental sickness in Her character
― johnny crunch, Sunday, 1 November 2009 03:37 (fourteen years ago) link
i guess. there's so much potential symbolism in putting shoes on the wrong feet that it sort of seemed significant on some level other than just random cruelty -- but it may be a mistake to read too much into the movie's symbolic scheme.
― STRATE IN2 DAKRNESS (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 1 November 2009 03:44 (fourteen years ago) link
yes! jewelry was my other thought.
― sarahel, Sunday, 1 November 2009 17:42 (fourteen years ago) link
parts of the movie really feel like von trier's taking the piss but somehow it works
― i ain't no daggum son of a gun (latebloomer), Sunday, 1 November 2009 23:04 (fourteen years ago) link
I loved it. And I definitely would say anything that seems vague or subtle is probably in your imagination. This seems like one of the most overt films ever.
― Nate Carson, Wednesday, 4 November 2009 23:45 (fourteen years ago) link
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2678/4078122071_6cd19337ef.jpg
― STRATE IN2 DAKRNESS (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 5 November 2009 22:21 (fourteen years ago) link
A+
― la'bloom generation (latebloomer), Friday, 6 November 2009 00:47 (fourteen years ago) link
lool'd
― Pedro Paramore (jim), Friday, 6 November 2009 01:06 (fourteen years ago) link
oh my god, is there any way I could get a super hi-res version of that to print and place in my video store? it would make a whole lot of us so very happy.
― Simon H., Friday, 6 November 2009 02:24 (fourteen years ago) link
the largest one they have is 665 x 1024 http://www.flickr.com/photos/samsmyth/4078122071/sizes/l/
― Pedro Paramore (jim), Friday, 6 November 2009 02:47 (fourteen years ago) link
Simon = future Tarantino?
― Your Favorite Saturday Night Thing (Dr Morbius), Friday, 6 November 2009 03:15 (fourteen years ago) link
ha there's about six more likely candidates where I work
― Simon H., Friday, 6 November 2009 04:22 (fourteen years ago) link
SPOILER
whats the significance of the epilogue? he turns around and sees the 3 animals again and then women start climbing and surrounding him - who are they and is it implied that they kill him (since when you see those 3 animals, someone dies). guessing they were executed witches, since thats what her thesis was on
anyway dope movie, i wanna see it again
― luol deng (am0n), Monday, 16 November 2009 05:20 (fourteen years ago) link
http://www.movieline.com/images/chaos_reigns_fox.jpg
lol
― luol deng (am0n), Monday, 16 November 2009 05:23 (fourteen years ago) link
whats the significance of the epilogue?
i thought the women at the end were basically a vision of nature -- since in the scheme of the movie women represent nature ("satan's church"), the engine of birth and death etc. and of course his killing her was a futile gesture, nature is in and around everything and will always triumph over reason. chaos reigns.
sort of simple-minded, obv., but the strength of the movie is much more in its execution and depth of feeling than in its ideas.
― hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Monday, 16 November 2009 05:32 (fourteen years ago) link
(so in that sense you could say the women kill him, since by bringing life into the world they simultaneously condemn it to death. that's the movie's central terror. )
― hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Monday, 16 November 2009 05:36 (fourteen years ago) link
ok yea that sounds about right
― luol deng (am0n), Monday, 16 November 2009 05:41 (fourteen years ago) link
ok so this is on netflix on demand.
pretty WOW. don't know what to make of it right now.
― circa1916, Saturday, 6 March 2010 09:30 (fourteen years ago) link
i was just saying to a friend yesterday that this is the movie i remember most from last year. which is not the same as saying it's the best thing i saw last year, but it did leave an impression.
― hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 6 March 2010 12:28 (fourteen years ago) link
This film was great! The most offensive thing in the whole DVD is the idiot from the Daily Mail demanding von Trier justify his making of the movie.
― Craigo Boingo, Saturday, 29 January 2011 12:29 (thirteen years ago) link
http://manilovefilms.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/CinCapsJediGhosts.jpg
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Thursday, 7 July 2011 07:38 (twelve years ago) link
The most offensive thing in the whole DVD is the idiot from the Daily Mail demanding von Trier justify his making of the movie.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1200742/CHRISTOPHER-HART-What-DOES-film-banned-days.html
love the plot description in this because it gets nowhere NEAR how graphic and crazy it is.
― owenf, Thursday, 7 July 2011 08:03 (twelve years ago) link
Considering showing this and 'Possession' as a double-header at one of our Film Club gatherings. Not sure they'd actually compleement each other that well though. Would have to do 'Antichrist' first I think as well. Hmm.
― One Big Craigo, Full Of Bad Boingos (Craigo Boingo), Thursday, 7 July 2011 08:53 (twelve years ago) link
hated this
― ride the dronosaur (jjjusten), Wednesday, 2 November 2011 19:59 (twelve years ago) link
Didn't totally adore it but appreciated it for being pretty unique and hard to forget
― StanM, Wednesday, 2 November 2011 21:26 (twelve years ago) link
Is there a Melancholia thread? Just saw it the other night, and I loved it.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 27 January 2012 18:35 (twelve years ago) link
I plan on seeing it but haven't yet. friend of mine saw it at the Castro theater and said he laughed through tons of it, which was um an atypical reaction in terms of the rest of the audience
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 27 January 2012 18:47 (twelve years ago) link
was shown this the other day. it's a fairly remarkable work - i had expected to hate von trier, but the balance of empathy is almost entirely with gainsbourg's character here. put crudely, the film is about how dafoe's character fundamentally misunderstands, mistreats and patronises her to the point of rejecting her desires for intimacy, her nature, her need to be loved rather than treated like an unexploded bomb - until she does explode - and then he kills her. an allegory for how men have treated women since time immemorial. he is almost too awful in his obtuseness - but this is what men are, all too often, when confronted by female anguish.
the issue of the shoes, placed on the wrong feet - this is the toughest part to explain within that narrative - i suppose that von trier is attempting to demonstrate that people (especially women?) can be irrational & operate under logics contrary to the (nefarious) scientific method which dafoe wields so fatally - this is a sympathetic reading, perhaps, but at no point in the film did i feel my misogyny sensors (insofar as i'm 'allowed' them) beeping - it really did feel like it was on gainsbourg's side (while retaining some small empathy for dafoe, the pedantic fool)
― imago, Tuesday, 25 November 2014 21:00 (nine years ago) link
it reminded me of how technically skilled and imaginative he is. people getting worked up over his narratives tend to overlook or underplay how well he uses light, sound and editing. there are things in antichrist that really don't look like anything else i've seen.
― flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Friday, September 18, 2009 2:14 PM (5 years ago)
agree w/this. i rate this film pretty highly even though i don't think i could ever explain what exactly LVT was trying to say with it, or whether it even means anything at all, but it's just an incredibly beautiful and unique film just on a surface, sense-oriented level. the only recent film that stuck with me for similar reasons was 'under the skin.'
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 25 November 2014 21:13 (nine years ago) link
this film and melancholia are masterpieces. shame about nymphomaniac.
― Treeship, Tuesday, 25 November 2014 21:42 (nine years ago) link
i'm going to have all three hurled at me before too long! delightfully intense opening gambit
― imago, Tuesday, 25 November 2014 21:44 (nine years ago) link
But Nymphomaniac (director's cut) is the best one of the three! Again, technical things, editing especially, but also the beautiful images of trees or hospital rooms or genitalia (joke). And just the whole rambling construction, all 5½ hours of it, with digression upon digression. Nobody does shit like this. Anymore.
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 25 November 2014 22:16 (nine years ago) link
I showed the first seven minutes in my film class. A couple of open-mouthed responses. I'd forgotten about the close-up of Willem Dafoe (or his body double's)'s meat.
― poppers fueled buttsex crescendo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 25 March 2024 20:35 (one month ago) link