I'm normally a big one for lyrics but I think Ian Curtis' were pretty dire - all that Ballard-rip-off stuff and the existential pomp of it all. Salvaged a bit by his voice, which I do like a lot. I don't even think "Atmosphere" has good lyrics. "Love Will Tear Us Apart" has BRILLIANT lyrics which from an artistic p.o.v. is the saddest thing about his death - that it seems like a breakthrough in terms of writing humane but unflinching stuff about relationships. But lyrically, generally, dud.
But the music! Bloody hell - the drive and claustrophobia and dynamics and Martin Hannett's production....it's extraordinary. A lot of it is Hannett and I think it's a shame that AFAIK I'm the first person to mention him in this thread. But that band could motor - "Dead Souls", for example, where the lyrics are pretty much irrelevant next to the huge concrete smack of the music. No, for the music, classic.
exactly.
― adam. (nordicskilla), Thursday, 16 September 2004 02:20 (nineteen years ago) link
― adam. (nordicskilla), Thursday, 16 September 2004 02:21 (nineteen years ago) link
― gaz (gaz), Thursday, 16 September 2004 02:22 (nineteen years ago) link
― adam. (nordicskilla), Thursday, 16 September 2004 02:23 (nineteen years ago) link
― gaz (gaz), Thursday, 16 September 2004 02:27 (nineteen years ago) link
― gaz (gaz), Thursday, 16 September 2004 02:28 (nineteen years ago) link
― adam. (nordicskilla), Thursday, 16 September 2004 02:28 (nineteen years ago) link
― AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 16 September 2004 02:28 (nineteen years ago) link
― adam. (nordicskilla), Thursday, 16 September 2004 02:29 (nineteen years ago) link
― gaz (gaz), Thursday, 16 September 2004 02:30 (nineteen years ago) link
― adam. (nordicskilla), Thursday, 16 September 2004 02:33 (nineteen years ago) link
― gaz (gaz), Thursday, 16 September 2004 02:35 (nineteen years ago) link
Heh. Well I'm already getting used to it, listening to it again.I'm d/ling the whole box set right now. I only ever had Substance growing up.That was a little jarring the first time I heard it - a little alarm went off.It totally sounds like he just fucked up a couple times and never got around to overdubbing it.But then the song's called "Disorder" so whatever.
― AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 16 September 2004 02:50 (nineteen years ago) link
― Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Thursday, 16 September 2004 02:54 (nineteen years ago) link
ihttp://users.net1plus.com/steff/ian3.jpg
― Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Thursday, 16 September 2004 02:59 (nineteen years ago) link
Just downloaded the video of JD playing "Transmission" on a television show in September 1979. Extremely disturbing to watch -- Curtis looks terribly ill in it, and it is edited very obviously so that one sees as little of him as possible.
"Transmission" is the greatest song of all time.
― snazz, Thursday, 16 September 2004 03:04 (nineteen years ago) link
― AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 16 September 2004 03:07 (nineteen years ago) link
I'm not sure if I could rock an Ian Curtis bookbag, but I at least want the option.
― snazz, Thursday, 16 September 2004 03:11 (nineteen years ago) link
That's a really flattering picture of Ian Curtis. Cool.
― sundar subramanian (sundar), Thursday, 16 September 2004 03:14 (nineteen years ago) link
― AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 16 September 2004 03:19 (nineteen years ago) link
― AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 16 September 2004 03:28 (nineteen years ago) link
― AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 16 September 2004 03:35 (nineteen years ago) link
And Joy Division = classic classic classic.
― minolta (minolta), Thursday, 16 September 2004 03:43 (nineteen years ago) link
I mean, "Transmission" and "Love Will Tear Us Apart" are absolutely essential & classic tunes, but as a whole, I just don't get it. I also agree with Tom's assessment that lyrically they're pretty dire, but would also add that I think Hannet's production on the drums was not up to snuff; they sound more often than not like full jugs of water. I'm basing all of this on Substance, BTW.
― Ian c=====8 (orion), Thursday, 16 September 2004 03:49 (nineteen years ago) link
ARAGHADFADFGA HDFASDFASD.
(That was my inarticulate expression of jealousy. Please note my comments about "Transmission" at the start of the thread.)
The great thing about Tom's argument is that it's a FINE argument for why lyrics need not be paramount. ;-)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 16 September 2004 05:31 (nineteen years ago) link
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Thursday, 16 September 2004 05:33 (nineteen years ago) link
GET UNKNOWN PLEASURES AND CLOSER NOW THEN DAMMIT!!!
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 16 September 2004 09:53 (nineteen years ago) link
Likewise the "Dance, dance, dance, dance, dance to the radio" in Transmission - a lyric so startlingly out of place here, seemingly flown in from a top 10 pop hit. Again the delivery is brutal.
Also "Where have they been? " (Decades)
Tom's point about LWTUA is well-made. Also Ceremony ("All she asks the strength to hold me/then again the same old story"). Actually these are brilliant lines, simply brilliant. Also the first line of the song is fantastic : "This is why events unnerve me".
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 16 September 2004 10:21 (nineteen years ago) link
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:46 (nineteen years ago) link
― kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:47 (nineteen years ago) link
― amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:48 (nineteen years ago) link
-- Ned Raggett (ne...), September 16th, 2004.
OTM.
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:49 (nineteen years ago) link
― Reed Moore (diamond), Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:53 (nineteen years ago) link
― amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:55 (nineteen years ago) link
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:01 (nineteen years ago) link
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:02 (nineteen years ago) link
― amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:03 (nineteen years ago) link
ANyway, Joy Division rocks! I still haven't picked up the box set, what's wrong with me, etc
― Reed Moore (diamond), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:06 (nineteen years ago) link
― amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:07 (nineteen years ago) link
― Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:08 (nineteen years ago) link
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:09 (nineteen years ago) link
http://www.easterncoastcostume.com/Pages/crowns/strawman.jpg
― amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:10 (nineteen years ago) link
― Reed Moore (diamond), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:11 (nineteen years ago) link
― amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:17 (nineteen years ago) link
― Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:22 (nineteen years ago) link
i sure hope they're a joke.
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:23 (nineteen years ago) link
staple guns?
― amateur!!st, Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:26 (nineteen years ago) link
― cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:30 (nineteen years ago) link
actually i suspect a *lot* of writers do something very like this, but morley is the only one i'm aware of who uses such nakedly useless stretches of deliberately(?) tiresome "literary" playfulness to mark the Three Chilling Dots (like [INSERT REALITY HERE] , and not using words which merely divert or move or distort to do so...])
(i didn't "get" this till i read ±nothing, whgere it's unavoidable)
so the tension is something like: clearly very able and literate writer who is also very extremely unusually perceptive abt ppl's motivations and feelings, deliberately choosing a style which contantly occludes and gets in the way of the blunt of expression of same....
-- mark s (mar...) (webmail), August 7th, 2003 1:58 PM. (mark s) (link)
"And so all of this bled fed wed and headed dead or alive into the drastic mind and body of Joy Division (who were outgrowing their mind and body and packing more time into the time they had than they had time for) and all of this, all these coincidences and transmissions and transitions and (r)apt moments and exotic settings and mild distortions, it all added up, and put them into this unique position where they were both the last ever great rock group (after The Velvet Underground, The Stooges, MC5, The Doors, Television, the Sex Pistols) and the first ever great rock band (before The Pixies, My Bloody Valentine, Nine Inch Nails, Nirvana, Smashing Pumpkins, Radiohead) ... they were some twisted turning point some tunnel of light and dark and love and hate that you must journey through from one era to the next if you are to make any new sense... Joy Division summoned up in a rocket shell in their time and place all the great rock - surface and substance, pose and power - that there ever was and ever will be."
haha i like that sentence:
i. it has terrific rhythmic poise, and.ii. is pitch-perfect in its invocation of mockable faux innocence, as a mask for actual genuinely (silly but knowingly silly) belief
-- mark s (mar...) (webmail), August 7th, 2003 2:41 PM. (mark s) (link)
the sentence in question has been very effective in getting us to disagree and explore more than the merely bald author-transparent journalistic report and/or critical claim being, er, claimed = it is doing the work it intended to do = it is a good sentence not a bad sentence (= the writer is not afraid to use "bad writing" — and thus the trashing of his own reputation as a stylist — as a device to produce lively, autonomous thinking on the part of the writer)*
(*i'm being a bit devil's advocate here in the sense that i think this device quite often fails w.morley, who uses it A LOT, risking catastrophe on a routine basis... i approve of this w/o always being convinced by it...)**
(**it's like football or something: a goal is better if it looked like it was a real mad thing to try but still goes in)***
(***i know fuck all abt sport)
-- mark s (mar...) (webmail), August 7th, 2003 4:01 PM. (mark s) (link)
― cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:34 (nineteen years ago) link