Black Kids - Wizard of Ahhhs

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (97 of them)

Is this Pitchfork's most embarrassingly transparent and desperate attempt to try to lay claim to some sort of status above the cunted internet feedback loop?

Yep! 10.0/10.0

Savannah Smiles, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 10:10 (fifteen years ago) link

damn homie

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 22 July 2008 10:13 (fifteen years ago) link

whatta lazy cop-out

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 22 July 2008 10:13 (fifteen years ago) link

i do love the role of "ray suzuki" as pitchfork's http://bp3.blogger.com/_WqvMLlERcvY/RvyAN31SBeI/AAAAAAAAACM/y7TDkgpYyqY/s1600/deathatgolf.jpg though

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 22 July 2008 10:16 (fifteen years ago) link

They changed it from a 0.0 to 3.3 within the last hour. They can't even commit to their bullshit.

Savannah Smiles, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 11:20 (fifteen years ago) link

And now Scott Plagenhoef is the author, not Ray Suzuki...

zeus, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 11:21 (fifteen years ago) link

and now the review is a picture of dogs.

oh, pitchfork, you card!

salsa shark, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 11:26 (fifteen years ago) link

i thought the review was always a picture of dogs

t_g, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 11:30 (fifteen years ago) link

I met someone who actually read pitchfork once, it was weird. I thought he was kidding but he looked all sad when I giggled.

Niles Caulder, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 11:30 (fifteen years ago) link

This will be their Rattle And Hum moment, right?

Dingbod Kesterson, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 11:32 (fifteen years ago) link

x-post: that's a good story, reading ilm is way cooler

t_g, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 11:40 (fifteen years ago) link

can someone explain what happened here?

cutty, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 12:44 (fifteen years ago) link

It was simply a computer error left over from our server change a few weeks back. An eariler version of this same review-- but with a placeholder rating, subhead, and author name-- was ported over and accidentally 'reverted to' in our system when I woke and it was changed asap. Sorry...it's a boring technical difficulty.

scottpl, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:35 (fifteen years ago) link

it's remarkable that a review like this one need a few weeks of advance planning, and that management still fucked it up.

elan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:51 (fifteen years ago) link

"Everybody's got to hear the shit on WBALLZ, WBALLZ

WBALLZ!"

elan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:53 (fifteen years ago) link

the original teaser made much more sense. now it's like they're apologizing to the band? either way this is just really lazy and kinda gutless

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:21 (fifteen years ago) link

It wasn't so much advanced planning as one early, internal joke that turned out to be the thing we ended up going with. We are also constantly working to correct and curb our CMS errors but a computer error and a human error are different things.

Whether a reader, or loads of them, finds it lazy or gutless is another matter, of course.

scottpl, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:24 (fifteen years ago) link

I think it's safe to say Pitchfork will never recover from this one error

The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:25 (fifteen years ago) link

In a cheap and shitty way this review is satisfying to me.

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:29 (fifteen years ago) link

I can't wait til the interview where that editor dude says "Pitchfork is entirely responsible for your backlash, whaddya think of that?"

Brooker Buckingham, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:34 (fifteen years ago) link

I've felt like someone owed me an apology for Black Kids ever since I heard them, so this seems about right.

St3ve Go1db3rg, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:48 (fifteen years ago) link

one early, internal joke that turned out to be the thing we ended up going with.

I don't understand; do you mean the review will remain the LOLDOGs image?

Savannah Smiles, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:54 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah,very good. and i hope they wont get ruined,once they will release a "proper" L.P.

-- Zeno, Sunday, 7 October 2007 10:39 (9 months ago) Link
ruined by loldogs

mizzell, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:01 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah, totaly ruined. 3.3 is even a high score for this bad record

Zeno, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:08 (fifteen years ago) link

What does it mean for the dog picture to have an "author?" Does that mean Plagenhoef took the picture and added the lolcat caption?

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:10 (fifteen years ago) link

think about it as an art piece...

Zeno, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:11 (fifteen years ago) link

In that case, 4chan is the internet's MOMA?

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:13 (fifteen years ago) link

HOMO, morelike

The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:14 (fifteen years ago) link

Is it too much for them to at least explain why they think the record is so awful?

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:20 (fifteen years ago) link

No shit! When they played a huge role in blowing them up to begin with!

Savannah Smiles, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:22 (fifteen years ago) link

Does it maybe mean they liked the EP but not the record like some of you dudes?

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:43 (fifteen years ago) link

I haven't heard the new record at all! I just think its horribly lazy to pull this kind of stunt. At least tell us why this didn't live up to the promise of the EP.

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:45 (fifteen years ago) link

Sometimes a couple of pugs are worth more than a thousand words. :-/

I agree with the "somehow, this review makes me happy" sentiment

Mackro Mackro, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:13 (fifteen years ago) link

And we've definitely proved that a couple of pugs means a thousand new blog entries on the Black Kids.

Mackro Mackro, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:14 (fifteen years ago) link

Does it maybe mean they liked the EP but not the record like some of you dudes?

-- call all destroyer, Tuesday, July 22, 2008 11:43 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Link

a. i dont think anyone here is playing capn save a black kid cuz we think this really awful record is good b. the record is basically the ep + 5 songs so that logic doesn't really fly either

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 22 July 2008 18:53 (fifteen years ago) link

How do you do this and not use a "DO NOT WANT" or "FAIL" image?

cee-oh-tee-tee, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 18:57 (fifteen years ago) link

^^the best question

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 22 July 2008 18:58 (fifteen years ago) link

Oh I dunno, there's some pretty posi posts about the EP and then it was all re-recorded or something, so maybe people are down on that. I really couldn't be bothered to learn more because the songs I've heard are derivative, smug bullshit that remind me of the worst aspects of being friendly with hipsters in college.

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 19:24 (fifteen years ago) link

it reminds you of getting friend-zoned?

s1ocki, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 19:27 (fifteen years ago) link

The friend zone (or friendship zone) is a folk psychology concept found in many texts geared towards a male audience about "dating advice", or "seduction advice". In that case, that man would be mentally categorized as a "friend" rather than a lover, i.e. put into the friend zone.

Great try, but no.

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 19:29 (fifteen years ago) link

It does kind of remind me of my roommate getting friend-zoned, though.

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 19:30 (fifteen years ago) link

Honestly? You think Black Kids are smug? It's slightly clever twee - almost the opposite.

skygreenleopard, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 05:15 (fifteen years ago) link

Also - slocki's comment? Hilarious. I should also emphasize I think it's the opposite not because it's twee (which can get pretty ironic and smug too) but because I think it's pretty sincere.

skygreenleopard, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 05:29 (fifteen years ago) link

nb:: this blog: http://tweefashion.blogspot.com/

wilter, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 05:31 (fifteen years ago) link

YO DUDE ARE YOU A SKYGREEN LEOPARD DUDE

jeff, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 05:45 (fifteen years ago) link

jk i don't care :D

jeff, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 05:45 (fifteen years ago) link

hehhhhh

wilter, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 05:47 (fifteen years ago) link

oh skygreen leopards they will believe anything.

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 11:41 (fifteen years ago) link

Jeff: Unfortunately, I'm not. Someone asked me that in the Pitchfork thread too - as I said there, I bought their CD a while ago and I've used their name as a log-in in everything since. I also like the band a whole lot. However, it can probably cause some confusion here on ILX. Might be changing the nickname soon.

skygreenleopard, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 23:17 (fifteen years ago) link

these things are so weird to me, like everyone goes apeshit for some halfway decent/halfway shitty band and then all of a sudden they release a new album and it's like THE SCALES HAVE FALLEN FROM MY EYES....

new shit seems like kinda spanau ballet type shit...i dunno...i seriously don't know why like vampire weekend's week-ass shit is the best thing ever and this weak-ass shit is the worst ever...like just flip a fuckin' coin. i probably like this sort gay nu-romantic type vibe better than cod-african preppy "funk"....v

M@tt He1ges0n, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 23:25 (fifteen years ago) link

spanDAU ballet

M@tt He1ges0n, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 23:44 (fifteen years ago) link

Unfortunately, I'm not.

LOL

call all destroyer, Thursday, 24 July 2008 13:30 (fifteen years ago) link

metacritic seems to have found the review unquantifiable.

poortheatre, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:07 (fifteen years ago) link

eight years pass...

umm..

http://www.stereogum.com/1925736/stream-black-kids-rookie/music/album-stream/

devvvine, Monday, 20 February 2017 18:27 (seven years ago) link

Kinda into this, two songs in and it sounds like the last eight years of indie music didn't happen.

devvvine, Monday, 20 February 2017 18:33 (seven years ago) link

I met someone who actually read pitchfork once, it was weird. I thought he was kidding but he looked all sad when I giggled.

― Niles Caulder, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 11:30 (eight years ago) Permalink

Hehehehehe!

Working night & day, I tried to stay awake... (Turrican), Monday, 20 February 2017 19:20 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.