Buddhism

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
can anyone recommend a beginner's guide to Buddhism book? I want to explore Buddhism, but I don't want to waste my time with some innocuous sounding school that actually turns out to be Evil Buddhism.

DV, Monday, 8 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

new eightfold path answers.

DV, Monday, 8 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Have you tried Racking Your Neighbors on the Wheel of Life-And-Death; A Beginner's Guide to Evil Buddhism?

Aimless, Monday, 8 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

sogyal rinpoche -- the tibetan book of living and dying

rinpoche is reknowned for presenting the essentials of buddhism in a palatable way that makes sense to westerners. this is the book i started with, and i still refer to it all the time as a reference. he also founded the rigpa organization in the u.s.a. (www.rigpa.org).

drake, Monday, 8 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

there's a book my dad liked that's called buddhism plain and simple. i haven't read it myself to recommend but i haven't heard him conjuring demons so it's probably not Evil Buddhism.

Maria, Monday, 8 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

you might try some d.t. suzuki, he's supposed to be an authority. I only have a slim book by 'christmas humphries' or something like that, which is interesting, but I'm not knowledgable enough to recommend it over other books (plus it's a tough go, like reading continental philosophy). the FAQ for the usenet buddhism group has lots of recommendations of the sort you're looking for though.

Josh, Monday, 8 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I've not read it myself, but a friend of mine constantly urges me to read

"What the Buddha Taught" by Walpola Sri Rahula


"This clear and informative guide draws on the words of the Buddha to convey the true nature of Buddhist wisdom. This classic book is regarded as one of the finest introductory books to Buddhism"

says the blurb

I'll get round to reading it soon, really I will.

C J, Monday, 8 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

christmas humphreys was a judge in the uk who wrote the then best-known guide to buddhism in the 40s, and some other books on zen and stuff later on => they're reliable in the sense that in the 60s, penguin was still prepared to call them THE GUIDE TO BUDDHISM, eg no one had stepped forward to say "this is garbage and by the way, don;t you think a namechange is in order"

i get the impression they went out of fashion in the 70s, perhaps not new age-y enough => my copy of his book abt zen has a hilarious cartoon of the bodidharma on the cover (grumpy old indian monk who went to china and invented a. zen and b. martial arts)

mark s, Monday, 8 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

yeah, the book of his I've got (some character on the cover, no monks or mothin) is very non-new-agey. actually, aside from the continental philosophy, it's more like reading greek philosophy in some ways, esp. presocratics

Josh, Monday, 8 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

haha reason I have an out-of-date guide to zen by fogey brit judge = it was a dollar = release your hold on the material world

Josh, Monday, 8 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

"Buddhism for Sheep" - buddhism explained in newspaper-style cartoons as per its relation to sheep.

Graham, Monday, 8 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

pali canon

The Hegemon, Tuesday, 9 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I would recommend anything by Lama Yeshe, a Tibetan Lama who has recently reincarnated in Spain.

chris sallis, Tuesday, 9 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I read the Rahula and found it a clean and effective intro, so I'll second that one.

nabisco%%, Tuesday, 9 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

four years pass...
Can't believe no one mentioned Alan Watts. Roshi Philip Kapleau's "The Three Pillars of Zen" is also pretty essential for a student of the Zen school.

I'm considering making a return to Buddhism, though not for the 'spiritual' reasons I approached it the first time several years ago. I've become disturbed by my tendency to privilege speed and multiplicity over depth and quality. I need MORE records, faster & more timely blog updates, more conversations via ILX, AIM & Facebook. This all goes on at the expense of having fewer/better records, deeper blog entries & more interesting conversations in fewer places.

So I'm cracking open the old Watts & Kapleau books again, I dusted off my copy of "Zen in the Art of Archery" and bought Herrigel's "The Method of Zen" last night as well.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 12 May 2007 23:38 (sixteen years ago) link

BIG ZEN aka the koandriver etc

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 12 May 2007 23:48 (sixteen years ago) link

BIG ZEUS aka the zeu pater

Curt1s Stephens, Saturday, 12 May 2007 23:52 (sixteen years ago) link

i am a buddhist, i have been my whole life, i just spent 6 weeks in nepal with my teacher. read either the essential chogyam trungpa or what makes you not a buddhist by dzongsar jamyang khyentse. dharma madmen the both of them w/good understandings of western mind and language.

jhøshea, Saturday, 12 May 2007 23:58 (sixteen years ago) link

or if you're feeling sensitive read something by pema chodron, the ultimate sweetheart.

jhøshea, Sunday, 13 May 2007 00:00 (sixteen years ago) link

i find Buddhism really confusing! as in, the more I study it (historical buddhism, i mean, forms of buddhism as practiced in eg the twelfth century in china) the less it seems like the image of Buddhism I always had in my head, which is a kind of fuzzy positive thing about not taking life and living well and not valuing temporal posessions and being generally good to the world. But then I go off and read sutras and it's more like 'your options are: burning hell! even more burning hell! hell without intermission! and a lifetime in this hell shall be as two hundred lifetimes in x heaven, a day of which is comparable to two thousand lifetimes in the southern world of mankind' and... it doesn't seem like the same religion, at all. It's so... fear-motivated, and there's all this focus on self-interest, always your own merit you're accruing: entirely possible that this is just the vehicle used to make people behave in a good way, but it turns me off quite a bit. Also Buddhist - maybe I mean Mahayana here - images of heaven are not so appealing, maybe I don't want to spend a long long lifetime in clouds of incense surrounded by jewels and gold everywhere I look, it sounds a bit painful on the senses frankly. Clearly I am far from enlightement and distracted from the core teachings by frivolous externals. :(

Jodo Buddhism is well awesome though, I'm totally up for a bit of Amidism.

c sharp major, Sunday, 13 May 2007 00:06 (sixteen years ago) link

also Evil Buddhism is kind of ace! esoteric Buddhist teachings = total shamanism, really great, you read about them and think 'i'm sorry, how did you ever manage to disguise this stuff as buddhist in the first place? it is mad worldly.'

c sharp major, Sunday, 13 May 2007 00:07 (sixteen years ago) link

in general try to stay away from so called guides to buddhism written by westerners trying to demystify the situation, they generally know not of what they speak and are throwing the baby out with the bath water etc. likewise with tradition translated texts which usually don't read very well for the beginner across the language/culture divide.

lama yeshe and sogyal rinpoche are decent recommendations - if you're interested in zen suzuki roshi's zen mind beginner's mind is quite potent.

jhøshea, Sunday, 13 May 2007 00:10 (sixteen years ago) link

also Evil Buddhism is kind of ace! esoteric Buddhist teachings = total shamanism, really great, you read about them and think 'i'm sorry, how did you ever manage to disguise this stuff as buddhist in the first place? it is mad worldly.'

without getting too into it, it's the view that makes anything buddhist, while the means can be identical to hindu or shamanistic practices. as dzongsar jamyang khyentse rinpoche says in the book recommended up thread: if you recognize your mind as compassion/emptiness, you can worship paris hilton and enemas and it is buddhism.

jhøshea, Sunday, 13 May 2007 00:15 (sixteen years ago) link

and c sharp major - as for the fire and brimstone aspect, with out totally writing it off, which would be quite arrogant of me; it's an unfortunate result of monastic culture. to this day if you go to many traditional monasteries and ask for a general teaching, that's what you'll get. if you make it clear you have some time to devote, they'll teach you how to work with your mind. it's sort saying if you can't commit yourself to serious practice then be good chap and don't do bad stuff - which is always nice advice.

of course now in the west there are many communities and teachers much more willing to give curious lay students the real juice.

jhøshea, Sunday, 13 May 2007 00:25 (sixteen years ago) link

xp 0 What are you referring to with "Evil Buddhism"? I R confused.

I have some interest in Zen Buddhism, but I never know where to start.

milo z, Sunday, 13 May 2007 00:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Milo, though I certainly can't speak with the authority of a practicing Buddhist like jhoshea, I might recommend Alan Watts' "The Way of Zen" as an introductory text for the curious. It combines a student's intimacy with concepts and history with a scholar's objective distance.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 13 May 2007 01:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Trungpa was an interesting character.

moley, Sunday, 13 May 2007 03:16 (sixteen years ago) link

So I'm cracking open the old Watts & Kapleau books again

Alan Watts would be roaring with laughter to hear that. Kapleau thought Watts was an undiscipled fraud, whilst Watts privately dismissed Kapleau as a dull and uninspired proponent of "sitting on your ass zen" (as if zen is a contest in who could sit longest).

Bob Six, Sunday, 13 May 2007 09:15 (sixteen years ago) link

oops...undisciplined.

The ex-Independent editor Rosie Boycott is said to have to some very juicy anecdotes about Chogyam Trungpa, from her involvement with him in the early 70s.

Bob Six, Sunday, 13 May 2007 09:18 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah pretty anyone who encountered him has very juicy anecdotes.

jhøshea, Sunday, 13 May 2007 13:16 (sixteen years ago) link

"the way of zen" got me started about 10 years ago. I wish I could say it was the prompt to a great spiritual awakening, but not at the moment.

That said, meditation and Buddhism have changed my life, for the better. I do think there's something to be said for simpler books, particularly if you're more exploring it at the moment. Really, at its core, Buddhism is pretty simple. I've heard it said that all the more esoteric and complex stuff (including all that blurb about 808903 realms of hell, and all the dancey dancey demons - which doesn't represent what I believe at all) was added later, when people in religious positions in India with a bit of power saw it was taking off, tried to get in on the act, and then tried to make it as esoteric and unreachable as possible to maintain some of the power they had.

"what the Buddha taught" by Walpola Rahula is pretty good (you should read it, C J). It cuts a lot of the crap. I liked the explanation of suffering/impermanence in the book, which can sound very nihilistic and pessimistic to a Westerner coming to the concepts. Although I do remember reading it and being slightly annoyed by some of it, so there must have been something in there I didn't like.

Evil Buddhism? Never did...sounds COOL.

hobart paving, Monday, 14 May 2007 10:12 (sixteen years ago) link

That looks like I'm dismissing the way of zen. I'm not, its a great book. Alan Watts generally (avoid the last book - the Tao of Philosophy - its a collection of writings and generally pretty tough going) is a good, and informative, read.

hobart paving, Monday, 14 May 2007 10:13 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't know about evil Buddhism, but the Tibetan tradition of Chöd encounters some of the dark stuff with a willing spirit:

http://www.dharmafellowship.org/library/essays/chod.htm

moley, Monday, 14 May 2007 10:22 (sixteen years ago) link

...incidentally, this tradition was founded by a woman - much rispek to our female butt kicking travellers on the path, because Chöd is hardcore.

moley, Monday, 14 May 2007 10:24 (sixteen years ago) link

hobart paving: spokesperson for the core of buddhism.

ok first of all, for its first 200 hundred years buddhism was taught completely verbally, nothing was written down. then some things were written down, probably not everything. so it's impossible to say what was added on later or whatever. all of that, of course, is irrelevant, there have been many buddhas, not just one. there are many living today. that's the whole point - we are all simply recognizing our own buddha nature, our own potential buddhahood.

teachers will offer teachings that are appropriate and helpful to the students that they are teaching at a particular time and place. the zen koan tradition was certainly added on later, but does that make it fraudulent?

as for the common longing many westerners have to find simplicity in the dharma, that's fine, you could say the dharma is simple; you could say it's complex. if your motivation is to cultivate compassion and wisdom in order to alleviate the suffering of sentient beings - i doubt you'd care whether it was simple or complex. and certainly this distinction will be totally lost when rock meet bone and you are left without defense or distraction to confront your own confusion.

there are many zen students who after years of practice have developed a nice warm feeling towards walking slow and eating tofu. likewise there are many from the tibetan tradition who are crazy religious fanatics. as i mentioned upthread, it's not the means - clean simple lines and upright posture or deity visualization - that make something buddhist, it's the view and motivation. which, of course, zen and tantric buddhism share.

hobart, your faux-historical reading of the origins of tantric dharma is so ignorant and mean-spirited as to be completely unconscionable, particularly coming from someone who considers himself to be some sort of buddhist practitioner, particularly in a setting where there are people who are curious about the dharma.

jhøshea, Monday, 14 May 2007 14:21 (sixteen years ago) link

goodness me!

you don't think your response is a little mean-spirited? I do feel rather like I've been attacked and then lectured on Buddhism. I'm not really interested in a more-Buddhist-than-thou conversation, but I'd consider that someone who claims the knowledge and compassion that you appear to be claiming might have answered my post with a little more compassion, or at least offered a more gentle challenge rather than an outright condemnation.

Looking back at my post, it is rather cynical, and I regret that. I didn't mean to suggest that any one aspect of the religion is somehow less "real" than another, which is perhaps what I did.

I'm aware of how Buddhism was taught, and that there is no universally accepted core. Trying to take a step back from this, and answer your post objectively, rather than in the angry manner it seems designed to provoke, my attempt to suggest my own perspective as some sort of core is actually rather offensive. However, I wasn't suggesting my truth as the only truth, "I've heard it said" doesn't imply that I know the answers to life, the universe and everything.

I DO think simplicity is important here. Although obviously any attempt to impose such a label is less than perfect, and there can be tremendous complexity within that simplicity. It IS my opinion that some aspects of Buddhism have been made needlessly complicated, or even inaccessible. This would not be unique to Buddhism, but would be true of many religions, and I believe that, in some aspects, this has been done for power-related reasons.

Okay, your post offers some room for reflection, and I'm going to try and be thankful for that, rather than react in the manner you might be expecting, and possibly wanting. I don't have time or energy to get into an argument with you over this, on this subject of all things. I regret that what I said gave offence, and was insensitive. I acknowledge your objections. Thank you for the lesson.

Yours
"some sort of Buddhist practitioner"

Actually, I quite like that.

hobart paving, Monday, 14 May 2007 19:39 (sixteen years ago) link

By the way, in the extremely unlikely event that I've PUT ANYONE OFF BEING A BUDDHIST NO WAIT, COME BACK, ITS NICE REALLY!!!

But I don't suppose I have - do you?

hobart paving, Monday, 14 May 2007 19:40 (sixteen years ago) link

well i'll leave it up to you to decide whether my response was intended to provoke anger or motivated by compassion or whatever. your implication that straight forward communication must naturally be based in aggression seemed a little questionable - not that i would hold myself up to be any sort of paragon of compassion or anything. i'm sure anything i say will be tinged with all sorts of confusion and your post most definitely did piss me off.

still, i wasn't trying to pick a fight, just attempting an honest uncouched response - really it was, from my point of view, a simple refutation of your ridiculous assertion that tantric buddhism was the creation of power mad brahmins - which your I've heard it said disclaimer did little to soften. likewise, just because you doubt that your comments could possibly have any effect on anyone doesn't mean you should regard your speech as unimportant or inconsequential.

as for the oft employed complaint that tantric buddhism is too complex or symbolic or esoteric - these things are only true until you try to understand what it's talking about. once you have a basic understanding, the straightforward clarity of dzogchen language might be the simplest thing there is.

jhøshea, Monday, 14 May 2007 20:37 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm unsure of how to answer you without sparking off further argument, and I genuinely don't have any interest in that. I did apologise for the manner of my post.

I do feel the need to answer a couple of your points. I made no assertion that straight forward communication must naturally be tinged in aggression, and find this rather a willful mis-reading of my post.

My feeling that you intended to provoke aggression was evoked more by the fact that, rather than engaging me on the matter in hand, you chose to personalise it, and to use terms such as "unconscionable", with all the implications that entails. Your response was "honest" in the same kind of way that punching me in the face might have been. Whilst that might be very honest, I'm not sure you could claim it was pacifist.

I have struggled with Buddhism, and with some Buddhists, over the years. That doesn't excuse the dismissal of certain aspects of it in my post which was, to some degree, slightly flip and off-the-cuff rather than as thought through as it should have been, in particular the dismissal of anything esoteric or complex. My personal experience has been that its easy to get lost in the esoteric, and lose sight of the bare bones, which is why, I suppose, I gave the response I did.

I don't believe tantric Buddhism was the creation of power-mad brahmins, to use your terminology. I DO feel, as I said earlier, that there should be a simplicity at the core of practice, which can easily be sidelined (again, from personal experience) by elements of the religion with more mystical overtones. I'm not sure whether you're actually arguing that Buddhism has never been used in the exercise of power, so I won't follow that argument any further.

I think its time I stepped back from this dialogue. I do genuinely regret giving offence, although I'm still a little angry at your response. I don't believe for a second, as you suggest I might, that my comments have no effect on people. I do believe that an off-the-cuff remark is unlikely to drive people away from Buddhism, particularly on a forum such as ILX where accepting a wide diversity of viewpoints is pretty much a given. What might be more likely to put people off is the sort of exchange we've just had, which doesn't reflect particularly well on us either as people or as representatives of a religion.

For what its worth, I am "some kind of pracitioner". If we were to get competitive about this (which would be some kind of irony in itself), I'm quite sure you'd be able to offer more knowledge of scripture and possibly more experience of practice - I've only been doing this for the past 5 years and have always "felt" it rather than read it - although that doesn't necessarily devalue my experience as I've always felt the things that mattered most to me, without necessarily grasping them intellectually, so I certainly don't claim to be any sort of expert. There are points you made upthread I'd like to engage with, but now really isn't the time.

Right, I'll read the rest of the thread with interest. Obviously, I acknowledge your right of response, but I feel that this conversation between us should be drawn to a conclusion, preferably an amicable one. So, with a bit more sincerity than last time, thank you for your response, and the thought provoked. Peace.

hobart paving, Monday, 14 May 2007 21:26 (sixteen years ago) link

hmmm....hobart and jhoshea

“When two Zen Masters meet on the road, they need no introduction; thieves and rogues recognize one another immediately.”

Dharma Combat

Bob Six, Monday, 14 May 2007 21:38 (sixteen years ago) link

love it.

Being a rogue would be fun. That's some motivation towards mastery.

hobart paving, Monday, 14 May 2007 22:00 (sixteen years ago) link

alright, cheers hobart, my apologies for any unkind or inaccurate words. may the dharma continue to flourish here in the virtual plain text realm of ilx.

jhøshea, Monday, 14 May 2007 22:13 (sixteen years ago) link

btw i've heard that kalu rinpoche story many times. not that it's not hilarious, it just always seemed, not so real. eh?

jhøshea, Monday, 14 May 2007 22:14 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.nndb.com/people/569/000087308/william-james-3-sized.jpg

SAME OCEAN DIFFERENT SHORES

PRACTICE SOME MAYAHANA COMPASSION

K THNX

remy bean, Monday, 14 May 2007 22:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Anyway, moving on... I see Brad Warner, author of Hardcore Zen, has a new book out this month.

Does anyone have any views on him (or his music come to that)? I quite liked the Hardcore Zen book.

Bob Six, Monday, 14 May 2007 22:19 (sixteen years ago) link

I like Watts' writing but I wouldn't really consider him an authority - d.t. suzuki perhaps a better starting point

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 14 May 2007 22:22 (sixteen years ago) link

I read "Zen Mind Beginners Mind" some years ago and was a little put off by (what I saw at the time as) a degree of esoterism. I suppose I should come back to it, though, with the same degree of open-mindedness with which I'm approaching the rest of this material.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 14 May 2007 22:56 (sixteen years ago) link

A student said to the chief monk, "Help me to pacify my mind!"
The chief monk said, "Bring your mind over here and I will pacify it."
The student said, "But I don't know where my mind is!"
The monk replied, "Then I have already pacified it."
The student said, "Explain to me in detail what you have just done."
The chief monk was silent.
The student said, "Well?"
The monk hung his head, saying, "I tried to confuse you so that you would go away."

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 14 May 2007 23:00 (sixteen years ago) link

I didn't know there was such a thing as Evil Buddhism!

That story is GREAT, Shakey M.C.

Abbott, Monday, 14 May 2007 23:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Hahaha xpost

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 14 May 2007 23:09 (sixteen years ago) link

i also like "optimism is a political choice" but that may not have quite the same valence for you

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 22 June 2018 21:05 (five years ago) link

always thought "hell is practice, not punishment" was good and buddhism sounding but i suspect it's just a bumpersticker.

Hunt3r, Friday, 22 June 2018 21:18 (five years ago) link

four years pass...

Buddhism - a religion based on psychology?

| (Latham Green), Friday, 27 January 2023 19:11 (one year ago) link

nah

G. D’Arcy Cheesewright (silby), Friday, 27 January 2023 19:14 (one year ago) link

Reducing religion to psychology =eternally dud

hrep (H.P), Friday, 27 January 2023 19:19 (one year ago) link

The Church of the Eternal Dud

I like it

I just wanted to bring up Buddhism to discuss became I have been interested in it lately. More philosophical Buddhism than faith-based Buddhism. Growing up at a Catholic it seems strange to have a spirituality based on mindfullness instead of guilt.

| (Latham Green), Friday, 27 January 2023 19:28 (one year ago) link

Check out Thomas Merton - a Catholic monk who was into zen

Andy the Grasshopper, Friday, 27 January 2023 19:36 (one year ago) link

Reducing non-western culture to western paradigms - also dud

not too strange just bad audio (brimstead), Friday, 27 January 2023 19:46 (one year ago) link

100% to Thomas Merton. An absolute master. His books “thoughts in solitude” is a classic, short form meditations, everyone should read it.

I have been interested in Paul F Knitter. The latter half of this interview gives a simple overview of him I think

https://honeylocustsangha.weebly.com/paul-knitter.html

hrep (H.P), Friday, 27 January 2023 19:49 (one year ago) link

xp otm

budo jeru, Friday, 27 January 2023 19:51 (one year ago) link

How Thomas Merton checked out is itself a matter of some controversy [In 2018, Hugh Turley and David Martin published The Martyrdom of Thomas Merton: An Investigation, questioning the theory of accidental electrocution]

Luna Schlosser, Friday, 27 January 2023 19:52 (one year ago) link

"Reducing non-western culture to western paradigms - also dud" I've been wondering if the terms in English that are used to describe things like Duḥkha in the way intended or if they just make people think kof them in unintended ways.
I have heard people say you can be Buddhist and Christian at the same time which seems odd to me.
Personally I am not Buddhist but i play one on TV.
Most of my info has come from Kung Fu movies in which Lamas are always sayingthings like "Buddhas name be praised! " And remaining calm while the template is under attack

| (Latham Green), Friday, 27 January 2023 19:57 (one year ago) link

LG, check out this episode of weird studies about dogen zenji: https://www.weirdstudies.com/16

budo jeru, Friday, 27 January 2023 19:58 (one year ago) link

I won’t pretend to know too much about Buddhism, but what I do know doesn’t seem heterodox to Christianity. Did not know that about Merton Luna, thanks for the rabbit hole

hrep (H.P), Friday, 27 January 2023 20:01 (one year ago) link

THanks for the links.

I think many bible thumping fire and brimstone type CHristians would call you a heretic for being Buddhist.
Of course you can always just say you are a philosopher and just happen to agree with the philosophies of certain Bhoddisatvas

| (Latham Green), Friday, 27 January 2023 20:05 (one year ago) link

I understand his (Merton's) body was returned to the U.S. on a plane full of U.S. servicemen's bodies being flown home from Vietnam

Andy the Grasshopper, Friday, 27 January 2023 20:06 (one year ago) link

"Mindfulness is said to be a $4bn industry. More than 60,000 books for sale on Amazon have a variant of "mindfulness" in their title, touting the benefits of Mindful Parenting, Mindful Eating, Mindful Teaching, Mindful Therapy, Mindful Leadership, Mindful Finance, a Mindful Nation, and Mindful Dog Owners, to name just a few."

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/jun/14/the-mindfulness-conspiracy-capitalist-spirituality

| (Latham Green), Friday, 27 January 2023 20:09 (one year ago) link

massive xps to latham's 1st post of this revive:

when your central practice is awareness, you observe myriad manifestations of mind in the process, so that, as a byproduct of awareness, buddhism has accumulated a lot of psychological savvy. but buddhism isn't 'based on' psychology. to the extent it engages with psychology, it's to set it aside.

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Friday, 27 January 2023 20:18 (one year ago) link

Thank goodness thumping brimstones don’t ontologically define Christianity then.
I’ve always been skeptical of western variants of Buddhism (emphasis on western) for the manipulative capitalist underpinnings sometimes expressed (as linked above). But no religion is exempt from this in the west

hrep (H.P), Friday, 27 January 2023 20:20 (one year ago) link

Good post aimless

hrep (H.P), Friday, 27 January 2023 20:21 (one year ago) link

Merton wormhole led me to this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sayings_of_the_Desert_Fathers

Must be from the bootleg Bible

| (Latham Green), Friday, 27 January 2023 20:31 (one year ago) link

Desert fathers are great. No bible, the desert fathers are 100’s of years after “biblical times”

hrep (H.P), Friday, 27 January 2023 20:35 (one year ago) link

massive xps to latham's 1st post of this revive:

when your central practice is awareness, you observe myriad manifestations of mind in the process, so that, as a byproduct of awareness, buddhism has accumulated a lot of psychological savvy. but buddhism isn't 'based on' psychology. to the extent it engages with psychology, it's to set it aside.

To this point, I recently posted this link on the meditation thread: https://tricycle.org/magazine/buddhism-and-psychotherapy

Cry for a Shadowgraph (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 27 January 2023 20:40 (one year ago) link

Feel like that Guardian writer is making it seem that Miles Neale is calling out Jon Kabat-Zinn as being a kind of Ray Kroc of mindfulness when it is the Guardian writer who is borrowing the term from Neale and doing the finger-pointing.

Cry for a Shadowgraph (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 27 January 2023 20:50 (one year ago) link

Ah, this is interesting. The author of that article wrote a whole book about McMindfulness and Jon Kabat-Zinn responded.
https://www.sussex.ac.uk/broadcast/read/49108

Cry for a Shadowgraph (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 27 January 2023 21:06 (one year ago) link

As far I can tell from Neale's webpage he has no, um, beef, with J K-Z. Here is something interesting I found there, where he talks about the relationship between meditation and psychotherapy, in particular the concept of spiritual bypass: http://embodied.bestdevserver.com/buddhism/self-care-and-selflessness-a-contradiction/

Cry for a Shadowgraph (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 27 January 2023 21:09 (one year ago) link

that piece seems pretty sound to me

I've had some minor engagement with the mindfulness industry - it seems to be a curate's egg with the potential to become something much worse - there are ways in which it seems much more appealing than psychotherapy and some of the techniques seem to help a lot but I'm profoundly ambivalent about it and the things it seems to emphasise and downplay. the disavowals of self-help can be about as convincing as "it's not a diet" - and many people involved seem to be cagey or downright dismissive about concepts like karma and reincarnation (or feel the need to translate them into scientific materialist language) and you can forget about god(s) and other beings in other realms* - it's being marketed as more scientific and pragmatic than TM and other new age stuff but also as more authentically buddhist and there is constant equivocation between mindfulness and buddhism as such - *maybe you get more into all that stuff as you go deeper but then it all sounds a bit culty

I'm not suggesting there is or was ever a true version of buddhism somewhere in asia unsullied by western nonsense (although that's a great hook for people selling their own takes on it) but stripmining a religion for its most instrumentally or therapeutically appealing parts and then claiming to be holding the true flame is a weird thing to do (it's a bit like how nietzche and schopenhauer and all them claimed their versions of nihilism were more authentically buddhist than the buddhists). that isn't to say that many of the techniques don't work quite well as advertised so I'm deeply conflicted about it all

your original display name is still visible (Left), Friday, 27 January 2023 22:00 (one year ago) link

There are a bunch of different takes on this other than "haha this is just the latest brand of Orientalist mumbo jumbo!" There are Secular Buddhists like Stephen Batchelor, then there is someone like Evan Thompson, author of Why I Am Not a Buddhist, to take two examples off the top of my mindhead.

Cry for a Shadowgraph (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 27 January 2023 22:08 (one year ago) link

The Man can't bust our mindfulness.

Cry for a Shadowgraph (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 27 January 2023 22:09 (one year ago) link

Pop Dharma

Andy the Grasshopper, Friday, 27 January 2023 22:11 (one year ago) link

I guess the only thing I have to add is that these questions - is X too individualistic (the concept of "spiritual materialism" is relevant here also), is Y beneficial or is this spiritual bypassing - never go away, and people that consider themselves Buddhist (hi) keep asking them.

death generator (lukas), Friday, 27 January 2023 22:27 (one year ago) link

am I correct in my impression that karma is much less central to western buddhism (and spirituality in general) than say 50 years ago? if so is there an obvious explanation for this?

and *why* is it that so many western buddhists and mindfulness advocates are so weird (almost embarrassed) about reincarnation? it sounds too religiony? are they ashamed of believing or not believing in it?

your original display name is still visible (Left), Friday, 27 January 2023 22:54 (one year ago) link

There is some dancind and tiptoing around that I have never even gotten near to so I don't have much to say.

Cry for a Shadowgraph (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 27 January 2023 23:01 (one year ago) link

Dancind and tiptoing = the Buddha's reindeer.

Shard-borne Beatles with their drowsy hums (Chinaski), Friday, 27 January 2023 23:04 (one year ago) link

Hahaha!

Cry for a Shadowgraph (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 27 January 2023 23:04 (one year ago) link

But do you recall
The greatest bodhisattva of all?

Cry for a Shadowgraph (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 27 January 2023 23:05 (one year ago) link

lol

Shard-borne Beatles with their drowsy hums (Chinaski), Friday, 27 January 2023 23:08 (one year ago) link

this dude seems pretty hardcore:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9W4SUepWOQ

Andy the Grasshopper, Friday, 27 January 2023 23:21 (one year ago) link

it's one path, but it's not a requirement

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Friday, 27 January 2023 23:27 (one year ago) link

A few years ago I read this book with the perhaps cheesy title of Without Buddha I Could Not Be a Christian, by Paul F. Knitter. One thing I remember about it is that he seemed to make an interesting argument for why certain things could be meaningful even if one did not believe in reincarnation or any kind of afterlife at all.

Cry for a Shadowgraph (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 27 January 2023 23:33 (one year ago) link

I also came to the conclusion at some point that Aimless’s screenname was derived from Buddhism but I don’t know if he is cool with me saying that.

Cry for a Shadowgraph (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 27 January 2023 23:36 (one year ago) link

my screen name's buddhist derivation is quite indirect and was mostly unconscious when it happened, but I've kept it over the decades largely to honor those hidden roots. it's ok to peg it to that.

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Friday, 27 January 2023 23:42 (one year ago) link

Ever since 1978 or so I've had a hard time deciding whether I'm a bad taoist or an easily sidetracked buddhist, so I oscillate between them, depending on which is easiest to impersonate.

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Friday, 27 January 2023 23:44 (one year ago) link

bad taoist = several old roommates of mine

Why wash the dishes piling up in the sink? Let the water flow around them

Andy the Grasshopper, Friday, 27 January 2023 23:52 (one year ago) link

That reminds me the terrible book Zen Guitar for Assholes where the guy recommends doing everything “100%, all out, all the time” or something like that, including doing the dishes. Not realizing that maybe, just maybe such a white knuckle attitude might actually lead somebody to think “Right now I don’t really feel like I can the dishes 100% so I will postpone that task until I feel up to it” instead of some more, say, self-aware approaches to handling the task with minimum wear and tear on the psyche.

Cry for a Shadowgraph (James Redd and the Blecchs), Saturday, 28 January 2023 00:27 (one year ago) link

"Reducing non-western culture to western paradigms - also dud" I've been wondering if the terms in English that are used to describe things like Duḥkha in the way intended or if they just make people think kof them in unintended ways.

You should totally check out this article by Carine Defoort:Is There Such A Thing As Chinese Philosophy?

Link is to a pdf file

The field divisions are fastened with felicitations. (Deflatormouse), Saturday, 28 January 2023 02:59 (one year ago) link

Today’s Daily Dharma is apropos.
https://tricycle.org/magazine/special-transmission/

The Big Candy-O (James Redd and the Blecchs), Saturday, 28 January 2023 13:03 (one year ago) link

I guess philosophy is philosophy and even that doesnt exist

| (Latham Green), Saturday, 28 January 2023 17:44 (one year ago) link

thx for that link, from the chan/zen-zone

normal AI yankovic (Hunt3r), Saturday, 28 January 2023 18:42 (one year ago) link

Sure. That was intense.

The Big Candy-O (James Redd and the Blecchs), Saturday, 28 January 2023 18:52 (one year ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.