i'm sorry but the vocals on this are horrible
― monotony, Tuesday, 30 July 2013 00:49 (ten years ago) link
apology accepted
― max, Tuesday, 30 July 2013 00:50 (ten years ago) link
:)
― carlos danger zone (mh), Tuesday, 30 July 2013 01:54 (ten years ago) link
This is vg but I love this guy always
― flamboyant goon tie included, Tuesday, 30 July 2013 02:21 (ten years ago) link
this song suuuuuuuuuuuucks
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 30 July 2013 02:25 (ten years ago) link
otm
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 30 July 2013 02:27 (ten years ago) link
http://theremixbaby.tumblr.com/post/56833536211/best-new-dead-girl
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 30 July 2013 02:36 (ten years ago) link
if i was a woman i would think chillwave hates me
― Does the RS Tsarnaev Cover Offend You, Yeah? (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 30 July 2013 03:00 (ten years ago) link
smh at max loving women studies 101
― carlos danger zone (mh), Tuesday, 30 July 2013 03:03 (ten years ago) link
it's called women's studies
― flamboyant goon tie included, Tuesday, 30 July 2013 03:25 (ten years ago) link
smh at my typos
― carlos danger zone (mh), Tuesday, 30 July 2013 03:33 (ten years ago) link
michelle otm
― max, Tuesday, 30 July 2013 10:55 (ten years ago) link
there are three other songs on the bandcamp linked from the site, on fraternity is by far the worst, words with friends is pretty great
― max, Tuesday, 30 July 2013 10:58 (ten years ago) link
surprised by the noise, really don't like the vocals much. but i'll give this guy a shot, sure.
― antoine fuckwant (goole), Tuesday, 30 July 2013 13:24 (ten years ago) link
http://deadgirlfriends.tumblr.com/post/56881361455/rmxbb-best-new-dead-girl
― markers, Tuesday, 30 July 2013 18:53 (ten years ago) link
Partly I'm just happy to hear new music from him (RUIN, specifically "So Close to Paradise" which hits really close for me, is one of my favorite albums of the last few years), but I think even without those expectations I'd love this. It's kind of surprising just how vicious the youtube comments are, though.
― CAROUSEL! CAROUSEL! (Telephone thing), Tuesday, 30 July 2013 18:56 (ten years ago) link
that names from an ad in artforum
― color definition point of "beyond "color, eg a transient that, Tuesday, 30 July 2013 19:11 (ten years ago) link
http://actuallygrimes.tumblr.com/post/56990576819/i-apologize-in-advance-but-there-will-be-swearing-in
― markers, Wednesday, 31 July 2013 19:54 (ten years ago) link
grimes takes criticism pretty hard
― max, Wednesday, 31 July 2013 19:57 (ten years ago) link
idk if the song isnt actually intended to represent a woman's POV then the argument is wrong inherently right?
of course this means the song fails on another level, but imo the song sucks so dont really have something invested in that
― rap steve gadd (D-40), Wednesday, 31 July 2013 20:21 (ten years ago) link
if female critics are reacting a certain way to a song about rape culture written by a man, the inherent problem is with the song, not the interpretations
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 31 July 2013 20:38 (ten years ago) link
except that some female critics are not interpreting it that way, and the artist is maintaining that he was not writing from the POV of a woman.
It might be a failure of communication if this type of misunderstanding is happening, because an artist shouldnt have to explain his piece in a tumblr post. But you don't think that the artist's intent matters at all?
― rap steve gadd (D-40), Wednesday, 31 July 2013 20:54 (ten years ago) link
except that some female critics are not interpreting it that way
every female critic i've seen writing about this w/ the exception of pelly has had a problem with the song
that said, i don't think artists are owed correct interpretations of their songs by the general public. obviously for critics, interpreting something "correctly" is important but there's a strength in numbers thing here imo, especially when we're talking about how women are hearing a song written by a man about rape culture and the patriarchy.
if you're an artist, it matters if your execution is so clumsy that your true intent becomes muddled
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 31 July 2013 21:09 (ten years ago) link
you're talking 'strength in numbers' off the myopic world of a few writers and twitter friends. that isnt representative.
clumsy execution is totally correct—i think the song sucks & don't want to waste time defending it. But blatantly misinterpreting a song as being written from a woman's POV when the artist is saying explicitly that it wasn't is jumping to a conclusion that doesn't seem to have an apparent basis.
― rap steve gadd (D-40), Wednesday, 31 July 2013 21:18 (ten years ago) link
this spring i was djing at a cool bar here and while i was setting up, before the bar had gotten very busy, the female bartender and her bf were gossiping about this dude that they (and i) knew whos a reasonably successful visual artist. he had just been arrested for beating up his gf and the way they were talking about it was intensely gross, blaming her for instigating the violence and expressing incredulity that she would ever press charges 'why does she want to ruin his life' all this stuff. and like, i feel like i hear stuff like that too frequently from ostensibly progressive people in art/music circles, like theres a p pervasive misogyny which whiney kinda jokingly points out, and that jb has spoken out against on his tumblr. and so i kinda read 'on fraternity' as being about like post-hipster culture and not 'rape culture' explicitly, or how the two interact or something.
and im not really sure how as a dude you would talk about that or make songs or w/e about it because being like 'this is something i've noticed, and i find it really upsetting' risks seeming condescending or worse, and so i admire jb for risking that, although all his explanations have been sort of embarrassing and sad. like i think the only real response to that first tumblr is just 'ok', because that seems like an obv reaction for some women to have, and it was offered with such a shrug in the first place. and the misogyny that exists in these circles is something that i find upsetting, that bothers me, that i would appreciate people talking about and arguing over. idk
also i wish the song was actually good, i think it would get a lot more slack if that were the case
― password1 (Lamp), Wednesday, 31 July 2013 21:31 (ten years ago) link
who exactly do you think is the audience for dead girlfriends?
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 31 July 2013 21:36 (ten years ago) link
at a certain point, a reality has to set in, which is that someone misinterpreted a lyric as if it was trying to do something it expressly was not trying to do.
that may be a failure of the artist, but it is not the particular failure the critics are pointing to.
― rap steve gadd (D-40), Wednesday, 31 July 2013 21:40 (ten years ago) link
well i think this is a unique case because of the subject matter of the song, where he's writing about such a sensitive topic that "misinterpretations" are his burden and not that of (female) critics
contrast this with something like "blurred lines," where some writers latched onto a few phrases and extrapolated out wildly to a conclusion that was incorrect.
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 31 July 2013 21:50 (ten years ago) link
i guess it's sort of noble for him to even approach the topic but if you're gonna do it you better nail it
But you don't think that the artist's intent matters at all?
― rap steve gadd (D-40), Wednesday, July 31, 2013 4:54 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark
youve been a music crit long enough deej to know that this is a perfectly valid position to take
― 乒乓, Thursday, 1 August 2013 00:31 (ten years ago) link
It is not valid inasmuch as it directly contradicts the criticism being leveled at the artist
― rap steve gadd (D-40), Thursday, 1 August 2013 01:15 (ten years ago) link
say more?
― 乒乓, Thursday, 1 August 2013 01:34 (ten years ago) link
remove bookmark until conversation is about cool lil songs
― carlos danger zone (mh), Thursday, 1 August 2013 01:57 (ten years ago) link
I’m so tired of people jumping on every possible controversy they can conjure because they need web traffic.
Grimes tumblr otm
― sleepingbag, Thursday, 1 August 2013 02:08 (ten years ago) link
https://twitter.com/elite_gz/status/363402960954339328
― markers, Friday, 2 August 2013 21:18 (ten years ago) link
link to the site he's talking about?
― Dan I., Friday, 2 August 2013 21:22 (ten years ago) link
good point. here you go: http://www.spin.com/articles/dead-girlfriends-on-fraternity-controversy-grimes-fugazi/
― markers, Friday, 2 August 2013 21:26 (ten years ago) link
That's a good discussion, they're not just all dumping on him. controversy's good for yr career, James!
― Dan I., Friday, 2 August 2013 21:36 (ten years ago) link
― Does the RS Tsarnaev Cover Offend You, Yeah? (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, July 29, 2013 11:00 PM (4 days ago) Bookmark
thanking u
― staind in the place where you live (crüt), Friday, 2 August 2013 21:42 (ten years ago) link
Wait was that tweet actually the petulant bs it reads like? Jesus Christ dude you are so lucky* to have their thoughtful attention.
*privileged
― eris bueller (lukas), Friday, 2 August 2013 22:02 (ten years ago) link
women, man. can't they just listen to a guy who's trying to help
― maura, Friday, 2 August 2013 22:37 (ten years ago) link
haha yeah I love how this guy follows up his weak garbled male appropriation of women's experiences by asking "why do I have no voice in this discussion?" to a group of women who have actual insightful things to say
― staind in the place where you live (crüt), Friday, 2 August 2013 22:45 (ten years ago) link
maybe we should send him a link to our "death of the author" discussion so he gets that interpretation doesn't mean the lyricist telling you exactly what the lyrics are supposed to mean
― carlos danger zone (mh), Friday, 2 August 2013 22:51 (ten years ago) link
obviously cant speak for the guy (of whose music i am a big fan so, idk, im biased i guess!) but the post he made immediately after the first 'wave' of controversy more or less seemed to imply that the song was about his own experience of (being) sexual(ly) assault(ed). he didnt come out and say that, so if youre really cynical maybe you assume hes just trying to imply that, or hes trying to weasel out or whatever. but id be wary at least for now of saying hes appropriating womens experiences.
other than that, idk, i have nothing to say really besides, huh.
― max, Saturday, 3 August 2013 01:11 (ten years ago) link
I liked the noisy bit
― a blessing and an inspiration (flamboyant goon tie included), Saturday, 3 August 2013 05:22 (ten years ago) link
http://defaultgenders.tumblr.com/post/57247050954/name-change
― MarkoP, Saturday, 3 August 2013 16:43 (ten years ago) link
In two weeks: PostHuman
Two weeks after that: "Surprise! I was Hugo Schwyzer all along!"
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 3 August 2013 16:55 (ten years ago) link
http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20121031153246/community-sitcom/images/1/1a/Human_Being.jpeg
― some dude, Saturday, 3 August 2013 17:06 (ten years ago) link
I'm glad he changed the name.
― staind in the place where you live (crüt), Saturday, 3 August 2013 18:02 (ten years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAocvKHUidg
― markers, Saturday, 3 August 2013 18:02 (ten years ago) link