Excelsior the book

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (832 of them)
I hope.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:46 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm not upset at how this would affect me personally of course but I don't use my real name in any way shape or form on here. So it's totally understandable and completely OTFM to be pissed about it if your real name is used on here and what you're saying is being put into book form.

J0hn D, don't flee...the book won't happen now, it's all good...

Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:46 (nineteen years ago) link

I wish, but I sort of doubt it.

x-post

Leon Czolgosz (Nicole), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:46 (nineteen years ago) link

'The artist formerly known as J0hn Darnie11e' = TAFKAJD

Momus (Momus), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:47 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, alright: Tep, your argument seems to be that a CafePress book is inherently "not really a book", in the same way that a mix CD made for a friend is different from a commercial CD made for all comers. I disagree.

Casuistry (Chris P), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:50 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh geez, Tep, trust me: I don't think this has made a whit of concrete difference either. But it makes a great deal of symbolic difference, and that's exactly why we've lost John. I doubt there was anything ill-intentioned about Mark did, but it's nevertheless stupid and sets a really, really dangerous precedent. Which is why I wish you weren't defending it as not-really-that-horrible --- nobody should ever get the impression that this kind of thing is even close to okay.

I can't agree that it sets a precedent, because I can't believe it's the first time. The first time we know about it? Seems like it. The first time it's happened to ILX specifically? Could be. (Although wasn't there something about an ILB thread being reprinted in a newspaper? I could be misremembering.)

People keep bringing up J0hn as though his threat to leave were the whole issue here, and for the most part I haven't talked about that at all -- it's his choice, and I don't see why anything I'd say would make any difference. I started out trying just to figure out what, exactly, people were uncomfortable with or angry about. If we want to set a precedent, shouldn't it to make it clear what the community's okay with and what it isn't?

(Every time I hit Submit there are new posts! I may never see any of you again.)

ost of x-posts. And Tep, much as I like you I have to say fuckyou to the idea that you can label someone's objections to stuff like this "silly." This is like shouting-out-of-cars all over again: you can't do rights-infringing shit to people and then call them crybabies when they'd prefer you not to.

I was on the other side for shouting-out-of-cars, though. (Well, one of the other sides ... oh, let's not bring it all back up.)

You can object to my using the word "silly," and that's fine, but c'mon, we don't need to get into the "you have the right to do X and I have the right to think Y about you doing X, which triggers your right to think Z about my actually saying Y about your X..." Somebody started singing it not knowing what it was, etc.

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:51 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't care what it is, it just seems like there is a silent code of ILX ethics that would imply that someone should ask first before doing something like this.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:51 (nineteen years ago) link

also, xpost

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:52 (nineteen years ago) link

There's also an EXPLICIT code, namely the FAQ excerpt quoted WAAAAAAY up at the beginning of this thread.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:52 (nineteen years ago) link

um, true!

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:53 (nineteen years ago) link

Tep, your argument seems to be that a CafePress book is inherently "not really a book", in the same way that a mix CD made for a friend is different from a commercial CD made for all comers. I disagree.

That's not the sum of my argument, but sure, a CafePress isn't inherently a book the way something published by a professional publisher is. A publisher might use CafePress, but when I put my cookbook through there, for instance, it doesn't have an ISBN number, it can't be ordered by anyone not looking for it, it isn't listed on Amazon, it can't be special-ordered somewhere, etc., etc.

I don't know if I'd say it's the same as the difference between a mix CD and a commercially produced CD, but it's a major difference. If there wasn't, I'd be a published cookbook author.

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:53 (nineteen years ago) link

'(Although wasn't there something about an ILB thread being reprinted in a newspaper? I could be misremembering.)'

summarize a book in 25 words, I think. But the diff here is that its an ilxor, on the other hand, the newspaper person should also know abt copyright.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:54 (nineteen years ago) link

I wouldn't rule out the possibility that the newspaper person emailed and asked the quoted people, even!

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:55 (nineteen years ago) link

Someone else had better buy a copy, or Mandee's will be worth millions someday.

xpost ISBN and Amazon don't get to decide what a "book" is or not! Many of my favorite books don't have ISBN's and aren't on Amazon, that's the whole idea behind "small press"! And I'm pretty sure most bookstores won't special order something that doesn't have an ISBN anyway.

Casuistry (Chris P), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:56 (nineteen years ago) link

Okay, let me suggest something. What about if Mark makes a promise not to sell his book to anyone who isn't a logged-in ILX regular? And what if he puts a limit of, say 100 copies on his run?

Lemme suggest something better: how about ILX regulars just print out threads they think are funny to keep for themselves? It's not difficult.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:56 (nineteen years ago) link

As far as I know it didn't happen (talked abt this at a FAP), but I might be wrong.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:57 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost - even better: print up what you think is funny at work without your boss seeing!

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:57 (nineteen years ago) link

The newspaper person, as I recall, did not e-mail anyone.

Casuistry (Chris P), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:57 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, the reason I'm avoiding the issue of legality is because I don't think it's cut and dried, but I also don't think either "he shouldn't do it, it's illegal" or "what's the problem, it was perfectly legal" would solve anything. So ultimately, the legality just doesn't matter very much.

(Chris, for heaven's sake, I'm both an author and an editor in the small press. We aren't going to have an argue about the innate essence of bookness. You can feel free to alone.)

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:58 (nineteen years ago) link

Ha, "have an argue." NEW ORLEANS I MISS YOU YOU LIVE IN MY MOUTH NOW.

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:59 (nineteen years ago) link

The real problem is just an ILXor to ILXor one, in my opinion, though the legality issue is obviously involved here as well.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:00 (nineteen years ago) link

If we wanted to add to Pitchfork's woes, we could sue them for quoting us (unattributed) in their >coverage of Morrissey's remarks about Reagan / Bush:

'Webboard comments have ranged from anti-European ("More tastelessness and idiocy from across the Atlantic") to mildly amused ("Somebody had to say it") to vehement agreement ("George W. Bush should die in a hotel fire in Birmingham, wrapped in sheets gritty with Mr Kipling crumbs") since the incident.'

All three comments, unattributed, came from one ILM thread, and the third is mine... But it's a parody paraphrase of a comment Morrissey himself made about Brett Anderson. So, if the lawyers had their way, we could sue Pitchfork, Morrissey could sue me, Bush could join him in a class action, Brett Anderson could sue Morrissey, Bush could invade Highgate, Ned could lock every thread on ILM, and so on and so on. Only the lawyers would benefit, and in the end only three vultures would be left alive on earth. (Cue TAFKAJD to say 'Momus, don't be disrespecting vultures. They are noble animals.')

Momus (Momus), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:04 (nineteen years ago) link

I think this is being slightly blown out of proportion. No one who isn't part of ILx would want this bloody thing, much less know about it. Do I think it would have been a good idea to say 'hey, I'm thinking about doing this' rather than 'here look, I've done it'? Sure. However, it didn't happen that way, and mark said himself, at the very beginning of this thread: [b]asically, the same rule applies: If any contributor objects then I shall withdraw it. People have objected, I imagine when he sees this, he will withdraw it. Can we collectively un-wad our panties now and go about the rest of the day?*

*This is not to say I don't think some of you have very valid arguments - it IS, rather, to say that he said if people said no that he'd get rid of it, people have said no, and now he'll get rid of it. Why waste the time and energy on something which has practically already been solved?

luna (luna.c), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:06 (nineteen years ago) link

CAFEPRESS.COM: KILLS ILX DEAD

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:08 (nineteen years ago) link

I find it entertainingly ironic that this thread is a far more beefy read than any of those threads in Excelsior.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:10 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh my god, making this thread into a book would be ultrameta.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:11 (nineteen years ago) link

And also a really bad idea.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:11 (nineteen years ago) link

Making it into pulp would be more fun, though.

Leon Czolgosz (Nicole), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:11 (nineteen years ago) link

you guys do realize that about 1000000000x more people have the ability to read EVERYTHING YOU EVER WROTE TO ILX every day all day, right?

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:12 (nineteen years ago) link

CLEAR THE FLOOR! SHIFT CHANGE!

Thread's done, make way for the people to comment on the thread now.

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:12 (nineteen years ago) link

i mean, i would smack mark on principle if the thing actually got published, but jesus.

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:12 (nineteen years ago) link

We should start linking to that shooter-dot-com NY photographer now.

Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:13 (nineteen years ago) link

I have a sneaky suspicion that I am not getting my fucking book now.

Homosexual II, Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:14 (nineteen years ago) link

you could print the fucking threads off at the library for cheaper than 18 bucks

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:16 (nineteen years ago) link

who reads book anymore anyways?

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:17 (nineteen years ago) link

ahahhaha, book is bad.

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:18 (nineteen years ago) link

Library? Huh?

Homosexual II, Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:18 (nineteen years ago) link

strongo otm 1000000000x people-wise and smacking-wise

CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:18 (nineteen years ago) link

I have the perfect way to get J0hn back. I'm just going to post what I think he'd have said on every thread, until he can't contain himself any longer and storms back in saying 'THAT IS NOT WHAT I THINK ABOUT HEIDEGGER YOU FUCK!'

Momus (Momus), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:21 (nineteen years ago) link

hahaha momus and j0hn fights are the best

artdamages (artdamages), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:22 (nineteen years ago) link

I keep hoping and praying for the Mountain Goats/Momus tour.

Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:23 (nineteen years ago) link

Worlds would implode.

Leon Czolgosz (Nicole), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:24 (nineteen years ago) link

this is one of the saddest aspects of J0hn leaving, really, Momus threads will become so much less interesting...

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:27 (nineteen years ago) link

Unless he really gets into this playing J0hn thing and carries on both ends of the argument himself, and becomes completely unhinged.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:28 (nineteen years ago) link

Out of curiosity, how does anyone (like, umm, Tep) think there's any way to fudge this, legality-wise? Reprinting, without permission, any substantive portion of a copyrighted work just isn't allowed; especially when it's then made available for sale. There are a lot of things -- brief quotes, attributed chunks, criticism, parody, &c -- that are fair use, but printing up hundreds of pages of copyrighted material and putting a price tag on it seems pretty clearly indefensible to me, legally speaking.

Jess, the key part of your sentence = "on ILX." We are all of us aware that loads of people can read what we write on ILX. Some of us would prefer to state very clearly, right now and for future reference, that we do not necessarily wish that material to be reproduced outside the place where we originally put it. Especially for sale.

(I've just remembered something that saddens me: J0hn actually did this same thing once, didn't he? Posting an ILX thread over to LP2J and then coming back to ask if anyone minded.)

nabiscothingy, Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:29 (nineteen years ago) link

now THAT would be greatness; fragmentation of the self ahoy (Momus do you like Pessoa?)

(xpost w/ nabisco)

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:30 (nineteen years ago) link

are you kidding? by the end of the year, momus and gareth will be living at john's house: keeping him up by skating and listening to noize. this is just the beginning. there has to be some pics of john at the upland skatepark from wayback.

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:30 (nineteen years ago) link

nitsuh i understand that, but i have a feeling what's underpinning most people's negative reaction to the book is not a feeling they're being swindled out of money that should "rightfully" be theirs or whatever, but that they just don't want ilx stuff to "leave the internet" for whatever reason.

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:32 (nineteen years ago) link

Momus do you like Pessoa?

He is merely one of my 83 identities.

Momus (Momus), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:33 (nineteen years ago) link

Sorry, 'he is merely 83 of my 83 identities'.

Momus (Momus), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:33 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.