XTC fans (or non-): possible explanations of their appeal???

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (313 of them)
Actually, in the sense (working overtime) of somewhat rhythmic late '70s Brit new wave jumping-around music for hyperactive aesthetes "progressing" toward prissy and way less rhythmic post-prog '80s Brit art-rock for genteel aesthetes who read too much, I think the Police are an obvious comparison who have barely been mentioned on this thread and maybe should be more often. But that's just me.

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 19:30 (nineteen years ago) link

Chuck, I first got into Skylarking on a monoaural single earphone (the kind old people used to use to listen to the TV), so I don't know if that cuts it! And I mentioned the Police, but there's this giant split in the Fun Quotient that made me feel bad doing it. Same vague Jamaicanisms and yelpy inflections and sharp guitars and movement toward new wave and then "adult pop," but god what a different tone.

A thousand pardons on Summer's Cauldron, yo. And I certainly don't forget "Sacrificial Bonfire"; I just always get distracted by "Dying" first. Colin's songs have an especially Muppetty quality that's sometimes just wrong (by the Apple Venuses he was turning into the High Llamas in a really bad way) and sometimes sweet -- Bonfire's on the way-good side.

nabiscothingy, Monday, 28 June 2004 19:33 (nineteen years ago) link

I remember being annoyed when I heard XTC's "Ella Guru" cover. At first it bothered me that they were playing it note-for-note, until I realized that they were even playing the tape edits in Beefheart's original identically, so I was impressed. I think my favourites are "Snowman" and "Helicopter". Um, I wish I had more to say.


...And PLEASE, don't let's start that old "Bob Seger, funky or not?" farce again! There's no convincing anyone who hasn't heard his old stuff, it's a futile argument.

Myonga Von Bontee (Myonga Von Bontee), Monday, 28 June 2004 19:34 (nineteen years ago) link

i'm just saying. chuck fancies himself a funkologist...

cutty (mcutt), Monday, 28 June 2004 19:35 (nineteen years ago) link

>vague Jamaicanisms <

Oh yeah, wait, wasn't XTC's second album a dub record? I'd totally forgotten about that. Did they ever pick up on that, or did they just abandon it? I guess I think of them as getting way LESS fun over the years, just like the Police (whose first three albums hit me as even more fun than the first three XTCs, which it may surprise people to hear that I actually DO like regardless.) Anyway, their career progressions seem very similar to me. As they got older and more pretentious, they retreated from energy and rhythm and boucing around... Either way, why did both bands decide as they got older that their experimentation would involve melodies more than rhythm, and would have more in common with, say, Yes (or, I dunno, Gershwin or somebody -- you tell me) than with Lee Perry? Or is that only my imagination? And if not, am I the only person here bugged by it??

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 19:41 (nineteen years ago) link

I think I'd be less bugged by it if (like Gershwin or somebody) they were better melodists than they actually are.

* Runs for cover *

* Adds disclaimer that he is not an XTC expert *

Tim Ellison, Monday, 28 June 2004 19:45 (nineteen years ago) link

go 2 is not a dub record by any means.

there are "vague jamaicanisms" spread throughout all their early work.

cutty (mcutt), Monday, 28 June 2004 19:46 (nineteen years ago) link

I think I'd be less bugged by it if (like Gershwin or somebody) they were better melodists than they actually are.

Don't make me start writing lists!!!

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Monday, 28 June 2004 19:47 (nineteen years ago) link

I remain open-minded!

Tim Ellison, Monday, 28 June 2004 19:50 (nineteen years ago) link

Chuck, I see some of the Police/XTC comparisons but Andy Partridge and Sting are coming from such different places - Partridge has the innocent exuberance, and Sting was fame-obsessed and pretentious. Plus, Partridge fired the band member he hated the most after their second album, relieving them of the (productive?) band tension that the Police lived with through Synchronicity.

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Monday, 28 June 2004 19:52 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't think XTC got more pretentious. More whimsical. More pastoral. More 60's-obsessed. But there was always humor. Unlike the Police for the most part.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 19:55 (nineteen years ago) link

>go 2 is not a dub record by any means<

Is the first one? (Oddly, for a long time the main commercial new wave radio show in Detroit was called "Radios in Motion"!) I haven't listened to the first or second one for ages, and now I kinda want to (maybe even the fourth; I liked "Generals and Majors" okay.) Anyway, I could have sworn that one of those early records had a bunch of dub versions on it. But, though I'm sure Shakey will think I'm just being falsely modest and shticky again (hey, it's FUN shtick! and hardly my only one!!), maybe my memory's just wrong. It's been a while.

Scott, I think I frequently *equate* "whimsy" with "pretension." (I have really never been a huge whimsy fan, I have to admit.)

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 19:57 (nineteen years ago) link

I really started getting into XTC more while listening to a cassette mix on a car on what I think was a mono tape player.

Rockist Scientist, Monday, 28 June 2004 19:58 (nineteen years ago) link

chuck - but you like pastoral-prog. that's why you might like some of Skylarking.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 19:59 (nineteen years ago) link

XTC use muso tendencies to *attempt* to make better music. Sting uses muso tendencies to cultivate a ridiculous image of being some kind of Rennaissance man.

dleone (dleone), Monday, 28 June 2004 19:59 (nineteen years ago) link

Anyway, I could have sworn that one of those early records had a bunch of dub versions on it.

It did. You're thinking of this:

http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&uid=UIDMISS70406171620380159&sql=A2ju67ub070jk

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 28 June 2004 19:59 (nineteen years ago) link

for the record, Crime Of The Century is by far my fave Supertramp album. But then I've only heard a couple Supertramp records.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 20:00 (nineteen years ago) link

>chuck - but you like pastoral-prog. that's why you might like some of Skylarking. <

Yeah, I actually remember that album having fairly pretty melodies when it came out, but then I forgot about it. I should play it back to back with the first Stackridge album sometime and see what happens. (But first I have to track down a copy of Stackridge!) (Plus, obviously I don't think "pretentious" equals "bad" per se'. And I LIKE Yes and lots of prog rock. Maybe even more than Lee Perry, when you get down to it. But Yes had a better rhythm section and a better singer than XTC, I think.)

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 20:06 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, Ned's right, this is the dub I was thinking about: "XTC's Go+ EP (packaged free with initial copies of the Go 2 album in the U.K.) "

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 20:10 (nineteen years ago) link

Even without a dub remix, there are obvious nods to dub on Drums & Wires and English Settlement.

Rockist Scientist, Monday, 28 June 2004 20:10 (nineteen years ago) link

>XTC use muso tendencies to *attempt* to make better music. Sting uses muso tendencies to cultivate a ridiculous image of being some kind of Rennaissance man. <

Well, it seems to me that, on Synchronicity and Ghost in the Machine, Sting was really doing the former at least as much as the latter. But of course there's no way to know anybody's intentions.

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 20:13 (nineteen years ago) link

XTC used to
'dub' live in the studio,
by leaving notes out

there's a whole cult thing
built around partridge bad luck,
battles with stage fright--

I just like the songs,
some are funny some are not,
too many lyrics

Begs2Differ (Begs2Differ), Monday, 28 June 2004 20:16 (nineteen years ago) link

No, I don't think that pretentious equals bad, I just don't think of XTC's music as being all that pretentious. Big and ambitious sometimes.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 20:19 (nineteen years ago) link

too many lyrics

You're related to Emperor Joseph, aren't you.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 28 June 2004 20:20 (nineteen years ago) link

100 posts and I didn't get a lick of shit for my Smashmouth comparison!

CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 28 June 2004 20:21 (nineteen years ago) link

when i think of pretension i do think of later police and stuff like U2 (two kinda contemporaries) where the feeling is that "overblown" equals "emotion" or something like that. I always got the impression from XTC (up until the apples & oranges album which i did think was kinda overblown) that they were enamored with the 60's ethos in regard to the "possibilities" of rock/pop/recording studio. Sound, big ideas, etc. Maybe in an artsy way, but for themselves first, and the audience after. Hey, wait, maybe that is pretentious.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 20:25 (nineteen years ago) link

I take it back. XTC were pretentious. But in a fun, smart, goofy, nerdy, way. Which is why critics love them. Or did love them. I always knew people who loved them who didn't listen to TONS of punk/new wave/alt/indie. I think they brought an element of classic-rockness to new wave/post-punk that kinda comforted people in a way. People could listen to something kinda hip and still get their Beatles. Like Hitchcock. Which is fine.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 20:29 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, both Smashmouth and XTC sort of sound like the Cars or ? and the Mysterians but not nearly as good, I guess. Except Smashmouth sound fatter. Which is to their credit. And less ambitious. Which is not. XTC never sound big and ambitious to me. They sound THIN and ambitious. I wish they sounded bigger. Or at least fatter. Smashmouth are all thumbs; XTC are all pinkies in the air. Smashmouth could afford more pinkie in their music; XTC could afford more thumb.(Also, both bands recall plenty of other bands who Shakey Mo thinks they have nothing to do with. But he is so fucking wrong it's not funny.)

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 20:30 (nineteen years ago) link

Plus, several of their lyrics would seem to recall "Cups and Cakes" by Spinal Tap. Except Spinal Tap had a better sense of humor about it.

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 20:33 (nineteen years ago) link

I think all I have in the house are the 2 dukes of stratosphere albums. But that's cheating.

I think they could sound sorta fat. There is some stuff I remember from Mummer that is kinda big and fat.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 20:34 (nineteen years ago) link

XTC are huge gnome-twee-treefolk-fairytale psych fans.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 20:36 (nineteen years ago) link

see, i like twee. and even whimsy.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 20:37 (nineteen years ago) link

??!!

2. Being eccentric--Are they as enjoyably and interestingly eccentric as either Kate Bush or Peter Gabriel?

Peter Gabriel = interestingly eccentric?

If by "interestingly eccentric" you mean "dull as dishwater," then perhaps I see what you're saying. On the other hand I'd be just as confused since Kate Bush is called the same thing in that statement.

I [heart] XTC, though I don't think there's much I could say that hasn't already been said on this thread.

martin m. (mushrush), Monday, 28 June 2004 20:38 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, it seems to me that, on Synchronicity and Ghost in the Machine, Sting was really doing the former at least as much as the latter. But of course there's no way to know anybody's intentions.

Right, IMO the Police achieved a very tricky balance of eclecticism and well-crafted pop songwriting on GitM, but from there the band (and later, Sting solo) got progressively middlebrow and "tasteful". Sting also got progressively more popular, at least for a while. XTC on the other hand, at about the same time, somewhere between Black Sea and English Settlement, got near the same balance, but ended up getting progressively less popular, emphasizing their idiosyncrasies and eventually settling into some kind of insular, baroque anglo-pop. Personally, I like latter day XTC, but there was a fork in the road circa 1981, and they took the path less traveled (and consequently, less followed).

dleone (dleone), Monday, 28 June 2004 20:48 (nineteen years ago) link

Ok dleone, but see, to me, it seems it's not so much that XTC chose their idiosyncrasies or the road less traveled as they picked the WRONG idiosycrasies and the WRONG road. Their earlier albums sound way MORE idiosyncratic than their later stuff, not less. Not to mention way less middlebrow (because way livelier, for one thing.) And I don't see how their earlier albums were more influential on the rest of music, if that's what you're suggesting; if anything, indie rock after '80s XTC (at least until the last couple years) emphasized prissy melody, not energetic rhythm. Prissy melody was the road MORE traveled. To me that's obvious. But again, my ears aren't yours...

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 20:57 (nineteen years ago) link

I mean, "insular, baroque anglo-pop" (especially with obscure quasi-literary/look-how-clever-we-are lyrics) describes just about every band to come out of England for the past decade or more, not to mention Americans ranging from, say, Pavement to Flaming Lips to Polyphonic Fucking Spree. It's been the standard indie way of doing things for ages. And in that context, XTC strike me as *generic,* not special at all. And even in the early '80s, it's what every Brit from Squeeze to Elvis Costello on *Imperial Boredom* was doing, I thought..

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 21:02 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm not suggesting any of their albums are that influential, really. And there are a lot of people (including fans and Virgin employees) who agree that they chose the wrong path. In this case, the "right" path would have been towards whatever sold more records. And I guess I define idiosynrasy differently than you; I see their ES and onwards output as drawing on their own personal peculiarities and tastes much more than their early records (which I also like). Partridge and Moulding seem like second rate pop stars at best to me, but perfectly suited to make music all day in their backyard shacks.

dleone (dleone), Monday, 28 June 2004 21:04 (nineteen years ago) link

someone, long ago so wisely said:

all people with a soft spot for the Beatles and the Kinks type of music will migrate to XTC with little pain.

Many things can be said about XTC, but for me to simplify it as much as is humanly possible: well-written, hoppy-boppy, finger-snappin', sing-along, quality, tap-your-foot POP SONGS, which 99 times out of a 100 are written by British artists. XTC fall well in line with this. Tim, have you heard "Life Begins at The Hop"? If you tell me you can sit still to that, then you might as well forget about XTC altogether.

In another XTC thread, I said Skylarking is the best Beatles-influenced album that has ever or will ever be made. Period.

English Settlement was honestly THE most difficult XTC album for me. I bought it a long time ago, sold it, and only tried to get into it again years later after I'd already gotten into ALL their other albums, and I still found it difficult. It frankly pains me to think an XTC novice would be using it as a starting point.

Ned, thanks so very much for clearing up the 'dub experiments' confusion without me having to explain it. I came across that CD quite innocently while on my XTC fanatic phase and was totally floored by that CD. I do NOT think it sounds "dub" in the sense of "reggae", nor do I believe it was even meant to imply as such. I also think this CD ["Explode Together: The Dub Experiments 78-80"] should NOT even be thought of next to the rest of XTC's stuff. For me it was a totally different thing, nearly a different band, but as I said, my jaw dropped nonetheless. Anyone who likes obscure weird post-punk stuff like me should check this CD out regardless of what you might think of XTC. It's a whole different ballgame!

Bimble (bimble), Monday, 28 June 2004 21:37 (nineteen years ago) link

Also, sticking up for "Sacrifical Bonfire" - count me in.

arrgh ILMers sending me on a mini-XTC trip when I've got so much other new music to listen to...arrggghhh do you people never quit?

Bimble (bimble), Monday, 28 June 2004 21:50 (nineteen years ago) link

> not to mention Americans ranging from, say, Pavement to Flaming Lips to Polyphonic Fucking Spree. It's been the standard indie way of doing things for ages<

Actually, Guided By Voices and Elephant 6 bands might be even better examples. {And honestly, I don't believe any of this music (including XTC) really sounds much like the Kinks --who I often love -- at all.}

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 21:57 (nineteen years ago) link

FWIW, I don't see any connection between XTC and prog

or XTC and Peter Gabriel

or XTC and Kate Bush.

Though I love Gabriel and Bush in their own ways.

Bimble (bimble), Monday, 28 June 2004 21:59 (nineteen years ago) link

Partridge and Moulding seem like second rate pop stars at best to me, but perfectly suited to make music all day in their backyard shacks.

Damn, man. It's not like we're talking about Marshall Crenshaw. Did Fuzzy Warbles make you that bitter?

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Monday, 28 June 2004 22:03 (nineteen years ago) link

XTC songs that are blatant Kinks homages:

Fruit Nut
the Affiliated (Dukes of Stratosphear)
Earn Enough For Us
Respectable Street
Love on a Farmboys Wages

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 28 June 2004 22:08 (nineteen years ago) link

Damn, man. It's not like we're talking about Marshall Crenshaw. Did Fuzzy Warbles make you that bitter?

Dude, where do you think they recorded Apple Venus? ;)

dleone (dleone), Monday, 28 June 2004 22:09 (nineteen years ago) link

"Blatant homages" =/ "sound much like the Kinks"

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 22:10 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm just sayin. I know how much you like to argue semantics.

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 28 June 2004 22:11 (nineteen years ago) link

"Respectable Street" is super-Kinks

CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 28 June 2004 22:21 (nineteen years ago) link

Chuck, here's your chance to list a bunch of bands you can insist "sound like" the Kinks. I'll get you started by suggesting Grand Funk Railroad, Kix, Big 'n' Rich, the Television Personalities, and Guns n Roses....

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 28 June 2004 22:23 (nineteen years ago) link

"respectable street" doesn't touch the kinks. though it shows a clear influence in the lyrical ideas and in the oo-oo-oo-oo-oo-oo-oo backing vocal part. which is to say it sounds like a record made by a band that admired the kinks, nothing more, nothing less. i like "respectable street" quite a bit. i like the kinks quite a bit more.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Monday, 28 June 2004 22:25 (nineteen years ago) link

With regard to Marshall Crenshaw, I would say that I like "Some Day, Some Way" more than any XTC song that I have heard to date.

* still remaining open-minded! *

Tim Ellison, Monday, 28 June 2004 22:30 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.