stereo question

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (38 of them)

The way loudness dials were originally designed is that you would set the volume knob to a level that represented where music sounded good to you. And then you would use the loudness knob to turn it down from there, and it would change the equalization to keep the levels consistent with your desired volume. The idea being that the proportion of various frequencies your ear detects changes with volume. At low levels, it's harder to hear bass, even though it is "there" your ears don't really register it, so loudness boosts the bass at low levels so it seems "normal."

Mark, Sunday, 22 May 2011 18:10 (thirteen years ago) link

one year passes...

for the last ~14 years had two paradigm atoms, paradigm sub, and an NAD 712. in the last two weeks both atoms' woofers blew out. i haven't been playing music extraordinarily loud or anything. was it just their time or is something funky maybe happening with the amp?

eris bueller (lukas), Tuesday, 12 March 2013 16:42 (eleven years ago) link

one year passes...

After years of making sure I had the 'L' speaker/earbud in my left ear and the 'R' in my right, it occurred to me Wait. Does it really matter?

So what if the searing guitar solo starts on the right, travels over my head and ends on the left? So what if Chuck D is in this ear and Flav is now in that ear now?

Please name examples where music recorded in stereo must be heard explicitly with the correct left/right channels set.

pplains, Sunday, 24 August 2014 21:36 (nine years ago) link

The only instances I can think of offhand are those where the liner notes specify "x is in the right channel, y is in the left channel" (e.g., the Ornette Coleman Double Quartet's Free Jazz).

Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Sunday, 24 August 2014 22:10 (nine years ago) link

i have been told that some bands intentionally mix the drums so you will hear them from the drummer's own perspective (hi-hat and snare on the left, floor tom on the right). i think i would rather hear them from an observer's perspective (i.e. the reverse). but i also think i probably don't care.

this may matter more in classical recordings, where producers presumably want to re-create the experience of being in a concert hall: violins to your left, violas and cellos to your right, etc.

fact checking cuz, Monday, 25 August 2014 04:10 (nine years ago) link

iirc Raising Hell by Run DMC pans "Left y'all / to the left y'all / because I rock upon the mic real def y'all" and "Right y'all / to the right y'all / because I rock upon the mix all night y'all".

boney tassel (sic), Monday, 25 August 2014 04:17 (nine years ago) link

would you hang a pollock upside down? no! it'd look stupid!

Peeking at Peak Petty (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 25 August 2014 04:36 (nine years ago) link

Most fish look pretty stupid upside down imo

oblique blasphemies (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Monday, 25 August 2014 06:05 (nine years ago) link

the (I'm surely bullshit) liner notes to pere ubu's st arkansas claim that we hear from left to right.

bamcquern, Monday, 25 August 2014 06:38 (nine years ago) link

i have been told that some bands intentionally mix the drums so you will hear them from the drummer's own perspective (hi-hat and snare on the left, floor tom on the right). i think i would rather hear them from an observer's perspective (i.e. the reverse).

I have a couple of jazz records that do this (separate different parts of the drum kit to different channels), and it's a bit disturbing to listen to them on the headphones, with a stereo set it's okay.

Tuomas, Monday, 25 August 2014 09:23 (nine years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.