― teh pow! (blueski), Monday, 20 September 2004 13:53 (nineteen years ago) link
thanks steven.
that sums up my own feelings about doves rather nicely.
(put on the last broadcast during this 'debate' and am really enjoying it ...)
― doomie x, Monday, 20 September 2004 13:56 (nineteen years ago) link
― teh pow! (blueski), Monday, 20 September 2004 14:01 (nineteen years ago) link
Nooooooooooo. The vinyl equivalent of a black hole, sucking the life out of every other record in it's orbit.
― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Monday, 20 September 2004 14:03 (nineteen years ago) link
― edward o (edwardo), Monday, 20 September 2004 14:03 (nineteen years ago) link
― teh pow! (blueski), Monday, 20 September 2004 14:05 (nineteen years ago) link
The thing about Embrace is they never had any real truck with the "new Oasis" comparisons, and in fact were really hamstrung by them. The intention, as told to me pretty explicitly the other week, was to be "My Bloody valentine with strings", i.e. a combination of raw noise and heartfelt sentiment. I don't think they actually sound much like Oasis at all and never did; I don't even like Oasis much beyond a few songs.
The things about Embrace that I love are pretty much threefold - firstly the songs, secondly the sense of community that the band encourage in their fans, the way they interract with them and feed off them (the secret gigs being a prime example), coupled with the media's rather bi-polar approach to the band it's created a very real sense of us-against-them which has fired the band, especially for this new album. And the third thing is their creativity - they've never stood still, always moved forwards, always had their sights set on the next record they're making, trying to develop their sound and not just by throwing in all the production glitches they can (which is what I felt Doves did too much on their last album), and they've never been recognised for doing that by anybody but their fanbase really. The second and third albums, and a lot of the b-sides from the beginning through to now, contain an awful lot of musical ideas that you wouldn't expect from a "four square indie band", ideas that bands like Oasis simply never had, and it's throughly irritating hearing them being criticised for being boring and dull and conservative when they're not. Also, they ROCK hard when they bother, and they are absolutely fucking great live - the atmosphere at their gigs is amazing when they take off, which is much more often than not in the dozen or so times I've seen them.
But of course this is all totally subjective, and to everyone else apart from the people who buy the records and go to the gigs and like the band, received wisdom and second hand cliché is all that matters.
― Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Monday, 20 September 2004 14:06 (nineteen years ago) link
― teh pow! (blueski), Monday, 20 September 2004 14:06 (nineteen years ago) link
― doomie x, Monday, 20 September 2004 14:07 (nineteen years ago) link
I have Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan and Fela Kuti and bhangra and dancehall compilations and all sorts in my record collection, Paul, don't you dare pull that reactionary shit on me you fucking idiot coward.
-- Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (sickmouth...) (webmail), September 20th, 2004 10:35 AM. (Nick Southall) (later)
is some funny shit!
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 20 September 2004 14:09 (nineteen years ago) link
― teh pow! (blueski), Monday, 20 September 2004 14:11 (nineteen years ago) link
i guess.
but the thread is still about embrace. and the struggles to make them interesting. which is interesting and keep me coming back!
tis a king crimson cover.
i dig doves emergence as well -- seemed so natural and less planned.
and i heard that they are planning to get chris nagle out of reclusive retirement to do their third. that would be cool.
― doomie x, Monday, 20 September 2004 14:12 (nineteen years ago) link
If only.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 20 September 2004 14:12 (nineteen years ago) link
― doomie x, Monday, 20 September 2004 14:13 (nineteen years ago) link
Agreeing with Nick, I think Doves are not great at hooks, choruses and melodies, and over employ various devices like 6/8 time (gah!)and twiddly minor-key arpeggios to suggest atmosphere. I do think they have *something* worthwhile though.
I have never heard Embrace.
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Monday, 20 September 2004 14:18 (nineteen years ago) link
Tracklisting =
01. No Use Crying 02. Nature's Law 03. You Will Hit The Target Every Time 04. Sainted 05. I Can't Come Down 06. Celebrate 07. Exploding Machines 08. Even Smaller Stones 09. The End Is Near 10. This New Day
I've heard it, and it's a big, aggressive rock beast, heaviest thing they've done but still very tuneful.
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 10:05 (eighteen years ago) link
― Merryweather (scarlet), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 10:40 (eighteen years ago) link
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 10:56 (eighteen years ago) link
― xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 12:21 (eighteen years ago) link
― xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 12:25 (eighteen years ago) link
Thanks Nick!
Drawn From Memory is such a good album that many people have never heard, though it's not for everyone.
― BeeOK (boo radley), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 23:18 (eighteen years ago) link
It is by far their best. http://sickmouthy.blogspot.com
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Monday, 13 February 2006 14:00 (eighteen years ago) link
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:30 (eighteen years ago) link
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:32 (eighteen years ago) link
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 18:32 (eighteen years ago) link
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 18:34 (eighteen years ago) link
― James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 18:35 (eighteen years ago) link
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 18:38 (eighteen years ago) link
fck. embrace were a different proposition when they weren't around.
― piscesboy, Tuesday, 21 March 2006 19:42 (eighteen years ago) link
― electric sound of jim (and why not) (electricsound), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 22:44 (eighteen years ago) link
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 22:58 (eighteen years ago) link
― edward o (edwardo), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 23:04 (eighteen years ago) link
I actually think they'll slip to three or four come Sunday, but it'd be nice.
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 23:06 (eighteen years ago) link
― edward o (edwardo), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 23:08 (eighteen years ago) link
― senseiDancer (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 23:36 (eighteen years ago) link
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 24 March 2006 12:25 (eighteen years ago) link
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Friday, 24 March 2006 12:31 (eighteen years ago) link
Have we ascertained The Lex's whereabouts when this malfunctioning happened?
― edward o (edwardo), Friday, 24 March 2006 12:37 (eighteen years ago) link
― Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy (Kerr), Saturday, 25 March 2006 16:52 (eighteen years ago) link
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Sunday, 26 March 2006 17:23 (eighteen years ago) link
Today it randomly shuffles up, and I absolutely fall into it, like a chasm I couldn't have missed if I'd just taken my eyes off the sky. Weird. Not that I am ready to defend its classic-ness yet, but perhaps it's not rubbish.
― Mitya (mitya), Sunday, 26 March 2006 19:54 (eighteen years ago) link
i don't much like embrace. even the bluetones are probably better.
― keyth (keyth), Sunday, 26 March 2006 21:02 (eighteen years ago) link
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 05:40 (eighteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 05:41 (eighteen years ago) link
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 05:52 (eighteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 05:55 (eighteen years ago) link
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 05:59 (eighteen years ago) link
― PB, Tuesday, 28 March 2006 10:53 (eighteen years ago) link
i thought they'd split up ages ago. why have they not.
also, HA HA HA NE-YO GOT THE NUMBER ONE :D
― The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 10:59 (eighteen years ago) link
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 11:06 (eighteen years ago) link