The RIAA Armageddon has begun

trying to think of any precedent for moving this kind of data between services and can't think of one

when was the last time something just shut down and all the users got screwed over? (I really can't think of one outside of stuff like online poker. I'm not being rhetorical - I'm sure it's happened in some capacity)

as for the Facebook example - I don't know how, but my guess is that it's going to be very clear to the users when they should start moving their photos off

Jon's point above is a very good one and potentially a big issue in the future. BTW I'm not really talking about Spotify necessarily, but rather a cloud service where you upload your mp3s and can stream them from anywhere, so you are still responsible for your own data (in a good way)

geocities

Tabblo http://archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Tabblo

Magnolia http://www.technologyreview.com/view/412041/are-we-safeguarding-social-data/

I was in diasp0ra, and now its gone!

when was the last time something just shut down and all the users got screwed over? (I really can't think of one outside of stuff like online poker. I'm not being rhetorical - I'm sure it's happened in some capacity)

thread relevant example: megaupload

some people actually used it to store things besides pirated music

I mean if this isn't an object lesson in the joys of cloud computing, I don't know what

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/257376/if_megaupload_users_want_their_data_theyre_going_to_have_to_pay.html

Admittedly it's also a lesson in the joys of hard drives:

"Goodwin's hard drive crashed, and he lost access to the data he backed up on Megaupload when the site was shut down on Jan. 19 on criminal copyright infringement charges."

why do I need a hard drive? it's all in the cloud! fluffy fluffy cloud

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHixChYgGRI

Rickie Lee Dotcom

well considering that those big send file services are used mostly for illegal activity and routinely delete files after some period of time, I don't think that it's really a good example

Geocities I get, but I never had an account there so I don't know if it just vanished overnight or what.

both examples are a far way from what Amazon is trying to do

no one mentioned Amazon

or at least, I didn't. (I mentioned facebook)

the point is that there is an established pattern of tech firms failing and just going "oops sorry!" to users, and pretending that other firms are "too big" to act that way is myopic imho

booming thread

I'm not really sure if the possibility of Facebook vanishing really convinces me that a cloud can't be reliable, I mean MySpace has been dead for years and IIRC everyone's stuff is still up there. Obviously companies can fail but I still like to think that anyone paying attention will have ample warning before a giant like Facebook goes down. I don't know anything about Carbonite but don't they have a plan in place should things go south for the company?

Don't think that personal storage as a whole is going away for a very long time, but I would think most devices we use 5-10 years from now wouldn't have a need for much data to be stored, music included

frogbs remember wordperfect? lotus notes? 3.5 floppies?

web-based storage is like five years old. it's still being born. amazon isn't going to be the same company in ten years. i mean, if you wanna put your baby fotoes on s3 and treat it like it's magic, that isn't my problem.

the point is preserving things doesn't just happen, you have to make it happen, and you can only rely on companies so much since it's usually lower down on the list of stockholders' priorities than pr would have you believe.

also technology and software just change really fast. no one likes to migrate. a lot of stuff falls through the cracks.

no one likes to migrate.

quite honestly, this cannot be reiterated enough

granted, megaupload's services were used for illegal activity, but a lot of folks used them legally for their ostensibly designed purpose - to transfer large files. files weren't deleted if you were a paying customer, and folks used them as a convenient online storage locker. I can't imagine anyone who was a paying customer thought the system would disappear overnight, and that their perfectly legal files would be suddenly inaccessible.

though it sounds like your angle is, "it's never happened to me, so it's not a risk", ok cool

xps

should we have a separate thread about this?

i think we already have a few

WordPerfect is a word processor isn't it? Maybe I don't remember that one.

Again, I don't think personal storage is going away altogether, but in 5-10 years the mega-storage iPod will likely be replaced with something that just streams from either a server like Amazon or some home storage unit. In other words the idea that your data needs to be duplicated from your computer to your iPod or phone will likely be replaced with something that allows them all to use the same data.

The idea of the safe online storage locker is fairly new and I don't think the examples here really apply to what Amazon is trying to do since the whole point is just to protect your data in case of a crash. And the demand for that goes up every day. IMO it's a different issue from "will our devices have huge storage capacity", but maybe I'm lost in this argument

yeah, we do... and to bring this back to music this whole cloud file storage/transfer/backup/access web of problems is really immense, pretending that there's some easy cost-free way to just stream everybody's personal libraries of music everywhere forever for free is just... man, why not throw a unicorn into that deal too. it just speaks of massive ignorance about how tech companies function, make money, etc. it's hardly a "no brainer" type of model.

xp

y'know, who's gonna maintain it, upgrade it, update it, who's going to pay for that, who's going to have access, how are copyrights going to be administered, etc these are not minor questions

so far in this wonderful new internet economy we can't even get a single paying streaming service with a comprehensive library of quality music functioning, the idea that some universal immortal digital jukebox in the sky is just a few years away, I can't even..

though it sounds like your angle is, "it's never happened to me, so it's not a risk", ok cool

no, my angle is that MegaUpload and say Carbonite are different concepts, anyone using MegaUpload as a storage locker had to be somewhat aware that its dubious legality could result in it just going away out of nothing. I think a true online storage site may operate differently.

also, I'm fully aware that RIGHT NOW uploading all your data to Amazon and formatting all your hard drives isn't a good idea, just that in the future this whole area may look quite different (as there may be a way to "guarantee" your data somehow)

"in the future, things may be different"

well Shakey for many people simply having Spotify on their PCs and phones is enough and I think the technology to stream stuff from your PC to your phone or even from Amazon to your phone already exists

"a few years" is an awful long time in the tech world

certainly, I don't think this service will be free

well Shakey for many people simply having Spotify on their PCs and phones is enough

except as noted Spotify doesn't pay musicians shit. what a great model for the future!

So now we're talking about the artists? I'm saying this as a "proof of concept" that most people who aren't hardcore music geeks are okay with 'just' streaming so this area may get pushed pretty hard. I don't think Spotify is the solution but the concept behind Spotify seems like it may stick around.

I thought this whole revive was about a stupid kid wanting a digital music library available for all her devices that would, presumably, somehow, also compensate artists. and she thinks the onus is on artists and corporations to work it out. the problem is they can't.

or maybe she doesn't care about compensation at all, I can't really tell

i was under the impression that the average person who uses spotify or itunes liked them! i mean like i was saying before old folks use them and if you can get old people to use them you are on to something convenient and easy.

have always assumed spotify will increase its pricing on premium and/or limit the free service further if/when it gets enough people hooked.

^^^worked so well for netflix

people ditch models when they start charging money

the fact that people complained about a service that allowed you instant access to so much, commercial free, that still costs just a fraction of what cable does kinda boggles my mind

netflix had crap selection though. If netflix had spotify-level selection, or if it announced upgrade to that level of selection at the same time as the price upgrade, I think more subscribers would have stayed.

bingo, and if Spotify sticks around as is for another year or so and then starts to charge, I think people will pay

I pay $10/mo. I'd probably pay $20/mo -- still cheaper than a pay CD/MP3 habit.

Plus amazing convenience -- having an entire record library on your phone, on your work computer, etc.

i know this isn't the scope of this conversation, but i've often wondered about whether we'll have more text/photo/media artifacts from 2012AD in 3012AD than we have from 1012AD today. seems like physical media can stand up to time + decay much better than digital media. on the other hand, we've gotta be producing so much more even physical media in 2012 than we did in 1012. if the grid goes down and the internet ends bc of something catastrophic (would not be the first knowledge catastrophe in history) we're gonna be fucked. of course, if that happens we might have more pressing concerns than losing the pics from that trip to cancun

we produce way more physical text/photo/media artifacts in 2012 than we did in 1012. 1992 vs 2012 might be a better comparison.

but it is something I worry about sometimes. How am I going to listen to these mp3s after the apocalypse?

Plus amazing convenience -- having an entire record library on your phone, on your work computer, etc.

if this service really was unlimited I can see paying $250-400 a year for it

Mordy even more horrifying than that is the fact that every kid born this century is going to have access to a bunch of embarassing Facebook updates and pictures from their parents. Will you want to run for president in 2036 and have someone dig up the time you "liked" that "drug test the poor" image? I sure as hell wouldn't.

that just seems like old stuff in new form. parents have always left children with embarrassing legacies - digital or otherwise

if the grid goes down and the internet ends bc of something catastrophic (would not be the first knowledge catastrophe in history) we're gonna be fucked.

I think about this a lot. no one will be able to make/do anything.