from what i've heard: as far as the vandalism of City Hall goes, apparently that wasn't intentional -- it was accidental -- there were physical struggles with security/cops and those items got damaged. The only intentional damage was the flag burning.
― sarahell, Monday, 30 January 2012 22:37 (twelve years ago) link
Quan is going to "call some of the national leadership of Occupy" to see if they'll rein in Occupy Oakland or disown them. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/01/30/BAPQ1N0G9K.DTL&tsp=1
― wmlynch, Monday, 30 January 2012 22:38 (twelve years ago) link
right.
mission accomplished!
xp
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 30 January 2012 22:38 (twelve years ago) link
if that doesn't work, she'll call the protesters' moms and tell them how disappointed she is in them.
― sarahell, Monday, 30 January 2012 22:40 (twelve years ago) link
picturing Quan calling a payphone near Zuccotti hoping someone in power answers.
― wmlynch, Monday, 30 January 2012 22:40 (twelve years ago) link
lol
I guess I'm not really clear on what Occupy Oakland is trying to accomplish with their tactics. if they just want to continue to fight a running street-war with the cops, well okay you got it, good job. just seems like a waste of resources for an already-strapped City fully stocked with asshole cops.
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 30 January 2012 22:41 (twelve years ago) link
well, they stated they wanted to open a community center and provide services to the community, so i'd guess they're trying to accomplish that.
― wmlynch, Monday, 30 January 2012 22:42 (twelve years ago) link
illegally taking over a building - a public building that's owned by the city - maybe not the best way to accomplish that
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 30 January 2012 22:45 (twelve years ago) link
just guessing here, but there may already be some clearly established process for opening a community center, I'm not sure
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 30 January 2012 22:47 (twelve years ago) link
squatting has a pretty long tradition. they didn't succeed but i don't think that their attempt was the complete failure of tactics you seem to.
― wmlynch, Monday, 30 January 2012 22:48 (twelve years ago) link
explain the clearly established process for upending the current economic system that favors the rich and the rich only and starves our cities of their resources. i think you elided that.
― wmlynch, Monday, 30 January 2012 22:49 (twelve years ago) link
wait I thought the goal was to open a community center
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 30 January 2012 22:50 (twelve years ago) link
google+ iirc
― teaky frigger (darraghmac), Monday, 30 January 2012 22:50 (twelve years ago) link
seems like the best way to find out what's going on with any occupation would be to go down & ask
― long duk dan (dan m), Monday, 30 January 2012 22:52 (twelve years ago) link
why bother when you can argue on the internet.
― wmlynch, Monday, 30 January 2012 22:52 (twelve years ago) link
The first step in upending the current economic system is to hold a dance competition at the vacant building and *poof!* there's your community center. Seems to work whenever an evil developer is trying to turn one into an orphan factory/kitten blood processing plant.
― Spectrum, Monday, 30 January 2012 22:52 (twelve years ago) link
orphan factory/kitten blood processing plant=jobs amirite.
― wmlynch, Monday, 30 January 2012 22:53 (twelve years ago) link
Quan is going to "call some of the national leadership of Occupy" to see if they'll rein in Occupy Oakland or disown them. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/01/30/BAPQ1N0G9K.DTL&tsp=1― wmlynch, Monday, January 30, 2012 4:38 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
i actually empathize w/ her to some extent but this is completely hilarious.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Monday, 30 January 2012 22:53 (twelve years ago) link
http://www.thejournal.ie/protesters-take-over-nama-owned-building-and-open-it-to-the-public-339068-Jan2012/
― judith, Monday, 30 January 2012 22:54 (twelve years ago) link
I've been down to OccupySF (back when there was one) - I'm not bothering going over to Oakland, I have other shit to do. But way to not engage with the issue - which is tactics and the efficacy thereof.
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 30 January 2012 22:54 (twelve years ago) link
just like you didn't engage with the oakland occupiers. i am noticing a pattern
― judith, Monday, 30 January 2012 22:55 (twelve years ago) link
“This is about lifting the veil of secrecy around NAMA and making the buildings available to the public,” Mick O’Broin, a member of the group told TheJournal.ie today.
M'OB RULE
― teaky frigger (darraghmac), Monday, 30 January 2012 22:56 (twelve years ago) link
fuckin postrophes
wasn't there a separate thread for occupy concern-trolling?
― long duk dan (dan m), Monday, 30 January 2012 22:56 (twelve years ago) link
I don't live in Oakland fyi
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 30 January 2012 22:56 (twelve years ago) link
honestly not trying to do any trolling, sorry to upset whatever hivemind thing you guys got going here jesus christ
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 30 January 2012 22:57 (twelve years ago) link
shakey mo will be first against the wall in the glorious new regime imo
― teaky frigger (darraghmac), Monday, 30 January 2012 22:58 (twelve years ago) link
I was just asking 'cause my searching was turning up nothing
― long duk dan (dan m), Monday, 30 January 2012 22:58 (twelve years ago) link
There's a pretty established way to get the community center thing going. One way is this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNhMjziHgzk
But a more normal way is to, you know, create a campaign, connect with community leaders, etc. Instead of thinking you can change the world with one bold piece of action! And then go home and forget about it the rest of your life.
― Spectrum, Monday, 30 January 2012 22:59 (twelve years ago) link
I'm not gonna cast those kinds of aspersions, Spectrum, but yeah I don't really understand what's so irretrievably broken with the City of Oakland's process for establishing community centers/designating unused property that the only acceptable/feasible response is a riot.
y'know the Panthers built Community Centers and got shot at/firebombed/bricks thrown at them, etc. but I don't recall any instances of them attacking city hall.
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 30 January 2012 23:02 (twelve years ago) link
march turned into a 'riot' when the cops started firing projectiles into crowds AGAINST THEIR OWN INTERNAL POLICIES and like two days after a federal judge told them (yet again) to cut it the fuck out. don't recall all the uproar about that but ok.
― wmlynch, Monday, 30 January 2012 23:05 (twelve years ago) link
i wonder why the 'one bold piece of action' strategy doesn't work.
― shaane, Monday, 30 January 2012 23:05 (twelve years ago) link
taking over the Kaiser building was doomed to fail from its inception, the occupy leaders had to know they weren't going to be allowed to stay. it was a pretty good pick symbolically, but if they really wanted to make it work they probably could have picked a dozen other buildings and made a fair go of it, at least for a little while.
― WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Monday, 30 January 2012 23:10 (twelve years ago) link
― wmlynch, Monday, January 30, 2012 5:05 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
this is true. but it's also true that the police (over)response was prompted (if not justified) by the stated purpose of the Occupy action.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Monday, 30 January 2012 23:11 (twelve years ago) link
i'm not sure how. violating internal procedures controlling how they use violence is justified because protesters wanted to enter an empty building?
― wmlynch, Monday, 30 January 2012 23:12 (twelve years ago) link
sparkle motion otm.
― wmlynch, Monday, January 30, 2012 5:12 PM (50 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
did you read the part just above your comment where i use the word UNJUSTIFIED?
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Monday, 30 January 2012 23:14 (twelve years ago) link
ha actually i DON'T use that word (heh) but i do say that the police tactics were "not justified"
the police's job is to uphold the law not break it
― Milton Parker, Monday, 30 January 2012 23:15 (twelve years ago) link
my point is just that the police were responding to a threat of criminal trespass on private property, which you can see is likely a more severe breach than marching on a public right of way.
that doesn't mean that the tactics the police were using are "justified," but it does mean that a harsh police response could have been predicted. indeed sometimes i think certain actions are taken precisely to prompt a harsh police response. which isn't ALWAYS a bad tactic in every context, but seems like a bad one in this time and place.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Monday, 30 January 2012 23:17 (twelve years ago) link
cops were totally wrong (as usual) AND ALSO totally predictable
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 30 January 2012 23:18 (twelve years ago) link
not just trespass but occupation, and not of a traditionally public space either.
now this may be a good idea in the best of worlds (make productive use of vacant buildings) but this particular instance had no chance of succeeding, especially undertaken the way it was. so either the organizers are incompetent or they were seeking an asymmetric police response.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Monday, 30 January 2012 23:19 (twelve years ago) link
xpost yes
like omg the OPD didn't follow their own policies/the law call the feds oh wait
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 30 January 2012 23:19 (twelve years ago) link
but yeah I don't really understand what's so irretrievably broken with the City of Oakland's process for establishing community centers/designating unused property that the only acceptable/feasible response is a riot.
Yeah, it would help to know the history behind this.
― frogify bool sheet (beachville), Monday, 30 January 2012 23:20 (twelve years ago) link
yeah amateurist i misread (or misunderstood) your comment above. and shakey is right the police tactics were entirely predictable, but still completely unjustified.
the nlg and aclu already have a lawsuit pending regarding opd's violation of their internal policies and their federal overseer has said no more but opd can't stop won't stop.
― wmlynch, Monday, 30 January 2012 23:21 (twelve years ago) link
this is a police department that is set to be taken over by the Justice Dept because of their ineptitude/institutional assholism iirc
frankly I consider it a small miracle that the OPD hasn't killed any Occupy Oakland people yet
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 30 January 2012 23:21 (twelve years ago) link
can't say they haven't tried.
this.
― i love pinfold cricket (gbx), Monday, 30 January 2012 23:24 (twelve years ago) link
the problem w/occupy's tactics insofar as i see them is that a lot of what i'm reading is breathless recitations of events taking place on the street, like they're talking about physical action and the geography of battle, for lack of a better term, and to me all it's doing is showing me something i already know, which is that cops can often act like complete assholes (to put it mildly) when given a single sliver of opportunity to do so. and i'm not sure street confrontations do much good anyway other than prove those already proven points.
i agree 100% with occupy's opinions on shit, generally speaking.
― omar little, Monday, 30 January 2012 23:25 (twelve years ago) link