New Yorker magazine alert thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6075 of them)

$25/year for the last 2 years, suckers

^^^yesss

at some point during the rodrigo rosenberg article i actually wondered if it was leading up to an april fool's joke

mookieproof, Thursday, 7 April 2011 09:43 (thirteen years ago) link

guys, guys - let's not allow a few pieces of meticulously researched and tautly written long-form journalism obscure the reams of smug forgettable shit in this monthly publication

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 7 April 2011 10:28 (thirteen years ago) link

Patricia Marx to thread.

Pop is superior to all other genres (DL), Thursday, 7 April 2011 11:04 (thirteen years ago) link

It's weekly BTW

Pop is superior to all other genres (DL), Thursday, 7 April 2011 11:04 (thirteen years ago) link

haha yes. which is kind of a miracle actually

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 7 April 2011 11:05 (thirteen years ago) link

$25/year for the last 2 years, suckers

Let's poll the subscription options.

Hey Look More Than Five Years Has Passed And You Have A C (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 7 April 2011 12:20 (thirteen years ago) link

I, like everyone else, accumulate daunting piles of New Yorkers, because each issue has so much I want to read. Then I wait for a vacation and bring along five or six issues. They're light and disposable, and I can discard them (or give them away, or leave them behind) wherever I happen to finish them. Perfect for airplanes, waiting rooms and hotels. Each issue is like a great little anthology.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 7 April 2011 13:21 (thirteen years ago) link

guys, guys - let's not allow a few pieces of meticulously researched and tautly written long-form journalism obscure the reams of smug forgettable shit in this monthly publication

Oh, good ol' reliable ilx, always someone coming along to rain on the parade.

'what are you, the Hymen Protection League of America?' (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 7 April 2011 13:51 (thirteen years ago) link

patricia marx writes what like... six articles a year?

the nyer critics are probably 3/4s unbearable but the rest of the stuff is consistently great, incl. talk of the town

ban drake (the rapper) (max), Thursday, 7 April 2011 14:13 (thirteen years ago) link

i've been finding the ny'er amazingly un-smug lately, i guess except for that insane david brooks article that i couldn't even finish.

call all destroyer, Thursday, 7 April 2011 14:28 (thirteen years ago) link

tbh & i say this as a fan i think the NYer house style w/ its long-form pieces is too straight & bland to be "smug"

ban drake (the rapper) (max), Thursday, 7 April 2011 14:35 (thirteen years ago) link

Adam Gopnik's pretty smug but I agree that the house style mostly avoids that pitfall.

Enjoyed the Tunisia feature in the same issue as the Grann one.

Pop is superior to all other genres (DL), Thursday, 7 April 2011 15:03 (thirteen years ago) link

ive given up on "shouts and murmurs"

gr8080, Thursday, 7 April 2011 18:19 (thirteen years ago) link

lioke even if someone who's opinion i respect tells me there's a good one i should read i refuse to on principle

gr8080, Thursday, 7 April 2011 18:19 (thirteen years ago) link

oh yeah haha i forgot about shouts and murmurs in my estimation of the nyers smugness, probably because i never, ever read it

ban drake (the rapper) (max), Thursday, 7 April 2011 18:20 (thirteen years ago) link

basically i check to see if its jack handey and if its not i skip

ban drake (the rapper) (max), Thursday, 7 April 2011 18:20 (thirteen years ago) link

I cannot face shouts & murmurs ever. I also never read the short fiction, cards on table.

What is the Rosenberg story everyone is talking abt? Starting to worry that I misplaced an issue...

the Stars That Play with Laughing Sam's Doink (Jon Lewis), Thursday, 7 April 2011 18:29 (thirteen years ago) link

It's in last week's issue and also online:
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/04/04/110404fa_fact_grann

jaymc, Thursday, 7 April 2011 18:31 (thirteen years ago) link

Oh cool, got that one already, been saving it.

George RR Martin profile in the current ish was hella depressing. Fans are not good people.

the Stars That Play with Laughing Sam's Doink (Jon Lewis), Thursday, 7 April 2011 18:34 (thirteen years ago) link

oh yeah shouts and murmurs blows obv

call all destroyer, Thursday, 7 April 2011 18:36 (thirteen years ago) link

The short fiction is hit or miss, but I liked the Murakami story they re-ran in the Japan issue.

'what are you, the Hymen Protection League of America?' (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 7 April 2011 18:37 (thirteen years ago) link

yeah i read the martin profile last night -- don't know anything about the guy, but yeeesh. his fans! definitely a good book or something to be written (if it hasn't been written already) about modern fandom, and how the internet has mucked everything up.

tylerw, Thursday, 7 April 2011 18:39 (thirteen years ago) link

It's rly rly weird psychologically and the GRRM profile is far from the first time I have noticed it; basically, Fans with a capital F have this weird seething RAGE toward the creators of the narratives they want. Like this impotent rage. The creator(s) don't even have to be late on delivery of new work like GRRM has been, the Fans just are constantly teetering between deification and hatred of those who CONTROL "their" characters. There DOES need to be a new book abt it because the internet has exacerbated it severely.

the Stars That Play with Laughing Sam's Doink (Jon Lewis), Thursday, 7 April 2011 19:27 (thirteen years ago) link

i still read the fiction every week but it's kind of depressing how far its fallen off. i remember back in the early to mid 00's when they had authors like munro, edward jones, murakami, jhumpa lahiri, etc in constant rotation. there's still a quality story now and then but it's much less frequent. i do really like the fiction podcast from the website tho.

Moreno, Thursday, 7 April 2011 20:39 (thirteen years ago) link

http://www.slate.com/id/2290801/

vampire weeknd (cozen), Monday, 11 April 2011 17:20 (thirteen years ago) link

all aboard the grann wagon

ban drake (the rapper) (max), Monday, 11 April 2011 17:29 (thirteen years ago) link

groann

vampire weeknd (cozen), Monday, 11 April 2011 17:34 (thirteen years ago) link

Started Lost City of Z and seriously, crack on paper.

Did anyone else notice one of the entrants to this week's caption contest?

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Saturday, 16 April 2011 22:06 (thirteen years ago) link

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/826480/Photo%20Apr%2019%2C%209%2057%2002%20PM.jpg

from the ipad edition, remnick's latest sounds like a must-read.

joe, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 21:09 (thirteen years ago) link

I feel like there are a few Franzen haters around here, but I'm surprised to find myself enjoying his article about the island, Robin Crusoe, and DFW.

'what are you, the Hymen Protection League of America?' (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 19 April 2011 21:11 (thirteen years ago) link

read that malcolm x thing yesterday. it was aight.

gr8080, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 21:28 (thirteen years ago) link

its just a book review.

gr8080, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 21:28 (thirteen years ago) link

haha joe

ban drake (the rapper) (max), Tuesday, 19 April 2011 21:28 (thirteen years ago) link

xxxp yeah i liked it ok...i generally like franzens fiction but not really his non-fic; he def jazzed it up & had a legit point but i was v much groaning at his blackberry/Blackberry analogy

johnny crunch, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 21:29 (thirteen years ago) link

Did anyone else notice one of the entrants to this week's caption contest?
ha, yeah. gonna assume that it's THE roger ebert?
Franzen essay was excellent despite some of the cringiness.

tylerw, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 21:29 (thirteen years ago) link

Oh yeah, I cringed a couple of times, plus the whole conceit started out a little "oh, poor life of famous author on the road" (not at all to take away from losing a friend) for me, but it was still a good read.

'what are you, the Hymen Protection League of America?' (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 19 April 2011 21:33 (thirteen years ago) link

only so many r eberts in chicago i'd imagine

My bad Van Buren! (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 19 April 2011 21:34 (thirteen years ago) link

ipad app dece?

thetan is cheatin (cozen), Tuesday, 19 April 2011 21:36 (thirteen years ago) link

it is him. he posted about it on his blog: he's been trying to get into the finals round for years and years

they call him (remy bean), Tuesday, 19 April 2011 21:37 (thirteen years ago) link

his caption wasn't that good iirc

tylerw, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 21:38 (thirteen years ago) link

no it wasn't.
cartoon was a pair of people standing in the middle of a wasteland under a mall parking lot sign with an "F" on it and Ebert has the woman saying "Guess which word I'm thinking of now."
har har
video games aren't art btw

My bad Van Buren! (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 19 April 2011 21:40 (thirteen years ago) link

ipad app dece?

― thetan is cheatin (cozen), Tuesday, April 19, 2011 10:36 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

it's ok, pricey, would be better if you got access with a subscription. i just loaded it up to check the price of each issue when i saw that "remnick on remnick" gaffe.

joe, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 21:45 (thirteen years ago) link

"That might play big in Chicago, but the New Yorker has a different set of standards."

xp

Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 21:45 (thirteen years ago) link

"we prefer film critics with senses of humor, ebert. you know, like david denby."

tylerw, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 21:53 (thirteen years ago) link

lol

'what are you, the Hymen Protection League of America?' (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 19 April 2011 22:02 (thirteen years ago) link

tbf anthony lane used to be kind of funny

Number None, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 22:13 (thirteen years ago) link

lane is kinda funny, but i don't think he's that great a film critic

tylerw, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 22:52 (thirteen years ago) link

he's very funny!

horseshoe, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 22:53 (thirteen years ago) link

I haven't actually read a Lane review in a while but some of his takedowns of hollywood blockbusters are classic. It can feel a little cheap though.

Number None, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 22:55 (thirteen years ago) link

whole travel issue was pretty enjoyable imo. the astana and chinese people touring europe articles in particular

dblake (symsymsym), Tuesday, 19 April 2011 23:05 (thirteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.