sott gets all the critical hype and acclaim, mostly cos i think its not very 80s sounding, its a bit more 'traditional' than previous prince albums in some ways, or at least pulls from more of pops history, and has some Serious Social Commentary, which critics always seem to fall for, and its more 'serious' than his other albums, not necessarily in a contrived way, but its def more measured, and has a more low key sound and tone, not exactly more mature, but its def not the raw and nasty prince of the early 80s. i dont think theres a note misplaced on the whole thing, its pretty perfect. but i prefer 1999 as it just sounds more bold, prince in full rude boy/not giving a shit mode, and also at his most sexual, there are also some strangely political moments on the record, but unlike sott, theyre less reasoned and more just bizarre and incorporated into princes sexual view of the world (so not exactly coherent or 'good' or 'sensible' politics, but def more fun and unsettling, which is never a bad thing. the sound is also very cold and stark and futuristic (something in the water) and also sweatier and harder (DMSR) if more juvenille. sott is perfectly executed but 1999 is messier in terms of its ideas - it feels like prince just ended up making longer tracks and more of them without thinking about it which led to this unexpected double album whereas sott seems like it was more considered (even though i know it had to be whittled down from a triple and various other album projects at the time). as an aside, emancipation was TOO considered which i think is what renders it a bit neutered compared to these two.
Poll Results
Option | Votes |
SOTT | 24 |
1999 | 19 |
― titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Monday, 11 July 2011 15:33 (twelve years ago) link