Paul McCartney Vs Brian Wilson : genius wreckage

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (23 of them)

Oh I guess not depressed through the whole seventies but definitely in the early and then trying to do something/anything to recover (with much help from Linda and their kids).
but apparently he was much more broken and aware of his creativity never fully back than I thought.
There are some interviews from the 70s and 80s about this.
So I was just thinking maybe he wasn't judged with the same kindness as BW was and all his goofy, silly (and plain bad) stuff would have been better considered if they had been done by BW.
Like what if Macca had taken more drugs in the 60s and hadn't had Linda !

AlXTC from Paris, Monday, 2 March 2015 17:07 (nine years ago) link

yeah, clearly not interchangeable at all. very different situations, output, personalities, etc.
that's really just an idea without much backing !

AlXTC from Paris, Monday, 2 March 2015 17:08 (nine years ago) link

have you read reviews of those 70s Beach Boys albums? they are not kind. before his first proper Landy-helmed solo album BW was hardly judged kindly, it was more like he was pitied

Οὖτις, Monday, 2 March 2015 17:09 (nine years ago) link

this is p good I guess: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/albumreviews/love-you-19770505

Οὖτις, Monday, 2 March 2015 17:10 (nine years ago) link

Critical thinking has probably changed in the past decade - McCartney is now the "flawed hero" and Wilson is the golden oldies guy subject to diminishing returns. Neither of those storylines are true -- but then neither of those storylines have much weight either, because no one really cares about what the "music critic consensus" is anymore. For what it's worth, I thought Memory Almost Full and Lucky Old Sun were really, really strong records. And I still think music critics have no idea how to write about mental health issues.

Chuck_Tatum, Monday, 2 March 2015 17:16 (nine years ago) link

Yeah the critics have definitely evolved regarding macca lately. But in the 70's and 80's it seems he was mainly considered an uncool joke.
Wilson seemed to always have a free pass.
Maybe it's just my own perception.
I love both but post 60's, I find macca's output considerably better (with major duds though).
And macca's latest stuff too (chaos being a favourite).
Most of wilson's solo stuff sounds quite bad to me (the production especially).

AlXTC from Paris, Monday, 2 March 2015 19:22 (nine years ago) link

no one does wall-o-buzzing-synths like Wilson imo, the production on Love You and that first s/t are quite strange and engagin

Οὖτις, Monday, 2 March 2015 19:30 (nine years ago) link

The synths in T.I.'s "What You Know" always felt similar to me. I love that sound and I don't hear it enough.

Potty Stickers (Old Lunch), Monday, 2 March 2015 19:33 (nine years ago) link

haha ok there's a connection I hadn't drawn before but I totally hear it now that you mention it. Wilson was ahead of his time with the synth stuff imo - just aurally, the way *everything* is processed - moreso than any of Macca's 70s productions.

Οὖτις, Monday, 2 March 2015 19:36 (nine years ago) link

Basically agree w AlXTC from Paris, and think that a lot of this has to do w their personas, and the cultural roles of their (former) bands. The Beatles were always on top, always trendsetters, really good at being famous (ie no nervous breakdowns during the production of what was supposed to be their best records). The Beach Boys had huge hits obviously, but also were kind of underdog personas, like the American somewhat odd-savant yin to the Beatles' overachieving, working-class yang. As a solo artist, McCartney had to overcome ridiculously high expecations, like those of a returning sports champion into a new season, and had haters simply for having been so successful (and likewise, undoubtedly overexposed). For solo BW, it's almost like anything you can get is a bonus, and it's an unspoken rule that you encourage his efforts rather than criticize his failures. I find it conspicuous and hypocritical, and with each passing not-very-good BW solo album, realize how incredible someone like McCartney really is. PS I am also Eugene Landy.

Dominique, Monday, 2 March 2015 20:24 (nine years ago) link

seven years pass...

Was listening to "IMagination" by Brian Wilson yesterday - so glossy and slick - it really brings in to sharp relief how bad his voice has been for the past 40 years - meanwhile Sir Paul has maintained his angelic muffelvox

| (Latham Green), Tuesday, 25 October 2022 19:18 (one year ago) link

I remember Wilson's SNL performance in the '70s being very cringe-worthy. (I think it was hosted by Jodie Foster, still a teenager then.) I'm not sure if his voice had physically soured though - it may have been his inability to sing the way he used to due to his mental fitness.

birdistheword, Tuesday, 25 October 2022 19:39 (one year ago) link

meanwhile Sir Paul has maintained his angelic muffelvox

You obviously haven't seen him perform in a long while.

Fronted by a bearded Phil Collins (Tom D.), Tuesday, 25 October 2022 19:56 (one year ago) link

Well, relative to Wilson's goose-link honk

| (Latham Green), Tuesday, 25 October 2022 20:00 (one year ago) link

McCartney sounded pretty good vocally up until the last decade or so

ColinO, Tuesday, 25 October 2022 20:56 (one year ago) link

Macca just sounds old. Which is to be expected.

immodesty blaise (jimbeaux), Tuesday, 25 October 2022 21:22 (one year ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.