Polyamory

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (514 of them)

Ugh, could this thread be deindexed?

uppers epilepsy sh@kedown (The Reverend), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 20:57 (nine years ago) link

I think I also just like the reliability of the monogamous relationship, like after a long day of work you know that the same person you love will be there waiting for you instead of wondering whether she'll be somewhere else or whether you're going somewhere else.

that isn't monogamy, that's "I'd be so happy to keep your dinner warm" 1950s suburban style traditionalism.

sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 21:53 (nine years ago) link

not necessarily--in my experience there's an emotional comfort that comes from predictable contact that doesn't require any of the trappings of "suburban style traditionalism" to manifest.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 21:56 (nine years ago) link

I go home and cook the dinner, that's why she's waiting for me.

ie that's projection imo s

dn/ac (darraghmac), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 21:57 (nine years ago) link

I think I also just like the reliability of the monogamous relationship, like after a long day of work you know that the same person you love will be there waiting for you instead of wondering whether she'll be somewhere else or whether you're going somewhere else.

that isn't monogamy, that's "I'd be so happy to keep your dinner warm" 1950s suburban style traditionalism.

― sarahell, Wednesday, June 4, 2014 5:53 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Um, no it isn't.

₴HABΔZZ ¶IZZΔ (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 21:58 (nine years ago) link

Also "be there waiting for you" = shorthand for "or will be coming home to you later." I happen to have longer work hours than my wife. Some nights she has classes and comes home later than me. You're being overly literal.

₴HABΔZZ ¶IZZΔ (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:00 (nine years ago) link

Sorry, just responding to the "after a long day of work (she) will be there waiting for you" -- maybe too literally? But it really conjures up this 50s suburban imagery. But the thing is -- people have lives outside of committed monogamous relationships. They have friends, hobbies, jobs ... maybe instead of sitting around at home, they go out with friends, they visit family, etc. Monogamy can be equally unpredictable, even without sexual infidelity.

sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:03 (nine years ago) link

Sorry - but your life sounds really dull, Hurting.

sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:04 (nine years ago) link

You're projecting an awful lot onto what I said.

₴HABΔZZ ¶IZZΔ (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:06 (nine years ago) link

I am responding to what you said!

sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:07 (nine years ago) link

I'm not sure where you got from my post that we don't have jobs, never go out, don't have friends, don't visit family, don't have hobbies, as though I literally meant the same exact job-home routine every day.

₴HABΔZZ ¶IZZΔ (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:08 (nine years ago) link

dull can be pretty fun though.

xp

festival culture (Jordan), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:09 (nine years ago) link

yeah yeesh sarahell

j., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:09 (nine years ago) link

Wait so is this thread not about me

polyphonic, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:09 (nine years ago) link

pretty sure Hurting wasn't meaning he literally comes home from work every day to a partner that is sitting on the couch anticipating his arrival, but was more making a broad statements about routines, but ymmv

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:11 (nine years ago) link

xxp - it sure sounded like you meant the same exact routine every day. That is the appeal you were attempting to convey, right? Also, based on other things you posted in this thread. Lots of people are boring. It doesn't mean you are deficient as a human being. Just own up to your boring-ness.

sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:11 (nine years ago) link

lol that isn't how it read at all.

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:11 (nine years ago) link

considering your user name ...

sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:12 (nine years ago) link

I think I also just like the reliability of the monogamous relationship, like after a long day of work you know that the same person you love will be there waiting for you instead of wondering whether she'll be somewhere else or whether you're going somewhere else.

He never said home; we wait for each other at the pub tbh

kinder, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:13 (nine years ago) link

The larger point still stands -- just because a couple is monogamous, doesn't mean that their lives are routine and just because a couple is poly, doesn't mean they aren't.

sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:15 (nine years ago) link

considering your user name ...

― sarahell, Wednesday, June 4, 2014 6:12 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

http://media.giphy.com/media/eruN8g7BhO4uc/giphy.gif

Neanderthal, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:16 (nine years ago) link

sarahell you are literally the only person who read it that way

k3vin k., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:16 (nine years ago) link

xp don't think "routine" was the point, the point I got in the context of the discussion was that you don't have to make a special appointment

kinder, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:17 (nine years ago) link

I think the thing that is the most salient to me (and what struck me as traditionalism) is the consistency of "waiting for one another" -- when plenty of couples I know don't have those routines. The other person will have things come up, make spontaneous plans with other people, etc.

sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:17 (nine years ago) link

you've heard of figurative language, right?

k3vin k., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:18 (nine years ago) link

well that's you then, no need to project so much onto what was a completely innocuous comment xp

j., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:19 (nine years ago) link

xp - the phrase "fuck off douchebag" rings a few bells for me, so yes

sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:19 (nine years ago) link

so glad we're discussing this

kinder, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:20 (nine years ago) link

xp j - it was innocuous! I am not saying that there's anything wrong with it! I am just saying it is traditional and a bit boring "to me" -- not that there is anything wrong with it.

sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:21 (nine years ago) link

polyanomie

guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:21 (nine years ago) link

xp, oh does it really? Good then. Fuck off, douchebag.

₴HABΔZZ ¶IZZΔ (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:22 (nine years ago) link

That it doesn't jibe with my experience or that of most of my friends. However, I imagine it is probably how the vast majority of people are.

sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:22 (nine years ago) link

the less fun people

k3vin k., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:22 (nine years ago) link

That must feel nice and comfy and smug to think

₴HABΔZZ ¶IZZΔ (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:23 (nine years ago) link

not you or your friends, though

k3vin k., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:23 (nine years ago) link

got it

k3vin k., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:23 (nine years ago) link

it doesn't seem that wise to be calling out people's relationships or lives for being boring in the middle of an actual decent discussion of polyamory, but now that we know you're a bold risk-taker couldn't you just let it lie and stop trying to own your overstep? xxxxxp

j., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:23 (nine years ago) link

To be perfectly honest though, yeah my life is more routine now with a child. But having a two-year-old run up to you like a maniac when you walk in the door and say a new completely ridiculous thing every night has not gotten boring yet.

₴HABΔZZ ¶IZZΔ (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:30 (nine years ago) link

xp - not really, conventional and boring is nicer and more comfortable.

But back to polyamory (sorry for the derail -- really) - and what I was saying is somewhat related to my take on it:

Jealousy is mostly unhealthy (hell, maybe entirely), but there is jealousy in relationships over many things that aren't just your partner having sex with another person. There is jealousy over time spent with family, children, friends, at work, doing creative pursuits. I think the key issue is to isolate the "sexual" aspect from the equation.

sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:31 (nine years ago) link

Jesus folks

dn/ac (darraghmac), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:32 (nine years ago) link

And the comment about making a "special appointment"! I mean, "date night" is a real thing! Monogamous couples have to make special plans to have time alone together!

sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:33 (nine years ago) link

I wish, I've to give ten weeks notice for pints

dn/ac (darraghmac), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:35 (nine years ago) link

i think it's established (out there) that polyamorists must often deal with time-jealousy that is not strictly sexual

maybe even time-jealousy over things that would not be paid as much attention between monogamous partners, who do still have their own time-sharing problems

j., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:37 (nine years ago) link

I think a lot of people also find that sexual involvement with a second person can interfere with your emotional connection with the first person. I'm not saying there aren't people for whom this isn't true, I'm just saying I think that's another reason most people aren't comfortable with polyamory. It's a fair point that people get jealous of other pursuits too, for sure, but I don't feel like, idk, getting together with friends and jamming gets in the way of my connection with my wife -- if anything it makes it stronger when I come back. Whereas spending a lot of one-on-one time with a woman I'm attracted to will tend to get in the way of things with my wife.

₴HABΔZZ ¶IZZΔ (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:39 (nine years ago) link

If that's boring, so be it. Everyone gives up some things to gain others. Sometimes I feel like polyamory is presented as having your cake and eating it too.

₴HABΔZZ ¶IZZΔ (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:41 (nine years ago) link

I think a lot of people also find that sexual involvement with a second person can interfere with your emotional connection with the first person.

This is totally true! When my now-ex and I were first getting together, he was dating another woman (who had a primary partner), and it was problematic for me. And when we talked about it, it came down to, "I have trouble getting in the mood because you are seeing someone else." And then he stopped seeing her, and that part of our relationship was fine.

sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:48 (nine years ago) link

His previous relationship was an on-again/off-again poly thing (his gf's desires). He was fine either way.

sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:51 (nine years ago) link

if it's not too personal to ask, did you get any psychological insight into why that would be (the getting in the mood thing)? you can imagine a sorta no-nonsense pro-poly saying 'why should that matter right now, let's just be together' etc

j., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:52 (nine years ago) link

well, in our case, sex was a key part of "being together," and the fact that I had trouble getting off, basically made sex "not good" -- as far as what caused it? Anxiety and insecurity. Envisioning him with this other woman. Worrying that she was a better lay than I was. Normal stuff.

sarahell, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 22:56 (nine years ago) link

i had a fairly normal monogamous relationship with a woman with some non-sexual… entanglements when i first met her, she wasn't poly, just had kind of a very jealous eye on her own social/relationship freedom, and i didn't think i felt much sex-related anxiety, but the plain not-knowing involved in her maintaining some of her privacy really tended to eat at me especially when we were precluded from spending time together. it was kind of impenetrable to me at the time.

i am not too prone to thinking in terms of 'is someone else better?' in many kinds of relationships, it seems like an interesting thing to keep in mind when considering the emotional aspects of polyamory. a much more poly-inclined woman i was involved with made some offhand remark about how easily someone else in her life made her laugh and that was waaaay worse than the fact that she slept with him sometimes.

j., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 23:06 (nine years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.