moderation request: democratic bans

how did an hour go by w/o comment on this?

http://www.savethemales.ca/freemason.gif

i wonder what poster this thread is about ...

Louis Jagger?

Jokes

i support this idea

me too

This is a horrible idea

well, I think it's a good idea only if the potential bans are nominated by admins (e.g. TOMBOT starting a "should cankles be banned?" poll rather than King Boy Pato starting a "should Dom Passantino be banned?" poll)

i still think this is a good idea

yeah everytime you decide to get tired of something everybody does you can start a big meta thread about how somebody who does it should be banned

ask dom how that worked out

Hey Dom, how did that work out?

serious answer: i think that this would lead to a whole bunch of people getting banned for the wrong reasons, esp since the drive to vote for a ban is always going to be stronger than the drive to vote against when mostly you just don't give a fuck about them or know who they are.

also it would lead to lengthy, insipid meta threads, which are bullshit

Key question: in the event of a "no" result to a "should x be banned" poll, would those requesting banning agree that the battle had been lost and proceed to stfu? Cause I don't think they would, and b-hurt would abound like beasts upon the earth.

no, because there is no way you can create a balloting system that is completely impervious to moderator tampering, which we would all do, constantly

I know for example that Keith, instead of trying to code a better board, actually spends all his time fucking with the poll results on ILM

Eh?

secret's out, sorry buddy

Ha, if only it were that easy. I appear to have made that really rather hard on myself. So much s**t is cached that doing that would involve stopping and starting the site, which scares me s**tless.

It's not moderator tampering that's the issue there - it's user tampering. As you know, I have actually coded the thing that and waht is asking for (a 'suggest ban' button that clocks up votes and then just automatically bans someone when the votes reach a certain level). I agree with you though, it would all go wrong really quickly.

keith is at defcon caressing the switch

Been there for about two years.

Would you press it L0uis?

questions to never ask l0uis ever, first in a series

What amazes me is that I really do have my finger on the button but I don't press it.

Of course not! Although I'd probably make some funky changes just to keep things fresh...

http://inform.glam.ac.uk/media/files/photos/buffy.jpg

Great Omar. I eagerly await its arrival.

What sort of 'funky' changes?

Actually, I've never seen a single episode of buffy the vampire slayer. It sounds shit.

i eagerly await louis.css

Oh, mostly coding it so that submitting certain words or phrases would have a certain result, that sort of thing...

Waht, like your name or something? I did that. Big HOOS, I have done a thing that lets you change your username. Sorry that you got stuck with it on day one!

Also, Omar, are you trying to suggest that I am asking for something for my work? Because I haven't and I won't.

easy there, no one's saying anything : O

Ah OK. I was confused as to why you posted a picture of a Buffy box set, like the one that Graham asked for in response to his hard work on ILX.

http://highpi.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/oldjokes.jpg

I understand. You made a joke about someone who isn't me.

I think ILX should have a lottery. One of those stone-throwin' kind.

Louis Jagger

Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger Louis Jagger

never ban grady

moderation request: can one of you go through that and googleproof each one, manually

:D

http://i36.tinypic.com/35ixa2x.jpg

Hey Dom, how did that work out?

-- Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 6 August 2008 21:52 (Yesterday) Bookmark Link

It worked out with the mods pretty much breaking every single promise they made.

http://woofwoof.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/11/13/000719821301lzzzzzzz.jpg

i would support more democratic bannage but i've never really been troubled by any banning of an ilxor by individual mod so it's not a big issue for me personally.

*takes notes*

^ un-necessary douchery but no matter

I think the premise of this thread would work better backwards. I like the idea of democratic unbanning, if the mods make an unpopular or controversial decision to ban someone and people want to vote to overturn it.

plz plz plz plz plz plz

being fair, everyone was otm about the church, but it went ahead and happened anyway.

yeah guys as long as there's a tombot there'll never be a chaki

no dude they complete each other, yin and yang... without chaki, tombot wouldnt be tombot

that's the dumbest shit you've ever said

ooh hellacious burn t-man

it is a little harsh, considering

double zinged by the tomster

c/d: people responding to good zings by nonchalantly acknowledging them

d

except when I do it

my point still holds, tom is batman and chaki is the joker

does that mean us ladies can start lining up to be eye candy? I'll be Poison Ivy.

erm can one poster suggest ban another poster more than once

*worried*

p.s. 40 of you can go suck eggs

p.p.s. one last push amirite

no they cannot xpost

you knobend

"yo, UK, no bend :("

i understand bro

What were you getting suggest banned for LJ? The Mansun thread?

I had nothing to do with it this time, btw.

Absolutely no idea. Steady accumulation due to rants/jibes being taken too seriously, I'd assume. The (obviously deliberately OTT) Liverpool thread probably grabbed me about 5-10 more humourless SB's. Oh, and I suspected you hadn't SB'd me; you're not passive-aggressive about your objections, which is a good thing.

This is a rather fascinating study in watching someone who doesn't know when to stop learn the hard way.

Conversely, a fascinating study in anonymous victimisation of soft targets.

The fact that you think the Lpool thread would net more SBs than your regular daily conduct is o_O.

What have you learnt from this episode?

(Laurel otm and kinda my point with my question. You _never_ learn the lesson.)

Okay as someone contributing to this, I suggest we stop this conversation as it is a) becoming a personal attack, and b) likely to goad the people participating in it into acting like knobs.

ok

Hang on, I'm getting all this from Laurel/JJ etc about my "regular daily conduct", which confuses me, as I've actually made it my business on ILX to sincerely participate and attempt to improve relations rather than troll and irritate. If the latter seems to be happening, then there's some serious communication breakdown. Generally when I have a pop, I'm doing so with tongue firmly in cheek. What I've learnt is that ILX still thoroughly befuddles me. Can someone spell this lesson out?

Dan I am so glad you posted that, you just saved me opening a can.

LJ I am gonna e-mail you.

this fuckin guy

lou jag i'm gonna give you this one for free

you know how i say stupid shit on ilx and generally act like a dick like 80% of the time and still don't catch half the shit you do?

one of the reasons for that is if i get hardsonned i dont make 50 posts about myself and my "posting style" and how i just dont geeeeeet why everybody doesnt love me

pro-tip^

but ethan this is the first time i've done that in ages

point taken

Unfortunately, frequency means nothing once people have formed an impression of you.

ON BEING A MORE USER-FRIENDLY TROLL
or how make yourself easier to ignore
by Ethan "And" What, S.Trife, Ph.D

You Have Been Yellow Carded By a Moderator: keep up the ad hominem and you're getting a ban

wrong thread, dude

lou jag i'm gonna give you this one for free

you know how i say stupid shit on ilx and generally act like a dick like 80% of the time and still don't catch half the shit you do?

one of the reasons for that is if i get hardsonned i dont make 50 posts about myself and my "posting style" and how i just dont geeeeeet why everybody doesnt love me

pro-tip^

― and what, Tuesday, 21 October 2008 20:10 (3 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

FAQ this shit

LJ is too harmless to be banworthy

well, I think it's a good idea only if the potential bans are nominated by admins (e.g. TOMBOT starting a "should cankles be banned?" poll rather than King Boy Pato starting a "should Dom Passantino be banned?" poll)

― Curt1s Stephens, Saturday, August 2, 2008 2:03 PM (4 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

cmon these would be be funny

why don't we have democratic bans yet

sb'd u for that

for agreeing with you?

you're a threat to his individuality

must admit urge to see some kind of suggest ban statscock is high

some mod should leak it to the media

valerie plame has 49 suggest bans shhhhh

Bumping for relevant history

Not to pick on LJ, mind.