tibetan self-immolation piece felt too short. interesting coming on the heels of the japan suicide piece though.
― Thelema & Louise (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 2 July 2013 15:05 (ten years ago) link
the inside cover is the same shot from the other side, and ernie and bert have the faces of roberts and scalia
― i don't even have an internet (Hurting 2), Friday, June 28, 2013 4:36 PM (4 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
roberts and scalia cuddling, muppet supreme court on the tv, just spitballin
― lag∞n, Tuesday, July 2, 2013 1:08 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I like it
― i don't even have an internet (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 2 July 2013 15:08 (ten years ago) link
http://www.theonion.com/video/sesame-street-bert-and-ernie-are-not-gay-they-are,33028/?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=SocialMarketing&utm_campaign=LinkPreview:2:Default
― dan selzer, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 01:22 (ten years ago) link
"if someone out there is offended by something i'm in no position to judge"
I'd amend that slightly. If they say they are offended, you are better off assuming they feel offended than assuming they are lying for ulterior motives. You can listen to them as they explain what they see when they look at the NYer cover and why they find it offensive. Again, there's no need to judge them as insincere.
But if they are making an argument as to why their pov should be adopted by others, including you, then it is perfectly possible and admissible to judge the force and cogency of their argument to see if it persuades you. If it doesn't persuade you, you aren't judging their feelings or their right to defend them. At times, you may even find their argument so weak as to be ridiculous. That's cool as long as you don't generalize that judgement any further than is warranted and extend it to judging their worth as a person.
― Aimless, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 01:45 (ten years ago) link
the part abt the griot in the mali piece was pretty out there
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 05:22 (ten years ago) link
Wow, I'd been waiting for something like the Mali piece for a while. That was pretty incredible.
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 7 July 2013 18:02 (ten years ago) link
Loved the Lepore piece on Jane Franklin!
― quincie, Sunday, 7 July 2013 19:05 (ten years ago) link
^^^
― mookieproof, Sunday, 7 July 2013 19:07 (ten years ago) link
I can't figure out if pop music is particularly ill-suited to the New Yorker, or if S F-J is just particularly ill-suited to write about it there. I find his pieces only so much wheel spinning in service of flimsy theses that never quite resolve themselves. Why make up some nonsense about a hard rock revival? How could he deride Creed et al, but then conveniently ignore Pearl Jam, the band that begat them, which continues to thrive at hard rock? Especially if he's going to talk about Nirvana as some sort of torchbearer? And calling "Nevermind" one of "four or five" perfect hard rock records? Why even add that? Why not just call it perfect? And then why in the world would you call it "explicitly indebted" to Aerosmith's "Rocks?" In what way?
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 7 July 2013 19:59 (ten years ago) link
The first page of that piece is basically gibberish.
― da croupier, Sunday, 7 July 2013 20:12 (ten years ago) link
Exactly. It's like he dictated it over the phone while driving around. And then it was edited down while he was unreachable.
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 7 July 2013 20:22 (ten years ago) link
That Lepore piece is one of the most beautiful things I've read in ages.
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 7 July 2013 20:50 (ten years ago) link
It was so, so good, wasn't it? And not the sort of thing I would normally go for.
― quincie, Sunday, 7 July 2013 21:10 (ten years ago) link
Didn't Lepore (or another NYer writer) do something a few years ago on Jane Franklin? Maybe a NYer.com blog post?
― Louie Althusser (Leee), Sunday, 7 July 2013 21:11 (ten years ago) link
It's almost something that Janet Malcolm would attempt.
― A deeper shade of lol (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 7 July 2013 21:54 (ten years ago) link
An op-ed for the Times, I think. Having read that made this feel a little warmed-over, but the framing with her mother was a lot more effective than that device usually is. Mostly because she's a very good writer.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 7 July 2013 21:59 (ten years ago) link
I know he's royalty/divinity around here, but he's really not a very good writer.
― 誤訳侮辱, Sunday, 7 July 2013 22:01 (ten years ago) link
his Tourettic impulse to offend
― Mordy , Monday, 8 July 2013 00:42 (ten years ago) link
― 誤訳侮辱, Sunday, July 7, 2013 6:01 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
he used to post here, but other than that i don't think he's worshipped or anything. i agree with josh that i don't really care to read about pop music in the NYer though
― k3vin k., Monday, 8 July 2013 05:44 (ten years ago) link
though i'd read it if nabisco were given his job
― k3vin k., Monday, 8 July 2013 05:45 (ten years ago) link
Oh, for sure. I love his writing, and always have. He and Mark R. are the two most thoughtful Fork peeps who could really live it up in that slot.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 8 July 2013 12:12 (ten years ago) link
I think the ilxor take on SFJ was mainly that he has to write for a New Yorker audience, not a music fan audience--which means that when he writes about QOTSA he has to take into account that the last hard rock band most of his readers spent much time thinking about was Nirvana.
― mimicking regular benevloent (sic) users' names (President Keyes), Monday, 8 July 2013 13:20 (ten years ago) link
Somewhere writing well must have factored into the grand plan, but that appears to have fallen by the wayside.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 8 July 2013 15:22 (ten years ago) link
x-post
yeah!
― A deeper shade of lol (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn),
Yeah as well to the history of the Voting Rights Act article.
― curmudgeon, Monday, 8 July 2013 15:54 (ten years ago) link
SFJ in the NYer always reminds me of an overly-parentally-attached teenager trying to explain trends to his "cool" mom.
― i don't even have an internet (Hurting 2), Monday, 8 July 2013 16:05 (ten years ago) link
announcing in passing that there are "four or five perfect hard rock albums" is definitely something a teenager would do
― da croupier, Monday, 8 July 2013 16:09 (ten years ago) link
actually, to his cool mom and his skeptical dad who will never be interested no matter what he says
― i don't even have an internet (Hurting 2), Monday, 8 July 2013 16:11 (ten years ago) link
is the guy ever coherent when he's trying to navigate between different strains of rock? Let's not forget, his most famous moment was when he wanted to know why indie rock wasn't funky like Mick Jagger and the Clash anymore.
― da croupier, Monday, 8 July 2013 16:15 (ten years ago) link
Saying there are "four or five" gives him some snob wiggle room, so that when you suggest an album he can say "no, not that one."
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 8 July 2013 16:18 (ten years ago) link
is Ashlee Simpson's Autobiography one of them
― first I think it's time I kick a little verse! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 8 July 2013 16:20 (ten years ago) link
Depends if you count four or five!
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 8 July 2013 16:24 (ten years ago) link
lcd display article had some interesting parts but was stylistically so annoying. could have fit way more cool facts about lcd display production in there if the author had taken out all the pointless quirky "funny" background stuff. i'm pretty sure they described every single meal they ate while in korea researching the article.
― congratulations (n/a), Monday, July 1, 2013 9:18 PM (1 week ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i JUST NOW saw that this was written by nicholson baker!?
― congratulations (n/a), Monday, 8 July 2013 17:56 (ten years ago) link
why is nicholson baker writing an article about lcd displays?
― congratulations (n/a), Monday, 8 July 2013 17:57 (ten years ago) link
he's obsessed with printed newspapers, libraries, etc.
what day of the week in the nyer on newsstands?
― caek, Monday, 8 July 2013 18:30 (ten years ago) link
by tuesday usually
― max, Monday, 8 July 2013 18:31 (ten years ago) link
thanking you
― caek, Monday, 8 July 2013 18:33 (ten years ago) link
writing about lcd displays seems like an inevitable thing for nicholson baker to do
― we're up all night to get (s1ocki), Tuesday, 9 July 2013 01:03 (ten years ago) link
He wrote an earlier NYer piece about reading e-books on an iPhone vs. an e-ink reader.
― o. nate, Wednesday, 10 July 2013 02:50 (ten years ago) link
dudes i know what he writes about, but the lcd article was literally about how lcd screens are made - it was a tech article, not a "how does tech affect reading" article. and it wasn't very good.
― congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 10 July 2013 15:32 (ten years ago) link
it was about how lcd screens are made and about how asia is funny because it's different from america
http://blog.ted.com/2013/06/26/bob-mankoff-picks-his-11-favorite-new-yorker-cartoons-ever/
― k3vin k., Friday, 12 July 2013 16:10 (ten years ago) link
there are some great ones there but the mozart one is pretty awful
― congratulations (n/a), Friday, 12 July 2013 16:20 (ten years ago) link
the explanation of the french army knife one is very ted.
― caek, Friday, 12 July 2013 17:06 (ten years ago) link
britisher egg collector one is amazing
― johnny crunch, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:46 (ten years ago) link
liked the franklin piece as much as everybody else; v lovely. also liked the tibet/immolation piece?
i had a daytrip involving copious waiting room time, waiting for a visa appointment, & stuffed a bunch of old issues into my bag to catch up; reading the joseph mitchell piece, which is great; liked the zadie smith on joni mitchell piece fine?, which iirc annoyed people, here - i can sorta see why because that kind of peripatetic, loftily quoting thing is destined to be on some level insubstantial, but i kinda liked its concerns. & read the purell piece. also good.
― szarkasm (schlump), Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:53 (ten years ago) link
Yeah, I don't think Baker was well-suited for this piece. He's great at writing about his own (i.e., user-centered) interactions with technology -- he also had a good one about video games a couple years ago, IIRC -- but this wasn't that.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 17:23 (ten years ago) link
Gladwell generator
― Brakhage, Thursday, 18 July 2013 20:14 (ten years ago) link
lol at "Monster Cocks: The Last Book You'd Ever Think I'd Write"
― how bad could it be to be stuck to the couch, forever... (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 18 July 2013 20:19 (ten years ago) link
The piece on domestic violence prevention was hair-raising.
― first I think it's time I kick a little verse! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 18 July 2013 20:20 (ten years ago) link
yeah
loved the beach erosion article (my alley) and lol at the karan family being called out in a national magazine for suing because beach replenishment prevented them from seeing the ocean from their ground floor
― mookieproof, Friday, 19 July 2013 01:08 (ten years ago) link