New Christgau Consumer Guide From MSN Music

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1340 of them)
I think he means that her possible evocation of Jay-Z, whether he's really the inspiration for the songs or not, brings him into the record. So that the listener has to contend with his presence, even if it isn't intentionally placed there. I think. It's hard to tell. I'm not sure why he admires her for opening that possibility, though. Certainly she didn't do anything within the record to suggest he's the inspiration. Did she? And if she did, why doesn't Xgau believe he inspired her?

Mordechai Shinefield (Mordy), Sunday, 11 February 2007 06:06 (seventeen years ago) link

She won't let him escape her grasp?

s w00ds (sw00ds), Sunday, 11 February 2007 06:13 (seventeen years ago) link

or maybe not "she won't let," but he "can't." no idea.

s w00ds (sw00ds), Sunday, 11 February 2007 06:16 (seventeen years ago) link

more lonley then the not liking the newsom place (strip the vocals, its more then okay) is the bday is astonishing and impt place

pinkmoose (jacklove), Sunday, 11 February 2007 06:47 (seventeen years ago) link

say what Anthony?xpost Yeah, that's what I thought, Scott, and goes with Mordy's "brings him into the record," but "leaves Hova with his hands full" is more about Jay-Z "having to contend with his presence" than "the listener" in general, though he sure better be listening good, seems to be the implication, so yeah he's in her snare as I said, in her grasp as Scott said, cos she sounds so effing powerful, I guess is what xgau's saying, and maybe I'd agree if I heard the album (since I slobbered all over the first Destiny's Child single in Voice: their feathers brushing my neck, "nettles and nightshade," oh gawd)(but they were like that, so maybe she is too, but her solo singles? Not so much, but hopefully the album.)

don (dow), Sunday, 11 February 2007 06:49 (seventeen years ago) link

I want to hug him for his Newsom review. I'm glad MSN is letting him do his thing.

Period period period (Period period period), Sunday, 11 February 2007 06:50 (seventeen years ago) link

don, did you review writing on the wall in the voice? i'm with you on beyoncé solo pretty much (have tended to like the riffy songs more than the song-songs, though "irreplacable"'s demon eye finally got me in its snare).

s w00ds (sw00ds), Sunday, 11 February 2007 06:56 (seventeen years ago) link

er, no, i guess you said "first" DC single--was that "no, no, no"?

s w00ds (sw00ds), Sunday, 11 February 2007 06:58 (seventeen years ago) link

two things

ys would be more interesting w. her just playing the harp, i find the kind of singing she does, a nusiance (and i think that she hides some skills on purpose)

bday is an album that i found really revealtory, for a number of reasons, and i thought that it should have done better critically and commerically. though i often disagree xgau, i was feeling that i was the only one who thot this was (her/a) masterpeice.

pinkmoose (jacklove), Sunday, 11 February 2007 07:04 (seventeen years ago) link

I hate when he reviews musicians' socioeconomic status, it seems very selective/inconsistent i.e. dissing Beyonce for being rich & materialistic while tacitly endorsing gangsta dope-dealing tales. Similiarly the "privlege" crack implies that Newsom is what? upper middle class? used her trust fund to hire Van Dyke Parks? heavens.

it's undignified & makes him sound like a bitter old hippie.

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 11 February 2007 12:29 (seventeen years ago) link

Kelefah put B-Day in his top ten in the Times actually.

And I still don't understand why people think what Lily Allen's parents did for a living is "relevant" as far as whether her music's any good or not (which is not to say it's not interesting; that sort of thing is always interesting. Actually, maybe the Joanna Nuisance review would be better if Bob was more specific about her class upbringing. Which I know nothing about; is it common knowledge? When Bob uses "privilege", I definitely assume "class" is coming into play, though I could well be misinterpreting him.)

I'm with Scott on the Clipse's words. Just like with lots of rappers (and plenty of non-rappers, though not too many country guys), I'm generally clueless on what the lyrics are supposed to add up to, and I'm not sure why being clueful about them would be a prerequisite to liking the record. Some lines they do sound cool; some less so. CD gets by on mood, inasmuch as it gets by (I'd give it a B+ or so too.)

xhuxk (xhuck), Sunday, 11 February 2007 12:39 (seventeen years ago) link

(that was an xp. hadn't read m coleman's post first!)

xhuxk (xhuck), Sunday, 11 February 2007 12:40 (seventeen years ago) link

(xpost, addressing m coleman)

is your position "people can't help being rich"? on the one hand, you're right, but on the other hand, privilege is a fair critique of a narrative/aethetic stance think: economic privilege, racial privilege, gender privilege, what have you - Newsome's vision is sorta by-and-for a real specific demographic and as such is profoundly limited, isn't that the point of what he's saying?

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Sunday, 11 February 2007 12:49 (seventeen years ago) link

I loved Milk Eyed Mender and [harsh words in re: Ys redacted, yay self-censorship]

-- Thomas Tallis

I liked Milk Eyed Mender but Ys is nigh-on unlistenable to me.

I keep saying this but go find the live recordings (w/accompanying players substituting VDPs arrangements on folkier instruments (not the full-orchestra shebang) and you'll be amazed how much more instantly palatable her singing is (vocally, calmer phrasing with some breathing space), how much warmer and musically appropriate it sounds, how the depth finally reveals itself... and then want to *slap her* for wishing to make Ys some kind of point-proving outré monolith that unfortunately turned into a plain unfriendly complete fuck up.

Shit like this is SO frustrating to me that although I think she's capable of being very, very good, in the long run I honestly think I'm better off just giving up on her NOW >:-(

about:coffee (fandango), Sunday, 11 February 2007 13:01 (seventeen years ago) link

thomas what you outline is a valid critique that requires more development and supportting example than a 200 word record review can afford. the reference to "privilige" in the newsom review read like a drive-by putdown, pure snark, in other words a cheap shot.

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 11 February 2007 13:08 (seventeen years ago) link

I mean, I'm fine with people liking it still but don't go giving me some kind of "it's a masterpiece, you just have to work at it... it took people a while to get into Trout Mask Replica" bullshit.

There's NO REASON Ys should be that impenetrable, and when presented with a little bit of care... it isn't! But I found out a bit too late and now all I feel towards it is hate for wasting so much of my fucking time "getting" it.

about:coffee (fandango), Sunday, 11 February 2007 13:09 (seventeen years ago) link

But people will defend (and overlook weaknesses in...) many fatally flawed albums to the ends of the earth if they genuinely believe in it's "genius". MEH.

about:coffee (fandango), Sunday, 11 February 2007 13:11 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm with Scott on the Clipse's words. Just like with lots of rappers (and plenty of non-rappers, though not too many country guys), I'm generally clueless on what the lyrics are supposed to add up to, and I'm not sure why being clueful about them would be a prerequisite to liking the record. Some lines they do sound cool; some less so. CD gets by on mood, inasmuch as it gets by (I'd give it a B+ or so too.)

This is true enough, but Christgau giving props to a gangsta rap album without tackling the moral issues is always going to come off as weirder than it would with most critics, because he worked more than most at putting these issues in the forefront of other reviews he's written (see his stuff on N.W.A., Dr.Dre.)

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Sunday, 11 February 2007 14:35 (seventeen years ago) link

Daniel OTM. I'm not too hung up on words, but the gangsta recidivism of the Clipse album interferes with my enjoyment of the record in a way that, say, Ghostface's doesn't (in my view Ghostface leavens his recidivism with enough surreality, denseness, and production hoo-ha).

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 11 February 2007 14:58 (seventeen years ago) link

I like their voices better than Ghostface's. (By the way, I think the Ghostface review is my favorite one in that consumer guide. Some intriguing thoughts in there, though Bob's idea that the majors are turning toward the long tail seems like wishful thinking.)

xhuxk (xhuck), Sunday, 11 February 2007 15:03 (seventeen years ago) link

and he loves "Suga Mama" as much as I do!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 11 February 2007 15:11 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh yeah, also: note which Gnarls Barkely track is not among his two favorites.

xhuxk (xhuck), Sunday, 11 February 2007 15:13 (seventeen years ago) link

Chuck's right, the Ghostface review is rich - I'm kinda surprised this line hasn't gotten more play here:

But hip-hop is now where rock was in the early '80s, when veterans such as Joni Mitchell, Randy Newman and Lou Reed were the equivalent of what the book trade called publishers' poets back when commercial publishers dealt poetry.

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Sunday, 11 February 2007 15:27 (seventeen years ago) link

It's a great line even though I'm not so sure he's right about hip-hop (he's totally right about Lou and Joni).

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 11 February 2007 15:33 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, it's both a good line and making me think, "But why should history be seen as fully repeating itself?"

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 11 February 2007 15:34 (seventeen years ago) link

What's that remark of (heh) Randy Newman's -- something about how a great writer will kill his mother for a great line even when it doesn't parse?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 11 February 2007 15:36 (seventeen years ago) link

well there is the pesky fact that the first one had some good songs and the second one was kinda Check Out My IMPORTANT IDEAS an' shit

Not trying to take us back to Newsom, but I think this pretty much sums it up for me. If not for the big names involved and the genuinely promising debut album, I highly doubt as many critics would've reacted to Ys. as positively as they did. Impossible to know, though, of course.

marc h. (marc h.), Sunday, 11 February 2007 15:52 (seventeen years ago) link

I think all prominent indie outlets would have been too terrified to talk shit about Ys, its momentum was pretty fearsome

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Sunday, 11 February 2007 16:15 (seventeen years ago) link

is there anything he doesnt like?!

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Sunday, 11 February 2007 16:15 (seventeen years ago) link

That Stylus review is evidence of why letter grades suck. At best (say, with most xgau), they're just redundant. At worst, they're a cheap way to imply a value you weren't able to argue for with actual words.

Zwan (miccio), Sunday, 11 February 2007 16:22 (seventeen years ago) link

all this talk almost makes me want to hear the newsom album. almost. some people had problems with fiery furnaces in the same way, no? 2nd album full of long-ass prog experiments. (i really liked that blueberry boat. never liked anything else half as much though. or played anything half as much.)

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 11 February 2007 16:23 (seventeen years ago) link

nothing i've read makes me want to hear that tv on the radio album though. and i kinda liked that katrina/dubya song they had on the internet.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 11 February 2007 16:24 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm really embarassed that Xgau felt the need to quote "I was a lover before the war." Did ANYBODY'S review not quote that fucking line?!

Zwan (miccio), Sunday, 11 February 2007 16:26 (seventeen years ago) link

his TVOTR review is actually really good. one of the best and most succint. the last line is especially OTM. mostly this sums up the record a bit too easily though - "I filed this under overwrought"

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Sunday, 11 February 2007 16:27 (seventeen years ago) link

That Stylus review is evidence of why letter grades suck. At best (say, with most xgau), they're just redundant. At worst, they're a cheap way to imply a value you weren't able to argue for with actual words.

I think with Xgau they're often almost an instrumental flourish, to strain a metaphor - if you read his stuff out loud and say the letter grade at the end, it puts a cap on the thing, like a more weighted "The End." Otherwise co-sign completely in re: both letter & number grades, they've been unhealthy for crit in general & I'm happy that the only place you see 'em in book reviews is in fucking People, which is exactly where they belong

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Sunday, 11 February 2007 16:31 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm really embarassed that Xgau felt the need to quote "I was a lover before the war." Did ANYBODY'S review not quote that fucking line?!

This makes me realize that I've never actually read a review of the album before Christgau's! At least I don't think I have. I was almost going to say that he really goes out of his way to squeeze a vague art-rock square peg into an un-vague political protest hole to justify PBS-style his not disliking it as much as he did their debut, but then I re-read the review and Bob really does make a case for it as a protest record of sorts. Not that that makes me remotely more interested in going back and listening to the thing again.

xhuxk (xhuck), Sunday, 11 February 2007 16:35 (seventeen years ago) link

When he read some CGs out loud at a reading last year, he'd often forget to throw in the grades. Most of the time they had plenty of flourish and finality without them, and in the cases where they didn't, the ambiguity was more honest and welcome for it.

x-post I'm glad he admits that a lot of the appeal is that its prettier. But yeah, political acknowledgement can be an easy bump to A- for him.

Zwan (miccio), Sunday, 11 February 2007 16:39 (seventeen years ago) link

And if Peter Gabriel opened his next album with that line, Xgau'd give it a big raspberry.

Zwan (miccio), Sunday, 11 February 2007 16:42 (seventeen years ago) link

well yes because it would be on a Peter Gabriel album

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Sunday, 11 February 2007 16:57 (seventeen years ago) link

since when was it not a Peter Gabriel album?

Matos W.K., Wednesday, 21 February 2007 20:13 (seventeen years ago) link

OMG his Newsom pan offends me mostly by presuming that I haven't already spent FOUR WHOLE UNDERGRAD MONTHS reading, re-reading, and writing several papers about The Faerie Queen.

nabisco, Wednesday, 21 February 2007 21:11 (seventeen years ago) link

Other than that, I don't think it's necessary to read any kind of buyer's remorse into this: it sounds like he enjoyed the first one, but found the new one overblown and self-important. The "original vs. worth doing" thing might be less about Newsom's style and more about the decision to do a grand suite with these conceits and this structure -- I mean, he suggests here that her songs should be simpler, which gets at the main difference between this album and the debut.

nabisco, Wednesday, 21 February 2007 21:17 (seventeen years ago) link

i love this sentence:
"Supposedly inspired by milestones in Newsom's life, these whimsical pastoral allegories reveal only that her taste for the antique is out of control."

but i disagree and have to ask what is so bad about having out of control taste for anything? i get how it jibes with the opening sentence, but it's a rather conservative position to take. also it probably wouldn't be too difficult to frame beyonce in the same way, but beyonce doesn't get that treatment because she isn't indie?

josh. (disco stu) on Sunday, 11 February 2007 04:58

He focused, like all critics do, on one observation in order to dismiss the album.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto) on Sunday, 11 February 2007 05:01


That sentence struck me as conservative as well.

Tim Ellison, Wednesday, 21 February 2007 21:23 (seventeen years ago) link

[i]When he read some CGs out loud at a reading last year[i]

the coffeehouse audience snapped their fingers and somebody shouted "go man go"

m coleman, Wednesday, 21 February 2007 21:39 (seventeen years ago) link

I mean, as Ray Manzarek once said, "The whole thing started with rock and roll (and) now it's out of control."

Tim Ellison, Wednesday, 21 February 2007 21:42 (seventeen years ago) link

Best Peter Gabriel album ever.

X-post obviously.

JN$OT, Thursday, 22 February 2007 16:01 (seventeen years ago) link

The distracting sense privilege is precisely what keeps me from opera and classical music. I mean, as if! Fucking white, over-educated blue bloods and their expensive instruments. Go back to the conservatory and unlearn that shit. And while you’re at it, pick up the new Clipse album, “Genius of Modern Music” and that Freedy Johnson album to learn how to keep it real.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 22 February 2007 17:04 (seventeen years ago) link

Johnston, even.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 22 February 2007 17:04 (seventeen years ago) link

As a nod to Christgau's New Journalism start, I will henceforth refer to the Consumer Guide as Paracriticism.

nabisco, Thursday, 22 February 2007 18:30 (seventeen years ago) link

*singles

So who you gonna call? The martini police (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 13 March 2021 22:45 (three years ago) link

The Paula Deen of American Rock Critics TM

"The Pus/Worm" by The Smiths (hardcore dilettante), Sunday, 14 March 2021 05:54 (three years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.