quiddities and agonies of the ruling class - a rolling new york times thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (8901 of them)

does it come with seven other shirts, because if not GTFO

signed, dude who bought 3 shirts from Marshall's for $43 earlier this week

I need new, hip khakis (DJP), Thursday, 19 April 2012 16:31 (twelve years ago) link

I have paid as much as $90 for a shirt.

i love the large auns pictures! (Phil D.), Thursday, 19 April 2012 16:32 (twelve years ago) link

i finally fucking bit the bullet and bought a suit, two suits actually, and ended up buying a few 80 dollar shirts in the process
the weird secret is that suits are seriously comfortable. i assumed they'd be like corsets but it's more comfortable than my regular clothes.

boy, was that Dan Fielding hungry for some cake! (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 19 April 2012 16:34 (twelve years ago) link

My standard shirt gambit is to wait for the Brooks Brothers and Charles Tyrwhitt sales and then buy a bunch at what usually amounts to $30-50 each. But I work in an industry where boring is not only accepted, it's encouraged.

i don't believe in zimmerman (Hurting 2), Thursday, 19 April 2012 16:35 (twelve years ago) link

I've purchased $70-$80 shirts when buying suits, which is why I only wear those shirts with said suits

having said that, I realize I'm wearing a $40 Penguin polo today I bought at an outlet for the "bargain" price of $40

I need new, hip khakis (DJP), Thursday, 19 April 2012 16:36 (twelve years ago) link

isn't it a stereotype of americans that we're supposed to be constantly bragging about what a great deal we got on things?

mh, Thursday, 19 April 2012 16:37 (twelve years ago) link

I realized I prefer blowing money on a nice shirt than on music or books, especially when I can either one online for pennies.

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 19 April 2012 16:37 (twelve years ago) link

*buy either one

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 19 April 2012 16:41 (twelve years ago) link

isn't it a stereotype of americans that we're supposed to be constantly bragging about what a great deal we got on things?

― mh, Thursday, April 19, 2012 12:37 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

quiddities of the middle class

i don't believe in zimmerman (Hurting 2), Thursday, 19 April 2012 16:42 (twelve years ago) link

Yeah that is pretty much the hallmark of things, although some newly-moneyed people still go on about it or are bizarrely thrifty in other ways.

mh, Thursday, 19 April 2012 16:47 (twelve years ago) link

Wait until there are downloadable shirts. Then Brooks Brothers can suck it.

i love the large auns pictures! (Phil D.), Thursday, 19 April 2012 16:49 (twelve years ago) link

Like, there's a goddamned loom attached to your computer and you d/l your shirt and it weaves it for you right there.

i love the large auns pictures! (Phil D.), Thursday, 19 April 2012 16:49 (twelve years ago) link

prefer downloadable sodomy first tbh

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 19 April 2012 16:50 (twelve years ago) link

yeah it's pretty hard to get people to pay $200 for a shirt w/o emotions coming into play

depends on yr income, doesn't it?

zubaz fupa (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 19 April 2012 16:54 (twelve years ago) link

somebody at nymag flagged this: that trudie styler article manages to shoehorn in some "bill clinton is a lech" stuff:

Afterward, at a dinner and live auction at the Pierre Hotel, Bill Clinton, Ms. Styler’s guest of honor, mingled with Aretha Franklin and Tom Hanks, then ogled Jennifer Hudson, prying his eyes away just long enough to explain what had induced him to come. “Sting and Trudie and I have been friends for a long time,” Mr. Clinton said, stealing a glance at his hostess, whose clingy white Pucci gown showed the outline of her underwear. Oh, and yes, “I believe in their cause.”

goole, Thursday, 19 April 2012 16:56 (twelve years ago) link

Ms. Styler’s guest of honor, mingled with Aretha Franklin and Tom Hanks, then ogled Jennifer Hudson, prying his eyes away just long enough to explain what had induced him to come.

ahh the joys of tantric sex

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 19 April 2012 16:57 (twelve years ago) link

Clinton a lecher == not news.

Aimless, Thursday, 19 April 2012 16:58 (twelve years ago) link

dude is a horny devil.

scott seward, Thursday, 19 April 2012 16:59 (twelve years ago) link

presidents are gross. obama may be the first non-gross president. no wonder so many people hate him.

scott seward, Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:01 (twelve years ago) link

like, i can understand becoming a brand enthusiast because you know that their shirts fit your body type perfectly, or that their shirts are durable and won't come apart in the wash, or even that their styles projects a certain image that you like also to project. the article goes beyond that, though: like there is an emotional reliance on a certain brand to constitute or support your sense of self. huh? i don't really get that.

zubaz fupa (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:01 (twelve years ago) link

clingy white Pucci

this is such a gross string of words

yologram (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:02 (twelve years ago) link

not bcuz of materialism or w/e but for some reason it's stomach churning

yologram (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:02 (twelve years ago) link

clingy white Pucci

this is such a gross string of words

― yologram (J0rdan S.), Thursday, April 19, 2012 12:02 PM (25 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

could be a riff-raff hook

goole, Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:03 (twelve years ago) link

what had induced him to come in a clingy white Pucci?

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:04 (twelve years ago) link

I think a lot of people don't follow trends or styles and finding a brand that they enjoy wearing kind of outsources the trust to that brand with the assumption that instead of knowing what looks good you just go in and buy three shirts from that brand

mh, Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:04 (twelve years ago) link

i just am baffled by these ppl who apparently only shop one brand at a time, what is that

zubaz fupa (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:06 (twelve years ago) link

Department stores sometimes arrange their clothing sections by brand!

mh, Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:07 (twelve years ago) link

clingy white Pucci

sounds like a codependent poodle

zubaz fupa (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:08 (twelve years ago) link

xp and the more expensive the store, the more likely it is that they do separate by brand!

i love the large auns pictures! (Phil D.), Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:09 (twelve years ago) link

True, the largest brands even have flagship stores.

mh, Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:12 (twelve years ago) link

Or, you know, lower end brands that ARE stores.

Like people who buy all J. Crew or The Gap or Banana Republic are doing one-stop shopping. Of course you're shopping for one brand at a time -- that is all that is in the store.

mh, Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:13 (twelve years ago) link

what's the difference between a "flagship store" and a regular store?

sarahell, Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:13 (twelve years ago) link

a flagship store has a huge flagship docked beside it

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:14 (twelve years ago) link

flagship stores are larger and tend to have more bells and whistles, also where they drop short run pieces or high end stuff

boy, was that Dan Fielding hungry for some cake! (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:15 (twelve years ago) link

guys you're not telling me anything i don't already know! i work in retail! i mean like the dude in the article who is basically described as sourcing his entire wardrobe from APC because he identified as an APC kinda guy.

zubaz fupa (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:17 (twelve years ago) link

xp I think of things being flagship stores if they typically are high-end brands sold by more boutique-style clothing stores, tend to only have a handful of stores in larger cities, don't really exist in shopping malls.

As opposed to stores that are in every mall, where the only place you get their goods is their store.

yeah elmo the guy makes little sense

mh, Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:20 (twelve years ago) link

i'll admit i'm a bit of a carhartt guy. but its not like thats all i wear.

scott seward, Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:22 (twelve years ago) link

i don't know what the hell i wear. i have like no clothes. i end up with stuff.

scott seward, Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:23 (twelve years ago) link

wearing carhartt jeans at the moment...in ugly green.

scott seward, Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:23 (twelve years ago) link

'Clinton is a lecher' indicates writer who is describing how visible the underwear is through a woman's clothes.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:24 (twelve years ago) link

That J Crew article is comedy gold. This is the funniest thread ever. The baffling absurdity of the modern human condition.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:25 (twelve years ago) link

does sting wear underwear? seems unlikely.

scott seward, Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:25 (twelve years ago) link

i'm in no way immune to branding or anything, i'm really not, but wearing all one brand head to toe would make me feel v self-conscious, like someone would notice! "hello i am mannequin, pleased to meet you, buy one get one today only"

zubaz fupa (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:28 (twelve years ago) link

(xp) A flagship store is one of the focal stores of a brand, and the term is usually only used when the brand has a good number of stores in order to differentiate it. They're usually in very large cities, are bigger than the other stores, have a different higher-end design, and focus more on selling the image of a brand. Where is is on the cost scale doesn't matter as much as the identity and focus on retail branding - some brands have no flagship locations, Prada has made a huge deal of theirs but companies like Nike also have them.

I DIED, Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:32 (twelve years ago) link

oh, well there you have it

mh, Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:34 (twelve years ago) link

i'm in no way immune to branding or anything, i'm really not, but wearing all one brand head to toe would make me feel v self-conscious, like someone would notice! "hello i am mannequin, pleased to meet you, buy one get one today only"

― zubaz fupa (elmo argonaut), Thursday, April 19, 2012 1:28 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark

in middle school you'd get shit if you wore mismatching brands i.e. nikes with adidas

dayo, Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:41 (twelve years ago) link

I guess we are not in middle school tho anymore

dayo, Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:41 (twelve years ago) link

uniqlo flagship across the street from me right now

boy, was that Dan Fielding hungry for some cake! (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:42 (twelve years ago) link

Love Uniqlo. Wish I had more money so I could go buy more black and grey t-shirts and black pants.

raw feel vegan (silby), Thursday, 19 April 2012 18:24 (twelve years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.