Going To Law School

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1957 of them)
gabnebb stop being an old grandpa! i am just saying it's like, hard to tell. i don't know what i'm supposed to do. i know any tard can beat me on doing exams even if i read more books.

nazi bikini (harbl), Wednesday, 23 August 2006 19:59 (seventeen years ago) link

do what? eat fruits?

i think it is better for me to think people aren't that smart. because i think i'm really smart and when they tell me everyone is just as smart as me i go UH OH but as long as i think they aren't that smart (like when they are acting like bros and saying "hey, bro, you gonna get drunk this weekend?" "yeeeahh bro!" "alright, bro!") i feel ok. i should go do work now bye

nazi bikini (harbl), Wednesday, 23 August 2006 20:05 (seventeen years ago) link

underestimate bros at yr peril

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 23 August 2006 20:07 (seventeen years ago) link

let's say i want to be a labor lawyer (partly because i care about the workers but partly because i would make slightly more money at it (right?) than poverty lawyering, which i am also interested in but i have mad loans to pay off and can't make it on 30k/year). so they said you can just take whatever classes you're interested in so you wouldn't have to just take only stuff related to whatever kind of law you want to go into. is that really true?

Someone may have addressed this, but... I, too, am on track to become a labor lawyer. If your school offers any labor/employment law classes, take them. I work at a union-side law firm right now and my hiring was contingent on my having taken labor law. You aren't foreclosed from being a labor attorney if you don't take labor and employment classes, but it will make you more attractive to potential employers. The most important thing, I think, is to get some experience, either working for a labor law firm or in some sort of public interest worker rights capacity, presuming you want to work union/worker side.

Oh and also? Labor lawyers don't make much more than public interest attorneys. At least the good guys don't. Sorry.

Also, my philosphy for second and third year was to take classes that a) were labor and employment related and b) interesting because look, I'm tired of law school and I will not sit in a class of 100 people to listen to someone drone on about secured transactions, nor will I read because just thinking the words "secured transactions" gives me a headahce. A class of 13 people discussing public sector labor law or critical race theory, though? I'm totally into it. Given how stupid expensive law school is, I don't want to waste my money taking a class that I won't attend or care about. But that's just me.

Party Time Country Female (pullapartgirl), Wednesday, 23 August 2006 20:09 (seventeen years ago) link

Also, when those bros come to school in suits on OCI days you will hate yourself, but that's okay because you're better than they are in every way that matters and most OCI firms are management side and you didn't want to work for them anway.

Party Time Country Female (pullapartgirl), Wednesday, 23 August 2006 20:11 (seventeen years ago) link

don't worry i will overestimate the other 99% of things

xpost i didn't think they made a whole lot either. the idea of secured transactions makes me want to PUKE but i am all over critical race theory. i guess we'll seeeeeeeee

nazi bikini (harbl), Wednesday, 23 August 2006 20:13 (seventeen years ago) link

that's a good approach if you know you want to do labor law and understand and accept that you won't make much money. it's not if you don't know what you want to do and might want to make more money. a different kind of employer might not look kindly on a transcript full of public sector law and critical race theory. my approach was relatively general/academic and maybe i over-recommend that, and admittedly i took the basic stuff you need for biglaw, but if you don't know what you want, i'd think you want to sample a bit to figure it out/hedge your bets.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 23 August 2006 20:15 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh and also? Labor lawyers don't make much more than public interest attorneys. At least the good guys don't. Sorry.

I should clarify - at least not to start. You can make like $70k once you make partner or make your way up to lead in-house counsel for a union (a strong union at least, not if you work for like, the Wobblies). But starting salaries for union side attorneys in Chicago run from $35 - $50k, which, with $150k in debt or thereabouts is kind of alarming. If your school has any kind of LRAP, you might be better off doing public interest law for the required period of time. You can do employment-related public interest stuff if you want to move into labor law when you meet the requirements for loan forgiveness.

Party Time Country Female (pullapartgirl), Wednesday, 23 August 2006 20:18 (seventeen years ago) link

xpost - yeah, I went to law school to become a union-side labor lawyer so that makes my class and career choices pretty easy. As long as I know a ULP from my asshole and never work for management (union folk are such a suspicious lot!), I should be okay.

Party Time Country Female (pullapartgirl), Wednesday, 23 August 2006 20:23 (seventeen years ago) link

You can make more as a paralegal.

cousin larry bundgee (bundgee), Wednesday, 23 August 2006 20:29 (seventeen years ago) link

you can also go biglaw out of the box and make $100K+ for a year or two before doing something else.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 23 August 2006 20:31 (seventeen years ago) link

oh my, your law is so big

cousin larry bundgee (bundgee), Wednesday, 23 August 2006 20:33 (seventeen years ago) link

you can also go biglaw out of the box and make $100K+ for a year or two before doing something else.

Yes. Career choices are as varied as those who would make them.

Party Time Country Female (pullapartgirl), Wednesday, 23 August 2006 20:40 (seventeen years ago) link

that's not a career choice. are you saying that doing that would foreclose you from doing something else?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 23 August 2006 20:41 (seventeen years ago) link

lol, woman i know made partner and rakes in $2MM now..

mentalismé (sanskrit), Wednesday, 23 August 2006 20:51 (seventeen years ago) link

that's not a career choice. are you saying that doing that would foreclose you from doing something else?

Nope.

Party Time Country Female (pullapartgirl), Wednesday, 23 August 2006 20:55 (seventeen years ago) link

mmmmm going to law school. i'll only be going to law school for about another 9 weeks or so. yay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

gem (trisk), Thursday, 24 August 2006 03:30 (seventeen years ago) link

one month passes...
Ok y'all, so I'm taking the LSAT on Saturday. I don't think I really want to go to law school but let me explain my situation and ask a question or two:

I have mediocre grades, but will likely score in the low to mid 170s on the LSAT and have a few years of work experience. I'm pretty handy with the essays and have a couple of good recs lined up. So I know I can get into a fairly high-level school if not top 10. I'm not wildly enthused about lawyering and the law, but I do have a law-related job and sometimes find it relatively interesting.

I'm not a hugely driven person and would generally like to have time for other things in my life beside my job - particularly music, but I would still like some challenge in my life.

So the question is, with a degree from a top-notch, if not top-10, law school, is it realistic to expect to be able to find a good-paying (like at high-five/low-six figure), moderately interesting that isn't insanely demanding? Or is this just a fantasy?

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 02:44 (seventeen years ago) link

(And is it realistic to think I can write a good essay when I can't even seem to put a sentence together? Gah!)

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 02:45 (seventeen years ago) link

this may be of limited relevance to you, but in australia that would be completely realistic... as we are in the middle of a resource/property development boom and have a strong economy, there is a trend of late for people to go 'in-house' to mining/accounting/finance/development companies rather than to top/middle tier law firms (being in-house counsel generally means not having to make billing targets and therefore not 'insanely demanding'). I don't know how this compares in the US, but it seems likely it would be quite similar? Here, you could also consider that many small boutique firms practise in specialised areas of law and also don't have the same pressure of billable hours as the big firms. Also, in Australia there is the option of working for a govt agency - again no billing targets, reasonably good wage though nowhere near as much as the private sector. easily $60k US though.

however, i reckon it would be pretty hard to get through a law degree, particularly at a top 10 school where the student body might be highly competitive, if you weren't really into it... and if the US legal education system is anything like Australia, with more graduates than legal grad positions, poor marks in your law degree heavily restricts your choices about where you go after you graduate.

gem (trisk), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 07:20 (seventeen years ago) link

Why do you want to go to law school A-ron? I'm guessing the only reason is because you think it is the ticket to making $80 or 90K. There are way better ways to make money than to pursue a degree (and resulting career) that you don't really have a burning interest for. I'd say your expectations seem a bit high as well.

don weiner (don weiner), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 12:45 (seventeen years ago) link

So the question is, with a degree from a top-notch, if not top-10, law school, is it realistic to expect to be able to find a good-paying (like at high-five/low-six figure), moderately interesting that isn't insanely demanding? Or is this just a fantasy?

My understanding is that the "isn't insanely demanding" bit is a total fantasy.

Young Fresh Danny D (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 12:48 (seventeen years ago) link

Would the diploma be worth the debt?

The Bearnaise-Stain Bears (Rock Hardy), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 12:50 (seventeen years ago) link

The lawyers I know who are reasonable happy with their jobs and don't find them insanely demanding are NOT the same lawyers who make mad cash. The mad cash lawyers rarely have lives that I would find tolerable, much less enjoyable.

I can't imagine looking myself in the mirror every morning if I was still in the IP division of a big pharma company. Soul-deadening stuff, for real.

quincie (quincie), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 12:54 (seventeen years ago) link

xp that's exactly what my sis is doing :( (well, maybe...she's doing patent law, in biotech)

and will be starting (STARTING) at 135k when she graduates next year from the U of MN. debt won't be an issue.

law school is insanely demanding, yes, but if you suck it up and work for the Man, you'll make bags of money and pay of your education fairly quickly. alternately, a law degree doesn't necessarily mean actually working for a law firm, or even in law. loads of people get law degrees and never end up practicing.

(And is it realistic to think I can write a good essay when I can't even seem to put a sentence together? Gah!)

^^^ this could be a problem though. you know that there's, like, a LOT of writing in law school right?

gbx (skowly), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 13:00 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't think I really want to go to law school.

This is enough information for me to say, "Then don't go." But why stop there?

will likely score in the low to mid 170s on the LSAT

How do you know this?

and have a few years of work experience.

Unless it's extremely fascinating, specialized, or famous nobel-prize winning type work experience, this doesn't matter.

So I know I can get into a fairly high-level school if not top 10.

No offense, and I only know you through this website and you seem like a very smart and funny person, but how do you know this? When you are competing for positions in top ten schools are are competing against people with excellent grades, lots of references, and high LSAT scores. Not to mention nepotism and name recognition. You might get in, but unless your recs happen to be tenured professors at said top ten law schools or there is a library on campus named after your father, there is really no guarantee about this.

I'm not wildly enthused about lawyering and the law

Then, seriously, do not go to law school.

but I do have a law-related job and sometimes find it relatively interesting.

Your law-related job is not the same as law school or being a lawyer, even if you're doing paralegal work.

I'm not a hugely driven person . . . So the question is, with a degree from a top-notch, if not top-10, law school, is it realistic to expect to be able to find a good-paying (like at high-five/low-six figure), moderately interesting that isn't insanely demanding? Or is this just a fantasy?

You've got three possible paths going to law school: 1) bust your ass night and day to put yourself in the top 10%, get on law review, get summer associate positions at big firms, get involved in lots of extra curriculars of whatever sort and basically be the type of go-getter, 80 hour a week-type guy that the $135k/year firms are going to want to hire; 2) do enough work to stay in the top quarter but let your passion for a particular area of law drive you into the types of jobs and activities that are going to make you the happy in your legal career and make considerably less money; 3) slack for three years, hate law school the entire time, wish you'd done something, anything else because now you're looking at triple-digit debt and you have to practice law, and eventually work doing something you really don't care about, which becomes just another daily grind job and isn't making the mega bucks you were hoping for.

The first one is out, because you're not a particularly driven person. The second one is out, because you don't really care about law school or a law job. That leaves number three, and if you have a fairly interesting law-related job right now, why go through the stress and debt of law school only to come out slightly worse off than you are now?

Party Time Country Female (pullapartgirl), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 13:26 (seventeen years ago) link

None of which is to say that you should take the LSATs, see what you get on them, and apply to top ten law schools. If you get in, you can probably go route number three and still get a good job on the strength of your law school alone. But given that law school is basically three years of brutal stress (and then the bar exam! THE BAR EXAM!!!!! ARRHGHGHGGG*) and costs more than single-family homes in most non-urban markets, doing it for any reason other than love of the law is pretty silly.

* Third year law student grappling with the nosy bastards at the character and fitness committee, trying not to think about the two days of essay and bubble testing that await me at the end of July.

Party Time Country Female (pullapartgirl), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 13:29 (seventeen years ago) link

is to say that you shouldn't take the LSATS, that is.

Party Time Country Female (pullapartgirl), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 13:30 (seventeen years ago) link

will likely score in the low to mid 170s on the LSAT

How do you know this?

Well, here I have to defend myself. I have a second job as an LSAT instructor, and I consistently score between 170-175 on practice tests.

Otherwise everything you're telling me sounds about right. Are you in law school now or are you a lawyer? When I explain these things to my wife I'd like to be able to say "A woman on ILX, who does ---, told me."

(And is it realistic to think I can write a good essay when I can't even seem to put a sentence together? Gah!)

^^^ this could be a problem though. you know that there's, like, a LOT of writing in law school right?

-- gbx (polarbea...), September 26th, 2006.

Here I was just referring to my garbled post. Writing is pretty natural for me, actually.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 14:16 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh sorry, I see you mentioned at the end that you're a third-year law student, so nevermind that question.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 14:17 (seventeen years ago) link

mr teeny took path one, he's really ideally suited for law school/big law firm and he's still pretty stressed out. He only had one day this month where he was home after midnight, but I can usually count on one week out of the month where he leaves before me and the kid get up and is home after we go to bed. There's always work on the weekends. It is hard work. But you do get paid well, and thank god because that student loan check is big. And then we get hit with surprises like the TOTALLY VOLUNTARY united way fund drive headed by Important Partner, or a suit blows out etc etc.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 14:27 (seventeen years ago) link

Well, here I have to defend myself. I have a second job as an LSAT instructor, and I consistently score between 170-175 on practice tests.

Okay, that makes sense - and I didn't intend to come across accusatorily, so I'm really sorry if I did. My understanding is that actual LSAT scores remain pretty true to practice test scores. My final score was within one point of the score I consistently got on practice tests.

I'm a third year law student who went back to law school at the ripe old age of 31. I would classify myself as a "number two" above. I spent a brief period of time as a number one and decided that maintaining the necessary level of hard work required to remain in that category would kill me. I'm a passionate labor and employment do-gooder, anyway, and nobody cares about your grades in that field as long as your loyal to the cause. Oh I also go to a second tier law school (I think we're in the 80s or 90s).

Going to law school as an adult, and a married one (I am also married, no kids, three cats) presents a whole different passel of challenges that straight-from-undergrad-ers don't have to worry about over and above the regular difficulties of law school. I'm guessing you've got friends and a social life and hobbies and those will all take a serious hit if you go to law school no matter how hard to try to avoid it. Then there's the sad truth of how completely annoying the majority of your classmates will be just by virtue of their utter lack of life experience... Or maybe that's just me. I am a pretty grumpy old bitch sometimes.

Anyway, my first instinct when someone says they don't care too much about law or being a lawyer but want to go to law school is to dive tackle them out of the way of the onrushing bus because the bottom line is this: law school is three years of intensive study of the law, leading to a job that is fully immersed in the law (with some extremely limited exceptions generally available only to those with outstanding academic performance or an existing network of connections within a specific field). A JD isn't an all-purpose degree. Going to law school without really being interested in the law is like going to a very expensive, difficult, and stressful cooking school without really having any interest in cooking.

Party Time Country Female (pullapartgirl), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 14:30 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, that's the feeling I've been getting. Your advice is much appreciated.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 14:32 (seventeen years ago) link

If you want to go back to school, how about a master's (or a second master's) in something of interest to you? Potentially cheaper and less stressful. When I'm particularly despairing of ever finding a job, passing the bar, working with attorneys for the rest of my life, I comfort myself with the possibility of getting an MLS and leading a quiet life as a research librarian in a law library somewhere, surrounded by books and hushed voices.

It's my happy place.

Party Time Country Female (pullapartgirl), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 14:37 (seventeen years ago) link

I speak with law librarians on the phone a lot. Always sound much nicer and more relaxed than the attorneys I speak with, who leave messages like "I need you to retrieve x file immediately. Please send it to me immediately." Yeah ok dude I have a time machine.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 14:39 (seventeen years ago) link

Going to law med school as an adult, and a married one (I am also married, no kids, three cats) presents a whole different passel of challenges that straight-from-undergrad-ers don't have to worry about over and above the regular difficulties of law med school. I'm guessing you've got friends and a social life and hobbies and those will all take a serious hit if you go to law school no matter how hard to try to avoid it.

This is what I'm worried about. Am I looking at four...no, wait...eigh--twelve years of no hobbies? :/

gbx (skowly), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 14:50 (seventeen years ago) link

You without hobbies = clinically brain dedd. You'll figure it out.

Laurel (Laurel), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 14:55 (seventeen years ago) link

jenny, your advice is so good.
i thought of going to law school right out of undergrad - and got in - but circumstances intervened and i did other things - but my intuition about law school was that it wasn't what i really wanted anyway. so i went on adventures and worked and then went to grad school, which i knew i really wanted to do, and now i am doing things i never thought i'd do (in a great band, making art, reading foucault for pleasure.) go with your gut, man.

rrrobyn, the situation (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 15:36 (seventeen years ago) link

I comfort myself with the possibility of getting an MLS and leading a quiet life as a research librarian in a law library somewhere, surrounded by books and hushed voices.

ahahahahaha

Mary (Mary), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 23:08 (seventeen years ago) link

Quiet, you. Stay out of my happy place.

Party Time Country Female (pullapartgirl), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 23:30 (seventeen years ago) link

Ha, I'm sure it's much less demanding and more pleasant than lawyering, but I just got back from a conference where they outlined a lot of the "challenges" facing law libraries: decreased funding, less need for books (with most sources licensed electronically), and the fact that, often, when you are asked a question, it's really hard, because the person has already checked the obvious places, which is easier to do now. Also academic librarianship (from what I can tell) seems to involve a lot of commitees and schmoozing. But, I've met a lot of people who went to law school and weren't happy with law, got their MLS and have been able to do really well (seemingly) in the academic law library field.

Mary (Mary), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 00:21 (seventeen years ago) link

BTW rabbit, are you by any chance the same rabbitrabbit that posts on JCList? If so, we're practically neighbors.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 00:28 (seventeen years ago) link

how old are you?

cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 00:34 (seventeen years ago) link

26, why?

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 00:36 (seventeen years ago) link

Nope, I don't post on JCLIst. I'm a Chicagoerite.

Party Time Country Female (pullapartgirl), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 01:01 (seventeen years ago) link

just curious. i went to law school at 25. also a drummer in a band, like yourself.

cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 01:01 (seventeen years ago) link

didn't you just get married? if wifey making you do this?

cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 01:02 (seventeen years ago) link

is wifey

cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 01:05 (seventeen years ago) link

Ha.

She's not *making* me do anything, but she keeps saying stuff like "You're so good at this stuff. You love to argue and over-analyze things. Why don't you just do it?" as though it were all as easy as taking the LSAT. So here I am going to ILX for back-up.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 01:09 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.