New Yorker magazine alert thread

tents indoors? molecular camping

“He never makes the same fucking flavors twice,” he said. “They’re rainbows. You can’t catch them.”

love lane, such a good writer

― lag∞n, Sunday, March 3, 2013 6:46 PM (42 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lol

no lol at u SEE

I think Lane is great and don't get why some people don't like him.

Same here. I can see why his opinions might annoy you and some of his jokes fall flat but to say that he's a bad writer - nah.

I think Lane is great and don't get why some people don't like him.

― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, March 3, 2013 9:04 PM (16 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This might explain a lil of it - http://urbanhonking.com/isawthat/2011/05/17/remember-the-ladies-2/

Ah yes, Adam Gopnik my old pal–whose writing I genuinely enjoy and who seems like a great dude

...

:)

I always found Lane oddly sex-obsessed, but sexist? Never noticed it. Is this a pervasive opinion? Still a good writer, and funny, and says good things about film, sometimes.

A little googling found this essay, that asserts Lane's "Dark Knight Rises" review was sexist ... against men!

Lane and Denby are both great y'all are mad

Lane's fun to read, and when he's really enthusiastic about something, it can be worth a look. But mostly he doesn't seem very interested in film, which is kind of a problem. Denby's just middlebrow nothingness. They shoulda grabbed Hoberman as soon as the Voice dumped him.

I don't get the impression Lane is uninterested in film at all. He does tend to lead with the less interesting film, or more Hollywood/commercial film, and then follow-up with a shorter review of a film that he likes more. But I may be misrepresenting his patterns. But he reads passionate to me, just not overly solemn or serious.

i think lane loves movies. hes a great writer too. dont know why they havent swapped out denby for brody

I occasionally agree with Denby's muddle-headed challops but he's such a damn Old Testament scold.

I like Brody, but I think I like him most as this (literally) hidden gem of the magazine. He's free to write about more esoteric stuff, but he's relegated to a tiny corner of the front of book. And the web.

brody's blog is usually pretty interesting

brody has hilarious taste in movies for a stern looking middle age man w/a huge beard

i like this cryptobragging links to uninteresting news articles in many languages

i actually like lane when he's not writing about movies. denby is horrible. a horrible film critic. they should have thrown him out the door and hired hoberman. that would have been great.

i skip denby but theres no way his reviews can compare in awfulness to how bad his books one abt getting divorced and jerking to internet porn and the other complaining abt mean blogs sound

My favorite pretentious film critic brag was when Jonathan Rosenbaum was writing about Dryer and referred to a new Dryer bio, but couldn't resist noting that the book was better in the original Dutch. I thought dude, there is no way you are fluent in Dutch, let alone fluent enough to read a biography in Dutch.

The book was better in the original google translated Dutch.

the book is better if you split it w yr date

Sorry posting from afar. Obv. I meant Dreyer, and I think the bio was in Danish. I blame google translate.

røsenbaum

A hint as to what Hersh is up to

http://m.democracynow.org/stories/11912

Did we somehow never discuss the article about the lady who shot her bro and a roomful of fellow professors?

I just read the whole thing, and holy shit

yeah i had read the wired article about her but that was def incredibly interesting too

by the time the transgender teens piece had gotten around to talking about YouTube I had already been sucked away from the article and down a 2-hour k-hole of trans teen vlogging

bolshoi acid attack piece this week was great, also the crazy dudes diving into florida sinkholes and spending 21 hours underwater

that reads like criticism but its meant to be praise

Can someone summarise the Urban Honking piece about Lane? I mean, I might agree, but it was too annoying to actually read after a para.

xpost

by the time the transgender teens piece had gotten around to talking about YouTube I had already been sucked away from the article and down a 2-hour k-hole of trans teen vlogging

― ❏❐❑❒ (gr8080), Tuesday, March 12, 2013 9:53 AM (35 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i.. sucked.. trans.. teen... hole ― ❏❐❑❒ (gr8080)

just read the larissa macfarquhar piece on aaron swartz. so damn sad.

i read the first half of that, felt like i got the idea and stopped

I get what you are saying gr80, I have a strange fascination with teens these days, and their feelings, and trans teen vlogging can be pretty powerful and encouraging.

havent read the article but teenagers are monsters

otm

The Urban Honking piece is a prime example of awful internet writing. Lane may indeed be an insidious misogynist but she mounts a half-assed case drizzled with lazy snark.

Read the rest of the Swartz piece k3vin - it gets richer as it progresses.

i support the causes of trans teens, but i will oppose to the death their right to use "transition" as a verb

that is a fairly common verb

a. intr. To make or undergo a transition (from one state, system, etc. to or into another); to change over or switch.

1975 Aviation Week & Space Technol. 6 Jan. 43/3 Transitioning to the advanced displays from the basic dial indicators found in standard aircraft sometimes causes minor confusion.

originally aviation jargon!

also, apposite:

1986 New Yorker 19 May 28/2 There can be something almost quaint, in our meeting here like this talking about Texas in transition, when the overriding question..is whether there will be anything to transition to.

slocki did u know irregardless is in the dictionary

no

all words are words

end of story