What You Get for ... $775,000

^My parent's house had one for years... mormons arrived despite. Basically their train of thought, after reading the sign, goes "CHALLENGE ACCEPTED".

cody house is straight up grotesque

― ice cr?m, Friday, January 7, 2011 10:03 AM

srsly

cody house architect:

http://sarafine.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/devendrabanhartb.jpg

i dont really like any of these houses this time tbh, woodstock master bath looks p pleasant tho

alameda one is ok

yeah also alameda's climate/location beats woodstock

alameda is charming but kinda the burbs so i dunno abt that

Alameda sits adjacent to the Oakland Airport which is rad if you're into jet-noise.

and who isnt to be frank

orig thread

Wonder how much the $700k homes in the OG thread are appraissed for now...

http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/1109-N-Rodney-St-Wilmington-DE-19806/72955676_zpid/

Whoops.

-$100k in 19 months then off the market

http://blog.getrealinontario.com/media/users/jody/bubly.jpg

oh well just rent til the market improves nbd wha whaaa

The Pueblo in NM is down to $593K asking price:

http://www.trulia.com/property/1058457669-10-Dusty-Trail-Dr-Placitas-NM-87043

that Alameda one is just my style, cozy.

Alameda. Craftsman 4 Lyfe.

Cody is a fun rodeo town.

Check http://www.primelocation.com/ for some nonsense housing and prices.

Automatic thread bump. This poll is closing tomorrow.

the exterior shot of the cody WYO place reminds me of the bluth house

think I would go fo alameda, I would get freaked out by having these floor to ceiling windows that looked out into...the vast desert...

three great, great homes. but i think i'd have to factor in the community. not sure precisely where the NY home is located in the state, but i think the CA home's proximity to SF makes that the choice for me.

incidentally 775K for those homes is -- even in this market -- phenomenal.

love Alameda, but I'd try to brighten up the interior - it takes skill, but I've seen some really well-done homes mixing Crafstman and later modernism

The Cody house would be bitching just because it backs up to a mountain, which equals shooting range to me.

I wouldn't mind summers in Wyoming -- I drove through the state once on the first of August and froze my ass off when we stopped for gas.

don't care for the wyoming house. it's nice and i love the spaciousness, but there's a cartoon western rusticity that grates. plus i'm almost certain i wouldn't care to live in/near cody, WY, so the house itself is beside the point anyway.

both of the others are gorgeous. prefer the woodstock setting (8 acres of woods!), but i'm a west coaster, so alameda sounds great. alameda house does pose obstacles in terms of the dark, woody interior - milo z OTM there. beautiful, but not exactly to my taste . wouldn't want to fuck with it, but nor would i feel entirely trapped by the period and style in deciding how to actually live in it. love the kitchen. then again, love the bath in woodstock. hard to call...

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

would live in these 3 tbh altho the florida one is a little too florida or something

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/02/23/greathomesanddestinations/20110223wyg_ss.html?ref=greathomesanddestinations

All three of those houses on the original post look kinda give me the creeps, they look like sets for poltergeist films or where Whitley Strieber hung out when he was 'abducted'

these do tend to be exclusively drawn from a pool of:

chicago apartments
upstate newyork hideaways
eccentric tucson terracotta clad bungalows
and porched florida playhouses

Austin house does a good job of balancing Craftsman cottage style with modern. I'd still probably strip all the wood and go lighter, though. (WTF at that place going for almost a half-mil in Austin? Real estate prices jumped since the last time I knew anyone shopping down there, I guess.)
Chicago condo is nice, but the kitchen is out of place.
Florida house is Florida-y.

http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2012/03/11/greathomesanddestinations/20120311-WYG.html#1
pretty good one

Vermont is sooooo huge for $1.6 mil. Venice looks like it should be half that. San Antonio looks about right for the price, but I don't like it.

I'm surprised the San Antonio house is as old as it is too.

Venice house is dope

http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2013/12/12/greathomesanddestinations/20131212-GH-WYG.html

this week is like the ur-what-you-get-for in showcasing i) too much wood ii) it looks like they shoot porn there & iii) why can i only realistically imagine this place as the scene of some kind of bloody, domestic Capotian carnage happening

I think the Houston house itself is the best of the three. I don't really like the style of the stuff in it, but sweet solarium. The first one does creep me out a little. I hate vaulted ceiling bedrooms, and it looks more like a lodge than a home.

And the third one is just boring and ugly and I can't even believe it's over 1 million.

That first one has a nice exterior and great location and then goddamn the ugliest fucking interior ever. Those floors look terrible. Sure, wide planks if you want to look vintage but they weren't making floors out of 1x12s.

Houston is a malarial swamp and that interior looks like a modernist McMansion in California. The solarium is a nice idea, except that you could only use it for 3 months/year in Houston.

Fake Spanish colonial is NAGL

i wish to die in the california:

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/21/realestate/650000-homes-in-california-florida-and-montana.html?ref=realestate#

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/overseas-property/property-51135473.html