New Yorker magazine alert thread

Lane has always had a pervy streak, which I think he means to be cheeky but which often comes off, well, gross. Which is ironic, because Denby is the one who had an actual addiction to internet porn, which makes his eliding the issue (in, say, his epic, rambling "Nymphomaniac" review) that much more conspicuous.

how is that ironic

The guy with the porn addiction reviews the porn-ish movie about the sex addict without mentioning his porn addiction? Isn't that ironic?

no

Also I read it as you think it's ironic Lane wrote the pervy article when it's Denby who had the addiction. still, not ironic.

How about rain on your wedding day?

is the de man profile called Who's De Man

De Man Who Couldn't Afford To Orgy

De Man Who Would Be King (Of Literary Theory). Elegant headline. They missed a trick.

she seemed to be made from champagne.

The Derrida piece in Critical Inquiry that tried to exculpate de Man is actually really sad to read. He is just reaching so desperately to not face the truth and it's unusual to read something by Derrida where his vilnerability is apparent.

Menand did a great job of articulating why deconstructionism was incredibly exciting to some people and why, after a brief acquaintance with it at university, it has almost zero appeal to me.

He also did a good job of clearing up misunderstandings, especially this idea that there is something "nihilistic" in teasing out paradoxes in apparently stable texts.

For me when I was studying literature, the thumbnail sketch of the idea was bracing and energising - it's always good to be told to question everything - but when I tried to go deeper I lost interest. It's just not how I like to read. But it was nice to see Menand push back eloquently against the current consensus that it was a pointless, arid detour.

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2014/03/franco-moretti-and-the-science-of-literary-criticism.html

this is pretty fascinating

I thought this piece was really, REALLY bad, like maybe the worst thing I've ever read in the NYer (granted it's on the "blog" so I guess that's their excuse):
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/culture/2014/03/the-pointlessness-of-unplugging.html

Yeah that's a pretty dumb piece.

the only shouts & murmurs piece that has ever made me teehee:

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/shouts/2014/03/good-meeting.html

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/culture/2014/03/lord-jamar-rap-hip-hop-conservative.html

This seems like it would appeal to the ilxor audience. Can't say I have ever listened to any Brand Nubian,and this article certainly isn't going to change that anytime soon.

Brand Nubian's music is awesome but I hated Lord Jamar on the Combat Jack show, bigot and true homophobe.

the scarjo piece had me contemplating cancellation my subscription, whoever greenlit that piece deserves as much scorn as anthony lane for writing it.

i guess i can tell anthony lane and david denby apart now.

tbh i couldn't even finish it.

The thing i find interesting about the Brand Nubian piece, is the way it shines a spotlight on the emerging reactionary impulses amongst some old school hip hop fans. It's like rap is getting it's very own version of classic rock and associated conservatism towards music that falls outside traditional ideas of "masculinity" or whatever.

?? that has always been the case

it just reminds me of an old article about Death Row Records where Snoop and the Dogg Pound run into the guy from PM Dawn and start yelling anti-gay slurs at him

apologies for being arguably off topic, but do any of you fuck w/ a digital only sub to this? i haven't had any sub since high school, but might change that eventually and am considering skipping print altogether

i guess it'd probably be a newsstand sub on my ipad

for 10 bucks more a year you get the print, too

i don't get the point of a digital subscription. NYers are easy to carry with you, no?

Digital subs arrive on time & your roommate can't steal them as punishment for not doing the washing up (that's me)

it just reminds me of an old article about Death Row Records where Snoop and the Dogg Pound run into the guy from PM Dawn and start yelling anti-gay slurs at him

― I got the glares, the mutterings, the snarls (President Keyes), Friday, March 28, 2014 5:00 AM (8 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

is this avail or can i get an issue date to pull from the archives? sounds dope

I hated the digital but am happy enough with the Kindle edition.

jc, couldn't find that but DID find this:
http://www.nytimes.com/1996/01/14/magazine/does-a-sugar-bear-bite.html?pagewanted=all
gonna slot this in the hip hop stories thread as well because it's a helluva read

thx 4ks

xpost the Death Row thing was not in the New Yorker--Spin, maybe?

Snoop, Dre’s little brother Warren G and Daz have come to pick me up for a ride to Long Beach. Downstairs, in the hotel lobby, Li’l Malik (of the group Illegal) and Snoop’s cousin, Big C-Style, are waiting, watching cars. Malik runs up to Snoop, “Yo, that fat PM Dawn nigga is right there. Look!” Prince Be is waiting for a valet to park his convertible. ” Faggot, biiyaach!” Snoop doesn’t join Malik in dissing Prince Be, but he doesn’t speak to him either. Once we’re inside Snoop’s black Grand Cherokee 4×4, I glance back at Prince Be through the tinted windows; his feelings are visibly hurt.

http://dreamhampton.com/1993/06/24/snoop-g-down/_2696090972.html

the article on Svetlana fascinated me, especially since I've been reading about George Kennan lately.

Not sure why Brand Nubian guy being a homophobe is shocking. "Punk Jumps Up to Get Up Beat Down" came out 20 years ago.

the story on the West Virginia chemical spill is the first I've read in months that felt like a slow wrenching of every organ in my body.

great new yorker momentz, this afternoon. i'm not sure if they occasionally hold off on publishing an article until the moment is right or if it's just a happy coincidence, but the Evan Osnos article on the recent West Virginia chemical spill, Chemical Valley is simultaneously the best article I've read on the spill and a powerful rebuke to the recent Supreme Court decision that was based on the idea that "Ingratiation and access … are not corruption."

but they aren't! Roberts said so.

citing the infallible "earlier dumb opinion that we wrote"

man that pain dr one

yeah, I felt awful about his daughter getting blackballed as a result of everything

the detail about them picking out prison-friendly wedding rings at k-mart :/

the guy seemed like such a fascinating chump, too, like a coen bros character

blanking on what i've read & liked recently but it dawned on me to hit up this thread, are any of you listening to the longform podcast? it's really good. nerdy interviews with nerdy journalists. it's really good. cool eps with like sarah stillman, ariel levy, rachel aviv, &c&c.

Loved the Ariel Levy and Emily Nussbaum ones. As always I could do with less Gopnik.

the article on memory was cool, not sure i had ever known of that study where what was it 20%? of the subjects "remembered" details of being lost @ a mall as a child even though it never happened

That militia article is ultimately not that great but was super engrossing