What I found highly amusing was the sequence that followed on Fox. The FoxTrax graphic, which has consistently shown the umpiring to be a disaster, popped up briefly. Before it could be activated, the game went into a commercial break. They didn’t return to it until a batter had been retired, at which time they highlighted the replay with some sponsor’s logo, and “showed” that the pitch was just on the outside corner.
Now, take this with a very large grain of salt, but I’m just distrustful enough of the powers involved here—-Fox and MLB-—to speculate as to the timing of the graphic and the information it provided. To have that tool, which had consistently shown the home-plate umpires missing pitches time and time again, show up to confirm perhaps the biggest called strike of the series, and to do so after ten minutes, after it had nearly been used in the immediate aftermath of the pitch... it just seems terribly CONVENIENT. The pitch didn’t look like a strike, Valentin didn’t think it was a strike, no one I talked to thinks it was a strike.
Regardless of whether that pitch was called correctly or not, the inability of these umpires to call a consistent, correct strike zone has been one of the biggest stories of the postseason. It’s not just big strikeout calls that change games. Take Yadier Molina’s at-bat in the fourth inning. Home-plate umpire Jeff Kellogg called a 3-1 pitch well off the plate a strike; Glavine threw essentially the same pitch on 3-2, and Molina had to swing, because even though it was not a strike, he couldn’t be certain the guy making the call was going to see it that way.
Keith Law, over at ESPN.com, has dubbed it the “Heisenberg Strike Zone,” which is a label I can’t top. Until and unless we concede that humans can’t do the job with the precision needed, however, we’re going to continue to see baseball games worth millions of dollars decided by funcationaries making a few thousand.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 16:34 (seventeen years ago) link
― (9ò_ó)-o Q(^.^Q) (Adrian Langston), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 16:38 (seventeen years ago) link
― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 16:44 (seventeen years ago) link
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 17:29 (seventeen years ago) link
Forgot to mention the Mets jersey I saw in thestands last Friday:
KAZMIR
Imagine the bitterness.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 17:45 (seventeen years ago) link
― Stuh-du-du-du-du-du-du-denka (jingleberries), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 20:04 (seventeen years ago) link
Dude, Q: How many batters after striking out while looking shake their heads like Valentin did?
― Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 20:26 (seventeen years ago) link
If you ask Morbius, he'll construe it however it best defends his stance (and/or the Mets bullpen VORP).
― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 20:28 (seventeen years ago) link
― Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 20:31 (seventeen years ago) link
And then calling Chris Duncan an odd choice to pinch hit before he homered... dude is a moron. I think he doesn't know what to say because Jeter is out of the playoffs :(
― bnw (bnw), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 20:35 (seventeen years ago) link
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 20:40 (seventeen years ago) link
Elias Says
Just how rare was Chris Duncan's pinch-hit homerun? In the 1,164 postseason games played since the American League and National League champions first met in 1903, there have been only two other occasions on which a left-handed batter pinch-hit a home run off a left-handed pitcher. Johnny Mize of the Yankees hit one off the Brooklyn Dodgers' Preacher Roe in the 1952 World Series, and Arizona's Erubiel Durazo hit one off Glavine, then with the Braves, in the 2001 NLCS.
― NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 20:44 (seventeen years ago) link
― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 20:47 (seventeen years ago) link
― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 20:48 (seventeen years ago) link
― Jimmy Mod is COMPLETELY MISERABLE SAN DIEGO (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 21:04 (seventeen years ago) link
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 21:41 (seventeen years ago) link
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 22:17 (seventeen years ago) link
― ▒█▄█ ▄▄▄ ▒█▄█ , Wednesday, 18 October 2006 22:17 (seventeen years ago) link
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 23:13 (seventeen years ago) link
― NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 23:25 (seventeen years ago) link
― timmy tannin (pompous), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 23:38 (seventeen years ago) link
― mattbot (mattbot), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 23:41 (seventeen years ago) link
― timmy tannin (pompous), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 23:42 (seventeen years ago) link
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 18 October 2006 23:53 (seventeen years ago) link
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Thursday, 19 October 2006 00:06 (seventeen years ago) link
― gear (gear), Thursday, 19 October 2006 00:09 (seventeen years ago) link
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Thursday, 19 October 2006 00:13 (seventeen years ago) link
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Thursday, 19 October 2006 00:17 (seventeen years ago) link
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Thursday, 19 October 2006 00:40 (seventeen years ago) link
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Thursday, 19 October 2006 00:42 (seventeen years ago) link
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Thursday, 19 October 2006 00:49 (seventeen years ago) link
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Thursday, 19 October 2006 01:08 (seventeen years ago) link
― timmy tannin (pompous), Thursday, 19 October 2006 01:25 (seventeen years ago) link
― mattbot (mattbot), Thursday, 19 October 2006 01:45 (seventeen years ago) link
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Thursday, 19 October 2006 02:09 (seventeen years ago) link
― govern yourself accordingly (dayan), Thursday, 19 October 2006 02:14 (seventeen years ago) link
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Thursday, 19 October 2006 02:23 (seventeen years ago) link
― timmy tannin (pompous), Thursday, 19 October 2006 02:47 (seventeen years ago) link
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/10/18/sports/19mets600.2.jpg
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 19 October 2006 02:57 (seventeen years ago) link
SO DON'T DO IT TO BILLY
OR HE'LL DO YOU IN
― David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 19 October 2006 03:07 (seventeen years ago) link
More McCarver brilliance tonight when they walked 'Yadi the body'.
Buck: That would qualify as a bad walk as it clears Carpenter for next inning.McCarver: But a GOOD walk for the Cardinals!
Uh, no shit.
― bnw (bnw), Thursday, 19 October 2006 05:01 (seventeen years ago) link
Suppan vs. Trachsel? Ollie Perez? Darren Oliver?
― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 19 October 2006 05:56 (seventeen years ago) link
― bnw (bnw), Thursday, 19 October 2006 06:26 (seventeen years ago) link
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Thursday, 19 October 2006 06:34 (seventeen years ago) link
― NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 19 October 2006 08:09 (seventeen years ago) link
― Tim McCarver (Alex in SF), Thursday, 19 October 2006 11:00 (seventeen years ago) link
― Joe Buck (Alex in SF), Thursday, 19 October 2006 11:01 (seventeen years ago) link
― Tim McCarver (Alex in SF), Thursday, 19 October 2006 11:02 (seventeen years ago) link
Hence, figures to be ILE's favorite baseball figure.
Simple on the starter: if Perez is OK (like for 3 innings), D. Oliver gets to pitch deeper into the game. If he stinks, Oliver comes in as soon as 2 guys get on.
I do not want to see Billy Fucko in any more tie or 1-run games.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 19 October 2006 12:27 (seventeen years ago) link
I don't the Mets' pitching staff was assembled with a mind to have Darren Oliver pitching in the late innings in a close Game 7. That would be a big waste of the league's best bullpen.
― NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 19 October 2006 12:46 (seventeen years ago) link