The production on the early Suede albums

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (114 of them)
There's a Tears thread, Mitya, so do please search for it. ;-)

Realizing I am about to revolt all of you but utterly not caring about it, Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness has more conceptual integrity than Dog Man Star and that fucker is twice as long.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 22 December 2005 15:33 (eighteen years ago) link

.. And the Boos complained about that production, too.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 22 December 2005 15:34 (eighteen years ago) link

You'll note they started producing themselves immediately after that album!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 22 December 2005 15:35 (eighteen years ago) link

Realizing I am about to revolt all of you but utterly not caring about it, Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness has more conceptual integrity than Dog Man Star and that fucker is twice as long.

Despite all my rage you're still just a rat in a cage.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 22 December 2005 15:36 (eighteen years ago) link

:-D

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 22 December 2005 15:36 (eighteen years ago) link

"the power" is very boring, maybe cos bernard doesn't play on it for one thing. there's a part in the book where bernard and brett agree that the song's a bit weak. apart from that one and maybe "black or blue", i don't really see the problem in the middle though.

Ned, i hadn't noticed you liked suede that much, we could have talked about that in bruxelles ! (for instance how heretic it is to prefer "coming up" to the two first ones...).

AleXTC (AleXTC), Thursday, 22 December 2005 15:40 (eighteen years ago) link

speaking about the tears : are they still together ? last time i heard of them was when they cancelled their paris show (for which i had a ticket...damn).

AleXTC (AleXTC), Thursday, 22 December 2005 15:42 (eighteen years ago) link

Heheh. It's an interesting heresy but not a unique one, a number of folks on the Suede list felt similarly. The Tears are still around I suppose.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 22 December 2005 15:43 (eighteen years ago) link

well, as i was reading the book, i strated to listen to all their albums again (something i hadn't done for a long while). "coming up" has good hits but as a whole, i don't really like it... too superficial i guess (which was the point, obviously).

AleXTC (AleXTC), Thursday, 22 December 2005 15:46 (eighteen years ago) link

It's weird, but for all the talk about 'let's go commercial' regarding Coming Up, I actually think that they conjure up an atmosphere that's far more romantic, for lack of a better term, than Dog Man Star. The latter is certainly more dank and gothed out (which normally I'm all for, of course!), but "By the Sea," "Picnic By the Motorway," "The Chemistry Between Us" and even good ol' "Saturday Night" feel far more beautifully dreamy. And as hands down great as "Still Life" is, my god do the Craig Armstrong-arranged strings on "She" hold their own in comparison.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 22 December 2005 15:51 (eighteen years ago) link

well, "she" would be a good example of my feelings toward this album. i remember when i first heard it i was immediately caught. the strings are excellent indeed. but now, years later, i never feel like listening to that song (same for all the other hits of the album) whereas i still play "the wild ones" or "sleeping pills" from time to time.

AleXTC (AleXTC), Thursday, 22 December 2005 15:57 (eighteen years ago) link

The production on the early Suede albums (60 new answers, 59 total)
Huh?

naranjito (Koens), Thursday, 22 December 2005 18:19 (eighteen years ago) link

"the power" is very boring, maybe cos bernard doesn't play on it for one thing.

Allowing for my lack of guitar-playing prowess, how can one tell? I remember reading interviews when Dog Man Star was released in which it was revealed that Brett played the guitars, but the electric lead sounds an awful lot like Bernard.

Are there other songs in the Suede catalogue on which Brett plays?

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 22 December 2005 19:48 (eighteen years ago) link

well, apparently, the "demo" of "the power" was played by bernard but then, since he'd left the band, i think it was brett, yeah, who played on the final cut, replicating exactly what bernard had played.
but to me, it's obvious that the track lacks... power ! (and i even find the guitar parts a bit too simple/basic to be exactly what bernard had played).

as for other songs played by brett, i suppose there must be in the post-butler albums as there are songs he wrote alone...

AleXTC (AleXTC), Friday, 23 December 2005 12:07 (eighteen years ago) link

Imagine if Johnny Marr was the only truly talented one in The Smiths. Apply copious amounts of (production) turd polish to fill out the talent gaps.

That's Suede. Dreadful band, acceptable and half-convincing at the time (like KasabianLibertineArcticKaiserKillers currently seem 'good' to some young and not-so-young folk) truly embarrasing now, they remind me of Placebo but withe the good stuff spread even thinner.

Merry Christmas (fandango), Friday, 23 December 2005 12:17 (eighteen years ago) link

both Bernard and Brett express disappointment with the production work of Ed Bueller on Suede and Dog Man Star as well they should, both those records sound like shit, and they only got worse as they went on.

Merry Christmas (fandango), Friday, 23 December 2005 12:19 (eighteen years ago) link

Imagine if Johnny Marr was the only truly talented one in The Smiths. Apply copious amounts of (production) turd polish to fill out the talent gaps.

well, i guess, that's roughly what bernard thought at the time !
as for the rest of your post, i don't agree, of course, but it's all about taste, eh...

AleXTC (AleXTC), Friday, 23 December 2005 12:22 (eighteen years ago) link

sorry, that was a really hatey-type of post (I liked them once!) but they always sounded like a band incredibly reliant on production to carry themselves over. By which I mean as far as I can recall from way back then they had a 'live' sound (preferable, leaner/sharper and tougher to my ears) but never bothered, or had the creative intelligence to let it develop enough to take onto record. Lazy, in other words.

Merry Christmas (fandango), Friday, 23 December 2005 12:27 (eighteen years ago) link

That's Suede. Dreadful band, acceptable and half-convincing at the time (like KasabianLibertineArcticKaiserKillers currently seem 'good' to some young and not-so-young folk) truly embarrasing now, they remind me of Placebo but withe the good stuff spread even thinner.
-- Merry Christmas (...), December 23rd, 2005.

(has 30 second compact flashback of 1992-94. stares at comment. mouth moves. no words become available..)

piscesboy, Friday, 23 December 2005 12:28 (eighteen years ago) link

four months pass...
some thread elsewhere reminded me of this and I'll blame that comment above on the xmas plonk... I don't think I hate Suede that much at all!

I must have been unusually overwhelmed by indie-student-glam that day to have had bile to spare on this. Heck, they're mostly mediocre (Britpop was a hero to most...) roughly equivalent to the class of '06 I guess. Depressing how little things change :/

They were certainly nowhere near as irritating as Placebo in the making a career out of three ideas stakes.

fandango (fandango), Sunday, 14 May 2006 11:34 (eighteen years ago) link

Hey now. (Says the Placebo fan.)

FWIW Brett mentioned the other day that while the Tears continue on his solo album is finally coming out soon. I admit I don't know what to think of that.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 14 May 2006 11:42 (eighteen years ago) link

I'll still defend Dog Man Star against all you apostates.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 14 May 2006 12:37 (eighteen years ago) link

Dog Man Star is fairly defensible IIRC.

fandango (fandango), Sunday, 14 May 2006 13:07 (eighteen years ago) link

I think I could live happily without ever hearing it again that said.

fandango (fandango), Sunday, 14 May 2006 13:09 (eighteen years ago) link

I think I ONLY liked Dog man star, and pretty much hated their other stuff... I only wish it was more indulgent... it sums up everything I like about the band in a single OTT package... The mucky sounding production gives that kind of dank edge to it all, rather than the airless, overly polished up latter-day stuff, which was obviously an attempt to be "modern pop". (whereas what they were great at was being a hauntological rock act... far more evocative than any of the 2006 indie crowd, or the rest of the brit pop crowd at the time...)

gekoppel (Gekoppel), Sunday, 14 May 2006 15:07 (eighteen years ago) link

Ed Buller did an excellent job om "Suede". On "Dog Man Star" something is wrong, I dunno if it's the production or the songs, but something it is.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 14 May 2006 18:41 (eighteen years ago) link

What did you think of The Tears, Ned? There was nothing... transcendent on it, but I enjoyed hearing Brett's voice again. Much better than the last Suede album, I thought.

pleased to mitya (mitya), Sunday, 14 May 2006 18:51 (eighteen years ago) link

Its very messy, fo sho. Lots of reverb on almost everything, but that's what makes it so atmospheric... its the opposite of crisply produced hyper-compressed pop-rock... I'm surprised you wouldn't enjoy it tho Geir, cos its uber-melodic, albeit not in a concise way like the debut (but you love prog right, so concision isn't everything?)

gekoppel (Gekoppel), Sunday, 14 May 2006 18:53 (eighteen years ago) link

i wonder what ed buller does these days

electric sound of jim (and why not) (electricsound), Monday, 15 May 2006 00:12 (eighteen years ago) link

The production on the first Suede album -- the mix, I mean -- is fairly crappy. "Moving" was mentioned upthread, but there are several other songs which sound as if a bottom (a rhythm section) wasnt even a consideration.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 15 May 2006 00:50 (eighteen years ago) link

What did you think of The Tears, Ned?

Here's where I admit I have yet to hear the album in full. (Did it even get a US release?) The couple of mp3s I heard were nice enough.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 May 2006 00:52 (eighteen years ago) link

'i wonder what ed buller does these days?'

If he's not up to much, he could ask the Psychedelic Furs for his old job back.

Peteski, Monday, 15 May 2006 06:35 (eighteen years ago) link

so brett will release a solo album now ? tsss... looking back, the tears were such an anticlimax. and I didn't even get to finally see mr butler perform with brett. damn them for several generations...

AleXTC (AleXTC), Monday, 15 May 2006 11:34 (eighteen years ago) link

It'll be interesting to see what the press make of brett's second comeback in 2 years. what 'the story' will be and such.
he'd better have some *fucking* great songs.

pisces (piscesx), Monday, 15 May 2006 13:19 (eighteen years ago) link

he'd better have some *fucking* great songs.

well if by getting back with the guy with whom he's done the best work of his life all he could come up with was some ok-but-a-bit-boring songs, I don't have high expectations...
and OTM about the handling of 2 comebacks back to back !

AleXTC (AleXTC), Monday, 15 May 2006 14:42 (eighteen years ago) link

eight years pass...

a nice read : http://thequietus.com/articles/16540-suede-dog-man-star-reissue-anniversary-review

and as for production on DMS :

'New Generation' on the other hand was, to Buller, a disaster. The stampeding cavalry of those Martin Chambers/Clem Burke drums, a multi-tiered pop attack all made 'New Generation' sound like a sure thing. But It was ruined by an abysmal mix, the "worst of my career," confesses the producer. Later on 'Trash' was viewed as the corrective to this wasted opportunity. "The guitars on that track were amazing and they were lost in the song," he admits. "The tapes should have been handed over to someone else, I was shot."

The mixing of the album was hastily completed. Buller claims that what exists on the original masters is far superior to what actually emerged. What did emerge sounded subterranean, drenched in that Butler-baiting reverb. Over the years, such flaws become part of a record's peculiar charm, even becoming the sonic glue that binds it together.

AlXTC from Paris, Friday, 24 October 2014 14:12 (nine years ago) link

it's funny how time changes people : now the track I enjoy the most on DMS is "Black or Blue"... and I would consider the Tears album a pretty good follow up to DMS in parallel universe !

AlXTC from Paris, Friday, 24 October 2014 14:14 (nine years ago) link

it's a freaking amazing piece that. interesting how BB has been proved right about the album and now even the producer is saying so.

piscesx, Friday, 24 October 2014 14:43 (nine years ago) link

how I wish a Butler DMS mix existed somewhere...

And as the years went by Butler made digs that barely concealed the trauma he felt from never taking Dog Man Star to completion.

I'd never thought about this but it must definitely be awful to have been unable to finish his masterpiece... (actually prevented from !)
kinda like Brian Wilson and Smile.
Maybe Butler should release Bernard Butler's DMS !

AlXTC from Paris, Friday, 24 October 2014 14:57 (nine years ago) link

Never really got BB's complaints about DMS production. The production jobs for McAlmont & Butler and The Tears sound pretty similar - with extra lashings of gloopy string to make them sound even messier.

Eyeball Kicks, Friday, 24 October 2014 16:19 (nine years ago) link

like.. woah.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFpeo1YLLsU

piscesx, Friday, 24 October 2014 16:55 (nine years ago) link

Butler's production on The Tears' album is worse than any Suede album

PaulTMA, Friday, 24 October 2014 17:19 (nine years ago) link

The production jobs for McAlmont & Butler and The Tears sound pretty similar

I disagree on this. Not to say he's a great producer or anything (he's not) but his production is very different from Buller's. Less reverb, clearer and more organic sound.
For instance on "Apollo13" from the Tears, Brett's voice is so close and naked it's almost disturbing !

AlXTC from Paris, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 14:43 (nine years ago) link

Fair enough, I just listened to Apollo 13 and you're right about the vocals. I don't know if I'd call it an organic sound, but you have a point. There's a kind of claustrophobic layering I don't like on a lot of Bernard Butler stuff, but even on something like Yes with McAlmont the vocals are actually quite clear on top of the muddy mess.

I also listened to the recent Suede album again today, and some of the songs are great, but the reverb is pushed way past Dog Man Star levels even. It's terrible on headphones.

Eyeball Kicks, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 23:34 (nine years ago) link

I never got into the latest album and don't understand the raving reviews. "it starts and end with you" is ok but nothing else really grabbed me.
actually, apart from the Butler era, there's nothing I feel like listening to from them (even though I liked "Coming Up" and even some stuff from "Head music" at the time...).
They still made some good songs after BB but I think the music lost a lot of depth. it became more superficial, like unidimensional (not just the poppy singles, even nice songs like "to the sea").

AlXTC from Paris, Thursday, 30 October 2014 10:29 (nine years ago) link

I rate Bloodsports up there with the first three Suede albums, but my god is the mastering horrible.

Welcome To (Turrican), Thursday, 30 October 2014 21:25 (nine years ago) link

I've grown to appreciate the production as this particularly British shitty sound aesthetic, sort of like American lo-fi, but higher-fi, yet still so weird and thin and shitty. Like they just don't know how to record the bottom end or distorted guitars right, or are trying to use hi-fi equipment to recall the less hi-fi "Ziggy Stardust" sound.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 30 October 2014 21:29 (nine years ago) link

yeah i'm baffled by the raves too it's a terrible record IMO, no better than Head Music. post-Butler they had maybe 2 great songs (Picnic.. and Chemistry.. off Coming Up) and beyond that they could be any half-decent Uk guitar band.

piscesx, Friday, 31 October 2014 05:24 (nine years ago) link

somehow, I think the first taste of the post BB line up is "the power". even at the time of the release, when I didn't know that butler didn't play on it, I found it a bit dull and liveless although it's nice and poppy (it's the only song that I never feel like listening to on DMS). so the problem of post butler suede is not just about the songwriting, since it was a butler/anderson song. there's a raw and passionate aspect in the performance that got lost with butler's departure.
when you listen to the guitar parts on "the power", it's almost a joke. some (very un-butler) acoustic strumming and very basic electric licks. there's almost nothing. they filled up the song with strings but it still sounds very empty.

AlXTC from Paris, Friday, 31 October 2014 14:52 (nine years ago) link

the end of "the power" is scary, what is that huge whining sound that envelopes everything?

brimstead, Friday, 31 October 2014 19:08 (nine years ago) link

well, I don't think it's possible to imagine what they would have done after DMS had they stayed together. and "coming up" and the mcalmont & butler stuff are certainly no indications since they would have evolved differently if they had kept working together, I suppose.
the BBC documentary is interesting when BB says 1/ he's never been as creative as during DMS ever since 2/ he's been traumatized for years and until now by having been left behind and not being able to finish his "baby".
I guess something was broken in him (and BA) at that key moment.

AlXTC from Paris, Friday, 7 November 2014 11:23 (nine years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.