― james porter (james porter), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 18:49 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 18:50 (nineteen years ago) link
― Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 18:51 (nineteen years ago) link
― g--ff (gcannon), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 19:32 (nineteen years ago) link
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 19:35 (nineteen years ago) link
I've just looked through Amazon and there's nothing obvious. It amazes me that you can't easily get these, Stage and David Live, and yet you can get "Peace On Earth" by Bowie & Bing Crosby for a fiver!
― Keith Watson (kmw), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 19:36 (nineteen years ago) link
― g--ff (gcannon), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 19:38 (nineteen years ago) link
x-post
― wetmink (wetmink), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 19:43 (nineteen years ago) link
― kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 19:44 (nineteen years ago) link
― sexyDancer, Tuesday, 15 June 2004 19:44 (nineteen years ago) link
― kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 19:48 (nineteen years ago) link
― Keith Watson (kmw), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 19:48 (nineteen years ago) link
Can I be heretical here and say I've never really cared for "Heroes" the song?
― noodle vague (noodle vague), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 19:57 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 19:58 (nineteen years ago) link
I think we've got an MGs video treatment right here.
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 20:10 (nineteen years ago) link
George Bush to thread.
As for Bowie, which ever one has 'Look back in anger'. I can't remember at the moment which one it's on.
― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 20:18 (nineteen years ago) link
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 20:20 (nineteen years ago) link
― Kent Burt (lingereffect), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 23:29 (nineteen years ago) link
i rank low so highly at least partly b/c it was the 1st berlin bowie that i'd heard on the CD reissue (i'd managed to get me hands on a cassette version of lodger circa 1989, which was no mean feat in those pre-bowie cd release days). in those halcyon days (circa 1985-1992), where getting anything before let's dance in ANY format qualified as something of a minor miracle, what rare snippets of the berlin-era songs that one would hear on the odd mix-tape were akin to tantalizingly incomplete ancient greek poems or plays. and largely for the same reasons -- in those days, one HEARD of how influential those berlin records were -- how one's favorites of those times like, say, numan or reznor or vince clarke or were but PALE COPIES of these records (or "influenced" by them [hello mr sinker!]). and, when "wild is the wind," "warszawa," or "beauty and the beast" appeared on those mix-tapes, one could SORTA grasp those connections (like a crawl through aeschylus or euripedes would shed light on what eugene o'neill was up to). otherwise, one had to take it on faith -- i hadn't heard those fabled (and, for all intents and purposes during that time period, "lost") recordings in their entirety. not to mention that it raised some intriguing questions re mr. bowie's oeuvre -- how could a guy who started out combining an orange mullet and ridiculous platform shoes with some japanese dude's vision of what a martian rockstar would wear turn 180 degrees and turn out these weirdly cold songs (i was naive and dumb back then too, "cocaine" meant "al pacino shouting 'come say hello to my li'l friend!!'" not "strange english dude making odd sounds in a german studio w/ an erstwhile pseudo-drag queen.") so when i managed to get my hands on a re-issued low, and sat enraptured through the clanging joy of "speed of life" through the calm loveliness of "all saints"*, it was rather like opening a box, discovering 1/3 of sophocles' lost works, and connecting the dots. (my then ardent love affair w/ NIN, nitzer ebb and KMFDM became less tender and tinder, to paraphrase another weird-looking english dude i liked back then.) (* -- i didn't then, and still don't, count the abominable "sound and vision" remix as anything worth getting worked up over one way or another.)i could also point out that, as far as low goes, that i cottoned more to its cold kling-klang sheen masquerading very real and intense emotions (mr. numan DID learn something from the master!), as well as the odd juxtaposition of structurally and lyrically knotty pop-song fragments and glacial synth epics. in comparison, heroes' pop moments were much more staid (and the synth epics much more tenuous). (though i like heroes well enough -- "heroes," "beauty and the beast," "v2 schneider," and "the secret life of arabia" guaranteed that [sorry ned, "sons of the silent age" never did much for me -- to my ears, it sounds almost like an inferior remake of "the supermen"].) and, of course, the whole station to station-to-scary monsters period is intriguing as a record of a very talented -- and very fucked-up -- artist slowly picking up the pieces of a shattered mind/muse/personality. but that's the common answer for these recordings, innit?― Eisbär (llamasfur), Wednesday, 16 June 2004 02:18 (nineteen years ago) link
i could also point out that, as far as low goes, that i cottoned more to its cold kling-klang sheen masquerading very real and intense emotions (mr. numan DID learn something from the master!), as well as the odd juxtaposition of structurally and lyrically knotty pop-song fragments and glacial synth epics. in comparison, heroes' pop moments were much more staid (and the synth epics much more tenuous). (though i like heroes well enough -- "heroes," "beauty and the beast," "v2 schneider," and "the secret life of arabia" guaranteed that [sorry ned, "sons of the silent age" never did much for me -- to my ears, it sounds almost like an inferior remake of "the supermen"].)
and, of course, the whole station to station-to-scary monsters period is intriguing as a record of a very talented -- and very fucked-up -- artist slowly picking up the pieces of a shattered mind/muse/personality. but that's the common answer for these recordings, innit?
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Wednesday, 16 June 2004 02:18 (nineteen years ago) link
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Wednesday, 16 June 2004 02:21 (nineteen years ago) link
Heroes>hot>Visage
― Edmundo (Edmundo), Sunday, 10 October 2004 18:51 (nineteen years ago) link
I was watching that in Japan last month, and I think it is remarkable, perhaps the video that keeps its appeal after many of the others on the Bowie DVD have faded. I think what's really unusual about it is the half-heartedness, the clumsiness. It's basically a rock video featuring a pierrot act, a mime sketch of a rock star making a rock video, yet too comically glum and sulky to go through the required hoops, and lacking the necessary gung ho conviction. 99% of rock videos have full-throttle conviction, conviction turned up to 11. But here Bowie mimes a desultory half-heartedness with deft physical theatre. The character (because it isn't really Bowie, it's a fellow, a sad sack, a thin-lipped melancholic) makes to play his guitar and gives up half way through the phrase. He just can't be bothered. He's awkward, but the awkwardness is performed very gracefully. There's something of Buster Keaton in the performance, the grace with which clumsiness is evoked. (Keaton gets a little homage in a much later Bowie video, 'Miracle Goodnight'.)
'Fashion', while lacking the winning tentativeness of the 'Be My Wife' video, does have some of the same deliberate clumsiness; the Bowie character makes a silly rat-like gesture at one point, stops, sniffs, wipes his nose with the back of his hand, and continues. It's a great little piece of actor's business, a sort of Brechtian alienation effect. Very few rock stars have the degree of theatrical sophistication it takes to risk ambiguity like that. And very few rock stars are attractive enough to risk making 'ugly' gestures or giving 'mixed messages'.
― Momus (Momus), Sunday, 10 October 2004 19:56 (nineteen years ago) link
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 10 October 2004 20:00 (nineteen years ago) link
on a far more basic level than momus's analysys: for me, the thing that always stuck out (literally) in the be my wife video is bowie's teeth. i could be remembering this wrongly, but ISTR several shots in which the fixed, desperate grin is pretty much the focus. there was a truth, an honesty about those teeth.
as for the thread: come on. low. there is no question there. heroes is merely a great album. low is LOW. it is ... unimpeachable. it is perfect.
― grimly fiendish, Sunday, 10 October 2004 21:08 (nineteen years ago) link
― wetmink (wetmink), Sunday, 10 October 2004 21:43 (nineteen years ago) link
― manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 10 October 2004 21:48 (nineteen years ago) link
― RJG (RJG), Sunday, 10 October 2004 22:52 (nineteen years ago) link
― The Brainwasher (Twilight), Sunday, 20 March 2005 00:48 (nineteen years ago) link
I am really enjoying all the stuff from this era on the Stage reissue. "Beauty & The Beast" and the instrumentals especially.
― 'haitch' (haitch), Sunday, 20 March 2005 12:08 (nineteen years ago) link
Both albums are great though, but "Low" is my fave Bowie album.
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 20 March 2005 15:55 (nineteen years ago) link
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 20 March 2005 15:57 (nineteen years ago) link
I'll split my vote: first side goes to Low, second side goes to Heroes.
― Revivalist (Revivalist), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 10:03 (seventeen years ago) link
― mike t-diva (mike t-diva), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 10:24 (seventeen years ago) link
― Comstock Carabineri (nostudium), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 11:38 (seventeen years ago) link
Unleach the hounds!
― Edward Bax (EdBax), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 12:49 (seventeen years ago) link
― Who Are You... The Nerve... I Wanna Get Out, I Wanna Get Out (Dada), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 13:00 (seventeen years ago) link
― Revivalist (Revivalist), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 13:00 (seventeen years ago) link
But Low is the better album, more extreme in its pop-soundtrack divide, more concise, less "rock" more "soul" in terms of the base materials for its songs...
― gekoppel (Gekoppel), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 15:45 (seventeen years ago) link
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 15:47 (seventeen years ago) link
― kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 15:50 (seventeen years ago) link
― gekoppel (Gekoppel), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 16:13 (seventeen years ago) link
Much as James Brown begat MC Hammer
― Who Are You... The Nerve... I Wanna Get Out, I Wanna Get Out (Dada), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 16:49 (seventeen years ago) link
Oh, and I agree completely w/Ned's choice waaay upthread. "Heroes" for me.
― Jay Vee's Return (Manon_69), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 17:09 (seventeen years ago) link
Except I hear nothing of Blur in anything by Blur. "Trouble In The Message Center" is "Heroes"-by-numbers though.
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 21:06 (seventeen years ago) link
If you mean that Brown taught Hammer how to wear ridiculous clothes and sing/shout banalities over beats, then yeah.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 21:39 (seventeen years ago) link
― M. Biondi (M. Biondi), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 22:31 (seventeen years ago) link
― willem -- (willem), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 04:57 (seventeen years ago) link
― willem -- (willem), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 04:58 (seventeen years ago) link
― Emily B (Emily B), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 20:19 (seventeen years ago) link
What's going on with the reissues? I expected to see a 30th Anniversary double deluxe just like the early albums a couple years ago, but no show. There's a couple pricey 2007 issues, but I don't know if they're remastered from the 1999 Virgin version. My Rykodisc Low is sounding a little brittle to me.
There's a brand new book out about the Berlin era by Thomas Jerome Seabrook called Bowie in Berlin: A New Career In A New Town. I flipped through it. Nice pictures, but it doesn't seem to improve on the Berlin section in David Buckley's Strange Fascination. Also released since the last post, David Bowie Under Review: 1976-1979. It's next in my Netflix, will report back.
I wonder how the albums would have differed if Bowie convinced Michael Rother (Neu!, Harmonia) to join in.
― Fastnbulbous, Sunday, 1 June 2008 13:27 (fifteen years ago) link
Fripp: "Currently we are in dispute with the David Bowie estate and PPL, who refuse to acknowledge that RF is a featured performer on both Heroes and Scary Monsters albums."
― WmC, Monday, 23 September 2019 21:50 (four years ago) link
I had to ask on FB what PPL does (which I forgot); it collects royalties for performers on songs, rather than just the writers. A bit stupid for the estate to not own up to this; also a bit lame for Fripp to air his dirty laundry on FB the way he did on this topic, it makes him look unbelievably petty.
― akm, Monday, 23 September 2019 22:13 (four years ago) link
Has he ever cared how he looks?
― WmC, Monday, 23 September 2019 22:23 (four years ago) link
true, i just don't know what he expects to get out of that post.
― akm, Monday, 23 September 2019 22:25 (four years ago) link
Not sure, but I think this is the same tack he took when he had that brief dispute with Kanye over Schizoid Man royalties. Ask nicely and privately once and then air it out. Never again with the Endless Grief.
― WmC, Monday, 23 September 2019 22:31 (four years ago) link
someone posted this on stupid steve hoffman forums which clears this all up: "At the Crimson pre-show last night, David Singleton explained that PPL informed DGM that Fripp would no longer be paid royalties as a 'featured' performer on Heroes since the production credits do not list him as such. PPL cited a law that went into effect around 1990 with regards to this issue and are arguing that even though Heroes was made in the 70's the ruling can be applied retroactively. It's another case of the music industry ripping off the artist. Lawyers for the Bowie estate are siding with this ruling.The fact that Tony Visconti and others involved in the making of Heroes acknowledge that Fripp was a co-creator and collaborator on Heroes, as well as interview transcripts of Bowie saying the same, is being disregarded since the album does not use the words 'featured' artist/player/etc.It's easy to see why Fripp is pissed."
― akm, Tuesday, 24 September 2019 17:45 (four years ago) link
I don't get what Bowie's estate gets out of siding with PPL on this.
― WmC, Friday, 27 September 2019 13:59 (four years ago) link
Low is better
― treeship., Friday, 27 September 2019 14:03 (four years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xC9FkNJt1Q
― MaresNest, Friday, 30 June 2023 23:25 (ten months ago) link
Spanish language version of “Heroes” icymihttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xqmu84ltzl0
― Looking For Mr. Goodreads (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 30 June 2023 23:53 (ten months ago) link
"Heroes" is stronger if you want songs: Low basically doesn't have any. You know it's rough sledding when your lead single is "Sound and Vision" (fourteen lines of lyrics, and no chorus) because it's the only thing on the disc (along with "Be My Wife") that even resembles a pop song. It's mainly compositions and fragments.
But Low's instrumental side is better. "Warszawa" thru "Subterraneans" gives Side B a nice arc, while "Heroes" has a slight sense of fizzling out at the end. And I think Low has to get points because it came first.
Both are amazing; among the best things he ever did.
― Coagulopath, Monday, 3 July 2023 03:35 (ten months ago) link
not sure abt yr definition of songs
heroes has 1 really really great tune but low has an almost perfect side of tunes
― corrs unplugged, Monday, 3 July 2023 06:45 (ten months ago) link
low 4 me
― ava (paolo), Monday, 3 July 2023 09:30 (ten months ago) link
heroes is probably my fave bowie tune though, i know that's a super obvious pick but there you go