XTC fans (or non-): possible explanations of their appeal???

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (313 of them)
They're like a pretentious Smashmouth.

CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 27 June 2004 17:08 (nineteen years ago) link

I like the songs that sound most like Smashmouth (the stuff they did when they had a drummer).

CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 27 June 2004 17:09 (nineteen years ago) link

Can I say Smashmouth one more time on this thread? Smashmouth.

CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 27 June 2004 17:09 (nineteen years ago) link

pretentious Smashmouth.

actually Smashmouth can be pretty pretentious too, just these guys got pretentious in a more baroque way. I guess the equasion is XTC - "Sgt. Peppers is the best album ever" + rasp = Smashmouth

CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 27 June 2004 17:11 (nineteen years ago) link

"Jason and the Argonauts" is pastoral-prog dancepunk, 'kay!

I would never consider XTC alongside Gabriel or Bush -- completely different aesthetics going on there. I can never imagine XTC giving off the same air of gravity, seriousness, artiness, or self-importance (note: I love Gabriel and Bush, too) as these two. If you're going to say that Gabriel and Bush are better at being prog (which in your definition seems only to mean being complex and intricate), then there are surely a WHOLE SHITLOAD of artists better than G and B! Same argument defeats your second point about eccentricity, too.

I realize that you're just trying to work out why you don't like them and I respect that, but you're pigeonholing them somewhere they just don't belong. I'd say your second characterization of them (as UK psych-pop/etc.) is much more on-point, but as far as them not being especially energetic or hooky... I can't reach into your ears and take the cotton out from over here! Seriously, though, you should get Black Sea if you want to give them a second chance. That was the album that completely and totally sold me on them, and their other records are easier to understand once you have a basis from which to appreciate their sound and approach.

Clarke B. (Clarke B.), Sunday, 27 June 2004 17:12 (nineteen years ago) link

Also, Partridge is an incredibly inventive and unique guitarist, though he's not flashy about it.

Clarke B. (Clarke B.), Sunday, 27 June 2004 18:32 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, my prog thing on this topic, of course, had to do with what I was defining as "pop-oriented, eccentric studio prog rock done in a New Wave context," not just prog in general.

Basically, what I'm asking is whether or not a part of what XTC fans like about their music is some sense of a perceived prog-ness. By this, I'm referring specifically to complexity in the songwriting, playing, studio arrangements and production, etc. (plus a general sense of eccentricity), as opposed to the prog elements that you bring up (gravity, seriousness, artiness, or self-importance).

Tim Ellison, Sunday, 27 June 2004 19:44 (nineteen years ago) link

Tim, with all due respect, I find a lot of the things you say on ILM kind of curious.

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Sunday, 27 June 2004 20:01 (nineteen years ago) link

Like Richard Nixon, I want to make myself perfectly clear.

No, really...my guess is that it's not the complexity that people like about XTC, but rather their melodicism and sound. The complexity is some sort of icing on the cake?

Tim Ellison, Sunday, 27 June 2004 20:10 (nineteen years ago) link

...for the XTC fan to feed his or her face?

Tim Ellison, Sunday, 27 June 2004 20:12 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm not going to repeat last week's rant, but XTC requires time to settle in. You can't just grab, say, English Settlement and expect it to hit you immediately. You need to give it ~20 listens before it hooks you, but when it does it really does.

Explanations of their appeal? Incredible songwriting, gorgeous lyricism, unmatched consistency.

(I'm Gonna Sit Right Down and) Whittle Away My Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 27 June 2004 22:36 (nineteen years ago) link

Basically, what I'm asking is whether or not a part of what XTC fans like about their music is some sense of a perceived prog-ness. By this, I'm referring specifically to complexity in the songwriting, playing, studio arrangements and production, etc. (plus a general sense of eccentricity), as opposed to the prog elements that you bring up (gravity, seriousness, artiness, or self-importance).

I don't think they're prog (and I like Yes and Floyd, and I don't see any common ground). I like Andy Partridge because he's a fantastic lyricist and writes direct, extremely effective pop songs.

In reference to "Senses Working Overtime" sounding cute: I see your point, and some people I've played XTC for hear an "oompa-loompa" quality in it. I attribute that to a willingness to be totally innocent, even naive, about their subject matter - spring, family, hallucinations, destroying civilization and reverting back to nature - and then giving themselves to it with total exuberance. Peter Gabriel and Kate Bush don't seem like good points of reference for XTC, and even next to a lot of post-punk they're a lot more giddy/innocent sounding.

I'd start with Drums and Wires ('specially "Helicopter," "Real by Reel" and "Scissor Man") or, as mentioned above, Black Sea. English Settlement took a while to settle in with me - now it's about my favorite record ever.

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Monday, 28 June 2004 01:16 (nineteen years ago) link

To be specific: I don't think they have any of the prog elements you list, Tim.

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Monday, 28 June 2004 01:17 (nineteen years ago) link

xtc started as a pop-punk combo, all hurried-up songs, then sometime in the 80s they transformed themselves into what the beatles would have sounded had they continued recording Sgt. Pepper's - type music, mixed with a good dose of Kinks. This last XTC phase managed to get them many fans, especially after Skylarking. Dear God (which was promptly included in the US version of the CD) illustrates this pretty well....So does Oranges and Lemons. So, my theory predicts that all people with a soft spot for the Beatles and the Kinks type of music will migrate to XTC with little pain.

AndreNY (AndreNY), Monday, 28 June 2004 01:53 (nineteen years ago) link

You know, I just don't know about the Beatles/Kinks thing, Andre.

Again, I'm only familiar with XTC from their songs that have been played on alternative rock/cutting edge radio since the beginning of the format (early-'80s, where I live--they've had a decent amount of songs on there, obvioulsy), plus hearing ES now and, I don't know...I remember hearing 25 O'Clock once and I heard part of Apple Venus a few years ago. I understand the impulse to call them Beatle-esque, but how accurate is that, ultimately? How much is a given XTC album really and truly equivalent to Sgt. Pepper or Magical Mystery Tour? Or how much is it equivalent to, say, the Kinks' Something Else (from the Kinks era that I am presuming you're talking about)?

Tim Ellison, Monday, 28 June 2004 02:30 (nineteen years ago) link

XTC is in no way prog. It sits just outside categorisation, but it's certainly not prog. Glam in the early days, perhaps.

Where does the XTC-Yes comparison come from? I've seen the parallel drawn loads of times, but the two bands are utterly mutually exclusive.

(I'm Gonna Sit Right Down and) Whittle Away My Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 28 June 2004 03:09 (nineteen years ago) link

Just to reassert, in using the term "prog" with regard to XTC, I wasn't thinking of Yes or Pink Floyd. I know that XTC might not sound very much like Peter Gabriel or Kate Bush, but I wondered if their fans like them for the same reasons that P.G. or K.B. fans like P.G. and K.B. By this, I mean that they like the progressive musical sophistication while also liking the fact that, unlike certain progressive rock dinosaurs, the music sounds modern and New Wave.

Tim Ellison, Monday, 28 June 2004 03:39 (nineteen years ago) link

THEYRE CUTER THAN THE BEATLES. THEY ARE ALL THE CUTE ONE.

Sonny A. (Keiko), Monday, 28 June 2004 03:49 (nineteen years ago) link

Tim, I think they're more like power pop bands - it's nice when they experiment musically, but it's never the point.

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Monday, 28 June 2004 04:15 (nineteen years ago) link

Ah. Well in that case, yes, but it's a wide net to cast.

(I'm Gonna Sit Right Down and) Whittle Away My Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 28 June 2004 05:39 (nineteen years ago) link

XTC and prog are affiliated I think because of the kind of arrangements XTC uses, especially from English Settlement onwards. They're usually at least as complex as, say, your average 70s Yes epic - just not as long, and the actual songs are rooted in pop.

Also, a lot of prog fans happen to like XTC.

dleone (dleone), Monday, 28 June 2004 13:22 (nineteen years ago) link

Dukes of the Stratosphear
PERIOD

Thor, Monday, 28 June 2004 13:42 (nineteen years ago) link

Dukes Of Stratosphear.

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 28 June 2004 14:44 (nineteen years ago) link

What Dahlen said. And if you want to hear the Beatle-esque thing, go straight to the string arrangement on "Grass" — or anything on Skylarking, for that matter. But more than prog as you describe it, Tim, I think of XTC (Partridge, really) as craftsmen above all else.

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Monday, 28 June 2004 15:01 (nineteen years ago) link

The relationship between XTC and prog is pretty much summed up for me by Dave Gregory’s guitar solos: this is a guy who can play these jazz-inflected ultra-composed and just blazingly precise breaks, and yet nary a one of them lasts longer than ten seconds. Which extends all over the band: they’re ridiculously adept at lots of aspects of their songwriting and musicianship and performance, but for the most part they pump that skill into building up the kind of Catchy Pop Songs anyone could be doing.

Best thing about XTC that people tend not to talk about: the performances tend to be amazing. Particularly around Drums and Wires: not only is Partridge a distinctive and engaging vocalist (the stutters and snorts on like “Scissor Man” and “Outside World” come out so well you almost don’t notice how odd they are), but as a band they just tear and swing, all casual, through some pretty acrobatic shifts (again, “Scissor Man”). (If they’d been playing something dark and heavy, my guess is that rock fans would look back at them as gods; but when you play giddy pop, people tend to read skill as just a given, or even a detriment.) The instrumental hot-performances faded away when they went into their pastoral studio-pop phase, obviously, but Partridge’s vox stayed as keen as ever.

Liking them around “Skylarking,” like everyone says, is just about enjoying mildly “sophisticated” pop songwriting and arrangement, something they do quite well and quite interestingly. (On that level there’s maybe a lean toward the kind of English “adult” pop songwriting that Bush and Gabriel are maybe part of --- I could imagine later-era Bush singing, say, “Another Satellite” --- but it’s so less theatrical and much more just “pop.”) And yes, it helps if you like the sort of giddy imaginary-pop vibe they’ve picked up from psychedelia. Just like lots of bands, from the Beatles to the Ladybug Transistor: this is sort of stage-musical dreamyland pop, a very knowing Apollonian construction of pop conventionals, not some real-world Dionysian thing. Which is why the Dukes of Stratosphear make a good shortcut to what the band’s all about: these are three guys who happily made up a corny alter-ego just to do really superb and only occasionally goofy pastiches of psychedelic pop.

For what it’s worth, I like XTC quite a lot, and I wouldn’t recommend English Settlement as a starting point. I’d recommend Drums and Wires and Skylarking.

nabiscothingy, Monday, 28 June 2004 15:39 (nineteen years ago) link

I like 'Mayor of Simpleton' but then again that's the only thing I've ever heard by them really.

57 7th (calstars), Monday, 28 June 2004 17:21 (nineteen years ago) link

Holy Crow. If you can't appreciate the UTTER BRILLIANCE of XTC (in any of their permutations -- whether early "punky" material or their later "bucolic pop" phase), you sincerely don't deserve to the ears that God stapled to your skull. Return them at once. No refund!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 28 June 2004 17:27 (nineteen years ago) link

See, I'd easily recommend English Settlement (or Drums & Wires) as a good starting point. It was certainly the album that got me hooked on XTC. "Senses Working Overtime" was my entry point - still one of the best songs I've ever heard - but really, there's not a single bad track in the bunch. Looking back at it now, it's a bridge between XTC's "quirky" earlier days ("No Thugs In Our House" fits in well next to "Respectable Street" or "Into The Atom Age") and their "pastoral" later material. How about not worrying about where English Settlement fits in within music history? It's like the non-music fans in my midst who hear songs I like and ask "so what kind of music is this?"

mike a, Monday, 28 June 2004 17:41 (nineteen years ago) link

Their first three albums are at least as good as, um, the debut album by the Yachts (who sound kind of similar), though not as good as *Breakfast in America* by Supertramp. That pretty, critically acclaimed album they did in the late '80s (Skylarking, I guess) was, um, pretty and critically acclaimed, I guess. Their "quirkiness" was/is nowhere near as annoying as, say, Robyn Hitchcock's or They Might Be Giants' quirkiness, for whatever that's worth. I have never understood why people think they were "funky." They were less funky than 10cc, that's for sure. Less funky than the Sparks, probably. Less funky than the FIRST Talking Heads album. More funky than Wire (when Wire were good, and not *trying* to be funky, at which they sucked, anyway) I guess, but who wasn't? Less funky than '70s OR early '80s Roxy Music, not even close. Less funky than ABC or Dead or Alive or A Flock of Seagulls or Frankie Goes to Hollywood or any of those guys, obviously. WAY less funky than Devo or the B-52s (or Gary Numan or Mi Sex, I suppose, which I guess is what "Making Plans for Nigel" was trying to do.(And that's only fellow art-pop/arch-pop bands I'm comparing them to. They were less funky than Molly Hatchet, as well!) Still? Their first three albums, as artfuckster new wave goes? Not bad. After that, they seemed to try to go all Sgt Pepper's prog-pop on us, and they got even stiffer and whiter and thinner than they'd started out as. I don't think their words ever made sense. MAabe people think they were funky because they took the beginning riff of "Life Begins at the Hop" from the 4 Tops?? Who the hell knows.

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 17:44 (nineteen years ago) link

its weird that youd compare them to the yachts. the yachts songs and the XTC songs are the only songs i dont really love on those DIY UK pop compilations... the vocal production/vocals on both bother me a little.

peter smith (plsmith), Monday, 28 June 2004 18:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Chuck, did you just criticize XTC for how unfunky they are?

dleone (dleone), Monday, 28 June 2004 18:06 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah. I'm not sure if I was answering anybody on this thread, though. Maybe I was just answering a pitch letter that Sasha Frere Jones sent to me about their box set three years ago; I can't remember...

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:09 (nineteen years ago) link

Can I send you a pitch about how James Brown doesn't write enough songs influenced by the Beatles and Brian Wilson?

dleone (dleone), Monday, 28 June 2004 18:11 (nineteen years ago) link

(actually, check XTC's cover of "All Along the Watchtower" for tense post-punk funk in action)

dleone (dleone), Monday, 28 June 2004 18:12 (nineteen years ago) link

chuck why do you always insist on bringing in things that have nothing to do with the subject at hand?

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:13 (nineteen years ago) link

chuck is the best I am buying that one book of his where he " insist[s] on bringing in things that have nothing to do with the subject at hand?"

artdamages (artdamages), Monday, 28 June 2004 18:17 (nineteen years ago) link

I know, I know, it's just his schtick...

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:19 (nineteen years ago) link

Why do you insist on being such a ridiculous literalist, Shakey? How does what I wrote "have nothing to do with the subject at hand" when somebody up above wrote "The early stuff sounds very post-punk to me -- like a British Talking Heads. Jerky, funk-influenced rhythms + a little attitude." The best music XTC ever made has a lot more to do with the Talking Heads than with the Beatles or Brian Wilson. I really don't give a shit about their later tedium. (And they were less funky than the Beach Boys used to be, anyway.) (And if they were trying to be the Beatles or Beach Boys, well, 10cc and Boston and ELO and Wings and the Knack were a lot better at it.)

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:21 (nineteen years ago) link

you brought up funk, which has nothing to do with XTC (and no one up to your post had mentioned it), then you went off on your usual rambling spiel where you namedrop a million bands ranging from the obscure to the mainstream (many of which bear no relation to the music being discussed), use some false modesty to cover your ass ("I could be wrong,", "maybe", "my memort is crappy" ad nauseam). I mean, don't you get tired of doing the same joke over and over?

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:25 (nineteen years ago) link

I mean, really chuck you're just as predictable as Geir Hongro, someone should just write a program to do your posts for you and you could retire in peace.

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:26 (nineteen years ago) link

Actually, I think XTC's early period has a lot more to do with Capt Beefheart, Kinks, Can, Roxy Music and Brian Eno, Sparks, David Bowie, etc - the same group of influences Talking Heads would have had.

And 'funk' isn't really something I've ever associated with them, in any phase.

dleone (dleone), Monday, 28 June 2004 18:27 (nineteen years ago) link

i am sure chuck can defend hisself, but how could anyone ever tire of his schtick? it is hilarious and occasionally (or always or never - doesn't really matter) makes sense. and he doesn't always invoke the schtick anyway.

artdamages (artdamages), Monday, 28 June 2004 18:30 (nineteen years ago) link

>>no one up to your post had mentioned it)<<

uh, yes somebody did. and i just quoted them in my previous post. (and again, sasha frere jones has defended xtc to me as a funky band as well. i don't really care whether you think funk has nothing to do with xtc; some people clearly disagree with you. and i answered them.) and ALL of the bands relate to the music being discussed, or I would not have mentioned them. (and my memory IS crappy sometimes. though apparently not as crappy as your reading comprehension.)

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:34 (nineteen years ago) link

I understand that it's your journalistic mission to show how every band is related to every other band and how genre labels are essentially empty and useless and how it's all just music maaaaan, but y'know, that just doesn't seem like an interesting or useful goal to me.

But hey, go nuts. You tell those people (all one of them on this thread) that XTC is NOT funky! YEAH!

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:37 (nineteen years ago) link

I was trapped in an elevator with Colin Moulding for nearly eighteen hours once, and lemme tell you, toward the end we were both of us getting way funky.

nabiscothingy, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:46 (nineteen years ago) link

> think XTC's early period has a lot more to do with Capt Beefheart, Kinks, Can, Roxy Music and Brian Eno, Sparks, David Bowie, etc <

Two of which I mentioned on this thread before anybody else had, but since I was obviously just picking random bands out my ass who have NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH XTC (even though ALL of the bands I named have a fairly similar aesthetic to XTC, i.e.: jagged or ornate artiste pop songs with wacky lyrics, more or less -- plus almost all of them are British, as I recall, oops fuck you), I guess that's just a coincidence. (Hell, if saying XTC isn't funky offends people 'cause nobody would ever think to call XTC funky in the first place, I'll just say XTC never seemed very SMART to me, either. But now I guess people will tell me nobody ever thought XTC were smart! I can't win.)

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:46 (nineteen years ago) link

touched a nerve there...

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:48 (nineteen years ago) link

"jagged or ornate artiste pop songs with wacky lyrics"

yeah, that's totally what I think of when I hear the names Molly Hatchet, SuperTramp, and Dead or Alive. (clue: this is sarcasm) Carry on...

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:53 (nineteen years ago) link

this is a guy who can play these jazz-inflected ultra-composed and just blazingly precise breaks, and yet nary a one of them lasts longer than ten seconds. Which extends all over the band: they’re ridiculously adept at lots of aspects of their songwriting and musicianship and performance, but for the most part they pump that skill into building up the kind of Catchy Pop Songs anyone could be doing.

I think this gets at a lot of what I like about the XTC songs I like. I love the brief guitar "solos," if you can call them that, on a song like "Ten Feet Tall." Actually, it kind of reminds me of the solos you get on the first side of the Velvet Underground's The Velvet Underground.

Much of the time I like them in spite of their quirkiness, which probably makes me less than a true XTC fan. I like them primarily for narrowly musical reasons (and because the fun things they do musically also move me), and because I do like many of the lyrics, at least in bits and pieces. The lyrics usually make plenty of sense to me, and on English Settlement, I like the way, for instance, "Yacht Dance" picks up the same themes as "Sense Working Overtime."

I don't know if I'd called them funky (and I am less and less sure I even know what funky means--I think I go for a different type of rhythm than what funk is about), but I think they are very strong rhythmically at times. It's not just a matter of melody.

Rockist Scientist, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:54 (nineteen years ago) link

chuck thinks bob seger is funky

cutty (mcutt), Monday, 28 June 2004 18:54 (nineteen years ago) link

Dominique OTM. Partridge's strained falsetto leaps on the choruses almost never work for me. They often seem to indicate a failure to come up with something compelling, going instead for a dramatic (and frequently awkward) progression/resolution.

Also agree about the "bells and whistles". O&L (and XTC's post-Skylarking output in general) suffers from this overcomplexified frilliness. Not so much in the production, but in the arrangements and the songs themselves. A Sting-like fondness for jazz/R&B strategies filtered through a fussy psych-prog sensibility that too often stands as a baffle between the tunes and their delivery.

Pye Poudre, Friday, 30 March 2007 17:26 (seventeen years ago) link

Hee. Last post, meet x-post.

Pye Poudre, Friday, 30 March 2007 17:46 (seventeen years ago) link

but you have to endure cranky, didactic piffle like "The Smartest Monkey" and "...Peter Pumpkinhead."

Not too much of a problem considering both are among the definite highlights on the album.

Geir Hongro, Friday, 30 March 2007 22:04 (seventeen years ago) link

'Nonsuch' always seemed more organic than 'Oranges and Lemons', the latter had a kind of dated sound, while 'Nonsuch' is timeless. I like almost every song there, but 'Books Are Burning' and 'Peter Pumpkinhead' are preachy and cliched a bit - 'Then She Appeared', 'Humble Daisy', 'That Wave' or 'Ugly Underneath' are my favourites perhaps.

zeus, Friday, 30 March 2007 23:43 (seventeen years ago) link

I absolutely loved Oranges & Lemons when it came out but it does sound a bit dated today.

Nonsuch is a real mixed bag - the quality of the tracks varies considerably from nearly-unlistenable ("Bungalow") to excellent ("The Disappointed"). I would rank "Wrapped in Grey" up there with the best pop music of the 20th century though. Everything about it is brilliant.

It took me a long time to get into XTC, and I only kept at it because most of my friends were completely nuts about them. Finally, one day I was listening to "Skylarking", it all just clicked, and they became one of my favorite bands.

The Breadmaster, Saturday, 31 March 2007 00:04 (seventeen years ago) link

I bought Nonsuch when it came out and remember being completely disappointed with it, to the point that I just sold it back and remember nothing at all about it now. But I also remember that my life was going through some major changes at the time and wonder if that might have prejudiced me at all. (I found the same kind of disappointment with another fave artist of mine's album that year, Robyn Hitchcock's Mossy Elixir)

Oranges & Lemons wasn't very good as an album either, but it did have some highlights. "King For A Day" being one of them and I will NOT tolerate any dissing of that song. We will have to step outside if you're going that route, heheh.

Thanks Mark G, I still think the best thing to do is get the big ass box set. (I usually spell it 'arse' but I feel like spelling it the US way in this case) I knew there was a thread about Fuzzy Warbles somewhere here...

Bimble, Saturday, 31 March 2007 01:45 (seventeen years ago) link

three months pass...

Finally!

I picked up Drums and Wires a few days ago, and I'm glad I made one more attempt with XTC. I don't know what happened in the 3 years between Drums and Wires and English Settlement, but if "Complicated Game" were to get into a schoolyard fight with a song like "Senses Working Overtime" (which I like, even), the latter would get bloodied and then have to watch his girlfriend make out with "Complicated Game".

Great song, great album. I also bought Black Sea, but I think I'm going to listen to Drums and Wires again first.

Z S, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 00:01 (sixteen years ago) link

'Complicated Game' is one of my favourite XTC songs, and one of their most underrated, period. Does the quiet to loud thing better than just about anything else, has great lyrics, and sports some truly unhinged guitar work.

Just got offed, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 00:04 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9GIxfbfob0

cutty, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 00:20 (sixteen years ago) link

the bonus tracks on the Black Sea CD are seriously incredible. "Smokeless Zone" sounds not just weird but utterly unique, unlike anything else I've ever heard, while remaining effortless and extremely fun; "Don't Lose Your Temper" has a guitar line that puts a smile on my face every time I hear it and is possibly better than anything on the album proper. especially after the rather dour "Travels in Nihilon", those tracks are like perfect little blobs of sunshine-flavored jello (wait, what the fuck?).

bernard snowy, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 00:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Actually, the best thing about the song is Partridge's delivery of the final, climactic 'God asked me...' verse. It's perfect, and I don't think vocal echo/multi-track has ever worked more splendidly. Repeat after me: RightRaRightRaRightRaRightRaRightRightRight!

OMG bryson strikes! "Smokeless Zone" is my favourite track off Black Sea (with the possible exception, and here's where you LOSE, of "Travels In Nihilon")! You forgot "The Somnambulist", btw, which still scares the living crap outta me.

Just got offed, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 01:02 (sixteen years ago) link

I wasn't counting "The Somnambulist" because I'm still not sure what to make out of it. it's sort of like those bonus tracks at the end of the notwist's Neon Golden, in that it's good, but so distinct in sound and mood from the rest of the album that it almost feels more like commentary than music.

bernard snowy, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 02:22 (sixteen years ago) link

nine years pass...

an old friend asked on fb which album his friends had owned the most copies of (in various formats), and my answer was XTC's Oranges & Lemons. i hadn't listened to it in a long time, so i pulled it out and listened to it in the car today.

to explain the appeal of XTC the first time they appealed to me is pretty easy: i was 12, they were weirder than anything i had heard before, they sang about politics and how horrible people are, they welcomed me into the garden of earthly delight, funny songs about love and genitals, their songs were catchy and not all the same, they weren't scary, and nobody else i knew had any idea who they were.

i vividly remember seeing them perform on MTV, which is what made me want to buy the album the first time. now that it's 2017, i remembered that i can see if that performance is on youtube and it is! i also found my 8th grade yearbook last week at my parents' house and i think XTC saved me from developing into a boring conformist.

all that from this performance of "scarecrow people", the song i remember liking when i saw this, probably sitting at home by myself bored and watching mtv
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AI8MalyCCGU

weird woman in a bar (La Lechera), Friday, 21 April 2017 19:00 (seven years ago) link

i calculated incorrectly -- i was 13 but the sentiment remains true

weird woman in a bar (La Lechera), Friday, 21 April 2017 19:03 (seven years ago) link

They're radio promo tour for O & L boots are pretty dope. Fun banter and slick guitar inter-play ...

BlackIronPrison, Friday, 21 April 2017 19:08 (seven years ago) link

Their - duh

BlackIronPrison, Friday, 21 April 2017 19:09 (seven years ago) link

man, wish I had a cool story like that. mine is I heard "Generals and Majors" on internet radio and then had to play it 10 more times, and eventually wondered what their other music was like

frogbs, Friday, 21 April 2017 19:11 (seven years ago) link

I honestly can't remember what my first exposure to them was. "Skylarking" was the first album I bought, but prior to that I was def familiar with Senses Working Overtime and a few other singles thanks to 91X airplay.

Οὖτις, Friday, 21 April 2017 19:13 (seven years ago) link

For me, it was just a case of knowing their two most well known tracks well ('Making Plans For Nigel' and 'Senses Working Overtime') and then checking out the albums to see if the rest of the stuff was any good. It was.

...so music and chicken have become intertwined (Turrican), Friday, 21 April 2017 19:15 (seven years ago) link

my memory of seeing that performance always made me doubt my sanity -- did it even happen? did i dream it up? i'm glad to realize i wasn't imagining it. such a great album all the way through.

at the time i was into INXS, REM, etc (lol) but also had one Cure album -- as a littler kid I loved The Beatles and XTC was the most appealing combo of modern humor and topical subject matter + well-crafted Beatley songs. i also hated Reagan and nuclear bombs so the political songs resonated a lot. i feel fortunate to have had nothing better to do that evening than watch tv by myself.

eventually i found Skylarking at the library.

weird woman in a bar (La Lechera), Friday, 21 April 2017 19:18 (seven years ago) link

Was 15, had seen them on Urgh! and then noticed cheap cassette of English Settlement at rockheads in downtown St. Paul (the version without Africa, cockpit, leisure etc on it-- I still don't like those songs being there). Loved it right away. The year after, Skylarking came out and became the huge album of my circle of high school friends.

gimmesomehawnz (Jon not Jon), Friday, 21 April 2017 23:15 (seven years ago) link

I doubt I'm the only one that discovered them this way, but They Might Be Giants have a song called "XTC vs Adam Ant" and I was at the age where I was just starting to learn about music not on the radio and would check out literally any band I heard about. Also got into Adam Ant that way, but he is not as much a fave

Vinnie, Saturday, 22 April 2017 01:15 (seven years ago) link

about a year and a half ago a good friend of mine made a very passionate and long post on FB explaining why, "after 20 years of near constant music consumption," he'd concluded XTC was his favorite band ever, for all the reasons we know... i was in new york and about to go to Other Music so i picked up Mummer and The Big Express there. ended up being my last visit there before it closed.

the O&L radio tour is sweet. the way their guitars blend on Love on a Farmboy's Wages - oh man

https://youtu.be/cTtFTHI7Or0?t=20m13s

flappy bird, Saturday, 22 April 2017 01:16 (seven years ago) link

I doubt I'm sure I'm the only one that discovered them this way, but it was on the 1982 WOMAD benefit double album Music and Rhythm, which had a bunch of artists who played the first WOMAD festival and which I bought for the unreleased Peter Gabriel, Pete Townshend and Jon Hassell tracks. It also had "It's Nearly Africa," which I completely flipped out over.

Bought English Settlement a few weeks later and flipped out 14 more times (see, 'cause there's a total of 15 tracks). By the time Mummer came out a year later, I had bought every album and most of the singles, EPs and side projects (with a big thank you to the late lamented Venus Records on 8th St. in NYC).

Hideous Lump, Saturday, 22 April 2017 05:38 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.