<3 grady shows us how to leave
― estela, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 23:26 (eleven years ago) link
nice
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 23:29 (eleven years ago) link
did i briefly meet the subject of this attachment? my visual memory has faded but i can recall that there was definitely cause for distraction
I don't think that would have been possible tbh (tho it is possible you briefly met an appropriate and perfectly sanctified attachment, who I also knew in a professional capacity - not quite such a catchy thread title).
Need to practice grady's nod and smile. way things have gone generally I'd look like a yokel with a twitch.
― Say Bo to a (Fizzles), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 07:59 (eleven years ago) link
but there can be no backsliding
correction: there can be some backsliding.
― Say Bo to a (Fizzles), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 21:37 (1 week ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
http://www.joethorn.net/wp-content/themes/editorial/functions/thumb.php?src=wp-content/uploads/ezra-prays-600x315.png&w=606&h=0&zc=1&q=90
― fizzle tics (Fizzles), Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:36 (eleven years ago) link
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5e/Bruegel%2C_Pieter_de_Oude_-_De_val_van_icarus_-_hi_res.jpg
― fizzles tics (Fizzles), Saturday, 23 February 2013 16:40 (eleven years ago) link
The sun is hot stuff, fizzles. Next time epoxy yr feathers.
― Aimless, Saturday, 23 February 2013 19:02 (eleven years ago) link
she is nothing like the sun. more like a quasar.
― fizzles tics (Fizzles), Sunday, 24 February 2013 10:35 (eleven years ago) link
need wings of elemental adamant from the core of Pluto.
and to flap very hard.
― fizzles tics (Fizzles), Sunday, 24 February 2013 10:38 (eleven years ago) link
Damn bro that's a hell of a pedestal you're building
― new hope for orang-utan (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Sunday, 24 February 2013 10:58 (eleven years ago) link
yeah, tell me about it. rest assured she's just a v nice person who I like a lot. not, idk, Cleopatra or anything, nor am I on some self-destructive jag like Bob in Hamilton's The Midnight Bell. but we're close professionally and like elliptical orbits seem to have times of great closeness and at other times for us to be distant from each other.
distance is safest and easiest to either envisage escaping from, or having escaped from, or in the process of escaping from the attachment, but is a lot less fun than the closeness.
basically I'm happier in her company than out of it, and I've resigned myself to being hooked until I'm unhooked. and well, you never know - we do have a ball from time to time.
in fact both Ezra and Icarus were chosen as much for their portrayals of indifference or embarrassment of the rest of the world (idk the story behind the durer - but that's what it looks like). obv such things are v important to the person going thru them - the most important thing - but to the outside world there is at best a bafflement. think Kipling's a rag a bone and a hank of hair.
I shd probably shut up rly, as it's been veering twds 77 territory for a while, but there is a large part of me that finds it not unamusing or without interest.
― fizzles tics (Fizzles), Sunday, 24 February 2013 11:36 (eleven years ago) link
we do have a ball from time to time
if ever further clarification were needed
― c'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas le beurre (imago), Sunday, 24 February 2013 11:55 (eleven years ago) link
(please answer in pictorial form)
― c'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas le beurre (imago), Sunday, 24 February 2013 11:57 (eleven years ago) link
Just starting to experience this for the first time. Not sure I'd find my crush remotely attractive outside of the workplace environment, but I'm curiously unmoved by this realisation. If anything it adds a slight air of mystique to the attraction.
Fortunately I'm spared all the awkwardness that's supposed to be attendant on this sort of situation by the fact that she's married and a decade older than me, and I'm kinda viewed as the baby in the office. I'm not sure anyone takes me very seriously yet. To that extent I suppose this is more like crushing on a teacher than a colleague, even though she is the person in the office who's nearest me in age. Still, it's quite nice though. Again, as with teachers at school, I suspect it'd be near impossible to work in a office with more than a couple of members of the opposite sex and not fancy any of them even a little bit.
In fact, upon reflection, this is EXACTLY like fancying the teacher at school - the fact that she's married and unattainable is the whole point I think. Never really thought about it in those terms though
― Windsor Davies, Sunday, 24 February 2013 12:00 (eleven years ago) link
Miss Fenwick. I must have been about five or six. Distraught when she married a German. Genuinely felt the barriers were not insuperable. Feel WD describes appropriate inappropriate professional attachment and I shd listen and learn.
imago - ill have a think about a pictorial representation of our hi-jinks, but in the meantime you did remind me that I have a... inappropriate er... something attachment to the grouping of women at the far left front of Poussin's Triumph of David, that is at least partially informed by my IPA tho largely in spirit and deportment than featural resemblance:
http://iamled.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/triumph-of-david.jpg
― fizzles tics (Fizzles), Sunday, 24 February 2013 12:29 (eleven years ago) link
I always figured lj would return, i forgot about the rules of the sequel- add spawn
― lance armstrong will have been delighted (darraghmac), Sunday, 24 February 2013 12:32 (eleven years ago) link
Aliens in Dulwich Picture Gallery. Examining catalogue nos etc. Ah balls, anyway. it's the thread for it after all.
― fizzles tics (Fizzles), Sunday, 24 February 2013 12:43 (eleven years ago) link
xpost and, ah, easy there fella. I may leave trails but I prefer them of breadcrumbs than actual ID parades.
― fizzles tics (Fizzles), Sunday, 24 February 2013 12:44 (eleven years ago) link
We should probably hang fire on this sort of judgement at least until I've got through a Christmas party or a leaving do or something. I may turn out to have feet of clay yet, definitely have previous with hugely inappropriate declarations of, if not love, then certainly affection/lust on these sorts of occasions.
― Windsor Davies, Sunday, 24 February 2013 12:52 (eleven years ago) link
Oh and how's N.5. getting on? Has he gone full Ralf Hutter yet? Never seen a man so preternaturally suited to his work - I think witnessing his neophyte mastery was what discouraged me from really trying
― c'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas le beurre (imago), Sunday, 24 February 2013 12:54 (eleven years ago) link
actually, sorry to be self-important, esp after the self-important garrulousness itt, but do you mind if I get mods to redact the post? it's not so much g00gling as the fact that there are other people I know who go on the site from time to time.
― fizzles tics (Fizzles), Sunday, 24 February 2013 13:42 (eleven years ago) link
And so.
― c'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas le beurre (imago), Sunday, 24 February 2013 13:44 (eleven years ago) link
Ah it's not quite a triple handjob but for nununuilx its enough to be going on with
― lance armstrong will have been delighted (darraghmac), Sunday, 24 February 2013 13:55 (eleven years ago) link
oh my god the women at my new workplace
― ❏❐❑❒ (gr8080), Friday, 1 March 2013 12:04 (eleven years ago) link
Otm
― poll that whitey music pfunkboy (darraghmac), Friday, 1 March 2013 12:06 (eleven years ago) link
no joke one of the "br4nd's thr33 c0r3 v4lu3s" is "flir7y"
― ❏❐❑❒ (gr8080), Friday, 1 March 2013 14:34 (eleven years ago) link
lol
― :C (crüt), Friday, 1 March 2013 14:47 (eleven years ago) link
I dream of staying at a flirty hotel.
― give me back my 200 dollars (NotEnough), Thursday, 21 March 2013 16:09 (eleven years ago) link
developing IPA from grad student who keeps coming into my office to hang out/get away from studies (many of them do this, so not necessarily a sign of interest)
― the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Thursday, 21 March 2013 17:44 (eleven years ago) link
Your posts are invalid unless you write them in IPA http://ipa.typeit.org/full/
― and that sounds like a gong-concert (La Lechera), Thursday, 21 March 2013 19:24 (eleven years ago) link
does your glottal stop when walks in the room?
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 21 March 2013 19:39 (eleven years ago) link
appropriate bar crush is go
― the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Tuesday, 7 May 2013 05:41 (ten years ago) link
this shit sucks ;_;
― Roz, Tuesday, 4 June 2013 17:45 (ten years ago) link
will 2015 be the year I stop having IPAs? no, it will not.
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Saturday, 3 January 2015 07:43 (nine years ago) link
oh God. Don't even want to write exactly how I am connected to this person, but I'm a grad student. Not my supervisor, at least.
― ljubljana, Thursday, 21 May 2015 01:39 (eight years ago) link
^my sympathy
as student had liaison with one prof but rationalized it bc i only audited his class & he was not in my department (though in related/overlapping field, advisor to some of my friends)
eventually i broke it off but it remained awkward situation
― drash, Thursday, 21 May 2015 03:26 (eight years ago) link
yeah, if anything were to come of it it would require... some re-jigging of my current formal dissertation arrangements. Best/worst is that I have an inkling it may be reciprocated. Could be extremely wrong about that though.
― ljubljana, Thursday, 21 May 2015 15:05 (eight years ago) link
that does sound complicated
every case/ decision is unique & individual; but for me felt prudent to maintain strict boundary bw personal entanglement & direct academic relationship (in which one party has direct power/ influence re other's work), though in academia that can be v fine line
it's romantic until it isn't
e.g. consider possibility of stalkery prof :( or having to work on high-stress longterm project with (or relying on) someone you don't want to see or who evokes bad feelings
― drash, Thursday, 21 May 2015 19:41 (eight years ago) link
That's why it would require some re-jigging of my current formal dissertation arrangements! But yeah, even if that were to happen, there are risks...
― ljubljana, Thursday, 21 May 2015 22:30 (eight years ago) link
I am more and more certain that this person is not interested in me and also not interested in my gender in general. So far this hasn't diminished my inappropriate attachment.
― ljubljana, Thursday, 19 November 2015 00:26 (eight years ago) link
had two of these in my training class. usually just repeat gibberish in my head and distract myself with images of dead elephants and move on with training....
― Hammer Smashed Bagels, Thursday, 19 November 2015 01:37 (eight years ago) link
but it does make the situation safer, if not less painful?
new hire in my dept is non-native speaker and emailed me about having coffee, called it "sharing zips" = instant IPA
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Thursday, 19 November 2015 02:23 (eight years ago) link
you're right.
― ljubljana, Thursday, 19 November 2015 03:31 (eight years ago) link
Eeeeesh. I'll say that one of the values of a committed relationship is increasing the risk of even thinking about this stuff. Lord knows.
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 19 November 2015 04:20 (eight years ago) link
Two reasons to shut the fuck up and never post to this thread again, to self:
1. You work with many attractive people of the gender that you're into, jackass, and you have HAD THOUGHTS
2. You are a dad and you have other things to think about and that does not give you any privilege or perspective to advise or even RELATE to people posting on this thread who are LFLIATWP
3. You said TWO, are you ready to STFU? OK good let's go to bed
Man I am glad I am around to talk to myself
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 19 November 2015 04:48 (eight years ago) link
I don't know how I ended up back here but here we are.
We both have like 3 weeks off over Christmas so hopefully it will just die down and go away.
It's not even lust it's just "you are the best person ever".
― Toot Your Hütter On Pollution Now! (Branwell with an N), Thursday, 10 December 2015 17:52 (eight years ago) link
is it the same person?
― kinder, Thursday, 10 December 2015 19:25 (eight years ago) link
Oh god no. This is like 2 workplaces later.
(Thank goodness, because the place where I had the original IPA was such a messed up an unhealthy environment for me that I do now think that the IPA was a symptom of how badly that place messed my head up.)
― Toot Your Hütter On Pollution Now! (Branwell with an N), Thursday, 10 December 2015 19:43 (eight years ago) link