The Hobbit films, previously to be directed by Guillermo del Toro and now to be directed by Peter Jackson again.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1313 of them)

whoa, didnt know andrew sullivan was gonna be in this

max, Friday, 11 February 2011 16:26 (thirteen years ago) link

three weeks pass...

Via Ian McKellen's blog: http://www.mckellen.com/cinema/hobbit-movie/110308.htm

I've seen Bilbo — in three dimensions.

I was visiting old friends in the Stone Street offices and heard Martin Freeman was just round the corner by the permanent greenscreen, done up as Bilbo, testing his costume in front of the 3D cameras. Indeed, there he was in the open air, mostly oblivious to the camera, though turning this way and that as required. Martin improvised a hobbity gait, padding back and forth, testing his big hairy Hobbit feet, pointy ears and little tum.

Beneath the shade of a tent, in a sun hat, Andrew Lesnie was remotely controlling the two lenses within the mighty camera which digitally records in 3D. His screen showed the familiar 2D image but next to it, above the director's chair, was a large colour screen in full magical three dimensions, much as it will appear in the cinema — courtesy of the spy-glasses that transform the blurred outlines onscreen to the high definition exactitude of the 3D effect.

Ian Curtis danced like a tortured chicken DO U SEE (Phil D.), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 15:00 (thirteen years ago) link

oh man

FUCK 3D

sean gramophone, Wednesday, 9 March 2011 17:06 (thirteen years ago) link

goddamn you Avatar so much to answer for

'what are you, the Hymen Protection League of America?' (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 17:12 (thirteen years ago) link

i have no desire to see any movie in 3D but how much does shooting it that way effect (or dim) the visuals if you're watching it in 2D (in a regular theater or at home later)?

JaySeanLilWayne (some dude), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 17:15 (thirteen years ago) link

"the spy-glasses"

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 9 March 2011 19:19 (thirteen years ago) link

Well to me it suggests that instead of shooting the film to make the best 2D movie they possibly can, they will be splitting their attention between two different formats, and possibly with an edge to 3D gimmicks.

sean gramophone, Wednesday, 9 March 2011 19:28 (thirteen years ago) link

"I've seen Bilbo — in three dimensions."

This statement seems so dirty to me...

Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 19:48 (thirteen years ago) link

Could it be that people aren't going out to see movies at the rate they used to unless they are 3D IMAX MEGABLOCKBUSTERS?

That's my guess.

Dear Caroline, I miss you terribly. The time has come to put ours (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 19:59 (thirteen years ago) link

People want to see those 1D blockbuster stories in 3D!

StanM, Wednesday, 9 March 2011 20:03 (thirteen years ago) link

so can we talk for a second about how he was watching Martin Freeman live in costume doing motion capture work and that's not the part he's talking about re: "I saw him in 3D"

ancient, but very sexy (DJP), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 20:04 (thirteen years ago) link

He saw Martin in reality and Bilbo on screen in 3D is how I understood it?

StanM, Wednesday, 9 March 2011 20:10 (thirteen years ago) link

one month passes...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfesknLk5uI

StanM, Thursday, 14 April 2011 14:52 (thirteen years ago) link

This is the first truly exciting thing I've seen about The Hobbit in a loooonnnggg time.

I'm totally psyched now and I think Peter Jackson as director is great move.

Moodles, Thursday, 14 April 2011 14:59 (thirteen years ago) link

April 1st lol @ http://www.mckellen.com/cinema/hobbit-movie/blog.htm

StanM, Thursday, 14 April 2011 15:02 (thirteen years ago) link

Surprised no-one posted about the 48 frames per second thing. Sounds much more interesting than it being in 3D.

nate woolls, Thursday, 14 April 2011 15:02 (thirteen years ago) link

I'd like to see a comparison 24/25 fps vs 48 fps because I'm not sure what to think. If it were such an improvement, wouldn't they've been shooting at 48 for years already?

StanM, Thursday, 14 April 2011 15:15 (thirteen years ago) link

can the human eye tell much difference?

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Thursday, 14 April 2011 15:20 (thirteen years ago) link

"Dear Mr. Lucas. Please take note.... ehem..

REAL FUCKING SETS!!!!

Thank you for your time.

aegisgfx 1 hour ago 5 "

not_goodwin, Thursday, 14 April 2011 15:32 (thirteen years ago) link

It'll look a lot more like video. x-post

Melissa W, Thursday, 14 April 2011 15:34 (thirteen years ago) link

martin freeman doing well for the ol' Postwar British Comedy scoreboard between arthur dent and bilbo. he should go oscar with money or something.

difficult listening hour, Thursday, 14 April 2011 19:10 (thirteen years ago) link

(totally looking forward to this though)

difficult listening hour, Thursday, 14 April 2011 19:12 (thirteen years ago) link

xpost

Let's not forget that he's Dr. Watson too!

Moodles, Thursday, 14 April 2011 21:37 (thirteen years ago) link

one month passes...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-13599286

Latham Green, Tuesday, 31 May 2011 14:26 (twelve years ago) link

Sir Ian McKellen and Elijah Wood will reprise their roles as Gandalf the Grey and Frodo respectively.

??? Was Frodo even born during the events of Hobbit? Or will the movies include an epilogue with Frodo or something?

Tuomas, Monday, 6 June 2011 13:11 (twelve years ago) link

Yeah some sort of framing thing.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 6 June 2011 13:24 (twelve years ago) link

I think Frodo is seen during a song and dance number with Smaug called "Don't be takin' my treasure/My precious Ring(reprise)"

Latham Green, Monday, 6 June 2011 13:27 (twelve years ago) link

There's gonna be a heck of a lot padding in these things

Number None, Monday, 6 June 2011 13:42 (twelve years ago) link

please God no long drawn out scenes with enya in the background and Hobbits sniffling and hugging

Latham Green, Monday, 6 June 2011 13:46 (twelve years ago) link

two weeks pass...

http://www.ew.com/ew/gallery/0,,20504849,00.html#20980350

Kim, Thursday, 23 June 2011 15:26 (twelve years ago) link

two weeks pass...

^ dwarves, not Hobbits, obv

StanM, Thursday, 7 July 2011 17:48 (twelve years ago) link

Ugh.

EZ Snappin, Thursday, 7 July 2011 17:48 (twelve years ago) link

So, in this period of Middle Earth, dwarves are made of plastic?

Michael Bay, CEO of Transformers (Phil D.), Thursday, 7 July 2011 17:49 (twelve years ago) link

They're related to garden gnomes.

EZ Snappin, Thursday, 7 July 2011 17:49 (twelve years ago) link

nice to see he's using a lighter touch this time. subtly done, those plastic midgets

remy bean, Thursday, 7 July 2011 17:53 (twelve years ago) link

god i need to remind myself to stop opening up "anticipating" threads

☂ (max), Thursday, 7 July 2011 18:05 (twelve years ago) link

haha max

Ayatollah Colm Meaney (Princess TamTam), Thursday, 7 July 2011 18:45 (twelve years ago) link

is this whole movie gonna be short people? if so they should only charge half price.

remy bean, Thursday, 7 July 2011 18:49 (twelve years ago) link

quarter price, since they're gonna split this movie into two parts

skinny arbuckle (latebloomer), Thursday, 7 July 2011 20:03 (twelve years ago) link

I had troll dolls that looked more convincingly human.

online pinata store (Nicole), Thursday, 7 July 2011 20:13 (twelve years ago) link

but they're not human, they're dwarfs, do you see???

not bulimic, just a cat (James Morrison), Thursday, 7 July 2011 23:27 (twelve years ago) link

wasn't the cartoon hobbit only 1 1/2 hours? i thought they captured everything necessary in that, and even padded it with songs. i totally don't get why this is gonna be 2 movies, and am a bit worried now!

messiahwannabe, Saturday, 9 July 2011 05:56 (twelve years ago) link

Entirely my concern! Should be a nice lighthearted prologue to the overblown Lord of the Rings.

Inevitable stupid samba mix (chap), Saturday, 9 July 2011 06:51 (twelve years ago) link

even the flimsiest novella can be adapted for the screen into two 3-hour movies -- the material is there, they may as well shoot as much of it as they want

some dude, Saturday, 9 July 2011 10:12 (twelve years ago) link

But they are putting in loads of stuff that isn't in the book.

Number None, Saturday, 9 July 2011 11:16 (twelve years ago) link

eh, i kinda disagree. i mean i'd be happy to be proved wrong by the movie itself - if it's 6 hours of film in 2 sittings and it all rocks, ok, great, i take it all back! but i feel like the hobbit's a fairly concise story, and filling it out into 2 long movies is kinda stretching it out more than is strictly necessary. i mean, are they really gonna put Gandalf's Adventures Somewhere Completely Different in the middle of the frikkin hobbit? frankly i'm worried.

the lord of the rings was overblown, but that's kinda it's charm. and yet how muchm of the books (not to mention filmed footage) did they have to excise to make it a compelling narrative? don't get me wrong, i'm not complaining, i thought the movies were great - enjoyed every minute. but they really couldn't have been a millisecond longer without starting to bore me.

the hobbit needs no new material - it's perfectly written to be transformed to a single feature length film. god, is this the studios pressuring (or even just encouraging/indulging) pj to make 2 movies instead of one, just to automagically double the ticket sales? ugh.

messiahwannabe, Saturday, 9 July 2011 11:38 (twelve years ago) link

(xpost 1 up)

messiahwannabe, Saturday, 9 July 2011 11:38 (twelve years ago) link

<already firing up final cut to make a "phantom edit" of bloated 6 hour hobbit epic fail>

messiahwannabe, Saturday, 9 July 2011 11:42 (twelve years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.