Anthony please believe, the man's just not CLEAN on so many levels, mmm-kay?
― suzy (suzy), Friday, 16 July 2004 17:38 (nineteen years ago) link
― amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 16 July 2004 17:39 (nineteen years ago) link
― suzy (suzy), Friday, 16 July 2004 18:42 (nineteen years ago) link
― amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 16 July 2004 18:46 (nineteen years ago) link
― suzy (suzy), Friday, 16 July 2004 19:00 (nineteen years ago) link
― amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 16 July 2004 19:13 (nineteen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 16 July 2004 19:21 (nineteen years ago) link
― amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 16 July 2004 19:25 (nineteen years ago) link
― cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 16 July 2004 19:35 (nineteen years ago) link
― amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 16 July 2004 19:36 (nineteen years ago) link
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 16 July 2004 19:42 (nineteen years ago) link
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 16 July 2004 19:43 (nineteen years ago) link
― amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 16 July 2004 19:44 (nineteen years ago) link
― jed_ (jed), Friday, 16 July 2004 19:48 (nineteen years ago) link
― amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 16 July 2004 19:50 (nineteen years ago) link
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 16 July 2004 19:50 (nineteen years ago) link
― St. Nicholas (Nick A.), Friday, 16 July 2004 19:51 (nineteen years ago) link
― amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 16 July 2004 20:02 (nineteen years ago) link
http://www.maggie-gyllenhaal.net/coppermine/thumbnails.php?album=41
― amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 16 July 2004 20:26 (nineteen years ago) link
― anthony, Friday, 16 July 2004 22:14 (nineteen years ago) link
― amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 16 July 2004 22:40 (nineteen years ago) link
― tokyo rosemary (rosemary), Friday, 16 July 2004 23:04 (nineteen years ago) link
― amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 16 July 2004 23:09 (nineteen years ago) link
― amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 16 July 2004 23:11 (nineteen years ago) link
― anthony, Friday, 16 July 2004 23:46 (nineteen years ago) link
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Saturday, 17 July 2004 01:21 (nineteen years ago) link
― ,,,,,,,,,,, Wednesday, 22 February 2006 14:20 (eighteen years ago) link
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 14:37 (eighteen years ago) link
http://www.amconmag.com/08_11_03/feature.html
― ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Wednesday, 22 February 2006 15:19 (eighteen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 15:23 (eighteen years ago) link
my devils advocacy on the ile thread about that is easily the dumbest shit ive ever posted
― ,,,,,,,,,,,, Wednesday, 22 February 2006 15:24 (eighteen years ago) link
I'm sure this has been on another thread, but still pretty funny:
http://www.hypebeast.com/image/2008/09/terry-richardson-obama-photo.jpg
― Spencer Chow, Thursday, 9 October 2008 05:50 (fifteen years ago) link
this guy's like the proto-cobrasnake, yeh?
― yungblut, Thursday, 9 October 2008 12:59 (fifteen years ago) link
terry richardson for vogue 2009 calendar
enjoy, mangs
http://hypebeast.com/2008/11/terry-richardson-x-vogue-2009-calendar/
― warmsherry, Thursday, 27 November 2008 14:04 (fifteen years ago) link
http://b.casalemedia.com/V2/62096/151749/Tshirt_ecoman_sd_728x90.giflol at terry richardson banner ad
― Ron Polarik, PhD (and what), Thursday, 4 December 2008 15:33 (fifteen years ago) link
Hoping this shitstorm means this dude is curtailed, if not officially declared OVER. The Guardian have it on page 3 today so maybe the magazines here will take note?
http://jezebel.com/5494634/meet-terry-richardson-the-worlds-most-fked-up-fashion-photographer
http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2010/mar/19/terry-richardson-fashion-photography-pornography
My own mag has a shoot with him in the current issue. As I mention upthread, I know the guy to say Hi to and that's never been unpleasant, but I've never liked his work. There are plenty of people in my field with power who don't either, but unfortunately I don't make commissioning decisions about what photographers we use (unless I've generated the feature in question). I will, however, ask the big boss if he plans to carry on using the man's work. I would imagine he might be embarrassed enough to drop his contribution; we regularly refuse to cover people the grapevine tells us are junkies or whatever.
It is difficult to stand up to behaviour like this from the editorial side of things, because in fashion magazines the *worst* thing to be in your office is the "worthy" one. Insisting on female agency or holding feminist views is seen as evidence that you're not cool, or you're reaching for those views because you're not pretty. Part of that is the tougher-than-thou atmosphere in a fashion industry workplace (anything to sideline a competitor is OK, if the losing party were tougher, they would not be a loser, yada yada).
― ned ragú (suzy), Saturday, 20 March 2010 11:44 (fourteen years ago) link
I thought it was already pretty obvious that this dude is a total perv (and a total hack). If this means I never have to hear of him/see his work ever again, then there may be hope in the world yet.
― ●●●●●●●● (EDB), Saturday, 20 March 2010 14:27 (fourteen years ago) link
And yes, it is pretty disgusting how these dudes get off on delusions of sexual omnipotence and license, and are so willing to totally abuse it. He and Dov Charney should be forced to fight to the death.
― ●●●●●●●● (EDB), Saturday, 20 March 2010 14:31 (fourteen years ago) link
Well, yeah. I should also note that a lot of people in fashion that you wouldn't expect to defend the status quo are in this case trying to do so, and in 'she would say that' terms.
― ned ragú (suzy), Saturday, 20 March 2010 15:45 (fourteen years ago) link
I can't think of this guy without remembering this anecdote I read about his dad:http://www.metafilter.com/82291/Sara-Ziff-talks-to-Louise-France-about-the-world-of-teen-modelling#2597914
Being a perv, recognized as such, and people dealing with your work I'm ok with. Using your position to exploit others, especially with young women, kids, or anyone else on the weak end of a power relationship, not so much. Ugh.
― mh, Saturday, 20 March 2010 15:50 (fourteen years ago) link
theres an utterly despicable article about this on the website i work for
― max, Saturday, 20 March 2010 15:56 (fourteen years ago) link
id rather not link to it directly but its the first google result here:
http://www.google.com/search?q=terry+richardson+the+daily+beast&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
― max, Saturday, 20 March 2010 15:57 (fourteen years ago) link
"He's so out in the open" reads to me as "I've never been abused, so I don't recognize the language of an abuser speaking"
Didn't realize he lived with his schizo, drugged-up dad when he started out.
― mh, Saturday, 20 March 2010 16:11 (fourteen years ago) link
that whole piece is just a gigantic kiss-ass morally repellent confession of total ignorance--even includes "oh shes just jealous" as a bonus at the end
― max, Saturday, 20 March 2010 16:14 (fourteen years ago) link
lol
http://thegloss.com/fashion/terry-richardson-is-really-creepy-one-models-story/
― plax (ico), Saturday, 20 March 2010 16:53 (fourteen years ago) link
also
http://www.terrysdiary.com/post/461129664/i-just-want-to-take-a-moment-to-say-im-really
fyi
― plax (ico), Saturday, 20 March 2010 16:55 (fourteen years ago) link
Is diddums hurt? Awwwwww.
― ned ragú (suzy), Saturday, 20 March 2010 16:57 (fourteen years ago) link
i mean, TR has been doing this for YEARS and it's not really a secret; my honest to god question is why people suddenly notice/are scolding NOW. Not saying he doesn't deserve the criticisim, but it strikes me as a total Maison Derriere thing of feigned shock...
― Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Saturday, 20 March 2010 17:03 (fourteen years ago) link
I'd have thought everything she says in that article is glaringly obvious. I guess it's not..?? That's sort of depressing.
― The Clegg Effect (Tracer Hand), Monday, 17 May 2010 13:33 (thirteen years ago) link
There is a vibe in fashion that only losers or The Worthy complain about the exploitation of people working professionally in the industry, the idea being that successful people have more important things (and people) to worry about. A commenter at Tavi's blog pointed out that such indignities would never befall Anna Wintour's daughter - which is kind of the point Tavi is trying to make, that this is a bully who preys on the powerless on those occasions he can.
― cleggaeton (suzy), Monday, 17 May 2010 13:51 (thirteen years ago) link
well yeah, i mean i know ppl on the low rungs of the fashion industry and they are all pretty horribly treated
― plax (ico), Monday, 17 May 2010 19:08 (thirteen years ago) link
also they are not running in heels style retards, they are capable skilled employees who get treated like shit and work for nothing
http://i.imgur.com/ELzYKVW.jpg
― 龜, Tuesday, 22 April 2014 06:15 (ten years ago) link
see i cant get a hard on w. his work. (isnt that the defention of porn, wether you can masterbate to it ?)― anthony, Friday, July 16, 2004 6:14 PM (9 years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Tuesday, 22 April 2014 12:01 (ten years ago) link
good analysis from anthony
― markers, Tuesday, 22 April 2014 13:08 (ten years ago) link
He has just been dropped by Target and Vogue because, hey, it turns out he's a rapey creep. Who knew?
― Yuri Bashment (ShariVari), Thursday, 1 May 2014 21:00 (ten years ago) link
I feel like there's a parallel here with Donald Sterling -- "so this is what changed your mind?"
― Doritos Loco Parentis (Hurting 2), Thursday, 1 May 2014 21:02 (ten years ago) link
Exactly. Nobody with even the vaguest interest in fashion could have been under any illusion about him being a vile predator but it's good to see the right thing being done, if only for the wrong reasons.
― Yuri Bashment (ShariVari), Thursday, 1 May 2014 21:06 (ten years ago) link
But also, people do things, and then they have regrets, and that’s also nothing to do with me. Then don’t do pictures like that again … I’m okay with myself about everything, and that to me is the most important thing.
that is very fucking far from the most important thing imo
― sktsh, Monday, 16 June 2014 19:59 (nine years ago) link
Oh well as long as Terry Richardson is OK with himself that's cool, move along everyone
― What is wrong with songs? Absolutely nothing. Songs are great. (DL), Monday, 16 June 2014 20:45 (nine years ago) link
lol @ poor Obama coming up when you google this dude's name
― djenter the dragon? (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 16 June 2014 21:01 (nine years ago) link
kinda feel this: http://gawker.com/heres-the-terry-richardson-profile-you-didnt-read-in-ne-1592188149
I already (thought that I) thought the worst of this guy, but the nymag article made me think worse.nobody's acting like this is a cool rehabilitating article right?
― chinavision!, Wednesday, 18 June 2014 03:23 (nine years ago) link
Not really "rehabilitating" but certainly overly balanced.
― Wristy Hurlington (ShariVari), Wednesday, 18 June 2014 07:26 (nine years ago) link
http://www.damemagazine.com/2014/06/17/terry-richardson-predatory-artist
― rap steve gadd (D-40), Wednesday, 18 June 2014 07:26 (nine years ago) link
what is 'overly balanced'
― rap steve gadd (D-40), Wednesday, 18 June 2014 07:27 (nine years ago) link
nb the article i linked is reading more into the nymag article than i think is reasonable ... but then i came away from reading the ny mag article thinking terry was a bigger scumbag than i thought so idk why it's being seen as esp. forgiving
the headline on the nymag article, though, def sets a really stupid tone
― rap steve gadd (D-40), Wednesday, 18 June 2014 07:28 (nine years ago) link
xp when they show 'both sides of the story' and act like they have equal weight
― just sayin, Wednesday, 18 June 2014 07:31 (nine years ago) link
isn't that a projection
― rap steve gadd (D-40), Wednesday, 18 June 2014 07:36 (nine years ago) link
like, i see these two paragraphs next to each other:
But he seems either unaware of or unwilling to acknowledge the ways in which coercion can be unspoken and situational. A prominent photography agent identifies the potential for abuse. “Kate Moss wasn’t asked to grab a hard dick,” this person says. “Miley Cyrus wasn’t asked to grab a hard dick. H&M models weren’t asked to grab a hard dick. But these other girls, the 19-year-old girl from Whereverville, should be the one to say, ‘I don’t think this is a good idea’? These girls are told by agents how important he is, and then they show up and it’s a bait and switch. This guy and his friends are literally like, ‘Grab my boner.’ Is this girl going to say no? And go back to the village? That’s not a real choice. It’s a false choice.”
Someone who’s spoken with Richardson about the Kibosh project recalls him describing his feelings with some nuance. “He said, ‘I was really up front about the kind of work I was making, and it came from pain; it was an expression of the pain and trauma I’ve experienced in my life, and I’m not proud of it.’ ” In our conversations, Richardson was less introspective and more defensive. “I don’t have any regrets about the work at all,” he tells me, “but obviously I don’t ever want someone to feel like that. It was never my intention. But also, people do things, and then they have regrets, and that’s also nothing to do with me. Then don’t do pictures like that again … I’m okay with myself about everything, and that to me is the most important thing.”
It's the structure of 'both sides' but not the content. i mean, apparently a lot of people aren't reading it the way i did, so some of that has to fall on the writer—when I read the "Canyons" (lindsey lohan, james deen, etc.) piece in the new york times, it was a lot more dryly humorous. So maybe this piece is sloppier? But nonetheless, I read that last paragraph as pretty damning.
― rap steve gadd (D-40), Wednesday, 18 June 2014 07:40 (nine years ago) link
The article does raise some of the concerns but, in my view, makes the ideas that he has 'pushed his art into grey areas that some people are uncomfortable with' and 'he is a rapist and sexual predator' seem like equally defensible positions. Maybe it is projection, i don't know.
― Wristy Hurlington (ShariVari), Wednesday, 18 June 2014 07:49 (nine years ago) link
for an overly balanced article it seems to have made people universally grossed out by terry richardson, so... maybe it's not overly balanced?like you might as well show 'both sides of the story' if one is clearly super damning and then your point is made. maybe I'm misreading though.
― chinavision!, Wednesday, 18 June 2014 12:42 (nine years ago) link
he is a butt hole
― Pew Nornographers (contenderizer), Wednesday, 18 June 2014 12:48 (nine years ago) link
idk, idk. Plenty of comments below the article itself that would seem to contradict that but perhaps that's to be expected.
xp
― Wristy Hurlington (ShariVari), Wednesday, 18 June 2014 12:49 (nine years ago) link
tbf there were rumors ahead of time that NYmag was working on something 100% in his defense and what they actually ran was pretty warts and all beyond the quotes TR gave, and in a way it's more damning for that stuff to appear in a piece that he cooperated with and was interviewed for.
― some dude, Wednesday, 18 June 2014 12:55 (nine years ago) link
Hah I didn't know his dad was also a famous fashion photog
― 龜, Wednesday, 18 June 2014 13:09 (nine years ago) link
That Dame mag piece is just weird. The prima facie idiocy of the "other side of the story" is all the more damning. It would be a less effective takedown without the stuff from the Richardson camp.
― ugh (lukas), Wednesday, 18 June 2014 15:27 (nine years ago) link
Yeah, the details about his dad are the only new parts of this for me (and that he took up with 17-year-old Anjelica Houston when TR was a kid).
― did click through tho on the money (Eazy), Wednesday, 18 June 2014 15:34 (nine years ago) link
On the one hand, Gavin Mcinnes liked the piece. On the other hand, Ross douthat was opposed.
― rap steve gadd (D-40), Wednesday, 18 June 2014 16:12 (nine years ago) link
― chinavision!, Wednesday, June 18, 2014 7:42 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Yeah this was my line of thinking. I don't need the writer to hold my hand on whose quotes are dumb and whose aren't when it seems self evident to me
― rap steve gadd (D-40), Wednesday, 18 June 2014 16:14 (nine years ago) link
http://racked.com/uploads/MarthaStewartTerryRichardson_2014_7.jpg
― the one where, as balls alludes (Eazy), Thursday, 31 July 2014 20:24 (nine years ago) link
Just wait until you see the subsequent photos in that series.
― Kool-Ranch! flavor Kool-Aid® drink mix (Old Lunch), Thursday, 31 July 2014 20:38 (nine years ago) link
One leg in the air, posing with a jar of peanut butter. (spoiler)
― the one where, as balls alludes (Eazy), Thursday, 31 July 2014 21:54 (nine years ago) link