mike woodson job search tracking thread, plus triangle offense knowledge assessment quiz (nba offseason news 2014)

i just read that article and that would probably be the most suicidal move the lakers could make. what the hell does fisher's history with kobe matter? kobe is under contract, he's not going anywhere

I kinda like the idea of Fisher as coach.

1) It means he can't play anymore.
2) Other reasons.

ha otm and if he was lakers coach then like double kill. more reasons to pile on

the only reason to bring fisher in is because kobe's said in the past the only person on gods green earth he'd defer to is fisher.

plz make this happen

Just as Bryant managed to get in Fisher's ear during contract negotiations, Bryant shared during the NBA Finals that Fisher's the only player on the team that he'll truly listen to at all times. No one questions Bryant's desire to win, his skill-set and work ethic, but few have the credibility to privately and publicly question Bryant (just ask Shaq). No one questions Fisher's leadership credentials and professional attitude, but not everyone would go out of his way and emphasize how highly important Fisher has been to the team like Bryant did during free agency.

http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jul/12/news/lat-fisher-bryant-sl

The knots that franchise is tying itself into to placate a guy who is probably going to play 45 games a year for two years and retire, it's so baffling

Sure hire that great leader who got his ass handed to him in the new CBA during the lockout

well to be fair their best player did blow his knee out

― le goon (J0rdan S.), Thursday, May 1, 2014

details details.

(I'm sure that was more billy hunters fault but I'll take shots at fish where I can)

http://www.nbapicshow.com/nba_picture/nba-big-picture/Kobe-Bryant-And-Derek-Fisher-Wallpaper-The-Best-Friends-And-Brothers.jpg

too big to embed but really, really worth your attention on this day of days

thank you

hire kobe's friend to be lakers coach, all problems are solved

lakers front office seems to think that treating kobe well will help them recruit free agents.. nevermind that the worlds biggest asshole is on your team RIGHT NOW and nobody wants to play with his ass.

i just don't get the derek fisher idea. nothing against fisher, but there's been this oddly high number of people moving or rumored to be moving straight into head-coaching jobs lately, without any coaching background (e.g., kidd; kerr; mark jackson (i think he was a novice?); now fisher). seems like coaching is a distinct set of responsibilities, and being a great player, analyst, generally smart, articulate person doesn't necessarily qualify you.

my friend insists that kobe is woj's source and he's trying to build up support for fish

I don't see why Fisher is a bad choice. Not something people in our position could really judge. He's a smart player, just wildly cheap.

do you think he would play himself if he were scott brooks?

haha maybe

you know I think signing fisher was even worse than playing him

"not a bad choice" dude there must be dozens of qualified coaches out there who actually know what they're doing and have some experience, why would the lakers, of all franchises, roll the dice on kobe's buddy?

I don't think players have to necessarily do an apprenticeship before coaching. He could be a legit coaching talent, we just don't know. Wasn't Doc Rivers just a broadcaster before getting his first NBA coaching gig?

Lakers have much more info on what kind of basketball mind Fisher has than we message board goons do.

true

i guess i'm just going off of woj's rationale which is that him being friends with kobe and durant somehow makes him an attractive candidate. if the guy can coach, fine

Yeah I mean for all the shit we've given them mark jackson and kidd have their teams in the playoffs

d fish could be a really good coach, i just love the idea of d fish coaching in LA with old Kobe

yes, i need this opportunity to focus my hatred

yeah I don't have any pretensions to knowledge of fish's quality as a coach, I just want to rag on him for years and years

there must be dozens of qualified coaches out there who actually know what they're doing and have some experience

totally hear ya on this, but I'm thinking people like Fisher, Jackson, Kidd paradoxically have more instant credibility to players? or a kind of cache? "guys your new coach is Derek Fisher" 'oh Fish ok cool' vs "guys your new coach is Mike Budenholzer" 'da fuck??? *googles Mike Budenholzer*'.
also maybe Lakers are more willing to play a risk v reward game, snatch up a possible good-to-great coach before he hits the open market and if it doesn't work out oh well they can afford to fire him, pay out his contract, and hire another big name coach.
and it's m/l working out with Jackson and Kidd so it's trendy, NBA is a pretty trendy-heavy league.

Lakers have much more info on what kind of basketball mind Fisher has than we message board goons do.

― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, May 1, 2014 11:15 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

based on their recent history if they hire him then hes prob not qualified, if they dont hire him then maybe he is

lakers are gonna be bad next year regardless tho

Hey I know the lakers are trying to glom on to any big name out there but if OKC wipes out and fires brooks they have to look hard at Kevin Ollie right?

as soon as uconn started making their run i thought ollie was the frontrunner if brooks was out, if only for 'how do we keep durant' reasons.

http://grantland.com/the-triangle/camron-harlem-mase-and-high-school-basketball-lies/

Nick Young ‏@NickSwagyPYoung 3h -- I'll be the new coach

lol why not?

Mark Heisler ‏@MarkHeisler 1h -- Scratch my Steve Kerr to #Knicks over #Warriors tab. Insider tells me it's likelier to be Warriors with daughter at Berkeley, fam in SDiego

it's all so confusing. i thought GSW didn't want to go for two consecutive "tv analyst to head coach" experiments?

Where did you hear that?

a twitter feed of one of those "nba insiders." of course, there is a wide swing in credibility from one "insider" to the next. just can't recall which one said that.

I haven't read that they don't want another tv analyst anywhere, and Kerr's name has been discussed wrt this story from the beginning due to his ties to Rick Welts and Kirk Lacob.

i'll see if i can track down that tweet.

yeah lacob wants kerr first havent heard anything about tv thing

I personally would rather they pick someone with coaching experience.

yeah totally agree. was really hoping for stan van

I didn't like how Stan handled the Dwight stuff.

Kerr is also a former GM so he's not just a tv guy fwiw

i loved it xp

Kerr's GM experience is part of what troubles me about him.

I personally would rather they pick someone with coaching experience.

Same.

No Dwights on the Warriors roster, I don't think?

loved the way stan van gundy handled the D12 situation, but i'm biased, cuz i think dwight howard is a clown.