XTC fans (or non-): possible explanations of their appeal???

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (313 of them)
Dukes of the Stratosphear
PERIOD

Thor, Monday, 28 June 2004 13:42 (nineteen years ago) link

Dukes Of Stratosphear.

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 28 June 2004 14:44 (nineteen years ago) link

What Dahlen said. And if you want to hear the Beatle-esque thing, go straight to the string arrangement on "Grass" — or anything on Skylarking, for that matter. But more than prog as you describe it, Tim, I think of XTC (Partridge, really) as craftsmen above all else.

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Monday, 28 June 2004 15:01 (nineteen years ago) link

The relationship between XTC and prog is pretty much summed up for me by Dave Gregory’s guitar solos: this is a guy who can play these jazz-inflected ultra-composed and just blazingly precise breaks, and yet nary a one of them lasts longer than ten seconds. Which extends all over the band: they’re ridiculously adept at lots of aspects of their songwriting and musicianship and performance, but for the most part they pump that skill into building up the kind of Catchy Pop Songs anyone could be doing.

Best thing about XTC that people tend not to talk about: the performances tend to be amazing. Particularly around Drums and Wires: not only is Partridge a distinctive and engaging vocalist (the stutters and snorts on like “Scissor Man” and “Outside World” come out so well you almost don’t notice how odd they are), but as a band they just tear and swing, all casual, through some pretty acrobatic shifts (again, “Scissor Man”). (If they’d been playing something dark and heavy, my guess is that rock fans would look back at them as gods; but when you play giddy pop, people tend to read skill as just a given, or even a detriment.) The instrumental hot-performances faded away when they went into their pastoral studio-pop phase, obviously, but Partridge’s vox stayed as keen as ever.

Liking them around “Skylarking,” like everyone says, is just about enjoying mildly “sophisticated” pop songwriting and arrangement, something they do quite well and quite interestingly. (On that level there’s maybe a lean toward the kind of English “adult” pop songwriting that Bush and Gabriel are maybe part of --- I could imagine later-era Bush singing, say, “Another Satellite” --- but it’s so less theatrical and much more just “pop.”) And yes, it helps if you like the sort of giddy imaginary-pop vibe they’ve picked up from psychedelia. Just like lots of bands, from the Beatles to the Ladybug Transistor: this is sort of stage-musical dreamyland pop, a very knowing Apollonian construction of pop conventionals, not some real-world Dionysian thing. Which is why the Dukes of Stratosphear make a good shortcut to what the band’s all about: these are three guys who happily made up a corny alter-ego just to do really superb and only occasionally goofy pastiches of psychedelic pop.

For what it’s worth, I like XTC quite a lot, and I wouldn’t recommend English Settlement as a starting point. I’d recommend Drums and Wires and Skylarking.

nabiscothingy, Monday, 28 June 2004 15:39 (nineteen years ago) link

I like 'Mayor of Simpleton' but then again that's the only thing I've ever heard by them really.

57 7th (calstars), Monday, 28 June 2004 17:21 (nineteen years ago) link

Holy Crow. If you can't appreciate the UTTER BRILLIANCE of XTC (in any of their permutations -- whether early "punky" material or their later "bucolic pop" phase), you sincerely don't deserve to the ears that God stapled to your skull. Return them at once. No refund!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 28 June 2004 17:27 (nineteen years ago) link

See, I'd easily recommend English Settlement (or Drums & Wires) as a good starting point. It was certainly the album that got me hooked on XTC. "Senses Working Overtime" was my entry point - still one of the best songs I've ever heard - but really, there's not a single bad track in the bunch. Looking back at it now, it's a bridge between XTC's "quirky" earlier days ("No Thugs In Our House" fits in well next to "Respectable Street" or "Into The Atom Age") and their "pastoral" later material. How about not worrying about where English Settlement fits in within music history? It's like the non-music fans in my midst who hear songs I like and ask "so what kind of music is this?"

mike a, Monday, 28 June 2004 17:41 (nineteen years ago) link

Their first three albums are at least as good as, um, the debut album by the Yachts (who sound kind of similar), though not as good as *Breakfast in America* by Supertramp. That pretty, critically acclaimed album they did in the late '80s (Skylarking, I guess) was, um, pretty and critically acclaimed, I guess. Their "quirkiness" was/is nowhere near as annoying as, say, Robyn Hitchcock's or They Might Be Giants' quirkiness, for whatever that's worth. I have never understood why people think they were "funky." They were less funky than 10cc, that's for sure. Less funky than the Sparks, probably. Less funky than the FIRST Talking Heads album. More funky than Wire (when Wire were good, and not *trying* to be funky, at which they sucked, anyway) I guess, but who wasn't? Less funky than '70s OR early '80s Roxy Music, not even close. Less funky than ABC or Dead or Alive or A Flock of Seagulls or Frankie Goes to Hollywood or any of those guys, obviously. WAY less funky than Devo or the B-52s (or Gary Numan or Mi Sex, I suppose, which I guess is what "Making Plans for Nigel" was trying to do.(And that's only fellow art-pop/arch-pop bands I'm comparing them to. They were less funky than Molly Hatchet, as well!) Still? Their first three albums, as artfuckster new wave goes? Not bad. After that, they seemed to try to go all Sgt Pepper's prog-pop on us, and they got even stiffer and whiter and thinner than they'd started out as. I don't think their words ever made sense. MAabe people think they were funky because they took the beginning riff of "Life Begins at the Hop" from the 4 Tops?? Who the hell knows.

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 17:44 (nineteen years ago) link

its weird that youd compare them to the yachts. the yachts songs and the XTC songs are the only songs i dont really love on those DIY UK pop compilations... the vocal production/vocals on both bother me a little.

peter smith (plsmith), Monday, 28 June 2004 18:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Chuck, did you just criticize XTC for how unfunky they are?

dleone (dleone), Monday, 28 June 2004 18:06 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah. I'm not sure if I was answering anybody on this thread, though. Maybe I was just answering a pitch letter that Sasha Frere Jones sent to me about their box set three years ago; I can't remember...

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:09 (nineteen years ago) link

Can I send you a pitch about how James Brown doesn't write enough songs influenced by the Beatles and Brian Wilson?

dleone (dleone), Monday, 28 June 2004 18:11 (nineteen years ago) link

(actually, check XTC's cover of "All Along the Watchtower" for tense post-punk funk in action)

dleone (dleone), Monday, 28 June 2004 18:12 (nineteen years ago) link

chuck why do you always insist on bringing in things that have nothing to do with the subject at hand?

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:13 (nineteen years ago) link

chuck is the best I am buying that one book of his where he " insist[s] on bringing in things that have nothing to do with the subject at hand?"

artdamages (artdamages), Monday, 28 June 2004 18:17 (nineteen years ago) link

I know, I know, it's just his schtick...

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:19 (nineteen years ago) link

Why do you insist on being such a ridiculous literalist, Shakey? How does what I wrote "have nothing to do with the subject at hand" when somebody up above wrote "The early stuff sounds very post-punk to me -- like a British Talking Heads. Jerky, funk-influenced rhythms + a little attitude." The best music XTC ever made has a lot more to do with the Talking Heads than with the Beatles or Brian Wilson. I really don't give a shit about their later tedium. (And they were less funky than the Beach Boys used to be, anyway.) (And if they were trying to be the Beatles or Beach Boys, well, 10cc and Boston and ELO and Wings and the Knack were a lot better at it.)

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:21 (nineteen years ago) link

you brought up funk, which has nothing to do with XTC (and no one up to your post had mentioned it), then you went off on your usual rambling spiel where you namedrop a million bands ranging from the obscure to the mainstream (many of which bear no relation to the music being discussed), use some false modesty to cover your ass ("I could be wrong,", "maybe", "my memort is crappy" ad nauseam). I mean, don't you get tired of doing the same joke over and over?

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:25 (nineteen years ago) link

I mean, really chuck you're just as predictable as Geir Hongro, someone should just write a program to do your posts for you and you could retire in peace.

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:26 (nineteen years ago) link

Actually, I think XTC's early period has a lot more to do with Capt Beefheart, Kinks, Can, Roxy Music and Brian Eno, Sparks, David Bowie, etc - the same group of influences Talking Heads would have had.

And 'funk' isn't really something I've ever associated with them, in any phase.

dleone (dleone), Monday, 28 June 2004 18:27 (nineteen years ago) link

i am sure chuck can defend hisself, but how could anyone ever tire of his schtick? it is hilarious and occasionally (or always or never - doesn't really matter) makes sense. and he doesn't always invoke the schtick anyway.

artdamages (artdamages), Monday, 28 June 2004 18:30 (nineteen years ago) link

>>no one up to your post had mentioned it)<<

uh, yes somebody did. and i just quoted them in my previous post. (and again, sasha frere jones has defended xtc to me as a funky band as well. i don't really care whether you think funk has nothing to do with xtc; some people clearly disagree with you. and i answered them.) and ALL of the bands relate to the music being discussed, or I would not have mentioned them. (and my memory IS crappy sometimes. though apparently not as crappy as your reading comprehension.)

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:34 (nineteen years ago) link

I understand that it's your journalistic mission to show how every band is related to every other band and how genre labels are essentially empty and useless and how it's all just music maaaaan, but y'know, that just doesn't seem like an interesting or useful goal to me.

But hey, go nuts. You tell those people (all one of them on this thread) that XTC is NOT funky! YEAH!

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:37 (nineteen years ago) link

I was trapped in an elevator with Colin Moulding for nearly eighteen hours once, and lemme tell you, toward the end we were both of us getting way funky.

nabiscothingy, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:46 (nineteen years ago) link

> think XTC's early period has a lot more to do with Capt Beefheart, Kinks, Can, Roxy Music and Brian Eno, Sparks, David Bowie, etc <

Two of which I mentioned on this thread before anybody else had, but since I was obviously just picking random bands out my ass who have NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH XTC (even though ALL of the bands I named have a fairly similar aesthetic to XTC, i.e.: jagged or ornate artiste pop songs with wacky lyrics, more or less -- plus almost all of them are British, as I recall, oops fuck you), I guess that's just a coincidence. (Hell, if saying XTC isn't funky offends people 'cause nobody would ever think to call XTC funky in the first place, I'll just say XTC never seemed very SMART to me, either. But now I guess people will tell me nobody ever thought XTC were smart! I can't win.)

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:46 (nineteen years ago) link

touched a nerve there...

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:48 (nineteen years ago) link

"jagged or ornate artiste pop songs with wacky lyrics"

yeah, that's totally what I think of when I hear the names Molly Hatchet, SuperTramp, and Dead or Alive. (clue: this is sarcasm) Carry on...

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:53 (nineteen years ago) link

this is a guy who can play these jazz-inflected ultra-composed and just blazingly precise breaks, and yet nary a one of them lasts longer than ten seconds. Which extends all over the band: they’re ridiculously adept at lots of aspects of their songwriting and musicianship and performance, but for the most part they pump that skill into building up the kind of Catchy Pop Songs anyone could be doing.

I think this gets at a lot of what I like about the XTC songs I like. I love the brief guitar "solos," if you can call them that, on a song like "Ten Feet Tall." Actually, it kind of reminds me of the solos you get on the first side of the Velvet Underground's The Velvet Underground.

Much of the time I like them in spite of their quirkiness, which probably makes me less than a true XTC fan. I like them primarily for narrowly musical reasons (and because the fun things they do musically also move me), and because I do like many of the lyrics, at least in bits and pieces. The lyrics usually make plenty of sense to me, and on English Settlement, I like the way, for instance, "Yacht Dance" picks up the same themes as "Sense Working Overtime."

I don't know if I'd called them funky (and I am less and less sure I even know what funky means--I think I go for a different type of rhythm than what funk is about), but I think they are very strong rhythmically at times. It's not just a matter of melody.

Rockist Scientist, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:54 (nineteen years ago) link

chuck thinks bob seger is funky

cutty (mcutt), Monday, 28 June 2004 18:54 (nineteen years ago) link

I was trapped in an elevator with Colin Moulding for nearly eighteen hours once, and lemme tell you, toward the end we were both of us getting way funky.

spill it. Oh, Chuck, fwiw, Colin Moulding is a huge Free fan.

Smart? I don't know. I would like to see you argue your way out of saying "XTC aren't anal enough".

x-post

dleone (dleone), Monday, 28 June 2004 18:55 (nineteen years ago) link

But so Chuck not caring about later-XTC is an obvious non-shocker. The thing about later-XTC is that it’s hard to defend it using any sort of grand history-of-music “this is what they contributed” theory. Hence the Beatles/Beach Boys talk: much of the material is just good pop, done good and well. Somewhere in all of that, though, I think there are flashes of things --- not even full songs, necessarily, just stuff-they-did --- that are nothing short of amazing, in all sorts of directions: I’m thinking of things on Skylarking like “Mermaid Smiled” or that sorta post-Police post-Bush “Another Satellite,” or the almost-concrete construction of “Dying,” or even their weirdly nice cod-jazz rhythmic inventions, like Oranges and Lemons’s “Miniature Sun.” Good pop, done well --- often in really interesting ways. After Oranges and Lemons I have no coherent defense for them, except that the pizzicato-pluck first song on the first Apple Venus is just magnificently arranged and the vocal performance is terrific.

Speaking of relevant bands: Stump! I feel a grand convergence between A Fierce Pancake and like Black Sea / bits of Drums and Wires.

I think we can grant Chuck's point that XTC were never particularly funky, let it die, and instead focus on this: the words don't make sense? Whuh? If anything this band's main word-problem has been making a little too much sense.

nabiscothingy, Monday, 28 June 2004 18:57 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't think their words ever made sense.

I'm with Nitsuh, I couldn't disagree more - Partridge is a fan-fucking-tastic lyricist, and even their psyched-out imagery at least fits the music.

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Monday, 28 June 2004 18:59 (nineteen years ago) link

skylarking sounds great if you are stoned. or so i've heard.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 19:01 (nineteen years ago) link

>"jagged or ornate artiste pop songs with wacky lyrics"
yeah, that's totally what I think of when I hear the names Molly Hatchet, SuperTramp, and Dead or Alive. <

It *should* be what you think of when you hear Supertramp, since it's exactly what Supertramp (as influenced by late '60s Beatles as XTC, and with their best album the same year as *Drums and Wires*) did. Dead Or Alive and the other '80s MTV Brit dance bands I named (ABC, A Flock of Seagulls, Frankie Goes to Hollywood) evolved out of the dance oriented Brit new wave XTC were part of circa 1979, and all made it dancier and more propulsive. Molly Hatchet were mentioned as a parenthetical aside in the post expressly to suggest that artsy British pop was hardly the funkiest white pop music around during the time XTC were doing their most rhythmic work. So yeah, again, they all had something to do with the subject at hand. Sorry if I didn't lead you by the hand explaining that step by step the first time.

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 19:05 (nineteen years ago) link

These days, Partridge's words (and be honest, when people talk about XTC, they're usually really just talking about Andy Partridge - even though "Grass" might be the best song on Skylarking) are as much word association as they are functional, narrative-driven prose. However, I agree, he's one of the great lyricists (see especially "No Language in Our Lungs", on almost this very topic)

dleone (dleone), Monday, 28 June 2004 19:06 (nineteen years ago) link

(xpost)

That's weird, I heard the same thing (on Skylarking) (while stoned) (the first song is called "Grass!"). Skylarking still feels like a big terrific musical to me, not least because the songs clearly describe a life cycle. (I've always wondered about the notes crediting Rundgren with the "sequencing concept" or something of that sort; clearly it went from the lyrics up!) (This is also why the substitution of "Dear God" bothers me --- not just because "Mermaid Smiled" is way way better but because that it completely alters the mood of the life cycle to put a moment of religious crisis in there instead.)

Another interesting reference point: Partridge vs. Costello. (Up through "10,000 Umbrellas" vs. The Juliet Letters!)

nabiscothingy, Monday, 28 June 2004 19:09 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost ruins joke; joker gets high and listens to skylarking

nabiscothingy, Monday, 28 June 2004 19:10 (nineteen years ago) link

steve miller sues

nabiscothingy, Monday, 28 June 2004 19:10 (nineteen years ago) link

>If anything this band's main word-problem has been making a little too much sense.<

In fact, you could almost say their sense was working overtime! (But I couldn't.) (I do think dleone's "not anal enough" comment was pretty funny, though. And no, I can't make that argument, either.)

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 19:11 (nineteen years ago) link

summer's cauldron is the first song on skylarking.

cutty (mcutt), Monday, 28 June 2004 19:11 (nineteen years ago) link

1000 Umbrellas = wow

cavalcade of x-posts

dleone (dleone), Monday, 28 June 2004 19:12 (nineteen years ago) link

does everyone ignore colin's sacrificial bonfire?

cutty (mcutt), Monday, 28 June 2004 19:13 (nineteen years ago) link

I will stick up for Robyn's quirkiness through Fegmania or so!

Tim Ellison, Monday, 28 June 2004 19:16 (nineteen years ago) link

Skylarking and Talk Talk's The Colour Of Spring were two of the very first cds I ever bought after my dad bought me a cd boombox when I graduated from high school. Those two cds set me up for some major disappointments as far as sound quality went when I made future cd purchases in the 80's. Wait, scratch that. I didn't buy them. I stole them from the record store that I my brother worked at.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 19:20 (nineteen years ago) link

And Globe of Frogs!

re: robyn

danh (danh), Monday, 28 June 2004 19:22 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, one thing that should be pointed out here is that I have never owned a very expensive stereo, which might explain something about why these guys have never hit me for the past 25 years. And my socks frequently tend not to match, as well. Plus I don't speak British.

cgycj, Monday, 28 June 2004 19:23 (nineteen years ago) link

I wouldn't mind listening to some of the old albums right now. I don't know what i have anymore. i haven't heard anything by them since the peter pumpkinhead album. i didn't care for that one at the time, but i might like it more now.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 28 June 2004 19:27 (nineteen years ago) link

i've been listening to them non-stop since this thread started.

cutty (mcutt), Monday, 28 June 2004 19:30 (nineteen years ago) link

Actually, in the sense (working overtime) of somewhat rhythmic late '70s Brit new wave jumping-around music for hyperactive aesthetes "progressing" toward prissy and way less rhythmic post-prog '80s Brit art-rock for genteel aesthetes who read too much, I think the Police are an obvious comparison who have barely been mentioned on this thread and maybe should be more often. But that's just me.

chuck, Monday, 28 June 2004 19:30 (nineteen years ago) link

Chuck, I first got into Skylarking on a monoaural single earphone (the kind old people used to use to listen to the TV), so I don't know if that cuts it! And I mentioned the Police, but there's this giant split in the Fun Quotient that made me feel bad doing it. Same vague Jamaicanisms and yelpy inflections and sharp guitars and movement toward new wave and then "adult pop," but god what a different tone.

A thousand pardons on Summer's Cauldron, yo. And I certainly don't forget "Sacrificial Bonfire"; I just always get distracted by "Dying" first. Colin's songs have an especially Muppetty quality that's sometimes just wrong (by the Apple Venuses he was turning into the High Llamas in a really bad way) and sometimes sweet -- Bonfire's on the way-good side.

nabiscothingy, Monday, 28 June 2004 19:33 (nineteen years ago) link

I doubt I'm the only one that discovered them this way, but They Might Be Giants have a song called "XTC vs Adam Ant" and I was at the age where I was just starting to learn about music not on the radio and would check out literally any band I heard about. Also got into Adam Ant that way, but he is not as much a fave

Vinnie, Saturday, 22 April 2017 01:15 (seven years ago) link

about a year and a half ago a good friend of mine made a very passionate and long post on FB explaining why, "after 20 years of near constant music consumption," he'd concluded XTC was his favorite band ever, for all the reasons we know... i was in new york and about to go to Other Music so i picked up Mummer and The Big Express there. ended up being my last visit there before it closed.

the O&L radio tour is sweet. the way their guitars blend on Love on a Farmboy's Wages - oh man

https://youtu.be/cTtFTHI7Or0?t=20m13s

flappy bird, Saturday, 22 April 2017 01:16 (seven years ago) link

I doubt I'm sure I'm the only one that discovered them this way, but it was on the 1982 WOMAD benefit double album Music and Rhythm, which had a bunch of artists who played the first WOMAD festival and which I bought for the unreleased Peter Gabriel, Pete Townshend and Jon Hassell tracks. It also had "It's Nearly Africa," which I completely flipped out over.

Bought English Settlement a few weeks later and flipped out 14 more times (see, 'cause there's a total of 15 tracks). By the time Mummer came out a year later, I had bought every album and most of the singles, EPs and side projects (with a big thank you to the late lamented Venus Records on 8th St. in NYC).

Hideous Lump, Saturday, 22 April 2017 05:38 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.