XTC fans (or non-): possible explanations of their appeal???

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (313 of them)
I take it back. XTC were pretentious. But in a fun, smart, goofy, nerdy, way. Which is why critics love them. Or did love them. I always knew people who loved them who didn't listen to TONS of punk/new wave/alt/indie. I think they brought an element of classic-rockness to new wave/post-punk that kinda comforted people in a way. People could listen to something kinda hip and still get their Beatles. Like Hitchcock. Which is fine.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 20:29 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, both Smashmouth and XTC sort of sound like the Cars or ? and the Mysterians but not nearly as good, I guess. Except Smashmouth sound fatter. Which is to their credit. And less ambitious. Which is not. XTC never sound big and ambitious to me. They sound THIN and ambitious. I wish they sounded bigger. Or at least fatter. Smashmouth are all thumbs; XTC are all pinkies in the air. Smashmouth could afford more pinkie in their music; XTC could afford more thumb.(Also, both bands recall plenty of other bands who Shakey Mo thinks they have nothing to do with. But he is so fucking wrong it's not funny.)

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 20:30 (nineteen years ago) link

Plus, several of their lyrics would seem to recall "Cups and Cakes" by Spinal Tap. Except Spinal Tap had a better sense of humor about it.

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 20:33 (nineteen years ago) link

I think all I have in the house are the 2 dukes of stratosphere albums. But that's cheating.

I think they could sound sorta fat. There is some stuff I remember from Mummer that is kinda big and fat.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 20:34 (nineteen years ago) link

XTC are huge gnome-twee-treefolk-fairytale psych fans.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 20:36 (nineteen years ago) link

see, i like twee. and even whimsy.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 20:37 (nineteen years ago) link

??!!

2. Being eccentric--Are they as enjoyably and interestingly eccentric as either Kate Bush or Peter Gabriel?

Peter Gabriel = interestingly eccentric?

If by "interestingly eccentric" you mean "dull as dishwater," then perhaps I see what you're saying. On the other hand I'd be just as confused since Kate Bush is called the same thing in that statement.

I [heart] XTC, though I don't think there's much I could say that hasn't already been said on this thread.

martin m. (mushrush), Monday, 28 June 2004 20:38 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, it seems to me that, on Synchronicity and Ghost in the Machine, Sting was really doing the former at least as much as the latter. But of course there's no way to know anybody's intentions.

Right, IMO the Police achieved a very tricky balance of eclecticism and well-crafted pop songwriting on GitM, but from there the band (and later, Sting solo) got progressively middlebrow and "tasteful". Sting also got progressively more popular, at least for a while. XTC on the other hand, at about the same time, somewhere between Black Sea and English Settlement, got near the same balance, but ended up getting progressively less popular, emphasizing their idiosyncrasies and eventually settling into some kind of insular, baroque anglo-pop. Personally, I like latter day XTC, but there was a fork in the road circa 1981, and they took the path less traveled (and consequently, less followed).

dleone (dleone), Monday, 28 June 2004 20:48 (nineteen years ago) link

Ok dleone, but see, to me, it seems it's not so much that XTC chose their idiosyncrasies or the road less traveled as they picked the WRONG idiosycrasies and the WRONG road. Their earlier albums sound way MORE idiosyncratic than their later stuff, not less. Not to mention way less middlebrow (because way livelier, for one thing.) And I don't see how their earlier albums were more influential on the rest of music, if that's what you're suggesting; if anything, indie rock after '80s XTC (at least until the last couple years) emphasized prissy melody, not energetic rhythm. Prissy melody was the road MORE traveled. To me that's obvious. But again, my ears aren't yours...

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 20:57 (nineteen years ago) link

I mean, "insular, baroque anglo-pop" (especially with obscure quasi-literary/look-how-clever-we-are lyrics) describes just about every band to come out of England for the past decade or more, not to mention Americans ranging from, say, Pavement to Flaming Lips to Polyphonic Fucking Spree. It's been the standard indie way of doing things for ages. And in that context, XTC strike me as *generic,* not special at all. And even in the early '80s, it's what every Brit from Squeeze to Elvis Costello on *Imperial Boredom* was doing, I thought..

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 21:02 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm not suggesting any of their albums are that influential, really. And there are a lot of people (including fans and Virgin employees) who agree that they chose the wrong path. In this case, the "right" path would have been towards whatever sold more records. And I guess I define idiosynrasy differently than you; I see their ES and onwards output as drawing on their own personal peculiarities and tastes much more than their early records (which I also like). Partridge and Moulding seem like second rate pop stars at best to me, but perfectly suited to make music all day in their backyard shacks.

dleone (dleone), Monday, 28 June 2004 21:04 (nineteen years ago) link

someone, long ago so wisely said:

all people with a soft spot for the Beatles and the Kinks type of music will migrate to XTC with little pain.

Many things can be said about XTC, but for me to simplify it as much as is humanly possible: well-written, hoppy-boppy, finger-snappin', sing-along, quality, tap-your-foot POP SONGS, which 99 times out of a 100 are written by British artists. XTC fall well in line with this. Tim, have you heard "Life Begins at The Hop"? If you tell me you can sit still to that, then you might as well forget about XTC altogether.

In another XTC thread, I said Skylarking is the best Beatles-influenced album that has ever or will ever be made. Period.

English Settlement was honestly THE most difficult XTC album for me. I bought it a long time ago, sold it, and only tried to get into it again years later after I'd already gotten into ALL their other albums, and I still found it difficult. It frankly pains me to think an XTC novice would be using it as a starting point.

Ned, thanks so very much for clearing up the 'dub experiments' confusion without me having to explain it. I came across that CD quite innocently while on my XTC fanatic phase and was totally floored by that CD. I do NOT think it sounds "dub" in the sense of "reggae", nor do I believe it was even meant to imply as such. I also think this CD ["Explode Together: The Dub Experiments 78-80"] should NOT even be thought of next to the rest of XTC's stuff. For me it was a totally different thing, nearly a different band, but as I said, my jaw dropped nonetheless. Anyone who likes obscure weird post-punk stuff like me should check this CD out regardless of what you might think of XTC. It's a whole different ballgame!

Bimble (bimble), Monday, 28 June 2004 21:37 (nineteen years ago) link

Also, sticking up for "Sacrifical Bonfire" - count me in.

arrgh ILMers sending me on a mini-XTC trip when I've got so much other new music to listen to...arrggghhh do you people never quit?

Bimble (bimble), Monday, 28 June 2004 21:50 (nineteen years ago) link

> not to mention Americans ranging from, say, Pavement to Flaming Lips to Polyphonic Fucking Spree. It's been the standard indie way of doing things for ages<

Actually, Guided By Voices and Elephant 6 bands might be even better examples. {And honestly, I don't believe any of this music (including XTC) really sounds much like the Kinks --who I often love -- at all.}

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 21:57 (nineteen years ago) link

FWIW, I don't see any connection between XTC and prog

or XTC and Peter Gabriel

or XTC and Kate Bush.

Though I love Gabriel and Bush in their own ways.

Bimble (bimble), Monday, 28 June 2004 21:59 (nineteen years ago) link

Partridge and Moulding seem like second rate pop stars at best to me, but perfectly suited to make music all day in their backyard shacks.

Damn, man. It's not like we're talking about Marshall Crenshaw. Did Fuzzy Warbles make you that bitter?

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Monday, 28 June 2004 22:03 (nineteen years ago) link

XTC songs that are blatant Kinks homages:

Fruit Nut
the Affiliated (Dukes of Stratosphear)
Earn Enough For Us
Respectable Street
Love on a Farmboys Wages

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 28 June 2004 22:08 (nineteen years ago) link

Damn, man. It's not like we're talking about Marshall Crenshaw. Did Fuzzy Warbles make you that bitter?

Dude, where do you think they recorded Apple Venus? ;)

dleone (dleone), Monday, 28 June 2004 22:09 (nineteen years ago) link

"Blatant homages" =/ "sound much like the Kinks"

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 22:10 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm just sayin. I know how much you like to argue semantics.

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 28 June 2004 22:11 (nineteen years ago) link

"Respectable Street" is super-Kinks

CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 28 June 2004 22:21 (nineteen years ago) link

Chuck, here's your chance to list a bunch of bands you can insist "sound like" the Kinks. I'll get you started by suggesting Grand Funk Railroad, Kix, Big 'n' Rich, the Television Personalities, and Guns n Roses....

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 28 June 2004 22:23 (nineteen years ago) link

"respectable street" doesn't touch the kinks. though it shows a clear influence in the lyrical ideas and in the oo-oo-oo-oo-oo-oo-oo backing vocal part. which is to say it sounds like a record made by a band that admired the kinks, nothing more, nothing less. i like "respectable street" quite a bit. i like the kinks quite a bit more.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Monday, 28 June 2004 22:25 (nineteen years ago) link

With regard to Marshall Crenshaw, I would say that I like "Some Day, Some Way" more than any XTC song that I have heard to date.

* still remaining open-minded! *

Tim Ellison, Monday, 28 June 2004 22:30 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't hear it (though I can see why somebody would say that about its song title) (though in my head it sounds more like the Jam, for some reason!) Is it supposed to sound like "Well Respected Man"?

xpost


The Kingsmen sounded like the Kinks sometimes. So did Slade. Even AC/DC. But I don't think anybody sounds like them very often. I think they're an easy crutch used by people who want to describe so-called "pop" bands who sound "British" and "vaguely '60s" and, um, "ornate." (So are the Beatles.) I've never heard an XTC song as pretty as "Waterloo Sunset." (I guess part of it is, it seems bizarre to me to act like the Kinks or Beatles sounded just ONE way.)

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 22:32 (nineteen years ago) link

> not to mention Americans ranging from, say, Pavement to Flaming Lips to Polyphonic Fucking Spree. It's been the standard indie way of
doing things for ages<

Actually, Guided By Voices and Elephant 6 bands might be even better examples. {And honestly, I don't believe any of this music (including
XTC) really sounds much like the Kinks --who I often love -- at all.}

-- chuck (cedd...), June 28th, 2004.


Yeah, but a lot of these bands weren't very good at it. I think XTC were pretty good at it. That's the difference for me.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 22:33 (nineteen years ago) link

There are lots of XTC songs that would sound a lot like Kinks songs if Ray Davies sang them! hahahaha! But it's true kinda.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 22:37 (nineteen years ago) link

>it sounds like a record made by a band that admired the kinks, nothing more, nothing less. i like "respectable street" quite a bit. i like the kinks quite a bit more. <

xtc:kinks::whitesnake:led zeppelin, maybe

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 22:41 (nineteen years ago) link

None of these auxiliary artists come anywhere near the consistency of Partridge's output. Can anyone think of a bad Partridge song? I can't, but I'm trying.

(I'm Gonna Sit Right Down and) Whittle Away My Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 28 June 2004 22:45 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh god Partridge has let off some fart bombs. "All You Pretty Girls"?

I just realized that REM is totally XTC now in that no-drummer-lets-get-crazy-with-the-Sgt.-Pepper-bullshit way.

CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 28 June 2004 22:46 (nineteen years ago) link

Are Modest Mouse big XTC fans? Don't ask me why I thought of that. Although their singer did sport Partridge's Amish farmer look for a while.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 22:47 (nineteen years ago) link

plus hairlines and all

(x-post!)

CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 28 June 2004 22:47 (nineteen years ago) link

(though in my head it sounds more like the Jam, for some reason!)

well, they were two late '70s, early '80s bands who were very enamored of the kinks and wished they could be just like them. so it makes total sense that those two bands would end up having more in common with each other than either one had with the kinks.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Monday, 28 June 2004 22:48 (nineteen years ago) link

And at least Slade and (Bon era) AC/DC (and possibly the Jam, early on, though I never listen to them) kept plenty of the Kinks' hard rock in their music hall, which is more than you can say about just about any of the '80s/'90s art-pop bands who allegedly do the Kinks thing.

xpost

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 22:50 (nineteen years ago) link

I would love to hear ray davies sing some jam songs like "english rose" or "thick as thieves". don't ask me why.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 22:55 (nineteen years ago) link

Dude, REM's current drummer is the hardest rocking drummer they have ever had. He wasn't in the band yet when they recorded the last album.

Tim Ellison, Monday, 28 June 2004 22:55 (nineteen years ago) link

That was a ton of X-posts to Anthony, obv.

Tim Ellison, Monday, 28 June 2004 22:57 (nineteen years ago) link

(x-post)

i like the jam quite a bit, but paul weller couldn't hold a candle to ray davies as a lyricist. paul weller was one of the clunkiest lyricists britain ever produced as far as i can tell. he sort of got away with it because the lyrics sort of matched his clunky cockney singing voice, but i think they might sound truly awful coming out of the mouth of a good singer like ray davies.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Monday, 28 June 2004 22:59 (nineteen years ago) link

I actually kinda hated the Jam back in new wave days, to be honest. There were hundreds of journeymen new wave rock bands way more catchy in 1978 or 1979 (and Weller wasn't half the singer Noddy Holder or Bon Scott was, obviously, and their rock wasn't as hard and their Brit wasn't as music hall.) So if they were as half-assed as you say, that's a relief, really. I've just been giving them the benefit of the doubt today for, um, singing about tube stations or whatever.

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 23:10 (nineteen years ago) link

I like The Jam! I like their songs! Yeah, the lyrics were clunky. But I'm a Crass fan, so.......

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 23:15 (nineteen years ago) link

best jam song of all time: "start," which is the one where they ripped off "taxman" pretty much note for note. in other words, the one where they went beyond pretend flattery to actual flattery. "tube station" was more of a pretend flattery kind of thing, though its heart was in the right place.

(and i repeat: i actually like the jam.)

fact checking cuz (fcc), Monday, 28 June 2004 23:18 (nineteen years ago) link

I just put on "In the City" and I'm surprised to hear how much he had the early Townshend guitar sound down. He had the Rickenbacher and Vox amp, obv, but he played the style well (well-er than some?), too--rhythm and lead.

Tim Ellison, Monday, 28 June 2004 23:25 (nineteen years ago) link

He was a good singer, too!

Tim Ellison, Monday, 28 June 2004 23:27 (nineteen years ago) link

I could just never figure out how come the bomb was "in" waldour street instead of "on" it. (plus, sham 69 seemed a lot more fun.)

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 23:35 (nineteen years ago) link

I like their kinks cover too.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 23:37 (nineteen years ago) link

Oddly, though, I remember having a small soft spot at the time (c. 1982) for the otherwise probably terrible "Town Called Malice," probably for its Supremes "You Can't Hurry Love" bassline (that the Smiths stole a couple years later in "This Charming Man" I think.)

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 23:38 (nineteen years ago) link

For me, The Jam was a childhood fave. So my opinions on their music is colored by that.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 23:38 (nineteen years ago) link

The canned phil collins horns that Weller took with him to the style council could be hard on the ears. (on the later jam stuff)

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 23:39 (nineteen years ago) link

i got the Jam dvd and I was highly entertained by all the videos that i could never see cuz i lived in america. There are a lot of brit ILMers who hate the Jam. I'm wondering if this is partly cuz they were so popular in the U.K. and they got sick of wellermania.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 23:41 (nineteen years ago) link

"Town Called Malice" is fab-yoo-lous.

Tim Ellison, Monday, 28 June 2004 23:44 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.