new novels and why they suck and whatever

I mean I'm not interested in innovation for the sake of innovation (either in music or in writing), it needs to be in the service of some larger, more fundamental goal or there's no potential for any kind of real emotional engagement

xp

I haven't read it but isn't that girl with dragon tattoo series that has a bajillion holds on it pretty outre?

nah they're pretty straight crime thrillers with a few twists and quirks ... lead character is "different" but I wouldn't call it outre

I liked Dragon Tattoo but Book 2 was the one I was talking about upthread as being disappointing to me (Girl Who Played w/ Fire)

shakey otm

liked Tree of Smoke but I'm a huge Denis Johnson fan and would recommend almost any of his other books over that one. it's pretty damn long and the Denis Johnson-y moments were too few and far between for it to be really great.

this is the only new book i want to read right now:

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_kzpq62Dqat1qz87jlo1_500.jpg

there's plenty of great literature that doesn't have much on the "story" level, for what it's worth

Shakey, when you put it in those abstract terms, it's pretty difficult to disagree with. The question is what looks like innovation to you. Your sense of invention or innovation is going to be different depending on your level of attention, and what you're paying attention to. For instance, I'm guessing there are things you find brilliant and inventive in music that someone who pays zero attention to music would have no real ability to recognize or understand.

The kind of invention you're talking about is a really noticeable one -- it's huge surface technical stuff. I don't say that to be snobby. I'm just telling you that there are a billion other avenues of invention, so you might feel like a writer is "settling" when they're actually doing amazing things with prose or perspective or meaning or style. Like the great stuff about that Lydia Davis story I posted isn't just the big formal fact that it's super-short.

The use of time signatures as an analogy strikes me as pretty telling, actually, because isn't the lit equivalent of time signatures a bunch of stuff about pacing and prose that is wildly different from writer to writer, or even across a single work by one writer? Writers are using all the time signatures! It just asks you to notice a little.

Anyway though I really do wonder if you'd enjoy that one David Markson book, possibly others.

i don't get how she wrote that story, unless she cooked the duck

wait that's a joke right? I was on the verge of explaining the story like a dumbass

fwiw I think that Lydia Davis bit is great - compact, very slyly done, but also sweet and human

Lipsyte's star has been very slowly rising one reader at a time for ages - seems like everybody who gets asked "what's interesting & good that people don't hear as much about?" mentions Lipsyte - I think a Big Moment is his for the taking if he feels like it

also he's not a novelist but this thread seems like the kinda thread where somebody ought to point out that Gary Lutz is maybe some kind of a genius

he's on that "20 emerging" list I linked, one of the few on the list proper that I've read any of

re: the duck story, You'd probably have to explain the story to me -- the way I read it it seemed like the author was responding to a "what is your favorite story that you wrote" survey, so she wrote one there on the spot because she really liked the idea of a domestic bond over vicarious duck-eating -- that's her special place in her head she goes to when she's feeling low or whatever, and she never had an opportunity to verbalize that idea until the story prompt came along.

i think it was like the guys favourite thing that happened to him was something that happpened to someone else, the story she wrote was written by someone else

like at first your confused and then the internal logic takes hold of the whole

key is that "favorite story she has written" can be unpacked a few different ways

Lipsyte's star has been very slowly rising one reader at a time for ages - seems like everybody who gets asked "what's interesting & good that people don't hear as much about?" mentions Lipsyte - I think a Big Moment is his for the taking if he feels like it

― get your bucket of free wings (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, June 25, 2010 5:19 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i think its his big moment right now!

the ask is totally worth picking up fwiw

lydia davis also has a very very nice-looking hardcover of her collected stories AVAILABLE NOW that i really want to get but its thirty bones and i own most of the stories in other collections

I guess, for me the things that are "critically acclaimed" always seem so safe, where do people read about new books that are stranger or at least not Yann Martel-ey

But what about _The Age of Wire and String_, which appeared in the third post of the thread and was never mentioned again? This was hugely critically acclaimed, right? And I will fight any man woman or child who denies that it's great, or that it's strange. Certainly Derby's "Super Flat Times" wouldn't exist without it (though SFT is certainly not a clone of AWS, it's a different thing, with more SF in its upbringing.)

which Davis collection should I start with?

Also, "The Ask" sadly not as good as "Home Land," a little too much fussiness at the verbal level at the expense of THE TIMELESS VERITIES OF CHARACTER AND PLOT (and i am in general way more on the side of verbal fussiness against timeless verities than most readers)

re: "read in a book" I thought maybe that was a distancing device? Like if she purportedly wrote it herself, it wouldn't really "exist"

by the way this really does remind me of those ilm lets-conver-a-rockist threads in that way where theres these two sorta-competing impulses--one being to list things that "prove" that the rockists conclusions about pop music are wrong, and the other being to attack the assumptions the rockist has about "good" music are wrong.

I don't think anyone's doing such a good job of the latter tbh.

have you ever won an argument with geir

no one wins an argument with geir because he doesn't actually engage with anybody. but plenty of people have proven him wrong, repeatedly.

I just don't see anyone on this thread stanning for that much conventional/mainstream narrative novels and/or forcefully arguing that Joyce, Nabokov, Cortazar et al are crap

I mean that would be a pretty ballsy argument to make, if someone's gonna go there let's see it...

i dont think thats the equivalent? i think convential/mainstream narrative novels are as good as and often better than highly "experimental" or "adventurous" novels

i also think that were relying really hard on a distinction that hasnt been very clearly delineated...

i dont think new novels suck i like a lot of them but also i like genre fiction

i also think that were relying really hard on a distinction that hasnt been very clearly delineated...

yeah I agree, where to draw the line is kinda problematic

i think it was like the guys favourite thing that happened to him was something that happpened to someone else, the story she wrote was written by someone else

like at first your confused and then the internal logic takes hold of the whole

^^ yeah, this is what I meant about the neatness of the loop. the syntax at the beginning is confounding and doesn't make sense -- is it a story she wrote or read? -- but once you get to the duck you see it, and then look back to the beginning and go ah. (it also repeats the syntax of the "what is" questions and the "hesitate(d) for a long time")

the collected stories of davis is a great thing to have, though not really something to just sit and read through (a lot of her stories are short and dense like that, or a little singular -- probably best read a little bit separately and individually and not in a big row or anything)

xpost - if my only choices are between Joyce/Cortazar/Nabokov and the entire world history of "conventional" literature my choice is going to pretty easily be the latter!

What Munro does with chronology is pretty "experimental" by my lights, and far from the A-B-C conventions Shakey's complaining about.

i actually dont even know what traditional narrative-type books youre reading besides zadie smith and the fucking kite runner.

white teeth, btw, is arguably an adventurously structured book--certainly nontraditional enough for james wood to hold it up as an example of a new quasi-genre of novel

btw people looking for completely-unsatisfied-with-old-paradigms fiction should read NY Tyrant magazine, about which I feel 1/2 the time v. enthusiastic & 1/2 the time cranky & reactionary "you're just doing that because you know if you tried writing straight narrative they'd laugh you out of here" dude

in lit theory this is known as Indie Kid's Dilemma btw

yeah, i agree. i've talked about that before on ilx somewhere. she is deceptively conventional. on the surface, it looks like the same old same old, but nothing could be further from the truth.

xx-post

did you read 'the corrections', shakey? i avoided it for years because the subject matter sounded well-trodden and boring, but finally read it last month on the strength of a recommendation. franzen does play with the timeline in some very slight ways, but that's not really the point, nor is the plot. and yet the writing is so good that it's totally compelling, and feels very unique and fresh because of it.

xps

this is a list of books that i liked that ive read p recently that i really liked:

the privileges by jonathan dee
your face tomorrow by javier marias
ice by vladimir sorokin

only the 1st is what i think of as "conventional" but it uses convention in strange ways - makes choices about voice & perspective that undermine some conventions idk im typing the word conventions a lot

nope never heard of the Corrections before but someone rec'd it upthread

xp

I avoided The Corrections for the same reasons (I sold a copy to Iggy Pop in 2001 lol) but was also surprised by its effectiveness.

just to avoid confusion, someone recommended thomas bernhard's "correction" upthread and i'm talking about jonathan franzen's "the corrections".

" yeah, this is what I meant about the neatness of the loop. the syntax at the beginning is confounding and doesn't make sense -- is it a story she wrote or read? "

You're gonna have to graph this out for me -- I didn't get Primer, either.

The Corrections is excellent, but (uninformed statement coming up) I'd always mentally lumped him in with the Brooklyn Lethem Safran Foer big-seller-credible crowd, not anything which seemed to be an antidote to rote contemporary trends, or anything under the radar.

privileges is good, yeah

i mentioned franzen as a response to this:

I just don't see anyone on this thread stanning for that much conventional/mainstream narrative novels

fwiw ill stan for a lot of convential/mainstream novels

and imo he can write circles around lethem, and i like lethem (at least up through 'fortress of solitude'). never read any safran foer.

xp

i read both the ask and flauberts parrot last week, and i liked the conventional/mainstream one about 6 billion times more

everyone read correction

yeah yeah its translated whatever