^^^save-a-ho
― tehresa, Monday, 5 April 2010 19:09 (fourteen years ago) link
lol
― mookieproof, Monday, 5 April 2010 19:15 (fourteen years ago) link
How does one 'get' a board?
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Monday, 5 April 2010 19:26 (fourteen years ago) link
http://www.getaboard.org/
― velko, Monday, 5 April 2010 19:28 (fourteen years ago) link
i feel sort of simultaneously glad & disappointed that i was totally unaware of there having been a 'shitstorm' on ilx this weekend
― thomp, Monday, 5 April 2010 19:30 (fourteen years ago) link
wish it had been today; i'm kinda bored
― mookieproof, Monday, 5 April 2010 19:31 (fourteen years ago) link
i been tryin to start one but jj is in mellow form and hi dere is eastery and tbh it's a dead loss.
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Monday, 5 April 2010 19:32 (fourteen years ago) link
seems like it's over and i'm sad
― harbl, Monday, 5 April 2010 19:34 (fourteen years ago) link
xp (for instance)
for example, a mod might temp ban someone who spent 24 hours posting the same picture over and over on discussions that other people were clearly interested in having
― Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 5 April 2010 19:03 (29 minutes ago)
I'm not questioning this course of action, but I'd be curious as to whether there are any repercussions on, say, a subboard mod that went on a spree of blatant and petulant abuse of their powers. Seems a more serious issue than posting an image to a few threads.
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Monday, 5 April 2010 19:35 (fourteen years ago) link
Generally speaking, you could expect to see that subboard mod have their powers taken away and someone else put in their place.
― Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 5 April 2010 19:37 (fourteen years ago) link
To be more specific- I'm aware that subboards have historically played fast and loose in a way that sitewide mods can't, but 'Site New Answers' has changed the whole dynamic imo and I'm just curious as to what kind of rules we're looking at here.
xp fairy nuff- I wasn't sure that that had happened or w/e. Hail enbb i for one bow to our new etc
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Monday, 5 April 2010 19:39 (fourteen years ago) link
It does depend to a large degree on the subboard; for example, lol mod abuse was very much a cornerstone to noise board interaction, so you would have to do something particularly egregious and possibly illegal in order to be a noise board mod and have your powers taken away from you (like, for example, hacking the board to steal a sitemod's credentials).
― Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 5 April 2010 19:43 (fourteen years ago) link
i'll try my best not to do that on 'I Love Football' (when you get around to creating it), then.
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Monday, 5 April 2010 19:47 (fourteen years ago) link
i still don't know why i'm not an IRE mod
― harbl, Monday, 5 April 2010 19:47 (fourteen years ago) link
if it ever becomes I Hate Everything again you should be
― velko, Monday, 5 April 2010 19:52 (fourteen years ago) link
; )
― harbl, Monday, 5 April 2010 19:53 (fourteen years ago) link
Since people have contributed to the servers on the entire site, it seems a little wrong for someone to 'own' one board, non?
― Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Monday, 5 April 2010 19:56 (fourteen years ago) link
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Monday, April 5, 2010 2:35 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
in the end I don't think that kate locking/deleting a thread on ILTMI is a "serious issue," it's just childish and frustrating that she did it because she didn't want to face up to someone questioning her beliefs. but I'd rather let kate have her forum where she feels she can express herself freely than do something that would run her off.
― still driving steen, banning deez, gettin my dick xhuxked (Curt1s Stephens), Monday, 5 April 2010 19:56 (fourteen years ago) link
^^^^make curt1s a site mod
― william mcgonadal's tay ridge disaster (acoleuthic), Monday, 5 April 2010 19:58 (fourteen years ago) link
xp poll
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Monday, 5 April 2010 19:58 (fourteen years ago) link
what a gay message board mod
― velko, Monday, 5 April 2010 19:59 (fourteen years ago) link
would like to petition that darraghmac never be appointed I Love Football mod.
― niminy-piminy cricket (Upt0eleven), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:07 (fourteen years ago) link
you'll get yours.
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:15 (fourteen years ago) link
'give' de subjectivisten to kate
― mookieproof, Monday, 5 April 2010 20:15 (fourteen years ago) link
but don't tell any of the dutchies beforehand
― harbl, Monday, 5 April 2010 20:17 (fourteen years ago) link
my borad? sweet.
although tbh it would likely make cogh look like a thriving metropolis so i think i'll pass.
― niminy-piminy cricket (Upt0eleven), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:17 (fourteen years ago) link
77 was and is owned by the people
― still driving steen, banning deez, gettin my dick xhuxked (Curt1s Stephens), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:19 (fourteen years ago) link
( <3 COGH btw )
― niminy-piminy cricket (Upt0eleven), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:19 (fourteen years ago) link
but I'd rather let kate have her forum where she feels she can express herself freely than do something that would run her off.
― a cross between lily allen and fetal alcohol syndrome (milo z), Monday, 5 April 2010 21:07 (fourteen years ago) link
― Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Monday, April 5, 2010 7:56 PM (1 hour ago)
i totes agree with this, and im all against the principal of board ownership but like, at the same time, lolbanning etc maybe requires like a partic type of ownership and i think like no boys allowed etc
― plax (ico), Monday, 5 April 2010 21:47 (fourteen years ago) link
the noize board, for example, is owned by j0n willi@ms
― jeff, Monday, 5 April 2010 21:48 (fourteen years ago) link
I definitely think ownership is the wrong word to describe this thing -- "custodianship" is more like it.
― my full government name (WmC), Monday, 5 April 2010 21:51 (fourteen years ago) link
borad curator
― velko, Monday, 5 April 2010 21:53 (fourteen years ago) link
tbh no matter how u feel abt this theres no way to stop ppl thinking they own the place
― plax (ico), Monday, 5 April 2010 21:54 (fourteen years ago) link
http://bartsblackboard.com/files/2009/11/The-Simpsons-06x19-Lisas-Wedding.jpg
― Aerosol, Monday, 5 April 2010 21:56 (fourteen years ago) link
"strut around" is cute imo
― mr. waffles (Nijoli), Monday, 5 April 2010 22:01 (fourteen years ago) link
thats like the most surmounter post ever to have been not posted by surmounter imo
― plax (ico), Monday, 5 April 2010 22:02 (fourteen years ago) link
the way i personally see it is thus: Nobody owns a thread, nobody owns a board, the only people who own ILX are those who pay for it's servers. As long as everybody acts decent, it's cool. But even boards specifically made for people (77, 1p3, TMI, The Cape, heck I had the underused ILG Players Club) are not those people's boards. Mods aren't usurping anyone's power, they're serving to make an attempt to keep the dialogue neutral and open and posi and they'll prune anything/one required to keep that the status quo, up to and including board and site mods.
but i'm just a guy
― forksclovetofu, Monday, 5 April 2010 22:10 (fourteen years ago) link
^^^this is fine and all but its kinda boring, mod terrorism on the subboards can b kinda fun. just feel like iltmi is a special case bc it has a specifici function wrt things ppl obviously wanna have real convs abt that other ppl might wanna avoid bc of nsfw/squeamish/prudishness w/e
― plax (ico), Monday, 5 April 2010 22:14 (fourteen years ago) link
i owned a board once. i gave it away. we cool.
― ✌.✰|ʘ‿ʘ|✰.✌ (Steve Shasta), Monday, 5 April 2010 22:15 (fourteen years ago) link
plax is right, no one talks about anything very serious on 1p3 and no one gets seriously butthurt when they are occasionally lolbanned or their threads are locked. on the other hand, for whatever reason, people really were into discussing the color of their poop, so kate's totaliatarian leanings are a little less endearing and she shouldn't be a mod unless she can chill out a little
― maderator (k3vin k.), Monday, 5 April 2010 22:29 (fourteen years ago) link
"Mod terrorism" as practiced on IRE, IP3, ITR, etc still promotes and encourages discourse and, as such, isn't contradictory towards anything Forks said.
I disagree that donating money buys you a stake in ILX btw.
― Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 5 April 2010 22:54 (fourteen years ago) link
serving to make an attempt to keep the dialogue neutral and open and posi
not even sure about this as a stated aim tbph
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:43 (fourteen years ago) link
nega 4 life
― rip sarah silverman 3/19/10 never forget (history mayne), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:46 (fourteen years ago) link
I disagree that donating money buys you a stake in ILX btw
Damn straight and I don't feel it shd really be brought up to back any opinion ever
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:06 (fourteen years ago) link
^ did not give
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:09 (fourteen years ago) link
ilx plc.
― niminy-piminy cricket (Upt0eleven), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:13 (fourteen years ago) link
iirc the last fundraiser we had happened real fast and some people who wanted to contribute didn't get a chance, but those issues aside it's an irrelevance - ILX has always been much more than the sum of the regrettably necessary dirty finance it occasionally has to dabble with
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:13 (fourteen years ago) link
ILX IS A FEELING
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:14 (fourteen years ago) link
You have tried to insert a duplicate message.
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:14 (fourteen years ago) link
v did not give either, tbf v
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:15 (fourteen years ago) link
oh i missed your first ^ lol
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:16 (fourteen years ago) link
"You have tried to insert a duplicate message"
has potential as a meme, with the right decisions made early on in the effort
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:18 (fourteen years ago) link