it's official The Jam are 10 times better than The Clash

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (107 of them)
I think the Jam were simply too British, Doctor.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 10 September 2004 06:26 (nineteen years ago) link

http://www.precisionbodyarts.com/Website/portfolio/kbgnewbig/clash.jpg

that is some tacky, ugly shit.

whoever started this thread OTM.

el sabor de gene (yournullfame), Friday, 10 September 2004 06:37 (nineteen years ago) link

"I think the Jam were simply too British, Doctor. "

I had a similar thought. I wonder if Brits and an Americans have significantly different takes on these two bands. If we correlated nationality with Jam v. Clash supremacy, would there be a strong correlation between band and nationality?

Would that be Americans = Clash - Brits = Jam?

supercub, Friday, 10 September 2004 06:50 (nineteen years ago) link

I just think the Clash had a more accesible, dare i say univeral appeal, whereas the Jam just seemed STRENUOUSLY British. This is not a bad thing, mind you, but it won't help you "crack America".

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 10 September 2004 06:54 (nineteen years ago) link

Too British? Possibly. They certainly stayed with 'small' issues vs the Clash's (v. confused) worldview. By 79 The Clash's big n fuzzy rebel gang image + classic iconography made for a v. pallatable package for the USA, vs Weller's stubborn refusal to play the game.

**Would that be Americans = Clash - Brits = Jam? **

Nah - I don't think anyone likes The Jam anymore here. Except me!

What do you mean by STRENUOUSLY British, Alex?


Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 10 September 2004 07:01 (nineteen years ago) link

What do you mean by STRENUOUSLY British, Alex?

I didn't mean for it to sound derisive. I just mean that the Jam's oeuvre was simply littered with largely obscure (to American listeners) British references, and -- as you said above -- they refused to adhere to conventional "rock" stereotypes.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 10 September 2004 07:16 (nineteen years ago) link

I liked when Tracie sang backing on the Jams last single, our local mag had 'corrected the obvious typo' and made it that she sang on the James Last single...

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 10 September 2004 07:37 (nineteen years ago) link

ze clash are better.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 10 September 2004 07:44 (nineteen years ago) link

I think they were both a bit rubbish. I like a few of the jam's singles (vs 1 of the clash's) but it seems obvious to me (=nr1 clash-h@t@) that the jam were not 10x better. The Buzzcocks were.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 10 September 2004 11:19 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't know what's wrong with me today, I'm just a big hornball, because I was about to start going off on how I used to have a massive crush on Mick Jones when I was about 14, but, erm, that's got nothing to do with anything.

But then again, The Jam have the 7B/Sophies game in their favour.

Super-Masonic Black Hole (kate), Friday, 10 September 2004 11:23 (nineteen years ago) link

Damned > Buzzcocks > Clash > Jam

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 10 September 2004 11:27 (nineteen years ago) link

Buzzocks>Jam>>Clash>>>>>>>>Damned!

Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:24 (nineteen years ago) link

No.

Buzzcocks > Clash > The Damned > being hurt with sharp objects > Jam

edward o (edwardo), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:25 (nineteen years ago) link

Dr. C made me cry.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:28 (nineteen years ago) link

magazine>buzzcocks>slits>stranglers>damned>ruts>x ray spex>>>>>>>>>>>>>>eater>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clash

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:36 (nineteen years ago) link

>jam

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:36 (nineteen years ago) link

;)

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:37 (nineteen years ago) link

No no no no.

Damned > Magazine > Buzzcocks > Clash > Slits > Ruts > X-Ray >> Jam >>>> Stranglers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eater

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:42 (nineteen years ago) link

Fuck No!

XRay Spex> Magazine>B'Cocks>Jam>Slits>Eater>Clash>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Stranglers>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Damned

Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:46 (nineteen years ago) link

Are you three auditioning for the new series of Grumpy Old Men or what? ;-)

Super-Masonic Black Hole (kate), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:46 (nineteen years ago) link

hawkwind>spacemen 3>loop

;-)

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:48 (nineteen years ago) link

J-Joo-i-i--n u-s-ss-ss-ss (arm falls off)

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:48 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm not playing this game!

Super-Masonic Black Hole (kate), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:49 (nineteen years ago) link

(Besides, it's Spacemen 3 > Loop > Hawkwind there, granddad!)

Super-Masonic Black Hole (kate), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:50 (nineteen years ago) link

I'd love to be on it!

Actually this ranking thing is silly. I refuse to accept that X-Ray Spex, Magazine and The Buzzcocks are anything less than perfect. The Jam were absoluetly great, but many faults. The Slits were great, but could have been greater. Eater are the only punk band ever really(copyright. M Sinker, but I think we should add The Desperate Bicycles and The Adverts). The Strangers were good, but very silly. And apart from a couple of singles the Damned were rub.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:51 (nineteen years ago) link

Shite, I forgot the adverts.

Van der graaf generator>magazine>popol vuh...oh, fuck it.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:52 (nineteen years ago) link

b-but machine gun etiquette! The black album!! Strawberries!! "burglary is the life for meee!!" etc etc etc

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:54 (nineteen years ago) link

Yes, but what about Hawkwind vs. the Clash. Who wins there?

Super-Masonic Black Hole (kate), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:54 (nineteen years ago) link

HAWKWIND FFS!!!

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:55 (nineteen years ago) link

Argh, what an awful question I have posed myself...

See, if it came down to how many records do I own of each, I own every studio Clash record except Give Em Enough Rope, while I only own one and a half Hawkwind records (couldn't fit all of Space Ritual on the tape.)

But if you are going to talk about the evil perfidious INFLUENCE, then almost every other record I own has probably been influenced by Hawkwind but I cannot think of a SINGLE decent band inspired by the Clash.

Super-Masonic Black Hole (kate), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Neither can I.

Yes, OK Norm - Machine Gun Etiquette is great, I agree. They're still rubbish overall.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:08 (nineteen years ago) link

Except maybe Fat Les.

Super-Masonic Black Hole (kate), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:10 (nineteen years ago) link

"Actually this ranking thing is silly...."

Extremely silly.

How do you do it? If you were to rank those bands according to which released the best individual album or which released the best individual single or which wrote / recorded the best individual song everey one of us would probably end up with something different every time - how can you possibly hope to compare e.g. The Slits 2 albums, 3 Peel sessions and a handful of singles with The Damned's 28 year career?

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:12 (nineteen years ago) link

With the possible exception of The Stranglers (I haven't heard all of their albums) none of the others have ever released anything as dire as I'm Alright Jack & The Beanstalk / Not Of The Earth by The Damned.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:14 (nineteen years ago) link

I would just rank them on order of what they mean to me, ie, ho happy i feel at the thought of listening to them. I like the Damned shitloads, but the thought of listening to the slits' john peel sessions cd ep makes me happier!!

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:15 (nineteen years ago) link

"I would just rank them on order of what they mean to me, ie, ho happy i feel at the thought of listening to them."

That's what I do - hence The Damned on top every time. Partly because I just can't understate the extent to which New Rose changed my entire life; and partly because none of those other bands have ever been able to put on a live performance that can hold a candle to The Damned when they're on form and at their peak.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:25 (nineteen years ago) link

understate s/be overstate, obv.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:26 (nineteen years ago) link

Subway Sect better than all of them except XRAY Spex.

**How do you do it? If you were to rank those bands according to which released the best individual album or which released the best individual single or which wrote / recorded the best individual song everey one of us would probably end up with something different every time - how can you possibly hope to compare e.g. The Slits 2 albums, 3 Peel sessions and a handful of singles with The Damned's 28 year career? **

Pretty much what Norman says - a highly subjective view of how much I love them TODAY.- how *happy* is good. Quantity of recds are not important. Stuff like record covers, a little *thing* the singer did with his hands on TOTP, what they were wearing etc etc are all HIGHLY IMPORTANT!!

Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:26 (nineteen years ago) link

Boy, am I glad I went to bed before this thing turned really ugly.

The next person to speak ill of the Stranglers gets their trousers set on fire.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:33 (nineteen years ago) link

I forgot the banshees in this silly ranking thing. the banshees = joint nr1 with magazine.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:34 (nineteen years ago) link

Who's spoken ill of the 'Glers (as I think you call them), Alex?

Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:40 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, I take this :

>>>>>>>>>>>

...to mean "is really greater than." And by saying Eater (:::teeth gritting:::::) is greater than the Stranglers is to truly disrespect the Stranglers.

But don't mind me, I'm just sensitive.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:44 (nineteen years ago) link

Best not to mention where Killing Joke would fit into that order right now methinks Doc.

[runs away]

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:47 (nineteen years ago) link

Yes, but I didn't say that anyone on the list was CRAP apart from a lot of the Damned stuff.

Eater are greater than the Stranglers in a *pure-punk sense* because they exemplified the punk spirit of getting up and doing it. The Stranglers made better records.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:58 (nineteen years ago) link

Fair enough, Doctor. Well-reasoned, and I will not committ arson on your pants.


Killing Joke have no place in this debate, Stew.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 10 September 2004 14:02 (nineteen years ago) link

**and I will not committ arson on your pants**

Cheers. That might spoil my weekend. I'll be needing my pants.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 10 September 2004 14:16 (nineteen years ago) link

Now what's all this about speaking ill about the Damned?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 10 September 2004 14:42 (nineteen years ago) link

Yes, hataz plz listen to "Stranger on the Town" right now.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 September 2004 15:05 (nineteen years ago) link

The Jam made a few classic punk novelty singles: "In the city there's a fahsand fings . ." but never an album I could stand to listen to all the way through. The first Clash album is a brilliant act of savagery that has never been equalled.

And someone's dissing the Damned? I'd take them over Paul Weller's 'Rock of the Seventies' Roadshow any night of the week.

S

Soukesian, Friday, 10 September 2004 21:33 (nineteen years ago) link

I can't say I agree with this at all. All I want of the Jam is my greatest hits album and with the Clash I at least want the first two records AND a hits comp. Paul Weller is a big fuddy duddy and I'm nobody's anglophile.
-- manthony m1cc1o (anthonyisrigh...), September 10th, 2004.

OTM.

(damn, seems like i've been "OTMing" all day")

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 10 September 2004 21:41 (nineteen years ago) link

I guess The Clash have always been the "critics choice" of the two bands, but personally I prefer The Jam.

The received wisdom used to be that the Sex Pistols were manufactured / put together, and that The Clash were the real deal.

The more you read about their respective histories, the more you find that its almost the exact opposite.

And, of course, that it doesn't matter in the great scheme of things.

Mark G, Monday, 6 July 2015 06:45 (eight years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.