The films of Abbas Kiarostami.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (44 of them)
Can I still have some of those almonds?

slutsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 14:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

I have watched Through the Olive Trees (have this on VHS if anyone wants a copy, though I'm suspicious of VHS-copying quality) and Close Up today spurred by this thread.

Cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 16:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

What did you think of the former? I think it's his most accessible film, at least of the ones I've seen.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 16:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

I think that final shot of Olive Trees is the greatest final shot I have ever seen, save perhaps for the endings of Sansho the Bailiff and Ingeborg Holm and The Searchers-- but like the former it demands to be seen in a theater.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 16:17 (twenty-one years ago) link

The greatest final shot for me is in Stalker, I just found it astonishing. The Searchers and Vertigo are up there too, but I can't remember the end of Sansho.

ryan (ryan), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 16:51 (twenty-one years ago) link

what's Ingeborg Holm? You know so much about film i feel the need to pick your brain.

ryan (ryan), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 16:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

OK, I'm no great shakes at 'reading' films (oh no!! "What is the point in summarising a film like that"!! OH NO!!!!) but here are my mental notes, internally dictated while watching Through The Olive Trees (note: these are just things that came to me and thus bring to bear upon them all my assumptions and maps):

i. the scene where the director huddles round the kids, asking them about 'co-operation', when he asks them how far they've travelled and they squall with indefinable excitement/exclamation, "9 kilometres" is brilliant.

ii. Shakespeare syndrome, sorta. You get this feeling when reading Shakey, niggling 'did he invent this trope or is he co-opting it, redefining it?' - which when, I felt, when I watched this film I got a lot in the sense well I was thinking "oh, this is ho-hum this film but, my God it's Iranian - I can imagine that some of the things that come out of his movies [the postmodern reflexivity?! - postmodern is, as Kogan says, ethnocentric and presupposes a tradition of modernism - where does Kiarostami's modernism come from] would actually be quite subtly subversive in an Iranian context.

iii. scene with car driving through dirt-track road, wing-mirror in shot, essentially dovetailing your attention between the two 'scenes' is beautiful and beguiling.

iv. Truly post-modern? OK OK I go on (and on) about "referencing narratives outside yourself" rather uninterestingly and ill-definedly but the only TRUE example of this I have ever seen of this phenomena, now that I come to THINK about it, think about how the references I've normally taken as ref-externals are every much a bit of the main narrative as the main narrative is, ie they are HEMMED in, thus pt of the blah blah... any way the only TRUE moment is in Japon when the drunk cast member starts raving about soundman and how the people from the film don't pay them enough, then he's told to shhhh...

Sorry Amateurist, this is all very unhelpful, uninteresting, and dull. Short answer: it is beautiful, he doesn't hold the shots too long in that interminable style Herzog does (the descent scene in Aguirre, and pretty much all of Kaspar Hauser) and the characters are amicable... Beautiful... see coulda done it in a word.

Cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 17:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

I am sorry.

Cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 17:14 (twenty-one years ago) link

(Coincidental MENTAL note: whilst watching this I was also thinking about The Stalker - that's a chart even I can't decipher).

Cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 17:14 (twenty-one years ago) link

No your thoughts are great. That scene in Japon--as well as the long shot of the winding road up the mountainside, framed so as to make it look almost two-dimensional--owe a lot to Kiarostami's Koker films I think. It's heartening to see his influence spreading around the globe, as I mentioned on another thread, without calcifying into something academic. The scene in And Life Goes On... where the old man asks for a new prop and a PA comes into the shot to hand it to him, or when he suddenly starts talking about how his "home" is actually only his home for the purposes of the movie--it's great comedy I think.

As for Kiarostami's modernism be careful not to patronize him. Kiarostami comes out of a pretty intellectual family and is as literate as you or I (probably more so) in Western books and music and movies. His early films, pre-Revolution, use Western pop songs. Both And Life Goes On and Olive Trees use Vivaldi. And Kiarostami has mentioned both Andre Bazin and The Godfather in interviews. He travels to Europe and elsewhere constantly and has had many exchanges with French cinephiles and phil. Not to mention that Persia has a long tradition of interchange with the West, which recent years (post-1979) may obscure. It won't do to suggest that he is a more "Western" director than others in Iran, although clearly he knows or has learned much about pitching his films to a Western audience. Better to say that he is a cosmopolitan director, who addresses himself to people in decidedly uncosmopolitan parts of Iran. That is indeed a major theme in many of his films, not to say all of them.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 17:39 (twenty-one years ago) link

Also I wouldn't make too much of modernism as a thing-in-itself whose appearance in Kiarostami's movies should be surprising or heartening in itself. I know my earlier posts totally go against that but I have a long ways to go before my thoughts as they are written down match up with the thoughts running through my head. Better to look at the details of what Kiarostami's "breaking the fourth wall" and so on actually do in these films. They raise a zillion questions about the people you're seeing portrayed; suggest complexities amongst "simple" characters and places that a million realist or neorealist works don't explore. I don't think his "modernism" serves to distance the audience, although perhaps that has been its affect in some cases--I think it brings you into the work, creates a fruitful tension. I'm being horribly vague and feel free to blast away at this fact.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 17:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

However the scene you mention in Japon seems a bit more academic to me, strictly because it makes such a big deal out of taking time from the narrative to witness this odd lunch break, which seems both inside and outside the diegesis. There's something purposely provocative about it, whereas Kiarostami's treatment of similar incidents is more gentle, more offhanded, and thus even stranger when factored in to the film as a whole.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 17:45 (twenty-one years ago) link

re:modernism - Yeah that's what I thought, and that's what I find interesting - this, what I think is a, symbiotic relationship between cultures and how when they meet they both feed and feed off each other... So Kiarostami meets Western literature then feeds it into Iran while Iran eeks into the literature and you have this wierd coming together... I wasn't patronising him but I was probably patronising Iran. Well, I wasn't patronising Iran so much as acknowledging it's tradition.

Speaking of which:

v. Freaky, almost Hobbesian possessive attitude towards women displayed by characters.

Cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 17:57 (twenty-one years ago) link

OK, I totally didn't say what I wanted to say. First of all, Kiarostami is well-acquainted with Western culture. But more important, his version of "modernism" needn't necessarily come from that source. There's a degree of sponataneous insight and generosity in the reflexive moves of those films that doesn't need to be inherited. Which statement can be understood as condescending itself. I guess what I'm driving at is that finding out the "source" of Kiarostami's modernism (or what we take to be a kind of Iranian modernist correlative) is perhaps less interesting that seeing what it does, how it feels.

Yeah the women thing can be alarming. There's that beautiful appeal by the suitor which I've never known how to take: "I don't want you for your money, or your beauty. I just want you to have a place in the world." Kiarostami's subsequent films have shown him to be sensitive to the restrictions facing women in Iran, so his distance from this issue--his unwillingness to confront it--in these films can be seen as part and parcel of the attitude he strikes toward the village in general: inquisitive, never presumptuous.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 18:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

Minneapolis showing of Ten in a theatre that seats roughly 800?

Sold out.

I still haven't made up my mind if it's up the the standards of either Taste of Cherry or The Wind Will Carry Us, but its feminism is not to be ignored.

Eric H. (Eric H.), Saturday, 17 May 2003 06:00 (twenty years ago) link

three months pass...
Just saw Taste of Cherry yesterday, and up until five minutes to the end, I was ready to accept it as a great film. Too bad that the ending SUCKY SUCKY SUCKS so bad as to pretty much nullify anything good I felt about it before then. A very homo pomo ending, if I may say so myself (and I shall).

And while this obviously is meaningless to a certain degree, it's so goddamn obvious how badly Kiarostami has been positioning himself as of late that he really, really, really, really wants to be Jean-Luc Godard. The way he dresses, the way he shaves, the sunglasses he wears, the way he talks about his films, the way he regards himself as an artistE. My friend met him last year and said he was a complete twat. Beside the point, maybe, but I guess I just want to turn the knife a few times before I withdraw the blade.

I'm still open to seeing more of his films, but if the others would rather pull Godard/Bresson tricks for shits and giggles, I'm out.

Should I just go to the Makhmalbafs instead?

Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 9 September 2003 04:30 (twenty years ago) link

the ending is the best thing about it!

make some more list threads, girolamo.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 00:07 (twenty years ago) link

a very homo pomo ending

Alright, I'll get you the second one, to which I'd respond: so what? But what the hell does the "homo" thing refer to?

Beside the point, maybe, but I guess I just want to turn the knife a few times before I withdraw the blade.

That was actually not Kiarostami you dug a knife into but rather a bag of old arguments which, upon being spilled open, you are now knee deep in.

Eric H. (Eric H.), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 03:00 (twenty years ago) link

I was arguing? I thought I was ranting. Pardon me!

Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 10 September 2003 06:25 (twenty years ago) link

No, please. Pardon me. You still haven't explained the "homo" thing.

Eric H. (Eric H.), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 20:49 (twenty years ago) link

"It's slang...ya know...he's American...it's a facking donut!"

Seriously, though, stop getting hung up on "homo pomo", as un-PC as it may be (love to the gay people, yo!). It's just an old rhyming term that my friend and I use whenever postmodernism tries to be too clever or too meta to the point of it's own bloviating stupidity. Kiarostami may indeed be a genius, his meta-ending may indeed be something new and different within Iran, but I judge it to be (by the h-p standards subjective as they are) homo pomo in extremis.

Whoa.

Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 11 September 2003 01:16 (twenty years ago) link

FIne. This homo loves pomo. But he can also handle subjectivity. He agrees with amateurist. He'll stop talking in the third person some other time.

Eric H. (Eric H.), Thursday, 11 September 2003 01:41 (twenty years ago) link

i liked the ending but clearly the best thing about it was the extensive use of long shot

ryan (ryan), Wednesday, 17 September 2003 23:04 (twenty years ago) link

I'll definitely give you that. I also liked the process that he used to actually get the passenger footage. But all that aside...um...well...I don't have anything to say on the other side of this ellipsis.

Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 18 September 2003 01:36 (twenty years ago) link

three years pass...

A Retro in Berkeley, can't wait. A few weeks ago I was telling my friend that after watching Apu by Satyajit Ray I simply had no desire to watch films for a while. Last week, thinking of other directors in the same vein as Ray I said thinking aloud "I bet Kiarostami has some films like that". Yesterday I found this quote:

"When Satyajit Ray passed on, I was very depressed. But after seeing Kiarostami's films, I thanked God for giving us just the right person to take his place."—Akira Kurosawa

http://www.bampfa.berkeley.edu/filmseries/abbas_kiarostami

oscar, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 02:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Life and Nothing More is the most boring heap I have ever sat through. Bah.

Stevie D, Friday, 20 July 2007 01:52 (sixteen years ago) link

well, you shd stay away from him, then.

Dr Morbius, Saturday, 21 July 2007 16:05 (sixteen years ago) link

eight years pass...

RIP:

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/jul/04/abbas-kiarostami-palme-dor-winning-iranian-film-maker-dies

"Cinema begins with D.W. Griffith and ends with Abbas Kiarostami." - Jean-Luc Godard

Foster Twelvetrees (Ward Fowler), Tuesday, 5 July 2016 01:38 (seven years ago) link

Apologies, didn't see the other thread revive.

Still, what a loss.

Foster Twelvetrees (Ward Fowler), Tuesday, 5 July 2016 01:46 (seven years ago) link

totally unrelatedly, I had just downloaded Where Is The Friends Home in hopes of watching it tonight. RIP

de l'asshole (flopson), Tuesday, 5 July 2016 01:53 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.