What are you reading - on or about October 2006

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (146 of them)
Livy is transparently rooting for the Romans to win.

Ya think?

I won't spoil the ending for you, though.

The battle of Cannae took place on my birthday, a few thousand years before my birth, according to the Wikipedia. I'm not sure how I should feel about that.

I am reading Nokter the Stammerer's Life of Charlemagne, which is awkwardly translated in the Penguin version (all the Latinisms are plain as day) but which, so far, is kind of hysterical.

Casuistry (Chris P), Monday, 30 October 2006 08:04 (seventeen years ago) link

PF: even better news: an LRB arrived this weekend! Now I have read a longer article on Gunter Grass than ever I imagined I might.

Thank you. I wonder if I will become a subscriber, in my own right, eventually.

Tim (Tim), Monday, 30 October 2006 13:59 (seventeen years ago) link

philosophical investigations, for the first time since sixth form, having finally bought a copy.

First 80-odd paragraphs are maybe the best philosophy ever committed to paper. I think he tends to lose me shortly after that though.

a cyberpunk detective thriller called a philosophical investigation.

Arf. I bought that, years ago, on the strength of the title. Disappointingly straightforward I thought, but dick lit ain't really my thing.

frank kogan's real punks don't wear black.

Been meaning to get that - mainly on the strength of his Wittgenstein tours de force over on ILX!

ledge (ledge), Monday, 30 October 2006 15:42 (seventeen years ago) link

So, I finished The Golden Bowl over the weekend, and I will probably read The Ambassadors at some point in the next month. Recent times have been hectic, however, so I can't read as much as I have been wanting to.

Currently, I am reading a book on African-Portuguese slave culture for a class, and probably will start Dangerous Liaisons within the next couple of days once all of the chaos has subsided a bit.

mj (robert blake), Monday, 30 October 2006 15:59 (seventeen years ago) link

i'm reading David Bowman's book on Talking Heads. i hate it and i hate him and if i ever meet him i will punch his nose. still reading it though - you can't thwart interesting characters and stories though he's having a fairly good stab at it.

jed_ (jed), Monday, 30 October 2006 16:44 (seventeen years ago) link

The ending of PI, Part I, is fantastic, but don't skip ahead and read it, it won't really make sense until you've gotten further along.

Casuistry (Chris P), Monday, 30 October 2006 20:14 (seventeen years ago) link

i am reading Carl Johann-Valgren's Hercule Barfuss story. It's ace so far!

wogan lenin (dog latin), Tuesday, 31 October 2006 00:17 (seventeen years ago) link

Hmm, just gone back to PI and I can't find the para that gave me problems last time... but due to my solipsistic tendencies, the private language argument is always a bone of contention.

ledge (ledge), Tuesday, 31 October 2006 00:37 (seventeen years ago) link

OK, I'll bite. How so?

Casuistry (Chris P), Tuesday, 31 October 2006 01:12 (seventeen years ago) link

traci lords bio (i know i know...) and susan sontag's book on photography

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 31 October 2006 09:32 (seventeen years ago) link

Haha, I'm reading the Manics Bio. Considering it's lauded as the best rock bock of the decade, it makes me glad I don't make a habit of reading rock books.

PL argument - I think it's just 'cause my sympathies lie in the opposite direction. While in general I buy his whole project of putting philosophy at the service of language instead of vice versa, in that particular instance I find the sceptical argument more compelling - irrefutable indeed; and the idea of being unable to follow a rule without a community just doesn't convince me.

ledge (ledge), Tuesday, 31 October 2006 09:54 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm just finishing "Ghostwritten" by David Mitchell. If I'd read this one first I'd have been dazzled by it -- it's easily the best of his first three novels, and he's a very talented writer. But, having read the other two first, there is a feeling of going over similar territory in a similar way. I gather he's tried to do something different with Black Swan Green, which seems to have surprised some reviewers, but I think it was something he had to do if his readership wasn't going to dwindle.

frankiemachine (frankiemachine), Tuesday, 31 October 2006 12:04 (seventeen years ago) link

Black Swan Green is a pretty straight teenager-coming-of-age story, no interlocking narratives or switching styles. It's an enjoyable read, but doesn't seem to have a point.

Ray (Ray), Tuesday, 31 October 2006 12:57 (seventeen years ago) link

?

it had a point! no tricks were necessary (although it does have an interlocking narrative from a previous book actually). i thought it was extremely moving which not something i could say about his other books, much as i liked them.

jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 31 October 2006 13:17 (seventeen years ago) link

Haha, I'm reading the Manics Bio. Considering it's lauded as the best rock bock of the decade, it makes me glad I don't make a habit of reading rock books.

hey there's a link! apparently traci guest appeared on a manics track?

the bio's lame. the whole fucking book she says she hates talking about her porn daaazzze! i mean ffs 90 percent of the readers all buy the damn book to find out more about that period in her life, not so much about her experiences in the rave scene. she must know this.

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 31 October 2006 13:22 (seventeen years ago) link

The only point I recall is contained within 'teenager comes of age'.
I don't think it was a bad book, by any means, but I was left wanting something more. The plot was fine, the style was fine, the characterisation was fine, but nothing stood out and actually impressed me. Was it moving? Yes, but not enough.

(I noticed the recurring character, but the narrative structure is still very simple. Not that there's anything wrong with that)

Ray (Ray), Tuesday, 31 October 2006 13:32 (seventeen years ago) link

Traci stepped in because Kylie wasn't available/was too prudish, if I recall (x-p)

Mädchen (Madchen), Tuesday, 31 October 2006 17:56 (seventeen years ago) link

Finished Suite Francaise the other day - positively breath-taking, even if one disregards the situation under which it was written. The appendices are pretty upsetting, though.

Anyway, after finsihing that, everything else kinda pales in comparison (to coin a cliche) - I've picked-up and put down five books, at last count, and finally settled on The Coroner's Lunch, 'cause I figured that it was different enough I wouldn't keep comparing it to Suite. It's pretty entertaining, I must say.

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Tuesday, 31 October 2006 23:17 (seventeen years ago) link

Neverending Story, I did have a brief daliance with Still Life With Woodpecker before I started Neverending Story but it didn't stick.

Navek Rednam (Navek Rednam), Wednesday, 1 November 2006 22:44 (seventeen years ago) link

I finished John Dufresne's Deep in the Shade of Paradise last night, which made me cry. I started reading it because I thought I had misplaced The True History of the Kelly Gang, which I later found in my suitcase, right where it should have been. So now, back to that, and once that's done I'll read those last 25 pages of At-Swim-Two-Birds.

Jaq (Jaq), Wednesday, 1 November 2006 23:02 (seventeen years ago) link

And hey! It's November! Quick, somebody start a new thread!

Jaq (Jaq), Wednesday, 1 November 2006 23:07 (seventeen years ago) link

Your wish is my command.

Aimless (Aimless), Thursday, 2 November 2006 02:55 (seventeen years ago) link

quick, write my dissertation!

Josh (Josh), Thursday, 2 November 2006 03:09 (seventeen years ago) link

No no Josh, it's NaNoWriMo, not NaDiWriMo!

Jaq (Jaq), Thursday, 2 November 2006 05:39 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.